Super Lawyer

Category: Independent Practitioner

  • “At the end of the day, I truly believe that we become lawyers in the real sense only when we stand beside those who genuinely need us.” – Priyanka Borana, Advocate at Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur.

    “At the end of the day, I truly believe that we become lawyers in the real sense only when we stand beside those who genuinely need us.” – Priyanka Borana, Advocate at Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    You began your academic journey with a background in commerce and CS before pursuing your LL.B. What inspired this transition, and how did your early education shape your understanding of law?

    Honestly, law wasn’t something I had planned from the beginning. I was sitting with my mother one day, completely confused about what to do next. I told her I wasn’t really interested in commerce, and she laughed and said, “Hamare ghar mein koi lawyer nahi hai, aur tumhara toh waise bhi ladai-jhagde ka dimag chalta hai — law kar lo.” It was said jokingly, but somehow it stayed with me. The very next thing I knew, I had taken admission in Madhusudan Law College.

    Once I started studying law, I realised how naturally it connected with the way I think — questioning, reasoning, and standing up for what feels right. My commerce and CS background gave me a habit of thinking logically and paying attention to detail, which later helped a lot in legal drafting and understanding case records. Looking back, that light-hearted moment with my mother actually became the turning point of my life.

    During your initial years of college and early practice, what key lessons or experiences prepared you for active litigation? Was pursuing litigation something you had always envisioned for yourself?

    To be very honest, during college I was never one of those overly serious law students. I used to bunk classes quite often and sit under the neem tree with friends. I was very active in co-curricular activities- debates, events, organizing functions, but attending regular lectures was never really my thing. At that time, I hadn’t even imagined that I would actually take up litigation one day.

    Things changed when I moved to Jodhpur in 2016. In 2018, I joined the trial court, and honestly, it was a tough beginning. I had no friends here, no contacts, and I didn’t know how I was going to find my place in a completely new professional circle. Those initial months: almost eight to nine, were all about learning by observing and surviving through small but meaningful experiences.

    Later, I shifted to the High Court, and that’s when I realised that maybe this was exactly where I was meant to be. Looking back now, I feel choosing litigation was one of the best decisions I’ve made. It challenged me, shaped me, and made me value the strength that comes from starting all over again in a new city, purely on your own effort.

    You have been practicing at the Rajasthan High Court across diverse areas such as commercial law, property disputes, arbitration, and criminal matters. How did you build versatility across these domains and manage all matters effectively?

    Over time, I’ve handled a variety of matters, from commercial and property disputes to arbitration and criminal cases, but if I’m being honest, criminal litigation is my real zone. It naturally suits my personality. I’ve always been someone who believes in standing firm, not getting intimidated, and saying things as they are. That fearless side of me connected very well with the criminal side of practice.

    In criminal law, you learn to read people, their behaviour, mindset, and what drives them. Understanding how a criminal thinks or reacts is not just about law; it’s about human psychology, and that’s what makes it so fascinating. It gives you a different kind of edge and maturity as a lawyer.

    For female lawyers especially, criminal litigation adds a certain strength to your personality, it teaches you how to hold your ground in tough spaces. Over time, I’ve realised that while I enjoy working across different branches of law, criminal litigation brings out the most fearless and analytical version of me.

    You have also been actively contributing as a pro bono lawyer. What motivates your involvement in public service, and how have these experiences shaped your understanding of access to justice?

    I’ve always felt that the purpose of being a lawyer shouldn’t just be limited to luxury litigation or earning money. Somewhere, we tend to forget that the law was made for people who actually need its protection the most. Around my own neighbourhood, I’ve seen so many individuals who quietly suffer because they don’t even know their rights, they simply don’t have the awareness or resources to seek help.

    That’s why I take my legal aid work very seriously. The Legal Services Authority often appoints me in such cases, and I consider it both a duty and an honour. One case that really stayed with me was an MTP (Medical Termination of Pregnancy) matter involving a minor rape victim from a very difficult background. She was completely unaware of the legal process, and time was crucial. Managing that case made me realise how powerful our profession can be when used with empathy and urgency.

    At the end of the day, I truly believe that we become lawyers in the real sense only when we stand beside those who genuinely need us. The real purpose of this profession lies in restoring someone’s faith in the law. When people see that justice can actually protect them, their trust in the system grows stronger, and that trust, once earned, is the most meaningful reward a lawyer can ever receive.

    As a panel advocate for the Rajasthan State Legal Services Authority, what has been one of the most challenging cases you’ve handled, and how did you navigate it?

    Every legal aid matter has its own challenges, but one case that I will never forget was before a Division Bench. I was representing the respondent father in a matter involving a 9-month-old baby who had been given in adoption without informing the natural mother.

    Even though I was appearing for the respondent, the case affected me deeply. When the court finally directed that the baby be handed back to the natural mother, the entire courtroom turned emotional. On one side stood the mother who had given birth, and on the other, the woman who had cared for the baby and nurtured her for months. Watching both of them break down was heart-wrenching.

    That day reminded me that law isn’t always about right or wrong, sometimes it stands between two truths, two emotions, and two lives. Even the Hon’ble Bench remarked that while everyone felt the pain, law is law. That moment taught me that as lawyers, we must carry empathy with firmness, to feel the human side of justice while still upholding the legal one.

    Alongside your legal practice, you have written articles for reputed publications on issues such as gender equity and the experiences of women in law. What inspired you to explore these themes, and how do you see the role of women evolving within the legal profession?

    Whatever I’ve written so far has come from what I’ve actually seen and felt inside courtrooms, not from theory, but from daily experiences. I’ve seen how small things, which often go unnoticed, slowly create barriers for women in this profession. Everyone talks about gender equity, but very few actually address the uncomfortable truths behind it.

    Through my writing, I’ve tried to reflect what many women advocates silently feel but don’t say out loud. These are thoughts that belong to all of us — I’ve just tried to put them into words. Because if we don’t speak, how will anyone know where the problem truly lies?

    Yes, things are changing, but the pace is slow. Still, I genuinely believe that women are no longer just part of the legal system — we’re shaping it, questioning it, and giving it new meaning. And if my articles can make even one person pause and think about these realities, I feel I’ve done something worthwhile as both a lawyer and a writer.

    You have represented clients before multiple forums, including the Rajasthan High Court, Commissions, and Tribunals, and have also appeared in various Public Interest Litigations. What is your perspective on the evolving scope of PILs and their significance for the legal community?

    Public Interest Litigation, in its true sense, is a beautiful concept — it allows the court to hear those who otherwise have no voice. I’ve been fortunate to work as amicus curiae in matters like the Nari Niketan case and the suo motu matter related to stray animals, both of which dealt with genuine issues that directly impacted public welfare. These cases made me realise how meaningful PILs can be when handled with sincerity — they push real change, bring accountability, and ensure that the law reaches beyond individuals to society at large.

    But the truth is, over time, I’ve also seen how this concept is being diluted. Many people now file PILs without proper groundwork or genuine cause — just to gain attention or to keep their names in circulation. Because of such misuse, even genuine petitions sometimes don’t get the seriousness they deserve. That’s the sad part — when the noise of the unnecessary hides the voice of the necessary.

    As lawyers, we carry a responsibility to preserve the sanctity of PILs. If we treat it with respect and care, it can remain one of the strongest instruments of justice in our system. For me, being appointed amicus and working on causes that truly matter has been both humbling and grounding — it reminds me that law is at its best when it serves humanity, not headlines.

    With experience spanning civil, criminal, and commercial practice, what moments have most shaped your perspective toward the practice of law?

    When I look back, I feel even small incidents can shape your entire perspective as a lawyer. I still remember one moment from my early days in practice. I had just joined my senior’s office, and one day, my matter was listed before a Division Bench. I requested an adjournment because I didn’t have the file — the staff had taken it, assuming it wouldn’t be listed.

    But the court refused and said, “No adjournment. Madam Borana, how long will you keep asking for adjournments?” For a second, I went blank. I said, “My Lords, I have no instructions to argue.” The Bench replied, “We’ll give you the file, you argue.”

    That moment hit me hard. I gathered courage and said, “My Lords, it’s not that I don’t argue — I just never got the opportunity in your court. You may ask me any facts from the file, and I’ll answer.” That one push changed everything. Later, I realised the judges weren’t being harsh — they were motivating me. And interestingly, the same judge today appreciates my work the most.

    That incident boosted my confidence and reminded me that sometimes the courtroom itself becomes your best teacher. Every tough moment, every unexpected challenge — they all prepare you quietly for what’s next.

    What core principles have guided you throughout your career, and what advice would you offer to young lawyers aspiring to build an independent practice in the High Courts?

    This profession tests you in every possible way, emotionally, mentally, and even morally. What has always guided me through it all are three simple principles: honesty, preparation, and patience.

    Honesty — because in the end, the court can always sense your intent.
    Preparation — because confidence in the courtroom doesn’t come from personality alone; it comes from the hard work you put in behind the scenes.
    And patience — because growth in litigation doesn’t happen overnight. You have to show up every single day, learn, observe, and keep your calm even when things move slowly.

    My advice to young lawyers is simple — don’t wait for confidence; build it through preparation and persistence. Read your files as if they’re your responsibility, not just your assignment. Respect the court, stay consistent, and never let rejections shake your foundation.

    As for myself, I wish to continue strengthening my independent practice and focus on matters that hold both legal and human value. Law, for me, is not about fame or success — it’s about ensuring that justice is not just delivered but also felt.

    Get in touch with Priyanka Borana –

  • Chasing Questions, Not Glory: Crafting a Global Legal Career  – Dr. Argha Kumar Jena, International Disputes Lawyer and Advisor.

    Chasing Questions, Not Glory: Crafting a Global Legal Career  – Dr. Argha Kumar Jena, International Disputes Lawyer and Advisor.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Your academic journey includes a full-scholarship Ph.D. in International Law and Economics from Rome and an LL.M. from Berlin. How has this interdisciplinary training influenced your understanding of economic analysis in the development of international legal norms and dispute resolution mechanisms? 

    Public international law in general requires deep academic insight considering that the efficaciousness of the ‘rule of precedents’ (if any) is volatile in practice. When it comes to International Economic Law (as we like to call it), issues in dispute concern not only economic treaties but its complex interactions with the branches of applicable national laws as well as commercial realities. In such instances, having cultivated the habit of interdisciplinary thought processes can certainly help in strategizing efficiently. ISDS being a form of dispute resolution where effects of economic policies are often subject to adjudication by international tribunals – requires one to understand macroeconomic impacts of such policies and/or measures and also analyze it within the contours of the facts. Dispute resolution mechanisms flowing from treaties are a herd of unicorns within the fields of law. Hence, having a wider field of intellectual vision that one may acquire through interdisciplinary academic pursuits and exposure to multiple legal systems can certainly help. However, I maintain that institutional education is not the only way of going about it. My journey is the consequence of my choices, that I remain happy about. 

    You pursued your Ph.D. in International Law and Economics while working full time, a challenge few take on. What was that experience like, and how did you manage the demands of both academic research and professional responsibilities?

    This again was a consequence of one of the choices that presented itself to me. Applying for Ph.D. Scholarships is a full-time job in itself, and I understood that from the failures of my initial attempts. Identifying a research gap, crafting a proposal and a plan of execution, having it critiqued from experts, choosing a Supervisor, shortlisting universities with appropriate departments, and then making it within the deadlines – all of these mandatory steps to begin a Ph.D. are time-consuming and require dedicated efforts. Luckily, during my stint at a boutique law-firm in Berlin, I had come to be professionally acquainted with a leading expert in the field of international economic law, Prof. Steffen Hindelang. Having already started to work with him part-time, while still at the law firm – allowed me to ease into the process. With time, I was exposed to several complex questions of law and started to learn approaches that experts take while opining on a matter of international economic law. My association with the Professor put me into a network of an intelligentsia, whose sharp and unfiltered critique helped me work on the list of what to do. As I continued to assist him in several of his engagements as an expert in several international forums and arbitrations, my ability to gain context expanded. Before trying to solve a problem, I got to understand a wider gamut of the field within which the solution was to be proposed. This led me to choose a Ph.D. theme that lay in the intersection of what I was working on, and what I could develop it into i.e., “Fate of Protectionism in International Investment Control: A Sustainable Development Perspective”. After 6/7 months of refining my proposal, I found the opportunity in Rome i.e., a rare interdisciplinary Ph.D. programme in economics and law – where I applied with my proposal and ended up getting selected. While the scholarship required me to move to Rome, I continued my role with the Professor that expanded over time as well. As my research and work were largely in the same field, both complemented each other. Being in Rome, allowed me the opportunity to work on a novel project on investment contracts at UNIDROIT. All of it together was indeed a demanding endeavour, but the symbiosis between all the engagements rendered it possible. Of course my mentors, supervisor, and university enabled me to travel and engage adequately to participate in forums of exciting discussions that kept me motivated. It was the ecosystem that made it possible for me.   

    With close to a decade of experience across Germany, Italy, and India, how has your cross-border legal practice informed your strategy in advising global clients, especially in high-stakes commercial arbitrations and international contract negotiations?

    A multi-jurisdictional exposure with the fortune of having hands-on experience throughout – is essentially a professional upbringing narrative. Having been successful at surrounding myself with people smarter than me in several instances has taught me much. As we all know, Civil Law and Common Law – being the two distinct forms of legal systems co-exist with characteristic differences whose intricacies one can experience better while working on cases that necessitate grappling with them. In my limited experience, understanding of differences in procedural and substantive law of contrasting jurisdictions is a non-negotiable for lawyers who want to work on matters ‘international’. So indeed, I now take into account more things in my analysis of facts and law, including cultural and systemic differences of jurisdictions. And most importantly, it helps me delineate the questions that I need help with, when corresponding with my colleagues outside India.  

    In terms of stakes – one must understand that in cross-border disputes, stakes are usually high by default. The process is complex and expensive for the parties concerned, hence is resorted to when stakes are generally high.   

    Your path to becoming a Principal Associate at DMD Advocates has been anything but conventional. What were some key turning points in your journey, and how did they prepare you for your current leadership role? Also, in your role at DMD Advocates, you lead advisory work on cutting-edge issues like crypto-assets and artificial intelligence. How equipped do you think the Indian legal system is in comparison to other jurisdictions to address the legal complexities emerging from digital assets and algorithm-driven systems?

    As key turning points, I would list three of them, (i) having had the opportunity to work and learn under an academic lawyer, that showed me a novel career path that I can tweak for myself, is possible; (ii) moving to Rome, that allowed me to be close to UNIDROIT and get acquainted with some experts who advise on matters concerning Digital Assets; (iii) deciding to move back to India for the opportunity at the Ministry of Finance, which allowed me to apply whatever I learnt to matters of economic treaties on a daily basis. 

    As for my role in DMD Advocates, I am a part of the dispute resolution and litigation team. Here I work on matters concerning both Indian law and International law. Working cultures differ across continents and countries, but it is usually inconsequential to engage in comparisons. However, my style of collaboration with colleagues (including my juniors), as I like to think it, is a blend of German directness in terms of giving and taking feedback, Italian tendency to ease into things unless necessary to do otherwise (I detest fake emergencies) and the signature Indian adaptability in making the best of what is available. 

    In terms of advisory in new technologies, a lawyer’s take is necessitated by the fact that the legal framework applicable doesn’t immediately change, instead it often may need to evolve. Hence, identifying gaps in the legal and regulatory frameworks and advising on account of realities, is a primary need of the hour. However, given the pace in which the digital economy of the world is changing, new challenging questions requiring interdisciplinary approaches are becoming increasingly common for those of us who are active in space. In terms of how prepared the Indian legal system is to adapt to new technologies, I think we have enough smart brains in the country to do the needful. The contextual regulatory landscape is evolving across the world, and India is no exception. It is the age of geoeconomics after all.       

    Having represented clients from the EU, Asia, and the Middle East in arbitration and contract-related matters, what recurring legal risks or contractual pitfalls have you observed in cross-border commercial transactions? Could you share a case study that was most interesting yet challenging for you?

    In terms of pitfalls in international contracts, there are many that I am aware of, but recurring ones include, (i) a uniform and well drafted choice of law/applicable clause across the master contracts and sub-contracts; (ii) lack of explicit referencing of the terms and conditions to a (cross-border) purchase order; and (iii) lack of well drafted hardship and/or force majeure clauses. While any of the three things that I have mentioned may seem elementary to contracts, they have observably caused several complexities that allow dispute resolution to be consequently delayed, albeit for justifiable reasons. 

    It would be difficult to provide a case study in the amount of detail that would be useful for students, but here is something that seems novel but is not. In major construction projects, the contractual framework consists of the master contract, several sub-contracts and also sub-sub-contracts. An arbitral award was passed against an Indian entity (a sub-contractor in such a project) in an international commercial arbitration. However, by the time the award was rendered, the award debtor was declared insolvent by the NCLT. As the lawyers advising the award creditors (who were European), one had the option of following the traditional route of participating in the insolvency proceedings as one of the creditors. However, rather than merely accepting the limited recovery prospects of traditional insolvency proceedings, one may identify alternative enforcement strategies leveraging the complex contractual architecture typical of major construction projects. Subject to the impact of applicable laws, an option could be pursuing parent company guarantees or performance bonds that were likely executed as part of the master contract arrangements. However, we ended up using several indemnity and guarantee clauses in the contractual framework to get the main contractor and the investors in the insolvent company to settle with us on a reasonable quantum.  

    Your experience spans both private and public international law, from assisting European governments in ICSID proceedings to advising the Indian government on WTO and UNCITRAL matters. In your view, what is the future of international investment law amid rising protectionism, digital sovereignty, and shifting geopolitical alliances?

    Investor-State Disputes, and their backgrounds vary greatly in the contexts of the countries involved. So, oversimplification of such complex constructs would be bordering on generalization – that is rather impressible in my profession. However, I can safely say that international investment law is at its adolescence. The procedural reform efforts to ISDS triggered in 2017 at the best of the UNCITRAL Working Group III, have made significant progress in some areas, especially in the context of procedural and crosscutting issues and instruments designed with a focus on mitigation of disputes. One must appreciate that while international investment law principles become seemingly sophisticated, the dispute resolution mechanisms contained in treaties also appear to evolve with time. While ISDS as a method of dispute resolution amongst sovereigns and private entities – is here to stay, the intricacies of its processes and the nature of the disputes themselves are bound to evolve, in light of the new technologies. The typology of policies that may come to be challenged under such a characteristic legal regime would certainly expand. New technologies (including Crypto-currency and Artificial Intelligence) have the potential to creep into the fact patterns of investment and trade disputes.          

    You’ve taught at institutions ranging from Uppsala University to UNIDROIT and South Asian University. Based on your global academic engagements, what do you see as the biggest pedagogical gap in training future international economic lawyers, and what resources or practices would you recommend for staying ahead?

    One of the most visible differences in Indian and European academia, at the graduate and post-graduate level is the student-teacher ratio, which is of course smaller/narrower in Europe. In my estimation, that difference can manifest in terms of student output, if the teaching methods are not curated well. In India, the number of students is higher, so a Professor’s workload will inevitably increase if old teaching methods are retained without integration of new technologies. I would imagine that post-graduation programmes (especially LL.M.s) in India can be modulated to compete with the quality in Europe, UK or USA. Given that most lawyers wouldn’t pursue Doctorates, a post-graduate degree program (like an LL.M.) would be the last stint in institutional education for many future lawyers. We should do our own parts to finish it well! 

    Some European universities use in their post-grad programmes a Problem-Based Learning (PBL) method, where every day’s lectures are accompanied by an application-based exercise and group activities. Indian universities also implement several of such methods, albeit in variance. However, some Eruopean testing methods include an examination for each module (which is always partly or fully open book) and an essay on a topic of their choice guided by Professors. For this to be effective in India, would need significant heavy-lifting by the Professors to design such open-book examinations and their grading methods that accounts for the behavioral patterns of Indian students. The pedagogical gaps, if any, I believe are (i) the lack of curated courses that necessitate post-graduate students to think in terms of real-life problems in examinations that they care about; (ii) lack of automated grading/marking in examination design that aim to test descriptive knowledge or memory retention. 

    As an enthusiast of international economic law, I believe staying atop geopolitical and new technologies news starts as difficult, but after a few months of regular reading becomes easier as one learns to drown the noise. The ORF Newsletter, CSIS Geoeconomics Bi-Weekly Newsletter are good places to start if you cannot read daily. The Economist and Economic Times, manages to keep pace with developments. However, one must cut to the source of the regulation or law concerned to form their own opinion. For investment arbitration news, popularly there is GAR, IAReporter, and Kluwer Arbitration Blog. For AI Research the newsletter from LORE, is quite insightful, I think. While several independent media sources can also be insightful, recommendations may vary according to areas of interest. 

    Get in touch with Dr. Argha Kumar Jena –

  • “Today, businesses operate in an environment where regulatory frameworks and expectations are rising faster than internal systems can adapt.” – Anandini Purohit, Founder & Partner at Simpli Counsel.

    “Today, businesses operate in an environment where regulatory frameworks and expectations are rising faster than internal systems can adapt.” – Anandini Purohit, Founder & Partner at Simpli Counsel.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    With over 14 years of experience in corporate and banking litigation, what initially motivated you to pursue law as a career, and what early experiences strengthened that decision?

    My interest in law was sparked quite early, I was drawn to the way legal frameworks shape real-world outcomes. I found the intersection of reasoning, language, and impact particularly compelling. What truly cemented my decision, however, were my early internships and court visits during law school. Watching senior advocates argue complex matters and observing how legal strategy could influence the course of businesses and individuals made me realize that this was a profession where intellectual rigor meets tangible change.

    In your early years with law firms, what experiences shaped your understanding of banking laws and guided you toward this specialization?

    In my formative years at leading law firms, I had the opportunity to work closely on recovery actions and regulatory compliance matters for major banks. My involvement with corporate recovery teams gave me a ground-level understanding of how financial institutions operate, where the friction points arise, and how legal intervention can create both risk mitigation and strategic advantage. These experiences naturally drew me toward banking, corporate and financial litigation,  a field that demands precision, meticulous research, commercial awareness, and long-term perspective.

    Having worked extensively with banks, corporates, and financial institutions, what do you see as the most pressing challenges businesses face today in managing disputes and compliance?

    Today, businesses operate in an environment where regulatory frameworks and expectations are rising faster than internal systems can adapt. Disputes often arise not just from contractual breaches but from operational gaps, inadequate documentation, and ever-evolving regulatory landscapes. The most pressing challenge I see is the lack of proactive legal risk mitigation & management. Many entities still view legal strategy as a reactive tool rather than an integrated business function, which leads to avoidable disputes, compliance lapses, and reputational risks. As the saying goes ‘prevention is better than cure’.

    You’ve also advised on digital and social media laws, as well as data privacy. How do you see these evolving areas influencing the future of corporate legal practice in India?

    Digital regulations and data privacy are no longer niche concerns, they’re becoming central to corporate strategy. With the Digital Personal Data Protection Act and increasing regulatory oversight, companies must build data governance and responsible handling into their core structures. Social media presence, influencer marketing, and tech platforms are creating entirely new legal questions around liability, consent, intellectual property and reputation. I believe corporate legal practice in India is at an inflection point where traditional commercial law will increasingly overlap with technology, media and communication laws, and lawyers will need to re-equip and upgrade constantly.

    What inspired you to establish Simpli-Counsel, and how does your approach to advising startups, Gen Z entrepreneurs, and corporates distinguish your consultancy?

    Simpli-Counsel was born out of a simple observation: many startups, Gen Z founders, and even established businesses need practical, clear, and commercially aligned legal advice — not just legalese. After years of working with large institutions, I wanted to build a consultancy that bridges structured legal strategy with the agility that modern businesses require. Our approach is deliberately collaborative and solutions-oriented. We focus on simplifying complex legal frameworks so that founders and business teams can make informed decisions swiftly, without feeling overwhelmed by jargon or legal process.

    Looking back, what has been one of the most complex or high-stakes matters you’ve handled, and what were your key learnings from it?

    One of the most challenging matters I’ve handled involved a multi-jurisdictional recovery action for a consortium of banks against a large corporate borrower. The case involved layered security structures, parallel insolvency proceedings, and regulatory sensitivities. Navigating this required not only deep legal analysis but also constant coordination between stakeholders across jurisdictions. My key takeaway was the importance of strategic clarity and communication — aligning diverse teams behind a coherent legal roadmap can often make the decisive difference in complex disputes.

    In your transition from working with established law firms to building your own consultancy, what have been the biggest challenges and most rewarding aspects?

    The transition from structured law firm environments to building my own practice has been both demanding and deeply fulfilling. The biggest challenge has been stepping out of established institutional systems and creating operational, branding, and business development structures from the ground up. But the reward has been immense: the freedom to shape a practice aligned with my values, the ability to work closely with clients as strategic partners, and the joy of seeing the building something authentic and future-oriented.

    Data privacy is becoming increasingly critical. What practical advice would you give startups and entrepreneurs on mitigating legal risks early, especially in this domain?

    Startups often underestimate data protection until they face a regulatory hurdle or breach. My advice is: embed privacy-by-design early on. Map what data you collect, define clear consent processes, implement basic security hygiene, and assign responsibility for compliance. Even simple steps like robust terms of service, privacy notices, and access protocols can dramatically reduce risk. More importantly, build a culture of respect for data & privacy — because in today’s world, trust is currency.

    What vision do you hold for the future of your practice, and what guidance would you offer younger professionals aspiring to build careers in data privacy and banking law?

    My vision for Simpli-Counsel is to build a modern, agile legal advisory practice that combines deep subject expertise with empathy for how businesses actually function and not how they should. I see tremendous opportunities at the intersection of corporate, technology, and regulation, and want to help clients navigate this evolving landscape with clarity and confidence.

    For young professionals, my advice is twofold: develop strong foundational legal skills, and stay curious about emerging areas like fintech, data privacy, and digital laws. The future belongs to lawyers who can blend legal acumen with strategic foresight and adaptability.

    Beyond your legal career, you are passionate about heritage crafts, travel, and fitness. How do these interests help you maintain balance and perspective in your professional journey?

    Law can be an intense profession, and for me, travel, heritage crafts, and fitness offer grounding and perspective. Exploring crafts connects me to India’s rich cultural fabric, travel fuels my curiosity and adaptability, and fitness keeps me focused and energized. These interests remind me that while our work is serious, our growth is richer when we remain open, balanced, and inspired by the world beyond our desks.

    Get in touch with Anandini Purohit –

  • “For me, law has always been more than a profession; it’s a way to create meaningful change.” – Pooja Dua, Founder of Law Chambers of Pooja Dua.

    “For me, law has always been more than a profession; it’s a way to create meaningful change.” – Pooja Dua, Founder of Law Chambers of Pooja Dua.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Ma’am, you have extensive experience in litigation, arbitration, and white-collar crime. What initially drew you to law as a career? How has your approach evolved over the years?

    I was drawn to law by a deep interest in how it shapes society and protects rights. From the start, I saw it as more than just statutes, it’s about people, justice, and creating real impact. Over the years, my approach has evolved from simply arguing cases to offering holistic solutions. Handling complex disputes in arbitration, construction, corporate matters, and white-collar crimes has taught me to blend legal strategy with commercial insight and human understanding. Today, I focus on resolving conflicts in a way that is not only legally sound but also practical and aligned with my clients’ broader goals.

    Having completed your law degree, what motivated you to focus on arbitration and alternative dispute resolution, and how did your education shape your career trajectory?

    My interest in arbitration and alternative dispute resolution grew during law school, but it truly took shape during an internship with BHEL, where I was first introduced to the practical side of arbitration. Seeing how complex commercial disputes could be resolved more efficiently and collaboratively outside traditional courts left a deep impression on me. This experience, combined with my Advanced Diploma in ADR from NALSAR, strengthened my resolve to pursue this field. It taught me to view disputes not merely as battles to be fought but as challenges to be resolved strategically, with solutions that balance legal precision and business realities. That foundation has shaped my career path, enabling me to build a strong practice in construction arbitration, commercial disputes, and complex contractual matters, where I focus on delivering outcomes that are both effective and commercially viable.

    You founded your own practice, handling complex and high-stakes matters. Which early experiences laid the foundation for establishing your independent practice, and what challenges did you face in building it?

    My early work in litigation and arbitration, particularly before High Courts, tribunals, and arbitral forums, laid a strong foundation for building my independent practice. A pivotal part of this journey was my longest professional association with H&A Associates, where I had the privilege of working under the guidance of Mr. S.W. Haider, one of the finest mentors one could have. His mentorship and insight shaped my understanding of complex legal strategy and advocacy at a very early stage. During this period, I gained vast experience handling high-stakes disputes, including those involving major government authorities such as Indian Railways, NHAI and CPWD. This experience gave me the confidence and capability to establish Law Chambers of Pooja Dua. Although building an independent practice came with challenges from creating a strong client base to managing multifaceted matters each milestone strengthened the firm’s foundation. Today, it stands as a multi-specialty practice known for handling intricate disputes with legal precision, strategic foresight, and client-centric advocacy.

    Your practice spans both domestic and international arbitration, particularly in infrastructure, construction, and industrial projects. How do you navigate the strategic and procedural differences between domestic and international arbitration?

    Domestic and international arbitrations may share the same foundation, but they demand very different approaches. In domestic matters, especially in infrastructure and construction disputes, the focus is on procedural efficiency and aligning with Indian laws and judicial precedents. International arbitration, on the other hand, brings in added layers different institutional rules, cross-border legal issues, cultural nuances, and enforcement across jurisdictions. My experience in both has taught me to adapt quickly and plan strategy from the outset, ensuring the process is not only legally sound but also practical and commercially effective for my clients.

    Having handled a variety of cases, could you share a particularly challenging dispute or arbitration, and how you approached dealing with such a high stake matter?

    One of the most challenging matters I handled was a multi-crore construction arbitration against a government authority, involving complex technical issues, strict contractual timelines, and significant financial exposure for my client. The stakes were extremely high both commercially and reputationally. My approach was to go beyond pure legal strategy: I collaborated closely with engineers and technical experts, dissected every contractual clause, and built a case theory that combined legal strength with technical clarity. Anticipating and countering the other side’s arguments well in advance proved crucial. Ultimately, our meticulous preparation and strategic advocacy led to a favourable award, reaffirming my belief that success in high-stakes disputes lies in deep preparation, multidisciplinary collaboration, and a solutions-oriented mindset.

    In an era of rapidly evolving commercial, technological, and regulatory landscapes, how do you stay ahead in advising clients on emerging legal challenges, and what trends do you foresee in dispute resolution and commercial law?

    In today’s fast-changing commercial and regulatory environment, staying ahead means thinking beyond the present. I focus on continuous learning tracking legal developments, technological shifts, and global best practices and aligning that knowledge with my clients’ evolving business needs. The future of dispute resolution will be shaped by specialisation, digitisation, and stronger institutional frameworks. We’re moving toward faster, tech-enabled processes, AI-assisted case management, and a more collaborative approach to resolving cross-border disputes. I believe the next decade will redefine how law interacts with business and my goal is to help clients not just adapt to these changes but use them as an advantage, turning legal foresight into strategic strength.

    For young lawyers aspiring to specialize in arbitration and corporate disputes, what key skills or experiences would you recommend prioritizing early in their careers?

    For young lawyers aspiring to build a career in arbitration and corporate disputes, my biggest advice is to focus on the fundamentals, strong research, precise drafting, and clear communication but never lose sight of the bigger picture. This field is about more than just legal knowledge; it’s about strategic thinking, commercial awareness, and the courage to take ownership of complex problems. Seek out every opportunity to observe proceedings, assist in drafting, and work closely with mentors. Those experiences will shape you far more than textbooks. My own journey was deeply influenced by the mentors I learned from, and that guidance was invaluable. Most importantly, stay curious and resilient. Arbitration is a constantly evolving space, and those who keep learning and adapting will find themselves not just practising law, but shaping it.

    Beyond your professional work, you are engaged in advisory roles with foundations, universities, and industry clients. How do you view the role of pro bono work and community engagement in a high-pressure legal career?

    For me, law has always been more than a profession; it’s a way to create meaningful change. My involvement with NGO’s and various universities allows me to use my legal skills beyond the courtroom, whether it’s empowering women, raising awareness about rights, or mentoring young lawyers. I also remain closely connected to Amity Law School, Noida, my alma mater, by engaging with students and contributing to alumni initiatives, something that allows me to give back to the institution that laid the foundation for my career.

    Alongside this, I work closely with real estate developers, industry leaders, and major brands on long-term retainers, advising them on projects that shape urban landscapes and impact lives at scale. Balancing high-stakes commercial mandates with community-focused initiatives keeps me grounded and reminds me why I chose this profession, to serve, to protect, and to make a difference. These diverse experiences not only add purpose and perspective to my work but also make me a more strategic and empathetic lawyer.

    Looking back at your career so far, what key lessons or principles have guided your practice in complex litigation, arbitration, and white-collar crime, and how would you advise the next generation of lawyers to approach similar challenges?

    Looking back, one of the most important lessons my career has taught me is that there are no shortcuts in law,  success is built on unwavering commitment, deep preparation, and continuous learning. Whether dealing with complex litigation, high-stakes arbitration, or white-collar crime matters, I have always approached every case with integrity, precision, and perseverance. Equally crucial is the ability to look beyond statutes — to understand the human, commercial, and strategic dimensions that shape every dispute.

    My journey, from working under the exceptional mentorship of Mr. S.W. Haider at H&A Associates collaborating with legal firms like Panda Law, and ultimately establishing Law Chambers of Pooja Dua, has reinforced the value of resilience, curiosity, and purpose at every stage. Each experience has contributed to the lawyer I am today and strengthened my belief in the transformative power of the law.

    To the next generation of lawyers, my advice is simple: master the fundamentals, seek out mentors who challenge and guide you, stay curious, and always remember that the law’s ultimate purpose is to serve and deliver justice. Embrace challenges as opportunities, not obstacles, and let hard work and integrity be the cornerstones of your practice. If you do that, you won’t just succeed, you’ll help shape the future of the legal profession.

    Get in touch with Pooja Dua –

  • “The future belongs to companies that proactively manage risks, draft robust agreements, and embrace arbitration as a tool to secure their interests.” – Abhijeet Gathraj, Founder of Gathraj & Co.

    “The future belongs to companies that proactively manage risks, draft robust agreements, and embrace arbitration as a tool to secure their interests.” – Abhijeet Gathraj, Founder of Gathraj & Co.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Sir, you’ve built an impressive and diverse practice, spanning corporate, commercial, and dispute resolution matters. What inspired you to establish your own firm, and what has been the most defining challenge in leading it?

    The decision to establish my own firm was born out of a deep conviction that law should be practised with independence, integrity, and an unwavering focus on client trust. I always envisioned creating a practice that was not only about providing legal advice but also about becoming a trusted partner in my clients’ journeys, helping them navigate complexities with clarity and confidence. This dream was not easy to pursue—it meant stepping out of my comfort zone, taking risks, and proving myself in a market already dominated by established players and multi-generational professionals.

    The most defining challenge was earning credibility in those initial years. With limited resources and no big name to lean on, every client I secured was through persistence, sleepless nights, and consistent delivery of results. It was a struggle marked by countless rejections, long hours, and sacrifices. Yet, these challenges shaped me into the professional I am today—resilient, determined, and deeply committed to excellence.

    You dropped out of Chartered Accountancy after giving 4 good years to it before pursuing law. What motivated you to transition into law, and how has your strong commerce background shaped your perspective and strategy in handling complex commercial disputes? 

    Dropping out of Chartered Accountancy (CA) was a nightmare for my family. After giving 4 long years pursuing CA, one fine day I decided that my calling is into Dispute Resolution and the very fact of appearing in court, preparing arguments and representing the other side of the dispute motivated me to transition into law. Accountancy background gave me a strong foundation in numbers, corporate structures, and financial regulations, but I realised early on that the “why” behind every transaction lay in the law. I wanted to go beyond balance sheets and immerse myself in the world of contracts, disputes, and advocacy, where strategy and persuasion could alter outcomes. The transition was not easy, but it felt natural. I was drawn to the dynamic nature of legal practice, where every case presented a new challenge and an opportunity to make an impact.

    My commerce background has been invaluable in my legal career, and pursuing one of the toughest accountancy courses prepared me for the hard work that is required in the legal profession. It allows me to see disputes not just as legal problems but as business realities. When handling complex commercial matters, I can dissect financial nuances while aligning them with legal strategy. This dual perspective gives me an edge in cross-border disputes, shareholder conflicts, and regulatory advisory, where understanding the commercial heartbeat is as crucial as the legal framework.

    In the early phase of your career, which experiences were most formative in laying the foundation of your practice, and what advice would you offer to students who are in that phase?

    The early phase of my career was defined by struggle, humility, and relentless hard work. I vividly recall handling matters that brought in little financial reward but demanded every ounce of preparation and commitment. Those small victories—whether drafting pleadings late into the night or representing clients who had no one else to stand for them—taught me the real meaning of responsibility and the power of trust people place in their lawyer.

    To students, my advice is simple: there is no shortcut to success, and neither is there any alternative to hard work. Never cheat your client and always be honest. Believe in yourself, focus on building your skills and resilience in the early years, rather than chasing titles or monetary gains. The foundations you build now: discipline, diligence, and the ability to think critically, will carry you throughout your career. 

    This profession rewards patience and persistence far more than instant success.

    As an empanelled attorney for multiple foreign consulates and high commissions, you handle roles that require immense precision and discretion. How do you balance these legal nuances, and what challenges have you encountered in representing such esteemed clients?

    Being empanelled with a few of the foreign consulates, high commissions, and foreign missions in India itself is an honour and privilege, as very few practising advocates and firms get this opportunity and not all. Representing NRI clients in their legal disputes itself is challenging and a responsibility that goes beyond routine practice. Every communication, every piece of advice, has to be meticulously crafted, knowing that the stakes often extend beyond the client to international relations and reputation.

    The greatest challenge has been balancing urgency with accuracy. Foreign clients and NRIs operate on strict timelines, and there is no room for error. I have often worked overnight to deliver outcomes that meet both the legal requirements and the client expectations. These experiences, though demanding, have shaped my ability to remain calm under pressure and deliver with unwavering focus.

    Having made significant contributions to dispute resolution and commercial law, what emerging trends do you foresee in cross-border disputes and arbitration involving Indian companies over the next five years?

    In the coming years, I foresee arbitration becoming the preferred mode of dispute resolution for Indian companies engaged in cross-border business. The global push for speed and enforceability, coupled with India’s growing recognition as an arbitration hub, will make this trend even stronger. I also anticipate a rise in disputes around technology, data, and e-commerce as businesses continue to expand into digital markets.

    Another trend will be the increasing need for companies to become contract-conscious. Too often, businesses treat contracts as formalities rather than safeguards. In cross-border contexts, this can be catastrophic. The future belongs to companies that proactively manage risks, draft robust agreements, and embrace arbitration as a tool to secure their interests.

    Your commitment to legal education through judging moot courts and client counselling competitions is commendable. Which skills do you believe law students should prioritise to stay future-ready and uphold the high standards expected in today’s profession?

    The profession today demands much more than just knowledge of statutes. The most future-ready lawyers will be those who can think critically, research deeply, and communicate with clarity. In a world where technology is advancing rapidly, adaptability and tech-savviness will be key. Students must be prepared to embrace new fields such as fintech, AI, and compliance law, while still mastering the fundamentals of litigation and arbitration.

    Above all, integrity is the cornerstone of this profession. Skills can evolve and be learned, but values remain constant. A lawyer who is trusted for their honesty, dedication and commitment will always stand apart, regardless of the changes the profession undergoes.

    Looking back at your career, could you share one of the most challenging cases you’ve handled so far? What were the key complexities involved, and how did you navigate them?

    One of the most challenging cases I have handled in my career involved a transnational child custody dispute, where I was appointed by a City Council in the UK to represent the interests of a 14-month-old child who was placed under foster care. The case was uniquely sensitive—not only did it involve intricate questions of international jurisdiction and child welfare, but it also carried an immense emotional weight. My role was to secure an interim order for the safe transit of the child to India, which required balancing legal precision with humanitarian urgency.

    Convincing the District Court of First Instance to hear the matter on an urgent basis was no easy task. The odds were against us—procedural hurdles, the complexity of cross-border custody laws, and the natural caution courts exercise in such delicate matters. I vividly recall preparing the case under extraordinary time pressure, knowing that every moment’s delay had real-life consequences for a child’s future. The hearing was conducted on a working day between Diwali and the New Year, a period when courts are generally overburdened, which added another layer of difficulty.

    What made this matter truly defining was the responsibility it placed on me—not just as a lawyer, but as a human being. I had to persuade the court that this was not just another legal dispute but an urgent humanitarian concern that required immediate judicial intervention. Ultimately, the case taught me that persistence, empathy, and the ability to rise above procedural roadblocks are what define a lawyer in moments of true challenge. It remains etched in my memory as a reminder of why I chose this profession—to make a tangible difference when it matters the most.

    As a registered trademarks attorney, your expertise in intellectual property is widely recognised. How do you see IP laws evolving in India and globally, and what guidance would you give students aspiring to excel in this dynamic field, both in terms of skills and professional values?

    Intellectual property is one of the most dynamic areas of law today, both in India and globally. With the rise of digital markets, I foresee stronger frameworks for online infringement, greater protection of trade secrets, and increasing international harmonisation of IP laws. India, too, is rapidly maturing in this space, and the opportunities for young professionals are immense.

    For students aspiring to specialise in IP, my advice is to go beyond statutes and cultivate an understanding of industries like technology, pharmaceuticals, and media. IP law is about protecting innovation, and one cannot protect what one does not understand. At the same time, cultivate patience and precision—IP is often a long game where persistence and values matter as much as knowledge. Read landmark judgments on IP laws and get a hold of the principles decided by the courts in such judgments.

    Reflecting on your journey from studying law at Gujarat University to becoming a trusted advisor for consulates and leading corporates, you’ve taken on highly varied and demanding roles. How do you balance these professional responsibilities while maintaining your personal life and well-being?

    Balancing professional responsibilities with personal life has been one of my greatest struggles. In the early years, work consumed every waking hour, and personal time was a luxury I could not afford. But over time, I realised that sustainability in this profession requires more than just hard work—it requires balance, discipline, and self-care.

    Today, I consciously prioritise three things: utmost discipline in managing my time, delegation to empower my team, and detachment to ensure I don’t carry every professional battle home. My family has been my strongest anchor, reminding me of the importance of perspective. At the end of the day, success has meaning only when it is achieved without losing oneself in the process.

    Get in touch with Abhijeet Gathraj –

  • “Clarity, professionalism and thorough preparation remain the constants across every forum.” – Mansha Khemka, Founding and Managing Partner at Khemka & Associates.

    “Clarity, professionalism and thorough preparation remain the constants across every forum.” – Mansha Khemka, Founding and Managing Partner at Khemka & Associates.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    You began your independent practice right after law school, at a time when structured platforms for women litigators, especially in criminal defense, were limited. What inspired you to take that bold step so early in your career?

    While studying law I realised that in Mumbai there were few structured opportunities for young women who wanted to build a career in criminal defence. Starting my own practice straight after graduation was a risk, but I wanted to create the kind of ethical and professional environment I had hoped to find. With strong support from my family, particularly my father, I began with pro bono work and built it one brief at a time. Those early choices continue to define our commitment to transparency and high professional standards.

    Having completed a decade in the profession, what initially motivated you to pursue law, and how did your experiences in law school deepen your understanding of the subject and shape your decision to take up litigation as a career?

    In high school I was active in debate and attended a Youth Conference at the United Nations in New York. Those experiences sparked an interest in advocacy and public affairs. I once considered becoming a commercial pilot but soon realised I wanted a career that allowed me to think critically and work closely with people. By the time I completed my law degree, litigation felt like a natural fit.

    Criminal defense, particularly white-collar crimes and complex litigation, is often regarded as one of the most demanding areas of practice. What drew you to this specialization, and how has your experience in this space evolved over time?

    Litigation is demanding but deeply rewarding. In criminal defence, defending rights and ensuring due process is both challenging and meaningful. Some of the most intellectually engaging matters have involved clients who cannot pay, where the work is driven entirely by principle. The hours are long and the stakes are high, yet the practice remains fulfilling. Persistence is key to sustaining a career in this field.

    You have handled high-profile and complex matters involving banking fraud, narcotics, and serious criminal charges. Could you share an experience that was especially challenging, and how you prepared yourself to handle it effectively?

    Early in my career I learned that knowledge of the law is only one part of effective practice. Litigation is about people, strategy and navigating systemic realities. The unpredictable nature of the justice system taught me to create internal processes that bring order to a naturally chaotic environment. We built systems to manage complex briefs while staying client focused and transparent. These lessons continue to guide how our team approaches every case and every client. Because we are active litigators, we bring a trial-tested perspective to all our non-litigation work. Our courtroom experience sharpens the way we draft contracts and structure transactions, and our work in criminal defence makes us particularly attentive to compliance and risk. This combination of skills allows us to offer advice that is both practical and strategically sound.

    As the founder and managing partner of Khemka & Associates, your practice has grown far beyond criminal defense into areas like consumer law, insolvency, family law, and cross-border matters. How do you manage these wide-ranging responsibilities while balancing your personal life?

    Balancing a litigation practice with personal life is never simple. I have been fortunate to have the support of family and friends from the very beginning. A turning point came when my younger sister, who trained with us while still in law school, formally joined the practice. Her distinct skill set enabled us to expand confidently into areas such as arbitration, consumer law, insolvency and family matters. With a strong team culture and shared values we have been able to grow while staying true to our commitment to professionalism and client service.

    You have also dealt with cases involving immigration law and cross-border issues. How have these experiences influenced your practice, and what unique challenges have you faced in handling such matters?

    Cross-border matters require working across jurisdictions and cultures. My early international exposure helped me collaborate effectively with foreign lawyers, but the real challenge lies in understanding different legal systems, managing clients across time zones and coordinating procedures. These experiences have strengthened our ability to handle complex briefs and positioned us as a practice that combines local expertise with a global perspective.

    Mentorship has been an important part of your journey, particularly in creating opportunities for young women lawyers. What values guide your approach to mentorship, and how do you envision the next generation of litigators evolving in India?

    More young women are entering the legal profession, but those who stay the course in litigation, particularly in Mumbai, are still relatively few. Many leave for personal reasons or because of a lack of sustained professional support. At our firm we make mentorship a priority, passing on the values that define our practice: open communication, an insistence that no task is too small or too big, and a belief that consistent effort and hard work are irreplaceable. As technology transforms courts and practice management, it will be inspiring to see how the next generation of litigators shapes this changing landscape.

    Having appeared before diverse forums ranging from trial courts to the Supreme Court and specialized tribunals, what key differences have you observed in the way proceedings are conducted in every forum, and how do you adapt your strategies to navigate these differences effectively?

    Each forum has its own rhythm and expectations. Trial courts require agility and a deep command of procedure. Higher courts demand precision and a focus on legal principles. Specialised tribunals often call for technical expertise. Every judge manages their docket differently. Success, apart from the merits of the case, depends on quickly understanding these nuances and adapting advocacy accordingly. Clarity, professionalism and thorough preparation remain the constants across every forum.

    Finally, after building an independent practice and establishing a recognized firm, what advice would you give to law students and young advocates who aspire to follow a similar path? What has been your source of motivation over the years, and how do you continue to stay inspired for the future of your practice?

    Litigation has some significant barriers to entry and starting independently is not easy. Whether you begin on your own or under the guidance of a senior, the training demands focus, resilience and discipline. We are all human and we will make mistakes; the more you practise, the more you learn and the better you become. Patience is key. Over the years I have found motivation in building a practice that combines the rigour of an international firm with a commitment to accessibility. We take on matters across a wide spectrum, sometimes at reduced fees or even pro bono when circumstances require, while maintaining the highest ethical standards. This blend of professionalism and service continues to guide the future of our practice.

    Get in touch with Mansha Khemka –

  • “Courtroom practice teaches you quickly that law is not just about theory but about how you apply it in real, practical situations.” – Shubhnit Hans, Founder & Managing Partner at Hans Law Associates.

    “Courtroom practice teaches you quickly that law is not just about theory but about how you apply it in real, practical situations.” – Shubhnit Hans, Founder & Managing Partner at Hans Law Associates.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Having over a decade of experience now, what were the initial years of your practice like? What inspired you to choose law as a career, and how did law school help shape the foundation of your professional journey?

    It’s been 10 years in this profession, yet the early days feel like just yesterday, when I was practicing in Delhi and learning to navigate the world of black and white. It didn’t take long to realize that this profession is far more about practicality than pure theory. Knowing the law and mastering your case file is essential, but equally important is understanding the judge, not personally, but in terms of their courtroom approach: their patterns, reactions, and preferences. From the very beginning, I developed the habit of sitting in court and observing judges closely. That practice, simple as it may seem, has proven invaluable throughout my journey as an advocate. 

    I come from a small town in Haryana called Karnal, where I completed my schooling. After that, I pursued my law degree at Amity University, Noida. My legal journey began with a litigation office in New Delhi, where I practiced for almost four years. In 2018, I moved to Chandigarh to start my own practice. As a first-generation lawyer, it was important for me to establish my name in my hometown, where I felt more connected and grounded. It wasn’t easy, there were no set plans, and no one in my family had a legal background. It all started when a cousin suggested corporate law while I was preparing for my 12th boards in 2010. I gave the entrance exams, got selected at Amity, and the rest unfolded from there.

    You began your career as an associate, handling a wide range of civil litigation and domestic arbitration matters. How did this early exposure influence your approach to complex disputes, and what key skills proved most valuable in the formative years of your practice?

    In the initial years of my practice as an associate, I was fortunate to be exposed to a wide range of civil litigation and domestic arbitration matters. This diversity of work taught me very early on that no two disputes are ever alike. Each case requires a tailored approach in terms of a legal strategy. What shaped me the most was learning how to balance theory with practicality. The law may be uniform, but its application depends on the facts, the forum, and often the perspective of the judge or tribunal. Observing court proceedings, understanding patterns of arguments, and seeing how small details could shift the direction of a case gave me a very grounded view of dispute resolution.

    As a first-generation lawyer, what motivated you to establish your independent practice? What vision did you have when you started, and how has it evolved over time?

    As a first-generation lawyer, what motivated me most to establish my own practice was the desire to build something independent, driven purely by merit, hard work, and client trust. Starting out, I had no legacy to rely upon and that became my greatest strength. It pushed me to focus on credibility, consistency, and results from the very beginning. My initial vision was quite simple: to create a practice that delivered practical, solution-oriented advice rather than just theoretical legal opinions and dragging each and every client to Court even if it could be settled outside the court. That was when Hans Law Associates was established. Over time, that vision has evolved into building a full-service firm where teamwork, innovation, and long-term client relationships are at the core.

    You have represented clients before the Punjab and Haryana High Court, consumer forums, RERA, and various tribunals. How has this diverse litigation experience enhanced your understanding of dispute resolution across different legal platforms?

    Representing clients before the Punjab & Haryana High Court, consumer forums, RERA, and various tribunals has given me a broad perspective on how dispute resolution functions across different platforms. Each forum has its own procedure, pace, and expectations, for instance, the High Court demands sharp legal reasoning and precedent-based arguments, while consumer forums and RERA focus more on quick, pragmatic relief to aggrieved parties. Ultimately, this cross-forum exposure has made me a more versatile advocate, able to approach disputes not just from a legal standpoint, but from a strategic, client-centric perspective.

    You have handled matters before the Haryana Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority, and several other tribunals. What unique challenges have you encountered in this specialized field, and how do you navigate them effectively?

    Handling matters before the HREAT, HRERA, Pkl, and other tribunals has been both challenging and rewarding. Real estate law, especially under the RERA framework, is indeed a booming area of practice. With rapid urbanization and increasing consumer awareness, disputes in this sector are growing both in volume and complexity. The unique challenges I’ve faced include balancing the interests of buyers and developers, staying updated on any recent precedents as it is a very new law and most importantly, ensuring enforcement of orders. While RERA was designed to be consumer-friendly, practical hurdles often arise in execution. I’ve found that navigating this space requires not only sound legal knowledge but also adaptability and persistence. This blend of legal precision and pragmatic follow-through has allowed me to add real value to clients in this fast-growing field.

    As a mediator at the Punjab and Haryana High Court, how do you see ADR evolving in India? In your experience, what advantages does mediation or arbitration offer compared to traditional litigation?

    As a mediator at the Punjab and Haryana High Court, I have witnessed how Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is rapidly evolving in India. With rising pendency in courts, ADR is no longer an alternative but an essential tool for timely and effective justice.

    The recent “Mediation for the Nation” drive initiated by the Hon’ble Supreme Court reflects this growing recognition. By encouraging parties to resolve disputes amicably, the judiciary has underlined mediation’s role in reducing litigation, promoting harmony, and ensuring quicker resolutions. I myself have seen a rise in settlements after the said initiative.

    In my experience, mediation preserves relationships and empowers parties to design their own solutions, while arbitration offers efficiency, confidentiality, and subject-matter expertise. Both provide speed, practicality, and satisfaction compared to traditional litigation that may take years. With institutional support and initiatives like Mediation for the Nation, ADR in India is poised to become a truly transformative mechanism for access to justice.

    You have drafted agreements for a variety of clients, including music and production companies as well as professionals like psychologists. What key challenges do you see in the entertainment sector, and how can these be addressed proactively through careful contract drafting?

    Drafting agreements in the entertainment sector brings its own set of unique challenges. Unlike traditional contracts, these often deal with creative rights, intellectual property, royalties, confidentiality, and moral rights, all of which can be highly sensitive and prone to disputes if not defined clearly. One of the biggest challenges is the ambiguity around ownership of content, whether it lies with the creator, the producer, or the platform. Another is the lack of awareness among artists and professionals about the long-term implications of exclusivity clauses, revenue-sharing models, and termination rights. Proactive solutions lie in clear, precise, and balanced drafting. 

    What advice would you give students aspiring to enter the legal profession, and what resources would you recommend to help them stay ahead in a constantly evolving field?

    My advice to students aspiring to enter the legal profession is to focus on fundamentals and be patient enough to adapt. Courtroom practice teaches you quickly that law is not just about theory but about how you apply it in real, practical situations. Developing habits like observing proceedings, reading judgments daily, and sharpening communication skills goes a long way. It’s a never ending learning process. I see a lot of individuals backing out from the profession as it may not satisfy you monetarily but once you understand the responsibilities that come with it, I am sure we are ready to go a long way. I’d also recommend building a mentor network and learning from senior advocates and peers. In a constantly evolving field, the ability to keep learning, unlearning, and relearning is the best resource you can carry with you.

    Balancing a demanding legal career with personal life can be challenging. How do you manage stress, maintain focus during high-stakes matters, and create balance between your professional and personal responsibilities?

    Balancing a demanding legal career with personal life is indeed challenging, but I’ve learned that discipline and perspective makes the difference. During high-stakes matters, I manage stress by preparing thoroughly as confidence in your case reduces anxiety. I also practice detachment after court hours, giving time to family, fitness, and spirituality, which keeps me grounded. For me, balance isn’t about strict separation but about ensuring that both professional duties and personal responsibilities get the attention they deserve. This balance not only helps me stay focused but also makes me more effective in my practice.

    Get in touch with Shubhnit Hans –

  • “Technology today is the key source to research and development, a way by which people can now know, read, understand the aspects and issues in real estate and business transactions.” – Deepanshu Garg, Founder of Legal Assist.

    “Technology today is the key source to research and development, a way by which people can now know, read, understand the aspects and issues in real estate and business transactions.” – Deepanshu Garg, Founder of Legal Assist.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    With your specialization in real estate transactions and property registration, what initially drew you to this niche area of law, and how has your interest evolved over the years?

    I have grown up in a family of lawyers, who are involved in this niche practice of law for the last 40 years. I am 4th generation in this side of practice. The environment, the discussions in family and social gatherings, watching of news roam around real estate and the law; the knowledge amongst citizens on the aspect of “how important is legal consultation before dealing in real estate transactions”; the growing real estate disputes in the family as well as in the market; the challenges faced by the citizens in the property registration process; the lack of future estate planning; etc., which gave me a good kick to enter into law, focus on this side and to scale up the practice to new boundaries.

    Through your practice, you have often highlighted the gap between property registration and ownership rights. What are the most common misconceptions people have when dealing with property transactions in India?

    From the very starting, I have strongly believed that people are unaware or ignorant of about the most important aspect when dealing with property transactions i.e. “Title Legal Due Diligence”.  This is the “laying foundation”. The money which people pay to buy a property, what exactly is that money for – is it the physical structure or the land on spot? Practically speaking, for people these are the two aspects only but wait, that value is actually weighed from “title ownership documents” which people execute and get registered. And that’s the major misconception prevailing amongst people. Even law clearly says, “Buyers beware”. If there is a discrepancy in the documents, the value you paid for that property is nothing more than a zero. 

    Another related misconception is that people believe drafting a document when dealing with property is “basic and regular and can be drafted on a set performa”, but no, there is no set performa prescribed anywhere in law. Any such document is a “contract” amongst the parties which govern their transaction and has to be drafted on case-to-case basis and on specific circumstances surrounding the entire transaction, overall considering the law.

    As the Founder of Legal Assist, a digital platform dedicated to property and business legal services, what inspired you to establish your practice, what were the key challenges you encountered in building it, and how do you envision technology transforming the future of property law practice? 

    Since many years now, the property registration appointment process has been made online, which is not only cumbersome but time taking too. It is not easy for a layman to take an appointment for registration. Further, we daily see the growing disputes arising in real estate transactions and business running. We further see the irregularities and unprofessional surroundings in the conveyancing field of practice of law.

    All this triggered me to develop an online platform where I can render my knowledge on the issues circumventing the real estate industry & transactions, property registrations, business industry & transactions, to help them and to make them cautious of their legal rights, obligations and safeguards. The major key challenges were to not be able to cover “all aspects/ issues” since they are vast in nature and the other was to actually make people believe in “what are the most important aspects” in real estate and business transactions. 

    Technology today is the key source to research and development,  a way by which people can now know, read, understand the aspects and issues in real estate and business transactions. Moreover, technology is the source to transparency and accountability, as by way of technology, things are not far away to come under one roof and better control of the government, assuring people more safety, trust and “ease of doing business”.

    Your work involves complex areas such as estate planning, inheritance, wills, and succession disputes. What are the most pressing issues clients face in matters relating to inheritance, and how do you guide them through emotionally sensitive cases?

    The most pressing issues I see are the disputes arising among the legal heirs after the death of deceased person who died intestate or without any future planning or without informing about his/ her assets to his/ her legal heirs and further, disputes arising in cases even where a deceased  left a WILL/ any other testament.

    Our approach of guidance is focussed initially on amicable settlement through mediation and consultation and if not this, by suggesting an equitable outcome, after considering the law from all four corners and the circumstances in hand, in a manner which rules out future disputes.

    Estate and succession planning is often overlooked until a dispute arises. What practical steps do you believe individuals should take early to avoid future litigation?

    Life is so uncertain these days. The most important aspect which I feel today is for a person to have a must is to initially have a broad family discussion amongst all members and align amicably whatever a person owns amongst his/ her family members. Then I believe in an equalization policy amongst members. If all the members accept this discussion, the family shall execute an Memorandum of Family Settlement incorporating the contents of such amicable understanding. Further, members, in such case or otherwise if family amicable understanding is not arrived at or possible, shall compulsorily make a testament/ WILL for writing down their wish in “clear terms” to be followed by each member after the death of the testator.

    If there’s less tunning amongst the family members and the above aspect cannot be worked out, then the best possible way is to distribute the assets during the lifetime only so that the respective beneficiary holds the same without any claim or objection from others.

    As someone who started with internships at leading law firms and later built independent practice, what lessons from those formative years still influence your approach to law and property related disputes?

    Clear understanding of law and being upgraded with current legal precedents; using the tool of mediation and conciliation; not merely focussing on making money but alongside guiding the client with result oriented approach. However small the matter or dispute may be, 100% efforts and hard work shall always be put.

    Property and inheritance laws are constantly evolving with new judicial precedents and legislative changes. How do you stay ahead of these developments, and what recent trends do you see shaping this field in India?

    My approach is to give daily an hour or more in watching the news, studying current market scenarios, blogs, judgments. By this, I am able to incorporate and utilize this knowledge in my practice practically.

    The upcoming centralized digitalized unique platform where property registration, all connected data such as data from Municipal Corporation/ Development Authority etc. will be inter-connectedly available and will be incorporated with ease of doing business policy of the government. The development of digital courts for NI Act cases, MSME Samadhan Portal, Pre-litigation process in commercial cases, Mediation Act, etc. are great initiatives of the government for early disposal of recovery matters. By such initiative and upcoming legal developments, people are becoming more aware about their rights and obligations.

    With such a diverse practice covering real estate, inheritance, litigation, and consultancy, what advice would you give to young lawyers who want to build a specialized yet well-rounded career in property and succession law?

    Thorough understanding of the real estate market and laws covering this industry is a must. The initial aspect is to be able to practically understand the “trends” of “disputes” in industry, thereby doing research in the light of actual circumstances and find out all the possible solutions to the problem and then picking up the best reasonable one. What is the best approach “practically” must be the concern always.

    Get in touch with Deepanshu Garg –

  • “To be a lawyer is to fight for justice, stand for truth, and give strength to those who cannot fight for themselves.” – Dr. Milap Narayan Chopra, Deputy Government Counsel, Government of Rajasthan.

    “To be a lawyer is to fight for justice, stand for truth, and give strength to those who cannot fight for themselves.” – Dr. Milap Narayan Chopra, Deputy Government Counsel, Government of Rajasthan.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Your academic credentials span law, commerce, business, and company secretaryship, culminating in a Ph.D. in Law. How has this multidisciplinary education shaped your approach to legal practice, especially at the intersection of law, business, and corporate governance?

    From the very first day of my law school, I carried a clear ambition to become a world-class corporate lawyer being inspired by Jim Carrey’s story, who wrote himself a $10 million check for “acting services rendered” and carried it as a reminder of his vision and by the mid-1990s fulfilled that vision through belief and intense hard-work. Motivated by this, I wrote my own paper slip in 2010 to myself; “Dr. Milap Chopra (Gold Medallist), B.Com., LL.B. (Hons), CS, MBA, LL.M., Ph.D.” and carried it in my wallet as a visualization and constant reminder of my ambition to become a world-class corporate lawyer. With that goal in mind, I carefully structured my academic and professional journey. Alongside my law degree, I pursued the Company Secretaryship (CS) course, completing both simultaneously to strengthen my understanding of corporate law and governance. I interned at India’s leading-top law firms including Amarchand, JSA, AZB, Anand & Anand, among others, gaining exposure to top-tier corporate practice across the metro cities. Throughout the academic journey of law school, I consistently maintained meritorious performance, ultimately graduating as the Gold Medallist and batch topper of Institute of Law, Nirma University.

    Yet destiny had a different plan. During the last semester of law school, my father, himself a practicing lawyer at the Bikaner Sessions Court, was elected as the First Citizen of Bikaner i.e., the Mayor of the city. He encouraged me not to take up a corporate job or join a law firm, but to pursue litigation. Respecting his guidance, I set aside the offers of a job I had received and began practice at the Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur, as an associate in the chambers of Shri Mahendra Singh Singhvi, Senior Advocate. That experience was not just training or learning; it was an immersion into the craft of litigation, teaching me the temperament, discipline, and holistic approach required for meaningful legal practice. I am deeply thankful to God for that turn of events, because it helped me realise that true legal practice requires temperament and an inbuilt nature — qualities essential for anyone who wishes to pursue litigation meaningfully. Law is not just a profession; it is a noble calling. It remains unique in its ability to serve the public interest at large, where one’s work can directly benefit society through precedents, judgments, and observations/outcomes.

    After starting practice at the Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur, I enrolled for Masters in Law at the prestigious Government Law College, Bikaner. This required remarkable dedication as in the first year, I travelled overnight every Tuesday from Jodhpur to Bikaner to give my six exams of the first year on every Wednesday; however, destiny had other pivotal moments as well, a life-threatening road-accident during that period became a blessing in disguise which forced me to pause and reflect, doctors advised me to pursue a desk job, and for a short while, my unfulfilled corporate dream seemed to materialize and I got the opportunity to work with the PwC at Gurugram, one of the world’s Big Four Consultancy firms wherein I soon realised I was not made for the corporate world. My temperament fit litigation, not a corporate desk. During my PwC days, I also pursued an MBA, completing it under tough circumstances, often writing three back-to-back exams of three hours each on weekends, as leave was nearly impossible in corporate life. That job experience further strengthened my resolve to practice at Jodhpur and added yet another dimension to my academic journey.

    Through it all, one firm belief and that paper slip has always guided me that extra qualifications add extra dimensions to one’s legal career. That conviction drove me to explore law, commerce, business, and company secretaryship, before finally pursuing a Ph.D. in Law. Today, this multidisciplinary foundation allows me to approach issues at the intersection of law, business, and corporate governance with a rare balance- offering solutions that are legally sound, commercially viable, & ethically responsible. And, finally, in July 2024, after 15 long years of academic and career journey, I added the “Dr.” prefix to my name, completing the journey I had envisioned on that first day of law school on a slip of paper. Through belief, conviction, hard work, and the courage to dream, every challenge i.e., exams, travel, job, courtroom battles, became part of the story. That slip was never just a piece of paper; it was a promise to myself, a compass that guided me to become the well-qualified lawyer I aspired to be, and a reminder that dreams nurtured with patience and perseverance truly come alive and I hope that anyone who reads this feels inspired to keep their own slips of hope alive.

    Pursuing CS and Law simultaneously is both ambitious and demanding. What advice would you offer to students who are considering this path? Are there any specific strategies or resources that helped you manage both effectively and could benefit others looking to do the same?

    Pursuing Company Secretaryship alongside a law degree is ambitious and demanding, but immensely rewarding if approached with purpose and discipline. From the very start of my law school, I aligned every step i.e., internships, academics, and extra qualifications with my goal of becoming a world-class corporate lawyer.

    My advice would be to treat both the programs as complementary, not competing. Law builds your legal reasoning and litigation skills; CS gives deep insight into corporate governance, compliance, and business operations. Today, modern litigation often involves complex corporate matters, and understanding both legal and corporate dimensions allows a lawyer to craft strategic, holistic solutions.

    Ultimately, my journey shows that combining CS and law not only prepares you for corporate practice but also enriches litigation skills. A modern litigating lawyer increasingly needs to understand business structures, governance frameworks, and compliance requirements to provide nuanced advice, anticipate challenges, and craft effective legal strategies. For students willing to embrace the challenge, the payoff is a multidisciplinary foundation that sets them apart and equips them to thrive in both courtroom and corporate boardroom settings.

    In your role as Deputy Government Counsel for Rajasthan, you’ve managed cases across diverse departments like Transport, Tourism, and Water Resources. Could you share a particularly challenging case or policy issue you handled, and how you approached its legal complexities?

    As Deputy Government Counsel for Rajasthan, one of the most challenging aspects has been handling cases that cut across diverse departments, from Transport and Tourism to Water Resources, Higher and Medical Education. Each case brings its own legal complexity, but the real challenge often lies in creating a channel of cooperation among multiple officers in charge of different departments and ensuring that a timely, coherent reply is filed before the Hon’ble Court. Unlike private practice, here you appear from the respondent’s side, where the responsibility is not only to defend but also to uphold the policies and decisions of the State.

    In matters like appointments, recruitments, examinations, policy changes, or large bunch-transfer cases, the pressure can be immense because of the far-reaching implications for both the government and the public at large. That is why I believe success depends on three things: having a good team of associates, valuing the effectiveness of court clerks or munshi’s, and maintaining proper updation of files and continuous monitoring of case status. These seemingly small practices are actually the backbone of timely and effective representation before the Court.

    My multidisciplinary background in law, commerce, business, & corporate governance has helped me approach these issues with a structured, solution-oriented mindset. Rather than being daunted by the complexity, I focus on building cooperation, managing deadlines under pressure, and ensuring that the State’s position is presented in a legally sound, precise, and persuasive manner. In many ways, these challenges mirror the lessons I’ve carried since law school that discipline, teamwork, and a holistic outlook are key to navigating the most demanding cases.

    What inspired you to establish Law Compass LLP? What were some of the early challenges you faced in building the firm, and what long-term vision do you hold for its role in the Indian legal ecosystem?

    The inspiration to establish Law Compass LLP came from my belief that the legal profession is not only about advocacy but about navigating people toward the best possible solutions. That’s why our firm carries the tagline: “Navigating you to the best possible legal solution.” As a co-founder, along with my Jaipur-based partner, Pranjal Singh, and our Delhi-based partner Siddharth Acharya, Advocate-on-Record, we envisioned a practice that offers clients both litigation and non-litigation expertise under one roof. Our diverse backgrounds allowed us to position Law Compass LLP as a one-stop solution for multifaceted client needs.

    The early challenges were the ones most young firms face i.e., building trust, managing resources, and delivering consistent results while ensuring timely compliance. But my multidisciplinary journey, coupled with our team’s strength in corporate law, governance, and litigation, gave us the foundation to bridge gaps effectively. We worked consciously on building a system that valued teamwork, proper updation of files, responsiveness, and a client-first approach, even under the extreme pressures that litigation often brings.

    What sets us apart is our functioning model. We focus not just on winning cases but on ensuring effective, time-bound relief, transparent communication, and value-driven fee structures. Like the big law firms in India, we are building a culture of professionalism, research-oriented strategy, and holistic solutions, but our boutique size allows us to remain nimble, personalized, and accessible. In this way, we hope to complement the Indian legal system by reducing delays, improving efficiency, and delivering justice in a way that clients find both approachable and dependable.

    Our long-term vision is to make a meaningful difference in the Indian legal ecosystem by providing solutions that are legally sound, commercially practical, and socially responsible. We aspire for Law Compass LLP to grow into a boutique firm that is known not only for legal excellence but also for its role in strengthening trust in the system itself — making the law work better for those it is meant to serve.

    You’ve represented a wide range of clients from banks and PSUs to co-operative societies and educational institutions. When handling government-related matters, what unique challenges arise, and how do you tailor your strategy to ensure effective and compliant representation?

    When it comes to government-related matters, the challenges are very different from private representation. The most unique difficulty lies in the volume of cases and the strict timelines within which replies and arguments must be prepared. The pendency of cases directly impacts the smooth functioning of governance, so the responsibility of a government counsel is not only professional but also systemic.

    To handle this, I firmly believe in the strength of a structured ecosystem which includes an effective court clerk/munshi, a reliable team of associates, regular updation of files, complete coordination with the OIC’s and constant monitoring of case status. Every stage i.e., from gathering factual reports, to preparing replies, to filing in the registry, to finally arguing with a well-prepared note ensuring that no matter goes unheard before the Hon’ble Court. For this, the cause list has to be noted with precision every single day, and it is the duty of a government counsel to make sure that not a single case is missed being represented. Even one lapse can have serious consequences for governance and public interest. Without that structure, government litigation can easily get derailed under its own weight.

    Fortunately, under the able leadership of our Hon’ble Chief Minister Bhajan Lal Sharma ji, the State of Rajasthan has made government-side litigation comparatively smoother and more systematic. We regularly hold meetings with the Officers-in-Charge (OICs) to review pendencies, address bottlenecks, and ensure that the State’s representation before the Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court is effective and timely. This cooperation between counsel and departments allows us to tailor our strategy in a way that is both compliant and efficient, ensuring that justice is not delayed for the people we ultimately serve.

    With such a strong academic foundation, do you believe that continuous scholarly engagement should be a part of every legal professional’s journey? How has your own academic work enriched your practice?

    Absolutely. On the very first day of my law school orientation, Senior Advocate Shri P.M. Thakkar told us that “a lawyer is always a student” that one must remain in constant learning mode, curious to know the “why” and committed to finding solutions through knowledge. That message struck me deeply. Inspired also by Jim Carrey’s story, I wrote on that slip of paper (which I have carried since my first semester) that I would remain a learner till the last day of my life.

    That conviction has shaped my journey. Even after completing my Ph.D. in Law, I regularly enroll in online courses, workshops, and other academic engagements. Today, my scholarly pursuits have come full circle, I now travel across institutions to deliver lectures, judge moot court competitions, and being a government counsel participate in government meetings and each of these experiences further refines my practice.

    For me, scholarship and practice are not separate but complementary. Continuous learning sharpens my arguments, broadens my perspective, and keeps me adaptable in a fast-changing legal landscape. In essence, my academic work has not only enriched my practice but also kept me aligned with the belief that law is a living discipline and to practice it meaningfully, one must always be willing to learn, unlearn, and relearn.

    Balancing a high-pressure legal practice with deep engagement in social leadership roles such as Founding Trustee of BEST Foundation Trust, Vice Chairman of JITO Youth Wing etc. is no small feat. How do you manage this balance, and what continues to motivate your commitment to social transformation alongside your legal career?

    Balancing law with social leadership has never felt like a burden; it has always been a calling. Two incidents, in particular, have shaped this approach for me.

    The first comes from my political legacy. My father, a deeply honest politician, always taught us that if society has given us everything, we must find ways to give back. That value has been a guiding principle in my life. With this conviction, I founded the BEST Foundation Trust “Better Education for Social Transformation”. Through this initiative, we work to make education accessible and meaningful by paying the school fees of underprivileged students, providing scholarships to meritorious ones, and creating opportunities for educational growth etc.

    The second defining moment was far more personal. During a life-threatening road accident, I was in a coma for 67 hours, and I lost a dear friend in that tragedy. That experience shook me and instilled a deep realization that we only have one life and the only way to honor it is by living with purpose & making a positive difference in society.

    So, even while managing the pressures of a legal practice, I consciously dedicate time and energy to social causes, supported by an effective team. What keeps me motivated is the belief that law and leadership must go hand in hand, one upholds justice in the courtroom, the other nurtures transformation in the community.

    You’ve been actively involved in initiatives focused on youth empowerment and educational access. What advice would you offer to aspiring legal professionals who wish to follow a path like yours? What mindset and resources do you believe are essential for building a meaningful legal career today?

    My advice to aspiring legal professionals is simple yet profound; always stay curious, always stay disciplined, and never forget to ask yourself the basic question: “Why Me?”

    Whether you are arguing before My Lords, preparing for a job interview, or even praying to God to fulfill your dreams, just pause and ask, why should this relief, this opportunity, or this blessing come to me? If you can honestly satisfy yourself with an answer, if you have worked hard enough to justify it, then trust me — it will be you.

    In my own journey, this mindset has been a compass. From managing rigorous studies in law, CS, MBA, LL.M. and Ph.D., to working with top firms, to practicing in court, to representing the State of Rajasthan as Government Counsel and even balancing social leadership, the “Why Me?” principle has kept me grounded and accountable. It pushes you to prepare better, to think deeper, and to act with integrity.

    So, to young professionals — build your career not just on ambition, but on clarity of purpose, a commitment to continuous learning, and the courage to answer that “Why Me?” every single day. That’s what transforms a legal career into a meaningful journey.

    Finally, what guiding motto or philosophy has carried you through your legal journey? And looking back, what inspired you to pursue a career in law in the first place?

    My guiding philosophy has always been that law is not merely a profession, but a noble calling; a lifelong duty to the Constitution and to society at large. A lawyer is entrusted with the privilege of defending rights, upholding justice, and ensuring that the rule of law prevails over fear, power, or influence.

    The inspiration to pursue this path came at a defining moment in my eleventh standard, when I had to choose my stream of study. At that time, the choices were clear — science for engineers, biology for doctors, commerce for accountants. Unsure of where I belonged, I asked my father what I should pursue. His answer changed the course of my life. Looking at my extrovert nature, my speaking skills, my temperament, and the qualities he believed reflected a good lawyer, he said to me:

    “You should become an Advocate and prepare for CLAT which has only recently been introduced. And then he said something that stayed with me forever: A lawyer is not just a professional, he is the guardian of rights and the defender of the Constitution. Law is supreme; it bows before no one, and neither can a true lawyer ever be bowed or broken. To be a lawyer is to fight for justice, to stand for truth, and to give strength to those who cannot fight for themselves. If you truly wish to live a life of meaning and difference, become a good lawyer because a good lawyer can never be silenced, never be tamed.” 

    Those words struck me to the core. They gave me a vision of law as a higher calling, a life of service through justice. And from that day onwards, I knew this was the journey I was meant for. As a strong believer in karma, destiny, and God, I have also realized that one must remain calm, patient, and consistent. If your deeds are sincere and your conviction unwavering, everything else eventually falls into place. Life has its own rhythm, and faith in that process gives you the strength to persevere even through the toughest trials.

    Looking back now, every academic pursuit, every courtroom battle, every social initiative I have undertaken has been guided by that conviction. For me, the practice of law is not just about winning cases — it is about carrying forward a legacy of courage, compassion, and constitutional duty. That is the motto that continues to carry me forward.

    get in touch with Dr. Milap Narayan Chopra –

  • “I chose to study the law because I knew with it, I would be empowered, independent and in a position to make a meaningful difference.” – Rajat Gangwar, Advocate, Allahabad High Court.

    “I chose to study the law because I knew with it, I would be empowered, independent and in a position to make a meaningful difference.” – Rajat Gangwar, Advocate, Allahabad High Court.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Coming from a family deeply rooted in public service, what inspired you to chart a different path as a first-generation advocate, and how has your family’s background in public service influenced your perspective as a lawyer?

    Since childhood I had seen my parents being posted at different places in the State of U.P. I soon also realized how demanding their work was. There were times when both parents found it difficult to even make it for school events like parent teacher meetings or the Annual Founder’s Day Programme. As I grew older and came close to choosing a career, I was certain that I did not want to join the administrative services as I found them to be very demanding, unpredictable and not free from external pressures.

    I chose to study the law because I knew with it, I would be empowered, independent and in a position to make a meaningful difference. Initially like most joining an NLU I too had dreams of working in a law firm but that was extremely short lived and after having interned in Courts and seen advocates make submissions, I found litigation quite attractive. I still remember as a young intern having seen Late Mr. Fali Nariman argue a matter before the Supreme Court for an entire day- though I understood little of it then but it left a lasting impact on me which only got further cemented during the course of my subsequent litigation internships.

    My family’s background in public service has significantly influenced my perspective of the law. Having heard accounts from my father of his experiences from the times when he was a City Magistrate in Allahabad (now Prayagraj) till he retired as a Special Secretary, and incidents from the time of my grandfather, who was the first Director General of Police U.P., I expected and continue to expect officers to have high standards in administration and in the discharge of their functions. Often these expectations have not been and are not met. I firmly believe in the separation of powers and the fact that the executive is primarily there to ensure the welfare of the people as per the law of the land and it should never exceed its jurisdiction or arrogate to itself powers which the law otherwise does not confer on it. 

    In the early phases of your career, what were the defining instances that shaped your understanding of the law, and which experiences do you still hold close to your heart today?

    Law as we learn it in the classrooms is very different from how it is applied in Courts. Also, litigation is not just contingent upon the understanding of the law but in my opinion, it also has got to do with understanding of the process of the law or in other words how it unfurls in the courtroom and ultimately applies to real life situations in the  form of an order or a decision. The proverb ‘There’s many a slip ‘twixt the cup and the lip’ applies best to litigation. Often it happens that one comes across a brief and after perusing it thinks that it is simple enough in the sense that the law applicable is clear and there could be only one way it could be decided. However, often to one’s surprise the decision might be the exact opposite. The Court may have proceeded on a consideration which was not only not anticipated by the counsel but perhaps seemed least relevant.

    An interesting incident happened with me early on in my practice. We had filed an application for recalling an ex-parte order of transferring the case from one district to another in favour of the wife. After a long and heated hearing the application for recall was dismissed and to my dismay without dealing with the main argument which I thought was the sheet anchor. However, the Hon’ble Judge was kind enough to tell me later that one can never get an order by fighting with the Court, no matter how meritorious one might think his/her case is, and the secret lay in calmly but repeatedly urging the Court to accept your point of view. What I also realized later was that it was always better to get a rough idea of the Judge’s view on the subject matter before one goes for the hearing, one should be prepared to the hilt and anticipate anything and everything and one should always while putting one’s case across be in a position to provide a plausible solution to the Court. 

    You have been empaneled with the Allahabad High Court Legal Services Sub-Committee. What are the different challenges involved in this role, and what responsibilities does it bring with it?

    My work with the Allahabad High Court Legal Services Sub-Committee has essentially revolved around filing and appearing in matters, mostly criminal appeals and bails, of convicts and under-trials who have not been able to engage a counsel independently by their own means. The fact that this work not only directly affects the life and liberty of the litigants but also requires representation of underprivileged litigants makes it extremely sensitive. I always try to ensure that this work is done on a priority basis and is given equal if not more importance than other regular matters of the chamber. 

    What has been the most memorable or challenging case in your litigation career, and how did it shape your approach to handling complex legal disputes?

    The most memorable case that I have worked on till now was a writ petition that we had filed before the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court at the behest of the informant, in an FIR, challenging the transfer of the investigation from the State Police to the CBI.

    In most cases it is the informant who seeks transfer of the case from the local police to the CBI and approaches the Court for such directions. However, in this case what we wanted was the exact opposite. The informant had lodged an FIR under the prevention of Corruption Act against an extremely high-ranking and resourceful individual involved in the administration of a State University. The State police had made significant progress and was at the verge of filing a chargesheet against the accused, though they had not been able to arrest the primary accused, and all of a sudden notifications were issued by the State and Central Government transferring the investigation to the CBI.

    This transfer was not at the request of the informant.

    The informant then preferred a petition before the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court praying for quashing of these notifications amongst other reliefs as he wanted the State police to complete the investigation which was anyway at its last leg. The petition, as drafted, addressed questions of Constitutional law ranging from Federalism to exercise of powers by the President and the Governor, the necessity for such action, its procedural and substantive limitations and internal procedures that had to be followed by the Ministries and Departments concerned.

    It was a task to keep the petition getting listed and taken up on different dates because it was a race against time as the investigation had already been transferred to the CBI. This matter not only exposed me to engaging aspects of Constitutional law but also gave a glimpse of ingenious and crucial strategies advocates from both sides employ to anticipate the next move and to finally win. I became aware of several tricks of the profession which otherwise I was unbeknownst of. The petition was ultimately dismissed by the High Court and so was the SLP. Thereafter an interesting event occurred. Some months after the dismissal of the petition, the informant was arrested by a Central Government investigating agency in relation to some offence pertaining to marksheets of students of another State University. I believe the informant is still in jail and the matter in which he is now an accused is sub-judice.

    I would say that in handling complex legal disputes my approach still remains mostly the same. One is required to research thoroughly, draft well, observe the benches and put one’s best foot forward. One however, in high stake matters, has to be weary and mindful, for the purposes of strategy, of what is happening around the matter especially if the matter is of a political nature or concerns important people. In such cases information and the timing of the information is extremely crucial and can make or break situations.

    There is a lot of information and also misinformation and sometimes things seem to be pulling you in all directions and you really don’t know how to plan ahead. What is therefore required is to keep a level head, a fearless and extremely professional attitude towards things and perhaps the guidance of someone trustworthy who has more years than you behind him in the profession. One must always give one’s best with the resources at one’s disposal and not worry about the result.

    The last and most important thing that I took away from this matter was that one should never take things personally and not have an emotional reaction to things. With this particular matter I was extremely fortunate to have the guidance and wisdom of my seniors from the bar at Lucknow and Allahabad. They guided me through what I think was a difficult terrain of dilemmas and decisions.

    In your experience appearing before various courts and tribunals, what strategies or principles have you found most effective in managing high-stakes litigation?

    In my opinion in high stake litigation, one has to be extremely mindful of time. Since these matters are extremely sensitive often due to the imminent threat and irreparable consequences. Even a few hours of delay can have disastrous consequences. Take the demolition of a property for example. There have been instances of petitions being heard while the local administration is already at the doorstep with bulldozers. One should be in a position to multi-task and move with lightning speed and take chances even if the odds don’t seem favourable.

    I recall a matter in which a part of the house of a litigant was being demolished for the operationalization of an airport and the matter had been listed on some other future date. By the time that date would’ve come the authorities would have very easily and conveniently demolished the property. Given the immediate nature of the threat, after a short discussion with a colleague who was also a co-counsel in the matter, we decided to mention the matter before the Court and make a request for the hearing to be advanced to that very day and for it to be taken up.

    We thought that the chances of success were rather slim and the Court would turn down the request but we still wanted to give it a shot. To our surprise the Court accepted the mention and summoned the file. What followed was a quick trip to the office of the Registrar and the section, written intimations to other counsels culminating in a stay order against the demolition.    

    Another important strategy in high stake matters, especially with voluminous paperwork, is to simplify the matter as much as one can for the convenience of the Court. Most Courts are burdened with work and often do not find time to go through hundreds of pages unless the matter is at the stage of final hearing. For the purposes of interim relief, I think it’s best to very succinctly put across the illegality in the impugned action at the start of the submission and then follow up with facts as and when they are needed. The strongest point which hits the core of illegality should be put across earliest, avoiding verbiage. Obviously, what that point is and how it has to be put across is a thing to be learnt over time. Hitting the nail on the head is crucial and arguments have to be honed and distilled for this purpose. I have had seniors tell me that if a petition has too many grounds then it essentially means that there are no grounds worth taking. I think the same applies to submissions.

    I have also found that in some important matters the responding side may want to delay the interim relief on some pretext or the other. Delay often results in denial for all practical purposes. Therefore, one has to be vigilant and tie up as many loose ends as one can. Serving of advance notices wherever possible, getting matters listed early or peremptorily on the board or getting a time fixed for hearing on a given day, making mentions and in the odd event getting proactive directions from superior courts are some measures one can adopt to ensure effective prosecution of one’s case.

    Having appeared before multiple forums, High Courts, Arbitral Tribunals, Consumer Forums, and Industrial Tribunals what strategies do you adopt to adapt your advocacy style depending on the forum?

    Sun Tzu in the Art of War has said that “If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles….”. Court hearings are obviously not like battles and the Judge is never an enemy but it never harms one to know what one is going to be faced with. Therefore, I believe it is imperative to know and understand the turf before one gets onto it. Different forums have different ways of functioning and adopt different procedures of doing the same thing. It is therefore crucial that one understands the procedures of the place where one is appearing. 

    The second aspect would be to understand the manner of functioning of the Judge or what people call reading the judge or reading the bench. Some Judges are more inclined towards equity while some prefer the dead cold letter of the law and apply it as it is. Some prefer long drawn arguments while some prefer that one straightaway comes to the main point. One therefore has to mould the manner of argument as per the nature of the Judge. Understanding the nature of the Judge helps you structure not only the arguments but also the manner in which you would want your case to proceed and avoid possible pitfalls.     

    With over a decade of diverse practice and multiple empanelments, what professional values have guided you throughout your journey, and what advice would you give young aspirants on building a career like yours while balancing professional commitments with personal life?

    I have always endeavoured to maintain my integrity and be honest with the Court. I have always advised litigants to adopt ethical means in the process of adjudication before the Courts and I don’t hesitate from saying that that has cost me work. I believe that at the end of the day it is a person’s integrity and reputation that matters most and as long as his/her conscience is clear nothing else really matters. Apart from joining a good chamber my advice to young aspirants would be to maintain a strong work ethic and to always keep their eyes and ears open as one learns most through observation. One must always keep the company of colleagues and seniors who are similarly aligned in their objectives and hold similar if not the same value system and imbibe not only knowledge and wisdom but also desired professional values. A good part of the initial years should be spent in learning and thereafter the focus should be on procurement of work. Since the journey of a litigating lawyer is long and arduous one should, as a matter of habit, definitely take out time for family, friends and oneself as work never ends. 

    Get in touch with Rajat Gangwar –