Super Lawyer

Tag: aviation

  • “Whether arguing corporate disputes, pursuing PILs, or handling sensitive criminal trials, every brief is a trust placed in my hands, to be discharged with integrity and dignity.” – Shashank Singh, Founding Partner, CTS Partners LLP.

    “Whether arguing corporate disputes, pursuing PILs, or handling sensitive criminal trials, every brief is a trust placed in my hands, to be discharged with integrity and dignity.” – Shashank Singh, Founding Partner, CTS Partners LLP.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    How did you transition from your early years in litigation to regularly appearing before the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the Delhi High Court, and various other forums across the country? What were some key early learning experiences that laid the foundation for your practice?

    My transition from the early years of litigation to regularly appearing before the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the Delhi High Court, and other forums across the country was not sudden but a steady climb. I began in the trial courts of Delhi, handling matters where stakes for clients were immediate and personal. Those formative years taught me that advocacy rests on preparation, precision, and respect for procedure. Drafting pleadings instilled discipline, cross-examination taught patience, and interim applications honed the ability to think on my feet.

    Gradually, I began assisting in matters before the Delhi High Court. The shift required a different skill: structuring arguments with clarity and economy so that cases could survive preliminary objections. As clients entrusted me with appellate work, I appeared before various High Courts and Tribunals, while also briefing senior counsel in complex matters, learning how to condense large records into strategic briefs.

    The opportunity to appear before the Hon’ble Supreme Court followed naturally. It began with assisting in Special Leave Petitions and transfer petitions, and over time, I began appearing independently in interlocutory and final hearings. The guiding principle, instilled in me early on, has remained the same: never step into court without absolute command over your brief.

    Looking back, the lessons that shaped me did not come from one case or one forum but from consistently engaging with diverse matters, from trial disputes to appellate work and public interest litigation. Each stage built upon the last, creating a practice grounded not in chance but in cumulative discipline.

    As the Founding Partner of CTS Partners LLP, how do you balance leading the firm’s litigation and advisory verticals, and what vision do you have for the firm’s growth in an evolving legal market?

    Balancing litigation and advisory is less about dividing time than ensuring both strengthen each other. Litigation shows how contracts hold up when tested, while advisory allows disputes to be anticipated and avoided. At CTS Partners, we built our practice on this philosophy. Our litigation work is rooted in preparation, advocacy, and navigating complex forums, while our advisory practice focuses on precise drafting, foresight, and regulatory clarity, sharpened by lessons from court.

    As Founding Partner, I ensure insights flow between the two. A dispute in arbitration refines our contract reviews, while advisory on transactions always factors potential litigation risks. This constant feedback loop is what makes us effective across both fronts.

    My vision for CTS Partners LLP is to be recognised not only for competence but for partnering with clients through the entire lifecycle of their ventures, from inception and compliance to disputes and enforcement. In a rapidly evolving legal market shaped by technology and sectoral change, we aim to combine the rigour of the traditional bar with innovation in delivery. With a deliberate focus on sectors like Aviation, Biotechnology, Renewable Energy, and Infrastructure, we seek to build a firm that creates enduring value for clients while shaping standards in emerging industries.

    Your grandfather, Hon’ble Mr. Justice K. N. Singh, was a towering figure in the legal fraternity. How did his guidance shape your professional philosophy and influence your career choices?

    Law in my family has never been just a profession, it has been a legacy of values passed across generations. My great-grandfather was a judge, my grandfather, Hon’ble Mr. Justice K. N. Singh, served as the 22nd Chief Justice of India, and several of my uncles and cousins have served on the Bench. Growing up, the lessons came not from books, but from conversations with my grandfather where governance, justice, and human dignity were discussed as naturally as daily affairs.

    The principle he impressed upon me was simple: “You may choose to earn or choose to learn. If you choose to learn today, Lady Law shall ensure you never have to worry about the other.” From him I learned that credibility rests on preparation, judgment, and integrity, not just oratory. Even after holding the highest judicial office, he valued respectful disagreement if it was backed by logic and research. That humility before the law left a lasting mark on me. I still recall my first matter, a bail application under the Official Secrets Act. Nervous as I was, I narrated every detail to him afterwards. His focus was not the outcome, but the strategy, questions of law, and procedural nuances. The lesson was clear: never enter a courtroom unprepared.

    These principles have remained my compass. Whether arguing corporate disputes, pursuing PILs, or handling sensitive criminal trials, every brief is a trust placed in my hands, to be discharged with integrity and dignity. My family’s service to the law is not a pedestal for me to stand on, but a standard to live up to. Legacy, in my view, lies not in offices held, but in the work you do case by case, client by client, cause by cause.

    You have worked extensively in the aviation sector, including regulatory compliance, aircraft leasing, and contractual review involving sovereign obligations and global norms. What are the sector specific challenges you encounter, and how do you balance domestic legal frameworks with international regulatory requirements?

    My work in the aviation sector began with PSUs such as Air India Engineering Services Ltd. (AIESL), where every matter sits at the intersection of domestic law, international treaties, and operational realities. Whether it is a long-term aircraft lease, an MRO agreement, or a procurement contract, the advice must be technically sound, commercially viable, and compliant with sovereign obligations.

    The sector’s foremost challenge is reconciling India’s regulatory framework with global commitments. For instance, an aircraft lease must satisfy the Cape Town Convention while also meeting the Directorate General of Civil Aviation’s requirements. Counsel must draft provisions that withstand scrutiny in Indian courts yet remain recognisable abroad. The PSU context adds another layer, requiring compliance with General Financial Rules and vigilance norms, often at odds with international market standards. Bridging this gap without diluting compliance or commercial feasibility is where legal strategy becomes critical.

    Aviation also evolves faster than legislation. Engine configurations, safety protocols, and maintenance cycles change constantly, making flexibility in drafting essential. This requires working closely with engineers, procurement teams, and regulators so that legal language keeps pace with operational realities.

    Balancing domestic and international frameworks comes down to identifying the non-negotiables: statutory mandates, governmental approvals, and compliance procedures on one hand; treaty obligations, OEM standards, and global safety norms on the other. Once these are secured, agreements and dispute strategies can be structured to preserve both sides. In aviation, the cost of error is never just financial – it touches reputation and safety. That is why I approach every matter with the objective of delivering solutions that are watertight in compliance, workable in execution, and defensible before both domestic regulators and international counterparties.

    You have worked on plant genetics and environmental sustainability. How do you see biotechnology law evolving in India, especially in light of climate change and sustainability concerns?

    My engagement with biotechnology law has been rooted in real-world solutions. A case in point is my intervention before the Hon’ble Delhi High Court on the city’s air pollution crisis, where I proposed structured plantation of tissue-cultured Bamboo developed through plant genetics. This variety grows at nearly 1.5 feet per day, reaching 40 feet within two years, is non-invasive, requires minimal maintenance, and has one of the highest carbon absorption capacities among terrestrial plants. Its significance goes beyond ecology—it is also a raw material for CNG, ethanol, and electricity generation, aligning environmental goals with renewable energy targets, employment generation, and revenue creation for the State.

    This experience reflects the direction in which biotechnology law in India must evolve. Our current framework, spanning plant variety protection, patents, biosafety rules, and biodiversity obligations, largely operates in silos, whereas real biotechnology projects cut across them. As climate change accelerates, the law will need to shift from merely managing risk to actively enabling innovation with measurable environmental and social value.

    Three changes are critical. First, integrating climate and sustainability targets into sectoral approvals so projects with clear ecological benefits face streamlined pathways. Second, creating predictable and time-bound regulatory clearance systems that allow innovators to move from laboratory to field efficiently. Third, balancing commercial exploitation with safeguards for biodiversity, soil health, and community rights. My experience shows that when legal strategy is integrated at the inception of a scientific plan, both compliance and commercial viability are far more likely. The future of biotechnology law in India lies in anticipating regulatory concerns early while enabling science to deliver climate resilience, food security, and economic opportunity.

    In the media and entertainment industry, you have handled intellectual property rights, contractual enforcement, and content regulation. How do you approach safeguarding creative rights in an age where digital content is expanding at an unprecedented pace?

    Safeguarding creative rights today requires more than reactive enforcement. With content created and distributed at unprecedented speed, the law must be embedded from the inception of a project. Contracts need to be precise and anticipatory, covering ownership, attribution, territories, and protection across emerging platforms, including streaming, interactive media, and AI-assisted formats.

    Infringement now extends beyond copying to unauthorised adaptations, derivative works, and misappropriation of concepts. My role is to anticipate these risks and ensure that protective clauses and enforcement mechanisms are in place upfront. Globally, frameworks like the US Digital Millennium Copyright Act provide structured procedures for takedowns and intermediary liability. India, however, still relies on broader provisions under the Information Technology Act, which were not designed for AI-driven content or mass online distribution. This absence of a dedicated framework, especially for AI training on copyrighted material, creates significant gaps for creators.

    In this environment, I adopt a proactive approach: contracts that are both jurisdiction-specific and internationally aware, active monitoring of infringement, and swift enforcement across forums. Protecting creative investment requires foresight and adaptability. My objective is to ensure creators can innovate and share their work with confidence, knowing their rights remain secure even as technology evolves.

    What has been one of the most challenging cases in your career, and how did you navigate the legal and personal complexities involved?

    In the course of practice, we encounter matters that test our interpretation of law, our procedural skill, or our ability to strategize under pressure. Then there are cases that demand far more, cases that place you directly before the rawest realities of human cruelty and compel you to carry forth with both the composure of an advocate and the compassion of a human being.

    One of the most difficult matters I have ever handled involved grave offences under Sections 376 and 377 of the Indian Penal Code, along with offences under the POCSO Act. The accused included the father of the victims, a young girl and her brother along with his associates. Representing the children in such circumstances is not merely about applying the statute. It requires a trauma informed approach, where every interaction is measured, where every question is weighed against the risk of inflicting further pain, and where the dignity of the victims is the paramount consideration. The courtroom in such matters is not just a place of law, it becomes a place where emotional safeguards are as vital as legal safeguards.

    What made this case uniquely difficult for me was how close it felt to home. My own nieces and nephews are of the same age as the victims. In the conference, as I listened to these children speak about their lives, their words were those of any child – school, friends, small joys, yet behind them lay a history no child should have to bear. In their eyes I could see my own kin, and that realisation was unsettling. It is one thing to know the facts as counsel, and quite another to feel them through the lens of your own family. The challenge was to channel that proximity into determination rather than distraction. The law required me to be measured, precise, and unwavering in court, while the human reality urged me to protect them as if they were my own. Every procedural choice, every submission, had to preserve the strength of the case while ensuring the children did not have to relive the trauma unnecessarily.

    In the end, what stays with me is not just the legal conclusion but the resilience of those two young lives. Despite their ordeal, they bore themselves with a quiet strength that left an impression far deeper than any verdict could. For me, this case was a stark reminder that advocacy is not only about securing justice on paper, but also about ensuring that those we represent are met with dignity, protection, and faith in the process.

    From environmental issues to governance reforms, your PIL work has addressed causes of broad public significance. In your view, what role will PILs play in shaping India’s legal landscape over the next 20 years?

    Public Interest Litigation has been one of India’s most transformative judicial innovations, allowing citizens to seek structural remedies for systemic wrongs. Its strength lies in a legacy built on landmark interventions: from Kesavananda Bharati’s Basic Structure doctrine which expanded judicial responsibility, to M.C. Mehta’s environmental cases that introduced CNG in Delhi’s transport fleet, to Vishaka which created an entirely new framework against workplace harassment. These cases show how PILs can reshape governance where legislation lags.

    When I intervened in Delhi’s air pollution crisis, I sought not rhetoric but a science-based solution: structured plantation of high-yield tissue-cultured Bamboo with extraordinary carbon absorption capacity and multiple commercial uses in clean fuels. The aim was to confront ecological, economic, and employment concerns in a single implementable measure.

    Looking ahead, the frontier of PILs will broaden to issues like climate change, cross-border crimes, digital privacy, and algorithmic governance. With India yet to enact a comprehensive AI law, it is conceivable that the first major questions of AI ethics and accountability will reach the courts through PILs. The challenge will be to preserve credibility by ensuring PILs remain grounded in research, evidence, and workable outcomes rather than quick, media-driven filings.

    If pursued with rigour and foresight, PILs will remain one of the most powerful levers of systemic reform, holding the State accountable, shaping public policy, and safeguarding constitutional values for the next generation.

    You have been active in mentorship and legal aid. What advice would you give young lawyers who aspire to appear in higher courts and work across diverse legal domains?

    The first thing I realised in practice is that there is no shortcut in law. This profession is not a place for instant gratification. The cases that test you, the seniors who challenge you, and the long hours of research for a matter that may be over in two minutes in court, all form part of the process that shapes a lawyer’s instinct.

    For those aspiring to appear before the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the High Courts, or even specialised tribunals, it is essential to understand that higher court practice is not built on clever argumentation alone. It rests on a solid command over facts, procedure, and precedent, as well as the ability to anticipate the bench’s concerns and respond with clarity. This requires discipline in preparation, not just reading the brief but living with it until every argument becomes second nature. Equally important is the ability to listen. Sometimes, knowing when not to speak is as strategic as knowing what to say.

    In my own journey, one of the most formative experiences was working with Hon’ble Mr. Justice R. S. Endlaw, Retired Judge of the Delhi High Court. He not only taught me how to carry myself in court but also encouraged me to observe the craft of Senior Advocates who argued complex matters before him. He would remind us that the art of advocacy lies as much in how an argument is presented as in the law that supports it. From him, I also learnt the discipline of research, not simply gathering material, but knowing what to look for, how to sift through competing strands of law, and how to present it with clarity. Perhaps most importantly, working under him gave me perspective on how a Judge, not one from my own family background but from outside, views a matter. To this day, I try to place myself in that position, to imagine how a Judge thinks, reacts, and weighs an argument. That training continues to guide me.

    In terms of practice, I feel that the wide range of matters I have handled—from aviation and energy to medical science and biotechnology, has been a real advantage. Some of these areas are highly technical, but that is precisely what the profession demands: the ability to absorb, adapt, and make sense of disciplines far outside one’s own training. The law, by its very design, pushes you to step beyond comfort zones and to develop the capacity to present almost anything with clarity and conviction. In India, this adaptability is becoming even more important. With a rapidly expanding Bar, seniors with decades of experience, and the recent entry of foreign law firms, competition is only going to get more intense. Against that backdrop, being multifaceted is not simply a matter of choice but of survival and effectiveness, since clients increasingly expect lawyers who can handle diverse and often overlapping fields. This is not to suggest that there is anything wrong with focusing on a single specialised field. But in our system, cultivating breadth in the early years gives a young lawyer resilience, perspective, and the confidence to meet very different kinds of challenges.

    Lastly, I believe it is important to never lose sight of the fact that law is a profession of service. Mentorship, legal aid, and pro bono work are not optional extras. They are reminders of why many of us entered the field in the first place. Whether representing a corporation in a regulatory matter or a victim in a criminal trial, the lawyer’s role is not just to safeguard rights but to protect dignity and trust. If one carries that ethic forward, higher courts will not only be places to appear in, but arenas where a lawyer can contribute meaningfully to the living fabric of the law.

    Get in touch with Shashank Singh –

  • “The principle that has guided me from the beginning is: Blend legal precision with business pragmatism.” – Saarth Dhingra, AGM-Legal at GMR Airports.

    “The principle that has guided me from the beginning is: Blend legal precision with business pragmatism.” – Saarth Dhingra, AGM-Legal at GMR Airports.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Having spent over a decade in the legal industry, handling diverse areas such as contract management, litigation and arbitration, trademarks, and legal advisory, what drew you toward in-house roles instead of pursuing a traditional litigation career?

    Over the years, I found myself more inclined toward roles where legal expertise is closely integrated with business strategy. While litigation offers its own challenges, I was drawn to in-house positions because they allow for ongoing engagement with the business, where legal input can shape decisions early and support long-term objectives. What appealed to me most was the breadth of exposure from contracts and disputes to intellectual property along with the ability to work cross-functionally. I’ve always enjoyed being a trusted advisor, not just resolving issues but helping prevent them through practical, forward-looking counsel. In-house legal work gave me the platform to apply the law in a commercially meaningful way, contribute to enterprise-wide goals, and build deeper relationships across the organization. That level of involvement and impact is what truly motivates me.

    Could you share a bit about your law school journey? What inspired you to pursue a career in law, and how did your LL.M. in Corporate & Financial Law shape your legal perspective and contribute to your long-term growth?

    My journey through law school was both intellectually stimulating and personally grounding—it confirmed that law was the right path for me. I was drawn to the clarity and structure that legal thinking brings, especially in navigating complex business scenarios. Early on, I realized I wanted to work at the intersection of law and commerce, where legal insight directly influences strategic decisions.

    What led me to pursue an LL.M. in Corporate & Financial Law from O.P. Jindal Global University (OPJGU) was a desire to deepen my expertise in areas that shape how businesses operate—corporate governance, M&A, financial regulation and cross-border transactions. The program not only sharpened my technical knowledge but also gave me a broader, international outlook, which has been essential in working with diverse industries and stakeholders. This academic grounding has played a pivotal role in my in-house journey. It equipped me to approach legal challenges with a commercial mindset, engage confidently with leadership, and contribute to sustainable, compliant business growth. OPJGU was established as a philanthropic initiative of its Founding Chancellor, Mr. Naveen Jindal, and I am truly indebted to him for establishing a world class university in India which has shaped the future of thousands of students globally including helping me in becoming a successful in-house counsel and working for giants like JSPL, BPCL, ReNew and GMR.

    You began your career with an in-house role, a path not many young professionals take right away. What early experiences or challenges helped build your legal foundation and shape your approach to corporate practice?

    Starting my legal career in an in-house role gave me a unique head start as it allowed me to understand the commercial realities of legal work from day one. Rather than focusing solely on theory or litigation procedure, I was immediately immersed in how legal decisions impact daily business operations and long-term strategy. One of the earliest challenges I faced was learning to tailor legal advice in a way that was both accurate and actionable for non-legal stakeholders. It pushed me to think beyond just identifying issues. I had to propose workable solutions that aligned with the company’s goals and risk appetite. Those early responsibilities, whether it was reviewing contracts, supporting compliance efforts, or advising internal teams, taught me to be responsive, business-minded, and pragmatic. They laid the groundwork for the way I practice today with a clear focus on enabling the business while managing legal risk thoughtfully.

    Over the years, you’ve held in-house roles across various organizations. How has each experience contributed to your legal and leadership development, and in what ways do these roles continue to influence your current position?

    Every in-house role I’ve taken on has added a different layer to my legal and leadership journey. Working across varied sectors and organizations has helped me develop a broad perspective and a flexible approach to handling legal challenges. It’s taught me to quickly understand business priorities and align legal strategies accordingly. Along the way, I’ve learned to navigate cross-functional dynamics, manage stakeholder expectations, and lead initiatives that have both legal and commercial impact. These collective experiences continue to influence how I work today; whether it’s offering practical, business-oriented legal advice, leading teams, or mentoring junior colleagues. They’ve shaped me into a legal professional who’s not just reactive, but someone who adds value proactively across the business.

    At GMR, you manage end-to-end contracts for the entire non-aero business across India. What are some of the recurring challenges you face during contract negotiations in this sector, and how do you typically address them?

    Working in the non-aero space at GMR Airports, one of the recurring challenges during contract negotiations is managing the varied expectations of diverse stakeholders from retail and F&B partners to service providers while staying within a strict regulatory framework. Each agreement involves a careful balance between commercial viability, operational flexibility, and legal compliance. Negotiations often involve complex revenue-sharing models and long-term commitments, which require clarity around deliverables, risk allocation, and exit rights. It can also be challenging to tailor terms that satisfy business teams yet remain aligned with airport concession requirements and regulatory obligations. To navigate this, I intend to focus on building structured, practical agreements with well-defined roles and responsibilities. I work closely with the internal teams to ensure business goals are captured clearly, while also ensuring the contract holds up to legal and compliance standards.

    What are the key legal complexities you encounter during due diligence in airport-sector transactions, especially when working with international investors or structuring joint ventures?

    In my opinion, due diligence in the airport sector, particularly when dealing with global investors or joint ventures, is layered and complex due to the regulated nature of airport operations and the involvement of public authorities. The first area of scrutiny is usually the concession agreement where we assess whether rights can be transferred, what limitations exist, and whether any government approvals could delay or derail the transaction. Issues like land tenure, encumbrances, and use restrictions are also critical, especially since many airport projects are developed on leased government land or under public-private partnership models. These factors often carry legal and operational risks that must be identified early. When foreign investors are involved, we also have to navigate FDI regulations, security clearance requirements, and ensure the investment structure complies with both aviation sector guidelines and company law. In joint venture setups, we focus on clarity around governance, economic rights, dispute resolution, and exit options, which can get intricate in a sector with long concession cycles. To address all this, we ensure to carry out detailed legal risk mapping, engage with stakeholders to understand regulatory expectations, and build robust representations and warranties into the deal documents. This helps ensure transparency and long-term sustainability for all parties involved.

    What advice would you offer to young legal professionals aiming to build a career in corporate law or enter in-house roles early on? Are there particular skills or experiences you believe they should focus on?

    For those starting out in corporate law or looking to join an in-house team early in their careers, I’d recommend focusing on building a well-rounded foundation not just in legal knowledge, but also in understanding how businesses function. Getting comfortable with contracts, compliance, and risk assessment early on will give you a strong advantage. It’s equally important to develop clear and concise communication skills, because in-house lawyers often act as bridges between legal and non-legal teams. I’d also advise young professionals to prioritize adaptability and commercial thinking and the ability to align legal advice with business goals is key in any corporate role. Real-world exposure, even through internships or secondments, can be more valuable than purely academic achievements. Lastly, find mentors, ask questions, and stay engaged with both legal and business trends. The more proactive and curious you are, the faster you’ll grow into a trusted advisor.

    What guiding principle has stayed with you throughout your career, and how does it shape your professional outlook today? What is your vision for the future, both personally and for the legal profession?

    The principle that has guided me from the beginning is: “Blend legal precision with business pragmatism.” This approach has helped me stay grounded in legal integrity while ensuring my advice adds real value to the business. It’s about being a protector of the organization’s interests, but also a facilitator of its goals. Even today, I focus on being solution-oriented and commercially aligned, especially in high-stakes or cross-functional matters. I believe that legal professionals should be trusted not just for their knowledge, but for their ability to guide outcomes and build confidence. In the future, I see myself stepping further into leadership and mentorship roles, using my experience to support both the organization and younger legal talent. As for the profession, I envision a shift toward more agile, tech-savvy legal teams, i.e. the ones that integrate deeply with business strategy and act as co-creators of value, not just risk managers.

    Get in touch with Saarth Dhingra –

  • “If you enjoy the law, keep your head down and work when times get tough, respect your seniors, there are enough reasons to pursue your journey.” – Udayan Verma, Independent Legal Practitioner.

    “If you enjoy the law, keep your head down and work when times get tough, respect your seniors, there are enough reasons to pursue your journey.” – Udayan Verma, Independent Legal Practitioner.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    You’ve built a distinguished independent practice, representing both high-stakes private clients and government enterprises. What inspired your transition from being an Associate under a Senior Advocate to establish your own practice?

    Thank you very much. As much as I appreciate the kind gesture, I feel it is too soon to say that I have a distinguished practice. I am definitely humbled and grateful by the opportunities that have come my way; there is still a lot of learning left and I hope to achieve more at the right time.  

    While practicing law, as one matures and learns to grasp how the legal industry operates in India, one reaches a stage where there is a simultaneous urge to make your own mark in the profession. One’s personal aspirations coupled with the rigorous training which is undertaken during the initial years of practice leads one to desire more from their capabilities as a lawyer. You get down to brass tacks, work on your thought-process and make an honest attempt at handling a legal brief sans supervision. In the process, you wish to hold your own turf, work with the tools which you have gathered, seek client(s) and navigate the case accordingly. You also become accountable and feel ready to take the flak when things don’t go as per expectations. In essence, this feeling is very subjective and the inflection point cannot be attributed to a single event.

    To answer your query, I feel ‘inspiration’ is not a linear term. It can come from the mundane to the magnificent moments of your personal and professional endeavours. They are building blocks of your personality which end up getting chronicled in the vicissitudes of life. In my case, there have been various instances which have inspired me to cut the cord and carry my own weight. Growing up in New Delhi one has an early exposure to the power corridors and legal circles of India. One of the earliest exposures which I can recollect is watching parliamentary debates and reading interviews of many senior lawyers and distinguished legal luminaries.  This was a constant source of inspiration during my formative years. A chance-meet with some of the prominent figures in the legal world was also a source of encouragement to consider joining the profession.  

    While these are contributory factors, I owe substantial credit to my Senior Mr. Prashanto C. Sen, Sr. Advocate who, being a first-generation lawyer, has established a flourishing litigation practice in India. His noble approach to the profession, impeccable standards and going the extra mile to serve the legal needs of his clientele inspired me the most. While taking me under his wings, he not only taught me the fundamentals of law; his training and invaluable wisdom which I imbibed, helped me come out of my shell at an early stage of my litigation career and further encouraged me to start my own practice.  

    Your practice spans infrastructure, mining, energy, and arbitration sectors known for their complexity and regulatory intensity. What drew you to these domains, and how did your early exposure during internships and associate years influence this path?

    Yes, my practice till now has ended up within the four corners of these domains that you have mentioned. Just to give you a brief overview, after graduating in B.A. (Hons.) from the University of Delhi where I read Economics, I pursued the three-year LL.B. course at Campus Law Centre, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi. While attending law school, I used to be drawn towards understanding the dynamics of laws and regulations which are applicable while conducting business activities and commercial dealings. This was probably because of my background in Economics which is a commercially – oriented field. 

    With time I was clear that I would like to gain further knowledge and deeper insights into commercial laws which are applied in business affairs. My interests and curiosity piqued during Company Law classes at CLC, and I wanted to further analyse how these laws end up navigating businesses in the real world. In order to see whether I fit into these domains, apart from general reading at law school, I simultaneously undertook multiple legal internships at some of the most prestigious law firms as well as the Attorney General of India’s office. My internship days taught me the basics of not just corporate law practice but also how to conduct oneself in law firms. Although as interns we had limited roles, it was during these rigorous training sessions that I got the initial exposure to these domains. At corporate law firms, I was able to understand how lawyers apply the law on a day-to-day basis to help corporations and other businesses solve complex legal issues in these sectors. I was fortunate to intern under some of the best legal minds in the country, many of whom showed excellent qualities of being a lawyer and were very patient with the younger lot.  

    When I decided to pursue a career in litigation, Commercial Litigation and Disputes Resolution came as a natural choice since it includes a mix of both – appearing before judicial forums and practicing commercial laws. It also includes within its fold advisory, ADR and counsel work. I chose counsel-chamber practice since there is more responsibility which is put on your shoulders thereby shortening the learning curve. In chamber practice, you are directly dealing with clients while single handedly assisting your Senior. 

    Importantly, Mining, energy and other areas of the infrastructure sector are highly regulated and routinely end up being exposed to major and complex litigations against the State. They require consistent consultations with counsels, legal experts and sectoral specialists. I was lucky to be selected at the Chambers of Mr. Prashanto Sen, SA to start my legal career.  It was during my initial days as an Associate where I got a proper exposure to these domains.  During my term as an Associate, I was tasked with handling very high stakes litigations for not just infrastructure MNCs but also government/PSU bodies as well as sector-Regulators such as CCI and AERA. This was a golden opportunity since one got to analyse issues from both ends of the spectrum – as a private entity as well as a public body. We were tasked with counsel work in diverse fields of law and I was taking care of briefs concerning three major sectors: mining, electricity and aviation. I was therefore very fortunate to get the right exposure in these fields at an early stage of my litigation career, and perhaps this was the inflection point since the exposure helped me shape my domain knowledge, and provided the required impetus to refine my legal craft. 

    Representing clients in high-stakes disputes involves navigating regulatory and commercial pressures. Could you share a particularly challenging or defining case and how was your experience dealing with it?

    That is correct, it is a high-pressure area of practice. Room for error is minimal.  The stakes are very high and the timelines equally rigid.  

    Till date, one of the most challenging and defining cases as an Independent Counsel has been C.A. No. 262/2020 (titled Vedanta Ltd. v. R.N. Mohapatra and Ors.) where I was engaged before the High Court in writ proceedings as well as the Supreme Court. The case involved various complex and interesting legal issue(s) concerning Constitutional Law, Contracts, Customs and Trade Law, Civil Contempt Jurisprudence. This litigation spanned over a period of close to 3 years and was one of my very first legal brief(s) as a newly-minted independent Counsel. It was during the course of this litigation that I ended up building great rapport with many able lawyers – both in-house and outside Counsels and commercial-management specialists with whom I still share a working relationship. I was also fortunate to have been guided by Senior in-house counsels and industry leaders, who were very kind to acknowledge my efforts and support me further in my practice.  

    I would say that handling high stakes disputes help you come out of your comfort zone as a lawyer. The experience(s) ends up educating you on the ground realities of how academic knowledge is to be applied whilst handling a matter, to the benefit of the client whose business interests are at stake and who is relying on your capabilities to assist them.

    These opportunities don’t knock on your doors very often; therefore, it is imperative that you take up such cases without any hesitation. You can always learn along the way. While handling these disputes one faces a lot of challenges – both professionally and personally – which end up testing your mettle. These cases are laborious and demand long hours which at times run into late nights and early mornings, working on weekends, gruelling schedules and exhausting deadlines, all while micromanaging immense pressure from the client. However, when you come out on the other end, you will always be satisfied irrespective of the outcome of the case and be glad that you pushed through.

    Having advised both government enterprises and Fortune 500 companies, what key differences have you observed in their legal cultures, decision-making processes, and approaches to risk?

    In my limited experience, I would say that the legal culture per se is not very distinguishable. At the end of the day both sets of corporations engage lawyers who play a very specific role. Lawyers have their tasks cut out and are only performing their duties as per the terms of engagement/Vakalat.  

    While it is true that private and public corporations have their distinct characteristics and cultures, both do have their sector-specific targets and goals which are required to be fulfilled at all times. The legal team(s) of both are answerable to the management’s needs. Thus, at a macro level and from the outside one does not feel that there is much difference in the day-to-day operations and engagements. 

    I cannot comment much on the decision-making process of either of the two, but I would say that there is a certain level of risk-taking appetite, which is much higher in private corporations as compared to government enterprises. This is borne out of various factors: Private corporations are Laser-focused on profitable outcomes of their decisions with minimal externalities. The time lines are very strict and there is little to no room for any ambiguity. The targets and management/commercial asks are very clearly classified and is percolated through a chain of command. As a corollary, the expectations from an outside Counsel also becomes crystal clear. Private corporations are democratic in that there is much more room to express creative ideas, out-of-the-box thinking is encouraged during conferences and at times appreciated. Frankly, one sees a very peculiar pattern where, due to the fact that private organisations encourage quick and bold decision-making efforts, the unnecessary clutter and irrelevant thought process are weeded out at the very initial stages of brainstorming, helping the team to clearly demarcate the tasks at hand and focus on the relevant issues. 

    On the other hand, PSEs work in a more conservative fashion but are professional in their conduct. There are already established norms and set patterns/traditions which are adhered to and followed while performing the tasks at these organisations. I would say that the propensity-appetite to take risks in PSEs are much lower and there is a consistent effort to avert exposure to untoward outcomes. Being a government company which is answerable to the state exchequer and other departments, a PSE always has a touch of public duty in their actions which ends up contributing to the behaviour of not being very intrepid. This factor is ingrained in the functioning of many PSEs and is reflected while handing litigations and taking decisions. PSEs do command a lot of admiration and respect for the work which they are doing in the infrastructure domain – they are very clear on their roles and the primary objective of building the nation. In that pursuit, many are working tirelessly to achieve this goal.

    You initially studied economics before pursuing law. What led you to choose a career in law, and how has your academic grounding in economics complemented your legal work?

    This is a very interesting question. I will say that an error of judgment led me into reading economics which then led me to law. It was during my first year of graduation at Sri Venkateswara College (University of Delhi) where I read taxation and basics of Public Economics. I had an epiphany and I started reading more basics of law which was available in the University library. This made me realise that law was my actual calling throughout. Since I did not want to let go of the opportunity of pursuing a coveted course such as Economics from DU, I decided to sit tight and then pursue the three-year LL.B. course offered by the Faculty of Law, University of Delhi. 

    Although Economics and Law only converge in certain specific legal fields such as Competition/Anti-Trust, Aviation, etc., in my personal opinion I feel Economics helped me to a great extent in shaping my commercial analyses of legal issues. B.A. (H) Economics is rigorous and is a highly analytical course rooted in problem solving capabilities. Further, commercial clients need a result-oriented approach to a dispute. The grounding in economics certainly complemented my legal work and till date helps me understand business-commercial needs in a better fashion.

    For young litigators looking to build a niche in infrastructure or regulatory disputes, what skills and experiences should they focus on early in their careers?

    For young litigators my advice is to undertake a lot of drafting work during the initial years of their career. Drafting is like solving mathematical equations – the more you do it the more skilled you become. Secondly, stay up to date with what’s happening around the world – read at least 2 national dailies. It is very important that your client believes that their lawyer is not living under a rock! Thirdly, you need to know which laws and bare acts to look into whilst dealing with a client query – while no one expects you to verbatim learn the statutes, it is expected that you can figure out the applicable laws on the issues. This comes with practice and it is important that you keep revising the bare acts occasionally/during vacations. Fourthly, it is a harsh suggestion but in order to survive in litigation you cannot look at the clock till you finish a task – infrastructure and regulatory sector is a very demanding branch with gruelling working hours. Just like building muscles during strength training, you need to build stamina to brave the requirements in independent practice. The longer hours you pull during your initial days will make or break your practice in the subsequent years. So be ready to give it your all. Lastly, and most importantly no matter how much pressure is put on you or how powerful your clientele is, never compromise on your ethics and integrity. Go to bed with a clean conscience. As Advocates, the Standards of Professional Conduct and Etiquette under the Advocates Act, 1961 is our Holy Scripture. As Officers of the Court, it is our solemn duty to uphold the Code’s sanctity. Make sure your professional standards don’t drop by any margin whatsoever. 

    What’s one core principle or motto that has guided your legal journey? How do you envision the growth of your practice and your role in the evolving legal landscape of India?

    There is a Latin phrase ‘Incende naves’ which means burn the ships. It isn’t about ships, it is about committing oneself to a belief, and striving towards achieving your goals and endeavours to the best of your abilities without looking back. This core principle has guided my legal journey from the day I stepped into law school. Legal practice (of any nature – litigation/corporate) is a complicated voyage riddled with uncertainties and externalities. I believe in order to survive in litigation you need this core principle ingrained in you at a very initial stage of life. If you enjoy the law, keep your head down and work when times get tough, respect your seniors, there are enough reasons to pursue your journey. 

    To answer your other question, I feel litigation and disputes practice is here to stay notwithstanding the onset of the Artificial Intelligence revolution across fields. Law is a distinct arena where no matter how much technology one infuses, one will always need the reassurance of a legal mind and a human touch. The legal landscape of India is definitely undergoing successive churns; this is part and parcel of a growing economy. I am looking forward to seeing more ADR mechanisms being put in place. I see a significant growth in arbitration as well as mediation sectors in the next couple of years. While my practice is already within the core litigation space, I do envision to move more and more into the arbitration and other ADR practice. There is a lot of work to be done in these fields. 

    With a practice that spans high-stakes matters and sectoral expertise, how do you maintain personal balance, and what keeps you intellectually and professionally motivated in the long run?

    In independent practice, how you manage your time is mostly up to you. It is important to have a daily routine and more important to stick to it. In my case, there are days when you don’t get time to even sit for a minute, but then there are days which are fairly light. So, I balance it out. On lighter days I do strength training, read a lot of non-fiction books (especially on current affairs, economics, etc.), and occasionally travel with family. 

    In the long run, the only thing which motivates you is your passion for law, helping people in need, and knowing that you are now part of a very illustrious and prestigious community, be it litigation or transactional practice. There is fairly no other stream of motivation because your career is not a straight steam-lined path. In order to find more motivation, it is important that you go to courts even on days when you don’t have a matter listed, sit and observe the judges as well as the seniors who are arguing a case, stay up to date on any important judgments and maintain very healthy professional boundaries between your practice and your clientele. 

    Get in touch with Udayan Verma –

  • “The key to building a successful legal career is to have a strong understanding of core legal principles. I would advise law students to intern in different practice areas and gain experience in both litigation and corporate law.” – Mansi Singh, Partner at BTG Advaya.

    “The key to building a successful legal career is to have a strong understanding of core legal principles. I would advise law students to intern in different practice areas and gain experience in both litigation and corporate law.” – Mansi Singh, Partner at BTG Advaya.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    With your distinguished and extensive legal career, could you share the initial catalyst that sparked your passion for law? Was there a defining moment or experience that led you to pursue this field, or did your interest develop gradually over time?

    I arrived at my career choice after exploring various options and narrowing down the ones that did not align with my interests or goals. In other words, I kind of chose this career by crossing out everything I did not want to do but once I chose my career path, I dedicated myself fully to it. I consistently worked hard to develop my skills and grow within the field. 

    Looking back at the early stages of your career, what were some key experiences that significantly enhanced your understanding of the law? How did these formative moments influence the direction and trajectory of your professional journey?

    In the early stages of my career, the key learnings came from actual exposure to client work which also included litigation where observing court proceedings and drafting pleadings gave me a strong understanding of the real-world application of legal principles. On the corporate front, client interactions and negotiations helped me understand legal documents from a business perspective. I learnt that no client is looking for a lengthy memo full of disclaimers. Clients seek practical, commercial and easy to implement legal advice. While a strong understanding of the law is of the utmost importance, it is crucial to find business friendly solutions for the client. 

    Another defining moment for me was winning the International Bar Association’s Aviation Law Committee’s Annual Scholarship in 2017 and travelling to Sydney for the Annual Conference. This included an opportunity to make a presentation before senior legal professionals. The IBA conference brings together thousands of legal professionals from across the globe. The opportunity to interact with senior lawyers from different jurisdictions helped me understand the legal trends, opportunities and challenges faced by lawyers in different parts of the world. It also helped me improve my communication skills by engaging in panel discussions and networking events. Most importantly, I made many global connections that I truly cherish. 

    I have also been lucky to find mentors who trusted me when I was a young lawyer trying to understand the nuances of legal practice. Mona Bhide, Managing Partner, Dave & Girish & Co. and Ramesh Vaidyanathan, Managing Partner, BTG Advaya have been instrumental in shaping my growth by not only providing guidance on navigating complex legal issues but also invaluable insights on balancing personal and professional growth.

    Your practice involves advising both multinational and domestic corporations on various corporate and commercial matters. Could you outline some of the primary challenges companies encounter when doing business in India, and how do you assist them in overcoming these obstacles?

    Doing business in India, entails navigating a complex regulatory landscape. Any person looking to invest in India must perform due diligence to ensure that they can invest in the planned activities. It is important to include sufficient contingencies in planning and timelines for setting up business in India.  Indian company laws and labor laws set out extensive operational requirements, and non-compliances can lead to fines, penalties, and criminal liability, including liability attaching to directors and management of the Indian company. The key to successfully doing business in India is to have experienced legal advisors and compliance managers and maintain an annual audit checklist. 

    Corruption risks in India are generally perceived to be high due to the bureaucratic environment, particularly in specialized sectors such as government procurement and real estate. I advise my clients to clearly communicate the company’s ‘zero tolerance’ policy towards corruption and institute whistleblower and anti-bribery training programs for India-specific projects.

    India’s tax regime is complex and evolving, with stringent compliance requirements. The nuances of Indian tax laws and documentation requirements can significantly impact transaction structures. Failure to address these tax considerations early can lead to unexpected tax costs, compliance delays, and potential legal challenges, ultimately derailing business objectives. A proactive approach to Indian tax planning is essential to avoid surprises and safeguard strategic goals.

    As an external member of Internal Committees under the anti-sexual harassment law, what are the key legal considerations companies should keep in mind when establishing these committees? How do you ensure they effectively address complaints and foster a safe working environment?

    The Prevention of Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (“POSH Act”) requires an employer to set up an Internal Committee (“IC”) at each office of an organization employing ten or more employees to hear and redress grievances pertaining to sexual harassment. There must be a minimum of four IC members including a senior level woman employee as the Presiding Officer, two other members from employees and an external member. While the minimum requirement is to have four IC members, it is advisable for the IC to have an odd number of members to effectively address any conflicts that may arise. 

    Further, it is important to sensitize employees and train IC members about the requirements of the POSH Act. Many companies rely on online training platforms for employee education but conducting at least one in-person workshop every year led by a professional expert in this field can offer employees and the IC a comprehensive understanding of the POSH Act. Some key aspects that the IC must keep in mind while addressing sexual harassment complaints is that sexual harassment is not just about the man’s intent but the women’s perception, the IC must follow principles of natural justice and provide fair opportunity to both the parties to make their submissions, act in an unbiased manner as per due process, maintain confidentiality and ensure non-retaliation at all times. The IC must document/record every aspect of the enquiry process and adopt an empathetic, objective and fair approach. 

    With your extensive experience in aviation law, particularly regarding aircraft registration and deregistration, what are some of the primary legal and regulatory challenges in these processes? How do you support your clients in ensuring compliance with aviation regulations?

    Registration of an aircraft is a comparatively easier process, but clients often face challenges during deregistration and repossession of aircraft. In case of leased aircraft, once an application is received from an aircraft lessor being the irrevocable deregistration and export request authorization (IDERA) holder in the prescribed format, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (“DGCA”) must deregister the aircraft within 5 working days. However, the airport operator must be paid the dues relating to the aircraft if the same are unpaid. Similarly, any other entity that has outstanding dues pertaining to the aircraft may also submit their claims to the DGCA. In cases where the lessee refuses to make the above payments, the lessors often end up paying them on behalf of the lessee and thereafter recovering them from the lessee is often an expensive and time-consuming process. 

    India acceded to the Cape Town Convention in 2008, but an enabling legislation was not passed. As a result, some domestic laws such as the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC”) conflicted with the provisions of the Cape Town Convention. If an airline filed for bankruptcy (such as the recent Go First case) the lessors were prohibited from repossessing their aircraft during the moratorium period. However, by way of a notification that was issued in October 2023, aircraft and aircraft equipment were exempted from the moratorium provisions under the IBC. Also, the Cape Town Convention Bill is presently awaiting Presidential assent to become the law. Once, the Cape Town Convention Bill is passed, it will accord supremacy to the Cape Town Convention and will streamline the process for deregistration and repossession of aircraft from India. 

    I assist my clients by providing them with regulatory and compliance support, assisting them in liaison with the DGCA and other regulatory authorities, assisting with drafting and reviewing transaction documents such as aircraft purchase and lease agreements and advice on structuring of transactions and risk mitigation strategies.

    In your practice involving airline operations, what are some of the most frequent consumer grievances, and what legal frameworks exist to address these issues?

    Most consumer grievances relate to delays, cancellations and refunds. The DGCA has launched the “AirSewa” web-portal/mobile application to deal with passenger grievances.  The Civil Aviation Requirements also provide for facilities/compensation to be provided to passengers by airlines due to denied boarding, cancellation of flights and delays in flights. Passengers can file grievances related to delays, cancellations, etc., on the AirSewa portal.   The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 also provides for remedies for passengers to claim compensation for any deficiency in the services provided by the airlines.

    As the Senior Vice Chair of the Aviation Law Committee of the International Bar Association and Chair of the India Wing of the International Aerospace Women’s Association, how do you envision the future of Indian aviation?

    The aviation industry in India has emerged as one of the fastest growing industries in the country and has recovered from the Covid-19 pandemic with passenger numbers exceeding the pre-COVID levels.  With disposable income in India growing, the demand for air travel will only keep increasing. To cater to the growing demand, the airlines in India have huge order books and the Government of India has been working towards increasing the number of airports. The success of Indian aviation will depend on infrastructure development to support the growing demand, policy reforms to meet global expectations and availability of skilled labor. Investments in emerging technologies with a focus on sustainability will also be an indispensable consideration for the growth of the industry. 

    For aspiring law students who wish to follow a similar career path, what advice would you offer in building a successful legal career? In today’s evolving legal landscape, especially with the growing impact of technology, what skills or personal attributes do you consider most vital for achieving long-term success?

    The key to building a successful legal career is to have a strong understanding of core legal principles. I would advise law students to intern in different practice areas and gain experience in both litigation and corporate law. This will help in understanding the full spectrum of legal work from courtroom procedures to commercial drafting and negotiations. Early exposure to different practices also helps in discovering one’s interests and strengths. Internships also provide an opportunity to build professional relationships, and this may open doors to future job opportunities.  Further, we live in a fast-paced world driven by technology and it’s a lot easier to stay updated today. One should inculcate a habit of reading every day to stay abreast of legal developments. 

    Throughout your career, what strategies do you employ to maintain a healthy work-life balance, and what advice would you offer to others seeking to balance career ambitions with personal responsibilities and community involvement? 

    Maintaining a healthy work-life balance is not always easy but you have to put that on your priority list. There will be days when you manage work better and there will be days when you manage your personal life better, there is no perfect balance. Prioritizing and having a written to-do list helps me to identify and focus on the most important tasks each day. Over the years I have also learnt the importance of saying ‘no’ without feeling guilty.  If you ever feel overwhelmed by the increasing workload that could result in stress or reduced productivity, I suggest having an open conversation with your seniors. 

    It is also important to build a strong support system. Having colleagues you can trust and rely on and having a family that supports your aspirations and well-being is the biggest blessing. Finally, invest in self-care. Try to find some time to exercise, sleep well and take that holiday that is on your bucket-list to re-energize yourself. Remember that you cannot pour from an empty cup. 

    Get in touch with Mansi Singh –

  • “A good cross-examination has the potential to turn litigation in your favor. Every day in a lawyer’s life is an experience and a learning.” – Rajesh Ramanathan, Partner, Factum Law

    “A good cross-examination has the potential to turn litigation in your favor. Every day in a lawyer’s life is an experience and a learning.” – Rajesh Ramanathan, Partner, Factum Law

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    What motivated you to pursue a career in law, and could you walk us through your journey from your early days in law school to becoming a partner at Factum Law? Additionally, could you share some of the challenges you encountered during the initial stages of your career and how you overcame them?

    The Question should be ‘Who?’ and not ‘What?”. I owe my professional life to my grandfather Mr. V.V. Ramanatha Iyer who was a prominent Lawyer in the Vellore District. As a school going kid, I used to accompany my grandfather to the Munisiff Court at Ranipet where he predominantly practised. It was his wish that I take after him. I joined Law School much against the wishes of my mother who like many others at that time thought that I would end up a Lier to be a successful lawyer. It took a while to convince her and she reluctantly agreed after I promised her that I will not Lie. It was my grandfather who sowed the seed in me to be a Lawyer and it was he who taught me that a Lawyer can be honest, truthful and successful. Legal education in those days were more theoretical unlike today and we hardly ever stepped into a Court during our Law School days. Of course there were quite a few exceptions to this and a few of my friends started interning quite early. 

    But I was a Reluctant Lawyer, when for the first time I set foot in Court almost 29 years ago.  Growing up, I was very quiet, reserved and had all qualities uncharacteristic of a Litigating  Lawyer. When I started my practise as a junior to my grandfather at Ranipet, I was just happily  going around the corridors of the Subordinate Courts as a privileged grandson but without actually knowing the fundamentals of being a Lawyer. I  felt I was in the middle of a jungle with  my eyes tied shut. I did not know what was happening.  I became a lawyer because of my  Grandfather and also because I did not know what else to do with my life.

    What inspired you to specialize in contentious and non-contentious litigation in areas such as IP, corporate, and commercial laws?

    When we started our careers as lawyers, we had only two options. Either to litigate or go inhouse. Since I followed my grandfather’s footsteps, contentious and non-contentious litigation was the obvious choice. But to sustain and keep up with that choice is a completely different challenge. I would say, Intellectual Property Rights and Commercial Laws chose me rather than me choosing them. A year into practice, my illustrious grandfather advised me to relocate and start afresh with a good Senior Practitioner at the Madras High Court. He felt that the Subordinate Courts were being bifurcated and it would be difficult for me to run around from one Court to the other in the Vellore District of Tamil Nadu. I am glad I took his advice and moved to the High Court where I was given the opportunity to join the chambers of Mr. V. Veeraraghavan, one of the most prominent Lawyers in the field of Intellectual Property Law in Chennai then.  It was more like an institution where we got to learn the practice of IPR and commercial Litigation. Mr. Veeraraghavan was instrumental in tutoring many other stalwarts like Mr. Prabhakara Reddy and Mr. Perumbulavil Radhakrishnan who were also my mentors and still continue to guide me in my journey.  All these mentors inspired me and continue to inspire me to do well. And IPR as a subject is so unique and different from all the other areas of laws, it is but natural to be drawn to this area of specialization.  

    We noticed you’re a senior panel lawyer for ‘The Institute of Chartered Accountants in India.’ How did this collaboration come about, and what does your role entail?

    I have been a Senior Panel lawyer for ICAI  the past few years. The collaboration started after a process of application and selection through an in person interaction. As a Senior panellist, I am entrusted with representing ICAI before the Madras High Court in select matters of complex legal issues. It has been both a learning and a rewarding experience representing one of the premier Statutory Bodies of the Country. 

    Given your extensive experience, what advice would you give to aspiring lawyers looking to specialize in intellectual property law?

    The Legal profession generally is a very noble profession which is also very satisfying and rewarding to all the genuine practitioners. I would most certainly tell all the youngsters who are looking at Law as a career, that honest, sincere hard work would make you very efficient and successful. It is imperative to believe that a lawyer is allowed to interpret a law but not facts. 

    Our profession has spread its wings far and wide now in terms of the avenues for a lawyer to get into. Earlier a lawyer had no other alternative but to either choose litigation or become an inhouse Counsel. But the options that are now available are much more. However,  It is my firm view that every lawyer on their enrolment should litigate in any Court of their Choice and convenience for a minimum of three years before choosing any other option. Because Litigation teaches us everything that one needs in life including Man Management. Right from just seeking an adjournment, to substantial arguments it is just an art. I always believe that the lessons a young lawyer learns from litigation in the first three years, would keep him/her in good stead for the rest of his/her life in whatever they choose to do.  So my first advice, if I may call it, is to gain experience as a litigator for a minimum period of three years before they decide to opt for any other avenues of the profession. 

    As for Intellectual Property Rights, this is the only area of law whose value stems from the public perception of such IPR (except Patents of course) and therefore every case would be different from the other. This is also a subject that just keeps evolving with every new invention and/or creative work. This to me is the unique aspect that makes it even more interesting than any other areas of law. The entry of AI now is taking to  different heights and it would be interesting to see where else it goes. 

    Can you share any insights into the legal landscape in India, particularly in terms of intellectual property rights and brand protection strategies?

    The Legal landscape is pretty promising as I believe that India of all the Major economies of the World has the best IPR protection in terms of Statutory Laws. Having said that, I also believe that we have to improve a lot in its implementation. Our Judiciary has been doing a lot to improve/ fasten the time for delivering Justice which by itself is no mean feat considering the population and the number of Judges we have. 

    As for strategies, I keep thinking that the brand owners take a long time to realise the potential value of their IPR’s and more often than not, the time delay in seeking Statutory protection by way of registering one’s brands or Patenting their new invention results in them losing value. Statutory protection of IPR’s should be the first on the agenda for a brand to be valuable. Registering a brand alone is not enough but maintaining it and protecting it from infringement at the right time is also equally important. In my little experience, I have come across quite a few brands losing their brand value just because they did not take action at the right time. It is also imperative for brand owners to understand that the cost and expenses for protecting and maintaining their brand is more of an investment than just an expense. 

    Looking back at your career journey so far, what are some key milestones or turning points that have shaped your professional growth and approach to law?

    Looking back, It just amazes me that I am able to sustain in this competitive field and quite well. I would like to think that the entire Universe comes to your aid if you just keep working without thinking about the result or the consequences. I take this opportunity to thank all my Seniors who nurtured/ mentored me and who still guide me in my journey. There are quite a few turning points since the day I started my career as a lawyer. I very vividly remember my Grandfather’s loving advice to relocate to the High Court and the day I joined the Chambers of my Senior Mr. V. Veeraraghavan who helped me transition into a High Court Practitioner. 

    The year I spent at the Franklin Pierce Law School in the USA would be the turning point or a milestone in my career. It is not only the Legal Skills I acquired there that made it a milestone, but the people I met there and the multi-cultural life that I was introduced to, changed me as a person. I went in as an Indian and returned as a true International. I still am in touch with most of my friends and teachers and I will always cherish my year at my alma mater. This camaraderie with all these people in a foreign Country for one full year taught me to be affable and friendly to all and guides me in my approach to the Legal Profession even today. Starting our own firm ‘Factum Law’ in the year 2017 was another key turning point in my professional life and with the right people to work with, this has been a very interesting and rewarding journey so far. 

    The International Trademark Association of which I have been a member since 2008, has also shaped my knowledge throughout. The Annual Meeting every year and the opportunity to meet thousands of IP practitioners from around the world in one place is always satisfying. This also helps me and my colleagues in keeping ourselves updated with all the developments of Law around the world. 

    None of this would have been possible if we did not have the right team to depend on. I am eternally grateful to all my team members for being with me through thick and thin. Thanks to them I am certain of many more milestones in my Professional life. 

    Reflecting on your time at UNH Franklin Pierce School of Law, could you share your experience and highlight any notable differences you observed between the educational approach there and the legal education system in India? How do you think these differences have influenced your practice of law?

    The life I spent at Pierce Law is the most memorable and life changing. I would be failing in my duty if I don’t credit Pierce Law for all of my achievements so far in my life and whatever I am destined to do more in this professional life. The Education system is more pragmatic whereas we in India still focus on theory. I am however told that it is changing here as well. There are no lectures in the US education system but only discussion. Which means you have to be prepared to be part of the discussion in every class. And you will be tested in the exams only on the discussion you had in the class. So it is imperative that you are well prepared even before attending the class and you get to participate in the discussion. This I believe is the most pragmatic way of teaching subjects and I hope Law Schools in India follow suit on this kind of pragmatic education. This has greatly influenced my thinking and my preparation for a case. 

    As a faculty member at EBC Learning and an alumnus of the Franklin Pierce Law Centre, do you incorporate your international experience and the teaching methodologies you encountered during your LLM into your approach to teaching? If so, how do you adapt these methods to suit the needs of your students and the legal education landscape in India?

    Whenever I get the opportunity to address  the students on some topic of interest, I make sure I follow the lessons learnt at Pierce Law. That of being pragmatic in my approach. So I try to make it an interactive session rather than just a lecture. This certainly aids in the students improving their thought process and their knowledge. This approach is imperative for Lawyers. I am also of the view that no Law school or college in India produces  Lawyers. They can only produce a good Law Student. It is the legal practice that moulds a student into a lawyer and that takes a minimum of three years. So a pragmatic approach would equip the students better in their transition to a professional lawyer. 

    Could you walk us through what a typical workday looks like for you, and how do you ensure you stay updated on the latest developments in the legal field amidst your busy schedule?

    Life of a lawyer is very demanding and unless we are prepared to sacrifice that ‘me time’, it will be very difficult to succeed. There are times when one feels overburdened but that comes with the territory. A typical day for me starts at 9.30 AM if not earlier. That depends on my Court work. Evenings are spent in preparing for the next day’s work and so on and so forth. Law journals and commentaries accompany me many times even in my travels. There can never be a day where a lawyer can say or feel he knows everything and the day one feels as such, would either be his last day of practice or after his retirement. Since Law is something that keeps evolving and changing with times, we as lawyers have to keep updating all the time. So I would only say ‘keep working’ to keep updated. 

    Do you remember the first time when you fought a case? Please tell us some anecdotes that happened in the courtroom.

    Very Vividly. That was my second day at the Madras High Court. I was asked to appear for a contemnor in a Trademark Infringement case against a formidable and successful lawyer who later became a Senior Counsel. I remember struggling to even mouth ‘May I please your Lordship” and the Judge had to lean forward to hear me. I was so nervous that I didn’t even know how I reacted in a room full of stalwarts. Within a few months, I became better at it and started enjoying my appearances in the High Court. Full credit to my senior who constantly encouraged me. It is those opportunities that I got from my seniors that exposed me to successful litigation early in my life. 

    Could you share with us one of the most interesting and challenging cases from your career that still resonates with you, and walk us through the complexities you encountered and how you navigated them? 

    There are quite a few. Particularly at the beginning of my career where I was assisting a Senior Counsel in a Trademark case. It was an appeal and the Senior Counsel appearing for the Appellant swayed the Bench completely in his favour. It looked as though we wouldn’t even have a chance to argue. 

    When it was our chance, all we did was to pick some errors in the Appellants documents and in no time the Division Bench turned in our favour. It showed me what presence of mind and a thorough knowledge of every single piece of paper filed in Court could do. That was a lesson I carried all through my life and I still make it a point to thoroughly study the files. You never know where the spark would come from. 

    I have also enjoyed my experiences in appearing in trial Courts and conducting cross examinations. One can never be fully prepared to cross examine a witness and a presence of mind is most essential to be a successful trial Lawyer. Conducting trials is an art by itself and every Law Student should expose himself/herself to the art of cross examination. A good cross examination has the potential to turn litigation in your favour. I will end by saying that every day in a Lawyers Life is an experience and a learning. I most certainly love the challenges that this profession throws at me every single minute.

    Thank you 

    Get in touch with Rajesh Ramanathan-

  • “Self-trust is the primary requirement. Understanding the fundamentals of law, good communication, time management, teamwork, dedication, critical thinking, and adaptability are equally important” – Savithri Sravanthi, Founder & Managing Partner at IUSTUS LEGAL

    “Self-trust is the primary requirement. Understanding the fundamentals of law, good communication, time management, teamwork, dedication, critical thinking, and adaptability are equally important” – Savithri Sravanthi, Founder & Managing Partner at IUSTUS LEGAL

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    Could you share with us the story behind your decision to pursue a career in law? Does anything change for a women post-marriage? Looking back, would you revisit your career path? 

    Becoming a lawyer was my childhood dream. Unlike an add-on degree, I wanted the legal profession to be my primary career. My father was an accountant while my mom initially was a homemaker and later turned into an entrepreneur. Fortunately, as a child there was no pressure from my parents to choose the career path of their preference or excelling in academics. My choice of electing a legal profession as a career option was welcomed and completely supported by my parents. Relentless support from parents meant a lot to me, which motivated me to achieve a Gold Medal in my bachelor’s degree. 

    Family support for any lady post marriage undoubtedly helps her to retain her identity whereby she can balance her career aspirations with familial responsibilities. I have been fortunate to receive encouragement from my husband and kids, that I was able to achieve a Gold Medal in my Master’s degree 17 years after I completed my bachelors. 

    Time files, it has been more than 2 decades. If I look back, I feel it is deeply fulfilling and gratifying. I wholeheartedly thank my mentors, seniors, peers and family who contributed to my professional growth and being part of my life’s journey. 

    As a legal advisor across various sectors, including IT & ITES, Manufacturing, Real Estate, Pharma and Techlaw, what common challenges do you encounter, and how do you address them while ensuring compliance and legal efficacy?

    Every client reposes trust on their advisors, either legal or financial. As a legal counsel I pre-empt and aid our clients navigate through complex situations and challenges and comply with the laws to avoid potential risks and liabilities and seamlessly concentrate on their business goals. 

    Every organisation requires to comply with a plethora of laws which makes it important for companies to place reliance on subject matter experts. As a legal counsel, we advise on various laws based on the needs of our client, which include data protection, labour & employment laws, consumer protection laws, intellectual property rights, corporate and commercial laws.

    Creating awareness and conducting training sessions to the appropriate functions helps us to interact with the teams to explain to them the need for compliance and adverse effects of non-compliance. These sessions instill a value system and is a collaborative work as we share real time experiences  and challenges. We advise on legal compliance after assessing each client’s pain points and prepare policy or guidelines to suit their requirement within the legal framework. Periodic supervision, audits and team reviews with clients aid to keep a watch on adherence with ever changing laws. Compliance is not a one-time event but an on-going task. By doing so, organizations ensure they meet legal requirements, uphold ethical standards, and manage risks effectively. This proactive approach not only reduces the likelihood of non-compliance but also enhances overall organizational resilience and reputation.

    As a practitioner in Anti-Sexual Harassment Law, how do you approach training and awareness sessions for employees and internal committee members to foster a culture of respect and inclusivity within organizations?

    Sexual harassment is a social issue. It has been nearly a decade, that our Government enacted the Prevention of Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (POSH Act) yet many establishments remain oblivious to its existence or compliance. Like Consumer awareness this also needs to reach the people. Like the impact created by the ‘Jago Grahak Jago’ awareness program run by the Government, we need a similar movement to sensitize and create awareness of this beneficial legislation.

    Regular meetings with IC members is highly recommended, awareness sessions for employees are important likewise orientation to IC members is also equally critical, as they redress the complaints. IC members  have to be trained to ensure judicious redressal, as most of IC members are seniors and experts in their field but may not be from legal background hence may need assistance to understand the nuances of law and manner of conducting redressal process in a time bound manner. 

    Usually, participants /audience are silent for the first 15-20 minutes, some voice their concerns during the session while some wait until we conclude. But there are many queries which can be resolved only by training and interactive sessions. These sessions are to be attended by all, it should not be a women’s day event. Government has enacted the law but its implementation is a collective responsibility. 

    Could you elaborate on your involvement in Estate & Succession Planning and share insights into the importance of such planning for individuals and families, especially in the context of evolving legal frameworks?

    Estate and succession planning are complex processes that require careful consideration of legal, financial, and personal factors. It is a collaborative effort of legal, tax and financial professionals to meet their goals and safeguard their properties. Will is the most sought out option for many as it is easy. Whereas for High Networth Individuals and Ultra High Networth Individuals s structuring, distribution and transfer of assets /wealth to beneficiaries or legal heirs upon death is a complex task. Identifying assets, including real estate, investments, savings, retirals, insurance policies, prized possessions, and personal belongings itself is the first step, which is followed by structuring and so on.  Trusts can be useful for minimizing taxes, legal attachments, and providing for minor children or individuals with special needs. Pre-empting pros and cons and advising clients is challenging yet fulfilling once we reach the desired outcome. We partner with reputed financial advisors and family office experts to give our clients holistic solutions.Although we have laws, healthcare/ advance medical directives, such as living wills, outline an individual’s preferences for medical treatment and appoint someone to make healthcare decisions on their behalf if they are unable to do so. This is a very sensitive topic similar to that of a Will. No child can ask his parent to execute a Will to safeguard our assets or have advance medical directive in place to avoid issues in case of incapacity of parent to make a decision.  

    Justice M S Sonak, who serves on the Goa Bench of the Bombay High Court, became the first person in Goa to register a “living will”, an advance medical directive for his family for when he cannot make his own decisions. Such trailblazers pave the way and pass on a message that nothing is permanent. It is rational to pass on responsibility of taking decisions in case of health in case of an emergency or wealth in case of eventuality. 

    What inspired you to embark on the journey of founding your own firm, IUSTUS LEGAL, and what specific vision or goals did you aim to achieve through this endeavour? Could you share some of the significant challenges you encountered when establishing IUSTUS LEGAL?

    Starting a law firm or independent practice is a logical and common path for any legal professional in practice. I believe a silver lining during pandemic for me was clients both domestic and international realised that corporate legal services can be rendered effectively and efficiently using technology. E-meetings became the go-to venue and virtual data room a repository of documents. Personally, I noticed there were avenues and opportunities which were opened and I wanted to explore the waters as the market dynamics were changing and legal compliance was gaining a foothold due to enormous foreign investments and funding which prompted legal due diligence and paved the way for diversified agreements and mandated compliance under corporate and labour laws.

    I truly believed that it was the right time for me to make my deep rooted vision of providing just and fair legal services to clients into a reality. Initially, I was apprehensive, as it could be risky moving out of my comfort zone and setting up a firm from scratch. It meant less to no work and less to no steady income. I took a leap of faith and established IUSTUS Legal. IUSTUS is a name derived from IUSTITIA, the Lady of Justice (Nyaya Devta) and also means righteousness, ‘dharma’, being just and fair which is based on the vision to create value to every client in every entrusted matter. It is fulfilling when a client entrusts a matter to you and feels content when the desired outcome and refers to new clients or more matters.

    It has been nearly 3 years since I ventured on this journey and we are expanding. I feel elated when I say it was an all women team (and young mothers) who continue to balance both professional and personal responsibilities effectively. We are expanding with young professional minds joining us.  I am grateful to the Almighty for being the guiding light, to our amazing clients, competent team and my wonderful family.  

    Entrepreneurship comes with its risks and challenges, but if you have conviction in yourself and faith in God, the journey is beautiful. 

    What challenges did you encounter as a woman along the way that shaped your journey to becoming a seasoned legal professional and Managing Partner at IUSTUS LEGAL?

    Conventionally, the representation of women in the legal profession is low. Despite significant advancements, women face challenges and many let go of this profession due to gender discrimination, demanding timelines, constant comparisons, unrealistic expectations, work-life balance, motherhood etc. Support from seniors and family is important for any woman to pursue their career aspirations. I was fortunate that there have been only a few such instances more gender based, but have heard so many experiences from my friends and colleagues to quit the profession and change their career paths. 

    In fact many women colleagues leave the profession due to familial responsibilities or unsupportive family, post marriage or childbirth. Out of 30 women students in my class of 2000 batch, hardly a handful women are continuing in this profession, which is disheartening.

    I truly believe and advise young mothers, who have no support but have legal acumen and skill sets, could take up tasks where they could work from home or work as freelancers. 

    Earlier, litigation or corporate law were the only options, now the legal profession has further branched out. One can be a legal correspondent, legal analyst, part time lecturer, corporate lawyer, labour law consultant, POSH advisor. Quitting is easy, navigating through odds is a challenge worth trying.  

    How do you balance your work-life as a legal professional? How do you manage your work day?

    Time is the most precious commodity which is non-renewable, but we need to value both time and money. Legal profession is highly demanding. Striking a balance is not an easy task as profession and personal life are equally important. Based on situations, I have prioritized both professional growth and personal life. 

    In response to your question, I prioritize work every day before I start my work, I read a matter and make hand noting this helps me recollect the matter easily, avoid procrastination, except in case of emergencies and keep a watch on the deadlines, in case work spills beyond expected timeline I ensure apprising clients helps in maintaining a healthy and long standing professional relationship. I believe enriching client relationships and being updated with domain areas is also spending time productively as a lawyer. delegation of work with a team helps in productivity, time management and ability to focus on priority and high risks matters.

    Most of all, I believe in spending time with family and taking short breaks/getaways as it rejuvenates me. This helps growth of professional and personal lives

    What advice or suggestions would you offer to the next generation of aspiring legal professionals who are entering the field, especially in light of the evolving legal landscape and emerging challenges?

    Self-trust is the primary requirement for any aspiring student as comparisons are bound to happen and that should not adversely impact on your growth. Embarking as a lawyer is an exciting yet challenging journey. Understanding the fundamentals of law and research are key skill sets but good communication, time management, team work, dedication, critical thinking and adaptability are also equally important. 

    Formal education gives aspiring lawyers an overview of law but practical learning under a senior /mentor and gaining insights from experienced professionals enhances the knowledge, legal reasoning and application of the education judiciously. Attending workshops, conferences, networking aids in an impactful way to foster continuous learning. A legal professional must be willing to be a lifelong student to sustain and grow. My motto ‘if you are not updated, you are outdated’. Stay updated to continue and shine in this noble profession and collaborate with colleagues. One may not know everything but everyone will know something.

    I am happy to have been part of this pious profession and strongly urge students to consider this as their career option, if it aligns with their skill sets, interests, and career aspirations. Lawyers can positively influence the Country’s law & policy, make key contributions in people’s lives and decisions through their expert legal guidance. 

    Get in touch with Savithri Sravanthi –

  • “Each case mainly has one or two arguments on which the entire case hinges, rest are all mainly fillers. So to ensure accuracy and effectiveness in the arguments, I mainly focus on these and try developing it more and in a better way.”- Ramnath Prabhu, Associate Partner at TLC Legal

    “Each case mainly has one or two arguments on which the entire case hinges, rest are all mainly fillers. So to ensure accuracy and effectiveness in the arguments, I mainly focus on these and try developing it more and in a better way.”- Ramnath Prabhu, Associate Partner at TLC Legal

    This Interview has been published by Pragya Chandni and The SuperLawyer Team

    Can you share with us what initially sparked your interest in pursuing a career in law, particularly specializing in indirect tax litigation and international trade policies?

    My father and his brother both practice as Sales Tax Consultants in the city of Mangalore. Back in the early 2000’s, their work involved a lot of attendant work such as visiting the Sales Tax Department for filing monthly returns and yearly assessments etc. Nothing was online then, so when I was at school, I used to visit them during these rituals to assist. However, it was more for the customary lunch at a hotel that followed. 

    When I was studying at college for my degree in commerce, I got more involved in the work. This allowed me to get to know about the legal proceedings that follow, such as issuance of proposition notices, appeals and tribunal proceedings etc. For this we would rely on advocates at Bangalore, which sparked my interest in indirect tax litigation and so I ended up studying law.

    With your extensive experience in handling cases across various sectors like oil and gas, telecommunication, banking, and more, what motivated you to focus on these specific areas within the legal field?

    Taxation is a very niche area of practice. So once you decide to pursue a career in it, you have to deal with a variety of cases relating to different sectors. It also depends on the place where one practices. For example, at Bangalore you may find more service tax litigations because of the place primarily being an IT hub. Whereas, when it comes to excise and customs, it is Mumbai and Gujarat because of the large manufacturing industries, customs ports and corporate offices of leading companies being located here. So bigger cities have their own advantages. 

    Could you walk us through your journey from your early days as a law student to your current role as an Associate Partner at TLC Legal, one of India’s leading law firms in indirect taxes and international trade policies?

    I did my law at SDM Law College, Mangalore. After I completed my law, I joined the law chambers of Mr.K.S.Ravi Shankar, Senior Advocate at Bangalore who practices at the High Court of Karnataka, in the areas of Indirect Taxation.

    Then when I moved to Mumbai, I got the opportunity of working as an associate at TLC Legal, which specialises in indirect tax litigation and advisory. Working at TLC Legal has been very fulfilling as I had the opportunity of working on some of the interesting as well as complex cases. I got the opportunity to work with some of the best legal minds of the country. 

    You’ve had the opportunity to work with esteemed legal practitioners such as Mr. K.S. Ravi Shankar. How did these experiences shape your approach to legal practice and influence your career trajectory?

    I had the fortune of working at the law chambers of Mr.K.S.Ravi Shankar, who is not only a distinguished lawyer but also a revered scholar on vedas and other scriptures. He is an exceedingly well read man, bestowed with great skills of advocacy. His chamber had good work in indirect taxation that immensely helped me build my interest in the subject. Working with him taught me how to be disciplined at work (he would begin his day in the office at 7 in the morning!), which to a large extent I try to practice. His one piece of advice to me, which I still vividly remember, is to cultivate the habit of reading, and that I should spend 10% of what I earn on buying books.   

    As someone who regularly appears before the Supreme Court, High Courts, and Tax Tribunals, what are some of the unique challenges you face in representing clients in complex indirect tax cases?

    Taxation as such is not a very interesting subject, and I have been told this by many. It can be humdrum particularly with cases that involve too many numbers. A lawyer needs to sit with the client or his accountant and understand it clearly. This is where knowing a bit of basic accounting and reading financial statements would come in handy. 

    But the real challenge is presenting the case before a Judge. Some of them are extremely patient, some are quick tempered, some are very vocal – they keep asking questions, and they will not move an inch further till they are satisfied. Therefore, I follow the rule of reading the brief thoroughly from the first page to the last, as you never know how things go on in the Court. 

    One thing I learnt from my senior Mr.Vipin Jain is to think about how to make the case interesting for a judge. One way of doing this can be by giving real life examples – even abstruse questions can be explained interestingly with simple examples and anecdotes.

    Can you share some insights into your approach to drafting appeals, petitions, and providing legal opinions under GST/indirect tax laws? How do you ensure accuracy and effectiveness in your legal arguments?

    Drafting is an art and one needs to put in conscious efforts to improve this. My approach has always been not to be too verbose in appeals and petitions, but brief and concise. I don’t find any point in making long written arguments or citing several case laws. 

    One part which I take utmost care while drafting an appeal or petition is the drafting of synopsis and the dates and events. Synopsis is the soul of any petition or appeal, and sometimes the judges skim through it to understand the case before coming to the Court. Preparing a two or three page succinct synopsis helps organise and put the thoughts onto paper for whatever may be the complexity of the matter. This would also help recollect the matter for when it is revisited after several years down the line.

    Each case mainly has one or two arguments on which the entire case hinges, rest are all mainly fillers. So to ensure accuracy and effectiveness in the arguments, I mainly focus on these and try developing it more and in a better way. 

    With your background in international business, trade, and tax law, how do you stay updated with the evolving landscape of indirect taxes and international trade policies, and how does this knowledge benefit your clients?

    Yes, it is important to stay abreast in the legal profession. For this I read mails sent by a few subscriptions which track these developments. 

    Finally, what advice would you offer to law graduates who aspire to specialize in indirect tax litigation and international trade policies, based on your own experiences and insights gained throughout your career journey?

    I always believe in “each to their own”, meaning what worked for me, may not work for others. But since you have asked this, here are a few points that I can think about:

    • Focus on communicating effectively. Lawyers always communicate, either written or oral. You may know your facts and the law well, but you can’t make an impact unless you are able to communicate effectively. Reading helps with this. 
    • Make use of online resources. Today many courts are live streaming on YouTube. There are other YouTube channels as well, like the Justice Nariman Official Channel, which is immensely resourceful. Listening to these would help understand how great legal minds work.

    Get in touch with Ramnath Prabhu-

  • “In law and in life, embracing every opportunity for learning and mentorship is the compass that guides you towards success.” – Raghunath Peter Doraisamy, Managing Partner at PDLegal LLC Advocates & Solicitors.

    “In law and in life, embracing every opportunity for learning and mentorship is the compass that guides you towards success.” – Raghunath Peter Doraisamy, Managing Partner at PDLegal LLC Advocates & Solicitors.

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    With 25 years of extensive practice in law, you’ve built an impressive career as the Managing Partner of PDLegal LLC. Can you share a bit about your journey from college days and struggles you faced during that time and what motivated you to establish your own law firm?

    My journey in law began with a deep-rooted passion for justice and advocacy, nurtured during my university days. This drive, coupled with extensive experience gained over the years, led me to establish PDLegal LLC. My goal was to create a firm that embodies a blend of personalized, partner-level service with efficiency and cost-effectiveness, addressing the evolving needs of our clients.  

    Your areas of expertise range from Maritime and Shipping to International Trade, among others. What drew you to specialize in these particular fields, and how have they evolved over the course of your career?

    My inclination towards Maritime, Shipping, and International Trade law stemmed from recognizing the dynamic and globally interconnected nature of these fields. These areas are not only pivotal to global commerce but also constantly evolving, presenting unique legal challenges and opportunities. Over my career, I’ve witnessed and adapted to significant changes in these sectors, ensuring that our firm stays at the forefront of legal expertise and innovation.

    Having been recognized by leading legal directories like Legal 500 and Chambers & Partners, what do you consider to be the key factors that contribute to your success as a litigation and arbitration counsel?

    The key factors that have contributed to my success in litigation and arbitration include a relentless commitment to excellence, a strategic approach to each case, and a deep understanding of our clients’ needs. Recognition by leading legal directories like Legal 500 and Chambers & Partners reflects our firm’s dedication to delivering high-quality legal services and our ability to achieve favourable outcomes for our clients.

    PDLegal LLC has a strong regional presence with offices in Singapore and Bangkok. How does the firm adapt to the legal landscape in different regions, and what challenges and opportunities does this bring to your practice?

    Adapting to the legal landscapes in Singapore and Bangkok involves a keen understanding of regional legal nuances and cultural sensitivities. Our firm leverages its strong regional presence to offer tailored legal solutions. The challenge lies in navigating diverse legal systems and market dynamics, but it also presents opportunities for cross-border collaboration and expanding our expertise in international law.

    Your practice involves both contentious and non-contentious matters. How do you balance being a trusted business advisor for non-contentious issues like joint ventures and mergers while also navigating complex litigation matters?

    The key to balancing both contentious and non-contentious matters lies in versatility and deep legal acumen. For non-contentious issues like joint ventures and mergers, I focus on being a strategic advisor, ensuring due diligence and foresight. In complex litigation, my approach is more dynamic, with an emphasis on thorough preparation and robust advocacy. This dual role requires adaptability and a deep understanding of our clients’ diverse needs.

    With your background in Maritime Law, how do you perceive the future of the maritime industry, especially considering the advancements in technology and environmental considerations?

    The maritime industry is poised for significant transformation, driven by technological advancements and environmental considerations. As we move towards more sustainable practices, I foresee increased adoption of stricter environmental regulations. 

    Given the recent advancements in technology, there’s a notable shift towards automation in shipping operations. How do you see this trend impacting the maritime industry, and what legal considerations or challenges might arise as a result of increased automation in shipping processes?

    Automation in shipping marks a revolutionary shift, enhancing operational efficiency and safety. However, it also introduces legal challenges, particularly in terms of liability, regulatory compliance, and cybersecurity. As the industry adapts to these changes, our role is to guide clients through this legal landscape, ensuring they stay ahead of the curve.

    As someone deeply involved in pro bono legal services, can you share a rewarding experience or a case where your involvement made a positive impact on the community you serve?

    We do a number of pro bono cases through the Law Society of Singapore Pro Bono Services (“LSSPBS”).

    Beyond your professional achievements, what are some personal hobbies or interests that you indulge in to unwind from the demands of the legal profession?

    To unwind from the demands of the legal profession, I enjoy watching football. I am an avid Manchester United fan.  

    Given your extensive experience and success, what advice would you offer to college students or young professionals on how they can make the most of their college days and choose meaningful internships to pave the way for a successful legal career?

    For university students and young professionals, my advice is to embrace every learning opportunity, whether in academics or internships. Focus on building a strong foundation in legal principles while also developing soft skills like communication and problem-solving. Networking and mentorship are invaluable; seek connections that inspire and guide you towards your career goals.

    Get in touch with Raghunath Peter Doraisamy-

  • At the outset, it is easier said than done because once you don the hat of an Arbitrator, you have to ensure impartiality and neutrality on one hand while ensuring procedural efficiency and effective communication on the other hand- Dr. Shashwat Bajpai, Founder of DRSB Law Chambers

    At the outset, it is easier said than done because once you don the hat of an Arbitrator, you have to ensure impartiality and neutrality on one hand while ensuring procedural efficiency and effective communication on the other hand- Dr. Shashwat Bajpai, Founder of DRSB Law Chambers

    This interview has been published by  Priyanka Karwa and The SuperLawyer Team

    Can you share your journey from being a B.A.LL.B (Hons.) graduate to completing your Master’s degree at the University of Oxford, specializing in Corporate Business Taxation and Arbitration? What inspired you to pursue such specific fields of law?

    My initial inspiration towards litigation emanated from being a 3rd generation lawyer and seeing both my father and grandfather argue in courts. My journey thereafter was fuelled by my deep interest in litigation and commercial law, and during my undergraduate studies I became captivated by the complexities of business transactions and the legal aspects of taxation and dispute resolution. This fascination motivated me to further my education and seek a deeper understanding of these subjects.

    My dream University was of course Oxford for pursuing their coveted Master’s degree  immediately after my graduation, due to its renowned academic reputation and rich legal heritage. Specializing in Corporate Business Taxation and Arbitration seemed natural, given the increasing relevance of these fields in our globalized business landscape.

    In essence, my academic journey reflects my passion for these two very specific and mutually exclusive fields of law.

    Your academic achievements include a Ph.D. from the National Law University, Delhi, and being a Fellow with the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators, United Kingdom. How did these experiences shape your career in law, particularly in arbitration?

    A short tete-a-tete with the legal luminary Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi propelled me towards embarking on pursuing a Doctorate degree. Completing my Ph.D. in a very niche area of Transfer Pricing provided me with a deep and comprehensive understanding of the intricacies of international tax law and practice. It allowed me to delve into complex legal issues, conduct in-depth research, and contribute to the evolving body of knowledge in this field. This academic journey not only honed my research and analytical skills but assisted me in my dealing of litigation challenges before the Courts while arguing complex issues.

    Becoming a Fellow with the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators is a pivotal step in my Arbitration career. This globally recognized qualification not only enhanced my credibility as an arbitrator / practitioner but also exposed me to diverse Arbitration and Award Writing perspectives as well as international best practices in the field. It was a transformative experience that broadened my horizons and equipped me with the skills necessary to handle intricate International arbitrations and disputes.

    In essence, these academic achievements have been instrumental in shaping my career by providing me with the knowledge, skills, and global perspective needed to excel in these specialized and rapidly evolving fields. 

    As the Founder Partner of DRSB Law Chambers, you’ve had an impressive career. Could you tell us about some of the significant milestones or cases that have defined your journey in the legal profession?

    Founding and leading DRSB Law Chambers has indeed been a remarkable journey , and I’m proud of the milestones and cases that have defined the Chambers. It’s been more than a decade, so there have been many jewels and it’s a uniquely difficult task to pick out a select few but I’ll highlight two.

    One notable case involved representing a Construction corporation in a complex 1000 Crore construction arbitration dispute. This case tested our expertise in not just the legal but the technical aspects around the much talked about Ashram Metro Station. The nuances argued before a 3-SC judges’ panel (retd.) was a challenging but ultimately successful endeavor that showcased the Chambers’ dedication to achieving the best outcomes for our clients as well as meticulous application of the law to the complicated facts.

    Another milestone was successfully arguing a transfer pricing case before the Delhi HC on the issue of comparables wherein the uphill task was to distinguish our case with the then settled law pertaining to the ‘question of law’ surrounding the issue of comparables. The facts were not only legally intricate but also strategically significant for our client, an international MNC, given its implications for previous and next several years.

    You’re known for your expertise in Domestic & International Arbitration and EPC Construction Claims. What drew you to these particular practice areas, and what challenges have you faced in handling such complex disputes?

    My focus on Domestic & International Arbitration and EPC Construction Claims was driven by a combination of factors, as these practice areas have indeed presented both unique opportunities and encounters in my legal career.

    The attraction to Domestic & International Arbitration emerged from my early experiences with a few established senior advocates practicing in this area. I was captivated by the idea of resolving disputes outside the traditional courtroom setting, especially in the context of infrastructure disputes. EPC (Engineering, Procurement, and Construction) Construction Claims, became an area of specialization due to the intricate and multi-faceted nature of construction projects. These claims involve complex contractual relationships, technical specifications, and often span multiple jurisdictions. My interest in this area grew as I realized the critical role it played in large-scale infrastructure and development projects worldwide.

    While these practice areas have been rewarding, they do come with their fair share of challenges.

    In EPC Construction Claims, the complexity lies in dissecting intricate technical details and translating them into legal arguments. Ensuring that both legal and technical aspects align in a claim can be a delicate balance. Additionally, construction claims often involve substantial sums of money, which adds pressure to deliver successful outcomes for clients, especially when involving ongoing projects.

    Moreover, the evolving landscape of domestic & international arbitration laws and rules requires practitioners like myself to stay constantly updated and adapt to new norms and regulations. Keeping abreast of these changes while maintaining the highest standards of legal representation is a continuous challenge and opportunity for growth.

    In summary, my attraction to Domestic & International Arbitration and EPC Construction Claims stemmed from a fascination with efficient dispute resolution and the complexity of construction projects and though the process can be demanding but eventually, also immensely gratifying.

    With your involvement in various legal associations and committees, such as the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (CIArb), Society for Construction Law (SCL) and the International Fiscal Association (IFA), how have these affiliations contributed to your professional growth and knowledge in the field of arbitration?

    My involvement in various legal associations and committees, including the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (CIArb), Society for Construction Law (SCL), and the International Fiscal Association (IFA), has been instrumental in my professional growth and has significantly enriched my knowledge in my fields.

    First and foremost, these affiliations have provided me with invaluable opportunities to network and collaborate with leading experts and practitioners in their respective fields. Being part of CIArb, especially as the Core Committee Member of the YMG (Young Member Group), for instance, has allowed me to engage with a global community of arbitration professionals and mentor young(er) minds. These connections have not only broadened my perspective but have also facilitated the exchange of best practices and innovative ideas in the realm of arbitration. CIArb has the unique distinction of offering excellent mentorship led by Dr. Bhasin, Tejas Karia, Nusrat Hasan and Vyapak Desai, amongst others.

    Furthermore, my involvement in the Society for Construction Law under the tutelage of Mr. Ratan Singh has been profoundly interesting, being in a category of a distinct few organizations of entirely focusing on the niche area of construction arbitration both domestic & international. Additionally, participation in these associations has granted me access to a wealth of resources and continuing qualification opportunities. Whether it’s attending seminars, conferences, or accessing specialized publications, these platforms have enabled me to stay updated with the latest developments and emerging trends in arbitration and related areas.

    On the other end of the spectrum, two tax spearheads, Mr. Ajay Vohra & Mr. Mukesh Bhutani propelled me towards the IFA membership, where I am currently the Vice-Chairman [IFA India-NRC]. It has provided me with unique insights into the intersection of domestic & International taxation perspectives. This multidisciplinary exposure has been invaluable in understanding the complex legal landscape surrounding working and finance mechanisms of multinational companies, especially when it comes to addressing taxation issues.

    These affiliations have also allowed me to contribute actively to the legal community by sharing my knowledge and experiences. Whether it’s through speaking engagements, publications, networking opportunities or committee work, I’ve had the privilege of giving back to the profession and promoting excellence in the field. In summary, my involvement in legal associations and committees, such as CIArb, SCL, and IFA, has been a catalyst for my professional growth.

    You’ve presided as the Sole Arbitrator under the administration of DIAC and Delhi High Court appointments. Can you walk us through your experience in this role and some key takeaways from your time as an arbitrator?

    Serving as a Sole Arbitrator appointed by the Delhi High Court and under the administration of DIAC (Delhi International Arbitration Centre) has been a fulfilling and enlightening experience. It has allowed me to witness first-hand the dynamics of dispute resolution from a neutral perspective. At the outset, it is easier said than done because once you don the hat of an Arbitrator, you have to ensure impartiality and neutrality on one hand while ensuring procedural efficiency and effective communication on the other hand. 

    It is essential to approach each case with an open mind, without any preconceived notions or biases. The realization that donned over me while sitting as an Arbitrator in a construction dispute, is combing through the complex factual aspects disputes assessing evidence, and documentary proof, which is crucial for rendering just awards. Fact-Finding Skills is indispensable to the process, especially while drafting the Award. Crafting a clear, comprehensive, and well-reasoned award is the final and critical step in the arbitration process, even in cases where the parties are settling and the Arbitrator is called upon to provide a settlement Award like in my case. The award should reflect the arbitrator’s understanding of the case and the legal principles applied.

    In summary, my experience as a Sole Arbitrator has reinforced the importance of impartiality, procedural efficiency, effective communication, legal expertise, fact-finding skills, and adaptability. It has been a continuous journey of learning and growth, and I remain committed to upholding the highest standards of arbitration practice in all my future appointments as well.

    In addition to being an advocate in the Supreme Court of India and High Courts, you’re also a voracious writer & author. Could you share some insights into this aspect compared to traditional legal advocacy?

    Being both an advocate in the Courts and a writer/ author has been a rewarding dual journey that has allowed me to explore the legal profession from two distinct but complementary angles, where both the legal advocacy and writing complement each other. I have written several articles and even a Book, and this passion for writing and authorship allows me to engage with legal topics on a broader scale, and not just from the limited perspectives of an argument before the court. 

    Through articles, books, and legal commentary, I can explore complex legal issues in greater depth and detail. Writing provides a platform to share knowledge, insights, and analysis with a wider audience, including fellow legal professionals, scholars, and the public. It allows for a more contemplative and in-depth exploration of legal concepts and developments.

    In fact, I feel writing and legal advocacy are not mutually exclusive but rather complementary. Writing enhances my advocacy skills by deepening my understanding of legal principles, enabling me to stay updated with legal developments, and improving my ability to communicate complex ideas clearly. It also helps in building a reputation as a thought leader in specific areas of law, which can enhance credibility as an advocate.

    Both legal advocacy and writing offer personal fulfillment, but in different ways. Advocacy provides the satisfaction of directly representing clients and securing favorable outcomes for them. Writing, on the other hand, offers the joy of intellectual exploration and the opportunity to contribute to the legal body of knowledge.

    In summary, the roles of an advocate and a writer/author are complementary facets of my legal career and I implore all young professionals starting their careers to embark upon their own writing expeditions.

    Finally, as someone with a wealth of experience in commercial law and arbitration, what advice would you give to fresh law graduates who are just starting their legal careers, especially those who may be interested in pursuing a path similar to yours in arbitration and dispute resolution?

    To fresh law graduates embarking on their legal careers, especially those considering a path in arbitration and dispute resolution, I offer the following advice:

    1. Build a Strong Foundation – Begin by building a solid foundation in the fundamentals of law. Understand the core legal principles, procedures, and jurisprudence. This strong base will serve as the bedrock for your future endeavors.

    2. Embrace Continuous Learning – The legal field is ever-evolving. Stay committed to lifelong learning. Attend seminars, workshops, and courses to keep abreast of legal developments, especially in the area of arbitration.

    3. Seek Mentorship – Find mentors who can guide you in your legal journey. Experienced mentors can provide invaluable insights, advice, and opportunities for growth.

    4. Develop Advocacy Skills – Whether you are interested in arbitration or litigation, honing your advocacy skills is essential. Practice public speaking, persuasive writing, and argumentation. These skills will serve you well in any legal field.

    5. Pursue Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Training – If you are interested in arbitration and dispute resolution, consider pursuing specialized training in ADR methods. This can include courses on arbitration, mediation, and negotiation.

    In the end be patient and persistent and don’t be discouraged by setbacks or challenges. Also, consider engaging in pro bono work or community service ,as it is not only a way to contribute to society but also an opportunity to gain valuable experience and make a positive impact. Remember that your legal career is a journey, and each step, whether big or small, contributes to your growth and expertise.

    Get in touch with Dr. Shashwat Bajpai-

  • Dhruv Paul, Senior Associate, Watson Farley & Williams, on studying in ILS, practising internationally and pursuing a niche field of law

    Dhruv Paul, Senior Associate, Watson Farley & Williams, on studying in ILS, practising internationally and pursuing a niche field of law

    Dhruv Paul is a graduate from ILS Law College, Pune, batch of 2008. He is currently Senior Associate in the Corporate and Aviation Groups of Watson Farley & Williams. Based out of the Dubai office, he advises clients on a wide range of largely cross-border transactions. Prior to Watson Farley & Williams he worked in the Dubai office of Clyde & Co. and before that in the New Delhi office of Trilegal. His area of expertise includes acting for global and regional conglomerates, financial institutions and high net-worth individuals on acquisitions, divestment and incorporated & unincorporated joint venture transactions, and corporate matters, across the MENA region and India. He also advises clients in the aviation sector, where he represents financiers, airlines, owners and operators on the finance, lease, sale and purchase, and operation & management of business jets and commercial aircraft.

    In this interview we speak to him about:

    • His time at ILS Law School, Pune
    • His experience working in Dubai and the difference in work culture
    • Specialising in niche areas of law

     

    How would you describe your time at ILS?

    I had five wonderful years in ILS Law College, Pune. It was my privilege to study amongst some of the most talented and ambitious people that I know. My batch mates as well as senior and junior colleagues were always working on moot courts, legal research and writing, sports and drama, volunteer work, and of course lots of internships!  I think we all pushed each other to strive for success, while not forgetting to have our fair share of fun, building life-long friendships and memories.

     

    Why did you decide to take up a BSL course as opposed to a B.A. or BBA LL.B. course prior to your LL.B. degree?

    As a youngster just out of school, I was not 100% certain about becoming a lawyer. The BSL LL.B. course of ILS Law College allows you to graduate in three years with a B.A. equivalent degree which qualifies you as a graduate to pursue anything else.  I thought this was a very useful feature to hedge my bets, just in case I didn’t like law school, etc. (of course in retrospect, I didn’t elect to opt out but it was good to know that I had an option without needing to spend two more years studying in futility).

     

    Did you have a mentor or guide during the formative years of your career?

    Yes, I had one or two seniors in college (who eventually graduated while I was still in college) who were of great help in terms of initial career planning. I have tried to build similar relationships with colleagues in each of the organizations that I have worked in. I still use some of them as a sounding board. I think a mentor/guide can add real value at certain junctures, by adding perspective and sharing experience. A mentor or guide can give you useful insight based on their own experience, and in a field where information dissemination is far from ideal, this is a useful tool. That said, I think it is equally important to have conviction in oneself and back yourself to make the right moves.

     

    Having worked in both India and Dubai, what is the difference you see in the work culture and environment?

    The key difference is that Dubai is an international financial centre and a significant cultural melting pot, whereas India is more uniform. The work culture and environment in Dubai is influenced by its richly diverse stakeholders whereas (in a strictly work culture and environment sense), India is pretty one-dimensional.

    In terms of my colleagues and counterparts in Dubai I regularly work with a diverse cross-section of lawyers qualified in England, Canada, Egypt, New Zealand, Singapore, Lebanon, New York, etc. Each of them approach matters in a slightly different way and offer different perspectives based on their experience and training. It is always an interesting and enriching exercise to work with such a diverse group, and to generally discuss the world-at-large with people with different perspectives.

    The client base also consists of a wide range of global, regional and local players, each represented by individuals belonging to different cultures and trained in different styles. There is always a challenge around the corner in how to deal with a specific situation. Even in terms of the actual work, transactions often involve two or more jurisdictions and could be inbound or outbound in across the region and beyond. Juxtapose this against a colleague pool of largely Indian qualified lawyers, practising Indian law in a largely inbound or domestic transaction environment, for largely Indian (or a few expat) client representatives.

     

    What prompted you to shift from working at a prominent Indian law firm to an international one?

    A key reason to shift was to experience the sort of diversity that I have described in my answer above. In addition, I was attracted to work in a large international firm with a wide network that would expose me to a best-in-class practice management, learning and development programme, precedent bank, etc. I also wanted to work in a team that acts as international transaction counsel, as opposed to correspondent local counsel. (I should add that my only experience in an Indian firm was at Trilegal, which fares quite well on most of these parameters in any case).

    My stint in international firms has improved my transaction management efficiency. It has helped me develop an intuitive and proactive (rather than reactive) approach to running transactions. I am encouraged to think commercially and practically in order to get the deal done and achieve the parties’ objectives, while of course remaining within legally acceptable parameters. Of course, working with governing laws that have well settled principles (e.g., English law) or with flexible and investor friendly jurisdictions (e.g., the Cayman Islands and the British Virgin Islands), helps this learning process.

    Tell us a bit about your experience at Trilegal for over five years.

    I joined straight out of law college, completely taken up by the novelty of a BlackBerry, a decent regular income, a plush office and the other bells and whistles. The ‘good life’ feeling was quite swiftly replaced by being hit with a wall of learning and development requirements. The next few years can be classified as a mix of a steep learning curve with long hours at the desk, punctuated by much needed (but all too short) breaks, holidays, retreats and bonus/increments. I received excellent training, and it was my privilege to work in Trilegal during its breakout phase in which it broke into India’s tier I market and metamorphosed from a promising start-up into prominent national player. I left with a sound set of lawyering skills and good relationships with seniors, peers and juniors. I couldn’t have asked for more.

     

    How did you come to develop expertise in niche areas of law, such as aviation and cross-border transaction?

    Having got through the initial slog of adjusting to working life, learning critical job skills and legal principles, and working on delivering projects and transactions; I assessed where I had reached and what I wanted to do next. I realised that there were a fair number of general corporate lawyers like me in the firm that I worked in and in each of the other firms that I could see myself working in. I then decided to try finding ways to differentiate myself. At the same time, I was inclined towards working in an international firm for the type of reasons that we have already seen above. At this stage, I came across a role that would provide me with some exposure to the aviation sector. My research suggested that this is a high growth sector in the Middle East and India. All of these factors, couple with my fascination for aircraft – the decision was made.

     

    If you could condense your career graph, how would you do it?

    In the initial stage, the challenges were around job/skill gap. I don’t think this was limited to me, most of my peers agree that our law training barely gives you the type of skills you need to succeed in transactional private practice roles. Even though I did a number of internships while in law school, most of my learning was ‘on-the-job’. Once I got comfortable in my (then) current position, I decided to shift gears by taking up a role in a different jurisdiction with an unfamiliar sector specialisation, in a different city and within a different category of firms. Looking forward, I guess I would like to continue developing my career, during a period which may see liberalization of the Indian legal sector, tech disruptions, macro-economic challenges, and the rest!

     

    What advice would you give the upcoming generation of lawyers?

    Pick up as many practical skills as you can while still in college/law school, but don’t forget to have fun! Learning a bit of coding might be the next differentiator.