Super Lawyer

Tag: Banking & Finance

  • Law, Leadership, and Business: Becoming someone that clients trust. – Aditya Singha, Independent Commercial and Transaction Lawyer.

    Law, Leadership, and Business: Becoming someone that clients trust. – Aditya Singha, Independent Commercial and Transaction Lawyer.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    I’ll start with a very, very prominent question: how did you decide to become a lawyer, and then how did you decide to pursue an MBA as well? And that too, by scoring a staggering GMAT score of 740. Please enlighten our learners and us as well.

    So, I’ll be very honest, I never even dreamt of doing an MBA when I was setting out to become a lawyer. But luckily for me, I was born in a family where my grandfather was a lawyer, and that too, he wasn’t a lawyer throughout his career. He became a lawyer after he retired from government services. He was a civil lawyer. You would imagine that a lawyer who would take care of disputes, of people who would take care of disputes for companies, would have a lot of people coming into the house.

    So, very early on, from my childhood days, I would see people come to him for advice and assistance, even people who used to stay near our society. I would always see them come with a sense of hope and a sense of gratitude when they would leave, and that feeling, that there’s one person who could give people that hope, that guidance and that comfort that they need at a time which is probably very traumatic or very difficult for them, was something that I took very closely. So, I wanted to become a lawyer from a very early age.

    Secondly, I also enjoyed reading a lot, so that went in my favor because I realized that a lawyer’s job is to constantly update his or her knowledge, constantly keep on reading, and I enjoyed reading. So I felt, okay, this is another avenue where I think I can enhance those aspects about me because I also love to read and I love to learn more.

    So, I really wanted to become a lawyer since I was 10 years old, and I never really took up any law coaching as such. This is going to segue into my GMAT score. I actually studied for the engineering entrance exams. I got a decent rank in the AIEEE and got on the extended merit list in the IIT as well, but I never wanted to become an engineer. Engineering was always, for me, a backup option.

    Once I got a good score in CLAT and then subsequently a score in AILET, which allowed me admission into National Law University, Delhi, I think it was a slam dunk for me because A, it was Delhi, and B, it was led by Professor Dr. Ranbir Singh, who had basically propped up NALSAR to become one of the best law schools in the country. I was genuinely excited about being part of one of the earlier batches of this institution, which thankfully today continues to be one of the best in the country.

    So, for me, law was always a very clear path. I would say corporate law was not really that clear of a path. It was only during my time working with different law firms that I developed a fascination for corporate law, and when I joined my first firm, I realized that there is a lot of excitement I find in helping businesses navigate challenges.

    I would say that is effectively the mantra that I followed. What do I want to be? I want to be someone who helps companies, businesses, entrepreneurs, and founders solve challenges and help them on the path to growth or to avoid risks from harming that business or harming that proposition. So that’s pretty much how my journey started.

    For my MBA, honestly, that’s a whole other answer. I never imagined that I would do an MBA. I never imagined I would go to INSEAD for my MBA, but yeah, I’ll be happy to discuss that once you want me to discuss it.

    We would love to discuss this immediately because, while you had initially prepared for engineering, you ultimately chose to pursue law. How did you adapt your mindset while preparing for the GMAT, given that it requires precision and a completely different approach compared to the way lawyers typically write? How did you unlearn certain habits, relearn new strategies, and successfully achieve this remarkable result?

    So first, the rationale for why I wanted to do an MBA sort of permeated from me setting up my independent practice. Once I set up my practice, I started engaging more with young founders and entrepreneurs. And because my intention was to help founders and entrepreneurs grow, it required me to deep dive into business and operations with them. I had to understand how they run their businesses, so I had to develop an understanding of business models. I needed to understand how they generate revenue and how they spend that money. I needed to develop an understanding of both accounting and corporate finance, and then I needed to understand what their next step would be.

    One example I can give is that I was advising a blockchain company back in 2021, and they wanted to develop a very unique synthetic trading portal on the blockchain. There was nothing similar like that existing either in India or anywhere else that we could find. We needed to create a structure that would comply with whichever laws were applicable in India because there was nothing that uniquely identified how this business would work.

    Helping that founder create a regulatory-compliant business model made me realize that there is a lot more value that lawyers can bring to companies and to founders because of our unique understanding of how regulations work and how they are applied, and because of our understanding of how impact and value can be created, having seen other founders achieve that. We can effectively leverage all of that exposure and bring value to founders not just from a legal perspective but also from a business perspective.

    All of these things combined started making me think about how I could add more value to these founders, to my clients. I realized that yes, I do have some form of knowledge or experience, but that was all secondhand because it was gained through interacting with C-Suite level executives or founders. There was nothing concrete I could rely on to advise these founders. That is when I started researching more about how MBA programs work, the value-add that someone like me could get, and how I could enhance and leverage the experiences I had in my past.

    That effectively started the journey and the momentum toward giving the GMAT, identifying INSEAD as a potential opportunity, applying for INSEAD, and then getting through. So that’s how that trajectory went.

    In terms of preparing specifically for GMAT, I can condense it very quickly. Yes, there is a lot of unlearning that needs to happen. You are absolutely right. There is a lot of effort required to understand how to solve problems. The idea is, as Indian students, many of us have a predictable set path in which we solve problems, whether quantitative or verbal. But the GMAT is one exam where the strategy is to find whatever way works to arrive at the correct answer.

    This is key in a service industry that relies on a lot of data that must be analyzed, synthesized, and then communicated to a client in a manner the client understands. The GMAT is effectively what you learn in an MBA program, condensed, and ensures that you have that knowledge ready so that you are not lagging behind in an MBA.

    So there was a lot of unlearning and a lot of relearning in terms of how to strategically and tactically approach specific questions, and a lot of practice was needed. I think what people forget is that it is not about how much you know for the GMAT but about how much you have practiced in that kind of environment because it is a very intense examination.

    For example, when I was giving the exam, there were COVID regulations for the admission centers. We had to give the exam in a room with our masks on. We could not take our masks off at all, and we did not have access to anything, including water. It was very strenuous because you are stressed about the exam, there is a timer running, you have to manage your time, you have to ensure that you answer every question, and if you skip a question, you cannot go back.

    So there are many permutations and combinations outside of just pure knowledge. It requires a lot of practice simulated in an exam environment. I think what worked for me was that I pushed myself to simulate that exam environment regularly. And of course, I had the benefit that, since it was my own practice, I could identify time slots every day for practice. But I think being disciplined and serious about what you need to do is the simplest way to achieve a good GMAT score.

    Wow! With your independent practice, you also managed to crack this challenging exam. Considering that you pursued your MBA during the COVID-19 period, a time when many perspectives on management evolved, how did this new understanding of management help you build a stronger practice after completing the course compared to the understanding you had before it? You must have done some comparative analysis on this if you don’t mind sharing, what were your key takeaways?

     That’s absolutely the perfect question because that is the one question I ask a lot of potential applicants who are in the legal field who want to do an MBA.

    That’s the one point I ask them to ask yourself, why are you doing this? What do you hope to gain out of this? Because an MBA is very customized, I would say. It’s a very bespoke course.  Because you’ll get a lot of information and a lot of that information is probably available at 100th of the cost. The question is, what do you want to derive out of that experience?  So I can say personally for me, there were a few factors that were very critical, which I feel I can leverage today after having completed. The first and foremost, and this goes well for most international MBAs, is the network. 

    At INSEAD, I think there is a rule that a particular nationality cannot be represented by more than 11 or 12% of the cohort. So it is by rule that you will be interacting with people from a variety of different geographies, different backgrounds, different experiences, and you are forced to be in that situation.

    When I say forced, it’s by nature of the groups that are set, the sections that are created. You are constantly interacting with people whom you probably may not have anything in connection with prima facie. Like in my group, you would not have another Indian and you would not have another lawyer. You would have people from completely different backgrounds, and I think that helps in two ways.

    Number one, after you graduate, your alumni network is probably one of the strongest in the world. So you can basically look at the alumni directory and you’ll find the who’s who of any industry. So you know, if you are stuck somewhere or you need assistance somewhere, you have an alumni base to rely on and it’s one of the strongest components of INSEAD. Second, you also develop an understanding of how different perceptions can approach different problems. Because when you are given a problem as a group,  as an analytical Indian lawyer, I might solve it in path A.  Someone who works in the renewable energy industries who’s only worked on offshore drilling, they look at that in another path. Someone who’s worked in hardcore finance, hedge fund, or investment banking, they look at that same problem maybe in my direction, but a different path.  Someone who’s an army vet, a Marine operator, they will look at it differently. So when you are interacting with so many different people trying to solve a very similar problem.

    You start getting an understanding of how different people think and what their rationale is for them. And when I look back, that helps me also tackle challenges that my clients face in different ways in which I would’ve never thought, because unfortunately, a lot of lawyers are caught in this bubble of thinking in a very pedantic and a very straight cut method.

     That usually doesn’t happen in an MBA because you are dealt with problems that span different industries and therefore you have to rely on different ways of thinking. So the mental models, the thought processes, the approach, I think that also helps you understand problems from different lenses.  And the last, and another important takeaway for me was how do you value the output more than the process? Because ultimately as a service provider, whether you’re a consultant, whether you’re a banker, whether you’re a lawyer, ultimately your goal is to resolve challenges and solve issues for your clients and do it in a way that they can trust you with their work going on. There’s a very important saying that one of the professors said that you know that you’re a good service provider when your client calls you up for help that is outside your core service. For example, if a client calls you up and says, Hey, Aditya, can you tell me the name of a good pediatric surgeon in Delhi?  That means they trust you for things even outside your core competence.  And how do you develop that trust is what we learned. How do you build processes that help you create that engine that gives them what they want? 

    So that was my takeaway, and that’s what’s helping me optimize and make my practice more efficient. More driven towards solutions rather than process, which may become an obstacle for client service

    The kind of trust your clients place in you is truly inspiring. It seems this trust stems not only from your legal expertise but also from your problem-solving approach, even beyond traditional legal boundaries. Is this the same trust that has enabled you to handle multi-million-dollar, high-stakes deals? Could you share a story of a particularly complex transaction or negotiation where your combined understanding of law and management helped you find a solution that others might have struggled with?

     Sure. So I think the first one, in terms of a complex deal.  I think the most complex deal that I did was one of the biggest deals that I did in my independent practice. It was an acquisition of a logistics company from a listed company.

    So we were acting for the acquirers. And safe to say that I had gained the trust of my clients to the extent that they would trust me with almost 150 crore rupee deal. In the listed company space, and what I realized later was this was going to be an uphill challenge because unlike any other deal that I had done even in my law firm career, this one required me to have a strong understanding of not just basics of M&A and transactional law, but also accounting.

    About how business operations in this industry were, because I had to sit with the client and understand the implications of what the negotiations were going to be, because ultimately those were to be reflected in the transaction document. So having that kind of interaction first with business, then with finance, then trying to understand how those interplay with the legal clauses.

    Then, drafting those clauses and then negotiating with a company that has probably a battery of lawyers that are assisting them because they’re a listed company.  So that was very, very challenging, and it was complex transactions, primarily because there were a lot of payment driven issues because it was effectively a carve out of the listed company.

    They were carving out a business and we were acquiring that business. So how do you create that delineation from now this belongs to us and whatever remains is yours. How the accounting for that is going to be done. And even if there is an agreement on how it’s going to be done in practice, ultimately it’s my job to put it on paper.

     So doing that, and this was before my MBA. So I did not even have that kind of a formal understanding of how finance and accounting work.  I had a bare bones understanding back then,  but it forced me to continuously interact with my client and understand what it is that they’re looking for.

    And I think this is the biggest learning I can give to anyone who’s advising clients on M&A.  Understand what your client wants out of this transaction. Because not every deal is the same. People have different expectations from that transaction. And your job as a counsel and an advisor is to understand what that requirement is and then put it on paper to either ensure it happens or to protect so that it doesn’t get taken away.

    So that deal for me was very challenging because I did not have any assistant, I had another senior lawyer who was working with me. But I needed to understand tax, accounting, employment, labor, and transactional work all on my own. So that was challenging, but very rewarding because we ended up having a very successful team.

    To your second point about interesting negotiations,  very interestingly, after my MBA, one of the deals that I had negotiated was against my earlier firm where I negotiated with one of the lawyers who I mentored back in the firm, and having that kind of interaction with him, trying to recall and leverage all the business side elements of what I wanted to protect for my client and interacting with him on that point was a very good learning for me.

    And it was a very, I would say, smooth process because.  I was very proud of the fact that he also came at me with very logical arguments. And this is another very important point because if this is going out to other lawyers who are in this profession, one thing again that you have to realize is please, whatever arguments you’re making in a negotiation, number one, be very well prepared with what you have to say, why you are asking for what you’re asking.

    And anticipate what the counterparty might say, putting yourself in their position.  Because a lot of time, the only argument you’re giving is, this is market standard. This is what we want. Without giving a rationale, then you’re effectively  moving yourself back from the negotiation table and you’re making it break down.

    So another very important aspect that I learned, especially for negotiations, is that you really need to put in a lot of effort, a lot of work to support what you are saying, why you are saying and why it makes sense. Because at the end of the day, your job is to ensure that there is a solution that works for everyone.

    You cannot drum things down on the other side unless of course you have leverage. But most times when parties are on an equal footing, you need to come with solid arguments, but also help the other side understand. Look, this works for me and it also works for you because A, B, C, and what you are suggesting doesn’t work because of D, E, F.

    So when you give rationale, it is very difficult for the human brain to immediately say no. It makes them think. And once you’re making someone think that, that means you’re moving ahead. So that’s a negotiation strategy that I deployed amongst the other things that I learned. But one thing that I felt very happy about was I could see that what I had learned almost entirely was being replicated by someone who  I basically helped and who’s now a very accomplished lawyer in his own right.

    So I think it was a good negotiation, and that’s the reason why I remember it so well.

    Wow! The way you approach challenges using both legal expertise and analytical skills developed through your MBA is fascinating. How has this combination helped you attract clients like startup founders seeking fundraising and structuring advice? Since law itself demands logical thinking, how did you transition from initially not being inclined toward corporate law to strategically building your expertise in this field? What steps did you take to train yourself to handle these challenges analytically and logically?

    I read a lot. The simplest answer is I read a lot. I put myself in situations where I was forced to be the one doing the grunt work. One example I can recall from the first firm I worked at was that we had one of the best corporate law libraries I can think of. There were books on M&A and transactions that I don’t think many law firms in India would have had access to.

    When I had access to that library and to some of the best corporate lawyers in the country, I was as inquisitive as a young lawyer could be. I would always read up on different transactions. I would read about how contracts are framed. I would read about best practices in the United States or the United Kingdom. I would read case laws during my off time. I would review transaction documents signed by the firm 10 or even 15 years ago.

    So, once I became interested in the business of transaction law—or any subject for that matter—it was always about putting myself in a situation where I could learn whatever I wanted to know about it. I would find resources, read, and absorb as much as I could. And now, this has become 10 times easier because all research often requires is a simple prompt. I think research has become easier, but at the end of the day, it’s about reading the full article or the complete chapter of a book and understanding it deeply.

    For me, developing this analytical skillset has always been through reading a lot and talking to a lot of lawyers. Whenever I was on a deal with someone who did things I didn’t understand, I would never hesitate to ask them, “Why did you say that? What was the point you were making in this argument? Why was this so important?” You’d be surprised at how many senior lawyers genuinely appreciate junior lawyers coming up and asking such questions.

    I would urge a lot of lawyers, especially those in law firms, to never hesitate in approaching your senior associate or principal associate and asking, “Why is this happening?” This is also a very important point for potential leaders. Whether you are becoming a senior associate, a principal associate, or a partner, whenever you are delegating work, it is imperative that you explain why you are doing it and what you are expecting from the team. This not only enhances their comprehension of the problem but also ensures that they remain focused on the outcome.

    For me, developing that thought process was both as a learner and as someone who mentored young lawyers and interns. Constantly engaging in that way made it second nature to me. Whenever a problem statement comes before me, I can immediately identify the key aspects—the fact pattern, the trigger points, and the interests that the client needs addressed.

    One of the first things I do when I take on a mandate is to talk to the client and understand what a successful outcome looks like for them. This is something I find many lawyers overlook. Even before my MBA, I always focused on this, but after my MBA, I learned that a successful advisor not only understands what the client needs but also helps the client define what they truly want. Sometimes clients are not equipped to frame their needs clearly. It is your job to guide them—to be like Gandalf for them, mentoring and advising them in a way that helps them discover the most viable solution.

    It’s all about constant interaction, continuous updating of knowledge, and being hungry to understand things. In every form of communication—whether on WhatsApp, email, or in conversations with juniors or seniors—you must have clarity in what you are saying and why you are saying it.

    Over time, it all becomes second nature. At least, that’s what has happened to me.

    Being an avid reader and someone who has never hesitated to question and learn from seniors, how has this curiosity shaped you into an approachable mentor? You’ve guided many aspiring legal professionals, how does it feel to see your mentees succeed, and what key advice or guiding principles do you usually share with them that our learners could benefit from?

    I’m very passionate about this, so I’d love to talk more about this. One, how I started, again, my inquisitive nature always made me question everything. And it was not just in a law firm; it was even at home. Why is this the way? Why is that the way? And because I had a background in science, it was always that questioning of why something happens.

    Unless you understand the why, you’re never going to understand the process itself. So you need to know why something happens. There has to be a reason behind it. And that prompted me to be very inquisitive. Based on that, I spoke to a lot of people. Sometimes I would be shooed away, but a lot of times I would be given a patient ear.

    And also, in a way, because I was instrumental in helping form the internship strategy at one of my firms, it made me interact with a lot of interns. Throughout that journey, I realized that interns also come to a law firm with the expectation of learning. They are not just there as law students who are expected to do a lot of grunt work or research work; they also have an expectation from the law firm. I learned that while interning in some of the best law firms in the country, a couple of them in fact, and there I got a sense of understanding what work goes on in a law firm.

    But there is also that learning that happens from some of the senior lawyers, which is absolutely incomparable because they know how things work in practice. What you are studying in law school is a lot of academic knowledge. So it was my role that because I got that, I had to give it forward, and I enjoyed doing that.

    I enjoyed speaking with interns one-on-one throughout my time in all the law firms that I worked with, and even now. Now the question is, how do I do it? Again, it’s a very similar way to how I work with clients. My first question to a lot of them is, I need to understand why are you here? Why are we talking?

    What is it that you hope to achieve out of this? There are people who come asking me for advice on how to manage toxicity in the workplace, which is unfortunately a very important topic but is very prevalent. A lot of people ask, I want to shift from a law firm to in-house. How do I do that?

    The first question I ask is why? What’s problematic in that law firm? What is it that you have identified that you cannot work for? If someone asks me, okay, I’m a lawyer who’s doing disputes, I want to go do an MBA, my first question is why? Have you asked yourself why you want to do this? Is it the money? Do you want to do law, or do you want to do law with that understanding?

    So the way I talk to students, mentors, and young lawyers is first I ask them what their motivations are. So it’s sort of like helping them drill down in their own mind what it is that they have to speak about when they come to me. And my role is mostly to help them realize what it is that they want and then give them my understanding with a very clear caveat.

    I am not a counselor. I am not a career guide, and I’m not, let’s say, an MBA coach. I can only tell you what worked for me, and there is nothing to say that what worked for me will work for you. So please take what I say with a pinch of salt. But what I can tell you are the principles that I applied; they are very likely to probably be relevant in your field because the principles are very straightforward.

    Have clarity of thought, understand the motivation behind any action, whether it’s speech or whether it’s written. Understand the implications or have an idea of what the implications of those actions would be, and then if you’re okay with the implications, go achieve that outcome in a strategic manner.

    Understand what it is that you want to do and then lay out a plan of action. Don’t just go headfirst into a situation and say, I’ll take things as they come, because that’s inefficient. One thing I keep telling people is law requires you to be efficient because at any point in time, you’re juggling five things.

    So if you’re not efficient, you are bound to drop the ball. And the best way to not drop it is to have some sort of structure, some sort of, I would say in a crude sense, an SOP. If a project comes, then I do A, B, C. If X happens, then Y is the outcome. While it takes time, the moment it gets crystallized, it becomes a very standard operating process for anyone.

    It then just becomes like a program. Once something comes, you know the path that you have to follow. So your brain is then only focused on exactly the substance, not the administrative process around it. And that helps a lot of people realize their own value, their own way of working. Some people work visually, some people work through reading.

    Some are more analytical than others, but then they find what it truly is that they want, and that’s when it’s more of a eureka moment for some of them. Obviously not everyone has that, but that’s my path. It’s not spoon-feeding. It is effectively helping them understand who they are, what it is that they want, and how they can do that.

    I can help you create a path to it, but what you want to do, that’s up to you. And then it applies everywhere, whether it’s professional or personal, whether it’s within the law or outside the law.

    Navigating such a demanding career, how do you maintain a balance between mental and physical health, especially when long hours and tight deadlines are involved? What strategies have worked for you to stay productive without burning out? Additionally, looking ahead, what are your plans for the next few years in terms of your career and practice, especially after transitioning from law to also pursuing an MBA?

    I can speak for hours because that is such an important aspect that I’ve realized. Unfortunately, a bit later in my professional life, but better late than never in my view. So I cannot stress enough how important managing your mental health and physical health is, especially in a career like law.

    I don’t think I need to go into the details of why it’s important. I think it is now an absolute truth that you need to maintain every aspect of your body, whether it’s the physical body or the mental body. You have to, if you want to lead a life that you are content with. There is no question about it.

    And I think that’s pretty much a given. How to do that is a major point. One thing I felt in my own life, even without having maybe the knowledge that I do today, is I could take care of my physical health because I wanted to. Right from the day I started working, in fact, a year before I started working, I made sure that I made it a habit to do some form of physical workout every single week, maybe four to six times continuously. Once it became a habit for me for, let’s say, over a month or two months, if I remember correctly, then it became an indispensable part of my daily routine, and I think that’s what’s most crucial. Once you make something a part of your routine, then it becomes something that you don’t need to think about.

    Yes, there is that initial inertia that prevents you from doing things that you know are important. That’s where actual growth is. If you push yourself through for a short period of time, once it becomes part of the routine, in fact, you feel the other way. There was this period of time when I was undergoing some physical issues where I couldn’t go to the gym, and I genuinely felt that I was missing out on something during the day because it feels that once I work out, once I come back to work, I feel motivated and invigorated. A physical workout of any kind, whether it’s running, walking, yoga, going to the gym, swimming, any form of physical exercise that elevates your heart rate and makes you sweat a little bit, is, I think, very crucial not just for your physical health, but it also has an impact on mental health.

    And when it comes to mental health, there is this saying that everyone should meditate for 20 minutes a day, except when you are really busy and stressed. In that case, you have to meditate for 40 minutes a day. What people don’t realize is the value in that statement is so deep that unless you do it, you will not realize it.

    Meditation doesn’t mean that you have to go to a particular place; if that works for you, great. But meditation is effectively calming your thoughts. It’s not about having no thoughts, but mindful meditation. The one that I follow is just having comfort in knowing that whatever you are thinking is okay, and you let it pass without judgment.

    Simply put, giving yourself 15 to 20 minutes a day, anytime during the day, where there is calm, where you are not worried about the next message, the next meeting, or a call that’s supposed to happen. The impact that that period of calmness has on your day, and if you do it over a period of time in your life in general, really helps you also become a better lawyer.

    I’ll give you an example. There are a lot of times in a lawyer’s life when, during negotiations, things can get very heated, and I have seen lawyers lose their cool in conversations. One thing I felt after I started meditating is that my reaction to a lot of unnecessary verbiage that’s thrown in a negotiation is much lower.

    I don’t react impulsively anymore, and what that does is it not only shows that you are the bigger person when you are keeping your calm while the other person might be shouting, but it also shows your client that you are confident about the path that you’re following. Ultimately, if your client sees that confidence in you, then that means you’re doing something right as his or her advisor.

    So it’s not just about feeling good about yourself. All of these things actually also help you become a better lawyer as well. It helps you deal with the stresses that the life of a lawyer will inevitably throw at you. It is a given that a lawyer’s life will have stress. There is no escaping that.

    Anyone who thinks otherwise is deluded, or they’re probably practicing law in a way I have never seen. But stress is effectively in the nature of the legal career, and the only way is, you don’t wish for stress to go away, you learn to deal with it, and you learn to manage it. One of the best ways to manage it for me turns out to be meditation.

    So I think it is absolutely critical.

    Get in touch with Aditya Singha –

  • “Law has always intrigued me because of its power to shape businesses, resolve disputes, and create order in an otherwise complex world.” – Ishaan Duggal, Associate Partner at HSA Advocates.

    “Law has always intrigued me because of its power to shape businesses, resolve disputes, and create order in an otherwise complex world.” – Ishaan Duggal, Associate Partner at HSA Advocates.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    What initially inspired you to pursue a career in law?

    Law has always intrigued me because of its power to shape businesses, resolve disputes, and create order in an otherwise complex world. While I did not have a predetermined path toward law, I was drawn to its logical reasoning, problem-solving, and impact on society. As I began to explore the legal field, I was drawn to the idea of working within a law firm environment, where I could help clients navigate complex legal challenges, whether in business, litigation, or personal matters. The opportunity to collaborate with skilled professionals and offer practical, strategic solutions to clients was something that truly inspired me. Ultimately, I saw a career in law as a way to apply my skills in critical thinking and problem-solving to advocate for clients and create lasting, positive outcomes. Over time, I developed a keen interest in commercial and financial laws, which eventually led me to specialize in insolvency and restructuring.

    What motivated you to pursue an LLM (Professional) in Banking and Financial Studies from NLU Delhi?

    After completing my law degree and practicing for a few years, I understood that it is crucial for legal professionals to stay ahead of the curve, and hence I wanted to deepen my understanding of banking, securities, insolvency and investment laws. The LLM (Pro.) in Banking and Financial Studies at NLU Delhi provided a strong foundation in areas like banking and finance, securities and investment laws, arbitration, insolvency and financial restructuring—topics that are highly relevant in today’s economic environment. This specialization has been instrumental in my practice, particularly where financial acumen is as critical as legal expertise.

    What were some key learning experiences in the early years of your career?

    The initial years of practice were a mix of excitement and steep learning curves. I quickly realized the importance of building strong client relationships. At first, I focused heavily on legal research and analysis, but I learned that a successful practice also requires understanding clients’ needs, building trust, and communicating complex legal issues in a way that is clear and actionable for them. Another key experience was learning to manage multiple cases and deadlines simultaneously while maintaining attention to detail. I also had the opportunity to work closely with senior attorneys, where I learned the value of mentorship, strategic thinking, and how to approach complex legal problems creatively. It was through these experiences that I developed a deeper understanding of how to balance legal expertise with client service, and how to work effectively as part of a team in a fast-paced law firm environment. 

    As far as my practice area is concerned, one of the most valuable experiences was understanding the practical application of insolvency laws, especially how different stakeholders—creditors, resolution professionals, and debtors—navigate the process.
    One key moment that stayed with me was working on a case where a corporate debtor’s revival depended on strategic negotiation rather than just legal arguments. This reinforced my belief that law is not just about statutes but also about commercial awareness and strategic thinking.

    What are the key challenges in insolvency proceedings in the Renewable Energy and Automobile sectors?

    Both industries present unique challenges. In the renewable energy sector, insolvency cases often involve long-term power purchase agreements (PPAs), regulatory approvals, and government policies, which can complicate resolution. In contrast, the automobile industry faces issues like supply chain disruptions and asset-heavy structures, making liquidation complex.
    One of the biggest challenges is finding resolution applicants who see long-term value in distressed assets. In such cases, we work closely with financial institutions and potential investors to structure resolution plans that align with industry-specific constraints.

    What was the primary legal issue in the ARCIL vs Bishal Jaiswal judgment, and what impact did it have on insolvency law?

    The Hon’ble Supreme Court vide judgment dated April 15, 2021 in the matter of Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd v. Bishal Jaiswal & Anr. decided a crucial question of law pertaining to whether entries in the Balance Sheet would amount to an acknowledgment of debt for the purpose of extending the period of limitation as provided under Section 18 of Limitation Act, 1963 (Limitation Act) as far as the IBC is concerned.  

    In this landmark judgment which is undoubtedly significant to all stakeholders under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), the Apex Court took cognizance of the fact that although the filing of a Balance Sheet is a statutory requirement as per the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, however, doing the same can amount to an acknowledgment of debt depending on the facts of the particular case as to whether an entry made in a Balance Sheet qua any particular creditor is unequivocal or has been entered into with caveats. These caveats could be in the form of notes to accounts or other qualifications made in the Balance Sheets.

    This judgment also set aside the majority decision of the Hon’ble National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) in the matter of V. Padmakumar v. Stressed Assets Stabilisation Fund wherein the majority opinion of the five-member bench was that entries in Balance Sheets would not amount to an acknowledgment of debt to extend limitation under Section 18 of the Limitation Act.

    In addition to the above, the Hon’ble Supreme Court relied upon its decisions in Sesh Nath Singh & Anr v. Baidyabati Sheoraphuli Co-operative Bank Ltd & Anr. and Laxmi Pat Surana v. Union Bank of India & Anr8 and observed that it is not possible to accede to the arguments that Section 18 of the Limitation Act cannot be made applicable to proceedings under the IBC.

    What advice would you offer to aspiring lawyers?

    • Hone your research and drafting skills, as the best arguments stem from well-researched positions.
    • Understand the commercial impact of legal proceedings—clients seek solutions, not just legal opinions.
    • Develop a strong foundation in commercial and financial laws, as they are critical for corporate litigation.
    • Stay patient and persistent—the legal profession demands continuous learning, adaptability, and strategic thinking.

    How do you maintain a work-life balance in a demanding legal career?

    Balancing work and personal life in the legal profession can be challenging, but I make a conscious effort to manage it effectively. A few strategies that work for me include:

    • Prioritizing tasks and setting clear timelines for completing them.
    • Taking short breaks and staying engaged in non-legal activities to maintain perspective.
    • Most importantly, understanding that while work is demanding, personal well-being is equally important for long-term success in this profession.

    Additionally, I’ve learned that there are certain periods, especially during high-stakes cases, when work demands more attention, and I adjust by being more strategic about my personal commitments during those times. The key is knowing that it’s a cycle—some weeks will be more intense than others, but I always make time to recharge when I can. In the end, it’s about being proactive in managing my time and knowing when to push and when to step back.

    Get in touch with Ishaan Duggal –

  • “I attribute my success to a combination of continuous learning, meticulous preparation, strategic thinking, adaptability, and dedication to my craft”- Sachiv Kumar, Senior Partner, SDS Advocates

    “I attribute my success to a combination of continuous learning, meticulous preparation, strategic thinking, adaptability, and dedication to my craft”- Sachiv Kumar, Senior Partner, SDS Advocates

    This Interview has been published by Pragya Chandni and The SuperLawyer Team

    Could you share a bit about your journey into the legal profession, particularly what led you to specialize in Banking & Finance and General Corporate law?

    My career path is a tapestry of diverse experiences, woven together by a passion and zeal for continuous learning and a relevant drive to understand the intricate legal landscape and providing strategic solutions to complex legal challenges. 

    My Journey of becoming a corporate lawyer has been very dynamic and full of exciting professional challenges. To sum up these extremely rich and eventful years (approx. 16 years) in a few sentences/para is surely an impossible task, however when I look back, the journey has been very rewarding and no experiences, challenges and detours have gone in vain. I have handled an enormous variety of matters and legal issues pertaining to Banking & Finance, General Corporate, Real Estate and Foreign Exchange Laws.  I also have experience in handling cross border deals encompassing Singapore and English laws. 

    My legal profession began when I secured placement from my college in India’s top private bank in 2008 and as an in-house counsel gained first-hand experience with the intricacies of financial laws, regulations and varied nature of transactions including project finance, corporate lending, syndications, consortium lending, etc. Working as an in-house counsel initially in a highly reputed private bank provided me with valuable insights into the legal challenges faced by financial institutions and complex documentations. This experience sparked my interest in specializing in Banking & Finance law, as I saw the opportunity to deepen my understanding of regulatory frameworks and provide strategic legal advice to financial entities. Within 4 years of my career, I was exposed to International banking and handled work related to English Laws, Singapore Laws, DIFC laws and worked on varied complex matters pertaining to these geographies along with all tier-1 international/domestic law firms and understood the nuances of International transactions which sparked my further interest in Banking and finance.

    Moreover, my role exposed me to various corporate matters, from contract negotiations to compliance issues, structuring the deals (including cross-border) and handling the clients on a day to day basis, which piqued my interest in General Corporate laws. My early days taught me to be disciplined, versatile, multi-tasking and detail oriented. 

    “You might find it funny but my friends used to call me ‘justice’ during my early days which some of them still continue to do and I was being labelled as ‘Hawk Eye’ because of my eye to minute details”. 

    What is your approach or philosophy to winning or representing a client and how do you balance the strategic needs of your clients?

    My approach inculcates ethics that best suit clients’ needs and works towards the satisfaction of clients. I have earned a reputation for the simple philosophy of “personal and prompt service and advice relevant to modern practical requirements of business”. My out of box thinking about a particular issue and providing a solution which is in the best interest of the client is what sets me apart. I take extra care to ensure that my client feels assured, focused and on track throughout the tenure of our arrangement.

    On various occasions, pointed out to me by my clients, my ability to deeply empathize with them, being able to put myself squarely in their shoes, and suggest a course of action that is in their genuine best interests even if it means it might not be so much in my own, has

    been the reason for winning the confidence of my clients. 

    One needs to understand that while negotiating you should only speak when it is required, be articulative, put in a fair offer and add value. While negotiating contracts my approach is to have a detailed eye on the minutest thing and find a balance. I don’t believe in taking extreme approaches and keep my calm and patience even if the discussion is going otherwise . No doubt for doing a proper negotiation you need to be prepared, have subject knowledge and confidence. I make sure that I have read the agreement and related laws before my negotiations and have thought about the best and worst outcome. 

    Balancing the strategic needs of clients with legal requirements in corporate advisory involves careful analysis and communication. I prioritize understanding the client’s goals and objectives, then develop strategies that align with both their business objectives and legal compliance. This often entails conducting thorough legal research, risk assessment, and collaborating closely with the client to ensure transparency and informed decision-making throughout the process. Effective communication and proactive management of expectations are key to maintaining this balance while navigating complex legal landscapes.

    I float ideas and suggestions and have my back up ready in case the initial recommendation/suggestion fails. Also I synchronised my thoughts and executed in such a manner that the other side get convinced with my arguments and advances. I give patient hearing to the points made by the other side and then ask them questions as to ‘why’ and ‘how’ the same is relevant to a particular issue. The idea/approach is to close the deal and find out the solutions so that the business is not affected and also legal requirements are met. There have been various instances where I have been part of major negotiations with bigger law firms/companies of the country, and I have been able to get the deal done in favour of my client with my negotiation skills and understanding of laws.

    With your extensive experience in both Indian and English law, could you highlight some of the key differences you’ve encountered when handling cross-border deals?

    Though Indian laws are based on common law principles, there are lots of differences between the two. The distinctions between Indian and foreign laws (including English Laws) encompasses various aspects, including the way commercial contracts are drafted, legal frameworks and jurisdictional principles, contract formation requirements, dispute resolution mechanisms, regulatory environments, and taxation considerations. 

    In most of the foreign geographies including England, there is no concept of stamping the contracts (except the debenture for mortgage of immovable assets), unlike India. There is no requirement of signing each and every page and only the last page is signed and executed as the burden of proof lies on the person denying the execution.  Anything above 2 (two) % of default interest is treated as damages, which can only be awarded by the courts, treatment of fixed and floating charges by the authorities under insolvency process. The loan agreement in foreign geography is based on standard Loan Market Association (‘LMA’) format in UK/European Countries and Asia Pacific Loan Market Association (“APLMA”) format which is a guiding factor and works as model loan agreements for use in various transactions and jurisdictions. Additionally, the compliance requirements, licensing procedures, and reporting obligations are slightly cumbersome in India unlike foreign countries which impacts the structuring and execution of cross-border transactions.

    Further, in Singapore, providing upward/cross guarantees are not easy unless some commercial consideration and corporate benefit is involved between the subsidiary (guarantor) and holding company. There is no requirement of board resolution in Singapore and the extract of ACRA is sufficient proof to evidence the persons authorised on behalf of the Company to execute the documents. 

    Your accolades speak volumes about your contributions to the legal industry. What do you attribute your success to, and how do you stay ahead in such a dynamic field?

    A lawyer’s work is perpetually exciting and stimulating. Please refer to the answer given in Question no.2 above, which is required to win your client and stay ahead in this dynamic field.

    Further, I attribute my success to a combination of continuous learning, meticulous preparation, strategic thinking, adaptability, and dedication to my craft. In such a dynamic field of law, staying ahead requires staying updated on legal developments, networking with peers, and being proactive in seeking out new opportunities for growth and innovation. Additionally, maintaining a strong work ethic and a passion for the law has been essential in staying ahead in this competitive environment.

    What sets me apart is my ability to understand clients’ wants, empathise with them, and ensure desired results in a time bound manner. Professionalism and courtesy towards my clients are my distinctive traits. One of my notable attributes is attention to detail and to leave no margin for errors. Reading large amounts of research, absorbing facts and figures, analysing material, and distilling it into something manageable is my key feature. In order to ensure that my clients feel assured and satisfied, I pass a legal problem through multiple screens and filters and subject it to multiple revisions to ensure a favourable outcome. 

    Further you need to be innovative in approaching clients nowadays as they have multiple options to get the desired result and to break the ice in this competitive environment one needs to be equipped with the target sectors. One of the innovative ways to get client’s attention is to keep updating your practice areas, your portfolio and your recent achievements on your website and periodically sharing information on various social media platforms and across various legal networking websites so that clients have easy access to them. Our team does extensive research on various RBI & SEBI Notifications/Circulars, Important Judgments and creates “Articles/Newsletters” and sends them to my clients so that they are informed about the latest changes in law. We are trying to focus more on making ourselves available and accessible digitally. Additionally, I also stay updated by reading newsletters/articles by other law firms and publications by legal databases/journals.

    Given your expertise in areas like Fintech Laws and Digital Lending, could you shed light on some emerging trends or challenges you foresee in these sectors?

    Certainly, In the rapidly evolving landscape of Fintech laws and digital lending, there are several emerging trends and challenges to consider:

    1. Regulatory Compliance: As Fintech innovations continue to disrupt traditional financial services, regulators are working to keep pace with new technologies while ensuring consumer protection and financial stability. Compliance with evolving regulations such as sandbox regulations, AIF regulations, Digital lending Guidelines, Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, GDPR, and AML/KYC requirements, etc. remains a significant challenge.
    2. Data Privacy and Security: With the increasing digitization of financial services, the protection of sensitive consumer data/personal data becomes paramount. Fintech firms must navigate complex data privacy laws and implement robust security measures to safeguard against cyber threats and data breaches and would need to strictly adhere to DPDPA, 2023, otherwise there may be huge penalties.
    3. Digital Identity Verification: As digital lending platforms gain popularity, the need for reliable methods of identity verification becomes critical. Fintech companies are/should explore innovative solutions such as biometric authentication and blockchain-based identity verification to streamline the lending process while mitigating fraud risks.
    4. Default Loss Guarantee (‘DLG’): With RBI coming with an overall cap of 5% on DLG structure to the LSP under Default Loss Guarantee Guidelines and all-in-cost mechanism, the Fintech’s/FIs are finding it difficult to the do the business and time and again clarity has been posed to RBI.

    Navigating these emerging trends and challenges will require collaboration between Fintech firms, regulators, and other stakeholders to foster innovation while maintaining trust and stability in the financial system.

    Handling diverse finance deals, from ship financing to asset-backed finance, must present unique challenges. Can you share a particularly memorable or challenging deal you’ve worked on and how you navigated it?

    It’s very hard to think of a memorable or challenging deal as there are quite a few and I encounter the same ‘now and then’ and I have always believed in taking up challenges and don’t like doing work where there are no challenges. The recent being the resolution of Reliance Commercial Finance and Reliance Home Finance Limited, where the matter went up to Supreme Court where the issue encompassed SEBI circular, RBI framework on stressed assets, debenture holder rights, etc. 

    Though each case presents unique complexities, but with my ‘out of box thinking’, greater and clear understanding of the issue and by staying adaptable and keeping abreast of legal developments, I am able to overcome these challenges. I think from 360 degree on any problem and filter my thought process. My approach inculcates ethics that is best suited for clients, and I ensure to put their interests over and above everything. I act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client and patience and never-giving attitude is the key. 

    In your experience, what are some common misconceptions/expectations that corporate clients have, and how do you address them?

    Some common misconceptions clients have:

    1. Cost: As there are a variety of corporate clients ranging from start up to mid-size and mid-size to big one, clients sometimes think that hiring a corporate lawyer will be too expensive. But we have modelled various categories of fee structures which are tailor made depending upon the complexity of matter and size of the corporation we are dealing with. For mid-size companies, we also offer a flexible retainership monthly model and navigate their day to day issues at a reasonable cost.
    2. Complexity: Clients sometimes believe that corporate law is overly complex and difficult to understand. We simplify legal concepts, providing clear explanations, and guiding them through the process step by step.
    3. One-size-fits-all solutions: Clients might assume that corporate legal solutions are standard and apply universally. We provide tailored legal advice to the specific needs and circumstances of each client’s business and tell them how a particular agreement cannot be used for some other deal.
    4. Timeframe: Clients may expect quick fixes or immediate results, underestimating the time required for structuring a complex contract or legal processes involved in achieving a desired result. We normally manage the expectations and provide realistic timelines so as to give quality services. In case of any urgent matter, we make sure that clients meet their deadlines even if we have to work extra hours.
    5. Importance: Some clients may not fully appreciate the critical role that corporate lawyer plays in protecting their business interests but in our discussions we have highlighted the potential risks of non-compliance and the benefits of proactive legal strategies.

    By addressing these misconceptions through clear communication, education, and personalized attention, corporate lawyers can help clients better understand the value and importance of their services.

    With your wealth of experience, what advice would you give to young lawyers aspiring to specialize in Banking & Finance and General Corporate law?

    Banking & finance is a wide spectrum. Being a banking lawyer gives you exposure to a wide variety of laws and clients. It encompasses lending, fintech lending, real estate, project finance, NCDs, Securitisation, syndications, issuance of equity, fund creation, etc. Not only as a banking lawyer but being a corporate lawyer requires resolute, unwavering, and fierce commitment to underlying principles of understanding and applying the laws. Needless to say, smart work coupled with hard work is the ultimate combination. 

    Some of my advice to young lawyers aspiring to specialize in Banking & Finance law or otherwise in any area of law would be:

    1. Passion and Zeal: First and foremost unless you are passionate and have the zeal to achieve, you cannot achieve the desired result. One needs to be mad for this profession and there is nothing called work-life balance, if you want to be successful in this profession. You need to make law your life and your life should be dedicated to law.
    2. Dream Big: Unless you dream, your dreams will never turn into reality and if you have to dream then why to dream small.
    3. Observe and Focus: Students must be very focussed during internships and should learn as much as they can and should not be in a hurry to leave early. Apart from learning legal knowledge, in my view internship is all about understanding the traits of becoming a lawyer. One should observe his/her seniors and learn the trick of the trade.
    4. USP/Impact: Create your own USP and be different from others. Make your presence felt. Please remember that it does not matter what you do, but it matters what impact and impression you create, when you leave the place.
    5. Delivery: Deliver more than what is expected.
    6. Responsible: Be responsible for your work and take onus for any mistakes. Committing a mistake is not an issue, but repeating the same and not admitting your mistake is a big problem amongst the current generation. Don’t give justification for your mistakes. Just admit it and move on. 
    7. In-depth Knowledge and Continuous Learning: Focus on building a solid understanding of  laws, including corporate law and financial principles. Read the books and bare acts instead of google research. Google is for reference and not the source of your opinion. Stay curious and open to learning. The legal landscape is always evolving, so ongoing education and professional development are critical for long-term success.
    8. Stay Updated: Keep abreast of industry trends, regulations, and market developments. The banking and finance sector is constantly evolving, so staying informed is key.
    9. Develop Analytical Skills: Hone your analytical skills to assess complex financial transactions and corporate structures. Attention to detail is paramount in these areas of law.
    10. Inter-personal skill: Build relationships with professionals in the field, including clients, mentors, and peers. Networking can open doors to opportunities and provide valuable insights. Develop strong communication skills, both written and verbal. Clear, synchronised thoughts and concise communication is key for a lawyer. One should be able to express what they think.
    11. Integrity and Professionalism: Lastly, uphold the highest ethical standards and act with integrity in all your dealings. Trust and credibility are invaluable assets in the legal profession.

    Get in touch with Sachiv Kumar-

  • “Challenges in insolvency proceedings are prevalent, but restoring client faith amid delays is essential. Legislative amendments offer hope for a brighter future.” – Unveiling the Journey of Shikha Goenka Ginodia, Partner at ANM Global

    “Challenges in insolvency proceedings are prevalent, but restoring client faith amid delays is essential. Legislative amendments offer hope for a brighter future.” – Unveiling the Journey of Shikha Goenka Ginodia, Partner at ANM Global

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    Shikha, could you tell us about how you began your journey in law and what motivated you to pursue this career path? What were some of the initial challenges you faced, and how did you overcome them to establish yourself in the legal profession?

    I don’t recall as to why, but as a child, I wanted to be a Judge. Then, post my 12th grade exams, like everyone else, I had to decide my career path and I chose law as may career path ahead. I distinctly remember some of my relatives advised my father that if I do law, then it will be difficult to find a groom for me. This increased my determination further to go ahead with law as my career path. Being a girl and belonging to a Marwari family, it was not an easy choice. However, fortunately, my parents supported my decision. That said, I didn’t have any guidance or a shoulder to fall back on for my journey in law. One thing which helped me to survive the various challenges in this otherwise fruitful journey was my passion. I guess somewhere that dream of mine to become a Judge, helped me to hang in there.

    Your journey from in house to law firm and also from litigation to corporate restructuring and insolvency practice is quite intriguing. Can you share what inspired you to transition into this field and how your previous experiences have shaped your current expertise?

    Yes. It has been quite a rollercoaster rise. I am among the few who has gone from a law firm to an in-house and then back to a law firm. My journey of Corporate Restructuring & Insolvency Practise started when I was with Piramal Capital & Housing Finance Limited.  I was fortunate to get the best team and guidance and support. I still remember, my senior at Piramal, guiding me that as an in-house counsel, how one has to wear both the hats – business and legal and keep shuffling between them. At Piramal, I was part of some of the high-profile real estate resolutions and saw the entire cycle of restructuring, pre-insolvency strategy, CIRP process and settlement. It also helped me to have a business enabler mindset rather than just a legal mindset. So, my experience with Piramal Capital really helped me to shape the current expertise of mine.

    In your current role at ANM Global, you’ve been involved in advising creditors and representing resolution professionals in insolvency matters. What unique challenges do you face in this area, and how do you overcome them?

    The biggest challenge which I am seeing is that creditors have somehow lost the faith in insolvency proceedings given a lot of delay in hearings at NCLT because of vacancy in the benches. The vacancy has now been filled and various positive amendments are being passed by legislature. Hence, when we speak to our clients, we inform them about these developments and are hoping that sooner or later their faith will be restored.

    Looking back at your journey so far, what’s one piece of advice you wish you had received when you were starting your career?

    When I see back, I feel none. I strongly feel each of my experiences in my entire journey and the challenges were a milestone rather than a stumbling block. Absence of any of those challenges would have made the journey less memorable. Looking back, I also feel that not having any godfather, so to say, helped me even more to get more out of each of my challenges on the way.

    What is your view on internships and early stages of a law career?

    Internship is a really good opportunity at the start of one’s career to understand areas of interest while at the same time, I would say that enjoy the college life as well as I strongly believe those days never come back again. During early stages of law, I would suggest one to work as diligently as possible as that is the time when one can create a strong base in law which is important to shape the career in the long run.

    You’ve been involved in various high-stakes cases throughout your career. Can you share a memorable success story where your strategic approach led to a favorable outcome for your client?

    I believe, the strategy should start right at the time of entering into any agreement or contractual obligation. Being always on litigation side, I knew how are the clauses interpreted and what are the things which should be taken care of at the time of entering into contracts and during the life of the contracts. Accordingly, we have a White Paper listing out statement of procedure (SOP) to be followed while executing the documents as well as during the transaction. We discuss this with our clients so that proper steps can be taken right at the documentation stage itself. The SOP tremendously helps in resolving the complicated matters.

    Besides that, from time to time, once the matter goes into litigation, we understand the end solution required, devise a strategy and then work towards it. This exercise done by us in each of the matter really helps us to get better results for our clients.

    Though I have been part of some of the big real estate resolution and dispute resolution where our strategy really worked for our client, there is one matter which I had in my initial days of legal practise and which remains close to my heart. We were briefed by an individual client wherein he had a huge property in South Mumbai and he had learnt that one of his relatives, has fraudulently filed some litigation in it and is about to take absolute possession on the next day in Bombay High Court. We devised the strategy on the same day, drafted the application overnight, filed the matter in morning, mentioned it and got a stay on the process of handing over the keys, all within a period of 24 hours.

    You have chosen Insolvency and Bankruptcy Law, litigations as your area of specialisation? Any specific reason behind it?

    Litigation was always my passion. Hence, even after completing my CS, I never pursued the same. I find Insolvency & Bankruptcy Law logical and versatile. The best part is that it keeps on evolving on a daily basis which makes it challenging as well as interesting.

    Apart from your legal career, we hear you enjoy cooking and playing badminton. How do you balance your professional life with your personal interests, especially with a young child?

    Yes. I love playing badminton with my husband and son. Whenever possible, I also play board games with my son and cook food for the family. These are stressbusters for me. For me, my career and my family has to go hand in hand and I try my best to spend my early mornings and weekends with my family. 

    Given your extensive experience, what advice would you offer to young professionals aspiring to build a career in law, particularly in the fields of corporate restructuring and insolvency?

    I believe today’s young professionals have become impatient looking for instant gratification. To all of them, I would suggest to show some perseverance and hang in there. As they say, Rome was not built in a day! All you need to do is continue working hard, focus on process and results will follow. With regards to Insolvency practise, my suggestion would be to try to understand it logically and keep yourself updated.

    What would be your one piece of advise for women practitioners?

    To the young women practitioners out there, I would just advice, be yourself. Don’t compete yourself with anyone. At times, in order to manage everything, we get too harsh with ourselves. I would say, learn to let go and enjoy your journey. It is the journey which makes the destination beautiful!  

    Get in touch with Shikha Goenka Ginodia-