We would love to learn more about the mentoring work that you do with the NGO called Youth Against Injustice Foundation and how you ended up co-authoring a book at such a young age. With your 13 years of experience, we would love to know more about how you ended up pursuing law and what motivated you to make that choice.
Thank you for this opportunity. To begin with, I am a first-generation lawyer. There are no lawyers in my family; everyone in my family is an engineer, so in a way, I’m the rebel because they wanted me to pursue engineering, but I chose law instead. Due to peer pressure, I was made to choose PCM (Physics, Chemistry, and Math) in my 11th and 12th. However, after my 12th, I decided not to pursue engineering.
The reason behind this was that I lost my father at a very young age, and during that time, I realized how complicated things could get. For instance, even obtaining a death certificate and managing the transfer of the bank accounts was full of issues. At the post office, they updated my mother’s name with a different spelling, so we had to run to court to get an affidavit declaring that both names referred to the same person.
That experience became a trigger point for me. I realized that this profession needed me, and I should do something to help others who face similar issues. That’s when I decided to pursue law. I joined the LLB course at Pune Law College, Bharatiya Vidyapeeth University, and after completing my LLB, I was fortunate enough to start my career with a lawyer in Defence Colony, who gave me a lot of freedom. I was allowed to argue cases from day one, and that support really helped me gain confidence.
Within five or six months, I was handling my own independent case before the Delhi High Court. It was a writ petition, a service matter, and I had promised myself that I would never take on service matters. But ironically, my first independent case was in service law. I won the case, which gave me a major boost in my career. I started getting more independent cases, and in 2012, I joined the LLM evening course at ILI. I was juggling my time between court, the office, and college, but it gave me confidence that I could do a lot with the limited resources I had.
After completing my LLM, I became an independent lawyer and started working with companies on a retainership basis. I then thought about starting my own law firm that could help young lawyers and mentor them, so they could have the kind of opportunities I didn’t get when I started. I’ve been mentoring interns and associates, making sure that they learn from the work they’re given and aren’t just there for a certificate. I try to teach them the practical nuances of law because most of the interns come for short periods, so it’s important to make the most of that time.
That’s an inspiring journey. We also want to understand your decision to pursue an LLM. It’s often said that once you’ve completed law and are doing litigation, there’s no need to pursue further studies. How did that decision enhance your presence in the legal fraternity?
From the beginning, I’ve had an inclination towards teaching. I used to help teach my junior batchmates during my LLB days. So, I decided to pursue an LLM, and I wanted to study at the best institute. I didn’t want to give up on my litigation practice either because that’s where my passion lies—appearing in courts. There were only two institutes in Delhi offering evening LLM courses—ILI and DU. I chose ILI because it’s one of the best in India, and the fact that it’s backed by the Supreme Court of India was an additional attraction.
I got selected after giving an entrance exam, and that gave me the chance to meet people from various backgrounds, including batchmates who were IPS officers, IAS, and IRS officers. It was fascinating to see how they were at the top of their careers but still pursued further education. The guest lectures from renowned personalities, including Supreme Court judges, were another highlight.
What I also learned during my time at ILI was how to handle pressure. Before joining ILI, I was someone who would always complete my work ahead of time. But during this course, I learned how to manage last-minute work, which has really helped me in my career today, especially when I’m under time constraints in the legal world.
That’s a great lesson on adapting to time pressure. Moving on, we’d love to learn more about your law firm, which functions both as a litigation and consulting firm. Many people often think that law firms are either litigation-based or consultancy-based but not both. How have you managed to maintain this balance in your firm?
My partner, who is also my wife, is a company secretary, and she handles the consultancy side of things, while I focus on the litigation and legal aspects. We’ve divided the work based on our strengths. Clients generally approach law firms for legal services like case representation, agreement vetting, or intellectual property filings, while for consultancy services like company registration or secretarial work, they tend to approach professionals like chartered accountants or company secretaries.
Since my wife is a practicing company secretary, she handles all the consultancy work, and I can focus on litigation. We’ve managed to portray our firm as a one-stop solution for all business needs, from company incorporation to winding up, taxation, secretarial compliance, and more. We also provide a virtual CFO service to startups and assist with funding rounds, negotiations, and business proposals.
The difference between litigation and consultancy is that while lawyers can provide legal consultancy, a consultancy firm provides a full package, handling everything from audits to legal opinions and business strategy.
It’s clear that you’ve built a successful partnership. What inspired you to start your own firm so early in your career? What challenges did you face in the beginning, and how did you navigate them?
I started my firm before I even got married. The inspiration wasn’t my wife—though she has been incredibly supportive—but I wanted to establish a law firm and take it to new heights. The challenges I faced initially were tough. Many people had promised to give me work, but they backed out. It was a very low phase, and I had invested all my savings into setting up the office. I started off getting only two or three cases a month, which was not enough to cover my expenses.
But slowly, I built relationships with people who helped me get more cases. Social media actually played a big role in my early success—I got my first big client through Facebook. From there, the business grew. I also did pro bono work, which helped with word-of-mouth marketing.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, business came to a standstill, but within two to three months, I was back on my feet and getting clients again. Despite having associates, I still prefer to be in court and actively involved in the work. Hard work and dedication have definitely helped me in growing my firm.
After marrying my wife, the consultancy side of our firm expanded, and now we have offices in the GCC region as well. Our services have grown, and we now provide solutions across multiple jurisdictions.
Keeping all that in mind, we would like to move forward and understand more. You are also an empaneled advocate for Punjab National Bank and IIFCL, that is, India Infrastructure Finance Company Limited. Could you share some key challenges that you face while representing these public sector organizations, especially in both litigation and corporate matters? What have you encountered, and how have you managed or made a roadmap for overcoming these challenges?
I’ve been handling their litigation work, not the corporate work of those banks and financial institutions. The challenge I face is that we always have to be on our feet. The trick I’ve learned is that I should do the work before they ask me to. They follow up with me, and because I do not wait to be asked, I stay ahead. I have learned that diligence is key, especially when working for these organizations. I make sure to handle all drafting and compliances well before the court hearings. Additionally, I make sure to follow up with them to get everything done on time.
It’s difficult to get things moving in government organizations because many approvals are required. So, I ensure that I get the necessary approvals early, so things can be done ahead of time before the court registry and the date comes up. One of the things I’ve learned working with them is how the financial sector works, especially how loans are given and the challenges of repayment. Many people come to court blaming the bank or financial institutions, saying they were not properly informed or their documents were not handled correctly. It’s challenging to manage these cases, but I try to be diligent in ensuring everything moves forward smoothly.
You have a booming litigation practice, but you’re also an independent director, registered with the Independent Director Database. How do you manage all of this? How did you end up taking this role, and how do you guide the companies with corporate governance and ethics, particularly as an outsider? How do you influence them to be more ethical and oriented toward better corporate governance practices?
I got my start as an independent director in 2014. I was appointed as an additional director at a company, and that’s how I got my director identification number. I helped them with diligence, corporate governance, and everything happening within the company. Later, I wasn’t a director for 2-3 years, but then I was appointed as an independent director for a company getting listed. However, I had to resign because I couldn’t pursue litigation cases while being an independent director, and I felt it was limiting my ability to perform my job fully.
When the Independent Director Database came about, I registered myself, and during the COVID period, when courts were closed, I qualified for the exam and later received opportunities to be an independent director for a couple of companies. I assist them with all their compliance needs, such as forming committees, handling labor issues, and guiding them through necessary legal updates. For example, I worked with a manufacturing company that had unskilled and skilled laborers. They weren’t aware of changes to daily wage norms, so I helped them avoid potential legal scrutiny.
With your booming career and all the work you’re doing, you also teach as a guest lecturer at Dharmshastra National Law University. How do you engage with the students and bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and the practical application they will encounter in their legal careers?
When giving guest lectures, I teach them both theoretical and practical aspects. For instance, when teaching them about pleadings, I don’t just explain the theory behind it—I give examples of how this particular order or section is used in court. I teach them how to draft and file applications, the basic nuances to keep in mind while drafting pleadings. I provide formats and give hands-on experience so they can understand how this works in practice.
I also teach them about client counseling, jurisdictional nuances, and the practicalities involved in court cases. For example, I teach them about the pecuniary jurisdiction in Delhi, explaining that cases below ₹3 lakh are filed before the civil judge, while cases above ₹3 lakh go before the District Judge and those above ₹2 crore go directly to the High Court. I also focus on the Commercial Courts Act, explaining how things like recovery suits were impacted after its enactment.
You have extensive experience and are heavily involved in international arbitration bodies such as DIAC, MIAC, and the Young ICCA. How has your participation in these institutions impacted your practice, and what role do you see these organizations playing in the field of commercial arbitration?
I’ve recently got attached to these institutions, so I don’t have hands-on experience yet. However, I can see how they are helping institutional arbitrations move forward. Previously, ad hoc arbitrations were handled by retired judges, but now these institutions are also paneling advocates as arbitrators, which gives a faster, more efficient way to handle cases.
A new aspect that’s coming into play is emergency arbitration, which became prominent after the Future Group case. These institutions provide a platform for urgent interim orders, which helps expedite matters when needed. While I haven’t had hands-on experience yet, I am looking forward to becoming more involved in the future.
You also balance your professional life with being a part of the NGO Youth Against Injustice Foundation, where you’re committed to social justice. How do you manage your time for all your professional responsibilities and still find time for social causes?
I manage my work-life balance by taking family trips regularly. Every month or two, I make sure to take some time off, go on a trip, and spend time with my family, especially my children. This helps them not feel neglected despite my busy schedule.
Regarding my work with the NGO, we focus on helping people involved in false rape cases and those who face difficulties registering FIRs. We also mentor students, providing them with knowledge about the legal aspects of pursuing cases related to harassment or abuse. I assist the NGO in guiding victims through the legal system and help create awareness.
You’re truly making an impact in many spheres. As we conclude this interview, could you offer some advice for law students or professionals who aspire to follow in your footsteps, whether in litigation, corporate law, or social justice?
My advice would be to dream big and be patient. If you want to succeed in litigation, take it step by step. My first five years were all about learning the basics. The next phase was about building a client base. And now, in the third phase, I focus on growing my practice and ensuring success.
I’d advise law students to be patient and go through these phases. The first five years should be focused on learning and building knowledge. Once you get clients, you’ll need to know how to handle them and offer the best services. Do not enter this profession solely for the sake of earning. The journey may be slow at first, but once you start earning, the possibilities are endless. Focus on knowledge, and the success will follow.
With over 17 years of experience, what initially motivated you to pursue a career in law? Was it your first choice, or did you contemplate it later in your academic journey? Additionally, could you share your experience in law school, and how did pursuing your master’s degree further shape your professional path? My entry into the field of law was not by chance, it was a well-thought-out decision. From childhood, my teachers and elders use to praise me for my analytical skills and attention to detail. They suggested I consider joining the field of law. When I was in 10th grade, my father took me to various career counsellors, where I underwent aptitude tests. By unanimous recommendation, the field I was advised to pursue was law. That was when I decided for certain that I wanted to pursue career in law.
After completing my 10th grade, I began preparing for entrance exams. I took entrance exams for various National Law Schools and cleared some of them. My ranking in Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University was good, and since I was from Delhi, I decided to pursue law here being home State.
I graduated with “First Class”. While pursuing law, I also did my PG Diploma in “International Trade and Business Law” from the Indian Society of International Law. I completed a summer course on International Trade Law at the same institution and also earned a PG Diploma in Corporate Law from Amity Law School. I also worked as a Rapporteur at the Indian Society of International Law and contributed to a project with the Ministry of External Affairs in the Legal and Treaties Division.
I was fortunate to receive a conditional offer for admission to the prestigious London School of Economics (LSE), one of the world’s most esteemed institutions. I also received admission to the National Law School, Bangalore, for an advanced course. However, I couldn’t pursue it because I became deeply involved in litigation.
I always wanted to pursue my master’s in London, and I collected numerous brochures during seminars. But, as they say, “Destiny” intervened. In my last semester, I had to undergo an internship, and I was fortunate to secure an internship with an Advocate-on-Record at the Supreme Court of India. This was when I decided to postpone my aspirations to study abroad, as I got deeply engrossed in court work, and the desire to pursue a master’s degree faded.
After almost 15 years in the profession, I finally did my master’s. Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR) has always been close to my heart, so I pursued an LLM in ADR. Doing my LLM in this field allowed me to go back to the basic textbook style of learning, while my professional experience helped me understand the subject better and connect with it.
During the early stages of your career, you must have encountered numerous valuable learning experiences. Can you highlight one particular experience that has stayed with you, and how did you navigate through the challenges of those formative years in your profession?
This is one of those professions where challenges arise every minute, so one has to be ahead of the curve at all times. Even while drafting, you must put yourself in the shoes of the other side to anticipate what their response might be. As they say about the art of cross-examination, “Don’t ask a question to a witness until you know what answer the witness will give.”
Law is a profession where every day is a new learning experience. One simply has to remain open to it. While “stubbornness” may be a strong word, it is essential to survive in litigation, especially as a first-generation lawyer. The key is never to say “NO”. I’d like to quote Sylvester Stallone from Rocky Balboa (2006): “It’s not about how hard you get hit; it’s about how hard you can get hit, how much you can take, and keep moving forward.”
Honestly speaking, there is nothing like “formative years” in this profession. You never truly settle, you comparatively settle. Instead, one reaches a point where you become more cautious because more eyes are on you, and one wrong move can be detrimental. As you gain more years in the profession, you become more cautious, as people are watching and waiting for you to make a mistake.
One learning which I got was, Court is the new class room , try spending as much time possible listening to arguments in matters. Court room is one such place where many facets law and facts are discussed and subconscious mind silently develops legal aptitude.
What inspired you to establish your independent legal practice, and what were the initial challenges you encountered while setting it up? How did you navigate through these obstacles, and what strategies or lessons learned during this phase have contributed to the growth and success of your practice today? The initial challenge is always managing daily expenses, especially in the early days. However, this was not much of an issue for me, as I am a workaholic and found ways to secure work to keep myself going. There is no shortage of work in this profession, but one must be willing to take on challenges and spend sleepless nights.
The advice I would give is that if you develop a skill, there’s no looking back. There are no shortcuts in law, one must work hard to chisel your abilities.
In your experience as panel counsel, could you share your experience working with organizations such as the Delhi Development Authority? What variety of cases did you deal with, and were there any particularly interesting cases? I have served as panel counsel for various government departments, including the Delhi Development Authority (DDA), Indian Tourism, LIC Housing Finance Limited, Delhi Legal Services Authority, and as Amicus Curiae with the Delhi State Consumer Commission, among others.
Serving these government departments gave me extensive exposure to a variety of cases, including real estate, consumer, matrimonial, and criminal matters. This experience helped me understand the workings of government departments, particularly how files move within the system and the importance of an internal Office Noting.
Every case is unique , so talking about one would undermine others. In one case, I was defending a landlord against a tenant who was very intelligent. Before cross-examination, the opposing counsel whispered to his client to deny everything. The opposing counsel was so confident in his client’s preparation that he sat at the back of the courtroom.
I confronted the witness with his signatures on the suit, and the very natural answer was that they weren’t his. This simple answer won me the case, as it invalidated the plaint. Immediately afterward, the other side tried to file an application to bypass the situation, but the damage was already done.
With your extensive experience serving both private clients and government departments, how do you manage the differing legal needs of these two client types while upholding the same level of dedication and excellence in your service? Whether representing private clients or government entities, the law remains the same. However, there are different demands based on the client type.
For instance, for a private client, developments in a case can often be communicated via phone, and that would suffice. For a corporate client, each step must be explained in writing, and updates must be communicated via email to all relevant stakeholders. Similarly, when working with the government, you must ensure that every action is recorded in the official file and directed to the correct officer.
A lawyer dedicated to their work will treat both private and government clients with the same level of service. Both types of clients ultimately want to win and be represented effectively.
Reflecting on your extensive legal experience, what has been one of the most intellectually challenging or intriguing cases you have handled? How did you approach the case in terms of legal strategy, preparation, and research, and what key insights did you gain from navigating such a complex legal matter? All cases are challenging and teach you something new. With each case, we return to the drawing board to research every aspect of it.
At times, lawyers become so focused on a case that they lose sight of the core issue. For complex matters, we often peel back the layers one by one, only to realize that the issue was simpler than initially thought. The key to cracking a case is to follow the old-school method, read the file carefully without focusing on the law first, understand the facts, and then apply the law.
In your experience working with corporate entities and managing cases related to real estate laws, what key pitfalls do these entities often encounter? What proactive measures or legal safeguards would you recommend to mitigate these risks from the outset, ensuring smoother transactions and compliance throughout the process? Faulty paperwork and inadequate due diligence are common problems in real estate matters. Many clients have projects in different states, and each state has its own peculiarities regarding record-keeping, such as local language requirements or state notifications, which corporate entities may overlook.
While due diligence is generally conducted when purchasing land, local experts familiar with regional laws should also be involved in the process to ensure proper compliance.
Balancing a demanding legal career with personal life is undoubtedly challenging. How do you maintain a balance between your professional commitments and personal well-being? What strategies do you employ to preserve your health and overall well-being while excelling in such a demanding profession? It is indeed very difficult for a first-generation lawyer to maintain a balance between personal and professional life and give equal attention to both. A first-generation lawyer faces many challenges, such as engaging and retaining competent staff, as well as maintaining an office, which many second or third-generation lawyers don’t face.
One must work late nights, miss family engagements, and be available even on holidays to meet clients’ needs and deliver timely services. Additionally, corporate clients often work in different time zones, so we must be available 24/7 to respond to queries or emails.
No doubt, this takes a toll on one’s health—grey hair and signs of aging appear earlier than expected. However, the adrenaline rush that this profession provides compensates for the physical toll. Post-COVID, work has become easier in some ways. Virtual hearings and digital tools have made it possible to work from anywhere in the world, making it more convenient for lawyers, especially first-generation ones.
With your expertise spanning multiple legal domains, what advice would you offer young lawyers aspiring to develop a diverse practice similar to yours? What essential skills and qualities do you believe are necessary for success in these competitive and multifaceted fields? Discipline and consistency are the most important qualities I would recommend to any young lawyer entering the profession. By discipline, I don’t mean waking up at 5 a.m. and working late nights, but maintaining a consistent level of reading. Whether it’s law books, self-help books, or spiritual texts, consistent reading is crucial for any lawyer. Without it, a lawyer will not be able to make a mark professionally.
So, be consistent with your reading, stay true to your work, and always advise your clients to the best of your abilities—not just to draw money from them, but to provide the right advice. Gone are the days when lawyers could manipulate clients for unnecessary fees; today’s clients often come prepared with knowledge from resources like Google.
This experience reinforced the idea that litigation is a double-edged sword. Your success or failure often depends on both your preparation and your client’s actions. A well-read lawyer will earn the respect of judges and peers alike, and this silent appreciation will aid your future success.
With nearly 18 years of experience in law, what initially drew you to the legal profession? Was there a particular event or experience that influenced your decision to pursue this path?
My father was an Engineer and he was always attracted towards law. While he was posted At Lucknow working as Junior Engineer in Public Works department and completed his law from Lucknow University while in service. He always said that a lawyer is a person who is always wanted by society. After completing my 12th from Boys High School at Allahabad I got admission in I. L.S. Law College Pune, which was one of the best Law Colleges in India in 2000.
During your time working with Senior Advocate Mr. Anurag Khanna, what were some of the key lessons or insights you gained that significantly impacted your approach to law?
My time working with Senior Advocate Mr. Anurag Khanna was very fruitful and a learning experience. The most significant lesson I learned was sincerity, perseverance and honesty. My senior while going through any file of a case would always look for the best legal point available to get the case admitted on first hearing and obtained a favourable order in favour of the client. His approach was to look for the one bullet point in the case that will force the Judge to pass an order in favour of the client.
After gaining valuable experience under the mentorship of a senior advocate, what inspired you to branch out and start your independent practice? What were some of the initial challenges you encountered, and how did you overcome them?
After working for around 8 years under the mentorship of the Senior Advocate I started feeling that 8 years is a sufficient time to get the insights as a junior and I should start my own independent practice. Once I started my own independent practice initially the work load was less as I had few briefs but slowly with sincerity and perseverance I was able to get more briefs. This profession needs a lot of patience and hard work. That it is really tough for first generation lawyers, who have no background in law.
You’ve worked on petitions under Section 391-394 of the Companies Act. Could you share your perspective on the complexities involved in such petitions and some of the challenges you’ve faced? Additionally, in your experience with liquidation matters, what do you consider to be the most common obstacles companies face in these situations?
The provision relating to amalgamation and mergers or restructuring debt was earlier covered under section 391-394 of the Companies Act, which is now being dealt with by National Company Law Tribunal. The most interesting part was the meetings which were to be conducted of shareholders of the companies, wherein 75% voting was required to be in favour of the scheme then only the scheme of merger or amalgamation could get through. The meetings were conducted in some other cities for which we have to travel. I have participated in such meetings in Jaipur, Mathura, Agra as Chairman and alternate Chairman. The Liquidation matters are the most complex and lengthy litigation which goes on for 10-20 years without being concluded. Sometimes the companies which are in liquidation can also be revived if they have a feasible revival plan.
You’ve been involved in land acquisition cases for authorities like NOIDA and handled cases under the Land Acquisition Act. What legal and ethical considerations do you think are crucial in these matters? Could you share an example of a particularly challenging case you’ve worked on?
The land acquisition matters mostly relate to the land of the farmers which are acquired by Noida and other Authorities for different purposes including Plant Industrial Development. The land acquisition cases are very fulfilling for a lawyer as the Advocate has to fight for the farmers’ rights. Recently I am working on a case wherein illegal classification was made by the Noida Authority between farmers themselves for two categories Pustaini and Gair Pustaini meaning ancestral and non ancestral land owners. The classification has been held to be illegal in the case of Ramesh Chandra Sharma by the Hon’ble Supreme Court but in spite of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court is not giving the benefit to the farmers for which we have filed various petitions on behalf of farmers and hearing is going on since past one month.
Your experience includes dealing with labour disputes under the Provident Fund Act and Industrial Disputes Act. What are the most common labour-related issues companies face today, and how do they typically navigate these challenges?
The Labor Laws in India are welfare statutes tilted in favour of the laborers. That the companies are being burdened with false cases which are being initiated by the laborers against the company. The most common tactics is to work for more than 240 days in a company and thereafter leave the company to get another job at a higher salary in another company and thereafter raise labour disputes and get benefits under various Labour Laws and also demand back wages.
In your role assisting with high-profile criminal cases, such as the Aarushi Talwar case, what are some of the major challenges you’ve encountered in criminal law, particularly with regard to public perception and media coverage?
In the Indian Democratic system, the media nowadays plays a very vital role as far as high-profile cases are concerned. The best part is that judges are not affected by the media coverage. While assisting Senior Advocate Mr. Anurag Khanna in the Aarushi Talwar case for the Central Bureau of Investigation. I had a chance to work for the prosecution. We were opposing the cases filed by Aarushi Talwar’s parents. The Division Bench of Allahabad High Court gave a verdict in favour of the parents of Aarushi Talwar. It was a great learning experience.
As technology continues to play a larger role in the legal field, how do you believe it is impacting corporate litigation and legal practice overall? Looking ahead, what trends do you think will become more prominent in the next five to ten years, especially in corporate law and litigation? How do you keep up with emerging legal trends?
Technology has been playing a very important role in law as one click we can search through lakhs of judgment. Chat GPT and AI will probably become more prominent in the next 5-10 years in corporate law and litigation. Due to technology the judges and lawyers are more updated and are aware of the judgment which is being pronounced every day by different courts throughout India. The technology cannot overtake the legal profession completely and the lawyers, clerks and judges will always be there to take forward the legal system.
Finally, what advice would you offer to young lawyers who aspire to make a lasting impact in their careers, particularly those with an interest in corporate and litigation law?
The young lawyers are the light for tomorrow. I see young lawyers to be very well versed in law and technology but they are lacking patience which is the most important aspect of litigation. I would advise the young lawyer not to take shortcuts and wait till your time arrives till then he should keep working hard.
With over 13 years of experience in various courts, including high courts NGT and Supreme Court as well. What were the personal experiences that may have influenced your decision to build your career in the legal fraternity and how was the path? How did you intend to follow it and how have you built your practice around it?
My journey in the field of law honestly started purely by chance. I was never supposed to be in the field of law, but it happened purely by chance. And as soon as I got into it, I started developing interest. In fact, I would say I’m more a product of reverse engineering than anything else, where my interest developed as I started working in the field. I predominantly come from a business family and as every person born in the business family, your first inclination is towards the family business. But as I started working in the field of law, as I started interning and thereafter, once I graduated and I started working with some law firms and some senior lawyers, it set out this kind of a feeling in me that I could work in this field and I could succeed in it. And it also enabled me to create my own niche, to create my own identity. And the rest is, as they say, is history.
You have also done MSc in management from Bradford University. What was the motivation behind doing this degree after law? And how has management degree or management education helped you in not only running your law firm, but actually working in the business operations field?
Because usually we have hardly seen lawyers doing management degrees. So how has it turned out for you?
As I came from a business family, I needed something to fall back upon because, you know, I joined the five year law course. So, obviously I had no knowledge about our business administration per se, apart from the practical side of things, which I saw how my family business was being run. So I believed that I needed some backup. Just in case my legal career doesn’t take off, I should have something to fall back upon. But, to be honest, my decision to do an MSc in management, and especially from the UK has reaped amazing rewards for me in my legal field, simply because, you know, when you are into corporate advisory or you work closely with companies.
A lot of times as lawyers, it is very difficult to understand the mindset behind doing business. And you normally would only look at the business or you would look at the company from the purview of what the statute says or what the law says. What the MSc basically helped me do is to differentiate and understand the business of my clients better. And, hence the advice that I would give them was more in terms of enabling them or rather giving them a better footing for them to do their business and to also help them create a more solid foundation while doing business. As lawyers, a lot of times we tend to be a little pessimistic towards things that’s an occupational hazard I would say.
That being said, if you are able to understand your client and your client’s requirements, especially somebody who has either got a startup or is well established entity, you are able to guide them in the proper manner and basically just enable the law to become more like a safety net for them rather than being an impediment. So, that’s how the MSc has really helped me.
Sir, before starting your career you have worked with several advocates, senior advocates as well. How was that journey helpful in shaping your career as well as if you could share some key learning experiences from the time when you were practicing with them, learning the nuances of the trades. Also, before you started your own practice, how did you make up your mind? Or how did you decide that now I can go independent?
I started interning with a senior lawyer here in Pune and what he helped me understand is that when you’re in practice, every little task that is given to you is of great importance. As I always tell even my juniors who work with me, my first task was, for the first maybe two or three months, not only stapling the notices, but also how the staple should be done, and how the letter should be folded. These are little little things. Then when it comes to the aspects of court, a lot of times you have to make applications which are handwritten. How the paper needs to be folded, how those decreases need to be done. All these little, little things were taught to me. So, law requires a lot of patience and I was lucky that I had mentors like the seniors that I had, who basically enabled me to understand the final nuances of law. See, when you are practicing, especially in the field of litigation, you come across various aspects. Simple things like, you are in court, you need to file a particular bunch of applications or a bunch of documents. They have to be threaded or you have to drive that thread through the top corner of how do you do that?
How do you go about it? A lot of times, you know, you’re privileged if you have a clerk with you, but if you don’t, how do you fend for yourself? And these smaller nuances helped me a lot. Even today if you leave me alone in my office, I can still operate on my own without anybody’s help. So, learning all these final nuances. Then came the aspect of the art of advocacy, how to present yourself in court. One of my seniors would often tell me this, that lawyers are like stage actors. The courtroom is your stage and everything that you do is noticed. Every word that you speak, everything that you cite, it gets you your attention.
Ensure that you’re well prepared with what you’re doing. You know what you’re saying. You can’t just go blabbering what you want over there. So even simple things like the way you would appear in court or your entire getup, whether you’re well taken care of. How your coat is, how your band is, if your shoes are polished or not. For men, if you’ve shaved or not, these are little, little things that even matter because at the end of the day, you’re creating an impression.
You’re creating an impression in the eyes of the judge, you’re creating an impression with the opposite side lawyer, and you’re creating an impression, not just with your client, but also with the other members of the fraternity. So, learning these little, little things is very important. I see a lot of times, the newer generation does not have the patience, they want to get from point A to point B in a jiffy. So law doesn’t work like that. It’s a process. You have to experience every element of that process. And if you are able to enjoy that process, the field of law really ensures that you’re well taken care of. If you start getting impatient, you will realize that a lot of people leave the field of law or they get into things like corporate practice or they get into things like joining some company. Litigation is tough, but it’s fun. And you have to enjoy it. You have to enjoy being in the court. You have to enjoy every moment of being in court. Just as is when it comes to non litigation practice. It also requires a lot of patience because you are restricted to your office. You have to understand what your client requires.
You have to understand how the market is behaving. You have to understand the field in which your client is currently operating. How does that field operate? What are the global ramifications of what you’re doing? So you have to understand all these nuances while applying the various facets of law to a particular document. You have to be well aware about everything around you. See you learn from every person that you meet. So it’s not just your seniors. I think I’ve learned a little bit from everybody that I’ve either seen in court or I have come across during my entire 13, 14 year journey. But yeah, my seniors have played a massive role in shaping me as to where I am today. And I credit them for that.
What was the inspiration behind establishing Regulus Advocates & Consultants after years and years of practice, what factors actually influenced you or your decision to start your own practice? And how was it that you built the resources for the same?
When I decided to go independent, it was a very tough decision because what happens is when you’re working with a senior, you’re living a life in a cocoon. Even if you make a little mistake, you know that you have somebody who’s covering up for you.
You know that a little here and there is fine because your senior is going to take care of it. But when you’re breaking out on your own, you are the whole and soul of whatever you’re doing. You’re responsible for every action that either you or your juniors are doing. So that being said. A lot of people find it tough going independent one is predominantly because, especially if you’re in the field of litigation, that work comes in slowly, and the gratification for that work comes in even later.
So a lot of times, you will have lawyers who work for minuscule fees just so that they can get to work, but that doesn’t mean that it keeps their cash flows going. And a lot of times it’s like working at a loss, but you do it for the experience. Going independent is like diving into the deep ocean. The moment you feel that, yes, you’re well equipped intellectually and with a little bit of experience to back you up, that’s the time you should start thinking of going independent. And so far as starting Regulus was concerned. I am a strong believer in the fact that consolidation is very important.
If you can bring various people together and work as one unit, it helps serve the purpose better than working as a lone wolf. You can’t behave like an individualistic person, when it comes to this, you have to think that collectively what you can offer to people. And that is what Regulus is all about.
We basically believe in providing a one stop shop solution for all our clients. So a lot of times we have clients who come to us with a particular legal requirement. And during the course of handling that client. The client itself realizes, Oh, I have another issue that needs to be taken care of. Now, they need not go out to any other lawyer because they know that my office is well equipped to take care of that. So that is what was the thought process behind starting Regulus. And, we’ve been able to do that to a large extent, I would say we’ve been able to do that. Where we helped clients in various walks of life, whether they’re individual clients or whether they’re companies.
So we’ve really been able to help them, secure them, and that’s how we want to keep working. So even whether it’s me or whether it’s my partner, our singular focus is to ensure that we don’t treat law like a business, but we treat law as something that we are passionate about. And through that passion is what we generate business. So it doesn’t work the other way around.
You have been involved in many cases at the Supreme Court as well. If you will be able to share or shed some light on the particular airline ticket refund case which has had bigger implications, what strategies did you follow or how was it that you planned and you had that particular favorable outcome for yourself and your client obviously? Also, how has your management degree helped you in building that particular strategy over here in this particular case?
To be very honest, I was the second lead on the matter. I was not leading the case. This case predominantly was happening during the lockdown and post lockdown scenario during Covid, it was in 2020 when the government had basically put a stop on all air travel. And when that happened, you had a lot of people who were either passengers or travel agents, facing tremendous losses because they had paid for their tickets for the travel during those months when the airlines had stopped operations and they were unable to get their money back.
And there was a notification by the central government saying how the money will be returned back to the passengers and things like that. Now, there was a petition that was filed by one organization. In the Supreme Court. I happened to be representing a travel agents association and it was tasked upon me to see whether we could intervene in this particular case.
I was lucky that I had the guidance and support of a very senior lawyer in Delhi. Who today is a sitting judge of the Bombay High Court, Dr.Neela Gokhale who was basically engaged by us to lead the entire matter. Now, interestingly, what happened was there were two other senior lawyers who were representing other organizations and then the airlines came all guns blazing with creme de la creme of the legal field where you had people like Hari Salve, Arvind Dada, Mukul Rohatgi and you know, the works. And you obviously had the Solicitor General also appearing for the Union of India.
Honestly, for me, that was extremely intimidating because I had never appeared in the matter where you had such a star studded opposition and people who I have looked up to in this field. So, it so happened that on the day of the arguments, Dr.Neela Gokhale’s mic couldn’t work and that was the only opportunity we were given for arguments. And it was absolutely magnanimous on her part where she said, look, you know, the case, just go ahead and argue. And I argued and I was plain lucky that the bench of the Supreme Court heard me out in detail. And see what happened was till date, till that case, The element, or rather, who is a travel agent was never really explained to any other court. But travel agents were always treated like a middleman or a dalal, as you would say.
But I basically went forward and explained the role of a travel agent and how that entire thing worked which struck a chord somewhere. And when the judgment came, the court basically put down all the suggestions and all the points that I had argued as a part of the judgment, which was tremendous. I mean, for me, that was incredible because the court mentioned my name in that, that because I have stated.
So it was a wonderful experience. And, I would say it’s a feather in my cap because it ended up being a reported judgment, and which was the only reported judgment right now that I have to do my entire work.
Over the years of your experience, how have you seen the legal landscape change and take shape, especially when it comes to corporate advisory or tech law or all these fields which are very emerging ones and how have you worked around your own role and how do you think all these technologies are going to play any role in future of your legal practice and of others, keeping in mind the way it is changing?
I would say that you have to look at law or rather any field for that matter in a pre COVID vis a vis a post COVID scenario, because what the pandemic really did was it changed the landscape of how work is done across the world.
Now, if you were looking at a pre COVID scenario, this interview would be happening face to face. I don’t think any of us were even aware about a platform called Zoom or Webex or any of that nature till before the pandemic came into play. I mean, I remember only using platforms like Skype. I was completely unaware about things like Zoom till the pandemic really came about.
And in the legal field, what it did was, It brought about a sizable revolution in so far as how the courts function. So a lot of the courts, like the High courts and the Supreme courts, the NCLT or the NGT for that matter are going virtual. I remember during that time we would appear in the NCLT in various matters.
And we would be appearing in various cities. So I would be sitting in my office in Pune, appearing in the morning, maybe in Mumbai, in the afternoon session, maybe in a place like Ahmedabad or Delhi. So what they did was that enabled people like me sitting in places like Pune to appear across India.
Even that Supreme Court case that I could handle, it was a virtual case, all the councils were appearing virtually. So what they did was it brought about a revolutionary change. Also, it brought about something which is known as e-Filing. Like all documents which are filed in the court are e-Filed today. Where in the past we would, you know, go and submit everything in the court. Now, it is all uploaded onto a platform and it is submitted there. So what happens is, it brings in technology to a large extent and it helps various people from various walks of life to also be involved in this field.
Now in the state of Maharashtra, you have the Bombay High Court, which is located in three places. You have it in Mumbai, you have it in Aurangabad, in Nagpur and then you have also one in Goa. But let’s keep Goa aside for the moment, we look at these three places. Now, each of these three benches have certain districts which have their jurisdiction to the Bombay High Court.
A lot of these people who are from these districts which are far away from Mumbai or from Aurangabad or from Nagpur have to travel every time to the respective places to attend the matters. Today, what happens is I’m able to sit in Pune, or the lawyer is able to sit in a place like Kolhapur or in Solapur, attend the matter in Mumbai virtually, without having the trouble of traveling all the way there.
So it is less time consuming, it is more productive. And it also enables a person who’s sitting in a remote place to have the experience of appearing before the High court. So, what technology has done is, it’s broken down the entire monopoly of certain lawyers in certain places that If it is a matter in the High court, only those lawyers will handle it.
That’s not the case anymore. So technology is making way for the Superb revolution in the field of law. You’re seeing it even in business and it is also bringing about a lot of complications with it. It has its advantages. It also has its disadvantages. You’re seeing cybercrime, you’re seeing all these things happen.
But that is also enabling a new generation of lawyers to come into play who are focusing more on these activities. We had the Information Technology Act, which was passed way back in the year 2011 2012, or even before that. But the actual implementation is actually happening now. In a post COVID scenario, you are seeing cybercrime, you’re seeing scams happening over using information technology, you’re seeing all these things happen.
And law is playing a huge role in that lawyers are playing a huge role in helping agencies understand how to work on it. Till about three, four years ago, you would not have any lawyers in India understanding what the GDPR guidelines were. But now you have a lot of lawyers who are understanding that, taking courses in that, and working in that field, advising companies on those fronts.
So, the post pandemic scenario has been, I think, great for the field of law. Yes, for the older generation, it has been quite a setback because they’ve had to unlearn a lot of things and relearn a lot of things, but it has helped them to a large extent as well because they have engaged juniors who understand the usage of technology. But for the newer generation, it’s become like a cakewalk.
There are skepticisms that there are chances that AI will take over all the work, we will not be left with much of the work. How do you see that particular fear and how would you like to suggest some ways of overcoming that fear and making sure that even if technology is coming in head on, still we have better chances of not only surviving, but thriving in those practices?
The way technology is an advantage, it’s bringing its disadvantages hand in hand. Now, you have a lot of the newer generation of lawyers or this newer generation of clients who come to you with solutions that they find on platforms like chatGPT. Now, even if you put an input on Chat GPT that drafts me an entire petition, it does that for you in a matter of seconds. You tell it, give me a case law on a particular subject. It gives you about 5, 10 case laws on a particular subject. But the problem lies in how much reliance do you base on it?
See finally, you can use these tools as mere reference points rather than being your primary source of information, they can be used as enablers of making your work simpler than being used as a primary source of drafting or creating a document. And unfortunately, I’m seeing a lot of people doing that. I’m seeing a lot of people using it in a manner in which they’re so reliant on that platform, on AI, which is not the best thing to do. For a simple reason is because the AI is also still learning.
It is, I would say, still at an infancy stage, it is also learning, it will take its time for it to understand what inputs and what it’s supposed to really give out as an output. But that does not take away from the fact that as a lawyer, your primary source of information has to be the books of law.
It has to be the statutes that are there available, and they have to be the commentaries and the various precedents set out by the various courts in the country. Yes, it is going to create a scenario where future generations of lawyers may have to face certain hardships. But I always say this, that when you look at it not as a problem, but you look at it as an opportunity. It also brings about various elements of opportunities to do different types of work. And you should use AI to work on a global stage then. You have to then aim higher and AI is only there to enable that for you. If you can do it, that’s the best, you should.
You actually juggle in your legal practice, then your firm management, then also with your social contribution with Drishaan Charitable Trust. How do you actually prioritize your responsibilities? How do you have that work life balance? And how do you make time for yourself? How do you make sure that you are in absolute perfect shape for your practice for yourself as well?
So far as my philanthropic work is concerned, that is something that I started about 15 odd years ago. So even before I got into the field of practice of law, I had started my organization and we’ve done a lot of work since then. Obviously, prior to me getting into the field of law, the amount of attention and work I could do in the field was much greater than what I can do today.
But that being said, our primary focus today is to ensure that we are able to provide financial assistance to anybody, any underprivileged child out there. Whether he or she requires medical aid or whether he or she requires educational help. So we are working towards that.
We’ve helped a lot of kids. In fact, just a couple of days ago, we conducted a massive eye camp just on the outskirts of Pune with the assistance of another organization, where we treated close to about, 4 and a 1/2, 5, 000 people, students, basically from the underprivileged backgrounds. And we did free eye checkups and we gave glasses off to whoever required it. So, this is something that we do. The reason we keep doing this or rather I keep doing this is basically it helps me have a different perspective about how the world is. That’s number one.
Number two, it also enables me to get my mind off the regular work kind of things. And, it is extremely satisfying. As I always say to my friends that you know, it is something that gives me a massive kick and I do it for that. But when you talk about things like mental health, a lot is said about it these days.
I think my generation or the generation before that were not really so bothered about our mental health and things like that, because we were made to grind our teeth to the very core and because we were made to work extremely hard, you know, there was nothing like saying no to any task.
So because of that, this element of feeling entitled to a particular thing never really arose for us. I feel a lot of the newer generation of the students that I see are always in this entitlement trap and because they feel that they are entitled to a particular thing and when they don’t get it, it starts putting a mental pressure on them.
Yes, there are a lot of people out there who work in some toxic places where they’re made to work, where the remunerations are not as good and the entire environment is not really good. Yes, in such places, there are cases of mental breakdowns, but at the same time, what the field of law really does is if you really grinded your teeth well enough, it toughens you out. And it helps you take on the world like no other profession can because see what happens, especially if you’re in litigation, you learn the art of talking to the lowest person in the court to the highest person who is the judge.
If you have to get your work done, how do you convince the lowest person in that, from say the person who calls out the case to the bench clerk, to anybody else, how do you work around it? That’s also an art. And it teaches you this, it enables you to learn these things. So people understand, human resource understanding is something that gives you a lot of insight.
All that is not that easy as well the way you were saying that even people do understand that we have to work hard but sometimes the work itself takes a different kind of toll. Don’t you think?
Yes, But to these people I’ll always say that you need to have a hobby that you can pursue, whether it is music, whether it is sport, anything else.
I mean, there are people who just like to take maybe a Sunday off and just go drive somewhere or cycle somewhere or take the motorcycles and go somewhere. You need that little bit of me time that you need to give yourself. And that is quite a lot to rejuvenate your mind and body. And it is important that you stay away from unnecessary vices.
I’m not saying you should not have a vice, but you stay away from the unnecessary ones. So, that will also help you keep your mind alert and be focused. Like, you know, I have a simple rule that if I’m going to be socializing over the weekday, I will ensure that I will never have any alcoholic beverages. It’s a rule because it can unnecessarily tamper with your mind. So you need a little bit of self discipline as well. And that nobody else can do for you that only that individual can do for himself.
What kind of key skills or mindsets that you emphasize while you are mentoring the young law students or your interns or your juniors and what kind of advice do you give them in order to make sure that it helps them stand out in the kind of competitive environment and the legal market that we are currently in?
The most important aspect for any young lawyer or any lawyer, I would say, young or old, new or experienced is the ability or the thing that you have to read, if you are averse to reading, then you’re not meant for this field. So even whether it means, reading the statute, whether it is reading the case law or whether it is reading your case file, a young lawyer or any lawyer has to have the ability to read . The second thing is reading between the lines is very important. So a lot of times you’ll come across documents which are running through thousands of pages. But how to have a quick read, how to read in a jiffy yet grasp and understand what is said in there so that you can give your inputs on it and give your advice on it in the proper manner.
That is most important. Another skill that I always emphasize upon is the use of technology. So, basic things like how to use your Microsoft Words or Excels or PowerPoint presentations, these are very important. Your command of the English language, especially if you want to practice in the higher courts is very important. In fact when you’re practicing in law, you need to have command all the languages that you either speak, but having knowledge and command over English is very important because if you get an opportunity, especially if you’re practicing in the lower courts and you get an opportunity to practice or conduct a matter before the High court or the Supreme court, you should have the to speak over there.
That also goes for, if you get a job or an opportunity to work with a law firm, and you’re going to be drafting contracts, your contracts are going to be in English. And therefore your command over that language is very important. That being said, the command over your native language is also important, because when you practice in the lower courts, which is the trial courts, A lot of times you will use your native language, which is like in Maharashtra, you’ll use Marathi or up North, you’ll use Hindi, down south, you’ll use any of those four or five languages that they speak there.
But if you’re going to be living in those places and practicing in those areas, you need to know the language there for sure. So that is another skill set that is very important and the most important aspect of it all is the, I won’t say the ability, but rather the desire to work hard. So if you can work hard, you can definitely excel in this profession.
While reading about you and the kind of work which Drishaan has done. How did you pick up that you have to work in the eye department because you started with Drishaan Charitable Trust in order to make sure that you work for not only students, but also those who need help with the eye and it’s not very easy for a non doctor to organize such big camps. How did you do that?
You don’t need to be a doctor or you don’t need to be equipped with that particular skillset to do that kind of work, to be very honest. I was all of 18 years old when I started doing this work, and it started off by me, to be very honest, using the money that I had collected during my 18th birthday, and I decided that I will utilize it to help one child get their eyesight back.
How I came to work on the aspect of the blind is predominantly because the college that I was studying in at that time would have these blind students there, and I would often see their struggle. So I said that if I can help one, maybe I can help start something with that. What happened was, when I did that particular activity, and I did it purely for myself, I didn’t do it for publicity, I didn’t do it for anybody’s attention.
It so happened at the hospital that I helped this child get operated in and things like that, they informed the local newspaper and that newspaper kept asking me to do an interview, which I rejected for a very long time until the editor in chief himself gave me a call one day and said that, look, I would like to speak to you regarding what you’ve done.
And it so happened that by then my next birthday had come up, I’d again helped another child. So they said, look, you want to know who you are and what you’re doing. So I went there for a regular chat. And I just spoke about what I’m doing and why I’m doing what I’m doing. Interestingly, without me knowing, he actually wrote an entire editorial about me in the local newspaper and that paper got circulated in various parts of Maharashtra and it created a position for me where I had people from across the state of Maharashtra coming to see me.
And meet with me and basically contribute to what I was doing. And that basically laid the foundations for Drishaan because by then I’d collected so much money from so many people that I could not obviously retain that money for myself. So then I formed a trust and through that trust since 2010, we’ve restored the eyesight of over 150, 175 odd kids till date. We’ve conducted various eye camps.
So what happened was we started working in this field and we realized that there is a disease called rubella. So, I started doing my own research on this. And then I started understanding that there is nobody who’s really working towards this. And it so happened that I realized that there’s no immunization program for it as well.
So I started writing to the government and I was writing to various authorities saying that they should start immunization programs. So that we can eradicate this disease out of India. Interestingly, in 2014, when the present dispensation came into power, I happened to write to the Honorable Prime Minister and in about three, four months, I got a response from the Ministry of Health saying that whatever I have stated out is being forwarded to the nursery departments and they are working on an immunization program.
So, that was extremely satisfying. And since then, because I also got busy with my work and things like that. My fieldwork reduced and my focus changed toward more of, helping kids or rather the underprivileged kids by way of financial help. So in order to do that we conduct small little programs where they’re more like fundraisers and things like that.
And it also creates awareness amongst people. And my logic behind it is simple, so in Hindi, as we say, “sirf drishti nahi drishtikon dena hai” That’s how we are doing it. So, what we are doing is, we are working with the underprivileged children, on one side, and at the second side, we are also now, we started a new program, where we’re calling various thought leaders to come and speak on certain subjects, because we want to change and imbibe the feeling of nationalism and patriotism in the youth.
So we are working on that as well now, slowly. So we recently did a program in the month of March or April, where we had various speakers come and speak on the subject of Savarkar. So we’re going to organize more programs in the future to speak about various other people and basically instill a sense of nationalism and patriotism in the youth.
What that also does is that also inspires them to carry on the work that I’m also doing because finally what we are doing is helping the children of the nation. And we are creating them for tomorrow.
Could you take us on a brief journey from your college days, highlighting key experiences or lessons that have shaped your path in the legal profession, leading to the establishment of Charter Law Chambers?
Sure! Starting from my college days, I learned the importance of critical thinking and research skills, which are essential in the legal profession. Participating in moot court competitions honed my advocacy skills and taught me the importance of preparation and presentation. Internships at law firms exposed me to real-world legal practice, where I learned about different areas of law and gained practical experience. Networking with professionals and mentors helped me understand the industry and navigate career opportunities. Overall, my college experiences laid the foundation for my journey in the legal profession, shaping my skills, knowledge, and passion for justice.
Additionally, the passion for justice and dedication to serving clients that were cultivated during college continue to drive the ethos of the law firm, ensuring a commitment to excellence and client satisfaction.
From its inception in 2019 to now, Charter Law Chambers has grown remarkably. What inspired you to establish this firm, and how has the journey been so far?
The inspiration to establish a law firm stemmed from a desire to create a space where I could apply my legal skills, knowledge, and passion for justice in a way that aligned with my values and goals. I wanted to build a firm that prioritized client service, innovation, and making a positive impact in the community.
The journey so far has been both challenging and rewarding. Building a law firm from the ground up requires dedication, hard work, and perseverance. There have been obstacles to overcome, such as navigating the complexities of running a business, attracting clients, and establishing a reputation in the legal industry. However, each challenge has provided an opportunity for growth and learning.
Your profile emphasizes your significant role in electricity regulatory matters. Can you share a specific case or achievement in the energy sector that you are particularly proud of?
My office assisted Adani Electricity Mumbai Limited (AEML) & Adani Electricity Mumbai Infra Limited (AEMIL) before the Supreme Court against a Civil Appeal filed by Tata Power Company Limited-Transmission challenging allocation of a Rs. 7000 Crore, 1000 MW HVDC VSC based Transmission Project, being one-of-a-kind Transmission Project in the City of Mumbai to to AEMIL (100% owned subsidiary of AEML) under Section 62/ non-bidding route of the Electricity Act, 2003, instead of Section 63/ bidding route.
Supreme Court on 23.11.2022 passed a landmark judgment thereby dismissing the Civil Appeal filed by Tata Power Company Limited-Transmission, thereby holding that the Transmission Project was rightly awarded to AEMIL under Section 62/ non-bidding route, and further held that Section 63/ bidding route is not the dominant route
Starting as a boutique regulatory litigation firm, CLC has expanded its practice areas. How did this diversification come about, and what factors influenced the decision to broaden the firm’s scope?
Expanding the practice areas of a boutique law firm involves careful consideration of various factors:
Client demand
Market Analysis
Competitor Analysis
Expertise and resources
Growth strategy
Client relationships
Regulatory considerations
Overall, a combination of market demand, strategic analysis, existing expertise, and client relationships typically influences the decision to expand the practice areas of a boutique law firm.
Being a member of the Supreme Court Bar Association and Delhi High Court Bar Association, how has networking within these professional societies contributed to your professional growth?
Being a member of both the Supreme Court Bar Association and the High Court Bar Association provides invaluable opportunities for networking and professional growth. Networking within these esteemed associations allows for:
Access to expertise
Referrals and collaborations
Mentorship and guidance
Visibility and reputation
Advocacy and influence
Overall, networking within the Supreme Court Bar Association and the High Court Bar Association offers numerous benefits for professional growth, including access to expertise, referrals, mentorship, visibility, and opportunities for advocacy and collaboration. These connections help foster a vibrant and supportive legal community, enriching the professional journey of its members.
Beyond legal practice, you’ve been involved in community development. How do you integrate social responsibility into the ethos of Charter Law Chambers, and can you share a specific initiative that holds personal significance for you?
Integrating social responsibility into legal practice involves a multifaceted approach aimed at making a positive impact on the community. Some instances such as doing pro bono work, policy advocacy and reform, diversity, equity and inclusion.
One such instance would be organising guest lectures at esteemed colleges all over India and holding conferences on in Delhi
Given your involvement in international workshops, like the one in Switzerland, how do global perspectives influence your advocacy, and how do you incorporate lessons from international experiences into your practice?
Overall, a global perspective enhances advocacy by promoting a deeper understanding of international laws and norms, recognising interconnectedness, fostering empathy and solidarity, promoting cultural sensitivity and diversity and utilising global platforms to advance social, economic and environmental justice.
Law is demanding, and stress management is crucial. How do you personally prioritize wellness amidst a busy legal practice, and do you encourage similar practices within your team?
Prioritizing wellness amidst a busy legal practice is essential for maintaining overall health and effectiveness. Overall, prioritizing wellness amidst a busy legal practice involves setting boundaries, practicing self-care, managing workload effectively, fostering open communication, promoting work-life balance, and providing resources and support to team members. By prioritizing wellness within the team, we can create a healthier and more productive work environment where individuals can thrive professionally and personally.
Given your involvement in education initiatives like teaching at Vivekananda College, how important do you think it is for legal professionals to engage in education, and what benefits do you see in such endeavors?
Engaging in ongoing education is crucial for legal professionals to stay current with developments in the law, enhance their skills and knowledge, and adapt to changes in the legal landscape.
As such, continuing education is essential for legal professionals to remain competent, relevant, and successful in an ever-changing legal landscape. By staying informed, enhancing skills, building expertise, fulfilling professional obligations, networking, and pursuing growth opportunities, legal professionals can continue to thrive in their careers and make meaningful contributions to the legal profession and society.
Having over 15 years of experience, what advice would you give to young lawyers aspiring to make a mark in the legal field, especially those interested in energy and infrastructure practice?
As a seasoned lawyer with over 15 years of experience in energy and infrastructure practice, here are some pieces of advice for young lawyers interested in this field:
Build a strong foundation
Specialize and gain expertise
Seek mentorship
Gain practical experience
Network strategically
Stay adaptable and open-minded
Demonstrate commitment and passion
Focus on client service
By following these pieces of advice and continuously learning, growing, and networking within the energy and infrastructure industry, young lawyers can position themselves for a successful and fulfilling career in this dynamic and impactful field.
