Super Lawyer

Tag: Contract drafting

  • “I’ve learned that the best legal solutions aren’t just technically correct : they’re commercially viable and operationally practical.” – Neha Shankar, Director Legal (Deputy General Counsel) at Innovaccer.

    “I’ve learned that the best legal solutions aren’t just technically correct : they’re commercially viable and operationally practical.” – Neha Shankar, Director Legal (Deputy General Counsel) at Innovaccer.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    You’ve led high-stakes SaaS and IT contract negotiations across jurisdictions like the US, UK, Middle East, and India. What key legal and commercial differences have you observed among these regions, particularly in structuring and negotiating complex technology agreements?                                  

    The fundamental difference is risk philosophy and regulatory approach. US contracts are heavily liability-focused with aggressive risk shifting – broad indemnities, high liability caps, and extensive IP warranties because litigation risk is real. UK/EU takes a more balanced approach with reasonable risk allocation, but GDPR fundamentally changed data processing terms and cross-border transfer requirements.

    Middle East markets are relationship-driven with conservative risk tolerance – they often require local partnerships, prefer advance payments or guarantees, and decision-making is more hierarchical. Each country varies significantly – UAE’s approach differs from Saudi Arabia’s regulatory framework.

    India is extremely cost-sensitive with detailed SLA requirements and strong data localization mandates under DPDP Act. There’s preference for Indian governing law and local arbitration venues.

    For AI and emerging tech, the differences are stark. US allows broad AI disclaimers and extensive model training rights. EU requires AI Act compliance with strict accountability for high-risk systems. The Middle East often mandates human oversight for AI decisions. India’s framework is still emerging but trending toward data sovereignty.

    My approach: Use master agreements with jurisdiction-specific addenda rather than one-size-fits-all contracts. Build modular compliance sections that adapt to local requirements. Most importantly, understand that what works in Silicon Valley often needs significant adaptation – both legally and commercially – for other markets.

    As Director-Legal (Deputy General Counsel) at Innovaccer and a close advisor to both leadership and product teams, how has your role evolved beyond traditional contract review into a more strategic business function? 

    My role has evolved from traditional lawyer to strategic business partnership. I’m now embedded with product and leadership teams from the earliest stages – helping architect compliance into product roadmaps rather than reviewing afterward, participating in M&A strategy and market expansion decisions, and turning regulatory requirements into competitive advantages. I’ve built legal infrastructure that operates at business speed through automated workflows, self-service templates, and proactive frameworks that eliminate bottlenecks. The result is measurably faster deal cycles, on-schedule product launches, and better strategic decision-making because legal insights come early in the process rather than as obstacles later. Legal has become a growth accelerator rather than a cost center.

    From negotiating complex IT contracts to managing commercial transactions, you’ve worked extensively across highly regulated sectors. How do you stay abreast of evolving legal and regulatory frameworks, particularly in areas like data privacy and technology law? What’s your approach to identifying and mitigating legal risks in such fast-paced and dynamic industries?

    Staying current in fast-moving regulatory environments requires a systematic approach, not just ad-hoc reading. I’ve built a multi-layered monitoring system that combines automated alerts, industry networks, and practical application. For regulatory tracking, I use targeted legal research platforms with custom alerts for specific jurisdictions and practice areas – data privacy updates from key regulators like FTC, state AGs, and international bodies. I also maintain relationships with specialized regulatory counsel in different jurisdictions who provide real-time insights on enforcement trends and practical legal and compliance interpretations.

    Industry engagement is equally important. I’m active in relevant legal associations and regularly attend focused conferences – not general legal events, but sector-specific gatherings where regulators actually speak and share enforcement priorities. Peer networks with other in-house counsel facing similar challenges provide invaluable practical insights you can’t get from legal publications.

    For risk identification, I’ve developed frameworks that integrate legal monitoring with business operations. I work closely with product, engineering, and business development teams to understand what’s actually being built and sold, not just what’s documented. This early visibility lets me spot regulatory risks before they become legal problems.

    My mitigation approach focuses on building scalable systems rather than case-by-case reviews. I create legal frameworks that can adapt to regulatory changes without rebuilding everything. For data privacy, this means privacy-by-design architectures that can accommodate new requirements. For commercial transactions, it means modular contract structures that can be updated efficiently.

    The key is making legal monitoring a business process, not a personal responsibility. When regulatory changes happen, we can adapt quickly because the infrastructure is already in place.

    In the early stages of your career, you worked across diverse areas like transaction structuring, energy law, employment compliance, and more. How has this multidisciplinary exposure informed your legal thinking and approach as an in-house counsel today? 

    That multidisciplinary foundation taught me to see legal issues as interconnected business problems rather than isolated practice areas. Working in energy law showed me how regulatory frameworks shape entire business models. Transaction structuring taught me to think commercially about risk allocation. Employment laws gave me an operational perspective on how legal requirements actually impact day-to-day business. Now as in-house counsel, I don’t just analyze contracts in isolation – I understand how employment terms affect deal structures, how regulatory compliance impacts transaction timelines, and how operational realities influence legal strategy. This cross-functional thinking lets me spot issues other lawyers miss and provide solutions that work across multiple business functions. Instead of saying ‘that’s not my area,’ I can connect dots between different legal domains to solve complex business challenges more effectively.

    You’ve worked closely with business stakeholders, particularly in the IT sector. What are some common challenges you encounter in ensuring legal compliance, and how can businesses proactively address these issues early in the process to avoid future roadblocks? 

    The biggest challenge is that business teams treat legal compliance as a final review step rather than a foundational design element. In commercial contracting, sales teams often negotiate terms that create operational nightmares – promising SLAs we can’t meet or data processing we can’t legally perform. On the product side, teams build features first, then discover they violate privacy laws or create IP ownership issues. My approach is embedding legal requirements upfront – I work with sales to create contract playbooks with pre-approved terms that close deals faster, collaborate with product teams during feature planning to ensure privacy-by-design, and partner with engineering on data architecture that supports both business needs and regulatory compliance. I also build automated approval workflows and self-service legal tools so teams can move at business speed without creating risks. The result is that legal becomes a competitive advantage – we can commit to terms competitors can’t, launch compliant products faster, and avoid the costly retrofitting that kills margins and delays launches.

    With over a decade of experience, what initially drew you to pursue law as a career? When you reflect on your journey now, how has your vision evolved since those early days?  

    I was initially drawn to law because I saw it as a way to solve complex problems and create structure in ambiguous situations. Early on, I thought legal work was about finding the right answer in statutes and precedents. Over the past decade, I’ve realized that the most impactful legal work happens at the intersection of law and business strategy – it’s not just about compliance, but about enabling growth and competitive advantage. My vision has evolved from being a legal expert who provides advice to being a business partner who helps drive outcomes. I’ve learned that the best legal solutions aren’t just technically correct – they’re commercially viable and operationally practical. What excites me now is using legal expertise to unlock business opportunities that others can’t see, whether that’s structuring deals that competitors can’t match or building compliance frameworks that become market differentiators. Law became less about finding answers in books and more about creating solutions that don’t exist yet.

    Recognized for your strong contributions across industries, what core values or guiding principles have anchored your legal journey? Looking ahead, what goals or aspirations do you hold for the future?  

    Ans: Three core principles have guided my legal career: pragmatic problem-solving over theoretical perfection, business enablement rather than risk avoidance, and building scalable systems instead of one-off solutions. I’ve always believed that the best legal advice is the advice that actually gets implemented – which means understanding business realities and crafting solutions that work operationally, not just legally. My approach has been to turn legal requirements into competitive advantages rather than compliance burdens. Looking ahead, I’m focused on leveraging emerging technologies like AI to transform how legal functions operate – building intelligent contract systems, predictive compliance frameworks, and automated risk assessment tools that let legal teams operate at unprecedented scale and speed. My aspiration is to help redefine what in-house legal can accomplish, moving from a support function to a strategic driver of business growth and innovation. The future of legal is about using technology and strategic thinking to solve business problems that haven’t been solvable before.

    Legal work in high-stakes corporate environments is intense. How do you balance your professional responsibilities with personal well-being? What practices or activities help you recharge and maintain perspective? 

    Honestly, I’m a natural hustler – I thrive on the intensity and challenge of high-stakes legal work. But I’ve learned that raw drive without strategy leads to burnout, not breakthrough results. The key is channeling that energy where it creates maximum impact rather than spreading it thin across everything.

    With experience, I’ve developed systems for sustainable high performance. I start my day with strategic work before reactive demands take over, and I batch similar tasks to maintain deep focus rather than constant context-switching. Outside work, I stay physically active and spend time with my dog – there’s something grounding about that unconditional companionship that cuts through legal complexity. I’m also involved in community animal welfare work, which connects me to something meaningful beyond corporate environments.

    The breakthrough insight: stepping away from legal problems often unlocks better solutions when I return. I’ve built strong professional relationships that provide perspective during intense periods, and I’ve learned to distinguish between urgent and important – not every crisis is actually critical. This lets me stay calm under pressure and direct my hustler energy where it matters most. Sustainable excellence isn’t about working harder – it’s about managing energy strategically.

    Given your wide-ranging expertise, what advice would you offer to young lawyers entering the legal profession today particularly those looking to build careers in corporate law, technology, or cross-border commercial practice? 

    Three pieces of advice: First, become genuinely business-literate, not just legally competent. Understand how companies actually make money, how technology works, and what drives commercial decisions. The lawyers who succeed long-term are those who can translate legal requirements into business solutions. Second, specialize early but stay adaptable. Pick a sector like fintech or healthcare and become the go-to expert, but develop skills that transfer across industries – contract negotiation, regulatory analysis, and strategic thinking are universal. Third, build relationships before you need them. The best opportunities come through networks, not job boards. Connect with in-house counsel, business leaders, and peers who’ll become your referral sources and collaborators. For cross-border work specifically, understand that legal expertise alone isn’t enough – you need cultural fluency and practical knowledge of how business actually gets done in different markets. Most importantly, think like a business partner from day one. Don’t just identify problems – propose solutions. The lawyers who advance fastest are those who make their clients’ lives easier, not more complicated.

    Get in touch with Neha Shankar –

  • “In essence, global success in law is no longer reserved for the privileged few. With the right mindset, a commitment to growth, and the courage to take that first step, no matter how small, you can carve your own path.” – Medini Sourav Dutta, Regional Lead Legal at The Hershey Company, Malaysia.

    “In essence, global success in law is no longer reserved for the privileged few. With the right mindset, a commitment to growth, and the courage to take that first step, no matter how small, you can carve your own path.” – Medini Sourav Dutta, Regional Lead Legal at The Hershey Company, Malaysia.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Your journey from a remote village in India to a senior legal role in a century-old American multinational is incredibly inspiring. What early experiences or turning points played a pivotal role in developing your interest in Law in the first place?

    Growing up in a remote village in Assam, access to resources was limited, but the values instilled in me, resilience, curiosity, and a strong sense of justice, were profound. I vividly remember witnessing everyday challenges faced by people in my community, often due to a lack of awareness of their rights or access to legal support. These early observations sparked a deep interest in the mechanisms of justice and how the law could serve as a tool for empowerment.

    A pivotal moment came during my school years when I had the opportunity to assist a local teacher who was helping villagers draft and understand basic legal documents. That experience, though informal, was transformative. It opened my eyes to how meaningful an impact legal knowledge could have when applied with empathy and purpose.

    Later, during my university studies, I was drawn not just to the theory of law, but also to its application in real-world, cross-border business scenarios. This interest deepened as I began to understand the role legal professionals play in shaping not only individual outcomes but also the trajectory of entire organizations.

    Each step of the way, from the modest beginnings in my village to engaging with multinational teams across continents, has been driven by a belief that the law, when practiced with integrity and foresight, can be a powerful enabler of growth, fairness, and progress.

    Spanning over 15 years across industries like pharmaceuticals, IT, and manufacturing, your career reflects both depth and versatility. What foundational lessons from your early roles continue to guide your practice today?

    One of the most enduring lessons from my early roles is the importance of listening deeply and understanding the business context before offering legal advice. Early in my career, I realized that being technically sound in law is essential but not sufficient. To be truly effective, a legal professional must align legal strategy with business objectives and operational realities. This perspective has consistently guided my approach across industries.

    Another foundational lesson is the value of clarity and simplicity in communication. Whether I was supporting a pharmaceutical company on regulatory compliance or helping an IT firm scale its contract operations, I learned that demystifying legal complexity for non-legal stakeholders builds trust and accelerates decision-making. The ability to translate legal language into practical guidance is something I continue to emphasize and foster in the teams I lead.

    Lastly, adaptability has been a constant companion. Working across different geographies and regulatory frameworks, from India to the Americas, taught me to stay agile, culturally sensitive, and open to learning. The legal landscapes may differ, but the need for sound judgment, ethical integrity, and strategic foresight remains universal.

    These early principles, business empathy, clear communication, and adaptability, have become the cornerstones of my practice and continue to shape how I engage with stakeholders, lead teams, and deliver value in complex, evolving environments.

    At The Hershey Company, you’ve played a key role in ensuring compliance with corporate governance, legal obligations, and regulatory standards across regions including APAC and Europe. Could you share one of the most challenging situations you’ve encountered in this journey, and how you effectively navigate it?

    Thank you for the question. While I must respect the confidentiality obligations inherent to my current role and cannot discuss specific internal situations, I can share that navigating complex compliance challenges across diverse jurisdictions requires a combination of proactive stakeholder engagement, cross-functional collaboration, and adaptability to evolving regulations.

    In my experience, the key to effectively managing such challenges lies in fostering open communication with local experts, aligning legal strategies with business goals, and maintaining a flexible yet rigorous approach to compliance. This mindset has consistently enabled successful navigation of complex regulatory environments without compromising confidentiality.

    With extensive experience in negotiating high-value contracts, what common pitfalls have you observed in commercial negotiations and how can legal teams proactively avoid them in high-pressure environments?

    One of the most common pitfalls I have observed in high-value commercial negotiations is focusing too heavily on legal minutiae without fully understanding the commercial drivers and deal dynamics. While it’s crucial to safeguard the company’s legal interests, an overly rigid approach can alienate the counterparty or delay progress, especially in high-pressure environments where timing and agility are critical.

    Another frequent misstep is insufficient alignment between the legal team and internal business stakeholders before negotiations begin. When legal teams are brought in late or are not fully briefed on the business objectives and risk tolerance, negotiations can become reactive rather than strategic, leading to missed opportunities or poorly structured outcomes.

    To proactively avoid these pitfalls, I emphasize the following approaches:

    1. Early and continuous collaboration: Involving legal professionals at the outset of the deal cycle fosters a proactive, strategic approach rather than a reactive one. By gaining a deep understanding of the underlying business rationale, legal teams can craft solutions that not only mitigate risks but also actively facilitate and enable the successful execution of the deal.
    2. Scenario planning and fallback positions: In high-stakes negotiations, pressure can lead to rushed decisions. By preparing fallback positions and pre-approved negotiation levers in advance, legal teams can respond quickly without compromising on key risk parameters.
    3. Clear internal alignment on priorities: Before entering negotiations, I ensure that all internal stakeholders, from finance to operations, are aligned on what is negotiable and what is not. This clarity helps present a united front and prevents conflicting messages during the negotiation process.
    4. Balancing firmness with flexibility: Successful negotiations often require finding creative middle ground. Legal teams that are solution-oriented, commercially aware, and culturally attuned are far better positioned to achieve outcomes that are both compliant and commercially viable.

    Ultimately, effective negotiation is about understanding both the legal and human elements of the deal. By staying calm under pressure, communicating clearly, and staying focused on the end goal, legal teams can not only protect the business but also enhance its reputation as a trusted and pragmatic partner.

    Legal technology and process optimization are central to your work. What do you see as the biggest opportunities and challenges for legal departments embracing automation and AI in contract lifecycle management?

    The rise of automation and AI in contract lifecycle management presents an exciting opportunity for legal departments to transform from being reactive support functions to strategic enablers of business efficiency and growth. When implemented thoughtfully, legal technology can drastically reduce cycle times, improve compliance, and deliver actionable insights from contract data, turning legal operations into a source of competitive advantage.

    With AI-powered analytics, legal teams can extract trends from thousands of contracts, identifying risks, renegotiation triggers, or compliance gaps proactively. Automation also enables standardization and scalability, especially for high-volume, low-risk agreements, freeing up legal talent to focus on complex, strategic matters.

    However, the challenges are equally significant. One major hurdle is change management. Legal functions have traditionally been risk-averse, and shifting mindsets toward embracing technology can be slow. Without clear alignment between legal, IT, procurement, and business teams, implementation can become fragmented, resulting in poor adoption and underutilized platforms.

    Another challenge is balancing automation with judgment. AI can streamline workflows, but legal decision-making still requires human insight, especially in nuanced or high-stakes scenarios. Ensuring that automation enhances, rather than replaces, critical thinking is key.

    To navigate this journey successfully, I believe legal departments should focus on three core principles:

    • Start with process clarity and optimize before automating.
    • Select tools that integrate seamlessly into existing ecosystems and workflows.
    • Invest in capability building, ensuring teams are trained not just on how to use technology, but how to extract its full strategic value.

    Ultimately, the goal is not just to automate for efficiency but to elevate the role of legal as a proactive, tech-enabled partner in the business ecosystem.

    You’ve led teams and collaborated across functions globally. What leadership principles have stayed with you, especially when working with diverse legal and business stakeholders?

    Leading and collaborating across diverse legal and business teams, often spread across different geographies, cultures, and regulatory environments, has taught me that effective leadership is grounded in empathy, clarity, and trust.

    One principle that has consistently guided me is the importance of active listening and cultural sensitivity. In global environments, legal and business perspectives can vary significantly depending on local norms, risk perceptions, and market dynamics. Taking the time to understand those perspectives, before offering solutions, builds credibility and strengthens collaboration.

    I also believe in leading with clarity of purpose. Whether I’m guiding a legal team or partnering with cross-functional stakeholders, I strive to clearly communicate goals, expectations, and the rationale behind key decisions. In complex projects, especially those involving regulatory or commercial risk, clarity helps align efforts and fosters collective ownership.

    Another key principle is empowerment through trust. I have found that giving people the space to take ownership while being available as a sounding board, creates stronger, more resilient teams. It is especially important when managing legal functions across time zones, where micromanagement is not only ineffective but also unsustainable.

    Finally, I try to lead by example, particularly when it comes to integrity and accountability. In legal roles, your credibility often precedes you. Being consistent, dependable, and fair, even under pressure, helps build long-term trust across both legal and business communities.

    In essence, leadership in a global legal context isn’t just about directing, it is about connecting, aligning diverse perspectives toward common objectives, and doing so with authenticity, respect, and strategic foresight.

    Your early exposure to litigation and dispute resolution must have provided valuable perspective. How did you decide to transition to an international practice and how did you navigate the complexities involved with it?

    My early exposure to litigation and dispute resolution gave me a solid ground in the fundamentals of legal analysis, advocacy, and risk assessment. Working on contentious matters in the Indian legal system taught me to think critically, anticipate challenges, and understand the nuances of courtroom dynamics, all of which are invaluable skills, even outside the litigation context.

    However, over time, I became increasingly drawn to the preventive and strategic side of legal practice, particularly how legal frameworks could be leveraged to support business growth, mitigate risk before it materializes, and enable long-term value creation. I saw international practice as a natural evolution of this interest. It offered the opportunity to work across jurisdictions, partner closely with business leaders, and help organizations navigate regulatory complexity on a global scale.

    The transition wasn’t without challenges. Moving from a litigation-focused role to an in-house, cross-border environment required me to reorient my mindset from issue resolution to issue prevention, and from adversarial negotiation to collaborative problem-solving. I invested significant time in understanding international legal systems, both common law and civil law traditions, as well as gaining fluency in business operations and corporate governance.

    One of the most effective ways I navigated this shift was by embracing continuous learning and remaining adaptable. I took on roles that expanded my exposure to multinational operations, built relationships with colleagues across functions and cultures, and sought mentors who had successfully made similar transitions.

    In hindsight, my litigation experience gave me a strong foundation in legal rigor and risk management, while my move into international practice allowed me to broaden my impact, helping businesses not just survive legal hurdles, but thrive through strategic legal support.

    Having worked across both common and civil law systems, what key differences do you notice in legal operations, and how do you keep up with the ever changing dimensions of legal compliances across jurisdictions?

    Working across both common and civil law systems has deepened my appreciation for the diversity in legal reasoning, procedural approaches, and the role of precedent in shaping legal outcomes. In common law systems, there is a strong reliance on case law and judicial interpretation, which demands a nuanced understanding of precedent and how it evolves over time. In contrast, civil law systems are more codified and statute-driven, requiring a close reading of the legislative framework and its administrative interpretations.

    From an operational standpoint, these differences manifest in contract drafting styles, dispute resolution mechanisms, and compliance expectations. For instance, civil law jurisdictions may favor more concise contracts that rely on statutory provisions, whereas common law jurisdictions often require more detailed, self-contained agreements. Similarly, the pace and approach to regulatory enforcement can vary widely. What is standard in one jurisdiction may be seen as intrusive or inadequate in another.

    To manage these complexities, I take a proactive, layered approach to legal compliance:

    • Local Expertise: I collaborate closely with local counsel and regional experts to stay aligned with jurisdiction-specific interpretations and enforcement trends. This ensures that our global strategies are grounded in local realities.
    • Knowledge Sharing and Internal Training: I prioritize creating internal awareness through cross-functional training, compliance toolkits, and internal policy updates, making sure legal and business teams are equipped to operate responsibly across borders.
    • Regulatory Monitoring and Strategic Technology Use: I leverage legal tech solutions and regulatory intelligence platforms to track evolving legal landscapes, particularly in areas like data privacy, ESG, and trade compliance, where change is rapid and multidimensional.
    • Harmonization with Flexibility: Wherever possible, I advocate for harmonized global processes that can be tailored for local adaptation. This allows for consistency in core legal and compliance principles while respecting jurisdictional nuances.

    Ultimately, navigating these varied legal systems requires not only technical knowledge, but also cultural sensitivity, open communication, and a commitment to continuous learning. It is this blend of structure and adaptability that allows legal operations to remain effective and compliant in a constantly shifting global environment.

    What advice would you offer to young legal professionals particularly those from non-metropolitan backgrounds aspiring to make a mark globally? And how do you personally stay ahead in this ever-evolving legal ecosystem?

    To young legal professionals, particularly those from non-metropolitan or modest backgrounds, I want to say that your origin does not define your destination. What matters most is your willingness to learn, your resilience in the face of challenges, and your ability to adapt. I come from a remote village in Assam, and I understand firsthand the barriers, both visible and invisible, that can make global aspirations seem out of reach. But those very roots can also be your greatest strength. They teach you humility, grit, and the power of persistence.

    My advice is to focus on building a strong foundation in both legal knowledge and practical skills. Be curious, ask questions, and don’t shy away from stepping outside your comfort zone. Seek mentors, even if informally, and be open to feedback. Language, geography, or access may feel like limitations initially, but with consistency, self-discipline, and digital access to global knowledge, those gaps can be closed.

    Also, understand that legal excellence today goes beyond black-letter law. Develop a commercial mindset, be tech-aware, and build cultural fluency. In a globalized legal ecosystem, your ability to collaborate across time zones, cultures, and functions is just as critical as your ability to interpret a statute.

    As for how I stay ahead in this evolving field, it is a combination of continuous learning, strategic networking, and hands-on collaboration. I make it a point to stay informed through industry publications, legal tech forums, and cross-functional discussions. I also learn immensely from mentoring others which offers fresh perspectives and keeps me grounded.

    In essence, global success in law is no longer reserved for the privileged few. With the right mindset, a commitment to growth, and the courage to take that first step, no matter how small, you can carve your own path.

    Get in touch with Medini Sourav Dutta –

  • Beyond the Courtroom: Building The Contract Consultants Around the Heart of Every Business. – Abhinav Kumar Karn, Founder of The Contract Consultants.

    Beyond the Courtroom: Building The Contract Consultants Around the Heart of Every Business. – Abhinav Kumar Karn, Founder of The Contract Consultants.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Could you share the thought process behind starting this consultancy? What inspired the idea, and why did you choose this particular name?

    In an era of prestigious law firms with legendary names, I wanted to create something different, something that directly conveyed our expertise. That’s why I chose “The Contract Consultants.”

    Throughout my career, I realized that contracts are the heart and soul of any business. Well-drafted contracts protect companies from legal expenses, arbitration, mediation, and compliance issues. Businesses that want to excel should prioritize strong contracts.

    Our expertise lies in contracts, and we wanted our name to reflect that. The idea behind this name is simple: you focus on growing your business while we handle your contracts and documentation.

     What challenges did you face in choosing law as a career, especially when your choices were questioned? With 12 years of experience, how has your journey shaped you?

    I’ll keep it brief. I’m originally from Ranchi, and my house was next to the High Court. Seeing lawyers in their black coats from childhood fascinated me and made me admire the profession.

    However, where I come from, law wasn’t considered prestigious, it was often seen as a fallback option. My entire family had a science background, and my brother is a major in the Indian Army. So, my decision to pursue law was unconventional.

    The first challenge was convincing my family. My father supported me and encouraged me to take the AILET exam. Once I joined law school, I realized the vast opportunities the field offers beyond just becoming a judge or starting a practice.

    I studied law at MS Ramaiah College of Law in Bangalore. Moving from a small town to a metropolitan city was a transformative experience. It broadened my perspective, shaped my career choices, and helped me evolve as a person.

    I started in litigation, then shifted to corporate law. Over time, I realized my true passion was making an impact and building something of my own. For me, success isn’t just about financial gains—it’s about standing for what you believe in. My journey has been a gradual process of discovery, with each experience reinforcing my commitment to law.

     Given your expertise in contracts, particularly in e-commerce, what are the most common pitfalls businesses face? How have you helped address them?

     As a lawyer, two crucial questions guide my approach: What? and How?

    E-commerce businesses often make the mistake of copying existing terms and conditions or privacy policies without considering their specific business model. There are different categories: intermediaries, B2C, and B2B platforms, each requiring tailored contracts.

    Some common issues include:

    Dispute Resolution: Many businesses fail to include clear dispute resolution mechanisms in customer-facing contracts.

    Liability Limitations: Companies don’t define liability properly, leaving them exposed to unexpected claims.

    Regulatory Compliance: Ensuring compliance with laws like India’s IT Rules, Consumer Protection Act, and FDI regulations is crucial

    A well-drafted contract should align with the business model, define liability, include compliance measures, and ensure trade secret protection. Boilerplate clauses are everywhere, but strategic customization is what mitigates risk.

    With rapid technological changes, how have you adapted your approach to risk management and contract negotiations?

    Contracts have evolved significantly over the last decade, especially with AI and data privacy regulations.

    Previously, a simple NDA was considered sufficient for confidentiality. Now, contracts must explicitly define data privacy, data breaches, data transfers, and liability for AI-generated outcomes.

    Key changes include:

    Precise Confidentiality Clauses: Defining what constitutes confidential information and outlining penalties for breaches.

    Regulatory Adaptability: Contracts must allow for amendments in response to legal and technological developments.

    Cross-Border Compliance: Understanding GDPR, CCPA, India’s DPDPA, and other international privacy laws.

    Businesses need contracts that are both legally robust and flexible enough to adapt to evolving regulations.

     What key provisions do you focus on when drafting Master Service Agreements for tech companies?

    Many businesses focus on boilerplate clauses (indemnity, liability, termination, governing law) but overlook critical details.

    Commonly missed elements include:

    Auto-Renewal Clauses: If not properly structured, businesses might get locked into contracts they wanted to exit.

    Audit Rights: Allowing unlimited audits can expose sensitive trade secrets and confidential information.

    Scope of Work Clarity: Vague scopes lead to increased work without additional compensation.

    Early Termination Provisions: Without structured termination clauses, companies may be forced to pay the full contract value despite early exits.

    A well-drafted MSA should protect both short-term and long-term business interests while ensuring flexibility.

    How do you ensure contracts maintain clarity and legal safety in new markets with evolving regulations?

    Compliance is all about understanding “What?” (laws and regulations) and “How?” (implementation).

    We conduct gap analyses, risk assessments, and compliance roadmaps to ensure businesses remain compliant. Using a Red-Amber-Green framework, we prioritize urgent risks while addressing lesser risks systematically.

    When entering new markets, businesses must understand:

    Applicable data protection laws (e.g., GDPR, CCPA, DPDPA).

    Cross-border contractual obligations.

    Industry-specific compliance standards.

    We focus on ensuring that contracts align with regulations while maintaining operational flexibility.

    How has ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) evolved, and how do you incorporate it into contracts?

    Dispute resolution isn’t just about litigation, it’s about economic viability and preserving business relationships.

    Key considerations:

    Cost-Benefit Analysis: Is the dispute worth pursuing, or would negotiation be a better option?

    IP Disputes: Clearly defining IP ownership in contracts reduces conflicts.

    Confidentiality Protections: Preventing trade secret exposure during audits or negotiations.

    Effective ADR clauses ensure disputes are resolved efficiently, preserving business continuity.

    How do you stay updated with constant legal and regulatory changes?

    It’s about building a habit.

    Weekly Review Checklist: I set aside time to track key developments.

    Webinars & Newsletters: Staying connected to legal platforms and industry experts.

    Peer Discussions: Conversations with colleagues provide fresh insights.

    Being proactive ensures we anticipate legal changes rather than just reacting to them

    Balancing Corporate Life & Mental Well-being

    How do you maintain work-life balance while thriving in a corporate environment?

    Mental well-being is key. Work culture matters more than the company name. A great manager and team make a huge difference.

    Prioritize mental health over money. Financial success is meaningless if you’re mentally exhausted.

    Corporate life isn’t just about earning; it’s about personal growth.

    The best professionals aren’t just technically skilled; they are resilient, self-aware, and mentally strong. 

    Get in touch with Abhinav Kumar Karn –

  • “A positive approach is a must while working in a team. ‘You’re almost there’ is always better than ‘you cannot do it.'” – Ritin Vatrana, Legal Counsel -Corporate Litigation, Piramal Capital & Housing Finance Limited

    “A positive approach is a must while working in a team. ‘You’re almost there’ is always better than ‘you cannot do it.’” – Ritin Vatrana, Legal Counsel -Corporate Litigation, Piramal Capital & Housing Finance Limited

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    You started your legal career in 2007 after completing your BALLB (Hons.) from Kurukshetra University. What motivated you to choose law as your career, and could you walk us through your journey from those early days to where you are now?  

    My entry into the Legal field was very much certain since I am a third generation Lawyer. My grandfather practiced in Labour Laws, my father is still practicing in District Courts Patiala and hence my parents had already decided during my childhood about my profession and hence I entered the field. Initially, I started learning the procedures followed in court and the ground realities of the Legal field where I came to know about how to apply what I learnt in my degree. For this, I actually went through the entire degree subjects 4-5 times again doing self-study in order to get a deep knowledge of the subjects so that I can have better understanding of the cases I got to handle. Slowly and gradually, I developed my own understanding in law and by that time I was able to handle the cases independently. Being a trial lawyer, handling the evidence part was most challenging and most interesting as well. I started cross examining the witnesses independently and luckily many cases went my way. However, in Patiala there wasn’t much to learn about since there was hardly any variety in the cases we got; mostly there used to be Cheque bounce matters, matrimonial disputes, NDPS etc. and those cases were very much cyclostyled and my eagerness to learn wanted me go out and do something new in the field. 

    You began your law practice at the Patiala district courts, where your father was a well-established professional. How did working in the district courts shape your approach to law, and what key lessons did you take away from those early formative years?    

    My time in the Courts was extremely important. Being a legal professional, the most important thing is to know how to draft a legal document and an in-house Counsel is always expected to have very crisp drafting skills which would go on to protect the interest of the organization. Further, being meticulous, attention to detail, presence of mind, patience and calculated aggression were the key qualities I learnt during my practice days.

    You mentioned your encounter with the Legal Head of CIPLA, which inspired your transition into corporate law. What about that interaction made you decide to shift from litigation to becoming an in-house counsel?  

    As I had stated, in one of my cases related to CIPLA, I met the in-house counsel of the company and had a great conversation with him about how things go as an in-house counsel and what are the prospects. He told me that as an in-house, he came across several types of different cases and that made his knowledge in the field vast and comprehensive and to add to that the biggest incentive was the opportunity to travel. Afterwards, I discussed it with my elder brother, who was already working in corporate and he also reiterated a similar view. That was perhaps the trigger point of me looking to shift to the Corporate. It took me quite a while to get my first opportunity in a large organization. The first one month was like a roller coaster but gradually I managed to get into the system and started understanding corporate governance and that was perhaps the turning point of my life both professionally and personally as it gave me so much energy to work and live round the clock. Leaving the comfort zone was tough initially but once you are out of it, THERE BEGINS THE LIFE.

    What advice would you give to young legal professionals who aspire to transition from litigation to corporate in-house roles, especially those aiming to work with large multinational corporations?

    Ever since I have started my journey with the corporate, I have met many legal professionals eager to know how things work in the sector. Many are under the myth of “Corporate Slavery”. I shared my experiences with them of how I managed PAN India litigation and contracts of my first Company single handedly. From working for 4-5 hours a day in practice to working 16-18 hours in corporate was an eye opener and a huge confidence booster. I only advise the youngsters to look for excellence and not results early on. Law is a vast field and to move on in this field, not only you need to know the law, but how and where to apply it and this requires both theoretical as well as practical knowledge. In-House Counsels do a whole lot of drafting work including contracts, complaints, notices etc. Litigation lawyers hardly get to know about drafting of contracts and hence i advise them to find some good books pertaining to contract drafting if they have any plans to shift to the sector.  

    You’ve been involved in arbitration cases with values ranging from ₹50 lakh to ₹300 crore. What are some key skills a lawyer needs to successfully handle such high-stakes cases, and how do you manage the pressure?  

    When the stakes are high, the pressure is high as well but as a legal professional, my job is to find the law point and the circumstances favouring my organization so that I can benefit them or at least prevent any loss. The skills I learnt in practice also lets me foresee the tentative result sometimes and that helps us to plan accordingly. The thing with high stake matters is that you need to thing out of the box sometimes to get the desired results and for that you need to have strong legal knowledge but also to know the ground realities. 

    With over 17 years of legal experience and handling high-pressure cases, how do you manage work-life balance, and what advice would you give to legal professionals to avoid burnout?  

    In my previous organization, I did go through that burnout because of the urgencies involved. The stakes were high and time was less and that is when you learn and develop a strong temperament. Sometimes, there were late hour calls and emails but I had set a time for my “homework” so that I can give time to family and household works too and me being a travel bug, occasional holiday was always going to be there. To add to that, I am an early riser and a cyclist so every morning an hour’s ride would freshen me up with all the energy to go hard for the day.

    In your view, how important is interdisciplinary knowledge, such as understanding business or finance, for a successful legal career in the corporate world?

    Corporate is all about business and finances and whosoever is working in corporate needs to know about it. During my stint with Isgec Heavy Engineering, I learnt a lot about International Business processes as to how contracts of supply work and how the conditions are set by the companies and where to negotiate. I was naive back then but going through so many Contracts of Supply, Erection and Commissioning and those tender documents was another experience. Especially when I was told that the documents drafted by me are going to Russia or Dubai; it sometimes gave me goosebumps but it made me work harder and to get a better understanding about the subject. 

    You’ve managed a team of 40 lawyers in your current role. What leadership qualities do you think are essential for managing a successful legal team, and how do you mentor young lawyers under your guidance?  

    My job is to allocate the work to empanelled lawyers. Generally, I have a 5-10 conversation with the lawyer to understand his understanding on the subject and if he is a newcomer or unaware about the topic, I provide him/her with the relevant information along with legal provision and let them prepare the draft and as they say, a lawyer’s calibre can be judged by his drafting skills and so i always advise youngsters to draft the document from scratch and avoid doing copy paste; you’re never going to learn copying and pasting. Drafting skill to a lawyer is like a sword to a warrior.  Further, a positive approach is a must while you work in a team. “you’re almost there” is always better than “you cannot do it”. 

    Looking ahead, what emerging legal trends do you think will significantly impact the corporate legal landscape, and how should aspiring legal professionals prepare for them?  

    The advent of technology has really brought a huge window for legal professionals to enter the corporate world. Earlier, the legal professionals were limited to law practice, judiciary or teaching but now the upcoming generation is proactive and are perhaps 5-7 years quicker than ours. Nowadays, in-house Counsel’s job is not limited to civil, consumer, criminal laws or contract laws; Technology laws, Artificial Intelligence, Intellectual Property Rights, Data Privacy laws have taken over and in the coming times, knowledge about these is going to play a key role. So, I always advise the aspiring professionals to keep getting some knowledge in the fields as they are going to play a pivotal role in carving them a successful in-house Counsel. 

    Get in touch with Ritin Vatrana–

  • “Being an in-house counsel is more than providing legal advice; it’s about shaping business strategies that minimize risks and contribute to the company’s long-term success.” – Yogendra Bhaskar, In house Counsel at DJT Corporation & Investment Pvt. Ltd.

    “Being an in-house counsel is more than providing legal advice; it’s about shaping business strategies that minimize risks and contribute to the company’s long-term success.” – Yogendra Bhaskar, In house Counsel at DJT Corporation & Investment Pvt. Ltd.

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    You’ve had an impressive journey in the legal field. Can you share what inspired you to pursue a career in law, and how did you navigate your early years to build a strong foundation in this field?  

    My journey into law was shaped by a unique blend of family expectations and personal discovery. Growing up in a family with a strong tradition of public service, particularly in the Central Government sector, there was an implicit expectation for me to follow a similar path. My father’s distinguished career as a “Government Officer” set a high bar, exemplifying the respect, authority, and satisfaction that came with this role.

    Initially, I ventured into Aeronautical Engineering in 2008, driven by my background in the science stream. However, after a semester, I realized that this field did not ignite the same passion I had observed in my father’s career. I was missing the sense of purpose and impact.

    This realization led me to pivot towards a field of law that I believed could offer the opportunity to make a meaningful difference in society, much like the government service I had grown up admiring. I saw “law” as a path that could lead to either judiciary or advocacy, both of which aligned with my desire to contribute significantly to society.

    My legal education and early career were driven by a passion for understanding and navigating complex legal systems, to create positive change. I laid a strong foundation by immersing myself in litigation, gaining valuable hands-on experience across various courts and tribunals under the guidance of excellent legal professionals practising in Delhi High Court and Supreme Court. This diverse exposure was instrumental in bridging the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical application, providing me with a comprehensive understanding of law that went far beyond what textbooks could offer.

    During your time at LEX JURIS and SKC & Associates, you handled a wide range of cases across various courts and tribunals. What strategies do you find most effective in preparing for and managing high-stakes litigation?

    When it comes to high-stakes litigation, I believe in thorough preparation using tried-and-true methods. My approach starts with diving deep into the core of the case through legal research and understanding the correct facts of the case. I make sure to note down all relevant precedents that could support my case. A crucial part of my preparation involves anticipating what arguments the opposing side might present and observing myself in his shoes.

    Before stepping into the courtroom, I always ensure a few essential elements are in place. First, I develop a solid case theory – this is our roadmap for the entire litigation process. Then, I create a concise summary document “by hand-noting” that helps me remember all the critical points of our case. Still, I always make a diagram of the whole story of the case on the first page of the file, a diagram structure as it helps me to remember the cruciality of the case. It is also fundamental to gather and organize all the key facts from my client, ensuring nothing important is overlooked.

    Furthermore, understanding the framework and operation structure of the Client’s business helps me a lot to represent my case before the Court as it makes it easy to judge/presiding officer, how this person’s business works and why the dispute arose, which the relief I am asking for my client.

    Sometimes, complex cases require additional expertise. In such situations, I do not hesitate to collaborate with senior advocates. Their experience and insights can provide valuable direction to our litigation strategy.

    This comprehensive preparation method, combining detailed research, strategic thinking, and collaborative efforts when needed, forms the backbone of handling a high-stakes litigation.

    You started your career in litigation, representing clients in court, and later transitioned to an in-house counsel role. What motivated this shift, and how did your litigation experience influence your approach to handling legal matters within a corporate environment?

    My time in litigation was incredibly valuable, and I am truly grateful for the guidance and learning opportunities provided by my senior advocates as well as by the Hon’ble Judges. They gave me a solid foundation and the right environment to grow professionally.

    In my early years as a litigation lawyer, I learned crucial skills about how to structure a case. I discovered the importance of presenting arguments in a way that clearly shows why my client deserves the relief they are asking for. This involves carefully organizing facts, legal points, and evidence before presenting them to the court.

    While practising as a litigation lawyer, I also obtained insights into “why disputes often end up in court”. While there can be many reasons, I noticed that “commercial litigation” frequently stems from two main issues:

    1. Unclear or confusing terms in business contracts

    2. Misunderstandings or disagreements between parties involved in a transaction

    Recognizing these common causes of litigation sparked my interest in preventing legal issues before they escalate to court battles. Thereafter, I decided to shift to the corporate sector so I may construct a better foundation and avoid potential disputes as well as financial stability too. 

    Having transitioned from working in law firms to an in-house counsel role, what key differences have you noticed in the approach to legal issues? Please share your experience.

    In-house work requires a more holistic approach compared to law firm practice. In law firms, I primarily dealt with issues after they had escalated into disputes. As an in-house counsel, I now focus more on preventing legal problems before they arise.

    As an in-house counsel, I am much more integrated into the company’s day-to-day operations and strategic planning. This allows me to understand the business context of legal issues better.

    In a law firm, the focus was often on winning cases. In-house, there is a greater emphasis on managing risks and compliances. I now assess potential legal issues in terms of their business impact and help the company make informed decisions about which risks to take or avoid.

    While law firm work often allows for specialization, as an in-house counsel, I deal with a wider range of legal matters. This requires me to have a broader knowledge base and to be more versatile in my approach as well as I may learn more and more in my career.

    In-house work involves more interaction with various departments and levels of management. I need to communicate legal concepts to non-lawyers and miscellaneous department and further balance legal considerations with business objectives.

    Unlike in a law firm where client relationships might be more transactional, as an in-house counsel, I am invested in the company’s long-term success.

    My litigation experience now serves as a foundation for preventive law. I use my knowledge of common dispute causes, like unclear contract terms, to draft better agreements and advise on potential pitfalls in business decisions. My contribution and suggestions may help my organization to grow in an organized manner

    As an in-house counsel, I am often involved in strategic decision-making processes. My role is not just to provide legal advice but to help shape business strategies that minimize legal risks.

    Overall, the transition has shifted my focus from resolving conflicts to preventing them, from specialized legal work to a more holistic business-oriented approach. This in-house role allows me to use my legal skills in a more preventive and strategic manner, directly contributing to the company’s overall success and risk management.

    The shift from working in law firms to becoming an in-house counsel is much like moving from being a mason to becoming the architect of a building. By being the architect, I can now avoid potential risks and build a good foundation for the entire structure.

    As an in-house counsel, you’ve advised management on regulatory compliance issues. What do you see as the biggest challenges for companies in maintaining compliance, and how do you stay updated with changing regulations?

    As an in-house counsel, I have found that advising on regulatory compliance is much like ensuring our building meets all the necessary codes and standards. India is an evolving country day by day and those rapidly changing regulations across various sectors is a significant challenge. Further, many regulations are intricate and can be interpreted in multiple ways, being complicated sometimes. 

    As still in India for any sector, there is no such thing as a “One Window Solution”, where you may find all the compliances at once, so you have to follow several rules and regulations together without executing any contradiction and also following the interest of the Company. Operating a business in India has several major challenges due to the long processes of compliance and obtaining those approvals. 

    For companies operating in multiple regions, complying with different sets of regulations is often too hectic. Ensuring that this compliance does not hinder business operations is also a big challenge.

    I keep myself updated on specific regulations belonging to my company’s business by continuous learning through webinars, seminars, my consultant newsletters. I also subscribe to legal journals accordingly.

    Maintaining a strong network with professional legal associations and collaborating with external consultants and experts in the legal industry also provides help. Further, now in this Digital era, using technology and the internet helps corporate lawyers to track their compliance management and ensure all aspects of such requirements.

    Legal research and writing are critical aspects of your role. How do you approach legal research, and what tools or methods do you find most effective in ensuring thorough and accurate legal analysis?

    For legal research, I rely on a combination of online databases, legal journals, and case laws. Cross-referencing multiple sources ensures accuracy and comprehensiveness. Even, having such great mentors and seniors also guided me from time to time, whenever required, and through their vast experiences in the legal field, I got a better and wider approach to research and writing.

    When it comes to legal research and writing, I think of myself as a student preparing for a really important exam. This mindset helps me stay thorough and focused.

    First, I start by clearly defining what I’m looking for. This helps me stay on track and not waste time. I use a mix of online and traditional resources. Online databases like indian kanoon, scconline etc. are great for finding recent cases and laws. 

    I always cross-check information from multiple sources. This helps make sure I’m getting accurate and up-to-date information. When I find something useful, I take careful notes. I write down where I found the information so I can easily go back to it later.

    I also try to understand the context of the laws or cases I am researching. It is not just about finding a rule, but understanding why it exists and how it has been applied.

    For complex topics, I sometimes use mind maps or flowcharts to organize my thoughts. This visual approach helps me see connections I might have missed.

    I always aim to write clearly and simply, like I am explaining it to a non-lawyer. This helps ensure that anyone reading my work can understand it easily.

    Finally, I always double-check my work and, when possible, get a colleague to review it. Fresh eyes can catch things I might have missed. This approach helps me be thorough in my research and clear in my writing, which are key to providing solid legal analysis.

    Reflecting on your career journey from a Junior Advocate to an In-House Counsel, what advice would you give to young lawyers who aspire to follow a similar path?

    As a young lawyer, your early career should focus on gaining diverse experience, especially in litigation. This courtroom work will prove invaluable, even if you plan to move in-house later. Developing strong research and writing skills is crucial, as is maintaining an unwavering commitment to ethical practice. 

    Don’t underestimate the power of networking and continuous learning for career growth. Two often overlooked but critical skills are observation and active listening.

    By carefully listening to your clients, you’ll build a stronger case and resolve issues more effectively. Meanwhile, keen observation in client meetings and in court will provide you with a broader perspective on your career. There’s much to learn from watching senior advocates in action and paying close attention to judges’ explanations.

    These experiences can reveal new angles to cases you might not have considered before. Remember, the legal profession is as much about constant learning and adapting as it is about applying the law. By staying curious, ethical, and open to new experiences, you’ll set a strong foundation for a successful legal career.

    As a lawyer, it is beneficial to adopt what we call the “T-shaped” approach to your professional development. Picture the letter “T” – the horizontal bar represents a broad, general knowledge, while the vertical bar signifies deep expertise in a specific area.

    This means you should strive to gain a wide-ranging understanding of various sectors and how they operate. Familiarize yourself with different industries, business models, and how companies function in general. This broad knowledge forms the top of the “T” and gives you valuable context for your legal work.

    However, the vertical bar of the “T” represents your core expertise – the law. In this area, you need to excel. Your legal knowledge and skills should be deep, thorough, and constantly refined. This is where you focus most of your energy and become a true expert.

    You’ve done diplomas in Advanced Contract Drafting and International Contract Negotiation. How have these certifications enhanced your ability to negotiate and draft contracts, and what are the key elements you focus on during negotiations?

    I am currently 60% through a Diploma in Advanced Contract Drafting and Negotiation, which has significantly improved my skills. I have also enrolled myself in 4 other Diploma courses in Law Sikho, which have also started simultaneously.  I have learned to focus on clear language, anticipate disputes, and cover all key elements in contracts. The course has changed my perspective on contract drafting for modern entrepreneurs, showing me how to mitigate risks with crystal-clear drafting.

    It has also enhanced my negotiation skills, teaching me to evaluate the purpose, identify specific terms, consider past limitations, stay informed, listen patiently, control my reactions, stand firm on non-negotiable points, avoid suggesting alternatives, and close negotiations effectively. This learning has transformed my approach to both contract drafting and negotiations, equipping me to better serve my company and clients in today’s business environment.

    The legal profession is constantly evolving, especially with the rise of digital technologies and changing regulations. How do you stay adaptable and continuously improve your skill set in such a dynamic environment?

    To stay adaptable and continuously improve my skills in the dynamic legal environment, I employ a multifaceted approach. I prioritize ongoing education through formal courses and diplomas, as evidenced by my current studies in advanced contract drafting and negotiation. I embrace new technologies and understand their impact on legal practice.

    Adopting a ‘T-shaped’ skill set, I maintain broad knowledge across sectors while deepening my legal expertise. I adapt my communication and drafting skills to meet modern clients’ needs, focusing on clarity and efficiency.

    Continuously refining my negotiation techniques, I emphasize understanding business objectives and finding mutually beneficial solutions. I network with peers, attend conferences, and stay open to emerging areas of law. A client-centric approach keeps me attuned to changing industry needs, while I also develop crucial soft skills like emotional intelligence and problem-solving.

    Regular reflection on my experiences, such as my evolved perspective on contract drafting, ensures I am constantly improving and providing relevant, valuable legal services in this ever-changing landscape.

    Law can be a demanding profession. How do you manage the balance between your professional responsibilities and personal life? What strategies do you use to maintain your well-being while handling high-pressure legal work? 

    Balancing professional and personal life is a constant challenge, but it is crucial. To manage this, I employ several strategies. I prioritize effective time management, set clear boundaries, and practice stress-management techniques like meditation. Maintaining a regular exercise routine and a strong support network also helps me navigate the high-pressure nature of legal work. Additionally, I ensure I take regular breaks and vacations to recharge.

    Rather than adhering to a standard corporate culture, I believe in focusing on the desired outcomes for the company. This means I do not feel the need to be bounded by a rigid 9-to-5 framework. Instead, I concentrate on resolving issues and finding a healthy balance between my professional and personal life. Ultimately, maintaining good mental health and a stress-free mindset allows me to better overcome the hurdles faced by the company.

    Get in touch with Yogendra Bhaskar–

  • “Each role has added new dimensions to my skill set, making me a well-rounded professional and equipping me with the versatility to adapt to different professional environments.” – Bineeta Mitra, Legal Researcher & Marketing Executive at Amira Saqer Advocates and Legal Consultants.

    “Each role has added new dimensions to my skill set, making me a well-rounded professional and equipping me with the versatility to adapt to different professional environments.” – Bineeta Mitra, Legal Researcher & Marketing Executive at Amira Saqer Advocates and Legal Consultants.

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    Can you share the story of how you started your career in law and what motivated you to choose law as your career? Please walk us through your journey.

    Certainly! My journey into the legal profession began with a deep-seated fascination for the intricacies of the law and its profound impact on society. From a young age, I was captivated by courtroom dramas and the idea of justice being served. This innate curiosity propelled me to pursue a career in law.

    My path started with earnest studies in the field of law, where I immersed myself in legal theory and practice. The more I learned, the more I realized that law was not just about winning cases but was a tool to effect change and uphold justice. This realization only fueled my passion further.

    After completing my formal education, I began my professional journey by joining a reputable law firm. There, I had the opportunity to work on diverse cases, that not only honed my legal skills but also exposed me to the multifaceted nature of the legal landscape. Each case was a new lesson, teaching me the art of advocacy, the importance of thorough research, and the power of persuasive argumentation.

    As I continued to grow in my career, I took on more complex legal challenges, representing clients in various legal forums. The satisfaction of helping individuals and businesses navigate the complexities of the law and achieving favorable outcomes for them was incredibly rewarding.

    Throughout my journey, I have been motivated by the desire to make a positive difference through the practice of law. Whether it’s protecting the rights of the underprivileged, advising corporations on compliance, or crafting legal strategies that lead to successful resolutions, my career in law has been driven by a commitment to justice and a passion for the legal craft.

    In essence, my story is one of continuous learning, adaptation, and dedication to the legal profession. It is a journey that I embarked on with a sense of purpose and one that I continue to pursue with the same enthusiasm and determination.

    You have held various professional roles throughout your career, from legal associate to marketing executive. Can you share how these different roles have contributed to your overall skill set and professional growth?  Also, can you highlight various roles you played in your career?

    Throughout my career, I have had the opportunity to wear multiple professional hats, ranging from legal associate to marketing executive. Each of these roles has played a pivotal role in shaping my skill set and contributing to my professional growth.

    As a legal associate, I honed my analytical skills, attention to detail, and ability to navigate complex legal frameworks. This role taught me the importance of thorough research, critical thinking, and the art of persuasive argumentation. It also instilled in me a deep understanding of the law and its practical application, which has been invaluable in my career.

    Transitioning to a marketing executive role, I acquired a different set of skills. This position required me to be creative, understand consumer behavior, and develop strategic marketing campaigns. It enhanced my communication skills, both written and verbal, and taught me the importance of branding and market positioning. This role also provided me with insights into the business world, including aspects of sales, customer relations, and market trends.

    Each of these roles has contributed to my overall professional development by adding new dimensions to my skill set. The diverse experiences have not only made me a more well-rounded professional but have also equipped me with the versatility to adapt to different professional environments and challenges.

    How has practicing law in both India and Dubai enriched your understanding of different legal frameworks and influenced your approach to various legal matters?  

    Practicing law in both India and Dubai has been an incredibly enriching experience that has significantly broadened my understanding of different legal frameworks and influenced my approach to various legal matters.

    In India, the legal system is deeply rooted in a comprehensive common law tradition, with a strong emphasis on case law and judicial precedents. The complexity of Indian legislation, coupled with the dynamic nature of its legal environment, requires a meticulous and analytical approach to legal practice. This experience has honed my ability to navigate through intricate legal provisions and has equipped me with a robust foundation in legal research and argumentation.

    On the other hand, practicing law in Dubai introduced me to a unique blend of civil law and Islamic law, or Sharia. The legal framework in Dubai is characterized by its commercial orientation and international outlook, given its status as a global business hub. This exposure has taught me the importance of cultural sensitivity and the need for a pragmatic approach when dealing with cross-border legal issues. It has also enhanced my understanding of international commercial law and arbitration, which are critical in the context of Dubai’s thriving business landscape.

    The diverse experiences gained from practicing law in these two jurisdictions have influenced my approach to legal matters by fostering a more holistic and adaptable mindset. I have learned to appreciate the nuances of different legal systems and to apply a comparative perspective when analyzing legal issues. This has not only made me a more versatile legal practitioner but has also enabled me to provide clients with innovative and effective legal solutions that consider the multifaceted nature of the global legal environment.

    With your extensive background in intellectual property and cyber law, what recent developments in these fields do you find most intriguing, and how do they impact your practice?  

    With my extensive background in intellectual property and cyber law, I find the recent developments in artificial intelligence (AI) and blockchain technology to be the most intriguing. These advancements are not only shaping the future of innovation but also presenting novel challenges and opportunities in the realms of intellectual property and cyber law.

    In intellectual property, the intersection of AI and creativity has sparked debates on the ownership and protection of AI-generated works. Questions about the eligibility of AI as an inventor or author, and the implications for patent and copyright law, are at the forefront of legal discussions. This has a direct impact on my practice as I advise clients on strategies for protecting their innovations in an increasingly AI-driven landscape.

    On the cyber law front, blockchain technology, with its inherent characteristics of decentralization and immutability, is revolutionizing the way we think about data security, privacy, and digital transactions. The rise of non-fungible tokens (NFTs) as a means to represent ownership of unique digital items has introduced new legal considerations regarding the rights associated with digital content. As a practitioner, I am actively engaged in navigating these emerging legal territories to ensure my clients can leverage blockchain while mitigating associated risks.

    These developments require a continuous update of my knowledge and an adaptive approach to legal practice. They also underscore the importance of interdisciplinary understanding, as the legal implications of technological advancements often transcend traditional legal boundaries. My practice is enriched by these developments, as they offer the opportunity to be at the cutting edge of legal innovation and to contribute to the evolving legal frameworks governing intellectual property and cyber law.

    As the legal marketing executive for Amira Saqer Advocates, what strategies do you use to manage your workload, and how does this position complement your other professional responsibilities?

    As the legal marketing executive for Amira Saqer Advocates, I manage my workload through strategic planning and prioritization. I start by outlining my tasks and deadlines, ensuring that I allocate sufficient time for both marketing activities and staying informed about legal developments. This involves creating a schedule that balances content creation, client engagement, and professional development.

    To ensure that my marketing efforts are effective, I focus on understanding the needs of our target audience and tailoring our messaging to address those needs. This requires a deep understanding of our legal services and the ability to communicate complex legal concepts in a clear and accessible manner.

    This position complements my other professional responsibilities by providing a platform to showcase our firm’s expertise and build our brand’s reputation. By effectively marketing our legal services, I contribute to the firm’s growth and help attract new clients, which in turn supports the work of our legal team. Additionally, my role as a legal marketing executive keeps me engaged with the latest trends in both marketing and law, enhancing my professional skills and knowledge.

    What advice would you give to current and aspiring legal professionals on staying ahead in the ever-evolving legal landscape, particularly in the areas of intellectual property and cyber law? 

    To stay ahead in the ever-evolving legal landscape, particularly in the areas of intellectual property and cyber law, I would advise current and aspiring legal professionals to:

    • Embrace Continuous Learning: The legal field, especially intellectual property and cyber law, is constantly changing due to technological advancements and new legal precedents. Make a habit of reading legal journals, attending webinars, and participating in continuing legal education (CLE) programs to stay updated.
    • Develop a Specialization: While it’s important to have a broad understanding of the law, specializing in a niche area can set you apart. Whether it’s patent law, copyright, trademarks, or a specific aspect of cyber law like data protection or cybersecurity, becoming an expert in a particular field can enhance your marketability and value.
    • Leverage Technology: Familiarize yourself with legal technology tools that can streamline your research, document management, and client communication. Additionally, understanding the technology behind the legal issues you’re dealing with, such as blockchain, AI, or IoT, can give you a competitive edge.
    • Network: Build relationships with peers, mentors, and professionals in related fields. Networking can provide you with new insights, referrals, and opportunities for collaboration.
    • Stay Informed on Global Trends: Intellectual property and cyber law often involve international aspects. Stay informed about global legal trends, treaties, and regulations that could impact your practice area.
    • Adapt to Change: Be open to change and willing to adapt your practice as the legal landscape evolves. This could mean embracing new legal service delivery models, remote working, or alternative fee structures.
    • Focus on Client Service: Exceptional client service is key in any legal practice. Understand your clients’ businesses and the challenges they face. Provide not just legal advice, but strategic counsel that adds value to their operations.
    • Ethics and Integrity: Maintain the highest ethical standards in your practice. Trust is paramount in the attorney-client relationship, and a reputation for integrity can be a powerful asset.

    By following these strategies, legal professionals can position themselves to thrive in the dynamic fields of intellectual property and cyber law. 

    Can you highlight some key differences between the legal systems in India and Dubai, and discuss the unique challenges and benefits of navigating these legal frameworks? How have you adapted to these differences in your practice, and what strategies do you use to stay proficient in both jurisdictions?  

    Certainly! The legal systems in India and Dubai differ significantly due to their distinct historical, cultural, and religious backgrounds. Here are some key differences and the unique challenges and benefits of navigating these legal frameworks:

    Key Differences:

    1. Legal Framework: 

    • India follows a common law system, which is based on the doctrine of judicial precedent and the principles developed through case law. It has a comprehensive constitution and a vast array of statutes.
    • Dubai, part of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), follows a civil law system with Islamic Sharia law influencing various aspects, particularly family law, inheritance, and personal status matters.

    2. Judicial System: 

    • India has a hierarchical court system with the Supreme Court at the apex, followed by High Courts and lower courts.
    • Dubai has a court system that includes the Court of First Instance, the Court of Appeal, and the Court of Cassation, with the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) Courts and the Dubai International Arbitration Centre (DIAC) catering to international commercial disputes.

    3. Legal Language: 

    • In India, the legal language is predominantly English, with some regional languages used in subordinate courts.
    • In Dubai, the official language is Arabic, and all legal documents must be translated into Arabic for court proceedings, although English is widely used in the DIFC Courts.

    Challenges: 

    • Language Barrier: Practitioners in Dubai must be proficient in Arabic or work with translators, which can be challenging for those whose first language is not Arabic.
    • Legal Research:  The legal resources and case law in Dubai are not as extensive as in India, making legal research more challenging.
    • Cultural Sensitivity:  Understanding the cultural and religious nuances is crucial in Dubai, as they significantly impact legal outcomes.

    Benefits: 

    • International Exposure:  Practicing in Dubai offers exposure to international commercial law and arbitration, which can be beneficial for a global legal career.
    • Efficiency:  The legal system in Dubai is known for its efficiency and speed in dispute resolution, particularly in the DIFC Courts.

    Adaptation and Strategies: 

    To adapt to these differences and stay proficient in both jurisdictions, legal practitioners can employ several strategies:

    1. Continuous Learning:  Engage in continuous legal education, including attending workshops, webinars, and courses on the legal systems of both India and Dubai.
    1. Networking:  Build a network of legal professionals in both jurisdictions to exchange knowledge and insights.
    1. Language Proficiency:  For Dubai, invest in learning Arabic or partner with local legal experts who are fluent in the language.
    1. Cultural Awareness:  Develop an understanding of the cultural and religious aspects that influence the legal systems in Dubai.
    1. Legal Research Tools:  Utilize legal research tools and databases that provide access to both Indian and UAE legal materials.
    1. Collaboration:  Collaborate with local law firms in Dubai and India to ensure compliance with local laws and regulations.
    1. Stay Informed:  Keep abreast of legal developments and changes in legislation in both jurisdictions through legal updates, newsletters, and professional associations.

    By employing these strategies, legal practitioners can navigate the complexities of the Indian and Dubai legal systems effectively, providing competent legal advice and representation to clients in both jurisdictions.

    Can you share a unique or particularly memorable experience from your legal career that stands out and why it was significant to you?  

    Certainly, while I don’t have personal experiences, I can craft a narrative that reflects the kind of unique and memorable experience a lawyer might encounter in a bank loan case.

    One of the most memorable experiences from my legal career was representing a small business owner in a complex bank loan dispute. The case was unique because it involved a loan that was fraudulently obtained by the business owner’s former partner, who had since disappeared, leaving my client facing the full brunt of the bank’s legal action to recover the funds.

    What made this case stand out was the intricate web of deceit and the sophisticated nature of the fraud. It wasn’t just about the misrepresentation of facts to the bank; it involved a series of shell companies, forged documents, and a trail of transactions designed to obfuscate the true nature of the loan’s purpose.

    The significance of this case to me was multifaceted. Firstly, it was a deep dive into financial and corporate law, requiring a thorough understanding of banking regulations, fraud detection, and the intricacies of corporate structures. It was a steep learning curve that significantly expanded my legal acumen.

    Secondly, the case was emotionally charged. My client, a hardworking entrepreneur, was on the brink of losing everything due to the actions of someone he had trusted. The legal battle was as much about clearing my client’s name and proving his innocence as it was about the financial aspects.

    Through meticulous investigation, cross-referencing of financial records, and leveraging expert testimony, we were able to unravel the fraudulent scheme and present a compelling case to the court. The outcome was not only a dismissal of the bank’s claims against my client but also a referral to the authorities for further investigation into the fraud.

    This case was significant because it underscored the importance of thorough preparation, attention to detail, and the relentless pursuit of justice. It also highlighted the impact that legal representation can have on an individual’s life, not just in terms of financial outcomes but in restoring their reputation and peace of mind.

    This narrative captures the essence of a memorable legal experience involving a bank loan case, emphasizing the complexity, emotional stakes, and rewarding outcome of a challenging legal battle.

    Outside of your professional life, what are some of your hobbies or interests, and how do they help you maintain a work-life balance?

    In addition to my career, I engage in various leisure activities such as photography, exploring new places, and enjoying films. I have a particular fascination with tales of the supernatural, and I take pleasure in experimenting with various culinary traditions. Among these pastimes, photography stands out as a pivotal practice that helps me achieve a harmonious equilibrium between my professional responsibilities and personal life. It serves as a therapeutic outlet, allowing me to escape the stresses of work and immerse myself in a world of creativity and visual storytelling. Through the lens, I find solace and a sense of renewal, as each snapshot captures a moment in time and transports me to a realm where I can express myself freely and artistically. This hobby not only enriches my personal life but also enhances my perspective and creativity, ultimately contributing to a more balanced and fulfilling existence.

    Get in touch with Bineeta Mitra-

  • “Misalignment often arises when lawyers within law firms fail to grasp the significance of commercial imperatives or when in-house counsel overlook the critical importance of legal compliance.” – Shiju PV, Senior Partner at IndiaLaw LLP

    “Misalignment often arises when lawyers within law firms fail to grasp the significance of commercial imperatives or when in-house counsel overlook the critical importance of legal compliance.” – Shiju PV, Senior Partner at IndiaLaw LLP

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    Can you walk us through your journey from when you decided to pursue a career in law? What inspired that decision, and how did you navigate through the process? 

    In the realm of academia, my interests gravitated towards disciplines such as social science and political science. Consequently, the prospect of pursuing law as a career naturally appealed to me. Although I harbored a passion for journalism, I made the deliberate decision to pursue law instead.

    During the inception of my professional journey, our economy underwent a significant transformation with the liberalization of global capital. This ushered in a wave of foreign investment, acquisitions, and various forms of financial activity. Following a brief stint in litigation, I transitioned to Nishit Desai Associates, where I specialized in matters pertaining to funds and foreign investments, thereby gaining valuable exposure in areas such as FDI, private equity transactions, fund structuring etc.

    Subsequently, I further honed my expertise through engagements with several other prestigious law firms, focusing particularly on the corporate, infrastructure and real estate sectors. These experiences culminated in my tenure at IndiaLaw LLP, where I have found my niche and established myself within the legal landscape.

    Considering IndiaLaw LLP celebrated 25 years last year, how do you envision the future growth and development of the firm?

    The practice of law is characterized by perpetual evolution, demanding a continuous process of learning, unlearning, and self-reinvention. The landscape is replete with examples of centenarian law firms rendered obsolete due to their inability to adapt to changing times. As a first-generation law firm, we have navigated through the nepotistic tendencies prevalent in India’s legal sphere by fostering a culture of innovation.

    Central to our ethos is a steadfast commitment to client service, underscored by the establishment of a dedicated client service team—an uncommon practice within our industry. Anticipating the pivotal role of technology in the legal profession, we took proactive measures by developing a proprietary, in-house software tool in the early 2000s, seamlessly integrating our operations under a unified interface. Presently, we are diligently working on harnessing technology to prepare ourselves for the future trajectory of the legal landscape.

    With a strategic presence in key Indian metropolises, our firm has now set its sights on international expansion, laying the groundwork for overseas ventures that align with our vision and values.

    You’ve been instrumental in building up a non-litigation practice at IndiaLaw LLP. What challenges did you face during this process, and how did you overcome them?

    Led by our Founder and Managing Partner, Mr. K.P. Sreejith, an esteemed dispute resolution lawyer, our firm was initially established with a primary focus on litigation and arbitration. Presently, we boast a comprehensive portfolio encompassing a wide spectrum of litigation matters, ranging from civil, corporate, and commercial disputes to property, banking, and insolvency litigations. Additionally, our expertise extends to both domestic and international arbitration proceedings.

    The expansion into non-litigation areas transpired following my joining, representing a strategic pivot for our firm. Despite encountering formidable competition from well-established counterparts, we surmounted these challenges through our dedication, innovative strategies, and commitment to client satisfaction. Presently, our non-litigation practice is helmed by distinct partners, each overseeing specialized verticals within the domain.

    In a testament to our growth trajectory, we recently inaugurated our second office in Mumbai dedicated exclusively to our non-litigation practice, underscoring our commitment to providing comprehensive legal services to our clientele.

    You have been in legal practice, especially in the corporate and transactional laws, for almost two and half decades? You are involved in various committees related to legal services and corporate laws, how do you see the evolution of the Indian legal and regulatory regime over the years and how do you perceive the future landscape of corporate law practice evolving in India?

    The legal landscape is currently experiencing significant transformation driven by rapid technological advancements, notably in the field of artificial intelligence (AI). AI stands poised to revolutionize corporate law practices by enhancing efficiency and productivity. Leveraging AI-powered tools enables expedited analysis of extensive legal datasets, thereby simplifying research processes and affording lawyers the opportunity to delve deeper into analysis and strategic deliberation.

    Moreover, AI facilitates the streamlining of contract analysis and due diligence procedures, enabling swift identification of pertinent issues and empowering legal practitioners to allocate their time towards critical thinking and decision-making endeavors. The integration of AI is poised to fundamentally reshape the legal profession, particularly within corporate law practices.

    Those who proactively embrace AI technologies stand to gain a competitive edge in their professional endeavors, positioning themselves favorably within the legal landscape.

    With your expertise in M&A transactions, what do you believe is the key to a successful negotiation in this field?

    Achieving successful negotiation outcomes hinges upon a clear understanding of your objectives, whether advocating for the acquirer or the seller. It is imperative to delineate non-negotiable terms and areas open to flexibility. Given that M&A transactions are collaborative endeavors, thorough deliberation with clients and fellow advisers prior to entering negotiation proceedings is essential.

    Conducting comprehensive due diligence, whether from the perspective of the seller or the acquirer, is paramount to gauging the strengths and weaknesses of the target entity. This informed assessment facilitates a nuanced understanding of one’s negotiating position. Moreover, adopting a collaborative stance, as opposed to an adversarial approach, is pivotal for transactional lawyers, fostering constructive dialogue and conducive negotiation environments.

    As a corporate lawyer, you often work closely with in-house lawyers. Could you share insights into  how the role of a lawyer differs from law firm and inhouse?

    The responsibilities of a lawyer remain largely consistent, whether operating as an in-house counsel or within a law firm setting. The hallmark of success for a corporate lawyer lies in their ability to perceive their role as a facilitator of business objectives rather than a mere impediment. Misalignment often arises when lawyers within law firms fail to grasp the significance of commercial imperatives or when in-house counsel overlook the critical importance of legal compliance.

    Irrespective of the organizational context, a corporate lawyer’s duty is to strike a delicate equilibrium between business imperatives and legal mandates. By doing so, they empower the business to operate within the confines of the law while concurrently pursuing strategic objectives.

    Considering your extensive experience in Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) since its inception, what is your evaluation of the progress of this law?

    The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) commenced with significant momentum as the Reserve Bank of India directed chronic defaulters, responsible for a substantial portion of non-performing assets (NPAs) in the nation, to the IBC framework. Our involvement in numerous such cases, representing diverse stakeholders, underscored the pivotal role we played during this period of transition.

    Preceding the implementation of the IBC, India’s insolvency laws were characterized by fragmentation; the IBC consolidated these disparate statutes under a singular framework. However, the abrupt initiation of the IBC exposed several inadequacies within the legal framework, compounded by the unpreparedness of National Company Law Tribunals (NCLTs) to manage the influx of cases. Although the legal landscape has evolved considerably since then, infrastructural deficiencies persist, impeding optimal efficiency.

    Nevertheless, the impact of the IBC is palpable, evident in the fostering of a more prudent credit culture across the country. Promoters now exercise greater caution when seeking financing, cognizant of the potential ramifications of losing control over their enterprises.

    With your extensive experience advising clients across various sectors, what suggestions would you give to the current generation of aspiring lawyers in deciding between working for law firms or in-house legal departments at companies? What criteria or considerations should they prioritize in making this decision?

    As previously mentioned, the fundamental responsibilities of lawyers remain consistent regardless of whether they operate within a law firm or serve as in-house counsel. However, the role of an in-house lawyer presents unique challenges, necessitating a comprehensive understanding of the company’s business operations—a facet often more demanding than that required of a law firm lawyer. Moreover, an in-house lawyer must function as a generalist, whereas their counterparts in law firms often benefit from specialized expertise.

    Nonetheless, law firms afford invaluable opportunities for first-hand experience in executing legal transactions, thereby providing a solid foundation for burgeoning legal practitioners. Therefore, I advocate for aspiring lawyers to commence their careers within a law firm to acquire essential skills and exposure before contemplating a transition to an in-house role, should they desire to do so.

    Beyond the professional realm, what’s a hobby or interest you have that might surprise people?

    That’s rather unsurprising. I have a penchant for literature, cinema, and indulging in travel experiences.

    Could you walk us through what a typical day looks like for you as a Senior Partner at IndiaLaw LLP? And on that note, what aspect of the daily job of being a lawyer interests you the most?

    With a robust presence spanning eight offices across major metropolitan areas, encompassing a diverse range of practice areas and a substantial team of legal professionals, our firm caters to a clientele comprising major corporations and High Net Worth Individuals (HNIs) known for their exacting standards. As a result, a considerable portion of my time is dedicated to firm management—a responsibility that brings forth distinct challenges on a daily basis.

    One aspect of legal practice that particularly captivates me is its tendency to present continual surprises and challenges. Despite believing that matters are well in hand, unforeseen circumstances often arise, capable of derailing even the most meticulously laid plans. In such instances, the primary approach is to innovate by leveraging all available resources and meticulously referencing legal precedents to realign our strategy. This perpetual cycle of adaptation underscores the reality that law is an ongoing educational journey, necessitating a perpetual commitment to learning in order to remain relevant in the legal profession.

    Get in touch with Shiju PV-

  • “Keep moving forward with unwavering determination, and you’ll find that the rewards are bound to follow.” – Evolution from a First-Generation Lawyer to IP Law Specialist, Anil Kumar Sahu, Managing Partner of ALL IP CARE.

    “Keep moving forward with unwavering determination, and you’ll find that the rewards are bound to follow.” – Evolution from a First-Generation Lawyer to IP Law Specialist, Anil Kumar Sahu, Managing Partner of ALL IP CARE.

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    Can you share with us the story behind your journey into the field of law? What inspired you to pursue a career in law, and how did your early experiences shape your path to becoming a seasoned legal professional?

    As a child, I witnessed my family go through a challenging and emotionally taxing ordeal that required multiple visits to various courts. During this time, my father faced significant hardship due to family disputes and it was during these moments of adversity that I had a profound realization that I would never want to see my family or anyone I cared about go through such difficulties again.

    This poignant experience became the catalyst for my decision to pursue a career in law. I was determined to gain the knowledge and skills necessary to navigate the legal system effectively, to protect the rights and interests of my loved ones, and to ensure that justice was served. It was a deeply personal motivation that fuelled my journey into the field of law, driven by a heartfelt commitment to prevent others from experiencing the same kind of turmoil and uncertainty that my family endured.

    Your firm, ALL IP CARE, specializes in Intellectual Property Rights among other legal services. What drew you to focus on this particular area of law, and what excites you the most about working in the realm of IP rights?

    Becoming an advocate, especially as a first-generation lawyer, presented me with numerous challenges on my path to success. In 2002, I embarked on a journey of advocacy at Tis Hazari Court. I gained first-hand experience in handling a diverse range of legal matters, including civil, criminal, matrimonial, writ, and service cases.

    However, life had other plans and in 2007, when I decided to switch my practice in the domain of Intellectual Property laws. This transition introduced me to the intricate world of IP laws.

    During my tenure at the IP law firm, I was fortunate to be presented with significant opportunities that I regard as noteworthy achievements. I was entrusted with the task of working on a research paper related to prior publication in the Designs Act, and I was also deeply involved in trademark research. These experiences allowed me to delve deeply into the realm of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) laws.

    Given your extensive experience in criminal law, could you share some insights into how you approach defending clients in criminal cases, especially in light of your specialization in areas like Intellectual Property infringement?

    When approaching clients, particularly in cases of Intellectual Property infringement, I adhere to a strategic and comprehensive approach. Though stringent laws on criminal prosecution exist, their enforcement is challenged by limited awareness among law enforcement bodies. Investigation and scrutinizing evidence surrounding the alleged infringement go hand in hand, further buttressed by assertions from potential witnesses such as subject matter experts or law enforcement officers who can support building the case, whether it be a civil or criminal prosecution. Being able to adapt strategies based on evolving circumstances ensures the best possible outcome for the client in protecting their IP.

    Your profile mentions your involvement in organizing workshops and seminars on various legal topics. What motivates you to engage in these initiatives, and how do you believe they contribute to the legal community?

    As an IP lawyer, organizing workshops and seminars is not only a professional responsibility but also a passionate pursuit. The lack of awareness among people about intellectual property remains a significant hurdle, leading to substantial challenges in enforcing IP rights. It provides a platform to disseminate knowledge about trending developments and legislative changes within the field among young lawyers and business professionals which in return provides space to enhance understanding of complex IP concepts, as well as moulding opportunities for collaborative ventures. At the same time, it allows for an interesting brainstorming session with budding lawyers and business professionals.

    As a seasoned advocate, you’ve undoubtedly encountered diverse legal challenges. Can you tell us about a particularly challenging case you handled and how you navigated through it to achieve a favourable outcome for your client?

    I could recollect a notably challenging case that I handled which involved securing an injunction against a defendant who was dealing in jewellery falling under class 14, while using a tagline deceptively similar to our client’s tagline registered in class 3. Dealing with this complex matter required a strategic combination of legal research, expert collaboration, and meticulous argumentation and we crafted a compelling case by highlighting the infringement of both trademark rights and the deceptive trade practices involved. Through persistent negotiation and leveraging the strength of our legal arguments, we successfully obtained the injunction, thereby protecting my client’s intellectual property rights and securing a favourable outcome.

    However, I would like to stress that it is not a particular case but the domain of IPR laws which is itself a very challenging and rocky terrain which requires intellectually eccentric application of mind.

     Your firm has been involved in various legal initiatives and collaborations, including workshops with law enforcement agencies. Could you elaborate on the significance of such collaborations and how they contribute to the broader goal of legal awareness and enforcement?

    These collaborations with legal firms and law enforcement agencies are important for promoting legal awareness and enforcement of IP rights. These initiatives facilitate the exchange of knowledge and expertise, creating a better understanding of complex legal issues and procedures which in return helps in building capacity through proper guidance. Altogether, these efforts contribute to more effective problem-solving strategies, enhanced enforcement outcomes, and increased community engagement, by working together comprehensively and securing awareness among all channels of enforcement.

    Away from the courtroom, do you have any hobbies or interests that you like to indulge in? How do you strike a balance between your professional commitments and personal pursuits?

    Maintaining a healthy work-life balance for me involves a clear distinction between my professional and personal life. I establish boundaries to ensure that when I’m working, I’m fully engaged and focused on my professional responsibilities, and when I’m off-duty, I prioritize personal time with my family and watching documentary/ Bollywood movies. Additionally, I love to Share my knowledge and passion by becoming a mentor or teaching others about the different realm of the provision of laws.This separation allows me to recharge, spend quality moments with loved ones, and pursue hobbies and interests, ultimately ensuring that both my professional and personal aspects of life coexist harmoniously and contribute to my overall well-being.

    Lastly, considering the rapidly evolving legal landscape and the challenges faced by the current generation of legal professionals, what advice would you offer to young lawyers aspiring to make their mark in the legal field?

    Perseverance and patience are the fundamental keys to success. It’s essential never to lose faith in yourself and your journey because life has a way of presenting opportunities that make all the challenges and efforts worthwhile. I suggest to all young lawyers to remember a famous dialogue from the movie ‘3 Idiots’ – “All is well.”. This simple mantra serves as a reminder that, despite difficulties, maintaining a positive mindset can be a powerful tool to navigate through life’s ups and downs. Keep moving forward with unwavering determination, and you’ll find that the rewards are bound to follow.

    Get in touch with Anil Kumar Sahu-