Super Lawyer

Tag: Corporate Litigation

  • “I think multi-jurisdictional careers are going to be the norm. It is very doable and in fact, some jurisdictions in the US, such as California, enable foreign trained lawyers to apply to the Bar without further education.” – Chidambara Sastry Sarva, Dual Qualified Lawyer and Advocate at the High Courts of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh. 

    “I think multi-jurisdictional careers are going to be the norm. It is very doable and in fact, some jurisdictions in the US, such as California, enable foreign trained lawyers to apply to the Bar without further education.” – Chidambara Sastry Sarva, Dual Qualified Lawyer and Advocate at the High Courts of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh. 

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Reflecting on your extensive experience of over a decade, what initially inspired you to pursue a career in law, and what was your journey like during law school at NLU Jodhpur?

    I’ve always been fascinated by how the law shapes societies and protects individual rights. Growing up, dinner conversations always revolved around legal and political issues. My father’s stories about his day at Court or a case often left an impression on me. However, it was not until Class 12, that I finally decided to pursue law. Preparing for the Common Entrance Test with Mrs. Sheela Reddy, who trained a handful of students pro bono, cemented my interest in law. She followed a Socratic method of teaching which I came to appreciate even more when I was at UC Berkeley. She would often quip that training with her, we had already covered all the subjects that would be covered till the third year of law school. She was not entirely wrong. 

    Choosing NLU Jodhpur was a turning point—it was challenging, exciting, and rewarding in equal measure. The curriculum was rigorous, and opportunities like mooting and journal editing pushed me to think critically and hone my legal acumen. Brief Writing for Moot Court Competitions gave me an opportunity to really experiment not just with legal writing but also with legal research. Although, when I look at those Briefs now, they seem silly, they have played a huge role in exposing me to various facets of advocacy. I was always clear that I wanted to pursue Litigation, probably because that is all that I had seen growing up. 

    Having completed your LL.M. at UC Berkeley, California, what led you to choose this institution and specialize in areas such as Constitutional Law and International Commercial Arbitration? How did the teaching methodology at Berkeley differ from what you experienced in India?

    Berkeley popularly is known for its IP program. However, I wanted to study with Professors like Erwin Chemrinsky and Neil Popovich who are well known in the fields of Constitutional Law and International Commercial Arbitration respectively. During my time at Berkeley I also opted for some IP course which focused on Federal Litigation which helped me a great deal when I later worked in the US. One Senior Advocate I worked with used to refer to Constitutional Law as the divine law. I agree with him. For me the genesis of any legal system flows from its constitution and constitutional theory. Even during law school, constitutional philosophy appealed to me a lot. The socratic approach of dissecting seminal Constitutional Law cases at Berkeley, gave me new insights into constitutional philosophy and the critical approach to  reading any case law. I also had the opposite to explore the field of Administrative Law, an offshoot of Constitutional law during my time at Berkeley. Comparing the evolution of Administrative Law in India and the US gave me a new perspective about how Indian Courts dealt with this subject. The compare and contrast approach along with the socratic approach, I believe has a lasting impact on anyone who studies as such institutions. The exposure the Institution offered is unparalleled. The multi national perspective you get to experience aids one in thinking from different perspectives as well.

    As a dual-qualified lawyer in both India and California, how has this qualification shaped your practice? How do you handle multi-jurisdictional disputes, particularly those involving private international law?

    Being qualified in both jurisdictions allows me to work seamlessly on matters in both jurisdictions and also cross-border matters, especially in cases involving overlapping jurisdictions. Like Courts in India, most Courts in the US have also gone digital during the COVID-19 pandemic. That change has further helped me appear virtually in matters in the US. Doing cases in both jurisdictions simultaneously offers me a unique way to compare both the systems, the laws, the manner of interpretation, and the approach. This has helped me in doing multi-jurisdictional matters as well. I am able to anticipate how different aspects could play out in the two jurisdictions.

    Managing each multi-jurisdictional dispute is unique. For instance, in a corruption case involving Indian and foreign entities, understanding the nuances of both legal systems was crucial. Managing such disputes often involves coordinating with subject experts, local counsel, and understanding the  differing legal frameworks. One has to anticipate how any stance taken in one jurisdiction may impact the other jurisdictions. 

    In your litigation practice in India, you’ve worked on intricate cases in Administrative Law, Company Law, and Constitutional Law. Could you share an example of a particularly challenging case and how you navigated it?

    I was fortunate to work on a few white collar offences and was successful in defending the independent directors of the Company. However, as an offshoot of the main offence, the SFIO had initiated proceedings before the NCLT against all the directors. Ultimately, it took us close to 14 years to have the matter resolved. All through this period, the case was heard by different benches of NCLT – some time in New Delhi and then in Hyderabad. Navigating the voluminous record running into several thousand pages each time we had to argue the matter and then to have the matter placed before a different bench was initially disheartening. Several other directors, considering the time it was taking, admitted their guilt and agreed for the punishment. However, we advised our client not to take such a plea and to fight it out. Ultimately, our client was the only one who was successful in defending the charges and the case was dismissed against him. The case was a learning experience not just on the skill of advocacy but also on the overlapping legal issues between criminal law and Company law. 

    Transitioning from the Indian legal system to the U.S. must have presented its challenges. What were the key differences in litigation practices between the two systems, and what were the most difficult aspects of passing the California Bar exam?

    While I noticed a lot of similarities between the two systems, the biggest difference I noticed is the approach to Litigation. All the stake holders in a dispute, including the Lawyers and Judges always try to settle the matter either before going to court or before trial begins. The attempt to settle disputes is not limited to civil matters but extends to criminal matters as well in the form of plea bargains. The other aspect that I noticed is the time it takes to get a dispute / case heard. There have been occasions where we would complete a trial in half a day and the judgement is also delivered immediately. 

    The most difficult part about the Bar exam, especially for foreign lawyers, is to be able to study for 14-16 hours a day for at least 50-60 days. That is the amount of time it takes to go over the 14 odd subjects that you get tested on. Most courses for the preparation are designed keeping in view this requirement. If one were to put in the long hours without giving into exhaustion, then clearing the exam is not that difficult. I think lawyers with some amount of practical training fare better in the exam because they are able to compare and contrast the systems to make it easier to remember a large amount of information.

    In both the corruption case and shareholder dispute you handled, you faced complex, multi-jurisdictional issues. How do you manage the intersection of domestic and international law in such cases?

    These cases require a fine balance between understanding the specifics of domestic law and the broader implications of international treaties or foreign regulations. In one of those instances, we had to attend court proceedings in three different jurisdictions carefully monitoring the stand being presented to avoid adverse results in any other jurisdiction. Trying to coordinate with lawyers from two other jurisdictions was very enriching in the sense that it gave us an opportunity to understand how they viewed and dealt with such disputes. Sometimes, the discussions would see no end as we differed on the strategy to be adopted in each jurisdiction. Thankfully those were very few instances.

    Can you elaborate on your role and the specific challenges you face while representing institutions like the Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanam (TTD) before the Andhra Pradesh High Court?

    While representing institutions like TTD a nuanced approach is required that takes into account the complexities of the case and the specific context of religious institutions. One of the primary challenges is balancing the legal aspects of the case with the deep religious sentiments of the millions of devotees associated with TTD. 

    When addressing legal issues, it’s crucial to be sensitive to the cultural and spiritual importance of TTD, as any decisions made can significantly impact the faith and emotions of the community. This requires not only legal expertise but also an understanding of the social and religious dynamics at play.

    Additionally, I focus on looking at the larger picture. This means considering the long-term implications of legal decisions, not just for TTD, but for the broader community and the heritage it represents. It’s important to advocate for solutions that not only resolve immediate legal challenges but also promote the greater good and ensure the continued functioning of the institution in a way that respects and upholds the values of the devotees.

    Overall, navigating these challenges requires a careful balance of legal strategy, cultural sensitivity, and a commitment to the wider implications of our work.

    What advice would you give to law students and professionals who aspire to build a career like yours, with a focus on international practice and successfully clearing the California Bar Exam?

    I believe that going forward there would be a globalisation of the legal industry. Lawyers with training in other jurisdictions are needed in all fields of law. For instance, when we represent Indian origin clients in the US, the client and the lawyers there prefer to have an Indian lawyer on the team. This would ensure a more robust representation for the client. I think multi-jurisdictional careers are going to be the norm. It is very doable and in fact some jurisdictions in the US enable foreign trained lawyers to apply to the Bar without further education. California is one such jurisdiction. 

    For those preparing for the California Bar, practice is key—focus on understanding patterns and writing concise, analytical answers. Legal writing is what most candidates find difficult.

    With your numerous professional commitments, how do you manage to maintain a balance between your personal life and your demanding legal practice?

    Balancing a demanding legal practice with personal life is indeed very difficult. One of the key strategies I employ is setting clear boundaries. This means making a conscious effort to separate work from personal time, ensuring that I dedicate specific hours to my legal practice while also carving out time for my personal life and family.

    Additionally, I maximize my time in court. Court appearances can be time-consuming, but I use that time efficiently. By preparing thoroughly and organizing my schedule around court dates, I can minimize the amount of time spent on related tasks outside of court, which helps free up more time for my personal commitments.

    Overall, while the challenge of maintaining this balance is significant, being disciplined about boundaries and strategic about my court-related time helps me manage both my professional responsibilities and personal life more effectively.

    Get in touch with Chidambara Sastry Sarva –

  • “For any professional, and particularly for a first-generation lawyer, mentorship is crucial in shaping their skills and understanding of the trade.” – Shyam Kumar, Partner at ALT INDIA LEGAL.

    “For any professional, and particularly for a first-generation lawyer, mentorship is crucial in shaping their skills and understanding of the trade.” – Shyam Kumar, Partner at ALT INDIA LEGAL.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team


    With over a decade of experience in the legal field, what was the initial inspiration that motivated you to pursue a career in law? 

    Honestly, I joined law school primarily because I didn’t want to pursue a career in medicine or engineering, as my parents had hoped. Convincing them that there could be a respectable career outside these two professions was challenging. However, with their blessings, it has turned out to be a better choice for all of us. 

    You began your professional journey in law during your final year of law school under the mentorship of Mr. A.P. Singh. How did this early exposure to infrastructure arbitration shape your career path, and what key lessons did you learn from working with him that have influenced your approach to legal practice? 

    For any professional, and particularly for a first-generation lawyer, mentorship is crucial in shaping their skills and understanding of the trade. While time and experience help hone one’s abilities, a professional’s approach often reflects the quality of mentorship they receive and the kind of people and environments they work with.

    I began my professional journey in the 4th year of law school under the guidance of my first mentor, Mr. A.P. Singh. I worked with him in my final year of college and continued after obtaining my degree and enrollment for over a year. Working with him provided my initial exposure to infrastructure arbitration, which became the foundation of my early practice—frequenting arbitration tribunals in venues like Neeti Bagh Club, India Habitat Centre, and five-star hotels more than the courts. This unique start gave me a different perspective on legal practice, which proved invaluable later. Mr. Singh has been a constant guide in my professional journey and continues to be so to this day.

    After your initial experience, you moved to Fox Mandal to gain experience at a law firm. Could you describe how your time there expanded your legal horizons, especially with regard to high-profile international arbitrations? 

    My time at Fox Mandal was immensely enriching, offering me the opportunity to work on high-profile, high-value international arbitrations and litigations. The experience of engaging in contests against magic circle firms significantly broadened my understanding of the global legal profession and deepened my knowledge of the complexities involved in cross-border disputes. In fact, I chose to decline higher paying job offers from Tier-1 law firms, opting to remain at Fox Mandal because of the exceptional quality of work and exposure it provided—an opportunity I deeply valued for its impact on my professional growth.

    Having worked in a smaller firm environment at Lotus Law Partners, how did this experience differ from working in larger firms like Fox Mandal? What specific aspects of working in a smaller firm did you find most beneficial for your development?

    My stint with Lotus Law Partners, led by Mr. Keshav Mohan, was brief but insightful. At the time, Mr. Mohan, counsel for Sahara Chief Mr. Subrata Roy, had recently gained prominence. Tragically, we lost him to the COVID pandemic. 

    In my experience, smaller offices foster stronger friendships and closer collaboration. They offer greater access to the overall strategy, as well as the finer details of decision-making processes, providing a more holistic understanding of legal practice. 

    Your time at Jaitley & Bakhshi must be pivotal in honing your leadership skills. Can you elaborate on how your role at the firm helped you develop the skills necessary to lead a team and understand corporate clients’ needs?

    There’s a significant difference between executing an assignment and effectively getting it executed by a team. The latter is a critical leadership skill that builds upon mastering the former. My time at Jaitley & Bakhshi challenged me to step into this role, helping me develop the ability to lead a team, manage responsibilities, and understand corporate clients’ needs from a leadership perspective. 

    What makes my tenure at Jaitley & Bakhshi more special is its personal connection to why I chose law in the first place—my admiration for Mr. Arun Jaitley. His charismatic oratory and debating skills left a lasting impression on me during my younger years. To work with his family office and have the opportunity for personal interactions with him was nothing short of a dream come true. I am deeply grateful to Sonali Jaitley and Jayesh Bakhshi, the firm’s partners, for their invaluable support and mentorship.

     In 2018, you made the bold decision to start your independent practice, Alt India Legal, despite being in a stable position. What motivated you to take this leap, and how did you prepare yourself for the transition from working within established law firms to running your own practice?

    My decision to start independent practice surprised many, given my stable professional and financial position at the time. However, I had come to realize that true growth only happens when you step outside your comfort zone. This belief motivated me to take the leap, and looking back, I’m glad I did. The transition from working within established law firms to running my own practice was undoubtedly challenging, but it has been incredibly fulfilling. Drawing on the experiences from my previous roles, I focused on building a practice that serves clients across key sectors, striving to deliver practical and effective solutions.

    Specializing in contractual and commercial disputes, employment litigation, insolvency, and infrastructure arbitrations, can you share an example of a particularly challenging case from your career, and how you navigated the complexities involved?

    There have been many challenging and interesting cases which are worth mentioning here but I would stick to a very recent case wherein the Supreme Court has agreed to consider the issue of lack of procedural guidelines in investigating the crime of fake/ counterfeit drugs being rampantly sold in Indian markets including private and government hospitals. 

    The background stems from the Supreme Court’s 2020 judgment in Union of India vs. Ashok Kumar & Ors. (AIR 2020 SC 5274), which removed the power of investigation in such cases from the police and entrusted it to drug inspectors. While the decision was well-intentioned, it has led to significant practical challenges. Drug inspectors, primarily functioning as licensing and regulatory authorities, lack the necessary wherewithal to investigate complex criminal activities.

    We are representing an association of 23 leading pharmaceutical companies in India, united in their fight against this menace. This case is not only about protecting the rights and business interests of these companies but, more importantly, about safeguarding the right to life of citizens. Counterfeit drugs pose a direct threat to consumers, who are often unaware they are the ultimate victims of such counterfeiting.

    Given your extensive career, what advice would you give to law students and young professionals aspiring to succeed in the legal field, particularly those interested in arbitration, insolvency, and corporate law?

    I understand that law schools have become more expensive, and students feel pressured to recoup these costs early in their careers. However, it’s important to approach the profession realistically and recognize that it differs from conventional jobs. My advice is to value mentorship and focus on acquiring the right skills—money is merely a by-product. Trust me, in the long run, this profession is financially rewarding and socially empowering. 

    Balancing the demands of managing your firm, practicing law, and personal commitments, how do you prioritize self-care and find time to unwind?

    Balancing the demands of managing my firm, practicing law, and personal commitments is undoubtedly challenging, especially given the constant urgency the profession demands. However, I recognize the importance of allocating time for health and family, making it a non-negotiable aspect of my life. I am fortunate to have a very supportive spouse, an adorable son, and very caring parents who constantly inquire about my health, much like the most diligent clients following up on their assignments.

    Get in Touch with Shyam Kumar –

  • “I firmly believe that by embracing these two principles: maintaining patience during the foundational years and being open to diverse cases, young litigation lawyers can build a successful and fulfilling career in law.” – Amit A. Tungare, Managing Partner at Asahi Legal.

    “I firmly believe that by embracing these two principles: maintaining patience during the foundational years and being open to diverse cases, young litigation lawyers can build a successful and fulfilling career in law.” – Amit A. Tungare, Managing Partner at Asahi Legal.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    You completed your Law degree while also pursuing a CS qualification. What inspired you to undertake both of these courses simultaneously and how has CS qualification helped you in your career?

    My interest in corporate law first sparked during my 12th standard commerce studies, specifically through the organization of commerce subject. But the real turning point came during my law school admission day at ILS Law College. While waiting in the long admission queue, a chance conversation with a fellow aspirant introduced me to the Company Secretary (CS) program and its potential to enhance a legal career. This serendipitous encounter proved to be life-changing.

    What made pursuing both qualifications simultaneously possible was the supportive environment at ILS Law College, which actively encouraged students to pursue additional professional qualifications. My hostel mates who were also pursuing their CS qualification became my support system and study partners. Their presence and mutual encouragement created an atmosphere of healthy competition and motivation. Looking back, I realize that the company you keep during your academic journey plays a crucial role in achieving your goals.

    The combination of these qualifications has proven invaluable in my litigation practice. I draw upon my CS knowledge almost daily while handling corporate cases. For instance, in one significant case, I had to cross-examine a company director regarding shareholder interests. My CS background provided me with deep insights into directorial duties and corporate compliance, enabling me to conduct a thorough and effective examination. In another case, I successfully defended an independent director by demonstrating that they weren’t involved in day-to-day operations, leveraging my understanding of corporate governance structures and directorial responsibilities.

    Today, I view both my law degree and CS qualification as equally vital to my career. They complement each other perfectly, providing me with a comprehensive understanding of both legal principles and corporate governance, which has significantly enhanced my effectiveness as a litigator.

    After enrolling as an advocate, how did your early career experiences help you navigate the challenges of becoming a prominent legal professional?

    After enrolling as an advocate, I made a strategic decision to first gain experience in a corporate legal environment before committing to litigation. This led me to join ESSAR’s legal and company secretarial department, where I simultaneously completed my mandatory 15-month company secretary articles. This dual experience proved invaluable, as it provided me insight into the workings of an in-house legal counsel while fulfilling my professional requirements. My time at ESSAR actually reinforced my original inclination toward litigation, with my senior colleagues strongly encouraging me to pursue this path despite its initial challenges.

    Following my stint at ESSAR, I began my litigation career under the mentorship of my father, Mr. Atul Tungare, who has established a respected practice in civil and criminal law at the Mumbai City Civil Courts. Working alongside him, I gained comprehensive exposure to both civil trials and criminal law. This apprenticeship was instrumental in teaching me the nuances of case management – from gathering client instructions and developing litigation strategies to representing clients from trial through appeal. Perhaps most significantly, working directly with clients from day one helped me understand their expectations and taught me an invaluable lesson: sometimes, the best service we can provide isn’t necessarily litigation, but rather counseling clients and helping them find alternative dispute resolution methods they might not have considered.

    What factors have motivated you to establish your own practice and what were the initial challenges you faced while establishing Asahi Legal?

    My journey as an independent practitioner has been deeply rewarding, particularly because it has allowed me to pursue a diverse range of legal matters without being constrained by conventional fee structures. This flexibility has enabled me to expand my expertise across multiple domains – from criminal and civil litigation to corporate law and cooperative societies.

    While I’ve thrived as an independent practitioner for the past decade, the decision to establish Asahi Legal stemmed from a desire to provide my existing clients – including corporate NBFCs, banks, and individuals – with comprehensive, tier-one legal services through a structured firm environment. In fact, the impetus to transition from an individual practice to a law firm came largely from my existing clients, who recognized that a formal firm structure would enhance the professional services they were already receiving.

    Looking back at the six months since establishing Asahi Legal, I realize this transition could have been made earlier. However, I’m gratified to see how the firm has evolved exactly as envisioned. With the invaluable support of my team and colleagues, we’re successfully meeting the needs of our growing clientele while maintaining the high standards of service that have always been central to my practice.

    You have significant expertise in handling cases under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). Could you discuss one of the most challenging cases you’ve worked on in this field and the strategies your team employs to navigate the complexities of the IBC?

    One of my most challenging cases involved representing a Resolution Professional in the early days of the IBC, around 2016-17. The case centered on a resolution plan that had been approved by the Committee of Creditors but included several unusual requests – specifically, relief and concessions from prosecution by various government authorities.

    The primary challenge we faced was the relative novelty of the IBC at that time. With minimal precedent to draw upon – there were few reported judgments from either appellate benches or coordinate benches in other cities – we had to craft innovative legal strategies. This scarcity of case law required us to think creatively about how to present our arguments.

    Our breakthrough came when we decided to deeply examine the parliamentary debates that preceded the IBC’s implementation. These debates proved crucial in demonstrating Parliament’s true intent behind the legislation. Our key argument was that denying these concessions would effectively revert us to the previous Companies Act regime, where government dues took precedence over creditors’ claims – precisely the situation the IBC was designed to reform.

    Initially, we faced considerable skepticism from the bench, as courts were traditionally reluctant to grant such broad concessions. However, we successfully demonstrated how approving these reliefs aligned with the IBC’s core objectives of maximizing asset value and ensuring efficient resolution. We also emphasized the potential precedential value of this decision for similar cases across the country.

    Ultimately, the NCLT approved the resolution plan with all requested reliefs and concessions intact. This case was particularly significant for my team, as it later became a valuable reference point for similar matters we handled before the NCLT.

    This experience reinforced a crucial lesson in legal strategy: when dealing with novel legislation where precedents are scarce, parliamentary debates can serve as powerful tools to illuminate legislative intent. Sometimes, the most compelling arguments lie not in the letter of the law, but in understanding and articulating its underlying purpose.

    Given your experience with the Companies Act, how do you approach corporate disputes and regulatory matters, especially when dealing with large corporate entities? Could you share a case where your legal strategy resulted in a significant outcome for your client?

    In my legal practice, I maintain a fundamental principle: every client deserves equal dedication and professional expertise, regardless of whether they’re an individual from a modest background or a listed corporate entity. This approach has been crucial in building trust and delivering consistent results.

    My methodology for handling corporate disputes and regulatory matters follows a structured approach. First, I conduct a thorough analysis of each case’s merits and challenges. I believe in absolute transparency with clients from the outset. Before taking on any case, I ensure the client fully understands the potential outcomes, legal precedents, and applicable regulations. This upfront honesty serves two purposes: it allows clients to make informed decisions and enables me to proceed with complete ethical clarity.

    Let me share a particularly illustrative case. We handled an appeal for a corporate client where the stakes were significant. What made this case successful wasn’t just the favorable outcome, but our approach to it. Because we had established clear expectations with the client from the beginning, our team could focus entirely on the legal merits without the burden of managing unrealistic expectations. This strategic transparency allowed us to channel our entire energy into developing and executing a robust legal strategy.

    I’ve found that this approach – combining thorough preparation, transparent communication, and unwavering professional dedication – consistently leads to optimal results, whether we’re dealing with complex corporate disputes or regulatory challenges. It allows us to maintain both ethical integrity and peak performance throughout the litigation process.

    As an advocate with experience in both civil and criminal law, how do you balance representing clients across such different legal domains, and how do you stay updated with developments in each area?

    In my experience, civil and criminal law are more complementary than different. While there are distinct procedural aspects to master, having expertise in both areas has actually enhanced my ability to develop comprehensive litigation strategies for my clients. This dual perspective often allows me to identify innovative solutions that might not be apparent when viewing cases through a single lens.

    I often hear from law students who believe they must choose between civil and criminal practice. However, I strongly disagree with this perspective. As a litigation lawyer, having a thorough understanding of both areas is invaluable. A narrow focus on just one domain can potentially limit the solutions we can offer our clients, preventing them from achieving the best possible outcomes.

    As for staying current with legal developments, the digital age has made this task significantly more manageable. Our firm subscribes to several national legal publications, and I actively encourage our associates to make use of these resources. Staying informed about the latest precedents isn’t just good practice – it’s essential to effective advocacy. Missing a recent ruling relevant to a client’s case could significantly impact the outcome, regardless of how strong the underlying position might be.

    With the wealth of legal information now freely available online, there’s really no excuse for not staying current, whether you’re a seasoned practitioner or a newly qualified lawyer. I believe this commitment to continuous learning is fundamental to providing excellent client service and maintaining high professional standards.

    Having represented clients at some of the most prestigious forums in the country, what personal values and principles have guided your career, and how do you ensure that these values are reflected in the work done by Asahi Legal?

    When I began my litigation practice, my primary motivation wasn’t financial gain but rather the opportunity to gain diverse experience across various legal forums. I deliberately kept my fees minimal, just enough to cover costs, because I was driven by the chance to represent clients in different jurisdictions and forums across the country. I’m deeply grateful to my clients who trusted me with their cases, as these opportunities have been instrumental in building my practice.

    This fundamental value – prioritizing experience and growth over immediate financial rewards – is something I actively instill in every associate at Asahi Legal. We emphasize that regardless of a client’s size or the fee structure, each case presents a unique learning opportunity. As litigation lawyers, we believe that the chance to appear before a new forum or handle a novel type of case adds invaluable experience to our professional growth, something far more precious than immediate monetary compensation.

    This philosophy continues to guide our firm’s approach today. At Asahi Legal, we remain enthusiastic about taking on unusual or challenging cases, including matters in forums where we haven’t previously appeared. We view such opportunities as chances to expand our expertise while delivering favorable outcomes for our clients. This openness to new challenges, combined with our commitment to excellence, has been crucial in shaping both our firm’s culture and our success in the legal field.

    What advice would you give to young law students and aspiring lawyers who wish to excel in the field of law?

    Based on my experience, I believe patience is the most crucial attribute for young lawyers starting their careers in litigation. Whether you’re practicing independently or working under a senior lawyer, it typically takes 4-5 years to truly gain mastery over your field. These initial years can be challenging, but it’s essential to embrace this period with optimism because it fundamentally shapes your entire career trajectory.

    During this phase, you might notice your peers in corporate law or working as in-house counsel earning significantly higher compensation. However, maintaining faith in your chosen path is crucial. Once you successfully navigate this learning period, litigation becomes an incredibly rewarding career. Unlike more routine legal work, litigation offers the excitement of handling diverse cases daily, challenging you to think creatively and keeping you intellectually stimulated.

    Additionally, I strongly advise young litigation lawyers to diversify their case portfolio, even if some cases don’t offer substantial fees initially. Each case, regardless of size, provides valuable courtroom experience and opportunities to develop your advocacy skills. Often, these seemingly modest cases can lead to connections with larger clients and more lucrative opportunities. Therefore, I encourage young lawyers not to dismiss cases solely based on immediate financial returns, provided they cover basic costs.

    I firmly believe that by embracing these two principles – maintaining patience during the foundational years and being open to diverse cases – young litigation lawyers can build a successful and fulfilling career in law.

    Get in touch with Amit A. Tungare –

  • “With ever growing complexities in the business, it has become indispensable that a balanced approach is maintained between the requirement of the business, laws and my dual qualifications of CS and Law have helped me to find a win-win situation for both verticals.” – Gagan Preet Singh, Global General Counsel at Whitespan Business Solutions Private Limited.

    “With ever growing complexities in the business, it has become indispensable that a balanced approach is maintained between the requirement of the business, laws and my dual qualifications of CS and Law have helped me to find a win-win situation for both verticals.” – Gagan Preet Singh, Global General Counsel at Whitespan Business Solutions Private Limited.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    You have over 21 years of experience in dealing with complex legal issues across various industries. How did your career journey begin, and what motivated you to specialize in Corporate Law, Mergers, Acquisitions, and regulatory matters?

    I grew up in Delhi and my school & college times were during the 90’s. Those were the times when the most sought-after career paths were law, engineering, medicine or chartered accountancy. Though I am a Science graduate, I somehow could not create the interest within me to pursue Science or its related fields as a career option. 

    I lived near the North Campus of Delhi University. So, quite often after college would get over, me and my friends would stroll within the North Campus area. There, outside the Faculty of Law, I used to see students carrying and studying voluminous books. The sight of such books created a spark of interest in Law within me. I really got fascinated by these voluminous books. Many times, it happened that I would visit any random book stall and pick any random law book to see what is written inside. As I explored this further, this spark became stronger and stronger. Those were the moments when I decided that yes, Law would be a career field for me and the topic that enticed me the most was – corporate law.

    With this passion, I enrolled myself for Company Secretary and after qualifying as a Company Secretary, my first step of becoming a corporate lawyer was taken. I joined a corporate group and was assigned to handle the matters relating to corporate law. This was my first exposure to the theoretical and practical aspects of corporate laws and my journey began.

    After a few years, I prepared myself for the Faculty of Law, University of Delhi (D.U.) entrance exams. I cleared it out and got admission into the LL.B. degree course offered by the University of Delhi. With my hard work and dedication, I became a Law Graduate as well. With the passage of time and getting more and more exposure to the various fields of corporate laws, I developed an inclination towards mergers, acquisition and related regulatory matters. Today, with an experience of two decades, I am cherishing my journey as a corporate lawyer.

    As a law graduate from Delhi University and a qualified Company Secretary, how has your dual qualification helped shape your approach to addressing legal and business challenges?

    The dual qualifications of being a law graduate from Delhi University and a qualified Company Secretary has helped me immensely in navigating an approach towards solving a corporate challenge. I have been able to view the risks involved in a task both from the business as well as from the legal angle and thereby able to provide a pragmatic solution.

    The dual qualifications have helped me to navigate the complexities of corporate law with tact, ensuring compliance and simultaneously providing legal advice, and thereby contributing to the smooth functioning of the business. With ever growing complexities in the business, it has become very indispensable that a balanced approach is maintained between the requirement of the business and the requirement of laws. For any business to thrive, the requirement of maintaining a balanced approach is a must and the dual qualifications have helped me to find a win-win situation for both the verticals. 

    Having dual qualifications have also helped the corporate whom I worked with in terms of single window resolution [for (i) non-litigation matters; (ii) litigation matters; and (iii) corporate matters] besides controlling the cost aspects. 

    In your current role as Global General Counsel at Whitespan Business Solutions, what are your primary responsibilities and obligations, and how do you effectively manage them?

    As a Global General Counsel at Whitespan Business Solutions, my primary responsibilities are that of a (i) business enabler; (ii) legal advising through evaluation and mitigation of risks involved in the business; and (iii) managing compliance. As a Global General Counsel, I have to see that unnecessary hindrances are identified and avoided.

    The challenges in managing these responsibilities are not easy. While the crossing of paths of business strategy and legal requirements can never be avoided, the biggest challenge for me is to ensure, not only in Whitespan but every other corporate I have worked with, that this cross does not become a dead end. To keep both the internal as well as the external stakeholders satisfied calls for an ardent approach toward the work, ability to convince the parties involved and thereby providing a win-win solution for all. 

    You have handled several mergers, acquisitions, and joint ventures. Can you share an example of a particularly complex transaction and the key legal strategies you employed to ensure its successful completion?

    As I mentioned earlier that with the passage of time and getting more and more exposure to the various fields of corporate laws, I developed an inclination towards mergers, acquisition and joint ventures (I would give here a common term to these – corporate restructuring – for the ease of understanding). Today, having undertaken a decent number of corporate restructurings, I would mince no word in mentioning that this line of business is not easy. Each and every case of corporate restructuring is unique and different from the other one and challenging. For e.g.: if one is working in a corporate group say ‘X’ and the ‘X’ takes, within its group, corporate restructuring twice, each of these two cases will be different from the other. There will be few common sections obviously, processes may be similar, but the schemes for undertaking these corporate restructuring will vary vastly on the grounds of: (i) due diligence; (ii) pricing; (ii) communication process; (iii) cultural diversity; (iii) employee engagement; (iv) financial integration; (v) system and data integration; (vi) management integration to name a few. And to make a point, each of these exercises in itself is a huge task.

    I will quote one case for an acquisition which I handled. However, since I am bound by the confidentiality clause, I will not name the parties. So, this was a case where an international company wanted to purchase a major stake in an Indian company. Thus, when a cross-border transaction is involved, in addition to the applicable Indian laws, I also had to keep in mind the provisions of RBI / FEMA. I was the counsel for the Indian group in which the international company intended to acquire a stake. My first test began with due diligence. While we provided all the relevant records to the counsel for the international company, their list of seeking clarifications would not end. Realising this, I decided that I would employ tact, legal strategy and sympathy to cross this bridge. With these action steps in mind, I discussed the open points with the opposite counsel. And as it turned out, after a few rounds of discussion, the due diligence was complete.

    The next and the biggest challenge came in the form of transaction documents i.e. Share Purchase Agreement, Shareholders Agreement etc. While drafting international agreements, it is essential to approach the process with a strategist mindset which involves a good number of key considerations like conditions precedent, conditions subsequent, selection of jurisdiction which would come into every aspect of dispute in a transaction. Coming back to the transaction, I had really hard negotiations on almost all the major clauses like tag along rights, drag along rights, pre-emptive rights, right of first refusal, reserved matter and indemnity clause. This exercise was a great experience for me and provided me with good learning as well as sharpened my professional and personal skills since the negotiations on the clauses were very hard, fierce sometimes, reached deadlock stages a few times and the entire process of negotiations consumed almost 3 months. But in the end, I could get the documents to a stage which was a win-win situation for all the stakeholders involved in the capital raise process which documents were at the beginning more of a one-sided affair. And thus, the transaction went through successfully.

    You have extensive experience advising on corporate governance and regulatory issues under the Companies Act, FEMA, and SEBI. How have these frameworks evolved over the years, and what changes do you foresee in the near future?

    The corporate actions in any corporate in India are majorly regulated by three laws namely, (i) Companies Act, (ii) RBI / FEMA; and (iii) SEBI. While Companies Act and RBI / FEMA applies to all companies whether listed or unlisted, SEBI is for listed companies.

    My experience of dealing with these regulatory bodies has always been good. Right from the starting days of my professional journey till date, I have always found the regulatory bodies supportive. My take on these regulatory bodies is that the first duty the corporate must do is to comply in letter and spirit. Even if some compliance is missed out, don’t panic and take any otherwise decision. Approach the regulator and speak with them, they are always ready to help.

    Having the understanding of business requirements, the authorities of these regulatory bodies are always working hard to make the respective framework business friendly keeping in mind the ask of the time. 

    How do you ensure that businesses remain compliant with the evolving regulatory landscape, especially in high-stakes transactions such as mergers, acquisitions, or foreign investments?

    Working in the corporate, my understanding of business and law is that both complement each other. A business cannot be successful without compliance with law and there will be no requirement of law if there is no business. This equilibrium is also necessary for the economy of the country. Businesses have also realised that to attract capital for business requirements, staying compliant is of utmost importance. Obviously, no one would like to join hands with a business which is non-compliant or less-compliant with the applicable laws. No one would like to pump their money into a business which has regulators running after it on account of non-compliance. Who would want to risk their money? Not even a single person. So, if any person thinks that compliance is costly, please ask him / her to try non-compliance. The person will get the answer.

    To ensure the business remains compliant, I would suggest the following:

    1. Keep a track of regulatory updates.
    2. Create an effective compliance program within the organisation and educate the employees about the same.
    3. Develop policies and procedures for compliance.
    4. Implement internal teams to monitor compliance.
    5. Create a business continuity plan in case of any unforeseen happening.
    6. Regular status update to the management on compliance.

    With such a demanding professional schedule, how do you unwind and maintain a work-life balance amidst your high-level commitments?

    Well, well, well, this is a tricky question and the most discussed topic nowadays. (Smile). Professional life is always demanding but as a human, one has to take out time for his / her personal well-being as well. Where work is important, life is equally important. For me, it’s like two pans of a weighing scale. Sometimes one goes up and the other comes down. But it should not happen that one is always up and the other is always down. To unwind myself, I listen to songs and read books. Besides, I also like watching suspense movies. It is very important for anyone to take care of oneself, in whatever way he / she likes. And so do I. Enjoy your life (both professionally and personally). 

    What advice would you give to young professionals aspiring to follow your path and build a successful career in corporate practice?

    My advice to the young professionals is simple, both for professional and personal growth – work hard and do not procrastinate. Avoid taking short-cuts. Learn new things and wherever required, de-learn and re-learn. Explore territories which scare you. Continuous learning is essential since our profession is ever evolving. Stay updated to the best possible way you can. This will give you a lot of confidence to face others whether it is your company management or your client. Networking is vital for success nowadays. Try making a decent circle of professionals where one can share, discuss and learn. 

    Remember, each day teaches you something. Every person around you teaches you something, bad people give you lessons and good people give you memories. Learn the lessons and enjoy the memories.

    Get in touch with Gagan Preet Singh –

  • “Cut Through the Noise and Focus on What Truly Matters: Resilience, Grace, and Patience Will Propel You in Your Legal Career” – Aditi Pawar, Counsel at Bombay High Court and Solicitor (England & Wales).

    “Cut Through the Noise and Focus on What Truly Matters: Resilience, Grace, and Patience Will Propel You in Your Legal Career” – Aditi Pawar, Counsel at Bombay High Court and Solicitor (England & Wales).

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    With over 13 years of experience in the legal field, what initially motivated you to pursue law as a career? Was it a deliberate decision, or did it evolve over time?

    Interestingly, my decision to pursue law wasn’t deliberate at all—it was a last-minute escape. A week before my engineering and medicine entrance exams, I realized neither path appealed to me. The thought of spending my life crunching formulas or dissecting cadavers didn’t exactly inspire joy.  By chance, I spotted an ad for law entrance coaching and thought, “This seems like a good way out—let’s give it a shot.” I didn’t know if law was my calling but was sure engineering and medicine weren’t.

    The first two years of law school felt like any other degree, but the third year, with its core law subjects, changed everything. It wasn’t an epiphany but a steady realization that I had found something I truly enjoyed. Thirteen years later, I genuinely still love being a lawyer. As a first-generation lawyer, the challenges have been daunting yet rewarding. What started as a spontaneous decision turned out to be the best choice of my life, and I wouldn’t have it any other way.

    Having started your career at a law firm and then transitioning to working as a Counsel in the Chambers of a Senior Counsel, how have these distinct experiences influenced and shaped your legal journey today?

    Starting my career at a law firm was an invaluable introduction to the legal world, exposing me to large disputes and seasoned practitioners. However, within a year, I realized my passion lay in counsel practice, driven by advocacy and the dynamic energy of the courtroom. Transitioning was challenging, but with my family’s unwavering support, I embraced the long-term growth this path promised.

    The turning point was joining the chambers of Senior Counsel Mr. Rahul Narichania, where my journey truly began. His chambers were a crucible of discipline, hard work, and rigorous legal thinking. Sir created an environment where asking “why” was never off-limits, encouraging us to challenge assumptions and delve deeply into the essence of every principle grounding my practice in clarity and first principles. His words, “Make your point—it might be taken, it might not, but make it,” reinforced the value of contribution regardless of seniority and built my confidence.

    In chambers, I learned to sift through complexities, focus on what truly mattered, and embrace the inherent uncertainty of counsel practice. Sir also encouraged me to chart my unique path however different it might to others with utmost courage and dignity, a lesson that has stayed with me. These foundational values have not only shaped my skills but also defined my identity as a lawyer. They have equipped me to navigate legal complexities, collaborate across jurisdictions, and build meaningful global relationships. For this- I remain deeply grateful.

    You successfully defended a high value Special Court Suit concerning securities transactions before the Bombay High Court. What was the most critical legal challenge you faced in defending such a high value case, and how did you prepare for it?

    Defending my client in this high-stakes case was a defining moment in my career, as it was my first final hearing brief as Lead Counsel at just 26 years old. The matter, an offshoot of the infamous Harshad Mehta scam, involved highly complex securities transactions, including Bankers’ Receipts (BRs) and Security General Ledger (SGL) entries, with claims exceeding hundreds of crores.

    The case required me to master intricate financial instruments and alleged misappropriations within the securities market. Understanding these complexities was crucial to framing effective arguments. I immersed myself in the fundamentals of these instruments and their regulatory framework, breaking them down to articulate their nuances clearly in court. Hours of detailed study and conferences with my attorneys, who placed immense trust in my abilities, helped me build a comprehensive understanding and argue with confidence.

    Arguing against seasoned senior advocates was both challenging and motivating. Their expertise pushed me to prepare meticulously, anticipate arguments, and analyse precedents thoroughly. By reconstructing the transaction timeline and exposing discrepancies in the plaintiff’s evidence, I successfully demonstrated that my client’s involvement was administrative and lacked fraudulent intent.

    A loss would have been catastrophic for my client, both financially (as the plaintiff sought to hold him liable for over Rs. 100 crore) and reputationally. The high stakes demanded absolute precision. This case, although daunting, became my greatest teacher, deepening my understanding of commercial litigation and refining my advocacy skills. This experience holds a resonant place in my career, not only for the legal challenges it presented but also for the invaluable lessons it taught me about resilience, collaboration, and the transformative power of belief in oneself.

    As a Solicitor qualified in England & Wales, how has this qualification enhanced your approach to handling cross-border work, particularly in international arbitration?

    My qualification as a Solicitor in England & Wales has profoundly enhanced my approach to cross-border work, particularly in international arbitration. However, the foundation of this expertise lies in the rigorous legal education and practice I received in India. The Indian legal system, with its unique blend of statutory frameworks and common law principles, provided the analytical rigor and adaptability essential for addressing complex legal issues. This solid foundation was further refined through my Solicitor’s qualification.

    The qualification exposed me to global legal standards, emphasizing precision, clarity, and commercial awareness. It deepened my understanding of common law principles, which are widely applied in international contexts, and equipped me to assess multi-jurisdictional risks effectively. As the legal system of England & Wales is a cornerstone of common law influencing global commercial systems, the insights gained were pivotal for navigating international legal principles, commercial practices, and dispute resolution mechanisms.

    Beyond technical expertise, the qualification broadened my cultural and professional perspectives. It enhanced my ability to work seamlessly with international teams, adapt to diverse legal frameworks, and meet the expectations of global clients. This experience fostered cultural sensitivity and strengthened my negotiation skills—critical when dealing with multinational stakeholders.

    Having represented clients in international commercial arbitrations under ICC, SIAC, LCIA, and other major arbitration bodies, what are the major challenges you face and how do you mitigate these challenges?

    Representing clients in international commercial arbitrations under institutions like ICC, SIAC, and LCIA requires a fundamentally different approach than domestic arbitration or commercial litigation. International arbitration emphasizes brevity and precision, (as I call it “appreciation for brevity”) with concise submissions and oral arguments tailored to tight timelines. Distilling complex issues into focused arguments is essential, demanding sharp analytical skills and the ability to present clear, persuasive cases.

    Cross-border disputes add layers of complexity, involving diverse jurisdictions, conflicting legal systems, and varying arbitration practices. Substantive foreign laws often govern, requiring meticulous research and collaboration with local counsel, when necessary to ensure compliance and alignment with the tribunal’s expectations. Sensitivity to cultural differences in legal reasoning further underscores the need for adaptability and global awareness.

    International arbitration operates within a dynamic framework shaped by treaties like the New York Convention, where enforcement strategies play a critical role. Pro-arbitration jurisdictions like Singapore provide robust support, while others with restrictive public policy interpretations demand tailored strategies. Effective arbitration agreements, neutral seats, and enforceable procedural rules are key to navigating these challenges. Emerging trends like ESG disputes, third-party funding, and rapid technological adoption continue to reshape the arbitration landscape. It is imperative to adapt swiftly by staying informed, embracing innovation, and continuously learning to navigate these evolving dynamics effectively.

    What I particularly find challenging, yet invigorating, is the swift adaptability required in presenting cases. International arbitration demands a nuanced alignment with the substantive or governing legal frameworks of a particular jurisdiction and procedural rules of each institution. I ensure that my approach is tailored to meet the specific demands of the arbitration at hand, aligning with its unique requirements while consciously avoiding the mixing of practices from domestic arbitration or commercial litigation. The two disciplines differ significantly in their approach, and maintaining clarity in practice is critical to delivering effective outcomes.

    Your experience spans drafting and negotiating key corporate documentation, such as M&A, joint venture, and licensing agreements. How do you ensure these agreements effectively manage risks and comply with both domestic and international legal frameworks?

    Although I began my career as a disputes lawyer, I also transitioned into transactional work after recognizing that many disputes stemmed from gaps or ambiguities in documentation. Disputes background has been invaluable, giving me a unique perspective on drafting and enabling me to identify potential areas of conflict and mitigate risks effectively through precise and strategic provisions.

    Drafting and negotiating corporate agreements demands a structured approach to manage risks and ensure compliance with both domestic and international legal frameworks. I begin with thorough due diligence, gaining a deep understanding of the transaction’s structure, regulatory environment, and jurisdictional specifics. For cross-border transactions, I analyse foreign investment regulations, tax implications, and competition law requirements within my professional boundaries. Collaborating with local experts in the relevant jurisdiction ensures compliance with foreign legal frameworks, while my research on treaties and international agreements bridges knowledge gaps.

    Precise drafting is central to risk management. I focus on clear definitions of roles, responsibilities, and obligations, and ensure robust indemnity, warranty, and liability clauses. Compliance with domestic laws such as the Companies Act, FEMA, and competition laws is integrated seamlessly with advice from foreign counsel for jurisdiction-specific issues. For cross-border agreements, I emphasize tailored dispute resolution mechanisms, often incorporating arbitration clauses under institutions like ICC or SIAC with neutral seats to ensure enforceability.

    Aligning agreements with the parties’ commercial goals is a priority. Active engagement with stakeholders ensures that contractual terms reflect their objectives accurately. My knowledge of English law, given its global relevance, has been instrumental in navigating cross-border transactions and collaborating effectively with international teams, always supported by local expertise for jurisdictional precision.

    Balancing a thriving legal career with personal commitments can be tough. How do you manage to navigate both your professional responsibilities and personal life?

    Balancing a legal career with personal life? It’s a bit like juggling flaming torches—demanding, precarious, and occasionally singeing. Over time, I’ve realized it’s not about achieving perfect balance but savouring small, meaningful moments amidst the chaos. It takes flexibility, planning, and a sense of humour that outruns even your tightest deadline. For me, balance is about finding joy in both work and life, whether it’s uncovering the perfect case law or unwinding with a good book and jazz.

    The key is giving 100% to whatever you’re doing—work or personal. This clarity didn’t come easily, and I’ve stumbled plenty along the way. I am still “work in progress” when it comes to this. Planning helps, but the unpredictable nature of law demands constant reprioritization. Some weeks, work dominates, while other weeks, I consciously slow down to recharge. I’ve come to embrace this rhythm and focus on what truly matters in the moment.

    Another important lesson is to separate professional pressures from personal life. The disputes or transactions we handle aren’t personal battles, and understanding this fosters a healthier relationship with the profession. Drawing boundaries has helped me maintain perspective and protect personal relationships from work stress.

    Above all, prioritizing health has been a hard-earned lesson. It’s a non-negotiable investment in sustained performance and clarity. Law is a marathon, not a sprint—though it often feels like a 100-meter dash with flaming hoops on heels. The late nights and challenges are part of the journey, but so is the unparalleled satisfaction of seeing hard work pay off.

    What advice would you give to young professionals aspiring to follow your path and build a successful career in commercial litigation and international and domestic arbitration?

    The best advice I can offer young professionals aspiring to succeed in commercial litigation and international arbitration is to be clear about what you want—and equally, what you don’t want. Your journey will be unique, and that’s perfectly fine. Confidence is key—build it daily. It’s not just a professional asset but a life skill that grows with every challenge you overcome.

    In commercial litigation, focus on mastering procedural laws and core areas like contracts and corporate disputes—they form the backbone of your practice. Start with domestic arbitration to develop a strong foundation in procedural nuances, drafting, and hearings before transitioning to international arbitration. Avoid jumping into international arbitrations directly; instead, strengthen your foundation through the rigors of commercial litigation and domestic arbitration. When you transition towards international arbitration deepen your understanding of cross-border principles to effectively navigate global challenges.

    Finally, cut through the noise and focus on what truly matters. Being a lawyer is demanding, so maintain resilience with grace and have dignified patience —it will take you far. Stay true to your goals, trust your instincts, and prioritize integrity, quality of work, and continuous growth. Law is as much about relationships as it is about rules. Nurture meaningful connections, embrace opportunities, and keep evolving and learning. Show up every day, even in moments of self-doubt, work hard, and bring along those who supported you on your journey- they deserve a share in your success.

    Get in touch with Aditi Pawar –

  • “The most important facet an individual should have in the field of law is that he should be a keen observer, good learner, hardworking and have perseverance in attaining the desired results even if it takes time.” – Subrat Sahu, Founder at Legumlatum LLP.

    “The most important facet an individual should have in the field of law is that he should be a keen observer, good learner, hardworking and have perseverance in attaining the desired results even if it takes time.” – Subrat Sahu, Founder at Legumlatum LLP.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Since you belong to a science background, what made you switch your career from Science to Law after attaining degrees such as B.Sc. in Zoology, Animal Biology and M.Sc. in Anthropology?

    Since I have a Science Background I have developed an analytical understanding of things during the course of my study. Also, the knowledge which I acquired was theoretical and which has a limited use. It is only applicable in a limited sphere, only in the realm of my study after that the knowledge is futile. I always wanted to work for the purposes of the poor and downtrodden people.

    Which can be done through addressing the plights of the undertrials and accused persons who do not get any legal help and are being languished in the jails.  The legal profession is dynamic and it gets changed day by day and which requires the technological know-how in a lawyer which is essential for addressing the plights of the litigants and lawyers and the judges who are not tech-savvy. These days the laws or statutes require the basic knowledge of science or scientific temperament in a lawyer to address some technological statutes, such as the IT act 2020, The Data protection Act, The food and adulteration act, The Patents Act-1970, The Mental Health Act, The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, Air and Water Pollution Control Act. Further the law provides the application of the knowledge obtained during the scientific studies and can be applied in the legal arena. As Scientific knowledge or scientific temperament is required by the legislators who frame the laws or statutes then comes the lawyers or paralegals who practice or draft the petitions or applications which require the scientific knowledge. Then comes the interpreters, they are the puisne judges, thus a scientific taskforce is needed in the legal framework to cater the techno legal subjects. There is a large demand of Engineers whether they are Civil, Mechanical, Electronics engineers in Patents drafting, and removing the defects mentioned in the Examination Reports of the patents examiner. There is a huge demand of the techno-legal professionals Many engineers, Science Graduates and Post Graduates are qualified lawyers, thus bridging the gap of the application of the technology on law and the law on technology. I specifically being a Science Graduate and Postgraduate driven by the need of the techno-legal professionals considered to go. 

    You have worked with various firms before setting up your own firm Legumlatum LLP. What according to you were the learning experiences that shaped your role as the Founder and Managing Partner of the firm?

    I had worked in different law firms, prior to launching of my own law firm and during the term there, I have learned the time management, the team work, done work diligently with the efforts to perform the work assigned. Also, during the course of the day we had discussions and we used to put all efforts or inputs among the teammates regarding the work assigned. We used to take views from all the team members regarding the work and put the best efforts in it. Thus, I inculcated the habits and the skills which I learnt during my tenures at different organisations. Also, being a first-generation lawyer, I worked hard to learn the nitty gritty of the legal profession and was never before earning the money. As I put my earnest efforts in the learning, during my tenures I did not hesitate in learning things by doing the work assigned, whether it is arranging the legal documents, and in drafting the suits, agreements etc. I never denied to do the work assigned to me as this is not of my domain.

     I paid utmost attention and put the efforts in the completion of the job assigned, for which I had done the research in various databases, like SCC online, Manupatra, DLT. All these efforts which are taken during the working hours made me a workaholic I used to learn from the mistakes of mine and others to cope with the situation in ordinary course.

    You have appeared before multiple legal forums including NCLT, High Courts, and the Supreme Court. How does preparing for and arguing cases at different levels of the judiciary differ, and what has been your approach?

    Preparation of the cases at different forums are altogether different. In the district courts there the wholesome preparation for the trial is needed, whether it is at the pleadings stage where complaint is to be filed and then the pleadings are to be completed, then the evidence stage where evidence has to be tendered in the civil cases the evidence by way of affidavit, then framing of the issues are to be done and arguments are to be tendered. Similarly, during the preparation of the cases at the National Company Law Tribunal, i.e. NCLT the soft copy of the petition is to be uploaded and the hard copy of the petition is to be filed. In the High Court the filing and listing is altogether different, then the listing of the matter after the filing is done by the registry of the High Court. The proceedings at High Court are different than the District Courts. Thus, the legal proceedings at the Supreme Court are different governed by the Supreme Court rules. Thus, it is to be said that the filing, proceedings are different in various legal forums. Thus, the preparation of the different cases at different forums are altogether distinct and the efforts to be put in these cases are different, and accordingly the strategy is being made to dealt with these cases at different forums.

    Being an independent practitioner with such vast experience, you must have come across interesting cases. Can you share with us the most interesting cases you’ve dealt with and your preparation for such cases? 

    I can share a civil case where the plaintiff is a senior citizen about 80 years age. The defendant is the daughter in law of the plaintiff. The plaintiff was allotted a property from the Government being the member of the Schedule Caste category. The plaintiff had allowed his sons and their families to stay in some portion of the allotted property and the Plaintiff was staying in one of the portions. The defendants had sold the property where the plaintiff used to stay to a third party by the registered sale deed by producing the false chain of documents. As per the notification of the government the piece of land which was allotted to the plaintiff can only be transferred to a member of the Scheduled Caste. Thus, there was a conflict to the ownership of the property where there are two parties declaring themselves to be the owner of the property. In the meanwhile, or during the course of the litigation, the plaintiff died and before the death of the plaintiff he had bequeathed the property in the name of his daughter by executing registered will, Power of Attorney, and gift deed.

    I put my submissions before the hon’ble court that the plaintiff is the owner of the said property and consequently his daughter became the absolute owner after the death of the plaintiff by virtue of the registered will, Power of Attorney, and Gift deed in her favour. The hon’ble court accepted my submissions and accordingly made his daughter the absolute owner of the property, thus now the plaintiff’s daughter has stepped into the shoes of her father and she will initiate the legal proceedings against the third party who is claiming to be the owner of the suit property. 

    IPR Law is a vast and dynamic field with new changes coming up every single day. Since you have immense experience in Patent Prosecution how do you think the dynamics have changed over the years including the recent amendment in the Indian Patent Rules,2024?

    Yes, I agree with you that the Patents Act-1970 is dynamic with new changes occurring every day. The Patents Act-1970 had transitioned in the British Era to the present day and is changing day by day. The Patents Act-1970 has taken shape in the form of the act VI of 1856 which was based on the British Patent law of 1852, in which certain exclusive privileges were granted to inventors of new manufacturers for a period of 14 years. In the year 1859 the act was modified as act XV as patent monopolies called exclusive privileges making, selling, and using inventions in India and authorising others to do so for 14 years from the date of filing specifications. 

    In the year 1872 the Patents and Designs protection Act came into force. Then in 1883, the protection of inventions came into force and in the year 1888 the consolidated to Inventions and Designs Act. In the year 1911 the Indian Patents and Designs Act came into existence. Further in the year 1970 the Patents act came into existence. Since 1970 there are six amending acts had shaped the Patents Act-1970. The recent was the Tribunals Reforms Act- 2021 which came into effect from 04.04.2021 after that there were amendments to the Indian Patents Act-1970 by the enactment of the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions Act, 2023) which decriminalised and rationalised offences to further enhance the trust-based governance for ease of living and doing business. The Indian Patents (Amendment Rules, 2024 were notified on March 15, 2024 which aimed to expedite the patent application process, provide flexibility on certain deadlines, simplify requirements for foreign filings, particulars and working statements and reduce frivolous pre-grant oppositions.

    You have over 15 Years of Experience, what advice would you give to the young generation who are starting out in their careers and wish to pursue the field of IPR?

    My advice to young generation who wish to pursue the field of IPR is that to be clear in the vision regarding the domain which they would require to pursue in IPR whether it is the Patents, Copyrights, or Trademarks or the Commercial law. The youngsters must exercise their choice to practice in the specific field of either IPR or Commercial Law.

    You mentioned being an ardent learner, gaining insights from both your own and others’ mistakes. Could you share an instance where a challenging case taught you a valuable lesson that has influenced your practice?

    As I had mentioned that I am an ardent learner, gaining insights from my and others mistakes, such a mistake from which I had learned is that I was not attentive to the specific timelines which are to be followed in various cases whether it is to be revision, or appeal or other instances. In IPR the filing of the documents is time bound and if the action is not taken in the stipulated time period, then in such cases the application gets abandoned.

    As someone who manages a legal firm and personally handles cases, how do you strike a balance between running the business side of Legumlatum LLP and being actively involved in legal proceedings?

    As I told you that I do manage the business of the Legumlatum LLP and also take care of the cases, I do such cases in the supervisory role in both the instances. I supervise the work done by our associates. I supervise the work done by our associates who are being delegated the work. Further the work which was being done at Legumlatum LLP is the team work.

    What do you think is the most necessary facet a lawyer should have if they wish to have a successful career in the field of law, especially IPR and Commercial Law?

    The most important facet an individual should have in case he has to have a great career in the field of law is that he should be a keen observer, good learner, and hardworking and have perseverance in attaining the desired results even if it takes time. 

    Get in touch with Subrat Sahu-

  • “The most important to excel in the legal field is to seek mentorship by connecting with experienced lawyers. Also, be open to changing your mind as you gain more experience” – Monika Bhatelia, Associate Partner at Singhania & Co LLP.

    “The most important to excel in the legal field is to seek mentorship by connecting with experienced lawyers. Also, be open to changing your mind as you gain more experience” – Monika Bhatelia, Associate Partner at Singhania & Co LLP.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Can you tell us about how you began your career in law and what led you to do law and specialize in commercial litigation, arbitration, and maritime law? Please allow us to walk through your journey.

    During my undergraduate law studies, I discovered a fascination with the legal aspects of business. An internship at a law firm provided invaluable practical experience, sparking a passion for advocating justice. As I explored various legal areas, my conviction grew. Commercial litigation, arbitration, and maritime law perfectly merged law and commerce, captivating me. The dynamic nature of commercial disputes and solving complex problems drew me in. Specializing in arbitration enabled efficient conflict resolution outside the courtroom, benefiting businesses. Maritime law’s international trade and unique challenges further solidified my interest. My journey toward specialization was driven by curiosity and a passion for justice. Working on diverse cases reinforced my dedication to honing skills in these fields.

    Maritime law is a unique area of practice. What drew you to admiralty and maritime matters, and what are some key insights you’ve gained from dealing with ship arrests, maritime liens, and international arbitration?   

    My fascination with admiralty and maritime law has been sparked by the intricate and global nature of this field. The convergence of law with international trade, shipping, and commerce presents distinctive challenges and opportunities. Through my involvement in ship arrests and maritime liens, I understood the critical role these legal mechanisms play in safeguarding the interests of creditors in a swift, high-stakes environment. Grasping the intricacies of jurisdiction and the interaction between various legal systems is essential, given that maritime cases often span multiple countries. 

    Given your extensive work with the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code (IBC), what challenges have you encountered in insolvency matters? How do you think the IBC has transformed the legal landscape in India?  

    Let me tell you, working with the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code can be quite a rollercoaster ride. One of the major challenges I’ve encountered is navigating through the complex legal framework and understanding all the intricate details of insolvency proceedings. The code is quite extensive and can be tricky to navigate, especially when it comes to interpreting certain provisions and their implications. It’s like diving into a maze sometimes, trying to figure out what steps to take next. There’s always pressure to meet tight deadlines and adhere to strict timelines laid out in the code, which can be stressful at times. 

    The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) has been a game-changer in India’s legal landscape by providing a more structured and efficient framework for dealing with insolvency cases. With the introduction of the IBC in 2016, companies now have a more streamlined process for resolving insolvency matters, which has significantly reduced the time taken to complete such proceedings. 

    The lBC has also brought about increased transparency and efficiency in insolvency proceedings, creating a more favourable environment for both creditors and debtors. Additionally, the IBC has encouraged a culture of accountability among businesses, as it mandates timely resolution of insolvency cases to prevent financial losses for creditors. Overall, the IBC has transformed the legal landscape by providing a faster and more effective mechanism for resolving insolvency cases efficiently.

    Your work involves representing cases in various courts, including the Bombay High Court, City Civil & Sessions Court, NCLT/NCLAT, and Family Court. How do you prepare differently for civil suits versus arbitration or family law matters?  

    Preparing for civil suits, arbitration, and family law matters requires tailored approaches due to their distinct legal frameworks and procedural requirements.

    When it comes to civil suits, my focus is on gathering comprehensive evidence, drafting detailed pleadings, and understanding the applicable laws and precedents. Court procedures, such as discovery and witness preparation, are crucial aspects that require meticulous attention. This often involves extensive research and documentation review to build a strong case.

    In the case of arbitration, the emphasis shifts towards confidentiality and efficiency. I prepare by thoroughly reviewing the arbitration agreement and focusing on procedural rules specific to the chosen institution. Developing persuasive arguments and preparing for a more informal setting are essential, as well as strategies for cross-examining witnesses.

    Family law matters involve emotions and relationships along with legalities so preparation may involve counselling clients about potential outcomes and helping them navigate complex personal dynamics. While documentation remains important, the approach often leans towards mediation and negotiation to resolve disputes amicably, with a focus on the best interests of any children involved.

    Although the core legal principles may overlap, the strategies and considerations for preparation differ significantly based on the context and desired outcomes. Each area of law requires a unique approach to ensure the best possible outcome for clients.

    As a visiting faculty and someone who frequently interacts with students and freshers entering the legal field, what are your thoughts on the current generation of aspiring lawyers? In your experience, what strengths do they bring to the profession, and in which areas do you think they need to improve or focus more on for their personal and professional development?  

    The current generation of aspiring lawyers is incredibly driven and passionate about making a difference in the legal field. They are eager to learn, and open to new methodologies, which can enhance efficiency in legal practice. Their familiarity with technology and innovative approaches to problem-solving brings impressive strengths to the profession. 

    I am impressed by their passion and dedication to the field, these students genuinely care about making a difference in society through their work. They are tech-savvy, well-informed, and have a strong sense of social justice, which is very encouraging to see. However, there are areas for improvement. One key aspect is the development of practical skills, such as negotiation and client management, which are essential for success in real-world legal practice. I also notice that they struggle with time management skills due to the heavy workload and pressure to excel. Encouraging internships and hands-on opportunities, enabling students to put their theoretical knowledge into practice and cultivate the essential skills needed for their future endeavours. Furthermore, I have observed a deficiency in practical experience among certain students when it comes to real-world legal environments, a crucial element in shaping a holistic comprehension of the field. 

    I am impressed by the dedication and enthusiasm of these aspiring lawyers as they have the potential to bring about positive change in the legal professional no doubt that they will go on to achieve great things in their careers.

    For young lawyers aspiring to build a strong foundation in litigation, what key steps or practices would you recommend they focus on during the early stages of their career to establish themselves in this competitive field?  

    For young lawyers aspiring to build a strong foundation in litigation, several key steps can help establish a successful career

    1. Gain Practical Experience: Seek internships and clerkships with litigation-focused firms. Hands-on experience in courtrooms and exposure to case preparation are invaluable.

    2. Develop Strong Research and Writing Skills: Mastering legal research and effective writing is crucial. Focus on drafting pleadings, motions, and legal briefs to enhance clarity and persuasion.

    3. Understand Court Procedures: Familiarize yourself with the rules and procedures of the courts where you plan to practice. Knowing the ins and outs can significantly impact case management.

    4. Build a Professional Network: Attend legal seminars, join bar associations, and connect with experienced practitioners. Networking can lead to mentorship opportunities and valuable insights.

    6. Stay Informed: Regularly read legal journals, case law, and various updates to remain current on developments in litigation and related areas.

    7.Learn Continuously: Be open to constructive criticism and use it to improve your skills. Learning from both successes and failures is key to growth.

    By focusing on these areas, young lawyers can create a solid foundation for a successful career in litigation.

    With such a demanding career in law, how do you unwind and relax after a challenging day? Do you have any personal routines or activities that help you maintain a healthy work-life balance?  

    Maintaining a healthy work-life balance is essential in a demanding legal career. After a challenging day, I find it helpful to unwind through several activities:

    1. Spending Time with Family and Friends: Engaging in quality time with loved ones helps me recharge and provides a supportive network. I am a mother of a toddler so my little one helps me to recharge my energy completely after a hectic day at work.
    2. Hobbies: I also dedicate time to hobbies like cooking and shopping which provides a creative outlet and distraction from work.

    These routines help me maintain perspective and stay grounded, enabling me to approach my work with renewed energy and focus.

    You’ve worked with renowned legal minds like former justices and senior counsels. Can you share a memorable experience or piece of advice from a mentor that has profoundly influenced the way you approach your practice?

     One memorable experience with my mentor Mr. Pradeep Kumar Jain, the Managing partner of Singhania & Co LLP, He often reminded me that the legal profession is not just about winning cases but also about upholding justice and serving clients with honesty.

    His advice to always consider the broader impact of our work—on clients, the legal system, has profoundly influenced my approach. It reinforced the idea that every case is an opportunity to contribute positively to the legal field. This perspective has guided me in making thoughtful decisions and striving for fairness, rather than merely focusing on outcomes. It’s a principle I carry with me in every aspect of my practice.

    With such a broad spectrum of specializations within the legal field, what advice would you give to young lawyers on the best ways to decide which area of the legal industry they should enter? How did you navigate this decision in your own career? 

    Deciding on a specialization in the legal field can be challenging, but there are several strategies young lawyers can use to find their path:

     The young lawyers should get exposure through internships, clerkships and court work. This hands-on experience can help identify what interest the individual the most. The most important to excel in the legal field is seek mentorship by connecting with experienced lawyers in different specialities. Consider what aspects of law excites you be it advocacy, negotiation or analytical work. The last piece of advice that I would like to share with all budding lawyers is, be open to changing your mind as you gain more experience. Many lawyers find their niche evolves over time. 

    In my own career, I navigated this decision by engaging in diverse experiences early on, which helped me discover my passion for commercial litigation. I was fortunate to have my mentor who guided me, allowing me to make informed choices about my interest. Ultimately combining passion and dedication with practical experience has been key to my journey. 

    Get in touch with Monika Bhatelia-

  • “The prosecutor’s job is not always to secure convictions of the accused at all costs, but to place before the courts all such evidence to enable them to decide the cases appropriately in the interest of justice and equity.” – Bharat Toodi, Company Prosecutor at Ministry of Corporate Affairs.

    “The prosecutor’s job is not always to secure convictions of the accused at all costs, but to place before the courts all such evidence to enable them to decide the cases appropriately in the interest of justice and equity.” – Bharat Toodi, Company Prosecutor at Ministry of Corporate Affairs.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Your legal journey began after completing your education at NALSAR University of Law. What motivated you to pursue law, and how did you get started in your career after graduation? 

    It was in the year 2003 when I completed my 12th class schooling. Thereafter, my orientation towards preparation for the civil services exam made me pursue Bachelor of Arts (B.A.) in a college at Hyderabad. It was during such time, where my inclination for pursuing Law degree course from the recognised National Law Schools in India made me to prepare for writing competitive entrance exams for each of the National Law Schools in India which enabled me to secure a Rank in Nalsar University of Law, Hyderabad in the year 2004 after discontinuing the graduation in Arts course. So, my basic motivation to pursue law was for one reason, to have a demanding and captivating career by having a graduation degree in law thinking it can also be useful for practicing law as a career and for the second reason that at the same time it can be used for preparation of Civil Services Examination through UPSC by taking Law as one of the optional subjects. 

    It was in the year 2009, I graduated with B.A., LL. B(Hons.) from Nalsar University of Law, Hyderabad and got enrolled as an Advocate in the year 2009 in the Bar Council for the State of Andhra Pradesh (Now State of Telangana). I had joined as an Associate in a law firm at Hyderabad in the litigation team. During that stage, my keen interest towards corporate litigation practice developed and my drafting abilities for preparation of various memos, petitions and counter affidavits for writ petitions were learnt including the observation of court proceedings in different judicial forums and arbitrations. 

    You have worked on a wide range of cases under the Companies Act and received commendations for achieving convictions. Can you share a memorable case that had a significant impact on your professional growth? 

    There are around three to four specific cases which were dealt by me under the Companies Act in which I have successfully achieved convictions with imprisonment, and they were claimed to be one of the rarest of rare cases as well under the Companies Act. One such interesting prosecution was related to a case filed under Section 628 of the Companies Act, 1956 where the Managing Director and a Director of a Company were impleaded as the accused on the basis that they were the signatories to the Balance Sheets which were uploaded online to the jurisdictional Registrar of Companies (ROC), and that case was proved by concluding that the Balance Sheets filed by the Company were false statements / false documents under Section 628 of the Companies Act, 1956, in which the Hon’ble Special Judge for Economic Offences Court at Hyderabad has sentenced the said accused with imprisonment and with fine.

    As someone who handles corporate frauds and violations, what have been the most challenging aspects of prosecuting such cases, and what insights have you gained that you think every legal professional should be aware of? 

     When the Going Gets Tough, the Tough gets Going. Every prosecution is in itself a very challenging task, as the prosecutors never know on which point a defence counsel can challenge the whole case for it to be proved as a false case initiated and achieve acquittal of the accused. Sometimes, though the case has been properly conducted by the prosecutors, the end results don’t seem to have achieved the required result which disappoints us. However, it is stated that winning a case or losing a case should not be the priority but rather such results should enrich our knowledge thereby leading to improve our work experience in future times. Nevertheless, the prosecutor’s job is not always to secure the convictions of the accused at all costs but to place before the courts all such evidence to enable the courts to decide the cases appropriately in the interest of justice and equity. To be honest, a prosecutor’s job is tiring / stressful and is never appreciated. It is under these circumstances, when appreciation letters from the Government of India Ministry of Corporate Affairs were issued to me with the kind cooperation and supporting roles from the higher authorities of the office of ROC and the Regional Director, made me relieved with such stress and made me to be more responsible, diligent and furthermore to work hard. On the other hand, I would also like to state that there are various persons in my life since the time that I have joined the law course who have made me a complete person of what I am today. So, my gratitude towards such persons whether from family or friends or relatives is always heartfully indebted. 

    One of the challenging aspects of prosecuting cases where corporate frauds and violations are observed is about making ourselves equipped with the knowledge of latest precedents and apply the same to be fitted into the facts of each case. As the Companies Act is an evolving law day by day and is being amended with a view to strengthen corporate governance with the ‘ease of doing business’ for making the companies to be incorporated, the prosecution gets tougher to prove a case because non-compliance under the provisions of the Companies Act is not about always having elements like ill motive / malafide intention to defraud the public at large which includes public interest (non-compoundable offences) but rather it is also about technical in nature for the companies to comply certain mandatory compliances within stipulated time periods given under the law (compoundable and adjudicable offences). 

    What really matters is not only about how the prosecution is dealt with and conducted by a prosecutor or by an advocate being the defence counsels to defend their clients but to know the art of court craft / tactics to enlighten the Hon’ble Courts with the new set of precedents and on the new interpretations of law set by various judicial forums and to know for their applications in the times of need. It is important to enlighten the Hon’ble Courts with the exact interpretation of laws and the provisions available to enable the Courts to arrive at a just decision of a case. This skill also includes to immediately refer to the relied citations or draw the Court’s attention to the relevant document(s) on the point of alleged issues, so as to be clarified to the Hon’ble Courts when sought for. 

    Could you share some of the most significant challenges and learning experiences you’ve encountered as a Company Prosecutor in the Central Government service, and how these experiences have shaped your approach to corporate litigation and prosecution under the Companies Act? 

    I am a first-generation lawyer nor was there any first-hand experience at the time when I was recruited as a Company Prosecutor through the UPSC, to deal with prosecutions under the Companies Act. Therefore, each case dealt by me in the initial days was with a fear that I had in my mind that I should not commit any errors or mistakes while conducting trial proceedings like marking of each document as exhibits which also included the task to produce additional documents as exhibits to be marked wherever required, or by re-calling the prosecution witnesses / defence witnesses whenever required, etc. That thought of mind made me study the cases with attentive mind with the importance of the prosecution documents relied during trial and put forth in my final arguments before the Hon’ble Courts that the prosecution case on hand is a fit case to be prosecuted for making the accused punished in accordance with law beyond all reasonable doubt. My significant challenge or the learning experiences was when I needed to prepare for cross examination of the defence after Section 313 Examination of the Accused was completed. The questions that I prepare and pose during the cross examination of the defence emphasized on the allegations of the prosecution relevant to the facts of the case i.e. ‘the art of cross examination’ and at the same time to make the defence to admit the suggestions being put forth while referring to the exhibited documents, which made / makes my job easy during hearing of final arguments. 

    Therefore, my outlook towards corporate litigation is all about mandatory compliance of the Companies with the laws within stipulated time periods. On other hand, the Prosecutor should make sure that the prosecution is launched within the limitation period in order to realize that the accused or the defence side does not have an extra edge to get an acquittal / discharge based on the very technical issue of the prosecution complaint being barred by limitation. In other words, it means Vigilantibus Non Dormientibus Jura Subveniunt – “The law assists only those who are vigilant, and not those who sleep over their rights.” So, wherever I felt there was a necessity to file an application for delay condonation for filing the prosecution complaint before the Hon’ble Court of law, I made sure that the prosecution complaint was calculated with the exact number of days being delayed in filing the same before the Hon’ble Court and with a prayer being made before the Hon’ble Court on the grounds elicited in the petition so as to condone the delay in the interest of justice and equity. Merely an application for filing of Condonation of Delay is filed on behalf of the Prosecution, it does not mean the Hon’ble Courts will always accept the said Application. Therefore, it was one of the challenges that I specifically faced to apprise the Hon’ble Court that the delay being sought to be condoned on various grounds as requested does not make the defence / accused to be prejudiced and pray that it is also a matter of fact that public interest is involved so that the Company and its Directors are prosecuted rightfully in the interests of justice. 

    You have published legal articles and won accolades for your writing. How important do you believe legal research and writing are for a successful legal career, and what role have they played in your journey? 

    During my law school days, we used to have project works for each subject in each of the semesters. It was during those days, my interest for writing legal articles developed with my initial research work in projects. As law students we need to also undertake internships during semester breaks in various academic / government institutes, organizations, advocate offices, law firms, etc. When I started writing legal articles it was all about making my resume look better to draw the attention upon my resume on such skills I possessed with interest. For example, one of my project works in Law and Poverty course had made me to publish an article about the child labour issues which was related to an internship in an NGO that I underwent during 1st year law student. Later the said project work was further improvised with the concepts studied in Law and Poverty course and thereafter it was published in one of the leading journals of the Indian Institute of Public Administration (IIPA), New Delhi. I won the first prize in the best-case study competitions conducted by IIPA, which was an article written based upon the practical exposure that I had undergone during my internship and as well as by application of concepts that I learnt in the Law and Poverty Course. This was one such instance, where I can say my drafting skills and legal research were improved. As learning is a continuous process, I am still striving to continue with improving my skills wherever possible. In today’s scenario, writing and drafting skills are also helpful in all my court crafts while preparing for the written arguments to be submitted before the Hon’ble Courts. 

    Definitely, legal research and writing skills makes one life easier in terms of litigation practice when the advocates issue legal notices, file their petitions / applications / affidavits etc., before the Hon’ble Court of Laws by praying for the causes for which such applications are filed and seek for Orders. So as to reiterate once again, one has to keep themselves updated with the overall developments and legal precedents which can be useful for their cases in future. So writing skills or legal drafting skills helps once self to critically evaluate the issues in hand of a case and makes us think about concluding the issue with the application of provisions of law at the right stage and right point of time including providing the actual suggestions to improve the current situations in hand. Such skills can make one think about pursuing other professional plans in their career as well. 

    Your career journey has taken you from private law firms to a significant government role. How has this transition shaped your understanding of law and governance, and what advice would you offer to lawyers considering public service? 

    As stated earlier, my career plans were altogether different for the purposes of choosing law as a course subject during my graduation. So, my destiny made me pursue law which enabled me to join the Central Government Services as a Prosecutor under the Companies Act, though my action plan for the career was different. To be honest, it was only after joining as a Prosecutor that I can say that I fulfilled my dreams of getting into a Government Service though it was in a different field. By having stated the same, when my career with a private law firm was started, I was not confident enough in the litigation practice. It was only when the role of prosecutor’s job was undertaken before the Designated Special Court under the Companies Act, I feel I have improved my understanding of law, its true interpretation with its application to the facts of each case and then my argument skills were developed to impress upon the Hon’ble Courts for the desired results. Therefore, according to me, one can do their best when their performance of the task is done with whole heartedness and with passion towards it seeking for the end results as anticipated. 

    What has worked for me may not work for everyone pursuing law so that they may end up in Government Services. However, I can surely advise the younger lawyers to keep their options open when deciding about their future plans for litigation practice, that being in Government Services (whether State of Central) by conducting prosecutions as a Prosecutor can also fulfil their dreams of having a litigation practice from the Government’s perspective. This type of trail court practice enables one to understand the Government’s policies, Governance and application of law from the Government’s view. Therefore, one may also consider entering into public services, if interested, as one of their litigation practice plans by becoming Public Prosecutors / into Judicial Services etc. 

    As a mentor to upcoming lawyers and legal professionals, what advice would you give to those who aspire to specialize in corporate prosecution and arbitration? What are the key skills they should focus on developing? 

    Qualities like Focus, Priorities, Dedication and Determination (FPDD) are essential for the upcoming lawyers to be developed within themselves. One must firstly choose a field in which he/she is interested to pursue in their career. Based on such a chosen option, one must give priority to that chosen field to get the best results out of it by way of keen practice and acquiring knowledge on the chosen subjects. That can be possible by focusing on such priorities, without any unnecessary deviations in the mind set. Finally, it is only with utmost dedication and determination that those priorities focusing on end results can successfully be achievable. 

    Corporate Laws are one of the law subjects which have been evolving rapidly and amendments to various laws are being taken place by the Government of India with an intention of making Companies / LLPs to be incorporated ‘with an ease of doing business’. All the upcoming lawyers or legal professionals must keep themselves informed with such latest amendments by regularly updating themselves through legal references like law journals, newspaper articles etc. One must also have the practical exposure to appear before different judicial forums especially before the trial courts, as trial courts are the first and foremost important forums where the applicability of basic knowledge of laws studied during the study of law courses at graduation level are applied practically. For these purposes, all law students should try to participate in the moot court competitions that are being carried out as a part of their curriculum during their law course. This will enable them to articulate their ideas into expressions without any hesitation or vanish their stage fear and at the same time they inculcate the habit of learning about how to acknowledge the crux of the issues involved in a case by implementation of law provisions into the case on hand. Therefore, one should not only be involved in just study of law subject as a course in itself but must also jump into the practical field work for getting the true essence of being a lawyer by practicing law, right from doing internships during their law study etc. For such work experiences, one must need a source of inspiration from their friends or family or any senior professionals / colleagues who can be their guide throughout their career, which in turn can help them to get the in-depth work experiences as may be required. 

    As someone deeply involved in corporate prosecutions, what emerging trends in corporate law do you foresee, and how do you think legal professionals should prepare to address these new challenges? 

    Corporate Social Responsibility included as a part of Corporate Governance is one of the emerging trends in Corporate Laws. Further, important topics like acceptance of deposits by the Public, Corporate Frauds including related party transactions, oppression and mis-management, mergers and amalgamations under the Companies Act, Dissolutions and Voluntary Liquidations under IBC provisions are few important topics among others to mention a few, for which every legal professional interested to pursue litigation in corporate laws must be thorough with. One must comprehend that they advise their clients based on their own legal due diligence on what makes their corporate decisions to be good for their companies rather than doing an act which only appears to be good on paper but not in accordance with the true spirit of law. Further, I also advise that any legal opinions / advice to their clients must always ensure that their clients respond to the Notices issued from any Government body / agency for alleged non-compliance of laws, if any, by way of a reply to be issued within a stipulated period mentioned in the said Notices. The clients should be also advised that they should not ‘refuse’ nor ‘un-claim’ those Notices addressed to them from the regulatory / administrative bodies. By doing so, they will not welcome any unnecessary litigation that may crop up by side-lining the real concerns related to the companies concerns. Therefore, it is not only the requirement for the companies to be vigilant in compliance with the laws in a time frame but also the legal professionals to be watchful enough to oversee their client’s requirements with correct advice to be given at the right time to avoid any unforeseen legal complications. The duty of the lawyer is to make sure that their client’s grievances are addressed before the appropriate courts of law timely who are seeking for justice, whenever the proposed cause of action will arise or ought to have arisen.

    With such a demanding career, what do you do in your free time to unwind and maintain a healthy work-life balance? 

    I travel with family, I like to paint and draw, I spend time with friends and watch movies during free time. I also like to focus on my physical and mental well-being / appearance by way of maintaining a fit body with exercises and walking / running.

    Get in touch with Bharat Toodi-

  • “Exposure to a diverse set of clients and sectors provides much needed agility and flexibility that is required in today’s world of technological and socio-economic disruptions.” –  Siddharth Ratho, Vice President and Head of Litigation at  Nuvama Group.

    “Exposure to a diverse set of clients and sectors provides much needed agility and flexibility that is required in today’s world of technological and socio-economic disruptions.” –  Siddharth Ratho, Vice President and Head of Litigation at  Nuvama Group.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Can you share the pivotal moment or motivation that inspired you to pursue a career in law, and how that decision has shaped your professional journey?  

    Growing up, I wanted to be many things. At different points, I was certain I wanted to play cricket for India, be a pilot, architect, astronaut, historian etc. I liked science, math, and humanities. I also loved sports and music. My parents allowed me to dream and never really tried to influence me towards a particular profession. I perceived the world as my oyster in an ocean of possibilities. 

    After finishing my high schooling in India, I went on to pursue my undergraduate studies in the USA from 2007 to 2011, with a full scholarship, double majoring in Economics and International Relations and minoring in mathematics. 

    Shortly after arriving in college in the US, the global financial crisis hit, with ripple effects felt all over the world, lasting over half a decade. Businesses went insolvent overnight, and tons of people lost jobs. Multiple lawsuits were filed, massive legal battles initiated, and a lot of discourse on what went wrong and who was to blame. While studying international political economies, foreign affairs, corporate finance, and many other fascinating subjects offered by my liberal arts college, I slowly but surely also started developing an interest in law. 

    After finishing my stint in the USA, I came back to India and pursued the three-year law degree at Government Law College, Mumbai. GLC allowed me to intern in a lot of great law firms while also pursuing my LLB degree. 

    The rest, as they say, is history! 

    You are a dual-qualified lawyer, both as an Advocate in India and a Solicitor in England and Wales. Do you think this dual qualification has given you a unique advantage in your career? If yes, how has it shaped your professional approach, and what kind of legal professionals do you think should pursue this path?  

    Having studied abroad early in my life, I always knew that I would never want to be limited by borders. 

    The first five years of my law career were spent at Nishith Desai Associates, where I was involved in several complex, cross border disputes spanning multiple jurisdictions. Even during my later stints at CAM and Trilegal, I was part of several foreign seated arbitrations in Singapore, London, Paris, New York all with their own challenges and nuances. 

    Getting a dual qualification in this increasingly intertwined world and given how my career had begun seemed like the way to go. So, I started looking up options. 

    At the time, the route to qualification as a Solicitor in England and Wales was known as QLTS. Nowadays, it is known as the SQE route. Pertinently, this route did not require you to compulsorily do an LLM in the UK and spend tons of money. It only required you to ace the two stages of the QLTS exams. The fact that English law is the most used law in multi-jurisdictional transactional documents was another factor in me choosing English law. It also certainly helped that English jurisprudence has developed for almost a millennium, ever since the Magna Carta, and is the genesis of the common law system as we know it today. So, choosing English law was a no brainer.  

    Studying for the qualification and dealing with the exam format (first stage in India and second in London) was an absolute pleasure. While my experience in some of India’s best law firms has taught me a lot, the rigour of the English law qualification exams truly took my skills and understanding of the first principles to a whole new level. As a newly minted “international lawyer”, I started seeing legal problems with even more clarity. Dissecting complex contracts became simpler. Deconstructing multi-jurisdictional legal quagmires, easier.  

    I don’t know whether the “dual qualified” brand by itself has given me any specific advantage in my career yet. However, it has certainly advanced my knowledge and better equipped me as a “global lawyer.’ 

    I see that a lot of young lawyers today want to pursue this dual qualification immediately after graduation. I would strongly advise that initially, young lawyers should focus on learning the basics before trying too much “fancy stuff”. Priority should be to get 8-9 years of work experience. Learn as much as possible. See where your career is going, and then do it, if you think it would help you in your line of work.

    Doing it with the expectation of some immediate gains may only disappoint you. 

    Do it as a quest for knowledge, and to challenge yourself, if you must. 

    Looking back at your experience in international arbitrations under various institutional rules (SIAC, ICC, LCIA), what have been your key learnings, and how do these frameworks differ in practice?  

    All these international arbitration institutions essentially follow the common principles of ensuring efficient, effective and swift arbitrations, managed in an extremely professional manner. Each rule comes with its own nuances and options offered. Diving into these nuances is an entire subject on its own. All of them offer some of the most advanced features and cutting-edge global practices in arbitration. 

    My experience in such arbitrations has given me firsthand experience and knowledge in arbitration’s global best practices.  

    I must mention that I have also done several Indian institutional arbitrations. The facilities and features that they have to offer these days are up there with the best in the world, are far more cost effective, and deliver equally efficient results. 

    What motivated your transition from starting off at law firms initially to becoming the Head of Litigation at Nuvama Group? 

    I have spent over a decade in some of India’s best law firms –have had some great mentors over the years, and the experience of some incredible matters along the way. I did not really have a pre-set plan to shift to a corporate in-house role. However, I had noticed of late that more and more companies were seeking to strengthen their legal teams and onboard talent. So, I was never averse to the idea if the right opportunity came along the way. 

    When this opportunity arose, I could not resist – a challenging role with a great profile, in an exciting and fast-growing industry. Also, I am truly dialled into the India economic growth story. The wealth management and financial sector in my opinion is going to be a front-runner in India’s quest to become an economic superpower this century. Also, I read up about Nuvama and was bought into its mission, vision and culture of excellence. It seemed like an ideal next step in my career where I could also use my multidisciplinary educational qualifications, my keen interest and knowledge in economics and finance, to add value in an exciting company making strides in a cutting-edge sector. 

    How did your experiences in law firms shape your approach to leading a corporate legal team?  

    My experience at India’s premier law firms helped me form a sound legal knowledge base, learn high level legal skills and put them into practice. It also instilled in me essential attributes, such as discipline, work ethic, attention to detail and the ability to perform under pressure. 

    Leading a function in a company requires clever use of “EQ’ along with “IQ”, understanding and coordinating between various functions and finding practical and strategic solutions to the every-day problems faced by companies in highly regulated sectors through a collaborative approach. Having a sound legal knowledge base and sharp skills is very important. You are required to make tough decisions every day to mitigate potential liabilities and protect the company. You may not always have time to do the necessary research and then come back with an answer. Businesses cannot wait too long for answers and solutions, especially in a fast-paced and fast-growing sector.

    You are put under the spotlight almost every day and you need to perform with alacrity. You need to provide solutions immediately.  If you do not have strong legal principles and skills to back you up, then you will not be able to do the  firefighting that the company requires you to do. 

    It’s been about five months since you transitioned to the corporate world with Nuvama Group. How has your experience been in adapting to the corporate culture compared to your previous experiences in law firms? Do you feel more aligned with the corporate side, or do you still lean towards the law firm environment, and why?  

    These five months have added a whole new perspective in my approach as a legal professional. I can now see how businesses perceive law firms. Having seen both sides, I am able to identify the gaps in terms of what law firms have to offer, and what businesses truly desire.  

    In terms of pure work environment, one refreshing difference for me is the variety of people with different educational backgrounds and qualifications that you are surrounded by. In law firms, you are surrounded by mostly lawyers. In my current role, I am interacting with MBAs, CFAs, CAs etc every day.  

    It’s too soon to say which side I am more aligned to. There is a lot to learn from both sides. What I can certainly say is that these five months have been the most unique in my work experience so far as this is the first time I am working somewhere which is not a law firm. What I have learned in these five months, I haven’t in my decade long experience in law firms. So, I am already a better lawyer now than I was five months ago along with the added wisdom that new and unique experiences and challenges provide.  

    I believe every lawyer should experience both sides at some point. 

    With your unique experience across both Indian and international legal landscapes, how do you perceive the evolving role of technology in dispute resolution, particularly in areas like international arbitration and commercial litigation?  

    One of the main concerns for businesses, while dealing with legal issues, is the costs involved. Technology is already doing a lot in terms of reducing legal costs. Hearings can happen over VC reducing travel costs. The use of technology in online dispute resolution is also quite promising. 

    Technology will further reduce “billable hours” by using AI to accomplish various more monotonous legal functions. Gone are the days when a law firm could charge a business endless hours for “research” and basic drafting and documentation work. 

    As technology improves, arbitrations and commercial litigations will continue to become more and more efficient and cost-effective.  

    In the future, technology and AI , through objective cost-benefit analysis, will help businesses assess whether it is worth fighting a case or merely settling a case through mediations. 

    The possibilities are endless. 

    You’ve worked on cases spanning sectors from fintech to renewable energy. How has this diverse exposure shaped your approach to problem-solving, especially in legal situations requiring cross-sectoral knowledge and multi-jurisdictional strategies?  

    This is another major advantage of starting off your legal career in law firms. You get to work with a diverse set of clients from various sectors. Legal solutions cannot always be black and white. A solution should be practical and enforceable. To be enforceable, they must account for practical realities. To understand these practical realities, it is important to understand the nature and characteristics of the business and the sector that you are dealing with. 

    Exposure to a diverse set of clients and sectors provides much needed agility and flexibility that is required in today’s world of technological and socio-economic disruptions.  

    You have represented clients in high-stakes disputes across various forums, including the Supreme Court and High Courts. What advice would you give young lawyers aspiring to excel in the legal field?

    Getting the basic habits right very early on in your career is most essential. Be disciplined, have a good work ethic and be an eager learner. Keep yourself up to date with the latest laws, regulations and judgments. 

    Particularly, young lawyers should note that legal drafting is one of the most difficult skills to acquire. And this skill comes only through practice. So, take up as much drafting work as you can early on. If you are good at drafting, you will eventually get noticed. 

    As a lawyer, the art of using language is your main weapon. As they say, the pen is mightier than the sword. This is your bazooka! So, hone it as much as you can. 

    Importantly, young lawyers should be aware that there will be a lot of ups and downs early on in their careers. So, keep your chins up, always find time to unwind and have a good time. Meet friends often and shut off work once or twice a week. 

    What hobbies or passions do you pursue outside of your legal career, and how do they help you unwind and maintain a healthy work-life balance?

    I am a cricket fanatic. However, it is difficult to gather a group of friends all the time to play. So, squash is something I have been playing frequently. I also try and ensure that I put in at least 4-5 rigorous work out sessions in a week. Being physically fit goes a long way in reducing the mental stress at work. It also helps in keeping negativity at bay and getting the positive juices flowing.

    Apart from this, I like listening to music and watching shows and movies on OTT platforms. 

    Having a good work life balance is the most important. No point working hard and for that extra bonus, if at the end of the day, you do not feel mentally and physically at ease. 

    Work smart, play hard and try and get sufficient down time. 

    Get in touch with Siddharth Ratho-

  • “The legal profession grants creative and financial freedom, but true success comes when one learns to focus on enhancing their lawyering skills without indulging in comparisons.” – Rishi Raj Sharma, Advocate-on-Record at the Supreme court of India and Founder of Law Chambers of Rishi Raj Sharma.

    “The legal profession grants creative and financial freedom, but true success comes when one learns to focus on enhancing their lawyering skills without indulging in comparisons.” – Rishi Raj Sharma, Advocate-on-Record at the Supreme court of India and Founder of Law Chambers of Rishi Raj Sharma.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    What inspired you to pursue a career in law, and how did you begin your journey in this field? What motivated you to establish your own practice in 2016, and what challenges did you face in the initial stages?

    Belonging to the family of civil servant, I was influenced by prominent members of legal fraternity who were family acquaintances. When I was around 9-10 years old, my father pursued LLB course from Agra University (though he never practised), which gave me access to judicial precedents that I used to read as bed-time stories. Being academically inclined, I was pursuing the IIT-dream, when I came across Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mocking Bird, which fructified my decision to pursue law. 

    My parents readily agreed to allow me to pursue law with the condition that I get admitted to one of the top law schools. I missed NLSUI-Bangalore seat by a whisker. However, I got selected in almost all other top law schools in country, but decided to join ILS Law College-Pune. During my five-years at law school, I worked hard on academics as well as all extra-curricular and sports activities. During college vacations, I did my internships with law firms, senior advocates, and high court judges for my all-round development as a complete lawyer.

    With an initial focus on work-discipline, I joined Remfry & Sagar, where I had an illustrious career for nearly five years. My memorable tenure at Remfry & Sagar taught my punctuality and sharpened my comprehension skills, which I feel are the key essentials for every good lawyer. Thereafter, for short periods, I joined few other legal offices, law firms, senior advocates, etc. to learn court-craft and get an exposure on the variety of work on offer in the market, and then, I set up my own chamber practice in the year 2016. With my experience, I advise that in our country, the legal profession is structured in a manner that one gets complete creative and financial freedom for work and growth only in self-owned law-firm/chamber practice. However, being a first-generational lawyer, the biggest initial challenge that I faced was handling clients and sometimes the lack of them. My advice to every aspiring and young lawyer is to not indulge in comparative analysis, and instead focus on enhancing the lawyering skills, and success will follow.  

    How did your time working with former Solicitor General Mr. Ranjit Kumar and former Additional Solicitor General Mr. Sanjay Jain shape your legal acumen? Can you share some insights from your time working with them?

    Both these two gentlemen are God’s men, and my two gurus, and legal legends in the true spirit. They have completely different lawyering kills and court-craft, but humbleness and kindness are common to them. When you spend long hours with someone together, especially your teacher/guru, a special bond develops with them. My life is deeply indebted to both of them in a lot many ways. Having worked elaborately with both of them, I say that Ranjit Kumar sir has an orthodox teacher-pupil like approach, where for gaining true knowledge, one has to first completely surrender and unlearn everything. Whilst Sanjay sir has a rather modernized approach, to teach and learn at the same time. 

    Can you share some insights and experiences from handling high-profile cases like Lajpat Nagar Bomb Blast case or the 2G scam?

    My third guru, Uttam Datt sir has taught me that all cases are equally important. The nature of court forum and the nature/gravity of the case should neither cause anxiety/over-keenness, nor deserve any special attention/concession. I do my best in every case and opportunity that lands at my door step. It is the small steps we take on daily basis that prepares us for the one large big step. Certainly, Rome was not built in a day. In my short career of fifteen years, God has been kind enough to provide me the opportunity to be associated with several high-profile cases defining legal jurisprudence in the country. I am grateful to Sanjay Jain sir for providing me with the opportunity to be involved in several high-profile cases such Lajpat Nagar Bomb Blast, 2G scam, and Antrix-Devas. All high-profile cases come with the baggage of voluminous court records and long-sitting hours. The happiness and satisfaction achieved by success obtained in these high-profile cases has no bounds and cannot be measured. 

    What are the unique responsibilities and challenges of being an Advocate-on-Record at the Supreme Court of India? Could you describe a typical day in your life as an Advocate-on-Record, and how do you manage the demands of such a prestigious and demanding role?

    Being an Advocate-on-Record at Supreme Court of India is a prestigious designation for any lawyer. We must understand that Supreme Court is the final frontier for all litigation disputes, and therefore, the biggest responsibility and challenge faced is to meet the expectation of clients. With the court hearings being conducted via hybrid mode – physically/virtually, and considerable infrastructure development, appearing before the Court has been made easier for the lawyers as well as the litigants. However, for listing of the case, one has to coordinate with the Registry, which since past few months has not been functioning at optimal level. Though the silver lining in the dark clouds is that some changes are lined-up, and we can expect things to improve in near future. 

    My chamber-practice is very structured and organized. Having an efficient and loyal clerk like Anand-ji helps.  We are planned/prepared in all our cases a week before the court-date, courtesy which I am able to appear before two-three different courts in a day. In my initial days of practice, I would be working 15-16 hours a day. However, things have changed post-COVID. Now, as opposed to the general practice of law chambers starting work post 4:00 pm, I start my work day at 7:30 am, and try to finish the major drafting work by 9:30 am. Courts are attended to from 10am to 4:30pm. The time available between court hearings is spent on reading case files, legal research, client meetings, etc. After court hours, 5:00pm to 6:30pm is spent on preparing for the next day or some client meetings. Unless there are some urgent pressing work commitments, I do not attend to any office work after 7:00pm. On a daily basis, 30 minutes is specially dedicated on reading the latest judicial precedents as bed-time reading.   

    As a legal advisor to media companies and projects like the documentary series “HUNT FOR THE INDIAN MUJAHIDEEN”, how do you balance creative freedom with legal compliance?

    Contrary to popular belief, the only role lawyers play in media and corporate houses is to red flag possible legal hurdles and issues, and suggest ways to avoid any hurdles/issues by making changes in the document, script, characterization, dialogues, nature of depiction / representation, drafting / vetting agreements/ NOCs / disclaimers etc. with the objective of retaining the creative freedom for the artists, who are essentially your clients. The final outlook of the visual content created and the market reception of the same is not in domain of the lawyer, whose job is to be handle and avoid all legal objections / possible legal objections from all sections of the society. This is relatively easier for fictional works, but for documentary works a lot of time is spent verifying the sources, whilst the problematic areas from lawyer perspective are inspirational works and biographical works.   

    Outside of your legal career, what hobbies or interest do you pursue, and how do they help you maintain a work-life balance?

    Litigation practice is a full-time job and serious work. I do not get time for pursuing hobbies and interests. I am immensely fond of reading and playing chess, but it has been a decade since I read a novel or played chess at club-level. All my days are structured and planned about a fortnight in advance. Whatever limited time I get from work, I spend with my family and go out for shopping, movies, social gatherings, temple visits, picnics, long-walks, sports, vacations, etc. During winters, I do play sports like badminton, cricket, and hockey at club-level. As a rule, I keep one day a week exclusively for family. I do cook once a week, which calms my mind.  

    Are there any specific legal reforms or policy changes you are passionate about advocating for, based on your experience in the field?

    My litigation practice is diverse to include civil, corporate and criminal matters, both at original and appellate levels. I strongly believe that the drastic changes need to be made in the judicial system to make it speedier. Justice delayed is Justice denied. We need more competent Judges at District Court level. All civil and criminal trials should be done on day-to-day basis. All cases should be processed chronologically. Hefty costs should be imposed for seeking adjournments. There are numerous judgements by Supreme Court and High Courts on this issue, but in ground reality, things still move at snail pace. 

    What trends do you foresee shaping the future of legal practice in India, and how are you preparing your firm to stay ahead of these trends?

    I feel law firm practice will be way forward. However, independent counsels / people with small chamber-practice will never be out of work. The focus is to keep enhancing the lawyering skills on daily basis. People with top skills are never out of work, be it in any field.  

    As someone with significant experience, how do you approach mentorship and leadership within your firm and broader legal community? What advice would you give to young aspiring lawyers who are just starting their legal careers and looking to make significant impact in the field?

    At this stage, mentorship are big shoes for me to fill. In the past, I have visited quite a few colleges to share my experience with the students. I am accessible to all young lawyers for guidance and advise, and many of them do consult me from time to time. My general advice to everyone aspiring to be a litigation lawyer is to keep head down, learn, work, and be patient for at least 8-10 years. As opposed to other professions, the legal profession requires considerable maturity, compassion, and years of skill and learning. I would suggest them to not compete with anyone or to do comparative analysis or to be influenced by social media influencers, and rather they must try to be a person with substance, and an empty noisy vessel.  

    Get in touch with Rishi Raj Sharma-