Super Lawyer

Tag: Interview

  • “Intellectual Property and Technology Law don’t exist in isolation; they constantly evolve with developments in innovation, economics, and ethics.” – Anushka Sachdev, Technology, Privacy and Data protection Lawyer at Timelex, Belgium.

    “Intellectual Property and Technology Law don’t exist in isolation; they constantly evolve with developments in innovation, economics, and ethics.” – Anushka Sachdev, Technology, Privacy and Data protection Lawyer at Timelex, Belgium.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Was law always your calling, or did your inclination toward it develop over time? How did NLU Delhi shape this perspective?

    I’ve always been drawn to problem-solving and the interplay between logic, language, and human behaviour. Law became my chosen path when I realised how deeply it shapes innovation, access, and justice in society. My inclination toward it certainly matured over time, especially during my years at National Law University, Delhi, which provided a rich interdisciplinary environment. My fellowships and research at the Centre for Innovation, Intellectual Property and Competition (CIIPC), Centre for Communication Governance (CCG) and seminar courses on Copyright, Technology law allowed me to explore privacy and digital technology law issues at a time when India was reimagining its digital landscape. Those experiences confirmed that my calling lay in technology and intellectual property law, where law meets innovation and ethics.

    How did you pursue your Master’s at MIPLC and how would you contrast it with the Indian legal education system?

    Pursuing an LL.M. at the Munich Intellectual Property Law Center (MIPLC) was both an academic and personal milestone. The admission process was highly competitive, involving a strong academic record, professional experience, motivation statement, and recommendations. What drew me to MIPLC was its small class size and its unique structure that provided a  comparative perspective on both U.S. and European Union (EU) laws, reflecting the program’s international orientation. By engaging with both systems side by side, the curriculum encourages students to develop a comparative analytical mindset, preparing them to navigate transnational IP, technology  and competition issues effectively. It offers an intense, research-driven curriculum jointly administered by the Max Planck Institute, University of Augsburg, Technical University of Munich, and George Washington University Law School. The experience was transformative- MIPLC’s international cohort fostered rigorous dialogue and cross-cultural exchange. 

    What drew you to specialize in Intellectual Property and Technology law, and how do you see this area evolving?

    My interest in IP and technology law grew organically during my undergraduate years, when I encountered the ethical and regulatory challenges that accompany innovation. During my LL.M. at the Munich Intellectual Property Law Center (MIPLC), I began exploring how IP interacts with emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence, data-driven innovation, and digital platforms. My master thesis on “Challenges in accessing data for AI training and solutions” sparked a deep interest in the legal frameworks governing data, algorithms, and innovation.

    This experience broadened my focus from traditional IP concepts like copyright and trademarks to the broader ecosystem of data protection, AI governance, and digital regulation. Upon returning to practice, I realized that the core principles of IP i.e. balancing innovation and access also underpin technology and data law. Working in Brussels further reinforced this transition, as I began advising on GDPR, EU AI Act, DSA, and Data Act issues. Today, I view technology law as an extension of my IP foundation where innovation meets accountability, and creativity meets compliance.

    Having worked across data protection, AI governance, and IP transactions, I’ve seen how these fields are converging. The coming years will see the EU AI Act, Data Act, and similar frameworks globally setting new precedents for accountability and fairness in innovation. Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDPA), 2023 aligns India’s privacy regime more closely with global standards like the GDPR while maintaining a strong focus on digital sovereignty. Alongside it, the proposed Digital India Act aims to modernize India’s tech regulation framework by replacing the two-decade-old IT Act, addressing emerging issues such as AI governance, platform accountability, and online safety in the evolving digital economy.

    What were the most valuable learnings from working with top-tier Indian firms early in your career?

    At Luthra & Luthra, I had the opportunity to work on a diverse range of matters from pharmaceutical and IP litigation to entertainment/media law. These formative years taught me the importance of precision and adaptability. I learned to approach complex regulatory issues strategically by balancing legal compliance with commercial pragmatism.

    A particularly impactful experience was challenging a government notification before the Indian Supreme Court, where I saw firsthand how constitutional principles intersect with regulatory frameworks. Another  was before the Bombay High Court when I delved into the complex interplay of rights of copyright owners, authors and copyright societies from Indian as well as international perspectives, specifically in respect of musical works and associated literary works included in a cinematograph film/sound recording. These experiences built a strong foundation in analytical thinking and advocacy, which continues to shape my approach today. 

    What motivated you to pursue an international career, and how did you navigate the transition between systems and cultures?

    An international career was both an aspiration and a natural progression of my academic and professional interests. Technology law is inherently global as data, AI, and digital technology transcends borders. My LL.M. in Germany exposed me to European frameworks like GDPR, EU Copyright law etc. which complemented my Indian experience and opened the path to working in Brussels.

    The transition came with challenges and navigating different legal systems, cultures, and languages required adaptability and openness. But it also offered invaluable perspective. Working across jurisdictions has deepened my understanding of comparative legal systems and helped me develop a nuanced, culturally sensitive advisory style. The key was staying curious, proactive, and empathetic. 

    How do you apply your experience at Timelex, particularly in EU projects on e-health, privacy, and robotics?

    At Timelex, my work involves drafting data processing, data sharing, licensing and material transfer agreements, and advising clients on data protection, data governance, artificial intelligence (AI) and other technology laws. It also involves conducting Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs), interpreting evolving instruments like the EU AI Act and other Data laws.  I also advise on European Commission projects in areas such as e-health, privacy, and AI, ensuring that innovation aligns with ethical and legal standards. This inter alia involves collaborating with multidisciplinary teams of researchers, engineers, and policymakers.

    My prior experience at Pierstone and Indian firms allows me to bring a comparative, practical lens understanding not only how regulation operates in theory but also how it can be implemented effectively across complex ecosystems. The intersection of AI, data, and health law is particularly exciting as it represents the future of responsible innovation.

    What advice would you offer to aspiring IP and technology law professionals?

    My first piece of advice would be to embrace the intersectionality of this field. Intellectual Property and Technology Law don’t exist in isolation; they constantly evolve with developments in innovation, economics, and ethics. To truly excel, it’s important to cultivate not only legal expertise but also an understanding of how technology works, why businesses innovate, and what drives policymaking. Reading beyond the law, especially in areas like data science, policy, and philosophy, helps you see the bigger picture.

    I’d also recommend engaging with practical experiences early: intern with technology firms, policy think tanks, or tech companies to understand how law operates on the ground. Writing and publishing are equally valuable as they force you to clarify your thinking and build visibility in the field.

    To stay updated, I find resources like the European Data Protection Board (EDPB), WIPO Magazine, and Max Planck Institute’s IP & Innovation reports incredibly insightful. Subscribing to newsletters such as Euractiv’s Digital Brief, or IAPP’s Daily Dashboard can also help keep you ahead of regulatory changes.

    How do you maintain work–life balance and manage mental health in a demanding field?

    For me, work-life balance is about creating intentional pauses. Law can be all-consuming, especially in high-stakes, intellectually demanding areas like technology regulation. Balance begins with discipline and self-awareness. I make it a point to structure my day, prioritize deep work, and set realistic goals instead of trying to do everything at once. I also ensure I take time to disconnect-reading, travelling, hiking, social dancing or simply spending time outdoors helps me reset and gain perspective.. 

    My background in classical dance has been especially grounding. Dance instilled in me mindfulness, rhythm, and patience, all of which translate beautifully into professional life. It reminds me that growth is a gradual, continuous process rather than a race. 

    Maintaining a structured routine, regular exercise, and mindfulness practices has been crucial. I also believe in fostering open conversations around mental health within the profession. Law can be high-pressure, but acknowledging that and creating supportive networks whether through mentorship or peer discussions makes a huge difference.

    Get in touch with Anushka Sachdev –

  • “In litigation, you may not win every matter, but if your effort and ethics remain uncompromised, growth is inevitable.” – Kartik Rai, Associate Partner at Rai & Rai Partners, Law Offices.

    “In litigation, you may not win every matter, but if your effort and ethics remain uncompromised, growth is inevitable.” – Kartik Rai, Associate Partner at Rai & Rai Partners, Law Offices.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Sir, you’ve built a distinguished career in litigation and dispute resolution over the past nine years. What initially drew you toward advocacy, and how did your early experiences shape your understanding of courtroom dynamics and the art of persuasion?

    Since childhood, I was quite clear that I wanted to pursue litigation, my father was into it, so the courtroom atmosphere was something I grew up around. When I began working with Mr. Sanjay Jain, Senior Advocate and former ASG, I truly learned what advocacy means in practice. He never lost his calm, even in the most charged hearings, and always looked for a balanced, midway approach to convince the judge rather than taking an extreme stand.

    I remember during the AgustaWestland bail matter, where Senior Advocates namely Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Mr. Dayan Krishnan, and Mr. Mohit Mathur appeared for the Petitioners and Mr. Jain argued with remarkable composure, relying purely on law and facts, and still managed to persuade the court. That experience taught me that true advocacy lies not in volume, but in conviction, clarity, and restraint and values that continue to guide me in every case I handle today.

    You began your professional journey handling complex Money Laundering and UAPA cases. How did working on such intricate and high-stakes matters early in your career influence your legal reasoning, discipline, and approach to strategy building?

    Working on complex matters like Money Laundering and UAPA cases early on really shaped the way I approach law. These matters required a lot of in-depth research, especially since UAPA was a relatively new statute at the time. It pushed me to understand the law from its roots and build arguments around evolving interpretations. When you deal with such intricate issues early in your career, you naturally develop a strong grip on smaller issues later. It also taught me the importance of being thorough, disciplined, and strategic because in high-stakes cases, every detail counts.

    From assisting on landmark public law cases to now leading high-value commercial and arbitration disputes, how would you describe your evolution as a litigator and the key experiences that have shaped your professional philosophy?

    It’s been quite a journey. Starting with landmark public law cases gave me a strong foundation in constitutional principles and the importance of fairness and accountability in governance. Those early experiences taught me how every case, no matter how big or small, impacts real people and public institutions.

    As I moved into commercial and arbitration matters, I began to see litigation from a different lens, one that focuses more on strategy, precision, and practical outcomes for clients. Leading high-value disputes has helped me evolve from just being a researcher and drafter to someone who can think on their feet, anticipate the other side’s moves, and guide a team toward a clear strategy.

    Overall, I’d say my professional philosophy has been shaped by a balance of both the patience and purpose I learned from public law, and the structure and strategy that commercial litigation demands.

    You’ve represented several major PSUs in significant commercial disputes and arbitrations. Could you share one particularly challenging matter that stands out to you and how you approached its resolution both strategically and practically?

    One matter that really stands out was an arbitration where I represented BSNL against a Malaysian company, which was being represented jointly by a Singapore-based firm and an Indian law firm. The case arose from BSNL inviting Expressions of Interest (EOI) for associations with external agencies to generate revenue from mobile-based advertising and other related value-added services.

    It was a complex and challenging case, both in terms of technical issues and cross-jurisdictional coordination. Despite the odds, we not only successfully defended BSNL’s interests but also secured a favorable award on our counterclaim. It was a deeply satisfying outcome because it required meticulous strategy, detailed preparation, and consistent teamwork. That case, among many others, reinforced my belief that in arbitration, success comes from preparation, clarity, and persistence.

    Your practice spans arbitration, land acquisition, and commercial litigation. What aspects of arbitration do you find most intellectually stimulating, and how do you view the future of institutional arbitration in India and abroad?

    I find construction arbitration particularly stimulating, as it involves complex commercial and technical issues, often requiring a deep understanding of contracts, timelines, and project execution. Both in India and abroad, construction arbitration is witnessing significant growth, and I believe this field is emerging as a major area of practice.

    Regarding institutional arbitration, the future looks very promising. The Government of India has taken several steps to strengthen the dispute resolution framework and promote Ease of Doing Business, including legislative interventions to improve the enforcement of contracts. The Department of Legal Affairs is considering further amendments to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, aimed at boosting institutional arbitration, reducing court intervention, and ensuring timely conclusion of proceedings. Additionally, the Ministry of Finance has issued an Office Memorandum promoting institutional arbitration specifically for CPSEs, PSBs, and Government companies, which further reinforces the emphasis on structured and efficient dispute resolution.

    Overall, I see arbitration evolving into a more efficient, structured, and internationally aligned system, which is exciting both professionally and intellectually.

    Having represented both PSU and private clients, what key differences have you observed in their approach to dispute resolution, and how do you tailor your strategies accordingly?

    With a PSU, arbitration is often treated as a formal, drawn‑out process, the state backing, lesser commercial urgency and internal culture mean delays are tolerated and mediation is increasingly preferred. 

    On the other hand, a private client is driven by commercial pressures to resolve disputes faster, uses institutional or international arbitration, and tends to keep the process aggressive and time‑sensitive.

    A PSU often treats arbitration as a background process because of government backing, less commercial urgency and internal culture, employees may be less alert to the complexities of documentation or fast invocation, and the dispute may be allowed to drag. In contrast, a private client is typically more commercially focused, more proactive about documentation and procedural steps, and more driven to resolve quickly (to free up capital, reduce cost and preserve relationships).

    Reflecting on your journey from interning at top firms to independently arguing complex matters, what have been some defining challenges or turning points in your career, and what guiding principle has consistently kept you motivated?

    In my early years, after leaving the office of the Ld. ASG and joining my father’s practice, I was asked to argue a criminal appeal before the Hon’ble Supreme Court. I contended that since the medical report did not show ‘grievous hurt’, the title to Section 326A IPC – which refers to ‘grievous hurt by use of acid’ – meant that the injury must necessarily be grievous and hence 326A should not apply. 

    Ultimately, the Hon’ble Supreme Court in *Maqbool v. State of U.P. (2018) held that “merely because the title to Section 326A of the IPC speaks about grievous hurt by use of acid, it is not a requirement under the section that the injuries caused should be invariably grievous.” 

    The Court overruled the earlier decisions of the Rajasthan and Madras High Courts on that point. 

     As a result, the judgment became reportable and serves as a leading precedent on the interpretation of Sections 326A and 326B.

    What has consistently kept me motivated and is a simple guiding principle is that there’s no substitute for hard work and integrity. In litigation, you may not win every matter, but if your effort and ethics remain uncompromised, growth is inevitable.

    Finally, what advice would you offer to law students and young advocates who aspire to build a strong foundation in litigation and arbitration? Are there any specific skills, resources, or habits you believe are vital for excelling in this field, especially in arbitration practice?

    For young lawyers who aspire to excel in arbitration and litigation, mastery of the fundamentals such as building a strong foundational knowledge in your chosen domain and sharpening your legal drafting and writing skills is indispensable. But beyond that, the focus must also be on developing the art of cross‑examination: understanding how to ask the right question, lead a witness, expose inconsistencies, and maintain control of testimony in real time. A successful career in litigation (and in arbitration where witness examination still matters) demands consistent learning, relentless hard work, resilience in the face of setbacks, sharp critical thinking, and above all, patience. By combining these competencies, rigorous preparation, adept cross‑examination, and steady professional growth, you set yourself apart in both domestic and global arenas.

    How do you maintain a balance between your professional commitments and personal life? What are some hobbies or activities that help you unwind and manage stress during demanding times?

    Over the years, I’ve realised that staying committed to one’s personal life actually helps you excel professionally. It’s the support and presence of family and friends, along with those timely meetups, that keep you grounded and refreshed allowing you to return to work with renewed focus and energy.

    Managing stress has indeed become a major concern in the legal profession, and it’s important not to let it take a toll on our health. I make it a point to take out time to play badminton regularly, and I also ensure that I participate in the sports activities organised by our Bar Associations from time to time. These moments of recreation really help me unwind and maintain a healthy balance between work and life.

    Get in touch with Kartik Rai –

    LinkedIn

  • “The importance of legal scholarship can be seen not only in academic growth but also through a positive change in law.” – Shivani Vij, Advocate-on-Record, Supreme Court of India.

    “The importance of legal scholarship can be seen not only in academic growth but also through a positive change in law.” – Shivani Vij, Advocate-on-Record, Supreme Court of India.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Your academic journey from graduating at the top of your class at NLIU Bhopal to completing the BCL at Oxford on a Chevening Scholarship has been exceptional. How have these contrasting academic environments shaped your legal reasoning and influenced your professional practice?

    My graduation at NLIU was an intense five-year trimester. NLIU was heavily student run, and this gave me the confidence to take charge. I was at the helm of co-curricular activities, in addition to academia. It also gave me space to grow as a young law student and have an opinion for the first time on anything contemporary or legal.

    NLIU will always feel like home, and I am proud of the strong foundation it gave me, but perhaps it faces the same challenge of the Indian legal education in its narrow/ low focus on independent research and writing. I strongly believe that a system that focuses on application of law and encourages research rather than exams may be better suited for litigation. Part of the problem is a dearth of practitioners as teachers in Indian law schools, unlike med schools. This is extremely relevant for procedural subjects.

    So, while I was at the top of my class in NLIU, I found myself at the bottom of my cohort in Oxford. BCL’s perspective on what a good essay should look like was very different from mine. Clarity of thought was given utmost priority. And though this sounds basic, I began viewing the ability to begin with a proposition of law, develop an argument and reason it out, a skill worth developing. Only later I realised this also reflected a good draft of a synopsis of a Special Leave Petition in the Supreme Court. Another area where the BCL broadened my perspective was comparative law. Many cases in the Supreme Court deal with constitutional challenges and look outside the Indian law, such as in anti-discrimination and administrative law. 

    The time spent by practitioners in teaching full time courses; for instance, Kings Counsels in the UK is also a big advantage. They regularly take out time for closed group discussions with two-three students and give individual attention to each essay. This interaction is truly phenomenal. 

    One last thing that I continue to reap the benefits of is the Oxford community. My friends at the programme are very dear to me and the university did everything to make this happen. Most of them, who went on to become barristers and solicitors, are still in touch with me and we often share our work experiences in the midst of remembering our time at the university. On the lighter side, the joy of studying in a Hogwarts styled city, with a library at every corner, and the beautifully designed lush green colleges, is simply unparallelled.

    Not many people start their litigation career with government practice. How was it working in the chamber of an Additional Standing Counsel at the Delhi High Court, very early in your career?

    I worked with Adv. Gautam Narayan (now a designated senior) for about two and a half years, when he was on the Delhi Govt panel. My experience in his chamber was very enriching, yet very demanding. The sheer volume of work one is expected to handle at a government chamber overwhelms you. And dealing with government departments for instructions each day can be very time consuming, with their usual red tape. Few other things that come handy with a government panel is to face constant flak from judges for the slow pace of work, not filing responses promptly etc.

    However, often less spoken about, is the ability to drive change and enable relief as a government counsel, which makes the job fulfilling. Not all cases are adversarial and many times the Court asks for assistance from government lawyers to reach authorities and implement orders. Cases on prison reform, bonded labour and environment protection are best examples of this. As part of the chamber, we were able to facilitate good green work in the Delhi Ridge and played a part in implementing the Delhi School Education Act.

    I consider myself extremely lucky to find a chamber like this and a boss like him, who taught me two simple yet difficult qualities of grit and discipline, that I carry with me till date. 

    Having worked with some of the most respected Senior Advocates and been involved in landmark cases, what have been your most formative learnings from chambers practice at the Supreme Court level?

    Today, the Supreme Court today is not just a constitutional Court but has taken the colour of a Court of Appeal with over twenty statutes with direct appeals from tribunals. To add to this, the bread and butter of a Supreme Court lawyer are special leave petitions which keep the Court fairly occupied. 

    I believe, to have a voice in such a busy appellate court, four things are important: 

    • A good draft is half the battle won.
    • A question of law gives you good ground to argue.
    • Pointed answers to queries makes the Court’s job easy.
    • Integrity goes a long way. Admitting the weakness in your case makes you more amenable to the Court.

    Though the Supreme Court largely remains a senior driven court, a young lawyer who can put her point across in a crisp manner, gauge the reaction of the bench and respond accordingly, can do very well.

    What motivated you to establish your own practice, and what initial hurdles did you face in doing so? What vision did you have for your independent practice from the outset?

    When I left Khaitan in 2018 and moved to litigation, my goal was to become an arguing counsel and have my own chamber someday. The power of a good counsel and her ability to move the bench attracted me. This came from my short stint at the Bombay High Court as part of the Khaitan IP team. 

    I started litigation in Delhi but struggled with its pace and uncertainty of work. The procedural paraphernalia to filing cases also irritated me as a junior. However, on most good days and some bad days, the goal remained firm. Once I stood at the podium and was able to have a conversation with the judge, I felt powerful. Even thought to myself, this is why I joined law school. I thoroughly enjoyed working in both my previous chambers, but I very much looked forward to arguing my own matters and the choice of going independent seemed inevitable. 

    In the last couple of years, I began taking up my own work. Initially, the work was sporadic and low paying, but slowly it’s picking up. A big decision was to decide the right time to take up an office space and keep a clerk. As significant recurrent costs for a young lawyer, this is an important decision to make.

    I must add that Gopal Sir & Haripriya Ma’am (senior advocates), who I worked with for over three years, have been instrumental in this journey. Not only did they help me with my initial cases, but also gave me opportunities to argue in the Supreme Court, even against senior advocates. Their trust and support in my moments of doubt continues to push me to do better. It also reminds me that someone with similar experiences and struggles came through with flying colours, and so can I. A good mentor is your best resource.

    At VIJ Law Offices, your matters span a wide legal spectrum from objecting to claim withdrawals in insolvency proceedings to criminal appeals from convictions and service matters. How do you manage such a diverse caseload, and which case has been the most intellectually or strategically demanding for you?

    As a (very) young chamber, I have tried to cultivate a practice with a wide range of civil and criminal cases. Partly, this stems from my exposure in my previous chambers to a comprehensive range of vires challenge, service law, company matters, land acquisition matters, arbitration, you name it. Soon enough, I gained the confidence to build arguments for any new point of law for any new case. Another factor which played a role is the stage of my career. Right now, I feel I should say ‘yes’ to each and every matter, without the worry of being branded a commercial or a criminal lawyer. A jack of all trades might not be a master of none for young lawyers.

    In my experience, criminal matters such as appeals from convictions, death sentence and bail, though not the most lucrative, require the most amount of work. Since they affect life and liberty of citizens, I find them the most laborious and emotionally challenging. The most intellectually demanding area, however, remains constitutional law. I have been fortunate to work on a spectrum of constitutional issues spanning from reservation law and parliamentary privileges to abrogation of Article 370. Though the interpretation of the Constitution is similar to a statute, but the basis of challenge of an amendment is entirely different and rests on the basic structure doctrine. The process of understanding the history of our Constitution, discerning the basic structure, and testing a constitutional amendment against it is both invigorating and challenging. Once you’ve done this, you may encounter an entirely different constitutional issue next time, such as the one concerning the CEC appointment – can the Courts fill a vacuum that arises due to inaction by the Parliament under the Constitution?  

    You’ve contributed actively through writings in The Hindu, Oxford blogs, and the NLUD Journal. What role do you believe legal scholarship plays in shaping both jurisprudence and public understanding/ change of the law?

    Immense importance. Writing is thinking, and I wish I had started before. As lawyers, we must acknowledge that articulation is our biggest asset. 

    As they say, laws are as good as the people implementing them, and lawyers have a big role to play here. With a firsthand experience of how matters are argued, how legislations work and courts interpret them, we can contribute to legal scholarship with our practical experience. Sr. Adv. Datar’s short articles on Article 14 are a great example of clarity and knowledge that comes with experience. 

    Writing also contributes greatly to drafting a good petition. Though journal publications are more valuable for their in-depth research, writing for newspapers has taught me the art of putting things simply. 

    The importance of legal scholarship can be seen not only in academic growth but also through a positive change in law. The Supreme Court in Navtej Singh (decriminalising homosexuality) and Lt. Col. Nishtha (permanent commission) was influenced by academic writings on indirect discrimination/ disparate impact and developed this as new dimensions of equality under Art. 14. Any new challenge on discrimination would now examine the disparate impact of a gender neutral provision on a particular group of the society.

    Clearing the Advocate-on-Record examination is a commendable feat. What responsibilities accompany this designation, and how has it influenced your litigation strategy and client engagement?

    Thank you. On a lighter note, I am very glad about my AOR results because the exam reminded me how difficult it is to sit down with a pen and paper for 3 hours, in the fear of time running out and the possibility of not making it through as a lawyer with 5-6 years of practice. The fear is real!!

    In my opinion, an Advocate-on-Record is very valuable, both for the client and the court. Right from the first client interaction, to drafting and filing the petition, reasoning with the registry (the most difficult part) and appearing and arguing in the court, an AOR can be a one stop shop to see a matter through in the Supreme Court. An AOR also holds good ground with the client to suggest which senior counsel should be engaged for which kind of matters. Being an AOR also comes with great responsibility. The court holds an AOR accountable for anything regarding the matter and the party, good or bad. When a senior counsel is unable to appear or reach for a matter, the AOR may be asked to address the Court. So, an AOR can easily be said to be the most important lawyer in the Supreme Court today. 

    I must add that historically the perception of an AOR was quite different. AORs often filed matters for other lawyers, without being involved in the process. Typically, lawyers who were solicitors and not attuned to arguing in the Court also chose to be AORs. Slowly and steadily this perception is changing.

    Being an AOR has certainly contributed to my practice. Clients and fellow lawyers, who may have seen me in Court with my previous bosses, feel confident to approach me directly for new cases. I believe clients also get a sense of satisfaction that ‘one lawyer’ would handle their case till the end.

    What advice would you offer to students and young lawyers, given your diverse and global perspective? What resources or habits would you recommend to help them stay sharp and build a well-rounded legal career?

    A simple advice would be – trust your gut to choose right and then trust the process. 

    Today, law has opened many doors for young graduates besides litigation and corporate. More young lawyers are choosing tech, policy, teaching or management roles where a law degree comes handy. One should be free to choose their own path without judgement. When I decided to pursue my LLM, I was told it was a waste of time for litigation and would in fact put me behind my peers. Many corporate firms would also say so and even discount your masters’ experience altogether. Keeping all aside, I decided to pursue the LLM/ BCL in a difficult covid year and would never discount that experience or trade it elsewhere.

    Besides, something that has helped me build a well-rounded career has been teaching. I understand it may not be enjoyable for everyone, but a fresh exchange of ideas to a deep dive into law, can open our horizons like no other. Teaching a course on bail this semester has made me realise some fallacies in our system, which I wasn’t privy to or hadn’t given much thought as a lawyer.

    Lastly, a piece of advice which is more suited to the legal profession than any other is – to persevere. Whichever path one may choose, the road to a successful lawyer is a long one. While I am still on this road, I’ve realized that I have been able to overcome the difficulties I faced in my career early on. For instance, understanding the court roster, procedure, complex matters, all seemed too alien when I started practicing in 2018. There was an urge to turn to more lucrative opportunities and turn down the sweat and blood of litigation. But perseverance kept me going and hopefully gets me through.

    Get in touch with Shivani Vij –

    LinkedIn

  • “Litigation is a marathon where the efforts that one puts in during the initial years yield results in the long run.” – Ramakrishnan S, Advocate on Record and Principal Attorney at Shiva & Co. Advocates.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    What initially inspired you to pursue a career in law? Was it a personal passion or did your father’s legacy in the legal field play a defining role in shaping your decision?

    Two reasons I suppose. The first being that my father was a lawyer as well. Though I didn’t know much in my younger years about the profession, just seeing him in the blazer and robe felt classy and had a certain aura. The second was that I didn’t quite like maths and science as subjects during my schooling days so much so that after Class 10 I immediately switched to Humanities for Class 11 and 12. On a lighter note, they say ‘karma is a boomerang’. I managed to avoid anything to do with Maths and Science for a good 7 years post Class 10 but both of them resurfaced once I stepped into my legal career and have been part of my journey since courtesy the matters that I handle. 

    You took over Shiva & Co. Advocates in 2008 at just 23. How did you adapt to the challenges of leading a full-fledged law firm so early in your career, and what were the key lessons from that transition?

    Circumstances forced me to take over the firm at the age of 23. I had just completed my LL.B from University Law College, Bengaluru in mid-2007 and was on track to do my Masters in Law having secured an offer both in London School of Economics and National University Singapore. Unfortunately, I lost my father in March 2008. Shiva & Co. Advocates was my father’s baby which he had started in the year 1988 and I did not want to see it shut down because he was no more, hence I immediately took over the reins of the firm. The challenges were aplenty since I was a complete rookie with an elementary knowledge of the law and no practical experience. My father, due to his sheer hardwork and dedication had become a successful and well-known lawyer and had built up a sizable practice and the nature of matters that he worked on towards his last few years involved high value and high stakes. My first few days after taking over the firm were spent in reaching out to Clients and asking them if they wanted to continue with the firm or wanted the briefs to be returned. The exercise rendered me almost briefless since Clients understandably did not want to entrust such high value and high stake matters to a rookie Counsel. My father’s junior colleagues at the chamber had moved on post his demise. The only staff I was left with was my father’s chauffeur, court clerk and stenographer. It took some time but slowly, brick by brick, with the able assistance of my support staff, we put things together. I was fortunate enough that in a couple of months, two clients of my father, one an individual and another a company in the travel sector gave me my first briefs, one being a landlord-tenant dispute and the other a consumer matter. The faith and encouragement that they reposed in me helped me find my footing and since then there has been no looking back. One thing that I never gave up on even during those early days when I was brief less, visiting Courts and reading up on the law. In terms of lessons or learnings, I would only say that what helped me during those early years were certain key aspects – mental fortitude to run the firm, come what may, a thirst to succeed in the profession, constant reading of the law and observing matters across various Courts. I always tell my junior colleagues that for a Lawyer, his/her eyes, ears and tongue are the most important sense organs. Eyes to observe, ears to hear and tongue to voice out an appropriate response after the brain has processed all the information and the right combination of this is what creates magic in Court. 

    Your firm handles a broad spectrum of work, from civil and criminal litigation to real estate and corporate matters. How do you manage and balance these diverse practice areas while maintaining quality and consistency across them?

    It comes down to putting in place an effective strategy. Over the years, I have had the assistance of my junior colleagues at the office who have ably assisted me in my matters. The majority of them joined right out of college and have left the firm after being part of it for a considerable amount of time and are doing well for themselves. They are spread across litigation, corporate, in-house and one of them is even a Judge in the Trial Court. The moment a brief is received, a short note is prepared on the facts of the case and the issues involved by my colleagues which is followed by a preliminary discussion post which tasks are assigned. My junior colleagues, over the years, have due to their efforts, handled various stages of a case on their own be it cross-examination, final arguments or arguments on interim reliefs and I am extremely happy to see their progress. As long as the work is process driven and each member of the firm recognises his/her roles and responsibilities, quality and consistency can be maintained effectively. 

    You completed the 40-hour Mediator Training Workshop jointly conducted by OCMC, NLSIU, and ICADR. How has this training influenced your approach to dispute resolution and client management in litigation and ADR matters?

    Honestly, I did the course only because Mediation was a buzzword then. We had a good set of trainers who invested time over two days to teach us all the ins and outs of Mediation. The workshop helped in understanding the essence and effectiveness of the process if done right away. In addition, a key takeaway for me personally was that it helped in shaking off some rusty bits in my approach towards client meetings and helped in having a more nuanced approach towards the same. Considering the explosion of litigation and pendency in the Courts, Mediation is certainly a viable tool that requires a bit more than a nudge in order to make it a preferred dispute resolution mechanism. The Mediation Act and the setting up of the Mediation Association of India are steps in the right direction.

    You have been actively involved in arbitration and other ADR mechanisms. How do you perceive the growing importance of ADR in India’s legal ecosystem, and what role does it play in your firm’s overall strategy?

    Arbitration as a dispute resolution mechanism has evolved over the years. Despite periodic amendments to the law, there is still a substantial portion of the process and provisions in the Act where there is Court intervention. Some developments such as fixing a timeframe for disposal, restricting the scope for appeal etc. have helped in speeding the process to some extent, however India as a destination for Arbitration still has a long way to go. There is definitely hope though. I recently attended an Arbitration conference in Mumbai and was pleasantly surprised at the interest shown by arbitrators and academicians from outside India regarding developments related to Arbitration Law in India. Online Dispute Resolution has also taken off in a big way in India and we are seeing multiple ODR platforms opening up. The impetus for Arbitration can also be seen as recent as this month when the Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh has announced the setting up of an International Arbitration Center in Vishakapatnam. On the flipside, Arbitration is still considered as a closed door club where only the rich can have proper access to the process by engaging the top lawyers in the country. This is due to the fact that the costs involved are steep and out of reach for most small and medium businesses who as a result continue to prefer the traditional litigation route despite its anomalies. The MSME Act and the Commercial Courts Act have provided some succour to these small and medium businesses with regard to speedy disposal of disputes. ADR as mechanisms are definitely required considering the docket explosion in Courts however they do need refinement on some key aspects. 

    Clearing the Advocate-on-Record examination is a significant professional achievement. Could you share your preparation journey, the challenges faced, and how this qualification has impacted your practice at the Supreme Court?

    As is with a few events that have occurred in my life, taking up the AoR exam was on a whim since a friend of mine had also decided to take it up. Despite having a decent practice in Bangalore in all of those years, I had never set foot in the Supreme Court for any matter and it irked me to an extent. I blame myself partly for having become too comfortable with my work in Bangalore to think of expanding my horizons. The Covid-19 pandemic was the time that curiosity got the better of me and since there was not much else to do, I decided to take a crack at the exams. Considering the mandatory 1 year training had to be done during the time of the pandemic, it involved a lot of self-study and listening to lectures online. To an extent, the years of practise prior to taking up the exam also helped me greatly since I had the benefit of practical exposure in the Courts. The most important tip I would say is that one would necessarily have to practice writing regularly since each paper is 3 hours and the questions require you to write a fair bit depending on the marks allotted for each of them. Overall, if one has put in his/her time in keeping themselves updated on the law and has been observant in the Courts, it would go a long way in making the exam relatively easier. Clearing the exams certainly was a high point in my career and it opened the portals of the Supreme Court to me. I have been blessed that in a period of about 3 years of becoming an AoR, I have handled a handful of matters in the Supreme Court that I have argued myself. Having a taste of all three Courts that is Trial Court, High Court and Supreme Court has provided me with the opportunity to further sharpen my tools since each Court mandates a different manner and approach towards putting forth one’s case. 

    You have authored articles published in the Karnataka Law Journal and SCC. How do you view the importance of legal writing, publication, and thought leadership in shaping the career of a practicing advocate?

    I assume writing, teaching etc. are inevitable extensions for a lawyer. At some point, the thought of publishing one’s views on a legal issue arises. At the same time, writing heavily tests your skills in presenting your thoughts in a sublime yet easily comprehensible manner. It involves hard labour since once you’ve zeroed in on a topic, you need to sift through copious amounts of literature right from commentaries, articles, case laws, online lectures etc. and condense the same into as minimal words as possible, in simple english, without compromising on the essence of the topic. Every lawyer at some point ought to give writing a shot since it not only enhances knowledge on the subject but also provides fellow lawyers/readers with an opportunity to ponder upon and debate on the same.

    With extensive appearances before various courts, tribunals, and authorities in Bangalore, what has been one of the most challenging matters for you?

    It would be difficult to pick a single matter since each matter comes with its own set of challenges and nuances. I would admit though that once you handle a few matters on a specific area of law, the briefs that you receive thereafter become easier to handle. For any lawyer, the most challenging matter would be the first matter that he/she handles in each Court/Tribunal since each of them require different approaches right from drafting the petitions/responses to processes involved to the submissions that have to be made. The majority of the lawyers would find the first appearance/submission in Court nerve-wrecking even if it is as small as seeking an adjournment or a passover. Likewise the first full-fledged submission, be it arguments on an interim application or final arguments or the first cross-examination to be conducted would be equally challenging. 

    Having built a diverse and successful practice, what advice would you offer to young lawyers aiming to excel in litigation, real estate, or multidisciplinary legal practice while taking on leadership roles early in their careers?

    As cliché as it may sound, the profession extracts a lot out of you. It requires a lot of dedication and continuous upskilling of your craft. Litigation is a marathon where the efforts that one puts in during the initial years yield results in the long run. One must keep themselves appraised with the latest developments not only in law but events happening around the country and the world. I would recommend freshers to dabble in as many different kinds of matters that one can do in the first few years before attempting to set out on focussing on niche areas. Thousands of lawyers graduate every year hence it is necessary that you start identifying and fine-tuning your core competence and work on your shortcomings. The profession, though unforgiving, is equally rewarding over time when results will bring in the expected monetary dividends as well in addition to recognition. Occasional slip-ups are part and parcel however what matters is that you learn from them and don’t repeat it. As regards leadership roles, I would suggest that you find a good mentor/senior to guide you the first few years and then plunge into having your own practice. It is important to find a good footing before venturing on your own. While I did not have a particular person who I could call a mentor, I have vastly benefitted from observing and interacting with multiple seniors and juniors in the profession alike and this is also something that one must inculcate since healthy conversations provide you with new perspectives. 

    What is the guiding philosophy or motto that has consistently inspired you throughout your journey? How has it shaped your approach to the profession, and what vision do you hold for your future practice?

    For me Shiva & Co. Advocates is an homage to my family who have been there for me every step of the way and allows me to be focussed on my career. Having a spirit of never giving up builds that drive and focus that you need to get far in the profession. One should also have the hunger to succeed at all times and strive to be better every single day. Needless to say honesty, loyalty and integrity are a fundamental and integral part of the profession and helps you go a long way yielding long-term dividends. This profession is not a race but a marathon. These are some principles or philosophies that have helped me along the way. As for my vision for the future, I am a firm believer in taking things one day at a time and giving it my fullest, the results are a mere formality. 

    Get in touch with Ramakrishnan S –

  • “I’ve learned that the best legal solutions aren’t just technically correct : they’re commercially viable and operationally practical.” – Neha Shankar, Director Legal (Deputy General Counsel) at Innovaccer.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    You’ve led high-stakes SaaS and IT contract negotiations across jurisdictions like the US, UK, Middle East, and India. What key legal and commercial differences have you observed among these regions, particularly in structuring and negotiating complex technology agreements?                                  

    The fundamental difference is risk philosophy and regulatory approach. US contracts are heavily liability-focused with aggressive risk shifting – broad indemnities, high liability caps, and extensive IP warranties because litigation risk is real. UK/EU takes a more balanced approach with reasonable risk allocation, but GDPR fundamentally changed data processing terms and cross-border transfer requirements.

    Middle East markets are relationship-driven with conservative risk tolerance – they often require local partnerships, prefer advance payments or guarantees, and decision-making is more hierarchical. Each country varies significantly – UAE’s approach differs from Saudi Arabia’s regulatory framework.

    India is extremely cost-sensitive with detailed SLA requirements and strong data localization mandates under DPDP Act. There’s preference for Indian governing law and local arbitration venues.

    For AI and emerging tech, the differences are stark. US allows broad AI disclaimers and extensive model training rights. EU requires AI Act compliance with strict accountability for high-risk systems. The Middle East often mandates human oversight for AI decisions. India’s framework is still emerging but trending toward data sovereignty.

    My approach: Use master agreements with jurisdiction-specific addenda rather than one-size-fits-all contracts. Build modular compliance sections that adapt to local requirements. Most importantly, understand that what works in Silicon Valley often needs significant adaptation – both legally and commercially – for other markets.

    As Director-Legal (Deputy General Counsel) at Innovaccer and a close advisor to both leadership and product teams, how has your role evolved beyond traditional contract review into a more strategic business function? 

    My role has evolved from traditional lawyer to strategic business partnership. I’m now embedded with product and leadership teams from the earliest stages – helping architect compliance into product roadmaps rather than reviewing afterward, participating in M&A strategy and market expansion decisions, and turning regulatory requirements into competitive advantages. I’ve built legal infrastructure that operates at business speed through automated workflows, self-service templates, and proactive frameworks that eliminate bottlenecks. The result is measurably faster deal cycles, on-schedule product launches, and better strategic decision-making because legal insights come early in the process rather than as obstacles later. Legal has become a growth accelerator rather than a cost center.

    From negotiating complex IT contracts to managing commercial transactions, you’ve worked extensively across highly regulated sectors. How do you stay abreast of evolving legal and regulatory frameworks, particularly in areas like data privacy and technology law? What’s your approach to identifying and mitigating legal risks in such fast-paced and dynamic industries?

    Staying current in fast-moving regulatory environments requires a systematic approach, not just ad-hoc reading. I’ve built a multi-layered monitoring system that combines automated alerts, industry networks, and practical application. For regulatory tracking, I use targeted legal research platforms with custom alerts for specific jurisdictions and practice areas – data privacy updates from key regulators like FTC, state AGs, and international bodies. I also maintain relationships with specialized regulatory counsel in different jurisdictions who provide real-time insights on enforcement trends and practical legal and compliance interpretations.

    Industry engagement is equally important. I’m active in relevant legal associations and regularly attend focused conferences – not general legal events, but sector-specific gatherings where regulators actually speak and share enforcement priorities. Peer networks with other in-house counsel facing similar challenges provide invaluable practical insights you can’t get from legal publications.

    For risk identification, I’ve developed frameworks that integrate legal monitoring with business operations. I work closely with product, engineering, and business development teams to understand what’s actually being built and sold, not just what’s documented. This early visibility lets me spot regulatory risks before they become legal problems.

    My mitigation approach focuses on building scalable systems rather than case-by-case reviews. I create legal frameworks that can adapt to regulatory changes without rebuilding everything. For data privacy, this means privacy-by-design architectures that can accommodate new requirements. For commercial transactions, it means modular contract structures that can be updated efficiently.

    The key is making legal monitoring a business process, not a personal responsibility. When regulatory changes happen, we can adapt quickly because the infrastructure is already in place.

    In the early stages of your career, you worked across diverse areas like transaction structuring, energy law, employment compliance, and more. How has this multidisciplinary exposure informed your legal thinking and approach as an in-house counsel today? 

    That multidisciplinary foundation taught me to see legal issues as interconnected business problems rather than isolated practice areas. Working in energy law showed me how regulatory frameworks shape entire business models. Transaction structuring taught me to think commercially about risk allocation. Employment laws gave me an operational perspective on how legal requirements actually impact day-to-day business. Now as in-house counsel, I don’t just analyze contracts in isolation – I understand how employment terms affect deal structures, how regulatory compliance impacts transaction timelines, and how operational realities influence legal strategy. This cross-functional thinking lets me spot issues other lawyers miss and provide solutions that work across multiple business functions. Instead of saying ‘that’s not my area,’ I can connect dots between different legal domains to solve complex business challenges more effectively.

    You’ve worked closely with business stakeholders, particularly in the IT sector. What are some common challenges you encounter in ensuring legal compliance, and how can businesses proactively address these issues early in the process to avoid future roadblocks? 

    The biggest challenge is that business teams treat legal compliance as a final review step rather than a foundational design element. In commercial contracting, sales teams often negotiate terms that create operational nightmares – promising SLAs we can’t meet or data processing we can’t legally perform. On the product side, teams build features first, then discover they violate privacy laws or create IP ownership issues. My approach is embedding legal requirements upfront – I work with sales to create contract playbooks with pre-approved terms that close deals faster, collaborate with product teams during feature planning to ensure privacy-by-design, and partner with engineering on data architecture that supports both business needs and regulatory compliance. I also build automated approval workflows and self-service legal tools so teams can move at business speed without creating risks. The result is that legal becomes a competitive advantage – we can commit to terms competitors can’t, launch compliant products faster, and avoid the costly retrofitting that kills margins and delays launches.

    With over a decade of experience, what initially drew you to pursue law as a career? When you reflect on your journey now, how has your vision evolved since those early days?  

    I was initially drawn to law because I saw it as a way to solve complex problems and create structure in ambiguous situations. Early on, I thought legal work was about finding the right answer in statutes and precedents. Over the past decade, I’ve realized that the most impactful legal work happens at the intersection of law and business strategy – it’s not just about compliance, but about enabling growth and competitive advantage. My vision has evolved from being a legal expert who provides advice to being a business partner who helps drive outcomes. I’ve learned that the best legal solutions aren’t just technically correct – they’re commercially viable and operationally practical. What excites me now is using legal expertise to unlock business opportunities that others can’t see, whether that’s structuring deals that competitors can’t match or building compliance frameworks that become market differentiators. Law became less about finding answers in books and more about creating solutions that don’t exist yet.

    Recognized for your strong contributions across industries, what core values or guiding principles have anchored your legal journey? Looking ahead, what goals or aspirations do you hold for the future?  

    Ans: Three core principles have guided my legal career: pragmatic problem-solving over theoretical perfection, business enablement rather than risk avoidance, and building scalable systems instead of one-off solutions. I’ve always believed that the best legal advice is the advice that actually gets implemented – which means understanding business realities and crafting solutions that work operationally, not just legally. My approach has been to turn legal requirements into competitive advantages rather than compliance burdens. Looking ahead, I’m focused on leveraging emerging technologies like AI to transform how legal functions operate – building intelligent contract systems, predictive compliance frameworks, and automated risk assessment tools that let legal teams operate at unprecedented scale and speed. My aspiration is to help redefine what in-house legal can accomplish, moving from a support function to a strategic driver of business growth and innovation. The future of legal is about using technology and strategic thinking to solve business problems that haven’t been solvable before.

    Legal work in high-stakes corporate environments is intense. How do you balance your professional responsibilities with personal well-being? What practices or activities help you recharge and maintain perspective? 

    Honestly, I’m a natural hustler – I thrive on the intensity and challenge of high-stakes legal work. But I’ve learned that raw drive without strategy leads to burnout, not breakthrough results. The key is channeling that energy where it creates maximum impact rather than spreading it thin across everything.

    With experience, I’ve developed systems for sustainable high performance. I start my day with strategic work before reactive demands take over, and I batch similar tasks to maintain deep focus rather than constant context-switching. Outside work, I stay physically active and spend time with my dog – there’s something grounding about that unconditional companionship that cuts through legal complexity. I’m also involved in community animal welfare work, which connects me to something meaningful beyond corporate environments.

    The breakthrough insight: stepping away from legal problems often unlocks better solutions when I return. I’ve built strong professional relationships that provide perspective during intense periods, and I’ve learned to distinguish between urgent and important – not every crisis is actually critical. This lets me stay calm under pressure and direct my hustler energy where it matters most. Sustainable excellence isn’t about working harder – it’s about managing energy strategically.

    Given your wide-ranging expertise, what advice would you offer to young lawyers entering the legal profession today particularly those looking to build careers in corporate law, technology, or cross-border commercial practice? 

    Three pieces of advice: First, become genuinely business-literate, not just legally competent. Understand how companies actually make money, how technology works, and what drives commercial decisions. The lawyers who succeed long-term are those who can translate legal requirements into business solutions. Second, specialize early but stay adaptable. Pick a sector like fintech or healthcare and become the go-to expert, but develop skills that transfer across industries – contract negotiation, regulatory analysis, and strategic thinking are universal. Third, build relationships before you need them. The best opportunities come through networks, not job boards. Connect with in-house counsel, business leaders, and peers who’ll become your referral sources and collaborators. For cross-border work specifically, understand that legal expertise alone isn’t enough – you need cultural fluency and practical knowledge of how business actually gets done in different markets. Most importantly, think like a business partner from day one. Don’t just identify problems – propose solutions. The lawyers who advance fastest are those who make their clients’ lives easier, not more complicated.

    Get in touch with Neha Shankar –

  • “Courtroom practice teaches you quickly that law is not just about theory but about how you apply it in real, practical situations.” – Shubhnit Hans, Founder & Managing Partner at Hans Law Associates.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Having over a decade of experience now, what were the initial years of your practice like? What inspired you to choose law as a career, and how did law school help shape the foundation of your professional journey?

    It’s been 10 years in this profession, yet the early days feel like just yesterday, when I was practicing in Delhi and learning to navigate the world of black and white. It didn’t take long to realize that this profession is far more about practicality than pure theory. Knowing the law and mastering your case file is essential, but equally important is understanding the judge, not personally, but in terms of their courtroom approach: their patterns, reactions, and preferences. From the very beginning, I developed the habit of sitting in court and observing judges closely. That practice, simple as it may seem, has proven invaluable throughout my journey as an advocate. 

    I come from a small town in Haryana called Karnal, where I completed my schooling. After that, I pursued my law degree at Amity University, Noida. My legal journey began with a litigation office in New Delhi, where I practiced for almost four years. In 2018, I moved to Chandigarh to start my own practice. As a first-generation lawyer, it was important for me to establish my name in my hometown, where I felt more connected and grounded. It wasn’t easy, there were no set plans, and no one in my family had a legal background. It all started when a cousin suggested corporate law while I was preparing for my 12th boards in 2010. I gave the entrance exams, got selected at Amity, and the rest unfolded from there.

    You began your career as an associate, handling a wide range of civil litigation and domestic arbitration matters. How did this early exposure influence your approach to complex disputes, and what key skills proved most valuable in the formative years of your practice?

    In the initial years of my practice as an associate, I was fortunate to be exposed to a wide range of civil litigation and domestic arbitration matters. This diversity of work taught me very early on that no two disputes are ever alike. Each case requires a tailored approach in terms of a legal strategy. What shaped me the most was learning how to balance theory with practicality. The law may be uniform, but its application depends on the facts, the forum, and often the perspective of the judge or tribunal. Observing court proceedings, understanding patterns of arguments, and seeing how small details could shift the direction of a case gave me a very grounded view of dispute resolution.

    As a first-generation lawyer, what motivated you to establish your independent practice? What vision did you have when you started, and how has it evolved over time?

    As a first-generation lawyer, what motivated me most to establish my own practice was the desire to build something independent, driven purely by merit, hard work, and client trust. Starting out, I had no legacy to rely upon and that became my greatest strength. It pushed me to focus on credibility, consistency, and results from the very beginning. My initial vision was quite simple: to create a practice that delivered practical, solution-oriented advice rather than just theoretical legal opinions and dragging each and every client to Court even if it could be settled outside the court. That was when Hans Law Associates was established. Over time, that vision has evolved into building a full-service firm where teamwork, innovation, and long-term client relationships are at the core.

    You have represented clients before the Punjab and Haryana High Court, consumer forums, RERA, and various tribunals. How has this diverse litigation experience enhanced your understanding of dispute resolution across different legal platforms?

    Representing clients before the Punjab & Haryana High Court, consumer forums, RERA, and various tribunals has given me a broad perspective on how dispute resolution functions across different platforms. Each forum has its own procedure, pace, and expectations, for instance, the High Court demands sharp legal reasoning and precedent-based arguments, while consumer forums and RERA focus more on quick, pragmatic relief to aggrieved parties. Ultimately, this cross-forum exposure has made me a more versatile advocate, able to approach disputes not just from a legal standpoint, but from a strategic, client-centric perspective.

    You have handled matters before the Haryana Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority, and several other tribunals. What unique challenges have you encountered in this specialized field, and how do you navigate them effectively?

    Handling matters before the HREAT, HRERA, Pkl, and other tribunals has been both challenging and rewarding. Real estate law, especially under the RERA framework, is indeed a booming area of practice. With rapid urbanization and increasing consumer awareness, disputes in this sector are growing both in volume and complexity. The unique challenges I’ve faced include balancing the interests of buyers and developers, staying updated on any recent precedents as it is a very new law and most importantly, ensuring enforcement of orders. While RERA was designed to be consumer-friendly, practical hurdles often arise in execution. I’ve found that navigating this space requires not only sound legal knowledge but also adaptability and persistence. This blend of legal precision and pragmatic follow-through has allowed me to add real value to clients in this fast-growing field.

    As a mediator at the Punjab and Haryana High Court, how do you see ADR evolving in India? In your experience, what advantages does mediation or arbitration offer compared to traditional litigation?

    As a mediator at the Punjab and Haryana High Court, I have witnessed how Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is rapidly evolving in India. With rising pendency in courts, ADR is no longer an alternative but an essential tool for timely and effective justice.

    The recent “Mediation for the Nation” drive initiated by the Hon’ble Supreme Court reflects this growing recognition. By encouraging parties to resolve disputes amicably, the judiciary has underlined mediation’s role in reducing litigation, promoting harmony, and ensuring quicker resolutions. I myself have seen a rise in settlements after the said initiative.

    In my experience, mediation preserves relationships and empowers parties to design their own solutions, while arbitration offers efficiency, confidentiality, and subject-matter expertise. Both provide speed, practicality, and satisfaction compared to traditional litigation that may take years. With institutional support and initiatives like Mediation for the Nation, ADR in India is poised to become a truly transformative mechanism for access to justice.

    You have drafted agreements for a variety of clients, including music and production companies as well as professionals like psychologists. What key challenges do you see in the entertainment sector, and how can these be addressed proactively through careful contract drafting?

    Drafting agreements in the entertainment sector brings its own set of unique challenges. Unlike traditional contracts, these often deal with creative rights, intellectual property, royalties, confidentiality, and moral rights, all of which can be highly sensitive and prone to disputes if not defined clearly. One of the biggest challenges is the ambiguity around ownership of content, whether it lies with the creator, the producer, or the platform. Another is the lack of awareness among artists and professionals about the long-term implications of exclusivity clauses, revenue-sharing models, and termination rights. Proactive solutions lie in clear, precise, and balanced drafting. 

    What advice would you give students aspiring to enter the legal profession, and what resources would you recommend to help them stay ahead in a constantly evolving field?

    My advice to students aspiring to enter the legal profession is to focus on fundamentals and be patient enough to adapt. Courtroom practice teaches you quickly that law is not just about theory but about how you apply it in real, practical situations. Developing habits like observing proceedings, reading judgments daily, and sharpening communication skills goes a long way. It’s a never ending learning process. I see a lot of individuals backing out from the profession as it may not satisfy you monetarily but once you understand the responsibilities that come with it, I am sure we are ready to go a long way. I’d also recommend building a mentor network and learning from senior advocates and peers. In a constantly evolving field, the ability to keep learning, unlearning, and relearning is the best resource you can carry with you.

    Balancing a demanding legal career with personal life can be challenging. How do you manage stress, maintain focus during high-stakes matters, and create balance between your professional and personal responsibilities?

    Balancing a demanding legal career with personal life is indeed challenging, but I’ve learned that discipline and perspective makes the difference. During high-stakes matters, I manage stress by preparing thoroughly as confidence in your case reduces anxiety. I also practice detachment after court hours, giving time to family, fitness, and spirituality, which keeps me grounded. For me, balance isn’t about strict separation but about ensuring that both professional duties and personal responsibilities get the attention they deserve. This balance not only helps me stay focused but also makes me more effective in my practice.

    Get in touch with Shubhnit Hans –

  • “Technology today is the key source to research and development, a way by which people can now know, read, understand the aspects and issues in real estate and business transactions.” – Deepanshu Garg, Founder of Legal Assist.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    With your specialization in real estate transactions and property registration, what initially drew you to this niche area of law, and how has your interest evolved over the years?

    I have grown up in a family of lawyers, who are involved in this niche practice of law for the last 40 years. I am 4th generation in this side of practice. The environment, the discussions in family and social gatherings, watching of news roam around real estate and the law; the knowledge amongst citizens on the aspect of “how important is legal consultation before dealing in real estate transactions”; the growing real estate disputes in the family as well as in the market; the challenges faced by the citizens in the property registration process; the lack of future estate planning; etc., which gave me a good kick to enter into law, focus on this side and to scale up the practice to new boundaries.

    Through your practice, you have often highlighted the gap between property registration and ownership rights. What are the most common misconceptions people have when dealing with property transactions in India?

    From the very starting, I have strongly believed that people are unaware or ignorant of about the most important aspect when dealing with property transactions i.e. “Title Legal Due Diligence”.  This is the “laying foundation”. The money which people pay to buy a property, what exactly is that money for – is it the physical structure or the land on spot? Practically speaking, for people these are the two aspects only but wait, that value is actually weighed from “title ownership documents” which people execute and get registered. And that’s the major misconception prevailing amongst people. Even law clearly says, “Buyers beware”. If there is a discrepancy in the documents, the value you paid for that property is nothing more than a zero. 

    Another related misconception is that people believe drafting a document when dealing with property is “basic and regular and can be drafted on a set performa”, but no, there is no set performa prescribed anywhere in law. Any such document is a “contract” amongst the parties which govern their transaction and has to be drafted on case-to-case basis and on specific circumstances surrounding the entire transaction, overall considering the law.

    As the Founder of Legal Assist, a digital platform dedicated to property and business legal services, what inspired you to establish your practice, what were the key challenges you encountered in building it, and how do you envision technology transforming the future of property law practice? 

    Since many years now, the property registration appointment process has been made online, which is not only cumbersome but time taking too. It is not easy for a layman to take an appointment for registration. Further, we daily see the growing disputes arising in real estate transactions and business running. We further see the irregularities and unprofessional surroundings in the conveyancing field of practice of law.

    All this triggered me to develop an online platform where I can render my knowledge on the issues circumventing the real estate industry & transactions, property registrations, business industry & transactions, to help them and to make them cautious of their legal rights, obligations and safeguards. The major key challenges were to not be able to cover “all aspects/ issues” since they are vast in nature and the other was to actually make people believe in “what are the most important aspects” in real estate and business transactions. 

    Technology today is the key source to research and development,  a way by which people can now know, read, understand the aspects and issues in real estate and business transactions. Moreover, technology is the source to transparency and accountability, as by way of technology, things are not far away to come under one roof and better control of the government, assuring people more safety, trust and “ease of doing business”.

    Your work involves complex areas such as estate planning, inheritance, wills, and succession disputes. What are the most pressing issues clients face in matters relating to inheritance, and how do you guide them through emotionally sensitive cases?

    The most pressing issues I see are the disputes arising among the legal heirs after the death of deceased person who died intestate or without any future planning or without informing about his/ her assets to his/ her legal heirs and further, disputes arising in cases even where a deceased  left a WILL/ any other testament.

    Our approach of guidance is focussed initially on amicable settlement through mediation and consultation and if not this, by suggesting an equitable outcome, after considering the law from all four corners and the circumstances in hand, in a manner which rules out future disputes.

    Estate and succession planning is often overlooked until a dispute arises. What practical steps do you believe individuals should take early to avoid future litigation?

    Life is so uncertain these days. The most important aspect which I feel today is for a person to have a must is to initially have a broad family discussion amongst all members and align amicably whatever a person owns amongst his/ her family members. Then I believe in an equalization policy amongst members. If all the members accept this discussion, the family shall execute an Memorandum of Family Settlement incorporating the contents of such amicable understanding. Further, members, in such case or otherwise if family amicable understanding is not arrived at or possible, shall compulsorily make a testament/ WILL for writing down their wish in “clear terms” to be followed by each member after the death of the testator.

    If there’s less tunning amongst the family members and the above aspect cannot be worked out, then the best possible way is to distribute the assets during the lifetime only so that the respective beneficiary holds the same without any claim or objection from others.

    As someone who started with internships at leading law firms and later built independent practice, what lessons from those formative years still influence your approach to law and property related disputes?

    Clear understanding of law and being upgraded with current legal precedents; using the tool of mediation and conciliation; not merely focussing on making money but alongside guiding the client with result oriented approach. However small the matter or dispute may be, 100% efforts and hard work shall always be put.

    Property and inheritance laws are constantly evolving with new judicial precedents and legislative changes. How do you stay ahead of these developments, and what recent trends do you see shaping this field in India?

    My approach is to give daily an hour or more in watching the news, studying current market scenarios, blogs, judgments. By this, I am able to incorporate and utilize this knowledge in my practice practically.

    The upcoming centralized digitalized unique platform where property registration, all connected data such as data from Municipal Corporation/ Development Authority etc. will be inter-connectedly available and will be incorporated with ease of doing business policy of the government. The development of digital courts for NI Act cases, MSME Samadhan Portal, Pre-litigation process in commercial cases, Mediation Act, etc. are great initiatives of the government for early disposal of recovery matters. By such initiative and upcoming legal developments, people are becoming more aware about their rights and obligations.

    With such a diverse practice covering real estate, inheritance, litigation, and consultancy, what advice would you give to young lawyers who want to build a specialized yet well-rounded career in property and succession law?

    Thorough understanding of the real estate market and laws covering this industry is a must. The initial aspect is to be able to practically understand the “trends” of “disputes” in industry, thereby doing research in the light of actual circumstances and find out all the possible solutions to the problem and then picking up the best reasonable one. What is the best approach “practically” must be the concern always.

    Get in touch with Deepanshu Garg –

  • “It must be understood that true inclusion lies in recognising difference, not ignoring it, and creating conditions that enable success on equal terms.” – Karan Kamra, Intellectual Property Lawyer.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Your journey from Dhanbad to where you stand today is truly inspiring. How have your personal experiences and academic background in Political Science shaped your decision to pursue law, and how have they influenced your strong legal journey and commitment to the profession?

    I’m a first-generation lawyer, born into a family deeply rooted in the pharmaceutical business, a world far removed from the courts and statutes that now define my everyday life. Growing up with cerebral palsy in a small town like Dhanbad, I often felt the need to prove myself – to be seen, to be heard, and to be taken seriously. For me, the black coat was more than a symbol of the legal profession, it  signified  a  possibility – that merit could speak louder than mobility and that confidence and conviction could override any preconceived notions about ability. 

    I came to Delhi and pursued Political Science. The discipline deepened my understanding of the Constitution, legal systems, and power structures. It eventually led me to Campus Law Centre, Faculty of Law where I discovered my calling in Intellectual Property law. 

    My personal experience instilled in me a deep sense of resilience, to persist, adapt, and advocate in a world not always built for difference.  At the same time, my academic grounding in Political Science gave me a strong structural lens helping me understand laws and  their intricate interplay with legal systems and institutions.  

    This foundation, combined with lived experience, has shaped not just how I view the law but how I approach Intellectual Property, with empathy for creators and right holders,  strategic thinking for brand protection, and a deep sense of purpose in safeguarding invention.  

    In the early phase of your career, you worked  in a full-service law firm and an independent  general practitioner. What motivated your transition into intellectual property law, and how did those foundational years shape your current approach to IP practice? 

    In the early phase of my career, working with a full-service law firm and an independent  general practitioner exposed me to the breadth and intensity of legal practice – from civil suits to commercial disputes. It was a rigorous training ground that honed my advocacy, research, and drafting skills. 

    I began noticing how deeply brands, trademarks,  domain names, content, and technology were getting intertwined with legal disputes. I was drawn to the unique intersection of law, commerce, and creativity that intellectual property law offered. The shift to IP felt organic—it allowed me to work not just reactively in disputes, but also proactively with creators, individuals and businesses to safeguard what they were building. 

    Those foundational litigation years instilled in me a detail-oriented, strategic mindset. They taught me how to anticipate risks, think like a litigator even in advisory work, and approach IP not in isolation, but in its commercial and legal context. 

    You’ve represented clients in domain name disputes before WIPO and INDRP. Could you walk us through your experience in this space? What are some of the key legal and strategic challenges entities commonly face in such matters? 

    The legal framework under both WIPO’s UDRP and India’s INDRP is robust but exacting, placing the onus on the Complainant to establish three core elements: (1) that the domain is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark in which it has rights, (2) that the registrant lacks legitimate interests in the domain, and (3) that the domain has been registered and is being used in bad faith. While WIPO offers quicker, globally recognized redress—typically resolving disputes within 60–75 days—INDRP is key for .in domain disputes and may take 3–6 months or more due to procedural flexibilities and single-arbitrator handling under NIXI.

    Success before both forums relies heavily on the Complainant’s ability to present comprehensive evidence, including proof of trademark rights, prior and continuous use, and supporting documentation like screenshots of misuse, WHOIS records, archived web content, and prior communications. This evidence must clearly align with the legal criteria, particularly to demonstrate the registrant’s bad faith and lack of legitimate interest. The process is evidence-driven and leaves little room for error.

    One of the significant challenges is that infringers often hide behind privacy services or proxy registrations, making it harder to trace the true registrant. WIPO has mechanisms in place to request unmasking, usually coordinated with the registrar, though it’s not guaranteed. INDRP poses more hurdles due to NIXI’s limited procedural transparency and lack of early disclosure protocols. In such cases, complainants must rely on circumstantial and digital forensics—such as WHOIS history, DNS and IP data, website metadata, and linkages across abusive registrations—to build a strong, inferential case.

    While dealing with software piracy and advising software firms, what major trends and challenges have you observed globally? How do you think India’s legal and enforcement mechanisms compare with international frameworks in addressing piracy?

    Software piracy today has evolved into a highly complex and dynamic threat, fuelled by digital proliferation and the increasing sophistication of infringers. We’ve seen a decisive shift from physical duplication to digital piracy, with unauthorized downloads, license key sharing, and hacked installations spreading through torrent sites, web platforms, and even on social media and e-commerce portals. A major trend is the rise of ‘cracked’ enterprise solutions being sold at a fraction of their actual price, often through resellers masquerading as legitimate vendors. In the SaaS ecosystem, misuse takes subtler forms – such as license overuse, unauthorized API calls, credential stuffing, and cloning of proprietary software models.

    From a comparative lens, India’s enforcement mechanisms have strengthened in recent years. Courts have become more proactive in granting Anton Piller orders, John Doe orders, and dynamic injunctions to block rogue websites. The IT Act and Rules coupled with the Copyright Act, provides a statutory framework for enforcement, and cybercrime units in metro cities are increasingly equipped to tackle software piracy, especially in B2B settings.

    However, when compared with jurisdictions like the U.S., EU, or even Singapore, India still lags in certain areas- particularly in digital forensics, quick takedown protocols and cross-border enforcement cooperation. Lack of digital IP expertise in certain enforcement bodies and different judicial approaches to damages also pose challenges.

    To combat this, software companies must take a multi-pronged strategy: strong, enforceable EULAs with audit rights; proactive license tracking using Software Asset Management (SAM) tools; deployment of digital watermarking and DRM technologies; and active online surveillance of infringing platforms. Legal action must often be supported by pre-suit investigations to establish unauthorized use, followed by civil enforcement and, where appropriate, criminal prosecution. 

    The most effective anti-piracy efforts globally involve a mix of litigation, technology, partnerships with enforcement agencies, and user education, something India is slowly but surely aligning itself. 

    You’ve also championed client interests during mediations at the Delhi High Court Mediation Centre. In your view, how effective is mediation in resolving complex IP disputes, and what role does it play in balancing commercial and legal interests?

    Mediation, especially in the context of IP disputes, can be a remarkably effective tool when approached with the right mindset. At the Delhi High Court Mediation Centre, I’ve seen firsthand how it creates space for parties to move beyond rigid legal positions and engage in commercially meaningful dialogue. Unlike litigation, which is often adversarial and time-consuming, mediation allows for tailored, confidential, and business-sensitive solutions, making it particularly valuable in high-stakes IP matters. 

    In disputes involving brand reputation, time-to-market pressures or ongoing commercial relationships, mediation offers the flexibility to craft outcomes that litigation may not be equipped to provide, such as licensing arrangements, joint ventures, or mutually acceptable phased withdrawals. Pre-suit mediation, in particular, has emerged as a powerful tool to resolve conflicts early, avoid escalation, and maintain goodwill – saving time, cost, and reputational strain.

    Ultimately, mediation helps balance legal rights with commercial realities. It empowers clients to co-create outcomes that serve both legal and business interests. In an IP landscape shaped by innovation and speed, mediation is increasingly becoming a strategic first step—particularly effective in resolving disputes early and efficiently, with the exception of aggravated cases of infringement or passing off that merit litigation.

    Having advised multinational clients in sectors such as automotive, pharmaceuticals, e-commerce, and hospitality, what unique IP challenges have you seen in the automotive sector? What preventive strategies would you recommend to avoid trademark issues early on?

    The automotive sector in India faces distinct IP challenges due to its vast supply chain, aggressive branding strategies, and a rapidly growing aftermarket ecosystem.  Trademark infringement today extends beyond core brand names and registered marks to include sub-brands, model names, variant tags, and even alphanumeric identifiers. Infringers, particularly in the spare parts and accessories markets, routinely misuse these marks to falsely suggest association or compatibility to original vehicle manufacturers (the rightful IP holders). This not only dilutes brand equity but also risks consumer deception and safety, especially when counterfeit or substandard parts and accessories are involved. 

    A common defence invoked by unauthorised sellers is Section 30(2)(d) of the Trade Marks Act, which allows the use of a registered mark to indicate the intended purpose of a product or service (e.g., “compatible with Brand X”). However, this defence is not absolute. The protection under the provision ceases to apply where the use is not in accordance with honest industrial or commercial practices, or where it takes unfair advantage of  or is detrimental to the distinctive character or repute of the mark. In the automotive space, this line is often crossed when infringers stylise logos, mimic trade dress, or market counterfeit parts under the guise of compatibility.

    Design infringement is another major concern, especially with regard to spare parts like headlights, grills, mirrors, and alloy wheels. Many of these are reverse-engineered and sold in the grey market without authorization, undermining both brand value and consumer safety. Companies often fail to register industrial designs or delay doing so, weakening their enforcement stance in cases of replication by third-party manufacturer.

    To address this, companies must actively monitor and enforce rights not just in their principal marks but also in model-specific and component-related branding, which are often more vulnerable. Registering sub-brands and variant names in relevant classes, including digital and retail categories, is key. Furthermore, legal notices and litigation should specifically challenge bad-faith use that exceeds the scope of Section 30(2) (d) focusing on consumer confusion, deceptive marketing, and reputational harm. 

    On the design front, preventive strategies include timely registration of industrial designs for high-risk components such as headlights, mirrors, grilles, and alloy wheels, especially those with distinctive visual appeal likely to be replicated. Companies should conduct regular design audits, embed subtle identifiers to support enforcement, and use border enforcement mechanisms to block infringing imports. Where misuse persists, design infringement lawsuits under the Designs Act, 2000—seeking injunctions, damages, and delivery of infringing goods—are vital tools to deter copycats and affirm rights. Combined with trademark enforcement, these steps help safeguard brand equity and product integrity across the automotive ecosystem.

    You’ve often mentored and guided younger professionals. What advice would you offer to law students or litigators looking to shift to IP law, and what resources or habits can help them stay competitive and updated in this fast-evolving domain? 

    For law students or litigators looking to transition into IP law, my first piece of advice would be: ‘cultivate curiosity’. It is important to ground yourself in the fundamentals—copyrights, trademarks, patents, and designs but it is equally imperative to go beyond textbooks. Following case law developments and tracking decisions of various courts, as well as international bodies like WIPO and dispute resolution platforms like INDRP, is essential. These decisions not only reflect how the law is being interpreted in real time but also reveal emerging trends, judicial attitudes, and strategic nuances that shape IP enforcement and protection.

    Using legal search engines like Manupatra and Westlaw, staying tuned into online news portals such as Live Law and Bar & Bench, and regularly reading blogs like SpicyIP and IPKat are excellent ways to stay updated. Newsletters, national and international legal magazines and webinars (hosted by bar associations or IP firms) also offer timely insights into evolving jurisprudence and policy shifts.  

    I would recommend interning with or working alongside seasoned practitioners. Many young professionals grow the most by observing and absorbing. Simply being in the room with experienced lawyers, watching how they interpret statutes, craft arguments and strategy and navigate court dynamics can shape your legal thinking in ways that are both subtle and lasting. Know the procedure as regards court filings and court practice. Most importantly, stay open to learning and listening whether from seniors, peers, or juniors. The humility will keep you sharp and grounded. 

    Balancing demanding professional responsibilities with personal well-being is no small feat. How do you manage this balance, and what practices or mindset have helped you stay grounded over the years? 

    Balancing the intensity of legal practice with personal well-being has been one of the most challenging and ongoing lessons of my career. In the early years, it was easy to get swept up in the long hours and high-pressure deadlines and the constant push to prove myself. But over time, I’ve come to realize that sustainability in this profession requires more than endurance, it needs intentionality, boundaries and deliberate pauses. 

    Balance comes from prioritizing high-impact tasks and pressing deadlines, while simultaneously planning a clear roadmap for research, preparation, and argument execution in other matters. This structured approach ensures that urgent work is handled efficiently without losing sight of long-term responsibilities, helping me stay steady, focused, and prepared across all fronts. 

    Spending time with family and friends, engaging in conversations beyond law, and learning to disconnect have become vital. Music, movies, and books are more than just breaks, they’re essential tools to break monotony, spark creativity, and keep me grounded.

    From being mentored by senior lawyers to independently handling high-stakes litigation, your journey has been marked by growth and learning. What are some of the most valuable lessons you’ve carried forward, especially when it comes to leadership and courtroom advocacy?

    Every journey has its highs and lows, and mine has been no exception. I did make my share of mistakes in the early years – be it in court, professional interactions, or even client handling. Each misstep became a valuable lesson. I learnt to face embarrassment, accept feedback, and grow from it. One of the most important lessons was to remain both tenacious in facing challenges and malleable enough to learn from seniors and peers—an essential balance not just at the start, but throughout one’s legal career.

    I’m deeply grateful for the mentorship I received, especially from Mr. Achuthan Shreekumar, Mr. Saif Khan and Ms. Binny Kalra in my early years. They taught me to take full ownership of my work, to be meticulous in my preparation, and to argue with clarity, conviction, and courage. These values continue to guide me through complex matters and high-pressure situations in court with balance and self-belief. 

    Observing some of the finest legal minds during my legal career has been my privilege. It has helped me absorb the nuances of court craft, statutory interpretation, and legal strategy, often through a quiet process of osmosis.

    Equally important have been the lessons in procedural rigour, understanding filings, registry practices, court processes, and client coordination. Perhaps most importantly, I’ve learned to listen, whether to seniors, peers, or juniors. Staying open and receptive has I’ve imbibed the importance of discipline, resilience, ethics, and a commitment to timeline – qualities that help build a legal culture that respects creativity, integrity, and innovation.  

    As a lawyer with cerebral palsy, you’ve spoken powerfully about inclusion and structural challenges. What changes would you like to see in the legal industry to make it more accessible, and how can organizations move from intent to implementation on this aspect?

    Navigating the legal profession as a differently-abled lawyer has been a mixed journey. I’ve been fortunate to encounter mentors and colleagues who valued my credentials and potential over visible physical limitations. Despite the same, I’ve also faced scepticism—about whether I could handle the physical demands of litigation or keep pace in a high-pressure environment. These misconceptions stem from deeper social conditioning around disability and competence. The only real way to counter them is through consistent performance, meaningful outcomes, and quiet persistence.

    Over time, I’ve realised the issue isn’t about access to opportunity. Many firms today are open to hiring professionals with disabilities, especially as diversity becomes a core organisational value. The real challenge lies in organisations being  truly disability-cognizant beyond the point of entry. 

    Genuine inclusion means going beyond symbolic representation—it requires accessible infrastructure, assistive tech and software apps, flexible work schedules. Most importantly, more organisations need to invest in inclusive training across teams and levels and to build  a culture rooted in empathy, understanding, and intentional dialogue. Equally important is addressing ‘disability blindness’—the expectation that disabled professionals meet identical performance standards without acknowledging their physical limitation or the systemic barriers they navigate. It must be understood that true inclusion lies in recognising difference, not ignoring it and creating conditions that enable success on equal terms. 

    Looking ahead, how do you see IP law evolving over the next decade, especially with the rise of AI-generated content, deepfakes, and non-traditional trademarks? What key reforms or innovations do you think are essential to future-proof the IP framework?

    Over the next decade, IP law in India will be under mounting pressure to modernise in response to rapid technological advances. AI generated content fundamentally challenges the traditional copyright framework, which is centred on human authorship and originality. As machines autonomously create literary, artistic, and musical works, existing laws struggle to define ownership, liability, and infringement. To address this, regulatory clarity is essential either through specific amendments to the Copyright Act or by introducing sui generis protections tailored to AI generated  and machine generated content. 

    To address deepfake misuse, India’s IP regime must strengthen personality rights to prevent unauthorized digital cloning of a person’s image, voice, or likeness, especially for commercial use. There must be an expansion of the scope of ‘misrepresentation’ under  trademark and passing-off laws to cover deepfake endorsements or AI-generated impersonations that mislead consumers or dilutes brand identity. 

    Additionally, there must  be  an introduction of mandatory disclosure or watermarking requirements for AI-generated or manipulated content, especially on social media or commercial platforms, to ensure transparency and traceability. Lastly, there is a need of faster takedown mechanisms and intermediary liability guidelines tailored to AI and deepfake content under IP enforcement rules, empowering right holders to act swiftly.

    Trademark law must evolve to protect non-traditional marks like sound, scent, motion, and holograms. With businesses increasingly operating in digital-first or virtual environments, including the metaverse,  the law must address how trademarks function when use is no longer confined to physical goods or services. This will require not only legislative amendments but also updated examination guidelines, jurisprudence, and technological competence within the Trademark Registry and Judiciary. 

    Get in touch with Karan Kamra –

  • “Reflecting on my journey, from a wide-eyed intern in Mr. Jethmalani’s chambers to leading Asal Legal Solution LLP, my greatest takeaway is that advocacy is a blend of conviction and compassion.” – Akash Kakade, Advocate Supreme Court of India.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Early in your career, you had the opportunity to work with various big names in the legal field. What were some of the most enriching experiences from those formative years that deepened your passion for the legal profession?

    The privilege of working under legal titans like Mr. Ram Jethmalani and Mr. Fali S. Nariman during my early years was akin to stepping into a masterclass in advocacy. In 2007, while interning with Mr. Jethmalani, I was thrust into the frenetic pace of a high-profile criminal case at the Supreme Court. I vividly recall his electrifying presence in court, where he dismantled a prosecution’s argument with razor-sharp logic and an almost theatrical flair. One evening, as we prepared for a hearing in the high-profile Jessica Lall murder case, he shared a gem: “The law is not just about statutes; it’s about storytelling that moves hearts and minds.” This perspective transformed my understanding of advocacy, igniting a passion for crafting compelling narratives grounded in legal rigor.

    Similarly, in 2009, assisting Mr. Nariman on a constitutional matter was a revelation. His meticulous analysis of Article 14 during a late-night briefing session taught me the art of weaving constitutional principles into practical arguments. Watching him argue before a Constitution Bench, I saw how his calm demeanour and scholarly depth commanded respect, reinforcing my belief that advocacy is as much about integrity as it is about intellect. These experiences cemented my love for the courtroom, where law becomes a living instrument of justice. I also remember an incidence where he asked me to draft something several times thereafter just near my breakpoint, asked me to get all the drafts and approved the 1st draft which I had shared saying it was the best one and I ought to have shown it to him. I didn’t understand the meaning of it then, however over a period of time I realised he taught me several valuable professional and life lessons through it.

    Your academic and professional background is both impressive and diverse. Could you take us back to the initial experiences that sparked your interest in the field of law?

    My fascination with law was born when our family friend Mr Jethmalani visited our home at Nagpur and there were tons of people there to visit him. I belong to a freedom fighters family and a family which has always been into social work, i was used to people visiting home. However people visiting Mr Jethmalani had a different approach and the respect commanded by him simply left an everlasting and permanent impression on me. He asked me “what I want to become when I grow up?”, I naively asked him, “what do you do?”, to which he said “I am a lawyer son”, so I promptly replied that I want to become a lawyer as well. That is the 1st time I said that and it was etched in my mind since then, as a teenager in 2001. That moment was electric, it showed me the law’s power to uplift the voiceless and the respect one commands with being true to one’s profession. My school debates on issues like caste discrimination and women’s rights further fueled this spark, as I realized advocacy could bridge ideals and action.

    This conviction led me to pursue a B.A. LL.B. at RTM Nagpur University, where I immersed myself in moot courts and legal aid clinics. A particularly memorable experience was organizing a legal awareness camp for rural farmers and downtrodden on the occasion of Dusshera Festival in Nagpur under the aegis of our political science professor , where I explained various faucets of laws in Marathi, my mother tongue. Seeing their faces light up with newfound understanding solidified my resolve to make law accessible and impactful, setting the course for my career.

    Your educational journey from RTM Nagpur University to Queen Mary University of London is inspiring. What motivated you to pursue an LL.M. in Commercial and Corporate Law abroad, and in what ways has that international exposure shaped your current practice before the Supreme Court of India?

    The decision to pursue an LL.M. at Queen Mary University of London was driven by a realization that India’s legal landscape was becoming increasingly globalized. By 2010, I had seen how multinational corporations and cross-border disputes were reshaping commercial litigation in India. I chose Queen Mary for its reputation in international commercial law and arbitration, aiming to master the nuances of global legal frameworks. The program’s modules, International Commercial Arbitration, Commercial Conflict of Laws, and Intellectual Property in Creative Industries, were intellectually exhilarating, challenging me to think beyond Indian jurisprudence.

    A defining moment was my dissertation on pre-arbitral interim relief, which required analysing cases from multiple jurisdictions. This global perspective proved invaluable when I returned to India. For instance, in the ABG Shipyard Swiss Challenge Process case at the Supreme Court, my understanding of international insolvency frameworks allowed me to craft arguments that aligned Indian law with global best practices. My London experience also honed my ability to navigate cultural and legal diversity, enabling me to represent clients like PT. Bara Daya Energi etc. with confidence. Today, this international lens informs my Supreme Court practice, blending global insights with constitutional rigor.

    You’ve appeared in several high-profile Constitution Bench matters, including the EWS Reservation and PMLA Validity cases. How have such landmark litigations influenced your legal philosophy and approach to constitutional interpretation?

    Appearing in Constitution Bench matters like the EWS Reservation and Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) Validity cases has been a humbling and transformative journey. The EWS case, which upheld reservations for economically weaker sections, taught me the importance of purposive interpretation to advance social justice. I recall a heated courtroom exchange where we debated the balance between equality and affirmative action, moments that underscored the Constitution’s role as a living document adapting to societal needs.

    The PMLA case, challenging the validity of stringent anti-money laundering provisions, was equally profound. It highlighted the delicate interplay between state power and individual liberties, shaping my belief in proportionality as a cornerstone of constitutional interpretation. These cases have instilled a legal philosophy that views the Constitution as a dynamic framework, requiring advocates to harmonize fundamental rights with directive principles. My approach now emphasizes rigorous research, contextual analysis, and a commitment to ensuring that constitutional interpretations serve both justice and the public good.

    As the Founding Managing Partner of Asal Legal Solution LLP, how do you navigate the demands of leadership while actively engaging in high-stakes litigation before the Supreme Court? What motivated you to establish your own practice in the first place?

    Leading Asal Legal Solution LLP while litigating before the Supreme Court demands a delicate balance of vision, discipline, and teamwork. As Founding Managing Partner since, I’ve built a firm that thrives on collaboration and innovation. I delegate research and drafting to a talented team of associates, empowering them to take ownership while I focus on courtroom advocacy and strategy. We use case management software (Libra) to streamline workflows, ensuring I can prepare for high-stakes cases like the Maratha Reservation matter without compromising firm operations. Evening team meetings foster open communication, allowing us to tackle complex cases with agility.

    My motivation to establish Asal Legal stemmed from a desire to create a practice that blends ethical advocacy with client-centric innovation. After years at Desai & Associates, I saw an opportunity to address gaps in legal services, particularly for clients navigating both Indian and international jurisdictions. Founding my own firm allowed me to take on diverse cases, from constitutional benches to international arbitrations, while mentoring the next generation of advocates. This independence has been liberating, enabling me to shape a legacy of impactful litigation.

    Your consistent involvement in social initiatives, particularly through the Maratha Sewa Sangh, reflects a strong commitment to public service. How do you strike a balance between your legal practice and social responsibilities?

    My involvement with Maratha Sewa Sangh and other initiatives is a natural extension of my belief that law must serve society and as a member of society one must give back to the society. As President of its Legal Cell since 2023, I’ve spearheaded legal aid camps and policy advocacy for marginalized communities, often working late evenings after court hours. For instance, organizing the first All India Conference for Rashtriya Maratha Seva Sangh was a logistical challenge, but my team’s support at Asal Legal ensured seamless coordination. I allocate specific days for social initiatives, using weekends for community outreach while reserving weekdays for litigation.

    This balance is fuelled by my conviction that legal expertise carries a responsibility to uplift. My team handles routine legal tasks, freeing me to draft policy recommendations or write columns for Organiser and Kashmir Canvas. These activities recharge me, as the gratitude of a farmer understanding his land rights or a student inspired by a legal talk mirrors the fulfilment I find in courtroom victories. This synergy ensures that my legal practice and social commitments reinforce each other.

    For law students aspiring to build a litigation practice like yours, what advice would you offer? What skills, mindset, or resources do you believe are essential for excelling in this demanding field?

    To law students dreaming of a litigation career, my advice is to embrace the grind with passion and purpose. Litigation is a marathon, not a sprint, so cultivate resilience to navigate setbacks like losing a case or facing a tough bench. Key skills include:

    • Legal Research: Be well versed with law and for that master platforms like SCC Online in order to build airtight arguments.
    • Drafting: Hone the art of concise, persuasive pleadings, every word matters in court.
    • Oral Advocacy: Practice clarity and confidence through moot courts and mock trials.
    • Networking: Seek mentorship from senior advocates; my internships with Mr. Jethmalani and others were game-changers.

    Adopt a growth mindset, view challenges as opportunities to learn as was taught to be by Mr Nariman. Early in my career, a dismissed petition taught me to anticipate judicial perspectives, sharpening my strategy. Resources like legal journals, bar association seminars, and internships in litigation chambers are invaluable. Above all, uphold integrity and empathy; clients trust advocates who fight for their cause with heart. Stay curious, stay ethical, and let your passion for justice drive you.

    Litigation can be incredibly intense and high-pressure. How do you manage the stress that comes with maintaining a rigorous legal practice, and what do you do to safeguard your mental well-being?

    The intensity of Supreme Court litigation, where deadlines loom and stakes soar, demands a robust approach to stress management. I start each day with 30 minutes of yoga and meditation, a ritual that grounds me and sharpens focus. A particularly vivid memory is meditating before arguing the auction case, which calmed my nerves and clarified my arguments. Regular runs in Talkatora Gardens and a disciplined diet keep me physically resilient, countering the sedentary demands of legal work.

    Professionally, I rely on my team at Asal Legal to share the load, delegating research and filings to avoid burnout. I set boundaries, reserving evenings for family or reading historical biographies, which offer perspective on life’s pressures. My social initiatives, like blood donation camps with Maratha Sewa Sangh, are surprisingly rejuvenating, helping others reminds me of the law’s broader purpose. These practices, combined with a supportive network of peers, ensure I thrive in the high-pressure world of litigation.

    Looking back at your journey so far from internships with iconic legal figures to leading your own firm, what has been your biggest takeaway or guiding principle as a legal professional?

    Reflecting on my journey, from a wide-eyed intern in Mr. Jethmalani’s chambers to leading Asal Legal Solution LLP, my greatest takeaway is that advocacy is a blend of conviction and compassion. Whether arguing a marathon case or advising a small business like ILA Naturals, I’ve learned that the law’s true power lies in its ability to humanize disputes. My guiding principle is to approach every case with unwavering integrity and a deep understanding of the client’s story. This means not just winning arguments but ensuring justice resonates, whether for a corporation or a community. This ethos, forged through years of mentorship and practice, drives me to leave a lasting impact on both law and lives.

    Get in touch with Akash Kakade –

  • Mr Swarnendu Chatterjee, Advocate-on-Record at the Supreme Court of India, talking about the nuances of litigation and becoming an AoR

    Mr Swarnendu Chatterjee, Advocate-on-Record at the Supreme Court of India, talking about the nuances of litigation and becoming an AoR

    This interview has been published by Sonali Parashar, Ojuswi Sahay the SuperLawyer Team

    Let’s start at the beginning, how did you decide upon making a career in Law?

    When I was in school, I didn’t have even the slightest interest in being a lawyer, although my father, Mr Arabinda Chatterjee (Senior Advocate) was a practising lawyer (quite successful!) in the High Court at Calcutta. I was interested in pursuing my career in Economics or, being a Chartered Accountant. However, as rhetorical and ironic as it was, when one day (I was in the 12th grade as far as recall), I had to go somewhere in the afternoon and my dad had asked me to come to his office near High Court, as the car was parked there. When I went there, I saw my dad’s office packed with junior lawyers and clients who were busy discussing their cases. Then it struck me, that, this profession is the one for me, as it will allow me to study the social strata more and help people to advance their causes in every sense.

    At that juncture, I decided to pursue my career in law. Further, as I was a commerce student, I wanted to pursue law with B.B.A. School of Law, KIIT University, Bhubaneswar was offering the course and I qualified the entrance and graduated in 2013. I qualified for the Bar (AIBE) in July/Aug 2013. This was my journey from school till I qualified to be a lawyer.

    You hold expertise in various areas of practice like Civil Law, Constitutional Law, Insolvency Laws, Taxation Laws, Labour Law, Criminal Law, and Arbitration. You are also qualified as an Advocate-on-Record in the Supreme Court of India.  How would you describe your journey in the field of litigation so far?

    I started my career in this profession, in the chambers of Late Shri PP Rao (Senior Advocate) and after his demise, I had a short yet effective stint as a junior to Mr P.S. Narasimha (now- Hon’ble Justice PS Narasimha, Judge, Supreme Court of India).

    Both my seniors do not need any introduction, as they have been doyens of the legal profession and have nurtured so many successful lawyers. It was an honour to work with both of them.

     During my initial days, I learnt the following things in the chambers of Late Mr Rao, 

    1. Patience
    2. ability to work hard
    3. “To desire something, I should deserve it first.”

    At the very outset, Sir (Late Mr Rao) had told me that, “decision to become a lawyer is a very tough one, it is not a 9 to 5 job, it is a 24-hour profession and that, it is a jealous mistress…the more you give, the more it will demand, but with time, you will be rewarded with the fruits. Initially earning will be less and there will hardly be any time for social life. If you are prepared, then carry on….else be an ornamental junior and then one day you will be nowhere.”

    During those days, Insolvency laws, particularly IBC (which came in Dec. 2016) were not there, so a majority of cases where I was involved with Sir were related to civil laws (education, land, reservation, service law et all.), arbitration disputes, some criminal matters and the matters relating to important questions of law in the realm of constitutional law. That is how I developed an interest and honed my skills in the aforesaid branches of law. 

    Once I was somewhat independent, the first matter, which I had dealt with was before the Hon’ble National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) and the question involved in that matter was related to the payment of gratuity to employees and workmen in a company undergoing liquidation under IBC. I somewhat had achieved success in that and thereafter I did quite a few matters before NCLTs (Delhi, Allahabad and Chandigarh) wherein I had the opportunity to study the law and the precedents minutely.

    Thereafter, an opportunity came my way, I successfully argued the case of workmen of Moserbaer India Limited (In liquidation) before NCLT Delhi, NCLAT and Hon’ble Supreme Court. 

    For the last four years or so, I have been doing cases related to IBC extensively and have appeared in matters before NCLTs (Delhi, Hyderabad, Mumbai, Chandigarh), NCLAT and Supreme Court.

    I do not however agree with the term, “expert”, as I believe that “we are students of law from the beginning till the end.” The day, the learning ends, lawyers are bound to board the flight from God’s airport (quoting Late Mr Jethmalani and Mr Nariman together)

    My journey so far (almost a decade) has been a mixed match with lots of twists and turns. However, with the good wishes of my peers, friends and blessings of my father and seniors in the profession, I can say that I have had a satisfying beginning to a race, where I intend to run to the fullest extent.

    The credit for me being an Advocate-On-Record in the Supreme Court goes to my father and my late senior, Late Shri PP Rao. They were my guiding light and a strong force, which inspired me and instilled confidence. Sir is no more (he passed away on 13.09.2017) but in every difficult situation, I try to remember his guidance and take a cue from the experience I had in his office (2013 to 2017).

    Litigation is a profession and not a job. One should remember, that the clock is the last thing that you should look at, during your work. This profession has no end time. It depends on you and how you prioritize your work. The mantra is to work hard during working days/hours and enjoy to the fullest during vacations. It is true for every gender. Nothing comes easy, at every step, there will be people to challenge you, dissuade you, demoralize you and there will be people and friends to inspire you and tell you/give you confidence that “yes you can”. Therefore, one must choose their friends/peer groups well. Hence, according to me, irrespective of the gender and issues involved in litigation, one should look at the brighter side of the profession and always strive to work hard and achieve the best.

    In your college days, you have interned at various organisations ranging from Judicial Clerkship at the Hon’ble High Court Judicature of Kolkata, to interning at reputed firms like Amarchand Mangaldas, Trilegal, to name a few. How important according to you is picking the right internship for one’s career ahead in Law School?

    Choosing the correct path is very important. Many people will try to guide you in different ways, but one should always weigh the advice with respect to their career choices. Most importantly, there is no branch of law, which will fetch a lawyer easy money and humungous earnings from the word “go”.

    In those places, they train you to be responsible and how you should work in a super competitive atmosphere. Further, you are taught how to move out of your “comfort zone” and strive toward excellence.

    Internship, especially in the formative years (4th and 5th year of law school/penultimate year in 3-year courses), plays an important role, for students to understand their niche areas and work towards it professionally. Students should remember that filling up their resumes/CV(s) with twenty to thirty internships, in my opinion, will not be useful, unless they have done something fruitful and worthy in those internships. Students should be aware and trained to draft their CV(s) properly, as in, the work/tasks done in those internships, should be properly mentioned and not as “attended court proceedings.” These sorts of sentences are vague and carry no meaning.

    Therefore, choosing of internships in the formative years, as I said, is important and plays a definitive role.

    Please guide our readers about the nuances of becoming an AoR, the responsibilities that follow, and the nature of work one can expect to take up as an AoR.

    Advocate-On-Record (AoR) is a designation which has to be earned upon qualification of one of the toughest examinations in India. It is conducted by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, on yearly basis. 

    An advocate is eligible to appear, once, the advocate has completed 4 years of practice and a further one year of training with an AoR with an experience of ten years or, more as an AoR in the Supreme Court. Therefore, a total of 5 years of experience is required to be eligible to appear for the exam.

    It is both a test of elimination and qualification and the pass percentage hovers around 10% to 15%. The pass marks in individual papers (4 papers total) is 50 and the overall candidate needs to score 240 out of 400 (therefore overall it is 60%). The papers are subjective and one needs to write answers by hand.

    The papers are (i) Practice and Procedure before Supreme Court (ii) Drafting in Supreme Court (iii) Professional Ethics and Advocacy and (iv) Leading Cases (list of cases is on the website of the Supreme Court).

    The majority have an idea that being an AoR is simple and they are only to be used as signatories to a petition to be preferred/filed before the Hon’ble Supreme Court. AoRs are NOT notaries. They hold a position of responsibility and it is a designation to be proud of. AoRs can be described as the “spinal cord” of the bar in the Supreme Court and of course, they come after the Ld. Senior Counsels who hold the fort with an AoR. Therefore, we need to be very careful about our drafts, the conduct and mannerism used and followed in Court.
    Being an AoR is not easy. It is like a “crown with a lot of thorns.” You are entrusted with drafting/ensuring the draft is according to the standard followed by the Supreme Court, filing and follow-ups with the registry, briefing a senior counsel (if required and instructed by the client) and on some occasions arguing the matter. It is a difficult but enjoyable journey as an AoR and a position to be proud of.

    You have dealt with various service matters and labour disputes across various jurisdictions. How was your experience in this category of litigation and, what would your advice be for lawyers and graduates who are interested in this area to take their skills a notch higher?

    It is a normal idea and thinking, that service matters/jurisprudence is easy. As I said, nothing is easy and it goes similarly for service matters unlike any other field of law. Service / Job for a human being is equally precious as his life. Livelihood depends on it. Therefore, it needs proper research, care and caution to present the case with precision and endeavour to get the relief, as much as possible. 

    Sometimes, the cases and the pain involved in some disputes get onto you. Remember that one has to be partisan as a lawyer and cannot get into the client’s shoes. It is very important to let the client know the possible outcome (in the fair opinion of the lawyer) of the case; even if it is negative. Some clients may go away and some may not follow the path. However, the reputation you carry will soar high and you will be regarded as an honest person. Being a lawyer is not only about the money and billing you do (it is important to an extent) but it is also important to advise correctly and try to sort out things, if possible, in the quickest and most effective manner. 

    The important skills according to me are:

    1. Being patient (earning will come but be patient in the beginning).
    2. Read the facts/papers well (do not leave any paper/fact).
    3. Research on the precedents based on the factual situation.
    4. Lastly, have your basic English and grammar in place.
    5. Sacrifice holidays/Sundays in the beginning and also work hard and if possible, for long hours without affecting the health.
    6. Observe your senior and learn how he approaches the matter and his/her presentation skills.

    If an Advocate, in my opinion, follows the aforesaid (basic and not exhaustive) things, mostly will be successful and the rest is the luck factor. If you work hard, success is bound to come (sooner or later).

    You are also a lifetime member of the Indian Institute of Arbitration and Mediation (IIAM). How essential do you believe Arbitration and Mediation is in today’s time and age and how should young professionals approach this area of practice?

    I am actually thankful to my friend, Iram Majid (the guiding force behind IIAM), who inspired me and inspires me constantly in this branch. A visionary and an excellent human being have been working very hard in this field for more than a decade now. I am happy to be a part of the prestigious IIAM.

    With the increasing burden in Courts, arbitration had already carved out its importance. However, mediation is also an important tool and we lawyers have to focus more on mediation and try and solve disputes as much as we can and to the extent possible by sitting across the table.

    Advocates should advise clients, where ever possible and to the extent possible to discuss, mediate with the other side and solve the disputes. However, cases which need arbitration and adjudication can surely be continued in Courts and await the verdict. This approach shall forward the cause of the client and also lessen the burden on the Courts.

    Young professionals should have an open mind and perceive ways and train themselves to solve and mitigate disputes along with their training to argue cases as well. An open-minded approach is necessary for successful mediation and we as lawyers should accept the approach of mediation with an open heart and mind.

    Earlier, you worked as a Principal Associate for Saraf and Partners, and now you are engaged in your own practice at Law Chambers of Swarnendu Chatterjee. How did you decide upon establishing your own practice and what are the challenges one can expect when making this move in their legal career?

    I had an amazing experience working as a Managing Associate in L&L Partners and thereafter as a Principal Associate in Saraf and Partners, Law Offices. I was in the dispute resolution team in both firms.

    In L&L, I was working with Mr Wasim Beg (Partner). It was an awesome experience for me. He is an excellent human being and has an open mind. He always listens to the ideas and promotes his team members. His forte being criminal law, I had the opportunity to hone my skills in that area by assisting him in some of the most complex and difficult matters in criminal law before the Hon’ble Delhi High Court, Bombay High Court, Esplanade Court (Mumbai), Rouse Avenue Court Complex, Tis Hazari Court Complex and Patiala House Court Complex.

    In Saraf and Partners, I had the opportunity to represent clients in Insolvency matters, like top nationalized banks, private banks and top resolution professionals, et all. I worked mainly in matters relating to Insolvency Disputes, SARFEASI, Companies Act and some matters related to civil disputes and arbitration.

    As I had the idea of counsel practice in my mind and I always wanted to argue cases, I thought, it is the best time now to branch out and do what I always intended to do. Hence, this decision to move out and establish my own chambers.

    It is not easy to move out from the comfort of the heavy pay packages which the firms offer you, especially when you have experienced something like the pandemic (Covid-19). However, sometimes, you must decide, what you want to do and make a move accordingly.

    As I have mentioned, I wanted to be an arguing counsel and practice accordingly, therefore, I planned a move at a juncture, when we can dare and say we have braved the waves of Covid-19 and even if it comes back, we are presumably well prepared with the e-courts system working well in Delhi at least.

    I intend to grow my practice as a counsel and as an Advocate-On-Record. My chambers are open for people/clients from every stratum. 

    Young lawyers, who intend to learn and work hard and most importantly are enthusiastic about litigation (not form ideas based on paycheque and the clock) are welcome to join. However, I do not intend to have a big team of juniors/colleagues. A small and efficient team works well for me.

    Finally, a word of advice for the lawyers and law graduates who are passionate about litigation?

    The only advice which I can share is litigation is not a T20 or One-Day match. It takes time to flourish. Hence, as I said, one needs patience, and the ability to work hard and research well. One should read about law, literature and the works of great advocates (like MC Setalvad, PP Rao, Shanti Bhushan, FS Nariman and so on).

    Further, write research papers, and hone your skills, so that the ability to write and bring out argumentative skills emanate from within.

    Further, do not get dissuaded by the common understanding that a particular branch of law pays well and others do not. With time, this profession rewards you with all laurels and honours provided you treat the same with all your best efforts and honesty.

    Lastly, do not go by the clock, learn to work hard and long, when required and try to advise clients properly and thereafter leave it to them for their decision; meaning do not try to make money when according to you the case has no merit at all. Even if it has 1% merit, you can go for it.

    Rest is all about how it spans out. There is a common understanding, that you need godfathers to flourish in litigation. It is not always true. If you don’t have godfathers, don’t feel out of place, then take it like Kapil’s Devils in the 1983 world cup. No one gives you a chance or has any expectations upfront, therefore, once you have the chance, make the most of it and make a mark in your career.

    All the best to team SuperLawyer for this interview. Cheers and thanks!!

    Connect with Swarnendu Chatterjee –