Super Lawyer

Tag: IP attorney

  • “All lawyers are Super lawyers; thus no single lawyer is a Super lawyer.” – Ankit Rastogi, Partner at Mason & Associates.

    “All lawyers are Super lawyers; thus no single lawyer is a Super lawyer.” – Ankit Rastogi, Partner at Mason & Associates.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    What drew you towards the field of Intellectual Property law, and what were some of the early experiences that helped lay the foundation for your practice in this domain?

    First of all, thank you for connecting with me to share my story. I was quite intrigued by the name of the platform ‘Super Lawyer’. This reminded me of the film ‘The Incredibles’ wherein a character Syndrome says that if all humans will have super powers, none will be a Super hero. Similarly, in my view since all lawyers are Super lawyers, thus no single lawyer is a Super lawyer. Now coming to your question: 

    I think my interest in Cinema. I was initially drawn towards Intellectual Property as a practice area since I had a lot of interest in movies. I was highly inclined towards Copyright Law, since I wanted to understand how the film industry functions. 

    As far as early experience that helped me lay the foundation in this domain are concerned, the first litigation matter that I worked upon was a passing off suit. In that suit, over a period of time after filing the suit, Defendant had obtained registration of its trade mark and moved an application for amendment of written statement to plead its registration. At that stage, when I was too young (barely a month into the practice) I thought that the Plaintiff’s case was over since the Defendant had obtained a trade mark registration. At that stage, my then senior told me that registration of Defendant’s mark is of no consequence in a suit for passing off, which is maintainable even against a registered proprietor. He further asked me to read N.R. Dongre and Ors. vs. Whirlpool Corpn. and Anr.; 1996 PTC (16) 583 (SC) wherein apex Court upheld this position arrived at by Single Judge and Division bench of the High Court. 

    You argued a landmark case where the Delhi High Court, for the first time, ruled on the registrability of geographical names as arbitrary trademarks. Could you share your insights from the case that shaped the Court’s reasoning, and what do you believe are the broader implications of this decision?

    To be really honest, I don’t know as to whether it was a landmark decision or not.  However, Siddharth Suri vs Registrar of Trade Marks does give a guiding light for registration of geographical names as trade marks where the geographical name has been applied arbitrarily to the goods. In this case, the goods were ‘Leather and imitations of leather, and goods made of these materials and not included in other classes; animal skins, hides, trunks and travelling bags; umbrellas, parasols and walking sticks; whips, harness and saddlery’ for which ‘Andamen’ was not found to be having a goods-place association. Accordingly, the objection under Section 9(1)(b) that the trade mark designates geographical origin was not found to be attracted since Andamen (whether said to be taken from Andaman Sea or from the Andaman & Nicobar Islands) does not have a reputation for goods falling in Class 18. 

    The broader implications of the decision are that when one comes across a geographical name as a trade mark, they should not disregard its protection/registration just because it is a geographical name but analyze whether that geographical area has an association or reputation for goods for which it is sought to be registered/protected.  

    You advise clients across diverse sectors including FMCG, pharmaceuticals, liquor, book publishing, and e-commerce. Given the rapid growth of the pharmaceutical industry, what are some of the major legal and compliance challenges entities face in this space?

    I think as far as the pharmaceutical industry is concerned, the biggest challenge has been counterfeit products. For a consumer, who may consume these counterfeit products; disaster always lurks around the corner to make its presence felt. In other terms, the consumers are extremely vulnerable to life threatening consequences. I have, in the past, worked on multiple matters, both civil and criminal, where the Defendants/Accused produced identical drugs and it is not possible to identify the fake unless you get inputs from the team who worked on the packaging and in some cases research. The pharmaceutical industry is one of the most regulated industries; since it has to cater to safety and efficacy. Keeping this in mind, it obviously has to comply with safety and cleanliness standards, good manufacturing practices, disclosure of information and that too in line with labelling requirements. The major problem in the industry is fake drug racket, which may or may not be related to any Intellectual property and could be a completely new mark, where the ingredients told on the label will not even be present in the drug and the drug would have been sold or supplied clandestinely with no regulatory approval at all. 

    As a Partner, staying ahead of the curve is crucial. In your view, how effective have the current government initiatives been in streamlining the IP registration process? What further improvements in your opinion can be made?

    In recent times, I could think of four initiatives done at the level of the Intellectual Property office which are commendable. First, is the possibility of search of device trade marks, which has been facilitated online by the IP office. The added advantage of this feature is that depending on the device/image the tool also suggests the possible Vienna Code Classifications; which also aids in saving time.  

    Second, is the enablement of a queue system for various functions and displaying it online; a real time check for hearing, review applications and examination status; which enables an entity to know as to where it marks stands in the list of hearings before the trade marks office.  

    Third is the Open house sessions, the IP office does with applicants and stakeholders everyday from 4.30 PM to 5.30 PM virtually to address grievances or take suggestions on any issue related to Intellectual Property Rights. 

    Last is the ‘Notifications/Reminders’ feature on the e-filing page and the ‘Reminders’ feature on the E-Register Page; which enables one to see latest updates on their portfolio of applications, ensuring that no important update is missed. This saves a tremendous amount of time.  

    In my view, to ensure a smooth registration process; the first thing that should be incorporated is consistency and standard operating procedures; so that every applicant or stakeholder has a clear idea of the chance of their application getting accepted or rejected.

    You’ve worked on intermediary liability matters. How do you assess the evolving legal framework around platform accountability, especially in light of recent judicial decisions and amendments to the IT Rules? What are the core challenges in striking a balance between free expression and regulatory obligations?

    I think the intention is always to balance; that’s what in my view, any legislature or government exercising its legislative powers under the IT Act, 2000 looks at while keeping in mind the protection of the people and at the same time working out the economics. So, that’s the word. BALANCE!! – the evolving legal framework in the IT Rules, especially The Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 [hereinafter ‘IT Rules, 2021’] indicates a tide towards control but the intent of that control is Balance; The amendments to the same in 2022 required the intermediary to make reasonable efforts so that content which is covered under Rule 3(1)(b) is, inter alia, not displayed on its platform. The intention is some sort of action; but the rule making body steers clear of indicating what sort of action (no pointers whatsoever) and leaves it as a subject of interpretation.  However, what are these ‘reasonable efforts’ or what could be some examples of these ‘reasonable efforts’; for that we get an indication from judicial decisions such as the recent decision in Indiamart Intermesh Ltd. v. Puma SE; 2025: DHC:4819-DB which indicates that one of the reasonable efforts for a platform could be that each of the sellers is aware of the requirement to not display counterfeit products and to ensure that they furnish an express undertaking to the said effect to the intermediary.  Apart from this, on reading of paragraph 92 of the decision, I think another indication of reasonable effort could also be not to re-list the same seller in respect of the same products whose listings have been taken down earlier. 

    As far as 2023 amendments are concerned; they appear to have been done majorly to have the online gaming intermediaries under a stricter control (as compared to intermediaries) , especially those online gaming intermediaries who enable the users to access any permissible online real money. A lot of compliance requirements under ‘IT Rules, 2021’ which were only applicable to a significant social media intermediary originally have been extended to online gaming intermediaries as well by virtue of the amendments done in the year 2023. 

    As far as your last question, I think the standard of morality/scandalous statements keeps shifting with every generation. The biggest challenge I believe is ‘viewpoint bias’ and the evolving nature of the society we live in. Thus, in my opinion there will always be shifting standards and that’s why this area of law will always be dynamic and never ending. In simpler terms, what may be kosher for one; may be outrageous for another and this will be perennial. So, it is extremely difficult to maintain that balance between free expression and regulatory obligations. 

    With such an enriching and diverse career, what initially inspired you to pursue law? What advice would you offer to law students and young professionals aspiring to build a career in Intellectual Property and litigation?

    I am an extremely lazy person when it comes to doing things for myself. I try to take the most convenient and easy route to navigate life choices. So, resultantly, the decision to pursue law was the length of the programme; five years. No worry after school for another five years. I thought in the beginning of the law school that may be after these five years; I will know what I need to do. However, post five years, I just went with the flow. In hindsight, I think I should not have done law. I could have explored a creative vocation where my thoughts could be disseminated freely (Obviously, subject to reasonable restrictions in Article 19).

    One of my advice to every aspiring professional in the field of Intellectual Property would be to be tech-savvy. To understand how content is being created these days. What are the terms of the AI platforms, which are used by us for content creation. Further, I would also recommend not to restrict their understanding of jurisprudence on intellectual property to India but analyze what is going on globally. In this decade already we are dealing with landmark decisions on intellectual property issues intertwined with technology utilised across platforms which have shown us issues which we could not have probably envisaged a few decades ago. Look at the issue that is challenging the use of content by AI platforms, ‘keyword advertising’, use of a mark in drop down menu at the back end to trigger a listing if one searches for those products on a platform, violations by virtue of deepfake technology etc. I mean, mirror websites and duping in the name of fraud schemes of investment or employment across the internet, fake domain names, domain name disputes are something that have become traditional violations of Intellectual Property and orders granting real-time injunctions are not being passed only in isolated cases.  

    So far as litigation is concerned, my advice has always been to be diligent and understand the background and the possible solutions through procedural laws. Litigation is not a predictable game; there are variables across stages in a matter – from inception to trial; from an ex-parte order till consequent appeals. One has to make a strategy giving all possible variables due weight. 

    Managing a demanding legal practice comes with its own pressures. How do you maintain a healthy work-life balance, and is there a personal philosophy or guiding principle that has helped you navigate your professional journey?

    To be really honest, I am unable to maintain a healthy work-life balance. Unfortunately, my matters, the ongoing developments in the fraternity, the need for being constantly updated & networking does not allow me to shut down/switch off. While my office is five (5) days working, the only time I think I am able to be completely at peace is when I sleep or I read. I read a lot, and have also in this process edited a few comic books. These are my only escapes apart from occasional films in theatres or at home. A lot of professionals, who might be really busy may say that they spend time with their families; switch off on weekends etc. Kudos to them!! I am never able to shut down. There is a constant barrage of thoughts in my head unless I am sleeping, reading or watching anything. I am constantly thinking of what needs to be done, are we on top of all our matters, has the team done all the compliances etc. There is a constant urge to ensure everything is under control and all bases are covered. This leads me to not have a work-life balance. 

    The only guiding principle that has helped me to navigate my professional journey is sincerity and time management. One has to prepare as much as they could for a matter while giving other matters also their due importance. One has to give every advice keeping all the ethical considerations in mind. I try my best every day to do and pull off a lot, sometimes much more than I actually can. Sometimes I succeed; sometimes I don’t. On days I succeed, I stay calm and think something constructive has been achieved. On the remaining days, I am just too hard on myself. 

    Get in touch with Ankit Rastogi –

  • “Legal entrepreneurship is about compound growth. Trust builds slowly; reputation takes time.” – Vedant Pujari, Founding Partner of Accures IP Care LLP.

    “Legal entrepreneurship is about compound growth. Trust builds slowly; reputation takes time.” – Vedant Pujari, Founding Partner of Accures IP Care LLP.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Coming from a commerce background, what initially inspired you to pursue law? Was it a long-standing goal, or did your interest in the legal field evolve over time?

    Like most 18-year-olds, I had little clue of what I wanted to do with my life. The only streams that most people around me suggested were engineering or medicine, but I knew those weren’t for me. Not because I didn’t respect those fields, but they just didn’t click with who I was. I ended up in commerce because I enjoyed business and finance as it felt naturally coming to me. Toward the end of my degree, I started preparing for CA like most commerce students do. But halfway through, I realized I was just going through the motions. It wasn’t exciting me.

    The real turning point was completely random. I was at the canteen at ILS Law College, Pune, chatting with a friend who was studying law. He started talking about constitutional law, contracts, torts and at that point something clicked. The way he described these subjects made me realize law could be the perfect blend of intellectual challenge and real-world impact I was looking for.

    I applied to ILS that same year. Best decision I ever made. What I love about this journey is that my commerce background wasn’t wasted, in fact it actually gives me an edge. When I’m advising startups or corporations today, I understand both the legal framework and the business reality. Law isn’t just rules on paper; it’s a tool to make business happen. My advice to young people feeling lost? Don’t panic if you don’t have it all figured out. Stay curious, take calculated risks, and trust that the dots will connect eventually.

    You began your legal journey with a prestigious law firm in Delhi. What drew you specifically to intellectual property law, and what early experiences deepened your interest and shaped your expertise in this domain?

    I have to credit Prof. Neelima Bhadbade at ILS Law College, Pune for planting the IP seed. Back then, intellectual property was still relatively niche in India, not like today where many are aware of it. She made it fascinating by connecting Indian law with international cases and showing us how IP actually worked in the real world.

    Getting campus recruited by an IP firm in Delhi was lucky timing. This Firm then was a small team of 7-8 people, which meant I couldn’t hide in a corner doing research all day. I was thrown into the deep end patent filings, trademark disputes, copyright issues and other wide spectrum of IP practice. My mentor back then, one of the founding partners thankfully gave me real responsibility early on. Scary at the time, but invaluable in hindsight. My personal rule was simple: “never say no to any assignment”. I’d stay late figuring things out, reading cases, calling up senior colleagues with questions. Resources weren’t as easily available as they are now, we had to dig for everything. But that struggle taught me to really understand the fundamentals.

    The breakthrough for me was learning to translate complex legal concepts into practical business advice. That’s what clients actually appreciate, not a lecture on case law, but clear guidance on what they should do next. That skill of making law accessible and actionable has been crucial throughout my career.

    What keeps me passionate about IP after two decades? The field never stops evolving. From AI-generated content to digital piracy to blockchain, there’s always a new challenge that requires you to think differently.

    After beginning in a law firm environment, you transitioned into a corporate role. What motivated this change, and what key differences did you observe in terms of the challenges, culture, and expectations in both settings?

    This transition wasn’t something I planned. It happened organically. After several years at the firm, the leadership decided to launch an IP outsourcing company to offer specialized services like patent searches, docketing, and portfolio management. They asked me to lead the IP products division, and I thought, “Why not? This could be interesting.”

    The culture shock was immediate and eye-opening. At the law firm, everything revolved around legal excellence. We asked questions like could your argument hold up in court? Would the IP office accept your position? Quality was paramount, even if it took longer. In the corporate environment, it was all about scalable processes, efficiency metrics, and standardized deliverables. Instead of crafting legal strategy, I was building repeatable workflows.

    The work rhythm was completely different too. Law firms operate on client urgency and if something’s critical, you work until it’s done. The corporate side was much more structured: 9 to 6 schedules, shift patterns for international clients, strict turnaround times. Frankly, I found it limiting. As a lawyer, I thrive on diving deep into complex problems, which doesn’t always fit neat time slots. What I missed most was the direct client relationship. In a law firm, we were solving strategic problems with general counsels and business leaders.

    Having said that, this stint was brief but valuable. It clarified what I really wanted from my career. I realized I am energized by intellectual complexity, client relationships, and strategic problem solving, client facing and all of which led me back to traditional legal practice. 

    Sometimes you need to step outside your comfort zone to appreciate what you have.

    What inspired you to establish your own legal practice, and how did you navigate the challenges of entrepreneurship in the legal field? Were there any pivotal moments that helped solidify your decision?

    The decision wasn’t a lightning bolt moment, in fact it evolved over time. After years in firms and that corporate stint, I kept asking myself: “What if I built a practice the way I think it should be done?” The pivotal moment came when I realized if I didn’t try now, I might never get another chance. 

    Let me be blunt about what entrepreneurship in law really looks like:

    Entrepreneurship is lonely. You can have great mentors and supportive family, but at 2 AM when you’re stressing about payroll or a difficult client, it’s just you. Nobody shares your failures, and the tough decisions are yours alone. Accept this reality upfront.

    Think long-term or don’t bother. If you expect quick wins, you’ll be disappointed. Building a respected practice takes years. I tell lawyers considering this path: if you can’t commit to a 10 to 15 year horizon, stay in your firm job. Legal entrepreneurship is about compound growth. Trust builds slowly; reputation takes time.

    Client relationships are everything. In a big firm, you inherit institutional relationships. As a founder, every client relationship starts from zero. I treated every matter, no matter how small, as if it were my biggest client. That approach led to repeat business and referrals.

    Vision with flexibility. I was clear about wanting to create an IP practice that truly served business needs, not just legal technicalities. But I had to adapt constantly because of the client’s changing requirements, the evolution of the legal landscape and market dynamics shift.

    Resilience isn’t optional. There will be lean months, difficult clients, and moments when you question everything. What got me through was believing deeply in what I was building and never compromising on quality.

    My advice to aspiring legal entrepreneurs is “don’t rush it”. Master your craft first, understand the business of law, and build relationships. Then, when you’re ready, jump with both clarity and courage.

    You’ve advised a wide range of clients, from startups and creative agencies to pharmaceutical companies and academic institutions. How do you adapt your IP strategies to meet the unique needs and growth stages of such varied industries?

    After 20 years of practice, I’ve learned that one-size-fits-all IP strategies don’t work. My approach is what I call “protection with purpose” – every IP decision must align with the client’s specific business goals.

    Startups and creative agencies need agility and smart prioritization. They’re usually cash constrained but need to show IP value to investors. I help them identify their crown jewels i.e. what IP assets will matter most for funding, partnerships, or market differentiation. We might focus on key trademarks, core provisional patents, or critical copyrights first, building the foundation they can expand later.

    On the other hand, pharmaceutical companies require sophisticated, multi layered strategies. We’re managing global patent portfolios, complex licensing deals, regulatory considerations. Here, it’s about creating patent thickets around key products such that it covers the compound, formulation, manufacturing process, methods of use. The goal is sustainable competitive advantage across multiple markets.

    Academic institutions have unique challenges – they want to commercialize research but maintain an open academic culture. The strategy focuses on identifying commercializable innovations early, filing strategic patents that don’t hinder further research, and creating licensing frameworks that benefit both the institution and industry partners.

    The key is spending time upfront understanding each client’s business model, competitive landscape, and growth trajectory. I’m not just filing patents or trademarks – I’m helping build strategic moats around their most valuable assets. What remains constant across all clients is the principle that IP should enable business, not complicate it. Whether I’m talking to a first-time entrepreneur or a Fortune 500 general counsel, the conversation starts with understanding what they’re trying to achieve.

    In your experience, what are the most common misconceptions businesses have about intellectual property protection? How do you guide them toward a more accurate understanding?

    After two decades of client conversations, I see the same misconceptions repeatedly. Here are the big ones:

    IP is only for big companies – Wrong. Some of the most valuable IP I’ve worked on came from small startups. Your trademark or patent could be your most important business asset, regardless of company size.

    One filing protects me everywhere – IP rights are territorial. A US patent doesn’t protect you in India. A trademark registered in India doesn’t automatically work in Singapore. Global protection requires global strategy.

    Once filed, I’m protected forever – IP requires active management. Patents expire, trademarks need renewal, portfolios need monitoring. I’ve seen valuable rights lost simply because nobody was paying attention to deadlines.

    My company name gives me trademark rights – Company registration and trademark rights are separate. You can register “XYZ Private Limited” but that doesn’t give you exclusive rights to use “XYZ” as a brand.

    How do I fix these misconceptions? Education and real examples. I show them competitors who got it right and ones who didn’t. I explain IP not as abstract legal concepts but as business tools. How a well-crafted patent portfolio helped one client raise Series A funding, or how trademark vigilance saved another from expensive rebranding.

    The conversation always comes back to business strategy. IP isn’t just legal housekeeping, it’s competitive advantage, asset value, and risk management rolled into one.

    How do you foresee IP law evolving over the next five years, especially considering emerging technologies, shifting regulatory landscapes, and global geopolitical dynamics?

    IP law is entering one of the most dynamic periods in its history. As we look ahead to the next five years, I believe several major forces will reshape how businesses think about and manage their IP and how lawyers will need to adapt their counsel to serve clients effectively.

    The rise of emerging technologies particularly AI and blockchain is challenging traditional IP frameworks. Questions such as who owns AI-generated content, or how blockchain can be used for IP rights management and enforcement are already pressing issues. I foresee regulatory bodies around the world moving to update and harmonise IP laws to address these new realities, though this evolution will be gradual and will require active dialogue between industry, policymakers, and the legal community. 

    We are also witnessing a shift toward a more strategic and data-driven approach to IP management. Businesses increasingly see IP not just as a legal shield but as a core business asset i.e. the one that supports valuation, drives licensing revenue, and enhances market position. In this context, IP lawyers must evolve from being pure legal technicians to becoming strategic advisors who can help clients align IP strategy with business goals. This is where my mantra of “protection with purpose” will be even more relevant going forward.

    Geopolitical dynamics and regulatory fragmentation will continue to pose challenges for global IP strategy. With shifting alliances, evolving trade agreements, and varying national approaches to data protection and IP enforcement, businesses will need tailored, jurisdiction-specific advice. I also expect greater emphasis on IP enforcement and brand protection in digital environments, as e-commerce continues to grow, and cross-border infringement becomes more sophisticated.

    In short, the future of IP law will be more complex, fast paced, and integrated with business strategy than ever before. As lawyers, we must be prepared to continuously learn, collaborate across disciplines, and help clients navigate this evolving landscape with foresight and purpose.

    My advice to clients: don’t wait for perfect regulatory clarity. The companies that adapt quickly to these changes will have sustainable advantages. Those that wait will be playing catch-up.

    Managing a demanding legal practice can be intense. How do you maintain a healthy work-life balance, and is there a personal philosophy or motto that has consistently guided you throughout your professional journey?

    Let me be honest, work life balance in legal practice isn’t about perfect equilibrium every day. It’s about sustainable intensity over decades.

    There are times when the practice demands everything like a major litigation heating up, international deals with tight deadlines or crisis management for key clients. During these periods, I’m all in. But I’ve learned to be equally intentional about recovery periods. When things are quieter, I actively recharge, usually with cycling, hitting the gym, watching mindless TV, or just sitting quietly doing nothing.

    Building a strong team was crucial for long-term sustainability. Early in my practice, I tried to handle everything myself. That’s a recipe for burnout. Learning to delegate and trust others was one of my biggest growth areas. A well-functioning team isn’t just good for business, it’s what allows you to have a life outside the office.

    My personal motto has evolved over the years, but what guides me now is “Do your best, let go of the rest, and expect less.” In a profession where perfectionism is expected, this mindset keeps me sane. I focus on delivering excellence where it truly matters, accept that I’m human and will make mistakes, and maintain perspective about what really counts in life. Law is what I do, not who I am.

    Physical and mental health aren’t luxuries, they’re business necessities. You can’t serve clients well if you’re constantly stressed or burned out. I’ve made peace with the fact that some periods will be all-consuming, but I actively protect time for renewal.

    What advice would you offer to young lawyers who aspire to work on IP law? Were there any specific habits, values, or resources that played a significant role in shaping your professional growth in this field?

    For young lawyers aspiring to build a career in intellectual property law, my foremost advice is this – develop both depth and breadth. IP is a wonderfully multidisciplinary field, it sits at the intersection of law, technology, business and creativity. IP law is constantly evolving whether through landmark judgments, international treaties or emerging technologies like AI. Develop a habit of reading widely not just case law, but also industry reports, scientific advancements and business news. Always act with professionalism and respect for confidentiality. Develop a mindset of “protection with purpose”, understand why each IP asset matters to the client’s business, and align your advice accordingly.

    Lastly, invest time in building mentorship relationships and learning from peers and seniors. In my own journey, I gained immensely from working under exceptional mentors who challenged me and gave me opportunities to grow. 

    After 20 years in IP practice, here’s what I wish someone had told me when I started:

    1. Develop both depth and breadth: Master core IP law principles but also understand the business and innovation contexts you’ll be advising.

    2. Adopt a mindset of continuous learning: Stay ahead of evolving IP law, emerging technologies (AI, blockchain), and global IP trends.

    3. Build strong values early: Always practice with integrity and diligence

    4. Embrace every opportunity to learn: Take on diverse assignments, large and small, and see every task as a learning opportunity.

    5. Learn from inspiring seniors and build trust-based networks. These relationships will shape your growth.

    Get in touch with Vedant Pujari –

  • “I was drawn to the international aspects of IP law and the potential to make a meaningful impact on a  global scale. Moreover, it allows me to work with innovators, entrepreneurs, and  creatives who are shaping the future.” – Rakesh Tanwar, Equator Law Chambers.

    “I was drawn to the international aspects of IP law and the potential to make a meaningful impact on a  global scale. Moreover, it allows me to work with innovators, entrepreneurs, and  creatives who are shaping the future.” – Rakesh Tanwar, Equator Law Chambers.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    What inspired you to pursue a career in law, and what key experiences  during your time in law school had a lasting impact on your professional journey? 

    My inspiration to pursue a career in Law was to Strive for Justice i.e. to make a positive  impact and promote fairness. Also, Law school’s rigorous academic environment and  the complexity of legal issues attracted me as I enjoy problem-solving and critical  thinking. During my time at Vivekananda Institutes of Professional Studies,  participating in clinical programs, such as legal aid clinics or externships, provided  hands-on experience and exposure to real-world legal issues. Also, engaging in moot  court and mock trial competitions helped developing advocacy skills, building  confidence, and fostering a sense of community among peers. Moreover, building  relationships with professors, peers, and practitioners lead to valuable guidance and  lifelong connections. Lastly, I would say, contributing to law reviews and journals  helped develop research, writing, and analytical skills, while also providing a platform  for publishing scholarly work. 

    After completing your law degree, you pursued a Master’s in Intellectual  Property Law at Queen Mary University of London. What led you to specialize in  IP law, and why did you choose this particular institution? Can you share your  experience at the university, and did you face any challenges during the admission  or enrolment process? 

    IP law is a complex and nuanced field, requiring a deep understanding of legal  principles, technical concepts, and industry trends. I enjoyed the challenge of  navigating this intricate landscape and helping clients navigate it. It also involves a high  degree of creativity and problem-solving. I relished the opportunity to think outside the  box, develop innovative solutions, and advocate for clients’ rights. IP law has a global  reach, affecting businesses, artists, and inventors worldwide. I was drawn to the international aspects of IP law and the potential to make a meaningful impact on a  global scale. Moreover, it allows me to work with innovators, entrepreneurs, and  creatives who are shaping the future. I find it rewarding to collaborate with clients who  are passionate about their work and committed to making a positive impact. And lastly,  IP law offers a balance of litigation and transactional work, allowing me to engage in  both contentious and non-contentious matters. I enjoy the variety and flexibility that  this balance provides. I also find IP law to be a field where I could make a tangible  difference in people’s lives and businesses. Protecting and promoting intellectual  property rights gives me a sense of fulfilment and purpose. 

    I chose Queen Mary University of London to pursue my master’s in law for several  compelling reasons. First and foremost, the university’s reputation for academic  excellence was a major draw for me. The School of Law is ranked 7th in the UK and  32nd in the world by QS World University Rankings by Subject. Another significant  factor was the diversity of programs and specializations offered by the university. I had  the flexibility to tailor my degree to my interests and career aspirations. Additionally,  the university’s location in London was a huge advantage. Being in the heart of London,  I had access to numerous barristers’ chambers, law firms, and the Royal Courts of 

    Justice, providing unparalleled opportunities for networking, internships, and job  placements. The expertise of the faculty was also a key consideration. The School of  Law has a team of renowned academics and practitioners who are leaders in their fields,  providing students with cutting-edge knowledge and insights. Lastly, the global  perspective and connections offered by Queen Mary University of London were highly  appealing. With partnerships and collaborations with top institutions around the world,  I knew that I would be part of a vibrant and international community of scholars and  professionals.  

    Despite a few challenges that generally appear while taking admission in a foreign  university as an international student, I persevered, and the experience has been  incredibly rewarding. The UK education system differs from my home countries. I had  to adjust to a new grading system, coursework requirements, and exam formats.  Obtaining a student visa was a complex and time-consuming process. I had to provide  extensive documentation, proof of funds, and English language proficiency. Studying  abroad is expensive. I had to secure scholarships, loans, or financial aid to cover tuition  fees, living expenses, and other costs. However, after immense efforts and  perseverance, I was able to secure a National Overseas Scholarship from the Government of  India that covered tuition fees, living expenses and other costs. 

    In the early stages of your career, you had the opportunity to work with  prominent lawyers and law firms. What were some enlightening experiences that  deepened your understanding of law, particularly intellectual property, and  motivated you to explore this area further? 

    I had several enlightening experiences that profoundly deepened my understanding of  intellectual property (IP) law. I assisted in a patent litigation case involving a complex  dispute over patent validity and infringement. This experience helped me grasp the  intricacies of patent law, including claim construction, prior art, and the role of expert  witnesses. I worked on a case involving the misappropriation of trade secrets by a  former employee. This experience highlighted the importance of protecting confidential  information, the challenges of proving trade secret misappropriation, and the strategic  considerations involved in pursuing litigation. I conducted IP due diligence for a client  acquiring a target company with a significant IP portfolio. This experience taught me  the importance of thoroughly reviewing IP assets, identifying potential risks and  liabilities, and negotiating IP-related provisions in transactional agreements. I worked  with expert witnesses in several IP cases, which helped me understand the importance  of expert testimony in IP litigation. I learned how to effectively communicate with  experts, prepare them for testimony, and use their expertise to build strong cases. I  assisted in several cross-border IP disputes, which highlighted the complexities of  navigating different legal systems, jurisdictions, and cultural nuances. This experience  taught me the importance of considering global IP strategies and coordinating with local  counsel to achieve effective outcomes.I counseled clients on various IP-related issues,  including IP protection strategies, licensing agreements, and dispute resolution. This  experience helped me develop strong client counselling skills, including the ability to  communicate complex IP concepts in a clear and concise manner.

    Having worked on international compliance matters, what are some of the  most common challenges you encounter when interpreting cross-border contracts,  especially between U.S. companies and international partners? Additionally,  could you share your observations on the key differences between common law  contract principles and U.S. statutory law? 

    When interpreting cross-border contracts, especially between US companies and  international counterparts, I commonly encounter the following challenges including  Divergent Legal Systems, Language Barriers, Cultural and Business Practice  Differences, Dispute Resolution Mechanisms and Compliance with Local Regulations.  Staying current with changes in laws, regulations, and court decisions across multiple  jurisdictions is an ongoing challenge when interpreting cross-border contracts. Cross 

    Border contracts often involve IP and data protection concerns and navigating these  issues requires expertise in multiple jurisdictions. Contract drafting styles and  conventions differ between the US and other countries and thus, ensuring consistency  and clarity in contract language is vital. 

    There are few major differences between common law principles and US statutory law  and therefore, the importance of understanding both while drafting, negotiating or  litigating, is highlighted. Firstly, US statutory law does not imply terms into contracts  as extensively as common law. Secondly, US statutory law does not require good faith  performance to the same extent as common law. Thirdly, US statutory law does not  emphasize reasonableness as much as common law and Lastly, US statutory law  provides more guidance on contract interpretation, such as the UCC’s rules for  interpreting contracts. On the other hand, common law emphasis on reasonableness in  contract interpretation and performance.  

    In your current role, you handle trademark infringement cases. What are the  primary challenges you face when navigating trademark infringement issues in  India, and how do you address them? 

    Trademarks in India face various challenges in handling trademark infringement issues.  Some of the common challenges are Complexity of Indian trademark law, Limited  resources, Counterfeiting and piracy, etc. To address these challenges, conducting  thorough searches of existing trademarks and pending applications can help identify  potential infringement issues. Registering trademarks with the Indian Trademark Office  provides legal protection and helps to prevent infringement. Sending cease and desist  notices to infringers can be an effective way to resolve disputes without resorting to  litigation. Using technology, such as trademark monitoring software, can help identify  potential infringement issues and streamline enforcement efforts. Educating the public  about trademark rights and infringement can help prevent unintentional infringement  and promote a culture of respect for intellectual property.

    Given your expertise in both Intellectual Property and commercial law, how  do you approach cases where these areas intersect, particularly those involving  brand protection, and commercial disputes? Could you share an example where  you successfully integrated your knowledge of both fields to provide a  comprehensive legal solution? 

    There are several areas of intersection between brand protection law and commercial  dispute resolution, for instance, Disputes arising from trademark provisions in  commercial agreements, such as licensing or franchise agreements; Allegations of  unfair competition, such as false advertising, in commercial disputes; IP protection in  commercial transactions, such as mergers and acquisitions; Addressing issues related  to gray market goods and parallel imports, which can impact brand reputation and sales. 

    Here’s an example: 

    Case Study: Licensing Agreement Dispute 

    A US-based software company developed a popular software platform for managing  supply chains. They entered into a licensing agreement with an India-based company to distribute the software in India. Later began to modify the software without former’s  permission and sold it to other companies, violating the terms of the licensing  agreement. It was discovered and a cease-and-desist notice was sent to the India based  company. However, they refused to comply claiming that the modifications were  necessary to adapt the software to the Indian market. Hence, a US based company needed  a lawyer who could navigate both intellectual property (IP) and commercial law to  resolve the dispute. By analysing and examining the licensing agreement, I negotiated with an Indian company leveraging the IP and commercial law analysis to reach a  settlement. The resolution also involved mediation between both the companies and the  Indian company was required to cease and desist from further modifying and  distributing the software, and to pay damages for the unauthorized use and distribution  of the software. Finally, I lead the parties to negotiate a revised licensing agreement  that better protected US based company IP rights.  

    What tools, resources, or methods do you rely on to stay updated with the  latest developments in trademark law and other related areas of commercial  law? 

    Online resources like information provided by WIPO Academy on Intellectual  property Rights including trademarks, patents, and copyrights, Industry conferences  and seminar focused on trademark Law and commercial law, legal research tools, legal  research platforms like Lexus-Nexus and West Law, professional associations like,  Inta, etc. Helped us to stay updated on the latest developments. 

    What advice would you give to law students or young professionals aspiring to  specialize in intellectual property law? What key skills and qualities do you believe are crucial for success in this field? 

    For law students aspiring to specialising in the field, engage in intellectual  property-themed moot courts and competitions to develop their skills in this field. Attending conferences, seminars, and networking events to connect with experienced  intellectual property lawyers can also be very helpful. Finally, following intellectual  property blogs, news outlets, and social media to stay informed about the latest trends  and cases is also significant.  

    For young professionals, it is important to develop a niche expertise by focusing on  specific areas of intellectual property law, such as patents, trademarks, or copyrights. It  is equally important to foster strong relationships with clients, colleagues, and mentors  to build a professional network. They can also consider obtaining a certification from  WIPO Academy or other similar organisation. Lastly, professionals must be prepared to  pivot and adjust to new developments, technologies, and trends in the field.

    Get in touch with Rakesh Tanwar –


  • “The most crucial skill for law students is strategic legal analysis combined with effective communication.” – M Abhijnan Jha, Partner at Lex Praxis.

    “The most crucial skill for law students is strategic legal analysis combined with effective communication.” – M Abhijnan Jha, Partner at Lex Praxis.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    What motivated you to pursue a career in law, and what inspired you to choose the B.P.Sc (Hons.) LLB (Business Law Hons.) program at National Law University, Jodhpur? Looking back at your law school years, what are some key experiences that have had a lasting impact on you?

    Growing up, I admired my father, a police personnel, whose commitment to justice and integrity deeply influenced me. Watching him serve the people with courage and dedication inspired me to pursue a career in law. Additionally, I was fascinated by courtroom dramas and legal stories portrayed in movies, which sparked my curiosity about the legal system and advocacy.

    I chose the B.P.Sc (Hons.) LLB (Business Law Hons.) program at National Law University, Jodhpur, because I was deeply interested in subjects like Political Science, Sociology, and Psychology. Their focus on understanding human behavior, societal dynamics, and governance aligned perfectly with my passion for law and justice. This interdisciplinary approach not only matched my interests but also provided a strong foundation for pursuing a career in law. During my law school years, participating in moot courts, insightful internships, and collaborating on research projects helped me develop strong analytical and advocacy skills. These experiences, combined with my early inspirations, shaped my approach to solving complex legal challenges.

    How did your early experiences at A&A Law Office, particularly in corporate and project finance, contribute to shaping your understanding of joint ventures, regulatory frameworks, and due diligence in commercial transactions?

    My early experiences at A&A Law Office played a crucial role in shaping my understanding of joint ventures, regulatory frameworks, due diligence, and intellectual property in commercial transactions. As it was a small law firm, I was involved in a wide range of legal work, from corporate and project finance to intellectual property matters. This exposure taught me how to assess risks, navigate complex regulatory requirements, and ensure IP protection. These experiences provided a solid foundation for strategic legal advisory and commercial law dynamics.

    How has your expertise in intellectual property law influenced your corporate advisory work, particularly when handling trademarks, copyrights, and design matters? What are your thoughts on the future evolution of intellectual property rights in the coming years?

    My expertise in intellectual property law has significantly influenced my corporate advisory work, especially when handling trademarks, copyrights, and design matters. It enables me to provide strategic guidance on brand protection, licensing, and enforcement, ensuring clients’ intellectual assets are safeguarded while maximizing commercial value. This knowledge also enhances contract drafting, due diligence, and risk assessment in corporate transactions. 

    Additionally, being a member of some of the world’s most prestigious organizations, such as the International Trademark Association (INTA), International Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property (AIPPI), Asian Patent Attorneys Association (APAA), and World Intellectual Property Forum (WIPF), has significantly contributed to my professional growth. These memberships have provided valuable opportunities to engage with global legal experts, stay updated on international IP trends, and expand my professional network. They have also enhanced my strategic insights and knowledge, enabling me to offer well-rounded and globally relevant legal advice.

    Looking ahead, I believe the rapid growth of digital commerce and emerging technologies like AI and blockchain will redefine IP rights. This evolution will demand adaptive legal strategies, international collaboration, and enhanced regulatory frameworks to address complex cross-border IP issues.

    Drawing from your experience in the real estate sector, what were some of the most difficult aspects of drafting and negotiating construction contracts and joint development agreements?

    Drawing from my experience in the real estate sector, some of the most challenging aspects of drafting and negotiating construction contracts and joint development agreements involved navigating complex regulatory compliance, risk allocation, and aligning the interests of multiple stakeholders. Ensuring clear terms on project timelines, payment structures, and liability clauses required meticulous attention to detail. Additionally, balancing legal safeguards with commercial feasibility while managing client expectations demanded strategic negotiation skills and effective communication. These challenges enhanced my problem-solving abilities and contract management expertise.

    Could you describe one of the most challenging cases you’ve handled so far and share your approach to navigating the complexities involved in that case?

    One of the most challenging cases I handled involved complex intellectual property litigation with cross-border implications. It required navigating conflicting jurisdictional laws and strategic enforcement of trademark rights. To manage this, I conducted in-depth legal research, collaborated with international counsel, and crafted adaptive litigation strategies to protect client interests. I focused on proactive risk management and effective communication to resolve disputes efficiently. This experience reinforced the importance of strategic foresight, agility, and resilience in high-stakes legal matters.

    What are some of the major challenges that businesses in the real estate sector are facing today? Additionally, how has the role of arbitration and other alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms evolved in this sector?

    Businesses in the real estate sector today face challenges like regulatory complexities, fluctuating market dynamics, land acquisition disputes, and financing constraints. Navigating compliance with environmental laws and urban development regulations also adds to the complexity.

    Arbitration and other Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanisms have become increasingly popular in this sector due to their cost-effectiveness and faster resolution compared to traditional litigation. ADR provides flexibility, confidentiality, and specialized expertise, making it a preferred choice for resolving real estate disputes efficiently.

    As someone who has played a pivotal role in high-stakes cases as both a Partner and Counsel, what do you think is the most crucial skill that law students should focus on developing to succeed in the legal field? Also, are there any resources you would recommend to help them stay updated on legal trends and developments?

    The most crucial skill for law students is strategic legal analysis combined with effective communication. They should also develop negotiation skills, adaptability to emerging technologies, and resilience in high-pressure situations. Writing articles, case notes, and thought leadership pieces not only sharpens analytical abilities but also enhances visibility in the legal community.

    I have authored over 20 publications in reputed journals, which has significantly contributed to my understanding of complex legal issues and trends. To stay updated on legal trends, I recommend using LinkedIn for networking and industry insights. Resources like CiteCase, Bar and Bench, Live Law, Manupatra, and College Law Review Journals provide comprehensive legal updates, case analyses, and emerging legal issues. Engaging with these platforms helps build a strong foundation and keeps one informed about the latest legal developments.

    Given the demanding nature of your professional commitments, how do you manage to strike a balance between your work responsibilities and personal life?

    Balancing professional commitments with personal life is achievable through strategic time management and leveraging technology. I have automated my legal processes and maintain a paperless office, enabling me to work efficiently from anywhere as a mobile lawyer. This flexibility allows me to manage tasks on the go while staying organized and responsive. By embracing digital tools and maintaining a disciplined schedule, I maximize productivity while also ensuring time for personal well-being and family, achieving a harmonious work-life balance.

    Could you kindly share the insights and experiences you’ve gained throughout your entrepreneurial journey?

    In addition to my legal career, I have always been passionate about entrepreneurship. I founded InCourt News in 2015, which gained recognition as one of the best mobile applications to have, featured in various magazines for its innovative approach to legal news delivery, and was later acquired by a legal marketplace. I also ventured into the skilling sector with “Skill Funds,” founding startups aligned with the Skill India Mission, aimed at empowering youth with industry-relevant skills. These experiences have enriched my leadership abilities, strategic vision, and problem-solving skills, complementing my legal expertise with an entrepreneurial mindset. Currently, I am running my law firm, Lex Praxis, leveraging my diverse experiences to provide strategic legal solutions.

    Get in touch with M Abhijnan Jha –

  • “There are no shortcuts to professional advancement, and there’s no justification for compromising on the highest standards of professionalism and quality” – Kalpana Garg, IP Attorney & founder at Umbrella Legal

    “There are no shortcuts to professional advancement, and there’s no justification for compromising on the highest standards of professionalism and quality” – Kalpana Garg, IP Attorney & founder at Umbrella Legal

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    Can you share your diverse and enriching journey from IIT Kharagpur to founding Umbrella Legal. What inspired you to transition from a technical background to a career in law and entrepreneurship?

    Thank you Superlawyer Team for this opportunity and I feel very lucky to be approached and interviewed for the second time in my legal career. To begin with, I am a first-generation lawyer who, in my third year of engineering, made the decision to shift gears. Throughout 4 years of engineering college, I participated in various extracurricular and events, which gradually led me to realize my passion and aptitude for law. During the final year of my engineering studies, subjects such as introduction to patents and technology transfer solidified my resolve to pursue law after engineering, with the aim of integrating knowledge from both fields to tackle complex issues. So, at the end of 4 years of engineering college, I opted for a three-year law program specialized for individuals with a technical background at RGSOIPL, IIT Kharagpur, instead of pursuing MTech or joining a corporate job. I had wonderful cohorts and friends at law school, who added to the need to challenge myself for learning and gaining experience. 

    Following campus recruitment at IIT Kharagpur, I joined Hero MotoCorp’s R&D setup as part of their IP cell, gaining valuable experience in handling patent-related matters. After a tenure of 2.5 years at Hero, I transitioned to TCS as an IP analyst, where I delved into core IP issues and gained extensive exposure to domestic and international IP laws, particularly in the software domain. While recognized as a valuable asset at TCS, I felt the urge to broaden my legal expertise, leading me to join Bajaj Electricals as Manager-Legal and IP. In this role, I provided comprehensive legal support across various departments, refining my leadership skills and navigating complex legal challenges across multiple business verticals over a span of 2.5 years. Subsequently, I moved to ATC Tires Private Limited, further expanding my legal exposure and expertise in handling legal and compliance matters. 

    The transition from an in-house counsel role to an entrepreneurial position is not abrupt but rather rooted in a steadfast aspiration that began during law school to establish my own firm. Through exposure and accumulated experience in the legal field, I eventually reached the point where I felt confident enough to leave my corporate position and embark on this entrepreneurial journey.

    Starting Umbrella Legal must have been an exciting yet daunting venture. What were some of the initial challenges you faced, and how did you overcome them to establish a successful legal practice?

    I think the decision to leave my position as Senior Manager-Legal in 2022 to start my own firm has been the biggest challenge. The magnitude of this challenge becomes evident when starting without an existing client base, despite a decade of experience. Over time, I learned to cultivate relationships and instil trust with clients gradually. My background as an in-house counsel proved invaluable in comprehending the intricacies of transactions from both business and legal perspectives, affording me a distinct advantage in handling certain complex matters.

    Your involvement with teaching and providing legal exposure to students at NMIMS Mumbai and IIM Bodhgaya is commendable. What drives you to impart knowledge and mentorship, and how do you believe it contributes to the legal profession?

    My father, a teacher himself, instilled in me the value of imparting knowledge and contributing to the community. I have a fondness for teaching, and whenever the opportunity arises, I am committed to delivering my best as a faculty member. As a legal professional, I actively engage in continuous learning, staying updated on emerging trends in law, and giving back to the legal community through knowledge sharing, mentorship programs, and academic collaborations.

    I had the pleasure of teaching two modules of the executive law program at IIM Bodhgaya, where participants engaged in discussions on legal interpretation, case studies, and shared their experiences in addressing similar issues within their organizations. Teaching law, to me, is about more than just imparting knowledge; it’s also an opportunity to learn from diverse perspectives and experiences.

    As someone deeply involved in the startup ecosystem, what do you believe are the key legal challenges that startups often overlook, and how can they proactively address them to ensure long-term success?

    The legal challenges start from selection of entities to incorporate to finally implementing practices to mitigate legal risks. I remember having this discussion with a client wherein they were ready to deploy all measures to ensure that accounts become up and running from day 1 but when it was time for legal compliances, the reply was “is it absolutely necessary” and what would be the penalty, if not complied. 

    Certain startups fail to recognize the significance of completing legal paperwork, safeguarding intellectual property, establishing legal frameworks, and formalizing co-founder agreements and equity distribution plans. The initial action to tackle these matters involves engaging an attorney for in-depth discussions concerning your needs, financial constraints, and deadlines. Establishing a structured timeline ensures that all necessary steps are taken in a timely manner.

    Becoming a registered patent agent is a significant achievement. Could you share with us your experience preparing for and passing the Indian Patent Agent Examination?

    In 2013, while serving as Deputy Manager at Hero MotoCorp, I successfully passed the patent agent examination. In my role, I was tasked with various responsibilities such as conducting patent searches, drafting, filing, and providing related advisory services. Given the frequent engagement with patent-related matters, I found myself referring to the relevant laws and regulations multiple times a day, inadvertently preparing me for the examination. Moreover, drafting patent specifications as part of my duties involved comprehending the inventions conceived by inventors, further enhancing my preparation for the examination.

    Your involvement in advising on software patents and navigating the complexities of international patent filings is impressive. What unique considerations or challenges arise when dealing with software-related inventions in the context of patents, and how do you address them?

    My exposure to software patents and challenges around them began with my engagement with TCS, Mumbai. I joined TCS in January 2015 and just a few months before, the Alice vs. The CLS case was decided in the US Supreme Court and every software company was concerned with the verdict. In that case, it was held that patent claims granted for computer-implemented electronic escrow services were directed to abstract ideas and not patentable subject matter. This case had a profound impact on the way of examination of software patents and laid out two step analysis. India patent office on the other hand was busy drafting CRI guidelines for examination of computer related inventions but there were a lot of comments and recommendations given by industry players upon release of those guidelines due to clarity and interpretation issues. One of the biggest challenges after the Alice case was to overcome the 101 rejections in the US with limited support available from pre-Alice patent specification. 

    You’ve mentioned handling complex transactions during your tenure with some of India’s biggest companies. Can you share some strategies or approaches you utilized when faced with particularly challenging cases, such as those involving intricate IP issues or high-stakes legal matters?

    Navigating transactions entangled in numerous legal complexities demands meticulous strategic planning, clear communication with the business team, and scrupulous attention to detail when reviewing documents and disclosures. In the initial stages, it’s crucial to engage in thorough discussions with relevant teams, delving into the nature, rationale, and expected outcomes, while also conveying expectations and providing regular updates.

    At the outset of such intricate transactions, establishing a risk matrix is imperative, allowing for the identification of potential risks and the implementation of mitigation measures to secure a favourable outcome. Complex transactions often involve unanticipated challenges and it becomes important to strategize and work to ensure that you do not deviate significantly while revisiting and adjusting the transaction structure. 

    Your journey from a deputy manager at Hero MotoCorp to founding Umbrella Legal is quite inspiring. What lessons or experiences from your early career do you carry with you today, and how have they influenced your professional growth?

    Thank you for your kind words. I appreciate your kind sentiments. Transitioning from my role as deputy manager at Hero MotoCorp to establishing my own firm has been a journey rich in valuable lessons and experiences, supported by the guidance of family, friends, and mentors at various stages of my career. One paramount lesson I’ve embraced and applied is that there are no shortcuts to professional advancement, and there’s no justification for compromising on the highest standards of professionalism and quality.

    Balancing a career as a legal entrepreneur and being a strategic legal advisor requires excellent time management skills. What are some strategies or habits that you’ve found effective in maintaining this balance and staying productive?

    In today’s fast-paced professional landscape, many individuals encounter the dual challenges of time management and maintaining a healthy work-life balance. Within the legal profession, given the demanding nature of the work and long hours, it becomes essential to implement strategies for effective time management. One particularly beneficial approach is establishing clear priorities and developing the skill of delegation.

    In the past, I struggled with setting boundaries regarding personal time, often allowing work-related matters to encroach upon my personal life. However, I gradually altered these habits. Now, I prioritize carving out dedicated time for my personal life to prevent burnout and ensure rejuvenation. This shift has been instrumental in enhancing my overall well-being and productivity.

    Get in touch with Kalpana Garg–

  • “By maintaining open communication channels and fostering a culture of compliance within the organization, I have been able to strike a balance between these sometimes conflicting priorities”- Divya Chandrasekaran, Founder, iPACT LEGAL

    “By maintaining open communication channels and fostering a culture of compliance within the organization, I have been able to strike a balance between these sometimes conflicting priorities”- Divya Chandrasekaran, Founder, iPACT LEGAL

    This Interview has been published by Pragya Chandni and The SuperLawyer Team

    Can you share with us your journey from law school to becoming a seasoned counsel, highlighting some pivotal moments or experiences that shaped your career path?

    My journey from law school to becoming a seasoned counsel has been quite an adventure! There were many pivotal moments and experiences that have helped shape my career path. Starting as a trainee in a top law firm, I learned the ropes from my seniors in the corporate team. I remember feeling a bit intimidated at first, but they were so supportive and patient with me, which really helped me grow and develop. Moving to the Intellectual Property team allowed me to handle huge IP portfolios and gain experience with national and international filings and directly managing the clients. It was quite a challenge, but I loved it! Transitioning to in-house counsel roles at large FMCG and pharmaceutical companies provided me with the opportunity to delve into the business side of legal practice, which was really fascinating. These experiences have been instrumental in shaping my approach to legal practice and have helped me develop a unique perspective that combines legal expertise with a deep understanding of business dynamics.

    You’ve had a diverse range of experiences, both in law firms and in-house roles. How have these different environments contributed to your skill set and approach to legal practice?

    Yes, while starting my own firm was always on the radar, I wanted to be well-prepared and well-equipped for that and I felt it is important to have sufficient experience in Firms and in-house roles for holistic professional growth. Working in both law firms and in-house roles has really helped me develop a well-rounded skill set and approach to legal practice. In law firms, I honed my legal knowledge and expertise in understanding the intricacies, and the art of handling clients, while in-house roles allowed me to gain a broader perspective on the intersection between law and business. It’s been really interesting to see how the two sides of the legal profession work together to achieve common goals. This combined experience has been my USP that sets me and my firm apart. The blend of these experiences has helped me develop a strategic and practical approach to legal practice, where I am able to not only provide sound legal advice but also offer valuable insights on how legal considerations can impact business outcomes.

    As a strategic partner for organizations, you’ve been involved in business development and advising on key initiatives while ensuring risk mitigation and compliance. Could you elaborate on how you balance these sometimes conflicting priorities?

    Balancing business development, risk mitigation, and compliance can be quite challenging at times. As a strategic partner for organizations, my approach is to prioritize risk mitigation and compliance while also supporting key initiatives that drive business growth. This often involves conducting thorough risk assessments, collaborating closely with stakeholders, understanding the practical challenges and pain points, and proactively identifying potential legal issues. By maintaining open communication channels and fostering a culture of compliance within the organization, I have been able to strike a balance between these sometimes conflicting priorities. As a thumb rule, I ensure that Compliance and adherence to Law in its Letter and Spirit is pivotal for the sustainable and scalable growth of any Organisation and as the Legal Counsel, it is one’s responsibility to guide the management of the Companies in the right direction.

    Throughout your career, you’ve been involved in negotiating, vetting, and drafting high-stake contracts. Can you share any strategies or approaches you’ve found particularly effective in these processes?

    Negotiating, vetting, and drafting key contracts is something I Love and am always excited about! But over the years, I’ve developed some effective strategies and approaches that have helped me in these processes. One of the most important things is to thoroughly understand the needs and objectives of both parties involved in the contract. This allows me to tailor the contract terms accordingly and ensure that everyone’s needs are met while complying with all statutory requirements. Additionally, maintaining clear communication throughout the negotiation process, paying attention to detail, and seeking input from relevant stakeholders can help ensure that the final contract accurately reflects the agreements reached by both parties. Another crucial aspect is to interact with the respective department which deals with that particular project, to understand the background, the practical challenges, and the probable risks while drafting, reviewing, or negotiating a water-tight and robust contract. Lastly, following red-lining etiquette and ensuring that you have proper and valid reasoning and rationale for every change made, accepted or rejected is the most effective strategy and art of vetting and negotiating a contract.

    Given your experience in supporting business development projects and signing commercial contracts with partners across various regions, what are some challenges you’ve faced in navigating international legal landscapes, and how have you overcome them?

    Navigating international legal landscapes can present unique challenges due to differences in laws, regulations, language barriers, and business practices across regions. To overcome these challenges, it is crucial to conduct comprehensive research, seek local legal expertise when needed, and establish strong working relationships with local partners. By staying informed about international legal developments and adapting to the cultural nuances of different regions, I have been able to effectively navigate complex legal landscapes and support business development projects across various regions including APAC, AFMET, CIS, LATAM, US, UK and Japan. Yet another major challenge in cross border deals and the most negotiated clauses would be the jurisdiction, dispute resolution and applicable law clauses. The Company and counsels, before deciding on the jurisdiction and applicable laws, have to factor in various aspect such as the costs involved in dispute resolution in a jurisdiction, the practicality of adherence to foreign laws, the risks involved and how stringent/lenient the laws of such country are with respect to the subject matter. 

    There have been interesting instances where some foreign counsels deleted or modified clauses saying it is not in line with their laws, and when we delved deep and tried to understand their laws, it was not the case. Hence while working on cross-border deals, it is important to not just go by the other Party’s interpretation of laws, but personally verify it from our end, either in-house or by seeking local expertise in those countries. 

    Your role has also involved working with cross-functional teams across multiple departments. How do you ensure effective communication and collaboration in such diverse settings?

    Absolutely! The key to successful outcomes in diverse settings is to prioritize open and transparent communication. I actively seek input from all departments involved in a transaction and encourage a collaborative work environment. By fostering a culture of mutual respect and shared goals, I have been able to facilitate effective teamwork and drive successful outcomes across multiple departments. Additionally, I make sure to take approvals, denials, or comments from cross-functional teams in writing and ensure that all stakeholders/relevant departments are marked in such communications to allow other stakeholders to raise any concerns or discussions if any. If it is an oral discussion, I send out the Minutes of the Meeting. This helps ensure that all discussions are recorded and can be referred to later if needed.

    Mentorship and team development seem to be important aspects of your leadership style. Could you share some insights into how you nurture talent within your team and promote their professional growth?

    Yes, I truly believe in nurturing talent within my team by providing opportunities for professional growth and development. I set clear expectations, offer constructive feedback, and empower team members to take on new challenges. Allowing and encouraging the team members to take ownership of every single task they handle, not just gives them confidence, but also makes them accountable for their assignments. Instead of giving them the answers, I tell them how to find the solution. This helps them handle any situation even in my absence and makes them better professionals. Having regular team meetings and brainstorming sessions has helped the team handle their workload meticulously and be abreast of the laws. I also believe in being open to feedback and constructive criticism, as it helps me and my team grow professionally. As Lawyers, it is important that we agree to disagree!

    Looking back at your journey, what advice would you offer to fresh law graduates who are about to embark on their own careers in the legal field?

    I would advise fresh law graduates to invest in continuous learning and professional development to stay abreast of legal developments and industry trends. 

    While it is easy to generate opinions or contract drafts using AI, it is important that every document is drafted meticulously and one understands the rationale behind every line that goes into a contract/document and mastering the art of interpretation. While AI is an effective tool that helps you work smart, it should not be a replacement for your hard work. Mere copy-pasting of language can land up being more dangerous and expensive than one can imagine. 

    Seek mentorship and guidance from experienced legal professionals to gain valuable insights and perspectives. No doubt is a silly doubt, never refrain from asking questions or getting clarification.

    Build strong relationships with colleagues, clients, and industry peers to expand your network and opportunities for growth. Embrace challenges and opportunities for growth, as they provide valuable learning experiences that can shape your career path. 

    Above all, approach your legal career with passion, dedication, and a commitment to excellence in all that you do. All the very best!

  • “If you’re committed to making a positive impact, integrating accessibility into your daily interactions and engagements is essential.” – Dr. Kalyan C. Kankanala, IP Attorney and Managing Partner at BananaIP Counsels

    “If you’re committed to making a positive impact, integrating accessibility into your daily interactions and engagements is essential.” – Dr. Kalyan C. Kankanala, IP Attorney and Managing Partner at BananaIP Counsels

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    Dr. Kalyan, as a founder, could you  give us an overview of BananaIP Counsels and describe your current responsibilities within the  firm?

    Absolutely. At BananaIP Counsels, we pride ourselves on being a forward-thinking IP firm that is not only technology-driven but also champions diversity, with a strong emphasis on women leadership and inclusivity of persons with disabilities. Our combination of technological specialization, legal expertise, and business insight allows us to  provide high quality IP services to clients.

    Our firm has specialized departments led by experienced partners in various technology sectors.  Additionally, we also have focused departments dealing with Trademarks, Copyrights, E-commerce Law, Entertainment Law, Open Source Law, and Technology Law, some of which are integrated IP divisions.

    In my current role, I lead the innovation, consulting, and strategy department of the firm. Our department focuses on the strategic IP needs of our clients, and the professional growth and knowledge development of our associates. We handle strategic and complex IP projects that cover a broad spectrum, from IP mining and audits to devising IP protection strategies, and from resolving disputes to facilitating licensing and commercialization efforts. 

    Interesting! We noted that this year marks the 20th anniversary of BananaIP Counsels. Could you share some insights into the firm’s evolution and highlight some of the key milestones achieved along the way?

    BananaIP Counsels is marking its 20th anniversary this year, having initially taken root in IIM Bangalore’s entrepreneurship cell (NSRCEL) back in 2004 as Brain League IP Services. Our journey through the years has been a tale  of survival, stabilization, and success. Despite the hurdles and destabilizing events encountered along the way, we have achieved at least part of what we set out to do. We believe that our efforts have   contributed to the current IP ecosystem in India at different levels. Overall, our endeavors over the past 20 years have fostered IP knowledge development, human capital growth, policy and legislative advancement, and the enhancement of IP service standards.

    From your experience, what is your assessment of the current IP landscape in India? Additionally, can you tell us your predictions for its development over the next decade?

    Over the past twenty years, the Intellectual Property (IP) system has witnessed considerable advancements in terms of IP filing numbers, the processes and systems introduced by the IP office, enforcement mechanisms, and the judiciary’s responsiveness. As of now, the IP system in India can be described as ‘reasonably friendly’.

    Despite these advancements, there remains substantial work to be done to cultivate an IP ecosystem in India that is both business-friendly and equitable. Currently, the system faces challenges such as limited accessibility, inconsistency and diversity in Court processes and speed, difficulties in digital IP enforcement, an underdeveloped licensing framework, and low hygiene levels. Over the next five to ten years, I anticipate progress in these areas, and I also expect a significant rise in IP filings and registrations.

    I believe the upcoming decade will be a ‘golden era’ for IP in India.

    With the ongoing discussions around Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its influence across sectors, what impacts do you foresee AI having on the field of IP, specifically regarding IP management and practices?

    Today’s discussions on AI encompass a range of IP issues, including protectability, ownership, enforcement, and dispute resolution. While important, these topics will not be the focus of this response. Instead, I will briefly touch upon how BananaIP is leveraging AI in our operations and our future plans for its use.

    BananaIP has always been an early adopter of technology, and we have developed several tools to enhance the quality and efficiency of our work. Currently, we utilize AI to assist us in reviewing and refining our work products, and to supplement some of our file management  and communications.  Due to concerns over confidentiality, we do not use AI for drafting patents and designs at this time.

    Additionally, we have developed complementary tools that aid in file management and the review of competitor filings. We are also in the process of creating predictive and analytical tools aimed at automating audits, portfolio management, and project documentation.

    While General AI has the potential to draft legal documents, the quality of its current output does not yet meet our firm’s standards. However, we anticipate significant advancements in this area, and believe that AI will soon be capable of producing first drafts that exceed the quality produced by our new recruits. Although we do not foresee AI replacing IP professionals in the near future, we do expect a notable adjustment in the distribution of tasks and responsibilities.

    Looking ahead, our goal for the next three years is to develop proprietary tools that will assist us in creating certain deliverables, reviewing projects, and automating manual processes.  Whether we like it or not, I believe that the IP profession has to adapt to the advancements in AI technology, and we must reconsider some of our current  practices. 

    Based on your experience, do interdisciplinary teams having technology, law and business experts work well together? What has your experience been?

    Our experience with interdisciplinary teams has been excellent. The interdisciplinary approach at BananaIP fosters a stimulating and intellectually rewarding work environment. Our operational model blends the openness of research labs with the structured discipline of law firms. Our team comprises technology specialists, many of whom are also qualified patent agents or attorneys with a deep understanding of  the law. Our lawyers   specialize in IP, and have an open mind to learning the science and technology relevant to their work. They   bring unique perspectives and contributions to each project, which  add significant value to our work products.

    We have learned that  BananaIP does not function like a typical law firm, and has  a unique culture. Can you tell us about your culture and values?

    BananaIP offers a welcoming, intellectually stimulating and open work environment. We value balancing work and life as much as we value our clients’ IP and business needs. Unlike many IP law firms, we don’t have a strict hierarchy and rigid structures. Our structure is mostly flat. Diversity, equity, and inclusion are  integral to our culture and values.

    Honesty, integrity, and dedication to our client’s cause form the core of  all our services.

    You have been talking a lot about accessibility off late, why do you believe accessibility is crucial for the IP system?

    One of the primary objectives of the IP system is  the benefit of the public. It  promotes creativity and inventive activity, and grants exclusive rights over inventions and creations with the objective of   eventually benefitting the general public. This objective is achieved through access, disclosure and publication of ideas and creations, and unless  these are fully accessible, a large portion of the public will not be able to benefit from them. In other words, accessibility of the IP system and   disclosures plays an important role in achieving the ultimate goal of  public benefit, and if there is no accessibility, the very purpose of the IP system  will not be served. Therefore, it is important to make the IP system fully accessible to everyone, and to ensure that no one is left   behind.

    In your interactions, you have often highlighted the suitability of the IP profession for individuals with disabilities. Could you explain your perspective on this?

    Certainly, to start with, let me state that I am a person with blindness, and  I have been able to  successfully practise as an IP attorney. This of course would not have been possible without the help and assistance of my colleagues, and confidence reposed in me by my clients. From my experience in the field, I strongly believe that the IP system is very suitable for persons with disabilities. Many reasons led me to this belief, and I will tell you three of them:

    A. Firstly, IP  filing and prosecution is today fully online, and one can practise   this without the  barriers  relating to physical movement and inaccessible premises. Several Courts have also gone online, and  have    taken some steps to facilitate accessibility of documents and materials.

    b. The IP Office  has issued accessibility guidelines, and has established a system to seek  reasonable accommodations. While there is much to be done to make its online systems fully accessible, the IP Office has shown the intent to do so. This makes it relatively easy for persons with disabilities to  overcome accessibility hurdles, and participate fully/equally  in the IP process.

    c. To get into this profession, a person with a disability need not be a lawyer. Persons with any degree can qualify as trademark agents, and  persons with a technical background can get into the patent profession.

    Overall, the IP profession is welcoming, and companies are not too uncomfortable in working with persons with disabilities. In my opinion, if a person with a disability is looking for an option that provides independence, autonomy, and respectability, the IP profession is a good  choice.

    You have been  interacting with  the Indian IP Office to improve accessibility to persons with disabilities. What  do you think the IP Office must do to make its systems and processes accessible to persons with disabilities? 

    The IP Office has taken an important step by releasing guidelines to improve access for all. However, this intention needs to be put into practice effectively. The IP Office  must take the following steps:

    a. The IP Office should organize training sessions to educate their staff about the needs of individuals with disabilities and highlight the importance of providing access. Currently, many officials believe that they have the right to refuse accessibility requests, thinking that the rules in IP laws are more important than the requirements of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act. Changing this mindset will make it easier for individuals with disabilities to engage with the IP Office.

    b. It is also important for the IP Office to enhance the accessibility of its online platforms. Despite some progress, their systems do not meet essential accessibility standards. Improving the accessibility of their filing systems and documents would be significantly beneficial.

    c. Furthermore, the IP Office has to consider issuing guidelines or circulars that require the submission of documents in an accessible format. This will ensure that everyone, including those with disabilities, can access these documents easily. Many High Courts have already required documents to be submitted in a format that is readable by optical character recognition (OCR), and the IP Office should follow this example.

    By implementing these measures, the IP Office can facilitate full and equal participation of all individuals, including those with disabilities, in the IP process.

    These steps do not seem very complex, and we hope the IP Office will look into them seriously. We noted that you recently published a book on accessibility entitled ‘Understanding Accessibility’ in which you  have  pointed out that everyone can contribute to accessibility. Can you tell us how we can do that?

    Well, if you have the intent and willingness to make a difference, you may consider  the following simple steps:

    1. Share any document or information you file or distribute in accessible formats. This is easy, and you may consider doing this for   all types of documents you share in general, or file before Courts or Tribunals. Here is a link that gives accessibility guidance for word documents, PDFs, and PPTs: https://www.adcet.edu.au/inclusive-teaching/accessible-content/accessible-documents
    2. Whenever you  share something on social media, ensure that  you include alternative text, image descriptions, video captions, etc. Most social media and messaging platforms have enabled these features, and all you need to do is spend an extra minute to make your post, photo, video, or document, accessible. You will find some accessibility tips at this link: https://disabilityin.org/resource/creating-accessible-social-media-content/

    I hope you will consider  incorporating these as a part of your day to day interactions and engagements.

    Thanks a lot for giving me this opportunity.

    Get in touch with Dr. Kalyan C. Kankanala–

  • “The diversity in my work not only keeps it intellectually stimulating but also allows me to bring a unique perspective to the table.” – Navigating the Legal Tapestry of Media and Entertainment, Sudisha Mukherji, Co-Founder of International Legal Alliance.

    “The diversity in my work not only keeps it intellectually stimulating but also allows me to bring a unique perspective to the table.” – Navigating the Legal Tapestry of Media and Entertainment, Sudisha Mukherji, Co-Founder of International Legal Alliance.

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    How would you introduce yourself to our readers, considering your diverse background in law, media, and entertainment, along with your successful stint as a model?

    Hello, I’m Sudisha Mukherji. With over eight years of experience as a media and entertainment lawyer and IP attorney, my journey through the media industry has been both diverse and enriching. Prior to my legal career, I delved into the worlds of modelling and theatre. I modelled for renowned brands like Garnier, Lux, and Coke, and walked the ramp for various designers at fashion events such as the Bangalore and Pune Fashion Weeks. These experiences, alongside my legal studies, gave me a unique perspective enabling me to adeptly navigate the complexities of the media and entertainment sectors, both in India and internationally, with a deep understanding of their intricacies.

    Your journey into the legal profession is quite intriguing. Could you share some key milestones and experiences that shaped your journey from being a model to becoming an esteemed media and entertainment lawyer? How did your experience in the fashion industry contribute to your current role as a media and entertainment lawyer?

    My transition from modelling to law was marked by several significant milestones and enriching experiences. Winning MTV’s “Making the Cut Season 1” and being a finalist in Miss India East 2012 were key highlights. Additionally, my active participation in the theatre production ‘Stories in a Song’ offered me a profound insight into the intricacies of the fashion, media, and theatre industries. Meeting my mentor, Adv. Jamshed Mistry, during my MCom, led me to pursue law. Even before I enrolled in LLB, I was certain about specializing in a specific area of law i.e., media and entertainment. This early clarity and guidance have been pivotal in my legal career.  These experiences coupled with mentorship have proven to be invaluable in my legal career. 

    The opportunity to work in fashion, media, and theatre industries equipped me with a deep and nuanced understanding of the inner workings of these sectors, enabling me to provide effective counsel to a diverse range of clients within the media and entertainment industry. This unique blend of practical industry knowledge and legal expertise allows me to approach each case with a comprehensive perspective, ensuring that I am not just a lawyer, but also a strategic advisor who understands the creative and business aspects of the media world.

    Managing both legal practice and involvement in the Ethics Committee of Nowrosjee Wadia Maternity Hospital and Bai Jerbai Wadia Hospital for Children is impressive. How do you balance your professional commitments with your responsibilities in the healthcare sector?

    My involvement with the healthcare sector, particularly with Nowrosjee Wadia Maternity Hospital and Bai Jerbai Wadia Hospital for Children, spans over six years. In this role, I serve as a Legal Expert on the Ethics Committee, focusing on ensuring adherence to good clinical practices for collaborative studies and research. This responsibility complements my legal practice rather seamlessly.

    In all honesty, I don’t view my role in the healthcare sector as an additional task to manage; rather, it’s an integral part of my professional journey. My work with the Ethics Committee enriches my understanding of legal issues in healthcare. The skills and insights I gain from one sphere often benefit the other.

    Balancing these commitments comes down to effective time management and a deep passion for both fields. The synergies between my legal practice and my role in healthcare governance allow me to navigate both areas effectively. My experiences in healthcare have provided me with a broader perspective on legal issues, enhancing my ability to advise clients with a more holistic approach. Therefore, rather than balancing two separate roles, I see them as complementary aspects of my professional life that enrich each other.

    Your clientele includes a diverse range of entities, from production houses to hospitals. How do you navigate between such different sectors, and what challenges or rewards come with representing clients with varied interests?

    Navigating between diverse sectors like production houses and hospitals presents its unique challenges and rewards, and my experience in both the media and healthcare industries plays a crucial role in this. One of the main challenges is the need to constantly adapt to the distinct legal landscapes of each sector. The media and entertainment industry, for instance, involves a lot of intellectual property, contractual, and compliance issues, while the healthcare sector demands a thorough understanding of medical ethics, privacy laws, and regulatory compliance. My background in both these areas allows me to transition smoothly between these different legal environments.

    The rewards of representing such a varied clientele are immense. It provides me with a rich, multifaceted perspective on legal issues. Working with production houses keeps me connected to the creative and dynamic world of media, while my involvement with hospitals grounds me in the impactful and socially responsible realm of healthcare. This diversity in my work not only keeps it intellectually stimulating but also allows me to bring a unique perspective to the table, combining creative problem-solving with a deep understanding of regulatory frameworks. In essence, the variety in my clientele enhances my capability as a lawyer. It enables me to approach legal issues with a broader, more informed perspective.

    Your journey involves a transition from a legal consultancy role to being an independent practitioner. What inspired you to take this leap, and how has it influenced the way you approach your work?

    The decision to transition from a legal consultancy role to becoming an independent practitioner was not so much a choice as a necessity. At that time, I was struggling to find work that aligned with my interests and expertise. However, once I made the leap, thankfully, my practice started to grow organically through word-of-mouth recommendations and referrals.

    This journey has profoundly influenced how I approach my work. One of the key aspects is my perspective on learning. I consider myself a lifelong learner; I learn something new every single day. This mindset has been crucial in my journey as an independent practitioner. I’ve learned everything on the job, and I’m deeply grateful to my mentors and seniors who have offered unwavering support, guidance, and encouragement. Their assistance was invaluable in the early days of my practice, and it remains just as important now, whenever I reach out for insight.

    Being an independent practitioner has also instilled in me a sense of resilience and adaptability. It has pushed me to be more proactive in seeking opportunities, developing new skills, and expanding my network. This journey has not only honed my legal skills but also sharpened my entrepreneurial instincts. It has taught me the importance of building and maintaining relationships, understanding client needs deeply, and consistently delivering high-quality work.

    In summary, the transition to independent practice has been a transformative experience. It has shaped me into a more versatile, knowledgeable, and resourceful professional, enabling me to offer more comprehensive and personalized legal services to my clients.

    During your secondment with Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited on their digital vertical while working for ANM, how do you perceive the ongoing digital transformation in the media and entertainment industry, and what legal challenges and opportunities does it present?

    The digital transformation in the media and entertainment sector, fuelled by online curated content platforms, broadens content variety, targeting diverse audiences. This shift brings legal challenges and opportunities in management of rights and online content regulation. Key areas include managing rights through agreements like co-production and licensing, and handling sensitive content and brand associations. Legal expertise is essential to navigate this evolving digital landscape, ensuring compliance and protecting interests amidst changing regulations and audience dynamics.

    Beyond the legal realm, what hobbies or activities do you engage in to unwind and rejuvenate?

    Outside of my legal career, I find joy and relaxation in spending time with my family and  my two wonderful boys. One of my favourite activities is curating sensory bin activities for them, which is both fun and engaging. Additionally, I enjoy unwinding by taking long drives, and immersing myself in the world of books. 

    With your extensive experience in media and entertainment law, what advice would you give to aspiring lawyers looking to enter this dynamic and ever-evolving field?

    To aspiring lawyers entering the field of media and entertainment law, I advise prioritizing mental health due to the field’s demanding nature, where everything often seems urgent. While it’s a learning-rich profession, remember that you can’t master everything at once. Taking time off for yourself is crucial to avoid burnout and maintain a healthy balance.

    Get in touch with Sudisha Mukherji-