Super Lawyer

Tag: matrimonial litigation

  • “I have learned that in matrimonial litigation especially highly contested and long-pending matters mediation is often the most effective tool.” – Rajiv Rajpurohit, Family Law Practitioner at the Courts of Ahmedabad & Pune.

    “I have learned that in matrimonial litigation especially highly contested and long-pending matters mediation is often the most effective tool.” – Rajiv Rajpurohit, Family Law Practitioner at the Courts of Ahmedabad & Pune.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    You’ve mentioned that your advent into the field of law was almost accidental, as you initially planned to pursue an MBA in Pune but were influenced by friends studying law. How did that unexpected shift shape your career path and your approach to the profession?

    I completed my schooling at a Government school in Rajasthan. In 2006, I moved to Pune for further studies. As everyone knows, Pune is often referred to as the “Oxford of the East.” At that time, Business Administration was in high demand, so after completing my schooling, I pursued a BBA in Pune. During those days, I had a few friends and acquaintances who were studying at various law schools. In the evenings, we would often meet for tea or simply hang out. They would share their experiences about academic activities, court visits, and legal studies. Listening to them gradually developed my interest in law, and I began considering admission to the field. Before enrolling in law school, I worked with the Symbiosis Group for a few months. However, when the time came to make a final decision whether to pursue an MBA or law. I was not fully confident and remained unsure. It was then that my father guided me towards pursuing law. With his approval and encouragement, I finally decided to enroll in law school. Most importantly, till date, my father has been a constant source of motivation and support, especially during a difficult phase when I felt like giving up legal practice and considering another career path. His encouragement has always kept me going.

    You have conducted highly contested divorce cases, resolved long-pending disputes through mediation, and handled matters ranging from custody to NRI divorces. How challenging is it to navigate cross-border family disputes, particularly NRI divorces, and what key stakeholders are usually involved?

    I have been practicing law since 2013, Over the years, I have handled hundreds of matrimonial disputes and cases in Ahmedabad, Pune and Mumbai, and have also appeared before several Hon’ble High Courts in India also before the Hon’ble supreme court of India. One common aspect in matrimonial disputes whether contested or mutual consent, whether involving NRIs, is that they often revolve around key issues such as claims of alimony, division of immovable assets, child custody, and other financial considerations. In such matters, the role of a lawyer is not limited to representing a client in court; it is also about guiding all stakeholders toward what is reasonable and achievable. In NRI divorce cases, the first challenge is often the logistical aspect ensuring the presence of parties or enabling their participation through virtual hearings, which most courts now facilitate. In mutual consent divorces for NRIs, the process can be straightforward once formalities are understood and complied with as per the law and procedure. From my experience, NRIs are usually clear about their terms, conditions, and settlement formulas, but it becomes the lawyer’s job to draft, execute, and present those terms in a legally sound manner so that there are no future disputes, particularly regarding child custody or financial obligations, another is regarding the if any joint property in foreign country and one of the spouse is in India and not looking for forward to go back., when I talk about long pending divorce cases I recall one particular case where a client had been contesting a matter for years. And later after a few years he came to me with the mindset of “ that he would only like to contest” rather than resolving it. After understanding his case history, I advised him that litigation should be the last resort, and that he should first try to settle the matter through communication either directly, via lawyers, or through mediation. Initially hesitant, he eventually followed my advice. Within three months, the matter was resolved amicably, something that could have been achieved years earlier had proper guidance been given. From my practice, I have learned that in matrimonial litigation especially highly contested and long-pending matters mediation is often the most effective tool. The key is to fully understand the facts, the parties’ financial capacities, the complexity of the issues, and the emotional aspects, and then to guide the stakeholders toward a reasonable middle ground. I firmly believe there should never be a point where a lawyer loses hope of settlement. Keeping that hope alive until the very end, unless a final order is passed, is essential in family disputes.

    With over a decade of experience before the Family Courts and High Courts in both Gujarat and Maharashtra, what procedural differences have you observed while practicing in these jurisdictions?

    This is indeed a very important question, because understanding procedural differences is crucial when practicing in different jurisdictions. Yes, there are significant differences between Gujarat and Maharashtra, and I have learned a great deal from working alongside lawyers in both states. When it comes to procedures, there are differences in the prescribed formats for filing applications, the method of preparing compilations, and the specific documentation requirements. The process for exhibiting documents also varies slightly between the two jurisdictions. In family matters, I have observed differences in the conciliation and mediation processes. The filing procedure itself also differs. For example, in Maharashtra, one can file a matter without physically going to court; everything can be done virtually through the court portal. Even the administration of an oath can be completed virtually by uploading a video, which is not the same in Gujarat. These procedural nuances highlight the importance of adapting to local practices while ensuring compliance with the law.

    Your practice emphasizes amicable, reconciliation-focused solutions. What trends have you noticed in the growing use of ADR in matrimonial disputes, and how do you see it shaping the future of family law?

    Yes, I strongly believe that there should be amicable solutions in matrimonial disputes because it is ultimately a question of precious time of life. If one is able to take a timely decision and resolve the dispute, it is far better than letting it remain in court for years, which rarely leads either party anywhere. However, it is important that both parties are willing to be reasonable with each other, even while keeping their differences, and remain focused during mediation. Nowadays, I see that even the Hon’ble Supreme Court actively promotes mediation in many matters. In my experience, Family Court judges also often take the initiative to speak with both parties, understand their concerns, and encourage amicable settlements. If the parties show willingness, mediation can be a highly effective tool. Such solutions can be facilitated by any authority through various methods, including formal mediation or counselling. Sometimes, emotions run high and parties are initially unable to take rational decisions. However, after proper counselling, they are often in a better position to make fair and reasonable decisions. Therefore, irrespective of the situation, I always advise that Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) and amicable settlements should be explored, as they are often the best way to ensure a fair and lasting resolution.

    You began your career as a Legal Associate under senior advocates before founding your own firm. What lessons from those early years continue to guide your courtroom strategy today?

    Yes, I began my career working with a lawyer who had many years of experience. I learned a great deal from advocates during my time in Pune and later in Ahmedabad. One of the key lessons I have learned is that if you wish to succeed as a litigation lawyer particularly in matrimonial matters, which often involve divorce, custody disputes, alimony, maintenance, and domestic violence, the first and foremost skill you need is to listen carefully to your client. You must understand where the real problem lies, while also respecting the emotional circumstances of the parties. I have also learned that you should never be judgmental when listening to clients. Instead, your role is to ensure you understand their circumstances fully. From my seniors, I learned the importance of proper drafting and being thoroughly prepared with arguments. I recall that when I was assisting senior lawyers, they would take detailed notes point-by-point and spend hours preparing final arguments for divorce cases. Contrary to the perception that matrimonial litigation is straightforward, I have found it to be complex, involving significant factual and legal research, especially since family disputes often involve many incidents that form the grounds for divorce. As per High Court and Supreme Court judgments, it is essential to keep updating oneself on recent case law. I have made it a habit to learn continuously from court proceedings, by listening to arguments and closely studying judgments.

    What motivated you to establish your own practice, and what vision did you have for it in the beginning? How did you overcome the initial challenges?

    It is always a challenge to choose litigation as a career after completing law. Initially, I opted for corporate work, but later my father motivated me to practice in court. He advised me to go to the court every day, whether I had a brief or not. I had no contacts who could help me enter the field of litigation, so I followed my father’s advice. I began visiting the court daily and interacting with lawyers. Eventually, I met one of my professors from my graduation days, who was also a practicing lawyer. I sought his help and asked if I could join his office. He told me that he didn’t have many matters at that time but could refer me to someone else. He gave me a reference to another advocate in Pune. When I went to meet this advocate, he asked me just one question: “When do you want to start?” My answer was, “I can start right now.” He immediately agreed and told me I could join and start working. I didn’t even go back home. I began working on the brief that very day. The second thing he told me was, “You will have to work hard, I will take care of your basic needs and concerns.” That assurance gave me the confidence I needed, and that is how my journey began. And this is how my journey started for my first client. One thing I learned early on is that you never know where clients will come from. They may walk in from anywhere, even from the court corridors. Sometimes, they may watch you argue in court, be impressed with your performance, and later ask for your contact details. In this profession, your performance is what pays you both in the form of clients and valuable contacts.

    What inspired you to choose matrimonial and family litigation as your primary specialization, and how has working in this niche shaped your perspective on law?

    Yes, my interest gradually shifted towards matrimonial law. Since I started my practice, I used to accompany my senior in family court matters assigned to me. Most of these cases, particularly matrimonial disputes, involved domestic violence and divorce. Slowly and gradually, this became my primary practice area. Although I have also handled other matters, over time my focus has increasingly been on matrimonial disputes and family matters. While I would not call it a specialisation, with experience I have gained significant exposure in this field. As I have already stated, dealing with matrimonial matters is not easy. It requires a great deal of skill, patience, and the ability to handle sensitive human emotions. I believe this area of law has immense potential, and one should continue to explore, understand, and work in depth within family and matrimonial matters

    Having such a diverse practice now and over a decade of experience, what advice would you give to new entrants in the field of law?

    All entrants in the field of law must be prepared to work hard, especially in the initial stages. One should not assume that any particular branch of law is not worth exploring. If an opportunity comes your way, it should be accepted and explored, as it may eventually lead to your mainstream practice. Therefore, do not make up your mind too early or immediately after graduating from law school. Take up different matters, handle them diligently, and if needed, seek guidance from experienced senior lawyers or practitioners in that particular area. Learn from each experience, as this gradual exposure will help you discover your true area of interest and expertise.

    Managing a practice across two jurisdictions can be demanding. How do you balance professional commitments with personal life, and what activities help you unwind and recharge?

    Yes, certainly, sometimes it requires motivation, but right from the beginning I chose to practise in two jurisdictions. As far as personal life is concerned, it goes without saying that law is a profession where, especially in the initial years, one has to compromise on personal life and carry the pressures of professional responsibilities. Being a noble profession, law demands complete dedication and 100% commitment. There is no other option but to prioritise professional life first. After a certain number of years, personal life also finds its balance, as family members begin to understand the efforts and challenges of a lawyer’s journey. Eventually, it becomes a routine. So yes, whether personal or professional, at the end of the day, life goes with the flow, and with time one learns how to manage both.

    Get in touch with Rajiv Rajpurohit –

  • “The challenges of litigation, coupled with the responsibility of advocating for clients across diverse forums, continue to strengthen my passion for this profession.” – Ms. Vikas Jain, Advocate at Delhi High Court.

    “The challenges of litigation, coupled with the responsibility of advocating for clients across diverse forums, continue to strengthen my passion for this profession.” – Ms. Vikas Jain, Advocate at Delhi High Court.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    With nearly two decades of experience practicing across multiple courts and legal forums, what first inspired you to pursue a career in law, and how has your motivation evolved over the years?

    From an early stage, I was fascinated by how the law functions as both a shield and a tool for justice. Watching how legal interventions could alter the course of people’s lives inspired me to pursue this profession. Initially, my motivation stemmed from a desire to understand the technicalities of the law and its practical application. Over the years, however, the focus has shifted towards ensuring accessibility to justice and using legal knowledge to create meaningful impact. The challenges of litigation, coupled with the responsibility of advocating for clients across diverse forums, continue to strengthen my passion for this profession. Today, my motivation is rooted not only in professional growth but also in the satisfaction of standing by those who rely on law as their last resort.

    You have handled an exceptionally diverse range of matters, from property disputes and intellectual property rights to criminal law and matrimonial cases. How do you adapt your legal strategies to address the unique demands of such varied practice areas?

    Each practice area carries its own nuances, requiring flexibility and a tailored approach. For property disputes, the emphasis is often on documentary evidence and statutory interpretation. In intellectual property matters, strategy lies in understanding technical details and balancing innovation with enforcement. Criminal law demands precision in procedural safeguards, while matrimonial cases require a balance of empathy and firmness. I adapt by conducting extensive research, analyzing precedents, and understanding the unique facts of each matter rather than relying on a one-size-fits-all approach. Equally important is the ability to listen, both to clients and to the evolving expectations of courts, which ensures that strategies remain responsive and effective across different fields.

    Property law and land disputes in India often involve intricate regulatory frameworks and procedural challenges. What approach do you prefer while navigating these matters effectively?

    Property disputes in India demand patience, detail-oriented analysis, and a deep grasp of statutory provisions. My approach begins with meticulous scrutiny of title documents, revenue records, and mutation entries. Given the overlapping jurisdictions of civil courts, revenue authorities, and tribunals, I place emphasis on identifying the proper forum and ensuring procedural compliance at every step. I also rely heavily on precedents, since land-related judgments often clarify ambiguities. At the same time, I encourage alternative solutions such as mediation to avoid protracted litigation, especially in family or co-ownership matters. Ultimately, a combination of technical accuracy, strategic drafting, and practical problem-solving enables effective navigation of these complex disputes.

     In the early stages of your career, what pivotal experiences helped deepen your understanding of the law, and how did they shape your professional approach?

    The early years of my career were spent in extensive court exposure—observing proceedings, drafting pleadings, and assisting senior counsels. One pivotal experience was handling procedural objections in trial courts, which taught me the importance of detail and timing. Another formative experience was preparing special leave petitions for the Supreme Court, which deepened my appreciation for precision in framing legal questions. These experiences instilled in me the discipline of thorough preparation and respect for judicial time. They also helped me understand that every matter, irrespective of its size, deserves equal attention, since even minor details can alter the outcome. These lessons continue to guide my professional approach.

    Having appeared before the Supreme Court, High Courts, subordinate courts, tribunals, and other forums, how does your preparation and strategy differ when handling matters at various levels of the judicial system? Additionally, what has been one of the most challenging cases for you and how did you navigate it?

    Preparation varies significantly with the forum. In trial courts, strategy revolves around evidence, cross-examination, and building the factual record. High Court matters often focus on questions of law and precedents, while Supreme Court practice demands brevity, clarity, and framing of constitutional or substantial legal issues. One of the most challenging cases I handled involved a service matter concerning a disabled ex-serviceman’s appointment, which was delayed due to procedural hurdles. It required not only persistence before multiple forums but also empathy towards the litigant’s hardship. The case reinforced the importance of resilience, drafting precision, and relentless follow-up to achieve justice.

    When managing sensitive cases such as matrimonial disputes or criminal matters, how do you balance legal precision with empathy, and what preparation goes into handling emotionally charged situations?

    In sensitive cases, the lawyer’s role extends beyond legal arguments to offering emotional stability to clients. I approach these matters with active listening, ensuring that clients feel heard and supported while keeping the focus on the legal remedies available. Preparation involves anticipating emotional outbursts, safeguarding the dignity of parties, and ensuring that sensitive facts are presented with discretion. Empathy helps in building trust, while legal precision ensures that arguments remain credible before the court. This balance is essential because, in emotionally charged cases, the outcome is not only measured in legal terms but also in the client’s ability to move forward with dignity.

    Over the past 19 years, what significant changes have you observed in the legal profession, particularly with the advent of technology, and how have you adapted your practice to remain effective?

    The legal profession has undergone a remarkable transformation with the adoption of technology. E-filing, virtual hearings, digital research databases, and AI-driven tools have revolutionized how lawyers work. Earlier, access to judgments and precedents was time-consuming, but today, technology has made research more efficient and comprehensive. I have embraced these changes by adopting digital platforms, managing case files electronically, and using technology to enhance client communication. While traditional courtroom skills remain indispensable, technology has improved accessibility and speed. The key is to blend the discipline of classical legal practice with modern digital efficiency to remain relevant and Effective.

    What advice would you offer to young lawyers aspiring to build a versatile and enduring career in litigation and dispute resolution? Which skills, habits, or resources should they start cultivating from the earliest stages of their journey?

    To young lawyers, I would emphasise patience and persistence as the cornerstones of a litigation career. In the early stages, focus should be on building drafting skills, observing court proceedings, and learning procedural law in depth. Cultivate the habit of consistent legal research, as strong fundamentals in precedents and statutes build long-term confidence. Networking with peers, maintaining professional ethics, and respecting the bench are equally crucial. I also advise developing communication skills—both oral and written—as they are vital in every forum. Most importantly, never lose sight of empathy, because law is ultimately about people, and balancing technical knowledge with human understanding creates a truly enduring career.

    Get un touch with Ms. Vikas Jain –

  • “Over the years I have learnt that litigation is one field where a woman can balance things, be the boss on her own terms!” – Garima Sachdeva, Senior Panel Counsel for Union of India at Delhi High Court & Armed Forces Tribunal.

    “Over the years I have learnt that litigation is one field where a woman can balance things, be the boss on her own terms!” – Garima Sachdeva, Senior Panel Counsel for Union of India at Delhi High Court & Armed Forces Tribunal.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Coming from a lineage of four generations in the legal profession and having been raised in both legal and military environments, what pivotal experiences or influences led you to pursue law as your career? In what ways has your military background shaped your legal perspective and practice?

    To be honest I was also one of those confused teenagers who couldn’t decide what direction to steer towards, one day I wanted to become an archeologist and the other day I wanted to become a fashion designer. But when you have so many lawyers in the family, that’s usually the safest option since you have someone to fall back on. I still remember the day my grandfather suggested to my dad that bring her to Law, and since my dad was the black sheep amongst the lawyers in the family, granddad had a sense of pride to have convinced me to pursue law as a family tradition. Being an Air Force kid, born in Bangalore and being brought up all over, I have lived and breathed the blue uniform life, from changing 9 schools in 12 years of school life, I was also taught to adjust and adapt to change almost every 2 years. I started my practice in 2014, with a military upbringing and a legal legacy I somehow felt the need that both had to be utilised to its max potential, and as if the universe had a plan all laid out, I started practice in an office which did military law and service laws as a major field of practice, and 11 years down, there has just been no looking back! Earlier I was fighting for the faujis against the fauj and now I’m proud to be fighting for the fauj instead, from private practice to being a Senior Panel Counsel for the Union of India. 

    What inspired you to pursue an LL.M. in International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights at Europa-Universität Viadrina in Germany? Could you share how your academic experience there enriched your understanding of law and influenced your professional journey?

    The subject of Humanitarian law encouraged me to pursue my masters in the middle of my practice, in 2019. I suddenly took the decision to step aside and study, with an intention to gain experience on an international level and for self growth. Learning International law and understanding its applicability in your country gives you a macro prospective of what you do in court rooms daily, specially in military law, learning how the military law functions internationally changes your prospective and brings a better geopolitical understanding of your country. For a subject like this, I picked a university which is one of the oldest University of Germany, it has seen all the major wars of the world from the Napoleon War to being the centre of the World Wars, the university in fact became a shelter for refugees during the world war, so it could not have been any better than this for a subject like this, with professors from all across the globe, it has certainly had a great influence on both my professional and personal life. 

    During the initial phase of your career, you worked closely with a senior who later was elevated as the Delhi High Court Judge. What were some formative experiences or lessons from that time that helped build your legal foundation and sharpen your skills as a practitioner?

    Every boss teaches you legal expertise but one of the main lessons that I learned from my senior, was the balancing act. We were all women in the office being led by a woman senior, as a lot of people say that a career driven woman usually loses sight of her homebound responsibilities,  no matter what women have to cater to work, home and self.. I personally do feel it is a woman CAN do it all! Over the years I have learnt that litigation is one field where a woman can balance things, be the boss on her own terms, be the boss at home and also be your own boss! We were not only taught to be efficient at work but also to be responsible back at home and at the same time celebrate every small accomplishment which is needed for one’s sanity, and I still live by the same and try passing that on to my associates and even interns. 

    What motivated you to establish your independent practice in 2017? What was the vision behind taking that step, and how has the journey unfolded since then?

    I guess, in litigation one has to take that leap of faith and jump, starting your practice is the ultimate milestone, sooner or later one has to just take the plunge and swim without the life jacket. It was a tough call, especially during covid, it was difficult to sustain and build the clientage, but I guess most of us went through the same struggle. 11 years in practice this year, every day is a new day, with a variety of matters on hand, it’s been all about brainstorming and eventually counting accomplishments, and thus, there has been no looking back! 

    As the Senior Panel Counsel for the Union of India at the Armed Forces Tribunal, Principal Bench, what types of matters do you typically handle? How do you approach cases that involve high levels of confidentiality and complex military legal issues?

    So Armed Forces Tribunal has a variety of military related issues it caters to, I have personally been handling cases related to the Disability pensions of officials in forces, matters pertaining to policy decisions of the forces, Cases of NOC and early discharge from service, Agniveer being one of the newest cadre in the forces has its own challenges which has been a part of my expertise before the AFT. I was recently handling a case filed by an Agniveer who was denied appointment due to a criminal case against him before a Juvenile justice court, and we dealt with it in accordance with the Agniveer recruitment rules. Some matters which are filed against the Court of Inquires and General Court Martial proceedings are extremely interesting, where you are not just dealing with procedural aspects but also dealing with the very personal acts and actions of the person involved in the said COI and GCM, now these are matters which may bring in a bit of complexity due to its nature. On the private side I remember dealing with cases involving sexual harassment at workplace by women in uniform in the paramilitary, those issues involve military laws and dealing with the disciplinary inquiries while also making sure the women before the courts are given the due respect they deserve being in women in military fighting for their own protection. 

    You’ve handled matters involving the Indian Air Force, Navy, Army, and Para-Military Forces, including inquiry proceedings and policy-related issues. What are some of the unique legal and procedural challenges in dealing with cases related to the armed forces, particularly concerning Short Service Commissioned Officers?

    One of the most important matters that I truly will always be grateful to be a part of are the right to Permanent Commission to women Short Service Commissioned officers of the Army and Indian Air Force. I joined the profession in 2014 when this legal battle was ongoing in various legal forums and I had the opportunity to assist my senior in these landmark matters and eventually take these matters ahead. We had several designated (rather legendary) seniors who led the show in the Apex court to restore the right to women in forces. When it comes to matter pertaining to the forces, the larger issue might remain common, however the policies around it keep changing, with regards to PC matters in the IAF, I was the first to challenge the 2019 policy for grant of PC to SSC officers, this policy incorporated all that had happened in courts up to date, with  new avenues to challenge, in fact in the midst of covid I remember running pillar to post from AFT to Delhi High Court seeking relief for an IAF lady officer, who was denied PC and was to be released from her service while the courts were on a winter break, and I still the remember the feeling when the matter was heard by a vacation bench in HC and the judgement was stayed, we had 2 days in had before our release, and suddenly at 11 in the night the next day, i got a call from the court staff saying her release had been stayed and the order is uploaded online, she was to hang her uniform the very next day. Another such empowering issue was in the initial years of my practice, when I was approached by a young girl who came from a conservative muslim family, but was very passionate to join the paramilitary forces, due to the struggle to convince her family she was delayed and was denied entry to the forces, and I can never forget J Hima Kohli, (who headed the service db in Delhi High Court that time) felt every emotion and passion of this young girl and directed the forces to grant her a joining, and that, was my first reported judgement and my first news article, certainly a major motivational boost for a young counsel. I was also appointed an amicus curiae just 2 years into practice in a matter which laid down the law on delay and latches with respect to the Right to Information Act.

    Since 2022, I have been a senior Panel counsel for the Union of India at both the Delhi High Court and the Armed Forces Tribunal, the switch from being against the Union of India to representing the Union has been quite drastic yet full of gratitude, representing the forces and defending them holds a different meaning for me (being a fauji kid). I have been representing the forces in a mixed bag of cases, from issues related to the disciplinary proceedings against officials, which involve Court of Inquiry proceedings and Court Martials which are intense yet interesting at the same time. Recently, I argued a matter before the HC which related to the fast track  promotions through a special exam conducted by the UPSC of a para military force, and it was basis a legal opinion I had made, that the entire rule position of the said force changed and assented to by the highest authority, now in implementation. I have been grateful to have been a part of another landmark matter which relates to the disability pension to the personnel of the forces, there are many more policy and disciplinary matters which I have been truly glad to have handled. 

    What advice would you offer to young lawyers who aspire to work on legal matters related to the Armed Forces? Were there any specific habits, values, or resources that played a significant role in shaping your professional growth in this field?

    The advice for young lawyers wanting to enter the AFT practice would be to firstly understand your defence forces’ uniforms, its important to learn their ranks, understand the hierarchy of these ranks and most importantly feel the pride of our country’s forces. Its genuinely upsetting to see the youngsters not even recognising the colours of the uniform of their armed forces, one should just begin with this value and respect, rest the seniors of the profession will teach you. 

    Legal practice is often incredibly demanding, requiring long hours and intense focus. Given your active involvement in public speaking and participation in DHC Bar Elections, how do you manage to balance these professional responsibilities with your personal life? Are there any routines, habits, or strategies you follow to stay grounded and maintain your focus?

    Honestly there is no one way of doing this, elections were a taxing few months, balancing election campaigns, work, and home, did take a toll on me on some days, but I kept telling myself that I need to do it because I CAN do it! Winning or losing was never on the charts, the process of elections changed me in so many ways.. it got me so close to so many seniors, colleagues, juniors which would have not been possible without this process, it’s all win-win by the end of it. Litigation is one profession, where the same set of people who have seen you step into this Black & White life will also see your rise and fall both professionally and personally. The same set of people are also going to be with you in your good and bad phase of life.. I really appreciate how the entire Bar reaches for your weddings, your kids’ weddings, your designation celebrations and they even stand by you in your hard times.. we meet them everyday for years.. this family is here till your last day in practice.

    Get in touch with Garima Sachdeva –

  • “What started as a passing interest grew into a true passion, and today, that commitment to justice is what drives my legal career.” – Ramandeep Bawa, Founder of RDB Associates.

    “What started as a passing interest grew into a true passion, and today, that commitment to justice is what drives my legal career.” – Ramandeep Bawa, Founder of RDB Associates.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    What inspired you to pursue a career in law? Was there a defining moment or personal experience that influenced your decision to enter the legal field?

    I wasn’t always drawn to law. As a child, I was more interested in creative pursuits, exploring stories and ideas rather than legal principles. But over time, I found myself captivated by how law shapes society and protects individuals. One pivotal moment was when I witnessed a close family friend navigate a complex legal issue. Seeing how the right legal guidance could change someone’s life made me realize the profound impact of this field. That experience planted the seed of curiosity, and the more I learned, the more I saw law as not just a set of rules, but a way to advocate, solve problems, and create meaningful change. What started as a passing interest grew into a true passion, and today, that commitment to justice is what drives my legal career.

    Early in your career, what experiences significantly shaped your understanding of legal practice? Could you share any pivotal moments or cases that contributed to your growth as a trial lawyer?

    Early in my career, I was fortunate to be mentored by Senior Advocate Mr. Ajay Burman after graduating in 2011. Under his guidance, I learned the nuances of trial advocacy—everything from drafting precise pleadings to developing effective courtroom strategies. His mentorship provided an invaluable foundation, shaping my approach to legal practice and reinforcing the importance of meticulous preparation.

    When I started my independent practice in 2013, it was a turning point in my journey. Representing clients across district courts, High Courts, and tribunals across India sharpened my ability to handle diverse procedural complexities. Each case brought its own challenges, but those experiences pushed me to refine my skills and deepen my understanding of the Indian legal system. Whether it was navigating intricate statutory interpretations or advocating for clients in high-stakes matters, those years played a crucial role in shaping me as a trial lawyer.

    As Nelson Mandela once said, “I never lose. I either win or learn.” That philosophy has resonated throughout my career—every challenge, every case, and every setback has been an opportunity to grow and refine my craft. The lessons I’ve learned early on continue to guide me, shaping the way I approach advocacy and justice.”

    What led you to establish your own practice, RDB Associates? What vision drove this decision, and what challenges did you encounter during the process?

    The decision to start RDB Associates in 2022 wasn’t just a career move—it felt like the culmination of everything I’d learned and cared about as a lawyer. After years of working independently across different courts and states, I kept thinking, What if I could build a firm that doesn’t just handle cases but truly fights for people? I wanted a place where strategy and empathy weren’t buzzwords but the foundation of every case. That’s how RDB Associates was born—a team built to tackle tough legal battles while keeping clients’ voices at the center.

    Funny enough, the name “RDB” wasn’t part of some grand plan. Back in law school, friends and professors started calling me that as a nickname—almost like a joke! But over time, it stuck. By the time I started my practice, clients would say, “We’re going to RDB for help,” and I realized it had become part of my identity. When I launched the firm, using that name felt right—it carried the trust I’d earned and the scrappy, personal approach I’ve always believed in.

    One case early on shaped everything for me. A client came to me completely broken by a legal battle—they’d almost lost faith in the system. I remember sitting with them, hearing their story, and thinking, This is why I do what I do. We worked day and night, dissecting every angle, and when we won, it wasn’t just about the judgment. It was about watching them walk out of court with their heads held high again. That moment crystallized my philosophy: Law isn’t just about arguments in a courtroom; it’s about restoring people’s dignity.

    Building the firm hasn’t been easy. Finding the right team—people who genuinely care about clients as much as winning—took time. Scaling across states while staying true to our “human-first” approach? That’s still a daily balancing act. But every time we take on a tough case or hear a client say, “You made this feel possible,” I know we’re on the right track. For me, RDB Associates isn’t just a firm—it’s a promise to turn legal battles into stories of resilience, one client at a time.

    You’ve been at the forefront of medical ethics and healthcare litigation, especially during the COVID-19 crisis. Based on your experience, what legal reforms are essential to better safeguard the rights of patients and healthcare providers in future public health emergencies?

    During my time working on the front lines of the COVID-19 pandemic—advising hospitals, patients, and government agencies on everything from vaccine mandates to life-and-death resource allocation decisions—I saw firsthand how our legal frameworks struggled to keep pace with the chaos of a public health crisis. Those years weren’t just about interpreting policies; they were about sitting across from exhausted ICU directors wondering if they’d face lawsuits for triage decisions, or patients’ families begging for clarity on why loved ones couldn’t access treatments. Those experiences convinced me that we need fundamental reforms to protect both caregivers and communities when the next crisis hits. That’s the exact reason why I enrolled in the Postgraduate Diploma in Medical Law & Ethics (PGDMLE) at NLSIU Bangalore. I realized I couldn’t just rage at the system’s flaws; I needed the tools to rebuild it. Studying the ethics of triage protocols, patient autonomy, and distributive justice gave me language for the moral vertigo I’d witnessed. But it also hardened my resolve: we must do better next time.

    A few priorities stand out to me. First, we have to address the legal gray areas that left healthcare providers paralyzed by fear of liability. I’ll never forget a Zoom call with a rural hospital team who’d reused PPE against normal protocols because they had no other choice—they spent more time worrying about lawsuits than patient care. We need laws that shield providers acting in good faith during emergencies, so they can focus on saving lives, not second-guessing every choice.

    Second, patients deserve more than vague promises during crises. Early in the pandemic, I worked with families who couldn’t get straight answers about vaccine access or ventilator allocation. That confusion eroded trust. We need enforceable rights to transparency—clear, legislated standards for how hospitals communicate priorities and allocate scarce resources. It’s not just ethical; it’s practical. Trust is the currency of public health.

    Third, the pandemic exposed how rigid regulations can stifle rapid response. I saw hospitals delay adopting telehealth because reimbursement rules weren’t updated, or scramble to interpret conflicting state/federal guidelines. We need “emergency mode” compliance frameworks—agile, pre-authorized systems that let providers adapt quickly without drowning in bureaucracy.

    And finally, telemedicine isn’t going anywhere. But its legal foundation? That’s still catching up. I advised dozens of clinics on privacy and licensing hurdles when they pivoted to virtual care overnight. We need durable laws that secure telehealth’s role in equitable care, not just temporary pandemic fixes.

    These lessons didn’t come from textbooks—they came from late-night calls with nurses, tense meetings with regulators, and too many conversations with grieving families. If we want a healthcare system that’s both compassionate and resilient, we have to build these reforms into its DNA now. Because the next crisis isn’t a matter of if—it’s when.

    As technology continues to reshape the legal landscape, how do you foresee cyber law evolving in India over the next few years, particularly with advancements in AI, increasing concerns over data privacy, and the rise of digital defamation cases?

    When I think about the future of cyber law in India, I’m struck by how rapidly technology is outpacing our legal frameworks. We’re at a pivotal moment where innovation and regulation must collaborate to protect citizens while fostering growth. Let me share my perspective on the key areas shaping this evolution.

    The Rashmika Mandanna deepfake incident last year was a wake-up call for me. Seeing how easily AI can manipulate reality made me realize how unprepared our laws are. I’ve spent hours discussing with peers: Who’s liable when a deepfake ruins a reputation? The creator? The platform hosting it? Right now, it’s a gray area. I strongly believe India needs AI-specific laws—or amendments to the IT Act—that enforce transparency and hold both developers and distributors accountable. Without this, misinformation could erode trust in digital spaces altogether.

    The DPDP Act of 2023 was a milestone, but I’m not convinced it’s enough. Take the Aadhaar breaches—these aren’t just technical failures; they’re systemic risks. In my research, I’ve noticed smaller companies often lack robust compliance frameworks. We need stricter audits, sector-specific rules (like for healthcare or finance), and real consequences for breaches. Personally, I’d advocate for a public awareness campaign too. People deserve to know how their data is used—and how to fight back when it’s misused.

    Last month, a friend’s startup was nearly derailed by a viral false review. It reminded me how fragile reputations are online. While free speech is sacred, I’ve seen too many cases where social media platforms hide behind “neutrality” to avoid accountability. My take? We need specialized cyber tribunals to resolve defamation cases faster. And intermediaries should be legally nudged to act responsibly—maybe by mandating takedown mechanisms for verified slander.

    The Air India data breach shook me. It wasn’t just about stolen passports—it exposed how vulnerable critical infrastructure is. I’ve spoken to cybersecurity experts who stress that reactive measures won’t cut it. Proactive steps like mandatory audits for utilities, ethical hacking certifications, and cross-border collaboration are vital. Frankly, if we don’t treat cyberattacks as acts of war, we’re leaving the door open for chaos.

    The RBI’s cautious stance on crypto is understandable, but ambiguity breeds risk. I’ve met young investors who don’t realize their crypto gains could be taxable—or that scams have little legal recourse. We need clear laws on fraud prevention, taxation, and consumer rights. Blockchain itself isn’t the enemy; it’s the lack of rules. Let’s regulate smartly, not stifle innovation.

    To me, cyber law isn’t just about rules—it’s about building trust in a digital India. Yes, laws must evolve faster, but collaboration is key. Lawyers, technologists, and policymakers need to sit at the same table. If we get this right, India could become a global model for balancing innovation and justice. And honestly, that’s what excites me most about working in this field.

    Your fluency in Japanese is quite rare among Indian legal professionals. How has this cultural and linguistic proficiency influenced your work with Japanese clients and impacted your approach to international legal matters?

    Learning Japanese started as a quirky lockdown project—honestly, I never saw it becoming part of my legal career! While most people mastered Dalgona coffee recipes, banana bread recipes or binge-watched entire seasons of TV shows, I decided to shake things up—I learned Japanese. 

    Here’s the thing: speaking Japanese isn’t just about translating words. For Japanese clients in India, it’s about catching the quiet stuff—the pauses, the unspoken hesitations. In Japan, communication is layered. You don’t just say what you mean; there’s a dance to it. I remember one case where a corporate client kept avoiding direct answers in emails. When I switched to speaking Japanese in our meeting, their relief was instant. Suddenly, we weren’t just talking at each other—we were problem-solving together. That trust? You can’t Google Translate that.

    There’s a saying in Japanese: “Kotoba yori kimochi”—feelings matter more than words. I’ve seen this play out in messy cross-border disputes or even delicate family cases. Once, in a tech contract negotiation, a tiny phrasing mismatch in English drafts nearly blew up the deal. But because I could explain the legal nuances in Japanese, we untangled it over a 10-minute call. The client joked afterward, “You’re like a legal diplomat with a dictionary brain.”

    Sure, it’s fun to surprise people when I switch languages in meetings, but the real win is this: law isn’t just about arguments. It’s about making someone feel heard, especially when they’re far from home. Whether it’s a corporate fraud case or a criminal defense matter, speaking Japanese lets me bridge two worlds. I’m not just their lawyer—I’m someone who gets why a bow matters more than a handshake, or why silence sometimes speaks louder than a contract clause.

    Funny how life works, right? A lockdown hobby became the tool that lets me turn legal headaches into human connections. And honestly? That’s the part of my job I love most—not just winning cases, but making sure no one gets lost in translation.

    You’ve built strong collaborations with international law firms. How have these alliances strengthened your ability to manage cross-border disputes, and what are some of the key challenges in reconciling international legal standards with Indian practices?

    One of the most rewarding parts of my career has been working with international legal teams—especially those involving Japanese stakeholders in tech, healthcare, or fraud cases. My fluency in Japanese and understanding of cultural nuances aren’t just “skills on paper.” They’ve been lifelines in building trust and untangling disputes that span borders. Let me give you an example: early in my career, I worked on a cross-border corporate fraud case where a Japanese tech firm was navigating a joint venture dispute with an Indian partner. The legal stakes were high, but so were the cultural ones. Being able to draft documents in Japanese, interpret subtle cues in negotiations, and explain the “why” behind India’s regulatory frameworks helped bridge gaps that might’ve derailed the case.

    These collaborations have taught me that cross-border work isn’t just about knowing the law—it’s about weaving together perspectives. For instance, working with EU teams on healthcare compliance, I saw firsthand how GDPR’s strict data privacy rules clashed with India’s evolving digital health policies. By pulling insights from both sides, we crafted hybrid strategies that satisfied regulators in Brussels and Mumbai. It’s like being a legal translator—not just of language, but of intent.

    But let’s be real: harmonizing international standards with Indian practice isn’t a tidy process. I remember a case where a Japanese client insisted on arbitrating a dispute in Tokyo under Japanese law, while the Indian counterpart demanded litigation in Delhi. The tension wasn’t just about “choice of law”—it was about pride, precedent, and perception. We navigated it by framing arbitration in Singapore as a neutral middle ground, but getting there required hours of candid conversations about what each side truly feared losing.

    Procedural differences can be landmines too. Once, during discovery in a U.S.-India fraud case, I realized the American team’s aggressive document requests were seen as invasive by the Indian witnesses. We had to recalibrate—explaining the “why” behind U.S. discovery rules to our clients, while gently pushing the U.S. team to respect local discomfort with overly broad requests. It wasn’t in any textbook; it was about empathy as much as strategy.

    And enforcement? That’s where theory meets reality. I’ll never forget the scramble to enforce an arbitral award from London in an Indian court—only to hit roadblocks because of a missing stamp paper. It felt absurd in the moment, but it taught me to sweat the small stuff and see the bigger picture: global rulings mean nothing if you don’t understand local procedural quirks.

    At its core, this work is about more than legal frameworks. It’s about asking questions like: How does a Japanese CEO’s expectation of “consensus” align with India’s more hierarchical corporate culture? Or Why might a German tech firm balk at India’s approach to interim injunctions? Those human, cultural layers are what make cross-border work so messy—and so fascinating. Every case is a crash course in humility, creativity, and finding common ground when the rulebooks disagree.

    Your pro bono work reflects a strong commitment to legal inclusion and social justice. What fuels this dedication, and how do you envision the broader role of legal professionals in expanding access to justice for marginalized communities?

    Justice isn’t just my profession—it’s a responsibility that defines how I approach the law. While my resume may not explicitly list pro bono hours, my career has been shaped by a conviction that legal advocacy should never be a luxury. Early in my practice, I represented a single mother facing wrongful eviction. She hadn’t slept in days, terrified of losing her home, yet she hesitated to seek help because she assumed the system was ‘not for people like her.’ That moment crystallized for me how deeply fear and complexity alienate marginalized communities from the very institutions meant to protect them. Since then, I’ve anchored my work in dismantling those barriers.

    My commitment starts with direct action. I’ve prioritized cases where individuals, like that single mother, lack the resources to fight systemic inequities. Whether it’s negotiating with landlords, defending workers’ rights, or guiding survivors of domestic violence through restraining orders, I’ve learned that access is the first hurdle. Many never reach a courtroom because they don’t know their options. That’s why I partner with NGOs to host free legal clinics in underserved neighborhoods. At one clinic, a teenager asked me, ‘Can the police really do that?’ after facing harassment. We drafted a complaint together, but what stayed with me was his shock that he had rights. It’s not enough to represent people—we have to empower them.

    This is where legal literacy becomes transformative. I’ve spent weekends leading workshops in rural communities, breaking down laws into relatable terms. For example, explaining inheritance rights to women through stories instead of statutes, or using role-play to teach villagers how to file RTI requests. When people grasp their rights, they shift from feeling powerless to becoming advocates for themselves and their communities. Technology amplifies this. During the pandemic, I collaborated with a tech startup to create a chatbot that guides users through labor law disputes in regional languages. One textile worker used it to reclaim months of unpaid wages—proof that innovation can democratize justice.

    But individual efforts aren’t enough. The legal fraternity must confront systemic flaws. I’ve joined advocacy groups pushing for reforms like simplifying bail procedures for low-income defendants and expanding legal aid funding. Last year, I testified before a state committee about how archaic procedural rules delay justice for rape survivors. It’s frustrating work—progress is slow—but necessary. We can’t fix a broken system without challenging its foundations.

    Mentorship is equally critical. I volunteer at law schools to nurture students who see law as a tool for social change. One mentee, now a public interest lawyer, recently texted me after winning a landmark case for tribal land rights: ‘You showed me that justice isn’t just in textbooks.’ That’s the legacy I want—inspiring the next generation to prioritize ethics over billable hours.

    Ultimately, justice is about dignity. Dr. King’s words—‘Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere’—ring truer today. When a farmer can’t contest land grabs or a Dalit student faces caste-based harassment without recourse, it corrodes our collective faith in the system. My role, as I see it, is to bridge the gap between the law’s promise and its practice. That means showing up in courtrooms and communities, drafting policies and pamphlets, leveraging tech and tradition.

    Yes, the challenges are vast—underfunded legal aid, bureaucratic inertia, and a culture that equates legal success with corporate pay checks. But every small victory, whether it’s a client’s relieved smile or a law student’s spark of idealism, reminds me why this work matters. Justice isn’t abstract; it’s the assurance that the system sees you, hears you, and fights for you. And until that’s a reality for every Indian, I’ll keep pushing—case by case, reform by reform, heart by heart.

    As a current member of the Sentence Review Board for the Delhi Government, you help review clemency and early release cases. What are the major aspects you have to keep in mind while making such decisions?

    I, though not a member, while assisting the Sentence Review Board, have learned that every case is a mosaic of stories, laws, and emotions. Let me share a few moments that shaped my perspective.

    There was a case involving a young man, barely 21, who’d been incarcerated for a non-violent drug offense. His file showed a troubled past—no family, homelessness, and exploitation by a local gang. But over time, he’d transformed. He earned a high school diploma in prison, taught others to read, and even started a small vegetable garden in the prison yard. The warden shared how he’d mediate conflicts among inmates, calling him a ‘quiet peacemaker.’ When compiling his case, I made sure to highlight not just his clean disciplinary record, but the person he’d become. It wasn’t about excusing his crime—it was about asking, Has he earned a chance to prove himself outside these walls?

    Then there was the heart-wrenching case of a 65-year-old woman serving time for embezzlement. She’d been a single mother, desperate to fund her daughter’s cancer treatment. Her remorse was palpable in every interview. She’d spent her incarceration stitching clothes for orphanages and writing letters of apology to the victims. But what stayed with me was her daughter, now cancer-free, pleading for a chance to care for her aging mother. I remember sitting with her file late one evening, thinking about the weight of punishment versus redemption. How do you measure justice when regret is so profound?

    I also recall a case where victim impact steered the conversation. A man convicted of assault had exemplary conduct in prison—counseling peers, earning certifications—but the survivor, still battling PTSD, feared his release. There were no easy answers. I worked closely with social workers to ensure her voice was central in the report, even including her request for a restraining order. It reminded me that fairness isn’t just about the offender; it’s about holding space for those still healing.

    Collaboration is key. Once, a prison nurse flagged an inmate’s terminal illness—a man with months to live, too frail to pose any risk. His brother, a farmer in Punjab, wanted to take him home to spend his final days with family. The medical reports, the brother’s letters, and the quiet dignity of the prisoner’s acceptance of his fate… these details became the backbone of my recommendation. The Board approved his release, and I later heard he passed away surrounded by loved ones. It reinforced why we must never reduce people to their worst mistakes.

    These experiences taught me that clemency isn’t about leniency—it’s about listening deeply to the law, the evidence, and the human heart. My job is to ensure the Board sees the full picture: the tears behind the paperwork, the growth amid the grit, and the fragile hope of second chances.

    You regularly engage with academic institutions and legal forums. What core principle do you emphasize to aspiring lawyers that you feel is often overlooked in formal legal education? Additionally, what guidance would you offer to young professionals still finding their footing in the legal field?

    When I mentor young lawyers, I always start with this: The law isn’t just about books and courtrooms—it’s about the person sitting across from you. Early in my career, I represented a single mother fighting a wrongful eviction. She wasn’t just a “tenant” in a file; she was terrified of losing the home where her kids took their first steps. That case taught me something no textbook ever did: empathy isn’t soft—it’s strategic. You can’t fight for someone if you don’t see them.

    Here’s what I wish someone had told me when I was starting out:
    Stay curious, but stay grounded. The law changes faster than TikTok trends—today it’s AI regulation, tomorrow it’ll be space law! But don’t chase shiny things at the expense of fundamentals. I still rehearse courtroom procedures in my head like a nervous rookie. Why? Because last year, I won a case on a procedural technicality my opponent overlooked. Basics matter.

    Words are your secret weapon. Early on, I wrote briefs packed with Latin phrases, thinking it made me sound smart. Then a judge pulled me aside and said, “Counsel, I’ve got 50 cases today—make me care in one page.” Now I write like I’m explaining things to my grandma. Clarity beats complexity every time.

    Your reputation isn’t a LinkedIn badge—it’s your currency. Once, a client asked me to hide evidence. I walked away, even though it meant losing a paycheck. Two years later, that same client referred a friend, saying, “You’re the only lawyer I trust.” Integrity compounds.

    Find your people. I wouldn’t be here without my mentor, Justice Kapoor, who once told me over chai, “Law is 10% argument, 90% listening.” Surround yourself with folks who’ll call you out when your ego’s writing checks your skills can’t cash.

    And burnout isn’t a trophy. I learned this the hard way during a marathon corporate trial. By day three, I was running on vending machine coffee and hubris. When I fumbled a simple objection, the opposing counsel smirked, “Tired, RDB?” Now I treat rest like it’s part of the job—because it is.

    Winston Churchill once said, “Success is not final, failure is not fatal…” I’ve lived that. I’ve lost cases I should’ve won and won ones I had no business touching. But what sticks with me isn’t the verdicts—it’s the client who hugged me after reuniting with their child, or the retiree who whispered, “You gave me hope again.”

    At the end of the day, great lawyering isn’t about being the smartest in the room. It’s about being the one who notices—the trembling hands, the unasked question, the quiet victory hidden in a compromise. Master that, and you won’t just practice law. You’ll change lives.

    Get in touch with Ramandeep Bawa –

  • “I’ve learned from my seniors that no brief should be refused on the grounds of scale or fee. No matter is too small, and every litigant deserves a chance.” – Vishesh Wadhwa, Founder of Vishesh Wadhwa Chambers.

    “I’ve learned from my seniors that no brief should be refused on the grounds of scale or fee. No matter is too small, and every litigant deserves a chance.” – Vishesh Wadhwa, Founder of Vishesh Wadhwa Chambers.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Your academic journey has clearly provided a strong foundation for your legal career. Could  you kindly share how these early academic experiences influenced your decision to pursue law, and what valuable lessons you gained during that time? 

    From a very early age, I was fortunate to be surrounded by the world of law. My father, Mr. R.K.  Wadhwa, a practicing lawyer, served as a constant source of inspiration and familiarity with the legal  system. Law, in that sense, didn’t come to me as a sudden career decision, it seeped into my life  gradually. The exposure at home planted the seed, even though, at one point, I had briefly considered  exploring a different path. 

    Thereafter during my days in Modern School, where I made a somewhat unconventional choice to  pursue Humanities, at a time when the stream was often misunderstood or even looked down upon. But  I had no inclination toward Physics, Chemistry, or Math. I was genuinely drawn to subjects like Political  Science and Psychology, which resonated with my interests. It was during this period that my interest  in law was truly solidified. My School also offered an intellectual environment. Being surrounded by  accomplished alumni, including legal luminaries, only deepened my resolve. 

    My journey continued at Amity Law School, which was still in its formative years, I belonged to the  fifth batch. The atmosphere was dynamic; our seniors had built the foundation for various  extracurricular societies, and soon, the baton was passed to us. I was deeply involved in debates, and  with encouragement from peers and mentors, I went on to found the Amity Law School Debating  Society. My passion for expression and the performing arts led me to also co-found the Music and  Theatre Society and become part of the Cultural Society. I actively participated in national-level moot  court competitions, and led contingents representing ALS at institutions like NALSAR, BITS Pilani,  and Symbiosis Pune. 

    I also realised that sometimes it’s not the ‘Big Wins’; But, the small victories that matter. Around my  Fourth year, Amity didn’t have its own logo at the time—it functioned under the larger Amity University  banner. But that lack of identity stirred something in me. I wanted ALS to have its own unique presence.  With support from then-Director Maj. General Nilendra Kumar, I conceptualized and designed the  official logo for ALS. 

    Having gained valuable experience through various internships and legal research positions  in the early stages of your career. Would you be able to share some of the most impactful or memorable experiences from that period and how they helped shape your understanding of the  law? 

    Internships were where theory met reality for me. I had the chance to intern with a wide variety of legal  offices, law firms, individual practitioners, and chambers. Each setting brought with it a unique learning  curve, and I quickly realized that no amount of classroom education could substitute for the practical  experience of being in court. In courts, you’re constantly thinking on your feet. You’re taught to use  every resource at your disposal—even when you walk into a courtroom with seemingly nothing. The  unpredictability trains you to stay alert, adaptable, and resourceful. 

    After graduating, I spent some time working with my father in the trial courts. It was a hands-on  experience that introduced me to the ground realities. My father had a purely criminal practice, he was  mostly briefed from the defence side to conduct cross-examinations which in a way, gave me deep  insights into trial work and how a criminal case is methodically built. It was an education like no  other. He used to tell me “Agar aap vakalat ko 2 din chhodoge to wo aapko 4 din peeche karegi.” —if you  step away from law for two days, it will set you back by four. And I felt the truth of that every time I  missed a day in court. Sometimes, even when you might not have a matter of your own, you still have to come to court even if you spend the day just sitting in the court library or listening to arguments in  someone else’s matter; that can at times teach you more than a lecture ever could.

    Soon after, I began assisting Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog in the High Court. He had this saying that stuck with  me: “If you’re good at law, you hammer the law. If you’re good at facts, you hammer the facts. If you’re  good at neither, you hammer the table.” It was humorous on the surface, but layered with insight. The  latter is one of the most important characteristics to have in a lawyer, where you put forward your  submissions to the Court knowing you might not be very strong either on the facts or on the law. This  is where your oratory skills and imaginations are used the most. 

    The early years are all about being a sponge. You absorb everything, from your seniors, your peers,  your juniors, and even opposing counsel. Every moment in court, even the bad one’s like every heated  exchange, every procedural hiccup prepares you for tomorrow. At times you might just be learning what  not to do the next time around. Whether you’re waiting for your matter to be called or spending time in  the Bar Room listening to seasoned lawyers dissect a point of law—it’s all part of your training. 

    Having worked alongside numerous esteemed Advocates and Senior Advocates, what inspired  you to establish your own practice? If you don’t mind sharing, were there any particular  challenges you faced when setting up your own firm in the initial stages? 

    Although I had worked with seniors in the field for some time including my Father, I still had the urge  to carve out something of my own. I wanted to build my own practice that reflected my ideals and my  name.  

    Of course, it wasn’t easy. The initial phase was lean, money was tight, clients were few, and everything  had to be managed singlehandedly. I didn’t have a team, or even support staff. No clerk, no office boy.  I was everything rolled into one; I was managing the files, doing the drafting, attending court, and at  times, even cleaning out my office. But that struggle, in hindsight, is what keeps you grounded and  makes you realise your worth. Despite those strenuous years, I would not trade it for anything. Having  your own practice comes with a sense of freedom which would give me the space to shape my identity  as a lawyer. 

    Twelve years on, I still consider myself a student of the profession. Every single day teaches you  something new. What I’ve come to realize is that a litigation office is a lot like a household. While you  might think of yourself as the head of the family, it’s the clerk who keeps the house running (who  actually governs everything and makes you feel the void if on leave), It’s the seniors who offer  perspective and grounding, and Your colleagues (the infamous Juniors, as people call them in this  profession); they help you out the most when you’re in an uncomfortable situation before a Judge and  teach you things which even a senior can’t teach you. These lessons, some learnt the hard way, have  formed the cornerstone of my independent practice. And even with all the unpredictability, I wouldn’t  trade this journey for anything. 

    Your involvement in pro bono work across a variety of legal sectors is truly commendable.  What motivates you to take on such cases, and if you would be willing, could you share a specific  instance where your pro bono work made a significant difference in someone’s life? 

    Pro bono work has always held a deeply personal significance for me. I believe that if the legal  profession has given you the privilege of a voice in a courtroom, the least you can do is use it for those  who cannot afford to be heard. Every human doesn’t come with resources, but everyone needs to be  represented; and I do believe that having some degree of privilege, it is our bounden duty to represent  their side of the stories and some of those stories stay with you forever. 

    The least a lawyer can do is give back to the society; because every client/ litigant who is seeking legal assistance cannot afford to spend heavily on counsel. I’ve learned from my seniors that no brief should be refused on the grounds of scale or fee. No matter is too small, and every litigant deserves a chance. That ethos continues to guide my practice.

    One such case was that of a man, whose young son, about 21-year-old boy, working as a young air  conditioning technician for DTC Buses, was brutally murdered in broad daylight. The father, who was  a rickshaw driver, and his wife, had been running from one police station to another, and despite the  gravity of the crime, no FIR had been registered. They were absolutely desolate and hopeless and not  in a position to afford any legal representation. They came to me through a Local Help who knew me  as somebody who would be willing to help them. I wanted to help them in whatever way I could extend.  You can’t take empathy out of this profession.  

    Another matter that stands out was a case involving slum demolition. Entire families approached me, numbers running into 100s; their homes, slums were to be demolished overnight and entire families  were to be displaced, without notice or recourse. My entire Team sat through the Night and we got relief the next day. The gratitude and blessings that those people felt is something that reminded me  why I did and what I did in the first place. These were more than just legal battles; Situations like these  reaffirmed my belief that the law must be a tool for justice, not just procedure. 

    With your extensive experience working with high-profile clients and handling numerous  reported judgments, could you share a particularly interesting or noteworthy case that has had a  lasting impact on you professionally? 

    One of the most impactful cases I handled came just a year and a half into my legal practice. A senior  lawyer referred the matter to me, since the client was in an urgent and vulnerable situation. It involved  a French national, residing in the UK, who had been in a live-in relationship with an Indian man. They  had a child together, and by mutual agreement, the child would visit the Father’s family in India for  short periods. However, during one such visit, the father refused to let the child return. The mother,  distraught and left with no recourse, flew to Delhi to seek legal assistance. That’s when I was brought  on board. 

    I had never handled a Habeas Corpus petition before, but we knew we had to act quickly. We spent the  night researching and drafting the petition. We mentioned the matter urgently the next day. The father  eventually appeared before the court, bringing the child with him. One of our other prayers was seeking  the custody of the Child for the mother, but the court was initially hesitant, as the scope of habeas corpus  petitions is generally limited. However, we showed precedents which recognized that in exceptional  circumstances, custody could be addressed within Habeas proceedings. 

    The court, after hearing our arguments, showed indulgence in the facts; The court also intervened to  ensure the mother’s visa extension was considered on priority, so that she could stay in India and contest  the proceedings. Within just two to three hearings, the matter was settled in our favour, and the child  was allowed to return to the UK with the mother. 

    The matter gave me immense confidence and encouragement; I realised that there was no substitute for  research and preparedness. It was our research that had come to the aid of our client. The emotional  weight of that case was also immense, not just for the parties involved, but for me as well. 

    There have been moments in my career when I was confident of my case, of the facts, of the law and  still lost. And then there have been matters where I thought I was fighting a losing cause, only to have  gotten a good order. I have learnt something fundamental through all this; sometimes, your job isn’t just  to win; it’s to show up, speak up, and stand firm, even when the outcome seems uncertain. You may be  fighting an uphill battle, but your presence and persistence can make all the difference. These  experiences have been humbling and invaluable. They’ve taught me to never take anything for granted  in this profession. 

    As a Panel Counsel for the Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee, you’ve made  meaningful contributions to welfare initiatives, especially for foreign national prisoners. What led you to focus on this area, and what unique challenges do foreign prisoners face in India? Could  you share any insights from a recent case or initiative in this field? 

    My time with the Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee has taught me many important lessons and  given me an opportunity to work for many causes. One case that stood out involved a convict who had  suffered a life-altering accident while working inside a jail-run paper factory. He lost three fingers due  to the lack of safety protocols. Prior to my involvement, multiple writ petitions had been filed on his behalf, but no concrete outcome was achieved. When the matter finally came to me, we argued that while prisoners may not be treated at par with civilian workmen under certain compensation laws, they  still possess fundamental and civil rights. If an injury occurs while working inside prison premises,  there is a duty on the State to ensure compensation and adequate medical care. The Court was kind to  accept our submissions and framed guidelines for compensating prisoners who suffer such injuries. In  my opinion it was a small but significant step toward justice behind bars. That case was a reminder that  dignity and rights do not stop at the prison gate. 

    Some causes find you before you go looking for them. My work with foreign national prisoners began  that way, through my role as a Part of the Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee, I came across  cases involving foreign national Prisoners, many of whom faced long incarcerations and still faced  uncertainty about their dates of deportation. These individuals faced a unique and often overlooked set  of challenges. Most had no local support, no financial means, no access to translators, and in many  cases, no consular assistance. Something as basic as arranging for a surety or providing a permanent  Indian address became insurmountable obstacles to their release. The legal system, while well intentioned, can become an alien labyrinth when you’re navigating it in a foreign land with no resources  or familiarity. Justice cannot be selective. It cannot favour those with access and leave behind those  without. If our system is to remain just and equitable, we must ensure that everyone, regardless of  nationality or status, is afforded due process and humane treatment. 

    During my time as DHCLSC, I also had the opportunity to visit the FRRO, we witnessed the  Overcrowding in the centre, and saw the deplorable state of affairs, where some foreign nationals are  there for more than 6 months, and some for many years altogether, which in my opinion should  absolutely not be the scenario. We came across multiple facets that in our opinion require interventions  and corrections. In our role, we even made a report and we submitted the same to the DHCLSC. 

    Your dedication to social causes, including fundraising and various welfare activities, is truly  admirable. What inspires you to invest time and energy into these causes, and how do you manage  to balance your professional commitments, social work, and personal life? 

    Giving back has never felt like an obligation; it’s always felt like a natural extension of my work. A  large part of that comes from my upbringing. My father was also active in bar politics. I had never seen  him turn his back on a cause, on a fellow lawyer in need of aiding the causes he believed in. 

    That influence shaped my own sense of responsibility. In my limited capacity I have tried to aid causes  I could contribute for; from assisting fellow lawyers in need during Covid crisis or organising Blood  Donation Camps and contributing to other initiatives. For me, legal work and social work are not  separate silos—they’re deeply intertwined. 

    Of course, balancing your personal lives and litigation isn’t always easy. The days are long, and  the stress of litigation can be unrelenting. But having a strong, dependable team makes all the difference.  My office operates like a family. In jest, but also in truth, I often say, your clerk is like your spouse, and  your colleagues are your children. Everyone has a role, everyone supports the other, and somehow, the  whole house runs.

    Time management and alignment of values are essential. When you genuinely care about what you’re  doing, the work, even the long hours, starts to feel purposeful. And that purpose sustains you. You don’t  just show up to win cases, you show up to make a difference. 

    Social commitments don’t compete with my professional life, they enrich it. In my opinion, this  profession requires you to be social, connecting with people is necessary to growing in the profession.  

    With your wealth of experience across diverse legal fields, you are uniquely positioned to offer  guidance to aspiring legal professionals. What advice would you offer to law students and young  lawyers who wish to pursue a career in litigation? Are there any resources or approaches that you  believe are essential for success in today’s legal environment? 

    Litigation is not for the faint-hearted. It tests your patience, your resilience, often all at once. You will  walk into court with a well-prepared brief and walk out feeling like you know nothing. You will lose  cases you believed were great and win cases you had given up on. It humbles you. And it should. Be  prepared to consult everyone—your seniors, your peers, even your juniors. I’ve learned valuable lessons  from colleagues younger than me, simply because they were looking at the problem from a fresh angle.  Don’t let ego get in the way of learning. This field rewards humility far more than bravado. 

    There will be days when you feel lost, when a judge pulls you up harshly, when you’ve stayed up  preparing and things still don’t go your way. That’s okay. As a lawyer, your duty is that of a messenger  between the client and the bench. Your role isn’t to take matters personally, but to do justice to the brief  entrusted to you, to the best of your ability and conscience. You’re a professional messenger between  your client and the bench. You have a responsibility of not upsetting either of the Two. 

    The courtroom has also taught me to never underestimate the importance of humility. No court is too  big and no matter is too small (I guess that’s what they say). It’s a bounden duty of any court to treat all matters at an equal pedestal. We, as officers of the court, our submissions should always be  respectful, well-prepared, and mindful of the board of the court. If you’re concise, clear, and courteous,  even the busiest bench will give you a fair hearing, every court/judge will have indulgence in your case. 

    I have learnt an invaluable lesson: litigation is never a race amongst individuals or a sprint—it’s a  marathon. Each lawyer begins from a different starting point. It’s a field that will exhaust you, test your  patience. Reaching every milestone would again make you realise that you’re still far away from the  end point. You just have to keep at it.  

    As technology continues to evolve, its impact on the legal sector, particularly in criminal law, is  becoming increasingly significant. How do you see the future of law unfolding in this regard? In  your view, how are courts and the legal system adapting to these changes, and what potential  challenges or opportunities do you foresee as a result? 

    I remember observing how things worked during my father’s time—everything was handwritten,  typewriters clacked away in the background, and court files were carried in bundles tied with redband.  The charm of old-school advocacy still lingers, but there’s no denying that the tools of the trade have  transformed. Today, virtual hearings, e-filings, digital courtrooms, online legal research, and case  tracking platforms have become the norm. The pandemic accelerated this shift, making digital  competence a necessity rather than a choice. For many of us, adapting to this new normal was  challenging, but also eye-opening. 

    Courts are adapting. Judges are becoming more comfortable with hybrid systems. Filing and listing  procedures are becoming more streamlined. But as we digitize, we must also confront the digital divide.  A significant portion of the bar, especially in district courts, continues to struggle with basic  connectivity, lack of infrastructure, and limited digital literacy. For justice to remain accessible, we  cannot allow technology to become a gatekeeper. It must be an enabler.

    A fair and inclusive legal system cannot only serve those fluent in English, comfortable with apps, or having high-speed internet. The evolution of legal practice must be sensitive to those left behind. We  need infrastructural support, training initiatives, and perhaps most importantly, the will to ensure that  no lawyer or litigant is excluded simply because they don’t have access to a screen.

    Get in touch with Vishesh Wadhwa –

  • “Be open to collaborations and aim for higher. Working together with an advocate or a friend on a sharing basis will yield better results.” – Adv Pushkar Patil, Advocate at Adv Pushkar Patil and Associates.

    “Be open to collaborations and aim for higher. Working together with an advocate or a friend on a sharing basis will yield better results.” – Adv Pushkar Patil, Advocate at Adv Pushkar Patil and Associates.

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    Could you share what motivated you to pursue a career in law and how your journey began, especially your initial experiences in the legal field?

    I am a second-generation lawyer, many people think that it is only because my father is an Advocate, that I have come into this field. It is partly true, watching him as a kid has always been the real source of inspiration. But I always wanted to be into Sports, to be honest. I have played at National Level Cricket, but being in the shoes of an Advocate is something I have always been passionate about. And if I rightly remember, I have been visiting the Court since I was 6 years old.

    Reflecting on your early career, what were some of the significant challenges you faced when you first started practicing, and how did you overcome them?

    After completing my LLB degree, I simultaneously pursued my education in Diploma in Corporate Law and a Diploma in Housing Law. I also worked with a Real Estate group that was engaged in buying and selling of properties that initially had my liking. However, I completed my LLM from University of Glasgow, Scotland and I intended to work in the United Kingdom itself. But maybe it wasn’t destined. I came back to India and immediately went to Mumbai and joined Jaykar and Partners. It was a good experience. One fine day, I got a call from my close friend who was facing multiple cases, and since the “fee” part wasn’t the initial criteria for me, I took up his cases and that’s how the real journey began. Contrary to what others think, my father did not entertain me in his firm, which I believe was a good decision. As of the challenges you may ask, yes, it was difficult, I used to take guidance from many friends and seniors who sometimes did guide well. The truth is, you never find perfection in practice, there is nothing called stability, l or fixed income, there are always going to be downfalls, it depends on every individual how sportingly he takes it and faces the situation. For me, I have always taken it positively, as the legend says, every Storm is followed by the calm.

    How did your time at the University of Glasgow, particularly studying LLM in International Commercial Law, influence your approach to legal practice and contribute to your expertise in handling complex cases?  

    There is a vast difference between studying LLB and LLM, on top of it there is a huge difference between the LLM in India as well as the LLM in Scotland. The LLM courses in the United Kingdom also differ from university to university. Just as any other ordinary kid, I was guided by the Consultancy firms to opt for a good university. In 2013, University of Glasgow, School of Law ranked No. 1. It was but natural I opted for taking admission there. The course was indeed difficult, but you learn through the course. Not just in studies, I had the opportunity to meet new people and explore new opinions, new cultures, new traditions, and new concepts and I also found small-time jobs where I made new friends. All this affects our thinking plus the Dissertation studies also helped me a lot to work on research techniques. In real life, these things help a lot. In simple words, you find out that to reach the top of the mountain, there are multiple ways, you just have to find the right ones. In situations of studying and appearing complex and complicated cases, sometimes hiring an expert along with you always gives a new direction and a new perspective with experience of course.

    You were awarded the Cyber – Techno Legal Pioneer award in 2021. Could you elaborate on the contributions that led to this recognition?

    When I begin my practice, initially I only wanted to work in the Corporate field and that was the exact reason I completed my LLM in Commercial Law and I joined a corporate firm. But down the line, handling my friend’s case and the cases referred by friends and relatives, had a variety in them. From Civil disputes, Matrimonial Disputes, criminal cases, etc., to mediation, all of this variety pushed me into the different types of matters which were neither of the same nature nor similar facts. Since I did not completely understand the law regarding electronic evidence or I would say there was not much awareness about the same in the beginning of year 2015, I started researching on the authenticity of electronic evidence. In this phase, cyber frauds had also started to begin, and this was something worth exploring. I started to handle matters that had the part of electronic evidence, electronic records and areas that covered the Information Technology Act. It is here I received appreciation from the legal fraternity, including Police officers who would also call me up and ask for guidance. I have in fact delivered over 75 lectures to various colleges and institutions which covers the topic of Cyber Crimes. The word quickly spread and it’s here. I came into contact with Dr. Rohan Nyayadhish who recommended my name for the Cyber-Techno Legal Pioneer Award in 2021. It felt really good. 

    With over 1000 cases handled, can you discuss a particularly challenging case and what unique legal strategies you employed to achieve a successful outcome?  

    Well amongst thousands of cases that me and my firm have handled, we dealt with a case of rape and bigamy. There has been a long debate as to whether Matrimonial Rape is punishable or not, but this unique case we dealt with was regarding Bigamy and cheating as well. So whether this can amount to Rape (having sexual intercourse with a second wife), was a real question. Although the Indian Penal Code defines Consent, in this case, we had to research the very concept of “Consent” obtained by deceit and fraud. The case was almost 13 years old and because of the strict guidelines of the hon’ble High Court, this case was expedited to be concluded within 3 months. The prosecution testified several witnesses to prove every section in isolation and I had the opportunity to cross-examine them at length. This case also had the angle of Information Technology where we challenged the “65B certificate” as it was not in proper format. We succeeded in getting our client acquitted because of various lacunae of the prosecution and the failure by prosecution to prove the “fraudulent intention” of our client.

    How do you see the role of technology evolving in the practice of law, particularly in the areas of criminal and cyber law, and what steps have you taken to integrate technological advancements into your legal practice?  

    Technology has become a basic need for our human society. Hate it or love it, you cannot ignore it. With the Rapid growth in digitalisation and the courts also moving towards adopting the good uses of Artificial Intelligence, there are going to be several challenges to not just the Courts, but also to the investigation agencies and this also means a good area of practice to all the lawyers to explore. Since the implementation of mandatory e-filing and the requirement to upload every application online first, we have no choice but to work in hybrid mode. So we have to adopt what is existing and although there is no smoothness in the work as yet, it will eventually become normal, we have to go with the flow and adopt the changes. For the basics, getting a good-sized semi Commercial Printer Scanner Xerox machine is what every lawyer needs along with a good speed Internet and a good Mobile Tablet with a good camera. This has been a modern-day basic in practice.

    You’ve been a guest lecturer on various legal issues at numerous prestigious institutions. How has this experience contributed to your professional growth and understanding of the law?  

    I have delivered lectures to various institutions on various topics. Every time I have to deliver a lecture, I make sure to give at least 2 full days for its preparation. I also prepare a PPT which gives the listeners an ease in understanding the concept. Once again, before any lecture, what I do is research. This is something I have learned during my LLM course and this has helped me alot to sharpen my own knowledge. To simplify it, the more and more books you read, the more and more you understand a concept and then you can explain it to the others which again sharpens your knowledge. Delivering lectures is stressful, but the sense of satisfaction that I see on the faces of the listeners at the end of it is everything that matters. In all my lectures, the only thing I try to do is, Keep it simple.

    Working with a team of 17 advocates and 6 interns at Patil and Mantri Associates, how do you ensure effective collaboration and maintain high standards of legal practice?  And  what advice would you give to young lawyers and law students who aspire to specialize in criminal and cyber law?

    To all the students, aspirants and upcoming lawyers and freshers reading this, I would suggest you, welcome and be open to collaboration on a sharing basis. You cannot become a master of all the concepts overnight. Law is vast, but you can always be smart enough to accompany another advocate who has an expertise in that matter and work alongside them for the benefit of your client and a fair amount of professional fee. With the debate going on in various parts of the country over the stipend, I would suggest you to aim for higher. “Stipend” will cut off your wings and settle you down for less, but working together along with an advocate or your friend on a sharing basis will yield better fruits. Once you are into a good experience, take up pro-bono matters, work for legal aid and use your experience, expertise and knowledge to give back to society. To the lawyers, I advise you to read a lot of articles, case laws, judgments etc and observe the cross-examinations in Trial Court, do not jump to higher courts. And to the law students, I would suggest in addition to all of these, participating in the Moot Courts, it helps.

    You’ve mentioned interests in activities like gym and American football. How do you balance these personal hobbies with the demands of your legal career? Please share how important it is to unwind yourself from work?

    Well, I do have a lot of interest in staying fit. I have been into sports since childhood; I have played National Level Cricket and have also for a brief period, been into kickboxing. I have also held the Vice-president post for Wako Kickboxing Trust, Pune and I suggest that every lawyer must give at least an hour of his busy schedule daily to work on his body. A good appearance and a wonderful personality is a positive energy. A positive energy keeps the mind calm and open to learning new things. No man on earth is so busy that he cannot give time to work on his health, so please make sure you stay fit. Be it any sport you love. Do not settle for less.

    Get in touch with Adv. Pushkar Patil-

  • “Filing false complaints may initially seem like a petty victory, but it leaves both parties with much resentment and whopping legal fees.” – Addressing the issue of false cases: Mrinalini Rajpal, Independent Legal Counsel- Family and Matrimonial Law

    “Filing false complaints may initially seem like a petty victory, but it leaves both parties with much resentment and whopping legal fees.” – Addressing the issue of false cases: Mrinalini Rajpal, Independent Legal Counsel- Family and Matrimonial Law

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    Reflecting on the beginnings of your career in law, could you share about your journey, about your family and what inspired you to pursue this path of Law?

    I come from a Sindhi business family that has been in the petroleum industry for five generations. Despite a business background, the elders always placed a strong emphasis on education, encouraging the growth of several doctors, engineers and business graduates within the family. My maternal side of the family were well-known producers and distributors in the Hindi film industry. A legal career was not a typical path within my family background, but on reflection, I feel it had always been my true calling. 

    My aspiration to pursue a legal career began at the young age of 13 when, at my school, JB Petit High School, Mumbai, I attended a lecture on environmental law by the eminent Senior Counsel Mr. Navroz Seervai. His views on how law could be used as a tool to bring about transformative changes in society resonated deeply.  The seed was further nurtured by regular teenager interests in legal fictional books and shows, and this led me to join Government Law College, Mumbai to pursue the 5-year degree course. 

    My interest in family law took root at a young age, influenced by personal relations. I witnessed the unfortunate plight of a family friend who despite being an educated lady, was in an emotionally abusive marriage but was unable to find a way out of it as she had no family or financial backing and was afraid of losing custody of her young children. Coming from a fiercely liberal background and school, it made me realise that there were people across strata who were stuck in a bad marital situation and were unaware of their options. I had hoped then, to be able to make a real difference in such situations and I am glad that I am finally in a position to realise that dream. 

    Your journey from commercial litigation to specializing in family law is quite fascinating. Could you share what prompted this transition and how it has enriched your professional outlook?

    Whilst I always knew I would eventually specialise in family law; I did not want to pigeonhole myself in a specialisation early on. I am glad I took the long road experiencing and learning about the myriad aspects of the law. During my college days, I recognized my inclination towards litigation and took up internships with law firms to acquire practical experience. I also interned at the National Human Rights Commission and in my final year, I did a judicial clerkship with the Hon’ble Mr Justice (Retd) S.J. Vazifdar (Former Chief Justice of Punjab and Haryana High Court). I observed firsthand the intricacies involved in conducting trials and the skills of persuasion a litigating advocate must possess.

    Upon graduation, I worked in several prestigious litigation firms, gathering knowledge and experience in difference areas of law such as media, real estate, arbitration, family, banking and finance. I learnt how to run a litigation holistically right from laying the foundation stone, being the first communication until its logical end. Working with the best litigators in Mumbai I learnt a lot of unique drafting styles, strategies towards a matter, practical tips on client handling or how to read a judge – with each matter furthering my skills as a litigator. 

    After spending a decade practicing commercial litigation, I took a sabbatical to expand my family and since then I have had the most wonderful experience raising my son–despite its inimitable challenges. It made me realize, like law, raising a child is a dynamic and ever-growing process, where you learn something new every day. I have also learnt the art of nuanced negotiating where I need to make my son believe that he has got his way! 

    In 2020 while the world was battling Covid, marital disputes spiked. I got a firm push towards family law when I helped a friend who was in the midst of a particularly tenacious negotiation against her well connected and financially sound (now ex) husband. He was unwilling to give her a fair settlement initially and she was out of her marital home with her young children. A long-winded expensive court battle was not an option. Extensive strategizing and negotiations eventually led to a satisfactory settlement, including a lumpsum alimony and a house in her name. This encouraged me to pursue my interest in family law and I joined the chambers of Senior Advocate Mrs. Mrunalini Deshmukh, to formally kickstart my practice. I was associated with her chamber for almost 2 years, whilst simultaneously building my independent practice. 

    In your experience, what is your perspective on false cases within the realm of family law? Have you encountered instances of such cases during your career, and if so, could you share your approach in handling them while upholding justice and maintaining ethical standards? 

    Matrimonial disputes are uniquely characterised with the baggage of bruised egos and scarred emotions on both sides – which unfortunately could result in acts of personal vendetta against the spouse (and family) at times. I have seen a sharp increase in matters where false complaints are being filed under Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO), and shockingly, even filing of false kidnapping cases, especially against the father. All these are awful pressure tactics, with a devastating impact on children. When one files a complaint for kidnapping or under POCSO- it appears that the party filing such complaint has forgotten that at the heart of the issue, there is a child being thrust into a conflict zone (which is the marital dispute essentially between the parents). To then further drag the child through such cases is adding additional trauma that the child most definitely does not deserve nor need. 

    My approach and advice is always- there are no winners in a divorce, so negotiate as hard as you can outside court in order to reach an amicable settlement and enter court only to file a mutual consent divorce Petition. I encourage parties to take all the help and external counsel possible, in the form of family, friends, mediators, marriage counsellors, well-wishers and lawyers. Exhaust all amicable possibilities including pre-litigation mediation and only once you’ve exhausted such possibilities and a settlement still hasn’t worked out, then go to court, but fight fair. Most importantly, if there is a child involved always remember that your north star is that young person, because your actions are shaping their future, and in the larger scheme, the future of generations to come. 

    Could you shed light on the importance of empathy and guidance in navigating clients through the emotional complexities inherent in family law disputes?

    Empathy is a super-power and as a family lawyer one should be cognisant of it, and try and cultivate it. According to me, family law practice is more about understanding the root of the dispute and finding a way to settle the matter as amicably as possible, rather than pushing to litigate. Either one or both parties may come from a place of ego. During the first meeting, I am usually told by the client that they want to “show their spouse their place” not being mindful that when you burn your house, you burn with it. It is then our duty to talk the client off the ledge and make them realise the pit-falls of their actions. I am very glad about the fact that in the past year I have managed to amicably negotiate and settle a number of cases, some of which started off with extreme hostility – which has further fortified my belief that at the core of every dispute, there is an inherent desire to end the acrimony and move on. I strongly encourage parties to first try counselling- individual as also couples counselling -before taking any drastic steps. Often counselling fails, but by then tempers have calmed, the parties have got better perspective and they are more receptive to a settlement. I also realised that clients (and their families) want me to hand-hold them through this very difficult phase, reassuring them that I have got their back and in doing so, it becomes much easier to reason with them.

    As an advocate for peaceful resolutions, how do you handle cases where litigation becomes unavoidable, and what steps do you take to mitigate adversarial dynamics?

    Commercial litigation lawyers usually aspire towards a landmark victory in Court and being a part of landmark judgments, but family law is a unique space where as a family lawyer, you may not be spoken of in the same breath as commercial legal luminaries, but should always be remembered as someone who brought about a peaceful resolution within a family. Having said that, it is not always possible to amicably settle matters and sometimes it is necessary to battle it out in Court. My mantra is to always keep it fair and honest whilst keeping the larger picture in mind – no matter what the circumstances may throw your way. At times, I have had to even reign my own clients in, and not let egos take over the process. However, even within an acrimonious battle, I always try and keep the door ajar for the opposing party/ counsel to walk in and engage in a settlement at any stage.

    In your experience, what are the most common misconceptions that clients have about family law, and how do you address them during consultations?

    One common misconception is that filing false complaints against the spouse and/or family will put the right pressure on you and get you the desired result. Completely untrue. Whilst filing such complaints may initially seem like a petty victory, after a point the feeling fizzles out, leaving both parties and their families with much resentment, a mountain of paper-work and whooping legal fees. The advice I provide can’t be the same for every client, it has to be tailor made keeping in mind facts and circumstances, but the one consistent advice I give is, if you want to file such complaints, be prepared to stay in court for a long time, losing years of your life and not to mention a large part of your income.  

    What advice would you give to aspiring lawyers, particularly those interested in specializing in family and matrimonial law, based on your own career journey and experiences?

    The most important yet basic advice I could offer is, do not bring your client’s energy back home, have an awareness about your own emotions and be mindful of your boundaries. A philosophy I strongly believe in is, if, as a family lawyer, you find yourself litigating more than amicably settling matters, you are doing it all wrong and need to rethink your perspective.

    With the demanding nature of your legal practice, how do you prioritize self-care and relaxation? Could you share some of your favorite methods for unwinding and maintaining a healthy work-life balance amidst your busy schedule?

    The balance between work and being physically and emotionally present for my young son, is challenging on many days. However, spending time with him is my absolute favourite way to unwind, especially after an exhausting day. We have some of the best conversations at dinner time. During the weekend, we catch up with our close-knit circle of family and friends and go for a swim at the CCI Club, which we both love. We love baking and cooking together. We also love discovering cafes around the city. To maintain a healthy work- life balance, I ensure that I start my day with a brisk walk by the sea, which both centres my thoughts and helps me plan my day. I have an incredible support system in my family and friends. I meet my friends for coffee and laughs at least once a week and those who don’t live in the city, we have a system of check-ins once every few days. I also ensure I meet up with my family almost every-weekend to get that much needed pampering. Both my siblings live out of the country so I make sure I take at least 1-2 holidays with them each year. At the end of the day, there is nothing that a well-rested night of sleep cannot cure. 

    Get in touch with Mrinalini Rajpal-

  • “Fostering effective collaboration is fundamental, whether engaging in negotiations or providing legal support, this entails a comprehensive approach grounded in clear communication, cooperation, and trust.” – Sudershani Ray, Partner at VantaLegal

    “Fostering effective collaboration is fundamental, whether engaging in negotiations or providing legal support, this entails a comprehensive approach grounded in clear communication, cooperation, and trust.” – Sudershani Ray, Partner at VantaLegal

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    You’ve had an extensive career spanning over 13 years in law. What initially drew you to this profession, and how has your journey been so far?

    Law was not my first choice, I always dreamt to become a doctor. But there was no way I could have made it to a medical college, as I was not good in maths and science.  20 years back  professions like law, engineering, and medicine were highly respected and prestigious, the level of respect they receive can fluctuate for a variety of reasons.  So, I decided to pursue law to serve the community. Just as doctors work to heal and improve the health of individuals, lawyers work to uphold justice, protect rights, and ensure fairness within the legal system.

    What inspired you to specialize in divorce law, service matters, civil, and criminal law?

    At my law school I intended to become a corporate lawyer or work for corporates during my internships I discovered a passion for litigation.  

    As a junior I worked in the chamber of prominent lawyers such as Advocate Neelima Tripathi( now senior advocate) , Advocate Gurang Kanth( now Justice Guarang Kanth), Advocate Suparna Srivastava wherein each day was  a learning experience, with victories and setbacks alike serving as fuel for my determination to continuously improve.

    Working in the chamber of my seniors I wealth of knowledge in field of civil law and property law which enabled me to lay a strong foundation in the civil law and property law.

    Why I became a family lawyer?

    This is a question I, admittedly never actually asked myself before, that is until in 2015 when I started considering for opting an additional specialization.  I sat down and actually asked myself … well , why did you  want to become a family lawyer in the first place?

    The answer I discovered was quite simple?

    I am an empathic person, who likes to help people, I love to listen to people’s problems and help guide them through sometimes the most difficult time in their lives.  When you’re going through a divorce, there’s a lot on the line. From your finances to your home and even the time that you spend with your children, it will all be a part of your pending divorce. Being a good Family Lawyer is to be understanding and empathetic, without becoming emotionally involved in your client’s life.

    Family Law is a difficult area of law, it is emotional for clients as they are often at their most vulnerable, people are frustrated with delays and costs (both of which are increasing each year), and no-one ever really wins. But at the end of the day, I would say in nearly every case I have advised or acted for someone I can look back and say I helped that person (even if it was only in a small way) and that is what matters to me and what makes it all worth it.

    You’ve been practicing independently for quite some time now. What motivated you to establish your own firm, RAY & ASSOCIATES?

     Establishing my own firm, RAY & ASSOCIATES, was a decision driven by a combination of ambition, capability, and a desire for autonomy. After gaining valuable experience practicing independently, I felt compelled to create a platform where I could orchestrate operations according to my vision and values. The motivation stemmed from a deep-seated belief in my abilities and the conviction that I could lead a team to success. Founding my own firm allowed me to cultivate an environment where I and my associates could work collaboratively, pooling our strengths and expertise to achieve common goals. Moreover, the opportunity to work on my own terms, setting the pace and direction of our endeavour’s, was immensely empowering. By establishing RAY & ASSOCIATES, I aimed to create not just a business, but a supportive and inspiring workplace where every team member feels valued and motivated to excel. This journey has been fueled by a relentless determination to innovate, grow, and make a meaningful impact in the legal landscape, driving us forward with passion and purpose.

    We understand that you specialize in matrimonial disputes among other legal areas. Can you share some insights or experience from one of your cases where the lady paid alimony to her husband? How do you approach such cases, and what factors might lead to such outcomes in matrimonial disputes?

    There have been a plethora of memorable cases mostly in the field of family law but a  exceptional  case I handled was where a wife  paid a certain amount to husband to get divorce. Certainly, in matrimonial disputes, the payment of amount by the wife to her husband is relatively uncommon but not unheard of.

    I recollect that the client X ( Name not disclosed for privacy) entered by office and presented the brief. He said  Mam I am a victim of false cases .  I want compensation and alimony. I laughed on him and remarked “ You have gone crazy and this has never happened to my knowledge . My client was adamant and persistence  to seek alimony from his wife.

    Family law is patience and perseverance.    This client of mine  cooperated in all legal proceedings and mediation. The man was ready to face the trial without fearing for consequences.

    In today’s time, there are increasing reports of men being victims of false allegations in matrimonial cases. What advice or insights would you offer to individuals who find themselves in such challenging situations and may not know how to navigate the legal complexities effectively?

    Navigating false allegations in matrimonial cases can be an incredibly daunting and emotionally draining experience for anyone, regardless of gender. For individuals facing such challenging situations, it’s essential to approach the matter with composure and strategic thinking.

    Firstly, seek legal counsel from a qualified and experienced lawyer specializing in family law. They can provide invaluable guidance and support, helping you understand your rights, obligations, and legal options.

    If a wife files a false case, then the few advise which I can   provide.

    Stay Truthful and Transparent: Being honest and transparent with your lawyer is crucial. Provide them with all relevant information and facts pertaining to the case to enable them to represent you effectively.

    Consider Mediation or Settlement: In some cases, opting for mediation or settlement negotiations can be a viable option to resolve the dispute amicably and avoid prolonged legal battles. However, this should be done under the guidance of your lawyer and with careful consideration of your best interests.

    Stay Informed: Stay informed about your legal rights and obligations. Ask questions and seek clarification from your lawyer whenever necessary to ensure that you fully understand the legal proceedings and implications of various decisions.

    Maintain Support Networks: Surround yourself with supportive friends and family members who can provide emotional support during this challenging time. Seeking counseling or therapy can also be beneficial in coping with the stress and anxiety associated with false allegations.

    Trust the Legal System: Have faith in the legal system and trust that truth and justice will prevail. While the process may be daunting, having a skilled legal advocate by your side can significantly increase your chances of achieving a favorable outcome in your case.

    By following these advice and insights and working closely with a knowledgeable lawyer, individuals facing false allegations in matrimonial cases can effectively navigate the legal complexities and protect their rights and interests.

     Documenting any evidence that disproves the allegations or supports your case is crucial. This could include text messages, emails, witness statements, or any other relevant documentation. Additionally, maintain open communication with your attorney and follow their advice diligently throughout the legal process. It’s also important to prioritize self-care and seek emotional support from trusted friends, family members, or counselling professionals to help cope with the stress and uncertainty of the situation. Remember, false allegations can be disproven with patience, perseverance, and the right legal representation.

    Looking back at your journey from law school to becoming a partner at VantaLegal, what are some pivotal lessons you’ve learned along the way that you would like to share with our readers aspiring to make their mark in the legal field?

    In reflecting on my trajectory from law school to achieving the status of partner at VantaLegal, I have garnered pivotal insights that I deem invaluable for aspiring legal practitioners seeking to carve their niche in the legal realm. Through this journey, I have underscored the paramount importance of perpetual learning, which serves as a linchpin for professional advancement in the dynamic legal milieu. Specializing in a distinct area of legal expertise has proven to be transformative, allowing me to distinguish myself and furnish exceptional value to our esteemed clientele at VantaLegal. Cultivating robust professional relationships has been foundational to my career trajectory, enabling me to unlock new vistas of opportunity and glean insights from peers and mentors. Upholding an unwavering work ethic and demonstrating perseverance are cardinal virtues in the legal profession, qualities that have been pivotal to my ascension to partnership within VantaLegal. Finally, I accentuate the indispensable nature of ethical standards in the legal domain, advocating for the steadfast adherence to integrity, honesty, and ethical precepts as non-negotiable tenets that engender trust and credibility with clients and peers alike. In culmination, I proffer guidance for aspiring legal professionals to embrace continuous learning, cultivate specialized expertise, prioritize relationship-building, uphold a strong work ethic and perseverance, and maintain unwavering ethical standards, as a blueprint for success and impactful contributions within the legal arena.

    Throughout your career, you’ve handled cases independently and provided legal consultancy services. Can you share a memorable case that taught you something profound about the legal profession or human nature?

    Every case provides a unique opportunity for learning and growth, both professionally and personally in family law. I recollect a case which is quite dear to my heart which was child custody. Cases involving child custody can be emotionally challenging, especially when there is acrimony between the parties involved.

    The parties had acrimonious relationship, due to dispute between parents affected child custody arrangement.  The father was unable to meet the child for 2 years  which had  emotional and psychological consequences on both father and the child involved. In this case, the court’s decision to grant the father custody during the summer vacation demonstrates the court’s recognition of the importance of the father-son relationship and the need to ensure the child’s access to both parents. This decision not only provided the father with the opportunity to spend quality time with his son but also helped to restore and strengthen their bond after a prolonged period of separation.

     This order enabled me to  realize that  moments like these, where the legal system can facilitate positive outcomes for families, that highlight the significance of the work done in family law courts.

    Especially in child custody it is imperative to provide a forum for resolving disputes and making decisions in the best interests of children,  being the officer of courts, we lawyer play a crucial role in promoting the well-being and stability of families.

     Amidst the demands of a thriving legal career, how do you unwind and recharge? Could you share some of your favourite ways to relax and rejuvenate outside of the courtroom?

    Balancing the demands of a busy legal career is crucial, and finding time to unwind and recharge is essential for maintaining productivity and well-being. Outside of the courtroom, I prioritize activities that promote relaxation and mental rejuvenation. Spending quality time with my pets, family and friends are incredibly rejuvenating. I practice mindfulness practices, such as meditation or deep breathing exercises,  helps  me to  promote relaxation and reduce stress. Recognizing the importance of maintaining a healthy work-life balance, I believe that fostering a sense of humanity and camaraderie within our profession is essential for long-term success and fulfilment.

    Collaboration seems to be a key aspect of your work, whether it’s negotiating agreements or providing legal support. How do you cultivate effective collaborations with clients and colleagues?

    In my legal practice, fostering effective collaboration is fundamental, whether engaging in negotiations or providing legal support. This entails a comprehensive approach grounded in clear communication, cooperation, and trust. I prioritize transparent communication channels, ensuring clients and colleagues are consistently updated and engaged, fostering a sense of accountability and mutual understanding. Additionally, I actively listen to and empathize with stakeholders’ perspectives, tailoring legal strategies to align with their goals. Collaboration is further enhanced through teamwork and cooperation, leveraging diverse expertise to achieve shared objectives efficiently. Moreover, I uphold principles of professionalism and integrity, cultivating an environment of trust where all parties feel empowered to collaborate openly and confidently. By adhering to these principles, I facilitate robust collaborations that drive successful outcomes in legal matters.

    Get in touch with Sudershani Ray-

  • “If you are prepared to accept failures/rejections on the way & are determined to be a continuous learner (in addition to thinking outside the box) nothing in this profession is impossible & you can soar to great heights.” – Kunal Basu, Founder of Lex Loretta.

    “If you are prepared to accept failures/rejections on the way & are determined to be a continuous learner (in addition to thinking outside the box) nothing in this profession is impossible & you can soar to great heights.” – Kunal Basu, Founder of Lex Loretta.

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    Could you take us through your journey from deciding to pursue law as your education to establishing Lex Loretta? What motivated you to choose law as a career path, and how did you transition from your legal education to starting your own practice?

    My name is Kunal Basu. I am a first-generation lawyer. As a child, I was fascinated by stories of the judicial services, but it wasn’t till many years later that I decided to enter law school in a bid to carve out a niche for myself in the profession. I always originally wanted to enter the judicial services & be a judge but chose to be an attorney. But when I started practicing law in ’22, I saw the reality of the legal system & how quickly shattered the hopes of a litigant could get. There are problems involved in the judicial system. On this note I told myself that come what may, I would be there for each litigant /lost soul who wanted my aid to traverse the labyrinth of long adjournments et al. That’s how my solo practice was initially born. Whilst my LLB degree provided groundwork, having a basic Drafting, Pleading & Conveyancing paper at law school easily helped me to draw up pleadings quickly sans relying on proformas.

    Your areas of practice cover a wide range, from estate transactions to criminal law. What drew you to such diverse fields, and how do you manage to navigate the complexities of each?

    In law school, I was fascinated by papers like the Transfer of Property Act, Indian Trusts Act & the Indian Stamp Act to begin with. We also had a Drafting, Pleading & Conveyancing paper as well. Being an only child, I realised that the world over, many parents have the same common pressing worry–how to pass their assets to their children in an effective manner whilst minimising chances of potential litigation. With this in mind & keeping in mind that for successful practice in trial courts, CPC & CRPC basics were crucial, I employed the system of concept-based learning–a trait that I still use to this day when practicing law in court. Using the method is how I manage to still retain the basic legal principles that help me to navigate. 

    As someone who mentors fellow attorneys facing burnout or feeling lost in their career, what advice would you give to young lawyers navigating the early stages of their profession?

    Be calm. Think with a cool mindset whenever approaching problems in your professional life. A lawyer is expected to resolve the problems of others in a calm & impassioned manner; and if this trait is followed in personal life, it can work wonders. Financials are a problem, but it’s only temporary.

    Your profile mentions a specialization in domestic violence cases involving male victims. Can you share some insights into the unique challenges faced by male victims in seeking legal recourse, and how you approach these cases?

    Whilst most cases I handle involve DV cases from the woman’s perspective, there are genuine cases involving male victims. This is because I have seen that in 99.9% cases, the victim of DV is mostly a female. At times the legal system can be biased towards a male victim & in such cases, it is a test of patience for both the lawyer & male client to navigate the legal system accordingly. As DV cases involving a male victim are special, one has to know not only the DV Act well, but also CrPC too & the basics of criminal drafting. As well as exercise a high degree of empathy.  

    With the rise of remote work and digital platforms, how has it impacted the way you deliver legal services, especially with Lex Loretta being a worldwide remote practice?

    Well… to be honest, delivery of legal services doesn’t always require a brick-and-mortar structure. All that’s required is a stable Internet connection, a secure (client) portal & a communication device. I anticipate that digital nomadism will be the new thing in the next 10 – 15 years. Remote work, I anticipate & digital platforms, I think, will be the new revolutionary approach for any business, including legal profession, to thrive post-COVID. However, I take strict measures to ensure that at no point should Lex Loretta violate advertising standards laid down by the Bar Council of India. 

    As a solo practitioner, what are some of the key challenges you face, and how do you overcome them to ensure the success of Lex Loretta?

    Being a first-generation lawyer, the hardest thing for me when I started practicing was the lack of a mentor. When I started solo practice, I faced challenges from all corners, primarily given the fact that I was a first-generation lawyer. See, most folks are biased towards any first-generation attorney (with exceptions). As days passed, I realised that the only way I could thrive was if I viewed the legal profession from a business perspective instead of cribbing. Keeping this in mind, I set up Lex Loretta on 28th Nov. 2023 by way of a written stamped charter. And it’s been a rollercoaster ride for me ever since then.

    Given your experience, what do you believe the current generation of law graduates can do to build successful and fulfilling careers in law?

    Believe in yourself. Period. Walt Disney said “If you can dream it, you can do it. Always remember that this whole thing started with a dream and a mouse.”  It just takes a spark in you, faith, tons of patience & perseverance to set the ball rolling in this profession. If you are prepared to accept failures/rejections on the way & are determined to be a continuous learner (in addition to thinking outside the box) nothing in this profession is impossible & you can soar to great heights. But if you are influenced easily by other’s perceptions of you, then nothing good will ever happen to you.

    Away from the legal world, what are some of your personal hobbies or interests that you enjoy indulging in?

    I enjoy listening to music, sketching & going on long walks. I enjoy disconnecting from the world for a while & giving more time to myself. I also like sketching abstract objects using vivid imagination & listening to music of all sorts. 

    Internships play a crucial role in a law student’s journey. How important do you think internships are for students, and what kind of internships would you recommend for aspiring lawyers to gain valuable experience and insights into the legal profession?

    See, internships are important for every law student & fresh law graduate to realise whether they are suited for a specific area of law or not. As each area of law is different, I feel that one should choose an internship based on how they view themselves in the next five years & proceed. For instance, if you like being a criminal lawyer, focus on internships under a lawyer, Corrections Department & the judiciary (if possible). Similar goes for any other areas of law. It’s not general. 

    Get in touch with Kunal Basu-

  • “The most important thing is we should not treat clients as a single point solution for all our financial needs, we should explain to them exactly what we are going to do and the win or lose situation”- Advocate Porkodi Karnan, Founder of Polax Legal Solutions

    “The most important thing is we should not treat clients as a single point solution for all our financial needs, we should explain to them exactly what we are going to do and the win or lose situation”- Advocate Porkodi Karnan, Founder of Polax Legal Solutions

    This Interview has been published by Pragya Chandni and The SuperLawyer Team

    Can you share the journey that led you to pursue a career in law, especially considering your background and childhood ambition?

    I am from a backward district of Tamilnadu and I am one among the four daughters of my parents. Everyone opted for various professions, but interestingly, this profession attracted me more, even in my young days.  The reason might be that the Sub Court campus at my native is existing near to my school.  I was going to school everyday by watching the court campus, with the busy advocates roaming here and there with robes.  I was very eager to know more about it and lots of questions came into my mind and the same were clarified by my father who was a teacher by profession and the entire outcome was that this is the only profession where I could question anybody, however giant he or she might be. Further I found this profession makes one closer with human problems. I am fond of moving with people and would like to be surrounded with people always. The litigation area turned out to be a good option for me. This is the main curiosity that pushed me to choose this profession as my childhood ambition approximately from my 6th standard onwards.

    With 25 years of experience in law, what inspired you to specialize in labor, service, and writ matters, particularly in the high court setting?

    Yes… after choosing law as my career, I did not have any clear idea initially. But while studying the Constitutional Law and Administrative law as subjects, my mind was very much obsessed with various decisions of the Supreme Court and High Courts questioning the excessive actions or inactions of the Government and that had driven me to concentrate my work in the High Court.

    Founding a law firm, especially one like POLAX LEGAL SOLUTIONS, requires vision and determination. What motivated you to take that step, and what challenges did you face in establishing and maintaining it?

    Being a woman, I had to balance both family life and profession, though my family is a supportive system for me. Sometimes our presence is very much needed at home to take care of our elders, kids etc. My husband, Mr.Ramar is also an advocate on the criminal side but I wanted to establish a separate office, though he is very supportive to me in personal life and professional life. I felt the necessity of someone to continue my cases even in my absence to justify my Clients.  The same was felt by my friend, Mrs.Lakshmi. We both used to help each other in all our cases from drafting to arguing. This went well and we both realised our compatibility and thus the concept of a Law Firm was coined.  The Firm was conceptualised into reality in the year 2013. We both had the determination to continue the profession without any break and that was the main reason for the concept of this Law Firm.  It is also time to show our young woman advocates that persuasion and patience in the profession would make you withstand forever. We have to create our own path to success. Moreover, since it was my childhood ambition to become an advocate, I have never felt any stress or depression in my professional life. As we face different cases, dealing with each case needs to be addressed individually and so I feel refreshed in each and every case. In fact I enjoy working and I don’t see any difficulty in family life and professional life. So go by what your heart says and life is so beautiful.  

    As a founder-partner of a leading law firm, what are some key lessons you’ve learned about leadership and collaboration, especially in an industry that traditionally has been male-dominated?

    In fact, we don’t feel any difficulty in running the firm as all the junior advocates associated with us were more co-operative, helpful and played a vital role in running our Firm. Legal profession is basically a 24 x 7 job and all of us were ready to work even at midnight, if it is necessitated by considering the urgency of the case. In fact, we created an atmosphere of joining together, working together, growing together and celebrating together. It enhanced our personal relationship also. 

    Being recognized as the only law firm with women advocates as partners running for 10 years is a significant achievement. Can you tell us about the importance of gender diversity and inclusivity in the legal profession from your perspective?

    Of course, it is a male dominated profession. When I entered into this profession during 2000, the daily cause list consisting of the list of cases published in Madras High Court consisted of 95% of male advocates names. And there were only a handful of women judges at that time, though there were well performing women seniors were found at Madras High Court. But going by the years, this trend has now changed.  In fact, I had not considered any of my co advocates, either male or female, as my competitor. I felt myself as the competitor and hence I never felt that I am running in a race along with male.  But, the way male advocates and even male judges look at the woman advocates is absolutely discriminatory. I can put an incident, one Mr.X, who is a sitting judge now, when he was an advocate made a comment to me that “a woman from a good family will not come for this profession”. This did not resist me or my character, but it made me change my perspective towards him.  One more incident to be pointed out, one of the senior advocates, who claims to be a progressive thinker,  threw a question that “from where and how do you get briefs?”. I don’t think that he could have put this question to any of the male advocates ever.

    -as in all the fields, there need not be any discrimination between male advocate or woman advocate,  and it should be termed only as “ADVOCATE”. An advocate is an advocate and where does the question of woman advocate or male advocate arise? We both are doing the same work with the same effort and determination. Even today, the Judges used to identify by saying “woman advocate”. We don’t want to be identified and we are advocates as such. 

    You’ve had the opportunity to work with esteemed companies as clients. Could you share some insights into maintaining successful client relationships and handling high-profile cases effectively?

    The issues of the clients should be given much more importance from the time of discussion with them till explaining the outcome of the cases. It is also needless to say that we have to let them explain the exact disputes or issues they are facing. Then only we can advise them of the legal solutions and we should not blindly follow their words without substantiating documents. The right legal advice given by you will make the Clients have confidence with you, sometimes, the advice could be not to initiate any legal proceedings. The most important thing is we should not treat them as a single point solution for all our financial needs, we should explain to them exactly what we are going to do and the win or lose situation. To be precise, proper legal advice, and  transparency are the key to retain your clientele. 

    Considering your extensive experience, what advice would you give to fresh graduates aspiring to pursue a career in law, particularly those interested in practicing in high courts?

    If litigation is your option, then  be ready to undergo proper training under the guidance of a senior; Be ready to work for 24 x 7; Be ready to do all the work in office, either it is drafting, research work or clerical work; get updated with latest decisions in important cases of your area of practice; spend more time in reading either case papers or the decisions related to cases; Knowledge is power in litigation so get equipped; consider each and every work as an opportunity as each and every single work done during this period would be an experience for you.  

    Get in touch with Porkodi Karnan-