Super Lawyer

Tag: Patent Attorney

  • “For students and young professionals moving from engineering to patent law, the first step is to maintain your strong technical knowledge.” – Iti Negi, Patent Practitioner.

    “For students and young professionals moving from engineering to patent law, the first step is to maintain your strong technical knowledge.” – Iti Negi, Patent Practitioner.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    In the early stages of your journey, particularly while transitioning into the world of intellectual property, what were some defining experiences that helped shape your practice in patents? Could you share any formative instances that honed your core skills?

    Overall, my journey in the field of Intellectual Property (IP) has been both enriching and transformative. Each organization I have worked with has added a unique dimension to my understanding of IP, helping me grow both technically and strategically. While I have had the opportunity to learn immensely at every stage, there are two experiences that stand out. Not only because of the nature of the work involved, but also because they came at pivotal moments in my career and had a lasting impact on how I approach patent practice today.

    The first was my transition into an in-house role at LG Electronics, which marked a significant turning point. Although this was not at the very beginning of my career, it was one of my earliest exposures to working in a large, innovation-driven product company. It was an exciting time as the first iPhone had just launched, reshaping the mobile industry. I was one of the few patent professionals hired outside LG’s IP team in South Korea, which gave me a unique vantage point.

    This role gave me critical exposure to the intersection of product design and IP. I worked extensively on handheld devices, touchscreens, and human machine interfaces. I learned to break down products into their technical components and identify key innovation areas. It was here that I began to understand the importance of aligning patent strategy with product roadmaps, ensuring that each patent family supported not just a single product but an entire innovation trajectory.

    In addition, I had the opportunity to contribute to emerging areas such as smart TVs and smart home initiatives. This showed me how cohesive, ecosystem-level IP strategy can create stronger value than isolated patents. Collaborating with different business units and cross-functional teams deepened my appreciation for how patents can be leveraged as long-term strategic assets. That early experience of helping shape an IP function within a rapidly evolving tech landscape laid a strong foundation for my future roles.

    The second defining chapter came during my time at Nokia USA. As part of Nokia’s patent team, I worked across high impact areas like User Interface (UI) and User Experience (UX), Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR), and digital health. Being immersed in Nokia’s global innovation ecosystem, from Nokia Research Labs and Nokia Bell Labs to academic collaborations across Europe and Asia, broadened my horizons both technically and culturally.

    My role encompassed a wide range of responsibilities including invention harvesting, portfolio development, prosecution, and strategic patent portfolio management across key jurisdictions such as the US, Europe, China, Japan, and Korea. I also got exposure to work with Technical Support teams for different patent licensing projects at Nokia. This includes preparing claim charts and evidence of use analyses, contributing directly to licensing and divestment strategies.

    This is where I gained a nuanced understanding of how the clarity and scope of a patent can directly influence its commercial value and enforceability. I began to think more holistically, not just about obtaining patents, but about building enforceable, high-quality assets that could withstand scrutiny in licensing and litigation contexts.

    Together, these two experiences helped me develop a well-rounded perspective, one that balances deep technical insight, legal precision, and strategic foresight. They taught me to view IP not just as a legal function, but as a business enabler, and that mindset has stayed with me throughout my career.

    With over 17 years of in-house patent experience, looking back, what initially inspired you to pursue a degree in law after completing your engineering? Was patent law always an area of interest, or did your passion for it evolve organically over time?

    Looking back, my path into patent law was not something I had mapped out early on. It was a journey that evolved gradually, shaped by experiences, exposure, and curiosity. What started as an interest in understanding how technology impacts real-world outcomes slowly matured into a deep, lasting passion for IP and patents.

    During my engineering years, I was always intrigued by how innovation could be protected, monetized, and scaled. Through internships and early professional experiences, I began to realize that I was drawn not just to the technical side of things, but to the intersection of technology, business, and strategy. I found myself wanting to explore the broader picture, what happens beyond the invention itself.

    That curiosity eventually led me to the field of intellectual property. I was particularly fascinated by how IP brings together technical analysis, strategic thinking, and legal structure. My initial experiences with patent work, mostly through hands-on projects and on-the-job learning, made a strong impression on me. The more I was exposed to the field, the clearer it became that I wanted to move beyond executing individual patent tasks. I was eager to contribute to broader innovation strategies and understand how legal frameworks support long-term business goals.

    As I worked across different projects and domains within the IP space, I gained a better appreciation for the breadth of the field. Patent law is vast, and exposure to varied technologies and business contexts helped me understand which aspects resonated with me the most. Over time, it became clear that deepening my legal understanding would allow me to be more effective and more strategic in my role.

    This was the turning point that led me to pursue a law degree. It was not about switching careers but about enhancing the one I was already building. Law helped me connect the dots between technology, innovation, and strategic value creation. It gave structure to the insights I had been developing through experience. 

    You’ve managed patent portfolios across major jurisdictions such as the US, Europe, Japan, China, Korea, and India. What are some of the most nuanced challenges you’ve encountered in aligning with these diverse legal frameworks?

    Yes, that’s right, managing patent portfolios across multiple jurisdictions involves navigating various topics and requirements, which can present nuanced challenges when trying to align a global strategy.

    One of the few topics to keep in mind is patent eligibility, particularly for software and business methods. Compared to other jurisdictions, the US tends to be more permissive but requires to show specific improvements in computer functionality or technological solutions to overcome eligibility rejections, following the Alice decision. Europe places strong emphasis on the technical contribution of an invention, where a business advantage alone may not be enough to establish patentability.

    Technical disclosure requirements also vary significantly, and this can impact claim amendments during prosecution. For example, the European Patent Office (EPO) is very strict about amendments not containing subject matter that extends beyond the content of the application as originally filed. When making amendments, it is important to specify where the support lies in the original application. Although exact wording is not legally required, examiners generally prefer amendments that closely match the original text. 

    Handling of prior art and grace periods differs across jurisdictions as well. The US offers a one-year grace period after disclosure, whereas Europe generally requires absolute novelty before filing. China and India allow limited grace periods under specific conditions. These differences make the timing of public disclosures and use of nondisclosure agreements important considerations.

    Inventive step criteria is another aspect to be mindful of. For example, the EPO primarily assesses inventive step using the problem-solution approach. This involves identifying the closest prior art, establishing the objective technical problem based on the differences, and determining whether the invention would have been obvious to a skilled person.

    When it comes to claims, jurisdictions also vary in their preferences and fee structures. For instance, there is often a dislike of excessive independent claims, and claim fees can increase significantly with multiple dependencies or a large number of claims. Careful planning of claim scope and format is therefore necessary to balance broad protection with cost-effectiveness.

    Overall, these jurisdictional nuances call for a careful and flexible approach. Understanding local laws, working closely with local patent agents and attorneys, tailoring claim language and prosecution strategies, and managing disclosures thoughtfully are important steps to building a patent portfolio that is both effective and enforceable across different regions.

    What inspired your transition from practicing in the Indian IP ecosystem to pursuing an international role, particularly within the U.S. patent system? After nearly a decade of working in India, how did you navigate the shift, both technically and culturally and what were some of the key experiences as you adapted to the U.S. IP landscape?

    My move to the US was not a planned career step but was driven by personal reasons. However, during my practice in India, I consistently worked with multinational companies, expatriates, senior leadership, and patent attorneys and agents from the US, Europe, and Korea. I also managed international patent portfolios and was regularly exposed to global patent laws and treaties, which provided a strong foundation for the transition.

    Technically, adapting to the US patent system involved gaining a thorough understanding of its examination procedures, claim drafting nuances, and administrative and legal standards. On the cultural side, I embraced the collaborative and fast-paced work environment, learning to navigate diverse communication styles and team dynamics effectively.

    Overall, my prior international exposure made the shift smoother and helped me quickly align with the US IP landscape while appreciating the cultural differences that enriched my professional growth.

    In your in-house roles, you’ve worked closely with engineers and product development teams to build high-value patent portfolios aligned with business strategy. From this experience, what are some common pitfalls you often see at the early stages of innovation or idea disclosure that, if left unaddressed, can lead to challenges or setbacks during later stages of patent prosecution? How can these be proactively avoided?

    A common pitfall at the early stages of innovation or idea disclosure could be insufficient technical details in the Invention Disclosures. Inventors may focus on what a new feature or a use-case is but sometimes fail to fully articulate the know-how and why behind its technical effect. This lack of depth may challenge later patent prosecution. To avoid this, we could implement a structured invention disclosure process where the patent practitioners work with the Engineers at an early phase of patent workflow and provide examples on the level of technical details needed.

    Industrial Application or Utility of Inventions. It’s good to work with Inventors to demonstrate a practical application for their inventions. Jurisdictions scrutinize “abstract ideas” or “computer programs per se.” To counter this, disclosures must highlight technical effects and improvements to, for example, existing computing or vehicles, not just a new user experience.

    Initial invention disclosures may focus solely on current product features, potentially overlooking future developments or competitive design-arounds. This can result in unduly narrow patent claims. It is therefore advisable to collaborate closely with inventors to explore potential workarounds, alternative technologies, and foreseeable product evolutions to ensure broader and more robust claim coverage.

    By proactively addressing these areas, early ideas translate into a robust, high-value patent portfolio that aligns with business strategy.

    Looking ahead, how do you foresee the role of an in-house IP professional evolving, especially in the context of generative AI, rapidly emerging technologies, and shifting regulatory environments? What skills, perspectives, or mindsets will be critical for IP professionals to stay ahead?

    The role of an in-house IP professional is fundamentally transforming, demanding consistent vigilance across both technical and legal domains due to their rapid evolution. The rise of generative AI exemplifies this shift, raising complex questions from Inventorship, AI governance and evolving standards of subject matter eligibility for AI-related inventions across different jurisdictions. Furthermore, the increasing use of AI tools in patent drafting and analysis requires us to master new proficiencies while mitigating risks like data security and “hallucinations.” Staying current in these areas is crucial, allowing IP professionals to move beyond traditional counsel to provide proactive, forward-looking strategic guidance that anticipates both technological breakthroughs and their unique legal ramifications.

    For patent professionals, this shift demands a deep understanding of these technologies, the ability to ask the right questions to the inventors so as to use the details to draft patent applications and create a patent portfolio that is robust, strategically aligned, and resilient to future developments (future-proof patent applications). Simultaneously, the use of AI in media and content generation is raising complex questions in copyright law, including issues around authorship, fair use, and derivative works. Navigating these emerging challenges requires both legal adaptability and technical insight.

    For students and young professionals exploring a transition from engineering to law and ultimately into the IP and patent domain, what advice would you offer? Could you suggest a potential roadmap or strategies to help them stay relevant and future-ready in this interdisciplinary space?

    For students and young professionals moving from engineering to patent law, the first step is to maintain your strong technical knowledge. As an engineer or STEM graduate, you have a solid foundation. Try to stay current with the latest technological trends within your specific field. Understanding the core technology is crucial, as patent law focuses on protecting innovations you thoroughly comprehend.

    Next, develop your legal knowledge. Immerse yourself in legal manuals, textbooks, and case studies. You must become comfortable with legal language, statutes, and court rulings. This new legal expertise will combine with your technical background, creating a unique and powerful skill set vital for the interdisciplinary world of intellectual property. This allows you to understand the interplay between technology and legal strategy.

    Finally, sharpen your writing skills. Much of your work will involve writing patent applications and legal arguments. Master both technical writing, for accurate invention descriptions, and legal writing, for clear application of the law. Also, cultivate essential soft skills like analytical thinking, perseverance, and attention to detail. These qualities are vital for success and will give you a distinct edge in this rewarding field.

    Balancing a demanding career with personal well-being is no small feat. How do you maintain that equilibrium? Are there personal practices, habits, or philosophies that help you stay grounded and balanced in both your personal and professional life?

    Balancing a demanding global IP role with personal well-being is vital. My approach starts with prioritizing well-being as a non-negotiable. This means regular self-care activities that recharge me. Exercise, mindfulness, hobbies, and time in nature are essential. I schedule short breaks daily to rest. Taking proper vacations allows me to truly disconnect from work. Maintaining 

    Effective time management helps me find that crucial balance. I plan my schedule carefully to allocate time for both professional responsibilities and personal commitments. This structured approach allows me to manage the high demands of my role without constant “on-call” pressure, creating a clear distinction between work and personal life.

    A strong support network is also critical. I cultivate relationships with colleagues, mentors, friends, and family. Their guidance, emotional support, and practical help are invaluable in navigating challenges. This network provides a crucial sense of community and perspective. My personal philosophy centers on finding purpose and meaning in my work, which boosts job satisfaction. I embrace continuous learning and growth to stay adaptable.

    Get in touch with Iti Negi –

  • Fueling the Future of Innovation Through IP Awareness and Advocacy – Nilanshu Shekhar, Founding Partner at KAnalysis

    Fueling the Future of Innovation Through IP Awareness and Advocacy – Nilanshu Shekhar, Founding Partner at KAnalysis

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Let me begin by asking you about your decision to do law after having an engineering degree or academic foundation in biotechnology and industrial microbiology. What was your inspiration in bringing intellectual property into your life, and how have you taken this approach to excel in the IP domain and make it a passion?

    As it happens with everybody, the shift to intellectual property from an engineering background, or in my case, the shift from biotechnology and industrial microbiology to IP, was not planned. It happened organically, and I began my career as a patent engineer in my first organization where I was introduced to the world of IP.

    That exposure was an eye-opener for me because I realized IP was the perfect intersection of science, law, strategy, and, more importantly, business. It allowed me to stay close to innovation while also influencing how innovations are protected and commercialized. So that is something that brought me towards IP, and the interest has kept me going to date. Over time, this technical-to-legal transition has shaped my entire approach to how I view IP.

    I don’t look at innovations in isolation. I view them as a larger part of the innovation journey because it’s all incremental and doesn’t happen as a eureka moment. That mindset continues to influence how I advise my clients even today. Whether it’s a startup or a multinational trying to scale its IP, I try to see the bigger picture of what the innovation would mean to them, how it aligns with their business goals, how to strategically protect it because IP, in isolation from business, is of no use.

    That’s how my journey towards IP keeps me motivated and going strong.

    Thank you so much for bringing in this aspect of the intersection of two fields, which are absolutely niche. Way back in 2007 itself, you started KAnalysis, and right now, you have made it a thriving IP law firm. What were some of the key challenges during those early years when you started your journey with a modest three-member team and navigated it through building a firm of this size and reputation, with a mission of making an IP hub in India? How have you done it?

    Well, it has happened gradually, I would say. When we started in 2007, we were working out of a single basement with very limited resources and zero clients. So, the initial challenge was how to show your credibility. Why would anybody trust a young firm or someone who has just started?

    We focused on quality, our responsiveness, and trust, because trust is something that takes you far. Even during our initial phase, we were doing the IP work. Wherever we were trained, we were not good at starting or setting up a business, managing cash flows, or getting clients, or getting an introduction to a client. We could execute a project, we could write a patent, we could search for prior art, or we could do a lot of things, but how to convince somebody to trust you?

    So those were tough initial days, as it happens with everybody. But the real challenge started as we grew. When you try to scale, the biggest challenge is that you should not dilute your core values. Consistency and patience are key. Over time, we have invested in people, set up robust processes, and, being from an engineering background, we could incorporate and adapt technology at various levels.

    People, process, and technology, I would say, are the three pillars we have not compromised on till now. The culture is that we will not compromise on these, however big we grow, because growth at the cost of culture and quality will not last long. Over the years, it has been almost 18 years. We have built slowly and steadily, investing in people, processes, and technology.

    That’s what I claim to be my biggest challenge now. As the team grows now, we are over a hundred people. The majority of my team is in India, but a few members are spread across the globe. The second-largest team is in the US, and we have small offices spread across the globe to take care of various jurisdictions.

    Every step has a new challenge, and as we grow, the challenges keep changing, but you have to adapt and survive.

    You have been resilient, and you have prospered through that. Keeping all that and working towards IP rights for more than 18 years now, what was the role of your engineering background in shaping the strategies that you particularly saw were different from regular lawyers? Obviously, there was a different understanding that came from having an engineering background plus a legal understanding. How have you seen that particular combination help you and your team grow and strategize at the same time?

    Yes, I have a different take on this. Whatever course or degree or exercise you take, it shapes your mind to think in a particular way. That’s what engineering does.

    Engineering doesn’t teach you anything specific. It trains your mind in a particular direction, to think a certain way, to solve issues or problems with a different bent of mind. Engineering teaches you to deconstruct a problem, break down the system into fundamental parts, look at each part individually, and then see their function and assimilate them.

    Law, on the other hand, teaches you to analyze. Law teaches you to connect those individual parts in a logical and legal framework. So, having training in both aspects helps you see the final picture without missing the finer details. That’s what the combination of engineering and law helps you achieve.

    Initially, I was more involved in patent prosecution. Over time, I was exposed to IP litigation, which has added a third dimension to my thinking. When you are prosecuting patents, your basic idea is to get a patent. When you go into litigation, you realize the basic idea is how to get a patent that is enforceable.

    It teaches you what holds in court and what falls apart. This practical insight sharpens my instincts in the entire scheme of things. Now I try to look for the best claim scope or how to draft better claims. As a litigator, I have realized that my ability to draft and interpret claims has also improved.

    Claims should be broad enough, assertable, and defendable even under attack. All those things shape your thinking. Every day is a learning process. Every case teaches you something. So whether I’m guiding someone, I’m not just focused on getting the examination and obtaining a patent, but also on how much I can contribute to obtaining an enforceable patent. My goal is to create IP that is not just strong on paper.

    It should withstand scrutiny. It should attract investors. It should survive litigation, both offensive and defensive, and it should support the business in market entry. Starting and setting up my business also helps me understand the key challenges any company faces with regard to IP protection.

    You don’t go all out and spend all your money on IP. Business is also important. It’s a combination and a learning that has helped me consult clients. I don’t work with clients as just a service provider or as a lawyer. I work hand in glove, even suggesting who they should go to for a merger or whom they should not partner with. I regularly undertake those kinds of activities.

    That’s why I like working with early-stage startups or small tech companies, because there you can be very closely invested. Over time, I’ve seen most of my clients trust me because we make them understand that IP isn’t just about legal protection. It’s a business asset.

    So technical understanding, legal foresight, and business acumen that’s why we have been successful as KAnalysis, I would say. I’ve seen my clients from their first provisional patent to securing multimillion-dollar funding. Those have been brilliant experiences.

    We would also love to understand that particular monetization process and the multimillion-dollar deals that you have done for IP monetization especially.

    But before that, we would love to ask you about your pro bono work also, where you have invested a lot of your time in initiatives like the IP Help Desk for startups and the IP workshops that you keep on doing. What actually fuels your dedication to promoting IP awareness and educating academicians and entrepreneurial communities related to this? Because you do it pro bono and you are also involved in a lot of deals which are for monetization. So how do you find the balance between these two, and how do you find time to do that?

    That’s interesting! I’ll tell you a very humorous anecdote. When I joined IP, it was very difficult to convince my dad what I was doing. And he is a professor. So that is the level of IP awareness in India. It took me a long while because India has no dearth of innovation, but IP awareness and awareness around IP rights remain uneven. Startups, academic institutions, and big companies have their setup because they have realized it the hard way.

    They have been sued or they want to protect, so they have mechanisms. But startups and academia lack IP awareness. Over the years, I have been working and managing one of the largest patent portfolios in India. We are managing portfolios in over 80 countries, spanning over 30,000 patents.

    So, handling that kind of a portfolio, I realized that most of my clients are from outside India. During COVID, you get time to ponder a lot about what we are doing and what we are giving back to society. During those days, I realized, let’s start an IP help desk to help startups, because startups are in the most gullible phase. I have seen investors who are real sharks take over their hard-earned innovation and everything. So I launched the IP help desk just to help them understand their questions, their issues, and guide them or handhold them without charging them. Because initially, they’re short on money and they think everybody is trying to sell something.

    I have done over 150 pro bono workshops across the country in the last two and a half years. These are not just lectures; they’re conversations where I help to demystify IP to the founders, to the people at incubation centers, those who have just started, and I give them practical, usable advice.

    How to stagger the cost. How you can protect yourself with minimum cost. So that when you attract investors, you may pay me but how can we get to that stage where you are attractive to the investor and protected. Because IP should not be an afterthought. It should be part of the innovation process from day one.

    Founders and researchers need to understand their rights and the value of protection. That’s what I do. I try to make them understand where the value lies. It’s not a cost center, it’s an asset. Slowly and gradually, I’m assisting over 1,000 startups at the moment, who are transforming in their trust in me, their confidence, and their outlook. For me, this is a way of giving back to the ecosystem, because ultimately this ecosystem has shaped me, and I ensure that the next generation has all the tools to compete globally. Because Indians should be competing globally. Big companies or multinationals will not build India. It will be the SME sector that writes the next India growth story.

    So that’s what my mission is to enable startups to lead the India story. Whatever little I can contribute, I try to contribute.

    That’s not little, that’s huge. One person can bring in so much change and can bring in so many people together to work towards one goal of making India again an IP hub as you have envisioned for everyone.

    Yeah, that’s why I keep my Fridays open for four hours. Anybody can book a slot and they can ask questions, without any charges. So that’s something that attracts most people.

    Wow! We would love to promote that aspect. And we’ll definitely talk about this the Fridays that you keep open for people to come to you and have that free consultation. That’s something which is not easily available, at least from such senior attorneys who are already managing such big portfolios.

    This is something that is very inspiring for young professionals also. So, sir, how would you like to talk about the intersection of science, innovation, and law, and what kind of core skills these young professionals can seek when they’re trying or thinking of building a career? And what do you propose to build that particular mindset, and what kind of advice would you like to give to them so that they can thrive in this particular field of intellectual property, keeping in mind that they also have to give back to society, as you already are doing?

    For anybody to give back to society, they should first focus on building their career and themselves. And they should enjoy IP, because this is a field where, if you don’t enjoy it, you cannot work a single day. That joy, that kick you don’t have to drag yourself to the office any day. You just look forward to it. And for that, the basics for students or young professionals is that you should develop interdisciplinary fluency.

    You should have a passion for science, an understanding of law, and an ability to look at business so that you are able to connect the dots. That’s something I always suggest. It’s not about mastering one thing. You have to be a jack of all trades. You have to be good at multiple things, because if you go in one direction if you are very good at law, IP is not for you. That’s the core legal side. If you’re good at engineering, IP is not for you either.

    You should have a flair for multiple things. That’s what IP requires. You should also cultivate a habit of deep listening, because the majority of my clients describe symptoms, not problems. My job is to diagnose both.

    They would just give me a situation where they’re stuck. That’s just a symptom. The real problem lies somewhere else. I need to identify what the root problem is and then provide a solution. Somebody has sued them filing a countersuit is not always the solution. There is also room for arbitration.

    If my case is not very strong, I would look for other avenues where I could bring the other party to the negotiating table. So that’s all part of business strategy. Secondly, I would advise the young generation to stay curious, because IP is evolving rapidly, especially with areas like AI, genomics, cleantech, and the majority of the new avenues that are coming.

    If you are not curious, if you are not rigorously reading, it’ll be very difficult to stay updated. This field needs you to be relevant. And finally, last but not the least be ethical. Cutting corners is not going to help you survive long in this field. This field is built on trust. So if you try to cut corners, you might get one or two clients, or you might get one or two cases, which would be shortcuts.

    But integrity will help you build a career. That’s a must. This field rewards only those who are sharp and sensitive. It’s not something you should be ruthless about. Those who can think like a scientist, act like a lawyer, and listen like a consultant. I always say to anybody who is hired that you should have good listening skills, but you should act like a lawyer and think like a scientist.

    That’s what an IP lawyer should be. It’s not a one-dimensional career, I would say. I have been actively mentoring our juniors to understand what I call IP fluency. It’s the ability to connect innovation, law, and commercial relevance. Because there is a brilliant invention that somebody has done, most of the inventors are very passionate about what they have created.

    But is it packaged enough to be marketable as a product? An IP lawyer would stop before that. I go that extra step. How would the market perceive this? What would be the best sales strategy? If you could associate your product with some bigger brand, how would this complement?

    So, those kinds of strategies I come up with because I try to help the business grow rather than just limiting myself to the IP side. So if you are someone who is curious, ethical, and eager to make an impact, IP is the career for you. It’s a very fulfilling career path. But choosing wisely is what I suggest.

    We also have one very good initiative in our organization where we have weekly training sessions for everybody. Whatever is there, they are given specific topics to present to the entire organization. Every fortnight, we have sessions so they get to dive deeper into that particular topic. That is something I have been doing regularly in this organization, because for me, it’s all about the culture that we build. We are here to nurture, and that’s what we have been doing.

    So I’ll start with “curiosity is the key, thinking like a scientist, acting like a lawyer.” Sir, keeping all that in mind, how have you developed this culture inside your organization and made sure that everyone is aligned with the whole process? Because it’s a huge organization.

    It’s in several jurisdictions as well. So the kind of thought process that’s involved also requires an understanding of having very good mental health as well as physical health. How have you worked on that and made sure that all your team members are not only aligned but also following the certain protocols that you may have set? Because it has become a very big and growing issue of mental health problems and compromised physical health and people have started talking about it. So how do you work around that and make sure that you also stay healthy and that your team across the globe is also equally healthy?

    It’s definitely a journey. I would say I’ve been trying hard to maintain a balance, but yes, it’s still a learning curve. I used to equate longer hours with better outcomes.

    That was earlier. Over time, I have realized or with experience, I could do things much quicker and I have realized that clear thinking, a strategic approach, and, I would say, strong leadership all combine to form a structure that helps you remain fit. By fit, I mean mental health more, because lawyers get involved in a case so much that they’re not able to shut down when they’re not working.

    Even in the subconscious mind, a case keeps on going. When you are so involved, a setback in court would ruin your evening, which shouldn’t be.

    So a lot of times it happens, but now I take time and ensure that I switch off. I listen to music, go for walks, or the best I like is speaking to young professionals that helps me unwind.

    And I have a supporting family. I have a very close group of friends. I have kids who help me relax, and that’s how I keep my mental balance. I would say they help me recharge, especially when things get intense and it happens almost every week. So that’s how it is.

    Delegation of work and another important point that I forgot worth mentioning, is building a strong second line. Because as the firm grows, you need to have a second line that takes care of the majority of my issues so that I come into the picture at a very later stage.

    That helps me go out and work daily because prioritizing mental health is not just about myself, but it’s all across the firm. Because if you are not sustainable, it’ll not last long. You’ll burn out.

    So we need to keep that flame alive but that flame should not burn you is what I always tell people. You stay motivated, but at least learn to enjoy, and that enjoyment should come.

    I’m very fortunate to have a set of friends who keep me grounded. They don’t let me fly too long. So that’s how I relax and unwind. And I’m still learning. Scaling means having trust in your second line, having trust in your delegation, having trust in your processes and culture. I’m very thankful that I have built a very good team. It’s a slow and steady process.

    Every hiring goes through a lot of vetting.

    I’m personally involved in most of the hirings that happen in the company because the culture should be intact. The mindset you can teach a person but you can’t change the attitude. So that is one thing I always, always look for in people. Somebody who has not played any sport would not be a good team player, is what I feel.

    So these are small, small things that I keep in mind when I look for people while hiring. I like to speak to them for an hour or so to understand and pick up some things from their mind. That person might be a brilliant asset, but if it’s not a fit for the culture, then he’s not the person for me.

    Amazing views, sir. Thank you so much for talking about building a very strong second line as well as delegating your work obviously with diligence and with the understanding that it’ll work after you have delegated.

    Sir, while you were talking about IP rights and IP management and other aspects of intellectual property, you also talked about negotiations and management. We would like to ask you your thoughts about the arbitrations that keep happening in intellectual property. How do you see the future of IP arbitration in India and globally as well? Because you have a global presence.

    I have been involved in several IP transactions as well, and over time I realized that your biggest competitors could be your potential collaborators in the future. This is a big jigsaw puzzle. Every piece needs to fit in somewhere, and that is something where there is always room for negotiation, because nobody is outrightly against anybody.

    It’s that everybody is protecting their own business interests. So in the broader sense, what we do is we try, as I mentioned earlier, to deconstruct the dispute. What is the major negotiating point? What is a strict no-go?

    Is there any chance where a financial negotiation could also take place?

    Because initially, I was also involved in a lot of IP valuation work as well. So, if there is a dollar value attributed to this particular piece of technology, could there be a royalty scope wherein we could have a negotiation around that?

    Arbitration is not always about having a mandatory step, because these days, courts have been constantly pushing for arbitration, and people should first try out arbitration before starting the trial.

    But arbitration as a first step needs to be taken care of. The real challenge I feel in India is that there are not enough trained arbitrators. Arbitration is a very, very specialized niche that is going to be very lucrative. There is very little expertise in that particular domain.

    Because an arbitrator who specializes in aerospace would not be a good fit for e-commerce.

    So for somebody who is a domain-specific arbitrator it has been a wonderful experience working with some very good arbitrators trained in Singapore or Dubai.

    Because those two centers I really like the framework they have: the training of arbitrators, the certification courses they offer.

    It’s amazing. I have had the fortune of working with quite a few of them, and I wish India had that kind of setup, where we have training schools for arbitrators where there is a specific coursework, six months or eight months, wherein arbitrators are trained to arbitrate. Because most of the time, we have our own biases, and arbitrators shouldn’t be biased.

    So those are small, small things that arbitrators need to inculcate. With training and proper guidance from established institutes across the globe, India can be a major hub because that would lead to a reduction in a lot of the backlog we have in courts, if there is a good arbitration mechanism.

    In IP, I would say it’s very laughable that most of the businesses 500, 600 crore businesses were started by a family. When they split, they don’t have a proper agreement about IPR or brands, and that fight goes on.

    Those family businesses I’ve been involved in a lot of feuds in family businesses where the brand, who owns the brand later, is a real nightmare, because many people don’t understand the value of the brand unless they see that they can’t sell using that brand. Then the valuation starts.

    So it’s still in a very, very nascent stage in India.

    But I am very hopeful that the next crop would be more accustomed to and more inclined towards alternate dispute resolution mechanisms.

    Sir, with the kind of experience and exposure you’re offering through your workshops, I truly hope many others follow your lead so that India can become the IP hub you’ve envisioned. As we come to the end of this conversation, I’d love to understand how you keep yourself updated with everything happening in the IP world. How much do you read, how often do you interact with the international community, and what differences have you observed in the understanding of IP rights across jurisdictions? Since you’ve worked in over 80 jurisdictions, you must have encountered varied approaches to the same IP concepts. It would be great if you could share those insights for the benefit of young professionals.

    Definitely. Because IP is a global thing. It’s not restrained. You need protection in multiple countries, but each country has a different law that we should understand. Each country has a different patentability criterion.

    Some things are patentable here, some things are not patentable here. Method patents are patentable in some countries, some countries only allow system claims. So this kind of thing, where you are seeking global protection if you don’t have a bird’s eye view of different jurisdictions that are patentable in Japan might not be patentable here in India. Or let’s say there is a business method patent, which is allowed in the US but not allowed in India. Software patents we face a lot of issues regarding Section 3D or repurposing of drugs. So all those things you need to work with attorneys across multiple jurisdictions to understand.

    If you are starting with a PCT application, my team has been trained with US attorneys, European attorneys, Canadian attorneys, even Japanese and Chinese attorneys. So when we write a PCT, you have room to amend in that specific jurisdiction when you enter that.

    When you are trying to prosecute applications across the globe if you are working here most people would go and help you to submit with a foreign attorney without giving you the legal perspective. Let’s say if you file in the US with 20 claims.

    Same application if you go to Europe why go with 20 claims if you have to pay an additional claim fee for five extra claims? Because above 15, Europe charges. In China, it charges above 10. Some people I have encountered in the past it’s against my profession but I would say that just to justify the billing of $20,000, they write a 200-page patent.

    That invention was brilliant and beautiful, and it should have been protected across the globe. But the translation cost was so high that the client could not afford to file in non-English jurisdictions. Only nine or ten countries allow you to file in English. The rest all require local language. You get the translation done.

    Why write a textbook when you are writing a patent? Be concise, be compliant, and think about the business of the client rather than your billing is what I always suggest. So having a global perspective with regard to global filings has been the hallmark of our success because our patents get prosecuted in multiple jurisdictions, and we are the ones who are responsible for all the jurisdictions.

    We would not say that we have drafted as per Indian law and the rest you take care of with your local attorneys. Then you keep on having office action after office action after office action, and you end up spending a lot without getting the patent because it was written in such a manner that there is very little room to go ahead.

    I’ll tell you, these days I’m facing a lot of issues with Indian companies, I would say. They cut corners while drafting a patent. They come to us for making a response for a US office action. After our response, the claims are allowed, but the final objection comes that there is no support for those claims in the specification.

    You can amend the claims, but you can’t amend the specification. A brilliant innovation goes down the drain because you have already disclosed most of the things. There are remedies that we suggest, but you end up having your cost at least 1.5 to 1.8 times. You try to save a few dollars and you end up spending a fortune. So that’s something that needs to be told to the people and to the business community that it’s always a penny-wise and pound-foolish situation.

    That is the kind of situation that most Indian businesses are facing these days.

    And as you mentioned at the start, they don’t want to pay. They will pay. They’ll pay when they are in a soup. Why get in a soup? Have preventive strategies first. That’s my advice.

    Why get into a suing battle later when paying upfront can keep you protected for life? I’d really like to understand your thoughts and motivation. How do you envision the IP hub idea becoming a reality in India over the next decade, especially considering the high-profile cases you’ve handled and the challenges you’ve seen businesses face? Since you’re mentoring so many attorneys, startups, and businesses, what would your advice or strategy be to help make this vision real, especially with the government also actively working towards IP awareness? How can both young professionals and seasoned attorneys contribute to this goal?

    I would say that we need to shift our mindset from domestic-first to a global situation. It should be global by design. Most of the people file PCT applications, and I have seen people who say that they have got a worldwide patent.

    So that’s the level of awareness they have. And they don’t enter the national phase, and everything goes down the drain.

    So if you start with a global perspective, then only you’ll be able to compete globally. That’s why KAnalysis started. We came up with the idea everybody laughed at us that how can you manage through a single window so many jurisdictions?

    Step by step, step by step, the team got trained. We got trained in understanding different countries, different jurisdictions, what kind of objections each country has. We have built strategies where you could save at least 40% of your cost if you plan your prosecution and global IP filing strategically. Minimum 40% saving that we have shown repeatedly again and again.

    That’s a huge amount of money considering you are looking at 8 to 10 jurisdictions to file. Of course, India has made commendable strides. It’s not that India has not done anything. At that time, there was no digital filing when I started. Now it’s all digital.

    Expedited examination is a very welcome step that we have. They have increased outreach programs, which is very good. They have stakeholders’ meetings that is a very welcome step.

    The major problem that I see is inconsistency in the examination of patents. Delay has been something that I have always been seeing, but now at least with expedited examinations and all, I’ve been able to get patents within a year, many times.

    So those are some things that have certainly helped. Just like USPTO, the Indian Patent Office needs to adapt to AI for basic things. You can’t replace humans, but at least the formalities checks and all those things could be automated. USPTO has automated all those things.

    That would help us get a better outcome, faster outcome, and reduce the delay in enforcement.

    I empathize with the judiciary because they have a huge backlog, but the Indian system legal reform is the need of the hour. If you want to be business-friendly, you need to have fast-track courts. IP divisions here in two high courts is a very welcome step. It’s really, really helpful. But we need to have more dedicated IP courts across the country.

    IP should be the prime focus of the country. Because if you want to become a so-called Vishwa Guru, then you need to focus on IP. If you don’t do that, you’ll not be a business-friendly jurisdiction. You’ll just be a center for cheap labor, and your manufacturing will move somewhere else because they will be cheaper than you.

    Unless you innovate, unless you try to remain attractive to innovation, unless you create an ecosystem for innovation you’ll just remain like that.

    We have seen examples. Malaysia was one such country which could not innovate. It rose very fast, and then stagnated and phased out. They were calling it the next bright spot.

    Innovation sustains. The US hardly makes anything. They innovate. So innovation needs to be nurtured.

    And at the very grassroots levels, school curriculum should have at least a course on IPR. I tell my kids a very fascinating story. They were making some paintings at home, so I told them to always sign your painting.

    Otherwise, somebody else would take the credit. That’s IPR.

    So that’s something we need to inculcate and create right from the initial days that anything you create, it’s your intellectual property.

    And think beyond. And our education system also needs an overhaul where we have relevant courses that are more aligned with industry requirements.

    That is something I look forward to with this government. Let’s see how much they do.

     Thank you, sir, for being here and for your incredible dedication to intellectual property. It’s rare to see someone live and breathe IP the way you do. We truly appreciate you taking the time to share your insights on IP rights, monetization, valuation, and so much more. Your passion is inspiring, and we hope it drives India closer to becoming a global IP hub.

    One thing I would like to add in the end.

    We should learn to celebrate innovators like we celebrate a lot of things.

    We should have a national program to celebrate innovators. That would be really an encouraging sign for anybody to innovate.

    Get in touch with Nilanshu Shekhar –

  • “Having a solid technical foundation helps me engage meaningfully with inventors, understand the core of their innovation, and translate that into precise legal language.” – Davender Punia, Patent Counsel at Wadhwa Law Offices.

    “Having a solid technical foundation helps me engage meaningfully with inventors, understand the core of their innovation, and translate that into precise legal language.” – Davender Punia, Patent Counsel at Wadhwa Law Offices.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    From engineering at BITS, Pilani to an LL.M. in Law & Technology at UC Berkeley, what inspired your transition from a technical role to a legal career, particularly in the field of intellectual property?

    I have always been someone who wanted to carve a slightly unconventional path. While many of my peers were heading towards an MBA or preparing for UPSC, I found myself questioning what would truly keep me intellectually engaged and professionally satisfied in the long run. That’s when I started reflecting deeply on my interests and I realised that law was something that genuinely intrigued me.

    So, I decided to take the leap and pursued an LL.B. from Delhi University along with my first job. During my law studies, I naturally gravitated towards patent law. It was a perfect intersection of my technical background and growing interest in legal thinking. That blend of technology and law really excited me.

    After completing my LL.B., I wanted to deepen my understanding and focus on this intersection, which led me to pursue an LL.M. in Law & Technology at UC Berkeley. Since then, I’ve been working as a patent lawyer, and while the transition from engineering to law was certainly a bold and challenging one, looking back now, I can say it was one of the best decisions I have made. It has been a fulfilling journey.

    In what ways has your engineering background influenced your approach to patent drafting, prosecution, or litigation especially when dealing with highly technical sectors?

    My engineering background plays a crucial role in how I approach patent matters. It has trained me to think logically, break down complex inventions into simpler components, and understand the technical nuances that are often central to patent drafting and prosecution. When dealing with inventions, having a solid technical foundation helps me engage meaningfully with inventors, understand the core of their innovation, and translate that into precise legal language. This ensures that the patents I draft are not only legally sound but also technically accurate and strategically strong. 

    Even in litigation, my ability to understand technical documents, prior art, and expert reports gives me an edge in building arguments and cross-examining technical witnesses. It helps bridge the gap between the legal and technical worlds which is essential in patent law.

    Transitioning from engineering to law is quite a significant shift. What were some of the key challenges you faced early on in your legal career, and how did you navigate them?

    Yes, the transition from engineering to law came with its fair share of challenges. The skill sets required in both fields are quite different. In engineering, the focus is largely on problem-solving in a structured, often individual capacity. On the other hand, law is much more dynamic and people-facing involving teamwork, client interactions, and the ability to communicate complex ideas clearly.

    Initially, it was a bit overwhelming to shift from working quietly on technical problems to having to articulate arguments, think on my feet, and engage with clients, patent officers or courts. Adapting to this new environment took time, but with consistent effort and mentorship, I eventually found a rhythm. Looking back, I see this shift not as a hurdle but as an important phase of personal and professional growth.

    You’ve been closely associated with the automobile industry- both through your prior engineering role at Maruti Suzuki and working on patent strategy for automobile companies. What are some of the unique IP challenges that companies in this sector face when operating in India?

    One key observation I have made while working with Indian automotive companies is that IP is often not treated as a strategic priority. It usually comes in late during product development, especially in a sector traditionally focused on production and supply chains. Enforcement is a major concern, particularly when it comes to tackling counterfeit products. Another challenge lies in vendor-level IP protection,many companies work with third-party suppliers without clearly defined IP ownership in contracts, which becomes a legal nightmare at a later stage.

    However, the landscape is evolving. With the rise of EVs, connected mobility, and software-driven features, IP is becoming increasingly important. Buyers today often care more about tech features than mechanical specs. Yet protecting such innovations especially software and AI is tricky in India due to patentability restrictions. A proactive IP strategy is now more essential than ever.

    Having represented clients in opposition proceedings and patent office hearings, how would you assess the Indian patent ecosystem in comparison to international jurisdictions? What best practices could India adopt to strengthen its system?

    The Indian patent ecosystem has come a long way, especially in the last few years. Timelines have improved, rules have been amended, digitization has made filings and hearings more efficient, the Patent Office is becoming more responsive, and special IP divisions are being set up at major High Courts. However, when compared to some international jurisdictions, there’s still room for improvement particularly in consistency of examination standards and depth of reasoning in office actions or opposition decisions.

    Another area where India can improve is in increasing technical training and specialization of patent examiners, especially in emerging fields like AI and biotech. Greater transparency in outcomes and timelines would also build confidence in the system. Adopting global best practices and encouraging early engagement between applicants and examiners, could also go a long way in strengthening the Indian IP ecosystem.

    Your time at UC Berkeley exposed you to global perspectives on intellectual property and business strategy. How has this international exposure influenced your legal thinking and practice within the Indian framework?

    Patent law is one field where the core concepts like novelty and inventive step remain largely uniform across major jurisdictions, thanks to global frameworks like the Paris Convention and the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). My exposure to the US patent system and interactions with peers from over 50 countries at UC Berkeley significantly broadened my perspective on how different countries approach similar IP challenges.

    This international experience equipped me to handle patent prosecution in jurisdictions like the US and EU with greater confidence. More importantly, it helped me view IP not just as a legal formality but as a strategic business tool. I now encourage clients to think about IP early and align it with their commercial objectives. It also made me more mindful of global standards in drafting, prosecution, and portfolio management. Bridging international best practices with the Indian framework has added real value to my practice and client outcomes.

    With rapid technological advancements, how do you see AI reshaping the legal industry? What steps can lawyers take to remain relevant in the age of AI??

    AI is a topic I am deeply passionate about. I would like to touch on two key aspects here- how AI is transforming the legal profession, and the legal challenges AI itself brings.

    AI will reshape every area of law, from IP to liability and contract interpretation to competition, data privacy, and regulatory compliance. Even without a dedicated AI law like the EU AI Act, existing legal frameworks will increasingly need to address AI-related issues. The day is not far when most law firms will have dedicated AI law practice.

    On the other hand, AI is also changing how we practice law. Given the template-driven and repetitive nature of much of legal work, AI tools are being widely adopted to improve efficiency. Major law firms in India have started integrating AI into their workflows. While this boosts productivity, it also raises concerns about the future of certain legal roles. 

    As the saying goes, “AI would not replace lawyers but will replace lawyers who don’t use AI”. To stay relevant, legal professionals must embrace technology, continuously upskill, and focus on areas where human judgment, strategic thinking, and empathy remain indispensable.

    Following up on the previous question, what are the key legal issues AI raises in the context of IP law?

    AI raises several complex legal questions in IP law because it challenges traditional concepts of authorship, inventorship, and ownership. For instance, most patent and copyright systems globally require a human creator or inventor but how do we address inventions or creative works autonomously generated by AI? Should the AI’s developer, user, or owner get the rights?

    Another major issue is training data. AI models are often trained on vast datasets that may include copyrighted works, raising concerns about infringement and fair use. Determining the originality of AI-generated content also becomes tricky when the model relies on pre-existing works.

    Additionally, protecting AI algorithms and models themselves whether through patents, trade secrets, or copyrights poses its own challenges, especially when the invention combines both software and data-driven elements. Courts around the world are grappling with these issues, and it’s prompting a re-examination of existing IP frameworks. As AI continues to evolve, significant legal reforms may be necessary to address these emerging challenges effectively.

    Looking back on your professional journey, what advice would you offer to students or young professionals aspiring to build a career in IP law, especially in patents?

    My advice to students or young professionals aspiring to build a career in IP law, especially in patents, is to stay curious and build a strong foundation in both technology and law. Patent law sits at the intersection of science, innovation, and legal reasoning, so having a genuine interest in understanding how things work is key.

    Second, be patient. The learning curve can be steep, especially when dealing with complex inventions or international legal frameworks. Also, focus on sharpening your writing and analytical skills, they’re at the core of good patent practice.

    Lastly, stay updated. With emerging technologies like AI, biotech, and quantum computing, IP law is constantly evolving.

    I would especially encourage science and engineering students to consider patent law as a career option. It’s a unique field where your technical background becomes a real asset, and the work is both intellectually stimulating and impactful.

    Get in touch with Davender Punia –

  • ” India is on the cusp of becoming a major technology hub, and IP will play a central role in that journey.” – Prateek Shrivastava, Founding & Managing Partner at PNA Intellectual Property & Technology Attorneys.

    ” India is on the cusp of becoming a major technology hub, and IP will play a central role in that journey.” – Prateek Shrivastava, Founding & Managing Partner at PNA Intellectual Property & Technology Attorneys.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    You began your career in Electronics and Communication Engineering before transitioning into intellectual property law. What inspired this shift, and how has your technical background influenced your approach to IP practice?

    Before moving into intellectual property law, I was working with a government-backed electrical equipment company, fully immersed in engineering projects. I kept noticing that while a lot of great ideas were being developed, very few were being protected or taken to market in a structured way. That gap between technology and protection really stayed with me and eventually pushed me to explore IP. 

    What began as curiosity soon turned into a career path. I decided to formally study law and later qualified as a Patent Agent, which gave me both the legal and technical grounding to work in this space. That combination of engineering, law, and patent practice has been invaluable. When I sit with inventors or R&D teams, I can dive into the technical details and at the same time think strategically about how to convert their work into strong IP assets.

    My engineering background helps me speak the language of technology, while my law degree and patent agent qualification allow me to translate that innovation into legal protection and business value. It’s this blend that really shaped my approach to IP and continues to define how I work with every invention that comes across my desk.

    As an empanelled IP Facilitator under the Government of India’s Start-up India Intellectual Property Protection (SIPP) Scheme, what are the key challenges and opportunities you encounter while supporting early-stage start-ups?

    Working as an IP Facilitator under the Government of India’s Start-up India Intellectual Property Protection (SIPP) Scheme has been a truly eye-opening experience. One of the biggest advantages of the scheme is the strong support it provides to early-stage start-ups. With the government offering significant rebates on official patent fees and providing pro bono professional assistance through empanelled attorneys to DPIIT-recognized start-ups, many young companies have been able to secure patents that they might have otherwise delayed or avoided due to cost concerns. This framework has opened the doors for start-ups to build strong IP foundations right from the early stages of their business.

    However, the biggest challenge continues to be awareness and mindset. Many Indian start-ups still approach patent filing as a defensive move or a legal checkbox they need to tick, rather than seeing IP as a core part of their growth strategy. In contrast, if you look at start-ups in the US or Europe, they adopt a far more aggressive, offensive IP strategy. They use patents to carve out market monopolies, create high valuation leverage, and build long-term competitive barriers. This is one of the reasons why IP-driven companies in those economies contribute significantly more to GDP and societal growth because they see IP as a business asset, not just a legal requirement.

    Through the SIPP scheme, I’ve had the chance to work closely with many such Indian start-ups and help them shift their perspective. One example that stands out is a EV based start-up we supported in securing their patents and aligning their IP portfolio. That strategic IP work became a major factor in them raising approx. USD 15 million in funding, proving that when IP is treated as a growth tool, it delivers tangible results.

    The opportunity here is immense. With the government backing start-ups through rebates and professional support, and with the right guidance on how to leverage IP offensively rather than defensively, Indian innovators can build companies that not only protect their ideas but also dominate markets.

    You’ve collaborated with premier institutions like IITs and NITs on IP strategy and commercialization. Can you share an experience on how you helped transform a research idea into a commercially viable innovation?

    Over the years, we’ve had the opportunity to work with several premier institutions, especially NITs, on building their IP strategy and taking research beyond the academic stage. A lot of the work coming out of these institutions is brilliant, but often, the initial intent behind filing a patent is academic credit rather than commercialization. Our role has been to change that perspective and create pathways for these ideas to become market-ready innovations.

    Being empanelled with multiple IITs and NITs has given us a chance to replicate this model across different institutions and help them not just file patents but also align their research with commercial outcomes. It’s incredibly rewarding to see academic innovation transition into real-world solutions and to know that our IP strategy is helping bridge that gap between lab and market.

    Through MoUs with universities and incubation centers, you’ve promoted a culture of IP awareness. What critical gaps do you see in IP literacy among Indian innovators, and how can they be addressed?

    Signing MoUs with universities and incubation centers has shown me how powerful structured IP awareness programs can be. Despite the growing innovation ecosystem in India, there are still some critical gaps in IP literacy that hold back many inventors. A large part of the problem is that IP is still seen just as a legal formality. Innovators often file patents to meet academic requirements or to create a defensive shield, but rarely integrate IP as a business and commercialization tool from the very beginning.

    Another major gap is geographical. Most IP awareness and resources are concentrated in Tier-1 cities, while a lot of untapped innovation is happening in Tier-2 and Tier-3 cities. These regions have bright minds and unique problem-solving approaches but lack exposure to structured IP education and professional guidance. That’s one of the reasons I recently started Udyovidh Innovation and Incubation Centre in Gwalior, a Tier-3 city, with the aim of bridging this gap. Our focus is on early-stage start-ups, helping them embed IP strategy into their business models from day one, and creating an ecosystem where innovation doesn’t get lost due to lack of guidance.

    What we’ve noticed is that once innovators from smaller cities understand how IP can help them secure funding, scale their business, and even expand globally, their entire approach changes. Tier-3 cities need this focus because they’re not just catching up, they’re creating solutions that are often more cost-effective and directly relevant to grassroots challenges. By building IP literacy in these regions, we’re not only helping start-ups protect their ideas but also enabling them to compete on a national and international stage.

     After working with several leading IP law firms, what motivated you to establish your own practice? What were the biggest initial challenges, and how did you overcome them?

    After working with some of the leading IP law firms, I realized that there was a gap that needed to be filled. A lot of start-ups, individual inventors, and innovators outside the big cities struggled to access high-quality, business-focused IP services. Most of the top-tier firms were catering primarily to large corporations. I wanted to create a practice that was agile and approachable, where a young start-up or a first-time inventor could get the same level of strategic IP support as an established company. That vision is what motivated me to take the leap and establish my own practice.

    The initial challenges were exactly what you’d expect i.e., credibility and trust. Competing with Tier-1 firms while being based in a Tier-3 city like Gwalior was not easy. People often questioned whether a small-city firm could deliver at the same standard. The only way to overcome that was through consistent, high-quality work and building long-term relationships with clients. We leveraged technology to work seamlessly with clients across India and overseas, and word-of-mouth from successful cases helped us grow organically.

    Looking back, those early challenges shaped the DNA of the firm. Yes, we committed mistakes but these mistakes taught us to stay client-focused, maintain the highest standards, and prove that quality IP services don’t depend on your postal code rather they depend on expertise and commitment.

    As a member of international bodies like FICPI and AIPPI, how do you view India’s evolving IP landscape in comparison with global trends especially in areas like AI, biotech, and clean energy? What policy changes or reforms would you like to see to strengthen support for inventors and start-ups?

    Being part of international IP bodies has given me a good perspective on how India’s IP ecosystem compares with global trends. In areas like AI, biotech, and clean energy, India is moving in the right direction, but we are still catching up when it comes to integrating policy, industry, and innovation at the same pace as countries like the US, Europe, or even some parts of East Asia.

    AI is a prime example. While India has strong talent and a growing start-up base, our patent laws still need more clarity around software and algorithm-based inventions to give innovators confidence. In biotech, the potential is huge because of our R&D capabilities, but faster regulatory clearances and better tech-transfer mechanisms from academia to industry are needed. Clean energy is another critical area where India is innovating at the grassroots level, but the IP frameworks to support large-scale commercialization need strengthening.

    One policy change I’d really like to see is more structured incentives for IP-driven start-ups, similar to what some European countries offer. This includes not just fee rebates but tax benefits for companies actively investing in patent portfolios and R&D. We also need to build better linkages between government-funded research and industry so that patents don’t just sit on paper but actually reach the market.

    India is on the verge of becoming a global innovation hub, but to truly compete at a world-class level, our IP policy needs to be more forward-looking and business-oriented, especially in emerging technologies.

    You actively mentor start-ups through incubation programs. What advice would you give young entrepreneurs on embedding IP strategy into their business early on? Additionally, what guidance would you offer to aspiring IP lawyers looking to enter this field?

    When I mentor start-ups through incubation programs, the first thing I tell young entrepreneurs is that IP isn’t something you add later; it’s something you build into your business model from the very beginning. Every product roadmap, every funding pitch, and even every discussion with potential partners or investors is stronger when backed by a clear IP strategy.

    My advice is simple: don’t look at IP as a cost, look at it as an investment. Even a basic prior art analysis before you start developing can save you from reinventing the wheel or walking into infringement issues later. Start small if needed, but start early and build your IP portfolio as you grow.

    For aspiring IP lawyers, my guidance would be to really understand technology and business beyond the legal language. A good patent attorney is not just someone who drafts claims; they are a bridge between innovation and strategy. Learn to decode inventions, understand how businesses work, and always think about the commercial value of the IP you’re protecting.

    As the founder of PNA Intellectual Property & Technology Attorneys, what is your long-term vision for the firm? How do you see IP shaping India’s future as a global tech hub?

    When I founded PNA Intellectual Property & Technology Attorneys, my vision was very clear i.e., to create a firm that doesn’t just provide legal services but becomes a true partner in innovation. I wanted to build a practice where inventors, start-ups, and companies feel that their ideas are being nurtured into business assets, not just filed as paperwork. In the long run, my goal is to make PNA a go-to destination for technology-driven IP strategy, both in India and globally.

     India is on the cusp of becoming a major technology hub, and IP will play a central role in that journey. If we want to compete globally, our innovators must be able to not only create but also protect and commercialize their technologies effectively. I see PNA contributing to that by helping inventors move from idea to market with strong IP foundations and by creating awareness that intellectual property is as important as funding or product development in building a successful tech business.

     Over the years, that vision has grown stronger, especially with the team that came together to shape the firm. Anmol has been instrumental in developing robust business development strategies. He brought in a structured approach to client engagement, built sustainable collaborations with universities and incubation centers, and ensured that our services were aligned with the rapidly evolving needs of start-ups and enterprises. His ability to translate market dynamics into actionable growth strategies has been key in expanding our reach and making PNA a trusted name, even outside the Tier-1 hubs.

     Monica, with her sharp legal acumen, has been the driving force behind our legal strategies. She has meticulously built processes that combine technical insight with legal precision, ensuring that every patent or trademark we handle is strategically positioned for both protection and commercialization. Her focus on maintaining international standards has also allowed us to manage cross-border IP portfolios effectively and deliver the kind of quality work that competes with global practices.

     My vision is also to bridge the gap between Tier-1 cities and emerging innovation clusters in Tier-2 and Tier-3 regions. We’ve already proven that high-quality IP services can thrive outside the big metros, and I want PNA to be at the forefront of making IP accessible, strategic, and business-oriented for everyone, from a first-time inventor to a scaling tech company.

    Get in touch with Prateek Shrivastava –

  • “While it may sound fancy to see lawyers speaking legal jargon, for me, a good lawyer remains to be the one who can explain the most complex solutions or strategies to clients in the simplest words.” – Vaishali Sharma, Managing Associate at ANAND AND ANAND.

    “While it may sound fancy to see lawyers speaking legal jargon, for me, a good lawyer remains to be the one who can explain the most complex solutions or strategies to clients in the simplest words.” – Vaishali Sharma, Managing Associate at ANAND AND ANAND.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Given your background in science, what initially sparked your interest in pursuing a career in law? Was it a conscious decision to transition into the legal field, or was there a particular experience that motivated you to choose this path? Additionally, how has your B.Sc. degree contributed to your success and approach in intellectual property law?

    I was pursuing my post-graduation in biotechnology when I realised that the potential of research in the biotech industry in India was limited and still in its nascent stages. While researching on various themes for one of my presentations during my post-graduation days at Venkateshwra College (DU), I bumped into the intersection and close connect of patent laws with the research industry. This presentation on patent and design laws sparked my initial interest in exploring a career in law back in 2009. IP law felt the best way I could have stayed connected with the research industry as also utilising my years of education in science. While IP law in India was burgeoning, it was relatively less explored and niche for me and my batchmates at Venkateswara College as most students in my class were interested in pursuing a career in research and were leaving the country to prestigious institutes in the UK, USA and Australia. In fact, out of a batch of 20 students, I was the only one to have made a conscious decision to transition into the legal field and this transition did make many of my friends and relatives inquisitive of the career path that lie ahead for me and its potential.

    Having completed my law in June 2013, I waited anxiously for over 3 years for the patent agent exam which was put on hold (in view of Madras HC Order dated March 15, 2013 in Sp.Chockalingam vs Controller Of Patents (W.P. No. 8472 of 2006)) and eventually conducted only in November 2016. Meanwhile, in my initial years, I got immense exposure to a variety of all IP laws including trademarks, copyright, designs, biotech/ chemical/ pharma patent matters, advertising, marketing, promotional laws amongst others. This diversity in my work exposure and constant intent to deliver my best helped me gain massive knowledge and grow professionally in the industry in the coming years. In 2018, Anand and Anand was nothing less than a dream come true and my journey with the firm streamlined my career trajectory more centric around brand strategy and I have been fortunate to have learnt from amongst the best minds of the industry since then.    

    Despite this swift transition from patent to brands over the years, I feel my B.Sc. degree contributed immensely to the success and approach in intellectual property law and till date remains to be as relevant as ever with my current specialisation in pharmaceutical trademarks. Pharma industry not holding the glamour as that of fashion/ hospitality/ lifestyle industry, at times, may fall short of attracting young professionals at times, but it was clearly not the case with me as I was inherently inclined towards the industry due to my educational background and continue enjoying my work till today.  

    Given your specialization in pharmaceuticals, what unique IP challenges do you typically encounter in this sector? How do you address complex IP issues, especially in relation to patent protection, data exclusivity, and regulatory concerns within the pharmaceutical industry?

    The Pharma industry is considered to be the most sensitive industry as it directly deals with human health and hence demands a greater need for protection. The same is also evident by the latest Reports released by Indian Trademarks Office (TMO), which indicates that trademark filings in class 5 form almost 14% of the total applications filed. And majority of these filings come from domestic businesses reflecting a robust focus on domestic innovation and trademark protection efforts.

    Moreover, with patent expiry of many blockbuster drugs in this decade, Indian generic companies take advance notice and line up to encash on these patented drugs going public by ensuring timely efforts to block brand names adept for their drug launches. Likewise the biosimilar market is growing substantially in India and so are the companies’ efforts in ensuring brand protection remain at forefront. The Indian Courts as well as TMO, to keep up with the public interest, tend to adopt a more stringent approach in allowing pharma marks for registration. Consequently, special attention is being adopted by pharma companies which necessitates the need for exhaustive research while brand selection process.

    Apart from brand names protection, IP protection in pharma industry is being availed for various packaging, labels, logos, get up, layout, combination of colours of the pharmaceutical products. Also, unique tablet designs (for instance capsules with distinct colour combination, some specific numerals/ alphabets embossed on the tablet) and distinctive shapes of containers, bottles, kits among others can be registered as 3-D trademarks/ design registration. Traditionally, foreign MNCs were seeking these special forms of protection but more and more Indian companies are exploring these additional forms to create product differentiation and carve out a niche for their products. These complexities often prompt lawyers devising brand protection strategies for pharma companies to be maintaining an intricate balance of navigating the legal landscape while also delivering business centric solutions to clients in a cost effective and time bound manner. Meanwhile, with several media reports citing  instances where drugs having identical or phonetically similar names have been prescribed for treating different ailments, putting public interest at risk, the Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation (CDSCO) is taking cognisance of the issue. Here, building a database of all pharmaceutical products and combating this overlap of brand names in the market to avoid risk of confusion remains one of the biggest challenges for the Ministry.

    As you began your career, what were some pivotal learning experiences that shaped your professional journey and deepened your understanding of IP law? Could you share any key moments or challenges from the early phase of your career that had a lasting impact?

    Learning in law does not come quickly and constant perseverance remains the key to success. IP law is dynamic and one thing I realised early on in my career is that there is no substitute to reading and keeping oneself updated. With so much development happening in terms of AI law, digital privacy, consumer protection, regulatory developments, there is no shortcut, and the secret to becoming a good lawyer lies in at least spending two hours of reading every day to keep abreast and expand your horizon of learning each day. In fact, being a lawyer, when you meet clients, it’s not just law that you discuss but myriad other topics come into discussion, and one should have enough knowledge to be able to have a conversation around anything. Your knowledge on general topics, at so many times, acts like an ice breaker and makes conversations easier to start.  

    Attention to detail and providing simplified solutions to clients is another important early learning in my career. While it may sound fancy to see lawyers speaking legal jargon, for me, a good lawyer remains to be the one who can explain the most complex solutions or strategies to clients in the simplest words. I learnt this early on from one of my bosses’ who primarily used to approve my advisory but used to devote time simplifying my language to ensure it reaches the right message across to the client. These early learnings have remained with me since the start of my career, and I follow these religiously for all my clients. 

    With your extensive experience in intellectual property, what are some of the most common IP-related challenges you’ve faced, particularly when working with brands in the fashion industry? Could you provide an example of a specific case where you encountered such challenges, and how you navigated them to achieve a favourable outcome?

    As our country is moving towards premiumisation and looks towards its youth population (which is the largest all over the world) for the economy’s 5 trillion dream, our fashion industry has a huge opportunity to grow. The iconic fashion brands have all one thing in common and that is a unique distinct identity that these brands have created over their decades of existence. Be it the Louis Vuitton distinctive ‘LV’ logo or well known touille logo, famous Christian Louboutin red sole, Cartier love bracelet or Hermes’ globally reputed Birkin or Kelly bags, these brands have become status symbol earning immense global goodwill and reputation. Likewise, these international fashion brands, the Indian fashion industry have realised the importance of not only creating their unique IPs but also protecting them from being diluted or misused by third parties in an unauthorised manner. In fact, Mr. Safir Anand is known to have created an industry level specialisation in the fashion space having strategized for Indian fashion businesses to scale up by leveraging the power of IP. Arguing in one such matter (under Mr. Anand’s guidance) for a renowned Indian fashion designer, we were assigned the task of convincing the Hearing Officer as to how a selvedge technique could be a unique IP for the business. We were successful in a registration being granted eventually as the selvedge had aesthetic value and had acquired the goodwill and reputation amongst the audience so as to act as a source identifier for the brand. 

    As a registered patent attorney, how does your expertise in patent law complement your work in brand strategy, particularly when advising clients in product-driven industries? Furthermore, what emerging trends do you see in the intersection of intellectual property law, branding, and patent strategy, especially in the context of a rapidly evolving market?

    My patents background acts like a firm rooting in my working with clients as science provides an analytical approach involving systematically breaking down complex problems into smaller, testable parts, creating hypothetical situations, data collection through detailed research, and going beyond what meets the eye and critical analysis of the entire information at hand thereby allowing for a structured and objective evaluation to reach well-supported conclusions. 

    As regards product driven industries, companies often manifest and tend to intensify efforts into building layers of protection around their patented products and setting up a guarded shield to maintain market share. Such efforts are often amplified by building unique brands, creating distinctive taglines for advertising/ marketing purposes, creating copyrightable promotional material, fictional characters and protecting non-functional aesthetic features and products shape or pattern design amongst others. These additional forms of protection help the patented products to capture niche markets and create their own space in a product segment, which they may continue to hold even after patent expiration. One such popular example is Pfizer’s brand Viagra, which managed to maintain a substantial market share, even after its patent expiration in 2020. The resilience of the drug in the face of generic competition is a testament to the company’s strategic marketing and the drug’s strong brand recognition which played a crucial role in maintaining its market share. This is a clear example showing that concerted efforts in building brand and patent strategy in the context of a rapidly evolving market are crucial for a company to build a sound blueprint for their patented products. Moreover, with the procedural changes brought about in India since the enactment of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and setting up of IP Divisions of various High Courts post abolishing of IPAB in 2021, the enforcement regime in IP industry has become robust, which further allows companies to ensure effective enforcement and a well-fortified all rounded protection in product driven industries.

    In your advisory capacity for the Government of India, particularly with regard to the railway project, what were the key considerations you factored into your strategic advice on brand protection? How did you address the challenges of safeguarding intellectual property in such a high-profile government initiative?

    The said project was high stake considering a third party had raised baseless allegations to the project’s brand name just days before the inauguration. As the high-profile project launch had already been widely advertised and covered all across the news portals, it was vital for us to carefully handle the situation factoring in not only the legal considerations but also realising the extreme sensitivity, such that any kind of escalation at that particular stage would have negatively impacted the project launch. This required our team to sit and assess our points of defence in great detail and following an exceedingly cautious approach we were able to successfully and expeditiously conclude the matter out of court. Our team efforts were duly acknowledged by the government officials who appreciated our office’s conscientious handling of the case. 

    What advice would you offer to young professionals aspiring to build a successful career in intellectual property law? Are there any specific resources, tools, or strategies that you would recommend to help them navigate the complexities of the global IP landscape?

    I profoundly believe in Amir Khan starrer- 3 Idiots popular dialogue “Baccha Kabil Bano….Kamyabi Toh Peeche Bhagegi”. That is “Choose excellence and success will follow”. The dominant ideology in India, till date, remains to be building a successful career even if that costs sacrificing one’s passion for it. However, rather than focusing too much on success, in the early years, young professionals should focus on finding what interests them, gaining knowledge on a variety of subjects and identifying one’s strengths and passion. Law is a demanding profession, and we end up spending the majority of our daytime at the workplace, so how we spend our days is how we spend our lives. Hence, choosing a career of self-interest can lead to personal growth as well as an organization’s growth. Surrounding oneself with right connects on LinkedIn is also helpful as it exposes one to industry specific knowledge in addition to gaining academic knowledge. Further, all forms of IP are intertwined intricately in our daily lives and there are so many online certificate courses, news blogs, legal subscription newsletters on all forms of social media, free seminars/conferences/ webinars that can help you track latest updates in IP and if reading all this ignites one’s interest, you should not be holding back and jump in to explore the immersive and ever evolving IP field. In my daily routine, I find WIPO Global Brand Database and USPTO/ EUIPO official websites helpful in tracking international clients’ brand portfolios. Reading the latest case laws on a daily basis is also an indispensable part of my day at work.

    After managing such demanding professional responsibilities, how do you unwind and relax? In what ways do your hobbies contribute to your overall well-being?

    My most favourite way to unwind is to spend quality time with close family and friends. Additionally, being close to nature seeps in me a feeling of abundance making me realise nature’s beautiful amalgamation of the most complex structures in the simplest manner. Replicating this to our profession, I, invariably strive to render the most uncomplicated and easily manageable and executable business solutions to clients.

    I also love travelling to newer places and meeting new people as it pulls one out of their comfort zone and plunges one into the unknown. This remains to be a vital quality to succeed in law as real growth lies in exploring the uncharted territories, challenging yourself to learn new things as the intersection of law and business is extremely dynamic in nature and rapidly evolving. Being in the legal profession one should absolutely avoid becoming complacent or overly comfortable with one’s current performance and achievements, potentially causing a lack of motivation or lack of intent to take on new challenges/ maintain high standards in work, often resulting in stagnation and a decline in quality or productivity. 

    Get in touch with Vaishali Sharma –

  • “I think we’re heading into a phase where Patent Law will become more flexible and open to innovation, not just in tech but in the way we approach regulation itself.” – Sangeeta Singh, Director of Patents at Adastra IP.

    “I think we’re heading into a phase where Patent Law will become more flexible and open to innovation, not just in tech but in the way we approach regulation itself.” – Sangeeta Singh, Director of Patents at Adastra IP.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    What inspired you to pursue a career in intellectual property law immediately after completing your Master’s in Organic Chemistry? How has your technical background contributed to your expertise and effectiveness in the patent field?

    After finishing my Master’s in Organic Chemistry, I was all set to dive into a Ph.D., but then a surprising opportunity at an IPR law firm came up. What I thought would be a short-term role quickly turned into a real passion. The idea of taking lab research and turning it into something commercially viable really sparked my interest, and before long, I realized patent law was where I wanted to build my career. My chemistry background turned out to be a huge advantage, helping me dive deep into life sciences and chemical inventions. It gave me the understanding I needed to break down the science behind patents, draft clear claims, and spot potential challenges during prosecution and litigation.

    What challenges did you face when you first entered the patent field, especially coming from a non-legal technical background? How did you overcome these obstacles, and what strategies helped you adapt?

    When I first jumped into the patent field, it felt like diving into the deep end—legal jargon everywhere, and I had no idea how the whole process worked! Coming from a technical background, the legal side was completely foreign to me. But I wasn’t about to back down. I threw myself into learning—devouring books, joining training sessions, and reaching out to my seniors. I remember spending extra hours at the office, diving into patent files and getting the hang of everything—from drafting to filing and grants. I made it a point to ask tons of questions and have lively conversations with my peers/seniors or other industry experts. I didn’t just stick to technical-legal side of patent either; I took on filing, invoicing, client communication, and really got a feel for how the entire patent system runs. That hands-on experience gave me the confidence I needed and helped me build a solid foundation in this new field.

    In your journey from a patent scientist to the Director of Patents at Adastra IP, how have your personal values and work ethics evolved?

    My journey from a patent scientist to the Director of Patents has been a big shift for me, both professionally and personally. Early on, I realized how important it was to get the technical details right and really understand patent law. This strong foundation helped me move forward in my career. As I took on more responsibilities, I also focused on networking, connecting with others, and collaborating with experts from all over the world—things that have helped me grow and expand my knowledge.

    A big part of my growth has been my commitment to lifelong learning. The patent world is always changing, with new technologies and legal updates popping up all the time. Staying open to learning—whether through reading, mentorship, workshops, or industry events—has given me fresh perspectives and helped me take on new challenges. Through it all, the idea of “work is worship” has been my guide. It’s a reminder to put my best effort into everything I do. Integrity has also become a key part of my work. By sticking to high ethical standards, I’ve been able to stay true to my commitment to the profession.

    What is a piece of advice you received early in your career that has stuck with you and continues to guide your decisions and actions in the patent law space?

    Early in my career, I can’t pinpoint one specific piece of advice, but I’ve learned so much from my mentors, and I’m still learning now. One key lesson that has always shaped how I approach my work in patent law is “Always put yourself in your client’s shoes.” This shift in mindset was a game-changer for me. It moved my focus from just understanding the technical details to truly considering my clients’ needs and goals. By viewing things from their perspective, I’ve been able to offer more practical, tailored solutions that truly add value.

    Another principle that has been my lifelong guide is, “There’s no substitute for hard work, and never stop learning.” This really resonated with me, especially in a field like patent law that’s always evolving. It’s easy to get comfortable with what you know, but this mentality keeps me pushing myself to stay ahead of new trends and developments. It’s a mindset that’s helped me grow both professionally and personally—because when you’re in a field that never stands still, neither can you!

    How crucial is it for professionals to maintain a healthy balance between their work and personal lives, and what impact can this balance have on their overall well-being and performance?

    Finding balance outside of work is super important, especially for professionals. It’s so easy to get lost in the hustle of your career, but taking time for yourself actually makes you better at what you do. For me, spending quality time with family, traveling, and diving into hobbies like designing help me recharge and come back to work with fresh ideas and a lot more energy. It’s all about keeping your mind and emotions in check, which keeps you focused, creative, and productive. Without that balance, burnout can creep in, and both work and personal life can take a hit.

    And honestly, health is everything. Your body is your temple, right? Regular exercise, yoga, and just taking care of yourself physically isn’t just about staying fit—it helps clear your mind and manage stress too. In a fast-paced field like patent law, finding time for personal care is key to staying sharp. So, no matter how busy you are, always make your health a priority. It’s the foundation for everything else.

    Having worked with Indian and Malaysian firms, how have your experiences differed in terms of patent ecosystem, cultural dynamics, and work approach? What insights can you share from navigating these diverse environments?

    Working with Indian and Malaysian firms has been an enriching experience, with both offering unique strengths. In India, the patent system is well-established, and you get to dive into complex cases that require a lot of technical and legal detail. It’s a structured and thorough process. Malaysia, meanwhile, has this fresh, evolving energy. The processes are streamlined, and there’s a clear push to align with global standards, which is exciting to be part of.

    Both experiences have been invaluable, showing me different ways to approach challenges and deliver solutions. I genuinely value what each brings to the table.

    With the rapid advancements in technologies such as artificial intelligence, how do you envision these developments influencing the future of patent law? In particular, how might emerging technologies like AI impact the way patents are filed, granted, and enforced? 

    AI is moving at lightning speed, and it’s shaking up patent law in ways we couldn’t have imagined just a few years ago. On one hand, it’s a game-changer. Tasks like patent searches and prior art analysis that used to take weeks can now be done in hours. It’s even assisting with drafting to some extent. But it’s not without its challenges. For one, how accurate are AI’s outputs? Can we always trust the data it presents?

    And then there’s the bigger question: what happens when AI creates something genuinely new? Does the AI get credited as the inventor, or do we need to completely rethink what inventorship means? We all have seen the DABUS case, current laws don’t quite fit, so do we need to revisit the framework or create new legislation?

    And let’s not forget the ethical side. If AI starts influencing decisions, how do we ensure it’s fair and transparent? These are tricky issues, and they’re not just legal questions—they touch on technology, policy, and even philosophy.

    This is why collaboration is going to be crucial. Lawyers, tech experts, and policymakers will all need to work together to keep the system fair and relevant. I think we’re heading into a phase where patent law will become more flexible and open to innovation, not just in tech but in the way we approach regulation itself. It’s an exciting time, but it’s definitely a space where we need to tread carefully and thoughtfully.

    With your elaborate experience in Patent Law what message would you like to convey to aspiring patent attorneys or professionals considering a career in intellectual property?

    To aspiring patent attorneys or professionals considering a career in intellectual property, my advice would be to be patient and persistent. Patent law can be a rewarding career, but it requires dedication and continuous learning. Building strong technical and legal skills is essential, and don’t be afraid to seek mentorship. Finding a niche that excites you and developing expertise in that area will set you apart in the field. Lastly, always stay curious and open to new knowledge, as the world is evolving rapidly, and so is the law that governs it.

    Given your extensive expertise in the field, are there any resources: books, or organizations that you would recommend for those starting a career in patent law?

    If you’re just starting in patent law, there are a few resources that can really help you get a solid foundation. For books, Patent Law by Hon’ble Justice Prathiba M. Singh, the recently launched Patent Law by Adarsh Ramanujan, and Patent Law by P. Narayan are all excellent choices for understanding the Indian patent system. If you’re coming from a technical background, Legal Writing by Bryan A. Garner is a great resource for honing your legal writing skills. Beyond books, it’s essential to regularly read the Patent Act—think of it as a novel. WIPO Academy’s online courses are good for your basic understanding of patent law. Finally, make sure to stay up to date with court judgments and attend seminars or networking events when you can—it’s a great way to stay connected and keep learning from the latest developments in the field and advance your knowledge.

    Get in touch with Sangeeta Singh –

  • “If you want to build a successful career in IP, there are only two ways to go about it. First is to find your WHY and continue to enrich the answer, and Second is to read as much as you can and as wide as you can.” – Rahul Bagga, Founder of Aumirah.

    “If you want to build a successful career in IP, there are only two ways to go about it. First is to find your WHY and continue to enrich the answer, and Second is to read as much as you can and as wide as you can.” – Rahul Bagga, Founder of Aumirah.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    You have a diverse background, both in Patent law and in Chemical Engineering. Can you share what inspired you to transition from a technical field like chemical engineering to a career in Intellectual Property Law? 

    I started with Patent Law, and to practise patent law – one needs to have a science/technology background. So, transition from an engineer to patent attorney was rather smooth and felt natural. However, transitioning to intellectual property law – covering trademarks, copyright, design, geographical indications, plant varieties, contracts etc. has been quite a journey. It was mostly inspired by my own hunger to expand my skills and offerings. The learnings in these areas too felt natural as they seemed like a natural extension of patent law – for the bedrock on which IP laws are framed and promulgated share common or similar pith, substance and motivations. If I am reaching out to a client, I have to then go with an entire set of solutions and deep knowledge on all fronts of IPRs.

    What are some important lessons from the early stages of your career that have stayed with you, and how have they influenced the trajectory of your professional journey?

    First and foremost, lesson that I have taken and retained and continue to expand is about finding my Why. Initially, I wasn’t sure why I am in patent law. Just because it is interesting – I get to work on frontiers of technology and law – wasn’t a good enough answer to Why. It was a self-centered answer. In business and particularly in client facing professions like law – your reasons to pursue those professions cannot be self-centred. You may start with such motivations but you cannot continue and grow with this motivation. Let’s face it – all learning becomes boring after you have spent enough time on it – this is true for me. I learn quickly. I read a lot. I get bored of a subject after having understood its basics/founding principles or first principles and move onto something new.  I continued to expand my Why – which in turn helped me expand my skillset, and which in turn allowed me to offer more and more services – high quality services – to my clients, and this skill or this aspect has shaped my professional journey deeply.  

    Given your extensive experience working with various corporations and legal entities, what inspired you to transition into starting your own practice with Aumirah and what were the initial challenges that you had to overcome?

    Frankly, if you are good at what you do – you won’t face any challenges. High quality clients or Impactful clients will find high quality professionals or Impactful professionals. Also, I have always worked like an entrepreneur. So, when I started Aumirah, for me it was being employed by Aumirah. It is not about entrepreneurship – it is about entrepreneurial mindset – that you can carry  in any form – as an employee or employer.

    Sure, I did face usual problems of cash flow etc. but I didn’t face any problems with respect to the work or getting work itself. For this, I am also obliged to my very dear colleagues who have worked closely with me and understood my “Why”. We have always found friends at the right juncture who took us along on path to growth. I have been blessed with some of the best clients one can get across the domain and they have spread our work far and wide.

    In your role as a mentor to startups, you’ve worked with several incubators like Nexus by the US Embassy and IIITD Incubator. What are the most common IP challenges you see startups facing, and how do you help them overcome these?

    The most common challenges faced by startups is lack of proper advice on IP rights at an early stage. I have seen many established companies with extremely poor IP frameworks and portfolio. Unfortunately, I do not see that improving anytime soon since IP advice right now is being doled out in the market is for sake of making money and not for sake of making the client and especially startups – sail through the initial phase of their journey. We definitely help startups overcome challenges by coming up with advisory on how to defer and when to prioritise what kind of IP. Not all IP is urgent. Not all IP can be deferred. Between these two paradigms – startups can find their right IP framework.

    With your background in chemical engineering, how do you assess the patentability of inventions in the tech or life sciences sectors? What common mistakes do inventors make when filing patents in these industries?

    The assessment of patentability – be it chemical engineering, semiconductors, biotechnology, robotics or automation – is highly similar. Sure, there can be differences in assessment of inventive step – for the context of ontology in each of the mentioned domains – but the first principles are similar. The common mistakes inventors do is to confuse their product as their invention.

    Having extensive experience in Patent Law, can you share a recent case where you helped a client with patent opposition or litigation, and what was the outcome?

    Sure. Recently, we strategized, prepared and litigated in the matter of Falcon Autotech vs Kengic China. We not only got the patent granted but also litigated it against Kengic and got an ex parte injunction in the first hearing itself before Delhi High Court. The matter pertained to sorters used in logistics and warehousing.

    As the leader of Aumirah, how do you foster a culture of innovation and excellence among your team, especially when dealing with high-stakes IP and corporate matters?

    At Aumirah, from very early on, everyone is exposed to clients or clients are exposed to even the junior most associate. This exposure and discussions with clients expose our team to the high stakes and wide range of work that we do, are capable of and can be capable of. The innovation and excellence cannot happen in silos. It is like you cannot be a good boxer if you training only with boxing bags – you have to do technical sparrings, power sparrings and sometimes even a club-level fight routinely to be able to enter the bigger arena eventually. So far, my team has made me proud of the fact that they have very judiciously handled clients. They are miles deep with our clients and also mile wider in law and its applications in handling their matters because of this exposure.

    What advice would you give to aspiring IP professionals who are looking to build a successful career in the field?

    If you want to build a successful career in IP or in fact any field of law – there are only two ways to go about it. First is to find your WHY – and continue to enrich the answer as you go along in your journey. Second is to read as much as you can and as wide as you can and if you cannot read – then keep company of people who read and make sure your choice of reading materials be not restricted to just law or science or business – make it wider – fiction, poetry, news, history, religion, vastu, architecture, biographies – become a sponge – absorb knowledge and become a powerhouse.

    Get in touch with Rahul Bagga –

  • “From Knitting, Kitchen, and Kids to Serial Entrepreneur: My Journey from Family Tradition to Entrepreneurial Success.” – Dr. Shweta Singh, a Serial Entrepreneur and Founder of Ennoble IP.

    “From Knitting, Kitchen, and Kids to Serial Entrepreneur: My Journey from Family Tradition to Entrepreneurial Success.” – Dr. Shweta Singh, a Serial Entrepreneur and Founder of Ennoble IP.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Your work in the intellectual property law space is highly specialized. What initially sparked your interest in IP law?

    This is a very interesting question for me. I’ve been asked this many times, and I always say that actually, my personality is such that I get bored easily with things. Things, not people—okay? So, if I am doing something continuously and it feels monotonous, I get bored. Since my childhood, it has been a dream of mine to do something of my own, possibly due to my background or family conditions—a very orthodox family. But I wanted to do something interesting that always excites me.

    It should always give me a kick to do better and better, until I achieve the best, right? So, that’s how I developed my journey. I would say my interest in IP law was sparked during my graduation days when I was actually searching for what I should do.

    And I encountered a book by B.D. Singh with a chapter on patents, and this chapter opened my eyes to the fascinating world of innovation and technology. As I delved deeper, I realized that working in this field means being exposed to new ideas and groundbreaking technologies every day.

    It felt like being on the front line of innovation. Now that you are involved in IP, you will realize why I chose it. What truly drove me to start my journey in IP was that it became not just my passion but my attitude. IP became more than just a field of study for me; it became a part of who I am. I believe I am at my best when I’m working in this space, and this confidence gave me the drive to turn my passion into a business.

    More than working with corporates and universities, I realized that there’s a huge gap in the support provided to universities, startups, and SMEs. When I entered the field of IP, I started catering to these needs. For me, it’s not just about protecting ideas but also empowering innovators and helping them realize the full potential of their creativity.

    During early stages of your career, while you spent four years working as an IP consultant, basically in patent research and analytics, what kind of experience was it that influenced your career trajectory? And what were the key insights that you would prefer to share?

    During the early stages of my career, I spent not four but six years working as an IP professional, focusing on patent research and analytics in both corporate and academic environments.

    I worked in the corporate sector and with Amity University, which was the only university where I worked as an employee. This experience was instrumental in shaping my career trajectory and deepening my understanding of IP from multiple perspectives. I learned how IP is handled in the corporate and business sectors and how it is managed in academia.

    In the corporate sector, I learned business strategies around IP that help companies stay ahead in competitive markets. Large corporations file patents not just to protect their inventions but to monetize them. This taught me how patents drive innovation and secure market advantages.

    In contrast, my time with Amity University exposed me to the academic approach to IP: how research translates into intellectual property and the challenges faced by institutions in managing and leveraging their innovation effectively.

    The biggest lesson I learned during this time was the immense potential of IP to create tangible value—whether for multinational corporations, universities, or startups. It also made me realize the importance of bridging the gap between innovators and the IP process, which ultimately inspired me to start my own venture.

    I also remember a pivotal experience in Singapore, where I attended a conference through WIPO. During the conference, someone remarked that India and China are “jugaad” countries that copy products and lack awareness about protecting intellectual property.

    This comment struck a nerve. It motivated me to return to India, leave my job, and create something that could address this issue. I conducted 75 free workshops for SMEs and universities in 2013 to spread awareness about why IP is important. It wasn’t just about filing; it was about understanding what you are losing by not protecting your ideas.

    You actually are the first-generation serial woman entrepreneur. Can you take us through that journey, through that experience that actually led you to start Ennoble IP and how do you see that this is impacting society at large and majorly women entrepreneurs?

    Let’s not define entrepreneurship by gender. I used to think of myself as a woman entrepreneur, but over time, I realized entrepreneurship transcends gender.

    Yes, as a woman, 20-40% of the challenges we face may be gender-specific. But the rest are the same for all entrepreneurs. I come from a small town in Eastern UP, and I belong to a traditional Rajput family. The mindset in my family was that women were destined for the “3 Ks”—knitting, kitchen, and kids.

    However, my parents, particularly my mother, were rebellious. My mother was determined to ensure that my sisters and I became financially independent. She always emphasized that financial independence is the key to freedom—freedom to make decisions without asking a father, husband, or boss for money.

    My journey as a first-generation entrepreneur has been both challenging and rewarding. During my university days, I discovered my passion for IP and realized I could work with innovators to protect groundbreaking ideas. After gaining industry experience in corporate and academic settings, I saw a significant gap in IP services for startups, universities, and SMEs.

    Starting Ennoble IP was my way of addressing these gaps, but it was also a journey of self-discovery. Each experience taught me resilience, adaptability, and the importance of staying true to my vision.

    So, he makes the decisions on how the house will run. We live in a joint family, and to this day, we still have a joint family. My uncle guided my father, and my grandfather also guided him, saying, “You have a daughter; save money and give her basic education if you want.” But my mother and father were very rebellious—both of them, I would say.

    The first step was taken by my mother, but yes, my father joined hands with her. My mother declared, “I have daughters, but that doesn’t stop me from building their careers or making them financially independent.” And my mother was determined throughout, until we realized the importance of financial independence.

    She taught us that financial independence is the freedom you actually require in your life. Otherwise, you will always have to ask. If you don’t have a brother, you’ll always turn to your father, saying, ‘I want this; give me this money.’ Then you’ll turn to your husband, saying, ‘I want this; give me your money.’ Finally, you’ll turn to your male bosses, asking for a raise.

    So, she asked, “Why don’t you create your own financial freedom so you don’t have to ask anyone?” She even gave her example: “See, if I have to make any decision, I have to ask your father. If I had been earning, I would have sat with him to discuss whether we should invest or not. Instead of asking, ‘I want this—will you help me buy that?’ I would have had the confidence to contribute equally.”

    So, she talked about financial freedom and confidence until the three of us realized how essential they are. My father supported me—I would say he was always the strongest backbone for us, alongside my mother.

    Now, coming to being a first-generation entrepreneur: my journey has been both challenging and incredibly rewarding. I always say, “Be proud of yourself,” and I am very proud of whatever I have achieved.

    Growing up, I didn’t have—as I mentioned—a family business or entrepreneurial legacy to guide me. But I always had a strong drive, inspired by my mother, to create something meaningful.

    The key moment that set me on this path was during my university days when I discovered my passion for IP. The idea that I could work with innovators, support them, and help protect groundbreaking ideas fascinated me immensely.

    After gaining industry experience—both in corporate and academic settings—I saw a significant gap, as I mentioned, in how IP services were being delivered to startups, universities, and SMEs.

    While large corporations had access to world-class IP support systems, smaller entities were often left struggling to navigate the complexities of intellectual property. That was something I wanted to change. That realization was the kick I needed to get started.

    I wanted to be independent, and my independence inspired my sisters, who said, “Yes, we will work.” But I was determined: “No, I don’t want to limit myself to one job. I want to build a business.” At that time, I was young and naïve, but as you grow, wisdom comes. I was still a child back then, thinking, “I will start a business where my daddy’s friends will come and say, ‘Please employ my child.’”

    And these relatives will come and say, “Please help me with the job also.” I was of that mindset, but I was totally wrong. So, for the young people who are watching this, this should not be the driving force for you. I was scared. I was scared, but with the vision, with the wisdom that comes with age and experience, I am not working today for myself.
    I’m working for almost 260 people who are working with me right now. Together, we are working towards that vision. So, entrepreneurship, I would say, is a very beautiful thing if you actually enjoy this journey. Starting Ennoble IP was my way of bridging the gap—not only in the industry but also in my thought process.

    I wanted to create a platform that not only provides IP services but also empowers innovators by making it more accessible, more understandable, and more strategically strong, where they get the support they need. Along the way, the three challenges I faced were, first, learning to navigate the business world without prior experience, second, building a trusted network, and third, establishing credibility as a first-generation entrepreneur.

    Now, coming to your question—yes, I faced challenges being a woman. As I mentioned, it’s only 20–40%, not more than that. The rest of the problems are the same. Trust is the major issue. At the time when I started, I was very thin and looked much younger than my age. This made people reluctant to trust me.

    Once, I was sitting with a vice-chancellor of a university, and after a talk, he said, “Madam, I thought that as the chief guest, you must be very old. Will you be able to handle this workshop and the university’s work? You are just a woman, madam. This university is very big.”

    In my mind, I was thinking, ‘Where have you come from? You have so many female faculty members, yet you doubt me?’ But I said politely, “Sir, I’ll need your help. If you help me, I will be able to manage.” This was me satisfying the male ego.

    After my talk, he said, “You are like chota packet bada dhamaka.” I responded, “No, sir, you are wrong. I may be small or big—I don’t know—but I am definitely a dhamaka.” Then I added, “Never underestimate women because if we can handle a kitchen and kids, we can handle anything.”

    I continued, “If a woman can bring life into this world, she can do anything.” He was silent, but now, we are good friends. I respect him a lot, and he often says, ‘Shweta, you changed my mindset.’ After that, he gave his daughter the wings she wanted.

    What I want to emphasize is that each experience has taught me resilience, adaptability, and, most importantly, staying true to my vision. This is very important. I often say resilience has built me because it’s like fighting against odd situations every time.

    As a woman, we face challenges, but as an entrepreneur, we face even more. It’s resilience that helps us persevere. People these days on Instagram talk about manifestation, right? I didn’t know this word back then, but now I realize that all this while, I was manifesting.

    From my childhood, I manifested something, and I believe in it. My favorite song is Chaand Taare Tod Lau. That song is about manifestation—and look at the actor! It’s all in your mind. You just have to believe.

    These characteristics and skills, no one is born with. You develop them through experience. I was very naïve when I started meeting investors. I didn’t want to raise money for my startup, but I have an NPO where I support women.

    I believe in giving back to society. Through that NPO, we support women. It’s not for profit. I have only invested my own money so far. We do not work for CSR funds because the women we support are doing fantastically well.

    When I started in 2012 or 2013, there wasn’t much exposure. In meetings with investors, they would say, “She may get married soon and plan a family.” I got furious during some of those interviews and said, “Sir, that boy will also plan for a family. He will also have a child.”

    Just because we, as women, go through this process doesn’t mean we are weak. It’s a mutual responsibility. But I have seen a change in the ecosystem now. We have become fearless.

    I had to learn and develop these skills, but this new generation—Gen Z—is already born with this fearless expression and thought process, which is commendable and really cool.

    When we three sisters discuss, we always say that if our mom had received a proper education, she would have been the CEO of a company. My dad has a slow decision-making process. My mom, on the other hand, is quick with decisions.

    But I would again emphasize—until the father supports the mother, she cannot do anything. My father is not a risk-taker, but I inherited that ability from my mother. The values and empathy, however, I got from my father.

    Intellectual properties have often been considered very complex and intimidating for startups. How did you handle those particular challenges whenever you faced those young innovators and startups?

    China is still leading the world in terms of patents. And I believe that we must strive to surpass China because population-wise, we are stronger. First, we are intellectually very sound when it comes to technology. So, I’m a very proud Indian. Actually, I say this often: I travel to a lot of countries, and when I come back, I love inhaling this polluted air. I genuinely love India, despite its challenges. However, India still has a long way to go.

    The scenario has changed. Earlier, there was no awareness. People didn’t know about IP, so they weren’t filing patents. Now, there is awareness. But still, many startups do not file. Why? Because they don’t give priority to IP.

    They think it’s something that can be addressed at a later stage. They ask, ‘Why invest the money now?’ They don’t realize that investing in IP strategies is the key to driving their business forward. They are unaware of the story of Google. They don’t want to know. They just see that Google has become Google—not through business strategy alone, but through its IP strategy.

    Apple is Apple because of its IP strategy. So, this is something I would like to emphasize before starting my answer.

    Coming back to your question, IP law does seem daunting for startups and young innovators, especially when they are more focused on developing their products or services than navigating the legal complexities.

    Some key challenges they face—and this is based entirely on my 10–12 years of experience—are:

    1. Lack of awareness: As I mentioned, many startups are unaware of the importance of intellectual property or the steps required to protect their innovations. IP strategy should be an integral part of the business strategy from the very beginning. They often underestimate how crucial it is to secure patents, trademarks, copyrights, or, if it’s a product, the design, right at the early stages.
    2. Limited resources: Startups, being small businesses, typically operate on tight budgets. This makes it difficult for them to prioritize IP amidst other pressing needs like product development or marketing. They end up investing more in product development and marketing rather than prioritizing IP.
    3. Global complexity: For startups looking to expand internationally, understanding and complying with IP laws across different jurisdictions can be overwhelming.
    4. Timing and strategy: Filing for IP protection too late or without a clear strategy can make startups vulnerable to infringement, competition, or even losing their innovations.

    At Ennoble IP, we address these challenges directly. We have designed our services specifically to tackle these four challenges. We start by educating startups and SMEs about intellectual property and how it can serve as a powerful business asset. We offer tailored solutions that are not only cost-effective but also of the same quality as corporate-grade services, and they align with the startup’s stage of growth.

    For example, we help startups conduct patent searches, explain why it is done, file applications, and ensure that their IP strategy aligns with their business goals. We also do not force startups to file a patent if it is unnecessary. Right? There are different IPs, and you already know this because you are in the same business line. Sometimes, a patent may not even be required—for example, in the music industry, where copyright is often sufficient. So, we create strategies accordingly. We also assist with global filings and provide strategic advice on leveraging IP portfolios for funding, partnerships, and market positioning.

    Our goal is to make the IP process as seamless as possible for startups and SMEs so that they can focus on what they do best: innovating. We always say, “You handle your product and marketing strategy, and we’ll handle your IP strategy.” Marketing also requires IP. Many firms don’t realize that their marketing materials and overall marketing strategy should involve IP considerations.

    Ultimately, IP should not be viewed as a hurdle but as an opportunity for smart businesses—startups and SMEs—to strengthen their competitive edge. As I mentioned, I am passionate about helping in these areas. 

    Given the scenario today, there is a rise of new technologies, there is a growing need for IP protection in the kind of fields where AI is getting involved. How do you see the intersection of IP laws and IP per se with this kind of disruptive tech, which is going to shape the future of innovation in a very different manner specially in the Indian environment and ecosystem?

    I would say that the intersection of IP law and emerging technologies is becoming increasingly crucial in shaping the future of innovation. Technologies like artificial intelligence, blockchain, quantum computing, and biotechnology are evolving rapidly, pushing the boundaries of traditional intellectual property frameworks. This presents both challenges and opportunities. One key challenge is the pace at which technology is advancing, often outpacing the conventional IP systems designed for traditional inventions.

    For instance, questions around the patentability of AI-generated inventions or the ownership of decentralized blockchain solutions are sparking new debates in legal and regulatory spaces. On the other hand, this intersection drives a deeper understanding of the strategic importance of IP. Companies and innovators are recognizing that a robust IP strategy is not just about protecting ideas but also about creating a competitive edge in a technology-driven market.

    Here, you don’t just need an IP strategy; you also need good market research. IP portfolios are becoming integral to attracting investments, forming strategic partnerships, and determining valuations during mergers and acquisitions. A classic example, albeit not recent, is Nokia, Microsoft, and BlackBerry. These cases illustrate how an IP portfolio can protect an entire company.

    At Ennoble IP, we are at the forefront of this intersection. We work with innovators to navigate this complexity, whether it involves filing patents for AI algorithms, protecting proprietary aspects of blockchain applications, or managing IP risks in cross-border collaborations. Our role is not just to protect innovations but also to help innovators leverage their IP to unlock new opportunities.

    Looking ahead, I believe IP law will continue to evolve to address the unique challenges posed by emerging technologies. For instance, there will be greater emphasis on global harmonization of IP laws to address the borderless nature of technology. More collaboration will also emerge between legal, technical, and policy experts to ensure that IP frameworks foster innovation without stifling it.

    The future of innovation will rely heavily on how effectively we align IP protection with the needs of new technologies. By staying ahead of trends and proactively addressing challenges, we can ensure that the innovation ecosystem remains vibrant and sustainable. IP, market research, and business intelligence must work collaboratively. For instance, in the case of AI and blockchain, where new advancements emerge daily, a robust strategy is essential.

    With my UAE office, I have seen how blockchain startups are leveraging IP strategies effectively despite varying jurisdictional rules. This diversity creates challenges, but India is becoming a goldmine for IP service providers. With huge investments in R&D flowing into India, we are at the cusp of something big.

    And believe me, my dad always told me, and this was my dad’s wisdom, people can take away your wealth and other materialistic things; they can take away everything, but two things nobody can rob you of are your knowledge and character. So, always work on those things. Today, I’m not scared, even if I lose everything, because I know I have expertise, and I have knowledge. I can earn again. Since I’m not scared, I always take risks. Knowledge is a very important tool in today’s world.

    Fifth is to create your own opportunities. If you find a door closed, don’t hesitate to build your own. As a first-generation entrepreneur, I didn’t inherit a business, right? I built one from scratch. It’s about being resourceful and proactive in creating pathways where none exist. Let me give you an example: I started a business in a very crowded space. IP is a very crowded space. But I didn’t hesitate to enter because I came up with an innovative model, collaborating with universities, startups, and small businesses.

    Now, the sixth point I would like to mention is to advocate for others. As women, we have a unique opportunity to lift each other up, whether through mentorship, collaboration, or simply sharing stories. Supporting other women can create a ripple effect of empowerment.

    For example, I often refer to the movie Jai Ho. If you’ve seen Salman Khan’s movie, you’ll recall the chain they create. I don’t remember all the details now, but the concept stuck with me. If one woman holds the hand of another and uplifts her, this chain can actually bring about change.

    Because, speaking from my own experience, I got more support from men than women. I didn’t receive much support from women, and that’s why I started my mission through WIF, my NPO, which supports women. Helping others in this way is one of the most meaningful things you can do in life.

    Lastly, the seventh point: embrace resilience. For me, resilience has been key. There will be setbacks, but resilience will carry you through. Every obstacle you overcome adds to your strength and experience, making you better equipped for the next challenge.

    What kind of advice would you give to others, specially women entrepreneurs as we see a lot of technology biases are also there. How do you see that one can navigate through those kinds of obstacles, especially in IP.?

    To all women entrepreneurs, I would say this: don’t let anyone define your potential. Dream big, be ambitious, and proudly say, “I am ambitious.” Don’t feel shy about wanting to make money—it’s okay to say, “I want to make money.” You must aim to build a business that not only fulfills your passion but also generates wealth. And don’t hesitate to seek help when needed.

    So, dream big, be ambitious, work relentlessly, and lead with purpose. Remember, your success is not just your own; it is an inspiration for others who are watching and believing they can do it too.

    Get in touch with Dr. Shweta Singh-

  • “There is no short cut to hard work. Success can only be achieved with patience, hard-work and perseverance fuelled by honesty and integrity.” – Shilpi Mehta Nanda, Founding and Managing Partner at Zeal Attorneys.

    “There is no short cut to hard work. Success can only be achieved with patience, hard-work and perseverance fuelled by honesty and integrity.” – Shilpi Mehta Nanda, Founding and Managing Partner at Zeal Attorneys.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    You have completed your Masters degree from University of New Hampshire School of Law, USA specializing in Intellectual Property Law, Commerce and Technology. What was your motivation to choose this specialization?

    I remember taking the ‘Intellectual Property Law’ as a mandatory subject in third year of my law school. I was so intrigued by the subject that I finished the entire course curriculum even before our professor taught it in the class. To further increase my knowledge on the subject I started a diploma course in Intellectual Property Laws at the Indian Law Institute, Delhi and attended the evening classes. I believe my attraction towards fancy colorful logos and brands along with my passion for reading stories and inclination towards dramatics and storytelling attributed to my decision of specialising in Intellectual Property Law. 

    Starting your career at prominent IP firms like Lall and Sethi and Anand & Anand must have been a rewarding experience. What key lessons did you learn during your time there that significantly influenced your career?

    It was an enriching experience to work with two of the prestigious law firms in the field of IP. One of the most important lessons I learnt at the beginning of my career at Lall and Sethi was to be always honest with your clients. I run my present firm ZEAL on the same principles –  honesty and integrity. At Anand and Anand, I learnt to handle bulk work and multi-tasking and the importance of billable hours in a lawyer’s life.    

    Serving as an Intellectual Property Attaché for India at the British High Commission and the UK Intellectual Property Office (IPO) must have provided valuable insights. Could you share your observations and experiences on how the UKIPO operates differently from the CGPDTM?

    At the British High Commission and the UKIPO, I majorly did policy related work relating to Intellectual property. This role was quite challenging as I was contributing to developing policies and engaging with Ministers and high-level officials of both the UK and India.  At the UKIPO, I polished my skills in the art of networking. The same holds immense importance to me even today.  While each job helped me in building my career and skills, my policy driven role at British High Commission assisted my vision and career path exponentially. 

    I particularly worked in the international division of the UKIPO which was responsible for serving the British stakeholders in India. My main profile was to assist and launch British businesses and work on their IP portfolios while working on their IP issues with DPIIT (at the policy level) and CGPDTM.  I majorly worked with DPIIT and CIPAM instead of CGPDTM during my tenure at UKIPO. 

    After gaining experience with various firms, you founded your own practice. What initial challenges did you encounter, and how did you navigate those obstacles?

    To my surprise, I did not face a lot of challenges after setting up my own practice. On the contrary, I faced a lot of criticism while leaving a prestigious job at the UKIPO. Everyone around me, except for a few people, discouraged me to start my own practice, advising it was a difficult market and I might not be able to survive, especially being a woman with two kids. However, my heart was set on building my own independent law firm. I successfully have been running my own firm for the past five and a half years now (special thanks to my supportive husband). 

    Six months after I started my own practice, covid crisis devastated the whole world and my newly established business was severely affected and so was my health. However, I bounced back both on the work and health front with the help of my family and my business partner Swati Mehta who joined the firm in 2020 as litigation head. With her joining and setting up of litigation department we expanded and diversified our practice areas significantly.     

    While advising clients on brand protection strategies and domain name disputes, what key factors do you consider? Can you discuss a time when your advice significantly helped a client?

    While advising our clients on brand protection strategies or domain name disputes, we take multiple factors into consideration for instance, statutory and common law rights of the client,  how big and important the brand is for the client, infringer’s economic and business strength, for how long the infringer has been in the market and most importantly, the client’s budget.

    One of our clients was struggling with getting his trade marks renewed by the Trade Marks Office for almost 2 decades. We advised the client to file a writ petition before the High Court of Delhi and am proud to say that we successfully received a favourable order for our client within merely 2 court hearings. 

    In another case, {Om Logistics Ltd. vs Sh Mahendra Pandey (CS (COMM) 447/2021)} we (along with Adv. Rahul Ajatshatru and Adv. Gitika Khanchandani) got a prominent order under Order 39 Rule 4. An ex-parte ad interim injunction issued by our client was set aside by the Delhi High Court. The Court held that the descriptive Words/ Religious Symbols/ Names of Deities cannot be monopolized. This order proved to be a significant milestone in field of Intellectual property and is often cited by the Judges while deciding trade marks matters. 

    Further, in another case {Usha Varia vs Rupinder Kaur & Ors (CS(COMM) 446/2022)}, the Defendants represented by us and Adv. Rahul Ajatshatru were restrained from infringing the Plaintiff’s registered trade mark ‘SAMOOLAM’ and from passing off of Plaintiff’s trade mark and Copyright material.

    You have mentioned that you’re an Independent Director at the Phonographic Performance Limited, India (PPL, India). How does your position on the board influence your broader goals and strategies in the IP landscape?

    As an Independent Director at the PPL, India, we collectively make sure that piracy is reduced, people get quality music and stakeholders get their dues. Being on the PPL Board assists me to approach the issue of Piracy and illegal distribution of music not only from the legal point of view but also business point of view as well as from the perspective of creators and distributors of music. 

    You have worked on various IP portfolios of National and International Clients, what has been one of the most interesting issues that you have dealt with that you’d like to share with our readers?

    One of the most interesting and recurring issue that keep on resurfacing in most of our matters is unauthorized registration of trade mark by the distributors. The domestic distributors get the registration of the trademark before the original international proprietor can get the trademark registered in India. I have seen this in several matters where the international clients have distributors in India operating for years and got their trademark registered in their own name and the clients are absolutely unaware of such registration for decades until one day they move to a new distributor and are threatened by the previous distributor of being the registered proprietor of international entities’ trade mark in India . 

    As a member of the Panel for Standardization at the Bureau of Indian Standards, what specific strategies are you advocating to combat piracy in India, and how do you envision these standards impacting both creators and consumers?

    Some of the strategies to combat piracy is India would include collaborating with all the stakeholders to ensure that the music is original, flagging websites that infringe copyright, giving proper credits to the creators, framing guidelines to not promote channels/ websites/ domain names that infringe copyright of the creators, creating an infringing website list (IWL) and spreading awareness amongst consumers as well as encouraging them to buy from the original source  are few measures that will help both creators and consumers.  

    In your opinion, what is the biggest challenge stakeholders are facing in the field of intellectual property law specially and what role do emerging technologies play in shaping these challenges?

    Some of the biggest challenges that stakeholders face in current IP scenarios include high litigation cost, widespread counterfeiting and piracy, lack of intermediary accountability and fallacious use of AI technology. Emergence of technology can work both as a catalyst for such challenges as well as a preventive tool to deal with them. Another major setback stakeholders are facing is that the technology is fast emerging and changes / progresses every day; however the pace at which the law agencies work is not only at the speed of a snail but also expensive and time consuming. Thus, it would not be wrong to say that infringers are often left unpunished and their illegal businesses (affecting rightsholders’ IP) keep on flourishing contributing immensely to heinous crimes like terrorism, drug and child trafficking etc.    

    How have accolades like the Indian Achievers Award impacted your career trajectory and the growth of ZEAL Attorneys?

    The awards have assisted us in gaining recognition among the existing and future clientele. Getting recognized for the hard work and efforts helps the organization to provide better services to our clients. To be candid, however, client’s feedback and satisfaction matters to us more than the Awards itself. 

    As a guest lecturer and author of numerous research papers, what core messages do you hope to convey to students and young professionals in the legal field that aspire to become IP professionals in the future?

    My advice to the students and young professionals would be that “there is no short cut to hard work”. Success can only be achieved with patience, hard-work and perseverance fuelled by honesty and integrity.

    Get in touch with Shilpi Mehta Nanda-

  • “Attributes like hard work, discipline, determination, self-reflection, and honesty have been pivotal in shaping my professional journey.” – Daleep Kumar, Partner at RNA, Technology and IP Attorneys.

    “Attributes like hard work, discipline, determination, self-reflection, and honesty have been pivotal in shaping my professional journey.” – Daleep Kumar, Partner at RNA, Technology and IP Attorneys.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Looking at your educational background you initially pursued B.Com from Delhi University and thereafter a Masters in Finance & Control. What motivated you to transition to a career in Law, particularly in Intellectual Property?

    My academic journey began with a focus on commerce, which led me to pursue B.Com and later a Masters in Finance & Control. During this time, I joined a top-tier law firm as a Trademark Assistant, where I was introduced to the dynamic world of Intellectual Property (IP) law. This exposure sparked my interest in IP, as I began to appreciate its vital role in brand protection and innovation. Inspired by the field’s unique impact on business and creativity, I decided to pursue an LL.B. and dedicate my career to IP.

    Transitioning into IP law has been immensely fulfilling, enabling me to work at the intersection of law, business, and creativity. This path allows me to guide clients through complex legal landscapes, helping them safeguard and grow their brands in an increasingly competitive market.

    You began your career with Top-Tier Firms which provided you with a strong foundation in IP fundamentals and allowed you to gain extensive experience. Can you take us back to your key learnings from the period that played a pivotal role in shaping your career?

    Starting my career at a top-tier law firm was invaluable in shaping my path in IP law. Those early years provided a solid grounding in the fundamentals of IP, from understanding the nuances of trademark registration to managing the complexities of opposition and enforcement. Working on a diverse array of cases allowed me to understand the strategic role IP plays in protecting and advancing business interests. 

    One of the key leanings was the importance of precision and attention to detail. IP law demands meticulous attention to both procedure and strategy, as a single oversight can significantly impact a client’s rights. I also gained a deep appreciation for balancing legal rigor with commercial insight. Early exposure to high-stakes cases taught me to think about IP from a business perspective, a skill that continues to shape my approach today.

    Finally, attributes like hard work, discipline, determination, self-reflection, and honesty have been pivotal in shaping my professional journey.

    As a Partner at RNA, Technology and IP Attorneys you oversee various domains such as Trademark Prosecution, Opposition, Litigation etc. What in your experience has been the most interesting case you’ve come across in your vast practice and how do you prepare for such a challenging case?

    Throughout my practice, I have handled a variety of complex and compelling IP enforcement cases. One such case involved trademark and copyright infringement, where a third party was mixing counterfeit products with genuine ones and selling them in packaging that closely imitated our client’s. The primary challenge was tracing the source, as these products were not sold online or stored at any physical outlet, making detection difficult. Moreover, the necessary lab testing sometimes confirmed product authenticity due to the blending of genuine and counterfeit products, further complicating the case.

    This case required innovative legal strategies, extensive evidence gathering through in-house investigations, and close collaboration to refine our arguments. We carefully assessed both sides’ positions, developing a robust plan while maintaining clear communication with the client to keep them informed and engaged.
    Through detailed research, strategic planning, and strong teamwork, we successfully navigated the complexities of the case to protect our client’s interests.

    As someone involved with the Trade Marks Journal and TM Watch Projects, what are the key challenges you encounter in this area? Additionally, how effective do you find the recently launched AI and Machine Learning-based Trademark Search Technology Portal by the Ministry of Commerce & Industry?

    We currently employ a third-party AI-powered tool to streamline the review of Trade Marks Journals, conduct comprehensive clearance searches, and enhance our trademark watch services. A key challenge in these projects is managing the extensive volume of data that requires thorough review and analysis. Ensuring consistency and accuracy in further refining the system-generated results is crucial, as even minor oversights can lead to significant implications for our clients. The team’s meticulous attention to detail is essential in filtering and verifying these reports to uphold the high standards our clients expect.

    The AI and machine learning-powered Trademark Search Technology, introduced by the Union Minister of Commerce & Industry on September 18, 2024, became publicly accessible recently on October 28, 2024. Although its full capabilities and effectiveness are still being assessed, this innovation is anticipated to significantly improve the accuracy and speed of trademark searches, creating a more efficient process for stakeholders and examiners alike. As with any new technology, some refinement may be necessary over time, but I believe that, as it evolves, this tool will become an invaluable asset to IP professionals.

    With more than 15 years in the legal field and your extensive expertise in IP management and strategy, what key changes do you believe the government should implement in the IP landscape to benefit all stakeholders?

    Enhancing IP awareness, particularly among startups, SMEs and law enforcing agencies, is essential. Streamlining IP registration processes to minimize delays and fostering cross-border IP collaboration would significantly benefit stakeholders. Further, integrating advanced tech tools like AI-driven analytics for faster IP clearance and infringement detection could make IP protection more accessible and effective. Strengthening enforcement mechanisms would also provide more robust protection, reinforcing India’s IP infrastructure and making it a stronger player on the global IP stage.

    You mentioned that you participated in the “JPO/ IPR Training Course for Practitioners Specialising in Trademarks” conducted by Japan Patent Office (JPO) and were awarded a Certificate of Appreciation. Can you share with us what that experience was like and what are the key differences in your opinion in the workings of JPO and Office of the CGPDTM?

    The training at JPO was an enriching experience that deepened my understanding of trademark law, especially from an international perspective. The JPO stands out for its remarkable operational efficiency and its forward-thinking use of advanced technology to streamline key processes, including trademark registration. While both the JPO and the Office of the CGPDTM share the goal of safeguarding intellectual property, the JPO’s use of AI in processing applications is a notable difference. Incorporating similar AI-driven solutions at CGPDTM could lead to significant advancements in process optimization and user satisfaction.

    As a Partner, you handle multiple areas, including IP management and strategy, domain name and company name disputes, as well as data privacy and protection laws. How do you balance your demanding workload with your personal life?

    Balancing a demanding workload with personal life requires disciplined time management and a clear prioritization of tasks. I have found that setting boundaries for work and dedicating time to personal interests—such as exercising, meditation, and travel—helps me stay grounded. Additionally, having a strong support system and a talented team at RNA enables me to delegate effectively, ensuring that both my work and personal life receive the attention they deserve.

    As a guest speaker at numerous IP training workshops, what advice would you offer to our young readers who aspire to become successful IPR attorneys like you in the future?

    My advice would be to embrace learning, stay adaptable, and focus on building a solid foundation in IP fundamentals. Understanding the broader implications of IP law on business and innovation is crucial. Equally important is to stay informed about technological advancements and evolving legal landscapes. Finally, developing soft skills—such as communication, resilience, and ethical integrity—is invaluable in this field, as it enables you to connect with clients effectively and grow as a trusted advisor.

    Get in touch with Daleep Kumar-