Super Lawyer

Tag: Patent Law

  • “For students and young professionals moving from engineering to patent law, the first step is to maintain your strong technical knowledge.” – Iti Negi, Patent Practitioner.

    “For students and young professionals moving from engineering to patent law, the first step is to maintain your strong technical knowledge.” – Iti Negi, Patent Practitioner.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    In the early stages of your journey, particularly while transitioning into the world of intellectual property, what were some defining experiences that helped shape your practice in patents? Could you share any formative instances that honed your core skills?

    Overall, my journey in the field of Intellectual Property (IP) has been both enriching and transformative. Each organization I have worked with has added a unique dimension to my understanding of IP, helping me grow both technically and strategically. While I have had the opportunity to learn immensely at every stage, there are two experiences that stand out. Not only because of the nature of the work involved, but also because they came at pivotal moments in my career and had a lasting impact on how I approach patent practice today.

    The first was my transition into an in-house role at LG Electronics, which marked a significant turning point. Although this was not at the very beginning of my career, it was one of my earliest exposures to working in a large, innovation-driven product company. It was an exciting time as the first iPhone had just launched, reshaping the mobile industry. I was one of the few patent professionals hired outside LG’s IP team in South Korea, which gave me a unique vantage point.

    This role gave me critical exposure to the intersection of product design and IP. I worked extensively on handheld devices, touchscreens, and human machine interfaces. I learned to break down products into their technical components and identify key innovation areas. It was here that I began to understand the importance of aligning patent strategy with product roadmaps, ensuring that each patent family supported not just a single product but an entire innovation trajectory.

    In addition, I had the opportunity to contribute to emerging areas such as smart TVs and smart home initiatives. This showed me how cohesive, ecosystem-level IP strategy can create stronger value than isolated patents. Collaborating with different business units and cross-functional teams deepened my appreciation for how patents can be leveraged as long-term strategic assets. That early experience of helping shape an IP function within a rapidly evolving tech landscape laid a strong foundation for my future roles.

    The second defining chapter came during my time at Nokia USA. As part of Nokia’s patent team, I worked across high impact areas like User Interface (UI) and User Experience (UX), Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR), and digital health. Being immersed in Nokia’s global innovation ecosystem, from Nokia Research Labs and Nokia Bell Labs to academic collaborations across Europe and Asia, broadened my horizons both technically and culturally.

    My role encompassed a wide range of responsibilities including invention harvesting, portfolio development, prosecution, and strategic patent portfolio management across key jurisdictions such as the US, Europe, China, Japan, and Korea. I also got exposure to work with Technical Support teams for different patent licensing projects at Nokia. This includes preparing claim charts and evidence of use analyses, contributing directly to licensing and divestment strategies.

    This is where I gained a nuanced understanding of how the clarity and scope of a patent can directly influence its commercial value and enforceability. I began to think more holistically, not just about obtaining patents, but about building enforceable, high-quality assets that could withstand scrutiny in licensing and litigation contexts.

    Together, these two experiences helped me develop a well-rounded perspective, one that balances deep technical insight, legal precision, and strategic foresight. They taught me to view IP not just as a legal function, but as a business enabler, and that mindset has stayed with me throughout my career.

    With over 17 years of in-house patent experience, looking back, what initially inspired you to pursue a degree in law after completing your engineering? Was patent law always an area of interest, or did your passion for it evolve organically over time?

    Looking back, my path into patent law was not something I had mapped out early on. It was a journey that evolved gradually, shaped by experiences, exposure, and curiosity. What started as an interest in understanding how technology impacts real-world outcomes slowly matured into a deep, lasting passion for IP and patents.

    During my engineering years, I was always intrigued by how innovation could be protected, monetized, and scaled. Through internships and early professional experiences, I began to realize that I was drawn not just to the technical side of things, but to the intersection of technology, business, and strategy. I found myself wanting to explore the broader picture, what happens beyond the invention itself.

    That curiosity eventually led me to the field of intellectual property. I was particularly fascinated by how IP brings together technical analysis, strategic thinking, and legal structure. My initial experiences with patent work, mostly through hands-on projects and on-the-job learning, made a strong impression on me. The more I was exposed to the field, the clearer it became that I wanted to move beyond executing individual patent tasks. I was eager to contribute to broader innovation strategies and understand how legal frameworks support long-term business goals.

    As I worked across different projects and domains within the IP space, I gained a better appreciation for the breadth of the field. Patent law is vast, and exposure to varied technologies and business contexts helped me understand which aspects resonated with me the most. Over time, it became clear that deepening my legal understanding would allow me to be more effective and more strategic in my role.

    This was the turning point that led me to pursue a law degree. It was not about switching careers but about enhancing the one I was already building. Law helped me connect the dots between technology, innovation, and strategic value creation. It gave structure to the insights I had been developing through experience. 

    You’ve managed patent portfolios across major jurisdictions such as the US, Europe, Japan, China, Korea, and India. What are some of the most nuanced challenges you’ve encountered in aligning with these diverse legal frameworks?

    Yes, that’s right, managing patent portfolios across multiple jurisdictions involves navigating various topics and requirements, which can present nuanced challenges when trying to align a global strategy.

    One of the few topics to keep in mind is patent eligibility, particularly for software and business methods. Compared to other jurisdictions, the US tends to be more permissive but requires to show specific improvements in computer functionality or technological solutions to overcome eligibility rejections, following the Alice decision. Europe places strong emphasis on the technical contribution of an invention, where a business advantage alone may not be enough to establish patentability.

    Technical disclosure requirements also vary significantly, and this can impact claim amendments during prosecution. For example, the European Patent Office (EPO) is very strict about amendments not containing subject matter that extends beyond the content of the application as originally filed. When making amendments, it is important to specify where the support lies in the original application. Although exact wording is not legally required, examiners generally prefer amendments that closely match the original text. 

    Handling of prior art and grace periods differs across jurisdictions as well. The US offers a one-year grace period after disclosure, whereas Europe generally requires absolute novelty before filing. China and India allow limited grace periods under specific conditions. These differences make the timing of public disclosures and use of nondisclosure agreements important considerations.

    Inventive step criteria is another aspect to be mindful of. For example, the EPO primarily assesses inventive step using the problem-solution approach. This involves identifying the closest prior art, establishing the objective technical problem based on the differences, and determining whether the invention would have been obvious to a skilled person.

    When it comes to claims, jurisdictions also vary in their preferences and fee structures. For instance, there is often a dislike of excessive independent claims, and claim fees can increase significantly with multiple dependencies or a large number of claims. Careful planning of claim scope and format is therefore necessary to balance broad protection with cost-effectiveness.

    Overall, these jurisdictional nuances call for a careful and flexible approach. Understanding local laws, working closely with local patent agents and attorneys, tailoring claim language and prosecution strategies, and managing disclosures thoughtfully are important steps to building a patent portfolio that is both effective and enforceable across different regions.

    What inspired your transition from practicing in the Indian IP ecosystem to pursuing an international role, particularly within the U.S. patent system? After nearly a decade of working in India, how did you navigate the shift, both technically and culturally and what were some of the key experiences as you adapted to the U.S. IP landscape?

    My move to the US was not a planned career step but was driven by personal reasons. However, during my practice in India, I consistently worked with multinational companies, expatriates, senior leadership, and patent attorneys and agents from the US, Europe, and Korea. I also managed international patent portfolios and was regularly exposed to global patent laws and treaties, which provided a strong foundation for the transition.

    Technically, adapting to the US patent system involved gaining a thorough understanding of its examination procedures, claim drafting nuances, and administrative and legal standards. On the cultural side, I embraced the collaborative and fast-paced work environment, learning to navigate diverse communication styles and team dynamics effectively.

    Overall, my prior international exposure made the shift smoother and helped me quickly align with the US IP landscape while appreciating the cultural differences that enriched my professional growth.

    In your in-house roles, you’ve worked closely with engineers and product development teams to build high-value patent portfolios aligned with business strategy. From this experience, what are some common pitfalls you often see at the early stages of innovation or idea disclosure that, if left unaddressed, can lead to challenges or setbacks during later stages of patent prosecution? How can these be proactively avoided?

    A common pitfall at the early stages of innovation or idea disclosure could be insufficient technical details in the Invention Disclosures. Inventors may focus on what a new feature or a use-case is but sometimes fail to fully articulate the know-how and why behind its technical effect. This lack of depth may challenge later patent prosecution. To avoid this, we could implement a structured invention disclosure process where the patent practitioners work with the Engineers at an early phase of patent workflow and provide examples on the level of technical details needed.

    Industrial Application or Utility of Inventions. It’s good to work with Inventors to demonstrate a practical application for their inventions. Jurisdictions scrutinize “abstract ideas” or “computer programs per se.” To counter this, disclosures must highlight technical effects and improvements to, for example, existing computing or vehicles, not just a new user experience.

    Initial invention disclosures may focus solely on current product features, potentially overlooking future developments or competitive design-arounds. This can result in unduly narrow patent claims. It is therefore advisable to collaborate closely with inventors to explore potential workarounds, alternative technologies, and foreseeable product evolutions to ensure broader and more robust claim coverage.

    By proactively addressing these areas, early ideas translate into a robust, high-value patent portfolio that aligns with business strategy.

    Looking ahead, how do you foresee the role of an in-house IP professional evolving, especially in the context of generative AI, rapidly emerging technologies, and shifting regulatory environments? What skills, perspectives, or mindsets will be critical for IP professionals to stay ahead?

    The role of an in-house IP professional is fundamentally transforming, demanding consistent vigilance across both technical and legal domains due to their rapid evolution. The rise of generative AI exemplifies this shift, raising complex questions from Inventorship, AI governance and evolving standards of subject matter eligibility for AI-related inventions across different jurisdictions. Furthermore, the increasing use of AI tools in patent drafting and analysis requires us to master new proficiencies while mitigating risks like data security and “hallucinations.” Staying current in these areas is crucial, allowing IP professionals to move beyond traditional counsel to provide proactive, forward-looking strategic guidance that anticipates both technological breakthroughs and their unique legal ramifications.

    For patent professionals, this shift demands a deep understanding of these technologies, the ability to ask the right questions to the inventors so as to use the details to draft patent applications and create a patent portfolio that is robust, strategically aligned, and resilient to future developments (future-proof patent applications). Simultaneously, the use of AI in media and content generation is raising complex questions in copyright law, including issues around authorship, fair use, and derivative works. Navigating these emerging challenges requires both legal adaptability and technical insight.

    For students and young professionals exploring a transition from engineering to law and ultimately into the IP and patent domain, what advice would you offer? Could you suggest a potential roadmap or strategies to help them stay relevant and future-ready in this interdisciplinary space?

    For students and young professionals moving from engineering to patent law, the first step is to maintain your strong technical knowledge. As an engineer or STEM graduate, you have a solid foundation. Try to stay current with the latest technological trends within your specific field. Understanding the core technology is crucial, as patent law focuses on protecting innovations you thoroughly comprehend.

    Next, develop your legal knowledge. Immerse yourself in legal manuals, textbooks, and case studies. You must become comfortable with legal language, statutes, and court rulings. This new legal expertise will combine with your technical background, creating a unique and powerful skill set vital for the interdisciplinary world of intellectual property. This allows you to understand the interplay between technology and legal strategy.

    Finally, sharpen your writing skills. Much of your work will involve writing patent applications and legal arguments. Master both technical writing, for accurate invention descriptions, and legal writing, for clear application of the law. Also, cultivate essential soft skills like analytical thinking, perseverance, and attention to detail. These qualities are vital for success and will give you a distinct edge in this rewarding field.

    Balancing a demanding career with personal well-being is no small feat. How do you maintain that equilibrium? Are there personal practices, habits, or philosophies that help you stay grounded and balanced in both your personal and professional life?

    Balancing a demanding global IP role with personal well-being is vital. My approach starts with prioritizing well-being as a non-negotiable. This means regular self-care activities that recharge me. Exercise, mindfulness, hobbies, and time in nature are essential. I schedule short breaks daily to rest. Taking proper vacations allows me to truly disconnect from work. Maintaining 

    Effective time management helps me find that crucial balance. I plan my schedule carefully to allocate time for both professional responsibilities and personal commitments. This structured approach allows me to manage the high demands of my role without constant “on-call” pressure, creating a clear distinction between work and personal life.

    A strong support network is also critical. I cultivate relationships with colleagues, mentors, friends, and family. Their guidance, emotional support, and practical help are invaluable in navigating challenges. This network provides a crucial sense of community and perspective. My personal philosophy centers on finding purpose and meaning in my work, which boosts job satisfaction. I embrace continuous learning and growth to stay adaptable.

    Get in touch with Iti Negi –

  • “As I tell young lawyers, both prosecution and litigation have something to offer and embracing both helps you become better at each one.” – Nithya Somasundaram, Advocate Patent Agent at R K Dewan & Co.

    “As I tell young lawyers, both prosecution and litigation have something to offer and embracing both helps you become better at each one.” – Nithya Somasundaram, Advocate Patent Agent at R K Dewan & Co.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    You have been practicing IP law for over 17 years, covering trademarks, patents, copyrights, and design protection. Looking back, what initially drew you to intellectual property, and how has your passion evolved over time?

    I am on the path I am today because of my guru, Professor P. Vanangamudi, whose initial guidance and mentorship shaped me into who I am now. I started my career with internships in criminal law and also experimented with some LPO work, but in 2005 I developed a fascination with intellectual property. I found patents particularly interesting because they connected back to my own scientific journey. On the first day of my internship, during a project with my learned mentors Adv. Surya Senthil (Ex-Technical Member – Copyrights) and Adv. Lakshmidevi Somanath (Ex-Technical Member – Trademarks), I was asked to draft an abstract for a patent application. That day proved to be a turning point, as it revealed how the law is deeply intertwined with scientific and innovative activity in very concrete ways. I was also fortunate to have Shri P. S. Surana (Co-founder, Surana & Surana International Attorneys) as my guide and mentor, whose constant encouragement to pursue IP and litigation drew me to focus on this field from that time onwards.

    In February 2009, I joined R.K. Dewan & Co., 82 years old IP boutique Firm that provided me with the right platform to grow my passion into a career. This is where my interest in IPR grew even stronger. I had the opportunity to learn, practice, and handle the next level of IP under the guidance of the luminary Dr. Mohan Dewan and the powerhouse of RKD, Dr. Niti Dewan. Their mentorship shaped much of what I am today at R.K. Dewan & Co. Prosecution had always been my comfort zone, and I was initially hesitant to step into litigation. My senior colleague, Advocate Balaji, through his guidance and strategic approach, inspired me and gave me the confidence to embrace litigation alongside prosecution.

    Over the years, what started as a fascination with patents grew into a much deeper dedication to all that is IP. I have come to see how trademarks, copyrights and designs are powerful strategic assets that promote innovation, branding and commercial growth beyond just legal rights. That evolution of seeing IP as a bridge between creativity, technology and commerce still inspires me everyday, even after 17 years of practice. 

    You pursued a B.A., B.L. (Hons) at the School of Excellence in Law, followed by a B.Sc. in Physics and an M.L. in International Law and Indian Constitution. How has this diverse academic background shaped your analytical approach and influenced your career in IP and litigation?

    I became a Registered Patent Agent due to my science background, which helped me navigate the technical side of patents. That history has been useful all along, especially when dealing with inventors or dealing with hearings with other parties and explaining their ideas.

    What really added value in my practice was my M.L. in International Law and Indian Constitution. I was given the big picture and scope of international and cross border cases that covered aspects of filings, prosecution rights and parties limitations. I worked at the Chennai firm of R. K. Dewan & Co., and worked on a few general civil litigation cases, as well. I always appreciated having a solid constitutional and international background, I could be exposed to the nature of the dispute while identifying where parties would have rights, an obligation (if there were any), and jurisdictional issues.

    Having appeared before the Trade Marks Registry, Patent Office, Intellectual Property Appellate Board, and Madras High Court, could you share the most memorable cases that significantly shaped your expertise in IP litigation and prosecution?

    Novartis vs Cipla – 3003/CHENP/2004, Chennai Patent office:

    One of the most formative experiences in my journey as an IP litigator and patent professional was the privilege of assisting and learning from Dr. Mohan Dewan during the landmark Novartis pre-grant opposition hearing before the Patent Office, Chennai. This case, which revolved around Application No. 3003/CHENP/2004 for “Inhibitors of Tyrosine Kinases,” stands out not just for its legal complexities but for the many lessons it imparted about the nuances of Indian patent law, especially around amendments, inventive step, and sufficiency of disclosure.

    The case centered around Novartis’ application (No. 3003/CHENP/2004) for a new class of tyrosine kinase inhibitors molecules with critical relevance in cancer treatment. The pre-grant opposition, filed by Cipla under Section 25(1), challenged the patent on multiple grounds, including obviousness (Section 25(1)I), insufficiency of disclosure (Section 25(1)(g)), and questions under Sections 3(d), 10(4), 57, and 59 of the Patents Act.

    I experienced first-hand the intensity of argument and the importance of deeply understanding technical details and strategic legal arguments in a high-stakes Patent opposition. The proceedings, which saw formidable representation from both Novartis and the opponent, Cipla Ltd., brought several procedural and substantive issues into sharp relief. 

    I took part in examining prior art, dissecting the detailed claim amendments, and debating whether the reversal of an amide bond (and the resulting molecular changes) amounted to a non-obvious inventive step. The discussion on the sufficiency of disclosure was equally instructive particularly the Controller’s emphasis that, for new chemical entities (NCEs), it is the supported utility that matters most at the filing stage, not retrospective efficacy data, unless Section 3(d) is directly invoked.

    This case underscored practical lessons in legal drafting, oral advocacy, and the handling of amendments under Section 59, where every narrowing of claims must remain anchored in the original disclosure. The Controller’s decision ultimately dismissed all opposition grounds, recognizing the inventive nature and adequate disclosure in the application, and allowed the patent to proceed. The clarity and logic with which the order dealt with the inventive step set a new benchmark in my understanding of patent jurisprudence in India.

    I have personally argued over 400 patent matters before the Indian Patent Office, and have also actively conducted matters before the erstwhile IPAB, the Madras High Court, the Karnataka High Court, and various District Courts. Handling exhibits, preparing briefs, and formulating technical arguments in these cases has reinforced the critical importance of precision, clarity, and a comprehensive understanding of both law and technology. This experience has been a defining milestone in my practice, affirming that thorough preparation, strategic advocacy, and meticulous attention to detail are essential qualities for any successful IP litigator.

    As an Advocate & Patent Agent at R K Dewan & Co., you handle brand advice, design protection, and IPR consultations. What are the biggest challenges brands face when entering the Indian market, and in India’s evolving digital and tech-driven IP landscape, what common pitfalls do innovators encounter? How can companies proactively protect their IP from an early stage?

    India is an incredibly diverse and fast-moving market, with great buying opportunities but also very real issues for brand owners. Cost competition is high, squeezing brand owners’ margins, while the threats of counterfeits and infringement can damage brand owner’s reputations and market share. The complexity of regulations and enforceability adds to the pressure, and many companies, especially small to medium enterprises, fail to allocate the necessary budget or focus to protect their IP. However, many larger companies are becoming more proactive, and have dedicated IP divisions and in-house counsel to drive better IP management.

    One of our clients had encountered issues while attempting to register their brand on the Government e-Marketplace (GeM), as this Govt platform intensified scrutiny on IP registrations, requiring comprehensive documentation to ensure authenticity and protect genuine brands. This was a strong reminder that the scrutiny of IP rights is more rigorous than ever. This is particularly relevant as online marketplaces keep expanding, requiring mandatory registration of IP as procurement authorities seek to verify authenticity. Too often, we see innovators engaging with their IP reactively, addressing infringement only after it happened, which is not an effective strategy in the digital and fast moving world we live in.

    In short, companies entering the Indian market must recognize IP protection as a foundational business priority. A proactive approach to IP management, conducting searches, timely registration, and ensuring robust confidentiality protocols, will not only take away the pressure of challenges such as counterfeits or cost pressure, but will maximally enable commercial exploitation of innovation in a dynamic market.

    You are a member of the INTA Brand and Innovation Committee. How has this international exposure influenced your perspective on global brand protection, and what emerging trends do you see shaping the future of trademarks and IP innovation worldwide?

    Serving as a team leader of the Product & Counterfeit Technologies group within the INTA Brand and Innovation Committee has been an invaluable learning experience for me. In that capacity, I have been able to work with international Attorneys from different jurisdictions as we tracked global brand protection challenges, discussed emerging issues, authored articles and suggestions, and facilitated education webinars and roundtables. 

    This experience allowed me to see the highly variable way IP practice is conducted across countries, as it is shaped by the differing needs and differing levels of proactivity in IP practice. For example, while the US, Europe, and the United Kingdom have long-standing comprehensive infrastructure and practice in IP, I saw exciting and impressive development and, in many countries like South Korea, China, Japan, India, and Singapore, there is rapid growth and increasingly sophisticated practice in enforcement and justice in this area of innovation. 

    This has helped me to better appreciate that IP strategies for protection will require a more robust, adaptable, and technology-driven approach. I have also observed that emerging trends like the use of AI and other advanced technologies to combat counterfeiting are shaping the future of trademarks and IP innovation worldwide, demanding greater collaboration, vigilance, and creativity from brand owners and IP professionals alike.  

    Technology commercialization and contractual agreements have been a significant part of your practice. How do you navigate the complexities of IP licensing for both startups and established enterprises, and what are the key challenges involved?

    In my opinion, guiding startups or medium sized businesses through the maze of IP licensing can justly be viewed as a balancing act based on knowledge and communication. One of the major challenges I see more often than not is the general lack of awareness (or desire to comprehend) responsible IP rights and licensing agreements. This is particularly true of startups. The case examples are pretty minimal, primarily because many new ventures receive limited or zero direction and experience managing and structuring these kinds of agreements. 

    Using a Academia-Industry partnership adds to the challenge, particularly for the commercialisation of technology and associated contracts. Parties need to specify who owns what, how the IP can be used, what will be the method of profit sharing. They also need to ensure how the confidentiality of the parties is preserved. Having the interests of all parties aligned would be preferable. 

    Startups may face some of these challenges given their limited resources and less power to negotiate, while established companies can face IP portfolio management challenges, as well as competitive edge protection challenges. We all know this is made even more challenging when one tries to facilitate developing constructive, industry specific, strategies for clients, as the true potential of their IP is unlocked and allowed to flourish, whose value could easily be compromised.

    Your career started with internships and junior associate roles in IP and civil litigation. What early experiences have helped you navigate complex IP disputes and establish yourself as a trusted advisor?

    I think my development as a practitioner was really shaped by the formative early years. I started out doing internships and then as a junior associate, and I was lucky to experience two very different but related areas of law, civil litigation and intellectual property litigating. During that time, I was not merely learning about the law in theory. I was sitting through hearings, helping to draft pleadings, and seeing the approaches that senior advocates took in court in deciding how to strategize.

    My best experience was being able to balance both prosecution and litigation. So on the one hand, I had actual experience with patent drafting, oppositions, and trade mark filings, which I think taught me a very technical, detail-oriented framework, while on the other, I had the experience of working with seniors on IP enforcement issues before the Madras High Court and the erstwhile IPAB. 

    I learned two things: that preparation and details are very important when working with complex disputes; and then also, I learned the importance of having trust and a good flow of clarity with clients. Because when a client comes to you, they are looking for more than a lawyer. They need someone who can sort through technically complex, high-risk disputes and return clear, readily manageable solutions. Over the years, that aspect is what made me credible and established me.

    Having managed multi-faceted IP portfolios and brand strategies, how do you foresee the convergence of AI, digital platforms, and global trade impacting IP enforcement and commercialization in the next five years?
    I visualize the next five years will see the intersection of AI, digital platforms, and international commerce, which will dramatically reshape enforcement and commercialization. Regarding enforcement, brands will increasingly rely upon AI-based monitoring systems to identify infringement, monitor supply chains, and detect misuse on e-commerce and social media platforms. Furthermore, we are already seeing the implications of the power of data analytics and image recognition methods to detect infringement much faster than traditional efforts allow. 

    With respect to commercialization, AI will start to re-use and re-imagine the notion of an asset, not only as a tool. Whether it is through AI-generated content, predictive analytics to inform research and development, or digital licensing platforms, businesses are increasingly going to understand that intellectual property is not merely a shield, but can also be used as a mechanism to create financial value.

    For us as professionals, this means transitioning away from the strictly enforcement-based position to advising the business more strategically. We will need to align legal protection with technology adoption, but also to align the business’ global strategies. In short, the practice of intellectual property will necessitate more and more a combination of legal skills, technology adoption, and commercial insight.

    Finally, what advice would you give to young lawyers and professionals aspiring to specialize in IP law, particularly in balancing litigation and prosecution on a global stage?

    As I tell young lawyers, both prosecution and litigation have something to offer and embracing both helps you become better at each one. The IP practice in India has also expanded tremendously; it is no longer a “road less taken.” The competition in this domain has intensified, and the number of practitioners is now greater. Moreover, IP is not a one-stream subject; it has many distinct subfields like trademarks, patents, copyright, designs, and geographical indications, all of which require different expertise. Young practitioners should consider specializing in these subfields and develop a focus area, while retaining a broad understanding of the other sub-disciplines.

    The rivalry among young lawyers has reached unprecedented levels, particularly due to the surge of private institutions producing law graduates every year. On the positive side, this generation is skilled in the use of technology and AI tools; however, I would advise them not to use these platforms at the expense of other more dependable methods. The core of any law practice is undertaking thorough legal research, reviewing original texts, statutes, case law, and recognized commentaries.

    Get in touch with Nithya Somasundaram –

  • Fueling the Future of Innovation Through IP Awareness and Advocacy – Nilanshu Shekhar, Founding Partner at KAnalysis

    Fueling the Future of Innovation Through IP Awareness and Advocacy – Nilanshu Shekhar, Founding Partner at KAnalysis

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Let me begin by asking you about your decision to do law after having an engineering degree or academic foundation in biotechnology and industrial microbiology. What was your inspiration in bringing intellectual property into your life, and how have you taken this approach to excel in the IP domain and make it a passion?

    As it happens with everybody, the shift to intellectual property from an engineering background, or in my case, the shift from biotechnology and industrial microbiology to IP, was not planned. It happened organically, and I began my career as a patent engineer in my first organization where I was introduced to the world of IP.

    That exposure was an eye-opener for me because I realized IP was the perfect intersection of science, law, strategy, and, more importantly, business. It allowed me to stay close to innovation while also influencing how innovations are protected and commercialized. So that is something that brought me towards IP, and the interest has kept me going to date. Over time, this technical-to-legal transition has shaped my entire approach to how I view IP.

    I don’t look at innovations in isolation. I view them as a larger part of the innovation journey because it’s all incremental and doesn’t happen as a eureka moment. That mindset continues to influence how I advise my clients even today. Whether it’s a startup or a multinational trying to scale its IP, I try to see the bigger picture of what the innovation would mean to them, how it aligns with their business goals, how to strategically protect it because IP, in isolation from business, is of no use.

    That’s how my journey towards IP keeps me motivated and going strong.

    Thank you so much for bringing in this aspect of the intersection of two fields, which are absolutely niche. Way back in 2007 itself, you started KAnalysis, and right now, you have made it a thriving IP law firm. What were some of the key challenges during those early years when you started your journey with a modest three-member team and navigated it through building a firm of this size and reputation, with a mission of making an IP hub in India? How have you done it?

    Well, it has happened gradually, I would say. When we started in 2007, we were working out of a single basement with very limited resources and zero clients. So, the initial challenge was how to show your credibility. Why would anybody trust a young firm or someone who has just started?

    We focused on quality, our responsiveness, and trust, because trust is something that takes you far. Even during our initial phase, we were doing the IP work. Wherever we were trained, we were not good at starting or setting up a business, managing cash flows, or getting clients, or getting an introduction to a client. We could execute a project, we could write a patent, we could search for prior art, or we could do a lot of things, but how to convince somebody to trust you?

    So those were tough initial days, as it happens with everybody. But the real challenge started as we grew. When you try to scale, the biggest challenge is that you should not dilute your core values. Consistency and patience are key. Over time, we have invested in people, set up robust processes, and, being from an engineering background, we could incorporate and adapt technology at various levels.

    People, process, and technology, I would say, are the three pillars we have not compromised on till now. The culture is that we will not compromise on these, however big we grow, because growth at the cost of culture and quality will not last long. Over the years, it has been almost 18 years. We have built slowly and steadily, investing in people, processes, and technology.

    That’s what I claim to be my biggest challenge now. As the team grows now, we are over a hundred people. The majority of my team is in India, but a few members are spread across the globe. The second-largest team is in the US, and we have small offices spread across the globe to take care of various jurisdictions.

    Every step has a new challenge, and as we grow, the challenges keep changing, but you have to adapt and survive.

    You have been resilient, and you have prospered through that. Keeping all that and working towards IP rights for more than 18 years now, what was the role of your engineering background in shaping the strategies that you particularly saw were different from regular lawyers? Obviously, there was a different understanding that came from having an engineering background plus a legal understanding. How have you seen that particular combination help you and your team grow and strategize at the same time?

    Yes, I have a different take on this. Whatever course or degree or exercise you take, it shapes your mind to think in a particular way. That’s what engineering does.

    Engineering doesn’t teach you anything specific. It trains your mind in a particular direction, to think a certain way, to solve issues or problems with a different bent of mind. Engineering teaches you to deconstruct a problem, break down the system into fundamental parts, look at each part individually, and then see their function and assimilate them.

    Law, on the other hand, teaches you to analyze. Law teaches you to connect those individual parts in a logical and legal framework. So, having training in both aspects helps you see the final picture without missing the finer details. That’s what the combination of engineering and law helps you achieve.

    Initially, I was more involved in patent prosecution. Over time, I was exposed to IP litigation, which has added a third dimension to my thinking. When you are prosecuting patents, your basic idea is to get a patent. When you go into litigation, you realize the basic idea is how to get a patent that is enforceable.

    It teaches you what holds in court and what falls apart. This practical insight sharpens my instincts in the entire scheme of things. Now I try to look for the best claim scope or how to draft better claims. As a litigator, I have realized that my ability to draft and interpret claims has also improved.

    Claims should be broad enough, assertable, and defendable even under attack. All those things shape your thinking. Every day is a learning process. Every case teaches you something. So whether I’m guiding someone, I’m not just focused on getting the examination and obtaining a patent, but also on how much I can contribute to obtaining an enforceable patent. My goal is to create IP that is not just strong on paper.

    It should withstand scrutiny. It should attract investors. It should survive litigation, both offensive and defensive, and it should support the business in market entry. Starting and setting up my business also helps me understand the key challenges any company faces with regard to IP protection.

    You don’t go all out and spend all your money on IP. Business is also important. It’s a combination and a learning that has helped me consult clients. I don’t work with clients as just a service provider or as a lawyer. I work hand in glove, even suggesting who they should go to for a merger or whom they should not partner with. I regularly undertake those kinds of activities.

    That’s why I like working with early-stage startups or small tech companies, because there you can be very closely invested. Over time, I’ve seen most of my clients trust me because we make them understand that IP isn’t just about legal protection. It’s a business asset.

    So technical understanding, legal foresight, and business acumen that’s why we have been successful as KAnalysis, I would say. I’ve seen my clients from their first provisional patent to securing multimillion-dollar funding. Those have been brilliant experiences.

    We would also love to understand that particular monetization process and the multimillion-dollar deals that you have done for IP monetization especially.

    But before that, we would love to ask you about your pro bono work also, where you have invested a lot of your time in initiatives like the IP Help Desk for startups and the IP workshops that you keep on doing. What actually fuels your dedication to promoting IP awareness and educating academicians and entrepreneurial communities related to this? Because you do it pro bono and you are also involved in a lot of deals which are for monetization. So how do you find the balance between these two, and how do you find time to do that?

    That’s interesting! I’ll tell you a very humorous anecdote. When I joined IP, it was very difficult to convince my dad what I was doing. And he is a professor. So that is the level of IP awareness in India. It took me a long while because India has no dearth of innovation, but IP awareness and awareness around IP rights remain uneven. Startups, academic institutions, and big companies have their setup because they have realized it the hard way.

    They have been sued or they want to protect, so they have mechanisms. But startups and academia lack IP awareness. Over the years, I have been working and managing one of the largest patent portfolios in India. We are managing portfolios in over 80 countries, spanning over 30,000 patents.

    So, handling that kind of a portfolio, I realized that most of my clients are from outside India. During COVID, you get time to ponder a lot about what we are doing and what we are giving back to society. During those days, I realized, let’s start an IP help desk to help startups, because startups are in the most gullible phase. I have seen investors who are real sharks take over their hard-earned innovation and everything. So I launched the IP help desk just to help them understand their questions, their issues, and guide them or handhold them without charging them. Because initially, they’re short on money and they think everybody is trying to sell something.

    I have done over 150 pro bono workshops across the country in the last two and a half years. These are not just lectures; they’re conversations where I help to demystify IP to the founders, to the people at incubation centers, those who have just started, and I give them practical, usable advice.

    How to stagger the cost. How you can protect yourself with minimum cost. So that when you attract investors, you may pay me but how can we get to that stage where you are attractive to the investor and protected. Because IP should not be an afterthought. It should be part of the innovation process from day one.

    Founders and researchers need to understand their rights and the value of protection. That’s what I do. I try to make them understand where the value lies. It’s not a cost center, it’s an asset. Slowly and gradually, I’m assisting over 1,000 startups at the moment, who are transforming in their trust in me, their confidence, and their outlook. For me, this is a way of giving back to the ecosystem, because ultimately this ecosystem has shaped me, and I ensure that the next generation has all the tools to compete globally. Because Indians should be competing globally. Big companies or multinationals will not build India. It will be the SME sector that writes the next India growth story.

    So that’s what my mission is to enable startups to lead the India story. Whatever little I can contribute, I try to contribute.

    That’s not little, that’s huge. One person can bring in so much change and can bring in so many people together to work towards one goal of making India again an IP hub as you have envisioned for everyone.

    Yeah, that’s why I keep my Fridays open for four hours. Anybody can book a slot and they can ask questions, without any charges. So that’s something that attracts most people.

    Wow! We would love to promote that aspect. And we’ll definitely talk about this the Fridays that you keep open for people to come to you and have that free consultation. That’s something which is not easily available, at least from such senior attorneys who are already managing such big portfolios.

    This is something that is very inspiring for young professionals also. So, sir, how would you like to talk about the intersection of science, innovation, and law, and what kind of core skills these young professionals can seek when they’re trying or thinking of building a career? And what do you propose to build that particular mindset, and what kind of advice would you like to give to them so that they can thrive in this particular field of intellectual property, keeping in mind that they also have to give back to society, as you already are doing?

    For anybody to give back to society, they should first focus on building their career and themselves. And they should enjoy IP, because this is a field where, if you don’t enjoy it, you cannot work a single day. That joy, that kick you don’t have to drag yourself to the office any day. You just look forward to it. And for that, the basics for students or young professionals is that you should develop interdisciplinary fluency.

    You should have a passion for science, an understanding of law, and an ability to look at business so that you are able to connect the dots. That’s something I always suggest. It’s not about mastering one thing. You have to be a jack of all trades. You have to be good at multiple things, because if you go in one direction if you are very good at law, IP is not for you. That’s the core legal side. If you’re good at engineering, IP is not for you either.

    You should have a flair for multiple things. That’s what IP requires. You should also cultivate a habit of deep listening, because the majority of my clients describe symptoms, not problems. My job is to diagnose both.

    They would just give me a situation where they’re stuck. That’s just a symptom. The real problem lies somewhere else. I need to identify what the root problem is and then provide a solution. Somebody has sued them filing a countersuit is not always the solution. There is also room for arbitration.

    If my case is not very strong, I would look for other avenues where I could bring the other party to the negotiating table. So that’s all part of business strategy. Secondly, I would advise the young generation to stay curious, because IP is evolving rapidly, especially with areas like AI, genomics, cleantech, and the majority of the new avenues that are coming.

    If you are not curious, if you are not rigorously reading, it’ll be very difficult to stay updated. This field needs you to be relevant. And finally, last but not the least be ethical. Cutting corners is not going to help you survive long in this field. This field is built on trust. So if you try to cut corners, you might get one or two clients, or you might get one or two cases, which would be shortcuts.

    But integrity will help you build a career. That’s a must. This field rewards only those who are sharp and sensitive. It’s not something you should be ruthless about. Those who can think like a scientist, act like a lawyer, and listen like a consultant. I always say to anybody who is hired that you should have good listening skills, but you should act like a lawyer and think like a scientist.

    That’s what an IP lawyer should be. It’s not a one-dimensional career, I would say. I have been actively mentoring our juniors to understand what I call IP fluency. It’s the ability to connect innovation, law, and commercial relevance. Because there is a brilliant invention that somebody has done, most of the inventors are very passionate about what they have created.

    But is it packaged enough to be marketable as a product? An IP lawyer would stop before that. I go that extra step. How would the market perceive this? What would be the best sales strategy? If you could associate your product with some bigger brand, how would this complement?

    So, those kinds of strategies I come up with because I try to help the business grow rather than just limiting myself to the IP side. So if you are someone who is curious, ethical, and eager to make an impact, IP is the career for you. It’s a very fulfilling career path. But choosing wisely is what I suggest.

    We also have one very good initiative in our organization where we have weekly training sessions for everybody. Whatever is there, they are given specific topics to present to the entire organization. Every fortnight, we have sessions so they get to dive deeper into that particular topic. That is something I have been doing regularly in this organization, because for me, it’s all about the culture that we build. We are here to nurture, and that’s what we have been doing.

    So I’ll start with “curiosity is the key, thinking like a scientist, acting like a lawyer.” Sir, keeping all that in mind, how have you developed this culture inside your organization and made sure that everyone is aligned with the whole process? Because it’s a huge organization.

    It’s in several jurisdictions as well. So the kind of thought process that’s involved also requires an understanding of having very good mental health as well as physical health. How have you worked on that and made sure that all your team members are not only aligned but also following the certain protocols that you may have set? Because it has become a very big and growing issue of mental health problems and compromised physical health and people have started talking about it. So how do you work around that and make sure that you also stay healthy and that your team across the globe is also equally healthy?

    It’s definitely a journey. I would say I’ve been trying hard to maintain a balance, but yes, it’s still a learning curve. I used to equate longer hours with better outcomes.

    That was earlier. Over time, I have realized or with experience, I could do things much quicker and I have realized that clear thinking, a strategic approach, and, I would say, strong leadership all combine to form a structure that helps you remain fit. By fit, I mean mental health more, because lawyers get involved in a case so much that they’re not able to shut down when they’re not working.

    Even in the subconscious mind, a case keeps on going. When you are so involved, a setback in court would ruin your evening, which shouldn’t be.

    So a lot of times it happens, but now I take time and ensure that I switch off. I listen to music, go for walks, or the best I like is speaking to young professionals that helps me unwind.

    And I have a supporting family. I have a very close group of friends. I have kids who help me relax, and that’s how I keep my mental balance. I would say they help me recharge, especially when things get intense and it happens almost every week. So that’s how it is.

    Delegation of work and another important point that I forgot worth mentioning, is building a strong second line. Because as the firm grows, you need to have a second line that takes care of the majority of my issues so that I come into the picture at a very later stage.

    That helps me go out and work daily because prioritizing mental health is not just about myself, but it’s all across the firm. Because if you are not sustainable, it’ll not last long. You’ll burn out.

    So we need to keep that flame alive but that flame should not burn you is what I always tell people. You stay motivated, but at least learn to enjoy, and that enjoyment should come.

    I’m very fortunate to have a set of friends who keep me grounded. They don’t let me fly too long. So that’s how I relax and unwind. And I’m still learning. Scaling means having trust in your second line, having trust in your delegation, having trust in your processes and culture. I’m very thankful that I have built a very good team. It’s a slow and steady process.

    Every hiring goes through a lot of vetting.

    I’m personally involved in most of the hirings that happen in the company because the culture should be intact. The mindset you can teach a person but you can’t change the attitude. So that is one thing I always, always look for in people. Somebody who has not played any sport would not be a good team player, is what I feel.

    So these are small, small things that I keep in mind when I look for people while hiring. I like to speak to them for an hour or so to understand and pick up some things from their mind. That person might be a brilliant asset, but if it’s not a fit for the culture, then he’s not the person for me.

    Amazing views, sir. Thank you so much for talking about building a very strong second line as well as delegating your work obviously with diligence and with the understanding that it’ll work after you have delegated.

    Sir, while you were talking about IP rights and IP management and other aspects of intellectual property, you also talked about negotiations and management. We would like to ask you your thoughts about the arbitrations that keep happening in intellectual property. How do you see the future of IP arbitration in India and globally as well? Because you have a global presence.

    I have been involved in several IP transactions as well, and over time I realized that your biggest competitors could be your potential collaborators in the future. This is a big jigsaw puzzle. Every piece needs to fit in somewhere, and that is something where there is always room for negotiation, because nobody is outrightly against anybody.

    It’s that everybody is protecting their own business interests. So in the broader sense, what we do is we try, as I mentioned earlier, to deconstruct the dispute. What is the major negotiating point? What is a strict no-go?

    Is there any chance where a financial negotiation could also take place?

    Because initially, I was also involved in a lot of IP valuation work as well. So, if there is a dollar value attributed to this particular piece of technology, could there be a royalty scope wherein we could have a negotiation around that?

    Arbitration is not always about having a mandatory step, because these days, courts have been constantly pushing for arbitration, and people should first try out arbitration before starting the trial.

    But arbitration as a first step needs to be taken care of. The real challenge I feel in India is that there are not enough trained arbitrators. Arbitration is a very, very specialized niche that is going to be very lucrative. There is very little expertise in that particular domain.

    Because an arbitrator who specializes in aerospace would not be a good fit for e-commerce.

    So for somebody who is a domain-specific arbitrator it has been a wonderful experience working with some very good arbitrators trained in Singapore or Dubai.

    Because those two centers I really like the framework they have: the training of arbitrators, the certification courses they offer.

    It’s amazing. I have had the fortune of working with quite a few of them, and I wish India had that kind of setup, where we have training schools for arbitrators where there is a specific coursework, six months or eight months, wherein arbitrators are trained to arbitrate. Because most of the time, we have our own biases, and arbitrators shouldn’t be biased.

    So those are small, small things that arbitrators need to inculcate. With training and proper guidance from established institutes across the globe, India can be a major hub because that would lead to a reduction in a lot of the backlog we have in courts, if there is a good arbitration mechanism.

    In IP, I would say it’s very laughable that most of the businesses 500, 600 crore businesses were started by a family. When they split, they don’t have a proper agreement about IPR or brands, and that fight goes on.

    Those family businesses I’ve been involved in a lot of feuds in family businesses where the brand, who owns the brand later, is a real nightmare, because many people don’t understand the value of the brand unless they see that they can’t sell using that brand. Then the valuation starts.

    So it’s still in a very, very nascent stage in India.

    But I am very hopeful that the next crop would be more accustomed to and more inclined towards alternate dispute resolution mechanisms.

    Sir, with the kind of experience and exposure you’re offering through your workshops, I truly hope many others follow your lead so that India can become the IP hub you’ve envisioned. As we come to the end of this conversation, I’d love to understand how you keep yourself updated with everything happening in the IP world. How much do you read, how often do you interact with the international community, and what differences have you observed in the understanding of IP rights across jurisdictions? Since you’ve worked in over 80 jurisdictions, you must have encountered varied approaches to the same IP concepts. It would be great if you could share those insights for the benefit of young professionals.

    Definitely. Because IP is a global thing. It’s not restrained. You need protection in multiple countries, but each country has a different law that we should understand. Each country has a different patentability criterion.

    Some things are patentable here, some things are not patentable here. Method patents are patentable in some countries, some countries only allow system claims. So this kind of thing, where you are seeking global protection if you don’t have a bird’s eye view of different jurisdictions that are patentable in Japan might not be patentable here in India. Or let’s say there is a business method patent, which is allowed in the US but not allowed in India. Software patents we face a lot of issues regarding Section 3D or repurposing of drugs. So all those things you need to work with attorneys across multiple jurisdictions to understand.

    If you are starting with a PCT application, my team has been trained with US attorneys, European attorneys, Canadian attorneys, even Japanese and Chinese attorneys. So when we write a PCT, you have room to amend in that specific jurisdiction when you enter that.

    When you are trying to prosecute applications across the globe if you are working here most people would go and help you to submit with a foreign attorney without giving you the legal perspective. Let’s say if you file in the US with 20 claims.

    Same application if you go to Europe why go with 20 claims if you have to pay an additional claim fee for five extra claims? Because above 15, Europe charges. In China, it charges above 10. Some people I have encountered in the past it’s against my profession but I would say that just to justify the billing of $20,000, they write a 200-page patent.

    That invention was brilliant and beautiful, and it should have been protected across the globe. But the translation cost was so high that the client could not afford to file in non-English jurisdictions. Only nine or ten countries allow you to file in English. The rest all require local language. You get the translation done.

    Why write a textbook when you are writing a patent? Be concise, be compliant, and think about the business of the client rather than your billing is what I always suggest. So having a global perspective with regard to global filings has been the hallmark of our success because our patents get prosecuted in multiple jurisdictions, and we are the ones who are responsible for all the jurisdictions.

    We would not say that we have drafted as per Indian law and the rest you take care of with your local attorneys. Then you keep on having office action after office action after office action, and you end up spending a lot without getting the patent because it was written in such a manner that there is very little room to go ahead.

    I’ll tell you, these days I’m facing a lot of issues with Indian companies, I would say. They cut corners while drafting a patent. They come to us for making a response for a US office action. After our response, the claims are allowed, but the final objection comes that there is no support for those claims in the specification.

    You can amend the claims, but you can’t amend the specification. A brilliant innovation goes down the drain because you have already disclosed most of the things. There are remedies that we suggest, but you end up having your cost at least 1.5 to 1.8 times. You try to save a few dollars and you end up spending a fortune. So that’s something that needs to be told to the people and to the business community that it’s always a penny-wise and pound-foolish situation.

    That is the kind of situation that most Indian businesses are facing these days.

    And as you mentioned at the start, they don’t want to pay. They will pay. They’ll pay when they are in a soup. Why get in a soup? Have preventive strategies first. That’s my advice.

    Why get into a suing battle later when paying upfront can keep you protected for life? I’d really like to understand your thoughts and motivation. How do you envision the IP hub idea becoming a reality in India over the next decade, especially considering the high-profile cases you’ve handled and the challenges you’ve seen businesses face? Since you’re mentoring so many attorneys, startups, and businesses, what would your advice or strategy be to help make this vision real, especially with the government also actively working towards IP awareness? How can both young professionals and seasoned attorneys contribute to this goal?

    I would say that we need to shift our mindset from domestic-first to a global situation. It should be global by design. Most of the people file PCT applications, and I have seen people who say that they have got a worldwide patent.

    So that’s the level of awareness they have. And they don’t enter the national phase, and everything goes down the drain.

    So if you start with a global perspective, then only you’ll be able to compete globally. That’s why KAnalysis started. We came up with the idea everybody laughed at us that how can you manage through a single window so many jurisdictions?

    Step by step, step by step, the team got trained. We got trained in understanding different countries, different jurisdictions, what kind of objections each country has. We have built strategies where you could save at least 40% of your cost if you plan your prosecution and global IP filing strategically. Minimum 40% saving that we have shown repeatedly again and again.

    That’s a huge amount of money considering you are looking at 8 to 10 jurisdictions to file. Of course, India has made commendable strides. It’s not that India has not done anything. At that time, there was no digital filing when I started. Now it’s all digital.

    Expedited examination is a very welcome step that we have. They have increased outreach programs, which is very good. They have stakeholders’ meetings that is a very welcome step.

    The major problem that I see is inconsistency in the examination of patents. Delay has been something that I have always been seeing, but now at least with expedited examinations and all, I’ve been able to get patents within a year, many times.

    So those are some things that have certainly helped. Just like USPTO, the Indian Patent Office needs to adapt to AI for basic things. You can’t replace humans, but at least the formalities checks and all those things could be automated. USPTO has automated all those things.

    That would help us get a better outcome, faster outcome, and reduce the delay in enforcement.

    I empathize with the judiciary because they have a huge backlog, but the Indian system legal reform is the need of the hour. If you want to be business-friendly, you need to have fast-track courts. IP divisions here in two high courts is a very welcome step. It’s really, really helpful. But we need to have more dedicated IP courts across the country.

    IP should be the prime focus of the country. Because if you want to become a so-called Vishwa Guru, then you need to focus on IP. If you don’t do that, you’ll not be a business-friendly jurisdiction. You’ll just be a center for cheap labor, and your manufacturing will move somewhere else because they will be cheaper than you.

    Unless you innovate, unless you try to remain attractive to innovation, unless you create an ecosystem for innovation you’ll just remain like that.

    We have seen examples. Malaysia was one such country which could not innovate. It rose very fast, and then stagnated and phased out. They were calling it the next bright spot.

    Innovation sustains. The US hardly makes anything. They innovate. So innovation needs to be nurtured.

    And at the very grassroots levels, school curriculum should have at least a course on IPR. I tell my kids a very fascinating story. They were making some paintings at home, so I told them to always sign your painting.

    Otherwise, somebody else would take the credit. That’s IPR.

    So that’s something we need to inculcate and create right from the initial days that anything you create, it’s your intellectual property.

    And think beyond. And our education system also needs an overhaul where we have relevant courses that are more aligned with industry requirements.

    That is something I look forward to with this government. Let’s see how much they do.

     Thank you, sir, for being here and for your incredible dedication to intellectual property. It’s rare to see someone live and breathe IP the way you do. We truly appreciate you taking the time to share your insights on IP rights, monetization, valuation, and so much more. Your passion is inspiring, and we hope it drives India closer to becoming a global IP hub.

    One thing I would like to add in the end.

    We should learn to celebrate innovators like we celebrate a lot of things.

    We should have a national program to celebrate innovators. That would be really an encouraging sign for anybody to innovate.

    Get in touch with Nilanshu Shekhar –

  • “Having a solid technical foundation helps me engage meaningfully with inventors, understand the core of their innovation, and translate that into precise legal language.” – Davender Punia, Patent Counsel at Wadhwa Law Offices.

    “Having a solid technical foundation helps me engage meaningfully with inventors, understand the core of their innovation, and translate that into precise legal language.” – Davender Punia, Patent Counsel at Wadhwa Law Offices.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    From engineering at BITS, Pilani to an LL.M. in Law & Technology at UC Berkeley, what inspired your transition from a technical role to a legal career, particularly in the field of intellectual property?

    I have always been someone who wanted to carve a slightly unconventional path. While many of my peers were heading towards an MBA or preparing for UPSC, I found myself questioning what would truly keep me intellectually engaged and professionally satisfied in the long run. That’s when I started reflecting deeply on my interests and I realised that law was something that genuinely intrigued me.

    So, I decided to take the leap and pursued an LL.B. from Delhi University along with my first job. During my law studies, I naturally gravitated towards patent law. It was a perfect intersection of my technical background and growing interest in legal thinking. That blend of technology and law really excited me.

    After completing my LL.B., I wanted to deepen my understanding and focus on this intersection, which led me to pursue an LL.M. in Law & Technology at UC Berkeley. Since then, I’ve been working as a patent lawyer, and while the transition from engineering to law was certainly a bold and challenging one, looking back now, I can say it was one of the best decisions I have made. It has been a fulfilling journey.

    In what ways has your engineering background influenced your approach to patent drafting, prosecution, or litigation especially when dealing with highly technical sectors?

    My engineering background plays a crucial role in how I approach patent matters. It has trained me to think logically, break down complex inventions into simpler components, and understand the technical nuances that are often central to patent drafting and prosecution. When dealing with inventions, having a solid technical foundation helps me engage meaningfully with inventors, understand the core of their innovation, and translate that into precise legal language. This ensures that the patents I draft are not only legally sound but also technically accurate and strategically strong. 

    Even in litigation, my ability to understand technical documents, prior art, and expert reports gives me an edge in building arguments and cross-examining technical witnesses. It helps bridge the gap between the legal and technical worlds which is essential in patent law.

    Transitioning from engineering to law is quite a significant shift. What were some of the key challenges you faced early on in your legal career, and how did you navigate them?

    Yes, the transition from engineering to law came with its fair share of challenges. The skill sets required in both fields are quite different. In engineering, the focus is largely on problem-solving in a structured, often individual capacity. On the other hand, law is much more dynamic and people-facing involving teamwork, client interactions, and the ability to communicate complex ideas clearly.

    Initially, it was a bit overwhelming to shift from working quietly on technical problems to having to articulate arguments, think on my feet, and engage with clients, patent officers or courts. Adapting to this new environment took time, but with consistent effort and mentorship, I eventually found a rhythm. Looking back, I see this shift not as a hurdle but as an important phase of personal and professional growth.

    You’ve been closely associated with the automobile industry- both through your prior engineering role at Maruti Suzuki and working on patent strategy for automobile companies. What are some of the unique IP challenges that companies in this sector face when operating in India?

    One key observation I have made while working with Indian automotive companies is that IP is often not treated as a strategic priority. It usually comes in late during product development, especially in a sector traditionally focused on production and supply chains. Enforcement is a major concern, particularly when it comes to tackling counterfeit products. Another challenge lies in vendor-level IP protection,many companies work with third-party suppliers without clearly defined IP ownership in contracts, which becomes a legal nightmare at a later stage.

    However, the landscape is evolving. With the rise of EVs, connected mobility, and software-driven features, IP is becoming increasingly important. Buyers today often care more about tech features than mechanical specs. Yet protecting such innovations especially software and AI is tricky in India due to patentability restrictions. A proactive IP strategy is now more essential than ever.

    Having represented clients in opposition proceedings and patent office hearings, how would you assess the Indian patent ecosystem in comparison to international jurisdictions? What best practices could India adopt to strengthen its system?

    The Indian patent ecosystem has come a long way, especially in the last few years. Timelines have improved, rules have been amended, digitization has made filings and hearings more efficient, the Patent Office is becoming more responsive, and special IP divisions are being set up at major High Courts. However, when compared to some international jurisdictions, there’s still room for improvement particularly in consistency of examination standards and depth of reasoning in office actions or opposition decisions.

    Another area where India can improve is in increasing technical training and specialization of patent examiners, especially in emerging fields like AI and biotech. Greater transparency in outcomes and timelines would also build confidence in the system. Adopting global best practices and encouraging early engagement between applicants and examiners, could also go a long way in strengthening the Indian IP ecosystem.

    Your time at UC Berkeley exposed you to global perspectives on intellectual property and business strategy. How has this international exposure influenced your legal thinking and practice within the Indian framework?

    Patent law is one field where the core concepts like novelty and inventive step remain largely uniform across major jurisdictions, thanks to global frameworks like the Paris Convention and the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). My exposure to the US patent system and interactions with peers from over 50 countries at UC Berkeley significantly broadened my perspective on how different countries approach similar IP challenges.

    This international experience equipped me to handle patent prosecution in jurisdictions like the US and EU with greater confidence. More importantly, it helped me view IP not just as a legal formality but as a strategic business tool. I now encourage clients to think about IP early and align it with their commercial objectives. It also made me more mindful of global standards in drafting, prosecution, and portfolio management. Bridging international best practices with the Indian framework has added real value to my practice and client outcomes.

    With rapid technological advancements, how do you see AI reshaping the legal industry? What steps can lawyers take to remain relevant in the age of AI??

    AI is a topic I am deeply passionate about. I would like to touch on two key aspects here- how AI is transforming the legal profession, and the legal challenges AI itself brings.

    AI will reshape every area of law, from IP to liability and contract interpretation to competition, data privacy, and regulatory compliance. Even without a dedicated AI law like the EU AI Act, existing legal frameworks will increasingly need to address AI-related issues. The day is not far when most law firms will have dedicated AI law practice.

    On the other hand, AI is also changing how we practice law. Given the template-driven and repetitive nature of much of legal work, AI tools are being widely adopted to improve efficiency. Major law firms in India have started integrating AI into their workflows. While this boosts productivity, it also raises concerns about the future of certain legal roles. 

    As the saying goes, “AI would not replace lawyers but will replace lawyers who don’t use AI”. To stay relevant, legal professionals must embrace technology, continuously upskill, and focus on areas where human judgment, strategic thinking, and empathy remain indispensable.

    Following up on the previous question, what are the key legal issues AI raises in the context of IP law?

    AI raises several complex legal questions in IP law because it challenges traditional concepts of authorship, inventorship, and ownership. For instance, most patent and copyright systems globally require a human creator or inventor but how do we address inventions or creative works autonomously generated by AI? Should the AI’s developer, user, or owner get the rights?

    Another major issue is training data. AI models are often trained on vast datasets that may include copyrighted works, raising concerns about infringement and fair use. Determining the originality of AI-generated content also becomes tricky when the model relies on pre-existing works.

    Additionally, protecting AI algorithms and models themselves whether through patents, trade secrets, or copyrights poses its own challenges, especially when the invention combines both software and data-driven elements. Courts around the world are grappling with these issues, and it’s prompting a re-examination of existing IP frameworks. As AI continues to evolve, significant legal reforms may be necessary to address these emerging challenges effectively.

    Looking back on your professional journey, what advice would you offer to students or young professionals aspiring to build a career in IP law, especially in patents?

    My advice to students or young professionals aspiring to build a career in IP law, especially in patents, is to stay curious and build a strong foundation in both technology and law. Patent law sits at the intersection of science, innovation, and legal reasoning, so having a genuine interest in understanding how things work is key.

    Second, be patient. The learning curve can be steep, especially when dealing with complex inventions or international legal frameworks. Also, focus on sharpening your writing and analytical skills, they’re at the core of good patent practice.

    Lastly, stay updated. With emerging technologies like AI, biotech, and quantum computing, IP law is constantly evolving.

    I would especially encourage science and engineering students to consider patent law as a career option. It’s a unique field where your technical background becomes a real asset, and the work is both intellectually stimulating and impactful.

    Get in touch with Davender Punia –

  • “Don’t just focus on learning law. That is essential and mandatory for the litigation career but not sufficient. Keep your eyes and mind wide open.” – Vishal Sharma, Founding and Managing Partner at Sharma & Associates.

    “Don’t just focus on learning law. That is essential and mandatory for the litigation career but not sufficient. Keep your eyes and mind wide open.” – Vishal Sharma, Founding and Managing Partner at Sharma & Associates.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    What inspired you to pursue a career in law despite having a background in science? What drove you to choose law as your profession, and how did your B.Sc. (Hons.) Computer Science contribute to your legal career?

    When I completed my B.Sc. (Hons.) in Computer Science from University of Delhi, some of my friends who had completed their engineering were placed in reputed Patent Analysis firms. A good science background is a mandate to work as a Patent Analyst. I found it interesting too and completed a few online primer courses on Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) from World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). I also completed a Patent Analyst training program from an institute and thereafter joined a Patent Analysis firm in Noida. During all this I got a good exposure to IPR laws of India. But after some time, I realised that I needed a degree in law to excel more into this field so that I do not remain confined to the corporate offices and thus I resigned. I cracked the entrance exam and joined the prestigious Campus Law Centre, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi for three-year LL.B. 

    A background in science gives me an edge in IPR practice. Apart from this, a good understanding of Computer Science helps me a lot in handling cases of cybercrimes. 

    How was your experience at Campus Law Centre? When did you decide that you will go for litigation?

    In CLC, within no time I realised that it was not just IPR laws that I was interested in but in all types of laws. From my first semester at CLC and till date there has never been a second thought in my mind about litigation. Some of my classmates used to do corporate internships, some used to prepare for government exams, some were planning for LL.M. and some used to prepare for the judiciary. I did none of these. Whenever I got time, I used to go to various courts. I used to watch court proceedings and meet various advocates. 

    From a first-generation lawyer to the Founding and Managing Partner of Sharma and Associates (S&A), how has been your journey? What early experiences in your career were most influential in shaping your understanding of law and motivating you to establish your own practice?

    Immediately after completing my LL.B., I joined the office of a senior in my home town where I got initial exposure to drafting and court craft. I started going to various district courts of Delhi and Haryana and also Delhi High Court. Luckily, I started getting my personal cases also from my relatives and friends. I started accepting my independent cases side by side from the beginning itself which cumulatively later helped me in taking the decision of going independent. 

    I never went for a corporate office. I worked for a very less time with seniors but whatever work I did initially was completely court litigation from morning till evening. I got a full-fledged exposure to the court atmosphere right from the beginning of my career which included interactions with the judges, advocates and court staff. 

    The kind of work that I got from seniors during initial months of my practice played a significant role in shaping my independent practice. I never used to appear with my seniors in the court. I had to handle cases on my own on the basis of the instructions. This created the platform of self-confidence which later helped me in going independent at a very early phase of my career.

    How has your LL.M. (Professional) in Intellectual Property Rights from USLLS, Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, Delhi, helped you tackle complex legal issues in the realm of intellectual property?

    It proved to be a very good decision for my career. The class consisted of practicing advocates, AORs, legal officers, judicial officers and government officers. All used to discuss their works and experiences with each other which significantly increased my understanding of the legal profession. I got a network worth keeping for a lifetime. 

    It was a weekend programme. All the classes and exams used to take place only on Saturdays and Sundays. Thus, my practice did not suffer at all during this course. I recommend this to all practicing advocates in Delhi who wish to pursue LL.M. along with their practice.

    The course was not theory oriented for me. I used to correlate my experiences of IPR practice with the lectures and discussions of the professors. The valuable insights gained during the classes and discussions enhanced the quality of my IPR practice.   

    How do you see the relationship between Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) and traditional litigation evolving? When do you think ADR is a more effective alternative compared to litigation in court?

    ADR and litigation go hand in hand these days. There are mediation centres in almost every court with well qualified mediators and staff. There are arbitration clauses in almost every agreement which we come across. Lawyers are common to ADR and litigation. A lawyer can represent his client before any ADR process or court as per the situation. People don’t come to the court to fight cases, they come to the court for relief and solutions. Mediation takes place in so many cases in the court on a regular basis. So, an advocate these days must have an understanding and skills of ADR.

    We at Sharma and Associates have the objective of providing solution-oriented services to our clients whether it be through litigation or mediation or arbitration. We have this strong philosophy that we charge our client not for the case but for the solution. There is a view that if a case gets settled the advocate will not get the fees which is actually not true. People come to court mostly when initial settlement talks fail. So, if an advocate even then gets the case settled between the parties on the basis of his skills, he can always charge his professional fees.

    I always say to the parties in civil and matrimonial disputes that time is money. ADR saves time and money for the litigants. I have personally seen that in settled cases the relation between the parties remains cordial as compared to decided cases. So, ADR is overall good for society as well.  

    Given your vast experience, what have been the most challenging cases you’ve handled? How did you approach the challenges, and what resources or strategies did you employ?

    I had Successfully argued application seeking cancellation of bail of the rape accused before the Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Special Court), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in 2021. After being granted the bail, the accused had not only launched an aggressive and defaming campaign on Facebook against the victim but had also circulated the victim’s mobile number to various people to harass her. I had been representing the victim pro bono right from the beginning in that case which involved allegations of rape on false pretext of marriage and cybercrime. It took several rounds of arguments by me and consequent detailed investigation by the police team to satisfy the Hon’ble Court about the misconduct of the accused.

    I had Secured Anticipatory Bail for my client in an alleged cheating case (420 IPC) of Rs. one crore related to FMCG goods in 2023 from the Sessions Court in the very first attempt itself. The complainant in that case was a mighty man with very good connections in the Police department and Court. I started my submissions with the clear facts and concluded with the settled laws through case laws. I addressed and satisfied the Court as to why the Custodial Interrogation of the accused was not required in the case. I also relied on the observation of the Supreme Court in Gagan Banga v. Samit Mandal & Anr. [Criminal Appeal No. 463 of 2022] that continuing trend of projecting purely civil financial dispute as criminal matter despite repeated judgments appears extremely disturbing. 

    Considering the demands of your profession, how do you manage to maintain a work-life balance? What strategies do you implement to safeguard your health and well-being while balancing a busy legal career?

    The issue of work-life balance comes before only those people who either take their work as a mandatory burden or who lack interest in their work. For me work and life are not different things. I don’t agree with people saying their work is their life either. Were you not living when you were not working? Will you not live when you will stop working? Work is a very important element of life but remember it is just one of the elements of life. Indulge in your hobbies, spend time with your family and friends, go on vacations and always spare some time for your body and mind. 

    I always ask my team to complete preparations for the cases of the coming month well in advance. I keep a note of pending works whether it be professional or personal in my phone and keep updating it. It is advisable to include different heads in this note like drafting, calls, research, meetings etc. I keep my clothes, bags and files ready for the next day before going to sleep to avoid hurrying in the morning. To be very honest it is not possible for me to go to the gym every day. I wake up a little early in the morning and do light exercises and meditation every day. I practice gratitude in the morning and evening every day to keep myself away from stress. I avoid using lifts whether it be courts or any other places. I can comfortably use stairs for going to the court rooms even on the seventh floor. 

    For aspiring lawyers who wish to make an impact across various areas of law, what advice would you offer? Are there any specific resources or approaches you recommend to stay current with the ever-evolving legal landscape?

    Don’t just focus on learning law. That is essential and mandatory for the litigation career but not sufficient. Keep your eyes and mind wide open. Observe and understand the society around you. Observe and understand the people around you. Your understanding of the society and the people must keep improving. People of all age groups will come to you for their legal problems. Your personality must reflect a certain level of maturity regardless of your age.  

    Networking is another essential requirement for litigation. Don’t meet and network with people just to expect cases from them. I have seen people doing that but trust me it won’t take you long. Keep building long term meaningful relationships and cases will come to you as a side product. 

    There is always a great emphasis on reading judgments of the Supreme Court and the High Courts. That is essential but not sufficient to excel in trial litigation. When I started my practice in trial courts, I adopted a different approach. I used to arrange and read the judgments of the trial courts where my cases were pending. Judgments of the trial courts contain facts, replies, issues, evidence, chief examinations, cross examinations, laws, arguments, relied citations and conclusions. By reading a trial court judgment, you can learn how to fight that type of case on behalf of either of the parties.  

    During initial years of practice, a young lawyer should accept all types of cases and legal queries. This makes your foundation strong. Later you can narrow down your areas of practice as per your interests and circumstances. Try to join a senior who allows you to take up your independent cases. Remember that the habit of salary is a slow poison if you wish to set up your independent practice. Aim to set up your independent practice at a reasonable early phase because later going independent becomes more and more difficult due to financial and other reasons. Some young advocates start their independent practice in partnership with other advocates which gives many benefits if goes well.    

    Get in touch with Vishal Sharma –

  • “My goal is to bridge the richness of tradition with the dynamism of modern legal practice, creating a meaningful impact for those I serve.” – Rishi Bansal, Advocate & Managing Associate at United & United.

    “My goal is to bridge the richness of tradition with the dynamism of modern legal practice, creating a meaningful impact for those I serve.” – Rishi Bansal, Advocate & Managing Associate at United & United.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    As one of the youngest and most innovative minds in your firm, looking back, do you feel that law was always your intended career path, or was there a particular experience or influence that steered you toward this profession?
    Looking back, I feel that law was always destined to be a part of my journey. As a fourth-generation lawyer, I was immersed in an environment where discussions about justice, strategy, and advocacy were part of daily life. While my parents never pressured me to pursue this path, the legacy of law within my family naturally drew me in. 

    My grandfather deeply inspired me, Mr. Krishna Gopal Bansal, and my father, Mr. Shravan Kumar Bansal, whose unwavering commitment to justice and innovation left a lasting impression on me.

    Accompanying them to their office as a child, I was captivated by their meticulous approach to every case and the respect they garnered from peers and clients alike. These experiences shaped my understanding of the legal profession as more than just resolving disputes; it’s about shaping lives, empowering communities, and upholding justice. 

    This profound sense of purpose motivated me to embrace the profession wholeheartedly. Today, as one of the younger members of my firm, I strive to honor this legacy while bringing a fresh, innovative perspective to an evolving field. My goal is to bridge the richness of tradition with the dynamism of modern legal practice, creating a meaningful impact for those I serve.

    What initially drew you to Intellectual Property Law, and what motivated you to pursue an LL.M. (Pro.) in this area? How has your specialization in IP law contributed to your professional growth and success? 

    My interest in Intellectual Property (IP) Law was rooted in both family legacy and a personal fascination with the intersection of creativity, innovation, and legal protection. My great-great-grandfather once advised my grandfather to delve into IP law, planting the seeds for what has become a multi-generational practice in our family. Growing up in this environment, I witnessed how IP law empowers creators, safeguards innovation, and fuels economic progress, sparking my own curiosity and passion for this field. 

    Pursuing an LL.M. (Pro.) in Intellectual Property Law was a natural step in deepening my expertise. The program offered me a comprehensive understanding of the intricate frameworks governing IP law, from international treaties to emerging trends and strategic enforcement mechanisms. It also broadened my perspective, exposing me to global practices and equipping me with the tools to address the complex challenges of a rapidly evolving domain. 

    Specializing in IP law has been a cornerstone of my professional growth. It has allowed me to collaborate with innovators, businesses, and creators, helping them protect their ideas and transform them into impactful realities. This focus has not only strengthened my legal acumen but has also enabled me to carve a unique niche in a competitive legal landscape. It continues to offer diverse opportunities to contribute meaningfully to the intersection of law, creativity, and innovation.

    With your extensive experience handling IP-related matters, could you share your journey from Trainee Associate to Managing Associate? How have your roles evolved over time at United & United, and what key lessons from your early years have had the most lasting impact on you today? 

    My journey from Trainee Associate to Managing Associate at United & United has been enriching and transformative. As a Trainee Associate, I was introduced to the foundational aspects of intellectual property law—conducting meticulous research, drafting applications, and assisting in litigation. Those early years were instrumental in shaping my understanding of the field and building a strong work ethic. 

    As I progressed, my responsibilities evolved significantly. As an Associate, I began managing cases independently, engaging directly with clients, and devising strategies to address complex IP matters. 

    Transitioning to a Senior Associate role further broadened my perspective as I took on mentoring responsibilities and played a more active role in developing firm-wide strategies. 

    As a Managing Associate, I oversee teams, handle high-stakes IP portfolios, and contribute to the firm’s vision of fostering innovation and excellence. Each role has brought new challenges and opportunities for growth, allowing me to refine my skills and leadership abilities. 

    The key lessons from my early years have left an indelible impact. I carry everyday principles such as attention to detail, clear communication, and continuous learning. Most importantly, I’ve learned that building strong relationships—with clients, colleagues, and industry stakeholders—is the cornerstone of long-term success in the legal profession. 

    Having represented leading brands in trademark and design matters, how do you adapt your legal strategies for clients across diverse industries? What unique challenges do you face when protecting trademarks for fashion and consumer goods brands specifically? 

    Representing leading brands across diverse industries requires a deep understanding of not only the law but also the unique market dynamics and creative nuances of each sector. My approach involves tailoring legal strategies to align with the client’s business goals, market position, and competitive landscape. By immersing myself in the specific industry’s trends, challenges, and consumer behaviour, 

    I can craft solutions that resonate with the brand’s identity and long-term vision. When it comes to fashion and consumer goods brands, the challenges are particularly distinct. These industries thrive on creativity, rapid trends, and high consumer engagement, which make their trademarks and designs both highly valuable and vulnerable. Protecting trademarks in these sectors often involves addressing issues like counterfeit goods, fast-paced design replication, and maintaining exclusivity in a saturated market. 

    Additionally, fashion and consumer goods brands frequently operate on a global scale, requiring vigilance against cross-border infringement and navigating varying legal frameworks in different jurisdictions. The challenge lies in ensuring comprehensive protection while enabling the brand to evolve and expand without unnecessary legal constraints. 

    To address these challenges, I focus on proactive measures such as securing robust IP portfolios, continuous monitoring for potential infringements, and leveraging technology-driven tools for enforcement. I also prioritize fostering strong client collaboration, ensuring that my legal strategies not only protect their rights but also enhance their market presence and brand equity. Ultimately, my goal is to help clients thrive in their respective industries by ensuring their creative assets are safeguarded and strategically positioned for sustained success.

    Your expertise in international trademark law is highly regarded. What challenges do you face when securing global brand protection for clients, and how do you manage cross-border trademark disputes or registrations? Can you share a particularly challenging case that tested your skills in this area? 

    Securing global brand protection involves navigating a complex web of legal frameworks, cultural nuances, and market-specific challenges. Each jurisdiction has its own set of laws, procedures, and timelines, requiring a tailored approach to ensure effective trademark registration and enforcement. One of the primary challenges lies in harmonizing these diverse legal standards while maintaining consistency in brand identity and protection strategies. 

    Cross-border trademark disputes further amplify the complexity. Issues such as conflicting trademark rights, bad-faith registrations, and parallel imports often arise, particularly in regions where trademark squatting is prevalent. Managing such disputes requires a combination of strategic foresight, meticulous research, and collaboration with local counsel to ensure compliance with jurisdiction-specific rules while aligning with the client’s global objectives. One particularly challenging case that tested my skills involved securing a global trademark for a tech company launching an innovative product line. The brand name faced conflicting registrations in multiple key markets, including the U.S., Europe, and parts of Asia, where trademark squatters had preemptively filed for similar marks. 

    The case required not only legal acumen but also diplomatic negotiation skills to resolve disputes amicably and cost-effectively. In some jurisdictions, we pursued opposition proceedings and cancellation actions, leveraging evidence of bad faith and non-use. In others, we negotiated coexistence agreements to establish boundaries for trademark usage while protecting our client’s interests. Meanwhile, we implemented a robust monitoring system to prevent future infringements and bad-faith filings. This case underscored the importance of proactive planning, thorough due diligence, and creative problem-solving. 

    By strategically combining legal action with negotiation, we successfully secured the brand’s global footprint, enabling the client to launch their product line seamlessly. Ultimately, challenges in international trademark law demand a balance of legal expertise, strategic adaptability, and cultural sensitivity. My experience in this field has honed my ability to address these complexities while ensuring clients’ brands are well-positioned to thrive in the global marketplace.

    Given that IP law is constantly evolving, how do you see the Indian legal landscape adapting to global changes? What is your opinion on the effectiveness of initiatives like the AI and ML-based Trademark Search Technology and IP Saarthi launched by the CGPTM and DPIIT? 

    Intellectual Property law is inherently dynamic, evolving in response to technological advancements, global trade practices, and the increasing significance of intangible assets. As a rapidly growing economy and innovation hub, India is adapting well to these global changes by modernizing its IP framework and aligning with international best practices. 

    Initiatives like the AI and ML-based Trademark Search Technology and IP Saarthi, launched by the CGPTM and DPIIT, are commendable steps toward enhancing the efficiency and accessibility of the Indian IP system. For instance, the AI and ML-based Trademark Search Technology has significantly streamlined the trademark registration process, reducing the time and effort required for preliminary searches. It reflects a forward-looking approach, leveraging technology to address challenges like backlog and accuracy in trademark examinations. 

    IP Saarthi, aimed at creating awareness and guiding stakeholders, can bridge the gap between innovators and the IP system, particularly benefiting startups and small businesses. It underscores the government’s commitment to fostering an IP-friendly environment by empowering creators with knowledge and resources. 

    While these initiatives are promising, their effectiveness will depend on consistent updates, widespread adoption, and adequate stakeholder training. The continued integration of advanced technologies and robust policy frameworks will ensure India remains competitive globally. As someone deeply invested in this field, I am optimistic about the transformative potential of these initiatives and look forward to seeing their long-term impact on the Indian IP landscape.” 

    In addition to your legal practice, you contribute to the legal community through seminars, publications, and mentoring. How do you view the role of legal education in advancing trademark law, and what advice would you give to young lawyers who want to specialize in this field? Can you also share some resources that students can refer to for staying updates on the latest legal trends in IP? 

    I firmly believe in the transformative power of knowledge, particularly in advancing trademark law and strengthening the intellectual property (IP) ecosystem. Education plays a crucial role not only in shaping the next generation of IP professionals but also in empowering key stakeholders to safeguard the rights of creators and businesses effectively. To that end, my team and I actively organize seminars, webinars, and training sessions, particularly for customs authorities and police personnel. By equipping them with a thorough understanding of IP law, we enable them to play a vital role in enforcing brand protection and combating counterfeiting. These efforts help ensure that government authorities are well-prepared to uphold the rights of brand owners. Equally important is our engagement with students and young lawyers who are eager to specialize in intellectual property law. Through mentorship programs, guest lectures, and interactive workshops, we aim to inspire and guide them to explore the immense opportunities within the IP sector. This field is not only a cornerstone of innovation and creativity but also a driver of economic growth in an increasingly knowledge-based global economy.

    To young lawyers aspiring to specialize in trademark law, my advice is threefold:

    1. Develop a Solid Foundation: Master the basics of IP law, including trademarks, patents, copyrights, and designs, as well as the intricacies of jurisdiction-specific regulations.
    2. Stay Curious and Updated: IP law is constantly evolving due to technological advancements and globalization. Stay informed about new legal precedents, international treaties, and emerging trends in industries like AI, fashion, and technology.
    3. Cultivate Practical Skills: Beyond academic knowledge, focus on skills like negotiation, litigation, and client management, which are crucial in real-world practice.

    For students seeking resources to stay updated, I recommend:

    • WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization): A treasure trove of international IP resources, reports, and case studies.
    • IP Blogs and Journals: Resources like SpicyIP, LiveLaw, barandbench and Manupatra are a great source of IP Blogs, case studies and latest news.  
    • Professional Networks: Engaging with IP-focused organizations like INTA (International Trademark Association) or participating in IP-related conferences is invaluable for networking and learning.
    • Books: Fostering the habit of regularly reading case laws, bare acts, and staying updated with the latest news is essential for delving deeper into the field of IP law.

    By fostering knowledge at all levels—whether among government authorities, businesses, or students—I aim to contribute to a stronger and more secure IP ecosystem where brands, innovation, and creativity can flourish.

    As the Managing Associate at your firm, you likely have significant responsibilities. How do you maintain a steady workflow while also balancing personal commitments and obligations? 

    As the Managing Associate at my firm, maintaining a steady workflow while balancing personal commitments requires a combination of organization, discipline, and clear prioritization. The key to managing both professional and personal obligations lies in setting realistic expectations and creating structured routines. In my professional role, I rely on effective time management tools and techniques, such as setting clear daily goals, prioritizing tasks based on urgency, and delegating where possible. This allows me to stay on top of deadlines, manage client expectations, and contribute to the growth of the firm. However, I also understand the importance of personal time for overall well-being and productivity. 

    I ensure that I set boundaries by dedicating time for personal commitments, whether it’s spending time with family, pursuing hobbies, or maintaining a healthy lifestyle. I’ve learned that balance doesn’t come from overloading one aspect of my life but by managing them in harmony. Maintaining this equilibrium also requires flexibility; there are days when work demands more time, and other days when personal priorities take precedence. What’s most important is remaining adaptable and staying grounded in both my professional goals and personal values. Ultimately, by fostering a disciplined approach to work and committing to self-care, I’ve found a rhythm that supports both my professional aspirations and personal happiness.

    Get in touch with Rishi Bansal –

  • “I think we’re heading into a phase where Patent Law will become more flexible and open to innovation, not just in tech but in the way we approach regulation itself.” – Sangeeta Singh, Director of Patents at Adastra IP.

    “I think we’re heading into a phase where Patent Law will become more flexible and open to innovation, not just in tech but in the way we approach regulation itself.” – Sangeeta Singh, Director of Patents at Adastra IP.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    What inspired you to pursue a career in intellectual property law immediately after completing your Master’s in Organic Chemistry? How has your technical background contributed to your expertise and effectiveness in the patent field?

    After finishing my Master’s in Organic Chemistry, I was all set to dive into a Ph.D., but then a surprising opportunity at an IPR law firm came up. What I thought would be a short-term role quickly turned into a real passion. The idea of taking lab research and turning it into something commercially viable really sparked my interest, and before long, I realized patent law was where I wanted to build my career. My chemistry background turned out to be a huge advantage, helping me dive deep into life sciences and chemical inventions. It gave me the understanding I needed to break down the science behind patents, draft clear claims, and spot potential challenges during prosecution and litigation.

    What challenges did you face when you first entered the patent field, especially coming from a non-legal technical background? How did you overcome these obstacles, and what strategies helped you adapt?

    When I first jumped into the patent field, it felt like diving into the deep end—legal jargon everywhere, and I had no idea how the whole process worked! Coming from a technical background, the legal side was completely foreign to me. But I wasn’t about to back down. I threw myself into learning—devouring books, joining training sessions, and reaching out to my seniors. I remember spending extra hours at the office, diving into patent files and getting the hang of everything—from drafting to filing and grants. I made it a point to ask tons of questions and have lively conversations with my peers/seniors or other industry experts. I didn’t just stick to technical-legal side of patent either; I took on filing, invoicing, client communication, and really got a feel for how the entire patent system runs. That hands-on experience gave me the confidence I needed and helped me build a solid foundation in this new field.

    In your journey from a patent scientist to the Director of Patents at Adastra IP, how have your personal values and work ethics evolved?

    My journey from a patent scientist to the Director of Patents has been a big shift for me, both professionally and personally. Early on, I realized how important it was to get the technical details right and really understand patent law. This strong foundation helped me move forward in my career. As I took on more responsibilities, I also focused on networking, connecting with others, and collaborating with experts from all over the world—things that have helped me grow and expand my knowledge.

    A big part of my growth has been my commitment to lifelong learning. The patent world is always changing, with new technologies and legal updates popping up all the time. Staying open to learning—whether through reading, mentorship, workshops, or industry events—has given me fresh perspectives and helped me take on new challenges. Through it all, the idea of “work is worship” has been my guide. It’s a reminder to put my best effort into everything I do. Integrity has also become a key part of my work. By sticking to high ethical standards, I’ve been able to stay true to my commitment to the profession.

    What is a piece of advice you received early in your career that has stuck with you and continues to guide your decisions and actions in the patent law space?

    Early in my career, I can’t pinpoint one specific piece of advice, but I’ve learned so much from my mentors, and I’m still learning now. One key lesson that has always shaped how I approach my work in patent law is “Always put yourself in your client’s shoes.” This shift in mindset was a game-changer for me. It moved my focus from just understanding the technical details to truly considering my clients’ needs and goals. By viewing things from their perspective, I’ve been able to offer more practical, tailored solutions that truly add value.

    Another principle that has been my lifelong guide is, “There’s no substitute for hard work, and never stop learning.” This really resonated with me, especially in a field like patent law that’s always evolving. It’s easy to get comfortable with what you know, but this mentality keeps me pushing myself to stay ahead of new trends and developments. It’s a mindset that’s helped me grow both professionally and personally—because when you’re in a field that never stands still, neither can you!

    How crucial is it for professionals to maintain a healthy balance between their work and personal lives, and what impact can this balance have on their overall well-being and performance?

    Finding balance outside of work is super important, especially for professionals. It’s so easy to get lost in the hustle of your career, but taking time for yourself actually makes you better at what you do. For me, spending quality time with family, traveling, and diving into hobbies like designing help me recharge and come back to work with fresh ideas and a lot more energy. It’s all about keeping your mind and emotions in check, which keeps you focused, creative, and productive. Without that balance, burnout can creep in, and both work and personal life can take a hit.

    And honestly, health is everything. Your body is your temple, right? Regular exercise, yoga, and just taking care of yourself physically isn’t just about staying fit—it helps clear your mind and manage stress too. In a fast-paced field like patent law, finding time for personal care is key to staying sharp. So, no matter how busy you are, always make your health a priority. It’s the foundation for everything else.

    Having worked with Indian and Malaysian firms, how have your experiences differed in terms of patent ecosystem, cultural dynamics, and work approach? What insights can you share from navigating these diverse environments?

    Working with Indian and Malaysian firms has been an enriching experience, with both offering unique strengths. In India, the patent system is well-established, and you get to dive into complex cases that require a lot of technical and legal detail. It’s a structured and thorough process. Malaysia, meanwhile, has this fresh, evolving energy. The processes are streamlined, and there’s a clear push to align with global standards, which is exciting to be part of.

    Both experiences have been invaluable, showing me different ways to approach challenges and deliver solutions. I genuinely value what each brings to the table.

    With the rapid advancements in technologies such as artificial intelligence, how do you envision these developments influencing the future of patent law? In particular, how might emerging technologies like AI impact the way patents are filed, granted, and enforced? 

    AI is moving at lightning speed, and it’s shaking up patent law in ways we couldn’t have imagined just a few years ago. On one hand, it’s a game-changer. Tasks like patent searches and prior art analysis that used to take weeks can now be done in hours. It’s even assisting with drafting to some extent. But it’s not without its challenges. For one, how accurate are AI’s outputs? Can we always trust the data it presents?

    And then there’s the bigger question: what happens when AI creates something genuinely new? Does the AI get credited as the inventor, or do we need to completely rethink what inventorship means? We all have seen the DABUS case, current laws don’t quite fit, so do we need to revisit the framework or create new legislation?

    And let’s not forget the ethical side. If AI starts influencing decisions, how do we ensure it’s fair and transparent? These are tricky issues, and they’re not just legal questions—they touch on technology, policy, and even philosophy.

    This is why collaboration is going to be crucial. Lawyers, tech experts, and policymakers will all need to work together to keep the system fair and relevant. I think we’re heading into a phase where patent law will become more flexible and open to innovation, not just in tech but in the way we approach regulation itself. It’s an exciting time, but it’s definitely a space where we need to tread carefully and thoughtfully.

    With your elaborate experience in Patent Law what message would you like to convey to aspiring patent attorneys or professionals considering a career in intellectual property?

    To aspiring patent attorneys or professionals considering a career in intellectual property, my advice would be to be patient and persistent. Patent law can be a rewarding career, but it requires dedication and continuous learning. Building strong technical and legal skills is essential, and don’t be afraid to seek mentorship. Finding a niche that excites you and developing expertise in that area will set you apart in the field. Lastly, always stay curious and open to new knowledge, as the world is evolving rapidly, and so is the law that governs it.

    Given your extensive expertise in the field, are there any resources: books, or organizations that you would recommend for those starting a career in patent law?

    If you’re just starting in patent law, there are a few resources that can really help you get a solid foundation. For books, Patent Law by Hon’ble Justice Prathiba M. Singh, the recently launched Patent Law by Adarsh Ramanujan, and Patent Law by P. Narayan are all excellent choices for understanding the Indian patent system. If you’re coming from a technical background, Legal Writing by Bryan A. Garner is a great resource for honing your legal writing skills. Beyond books, it’s essential to regularly read the Patent Act—think of it as a novel. WIPO Academy’s online courses are good for your basic understanding of patent law. Finally, make sure to stay up to date with court judgments and attend seminars or networking events when you can—it’s a great way to stay connected and keep learning from the latest developments in the field and advance your knowledge.

    Get in touch with Sangeeta Singh –

  • “What drew me specifically to IPR was the dynamic nature of the field; I felt a sense of purpose in helping artists, inventors, start-ups, and global corporations safeguard their innovative ideas from infringement, allowing them to flourish creatively and economically.” – Ronil Goger, Founder & Managing Partner at Blaze Legal.

    “What drew me specifically to IPR was the dynamic nature of the field; I felt a sense of purpose in helping artists, inventors, start-ups, and global corporations safeguard their innovative ideas from infringement, allowing them to flourish creatively and economically.” – Ronil Goger, Founder & Managing Partner at Blaze Legal.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Throughout your law degree, you gained valuable experience through significant internships. What initially motivated you to pursue a career in law, and what specifically drew you towards Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)?

    Every journey begins with a spark – an event, an experience, or sometimes just an insatiable curiosity. My journey into the field of law or more particularly intellectual property began during my 5th Grade – when the first live-action Spider-Man movie hit the screens and left me ensnared in a web of intriguing questions.

    As a comic enthusiast with a keen interest in the Marvel Comic Universe, I felt a surge of curiosity when the Sony Pictures logo appeared at the beginning of the film, with only a fleeting reference to Marvel. As I explored the details further, my father (the guiding light) stepped in to clarify that Sony holds the movie rights. This revelation ignited a ‘flame’ in me – a desire to uncover how Sony came to own the rights to my beloved Marvel superhero and trying to decode the complex arrangements of intellectual property licensing and assignments.

    As I progressed through my life, I was exposed to various branches of law including criminal, property, marriage, company regulations, etc. However, what truly set my heart racing was the realm of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR). The world of IPR is a fascinating intersection of law, creativity and innovation. It offers the unique opportunity to protect the fruits of human creativity – be it a catchy tune, an imaginative work of fiction, a brilliant invention, or a ground breaking brand.

    In an endeavour to gain insights, I interned with various companies and leading law firms such as Khaitan & Co., IREO, Sagar Chandra & Associates, AMC Law etc. 

    What drew me specifically to IPR was the dynamic nature of the field. In a world dominated by rapid technological advancements and the internet, the landscape of intellectual property is constantly evolving. Each case is unique, presenting an exciting puzzle to solve. I felt a sense of purpose in helping artists, inventors, start-ups, and global corporations safeguard their innovative ideas from infringement, allowing them to flourish creatively and economically.

    Starting your career at Shardul Amarchand & Co. must have been a formative experience. What were the most valuable lessons you learned there, and how did that experience shape your legal career?

    Entering the professional world can be a daunting yet exhilarating experience, especially when it involves stepping into a field as complex as law. My first job at Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co. (SAM) not only marked a significant milestone in my career but also provided invaluable lessons that shaped my understanding of legal practice. In this role, I was exposed to the intricacies of legal research, client interactions, and the daily operations of a dynamic office environment. The experience illuminated the importance of attention to detail and the impact of effective communication, both essential skills for any aspiring legal professional.

    Further, observing seasoned attorneys navigate difficult cases further reinforced my desire to pursue a career in law, revealing the profound responsibility lawyers hold in protecting and enforcing the rights of clients. Through my experience at SAM, I developed a range of skills that will be invaluable throughout my career. One of the most critical abilities I honed was my capacity for effective communication, both written and verbal. Drafting correspondence and legal documents required clarity and precision, ensuring that complex legal concepts were accessible to clients and colleagues alike. Furthermore, I learned the importance of digital literacy in a legal context, as many tasks involved using specialized software for case management and research.

    The experience of working at SAM served as a profound catalyst for both my personal and professional growth. Engaging with intricate legal cases exposed me to the complexities of the legal system, enhancing my analytical skills and critical thinking. Additionally, my role involved collaborating with diverse stakeholders, fostering effective communication and teamwork. Also, the primary focus in the formative years should be developing dependency and trust. As soon as you secure your first position, the paramount focus should be cultivating a sense of self-reliance and taking charge of your responsibilities.

    Developing the invaluable skills of ‘being ever-ready to lend a hand’ and ‘committing unwavering effort‘ will undoubtedly elevate your professional prowess. While you may not be the sharpest mind in the room, your ability to outwork your peers is entirely within your control. In fact, every critique should be embraced in the most constructive manner. It is expected that one will be a novice, and thus, the occasional misstep is permissible. The most crucial point is how one overcomes their vulnerabilities and emerges stronger from each error.

    Ultimately, these formative experiences not only solidified my aspirations within the legal field but also instilled a strong sense of confidence in my abilities to navigate professional challenges, contributing significantly to my overall development trajectory.

    After working with top-tier law firms, you chose to establish Blaze Legal. What were the key factors that motivated you to venture into your own practice, and what challenges did you encounter in the early stages?

    The decision to establish Blaze Legal was fuelled by a potent mix of passion, vision, and the allure of independence that danced in my mind like fireflies on a summer night. Having navigated the intricate corridors of top-tier law firms like SAM and Archer & Angel, I found myself captivated by the prospect of creating something uniquely mine—an ecosystem where innovative legal solutions merged seamlessly with genuine client relationships.

    One key factor in this venture was the desire for creative freedom. Within the structured entities of larger firms, I often felt confined by the established processes and conventional practices. I envisioned Blaze Legal as a dynamic space where fresh ideas could flourish, where each case could be approached with a blend of ingenuity and empathy, allowing us to truly serve our clients’ needs rather than merely ticking boxes. Another motivating force was the ambition to prioritize accessibility. In my experience, I witnessed too many individuals and start-ups feeling alienated by the legal world – a realm often seen as intimidating and unapproachable. With Blaze Legal, I aimed to break down those barriers, offering a welcoming atmosphere where clients could engage openly and collaboratively. I wanted to usher in an era where legal counsel was not just a luxury for the affluent but a resource available to anyone seeking guidance.

    However, the journey was not without its hurdles. In the early stages, I grappled with the challenge of building a brand from scratch. Establishing credibility in a saturated market demanded not just legal acumen but also strategic marketing and networking efforts. The initial months were a delicate balancing act – juggling cases while cultivating relationships, all while needing to demonstrate that Blaze Legal was a formidable player in the legal landscape.

    Financial uncertainties loomed large, too. Transitioning from the stability of a well-established firm to the unpredictable tides of entrepreneurship tested my resolve. There were sleepless nights spent poring over budgets, forecasting cash flows, and tapping into my savings with a mix of hope and trepidation.

    Then, there were the lessons learned through trial and error—navigating the intricacies of technology, streamlining operations, and moulding a team that shared my vision. Each challenge was a spark igniting growth and resilience, shaping Blaze Legal into a beacon of innovation and integrity.

    In retrospect, launching Blaze Legal was akin to stepping into an uncharted wilderness. It demanded courage, creativity, and countless cups of coffee. Yet, every triumph – no matter how small – felt monumental, lighting the path ahead and affirming that this venture, born from ambition and the desire to make a difference, was indeed worth every effort.

    Blaze Legal provides services related to trademark, copyright, and patent filings. What are some of the unique challenges you face when dealing with IP offices in jurisdictions like Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka, and others, and how do you navigate these complexities?

    Dealing with Intellectual Property (IP) offices in the Southern Asian jurisdictions such as Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Maldives, etc., presents a unique set of challenges that require a blend of cultural understanding, local expertise, and strategic ingenuity. For starters, the IP registration process in these countries often involves intricate bureaucratic steps that can be time-consuming and opaque – which adds 30-40% extra time to expected timelines. To tackle such issues, we have established strong relationships with local agents or attorneys who are familiar with the nuances of the local bureaucracy. Their insider knowledge can expedite processes and help in navigating red tape efficiently.

    Further, in some of these jurisdictions, the technological infrastructure for IP registration and enforcement may not be as advanced, leading to delays and inefficiencies. Preparing all documentation meticulously and in advance, and maintaining hard copies as backups – can help dealing with any pitfalls. Also, regular follow-ups through both digital and physical means can ensure that your filings are progressing without unnecessary delays.

    Separately, since each jurisdiction has its own set of IP laws and regulations, which can differ significantly from one another and from international standards, conducting thorough legal research and staying updated on changes in local IP laws can be beneficial. Lastly, for protecting IP once registered, we have developed comprehensive and tailored IP enforcement strategies that includes local legal action, public awareness campaigns, and collaboration with local authorities.

    Accordingly, navigating the complexities of IP management in Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka, and similar jurisdictions requires a proactive and well-informed approach. By leveraging local knowledge, maintaining rigorous documentation, and adopting a culturally sensitive stance, you can successfully manage and protect your intellectual property across diverse legal landscapes.

    Can you share an example of a particularly challenging cross-border IP case you’ve handled, and how you navigated the legal landscape?

    Navigating the complex realms of international law has been one of the most intellectually rewarding and challenging experiences in my legal career. One particular case stands out in my mind, encapsulating the intricate nature of cross-border trademark disputes and the necessity for a nuanced approach.

    The case involved a multinational company that specialized in luxury cosmetics. After years of operating under a specific brand name in Europe, the client decided to expand into emerging markets in Asia. However, upon entering these new territories, the company faced a formidable obstacle: a local competitor had registered a similar trademark in Bangladesh & Nepal that not only created confusion among consumers but also threatened the established brand’s reputation. The stakes were enormous, not only for the financial investment in this expansion but also for the brand’s identity and market position.

    Understanding the gravity of the situation, I led a team that included attorneys specialized in intellectual property law within the jurisdictions involved. Our first step was to conduct a comprehensive trademark audit. We examined existing trademarks in both Europe and Asia, paying close attention to the potential for conflicts and the likelihood of confusion among consumers. This required an in-depth understanding of both the nuances of trademark law in different countries and the cultural perceptions associated with brand names.

    One of the key challenges we faced was the disparity between jurisdictions regarding trademark registration and enforcement. To approach this challenge effectively, we decided to implement a dual strategy. First, we initiated negotiations with the local company that held the conflicting trademark. Understanding the significance of relationships in many Asian cultures, we engaged a local law firm to help facilitate discussions. Highlighting the potential benefits of coexistence was key; we proposed licensing agreements that would allow both parties to operate without infringing on each other’s market presence. This approach not only showcased our commitment to enforcing our client’s rights in the concerned jurisdictions but also resolving the matter swiftly and amicably.

    Simultaneously, we prepared for litigation as a backup plan. This involved gathering evidence of our client’s prior use of the trademark in Europe and building a case that demonstrated the risk of consumer confusion should the status quo continue. We also conducted market surveys in the Asian territories to gauge consumer perceptions regarding brand recognition and confusion. This data would serve as vital support in a potential courtroom battle. Over several months, negotiations fluctuated with moments of tension and progress. Our collaborative efforts eventually yielded a breakthrough: the local competitor agreed to cease all use of the infringing mark and cancelling the registrations – which allowed our client to smoothly expand and use the trademark in specified regions while recognizing our client’s legal rights. This resolution not only avoided a protracted legal fight but also strengthened the client’s position in the new market.

    Reflecting on this experience, I recognize that successful navigation of cross-border trademark cases hinges on a multifaceted approach – combining legal expertise with cultural sensitivity and strategic negotiation. It reinforced the importance of adaptability and thorough preparation in overcoming the hurdles presented by diverse legal systems.

    What advice would you give to young lawyers who are looking to specialize in IPR and litigation?

    As a young Mike Ross or Racheal Zane, embarking on a career into IPR law and litigation, you are entering a dynamic and evolving field that merges creativity with legal acumen. This dual discipline requires not only a firm grasp of complex legal principles but also a keen understanding of the ever-evolving nature of technology and business.

    First and foremost, a comprehensive understanding of IPR law is paramount. Young lawyers must immerse themselves in the foundational doctrines of intellectual property – copyright, trademark, patent, design and other unconventional IP laws, as each area has its own set of regulations and implications. To navigate these complexities, I recommend pursuing an advanced degree or certification specifically related to IPR. Engaging with esteemed institutions that offer specialized programs showcases dedication and equips young lawyers with theoretical knowledge and practical applications crucial for their future practice. Understanding both domestic and international laws is crucial, given the globalization of business and the internet’s impact on IP.

    Secondly, seek mentorship from seasoned professionals in the field. Surrounding yourself with experienced practitioners can provide invaluable insights that textbooks cannot offer. A mentor can help you refine your skills, advise you on best practices, and introduce you to networks within the industry. Take the initiative to attend industry events, where you can meet potential mentors and gain exposure to various aspects of IPR and litigation. Additionally, gaining practical experience is paramount. Look for internships with legal practitioners and firms that specialize in IPR laws. This hands-on experience will not only enhance your understanding of the legal processes involved but also develop your analytical and advocacy skills. Engage in pro bono work related to IPR cases as it can provide you with unique experiences while contributing positively to the community.

    Furthermore, staying abreast of technological advancements and emerging trends in IPR is essential. The rapid evolution of technology – be it artificial intelligence, blockchain, or biotechnology, continually reshapes the IPR landscape. Young lawyers should engage in continuous learning through seminars, webinars, and workshops. Actively participating in discussions surrounding innovation can enhance one’s ability to anticipate and respond to new legal challenges. Reading prominent journals and following influential thought leaders in the field will provide insights into current issues and emerging best practices, further reinforcing their expertise and credibility.

    Lastly, emotional intelligence plays a significant role in successful legal practice. Developing the ability to empathize with clients, understand their concerns, and communicate effectively can set aspiring lawyers apart. Active listening fosters trust and enables lawyers to tailor their services to meet clients’ specific needs. Moreover, handling the emotional weight of contentious litigation requires resilience and composure. Young lawyers should seek opportunities to cultivate these skills, whether through formal training or simply through reflective practice in their everyday interactions.

    In conclusion, specializing in IPR and litigation offers an intellectually stimulating and rewarding career pathway. By committing to ongoing education, honing litigation skills, building a strong professional network, maintaining an adaptable mindset, and cultivating emotional intelligence, young lawyers can establish themselves as proficient advocates in this dynamic field. The journey may be challenging, but with perseverance and passion, they can carve out a distinct niche as leaders in intellectual property law. As they embark on this exciting road, let them remember that their contributions to the protection of innovation not only shape industries but also drive societal progress.

    Get in touch with Ronil Goger –

  • “From Knitting, Kitchen, and Kids to Serial Entrepreneur: My Journey from Family Tradition to Entrepreneurial Success.” – Dr. Shweta Singh, a Serial Entrepreneur and Founder of Ennoble IP.

    “From Knitting, Kitchen, and Kids to Serial Entrepreneur: My Journey from Family Tradition to Entrepreneurial Success.” – Dr. Shweta Singh, a Serial Entrepreneur and Founder of Ennoble IP.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Your work in the intellectual property law space is highly specialized. What initially sparked your interest in IP law?

    This is a very interesting question for me. I’ve been asked this many times, and I always say that actually, my personality is such that I get bored easily with things. Things, not people—okay? So, if I am doing something continuously and it feels monotonous, I get bored. Since my childhood, it has been a dream of mine to do something of my own, possibly due to my background or family conditions—a very orthodox family. But I wanted to do something interesting that always excites me.

    It should always give me a kick to do better and better, until I achieve the best, right? So, that’s how I developed my journey. I would say my interest in IP law was sparked during my graduation days when I was actually searching for what I should do.

    And I encountered a book by B.D. Singh with a chapter on patents, and this chapter opened my eyes to the fascinating world of innovation and technology. As I delved deeper, I realized that working in this field means being exposed to new ideas and groundbreaking technologies every day.

    It felt like being on the front line of innovation. Now that you are involved in IP, you will realize why I chose it. What truly drove me to start my journey in IP was that it became not just my passion but my attitude. IP became more than just a field of study for me; it became a part of who I am. I believe I am at my best when I’m working in this space, and this confidence gave me the drive to turn my passion into a business.

    More than working with corporates and universities, I realized that there’s a huge gap in the support provided to universities, startups, and SMEs. When I entered the field of IP, I started catering to these needs. For me, it’s not just about protecting ideas but also empowering innovators and helping them realize the full potential of their creativity.

    During early stages of your career, while you spent four years working as an IP consultant, basically in patent research and analytics, what kind of experience was it that influenced your career trajectory? And what were the key insights that you would prefer to share?

    During the early stages of my career, I spent not four but six years working as an IP professional, focusing on patent research and analytics in both corporate and academic environments.

    I worked in the corporate sector and with Amity University, which was the only university where I worked as an employee. This experience was instrumental in shaping my career trajectory and deepening my understanding of IP from multiple perspectives. I learned how IP is handled in the corporate and business sectors and how it is managed in academia.

    In the corporate sector, I learned business strategies around IP that help companies stay ahead in competitive markets. Large corporations file patents not just to protect their inventions but to monetize them. This taught me how patents drive innovation and secure market advantages.

    In contrast, my time with Amity University exposed me to the academic approach to IP: how research translates into intellectual property and the challenges faced by institutions in managing and leveraging their innovation effectively.

    The biggest lesson I learned during this time was the immense potential of IP to create tangible value—whether for multinational corporations, universities, or startups. It also made me realize the importance of bridging the gap between innovators and the IP process, which ultimately inspired me to start my own venture.

    I also remember a pivotal experience in Singapore, where I attended a conference through WIPO. During the conference, someone remarked that India and China are “jugaad” countries that copy products and lack awareness about protecting intellectual property.

    This comment struck a nerve. It motivated me to return to India, leave my job, and create something that could address this issue. I conducted 75 free workshops for SMEs and universities in 2013 to spread awareness about why IP is important. It wasn’t just about filing; it was about understanding what you are losing by not protecting your ideas.

    You actually are the first-generation serial woman entrepreneur. Can you take us through that journey, through that experience that actually led you to start Ennoble IP and how do you see that this is impacting society at large and majorly women entrepreneurs?

    Let’s not define entrepreneurship by gender. I used to think of myself as a woman entrepreneur, but over time, I realized entrepreneurship transcends gender.

    Yes, as a woman, 20-40% of the challenges we face may be gender-specific. But the rest are the same for all entrepreneurs. I come from a small town in Eastern UP, and I belong to a traditional Rajput family. The mindset in my family was that women were destined for the “3 Ks”—knitting, kitchen, and kids.

    However, my parents, particularly my mother, were rebellious. My mother was determined to ensure that my sisters and I became financially independent. She always emphasized that financial independence is the key to freedom—freedom to make decisions without asking a father, husband, or boss for money.

    My journey as a first-generation entrepreneur has been both challenging and rewarding. During my university days, I discovered my passion for IP and realized I could work with innovators to protect groundbreaking ideas. After gaining industry experience in corporate and academic settings, I saw a significant gap in IP services for startups, universities, and SMEs.

    Starting Ennoble IP was my way of addressing these gaps, but it was also a journey of self-discovery. Each experience taught me resilience, adaptability, and the importance of staying true to my vision.

    So, he makes the decisions on how the house will run. We live in a joint family, and to this day, we still have a joint family. My uncle guided my father, and my grandfather also guided him, saying, “You have a daughter; save money and give her basic education if you want.” But my mother and father were very rebellious—both of them, I would say.

    The first step was taken by my mother, but yes, my father joined hands with her. My mother declared, “I have daughters, but that doesn’t stop me from building their careers or making them financially independent.” And my mother was determined throughout, until we realized the importance of financial independence.

    She taught us that financial independence is the freedom you actually require in your life. Otherwise, you will always have to ask. If you don’t have a brother, you’ll always turn to your father, saying, ‘I want this; give me this money.’ Then you’ll turn to your husband, saying, ‘I want this; give me your money.’ Finally, you’ll turn to your male bosses, asking for a raise.

    So, she asked, “Why don’t you create your own financial freedom so you don’t have to ask anyone?” She even gave her example: “See, if I have to make any decision, I have to ask your father. If I had been earning, I would have sat with him to discuss whether we should invest or not. Instead of asking, ‘I want this—will you help me buy that?’ I would have had the confidence to contribute equally.”

    So, she talked about financial freedom and confidence until the three of us realized how essential they are. My father supported me—I would say he was always the strongest backbone for us, alongside my mother.

    Now, coming to being a first-generation entrepreneur: my journey has been both challenging and incredibly rewarding. I always say, “Be proud of yourself,” and I am very proud of whatever I have achieved.

    Growing up, I didn’t have—as I mentioned—a family business or entrepreneurial legacy to guide me. But I always had a strong drive, inspired by my mother, to create something meaningful.

    The key moment that set me on this path was during my university days when I discovered my passion for IP. The idea that I could work with innovators, support them, and help protect groundbreaking ideas fascinated me immensely.

    After gaining industry experience—both in corporate and academic settings—I saw a significant gap, as I mentioned, in how IP services were being delivered to startups, universities, and SMEs.

    While large corporations had access to world-class IP support systems, smaller entities were often left struggling to navigate the complexities of intellectual property. That was something I wanted to change. That realization was the kick I needed to get started.

    I wanted to be independent, and my independence inspired my sisters, who said, “Yes, we will work.” But I was determined: “No, I don’t want to limit myself to one job. I want to build a business.” At that time, I was young and naïve, but as you grow, wisdom comes. I was still a child back then, thinking, “I will start a business where my daddy’s friends will come and say, ‘Please employ my child.’”

    And these relatives will come and say, “Please help me with the job also.” I was of that mindset, but I was totally wrong. So, for the young people who are watching this, this should not be the driving force for you. I was scared. I was scared, but with the vision, with the wisdom that comes with age and experience, I am not working today for myself.
    I’m working for almost 260 people who are working with me right now. Together, we are working towards that vision. So, entrepreneurship, I would say, is a very beautiful thing if you actually enjoy this journey. Starting Ennoble IP was my way of bridging the gap—not only in the industry but also in my thought process.

    I wanted to create a platform that not only provides IP services but also empowers innovators by making it more accessible, more understandable, and more strategically strong, where they get the support they need. Along the way, the three challenges I faced were, first, learning to navigate the business world without prior experience, second, building a trusted network, and third, establishing credibility as a first-generation entrepreneur.

    Now, coming to your question—yes, I faced challenges being a woman. As I mentioned, it’s only 20–40%, not more than that. The rest of the problems are the same. Trust is the major issue. At the time when I started, I was very thin and looked much younger than my age. This made people reluctant to trust me.

    Once, I was sitting with a vice-chancellor of a university, and after a talk, he said, “Madam, I thought that as the chief guest, you must be very old. Will you be able to handle this workshop and the university’s work? You are just a woman, madam. This university is very big.”

    In my mind, I was thinking, ‘Where have you come from? You have so many female faculty members, yet you doubt me?’ But I said politely, “Sir, I’ll need your help. If you help me, I will be able to manage.” This was me satisfying the male ego.

    After my talk, he said, “You are like chota packet bada dhamaka.” I responded, “No, sir, you are wrong. I may be small or big—I don’t know—but I am definitely a dhamaka.” Then I added, “Never underestimate women because if we can handle a kitchen and kids, we can handle anything.”

    I continued, “If a woman can bring life into this world, she can do anything.” He was silent, but now, we are good friends. I respect him a lot, and he often says, ‘Shweta, you changed my mindset.’ After that, he gave his daughter the wings she wanted.

    What I want to emphasize is that each experience has taught me resilience, adaptability, and, most importantly, staying true to my vision. This is very important. I often say resilience has built me because it’s like fighting against odd situations every time.

    As a woman, we face challenges, but as an entrepreneur, we face even more. It’s resilience that helps us persevere. People these days on Instagram talk about manifestation, right? I didn’t know this word back then, but now I realize that all this while, I was manifesting.

    From my childhood, I manifested something, and I believe in it. My favorite song is Chaand Taare Tod Lau. That song is about manifestation—and look at the actor! It’s all in your mind. You just have to believe.

    These characteristics and skills, no one is born with. You develop them through experience. I was very naïve when I started meeting investors. I didn’t want to raise money for my startup, but I have an NPO where I support women.

    I believe in giving back to society. Through that NPO, we support women. It’s not for profit. I have only invested my own money so far. We do not work for CSR funds because the women we support are doing fantastically well.

    When I started in 2012 or 2013, there wasn’t much exposure. In meetings with investors, they would say, “She may get married soon and plan a family.” I got furious during some of those interviews and said, “Sir, that boy will also plan for a family. He will also have a child.”

    Just because we, as women, go through this process doesn’t mean we are weak. It’s a mutual responsibility. But I have seen a change in the ecosystem now. We have become fearless.

    I had to learn and develop these skills, but this new generation—Gen Z—is already born with this fearless expression and thought process, which is commendable and really cool.

    When we three sisters discuss, we always say that if our mom had received a proper education, she would have been the CEO of a company. My dad has a slow decision-making process. My mom, on the other hand, is quick with decisions.

    But I would again emphasize—until the father supports the mother, she cannot do anything. My father is not a risk-taker, but I inherited that ability from my mother. The values and empathy, however, I got from my father.

    Intellectual properties have often been considered very complex and intimidating for startups. How did you handle those particular challenges whenever you faced those young innovators and startups?

    China is still leading the world in terms of patents. And I believe that we must strive to surpass China because population-wise, we are stronger. First, we are intellectually very sound when it comes to technology. So, I’m a very proud Indian. Actually, I say this often: I travel to a lot of countries, and when I come back, I love inhaling this polluted air. I genuinely love India, despite its challenges. However, India still has a long way to go.

    The scenario has changed. Earlier, there was no awareness. People didn’t know about IP, so they weren’t filing patents. Now, there is awareness. But still, many startups do not file. Why? Because they don’t give priority to IP.

    They think it’s something that can be addressed at a later stage. They ask, ‘Why invest the money now?’ They don’t realize that investing in IP strategies is the key to driving their business forward. They are unaware of the story of Google. They don’t want to know. They just see that Google has become Google—not through business strategy alone, but through its IP strategy.

    Apple is Apple because of its IP strategy. So, this is something I would like to emphasize before starting my answer.

    Coming back to your question, IP law does seem daunting for startups and young innovators, especially when they are more focused on developing their products or services than navigating the legal complexities.

    Some key challenges they face—and this is based entirely on my 10–12 years of experience—are:

    1. Lack of awareness: As I mentioned, many startups are unaware of the importance of intellectual property or the steps required to protect their innovations. IP strategy should be an integral part of the business strategy from the very beginning. They often underestimate how crucial it is to secure patents, trademarks, copyrights, or, if it’s a product, the design, right at the early stages.
    2. Limited resources: Startups, being small businesses, typically operate on tight budgets. This makes it difficult for them to prioritize IP amidst other pressing needs like product development or marketing. They end up investing more in product development and marketing rather than prioritizing IP.
    3. Global complexity: For startups looking to expand internationally, understanding and complying with IP laws across different jurisdictions can be overwhelming.
    4. Timing and strategy: Filing for IP protection too late or without a clear strategy can make startups vulnerable to infringement, competition, or even losing their innovations.

    At Ennoble IP, we address these challenges directly. We have designed our services specifically to tackle these four challenges. We start by educating startups and SMEs about intellectual property and how it can serve as a powerful business asset. We offer tailored solutions that are not only cost-effective but also of the same quality as corporate-grade services, and they align with the startup’s stage of growth.

    For example, we help startups conduct patent searches, explain why it is done, file applications, and ensure that their IP strategy aligns with their business goals. We also do not force startups to file a patent if it is unnecessary. Right? There are different IPs, and you already know this because you are in the same business line. Sometimes, a patent may not even be required—for example, in the music industry, where copyright is often sufficient. So, we create strategies accordingly. We also assist with global filings and provide strategic advice on leveraging IP portfolios for funding, partnerships, and market positioning.

    Our goal is to make the IP process as seamless as possible for startups and SMEs so that they can focus on what they do best: innovating. We always say, “You handle your product and marketing strategy, and we’ll handle your IP strategy.” Marketing also requires IP. Many firms don’t realize that their marketing materials and overall marketing strategy should involve IP considerations.

    Ultimately, IP should not be viewed as a hurdle but as an opportunity for smart businesses—startups and SMEs—to strengthen their competitive edge. As I mentioned, I am passionate about helping in these areas. 

    Given the scenario today, there is a rise of new technologies, there is a growing need for IP protection in the kind of fields where AI is getting involved. How do you see the intersection of IP laws and IP per se with this kind of disruptive tech, which is going to shape the future of innovation in a very different manner specially in the Indian environment and ecosystem?

    I would say that the intersection of IP law and emerging technologies is becoming increasingly crucial in shaping the future of innovation. Technologies like artificial intelligence, blockchain, quantum computing, and biotechnology are evolving rapidly, pushing the boundaries of traditional intellectual property frameworks. This presents both challenges and opportunities. One key challenge is the pace at which technology is advancing, often outpacing the conventional IP systems designed for traditional inventions.

    For instance, questions around the patentability of AI-generated inventions or the ownership of decentralized blockchain solutions are sparking new debates in legal and regulatory spaces. On the other hand, this intersection drives a deeper understanding of the strategic importance of IP. Companies and innovators are recognizing that a robust IP strategy is not just about protecting ideas but also about creating a competitive edge in a technology-driven market.

    Here, you don’t just need an IP strategy; you also need good market research. IP portfolios are becoming integral to attracting investments, forming strategic partnerships, and determining valuations during mergers and acquisitions. A classic example, albeit not recent, is Nokia, Microsoft, and BlackBerry. These cases illustrate how an IP portfolio can protect an entire company.

    At Ennoble IP, we are at the forefront of this intersection. We work with innovators to navigate this complexity, whether it involves filing patents for AI algorithms, protecting proprietary aspects of blockchain applications, or managing IP risks in cross-border collaborations. Our role is not just to protect innovations but also to help innovators leverage their IP to unlock new opportunities.

    Looking ahead, I believe IP law will continue to evolve to address the unique challenges posed by emerging technologies. For instance, there will be greater emphasis on global harmonization of IP laws to address the borderless nature of technology. More collaboration will also emerge between legal, technical, and policy experts to ensure that IP frameworks foster innovation without stifling it.

    The future of innovation will rely heavily on how effectively we align IP protection with the needs of new technologies. By staying ahead of trends and proactively addressing challenges, we can ensure that the innovation ecosystem remains vibrant and sustainable. IP, market research, and business intelligence must work collaboratively. For instance, in the case of AI and blockchain, where new advancements emerge daily, a robust strategy is essential.

    With my UAE office, I have seen how blockchain startups are leveraging IP strategies effectively despite varying jurisdictional rules. This diversity creates challenges, but India is becoming a goldmine for IP service providers. With huge investments in R&D flowing into India, we are at the cusp of something big.

    And believe me, my dad always told me, and this was my dad’s wisdom, people can take away your wealth and other materialistic things; they can take away everything, but two things nobody can rob you of are your knowledge and character. So, always work on those things. Today, I’m not scared, even if I lose everything, because I know I have expertise, and I have knowledge. I can earn again. Since I’m not scared, I always take risks. Knowledge is a very important tool in today’s world.

    Fifth is to create your own opportunities. If you find a door closed, don’t hesitate to build your own. As a first-generation entrepreneur, I didn’t inherit a business, right? I built one from scratch. It’s about being resourceful and proactive in creating pathways where none exist. Let me give you an example: I started a business in a very crowded space. IP is a very crowded space. But I didn’t hesitate to enter because I came up with an innovative model, collaborating with universities, startups, and small businesses.

    Now, the sixth point I would like to mention is to advocate for others. As women, we have a unique opportunity to lift each other up, whether through mentorship, collaboration, or simply sharing stories. Supporting other women can create a ripple effect of empowerment.

    For example, I often refer to the movie Jai Ho. If you’ve seen Salman Khan’s movie, you’ll recall the chain they create. I don’t remember all the details now, but the concept stuck with me. If one woman holds the hand of another and uplifts her, this chain can actually bring about change.

    Because, speaking from my own experience, I got more support from men than women. I didn’t receive much support from women, and that’s why I started my mission through WIF, my NPO, which supports women. Helping others in this way is one of the most meaningful things you can do in life.

    Lastly, the seventh point: embrace resilience. For me, resilience has been key. There will be setbacks, but resilience will carry you through. Every obstacle you overcome adds to your strength and experience, making you better equipped for the next challenge.

    What kind of advice would you give to others, specially women entrepreneurs as we see a lot of technology biases are also there. How do you see that one can navigate through those kinds of obstacles, especially in IP.?

    To all women entrepreneurs, I would say this: don’t let anyone define your potential. Dream big, be ambitious, and proudly say, “I am ambitious.” Don’t feel shy about wanting to make money—it’s okay to say, “I want to make money.” You must aim to build a business that not only fulfills your passion but also generates wealth. And don’t hesitate to seek help when needed.

    So, dream big, be ambitious, work relentlessly, and lead with purpose. Remember, your success is not just your own; it is an inspiration for others who are watching and believing they can do it too.

    Get in touch with Dr. Shweta Singh-

  • “Mediation is about finding common ground—something I strive for not just in disputes, but in all my professional relationships.” – Sunil Jose, Founder & Managing Attorney at SUNS LEGAL

    “Mediation is about finding common ground—something I strive for not just in disputes, but in all my professional relationships.” – Sunil Jose, Founder & Managing Attorney at SUNS LEGAL

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    Could you walk us through the pivotal moments and decisions that shaped your career path, from your early days in college to landing your first job, and ultimately, to where you are today? What inspired you to pursue a career in law, particularly specializing in Intellectual Property?

    I have always loved reading and listening to the news and have been deeply interested in politics and social issues. Naturally, becoming a lawyer seemed like the right path for me. After finishing college, I developed an interest in company law and moved to Chennai to start my legal career. The turning point in my career came in 1995 when I happened to watch a court case involving a trademark dispute by chance. I attended all the hearings of that case and had the opportunity to listen to arguments in a few other cases as well. I had a fair understanding of Intellectual Property, but witnessing a court argument over IP for the first time was a pivotal moment for me. This was when India became a member of the WTO, and the controversy surrounding India’s WTO membership and TRIPS agreement conditions was a hot topic. Observing these cases sparked my curiosity and deepened my interest in the subject. This inspiration led me to pursue a master’s degree in IP in 1999.

    After completing my master’s, I had the opportunity to work for a new law firm in the Middle East that sought lawyers with expertise in then trending subject, Intellectual Property. This firm had several foreign clients dealing with IP issues, marking my initial exposure to Intellectual Property disputes. Later, I joined Abu Ghazaleh Intellectual Property (AGIP), which opened doors to working with Forbes 500 clients. My experience at AGIP significantly shaped my career as an IP lawyer.

    Your professional journey includes solo practice as well as working with leading IP firms. What motivated you to establish Suns Legal, and what unique value proposition do you bring to your clients as a solo practitioner?  

     Being a solo practitioner has its perks. For one, I can give each client my full attention, which means I can create legal strategies that are just right for their specific problems. I can quickly adapt to any changes and offer flexible solutions. Running my practice also lets me keep my prices competitive while maintaining high quality. With my expertise in Intellectual Property law and the experience I have gained from working with top firms, I can provide clients with expert advice and solutions. Building long-term relationships based on trust is very important to me. All these factors help me deliver high-quality service and show my commitment to meeting my client’s legal needs with professionalism and care. 

    Beyond your professional accomplishments, you’ve also been recognized as a LinkedIn Top Voice for your contributions to thought leadership in Intellectual Property. What motivates you to share your expertise and insights with a wider audience?

    I am not a social media expert, but I love creating content. LinkedIn is the only platform I am active on. My strong belief in the power of knowledge sharing and the incredible reach LinkedIn offers drives me to share my expertise and insights.

    Intellectual Property (IP) is such a complex and evolving field, and I feel a real responsibility to make it easier for others to understand. My passion for teaching plays a big role in my eagerness to write on LinkedIn. By sharing my experiences and insights, I aim to help individuals and businesses get a better grasp of IP issues.

    Engaging with a broader audience helps me stay updated with the latest trends and developments in the field. It also creates a community of like-minded professionals and enthusiasts who can learn from each other. Through LinkedIn, I have connected with many such individuals who regularly interact with me.

    I often get direct messages from people who appreciate my efforts to explain these complex topics in simple terms. It makes me especially proud when teachers tell me they use my insights to help them teach the subject more effectively. That kind of recognition means a lot to me.

    I often find my associates and interns through this platform. While generating leads was not my primary goal, many of my clients have come through LinkedIn. Plus, the platform has allowed me to connect with the vibrant Kerala Creators community, which has been fantastic.

    Being recognized as a LinkedIn Top Voice was such a pleasant surprise! I humbly accept it as a testament to my efforts, and it inspires me to keep contributing to the IP community.

    Your extensive experience spans across various countries and cultures. How do you navigate the nuances of Intellectual Property laws in different jurisdictions, and what challenges do you commonly encounter?

    Dealing with Intellectual Property (IP) laws across different countries and cultures can be quite challenging. However, many advantages made the experience rewarding. The basics of intellectual property are the same worldwide, which provides a solid foundation. The support from bilingual lawyers was invaluable. Working with Forbes 500 companies and their lawyers was a rare and valuable experience.

    That said, the challenges were more significant than the advantages. Most Middle Eastern countries follow civil law, while many of my clients are from common law countries. This difference needed careful adjustment. Additionally, Arabic is the main language in most Arab countries, which introduces additional complexities. The judicial systems in these regions were still developing, with few established precedents. IP was a new subject, and there were only a few judges or officers with knowledge of it. Many countries were monarchies, making it difficult to resolve disputes, especially when the other side had the support of the ruling families. The bureaucracy was often not transparent or easily accessible, and there were significant differences in culture and values that needed to be addressed.

    Despite the challenges, I survived and thrived, gaining incredible learning and exposure. It was a journey filled with learning and growth, and I continue to overcome the challenges.

    In addition to your legal expertise, you’re also a Certified Mediator and a Distinguished Toastmaster. How do you think these skills complement your role as a legal professional, and how have they influenced your approach to advocacy and negotiation?

    I have been a Toastmaster for around 15 years, and it has helped me improve my public speaking and leadership skills. In law, effective communication is crucial, whether it is presenting a case in court, negotiating with opposing counsel, or talking with clients. Toastmasters has made me more confident and articulate. It has also significantly boosted both my verbal and non-verbal communication skills, and my ability to handle unexpected questions or situations gracefully. It also taught me how to manage my time effectively and handle spontaneous questions during seminars, classes, and training programs.

    I love mediation. It has always come naturally to me, but I decided to get certified later in my career to validate my skills. Mediation is all about finding common ground and facilitating communication between parties. It has taught me to listen actively, understand different perspectives, and work towards solutions that benefit everyone involved. This approach not only helps resolve disputes but also prevents them from escalating. It plays a special role in settling Intellectual Property disputes, which often demand time-bound solutions.

    These skills have changed how I handle advocacy and negotiation. They have made me more understanding, patient, and thoughtful. I can better understand what everyone needs and worries about, which helps me make stronger arguments and find effective solutions. Overall, these skills have made me a better and more effective legal professional.

    You’ve been involved in numerous high-profile cases, such as advising multinational corporations and assisting in preventing unauthorized use of copyrighted material. Can you share a particularly challenging case and how you navigated through it?

    One of the toughest cases I handled was quite unusual. A Ministry in a Middle Eastern country, which was responsible for handling copyright matters, ended up using a copyrighted design from an internationally known magazine. The irony was that we had to contest a copyright violation against the very government department that oversees copyright issues! This made the situation delicate and complex. 

    After a lot of negotiation and presenting a strong case, we managed to convince the Ministry of the violation they had committed. They eventually agreed to rectify the mistake by removing the copyrighted design. This case was particularly challenging due to the involvement of a government entity, but it was incredibly satisfying to reach a successful resolution. 

    Given your experience in portfolio management strategies, what advice would you offer to businesses looking to safeguard their intellectual property assets in an increasingly digital and globalized world?

    It is very important for businesses to regularly review their IP portfolio to keep track of all assets and identify any areas that might need attention. Registering IP, such as trademarks, patents, and copyrights, in all the places where they do business provides legal protection and makes it easier to defend their rights. 

    Monitoring the market for any unauthorized use of IP is essential. When working with third parties, using clear contracts that outline IP ownership and usage rights helps prevent disputes and ensures proper use. Leveraging technology is another great strategy. 

    Staying informed about changes in IP laws and regulations, both locally and internationally, helps you adapt your strategies to stay compliant and protect your assets effectively. Finally, seeking professional advice from IP lawyers and consultants can provide you with expert advice tailored to your specific needs and challenges.

    On a personal note, what do you enjoy doing in your leisure time? Any hobbies or interests that help you unwind and recharge outside of your demanding legal practice?

    In my free time, I love spending quality moments with my family. Watching movies together is always refreshing, especially when we find one everyone enjoys. I also value the time I spend with close friends; their company is always a joy. Listening to spiritual talks helps me find peace and balance, and I find it very calming. I also enjoy reading psychology books, which offer interesting insights into human behaviour. Attending Toastmasters meetings is something I look forward to as well. It’s a fantastic way to connect with like-minded individuals. 

    You’ve mentored many young law graduates and interns throughout your career. What advice would you give to the current generation aspiring to build a successful career in Intellectual Property or law in general?

    Staying curious and always learning is crucial, as the legal field is constantly changing. Keep your eyes open and stay updated on the latest developments. Networking is crucial, so build strong relationships with peers, mentors, and professionals in the industry. These connections can provide valuable insights and opportunities. Gaining practical experience through internships helps you understand the field better and apply what you have learned. Patience and persistence are essential, as building a successful career takes time and effort. Being a self-starter and giving one hundred percent dedication to your work will make you unique. Loving what you do and always striving to improve will set you apart. 

    Suns Legal has recently completed six years, marking a significant milestone. Could you share some of the key achievements and challenges you’ve experienced during this journey, and how they have shaped the firm’s growth and vision for the future?

    Celebrating six years at Suns Legal is indeed a significant milestone for us. We have had our share of achievements and challenges that have shaped our journey and vision for the future.

    One of the biggest challenges has been keeping up with fast-changing technology, which requires huge investments. During our early growth stage, we were hit by the pandemic, which forced us to adapt quickly to remote working. We also faced extremely high competition, with undercutting and fly-by-night firms making the market tough.

    Despite these challenges, we have had some remarkable achievements. We have built a diverse client base and formed extensive friendships along the way. Stepping out of our comfort zone has allowed us to grow, and we have focused on training young talent and absorbing them into our team. Building trust with our clients has been crucial, and we are now known as experts in our field. This journey has also allowed us to do things we could not do before.

    Looking forward, we aim to develop the firm by focusing on quality and expertise. We plan to expand our team, embrace updated technology, and broaden our service areas. Our goal is to continue growing while maintaining our commitment to excellence.

    Get in touch with Sunil Jose-