Super Lawyer

Tag: property law

  • “The future belongs to companies that proactively manage risks, draft robust agreements, and embrace arbitration as a tool to secure their interests.” – Abhijeet Gathraj, Founder of Gathraj & Co.

    “The future belongs to companies that proactively manage risks, draft robust agreements, and embrace arbitration as a tool to secure their interests.” – Abhijeet Gathraj, Founder of Gathraj & Co.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Sir, you’ve built an impressive and diverse practice, spanning corporate, commercial, and dispute resolution matters. What inspired you to establish your own firm, and what has been the most defining challenge in leading it?

    The decision to establish my own firm was born out of a deep conviction that law should be practised with independence, integrity, and an unwavering focus on client trust. I always envisioned creating a practice that was not only about providing legal advice but also about becoming a trusted partner in my clients’ journeys, helping them navigate complexities with clarity and confidence. This dream was not easy to pursue—it meant stepping out of my comfort zone, taking risks, and proving myself in a market already dominated by established players and multi-generational professionals.

    The most defining challenge was earning credibility in those initial years. With limited resources and no big name to lean on, every client I secured was through persistence, sleepless nights, and consistent delivery of results. It was a struggle marked by countless rejections, long hours, and sacrifices. Yet, these challenges shaped me into the professional I am today—resilient, determined, and deeply committed to excellence.

    You dropped out of Chartered Accountancy after giving 4 good years to it before pursuing law. What motivated you to transition into law, and how has your strong commerce background shaped your perspective and strategy in handling complex commercial disputes? 

    Dropping out of Chartered Accountancy (CA) was a nightmare for my family. After giving 4 long years pursuing CA, one fine day I decided that my calling is into Dispute Resolution and the very fact of appearing in court, preparing arguments and representing the other side of the dispute motivated me to transition into law. Accountancy background gave me a strong foundation in numbers, corporate structures, and financial regulations, but I realised early on that the “why” behind every transaction lay in the law. I wanted to go beyond balance sheets and immerse myself in the world of contracts, disputes, and advocacy, where strategy and persuasion could alter outcomes. The transition was not easy, but it felt natural. I was drawn to the dynamic nature of legal practice, where every case presented a new challenge and an opportunity to make an impact.

    My commerce background has been invaluable in my legal career, and pursuing one of the toughest accountancy courses prepared me for the hard work that is required in the legal profession. It allows me to see disputes not just as legal problems but as business realities. When handling complex commercial matters, I can dissect financial nuances while aligning them with legal strategy. This dual perspective gives me an edge in cross-border disputes, shareholder conflicts, and regulatory advisory, where understanding the commercial heartbeat is as crucial as the legal framework.

    In the early phase of your career, which experiences were most formative in laying the foundation of your practice, and what advice would you offer to students who are in that phase?

    The early phase of my career was defined by struggle, humility, and relentless hard work. I vividly recall handling matters that brought in little financial reward but demanded every ounce of preparation and commitment. Those small victories—whether drafting pleadings late into the night or representing clients who had no one else to stand for them—taught me the real meaning of responsibility and the power of trust people place in their lawyer.

    To students, my advice is simple: there is no shortcut to success, and neither is there any alternative to hard work. Never cheat your client and always be honest. Believe in yourself, focus on building your skills and resilience in the early years, rather than chasing titles or monetary gains. The foundations you build now: discipline, diligence, and the ability to think critically, will carry you throughout your career. 

    This profession rewards patience and persistence far more than instant success.

    As an empanelled attorney for multiple foreign consulates and high commissions, you handle roles that require immense precision and discretion. How do you balance these legal nuances, and what challenges have you encountered in representing such esteemed clients?

    Being empanelled with a few of the foreign consulates, high commissions, and foreign missions in India itself is an honour and privilege, as very few practising advocates and firms get this opportunity and not all. Representing NRI clients in their legal disputes itself is challenging and a responsibility that goes beyond routine practice. Every communication, every piece of advice, has to be meticulously crafted, knowing that the stakes often extend beyond the client to international relations and reputation.

    The greatest challenge has been balancing urgency with accuracy. Foreign clients and NRIs operate on strict timelines, and there is no room for error. I have often worked overnight to deliver outcomes that meet both the legal requirements and the client expectations. These experiences, though demanding, have shaped my ability to remain calm under pressure and deliver with unwavering focus.

    Having made significant contributions to dispute resolution and commercial law, what emerging trends do you foresee in cross-border disputes and arbitration involving Indian companies over the next five years?

    In the coming years, I foresee arbitration becoming the preferred mode of dispute resolution for Indian companies engaged in cross-border business. The global push for speed and enforceability, coupled with India’s growing recognition as an arbitration hub, will make this trend even stronger. I also anticipate a rise in disputes around technology, data, and e-commerce as businesses continue to expand into digital markets.

    Another trend will be the increasing need for companies to become contract-conscious. Too often, businesses treat contracts as formalities rather than safeguards. In cross-border contexts, this can be catastrophic. The future belongs to companies that proactively manage risks, draft robust agreements, and embrace arbitration as a tool to secure their interests.

    Your commitment to legal education through judging moot courts and client counselling competitions is commendable. Which skills do you believe law students should prioritise to stay future-ready and uphold the high standards expected in today’s profession?

    The profession today demands much more than just knowledge of statutes. The most future-ready lawyers will be those who can think critically, research deeply, and communicate with clarity. In a world where technology is advancing rapidly, adaptability and tech-savviness will be key. Students must be prepared to embrace new fields such as fintech, AI, and compliance law, while still mastering the fundamentals of litigation and arbitration.

    Above all, integrity is the cornerstone of this profession. Skills can evolve and be learned, but values remain constant. A lawyer who is trusted for their honesty, dedication and commitment will always stand apart, regardless of the changes the profession undergoes.

    Looking back at your career, could you share one of the most challenging cases you’ve handled so far? What were the key complexities involved, and how did you navigate them?

    One of the most challenging cases I have handled in my career involved a transnational child custody dispute, where I was appointed by a City Council in the UK to represent the interests of a 14-month-old child who was placed under foster care. The case was uniquely sensitive—not only did it involve intricate questions of international jurisdiction and child welfare, but it also carried an immense emotional weight. My role was to secure an interim order for the safe transit of the child to India, which required balancing legal precision with humanitarian urgency.

    Convincing the District Court of First Instance to hear the matter on an urgent basis was no easy task. The odds were against us—procedural hurdles, the complexity of cross-border custody laws, and the natural caution courts exercise in such delicate matters. I vividly recall preparing the case under extraordinary time pressure, knowing that every moment’s delay had real-life consequences for a child’s future. The hearing was conducted on a working day between Diwali and the New Year, a period when courts are generally overburdened, which added another layer of difficulty.

    What made this matter truly defining was the responsibility it placed on me—not just as a lawyer, but as a human being. I had to persuade the court that this was not just another legal dispute but an urgent humanitarian concern that required immediate judicial intervention. Ultimately, the case taught me that persistence, empathy, and the ability to rise above procedural roadblocks are what define a lawyer in moments of true challenge. It remains etched in my memory as a reminder of why I chose this profession—to make a tangible difference when it matters the most.

    As a registered trademarks attorney, your expertise in intellectual property is widely recognised. How do you see IP laws evolving in India and globally, and what guidance would you give students aspiring to excel in this dynamic field, both in terms of skills and professional values?

    Intellectual property is one of the most dynamic areas of law today, both in India and globally. With the rise of digital markets, I foresee stronger frameworks for online infringement, greater protection of trade secrets, and increasing international harmonisation of IP laws. India, too, is rapidly maturing in this space, and the opportunities for young professionals are immense.

    For students aspiring to specialise in IP, my advice is to go beyond statutes and cultivate an understanding of industries like technology, pharmaceuticals, and media. IP law is about protecting innovation, and one cannot protect what one does not understand. At the same time, cultivate patience and precision—IP is often a long game where persistence and values matter as much as knowledge. Read landmark judgments on IP laws and get a hold of the principles decided by the courts in such judgments.

    Reflecting on your journey from studying law at Gujarat University to becoming a trusted advisor for consulates and leading corporates, you’ve taken on highly varied and demanding roles. How do you balance these professional responsibilities while maintaining your personal life and well-being?

    Balancing professional responsibilities with personal life has been one of my greatest struggles. In the early years, work consumed every waking hour, and personal time was a luxury I could not afford. But over time, I realised that sustainability in this profession requires more than just hard work—it requires balance, discipline, and self-care.

    Today, I consciously prioritise three things: utmost discipline in managing my time, delegation to empower my team, and detachment to ensure I don’t carry every professional battle home. My family has been my strongest anchor, reminding me of the importance of perspective. At the end of the day, success has meaning only when it is achieved without losing oneself in the process.

    Get in touch with Abhijeet Gathraj –

  • “Technology today is the key source to research and development, a way by which people can now know, read, understand the aspects and issues in real estate and business transactions.” – Deepanshu Garg, Founder of Legal Assist.

    “Technology today is the key source to research and development, a way by which people can now know, read, understand the aspects and issues in real estate and business transactions.” – Deepanshu Garg, Founder of Legal Assist.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    With your specialization in real estate transactions and property registration, what initially drew you to this niche area of law, and how has your interest evolved over the years?

    I have grown up in a family of lawyers, who are involved in this niche practice of law for the last 40 years. I am 4th generation in this side of practice. The environment, the discussions in family and social gatherings, watching of news roam around real estate and the law; the knowledge amongst citizens on the aspect of “how important is legal consultation before dealing in real estate transactions”; the growing real estate disputes in the family as well as in the market; the challenges faced by the citizens in the property registration process; the lack of future estate planning; etc., which gave me a good kick to enter into law, focus on this side and to scale up the practice to new boundaries.

    Through your practice, you have often highlighted the gap between property registration and ownership rights. What are the most common misconceptions people have when dealing with property transactions in India?

    From the very starting, I have strongly believed that people are unaware or ignorant of about the most important aspect when dealing with property transactions i.e. “Title Legal Due Diligence”.  This is the “laying foundation”. The money which people pay to buy a property, what exactly is that money for – is it the physical structure or the land on spot? Practically speaking, for people these are the two aspects only but wait, that value is actually weighed from “title ownership documents” which people execute and get registered. And that’s the major misconception prevailing amongst people. Even law clearly says, “Buyers beware”. If there is a discrepancy in the documents, the value you paid for that property is nothing more than a zero. 

    Another related misconception is that people believe drafting a document when dealing with property is “basic and regular and can be drafted on a set performa”, but no, there is no set performa prescribed anywhere in law. Any such document is a “contract” amongst the parties which govern their transaction and has to be drafted on case-to-case basis and on specific circumstances surrounding the entire transaction, overall considering the law.

    As the Founder of Legal Assist, a digital platform dedicated to property and business legal services, what inspired you to establish your practice, what were the key challenges you encountered in building it, and how do you envision technology transforming the future of property law practice? 

    Since many years now, the property registration appointment process has been made online, which is not only cumbersome but time taking too. It is not easy for a layman to take an appointment for registration. Further, we daily see the growing disputes arising in real estate transactions and business running. We further see the irregularities and unprofessional surroundings in the conveyancing field of practice of law.

    All this triggered me to develop an online platform where I can render my knowledge on the issues circumventing the real estate industry & transactions, property registrations, business industry & transactions, to help them and to make them cautious of their legal rights, obligations and safeguards. The major key challenges were to not be able to cover “all aspects/ issues” since they are vast in nature and the other was to actually make people believe in “what are the most important aspects” in real estate and business transactions. 

    Technology today is the key source to research and development,  a way by which people can now know, read, understand the aspects and issues in real estate and business transactions. Moreover, technology is the source to transparency and accountability, as by way of technology, things are not far away to come under one roof and better control of the government, assuring people more safety, trust and “ease of doing business”.

    Your work involves complex areas such as estate planning, inheritance, wills, and succession disputes. What are the most pressing issues clients face in matters relating to inheritance, and how do you guide them through emotionally sensitive cases?

    The most pressing issues I see are the disputes arising among the legal heirs after the death of deceased person who died intestate or without any future planning or without informing about his/ her assets to his/ her legal heirs and further, disputes arising in cases even where a deceased  left a WILL/ any other testament.

    Our approach of guidance is focussed initially on amicable settlement through mediation and consultation and if not this, by suggesting an equitable outcome, after considering the law from all four corners and the circumstances in hand, in a manner which rules out future disputes.

    Estate and succession planning is often overlooked until a dispute arises. What practical steps do you believe individuals should take early to avoid future litigation?

    Life is so uncertain these days. The most important aspect which I feel today is for a person to have a must is to initially have a broad family discussion amongst all members and align amicably whatever a person owns amongst his/ her family members. Then I believe in an equalization policy amongst members. If all the members accept this discussion, the family shall execute an Memorandum of Family Settlement incorporating the contents of such amicable understanding. Further, members, in such case or otherwise if family amicable understanding is not arrived at or possible, shall compulsorily make a testament/ WILL for writing down their wish in “clear terms” to be followed by each member after the death of the testator.

    If there’s less tunning amongst the family members and the above aspect cannot be worked out, then the best possible way is to distribute the assets during the lifetime only so that the respective beneficiary holds the same without any claim or objection from others.

    As someone who started with internships at leading law firms and later built independent practice, what lessons from those formative years still influence your approach to law and property related disputes?

    Clear understanding of law and being upgraded with current legal precedents; using the tool of mediation and conciliation; not merely focussing on making money but alongside guiding the client with result oriented approach. However small the matter or dispute may be, 100% efforts and hard work shall always be put.

    Property and inheritance laws are constantly evolving with new judicial precedents and legislative changes. How do you stay ahead of these developments, and what recent trends do you see shaping this field in India?

    My approach is to give daily an hour or more in watching the news, studying current market scenarios, blogs, judgments. By this, I am able to incorporate and utilize this knowledge in my practice practically.

    The upcoming centralized digitalized unique platform where property registration, all connected data such as data from Municipal Corporation/ Development Authority etc. will be inter-connectedly available and will be incorporated with ease of doing business policy of the government. The development of digital courts for NI Act cases, MSME Samadhan Portal, Pre-litigation process in commercial cases, Mediation Act, etc. are great initiatives of the government for early disposal of recovery matters. By such initiative and upcoming legal developments, people are becoming more aware about their rights and obligations.

    With such a diverse practice covering real estate, inheritance, litigation, and consultancy, what advice would you give to young lawyers who want to build a specialized yet well-rounded career in property and succession law?

    Thorough understanding of the real estate market and laws covering this industry is a must. The initial aspect is to be able to practically understand the “trends” of “disputes” in industry, thereby doing research in the light of actual circumstances and find out all the possible solutions to the problem and then picking up the best reasonable one. What is the best approach “practically” must be the concern always.

    Get in touch with Deepanshu Garg –

  • “An international legal career is not just about crossing borders it’s about bridging legal systems, people, and perspectives.” – Sandip Bhosale, Senior Legal Manager at Maatrum Technologies.

    “An international legal career is not just about crossing borders it’s about bridging legal systems, people, and perspectives.” – Sandip Bhosale, Senior Legal Manager at Maatrum Technologies.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    You’ve advised on major infrastructure, real estate, and cross-border commercial transactions across India and Southeast Asia. How has this international exposure influenced your approach to corporate legal practice?

    Advising on major cross-border transactions in Southeast Asian Countries including Laos, Cambodia and Myanmar has significantly shaped my approach to corporate legal practice in three key ways: adaptability, cultural intelligence, and risk sensitivity.

    Working across jurisdictions each with its own regulatory landscape, commercial norms, and legal frameworks requires a flexible, solution-oriented mindset. I have learned to quickly assess unfamiliar legal systems and align them with international best practices, ensuring seamless integration for clients operating in multiple markets. Cross-border deals are not just about laws they are about people, relationships, and negotiation styles that vary widely across Southeast Asia. Understanding these nuances has allowed me to anticipate counterparties’ priorities and negotiate more effectively, often bridging gaps that go beyond legal language. 

    I remember, in the beginning of my career, I was a part of foreign lawyers team, where we used to discuss best practices in various jurisdictions. We use to work collaboratively with local counsel to structure transactions that are both legally sound and commercially viable. Overall, this international experience has reinforced a pragmatic, forward-thinking approach to corporate law balancing legal precision with commercial acumen, always with a view toward helping clients achieve cross-border growth sustainably.

    Having worked on joint ventures, franchise agreements, and market entry strategies in countries like Cambodia, Myanmar, and Laos, what legal or regulatory challenges do you think foreign investors often underestimate in these markets?

    In my experience advising on joint ventures, franchise agreements, and market entry strategies in countries like Cambodia, Myanmar, and Laos, foreign investors often underestimate several legal and regulatory challenges, particularly in three areas: regulatory opacity, local partner risks, and enforcement/judicial system. Investors often assume that laws, especially investment and company laws are fully codified and consistently applied. In reality, many regulations in these markets are underdeveloped, ambiguously worded, or enforced unevenly. 
    In joint ventures and franchise models, investors may overlook the importance of deep local due diligence. Investors sometimes don’t appreciate how vital it is to assess a partner’s political exposure, informal influence networks, or track record of compliance, not just their balance sheet. I have also done due diligence of local entities for JV transactions. 
    While contracts might be drafted to international standards, enforcement is a different story. Judicial systems in these markets may lack independence, speed, or the capacity to handle commercial disputes efficiently. Arbitration clauses are increasingly used, but enforcing foreign arbitral awards still comes with practical and procedural hurdles.

    From securing mining permissions to resolving land litigation and facilitating tribal land sales, your work requires extensive coordination with government authorities. What strategies have proven most effective for you in managing complex regulatory and compliance issues?

    Managing complex regulatory and compliance issues especially in areas like mining permissions, land litigation, and tribal land transactions requires a combination of strategic planning, stakeholder engagement, and proactive communication.  initiating dialogue early in the process. Building trust and rapport helps in reducing delays and misunderstandings later. Collaborating with local consultants or retired officials who understand the ground realities and bureaucratic procedures helps in navigating procedural bottlenecks effectively.

    With your diverse experience across jurisdictions and sectors, how do you stay abreast of rapidly evolving legal landscapes, particularly when advising on cross-border transactions?

    I stay updated through leading international legal databases, newsletters from top law firms, and updates from regulatory bodies like SEBI, RBI, and international organizations. 

    For cross-border matters, I work closely with reputed local law firms in the relevant jurisdictions such as Lao Law and Consultancy. Their insights help ensure that advice is aligned with both local practice and international best standards.

    Beyond black-letter law, I track economic policies, sanctions regimes, and trade developments that influence cross-border deal structuring and risk allocation. This enables more holistic legal advisory.

    You’ve worked closely with operations and tech teams to streamline legal workflows. In your view, what role should technology play in modern legal practice, especially in areas like due diligence and contract lifecycle management?

    Technology is no longer a support function, it’s becoming a core enabler of modern legal practice. Especially in areas like due diligence and contract lifecycle management (CLM), its role is transformative.

    CLM platforms provide insights into contract performance, risk patterns, and renewal cycles. This allows legal teams to move from reactive to proactive governance and to offer business-aligned advice. Tech solutions can flag non-standard clauses, track obligations, etc. By offloading routine work to tech tools, legal teams can focus on higher-value tasks such as negotiation, risk strategy, etc.

    What inspired you to pursue a career in law, and how did your time at Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law, including your Master’s specialization in Business Law, shape your legal perspective?

    Coming from a family with no legal background, I often saw people around me struggle with legal issues due to a lack of awareness and access to proper legal guidance. I realized there was a gap and I felt a strong desire to bridge it. The idea of becoming the first in my family to step into the legal field gave me both a sense of responsibility and purpose. It inspired me to be a source of support not just for my family, but for others in similar situations. I wanted to break new ground and prove that even without a legal legacy, one can make a meaningful impact through dedication, learning, and service.”

    My time at Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law (RGNUL) was pivotal in shaping this vision. The university’s strong academic rigor, coupled with exposure to national-level moot courts, legal aid work, and policy discussions, grounded my understanding of the law not just as theory, but as a practical force. RGNUL also offered a diverse peer network and faculty mentorship that encouraged critical thinking, debate, and an ethical approach to legal practice. 

    You began your career with an international legal consultancy which is a significant early achievement. What steps did you take to secure this opportunity, and what foundational lessons from that phase still guide your practice today?

    Securing an opportunity with Lao Law & Consultancy (LLC) early in my career was the result of deliberate planning, consistent effort, and a focus on aligning my skills with global standards. During law school, I prioritized building a strong foundation in commercial and corporate law while simultaneously engaging in internships, seminars and research etc. 

    Foundational lessons from that early phase continue to guide my practice today. Understanding that legal advice must be commercially viable and actionable. Recognizing the importance of jurisdictional nuances and the need for precision in cross-border matters. Operating in a fast-paced international setting taught me to stay agile, culturally sensitive, and committed to lifelong learning.

    In your current role, where you oversee land-related legal compliance and litigation for mining operations, what are the industry specific legal challenges you face?

    Mining projects often span large, fragmented parcels of land, including private, government, forest, and tribal lands. Ensuring clear title, verifying ownership history, and addressing legacy encumbrances or informal claims requires intensive due diligence and strategic legal structuring. I was fortunate to advice and clear more than 600 Acres acquisition in Maharashtra for mining activities. Having previous experience in dealing with land acquisition and due diligence for renewable energy projects helped me a lot in mining projects as well. 

    A significant challenge lies in obtaining approvals for tribal land transfer, conversion of land from Class-II to Class-I. Obtaining approvals from Directorate General of Mines Safety (DGMS), Forest Departments etc. These processes are time-consuming, community-sensitive, and legally intricate. I was also witness to the Public Hearing for a mining project in Maharashtra. 

    Mining projects frequently face PILs, NGO-led litigation on grounds of environmental impact, displacement, or procedural lapses, litigation for land compensation enhancement. I have seen and studied more than 70 petition filed by local persons for land acquisition compensation enhancement. 

    The involvement of multiple authorities revenue, forest, tribal welfare, mining, Directorate General of Mines Safety (DGMS) and environment often leads to conflicting interpretations or procedural overlaps.

    What advice would you give to students aiming to build an international legal career? Are there any resources or habits that have helped you stay ahead of evolving global legal trends?

    Solid grounding in contract law, corporate law, and dispute resolution is essential. Prioritize analytical thinking and precision in legal writing skills that are universally respected across jurisdictions. Don’t limit your reading to national statutes. Study international treaties, arbitral awards, and cross-border case law to understand legal reasoning across systems. Intern with firms that handle cross-border work.Learn a foreign language if possible it can be a major advantage.

    Lastly, stay curious and open to different legal cultures. An international legal career is not just about crossing borders it’s about bridging legal systems, people, and perspectives.

    Get in touch with Sandip Bhosale –

  • “The SQE not only enhances one’s grasp of Indian law but also equips practitioners with nuanced legal principles that, although rarely argued in Indian courts, are often favourably applied when effectively presented.” – Abhirath Thakur, Solicitor (England and Wales) and Principal Associate at Economic Laws Practice.

    “The SQE not only enhances one’s grasp of Indian law but also equips practitioners with nuanced legal principles that, although rarely argued in Indian courts, are often favourably applied when effectively presented.” – Abhirath Thakur, Solicitor (England and Wales) and Principal Associate at Economic Laws Practice.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    What inspired your decision to pursue law, especially coming from an Army background? Was there a particular experience or influence that sparked your interest in the legal profession and if not how did it develop?

    Being from a Defence family, I grew up observing my father’s unwavering commitment to discipline, integrity, and justice—not just for himself, but for those around him. When I was in Class 12, he was posted in Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, where he was entrusted with handling discipline and vigilance matters, including the oversight of legal cases. I often saw him engage with lawyers and Central Government Standing Counsels, and listening to those discussions sparked my initial interest in the legal field.

    Another significant source of inspiration came from our family legacy. My great-grandfather was a barrister trained in England and was considered one of the most affluent and sought-after lawyers of his time. Stories of his work, often narrated by my father, filled me with pride and deepened my fascination with the legal profession. My father’s own experience in the Defence Forces had shown him the transformative power of law in shaping society. His belief in its impact and his encouragement played a crucial role in motivating me to consider a career in law.

    Once in law school, I made it a point to seek practical exposure early on. I interned at various law firms across both corporate and litigation domains to gain a hands-on understanding of the profession. These experiences were eye-opening and shifted my perception of law from a purely academic subject to a dynamic and impactful vocation. I found particular excitement in applying legal principles to real-life situations and was deeply inspired by watching seasoned advocates present arguments in court.

    This exposure transformed my attitude toward the field. I began to genuinely enjoy my studies and took part in moot court competitions, debates, and academic research with renewed enthusiasm. What started as a reluctant compromise gradually evolved into a meaningful and fulfilling calling.

    Looking back, choosing law has been one of the most rewarding decisions of my life. If given the chance to choose again, I wouldn’t hesitate to take the same path.

    You pursued your LL.M. in International Commercial and Corporate Laws at Queen Mary University of London, one of the leading programs in commercial laws and arbitration. How did that academic experience sharpen your legal reasoning, and how do you integrate that international perspective when handling domestic disputes in India?

    Before pursuing an LL.M., I spent four years working in the dispute resolution team at Wadia Ghandy & Co., Delhi. During my tenure, I handled a diverse range of commercial and corporate matters, albeit from a dispute resolution perspective. Working on high-stake and complex cases made me acutely aware of a gap in my understanding of commercial and corporate law—my knowledge, while broad based, lacked the depth I aspired to achieve. This realization prompted my decision to pursue an LL.M., with the aim of gaining a more nuanced and in-depth understanding of this domain.

    My longstanding interest in commercial and corporate law stems from a deep-rooted passion for commerce and business which further motivated me to pursue an LL.M. where I could experience the intersection of law and business, taught by some of the most respected professors in the field. In addition to enhancing my legal understanding, I was also drawn by the opportunity for international exposure and the chance to engage with a truly global legal perspective.

    Undoubtedly, the LL.M. expanded my intellectual horizons and significantly deepened my understanding of international commercial laws. Exposure to an international legal framework offered a broader context and allowed for a more well-rounded grasp of the subject matter. My coursework included modules such as Mergers (a court-approved process in India), Acquisitions and Takeovers, International Commercial Law, Trial Advocacy, Regulation of Financial Markets, Conflict of Laws, and International Commercial Arbitration, among others. I had the privilege of learning from world-renowned professors like Mr. Stavros Brekoulakis and Ms. Rosa Lastra, both recognized authorities in their respective fields, as well as attending guest lectures delivered by distinguished legal luminaries.

    What particularly stood out to me was the pedagogical approach of the LL.M. program. The teaching was rooted in exploring the “why” behind laws—their purpose, evolution, and the jurisprudential rationale—rather than simply focusing on the “what,” which tends to be the predominant style in Indian legal education. This method fosters greater intellectual flexibility and clarity, which I find immensely valuable, even when working on domestic legal matters, as the foundational legal principles often remain consistent.

    To illustrate, consider the field of international arbitration, which has gained significant prominence in recent years and is now considered a cornerstone for lawyers dealing with cross-border disputes. The procedural frameworks of leading arbitral institutions as well as our own Arbitration Act are grounded in the UNCITRAL Model Law. Being taught by professors with direct experience in shaping and applying these frameworks offers invaluable insight—something that an LL.M. program uniquely provides and therefore applying this knowledge in the arbitrations which I am involved in proves to be highly beneficial.

    With 9 years of post-qualification experience in dispute resolution and arbitration, what originally drew you to this field? What have been the most defining moments or lessons that shaped your professional approach within high-stakes litigation environments?

    During law school, I explored a broad spectrum of internships across both corporate and litigation domains. These included stints under senior counsels, litigation lawyers, and prominent law firms. By the end of my academic journey, I found myself increasingly inclined towards litigation. However, I remained cautious about fully committing, having been advised by several mentors about the profession’s slow initial progression and modest early rewards.

    In pursuit of clarity, I joined ASP Advocates—a full-service law firm led by my mentor, Mr. Abhishek Seth. He graciously offered me a legal position where I engaged in a balanced mix of litigation and corporate transactional work. My time at ASP proved instrumental in shaping my professional outlook. I found myself especially drawn to courtroom proceedings, legal drafting, and the application of legal principles to complex factual scenarios. These experiences sharpened my analytical thinking and compelled me to approach problems creatively and critically. After more than a year at ASP, I was certain that litigation was the path I wanted to pursue.

    With a clearer sense of direction, I joined the Delhi office of Wadia Ghandy & Co., where I was exposed to a more demanding and dynamic litigation environment. I worked on a wide range of matters—from high-stakes disputes to those with relatively lower stakes. Interestingly, I came to appreciate that it is often the smaller matters that truly shape a lawyer’s core skills. While high-stake cases typically involve a team of lawyers—where one’s role may be limited—smaller matters offer greater responsibility, hands-on experience, and opportunities to build courtroom confidence. I strongly believe in regularly taking up such cases, along with engaging in pro bono work, both of which are essential for holistic professional growth.

    That said, the value of working in high-stakes litigation cannot be overstated. At Wadia, I was fortunate to be involved in a landmark constitutional matter referred to a nine-judge bench. The case presented intricate questions of constitutional law and involved collaboration with some of the most respected senior advocates before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. It demanded intense preparation—multiple strategy conferences, long hours of research, and detailed analysis of extensive judicial precedents. The experience, while intellectually demanding, was equally enriching. I learned through observation—how senior counsels structured their arguments, interpreted precedents, and framed issues strategically to serve the client’s interests. Beyond the legal learning, such work cultivates discipline, resilience, and a deep respect for the value of time—all vital qualities for a successful litigator.

    As my tenure at Wadia progressed, I came to appreciate that every matter—regardless of its perceived importance—requires diligence, precision, and intellectual agility. Growth in litigation is rarely linear; it is the product of sustained effort, patience, and humility. The profession teaches you that it is better to take deliberate steps than to chase quick wins. Success lies in consistent performance, staying focused, and not being swayed by external comparisons. Ultimately, perseverance and commitment—not shortcuts—are the true markers of progress in this field.

    Being dual-qualified as a Solicitor in England & Wales and an Advocate in India is a rare accomplishment. What motivated you to pursue this path, and how has it enhanced your ability to handle cross-border disputes or advise international clients?
    Preparing for the Solicitors Qualifying Examination (SQE) significantly deepened my understanding of the law. The SQE not only enhances one’s grasp of Indian law but also equips practitioners with nuanced legal principles that, although rarely argued in Indian courts, are often favourably applied when effectively presented.

    Following the completion of my LL.M., I was driven by a strong desire to further strengthen my legal acumen, especially in the context of local and general laws of England and Wales—such as criminal, property, and civil law—which have profoundly influenced the Indian legal system. These laws, having been extensively borrowed and embedded into our legal framework, are best understood through a comparative lens.

    After conducting thorough research and engaging with qualified Solicitors, I was convinced that studying for the SQE would provide me with the foundational understanding of English law necessary to gain a richer, more structured comprehension of Indian law. While an LL.M. offers a broad, often international, legal perspective, the SQE is grounded in the practical and substantive law of England and Wales, which a Solicitor is expected to advise on across a wide range of practice areas. This distinction made the SQE particularly appealing as a rigorous yet rewarding route to legal excellence.

    My SQE preparation has already had a tangible impact on my practice. At Economic Laws Practice, where I was involved in a variety of criminal and property cases, my enhanced understanding of legal principles has proven invaluable. Moreover, the knowledge gained has played a significant role in navigating a complex arbitration involving mortgage disputes, stamp duty issues, and interest-related legal principles.

    You’ve advised clients across a wide spectrum, from defamation and regulatory enforcement to complex partnership disputes. Can you share an example of a particularly challenging or meaningful case and how you navigated it?

    One matter I fondly recall – which was handled by me entirely independently – involves an engaging dispute in the realm of Intellectual Property Law, where I had the opportunity to defend a business conglomerate which was sued for alleged trademark infringement relating to the name of a restaurant it had established in India. The opposing party, a restaurant chain based in the United States, had engaged one of India’s leading IP law firms to represent them.

    The crux of the dispute revolved around the use of the restaurant’s name. The opposing party not only sought its immediate discontinuation but also demanded an exorbitant amount in damages and compensation. However, once I presented our defense, it became evident that their claims were unfounded. My argument drew upon a range of statutory and common law principles, including the absence of cross-border reputation, lack of trademark advertisement or market penetration in India, the generic and descriptive nature of the name, and the failure to establish continuous use. These factors collectively undermined the credibility of their claims and formed a strong foundation for our defense.

    Rather than escalating the matter further, the opposing party recognized the weakness of their position and initiated settlement discussions. What followed were protracted negotiations under the aegis of the Delhi High Court. In a rather unexpected outcome, the settlement concluded with my client receiving compensation—rather than paying it. In exchange, my client agreed to slightly modify the restaurant’s name, though the establishment eventually closed due to limited footfall.

    As someone qualified in two legal systems, what are the biggest differences you’ve observed in dispute resolution culture between India and the UK? 

    While the Indian and UK legal systems share a common foundation rooted in common law principles, the administration of justice in the two countries differs significantly. In my experience, litigation in the UK is far more streamlined and structured to promote early resolution. Protracted legal battles, which are relatively common in India, are a rarity in the UK.

    UK courts often actively encourage—and in some instances, require—parties to explore settlement options before proceeding to trial. This emphasis on alternative dispute resolution and various pre-action protocols helps to reduce the burden on the judiciary and results in more efficient case management. Even though pre-litigation mediation in India is mandatory for commercial matters, it is not strictly followed before proceeding for litigation on one ground or the other. 

    To put this into perspective, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom hears and decides approximately 80 to 120 cases per year. In contrast, the Supreme Court of India handles nearly 600 matters in a single day. Similarly, the lower courts in the UK typically list only two to three cases for hearing each day, allowing for focused and in-depth deliberation. In India, however, the dockets of lower courts are often overcrowded, with judges expected to handle a substantially higher volume of cases daily.

    What guidance would you offer to young lawyers interested in building a career in dispute resolution and arbitration, particularly those exploring international qualifications or LL.M. programs abroad? What key skills or experiences should they prioritize?

    This question has vexed many students in the past and therefore I will strive to answer this in a clear and concise manner. I firmly believe that pursuing an LL.M. can provide invaluable exposure, especially in fields with an international focus. However, it’s essential to approach this decision with clear and realistic expectations. An LL.M. should not be pursued solely as a pathway to employment abroad, as many students may face a harsh reality—the job market in foreign jurisdictions is often limited and highly competitive. The decision to pursue an LL.M. should be guided by a range of considerations—academic interests, professional goals, financial feasibility, and personal fulfilment. There’s no universal path, and what works for one may not suit another. Therefore, it’s important to evaluate all these factors carefully before taking the plunge.

    An LL.M. can be especially beneficial in fields with a strong international focus such as international arbitration, cross-border commercial litigation, international trade law, transnational mergers and acquisitions, and similar areas. In such domains, the specialized knowledge and global perspective offered by an LL.M. can significantly enhance your career prospects.

    In my experience, gaining some work experience before pursuing an LL.M. is highly advisable. There are two key reasons for this: first, with practical experience, you’re better positioned to understand and appreciate the academic content of the program. Second, if you intend to leverage your LL.M. for international job opportunities, prior work experience may place you in a stronger position. That said, I’m not suggesting waiting too long—after all, the energy, enthusiasm, and flexibility you have at 26 may not quite be the same at 36.

    An LL.M. also offers an excellent platform for building a global professional network. It brings together individuals from diverse jurisdictions, offering the chance to forge meaningful connections and broaden your international legal perspective—both of which are valuable assets in today’s interconnected legal landscape.

    While the LL.M. certainly plays a pivotal role in supplementing legal knowledge and providing a strong academic foundation, it is not a substitute for the essential traits of a successful lawyer—hard work, resilience, and sharp analytical skills. Rather, it serves as a powerful catalyst that enhances these qualities and prepares one for the evolving demands of modern legal practice.

    Get in touch with Abhirath Thakur –

  • “I believe that studying not only briefs but also judgments, articles, and legal news helps clarify concepts, improve vocabulary, and enhance drafting skills.” – Navin Kumar Jha, Advocate at Delhi High Court.

    “I believe that studying not only briefs but also judgments, articles, and legal news helps clarify concepts, improve vocabulary, and enhance drafting skills.” – Navin Kumar Jha, Advocate at Delhi High Court.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    You completed your law degree in 2015. Was pursuing a career in law something you had always planned, or did it develop as an interest over time? What early experiences solidified your decision to pursue a legal career?

    Interest towards law developed during secondary school when we were  introduced to Political Science where we studied about the Constitution and rights.  Since then I have had a keen interest in law. Although at that stage we lacked  information regarding different laws viz. civil laws, criminal laws however I  wanted to dig more into the subject and gain knowledge beyond the syllabus. I  opted for science in my high school but It was only after high school, I decided  to pursue law as a career. 

    Regarding experiences that solidified my decision to pursue law as a career would  more be attributable to the fact that back in late 2000s, engineering was getting  very popular and engineering was the most common career choice. I did not want  to pursue engineering and pursuing law as a career made me stand out from the  general inclination towards engineering. Moreover it was more of a practical  decision to choose law as I believed that engineering as a career had reached its  saturation. 

    In the early stages of your career, you worked as a legal executive. How did this experience shape your understanding of the law, and in what ways did it contribute to your professional growth and career trajectory?

    I joined Sand Legal Services Pvt Limited and we provided compliance services  to our clients. The scope of work was client oriented where in we had to navigate  through the business of the client and understand what statutory compliances are  to be observed by the client so as to avoid any penal repercussions upon the client.  At Sand Legal Services, I understood the importance of due diligence and  compliance for the smooth functioning of any business. At Sand Legal, I had the  first experience of catering to the needs of client myself being a lawyer. Since  the stakes were high, any omission could not be afforded and an eye for detail  developed. At Sand Legal, other developments also happened viz improvement  in communication skills which is an essential part in modern advocacy especially  when you are dealing with corporate clients. At Sand Legal as part of job, I read  bare acts such as Factories Act, Shops and Establishment Act, Legal Metrology  Act, Payment of Wages Act etc line by line and their corresponding state rules.  A habit of reading bare acts and applying the law into the realm is what I would  say was a take away from Sand Legal.  

    I would say my first job at Sand Legal gave me a first hand experience in the field  of law and I was fortunate that my superiors were present to correct my mistakes  but eventually I learned that mistakes while dealing with law are costly which  was handy in my future roles.

    After working in an in-house legal capacity, you transitioned to litigation with a law firm. What motivated this shift, and what cultural differences did you observe between working in-house versus within a law firm environment?

    I had gained two years of experience in due diligence and compliance at sand  legal, although for a subject which is so vast, two years of experience is  negligible. However while working at Sand legal, I had made up my mind that it  would be better for me to build a career around litigation. 

    It would not be possible for me to effectively differentiate my experiences at Sand  Legal and in a Law firm dealing in litigation. Even at Sand Legal, the role was not  purely in-house but more of client-oriented which is as of any law firm. The  striking difference is only that in a Law Firm, focus shifted on litigation, rather  than due diligence and compliance. The Setup at law firm and Sand Legal was in  principle alike. Both the organisation endeavoured towards client services. On one hand where Sand Legal attempted due diligence and compliance which  play a key role in avoiding litigation, at law firm litigations were handled. The  stakes are much higher in litigation as litigation is the last resort, I would say and  therefore the advocates are in a better position to command the strategy and path  for safe exit of the client from the legal conundrum. 

    After gaining valuable experience with several legal entities, you chose to establish your own practice. What inspired you to take this step, and did you face any significant challenges when founding KPNJ LEGAL?

    Starting my own practice had been my objective since the beginning of my career. It was important that I train myself under able guidance so to begin my law firm KPNJ Legal. 

    There were difficulties initially and continue even today. For any person who wishes to start his own setup in any profession or business, finance is the biggest  concern. A profession like law may not need a high capital investment as  compared to any other profession, however for a young advocate who wishes to  setup his own office, he/ she must bear in mind that he may continue bearing  expenses towards his office rent, juniors without any inflow of money and that  may last for months until you land clients who graciously pay. Another challenge  is that landing clients should be regular because you have to maintain an office.  

    The role and focus of a litigator shifts from only being a student of the law to different other roles viz he has to work towards networking so that clients keep  coming and secondly he steps into managerial shoes where he has to manage  affairs of his office, the deputation of his juniors, clerks in various courts etc.  These challenges do not end with time but keep on growing with time if you are  on the right track and if you have a growing practice.

    How do you approach civil litigation cases, especially those involving recovery, damages, and rent control issues? Could you share some of the most notable challenges you’ve faced while handling injunction and declaration suits?

    First thing first, in any case involving civil, criminal or any other sort of litigation  is that I have to get my facts right. By the phrase get my facts right, I mean that I should understand the unfolding of events in chronological order. If only I understood the facts, I would be able to contemplate the relief that I desire from  the courts. Facts and relief are the backbone of draft in civil litigation. Knowledge of law plays along in the process of drafting. Questions such as whether I have  taken adequate measures to curve out the cause of action, court fees, limitation, jurisdiction and whether the relief I am seeking is tenable in law are to be  addressed and envisaged in the draft itself. The challenge is that your case should  not be dismissed for any of the aforesaid reasons. 

    Regarding injunction and declaration, I would narrate a very recent case which is  still ongoing in a civil court in Delhi. Some person whose application for interim  restraint was dismissed approached me and I was given the brief to file an appeal  for the same. The trial court had observed that the possession of the person over  property qua which restrainment order was sought is not prima facie clear. Our  ground of appeal was that the trial court erred in observing that the possession  was not clear. Ultimately the order of the trial court was overturned and interim  stay was granted. Now in this case, the trial court has come up with another issue  that is in regard to its jurisdiction. Since the reliefs are constrained to injunction  and declaration and fixed court fees have been paid, the trial court has questioned us regarding the value of suit for the purpose of jurisdiction. When it comes to recovery cases, damages, rent control where a certain liquidated amount is in  play, the jurisdiction of courts become very clear but with the case in hand which  seeks injunction and declaration, the value of the suit for the purpose of  jurisdiction is to be satisfied to the court. 

    In your arbitration practice, particularly with cases before DIAC, what common issues do you address, and what strategies do you employ to ensure successful resolutions for your clients? 

    DIAC has a large panel of wonderful arbitrators who are competent enough to  understand the complex nature of commercial transactions and adjudicate upon  it. The Infrastructure at DIAC is again State of the art. The deputy counsels are  prompt. The information system regarding dates and orders are also functional.  Overall the dispute resolution experience at DIAC is wonderful. 

    However a major issue which I believe at DIAC is its fee structure which I would  say is on a higher side. When there is a dispute between two corporate giants, they  have budgets to pay the DIAC fees but on the other hand proprietorship firms, 

    MSMEs who prefer Arbitration outside the scope of MSME Samadhan,  individuals, and small businesses may find it difficult to pay the fees at DIAC. No  wonder to maintain a world class centre such as DIAC, enormous money has to  be spent, but then again the purpose of ADR which should be quick and cost effective  resolution is being defeated. 

    The other major issue is that there is no effective way to compel the Defendants  to pay the DIAC fees. In case defendants do not pay his part of fees, the claimant  is burdened to pay the same to keep his case going. Later the claimant can execute  the decree and recover the fees but the fact that a person already in distress has to  pay for the cost of another party seems unfair. 

    Sadly no strategy can be adopted to overcome this situation. However, since you  ask, I would narrate a recent incident at DIAC where the claimant had approached  DIAC and I, being from the defendant side, appeared before the DIAC. Settlement  was reached between the parties and the arbitrator was informed of it. The Arbitrator  ordered that a claim petition should be filed and accordingly consent decree was to  be passed. The claim petition had to be invited to ascertain the DIAC fees. The Claim petition was filed, the DIAC fees was ordered to be paid but subsequently  now the claimant has stopped appearing before the DIAC. The matter is still  pending. It would be interesting to see what methods are adopted to recover the  fees. 

    As global compliance becomes increasingly important, how do you ensure compliance with international legal standards? Could you share an example where global compliance considerations had a significant impact on a case or transaction?

    Global Compliance has several verticals viz ESG Standards, Whistleblower  policy, privacy policy, anti-corruption and bribery policy etc. A corporate should  ensure that he has a functional and well documented policy for all the above. It  should be ensured that the policies are strongly implemented. As an advisor, my  duty is to keep my clients updated of the changes/ updates in the compliance  sector. Framing of policy is a one time thing but keeping the policy updated is a  continuous practice wherein my role becomes significant. Ensuring that the  policies are implemented in letter and spirit is also a continuous process.  Compliance audit is an effective way to ensure compliance. 

    In practical scenarios, a balance has to be drawn between companies’ operation  and growth that sometimes may not align with ESG standards. 

    Balancing a demanding career and leadership responsibilities is challenging. How do you personally maintain work-life balance? Additionally, what steps do you take to foster a healthy work-life balance within your team, while still driving professional success?

    It’s true that leadership responsibilities shift focus from the core nature of work  that is to study and practice law. The focus shifts rather to team members  performing well but it has a positive aspect. We are as good as our team. A well  groomed team makes things simple. 

    To me personally work life balance has never been an issue. Time management and plans made well in advance avoid chaos at the last moment. Yes there are  times when an unplanned meeting comes up or an exigency erupts, court hearings  elongate etc and then I need to prioritize things which may be difficult sometimes 

    The same goes with team members. However a strong team keeps things moving despite challenges and individual  absences. I believe that work is a part of life and one should not draw rigid  boundaries between them. If there is an exigency during the office hours, I would  not see the pending works and the same goes the other way that if there is midnight  call at work of importance, I should attend to it. 

    However such situations are rare and with efficiency, time management and  planning one may need not to bother about work life balance. 

    What advice would you offer to aspiring lawyers looking to make a meaningful impact in diverse areas of law, as you have? Are there any resources or strategies you would recommend for staying current with the constantly evolving legal landscape?

    I am still a young and aspiring lawyer, I would say. But yes, few things have  worked for me which I can share. First of all, study. Not only the brief we have at  hand but also some articles, some judgement, legal news etc which are published.  Read Judgments. That would clarify the concept of law, increase your vocabulary  and enhance your language which will help in drafting. When it comes to artistic literature, there is a popular saying that if you read one thousand lines, you would  be able to write ten lines. Same goes with the profession, If you read, then only  you can draft, either it be a contract or petition. 

    Live law and Bar and Bench are great platforms to know and remain updated with  things happening in Indian Courts. 

    Get in touch with Navin Kumar Jha –

  • “Practice discipline if you want to practice law, start from trial Courts and be respectful to senior members of legal fraternity.” – Pradyumna Tyagi, Founder & Managing Partner at Pradyumna Law Associates.

    “Practice discipline if you want to practice law, start from trial Courts and be respectful to senior members of legal fraternity.” – Pradyumna Tyagi, Founder & Managing Partner at Pradyumna Law Associates.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    With a background in commerce, what inspired you to pursue a career in law? Were there any specific experiences that guided you in this direction? Additionally, what motivated you to pursue your Master’s from Indian Law Institute?

    Background and inspiration: 

    The transition from commerce to law represents a strategic professional evolution where analytical skills, commercial awareness, and comprehensive understanding of business dynamics become powerful legal assets. Their background enables them to navigate complex legal landscapes with greater strategic insight, particularly in specialized domains like money laundering, corporate law, financial litigations, and business advisory services. The commerce background offers more holistic legal solutions that seamlessly integrate legal expertise with deep commercial understanding.

    Specific experiences: 

    Being a commerce student, I also contested elections at the graduate level (Sh. Bhagat Singh College, University of Delhi) and Law School (Campus Law Centre, University of Delhi). The said experience also enlightened me with the fact that polity and law goes hand in hand. I held various positions like: Cultural Secretary, Sports Secretary, Media President and Spokesperson of Delhi University Students Union. Consequently, I realised the value of possessing a quality legal acumen and the relevance of law in the times when the country ought to be ‘ruled’ by law.  

    Master’s from Indian Law Institute:

    I always wanted to pursue master’s from a country’s top notch institution as it is said that “if you want to learn, learn from the best”. The Hon’ble Chief Justice of India is the ex officio president of the Indian Law Institute. Its exceptional library, international collaborations, and strategic positioning provide students with a transformative educational experience that bridges theoretical knowledge and practical legal expertise. I was a Member, Editorial Board, ILI Law Review. Consequently, I learned and acquired legal knowledge from the top notch faculty in the country. 

    Early in your career, you worked with several legal organizations. Could you share some of the most memorable or impactful experiences from this period, and how they contributed to your legal development and career path?

    It is not possible to figure out any experience as the most memorable or impactful, for my whole journey of leaning was extremely memorable and impactful. 

    Though the first memory that shall never fade away relates to the times when first time post enrolment, as an Advocate, I started practising under the guidance, mentorship, supervision and association of Mr. Sanjay Mann, Advocate (former CBI Officer and currently empanelled Advocate for SEBI, Delhi & NHAI). Just two months after starting to practise, I encountered a situation at the courtroom wherein the Hon’ble court asked me to cross examine a primary/principal witness and I had no clue whatsoever relating to the methodology involved behind examining a witness as I was merely two months old at Bar. It was an intense moment as the Hon’ble Court grilled me to start the examination, but I could not do so. That was the day I came back to office, narrated the whole courtroom story, and requested my senior and first Guru in the legal profession Mr. Mann to teach me the art of cross examination. Merely having a few months experience at Bar, my senior taught me the methodology involved and the approach towards examining a witness in a particular case. When I became confident about the said art of examination, I started eagerly waiting for that case to come again for cross examination and used to think every time about the questions I am going to put to the witness. I did a rigorous cross examination of the said witness in the same case for the whole day and got the Dasti copy of the said examination on request from the Court. Lately, I was so amused to know that our office won that case based upon the cross examination of the said principal witness.

    Apart from the aforesaid experience there are many more as I am learning something unique from every place I worked at like the office of Senior Advocates, law firms, trial Court Chambers etc. I believe, the holistic experience of working under seniors made me realise that this profession is so noble and powerful that possessing a deep/critical legal knowledge and putting in hard labour in the initial phase of the career could do wonders for the welfare of society. 

    After spending around five years working within the legal field, what drove you to start your own practice? What were the main challenges you faced when starting out, and how did you overcome them?

    The first-generation lawyer is like a Karna of Mahabharta who is not in conflict with Arjuna rather in conflict with first generational challenges. After going through an intense legal training under respected seniors, law offices like Zeus Law (where I particularly learned the art of drafting), I decided to start the most difficult phase of profession as early as possible so that the said tough patch may pass during young age and believe you me that starting ‘your own practice’ is a calling, not a conscious decision. Before going independent one must make sure that he/she has learned reasonably under the guidance of seniors so that you may do justice to any legal assignments (in the form of cases) that may come your way.    

    For any Advocate in initial years of practice there would be three main issues, and all are relating to expenses and income: residential accommodation expenses (if you are not from the place where you are practising although I did not face this issue as I am born and brought up in Delhi), office expenses and clients. So my challenges revolved around the said issues only but then gradually you become mentally tough enough to deal with them. The best way to overcome said challenges is to have a realistic approach (without paying much attention to the virtual world of deceptions), make sure that you are doing something and coming/going out of office in a disciplined manner, and being respectful to the senior members of the legal fraternity.  

    Working with prominent clients in the construction and engineering sectors, what according to you are the key legal challenges these organizations face in navigating regulatory norms in India? How do you address these challenges in your practice?

    In India we have so many kinds of regulations and legislations relating to the concerned sectors and many times said regulations/legislations varies from state to state, so a business entity always has the fear of falling into a situation wherein a particular regulation/legislation might have got violated. For resolving the said issues, we do the legal research in the most diligent manner possible and navigate the norms on their behalf in order to provide them legal advice relating to legal compliances. Also, many times we represent and defend the construction/engineering sector companies/partnership firms in high stake arbitration proceedings with the state or central government bodies.   

    Considering your involvement in arbitration proceedings for various big clients, what have been some of the most challenging arbitration cases you’ve handled, and what steps did you take to navigate these challenges successfully? Additionally, how do you ensure the efficient resolution of disputes in international arbitration, particularly involving international clients?

    The universal challenge in a high-stake arbitration matters, relating to gas, energy, oil, infrastructure, pharmaceutical etc. is to have a several conferences to understand the essence of factually technical processes relating to which a dispute had arisen because in such matter you could not apply the law unless you understood the technicalities of facts. Most of the times I have seen that the parties have been represented without understanding the factual technicalities. Consequently, the best way to resolve any arbitration dispute is to understand the factual technicalities first, focus on provisions of the Arbitration Act and its interpretation through landmark/recent case laws. 

    You’ve handled numerous high-profile bail cases. Could you describe your approach when dealing with complex criminal cases, such as the AIIMS Government Case or the Faridabad Liquor Scam? Additionally, what do you consider the most crucial aspect when arguing for bail in cases involving cybercrime and other serious offenses?

    Yes, I was privileged to handle high profile bails considering the heinous offences attracted and we have an impeccable record of securing relief of bail almost every time we moved the bail application. It is said that the criminal practice is the game of two and a half legislations i.e., Indian Penal Code, 1860, Criminal Procedure code, 1973 and criminal side of Evidence Act, 1872. But I am telling you need to have an art of spontaneity in criminal practice if you want to do exceptionally well. I believe an Advocate should ‘only’ focus on the fundamentals of bail instead of discussing facts not relevant for the purpose of deciding the bail Application. I believe, arguments on bail applications in any high-profile matter should not take more than 15 to 30 minutes (on the higher side). Keeping the submissions confined to fundamentals like, prima facie case not made out, criminal antecedents, necessity of custody of Accused, balancing of accused’s right to personal liberty and I.O. ‘s right to interrogate etc.

    In cyber-financial crimes, a vital point to analyse is the financial trails involved and connecting the dots between the accused persons involved with the victim.

    Could you share your approach to handling Special Leave Petitions (S.L.P.) and civil appeals before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India? How do you prepare for presenting a case before the Supreme Court, and what resources or strategies do you use in your preparation?

    The sole approach and strategy revolve around an art of navigating the essence of legal issues involved after diligently going through the facts considering records of trail courts and appellate courts/tribunals records. Thereafter, correlating the legal issues with the factual side and boiling down the said correlated issues into limited grounds of appeals considering the fundamental/constitutional rights along with other legislations, regulations etc.

    What advice would you offer to young lawyers looking to build a successful career in law? Are there any particular resources, habits, or practices you recommend for staying current with legal developments and expanding their knowledge?

    My advice, considering the altered issues in young lawyers due to changing societal thought processes, is firstly, practice discipline if you want to practice law, start from trial Courts, without falling for the glamours of appellate Courts in initial years of profession despite of the fact that someone in your known is doing appellate court practice, focus on law/interpretation of law during juniorship and be respectful to senior members of legal fraternity.

    Running your own practice and managing your Chambers comes with substantial responsibilities. How do you balance these responsibilities, and what strategies do you use to manage stress and unwind after a demanding day?

    I started my own practice with legal commentaries, a laptop and holy Gita in hand from a single cabin type room taken on rent. I believe, discipline, optimism, regular procurement of legal knowledge, putting in all your efforts to deal with all cases assigned without discriminating between high stake  and low stake matters etc have balanced the responsibilities and managed the stressful profession for me.

    Get in touch with Pradyumna Tyagi –

  • “Law as a profession is highly demanding and if one learns to train their minds and control their desires in the nascent stages of their careers, the journey becomes much easier.” – Randeep Sachdeva, Partner at Verbis Legal LLP.

    “Law as a profession is highly demanding and if one learns to train their minds and control their desires in the nascent stages of their careers, the journey becomes much easier.” – Randeep Sachdeva, Partner at Verbis Legal LLP.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    As someone without a legal background, what inspired you to pursue a career in law? Was there a specific event or experience that influenced your decision to enter this profession?

    Although I didn’t initially have a legal background, my journey into law was driven by a deep desire to create a meaningful change. One defining moment for me was witnessing how many individuals and businesses face barriers in accessing effective legal support. That realization made me see the legal profession not just as a set of rules and procedures but as a vital tool for problem-solving and advocacy.

    • What also drew me to law was its ability to shape systems and create fairness. I’ve always been passionate about finding solutions to complex challenges, and I saw law as a way to channel that passion into tangible outcomes. It’s a field where you can truly combine intellect with empathy—strategizing to solve problems while making a positive impact on people’s lives.
    • This inspiration eventually led to the creation of my own law firm, Verbis Legal LLP. Founding Verbis Legal at the peak of COVID was not just about starting a business—it was about creating a space where legal services are not only accessible but also deeply personalized. My goal has always been to provide clients with clarity and confidence, especially when they are navigating difficult or uncertain circumstances.
    • What excites me most about this profession is how it constantly challenges you to think critically, adapt, and grow. Every client and case is unique, which means every day is an opportunity to learn something new and make a difference. Starting my own practice has been a deeply rewarding journey, and it’s reinforced my belief that law is not just about cases; it’s about building trust, fostering relationships, and being a dependable advocate for those who need it most.

    In the early stages of your career, you likely encountered numerous challenges. What were some of the key lessons from that period that helped shape your professional growth?

    Honestly, I was lucky enough to have good mentors and have had the privilege to work with some of the finest names in our profession. But just at the top of my head would be that I was not used to spending hours and sometimes even nights on one brief. I would say that Law as a profession is highly demanding and if one learns to train their minds and control their desires in the nascent stages of their careers, the journey becomes much easier.

    After working with several lawyers and law firms over the years, what motivated you to establish your own practice? What initial hurdles did you face, and how did you overcome them?

    After working with several lawyers and law firms over the years, I realized that while each experience enriched my understanding of the legal profession, there were aspects I wanted to approach differently. Establishing my own practice, Verbis Legal LLP, was driven by a vision to create a firm that prioritizes personalized client relationships, streamlined processes, and innovative problem-solving. I wanted to build a space where clients feel heard, empowered, and confident in the legal support they receive.

    • The decision to start my own firm was not without its challenges. One of the initial hurdles I faced was transitioning from a structured, established environment to building everything from the ground up. From defining the firm’s mission and values to managing operational details like compliance, staffing, and client acquisition—it was a steep learning curve. Additionally, stepping into an entrepreneurial role required me to balance legal expertise with business acumen, which was a new but rewarding challenge.
    • To overcome these hurdles, I focused on three key strategies. First, I leaned on the network I had built over the years, seeking mentorship and guidance from experienced professionals. Second, I invested in understanding the business side of running a law firm, from financial management to leveraging technology to improve client services. Lastly, I stayed committed to the principles that motivated me—providing accessible, efficient, and empathetic legal solutions—which served as my compass during difficult times.
    • Establishing Verbis Legal LLP has been one of the most fulfilling journeys of my career. It has allowed me to create a practice that aligns with my values while offering clients the kind of personalized, results-driven support that I believe makes a lasting difference.

    In your role as an Empaneled Advocate at the Supreme Court, you have represented various cases before the Constitution Bench. Could you share an especially interesting case and describe your approach to handling it?

    • While I was working with Additional Solicitor General of India, Mr. Jayant K. Sud, I assisted him on a very important constitutional bench issue which was “Whether the Demand can be proved through circumstantial evidence in the absence of direct evidence under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988?”. This case had a huge impact on all the trials under the Prevention of Corruption Act in our country. I recollect assisting Mr. Sud at this point in time, and his meticulous approach and the hours he put in on the brief was extremely inspirational.
    • I believe working and assisting the lead counsels on various Constitution Bench cases was a one of a kind experience, and honestly the experience of a lifetime which I can say was a privilege which I got to experience. The learning and experience that I gained from such cases was invaluable.
    • Another case I had the privilege of working was the case of N.N. Global III where a Seven Judge bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court was debating a very interesting question of law. It involved very basic but yet unresolved technicalities of Arbitration Law in India.
    • I also got a very rare opportunity to assist the lead counsel in a Nine Judge Constitutional bench in the matter of State of Uttar Pradesh v Lalta Prasad Vaish, this is a very distinct opportunity which not all lawyers get so in a way I would consider myself extremely lucky. This case settled a significant question of Federal structure of power sharing that the Indian Constitution entails.
    • Working on all these cases was a great opportunity and a huge learning curve for me. Learning from the best counsels and senior counsels in India and being part of these historic landmarks in the Indian legal system has been a proud moment for me.

    In a high-profile case where you represented the Union of India, how did you contribute to the creation of the new protocols for managing motor accident claims? What key changes were introduced, and how do they enhance the efficiency?

    So, Bajaj Allianz General Insurance filed a petition before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India seeking the streamlining of the process of Claims before Motor Accident Claim Tribunals all over the country. Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors., [W.P. (C) No. 534 of 2020]. At this point I was assisting Mr. Jayant K. Sud who was the Additional Solicitor General of India at the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India.

    To give a gist, the key reforms that the came to light because of the said petition were:

    • Digitalization of Processes: Introducing a centralized, digital platform for filing and processing motor accident claims through a mobile application, which the Central Government is about to introduce to streamline procedures, reduce delays, and ensure transparency.
    • Direct Payment Mechanisms: In case of motor accident claims, the victims are often made to run pillars to post for getting compensation. However, the Supreme Court directed implementing systems for direct payment of compensation to claimants via insurers, minimizing delays caused by bureaucratic or legal processes.
    • Establishment of a Motor Accident Mediation Authority (MAMA): Setting up a mediation body to facilitate faster resolution of disputes through alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods before matters proceed to MACT.
    • Fixation of Standardized Compensation: Creating a framework for uniform compensation calculations, reducing subjectivity and litigation over quantum disputes.
    • Improved Coordination Among Stakeholders: Strengthening coordination between insurers, law enforcement, and healthcare providers to ensure timely access to accident reports, medical records, and other critical information.
    • Reduction in Pendency of Cases: Specific measures to address the backlog of pending motor accident cases in MACTs through enhanced case management and procedural reforms.
    • Introduction of a Mobile Appellant by the parent body of all Insurance Companies, i.e. GIC which was a one stop shop for all stakeholders be it the Local Police, the Insurance Company, the Claimant or anyone else.

    What is one core practice you consistently follow when preparing for a case? What resources do you rely on, and how do you stay informed about the latest developments in law?

    One core practice I consistently follow when preparing for a case is meticulous research and strategic planning. I believe that understanding every nuance of a case—whether it’s the facts, applicable laws, or the client’s objectives—is critical to building a strong foundation. My approach involves breaking down the case into its key components, identifying potential challenges, and crafting a strategy that addresses both the immediate and long-term implications. There are times when you need to become the devils advocate to anticipate the questions you may receive from the Bench or things you may need to be prepared for in court.

    • I rely heavily on a combination of resources to ensure thorough preparation. Legal research platforms like SCC, Livelaw and Bar and Bench are indispensable for accessing statutes, case laws, and precedents. In regards to staying informed about the latest developments in law, I honestly would want to give credit to my colleague Dhruv who actually showed me the ropes when I joined this profession, and it was him who got me into the habit of reading 5 new case laws every week, so that made a huge a difference eventually. 
    • There are times when I also prioritize direct engagement with clients to gather context and insights that may not always be apparent from the documentation. This helps me align the legal strategy with their unique goals and circumstances.
    • Ultimately, preparation for me is about blending research with foresight. It’s not just about knowing the law but about anticipating how it will apply in the specific context of the case. This disciplined approach ensures that I’m always ready to advocate effectively and deliver the best possible outcomes for my clients.

    What advice would you give to young, aspiring lawyers who aim to follow a career path similar to yours and achieve success in the legal field?

    • If I look back at my journey in the field, I have worked with a lot of young, aspiring lawyers or for that fact even interns. From my observations and experience I have always advised my fellow colleagues to cultivate resilience. A career in law can be demanding, with long hours and tough challenges. It’s important to develop the ability to learn from setbacks and keep your perspective intact. Success in this field is a marathon, not a sprint, and your perseverance will be as important as your skills.
    • Secondly, an aspiring lawyers must remain endlessly curious not just about the law but about your clients, their industries, and the broader world. A deep understanding of your clients’ needs and the context in which they operate is what sets great lawyers apart. 
    • Last and most importantly I would say young lawyers must invest in relationships. The legal profession is built on trust, collaboration, and mentorship. Seek out mentors who can guide you, colleagues who can inspire you, and clients with whom you can build long-term partnerships. Equally, be generous with your time and support for others; relationships are a two-way street. 

    Balancing a demanding legal career while managing your own firm requires a significant amount of responsibility. How do you maintain a balance between your professional obligations and personal life, and what strategies do you use to achieve that balance?

    • It is certainly a challenging process, but I’ve learned that it’s less about achieving a perfect balance and more about being intentional with your time and priorities. For me, it starts with understanding that there will be seasons—sometimes when work demands more of me and others where I can lean more into my personal life. For me the key is making sure neither is neglected for too long.
    • One of the major principles that I rely on is maintaining clear boundaries. I’ve learned to be present in whatever I’m doing—whether that’s a client meeting or dinner with my family. I make an effort to avoid letting work bleed into personal time unnecessarily. Technology is a double-edged sword, but I use it to my advantage by setting specific times to check emails and stepping away when I need to recharge.
    • Another key is delegation and trust. As much as I want to be hands-on, I’ve learned to rely on my team. Empowering others not only helps me manage my workload but also creates opportunities for them to grow. My team Dhruv, Vedant and Shivaang deserve all the credit in the world for helping me achieve what I have and for making sure to take on all the pressure so I get to spend that time with my family.
    • Ultimately, balance is about being honest with yourself about what’s most important in the moment and giving yourself permission to adapt. It’s a constant work in progress, but the rewards are worth it.

    Get in touch with Randeep Sachdeva –

  • “I think the 2 most important skills that a lawyer needs, in order to thrive in the fast evolving legal environment, is preparedness and humility.” – Sugyata Choudhary, Principal Associate Dhaval Vussonji & Associates.

    “I think the 2 most important skills that a lawyer needs, in order to thrive in the fast evolving legal environment, is preparedness and humility.” – Sugyata Choudhary, Principal Associate Dhaval Vussonji & Associates.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    With a decade of experience in commercial disputes, what initially inspired you to pursue a career in law, particularly in the area of dispute resolution? 

    So I did not really have it all figured out for me initially when I was making a career choice. Like most teenagers, I was confused and didn’t even know what I wanted to do. I had done 11th and 12th grade in the Science stream and at that point of time I had never fancied a career in law. I was more inclined towards doing either medicine or any other para medical field. Due to some family circumstances at that point in time, I was unable to pursue medicine and had to fall back on the next best career choice. The confusion did not end here. I saw both law and journalism as reasonably good career options. While the power that came with being aware of our rights inspired me to pursue law, I was equally enticed by the power to make a mass impact that came with being a journalist. I wanted to be able to make some sort of impact in what I did, so I secured admission in a journalism college on the same day when the first merit list at GLC was to come out. But as life would have it, something made me realise that I can make an impact even by pursuing law. So I left the admission secured in journalism and signed up for the five year law course instead. That was how I began my journey in law.

    After earning your degree and being designated as a Solicitor, how did your early experiences in litigation at various law firms help shape your approach to handling complex commercial disputes? What were the key lessons you learned during this period? 

    While in my 4th year of college I made an unconventional but conscious choice of signing articleship for 3 years for qualifying as a Solicitor with a small boutique law firm in Mumbai which was primarily into dispute resolution. Even after qualifying as a Solicitor I continued working at this firm for a couple of years before I moved to a bigger firm. I was fortunate to be exposed to some very sensitive matters at this time including arbitrations, suits and writ petitions that were both complex and high value. So right from the start I was directly put into the hot tub and had to find my way into understanding complex commercial disputes and finding ways to resolve them. I believe that it was the training that I received during this time which set an extremely solid foundation for a decade of my career in dispute resolution that lay ahead. Many litigation lawyers are often given the advice that you must start practicing with the smaller courts, because this is where you actually learn the nitty gritty of trial and procedure. I did quite the opposite. I started my career with litigation in the Bombay high court and even supreme court, and quite honestly, I think it worked out beautifully well for me. The precision that is required for handling complex disputes in the higher courts forced me from the very start to pursue accuracy in whatever I was doing. Since the stakes in every matter that I was handling were high, there was very little room for error, which forced me to check, and re-check my work which was, I think, an extremely essential skill that one needs to develop in this profession. As far as nitty gritty of procedure is concerned, in my experience, I did handle a fair amount of disputes in the lower courts as well, and to be honest, I felt that the higher courts followed a more precise way of following the procedure with lesser adjournments and delays and more precision in interpretation of the law. Another key lesson that I learnt in my initial years at law firms was how to handle clients. Client counseling is a skill that is extremely crucial for the purpose of understanding a dispute and then effectively resolving it. Exposure to different kinds of clients, both corporate and individuals, understanding the dispute, understanding what exactly is the remedy that they are seeking, these things were extremely important. A client himself can make or break his own case and to get the right information out of the client is sometimes a very underrated skill. So these were some of the key learnings that I had during my initial years.

    You have significant exposure to both domestic and international arbitration. Can you share how these two spheres differ in terms of legal approach and challenges, and what has been your strategy for effectively navigating both?

    I believe, earlier on, while institutional arbitrations were not as popular in India, and ad hoc would be the natural first choice of parties, there was a vast difference in the way arbitrations were conducted in India and Internationally. Thankfully, the UNCITRAL and CIArb have done so. Post the 2015 amendment and the increasing pro-arbitration jurisprudence in India, the gap has narrowed down quite a fair bit . For example, something as simple as fast track arbitrations or document-only arbitrations was a concept India was oblivious to until recently. Fair to say that on interpretation of the law, there were not much difference in the approach, however International arbitrations have their own challenges when it comes to costs of arbitration. However, more than the arbitration proceeding itself, the major difference, which I believe will always exist, is in the system of the courts of various jurisdictions in challenges to the arbitration award or the arbitration procedure. The best strategy to effectively navigate both kinds of arbitration is to be open to learn, no matter how experienced you are in the profession, to be flexible in your approach to learning and most importantly to be observant of the smallest details.

     As a Fellow at the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators, how has this designation enriched your skills and approach to arbitration? 

    I had taken the Accelerated Route to Fellowship, from CIArb London and I must say it went a long way in widening my knowledge of arbitration. The standards of procedure and conduct of international arbitration was meticulously explained by CIArb and the method adopted to teach during the course was key in building skills which are absolutely essential for a successful career in arbitration. The study was a rigorous one, which contained case study based, and unconventional questions, which forces one to think out of the box and present solutions. It ended with a rigorous award writing assessment, which further trains the mind to think from the arbitrator’s perspective and balance equities in a dispute. CIArb is also an internationally acclaimed standard and exposed me to a network of some of the brightest minds in Arbitration. I highly recommend budding arbitration practitioners to pursue the fellowship from CIArb to widen their knowledge and network. 

    In your current role, you focus on banking/real estate litigation and advisory relating to enforcement of security by Financial Institutions . What are the most common challenges faced by financial institutions in these areas, and how do you tailor your legal strategies to meet their needs?

    In my current role I work on complex matters relating to recovery of stressed assets by financial institutions as well as Banking and real estate related litigation. I have come across cases with large amounts of money which turn into non-performing assets for these financial institutions due to the default of the borrowers. Most commonly, the challenges faced by these financial institutions comprise of dealing with fraudulent transactions made by the defaulting borrowers like multiple sales of their security, siphoning of monies and even forgery. Another major challenge faced by these institutions are the legal complications that arise due to the interplay of various laws in the country like RERA, SARFAESI, Transfer of Property Act, Slum Rehabilitation Law and general laws that sometimes form an impediment in enforcing their security effectively and delay the recovery process. My job in my current role is to work on effectively designing the best legal strategies for helping the clients achieve fast recovery of the stressed assets in the most efficient manner, and thereafter to implement that strategy, which may contain a combination of remedies. The most effective way of doing this is to keep myself abreast with the latest legal developments in banking and real estate related law and applying the latest law to the peculiar circumstances of the given case in order to come up with the best way forward. 

     Given your diverse background, what do you think are the key skills and qualities a lawyer needs to thrive in the fast-evolving legal environment, particularly when dealing with multi-jurisdictional disputes or complex financial matters? 

    I think the 2 most important skills that a lawyer needs, in order to thrive in the fast evolving legal environment, is preparedness and humility. I always believe it is extremely essential to know your brief like the back of your hand. Preparedness in law is a tool that can make a lawyer formidable. This must be coupled with humility. As our senior Mr. Fali Nariman put it, I quote : “The moment you say, you know everything, I’m afraid, that’s the beginning of your downfall.”

    In addition to your demanding legal practice, how do you maintain a healthy work-life balance? Are there any personal habits or practices you find particularly useful in maintaining focus and achieving long-term success in your career? What strategies do you use to remain calm in high-pressure situations? 

    I am sometimes unable to stay consistent, but I do follow some sort of physical exercise for half an hour in the morning. It could be home work outs or yoga or just stretching exercises. Physical movement works wonders to keep the mind balanced and cope with stress. I also try and make it a point to travel whenever I get the opportunity. Also, meditation and spending time with Animals or in nature goes a long way to give the mind the much needed pause and refuel back into action. I read this somewhere and I believe it is so important for everyone in the hustle culture to know this- “Rest is not taking the foot off the gas, it is putting fuel in the tank” .  

    What advice would you offer young lawyers who wish to specialize in arbitration and build a successful practice similar to yours? 

    Few things: 1. Never be lazy to read. Know the difference between just reading something mechanically and understanding what you read. 2. Organise your brief well. We often underestimate the impact organisation has on productivity and when dealing with voluminous papers and proceedings, organisation can sometimes make or break your case 3. Cultivate the practice of updating yourself with the latest judgments. Arbitration as a practice area is evolving very fast with jurisprudence changing almost every day. Keeping abreast with the latest law makes a huge difference when it comes to advising clients.

    Get in touch with Sugyata Choudhary –

  • “Be consistent, work steadily, even when success seems distant and most importantly, remain determined, litigation is not an easy path, but it is one that rewards those who persevere.” – Kunal Kumar, Independent Counsel.

    “Be consistent, work steadily, even when success seems distant and most importantly, remain determined, litigation is not an easy path, but it is one that rewards those who persevere.” – Kunal Kumar, Independent Counsel.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    What motivated you to pursue a career in law, and what factors influenced  your decision to enter this field? 

    While I was a PCM (Science with Mathematics) student in school, I always knew  that engineering or any science-related field wasn’t my calling. At the same time,  my family never imposed their aspirations on me, thus allowing me to focus on  what truly resonated with me. 

    What stood out to me about the law was its dynamic nature and its potential to  impact society. During my senior year of school, I had the opportunity to meet  one of my father’s friends, now a reputed senior advocate. He shared how the  profession is not just about arguing cases in court but about shaping the law,  resolving disputes, and bringing meaningful changes to people’s lives.  “Curiosity, consistency, and determination,” he said, “are the pillars of success  in the legal field.” Those words struck a chord with me and broadened my  understanding of what a career in law could entail. Choosing law was not just  about ambition; it was about aligning my interests with my strengths. I’ve always  been drawn to structured reasoning, persuasive communication, and finding  creative solutions to challenges. 

    Looking back, my decision to pursue law feels both deliberate and intuitive,  shaped by personal experiences, influential encounters, and the freedom to  chart my own course. It wasn’t a single moment but a combination of factors that  made me realize that law was where I could thrive and make a meaningful  impact. 

    You went on to pursue your LL.M. in Dispute Resolution from the Straus  Institute at Pepperdine University, California (2015), where you were  awarded the prestigious Straus Fellowship Award of USD 25,000. What was  the driving force behind choosing this institution for your Masters? 

    During my bachelors in law, I had the privilege of interning with Mr.  Veeraraghavan Inbavijayan, one of the foremost arbitrators in the field, who  became both a mentor and an influential figure in my professional growth. This  internship, although conducted online in 2013—when digital internships were  not as widely recognized as they are today—was an incredibly rewarding  experience. Mr. Inbavijayan tasked me with researching and preparing detailed  notes on various case laws pertaining to construction, maritime, and  commercial disputes, areas in which he was actively serving as an arbitrator. The  real value of this internship came not just from the legal research, but from the  unique opportunity to observe the intricate process of arbitration from a neutral,  impartial perspective.

    This exposure gave me invaluable insights into how arbitration operates as a  mechanism for dispute resolution. What stood out to me the most was the  flexibility inherent in the process, which allows parties to resolve conflicts in a  more streamlined, cost-effective manner compared to traditional litigation. The  freedom arbitration affords to the parties, especially when it comes to choosing  the governing laws and procedural rules, deeply fascinated me. This flexibility  allows for the customization of the proceedings, making it an appealing choice  for complex, multi-jurisdictional disputes that require tailored solutions. The  dynamic nature of arbitration, coupled with its efficiency, was exactly what I was  looking for in the field of law. 

    It was during this time that I became certain that arbitration and dispute  resolution were the areas I wanted to specialize in. This passion led me to pursue  an LL.M. in Dispute Resolution from the Straus Institute at Pepperdine University  in California. I chose Pepperdine not only because of its reputation as a leading  institution in the field of dispute resolution and its leading ranking, but also  because of its practical, hands-on approach to teaching and its strong emphasis  on international arbitration and resolving disputes. The Straus Institute’s unique  curriculum, combined with its faculty of esteemed professionals who have made  significant contributions to the field, made it the ideal place for me to further my  knowledge and skill set. The opportunity to study under experts in the field, while  also engaging with a diverse, international student body, further solidified my  decision. My experience at PepperdineUniversity, particularly being awarded the  prestigious Straus Fellowship Award of USD 25,000, gave me both the academic  foundation and the practical tools to excel in this field. It was a pivotal step in  shaping my career as a dispute resolution professional, and I look back on it as  one of the most transformative periods of my professional life. 

    During your early career, what valuable insights did you gain from your  internships in Dubai, particularly regarding international arbitration? How  were they different from the law firms in India? 

    During the early stages of my career, I had the opportunity to intern at several  prominent law firms in Dubai, which provided me with invaluable insights into  international arbitration, particularly in the context of the Middle East and cross border disputes. These internships were pivotal in shaping my understanding of  the practical aspects of arbitration and the unique challenges faced by  practitioners in a globalized legal environment. 

    One of the most significant takeaways from my time in Dubai was the exposure  to the complexity of multi-jurisdictional arbitration cases. Unlike India, where  many arbitration matters are still in the process of evolving, Dubai is known for  being a hub for international arbitration due to its strategic location and modern  infrastructure. The Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) and the Dubai  International Arbitration Centre (DIAC) offer a dynamic and highly regulated  environment for resolving disputes that involve parties from different legal systems. I had the opportunity to work on cases involving international  commercial disputes, construction contracts, and trade agreements, often  involving parties from diverse backgrounds and legal traditions. This taught me  the importance of understanding and navigating the cultural, legal, and  procedural differences that impact the way arbitration is conducted in different  parts of the world. 

    The most striking difference I noticed between law firms in Dubai and those in  India was the level of global exposure and the emphasis on handling cross border disputes. In Dubai, arbitration is seen as a preferred method of dispute  resolution, and the legal landscape is highly international, with professionals  from all over the world practising together. This globalised atmosphere made it  clear that international arbitration requires not just expertise in local law but also  a deep understanding of international conventions, and the nuances of various  national legal systems. The law firms in Dubai, where I interned, placed a  significant emphasis on teamwork and collaboration with international partners,  which helped me develop a more holistic view of the legal process. 

    In contrast, the firms in India, while still handling complex arbitration cases, were  more focused on domestic laws and issues that were more localised,  particularly due to the legal framework in India being still relatively in its  development phase compared to more established jurisdictions. Arbitration in  India often involved navigating a system that had a more procedural and  statutory focus, with a stronger emphasis on litigation and court involvement in  certain cases. This made the experience in Dubai refreshing, as I was exposed to  a more streamlined and flexible approach, where the role of arbitration centres  and the autonomy of the arbitrators were much more pronounced. 

    Overall, these internships in Dubai not only broadened my knowledge of  international arbitration but also deepened my appreciation for the importance  of adaptability, cultural sensitivity, and global legal practices in today’s  interconnected world. The exposure to both global legal practices in Dubai and  the evolving legal landscape in India has given me a comprehensive  understanding of how arbitration can function on both local and international  stages. 

    How was your experience at Pepperdine University, California? Were there  any other courses which were not strictly related to arbitration? How was the  experience of learning different from the law school you attended in India? 

    My time at Pepperdine University in California was an enriching and  transformative experience. Studying at the Straus Institute for Dispute Resolution exposed me to a world of legal education that was dynamic,  interdisciplinary, and practical. One of the courses which was not strictly arbitration  related, and which I truly enjoyed was ‘Mediation – Theory and Practice’, which  was taught by one of the most reputed professors at Pepperdine. The professor’s expertise and real-world experience made the class not only intellectually  stimulating but also deeply insightful. I came to appreciate how mediation, as a  dispute resolution process, can often be more valuable than arbitration,  especially in cases where preserving relationships and finding mutually beneficial solutions are paramount. While arbitration is structured and often  adversarial, mediation allows the parties to have greater control over the  outcome. In mediation, the role of the mediator is not to impose a decision but  to facilitate a dialogue that helps the parties reach their own resolution. This  process, which emphasizes collaboration, negotiation, and empathy, is  especially valuable in disputes involving long-term relationships, such as family  businesses or international partnerships. I found that in many cases, mediation  can help preserve ongoing relationships that could be irrevocably damaged  through arbitration or litigation. For example, in a commercial dispute between  two family-owned businesses, mediation could have been a better approach to  help the parties maintain their business relationships while resolving their legal  issues amicably. 

    Another course that had a profound impact on me was Cross-Cultural Conflict  and Dispute Resolution, which taught me the importance of understanding how  culture influences the way people approach conflict and resolution. This course  was particularly relevant in the context of international arbitration, where the  parties often come from diverse cultural backgrounds. I learned that cultural  differences can significantly impact negotiation styles, communication, and  even perceptions of fairness. For instance, I discovered that in some cultures,  maintaining harmony and avoiding confrontation is more important than directly  addressing the issue, while in others, a more direct, assertive approach is  preferred. A great example of this is the difference in conflict resolution  approaches between Western and Eastern cultures. In the West, particularly in  the United States, a direct, problem-solving approach to conflict is common,  with a focus on resolving issues quickly and efficiently. In contrast, many Asian  cultures, such as those in Japan and China, place a higher value on maintaining  face and relationships, often preferring a more indirect, collaborative approach  to resolving disputes.  

    The educational experience at Pepperdine was vastly different from the law  school I attended in India. In India, while the legal education is rigorous, it tends  to be more focused on theoretical learning and the application of Indian law, with  a strong emphasis on preparing students for the Indian legal system. The  approach at Pepperdine, on the other hand, was much more interactive,  practical, and globally oriented. The emphasis on skills like negotiation,  mediation, and understanding cross-cultural differences was something that  added a whole new dimension to my legal education. I appreciated the  interactive classroom environment, where we engaged in simulations, role playing exercises, and discussions with peers from diverse legal backgrounds.  This collaborative learning approach was a refreshing change from the more  traditional, lecture-based style that I was accustomed to in India.

    Moreover, the diverse student body at Pepperdine University, representing  various nationalities and legal systems, provided a unique opportunity to learn  not just from professors but also from peers. This multicultural environment  enriched my understanding of international dispute resolution and made me  more aware of the complexities involved when resolving conflicts between  parties from different legal traditions and cultural contexts. 

    What motivated you to establish your independent litigation practice in  2020, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic? How did the transition  from large firms to independent practice unfold, and how did you manage the  shift? 

    Since the beginning of my law career, I was certain that I wanted to eventually  establish my independent practice. While working with several reputed law firms  and distinguished lawyers, I gained invaluable insights into the intricacies of legal  practice, but I always envisioned carving my own path. By 2020, I felt confident  that the time was right to take this step. 

    Launching an independent practice during the COVID-19 pandemic presented  its own set of challenges. The legal landscape had shifted dramatically, with  virtual hearings becoming the norm and access to clients and courts being  heavily restricted. Yet, I saw this as an opportunity to adapt, innovate, and build  a practice rooted in resilience and client-centric solutions. 

    I distinctly remember my first case under my independent practice—a  matrimonial dispute. A wife approached me after her husband had filed a divorce  petition on the grounds of cruelty and had even gone so far as to challenge the  legitimacy of their child. It was an emotionally charged and legally complex case,  especially since the opposing counsel presented substantial evidence to  support their claims. 

    With a methodical approach, I focused on crafting a strategy that emphasized the inconsistencies in their arguments while drawing attention to the factual and  emotional dimensions of my client’s situation. After meticulous research,  evidence collation, and persuasive arguments, we succeeded in securing  reasonable maintenance for both the wife and child. Additionally, we were able  to successfully defend the allegations regarding the child’s legitimacy as well as  the grounds he had taken for filing the divorce petition. Eventually, the parties  resolved their differences amicably and opted for a mutual consent divorce. 

    That case was pivotal for me—not just because it was my first as an independent  lawyer, but also because it reinforced the realization that independent practice  requires a broad-based approach. While arbitration had always been a key focus  for me, this experience made me realize the importance of diversifying my areas  of expertise to serve a wider spectrum of clients. The transition from large firms to independent practice wasn’t without its hurdles. From setting up an office and building a network of clients to manage administrative responsibilities single handedly, it required immense dedication and adaptability. However, the sense  of autonomy and the ability to directly impact clients’ lives made the journey truly  fulfilling. 

    Could you describe some of the arbitration cases you handled in your experience over the years?  

    Throughout my legal career, I have had the opportunity to handle a diverse array  of arbitration cases spanning commercial, maritime, construction, and other  specialized disputes. My work has taken me across various jurisdictions and  arbitration forums, including proceedings governed by the rules of SIAC, LCIA,  ICC, and DIAC, among others. 

    One notable segment of my practice involves construction disputes, which often  require a deep understanding of technical issues, contractual frameworks, and  project-specific challenges. Many of these disputes are governed by FIDIC  contracts, where issues such as delays, price variation, cost overruns, defective  work claims, and contract terminations frequently arise. For instance, I  successfully represented a client in a complex arbitration concerning a multi million-dollar infrastructure project. The dispute revolved around delay penalties  and other related issues and allegations under the FIDIC Silver Book. My  approach combined a meticulous analysis of technical reports with a robust  presentation of the contract’s terms, ultimately securing a favourable arbitral  award for my client. 

    Another compelling case I worked on involved an international arbitration under  LCIA Rules. This dispute was unique, revolving around the ownership and  authenticity of a painting by a renowned artist. It was a fascinating blend of legal  and art historical issues, requiring close collaboration with art experts,  authentication agencies, and valuation professionals. Navigating through  conflicting expert testimonies, I was able to establish the authenticity of the  artwork and protect my client’s ownership rights, leading to a successful  resolution of the dispute. 

    My experience also extends to maritime arbitration cases, where I have dealt with disputes involving charter party agreements, cargo claims, and shipbuilding  contracts. One such case involved a dispute over demurrage claims under a  charter party agreement, where my ability to interpret contractual clauses and  maritime regulations proved critical in achieving a favourable award for my  client. In addition to these, I have handled several high-stakes commercial  arbitrations, often involving breaches of contract, shareholder disputes, and  joint venture agreements. Each case has contributed to my understanding of  arbitration as a dynamic and multifaceted process. I remain committed to delivering effective and pragmatic solutions for my clients in this ever-evolving  field.

    Having handled various matrimonial cases in your independent practice,  what significant trends or changes have you noticed in matrimonial laws? 

    In my experience handling a wide array of matrimonial cases, one of the most  frequent inquiries from clients revolves around questions like, “Do I have to pay  alimony to my wife?”, “Can I file for divorce?”, “How much maintenance can I  expect?”, etc. While these questions are valid, the answer is often one of the  most quintessential lawyerly responses: “It depends.” Matrimonial law does not  operate on a one-size-fits-all formula. Alimony, maintenance, and divorce  settlements hinge on a variety of factors, including but not limited to: The  financial standing and status of the families involved, The standard of living  enjoyed by the couple during the marriage, The financial needs of the wife and  children (if any), The income sources and earning capacities of both parties.,  Educational qualifications and professional opportunities are available to both. 

    It is crucial to emphasize that just because a wife earns more than her husband,  it does not automatically disqualify her from seeking maintenance. The courts  adopt a balanced approach, taking into account the overarching principles of  fairness and justice. One recurring question I encounter, particularly from male  clients, is: “Why are matrimonial laws so wife-centric?” This perception is  shaped, in part, by social media narratives/influencers that often paint a one dimensional picture. It’s important to understand that laws like the Protection of  Women Against Domestic Violence Act are designed to address systemic and  pervasive issues of abuse that continue to exist across many regions in India,  especially in non-urban areas where such incidents frequently go unreported. 

    At the same time, I acknowledge that not every case filed by a wife is genuine.  Instances of misuse of these laws do occur, leading to false allegations against  husbands. However, this does not undermine the broader objective of such  legislation. Trusting the judiciary to scrutinize and differentiate between genuine  and false claims is imperative. A case that exemplifies this nuanced approach  involved a husband with negligible income compared to his wife, who was a high earning professional. Despite the apparent disparity, the court granted  maintenance to the husband (and not the wife!) under the Hindu Marriage Act,  recognizing his genuine financial dependence and needs. The takeaway here is  that matrimonial disputes are inherently complex, and the determination of  alimony, maintenance, or grounds for divorce varies significantly from case to  case. It is always advisable for individuals to consult a qualified lawyer for  tailored legal advice, rather than relying solely on information found online or  anecdotal accounts. 

    Reflecting on your journey, what advice would you offer to students and/or young lawyers who are just starting out in their legal journey? 

    A piece of advice I’d offer to young lawyers and students embarking on their  legal careers is this: “Follow the law, not the money.” In the initial stages,  particularly in litigation, the financial rewards may seem modest compared to other legal fields. But the real value lies in the experience you gain, the lessons  you learn, and the skills you develop during these formative years. Litigation demands hard work, patience, and resilience. You may take on cases that  don’t pay much, or even refer cases to seniors or colleagues, but ensure that you remain actively involved. Follow up, understand the intricacies of each matter, and use every case as a learning opportunity. Remember, the more  cases you immerse yourself in, the sharper and more seasoned you’ll become  as a litigator. 

    I was once told: “Curiosity, consistency, and determination are the pillars of  success in the legal field.” These words have stayed with me throughout my  career. Stay curious, delve into the nuances of the law. Be consistent, work  steadily, even when success seems distant. And most importantly, remain determined, litigation is not an easy path, but it is one that rewards those who  persevere. 

    So, to all young lawyers: don’t give up. The early years may feel overwhelming,  but with time, effort, and a genuine passion for the law, you will find your place in this profession. Success in litigation is not measured overnight; it’s a  journey of constant growth, built one case, one argument, and one lesson at a  time.

    Get in touch with Kunal Kumar –

  • “Adjusting and adapting to the needs and requirements of clients and tailoring the services to the specific needs of each client is the best way to go.” – Fauzia Khan, Legal Consultant at Paoletti Law Group

    “Adjusting and adapting to the needs and requirements of clients and tailoring the services to the specific needs of each client is the best way to go.” – Fauzia Khan, Legal Consultant at Paoletti Law Group

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    Your career spans over 15 years, with diverse experiences in corporate law and litigation. Could you share with us how your journey began and evolved to your current role as a Legal Consultant at Paoletti Law Group? Please walk us through your Journey from choosing Law as a career to working in Dubai? 

    Law has always been my calling. Since the age of 14, I have had a deep desire to pursue a career in law. Despite coming from a business-oriented family, I knew that my path lay in the legal profession. I am the first lawyer in my family in 3 generations.

    My journey in law began with my internship under the guidance of a senior advocate in Gauhati High Court in the year 2009. My senior, Mr. S.S. Sharma was a very patient and attentive teacher, and I learned a lot from him. I practiced under my senior’s guidance for 4 years and then started my own independent practice. 

    My thirst for knowledge is what led me to Dubai, UAE. I wanted to learn and experience law on an international level and Dubai offered me the perfect opportunity to do so. I landed in Dubai, UAE just before the lockdown in 2020, but I was blessed to still have found work here. 

    Throughout my career I have encountered an endless supply of legal issues, most of them demanding a unique solution. Navigating and resolving these issues have constantly kept me going. I love facing new challenges and finding out different ways of solving them. 

    As a legal consultant, you’ve navigated various legal landscapes, from India to Dubai. How do you perceive the differences in legal practice and client expectations between these regions, and how has this impacted your approach to advising clients?

    Having experience in both India and UAE jurisdiction, I have had the opportunity to deal with diverse legal landscapes and understand the nuances of the expectation a client may have in each region. In both India and UAE, clients may have different legal requirements, but their needs, overall, are similar. All a client wants is someone to guide them through the legal maze and provide support and solutions for their issues.

    Adjusting and adapting to the needs and requirements of clients and tailoring the services to the specific needs of each client is the best way to go. By utilizing my knowledge and expertise, I offer strategic and pragmatic advice that tackles each unique challenge and difficulties encountered by each client.

    Moving from India to Dubai for your legal career marks a significant transition. What factors influenced your decision to relocate, and how has this move impacted your professional growth and experiences? 

    Like I have explained already, my thirst for knowledge and zeal to learn about law on an international level is what brought me to Dubai, UAE. Since moving here, I have had the good fortune to grow both personally and professionally. Working in Dubai has exposed me to diverse cultures, legal systems and business practices broadening my skill set as a legal consultant. This experience has been vital in shaping my understanding of cross-border legal practices. 

    Overall, the decision to move to Dubai, UAE has been instrumental in the development of my professional career. 

    Your role involves advising on Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) matters. Could you elaborate on how you integrate ESG principles into your legal strategies, and why they are increasingly important in today’s business landscape?

    Integrating Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) principles into legal strategies involves a multi-faceted approach that encompasses compliance with environment regulations, promoting social responsibilities and best practices. This includes advising on risk mitigation strategies, conducting due diligence on ESG issues, and implementing policies and procedures to ensure compliance with applicable laws and standards. By aligning legal advice with ESG objectives, organizations can enhance their reputation, mitigate risks, and drive sustainable growth.

    Considering your experience in international legal consulting, particularly in the UAE, what unique insights have you gained about cross-border legal practices and the challenges involved?

    My experience in international legal consulting, particularly in the UAE, has provided me with unique insights into cross-border legal practices and the challenges involved. One of the key challenges in cross-border legal practice is navigating the complexities of different legal systems, cultural norms, and business practices, which can vary significantly from one jurisdiction to another. I strive to provide clients with advice that addresses their legal needs and helps them achieve their business objectives in an increasingly interconnected world.

    Your expertise in drafting legal documents ranging from complex joint venture agreements to trademark registrations is commendable. What strategies do you employ to ensure clarity and efficacy in your drafting process? Any tips for students? 

    Drafting any kind of a legal document requires extensive research and accurate analysis of the issues and requirements involved in drafting that particular document. This includes reviewing relevant statutes and industry norms to ensure that the document is legally sound and meets the objectives of the parties involved. 

    For students aiming to excel in legal drafting, I recommend prioritizing clarity, precision, and meticulous attention to detail. Proper research and analytical skills, along with honing the ability to convey intricate legal concepts in straightforward language, will be instrumental in shaping their success in future legal endeavours.

    With the demands of your profession, maintaining work-life balance is crucial. How do you unwind and rejuvenate after challenging days or intense legal engagements, and how do these activities contribute to your overall effectiveness as a legal consultant?

    With the demands of my profession, maintaining a healthy work-life balance is crucial to my overall well-being and effectiveness. After challenging days or intense legal engagements, I prioritize activities that help me unwind. One of my favourite ways of unwinding is spending time with my family and friends. Additionally, I find solace in travelling and exploring new places. Engaging in these activities rejuvenates me, enabling me to return to work with renewed energy.

    With your extensive experience in diverse legal matters, what advice would you offer to aspiring lawyers looking to build a successful career in corporate law and litigation, especially in today’s rapidly evolving legal landscape?

    Aspiring lawyers aiming to build a successful career in the legal field should focus on several key points:

    First and foremost, continuous learning is essential. Stay updated on the latest developments through ongoing education, attending seminars, webinars, and conferences, and engaging in professional development opportunities. Networking is another key aspect of building a successful legal career. Build a strong professional network by connecting with colleagues, mentors, and industry professionals. Embrace new technologies and methodologies that can improve efficiency and effectiveness in your practice. Develop strong communication skills, both written and verbal, as effective communication is essential for a successful legal career. Uphold the highest standards of ethics and professionalism in your practice to build trust with clients and colleagues.

    Get in touch with Fauzia Khan-