Super Lawyer

Tag: Tech Laws

  • “That habit of consciously engaging with the law, not just reacting to it, helps me filter noise from relevance.” – Arrpita K Bhatt, Media and Entertainment Lawyer.

    “That habit of consciously engaging with the law, not just reacting to it, helps me filter noise from relevance.” – Arrpita K Bhatt, Media and Entertainment Lawyer.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Coming from a commerce background, what inspired you to pursue a career in law? In what ways has your academic foundation in commerce complemented your legal journey, particularly in corporate or commercial legal matters?

    While I began my journey in commerce, my deeper purpose was always rooted in empowerment—especially through education. I saw law as a transformative tool, not just to resolve disputes but to elevate people’s understanding of their own rights. That vision pushed me to transition into the legal field.

    During my B.Com, I worked as an Internal Stock Auditor and Stock Researcher. That experience grounded me in the practical workings of the corporate world—from compliance intricacies to financial accountability. It didn’t just teach me numbers; it taught me how businesses breathe. So when I entered law, especially corporate and commercial law, I wasn’t looking at statutes in isolation—I understood the business realities behind them. This dual perspective has helped me serve clients with both strategic insight and legal precision.
    At every step, law has enabled me to blend purpose with profession—using my legal acumen to educate, empower, and break barriers, whether it’s through my professional practice or through initiatives like BLU. 

    How was your experience pursuing an LL.M. in Intellectual Property Rights and Information Technology? What drew you to this specialization over others, and how has it shaped your perspective on law and innovation?

    Growing up as a millennial, I witnessed the Internet evolve from dial-up modems to streaming platforms, memes, and digital marketplaces. That transformation fascinated me. I was always curious about how technology shaped communication, expression, and even identity. At the same time, I was a budding writer—scribbling short stories, blogging, and researching how books get published. That’s when I stumbled upon the concept of Intellectual Property. It felt like unlocking a new superpower—realizing that ideas, like inventions or writings, had legal lives of their own.
    Back when I was in law school, IP wasn’t yet the buzzword it is today. But I could see its future relevance—how creativity and innovation would increasingly become the currency of our generation. That foresight, combined with my natural curiosity for tech and content, made IPR and IT Law a very intuitive choice for my LL.M.
    Pursuing this specialization gave me a profound appreciation of the balance between innovation and regulation. It shaped my ability to not only advise creators and tech companies but also advocate for ethical, accessible, and inclusive innovation. Today, whether I’m working on a deal, mentoring students through BLU, or speaking on digital rights, my perspective is shaped by that early blend of passion, foresight, and learning.

    In the early phase of your career, you were drawn to academics. What were some of the key experiences during that time that deepened your understanding of law and the subjects you taught? What eventually motivated your transition from academia to law firm practice?

    I’ve always had the heart of an academician. Even while pursuing my Master’s, I found myself teaching, mentoring, and constantly questioning the “why” behind every legal principle. That dual role—as both a student and a lecturer—helped me look at law from both sides of the lens: as a learner and a guide.

    Among all the subjects I engaged with, Contract Law left a lasting imprint. It’s one of those timeless areas of law—centuries old yet constantly evolving. No matter how advanced technology becomes or how industries pivot, contracts remain the language through which businesses and individuals build trust. Teaching contracts made me realize how theory and practice often diverge, and that’s when the spark was lit—I wanted to experience how these doctrines come alive in boardrooms, negotiations, and deal-making.
    That desire to move beyond the black-letter law and engage with the real-world intricacies of business is what eventually drew me to law firm practice. I wanted to see how contracts function under pressure, in dynamic sectors, across jurisdictions—and how I, as a lawyer, could bring both legal integrity and commercial sensibility to the table.
    Even today, that academic lens hasn’t left me. Whether through social work or mentorship, I continue to teach—but now with the added richness of my experience and applied insight.

    Transitioning to an in-house counsel role marks a significant shift in a legal career. You’ve worked with some of the biggest names in the media and entertainment sector. How have these roles differed from one another, and could you share one of the most challenging cases you encountered along the way?

    Having worked both at a law firm and as in-house counsel, I’ve come to realize that the shift isn’t so much about a change in career—it’s a shift in perspective. In a firm, you operate as a specialist—often brought in to solve a specific legal problem. But as an in-house counsel, you’re a strategic partner. The role demands that you understand the pulse of the business, anticipate risks before they arise, and offer solutions that don’t just check the legal box, but help the business move forward with confidence.
    What’s unique about the media and entertainment sector is that it may appear as one unified industry, but it’s actually a convergence of many touchpoints—IP, contracts, advertising laws, digital platforms, privacy, broadcasting compliance, and more. Each company I’ve worked with has had its own rhythm—some with a strong content-first approach, others more tech-driven or distribution-led. Understanding the nuance of each business model has been essential, because legal advice isn’t one-size-fits-all; it needs to be context-aware and commercially sound.
    As an in-house lawyer, I see my role as that of an enabler—ensuring the legal function supports innovation, protects creative vision, and helps the business build sustainable value while staying compliant. That blend of law and business strategy is what makes this role both challenging and deeply fulfilling.

    As in-house counsel, how do you navigate the ever-evolving legal landscape especially with regard to content licensing, intellectual property, and digital media regulation in a fast-paced, highly regulated industry?

    Law, by its very nature, is in a constant state of evolution. Even as we speak, it’s shifting—adapting to new technologies, redefining old principles, and responding to societal and business needs. As a legal professional, evolving alongside it isn’t optional—it’s essential.
    In an industry like media and digital content, where disruption is the norm, my approach has been to be informed. I don’t believe in simply forwarding the latest update or echoing headlines. For me, it’s about pausing, reading deeply and asking—what does this mean for our business?
    That habit of consciously engaging with the law, not just reacting to it, helps me filter noise from relevance. It ensures that when I advise on licensing structures, IP risks, or platform regulations, the counsel is not only current but also considered. The joy is in doing the work, not just knowing the jargon.

    Ultimately, being an in-house counsel is about bridging change with clarity—guiding your team through uncertainty, while staying rooted in both principle and practicality.
    
    Your expertise spans IPR, media, and technology laws, with a focused interest in data privacy. In your view, what steps can India take to strengthen its data protection regime and bring it closer in alignment with global frameworks such as the GDPR?

    India’s journey toward a comprehensive data protection framework is both necessary and timely. As the world’s largest democracy with a rapidly digitizing population, our approach must be inclusive, scalable, and rooted in our constitutional values.
    Frameworks like the GDPR have certainly set global benchmarks, and there is much we can be inspired by—particularly in areas like user consent, accountability, and transparency. But our legal and societal landscape is distinct, and that calls for a framework that is uniquely Indian in its design and delivery.
    One key difference lies in the scope of government exemptions. Our law, in its current form, allows certain leeways for the State in matters of data processing. While this reflects the need for governance flexibility, it also places a greater onus on transparent implementation and robust oversight. As citizens, we must remain aware of our rights and engage in the legal process, so the law can evolve to reflect the democratic ideals it’s built upon.
    Ultimately, the goal isn’t to replicate GDPR—it’s to build a framework that works for India, encourages digital trust, and empowers every citizen in this data-driven age. And I believe we are well on our way to achieving that.

    As an author and a mentor deeply engaged with the next generation of legal minds, what gaps do you observe in contemporary legal education? How does your initiative, Basic Law Understanding(BLU), aim to bridge the gap between academic theory and practical legal application?

    We often say that the next generation is tech-driven—and that’s a wonderful strength. But in a world shaped by AI and automation, we need to ensure that not just GenAI is well-trained, but also that Gen Next of professionals are trained to think independently, apply critical reasoning beyond just algorithms.

    BLU is not just a knowledge exchange—it’s a purpose-driven initiative to empower. It is designed for the masses—to bridge the gap not only between classroom and courtroom, but between citizens and their rights. Whether it’s a student understanding broadcasting rights or a citizen decoding consumer rights. The aim is to be ‘Aware’. 

    Having actively contributed to grassroots activism, corporate legal affairs, academic publishing, and mentoring while also leading social initiatives, how do you maintain a balance between your professional responsibilities and personal well-being?

    For me, the idea isn’t to chase balance—it’s to create blend. I don’t see my life as separate compartments of “work,” “passion,” and “personal time.” Instead, I try to design my day—and my purpose—in a way that all these facets flow into one another. But at the core of it all is one intention: to use law as a tool to empower.

    This blend helps me stay connected to what I do and why I do it. I’ve learned that personal well-being doesn’t come from disconnecting from work—it comes from doing work that is aligned with your values, surrounded by people who believe in impact over optics.
    Of course, I have my “DND” moments too—where I switch off, read something that has nothing to do with the law, or spend time with the people who keep me grounded. But I don’t put pressure on myself to perform a balance like a checklist. Instead, I remind myself: if what you do fuels you, then you’re already living in alignment.
    Whether it’s Gen Z finding their calling or seasoned professionals reinventing their role, I believe the future of law lies where empathy, and empowerment coexist naturally.

    What advice would you give to aspiring lawyers at the beginning of their careers? Are there any key habits, mindsets, or resources that you found particularly helpful in shaping your own path in law?

    My biggest advice? It’s that idiom

    “Jack of all trades, master of none, but better than being stuck mastering just one.”

    Law is a vast and layered field, and the more you expose yourself to its different shades—be it contracts, litigation, dispute resolution —the clearer your own voice and direction will become.

    In the early years, don’t rush to define your niche. Explore, assist, volunteer, write, question. “The legal profession isn’t a linear path—it’s more like a mosaic. Each experience, even the smallest one, adds depth to your understanding.” It’s okay to not have all the answers at the start—curiosity will take you further than certainty ever can.

    What helped me most was following what intrigued me. 

    And finally, stay rooted in empathy and purpose. Read beyond the law, fuel your hobbies. Listen to voices outside your echo chamber. Do something that connects you to yourself the most. 

    Your journey is your own, so don’t fear the unconventional. Walk it with awareness, and you’ll find not just success, but meaning.

    *All views and responses mentioned here are personal.*

    Get in touch with Arrpita K Bhatt –

  • “Withstanding pressure, paying close attention to detail, building relationships, staying focussed and the virtue of “giving more than you take”, in the initial years are most important.” – Utsav Mukherjee, Founder of The Law Offices of Utsav Mukherjee.

    “Withstanding pressure, paying close attention to detail, building relationships, staying focussed and the virtue of “giving more than you take”, in the initial years are most important.” – Utsav Mukherjee, Founder of The Law Offices of Utsav Mukherjee.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    What motivated you to choose law as your career, and what factors influenced this decision? How did your time in law school further fuel your passion for the field and shape your aspirations moving forward?

    Back when I decided to pursue law, I did not know what exactly my career graph would look like. I just knew that I had some of the characteristics and skills which lawyers require. I was a voracious reader. I was a deep thinker. And I was a good communicator. Writing and speaking well came naturally to me. Law school was an interesting experience. I prioritized building relationships from my early days. Right from my internship days. In fact, some of my good friends and professional connections today are people who I met while interning with different law firms and offices. So my passion for law grew as I interned with different law firms and offices. I enjoy deep research and writing as much as I enjoy public speaking, and therefore, I thoroughly enjoyed my internships, as well as extra curricular activities in law school. My confidence grew further when I represented my university in National Moot Court Competitions, and Model United Nations. 

    In the early stages of your career, as you worked with various lawyers and law firms on landmark cases, what was your experience like? What moments or particular cases helped deepen your understanding of the law and shaped your approach as you were learning the ropes? Is there a particular experience you’d like to share with our readers?

    The early days of my professional journey, working with different chambers and firms, were indeed a grind. In the very beginning, you have to do a lot of grunt work. Yes, you have to understand the nitty gritties of legal procedures and filings. You initially learn to take notes meticulously, manage files, communicate efficiently with senior colleagues, office staff and clients. It’s only after this stage that you start getting more interesting work. I had an advantage in the sense that I worked with very small setups initially, so bigger responsibilities like drafting pleadings, briefing senior counsels and court appearances came to me sooner. In fact, in a little more than a year, I was managing client portfolios and cases myself. One of the chambers that I worked with had an interesting “anchor” system, which meant that every case was assigned to a particular associate, who was the “anchor” on that matter, and was almost entirely responsible for that case. I believe this is the best way for seniors to manage their offices, and younger lawyers to “learn the ropes” quickly. 

    Some of the cases that really broadened my understanding of law, its formation and application were landmark constitutional matters. This included matters like the petition challenging the constitutionality of the “Marital Rape Exception” and the petition seeking recognition of “Same Sex Marriages”. While working on these petitions, I got the opportunity to dive deep into various laws, including the Constitution itself, family laws, criminal laws, civil laws, property laws, public laws, citizenship laws and most importantly interpretation of statutory provisions by courts, and the courts’ take on laws made by the legislature that may otherwise seem to infringe upon fundamental rights, or violate the Constitution. These experiences helped me in handling other civil and commercial matters as well. Later on, when I shifted to Singh & Singh Law Firm LLP, the intellectual property law firm, originally founded by Hon’ble Justice Prathibha M. Singh and the Learned Senior Advocate Mr. Maninder Singh, the base that I had built in civil, commercial and constitutional laws, enabled me to pick up IP practice and its fundamentals rather quickly.  All of this eventually compounded and enabled me to kickstart my own practice in Intellectual Property, Tech, Regulatory & Commercial Laws. 

    At Singh & Singh Law Firm LLP, you worked on a number of significant intellectual property cases, such as those involving counterfeit products and trademark infringement. What challenges did you encounter when dealing with unknown defendants and e-commerce platforms? How did your experience in these cases shape your approach to cases involving intermediary liability and technology laws?

    That’s an interesting question. Acting against unknown defendants, especially counterfeiters, is a real challenge, for both aggrieved companies and the courts. This is because counterfeiters operate in an incredibly stealthy manner. There was one particular case, where we were representing a large pharma company, against unknown counterfeiters, who were listing counterfeits of our clients’ products on Flipkart. We fondly refer to unknown defendants in IP cases as Ashok Kumars, the Indian equivalent of “John Doe”. These Ashok Kumars would use the names and GST numbers of actual businesses, without their consent, to put up listings of counterfeits of our clients’ products. When our client went to the addresses of those businesses, they found out that their names and GST numbers were being misused by nefarious counterfeiters. These counterfeiters operate through a vicious nexus, and it becomes virtually impossible to trace them. So now the question is, what can be done in such cases? 

    When we approached the court, the first defendant in our lawsuit was “Ashok Kumar”. The second was Flipkart itself, and then we impleaded the businesses whose names and GST numbers were being misused. We got an injunction from the court, preventing the unauthorized usage of our client’s trade marks, and uploading of counterfeits on Flipkart. The court directed that whenever our client would inform Flipkart about any counterfeit listings, Flipkart would take down the listings within 24 hours of receiving the information. Further, both our client and Flipkart would file monthly compliance affidavits, with details of the listings reported and taken down. So this order was a step in the right direction, as intermediaries like Flipkart are normally only obligated to take down anything unlawful once they get a court order for each listing. Special orders like the one I’m telling you about are passed when there’s rampant and uncontrolled unlawful activity taking place on a platform, like the counterfeit listings. After this order was passed, we pressed that directions should be issued to Flipkart to take more proactive steps to prevent the listings of counterfeits on its platform, in light of the PUMA judgment. The case is still going on. All this information is available in the court orders available publicly, and articles reporting on them. 

    When handling domain name disputes before WIPO and NIXI, what critical factors should a business consider before pursuing a complaint or defending one? Can you walk us through a recent case you’ve managed in this area?

    There are a couple of factors that need to be seen in such cases. One is regarding registration of the “domain name” as a trade mark. A domain name is also a trade mark. Hence, like other trade mark disputes, the party which has prior adoption and prior registration is at an advantage in such cases. Another factor that is seen is the intent behind the usage. Is it honest? Or is it dishonest usage to come closer to someone else’s brand name, to deceive customers?

    The domain name dispute that I dealt with recently was quite interesting. It was with regard to cyber squatting. Cyber squatting is when someone registers a domain name without any intention of using it. Now why would someone do this? So that they can profit, when someone else who genuinely wants to use that domain name for their website comes forward, and is compelled to buy it from the cyber squatter. So I represented the genuine user against the cyber squatter. And we were able to settle the dispute in favour of our client. We were able to exert significant pressure because of the fact that our client’s trade name, which was the same as this squatter’s registered domain name, was already registered as a trade mark in more than 30 countries. 

    With growing global concerns about privacy, how do you guide clients in the tech and fintech sectors to ensure compliance with GDPR and other data privacy laws? Could you provide an example of a recent case where your team helped a client navigate privacy and regulatory challenges, especially with emerging technologies like blockchain or cryptocurrency?

    Well, we start with the basics. Having a solid privacy policy in place. GDPR compliance is essential. Now that the enforcement of the DPDP Act is also around the corner, we need to make sure that we address that as well. We advise companies to also have privacy compliant agreements with vendors and other stakeholders, to prevent any breaches of sensitive data. We advise them to have responsible data protection officers and effective grievance redressal mechanisms in place that are in compliance with privacy laws. 

    When it comes to Cryptocurrency and Blockchain technology clients, we have advised them extensively on KYC regulations, Anti Money Laundering Regulations and Counter Finance Terrorism Regulations. Since a lot of these exchanges are set up in places like the British Virgin Islands and the Cayman Islands, compliance with the regulations that I’ve mentioned is essential in these jurisdictions. We also tailor their terms and policies accordingly. It really is fascinating. 

    As businesses increasingly operate on an international scale, how do you address cross-border IP and commercial law challenges, particularly for clients in highly regulated sectors like pharmaceuticals or fintech? What strategies do you use to ensure compliance with both Indian and foreign regulations?

    It’s indeed true that businesses are increasingly operating on an international scale. Very recently, a client has approached us for IP filings and enforcement in several countries. One of the best mechanisms that we use for international IP filings is the Madrid Protocol. It allows an applicant to file for trade marks in several countries through a single application. So, one can file for trade marks through this mechanism in all the countries that accept Madrid filings. They just need a registered trade mark in one country as the base application. Although Madrid filing is expensive, it is still much more cost efficient than filing directly at each country’s national IP office, when you’re filing in several countries. Many large product based companies, such as pharmaceutical ones, operate in multiple countries, and such mechanisms are very helpful for them. 

    Although you can file through Madrid in several countries, the applications are eventually forwarded to the national IP offices of each country, where the registries may possibly raise objections, or third parties may file oppositions. To deal with such scenarios, we have a wide network of local IP counsels in several countries. We also utilize this network in case a client wants to file in a country that does not accept Madrid. 

    So that’s just international IP filings. Our network stretches across Asia, the Asia Pacific, Eurasia, Europe, Africa, the Middle East, Latin America and North America. I’ve met many of the fantastic IP counsels and firms in these countries personally, in the course of work and at international IP conferences. As far as contract drafting and advising on compliances for international clients is concerned, we do it ourselves, and rope in our affiliates and international partners across the globe for fine-tuning and on ground requirements. 

    What unique legal challenges do startups face when incorporating companies in India or abroad? How does your firm tailor its legal advisory to meet the specific needs of startups, especially in industries like e-commerce, technology, and fintech?

    Startups, particularly tech startups, have diverse legal needs. One of the key stages where they require counsel is when they’re negotiating contracts with investors. They have to be very careful, not to relinquish control, and having a lawyer carefully draft their contracts and guide them in negotiations is crucial. Of course, having their IP in place is also essential. Many startups actually want us to apply for their IP at the very outset, as it helps them display authenticity and secure investments.  One interesting, recent experience that I had, was drafting the contracts for an ed-tech startup, entering into a collaboration with another education company, to co-brand and offer courses to their customer base jointly. It was interesting as we had to draft the IP related clauses very strategically, to protect the interests of our client, in this co-branding venture. 

    Then, we also help them have appropriate policies in place and contracts, for employees, particularly with regard to confidentiality concerns, remuneration and benefits. If you’re asking me particularly about tech and fintech startups, we also advise them on specific regulations that apply to them, such as RBI regulations, NPCI regulations, the IT Rules, privacy regulations and the like. 

    Given your extensive experience, what advice would you offer to aspiring lawyers and law students who wish to build a rewarding and successful career in law?

    I would say that this line of work requires a lot of patience, persistence, development of a thick hide, and a knack for understanding business as well as you understand the law. Withstanding pressure, paying close attention to detail, building relationships, staying focussed and the virtue of “giving more than you take”, in the initial years are most important. I also developed most of these traits over a passage of time,  and am still growing. So I understand that it’s no cakewalk. One must keep at it. 

    Maintaining a balance between a high-pressure legal career and personal well-being is something many professionals struggle with. How do you manage to keep a healthy work-life balance, ensuring that both your professional commitments and personal life thrive without one overshadowing the other?

    I don’t think this part is as hard as people make it out to be. Legal professionals are busy every day of the week. But as they grow in their careers, they get more control over their time. So it’s for you to make the most of your spare time, and manage your waking hours efficiently. I allot some of my spare time to fun activities that also contribute to my professional growth, such as going to social events, or making episodes for my YouTube Channel, called the “Utsav Mukherjee IP & Tech Law Show”. I also go sightseeing whenever I attend conferences in other cities or countries. I enjoy reading and also watch a nice movie or two over the weekend. 

    Get in touch with Utsav Mukherjee –

  • “Resilience and adaptability are crucial especially in a rapidly evolving field like law”- Arun Visweswaran, Partner, Addleshaw Goddard

    “Resilience and adaptability are crucial especially in a rapidly evolving field like law”- Arun Visweswaran, Partner, Addleshaw Goddard

    This Interview has been published by Pragya Chandni and The SuperLawyer Team

    Sir, could you please share the pivotal moments or experiences during your academic journey, from studying Electronics and Communication Engineering at Anna University to pursuing Law at King’s College London? What influenced your decision to transition to law?

    I enrolled in Engineering as I always had an interest in the sciences and intended to pursue a career as an Engineer. However, both during school and later during my Engineering degree, I found myself consistently drawn to activities such as debating and writing and taking on leadership roles representing my peers. This led me to explore other career opportunities and law presented a perfect confluence of speaking, reading and writing skills which attracted me greatly more so given its impact on every aspect of society.  I also realised that the analytical and problem-solving skills I had developed while studying engineering would be an asset in legal practice and provide a unique perspective on legal issues.

    Studying law at King’s College London was a transformative experience. It not only provided me with a solid foundation in law (and confirmed my decision to switch paths) but also exposed me to a diverse and dynamic legal environment in one of the world’s leading legal hubs. 

    How did your early experiences as a trainee at Clifford Chance shape your career path? 

    My early experiences as a trainee at Clifford Chance were invaluable and played a significant role in shaping my career path. During my training, I was exposed to a broad range of practice areas including transactional work and disputes. This gave me a well-rounded understanding of the legal profession and allowed me to identify the areas I was most passionate about.  It also gave me many life-long friends who continue to inspire me.

    Being part of a global law firm also offered me the opportunity to work on complex and high stakes matters in three different jurisdictions being the UK, Dubai and Singapore. This experience was instrumental in developing my skills in navigating cross-border legal issues and managing diverse client relationships.

    The firm’s approach of providing the highest quality of service to clients and its emphasis on continuous learning and development have greatly influenced my approach to legal practice. These early experiences laid a strong foundation for my subsequent roles and continues to guide me in my current position as a Partner at Addleshaw Goddard LLP.

    How has your experience evolved with your recent transition to Addleshaw Goddard LLP as a Partner in their disputes team?

    I am grateful for the opportunity to join the talented team of lawyers at Addleshaw Goddard LLP who are a leading global law firm. I joined them at a time of unprecedented growth for the firm which has been built on a solid platform of expertise and providing exceptional legal services to clients. These principles resonate strongly with my approach to legal practice, and I look forward to growing further with them. 

    You’ve been involved in many high-value and complex cases throughout your career. Could you walk us through a specific case that stands out to you and share the challenges you faced and lessons learned? 

    The first construction dispute I handled as an associate was also a memorable one due to the challenges it posed to me personally and the lessons learned. This was a large infrastructure dispute valued at over USD 200 million and I was leading all aspects of the matter from drafting the pleadings, handling witnesses and experts to conducting a large part of the advocacy.  

    While I had participated in various moots during law school, this was my first experience of advocacy (after law school) where I had to cross-examine three fact witnesses and the delay expert. In the process of preparing my questions, I came across one of the clearest expositions of the art of cross-examination in Irving Younger’s lecture from the 1970’s (which is available on Youtube). Taking his “10 commandments” as a guide, I carefully prepared my strategy for cross-examination and delved into technical questions with the assistance of our delay expert. It was therefore entirely satisfying to have effectively cross-examined the expert’s opinion and challenged their credibility such that the Tribunal dismissed their report entirely.  It was particularly gratifying when the other side personally congratulated me on a very good cross-examination. 

    This case taught me the importance of thorough preparation and the value of a well-planned cross-examination. It also reinforced my focus on construction disputes where my engineering background brings an ability to delve into both the legal and technical issues.  

    With your extensive experience across the Middle East how has working in diverse legal systems and cultures shaped your approach to dispute resolution, and what unique challenges have you encountered?

    Working in diverse legal systems and cultures in the Middle East has significantly shaped my approach to dispute resolution. It has taught me the importance of understanding the local business culture, legal landscape, and the unique dynamics of each jurisdiction. 

    Each country in the Middle East has a unique legal system and regulatory framework. For instance, the DIFC Courts in Dubai and the ADGM Courts in Abu Dhabi operate on a common law framework, while other parts of the UAE follow civil law. Understanding these differences and being able to operate effectively within these diverse legal systems requires adaptability and has been an opportunity for professional growth.

    Overall, my experience in the Middle East has enriched my legal practice and provided me with a broader and more nuanced perspective on dispute resolution.

    Given your role in tech disputes, how do you navigate the intersection of technology and law? Can you share a notable case or challenge you faced in this realm and how it was resolved?

    Navigating the intersection of technology and law requires a good understanding of both fields. It’s about being able to understand the technical aspects of a case, as well as the legal implications. This is where my background in engineering combined with my legal expertise comes into play.

    One notable case I handled involved advising a global tech company on a multi-million-dollar software licensing dispute with a global software/cloud service provider. The case was complex as it involved intricate details of software licensing, cloud computing and IP rights. The challenge was to understand the technical aspects of the software provided and how that interacted with the contract terms and the facts which were quite complex. 

    Our advice allowed the client to successfully conclude a settlement with more than 90% reduction of the claim amount. The case was a testament to the importance of understanding both the technology and the law in tech disputes. It also highlighted the value of negotiation and mediation skills in resolving complex disputes.

    How has sharing your insights through publications contributed to your professional growth, and how do you stay updated on the latest developments in your areas of expertise?

    Sharing insights through publications has been a vital part of my professional growth. It has not only allowed me to contribute to the broader legal discourse but has also helped me clarify my own understanding of complex issues. Furthermore, my publications have also been a valuable tool for engaging with clients and other professionals in the field.

    Staying updated on the latest developments in my areas of expertise is a continuous process. I regularly read legal articles, attend seminars and conferences, and participate in professional networks and associations. I also engage in regular discussions with colleagues and other professionals in the field, who often provide valuable insights into emerging trends and issues.

    Drawing on your experience, what advice would you give to recent law graduates who are just starting their legal careers? What key lessons have you learned that you believe would be valuable for those entering the legal profession today?

    1. Find your passion: Law is a broad field with many specializations. Try to gain exposure to different areas of law early in your career to identify what truly interests you. Once you find your passion, dive in and become an expert in that area.
    2. Never stop learning: The law is constantly evolving, and it’s important to stay updated on the latest developments in your field of practice. Regularly read legal journals, attend seminars and webinars, and participate in professional associations.
    3. Develop strong relationships: Building strong relationships with colleagues, mentors, and clients is crucial for advancement in the legal profession – and this starts right from law school!  
    4. Work on communication skills: Effective communication is key in the legal profession. Whether you’re advocating for a client in court or drafting legal advice the ability to convey your ideas in a simple, structured, and persuasive manner is crucial. 
    5. Embrace technology: Technology is transforming the legal profession. Be open to learning about new legal tech tools (e.g.AI) and how they can enhance your practice.

    As for key lessons, one of the most important I’ve learned is that resilience and adaptability are crucial especially in a rapidly evolving field like law and one should remain curious about developments rather than shun them altogether. The other lesson imparted to me by a senior counsel I admire is that of the 3 P’s – Preparation, Preparation, Preparation – which is critical to success in any case.

    Get in touch with Arun Visweswaran-

  • Witness Ishita’s unique approach to supporting startups, SMEs, and SMBs, where legal challenges are met with a combination of intersectional learning and on-site visits to comprehend the intricacies of each business. – Unveiling the Journey of Ishita Sharma, Partner at Fathom Legal

    Witness Ishita’s unique approach to supporting startups, SMEs, and SMBs, where legal challenges are met with a combination of intersectional learning and on-site visits to comprehend the intricacies of each business. – Unveiling the Journey of Ishita Sharma, Partner at Fathom Legal

    This interview has been published by  Priyanka Karwa and The SuperLawyer Team

    Can you share your journey of how you ended up pursuing a career in law, particularly highlighting any key moments or influences that led you to this path?

    Since a young age, I have been captivated by the notion of engaging in public service. Throughout my life, I have consistently embodied an altruistic spirit, always eager to extend a helping hand whenever the opportunity arises. This proclivity guided my career aspirations, causing them to fluctuate between the realms of medicine and civil service, ultimately culminating in my decision to pursue a career in law.

    The thrust behind this choice stems from my inherent sense of compassion. Moreover, the unresolved intricacies of one or two-generational family disputes served as a potent motivational catalyst propelling me toward the legal profession. This personal connection and resonance with the challenges of familial discord have played a pivotal role in shaping my professional trajectory, a narrative that aligns with the experiences shared by many individuals, including myself, on their journey toward a chosen career.

    Your academic achievements are impressive, including a degree from National Law University and a Harvard University Summer Course in Intellectual Property Rights. How did these experiences shape your approach to practising law?

    The rigorous curriculum at National Law University provided me with a solid foundation in legal principles and analytical thinking. It instilled in me a sense of discipline and a deep understanding of the complexities within the legal field. This educational background has been instrumental in shaping my methodical and detail-oriented approach when addressing legal matters.

    Further, the Harvard University Summer Course in Intellectual Property Rights enriched my perspective by exposing me to global standards and cutting-edge developments in the field. Engaging with a diverse cohort and learning from leading experts broadened my understanding of the nuances in intellectual property law. This experience heightened my appreciation for the intersection of law and innovation, fostering a creative and forward-thinking mindset in my legal practice. Not only that, it was only after this course that I was able to identify my target market and understand the businesses that we work with.

    In essence, these academic experiences have equipped me with a robust legal foundation, a meticulous approach to problem-solving, and a global perspective that I bring to my practice at Fathom Legal, enhancing my ability to navigate the complexities of the legal landscape thereby making Fathom Legal, Advocates and Corporate Consultants a full-service Entrepreneurship Law firm.

    You’ve had significant experience in corporate law, from debt recovery to Corporate disputes including company law cases as well. Can you tell your areas of work and what were your learnings from it?

    Throughout my 6-years of practice, I’ve navigated diverse legal landscapes, handling cases spanning from debt recovery, real estate, Insolvency and bankruptcy matters, as well as issues of Oppression and Mismanagement, Customs, and White-Collar Crimes, notably under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act before the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence.

    On the corporate front, our focus extends beyond litigation. We support clients in enhancing their technological frameworks by integrating legal expertise, ensuring compliance, data security, and addressing workplace safety concerns including Prevention of Sexual Harassment (POSH) and DNI aspects. Our role involves providing comprehensive legal guidance on day-to-day organizational challenges. Pioneering the domains of Web 3.0 and Artificial Intelligence, we’ve assisted numerous startups with offshore incorporations and global entity restructuring via mergers and acquisitions.

    Each case presents a unique learning curve, emphasizing the significance of understanding clients’ pain points before meetings and maintaining composure during challenging situations. Continuous legal advancements prompt ongoing learning, offering a wealth of knowledge each day.

    Your work involves supporting startups, SMEs, and SMBs. What unique legal challenges do these businesses face in India, and how do you help them overcome these challenges?

    My Law firm, Fathom Legal, Advocates & Corporate Consultants is a one-of-a-kind full-service Entrepreneurship Law firm in India with its major clientele being SME’s, SMB’s and Mid-Cap companies. The reason to specifically focus on these industries is because, in my opinion, they form the backbone of our nation’s GDP. 

    Our client pool is versatile. A lot of our clients are SaaS companies, aggregators, Fintech platforms, Edtech Platforms, Export houses, traders, manufacturers etc. The most common problems that they face is cancellation of projects midway, unpaid bills, quality issues to state a few.

    Our team has a very different methodology of working. We believe in intersectional learning. A lawyer with an understanding of business is all that a client wants.  We visit our clients’ offices/factories and try to get hold of as many business nitty-gritties as possible to assist our clients in the most efficient manner.  After developing a detailed understanding we review their paperwork to identify the gaps in their systems and rectify those gaps through agreements and contracts making sure a proper checks and balance system is created within each organization for its smooth functioning.  Of course, it takes a couple of months to iron out all the long existing problems but we believe in providing a permanent long-term solution rather than a temporary fix.    

    Beyond your legal career, you also run an NGO, Paritripta Foundation, focusing on social causes and justice. Could you tell us more about the foundation’s work and its impact on the community?

    Paritripta Foundation holds a special place in my heart and is being nurtured as the legal advocacy arm of Fathom Legal. This not-for-profit organization spearheads various impactful projects, including ‘Project Patrkarita,’ dedicated to fostering free and unbiased media. Additionally, ‘Project Ankush’ focuses on educating young minds about various forms of harassment and equipping them with coping mechanisms. There are many more parallel projects that we wish to take up but are at a halt due to the limitation of funds.

    Moreover, we’re actively engaged in advanced research addressing critical societal issues. These encompass concerns like household cooking gas restrictions, the implementation of green roofs, challenges within overcrowded prisons leading to same-sex assault, as well as the exploration of PrEP and PEP drugs for HIV treatment. These issues strike at the core of our society and demand urgent attention.

    Our aim is to pursue public interest litigations on these matters, striving to contribute to a brighter and secure future for our nation.

    You’ve published several papers and books on legal topics. Is there a particular topic you’re passionate about, and can you briefly discuss why it matters in today’s legal landscape?

    In today’s legal landscape, Foreign Portfolio Investment (FPI) and Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) play crucial roles in shaping India’s economic and legal framework. Their impact extends beyond the economic domain to influence legal policies, regulatory frameworks, and compliance standards.

    FDI is critical for India’s growth trajectory, as it aids in infrastructure development, technological advancements, and job creation whereas FPI brings in short-term capital that can be beneficial but also poses risks due to its volatile nature. Both FDI and FPI contribute to India’s balance of payments, foreign exchange reserves, and overall economic stability.

    FPI and FDI necessitate robust legal frameworks and regulations to govern their entry, operation, and exit from the Indian market. Legal structures such as the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA), Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) regulations, and various other laws are crucial in governing these investments. 

    Both FPI and FDI significantly influence India’s legal landscape by necessitating robust legal frameworks, stringent compliance, dispute resolution mechanisms, policy advocacy, and the protection of investor rights. Legal experts like us play a vital role in facilitating, navigating, and safeguarding these investments within the country’s legal framework.

    You’ve had the opportunity to work remotely with international clients. What challenges and opportunities does remote legal work present, and how do you navigate them?

    Handling international clients presents a captivating yet challenging scenario. Initially, navigating different time zones posed a hurdle, compelling me to work during unconventional hours. Communication barriers with attorneys in Belgium and Japan were another obstacle. Understanding the diverse legal landscapes across various jurisdictions was crucial; lacking that knowledge made operationalizing in specific regions a challenge. Embracing technology became imperative for seamless cross-border collaboration, and leveraging the latest tech proved instrumental in streamlining processes.

    However, working with international clients was an eye-opening experience. It broadened my global perspective significantly, offering exposure to diverse practices. This exposure, in turn, elevated my performance, aligning it with international standards. Moreover, it instilled in me the importance of trusting and delegating tasks, a pivotal aspect in our industry.

    One particularly demanding yet rewarding client, a law and lobbying firm in the United States, reshaped my outlook on international relations. This collaboration extended to intriguing opportunities, such as RSVP to closed sessions at The White House. As a legal journalist, having my articles published in prominent legal blogs in the United States has been an enriching outcome of this association.

    Overall, this experience revolutionized my understanding of international relations’ intricacies, emphasizing the significance of trust, and offering unparalleled insights into navigating complex global landscapes.

    As a final question, what advice would you like to share with fresh graduates who are about to enter the legal profession, considering your journey and experiences in the field?

    To the fresh graduates, I just want to say that stay curious and stay hungry for knowledge. Go aggressive on your hunger. Explore as much as possible. Catch up with the technology and stay ahead of it. For a flourishing practice make sure to meet new people and create your own network. Strengthen your logical, analytical, legal and business skills. Seek mentorship and develop soft skills. Explore diverse fields of law before you are sure to identify what you enjoy the most. Uphold ethical standards. Trust and integrity are pillars of the legal profession; don’t compromise them for any reason. Also remember, In the face of challenges or rejections, perseverance is vital. Keep pushing forward; every setback is a chance to grow.

    Get in touch with Ishita Sharma-

  • In Conversation with: Bhagyashree Pancholy, CoFounder at Avyana GmbH, Metalawyers India, Web3 Law and AI Law Specialist

    In Conversation with: Bhagyashree Pancholy, CoFounder at Avyana GmbH, Metalawyers India, Web3 Law and AI Law Specialist

    This interview has been published by Prabhjot Singh, Priyanka Karwa and The SuperLawyer Team

    Did you always want to become a Lawyer or was it something that you decided in the later part of your school life? What other career options would you have considered, if not particularly law?

    No, I had never wanted to become a lawyer, in fact, my dream was to become an astronaut after watching I dream of Genie as a child. But after graduating with Geography Honours from Miranda House, Delhi University, I filled Law faculty form, sat for the entrance exam, and cleared it. Since it was the first exam I cleared after graduation, and did not want to study anymore during the summer breaks, I just decided to join Campus Law Centre.

    I would have been an environmentalist or a vet if not for a lawyer.

    What can be the real challenges while establishing a career in the field of law?

    There could be many, but I will restrict myself to the two I experienced and get asked about a lot:

    (1) godfather or having mentors/family members in the legal field,

    (2) how can I work remotely or cross border as a lawyer.

    Definitely, in litigation, having a family member or a mentor that supports a novice lawyer helps. But let us come to the second challenge of working remotely and across borders.

    Covid changed the way the world worked and it pushed the Indian judiciary to adopt the technology. Many advocates pleaded from the comfort of their houses by using video communication platforms and many more parties to the lawsuit were given an opportunity to hear their cases in person.

    As COVID restrictions loosened up, many lawyers went back to the old way and yet many new ones want to work remotely. And some, also cross borders.

    What many lawyers do not understand is that with globalization and emerging technology, lawyers will have to be border-less.

    New tech and associated legal areas like data protection, privacy, web 3, cryptocurrency etc. are border-less and the system will have to move from litigation in a specific country to alternate dispute mechanisms like arbitration or mediation. 

    New lawyers will not have to appear in front of a district judge every day, they will be assisting legal counsels and judges outside of India and will need to know many other laws apart from Indian laws.

    This can be challenging as now lawyers will literally be competing with lawyers globally

    Where individuals are still struggling learning about GDPR and data protection, you had a control on it way more earlier, what was your preparation for the same and how professionals can take charge on such critical laws?

    I actually started working in data and privacy when GDPR didn’t exist and many were not aware of this right of theirs.

    At my first place of work in 2012, which was a tech/SaaS company that hosted websites globally, I was introduced to user privacy. The lack of laws and fewer judicial precedents meant every builder had their own way of assigning roles and responsibilities when it came to data privacy.

    The strict segregation of controller and processor came much later when GDPR came into effect, but back then, we were responsible for assigning such roles and interpreting local IT laws in a way that protected the rights of both, user and builder, across jurisdictions. 

    My seniors in the legal team were my guides who had a rich experience in such fields with big companies like Intel, Microsoft, and Google who taught me everything I know about data protection and privacy policies. 

    Even after GDPR came into effect, we did not have to re-do a lot, as GDPR is more about regulation than prohibition (many users believe that under GDPR, companies are prohibited from storing and processing their data which is incorrect).

    I am seeing a repeat of 2012 now in web3 and AI space. The laws are currently non-existed and are being drafted, and each user is interpreting and applying local laws to the best of their knowledge. 

    I would suggest the upcoming legal minds not focus on a lot of courses, but gain knowledge of such laws by experience. I never sat for any data protection and privacy exam, have no certification in this, and yet I know these laws because I learned from working in these sectors.

    Congratulations on being listed as Remote Influencer and Women Lawyer in the Legal Technology Sector, how would you describe your role as a leading lawyer in the technology sector?

    Not easy, in short. Tech is a male-dominated world and when I attend business meetings as a co-founder of my company that researches in the field of Artificial Intelligence, I do get an occasional look.

    Again, I started working remotely in 2012 for many personal reasons and it was very, very tough to break into the industry. Lawyers working remotely was unheard of, and to be in the tech sector, even a lawyer needed to understand the basics of it.

    After working hard for ten years, I am now in a much more comfortable situation where I work on new technology, overseas labour compliance, artificial intelligence and law, remote work and law, and lecture at universities.

    Though it may appear as if I have settled, I can assure you that every month, I end up reading and learning about new tech, digging some judgments on them, and interpreting laws (even though I don’t speak many European languages or am qualified to practice there.

    I have interpreted German, French, Swedish, Swiss, Australian, Canadian, etc laws for my clients in the tech industry or as my role as the GC at Lano Software GmbH), aiding courts and litigators in lawsuits around web3 and AI law across the globe and going back to studying some more.

    At my first workplace, I ended up learning PHP as it was needed for me to understand the tech before writing user rights documentation for it. Now, for my company, I am learning Python to be able to understand our projects, write accurate legal documents for the products and aid my co-founders.

    What are the challenges that HR’s in their work life face with emerging technologies like Meta Verse and Web 3? And how can they overcome those?

    Let us first understand that when employees work in metaverse or any other virtual platform, it is deemed to be a workplace. Employment and workplace health and safety laws will be applicable in these workplaces as well.

    In 2 years since I have been working in this tech, I have seen the following challenges that HRs have faced and I was consulted:

    1. Establishing the identities of avatars that employees use in the metaverse

    2. Checking if the employees are using a VPN or not

    3. VR headsets that are available in the market are bulky and may cause temporary disorientation, watery eyes, headaches, or other nerve-related issues if used for longer periods of time. Injuries from the usage of VR headsets may amount to workplace injuries for which employers will be liable.

    4. Cases of cyberbullying, harassment, or discrimination in the virtual workplace will also be the liability of the employers.

    5. HRs will need to remember that employment contracts signed in the metaverse may not be legally binding, hence, such contracts should be signed as per the local laws in the non-virtual world.
    6. Salaries, remittances, perks, and benefits to the employees must be done in legal tenders only. There is a trend of accepting crypto payments as salaries or to contractors for their services rendered, which is illegal. However, there are a few apps that facilitate this and can be used as they deduct the mandatory taxes from the gross amount, turn the net amount into cryptocurrency and transfer it to the beneficiary.

    What HRs can do to overcome such issues:

    1. Draft workplace policies that take into account the metaverse workplace.
    2. Include cyber bullying, online harassment, discrimination and other forms of online safety norms in the company policies

    3. Prohibit the use of VPNs by employees

    4. Maintain and update a list of avatars that employees use and ensure that they are not copyrighted and are available for commercial and non-commercial use 

    5. Draft an extensive and clear-cut workplace safety policy

    6. Conduct company-wide training for the usage and code of conduct of the VR workplace

    7. Set salaries and compensation expectations right. Will these be made in cryptocurrencies, if yes, how and if no, why should be mentioned in the employment contracts.

    8. Draft a VR workplace policy, in addition to the regular workplace policy, that should contain all the issues related to VR.

    You have a decade of experience in dealing with employment laws, at a similar pace, how crucial is it for the employees to strike a balance between work-life balance and are there any laws that we should be aware of significantly?

    Since I work for a German company, I can tell you that the laws in the EU are very strict and employee-friendly. As per German laws, I cannot be disturbed during my non-working hours and cannot work overtime, unless mutually consented.

    In India, the concept of work-life balance is unheard of at many companies. Toxic work culture, unnecessary work pressure, office politics and favoritism, and lack of knowledge of the employee’s part of their rights are duties are major challenges.

    I have to admit that these challenges also exist in the EU, but there are regulations that prohibit employers from doing certain actions that result in a toxic workplace environment.

    The laws also exist in India, but the question is always of implementation and the lengthy process of getting justice. Labour courts in India are slow and definitely have a lot of work, but then employers do manage to get out with little to no repercussions. 

    The HRs and the in-house legal team at companies should continuously educate the employees about their rights so that friction is easily mitigated.

    In the EU, employees enjoy protection to a very large extent and the onus is on the employer for many issues, thereby, making it easier for the employee who has been wronged to get justice.

    One must always remember, you are replaceable at the workplace, but not at home.

    Will AI be the future of law?

    Legal tech is to a lawyer what a tractor is to a farmer. A recent report I read mentioned that AI was more accurate at reviewing a contract than a team of very experienced lawyers (96% to 81%). And then there was a very interesting discussion on if AI will replace lawyers.

    Having worked in deep AI for a little less than three years now, I can tell you that legal tech powered by AI will be a boon and not a bane.

    Currently, AI is not 100% accurate and there will always be a need for a human to counter-review as AI has its own limitations. AI will be an aide and not the controller.

    In a few courts in the Netherlands, for a test project, AI was also deployed to aid the judges in delivering judgments, researching case laws, and suggesting legal theories which actually helped the judges a lot. 

    Of course, lawyers in the future will intervene to eliminate AI bias and that I think will be a major game changer, combining the accuracy of AI along with the rationality of humans.

    Can an Advocate be soft-spoken yet established; what do you think about how the legal profession takes this quality?

    Yes, absolutely. It is very wrong for people to think that a loud or aggressive individual will be a good lawyer. To be a good lawyer, one needs to have sound reasoning, analysis, logic, and effective communication skills along with strong professional skills and ethics. 

    Get in touch with Bhagyashree Pancholy-

  • In Conversation With: Namrata Pahwa, Advocate- practicing Fashion and Entertainment laws, and also featured in the WIPF Powerful Women in IP, 2021.

    In Conversation With: Namrata Pahwa, Advocate- practicing Fashion and Entertainment laws, and also featured in the WIPF Powerful Women in IP, 2021.

    This interview has been published by Sonali Parashar, Ojuswi Sahay, and the SuperLawyer Team

    What factors made you opt for Law as a profession? How would you describe yourself as a law student? 

    There were 3 main reasons for me to choose to study law– a) I was good at debating and articulating my thoughts; b) I was in sheer awe of the black robes worn by Advocates and c) I wanted to opt for a profession different than the members of the family (the rebel in me).

    You completed your masters in International Business Law from the National University of Singapore (NUS). What challenges have you faced in the admissions process? 

    I applied to NUS because I was aware of and most impressed by their pedagogue and selection methodology. NUS always looks at a student in a holistic manner without focusing on one aspect alone. I remember writing my Statement of Purpose with a lot of heart and I think that’s what got me through. The admission process was as smooth as butter and it was the best time of my life!

    What special efforts does a law student have to make while pursuing law as a profession?

    For any student to succeed in the field of choice one has to be diligent, focused and disciplined. These key strengths are what will get you through anything. In the same vein, I would like to add, that as a law student, you should write as much as you can, do as many internships as you can and be a part of the requisite co-curricular.

    After interning and working under various law firms, you started practicing independently in Fashion and Entertainment Law, IP Prosecution, transactional and litigation. How would you describe your role as an independent practitioner? How strenuous is it to deal with and lead the matters? 

    My role as an independent practitioner is manyfold and I get to wear different hats from being an accountant to a paralegal to even a PR manager, but I wouldn’t have it any other way. It is most stressful but not as much as it is exhilarating and satisfactory.

    Fashion and Entertainment Law, these words excite most young creative-minded lawyers. What according to you this area of law seeks from an advocate? Is this area as exciting as it sounds? How can one enter into Fashion and Entertainment Law?

    I say often that I work in the most exciting genre/vertical/niche of civil law which is Fashion and Entertainment. I can understand the appeal that it has over students and young lawyers but I must warn them that like any other vertical of law, this also demands an equal amount of research, skill and strategy. Fashion and Entertainment law is an umbrella that houses many genres of law like Torts, Contracts, Intellectual Property, Custom law, Employment law, Criminal law and many others.

    First, a student must understand each aspect of Fashion and Entertainment law which only internships can provide. Read as many cases and keep yourself updated on the latest developments. One can join a law firm with such a vertical or be an in-house lawyer for a fashion brand or even enter it through academics.

    Would you like to discuss how brand names create a monopoly in the fashion industry? 

    For a brand name to create a monopoly in the market, they have to protect its name in terms of a trademark, its designs in terms of copyright or design, and its technology in terms of a patent and safeguard all of them through contracts. Apart from this, global goodwill and repute play a big role in creating a niche in the market.

    You are also accredited with WIPF Powerful Women in IP 2021. Would you like to discuss your achievement and the hard work involved in that?

    Before WIPF I was offered many awards for which I would have had to pay a sum of money in some form or the other. I detest that approach. So when WIPF got in touch with me, their first email stated that this did not involve any pecuniary transaction. This list was a compilation of the best Female IP lawyers in the country. For me to be on the same list as Justice Pratibha Singh and both of my ex-employers, was enough gratification for me. 

    Since the first lockdown, I shifted my focus online by conducting various webinars and talks. I also formulated my own Fashion Law Module. All I had was consistency and hard work and that was all I needed to get me to where I am today.

    What considerations do you take into account while hiring a legal professional/ graduate in your firm? What advice would you give to others who want to set off in a similar direction?

    I look at my juniors/interns as my colleagues and equals and expect them to work as hard as I do. A brief understanding of IP is important, the rest one always learns along the way. 

    Don’t be afraid is what I’ll tell others. Don’t hesitate in asking for work or looking for guidance. Teach yourself something new every day and you shall be more than fine!

    Get in touch with Namrata Pahwa –