Super Lawyer

Tag: Transactions

  • “Looking back, I’d say building an international legal career requires a combination of strong technical skills, cultural curiosity, and adaptability.” – Nayanika Ruia, Associate at Goodwin, United States.

    “Looking back, I’d say building an international legal career requires a combination of strong technical skills, cultural curiosity, and adaptability.” – Nayanika Ruia, Associate at Goodwin, United States.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Being dual-qualified in both India and New York is a remarkable achievement. What first inspired you to choose law as a career, and what motivated your decision to build an international practice?

    Hailing from a family of prominent lawyers and businessmen, I have been exposed to the world of commercial and legal transactions since a very young age. My initial interest in law was sparked during family dinner conversations about how legal frameworks influence business strategy and drive corporate growth. Those early discussions made me curious about the intersection of law and commerce and ultimately motivated me to pursue a career in law. My interest in corporate law was primarily triggered after I participated in a corporate and securities law moot court competition in law school, where I conducted research on issues relating to insider trading and investment fraud. My constant endeavor to explore and navigate through the practical aspects and intricacies of commercial laws motivated me to pursue internships with corporate law teams at premier law firms and various multinational companies. As I delved deeper into the field, I was drawn to the dynamic, fast-paced world of mergers and acquisitions and private equity—areas where legal precision, business insight, and negotiation strategy converge. After graduation, I gained extensive transactional experience in the M&A practice at AZB & Partners, Mumbai and Trilegal, Mumbai. Qualifying in India gave me a strong foundation in company laws and exposure to a rapidly evolving corporate landscape. However, I was increasingly working on cross-border deals involving US investors, Delaware entities, and multi-jurisdictional structures. This motivated me to pursue an LL.M. in the USA, not only to deepen my understanding of the US law but also to add value in cross-border transactions. My goal has always been to operate at the intersection of jurisdictions, helping Indian companies scale internationally and advising US private equity players and venture capital firms on investments into emerging markets. New York is the financial capital of this world and home to all the big multi-national corporations, private equity firms, and financial institutions. International qualification in New York was a natural step towards building that kind of practice and seeking the desired global exposure. I wanted to be at the forefront of my practice, in the city where all big-ticket matters unfold. Being dual-qualified in both India and New York has been instrumental in shaping my legal career, particularly in corporate law, where cross-border transactions are increasingly the norm.

    During law school, you completed 15 internships at some of India’s most prestigious law firms and multinational organizations. How did these diverse experiences shape your inclination towards corporate law, and what key lessons from those years continue to influence your professional approach today?

    Completing 15 internships during law school gave me an unparalleled opportunity to explore different areas of law and understand how legal theory translates into practice. From interning in the corporate teams of top-tier corporate law firms to in-house legal teams at multinationals, each experience offered a unique perspective. Learning the practical aspects of transactional work while undertaking due diligence exercises and drafting agreements gave me a hands-on exposure into the professional work at law firms and a glance into the legal requirements of companies from a client’s perspective. While this industry demands long and hectic working hours with challenging work-life balance, I enjoyed the fast-paced and high-stakes environment, and more importantly, I was fascinated by how lawyers help structure complex transactions, negotiate and draft key transaction documents, and manage stakeholder expectations by aligning legal solutions with business goals. I still remember the lessons I learned from my mentor, a counsel at Trilegal that continue to guide my professional growth till date: (a) Adaptability: working across diverse teams, sectors, matters and legal issues taught me how to quickly assess context and contribute meaningfully, even with limited time or background in this fast-paced industry; (b) Precision: handling high-value transactions at law firms taught me early on that attention to detail isn’t just expected, it’s essential. It’s not limited to the role of a junior associate reviewing documents, but rather a discipline that must be upheld at every level of the deal team; and (c) Communication: be it drafting a memo or conducting a due diligence review, clarity in communication and collaboration as a team make the long working hours bearable and the work more enjoyable. Looking back, those years gave me more than just technical exposure, they solidified my decision to pursue a career in corporate law and helped me build the skillset, habits, mindset, and curiosity that I carry into every transaction even today.

    At Columbia Law School, you not only pursued your LL.M. but also engaged deeply as a Research Assistant and took on leadership roles in student associations. How did these academic and co-curricular experiences expand your perspective on law and prepare you for a global career?

    Pursuing my LL.M. at Columbia Law School was transformative, not only because of the world-class academic environment, but also due to the breadth of co-curricular opportunities that enriched my understanding of the law from a global and interdisciplinary perspective. The opportunity to learn from distinguished professors and engage with the vibrant community made it an enriching educational experience! As a Research Assistant to Professor Jeffery N. Gordon, I had the opportunity to work closely on comparative legal issues, including research on complex M&A issues and legal grey areas, which not only sharpened my analytical and research skills but also gave me insight into how legal systems address ambiguity across jurisdictions. This role honed my ability to approach legal challenges from both doctrinal and policy-based angles. Beyond the classroom and theoretical learning environment, I took on leadership roles in student associations, such as, Student Editor for the Columbia Journal of Asian Law and Secretary of the Columbia Corporate Responsibility Association. I was also an active member of the Columbia Business & Law Association and Columbia Law Women’s Association. Organizing and moderating panel discussions alongside legal scholars and engaging/ interacting with BigLaw partners broadened my perspective on the practice of law across different commercial environments that I now regularly witness in my cross-border practice. My proactive participation in co-curricular activities allowed me to collaborate with my peers from diverse legal backgrounds, exchange perspectives on global legal issues, and build meaningful connections within the international legal community. Together, these academic and extracurricular engagements at Columbia Law not only enhanced my cross-cultural exposure but also equipped me with the global mindset to thrive in the US legal fraternity. In a nutshell, choosing to study at Columbia was one of the best investments I’ve made, not just academically, but personally as well. While the LL.M. program offered world-class legal training and exposure to a truly global network, living in New York added a whole other layer to the experience. I took full advantage of what the city had to offer, catching Broadway shows, exploring museums, trying out food from around the world, and just soaking in the vibe and energy of the city.

    Having worked with leading law firms before pursuing your international practice and master’s degree, what cultural and procedural differences stood out to you between legal systems? What were some things you had to learn, adapt, or even unlearn to navigate these differences effectively?

    Having worked on M&A and private equity deals in both India and the USA, the differences were striking. While the skillset of a corporate lawyer is arguably transferable and is not jurisdiction specific, in India, deal-making often involves more regulatory oversight, heavily negotiated transaction documents, partly due to enforcement uncertainties and foreign investment restrictions (FDI). In contrast, US transactions are typically fast-paced, more standardized, and heavily focused on commercial outcomes / business goals through precise contract drafting. For instance, I worked on a cross-border transaction that involved a Delaware entity that wanted to acquire an Indian company as its wholly owned subsidiary. As part of the transaction, I realized that Delaware enjoys significantly greater flexibility by providing the board of directors the discretion to govern the entity, whereas, in India, the corporate governance of an entity is more prescriptive and compliance-heavy with stricter rules on matters like related-party transactions, board composition, and structuring. While these legal safeguards in India serve important governance goals, they can sometimes limit the structuring creativity available in complex deals. Culturally, I had to adapt from a well-defined organizational structure in Indian law firms to a more collaborative, client-facing role in the USA, where lawyers early-on in their careers are expected to engage more directly and strategically with the client. I also noticed a shift from providing detailed legal analysis to offering simple, concise (to the point), business-oriented advice, which is critical in the US private equity and M&A space. This transition pushed me to unlearn overly cautious habits and instead focus on practical, deal-driven lawyering, a mindset that’s essential in global transactional work. One of the most appreciated cultural differences I experienced is that the “open door policy” in US law firms is genuinely practiced and not just stated. There’s a strong emphasis on accessibility, mentorship, and collaboration, regardless of hierarchy. Junior lawyers are encouraged to ask questions, contribute ideas, and engage directly with senior associates, partners and even clients, which fosters both learning and confidence.

    In your current role, you represent private equity firms, venture companies, and strategic investors in complex cross-border transactions. What have been the most rewarding aspects of working on such high-value deals, and how do you approach the challenge of reconciling multiple statutes and jurisdictions?

    I am currently a mid-level associate at Goodwin Procter, LLP, New York, focusing my practice on domestic and cross-border mergers and acquisitions, specifically leveraged buyouts, private equity transactions, and venture capital investments. Working on complex cross-border transactions has been incredibly rewarding, both intellectually and professionally. The most fulfilling aspect is helping clients navigate high-stakes decisions that directly shape and impact their business growth. The best part about my work is that it never gets boring!  Whether it’s representing private equity firms, venture-backed companies, or strategic investors, each transaction presents a unique set of challenges and opportunities. Being at the intersection of law, business and strategy is both challenging and energizing. There is a thrill in closing complex M&A deals. One of the key complexities is managing/ coordinating cross-border work and reconciling multiple legal regimes, especially when deal terms, corporate governance standards, or enforceability vary significantly across jurisdictions. We approach this by collaborating closely with key transaction stakeholders such as RWI insurer, opposing counsel, local counsel and by ensuring alignment on key provisions like representations and warranties, indemnities, and shareholder exit rights across transaction documents. Driving projects by setting timelines for internal workstream, determining and planning internal deliverables, and leading team calls to meet deadlines to increase efficiencies helps manage risk and maintain deal momentum across borders.

    Qualifying as a New York lawyer is no small feat. How did you prepare for the bar exam, and how has this qualification added value to your practice? What advice would you offer law students and young lawyers aspiring to clear the exam and pursue international opportunities?

    Preparing for the New York Bar Exam was intense, especially coming from a non-US legal background. While I recall it as being a traumatic experience, I did learn a lot along the way! I approached it with a structured plan and a strict routine. I enrolled in a bar prep course, followed a study schedule, and focused heavily on practicing questions and timed essays to build both speed and familiarity with the exam format. I mostly focused on practicing past exam questions because they really helped me get a solid grasp of the legal concepts and figure out how to manage my time during the test. Consistency and discipline were key. I used to wake up early to read through the study modules and watch all the videos and then spend the whole day practicing questions. This helped me understand and apply the legal concepts without the need to cram them up. Qualifying as a New York attorney not only adds credibility in one’s practice in the USA but is also a requirement for most BigLaw firms in making their decision to hire you to practice law in New York. As a New York qualified attorney, I am able to advise on US legal aspects directly, particularly in deals involving New York law-governed documents, which are common in my area of work. My advice is to treat the bar exam like a full-time job for those one to two months. Focus on understanding the test, its format/ structure and not just the law. No matter which bar prep course you choose, practice, practice and practice! This is very important. You don’t need to ace the exam (no extra points for high scorers) – you only need to pass it! Follow a study routine which works best for you but stick to it. There might be days when you may lack the motivation to study or feel burnt out but believe me, keep at it, be positive and put in the hard work because it definitely pays off!  

    With such elaborate professional responsibilities and a demanding work schedule, how do you strike a balance between your personal and professional life? What strategies or habits help you manage it all effectively?

    Balancing a demanding career in corporate law with personal life is definitely a big challenge! However, with time and experience I’ve found that setting clear boundaries and prioritizing both work and downtime is essential. While my law firm does strongly emphasis on physical and mental wellbeing by organizing retreats, wellness days and initiating activities to relieve work stress etc. I make it a point to schedule focused work hours and then fully disconnect during personal time, whether that’s spending time with family, exercising, or pursuing hobbies. I believe that following a proper routine and managing time consciously are key habits. I endeavor to stay organized and avoid burnout by using my vacation days to travel, which I deeply enjoy. I plan my weekends ahead and try to squeeze in activities which I really want to do such as watching a Broadway show or even going on hikes! Even when I get very little time for myself during rough days or intense work phases (when we are signing or closing a transaction), I try to do something that makes me feel calm and relaxed. I listen to music, play the piano or read a novel. I try to exercise regularly, stay hydrated and remain active during the day. Ultimately, I have learnt from my experience that work life balance is less about reaching a perfect equilibrium every day but more about putting in consistent effort to recharge and stay mentally fresh, which ultimately makes me more productive professionally and personally.

    Looking back at your journey, what advice would you give to students and young lawyers aspiring to build an international career like yours? Are there specific resources, skills, or values you recommend they focus on to thrive in this path?

    Looking back, I’d say building an international legal career requires a combination of strong technical skills, cultural curiosity, and adaptability. Moving to another jurisdiction and pressing the restart button in your professional life is not easy. One should have an open mind to adopt change and the strength to address any unforeseen challenges. It is important to develop a global mindset: stay curious about different legal systems, business cultures, and geopolitical trends. First and foremost, young lawyers still in law school should gain internship experience early on to understand the practical side of the legal profession. It’s essential to go beyond textbooks and see how law operates in the real world. A strong resume with good academic performance, complemented by diverse co-curricular and extracurricular activities, can significantly strengthen an application to study abroad. During my time in law school, I was an active mooter, and I continue to stay engaged with the community by judging some of the most prestigious moot court competitions globally. For those aiming to pursue an LL.M. in the US especially in corporate law, I strongly recommend gaining some hands-on experience in M&A or private equity transactions before applying. The LL.M. is a significant academic and financial investment, and it’s important to approach it with clear intent and direction. Students should not come with the sole aim of landing a job. The LL.M. is also an opportunity to grow as a lawyer, broaden your perspective, and experience true global exposure. Along the way, networking is absolutely key. Building meaningful and genuine relationships with alumni, law firm professionals, professors, and peers can open doors and provide lasting value well beyond the program. Finally, I would say: cultivate resilience and humility. The path can be challenging, especially as you navigate cultural, academic, and professional differences. But those who remain adaptable, open-minded, and solution-oriented will not only succeed but they will thrive.

    Get in touch with Nayanika Ruia –

  • “When a brief comes your way, defend your client like a warrior: with full commitment, clarity, and confidence.” – Angad Baxi, Advocate on Record and Principal Associate at J. Sagar Associates.

    “When a brief comes your way, defend your client like a warrior: with full commitment, clarity, and confidence.” – Angad Baxi, Advocate on Record and Principal Associate at J. Sagar Associates.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Coming from an academic background in economics, what inspired you to pursue a career in law? Has your background in economics enhanced your ability to navigate complex commercial and transactional disputes?

    Looking back, I believe I was always meant to be a lawyer. I distinctly remember in Class 6, I wrote in my slam book that I wanted to be one, without fully understanding what it meant. One vivid memory is from a school session where we talked about our parents’ professions, and I was fascinated by a friend whose family included a prominent criminal counsel — I was hooked. My time at Modern School, Vasant Vihar, further shaped this instinct. I was drawn to history, public speaking, dramatics, and editorial work, all of which naturally nudged me toward law.

    However, as a first-generation lawyer with no immediate role models, I had to be practical. At that time, I had topped in economics and was equally passionate about history. I faced a real conundrum: pursue economics, follow history academically, or take the uncharted path into law.

    I chose to study Economics (Hons.) at Delhi University, knowing well that if law was truly my calling, I could always pursue the three-year law course later. That clarity helped me focus. Though I did well academically, I realized early on that economics was not my true passion. I enjoyed its rigour but not the heart of it. The day I graduated was the day I gave myself permission to fully pursue law.

    That said, I don’t regret my economics background — it has deeply shaped my approach to litigation. Understanding economic models, financial structures, and market behaviour enables me to unpack complex commercial disputes with greater insight. Whether it’s a shareholder conflict, contractual dispute, or regulatory challenge, my economics training helps me grasp the underlying commercial drivers, spot inconsistencies in financial narratives, think strategically and to ask “why” until something actually made sense. In high-stake litigation, clarity of thought and structured analysis make a tangible difference, and this analytical discipline has been a real asset throughout my career.

    Early in your career, you worked with a range of law firms and senior lawyers. What are some of the foundational experiences during that period that continue to shape your legal practice today?

    Early in my career, as a first-generation lawyer with a three-year law degree, I was acutely aware that I needed to make every internship count. I sought out diverse experiences, interning with Tier 1 and Tier 2 law firms, specialized litigation boutiques, corporate firms, and even spending time with trial court, High Court, and Supreme Court lawyers. This breadth gave me a panoramic view of the profession and helped me understand its many facets.

    My final internship was with Mr. Amarjit Singh Chandhiok, Senior Advocate, which eventually led to me joining his chamber. Many questioned my choice to work with a senior counsel straight out of law school, but I knew the value of the environment I was entering. Fali S. Nariman’s phrase resonates deeply with me: “When you mention a famous racehorse, the first question is always, ‘From which stable?’ The stable matters.” For me, Mr. Chandhiok’s chamber was that stable, the ideal place to hone one’s craft.

    Mr. Chandhiok is the quintessential mentor. His razor-sharp eye for detail, encyclopaedic knowledge of civil and commercial law, and unmatched clarity of thought set a high bar for anyone aspiring to excel in litigation. It was there I truly understood the critical importance of strategic thinking before stepping into court and the necessity of being impeccably prepared. The chamber handled a wide spectrum of complex cases—arbitrations, election petitions, shareholder disputes, guardianship matters, civil suits—each presenting unique challenges and learning opportunities.

    The work ethic instilled in that chamber remains with me. Often, the briefs would come only by late evening, requiring all-nighters to prepare comprehensive notes for Mr. Chandhiok’s arguments the next day. This rigorous training taught me the value of hard work, discipline, and an unwavering attention to detail. But beyond the technical skills, it was Mr. Chandhiok’s words of wisdom after every case, his humility, and relentless pursuit of excellence, that reminded me there is always more to learn and room to grow.

    Many successful lawyers speak warmly of their formative chambers, and I echo that sentiment. That environment shaped not just my legal skills but my approach to the profession and to clients, grounded in diligence, strategy, and integrity. It remains the foundation upon which I continue to build my practice today.

    What made you switch from a Senior Counsel’s chamber to a tier 1 law firm, JSA Advocates & Solicitors. What changes did you encounter making the shift from a senior counsel to a law firm. 

    I wanted to broaden my horizons and take on the role of a drafting and filing counsel, while engaging with a wider spectrum of complex commercial and transactional disputes. I first learned about a vacancy on Mr. Dheeraj Nair’s (Partner) team through my best friend who works at JSA. I had also seen Mr. Nair in action, strategizing thoughtfully and decisively alongside Mr. Chandhiok during a court hearing, which left a lasting impression on me.

    Having now worked alongside Mr. Nair for seven years, I can confidently say that I owe much of my professional growth and success to his exceptional mentorship. He is not only an outstanding lawyer with a deep strategic mind but also possesses exemplary client management skills. It was with him that I truly understood the importance of building long-term client relationships, something that requires not just hard work but countless sleepless nights until those eventual eureka moments arrive, and trust me, they always do. His ability to simplify complex problems, think several steps ahead, and communicate with clarity is truly inspiring. What stands out most is his commitment to nurturing young lawyers by instilling confidence and encouraging independent decision-making, qualities essential to growth in the formative years of a legal career.

    JSA is a visionary firm that genuinely values every lawyer’s contribution, fostering a culture of collaboration, continuous learning, and innovation. The firm’s forward-thinking approach and emphasis on teamwork create the ideal environment to develop as a well-rounded legal professional. At JSA, talent is recognized and nurtured, and I continue to learn and grow every day.

    Of course, working at a law firm involves a shift in perspective. You move to the other side of the spectrum, from pure advocacy to client interface, drafting, filing, conferencing, arguing in court, and even raising bills. You need to stay on top of all these aspects. Importantly, it is here that you truly appreciate the commercial side of law, the strategic thinking, client focus, and business realities that shape legal advice and advocacy.

    What made you give the prestigious Advocate-on-Record examination? As an Advocate-on-Record at the Supreme Court of India, how has this designation influenced your practice, particularly when appearing before the Supreme Court? What additional responsibilities does this role entail?

    My decision to pursue the Advocate-on-Record (AOR) examination was inspired by Mr. Dheeraj Nair, who is an AOR himself. His expertise and professionalism motivated me to deepen my engagement with Supreme Court practice. The AOR designation is a prestigious credential that signifies mastery over Supreme Court procedures, drafting, and advocacy.

    Being an AOR has significantly influenced my practice by enabling me to file and argue cases directly before the Supreme Court, enhancing my ability to manage cases end-to-end. It has sharpened my drafting skills, improved my understanding of complex procedural nuances, and instilled a greater sense of responsibility and ethics.

    Additionally, the role involves coordinating with multiple teams within the firm who seek to file cases before the Supreme Court, which helps expand one’s professional reputation. Being an AOR requires a comprehensive approach that balances client expectations, legal strategy, and court requirements. This designation has been instrumental in broadening my professional capabilities and strengthening my commitment to delivering high-quality advocacy at the highest judicial level.

    You’ve advised on a wide array of legal issues including shareholder disputes and commercial contracts. What is your approach?

    I have advised on a wide range of legal issues, with shareholder disputes being a key area of specialization. These disputes involve complex interpersonal dynamics, competing interests, and nuanced corporate governance challenges. Successfully resolving them requires a solid grasp of company law, contractual frameworks, and sharp negotiation and strategic skills.

    My approach combines meticulous fact-finding with anticipating opposing strategies, crafting compelling arguments, and managing sensitive negotiations. This combination of legal acumen and practical strategy enables me to help clients navigate these disputes toward effective and sustainable outcomes.

    With respect to gaming laws and regulatory compliance, how would you assess India’s legal framework in comparison to internationally accepted norms? What are the major compliance challenges businesses in this sector face?

    India’s legal framework for online gaming is evolving but remains fragmented compared to more cohesive international models. The 2023 amendments to the Information Technology Rules introduced self-regulatory bodies and defined permissible real-money games, but the overlap between central guidelines and varied state laws continues to create compliance uncertainty.

    Major challenges include regulatory ambiguity, inconsistent licensing processes, complex tax structures, and an aggressive enforcement climate. In contrast, many global jurisdictions offer streamlined, centralized regulation that promotes industry growth and investor confidence.

    To align with international standards, India needs a unified national policy that reconciles state and central regulations and provides long-term clarity. In this landscape, lawyers play a key role in helping businesses navigate legal risks, ensure compliance, structure operations, and engage effectively with regulators.

    You regularly advise foreign clients on Indian legal matters, especially in high-stakes, cross-jurisdictional transactions. How do you navigate the differences between the legal systems?

    Advising foreign clients on Indian legal matters, particularly in complex, cross-border transactions or disputes, requires more than just a knowledge of Indian law. It involves simplifying the law, explaining the procedural nuances, and often, the practical vagaries of the Indian legal system. A lawyer’s job in this context is not only to identify the risks but to provide clear, actionable solutions.

    Foreign clients and firms come to us for results, not just analysis. I make it a point to move beyond theoretical advice and focus on pragmatic, commercially viable strategies. Over time, I’ve built strong rapport with several international clients and counterparts, owing to my problem-solving approach and my ability to communicate local complexities with clarity and confidence. That balance between legal insight and practical execution is what truly makes cross-jurisdictional work successful.

    Given your work with India’s leading e-commerce platforms, what are the recurring legal challenges these platforms face regarding intermediary liability and content removal, especially amid changing digital regulations? How effective are current mechanisms in resolving these disputes?

    E-commerce platforms in India operate under increasing regulatory pressure, particularly concerning intermediary liability and content takedown obligations. While the IT Act provides a “safe harbour” to intermediaries, the practical enforcement of this protection remains inconsistent.

    Many courts across the country are still hesitant to extend timely protection under the safe harbour principle, which creates urgency in seeking relief. Given how time-sensitive these issues can be, I often find myself moving quickly between courts in different parts of the country to secure interim protections and maintain operational continuity for clients.

    A key challenge lies in navigating overlapping obligations, balancing compliance with evolving IT Rules, addressing takedown demands, and mitigating exposure to reputational and legal risks. Current mechanisms such as self-regulatory bodies and grievance redressal structures help to an extent but lack uniform enforcement and often do not provide swift remedies.

    From a strategic perspective, it is essential for intermediaries and e-commerce platforms to establish clear internal protocols, escalation frameworks, and litigation preparedness. As counsel, we do not just advise on what the law says, but help clients anticipate regulatory action, build proactive compliance systems, and craft legal strategies that ensure effective and timely results.

    Could you share your experience handling one of the most challenging cases you’ve come across? How do you approach such complex matters, from research to strategy and how do you manage the pressure in high-stakes situations?

    I cannot single out one particularly challenging case because my work spans a wide range of complex matters. I regularly handle commercial and contractual disputes, shareholder and joint venture conflicts, domestic and international arbitration, banking fraud, insolvency, white-collar crimes, gaming laws, regulatory compliance, and public law issues. Many of these cases require creative thinking and tailored strategies, which clients expect from us.

    I focus on extracting detailed information from my clients because as lawyers, we often find solutions or key documents that laypeople might miss. Asking questions, and then asking more, is essential. Clients appreciate this thoroughness over time. One important lesson I have learned from senior colleagues is the power of asking the right questions. An eye for detail makes all the difference.

    My approach starts with deep research and understanding of both legal and commercial aspects. I develop dispute resolution strategies that combine pre-litigation efforts with litigation or arbitration while always aligning with the client’s business goals. Managing pressure in high-stakes matters requires discipline, preparation, and staying calm under uncertainty. Working across courts, tribunals, and regulatory bodies, I rely on meticulous planning and teamwork to navigate complex situations and deliver effective results.

    This broad exposure has helped me develop a flexible mindset and problem-solving skills to meet clients’ needs even in the most challenging matters.

    With rapid developments in data privacy laws and digital regulation, how do you foresee the legal landscape in India evolving over the next few years? Are there any trends that businesses or legal professionals should be particularly mindful of?

    India’s data privacy and digital regulation landscape is evolving rapidly and is expected to become much more robust in the next few years. The upcoming comprehensive data protection law will impose stricter requirements on how businesses collect, process, and transfer personal data, emphasizing user consent, data security, and cross-border data flows. This will push Indian companies and foreign investors to enhance their compliance frameworks and technology safeguards.

    Regulators are likely to increase scrutiny, focusing on transparency, accountability, and enforcement against violations. Cybersecurity norms will also tighten, and there will be closer coordination between data privacy laws and sector-specific regulations like finance, healthcare, and telecom.

    As a lawyer advising clients in India, I focus on helping them understand these evolving rules in practical terms, not just the legal text. This means guiding them through data audits, compliance program design, and risk assessments, while also preparing them for potential regulatory investigations or breaches. 

    I work closely with clients to build proactive strategies that balance legal requirements with their business realities, helping them stay compliant while minimizing disruption. This client-centric, solution-driven approach is critical given how fast and complex the regulatory environment is becoming in India.

    Is there a guiding principle or professional motto that you’ve followed throughout your career? What  advice would you offer to young law graduates aspiring to build a career in litigation and dispute resolution?

    A guiding principle I’ve followed throughout my career is to be practical, business-friendly, and bold in representing my clients. While developing strong legal arguments are important, often the most effective solutions come from understanding the client’s commercial realities and crafting strategies that balance legal rigor with practical outcomes. When a brief comes your way, defend your client like a warrior — with full commitment, clarity, and confidence.

    Also, keep saying YES. Even when it feels daunting or you feel unprepared, step forward and volunteer. Some of the most defining moments in my journey came from saying yes to opportunities I wasn’t sure I was ready for.

    For young law graduates aspiring to build a career in litigation and dispute resolution, my advice is to develop not only your legal knowledge but also your ability to think strategically and communicate effectively. Be willing to ask the right questions, dig deep into facts, and understand the context behind every dispute. Litigation or Dispute Resolution is not just about winning arguments; it’s about delivering solutions that work in the real world. Stay bold, stay curious, and never lose sight of the client’s goals. Practicality and fearlessness will set you apart as a trusted advocate.

    You maintain a diverse and demanding practice appearing in courts, advising clients, contributing thought leadership, and more. How do you find balance between your professional obligations and personal life, and how do you manage stress in such a high-intensity career?

    There is no such thing as work-life balance in law—that’s the honest truth, and I wouldn’t want it any other way. A good lawyer never really stops working; clients’ legal challenges keep coming, and you’re constantly thinking through solutions and next steps. Trust me, all of us in this profession enjoy that challenge. 

    To manage stress, I try to make some time for reading non-fiction, playing pickleball, taking family vacations, and catching up with my non-lawyer friends to stay grounded and keep my “other” world alive. But I’d be lying if I said there is any perfect balance between work and life.

    Get in touch with Angad Baxi –

  • “IPR is relevant across industries, and with the growing awareness of IP, career opportunities in this field are increasing.” – Kavita Mundkur Nigam, Partner at Krishna & Saurastri Associates LLP.

    “IPR is relevant across industries, and with the growing awareness of IP, career opportunities in this field are increasing.” – Kavita Mundkur Nigam, Partner at Krishna & Saurastri Associates LLP.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team


    With your vast experience and accomplishments in the legal field, could you share what initially sparked your interest in law? Was there a defining moment that led you to pursue this career, and what drew you specifically to specialize in intellectual property law?

    The greatest reason or inspiration for taking up law was my maternal grandfather who came from a family having many generations of lawyers including his father and uncles. My grandfather was himself a lawyer by qualification but joined the Sales Tax Department and retired as Commissioner of Sales Tax, Government of Maharashtra. He was extremely passionate about law and on behalf of the Sales Tax Department, briefed and closely interacted with many distinguished lawyers of his time including the then Advocate General Mr. H. M. Seervai whom he deeply admired. The countless anecdotes he narrated to me and the zeal he had for the legal profession had a profound impact on me, unknowingly and when the time came for me to choose my profession, law came as a natural choice.

    While Law was in the family, Music, Literature and Art also ran deeply in my family, my mother being a Hindustani Classical Vocalist and my grandmother, a vocalist, poet, playwright and writer. They would often participate in seminars on copyright in relation to the fields of music, literature and art. I would accompany them and listen to the sessions with great interest. That sparked my curiosity and by the time I completed my graduation in law, I found IP to be a fascinating and an ever-evolving subject having an application across industries and I was convinced to take it up as my field of specialization. 

    You began your career as an Associate with a law firm. What were some of the key experiences during this early phase that helped deepen your understanding of the law, especially intellectual property law, and laid a solid foundation for your expertise in this area?

    I began my career with a full-service law firm Desai & Diwanji where I mainly worked on corporate and commercial transactions. My experience in intellectual property law began when I joined my present firm in the year 2008. Exposure to myriad cases in the areas of IP prosecution, legal advisory, contentious matters, anti-counterfeiting, IP transactions etc. involving different kinds of IP including trade marks, copyright, designs and some aspects of patents, right in the beginning of my tenure, gave me many opportunities to research, learn, resolve issues and deepen my understanding of the subject. Also, I firmly believe that there can be no substitute for hard work in laying a strong foundation, especially in the initial years of your career. I spent a lot of time reading, researching, studying the suggestions of my seniors and colleagues which I continue to do as learning is a never-ending process and updating yourself from time to time ensures you never feel complacent or stagnant. 

    Throughout your career, you have worked on complex IP transactions in industries such as media, entertainment, pharmaceuticals, and FMCG. What do you believe are the primary challenges businesses face when dealing with commercial transactions involving IP rights?

    As for already existing IP of the parties involved, gaps in IP ownership, lack of proper documentation for securing IP rights, third party claims to IP, vulnerability of registered IP to revocation are some challenges seen in commercial transactions involving IP rights. Similarly, while negotiating strategic collaborations or service contracts, differentiating between already existing IP and IP generated under the contract, deciding upon an ownership structure for the IP generated out of such services or collaboration could be challenging.

    Your experience spans both domestic and cross-border IP disputes. How do international IP issues differ from domestic ones?

    IP disputes per se, such as infringement, passing off etc., governed by Indian laws and taking place in India may not have material differences only by reason of one of the parties being a foreign entity. However, where these disputes emerge from cross-border contracts governed by foreign laws and have elements of IP protectable or enforceable under Indian laws, there could be challenges. Similarly, when an Indian entity wishes to enforce its IP rights against a foreign entity for acts done outside India, foreign laws may apply. Although IP laws worldwide have many commonalities, they are not completely harmonized. Concepts of authorship, ownership of IP, infringement, exceptions to infringement, availability of overlapping protection under different types of IP laws such as Copyright & Designs or Trade Mark & Designs, subject-matter of trade marks, copyright, designs or patents (more so in light of emerging technologies) might vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Accordingly, these disputes may have different nuances.

    Could you share your insights from handling domain name disputes under ICANN’s UDRP? In addition, what role does arbitration play in resolving international IP disputes, particularly within frameworks like the ICC?

    The domain name dispute resolution process under ICANN’s UDRP is effective particularly when disputes arise out of cybersquatting or prima facie bad faith registration of domain names. In my experience, this process has been cost effective, expeditious and helpful especially where the adverse party is not located in India or where the registrant’s name and address is not disclosed by domain name registrars. Institutional arbitration, such as under the ICC Rules, plays an important role in resolving multi-jurisdictional / international IP disputes. However, these are typically disputes arising out of contracts and lawyers play a crucial role in informing the arbitrator (who may be qualified in laws other than the governing law of the contract) of nuances in the laws that are applicable to the dispute.

    Intellectual property is often crucial in mergers, acquisitions, and private equity transactions. How do you ensure that IP rights are effectively safeguarded during these processes, and what is their role in such transactions?

    Intellectual property is often the driving force for most acquisitions, mergers and collaborations. Effectively identifying IP, particularly unregistered IP, ensuring a proper and seamless transfer of all IP, registered or unregistered in favor of the acquirer, designing an efficient IP matrix in cases of joint IP ownership / collaboration, identifying third party contribution, claims or rights in IP creation and devising appropriate techniques to secure all IPR through documentation and statutory filings are some aspects to be considered during such transactions.

    What advice would you offer to aspiring IP lawyers or those considering a career in intellectual property law? Also, could you share some resources or strategies you use to stay current with global legal trends, particularly in the IP domain?

    To aspiring IP lawyers, I would like to say that IP is a fascinating subject having many dimensions and is ever evolving particularly with newer and emerging technologies. IPR is relevant across industries and with the growing awareness of IP, career opportunities in this field are increasing. You could choose sub-areas of your interest to practice such as IP prosecution, litigation or transactions and advisory. However, aiming for holistic exposure to various kinds of IP cases especially in the initial years will certainly help in the long run. Needless to say, like in any other field, hard work and a well-balanced approach helps one grow in the profession and also as an individual. These days there are several online platforms, newsletters, digital publications and media offering information and updates on IP related transactions and disputes, both domestic and international. There are also many subscription-based databases where one can find articles, copies of judgments and orders for detailed reading.

    Get in touch with Kavita Mundkur Nigam –

  • It is not necessary to know everything about what a transaction entails in your initial years, but you should either find answers to or have the will to ask questions regarding aspects that are introduced to you-Pranav Gadi, Founder – Gadi & Associates

    It is not necessary to know everything about what a transaction entails in your initial years, but you should either find answers to or have the will to ask questions regarding aspects that are introduced to you-Pranav Gadi, Founder – Gadi & Associates

    This interview has been published by Priyanka Karwa and The SuperLawyer Team

    Can you walk us through your journey and share what led you to pursue a career in law, particularly with a focus on corporate mergers and transactions? 

    Many decide their career paths while they are about to enter Class 10 in school. While my mind was always inclined to take science and pursue a career in medicine, destiny took me to Accountancy in my 11th and 12th. Blessing in disguise, as it felt that I got into the subject where I belong. So my journey started there. With the preliminary learning of accountancy, I decided to pursue a career in commerce and took admission in B.Com (H) in Delhi University. It was around the end of 2008, where I was still wondering whether it would make sense to do an MBA (like my peers) and move on to joining a bank or a consultancy in finance, but then again I was destined to be introduced to a subject called ‘Corporate Law’ during my 2nd year of B.Com. It was fascinating as I was always keen to learn about companies and their functioning, given that we grew in the era of blooming joint ventures, international tie ups and growth of Indigenous businesses in India. I was intrigued to know how much running a company is driven by accounts and mathematics, and thus, that’s where it all began. I chose to pursue a career in law. However, maybe I wasn’t prepared enough, and I failed my first attempt into Delhi University (Law Faculty) in the entrance exam. It was 2009, peers had found their place and here I was wondering what I should do now. I decided its time to drop a year, work with a financial advisory company and reattempt the Law entrance exam. I joined Law Faculty in 2010 and graduated in 2013 with a degree in B.Com (H) and LL.B. During my student days at the Faculty I continued interning with different law firms in New Delhi, NCR. My most memorable internships were at J. Sagar Associates (my first job). I was given an opportunity to join JSA in August 2013 and I continued working there for a while before I moved onto other law firms such as Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas. My focus area in all these firms was corporate-commercial and I was given an opportunity to assist team members in ongoing live transactions ranging from business transfers, joint ventures, private equity, and other general corporate advisory services. I believe that if I wasn’t given this chance, life would probably have been very different. Thus, if at all I can say that I have gained knowledge in the field of law, the credit truly goes to those seniors who gave me the opportunity to learn. Thus, through this medium I would like to thank Mr. Jyoti Sagar (Chairman and Founder) and Mr. Upendra Nath Sharma (Partner, JSA).

    After years of learning from different lawyers and gradually taking steps to lead transactions and advise clients, in 2020 I set up a small law firm – Gadi & Associates (GnA). It was tough and challenging to make this decision but I believe that sometimes as a lawyer you have to take steps that are beyond your comfort zone to ensure that you give the soundest and best legal advice. Thus, while keeping that thought in mind, I took this decision and set up a shop (a table and a chair in my house and a banner on the window). The shop was now open. I have primarily gained experience in corporate law and so my first instinct drew me to help Clients in contractual matters. It’s not uncommon that once you disassociate with bigger brands, Clients take time to get that confidence in you, but I am grateful to my initial clients who had that faith in me and gave me my first assignment.

    2020 was the birth year of GnA with a single member team and today I run a law firm with a strength of 25 (all inclusive).

    Given your extensive experience with tier 1 law firms and now as the founder of Gadi & Associates, what motivated you to establish your own legal practice in New Delhi? 

    The key motivation to establish GnA and to take on this journey was to challenge myself in an environment with cut-throat competition. I genuinely feel that every lawyer has his/ her own way of expressing opinions and assisting clients, so one shoe doesn’t fit all. The key was to demonstrate to clients that my style of thinking and my approach to matters is unique and could yield results which they probably wouldn’t expect. While I never discount my learning years, I did feel that it was time to practice in a style and manner as I independently wished to apply, rather than aiming to make a change in the existing set up of other law firms. Having said that, establishing from scratch without any legacy in the industry did throw its own challenges and sometimes made it difficult to work, but I always kept repeating this to myself – ‘Don’t be ashamed if you fail, be ashamed if you fail without trying’. So I kept at it and kept trying. GnA came into existence and grew bigger and bigger in size, with its first office in 2021 and with now a new office in 2023. What back then in 2020 felt would be impossible, started becoming a reality and now is being lived each day with the focus to make other impossibilities a reality. So I can say this with all conviction that it was not easy to start and was surely not easy to continue, but now when I look back I say to myself that it was not that difficult too. My other motivation  was to try and bring a different approach to corporate matters. While as counsel we typically work on agreements and assist clients in negotiations, I try to understand the financial modelling behind each transaction or commercial tie up. Definitely I do not give any opinions on accounts but given my background and keen fondness to learn different aspects of accountancy, it helps in understanding and advising best legal resources and positions to have in such matters. Needless to say that a commercial tie up or a strategic alliance are primarily driven by the accounts behind it, so as a commercial lawyer it is our job to understand that relationship and advise accordingly.

    You’ve been involved in a variety of high-value transactions, including representing a global private equity fund in a multi-billion-dollar acquisition. Can you share some insights into the challenges and strategies you employed in such a complex deal? 

    It wouldn’t be fair to give any critical details in the public domain, but it a few aspects that I would like to share are: (i) Commercial Sense – When I got introduced to the transaction I was only trying to figure out in my head the commercial sense behind the matter and if the deal at that particular value made sense. That gave me an opportunity to learn something new that I hadn’t been introduced to earlier, and that was the economic benefit of the future. Many times I have heard people use the phrase ‘does this make any commercial sense’, even by me while discussing the matter with colleagues. However, I did get the answer to this question in a manner that I hadn’t expected. It wasn’t necessary to see the commercial sense of the matter in the present but rather what it would be in the near future or within a period of time being envisaged by the acquirer. While doing the matter, we get involved with the details of the matter but somehow miss seeing the macro approach of the said industry vis-à-vis other industries. So it wasn’t necessary for just this business to grow but to see how it is important for other industries to flourish and grow at the same time to ensure that the growth of this business continues and eventually that commercial sense comes to light. (ii) Due Diligence – If there is something that helps in undertaking transactions or ensuring that a lawyer is doing his/ her job, it is important to take note of the criticality of due diligence. It is not merely a report, but an action item that can change or mould the frame of the transaction. We do hear of different forms of due diligence reports, but at the end the critical aspect is ‘due diligence’. I believe my key learning here was to be a part of the due diligence team and understanding the different forms of compliances and key requirements to put together one list of critical aspects. If there were any findings that showed any legal issues then it is important to also find the recourse to such legal problems and assist in implementing the solution. We did find a few critical legal challenges here as well, but given the experience of the team I was working with, it was easy to help in implementing the correct solution and take the transaction forward. So in a nutshell as a strategy to a transaction, due diligence is key and must be undertaken with great importance.

    Your role involves advising multinational companies, startups, and family-run businesses. How do you tailor your approach when dealing with such diverse clients, each with its unique set of challenges and priorities? 

    Truly, this journey started with GnA. Prior to starting GnA it was mostly assisting large scale companies in their matters including transactions, general corporate advisory, compliance, etc. It is only when I started GnA that I understood the importance of being a ‘Generalist’. While I do say that my key focus area in law is corporate – commercial, I started branching into other aspects of law and advising diversified clientele in a variety of matters. While the category of clients in question still seem to be hinting more on corporate work, in reality it entails a number of legal aspects such as promoter relationship, family lineage planning with succession plans, asset management under different vehicles for betterment of operations, etc. This may also at times include undertaking real estate transactions, preparing wills and settlements and also managing the operations of smaller set ups in terms of division of roles. One key aspect here to note is that it is not limited to operating out of one vehicle for family businesses, our laws give us many ways of undertaking such plans. For instance a division of businesses is not merely to be driven by settlements, it could be that we divide businesses by way of demergers, slump sale, etc., and the meaning behind these transactions are completely different than what we generally do for other corporations. In the case of start ups, it is critical for a lawyer to understand the drive of the promoter(s). As lawyers it is important to understand that a promoter(s) does not generally know about compliance and applicable laws. It is the duty of a lawyer to ensure that the start up business becomes compliant with all laws while ensuring that the Promoter(s) can stay on course with the project that they initiated.

    Having assisted in the acquisition of a refractories plant and the fund raise for a logistics company, could you highlight the key considerations and legal intricacies involved in transactions within the manufacturing and logistics sectors? 

    The former was an asset purchase transaction, different from the typical slump sale transaction. In an asset purchase the key factor is identified: purchase price of the assets and transfer of each individual asset be it a plant, machinery, equipment, land, etc. Frankly, while the entire transaction was similar to any other asset purchase deal, the critical aspect of this deal was the transfer of real estate. This was probably the first time experiencing a transaction with respect to real estate where my involvement was not limited to preparing the definitive document but also to assist the client in the entire registration process. This experience was beneficial and educational as it helped my journey to start working on more real estate transactions and today at GnA we have a full real estate practice where we help with sale, leasing, mortgage and joint development transactions. The latter was a large-scale private equity transaction, where I was a part of the team that represented the company and the promoters. What was critical here was the fact that the business that we represented was becoming the growing need of the ever-evolving logistic sector of the country assisting ecommerce. As I have said earlier that not many times do you get the commercial sense from the transaction itself, but when you apply it with other sectors that are supportive sectors and see the immense opportunity there, you can co-relate as to why this sector would grow too and therefore, investments in such companies became the growing need. Although as a counsel, I did work on the investment document and assisted in the effective transaction closure in a timely manner.

    In addition to your transactional work, you’ve also assisted clients in matters relating to disputes. How do you decide to diversify from corporate to litigation? 

    Well, as I mentioned, GnA was the reason I thought it was best to be a ‘Generalist’. Where I could have decided to remain a part of other firms and continued working only in corporate law, I did choose the other path and started GnA. Given this decision it became even more important to see the world of law in the Court of Law. Thus, it all started with a simple legal notice in the case of an employee dispute. I was approached by one of my existing clients to pursue a case against an employee involved in embezzlement. This was something that in my other organisations I would have passed onto my colleagues, but at GnA I chose to take this up as my very own and moved on with the mandate. As the matter progressed and went on, I started learning this aspect ‘on the job’. It’s been roughly 3.5 years since that first notice and today I engage in large scale dispute matters ranging from arbitration, company law petitions, insolvency matters, recovery matters, etc. In fact, starting a disputes practice gave me a better understanding of how words in a contract could have different meanings in different situations. Therefore, now drafting a contract makes it critical for me to examine each provision/ clause with such combinations that maybe wouldn’t have been the case if I wouldn’t have stepped into the world of litigation. I sincerely believe that each lawyer (corporate or litigation) should gain experience of both worlds as they are complementary in nature and not as alternate professions.

    With a wealth of experience, what advice would you give to law graduates aspiring to specialize in corporate law and mergers and acquisitions? 

    To the aspiring law graduates who wish to enter the field of corporate law whether for M&A, PE, VC or general corporate advisory, it would help if you start from the basics. It is not necessary to know everything about what a transaction entails in your initial years, but you should either find answers to or have the will to ask questions regarding aspects that are introduced to you. In practice, many seniors use terms and abbreviations which any aspiring law graduate/ intern may not understand (the same happened with me), which makes it even more difficult to comprehend the entire discussion which is taking place. Thus, an on-the-job experience makes it even more important to learn such aspects by either spending time to find the answers or questioning the seniors. A senior colleague of mine once said to me ‘sometimes I forget that my junior colleague has not read this in his life’, which basically means that seniors do know that you are new to this world and will take your own time to learn, but it still will demand your full involvement in the matter by being inquisitive and focussed. A great way to get a kickstart in the field of corporate law is by doing internships with corporate law teams of firms that generally undertake transactions. As a law student who still has a couple of years left before he/ she graduates, if you are keen on becoming a corporate lawyer, you should find data about transactions and the partners of firms who undertook those matters and then try and get internships with those partners to ask them questions about the transaction. Having said that, law is a journey that involves never ending learning and every lawyer has something to share for you to learn.

    Get in touch with Pranav Gadi-

  • Engaging experienced tax attorneys is crucial to navigate the complex legal landscape effectively- Adarsh Somani, Partner at Economic Laws Practice

    Engaging experienced tax attorneys is crucial to navigate the complex legal landscape effectively- Adarsh Somani, Partner at Economic Laws Practice

    This interview has been published by  Priyanka Karwa and The SuperLawyer Team

    Can you tell us a bit about your journey and how you ended up pursuing a career in law, particularly specializing in taxation and related areas?

    I was born and raised in a family with a deep-rooted background in law and taxation. From a very young age, I was exposed to discussions about legal matters and the intricacies of tax law (though am not claiming that I particularly followed everything!). My father and some close relatives were established tax specialists, and their passion for their work naturally influenced my interests as I grew older.

     As I progressed through my education, I found myself naturally gravitating towards subjects that aligned with the legal and financial world. I was particularly drawn to the complexities of taxation and how it played a vital role in shaping economies and businesses. I realized that taxation was not just about numbers and calculations; it was a dynamic field with constantly evolving laws and regulations that had significant implications on individuals and organizations alike.

    After completing my legal education and obtaining the necessary qualifications, I ventured into the field of tax law, ready to take on the challenges that came with it. Over the years, I have had the privilege of assisting numerous clients with tax planning, tax controversy matters, and cross border taxation, among other areas.

     My journey in the field of law, particularly specializing in taxation, has been incredibly rewarding. I continue to be fascinated by the ever-changing tax landscape and remain dedicated to helping individuals and businesses navigate the complexities of tax law to achieve their financial goals while ensuring compliance with all relevant regulations.

     As I look back on my path, I feel grateful for the strong foundation laid by my family’s background in law and taxation, as it has shaped me into the professional I am today—one who is deeply committed to making a positive difference in the lives of those I serve.

    With almost 18 years of experience in tax law, could you share some pivotal moments or experiences that shaped your expertise and passion for this field?

    Over the course of my 18-year journey in tax law, I have encountered numerous pivotal moments & experiences that have profoundly helped my passion inch northwards for this field. Some of these moments include:

    1. Early Mentorship: Right from the guidance of my father in early stages of my career as well as in the early years of my career and support and push of my first few mentors at BMR Advisors (all seasoned tax attorney/ specialists) the expertise and passion were always enlarging. Their guidance, wisdom, and willingness to share their knowledge played a crucial role in my development as a tax professional. Witnessing their dedication to their clients and their mastery of complex tax matters inspired me to strive for excellence in my own practice.

    2. Challenging Tax Cases: Throughout my career, I encountered several highly complex and challenging tax cases that required innovative solutions. These cases pushed me to expand my knowledge, research skills, and critical thinking abilities. Successfully resolving these intricate tax issues gave me a sense of accomplishment and reinforced my passion for tax law.

     3. Staying Current with Tax Law Changes: Tax law is a constantly evolving landscape, with frequent changes to regulations and tax codes. Staying up-to-date with these developments has been a significant challenge, but it is also crucial for providing accurate and effective advice to clients. My commitment to ongoing education and continuous learning has been instrumental in maintaining my expertise in this dynamic field.

     4. Cross-Border Taxation: As businesses increasingly operate on a global scale, cross-border taxation has become my prominent area of focus. Handling these matters exposed me to the complexities of dealing with multiple jurisdictions, trade agreements and varying compliance requirements. These experiences broadened my perspective and enriched my understanding of the global tax landscape.

    5. Advocacy and Tax Reform: Throughout my career, I have been involved in advocating for changes in tax laws and regulations to benefit taxpayers and improve fairness in the system. Engaging in discussions with policymakers, participating in tax reform initiatives, and contributing to public discourse on tax-related matters allowed me to see the potential impact of legal professionals in shaping tax policy.

     6. Sharing Knowledge: As my career advanced, I found joy in sharing my expertise with aspiring tax professionals and clients alike. Conducting seminars, writing articles, and participating in panel discussions not only helped disseminate knowledge but also encouraged me to continuously refine my understanding of tax law.

    Each of these pivotal moments and experiences has contributed to my passion for tax law and my commitment to provide top-notch legal counsel to my clients. The ever-changing and intellectually stimulating nature of this field, combined with the ability to make a tangible difference in the lives of individuals and businesses, continues to fuel my enthusiasm for the work I do as a tax attorney.

    As a Tax Partner at Economic Laws Practice, you focus on GST, customs & trade, providing strategic transaction advisory and policy counsel. Could you shed some light on the scope and significance of these areas in the business landscape?

    ELP first of all has been blessing, more of a home coming I would say! A lawyer at a law firm, my first!.  Businesses as well as economy are all fueled by tax and trade policies. Navigating the complexities of these areas is vital for businesses to ensure tax efficiency, regulatory compliance, and a competitive edge in the global market. As a Tax Partner at Economic Laws Practice, my role involves assisting businesses in harnessing the opportunities and overcoming the challenges presented by these dynamic aspects of the Indian economy.

    You’ve advised multinational and domestic companies on tax-efficient value chains in business. What are some key principles or strategies businesses should keep in mind when aiming for tax efficiency?

    When aiming for tax efficiency in their value chains, businesses should consider several key principles and strategies to optimize their tax positions while remaining compliant with applicable tax laws. Some important principles and strategies to keep in mind include (i) Proper Entity Structure; (ii) Interplay of Customs and Transfer Pricing Compliances; (iii) Tax Treaty & Trade Agreement Utilization; (iv) Location of Intellectual Property; (v) Business Object Mapping, the most Optimum structure may not work for all businesses in view of its objectives!; (vi) Use of Tax Incentives and Exemptions; (vii) Serious credits to documentation; (viii) Flexibility for ever changing policy landscape; etc

    Also, such assignments would often involve engaging with experienced advisors & consultants on different subject matters as well as jurisdictions. The learning from these experiences can always prove to be  valuable.

    For any budding lawyer, it is important to note that while pursuing tax efficiency is a legitimate business goal, businesses must ensure that their tax strategies comply with the law and are not driven solely by aggressive tax avoidance practices, which may be subject to scrutiny and potential legal consequences. Striking the right balance between tax efficiency and compliance is crucial for the long-term success and reputation of any business.

    Indirect tax legislations can be complex and vary across different industries. What are some common challenges you encounter while advising clients, and how do you overcome them?

    Advising clients on indirect or other tax legislations presents challenges due to complexities and variations across industries. Common hurdles include interpreting ambiguous laws, staying updated with changing tax regulations, addressing cross-border transactions, and managing compliance burdens. Overcoming these challenges involves continuous research, industry-specific expertise, collaboration with subject matter experts, cautious interpretation of laws, and developing cost-effective solutions. Communication with non-tax professionals aids in ensuring client understanding. Additionally, creating robust compliance frameworks, automating processes, and representing clients in disputes or litigation contribute to providing effective advisory services.

    Tax litigations can be high-profile and challenging. How do you approach such cases, and what advice would you give to companies facing potential tax disputes?

    Approaching high-profile tax litigations requires a thorough understanding of the specific tax laws, industry intricacies, and potential implications. My strategy involves conducting in-depth research, consulting past precedents, and collaborating with experts to build a strong case. For companies facing potential tax disputes, my advice is to stay proactive by maintaining meticulous records, complying with regulations, and seeking professional advice early on. Engaging experienced tax attorneys is crucial to navigate the complex legal landscape effectively. Open communication with tax authorities, willingness to resolve disputes amicably, and a focus on compliance can help mitigate risks and achieve favorable outcomes.

     As a part of Business World’s elite 40 Under 40 Club of Young Law Achievers and being recognized by The Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, what personal qualities or professional attributes do you believe have contributed to your success in the legal field?

    As a member of Business World’s distinguished 40 Under 40 Club of Young Law Achievers and having earned recognition from The Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, my success in the legal field can be attributed to several personal qualities and professional attributes. Continuous learning, a proactive approach in gathering facts to build strong business acumen, effective problem-solving skills, and a commitment to innovation are some of the key factors that have contributed to my achievements. Moreover, maintaining personal integrity and cultivating professional networks and relationships have played pivotal roles in fostering credibility and growth.

    Additionally, I must acknowledge the invaluable support and contribution of my exceptional team & mentors, whose dedication and professionalism have been crucial to my personal success. Their commitment to excellence during business hours and camaraderie during social gatherings have been truly inspiring and rewarding.

     Needless to add that by embodying these personal qualities and professional attributes, I have been able to make a positive impact in the legal field, earn recognition from industry peers, and achieve success in my career as a tax specialist.

    Apart from your legal career, you also engage in speaking at tax & regulatory conventions and write articles for leading publications. How do these activities complement your professional work, and what drives you to share your knowledge in this way?

    Engaging in speaking at tax and regulatory conventions and writing articles for leading publications complements my legal career by allowing me to share my knowledge and insights with a broader audience. These activities serve as platforms to disseminate complex legal concepts in a more accessible manner, contributing to the professional development of peers, clients, and the wider community. The drive to share knowledge stems from a passion for empowering others with valuable information, fostering a culture of continuous learning, and making a positive impact in the legal and business domains. It also reinforces my commitment to staying at the forefront of industry trends and best practices.

    Many fresh law graduates aspire to have a successful career like yours. What advice would you give to them as they begin their journey into the legal profession, particularly those interested in taxation and related fields?

    Certain non-negotiable attributes for any aspiring lawyer include a strong focus on continuous learning, an earnest pursuit of mentorship, a willingness to embrace technological advancements, the development of impeccable communication skills, an unwavering work ethic, perseverance in navigating challenging circumstances, and a receptive attitude towards exploring diverse opportunities. These foundational qualities form the bedrock for a successful and rewarding career in the legal profession, enabling growth, adaptability, and the ability to excel in an ever-evolving legal landscape.

    Get in touch with Adarsh Somani-

  • Zeeshan Ali Khan, Partner-IP Enforcement at Rahul Chaudhary & Partners In Conversation with SuperLawyer On IPR and Networking for First Generation Lawyers

    Zeeshan Ali Khan, Partner-IP Enforcement at Rahul Chaudhary & Partners In Conversation with SuperLawyer On IPR and Networking for First Generation Lawyers

    This interview has been published by Prabhjot Singh, Priyanka Karwa and The SuperLawyer Team

    Being a science student, and then choosing law, what was the idea behind?

    Though I was doing good in science, however somehow, I was not interested in pursuing a career in science and therefore, was looking for options. During this time, my family suggested me to go for a career in law and when I started preparing for entrance exams of different law schools (as we did not have CLAT back then) – it really fascinated me. I started reading about famous lawyers in India and also visited the lower Court in my city, the idea of wearing that collar band and arguing in Court used to give me goosebumps.

    At was during this time that I firmly took a call to make a career and practice law.

    How challenging has it been for you so far in the legal industry?

    It has been a very satisfactory journey so far. I was able to clear the entrance exam of two National Law Universities and two reputation private universities and decided to join HNLU, Raipur. I joined the third batch of HNLU, Raipur in 2004 and was fortunate to have been taught by some of the best faculties at the time. My five year stay at HNLU was both memorable and enlightening at the same time.

    The strict time lines to submit projects and moot court memorials gave me an early introduction of how the legal profession going to be and worked as a solid foundation for later part of my career.

    I joined an IP boutique firm ZuesIP immediately after completing my course and thereafter, my joined current firm Rahul Chaudhry & Partners in 2010.

    My firm and my mentor Mr. Rahul Chaudhry, the Managing Partner of the firm have immensely helped me become the professional I am today. I started as a junior associate in the firm and slowly learned the nuances of IP and law in general. I was designed as Partner – IP Enforcement in 2021 and handles IP Enforcement before the Courts in India, Domain Name as well as Custom Authorities.

    What created your interest in the IP sector? And how did you prepare yourself for everyday challenges in the same? 

    My initial interest in IPR started when we were taught IPR in the second and third years of our law course. The idea of knowing, protecting as well as helping the brands grow attracted me and I decided to intern with IP Firms to better understand the subject. I learned the intricacies of IP as a subject and practical aspects of implementing the same in day-to-day legal practice during these internships.

    Accordingly, I opted for IPR as my honours subject in the university and got a specialization in the same.

    Preparing myself to practice IPR was not a challenge for me as I had a keen interest in the subject. I used to go through all major IP judgments by the Courts to keep myself updated of the latest developments and still try to read as much as I can whenever the schedule permits.

    According to you, what networking strategies should be adopted by the first generation lawyers specifically in corporate?

    Being a first generation lawyer myself, I have never felt any difference in terms of treatment by law firms or corporates. If you have knowledge of the subject and good command over language – you are bound to be noticed. The age old saying that there is no substitute to hard work is absolutely correct. I am a strong supporter of making your work speaks for yourself. If you are getting reliefs for your clients and are being recommended for your work – the world will look for you.

    At the same time, I would suggest one to leverage technology, join industry groups in person or through various social media like LinkedIn and also offer educational resources. Give presentations and educational lectures in various industry gatherings as well as educational institutions.

    What are the most important qualities for an intellectual property lawyer?

    An IP lawyer needs to keep himself updated with latest judgments and industry practices. With the creation of IP Divisions in the Courts, IP has become even more niche practice. Going through PTC on a regular basis and keeping a track of prosecution practice is also very important. I always suggest that to be a successful IP lawyer, one should have a good command over prosecution side as the same forms the foundation of one’s IP practice.

    How a trade mark application is filed, the route it takes for registration and how to overcome the objections raised by the Administrative Authorities (like Trade Marks Registry) are all very important. A wrong advice to the client during prosecution and registration procedure can ruin all future prospects of protecting and enforcing the mark.

    Zeeshan, do these legal tech tools have helped litigants and corporates so far in preparation of different documents or filing and what in the future would be challenges for lawyers in dealing with such tools?

    The tech tools are indeed helpful and I see them playing a greater role in future. Along with saving time, the tools also minimise the chances of an error. Many corporates have started using them to keep a track of their matters pending in the Courts, checking the deadlines and even setting reminders to ensure that no deadlines are being missed. As we all know, deadlines play very important role in our profession.

    The time frame provided by the statues to file pleadings/documents before Courts as well as various administrative authorities are to be strictly followed, specially in IP prosecution. Hence, I believe the tech tools are going to be a game changer in future. With respect to the challenges, I believe the new generation of lawyers will not have any difficulty in handling these tools. I suggest even law schools should start preparing the students to use these tools during their course.

    As a partner of a law firm, how do you manage to balance the work-life aspect?

    Work-life balance is very important to ensure a long-term efficiency in work and a satisfaction in your personal life. My day usually starts at 9 am in the office and then few hours are spent in the Court as well. Being a partner, I also try spending sometime with my team members to interact and discuss work and the general life related aspects. However, one needs to prioritise the work and maintain a discipline during the working hours.

    I am a strong supporter of not carrying the work related stress to home and spend my away time playing with my daughter as well as working out. It is equally important to take care of your health and therefore, I have made it a routine to work out for atleast an hour every morning.

    The same not only helps me stay strong physically but also strengths my mind and helps me to prepare myself for the day.

    Lastly, any advice for our young law generation?

    Legal field requires continuous study and keeping yourself updated of the latest developments. So, it is very important to make an early habit of reading latest judgments as well as precedents. Young lawyers should also visit Courts and hear established legal practitioners argue the cases in Court.

    Get in touch with Zeeshan Ali Khan-

  • In conversation with Anweshaa Majumdar, Corporate Lawyer at Trilegal, talking about her current role and her experiences in different areas of the Corporate law practice.

    In conversation with Anweshaa Majumdar, Corporate Lawyer at Trilegal, talking about her current role and her experiences in different areas of the Corporate law practice.

    This interview has been published by Sonali Parashar, Ojuswi Sahay the SuperLawyer Team

    Tell us about yourself and why you chose law as a profession. What other professions would you have considered if not law? 

    I have always known that I am a people person and communication is a strong skill that I possess, and I knew I wanted to pursue a career wherein I could hone this skill further. Despite taking science as my stream for my 11th and 12th, I knew my calling was not in the science or engineering stream. The career paths that I was keen on pursuing were law and journalism. I had, in fact, gotten into my preferred colleges for both these degrees. However, my parents were insightful about the potential of Jindal Global Law School, even though at that time there was no placement matrix to rely on. They felt that Jindal was a law school of the modern era and I also took the leap of faith and joined. My parents’ insight, has always proved to be correct as now, JGLS is known to be the best private law school in India. I personally feel I would have thrived in journalism as well, but I always knew that I would be a better lawyer than a journalist.

    You have worked extensively on succession planning and wealth restructuring/ management with a lot of experience working with Family Businesses. What drew you to this field in the first place? Would you like to tell us about your journey to this point?

    Honestly, I joined PwC as a fresher from college and when I was told that I would be joining a team which primarily focuses on succession planning and wealth restructuring, I was intrigued as it was a very niche and lucrative field. When I graduated from college, I knew I wanted to be in the corporate field, and being in the succession planning space, I was able to network and interact with various high net-worth families in India Bangladesh as well as Sri Lanka. When you work in a Big4 as a lawyer, your learning goes beyond the technical legal aspects, and you get a lot of exposure to various business building/continuity strategies. Working in PwC also allowed me to gain insight into tax-related aspects of a business and pointers to consider during corporate restructuring. I started in PwC as an Associate and left as an Assistant Manager.

    Other than the above mentioned,  you also hold expertise in General Corporate, Transactions, Mergers & Acquisitions, and Drafting Agreements. What, in your opinion, are the upcoming corporate trendsetters? It would be an excellent compass for our readers.

    In my opinion, an upcoming trendsetter is a simplified style of drafting. Drafting is a skill which will be required in whichever field one is part of, whether it is M&A, private equity, venture capital etc. The documents are essentially the same, but the context of the transaction is different. A trend that I have seen evolving in the legal space is the moving away from verbose legal language to simple language which is understandable to the clients as well as the counterparties. This is a trend I definitely stand by, as I have seen that by simplifying the drafting of contracts, it is possible to keep the rights intact and it also reduces the back and forth between the counsel and the client and even the client and the counterparty, and therefore significantly reducing the transaction closing timeline. My team follows a mantra of “draft the way you speak formally”.

    I have always believed in this concept, and I am elated to see that it is being practiced widely now. Further, I also believe that the M&A, private equity and investment structuring field is a phenomenal space to be in, as one gets to work on different kinds of deals which involve different strategies, negotiation points and consideration structures. After being in fields like this for a while, you are able to anticipate any plausible push-backs from counterparties, push for rights which will be beneficial to your client, address different options of consideration structuring and are able to identify any potential risks and advise to rectify them accordingly. The transaction space such as these typically does have heavy workloads, but the learning curve is steep and the effort you put in along with your experience does positively contribute towards your individual value as a lawyer.

    You are currently working at Trilegal. Previously, you were associated with Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, and before that, you were with PwC. How different it is to work at these three behemoths?

    After my stint at PwC, my entire team moved out with the Partner as he wanted to start his own ventures – one of them being a venture capital fund called Turbostart. At Turbostart, I was designated as Corporate Counsel and assisted with all the legal documentation required when the fund identified start-ups to invest in. After this stint, I decided that I wanted to move back to a core legal practice and that is when I got into Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, in the legal advisory team in their General Corporate practice. From there, I was selected for the Transactions team at Trilegal where I am today. At Trilegal, I work on high net worth deals in the M&A and private equity space. In these three behemoths, I have learned different things which I will carry with me throughout my career.

    At PwC, I got to work with many incredible chartered accountants outside my core team on various deals, I was able to get over my irrational fear of numbers and was able to understand various tax and business-related aspects of a transaction. At CAM, as I was in an advisory team, I was able to work on various opinions and memos relating to different aspects of the law, and was able to further my knowledge in these domains and re-connected with the process of legal research and statutory interpretation.

    In Trilegal, I am now working with an incredible team, in a very dynamic field. As we work on different kinds of deals at one time, one gets exposure to many drafting and negotiation strategies, front-ending deal closures, as well as exposure to transactions in various sectors. I would definitely say that during my formative years in PwC and during my time in CAM and now Trilegal, the learning curve has been steep, the professional exposure has increased, along with responsibilities and accountability and I feel that all 3 places have largely contributed to the professional I am today.

    You earned your Diploma in Entrepreneurship Administration and Business Laws from the West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences after graduating from JGLS. In what ways does entrepreneurship aid a lawyer’s understanding of business?


    Especially in today’s day and age, where entrepreneurship is the theme of the market, I feel entrepreneurship increases a lawyer’s scope of understanding beyond the law itself. As someone who has had exposure to both, I think entrepreneurship is essential in understanding the business, which as a result will improve your legal advice as there is a much more holistic perception rather than a singular focus on a legal point. Once you have a decent understanding of the business, its operations, pain points, and strategies you are in a better position to align your legal advice and anticipate the outcomes of your recommendations which could be both legal and business-centric.

    Are you able to carve out time for your other interests or hobbies given the nature of the legal profession?

    I would not say that it is easy to take out time. But I would definitely say it is essential and sometimes you have to really push yourself to take out time for your hobbies. I choose to unwind with music as I play the ukulele or travel (either to work from out of the station or as a normal vacation). These little breaks are quite important to rejuvenate your mind and especially in this fast-paced profession, it should definitely take precedence to avoid burnouts.

    You are a young and well-established legal professional. What is your success mantra?


    My success mantra actually took some time to build, and now when I look back, it all boils down to “believe in yourself”.  Do not be afraid to take challenging career shifts, if you think it is the right thing to do – and even if it doesn’t work out, at least you tried it. Bounce back up and move on. I also believe in the aspect of not halting the process of learning – I have learnt from every case/matter I have handled and from the people I have interacted with and built a network even after. Another thing that I regularly follow, is self-introspection. It is extremely insightful to honestly connect with yourself, as it helps you figure out what you want, what your priorities are and how to achieve your goals.

    What career advice do you have for our readers?

    Never pay heed to people who discourage you. There are various kinds of people that you will have to encounter during your professional life, there will be people who will think that you do not have it in you to make it big. My advice – do NOT listen to them. Other people’s perceptions do not define who you are or what you can do. In today’s day and age of social media and seeing the career milestones of your peers might lead you to pressurise yourself, but don’t let it. Personally, back in 2020-21, I had found myself in a situation which required an immense amount of self-motivation to get out of. I would urge everyone to find that within themselves. The imposter syndrome is a self-created construct, break it down and thrive. Another piece of advice I would give, especially to people who are starting off their career – is never be afraid to burn bridges if you are not being respected. Put yourself first, know your worth and your path will find you one way or the other.

    Work on your soft skills as much as you would work on your technique. Believe it or not, both are equally important. Build your network, keep reading up, keep working on your communication skills (written and spoken) and always keep in touch with people who have impacted your career path in any positive way.

    Get in touch with Anweshaa Majumdar –