Super Lawyer

Author: SuperLawyerTeam

  • “What drew me specifically to IPR was the dynamic nature of the field; I felt a sense of purpose in helping artists, inventors, start-ups, and global corporations safeguard their innovative ideas from infringement, allowing them to flourish creatively and economically.” – Ronil Goger, Founder & Managing Partner at Blaze Legal.

    “What drew me specifically to IPR was the dynamic nature of the field; I felt a sense of purpose in helping artists, inventors, start-ups, and global corporations safeguard their innovative ideas from infringement, allowing them to flourish creatively and economically.” – Ronil Goger, Founder & Managing Partner at Blaze Legal.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Throughout your law degree, you gained valuable experience through significant internships. What initially motivated you to pursue a career in law, and what specifically drew you towards Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)?

    Every journey begins with a spark – an event, an experience, or sometimes just an insatiable curiosity. My journey into the field of law or more particularly intellectual property began during my 5th Grade – when the first live-action Spider-Man movie hit the screens and left me ensnared in a web of intriguing questions.

    As a comic enthusiast with a keen interest in the Marvel Comic Universe, I felt a surge of curiosity when the Sony Pictures logo appeared at the beginning of the film, with only a fleeting reference to Marvel. As I explored the details further, my father (the guiding light) stepped in to clarify that Sony holds the movie rights. This revelation ignited a ‘flame’ in me – a desire to uncover how Sony came to own the rights to my beloved Marvel superhero and trying to decode the complex arrangements of intellectual property licensing and assignments.

    As I progressed through my life, I was exposed to various branches of law including criminal, property, marriage, company regulations, etc. However, what truly set my heart racing was the realm of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR). The world of IPR is a fascinating intersection of law, creativity and innovation. It offers the unique opportunity to protect the fruits of human creativity – be it a catchy tune, an imaginative work of fiction, a brilliant invention, or a ground breaking brand.

    In an endeavour to gain insights, I interned with various companies and leading law firms such as Khaitan & Co., IREO, Sagar Chandra & Associates, AMC Law etc. 

    What drew me specifically to IPR was the dynamic nature of the field. In a world dominated by rapid technological advancements and the internet, the landscape of intellectual property is constantly evolving. Each case is unique, presenting an exciting puzzle to solve. I felt a sense of purpose in helping artists, inventors, start-ups, and global corporations safeguard their innovative ideas from infringement, allowing them to flourish creatively and economically.

    Starting your career at Shardul Amarchand & Co. must have been a formative experience. What were the most valuable lessons you learned there, and how did that experience shape your legal career?

    Entering the professional world can be a daunting yet exhilarating experience, especially when it involves stepping into a field as complex as law. My first job at Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co. (SAM) not only marked a significant milestone in my career but also provided invaluable lessons that shaped my understanding of legal practice. In this role, I was exposed to the intricacies of legal research, client interactions, and the daily operations of a dynamic office environment. The experience illuminated the importance of attention to detail and the impact of effective communication, both essential skills for any aspiring legal professional.

    Further, observing seasoned attorneys navigate difficult cases further reinforced my desire to pursue a career in law, revealing the profound responsibility lawyers hold in protecting and enforcing the rights of clients. Through my experience at SAM, I developed a range of skills that will be invaluable throughout my career. One of the most critical abilities I honed was my capacity for effective communication, both written and verbal. Drafting correspondence and legal documents required clarity and precision, ensuring that complex legal concepts were accessible to clients and colleagues alike. Furthermore, I learned the importance of digital literacy in a legal context, as many tasks involved using specialized software for case management and research.

    The experience of working at SAM served as a profound catalyst for both my personal and professional growth. Engaging with intricate legal cases exposed me to the complexities of the legal system, enhancing my analytical skills and critical thinking. Additionally, my role involved collaborating with diverse stakeholders, fostering effective communication and teamwork. Also, the primary focus in the formative years should be developing dependency and trust. As soon as you secure your first position, the paramount focus should be cultivating a sense of self-reliance and taking charge of your responsibilities.

    Developing the invaluable skills of ‘being ever-ready to lend a hand’ and ‘committing unwavering effort‘ will undoubtedly elevate your professional prowess. While you may not be the sharpest mind in the room, your ability to outwork your peers is entirely within your control. In fact, every critique should be embraced in the most constructive manner. It is expected that one will be a novice, and thus, the occasional misstep is permissible. The most crucial point is how one overcomes their vulnerabilities and emerges stronger from each error.

    Ultimately, these formative experiences not only solidified my aspirations within the legal field but also instilled a strong sense of confidence in my abilities to navigate professional challenges, contributing significantly to my overall development trajectory.

    After working with top-tier law firms, you chose to establish Blaze Legal. What were the key factors that motivated you to venture into your own practice, and what challenges did you encounter in the early stages?

    The decision to establish Blaze Legal was fuelled by a potent mix of passion, vision, and the allure of independence that danced in my mind like fireflies on a summer night. Having navigated the intricate corridors of top-tier law firms like SAM and Archer & Angel, I found myself captivated by the prospect of creating something uniquely mine—an ecosystem where innovative legal solutions merged seamlessly with genuine client relationships.

    One key factor in this venture was the desire for creative freedom. Within the structured entities of larger firms, I often felt confined by the established processes and conventional practices. I envisioned Blaze Legal as a dynamic space where fresh ideas could flourish, where each case could be approached with a blend of ingenuity and empathy, allowing us to truly serve our clients’ needs rather than merely ticking boxes. Another motivating force was the ambition to prioritize accessibility. In my experience, I witnessed too many individuals and start-ups feeling alienated by the legal world – a realm often seen as intimidating and unapproachable. With Blaze Legal, I aimed to break down those barriers, offering a welcoming atmosphere where clients could engage openly and collaboratively. I wanted to usher in an era where legal counsel was not just a luxury for the affluent but a resource available to anyone seeking guidance.

    However, the journey was not without its hurdles. In the early stages, I grappled with the challenge of building a brand from scratch. Establishing credibility in a saturated market demanded not just legal acumen but also strategic marketing and networking efforts. The initial months were a delicate balancing act – juggling cases while cultivating relationships, all while needing to demonstrate that Blaze Legal was a formidable player in the legal landscape.

    Financial uncertainties loomed large, too. Transitioning from the stability of a well-established firm to the unpredictable tides of entrepreneurship tested my resolve. There were sleepless nights spent poring over budgets, forecasting cash flows, and tapping into my savings with a mix of hope and trepidation.

    Then, there were the lessons learned through trial and error—navigating the intricacies of technology, streamlining operations, and moulding a team that shared my vision. Each challenge was a spark igniting growth and resilience, shaping Blaze Legal into a beacon of innovation and integrity.

    In retrospect, launching Blaze Legal was akin to stepping into an uncharted wilderness. It demanded courage, creativity, and countless cups of coffee. Yet, every triumph – no matter how small – felt monumental, lighting the path ahead and affirming that this venture, born from ambition and the desire to make a difference, was indeed worth every effort.

    Blaze Legal provides services related to trademark, copyright, and patent filings. What are some of the unique challenges you face when dealing with IP offices in jurisdictions like Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka, and others, and how do you navigate these complexities?

    Dealing with Intellectual Property (IP) offices in the Southern Asian jurisdictions such as Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Maldives, etc., presents a unique set of challenges that require a blend of cultural understanding, local expertise, and strategic ingenuity. For starters, the IP registration process in these countries often involves intricate bureaucratic steps that can be time-consuming and opaque – which adds 30-40% extra time to expected timelines. To tackle such issues, we have established strong relationships with local agents or attorneys who are familiar with the nuances of the local bureaucracy. Their insider knowledge can expedite processes and help in navigating red tape efficiently.

    Further, in some of these jurisdictions, the technological infrastructure for IP registration and enforcement may not be as advanced, leading to delays and inefficiencies. Preparing all documentation meticulously and in advance, and maintaining hard copies as backups – can help dealing with any pitfalls. Also, regular follow-ups through both digital and physical means can ensure that your filings are progressing without unnecessary delays.

    Separately, since each jurisdiction has its own set of IP laws and regulations, which can differ significantly from one another and from international standards, conducting thorough legal research and staying updated on changes in local IP laws can be beneficial. Lastly, for protecting IP once registered, we have developed comprehensive and tailored IP enforcement strategies that includes local legal action, public awareness campaigns, and collaboration with local authorities.

    Accordingly, navigating the complexities of IP management in Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka, and similar jurisdictions requires a proactive and well-informed approach. By leveraging local knowledge, maintaining rigorous documentation, and adopting a culturally sensitive stance, you can successfully manage and protect your intellectual property across diverse legal landscapes.

    Can you share an example of a particularly challenging cross-border IP case you’ve handled, and how you navigated the legal landscape?

    Navigating the complex realms of international law has been one of the most intellectually rewarding and challenging experiences in my legal career. One particular case stands out in my mind, encapsulating the intricate nature of cross-border trademark disputes and the necessity for a nuanced approach.

    The case involved a multinational company that specialized in luxury cosmetics. After years of operating under a specific brand name in Europe, the client decided to expand into emerging markets in Asia. However, upon entering these new territories, the company faced a formidable obstacle: a local competitor had registered a similar trademark in Bangladesh & Nepal that not only created confusion among consumers but also threatened the established brand’s reputation. The stakes were enormous, not only for the financial investment in this expansion but also for the brand’s identity and market position.

    Understanding the gravity of the situation, I led a team that included attorneys specialized in intellectual property law within the jurisdictions involved. Our first step was to conduct a comprehensive trademark audit. We examined existing trademarks in both Europe and Asia, paying close attention to the potential for conflicts and the likelihood of confusion among consumers. This required an in-depth understanding of both the nuances of trademark law in different countries and the cultural perceptions associated with brand names.

    One of the key challenges we faced was the disparity between jurisdictions regarding trademark registration and enforcement. To approach this challenge effectively, we decided to implement a dual strategy. First, we initiated negotiations with the local company that held the conflicting trademark. Understanding the significance of relationships in many Asian cultures, we engaged a local law firm to help facilitate discussions. Highlighting the potential benefits of coexistence was key; we proposed licensing agreements that would allow both parties to operate without infringing on each other’s market presence. This approach not only showcased our commitment to enforcing our client’s rights in the concerned jurisdictions but also resolving the matter swiftly and amicably.

    Simultaneously, we prepared for litigation as a backup plan. This involved gathering evidence of our client’s prior use of the trademark in Europe and building a case that demonstrated the risk of consumer confusion should the status quo continue. We also conducted market surveys in the Asian territories to gauge consumer perceptions regarding brand recognition and confusion. This data would serve as vital support in a potential courtroom battle. Over several months, negotiations fluctuated with moments of tension and progress. Our collaborative efforts eventually yielded a breakthrough: the local competitor agreed to cease all use of the infringing mark and cancelling the registrations – which allowed our client to smoothly expand and use the trademark in specified regions while recognizing our client’s legal rights. This resolution not only avoided a protracted legal fight but also strengthened the client’s position in the new market.

    Reflecting on this experience, I recognize that successful navigation of cross-border trademark cases hinges on a multifaceted approach – combining legal expertise with cultural sensitivity and strategic negotiation. It reinforced the importance of adaptability and thorough preparation in overcoming the hurdles presented by diverse legal systems.

    What advice would you give to young lawyers who are looking to specialize in IPR and litigation?

    As a young Mike Ross or Racheal Zane, embarking on a career into IPR law and litigation, you are entering a dynamic and evolving field that merges creativity with legal acumen. This dual discipline requires not only a firm grasp of complex legal principles but also a keen understanding of the ever-evolving nature of technology and business.

    First and foremost, a comprehensive understanding of IPR law is paramount. Young lawyers must immerse themselves in the foundational doctrines of intellectual property – copyright, trademark, patent, design and other unconventional IP laws, as each area has its own set of regulations and implications. To navigate these complexities, I recommend pursuing an advanced degree or certification specifically related to IPR. Engaging with esteemed institutions that offer specialized programs showcases dedication and equips young lawyers with theoretical knowledge and practical applications crucial for their future practice. Understanding both domestic and international laws is crucial, given the globalization of business and the internet’s impact on IP.

    Secondly, seek mentorship from seasoned professionals in the field. Surrounding yourself with experienced practitioners can provide invaluable insights that textbooks cannot offer. A mentor can help you refine your skills, advise you on best practices, and introduce you to networks within the industry. Take the initiative to attend industry events, where you can meet potential mentors and gain exposure to various aspects of IPR and litigation. Additionally, gaining practical experience is paramount. Look for internships with legal practitioners and firms that specialize in IPR laws. This hands-on experience will not only enhance your understanding of the legal processes involved but also develop your analytical and advocacy skills. Engage in pro bono work related to IPR cases as it can provide you with unique experiences while contributing positively to the community.

    Furthermore, staying abreast of technological advancements and emerging trends in IPR is essential. The rapid evolution of technology – be it artificial intelligence, blockchain, or biotechnology, continually reshapes the IPR landscape. Young lawyers should engage in continuous learning through seminars, webinars, and workshops. Actively participating in discussions surrounding innovation can enhance one’s ability to anticipate and respond to new legal challenges. Reading prominent journals and following influential thought leaders in the field will provide insights into current issues and emerging best practices, further reinforcing their expertise and credibility.

    Lastly, emotional intelligence plays a significant role in successful legal practice. Developing the ability to empathize with clients, understand their concerns, and communicate effectively can set aspiring lawyers apart. Active listening fosters trust and enables lawyers to tailor their services to meet clients’ specific needs. Moreover, handling the emotional weight of contentious litigation requires resilience and composure. Young lawyers should seek opportunities to cultivate these skills, whether through formal training or simply through reflective practice in their everyday interactions.

    In conclusion, specializing in IPR and litigation offers an intellectually stimulating and rewarding career pathway. By committing to ongoing education, honing litigation skills, building a strong professional network, maintaining an adaptable mindset, and cultivating emotional intelligence, young lawyers can establish themselves as proficient advocates in this dynamic field. The journey may be challenging, but with perseverance and passion, they can carve out a distinct niche as leaders in intellectual property law. As they embark on this exciting road, let them remember that their contributions to the protection of innovation not only shape industries but also drive societal progress.

    Get in touch with Ronil Goger –

  • “The legal profession is not just about personal growth but also about service to society. Uphold the rule of law, work for the right cause and contribute positively to the legal community and the society at large.” – Aasim Shehzad, Founding Partner at BFS Legal and Counsel at Madras High Court.

    “The legal profession is not just about personal growth but also about service to society. Uphold the rule of law, work for the right cause and contribute positively to the legal community and the society at large.” – Aasim Shehzad, Founding Partner at BFS Legal and Counsel at Madras High Court.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    With over two decades of experience in various areas of the law, looking back, was law a planned career path for you and what inspired your practice specifically in Arbitration & Constitutional Laws?

    Law has always been a deeply personal and deliberate career choice for me—a passion that took root when I was just 10 years old. My fascination with the legal profession was sparked by moments such as seeing my father in his lawyer’s robes and observing advocates gathered outside the District Court, which I passed by daily on my way to primary school. Reading landmark judgements featured prominently on the front page of the newspapers and the role played by the lawyers further motivated me. The courtroom’s dynamic nature—the challenge and intellectual rigor of the adversarial process inspired me to imagine myself as an advocate. These early experiences left a profound impression on me, fostering a deep admiration for the sense of purpose and justice inherent in the practice of law. My parents (Mr.K.M.Shafeeq Ahmed & Mrs.T.Akthar Sultana) deserve a mention for providing their unwavering support and encouragement which gave me the confidence to pursue my passion, ultimately transforming a childhood dream into a lifelong vocation.

    When I enrolled and started my legal practice in 2003, Arbitration caught my interest as it emerged as a growing field offering effective and efficient alternative dispute resolution mechanism. It was a welcome change to witness a system that allowed resolution of disputes outside traditional courtrooms, in a manner that preserved fairness, saved time and resources and proved highly effective when compared to the conventional mode of dispute resolution.

    As for constitutional law, a deep understanding of the Constitution is indispensable for any lawyer. It serves as the foundation of our legal system- not only safeguarding fundamental rights but also acting as a benchmark to test the validity and vires of other laws, rules and regulations.

    Having appeared before various forums from Supreme Court of India to High Courts at Allahabad, Delhi, Hyderabad and Madras, Principal District & Sessions Courts, Armed Courts Tribunal, Company Law Board, Central Administrative Tribunal etc., can you share with us the journey that led you to founding BFS Legal? What were the initial challenges you faced when establishing the firm?

    The journey to founding BFS Legal is a testament to perseverance, professional growth and the importance of teamwork. It all began with a strong foundation laid during my initial years of practice under the guidance of Mr.J.Sivanandaraaj (now a designated Senior Counsel) whose mentorship exposed me to a diverse range of branches of law and instilled key values of discipline, professionalism and ethics. The early exposure to branches like Arbitration, Constitutional Law, Commercial Litigation, Company Law and Business Crimes clearly shaped my professional interests and trajectory.

    My extensive experience briefing eminent Senior Counsel and arguing cases across various jurisdictions greatly refined my legal acumen and advocacy skills. This journey was firmly rooted in my formative years as a mooter, representing Dr. Ambedkar Government Law College, Chennai (formerly Madras Law College), at prestigious international competitions such as the Willem C. Vis International Commercial Arbitration Moot in Vienna and the Stetson Environmental Law Moot Court Competition in Florida, alongside numerous domestic moot court competitions.

    The transition in 2007 when my senior decided to merge his practice with a firm having pan India practice became a pivotal moment, sparking the creation of BFS Legal. My determination to retain my identity as a litigation lawyer and the camaraderie with my colleagues, Mr.P.V.Balasubramaniam (now a designated Senior Counsel), Mr.D.Ferdinand and Mr.Akhil Bhansali were instrumental in this decision.

    Establishing BFS Legal, however, was not without its challenges. Identifying a suitable office location and setting up infrastructure within a tight timeframe was a significant hurdle, especially during the court vacation period. Yet, our collective resolve and resourcefulness enabled us to overcome those initial obstacles, setting the stage for BFS Legal to grow into a successful and respected firm, it is today. This journey underscores the importance of a strong professional foundation, collaboration and the courage to take risks to achieve one’s vision.

    You’ve argued several precedent-setting cases before the Madras High Court. Could you share one of the most significant cases you’ve worked on, and the impact it had on your career or the legal landscape?

    One of the most memorable and challenging case that I worked on involved filing an appeal against the dismissal of an application under Order 6 Rule 16 of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC) by a Single Judge of the Madras High Court. The appeal was heard by the First Bench, comprising the Chief Justice Ms.Indira Bannerjee and Mr.Justice M. Sundar. The primary issue was the maintainability of an intra-court appeal against an order that was not final in nature, as such orders are generally not appealable.

    For two days, I had the privilege of arguing before the Hon’ble Judges, presenting comprehensive arguments on how the provisions of the CPC risk becoming ineffective if litigants were compelled to endure a protracted trial when the outcome was evident due to inherent flaws in the pleadings. The Bench rigorously examined and grilled me on my submissions, challenging every aspect of my reasoning. This experience was invaluable in deepening my understanding of how appellate courts test appeals and interpret statutory provisions and the thoroughness of the judicial process.

    This case is memorable for me because it sharpened my ability to articulate complex procedural issues and strengthened my confidence in handling challenging legal questions under rigorous judicial scrutiny by the sharpest minds. On a broader level, it underscored the importance of procedural fairness and judicial efficiency in civil litigation. Arguing the case before a bench that subjected me to intense questioning right from the word go had a profound impact on my professional journey, reinforcing my belief in the transformative power of well-constructed legal arguments and the ability to think on the feet to withstand intense questioning by the Judges.

    Your expertise in arbitration has been recognized by your appointment as an arbitrator at the Madras High Court Arbitration Centre. How do you see the evolution of arbitration in India, and what role do you think it will play in the future of dispute resolution?

    Arbitration in India has come a long way, evolving significantly over the years to address inefficiencies and delays. Historically, litigation in India has often been criticized for being time-consuming, leading to the adage, “Process is the punishment.” Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanisms such as Arbitration, Conciliation and Mediation have emerged as a critical solution to mitigate these delays and provide efficient avenues for dispute resolution.

    Legislative amendments to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, particularly in 2015 and 2019, have been instrumental in enhancing the arbitration process. By introducing stricter timelines for pleadings, arguments, and the delivery of awards, these reforms aim to ensure that arbitration remains an efficient alternative to traditional litigation. The treatment of appeals under Sections 34 and 37 as special proceedings, distinct from regular civil appeals, further reflects the judiciary’s intention to preserve the expeditious nature of arbitration as contemplated by the Parliament.

    The institutionalization of arbitration centres, such as the Madras High Court Arbitration Centre under the auspices of Madras High Court, is another significant development. These centres promote professionalism and ensure adherence to timelines, thereby increasing the credibility of the process. As an arbitrator, I have witnessed firsthand how these changes have streamlined proceedings and enhanced the experience for litigants.

    As businesses demand quicker resolutions to maintain continuity and reduce costs, arbitration offers a viable path. Additionally, the integration of technology, online dispute resolution platforms and the increasing emphasis on mediation and conciliation as complementary processes will further strengthen the ADR ecosystem. Looking to the future, arbitration will play an increasingly dominant role in dispute resolution, particularly in commercial and cross-border disputes.

    However, the ultimate success of arbitration in India depends on a continued focus on minimizing judicial intervention, ensuring uniform standards for arbitral awards, and fostering trust in the system. With these advancements, arbitration is well-positioned to become the preferred mode of dispute resolution in India, balancing efficiency with fairness.

    You have acted as legal advisor to the Tamil Nadu Wakf Board and also have had a unique opportunity to work on public interest litigation matters. Can you tell us about your experience in this area, and your preparation for approaching such cases?

    Working as a legal advisor to statutory body like the Tamil Nadu Wakf Board and engaging in public interest litigation matters has been a deeply enriching experience, marked by unique challenges and opportunities. It requires balancing the legal intricacies of governance with a commitment to justice and public welfare.

    Representing statutory bodies involves navigating several hurdles, primarily arising from systemic constraints. The sheer number of ongoing cases can be overwhelming, and prioritizing urgent matters demands effective time management. Due to staff shortages and administrative bottlenecks, panel lawyers often receive incomplete or delayed information, which can hinder case preparation. Lawyers frequently need to take the initiative to gather and verify data to ensure accurate representation. This involves persistence and innovative problem-solving to piece together the required context. Panel lawyers often have to devise innovative strategies to collect and corroborate data, ensuring that the responses are both accurate and comprehensive.

    Handling Public Interest Litigation (PIL) cases requires a thoughtful and strategic approach, as these cases often involve matters of broad social significance, addressing the rights of marginalized communities or issues that affect public welfare. Here are key steps to approach PIL cases effectively:

    1. The issue should affect a larger section of the population, not just a specific individual or group.
    2. The case must have a legitimate public interest element, such as a violation of Constitutional Rights, Public Health, Law & Order, Environmental Protection, Human Rights, Law & Order or those affecting public at large.
    3. Thorough Research and Legal Grounds requires
    4. Examining the relevant statutes, constitutional provisions, and precedents.
    5. Clearly identifying the legal violations.
    6. The petition should speak for itself setting out clear facts and the legal grounds in order to make a compelling argument. Emphasis should be on how the issue affects a large section of the population or public welfare. It is imperative to highlight the urgency for judicial intervention.
    7. Ensure that you rule out alternate remedy that may be available for achieving what you seek through PIL.
    8. Consult with affected communities to bring out the practical side of the issue.
    9. Judges often scrutinise whether issue is being brought before the court in good faith or for seeking publicity.
    10. Courts may want to know a clear remedy. Therefore, one should be ready to offer practical solutions for the Court’s consideration.

    Ultimately, representing a statutory body or addressing public interest issues have not only deepened my understanding of the law but also reinforced my belief in its transformative power to address systemic challenges and serve the greater good.

    You’ve been a guest lecturer at Tamil Nadu Dr. Ambedkar Law University and judged several national and international moot court competitions. What advice would you give to young law students and aspiring lawyers today?

    For young law students and aspiring lawyers, I’d emphasize these key principles to guide their journey in the legal profession:

    1. Choose a Senior of Repute & Knowledge: My primary advice to young lawyers is to focus on building a strong foundation by working with a senior of repute and expertise in your chosen area of law. A knowledgeable and respected mentor can provide invaluable guidance, help refine your skills, and expose you to diverse facets of legal practice. Learning under such a senior not only sharpens your understanding of the law but also instils discipline, work ethic, and professionalism—qualities essential for long-term success in the legal field.

    2. No Substitute for Hard Work: The legal profession demands immense dedication, and the effort you put in during your formative years will shape your career. Stay disciplined, dive deep into your studies and refine your skills tirelessly. Never forget that there are no shortcuts to success and consistent hard work is the foundation of a strong career.

    3. Stay Focused: In a world full of distractions, focus is your greatest ally. Set clear goals, prioritize learning, and avoid shortcuts. Success in law is a journey, not a sprint.

    4. Integrity is Non-Negotiable: Trust and Integrity are the cornerstones of a lawyer’s reputation. Never compromise on these values, as they are your greatest assets in earning respect and building lasting professional relationships. Always uphold honesty and integrity, both with clients and in court.

    5. Never Mislead the Court: Credibility is everything. Judges and peers respect advocates who present their cases truthfully and ethically.

    6. Learn by Observation: Courtrooms are classrooms. Observe how experienced advocates present their cases, frame arguments and handle judges’ questions. There is immense value in observing and learning from others.

    7. Have an Alternate Argument: Always be prepared for contingencies. A backup argument demonstrates your understanding of the case and readiness to adapt.

    8. Chase Excellence, Not Money or Fame: Focus on becoming the best in your field. Success, Recognition and Rewards are the by-products of excellence. Focus on mastering your craft, and everything else will follow.

    9. Challenge Your Limits: Instead of fearing challenges, embrace them. Use every obstacle as an opportunity to grow and continuously push yourself to improve. The legal field is vast, and the more you stretch your boundaries, the more you’ll achieve.

    10. Look for Opportunity in Adversity: Challenges often bring hidden opportunities. Approach setbacks with a problem-solving mindset and use them as stepping stones to success.

    11. Being Good Pays: Kindness and professionalism go a long way. Treat everyone with respect and courtesy.

    Lastly, remember that the legal profession is not just about personal growth but also about service to society. Uphold the rule of law, work for the right cause and contribute positively to the legal community and the society at large.

    What motivates you to provide pro bono legal services to those in need and how do you see the role of lawyers in social justice? How important is espousing larger cause through Public Interest Litigation?

    Pro bono work allows lawyers to challenge injustices, advocate for marginalized communities, and harness the power of law to drive social change. I firmly believe that lawyers play a vital role in promoting social justice. As officers of the court, we are uniquely positioned to bridge the gap between the legal system and the public, ensuring that justice is not a privilege for the affluent but a fundamental right accessible to all. Public Interest Litigation (PIL), in particular, exemplifies this ethos. It enables lawyers to address broader societal issues—whether it’s environmental protection, safeguarding fundamental rights, public health, law and order or rectifying administrative failures. The impact of such work often extends beyond individual clients, influencing policies and creating precedents for a better society.

     Given the demanding nature of your obligations at work and your commitment to social justice and pro bono work, how do you manage to maintain a balance between your professional obligations and personal well-being?

    Maintaining a balance between professional commitments, social causes and personal well-being is undoubtedly challenging, but it’s essential for long-term sustainability in a demanding profession like law. Here’s my framework to approach such balance:

    1. Starting the Day Early with a Clear Plan: Beginning the day early allows me to plan effectively and approach my professional obligations with focus and clarity. A well-structured day ensures that no time is wasted, enabling me to stay productive and efficient.

    2. Setting Clear Boundaries: Defining specific work hours and creating time for personal activities helps maintain a boundary between professional and personal life.

    3.Prioritizing and Delegating: Identifying tasks that require my direct involvement and delegating those where my absolute involvement is not required ensures that my energy is spent on what truly matters.

    4.Exercise for Body and Mind: I start my day with exercise, which helps keep my body healthy and my mind sharp. Physical activity is essential to stay energized and manage the stresses of a demanding schedule.

    5.Aligning Work with Purpose: When professional work resonates with personal values, it can become a source of emotional contentment.

    6.Practicing Time Management: Efficiently managing time by breaking tasks into smaller, actionable steps helps avoid mind blocks and burnouts.

    7.Family Time: Spending time with family is non-negotiable. It provides a sense of balance and fulfilment, even amidst a busy schedule.

    8.Commitment to Social Causes: Allocating some time in a week for social causes is important. Contributing to society through these efforts is both rewarding and a meaningful extension of my professional life.

    9.Reflecting and Adjusting: Regularly reflecting on what’s working and what’s not can help recalibrate commitments to ensure they’re sustainable in the long term.

    10.Reading and Traveling: Reading books on diverse subjects and traveling are vital for broadening perspective and providing mental rejuvenation. They inspire me and offer a much-needed break from routine.

    By maintaining this balance, I ensure that I can meet my professional obligations while also nurturing my physical health, personal relationships and social commitments. This harmony sustains my productivity and passion in every aspect of life.

    Get in touch with Aasim Shehzad –

  • “If you want to build a successful career in IP, there are only two ways to go about it. First is to find your WHY and continue to enrich the answer, and Second is to read as much as you can and as wide as you can.” – Rahul Bagga, Founder of Aumirah.

    “If you want to build a successful career in IP, there are only two ways to go about it. First is to find your WHY and continue to enrich the answer, and Second is to read as much as you can and as wide as you can.” – Rahul Bagga, Founder of Aumirah.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    You have a diverse background, both in Patent law and in Chemical Engineering. Can you share what inspired you to transition from a technical field like chemical engineering to a career in Intellectual Property Law? 

    I started with Patent Law, and to practise patent law – one needs to have a science/technology background. So, transition from an engineer to patent attorney was rather smooth and felt natural. However, transitioning to intellectual property law – covering trademarks, copyright, design, geographical indications, plant varieties, contracts etc. has been quite a journey. It was mostly inspired by my own hunger to expand my skills and offerings. The learnings in these areas too felt natural as they seemed like a natural extension of patent law – for the bedrock on which IP laws are framed and promulgated share common or similar pith, substance and motivations. If I am reaching out to a client, I have to then go with an entire set of solutions and deep knowledge on all fronts of IPRs.

    What are some important lessons from the early stages of your career that have stayed with you, and how have they influenced the trajectory of your professional journey?

    First and foremost, lesson that I have taken and retained and continue to expand is about finding my Why. Initially, I wasn’t sure why I am in patent law. Just because it is interesting – I get to work on frontiers of technology and law – wasn’t a good enough answer to Why. It was a self-centered answer. In business and particularly in client facing professions like law – your reasons to pursue those professions cannot be self-centred. You may start with such motivations but you cannot continue and grow with this motivation. Let’s face it – all learning becomes boring after you have spent enough time on it – this is true for me. I learn quickly. I read a lot. I get bored of a subject after having understood its basics/founding principles or first principles and move onto something new.  I continued to expand my Why – which in turn helped me expand my skillset, and which in turn allowed me to offer more and more services – high quality services – to my clients, and this skill or this aspect has shaped my professional journey deeply.  

    Given your extensive experience working with various corporations and legal entities, what inspired you to transition into starting your own practice with Aumirah and what were the initial challenges that you had to overcome?

    Frankly, if you are good at what you do – you won’t face any challenges. High quality clients or Impactful clients will find high quality professionals or Impactful professionals. Also, I have always worked like an entrepreneur. So, when I started Aumirah, for me it was being employed by Aumirah. It is not about entrepreneurship – it is about entrepreneurial mindset – that you can carry  in any form – as an employee or employer.

    Sure, I did face usual problems of cash flow etc. but I didn’t face any problems with respect to the work or getting work itself. For this, I am also obliged to my very dear colleagues who have worked closely with me and understood my “Why”. We have always found friends at the right juncture who took us along on path to growth. I have been blessed with some of the best clients one can get across the domain and they have spread our work far and wide.

    In your role as a mentor to startups, you’ve worked with several incubators like Nexus by the US Embassy and IIITD Incubator. What are the most common IP challenges you see startups facing, and how do you help them overcome these?

    The most common challenges faced by startups is lack of proper advice on IP rights at an early stage. I have seen many established companies with extremely poor IP frameworks and portfolio. Unfortunately, I do not see that improving anytime soon since IP advice right now is being doled out in the market is for sake of making money and not for sake of making the client and especially startups – sail through the initial phase of their journey. We definitely help startups overcome challenges by coming up with advisory on how to defer and when to prioritise what kind of IP. Not all IP is urgent. Not all IP can be deferred. Between these two paradigms – startups can find their right IP framework.

    With your background in chemical engineering, how do you assess the patentability of inventions in the tech or life sciences sectors? What common mistakes do inventors make when filing patents in these industries?

    The assessment of patentability – be it chemical engineering, semiconductors, biotechnology, robotics or automation – is highly similar. Sure, there can be differences in assessment of inventive step – for the context of ontology in each of the mentioned domains – but the first principles are similar. The common mistakes inventors do is to confuse their product as their invention.

    Having extensive experience in Patent Law, can you share a recent case where you helped a client with patent opposition or litigation, and what was the outcome?

    Sure. Recently, we strategized, prepared and litigated in the matter of Falcon Autotech vs Kengic China. We not only got the patent granted but also litigated it against Kengic and got an ex parte injunction in the first hearing itself before Delhi High Court. The matter pertained to sorters used in logistics and warehousing.

    As the leader of Aumirah, how do you foster a culture of innovation and excellence among your team, especially when dealing with high-stakes IP and corporate matters?

    At Aumirah, from very early on, everyone is exposed to clients or clients are exposed to even the junior most associate. This exposure and discussions with clients expose our team to the high stakes and wide range of work that we do, are capable of and can be capable of. The innovation and excellence cannot happen in silos. It is like you cannot be a good boxer if you training only with boxing bags – you have to do technical sparrings, power sparrings and sometimes even a club-level fight routinely to be able to enter the bigger arena eventually. So far, my team has made me proud of the fact that they have very judiciously handled clients. They are miles deep with our clients and also mile wider in law and its applications in handling their matters because of this exposure.

    What advice would you give to aspiring IP professionals who are looking to build a successful career in the field?

    If you want to build a successful career in IP or in fact any field of law – there are only two ways to go about it. First is to find your WHY – and continue to enrich the answer as you go along in your journey. Second is to read as much as you can and as wide as you can and if you cannot read – then keep company of people who read and make sure your choice of reading materials be not restricted to just law or science or business – make it wider – fiction, poetry, news, history, religion, vastu, architecture, biographies – become a sponge – absorb knowledge and become a powerhouse.

    Get in touch with Rahul Bagga –

  • “My takeaway from my journey in the field of law has been to be patient, to keep up the hard-work, and to know that every opportunity and every win or loss is a golden ticket to learn something new.” – Shraddha Deshmukh, Advocate-on-Record at Supreme Court of India.

    “My takeaway from my journey in the field of law has been to be patient, to keep up the hard-work, and to know that every opportunity and every win or loss is a golden ticket to learn something new.” – Shraddha Deshmukh, Advocate-on-Record at Supreme Court of India.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    You completed your Bachelor in Civil Law at Brasenose College, University of Oxford. Was law always the career path you envisioned for yourself and what motivated you to pursue law as a profession?

    My tryst with law was accidental. I had lost my Civics book, a day prior to my final exams in school. My father sat me down with a copy of the Constitution of India and spoke about Keshvananda Bharti. Whilst reading through the charter on Fundamental rights and duties, I came across the wide powers of the courts as enforcers and protectors of rights and therefore, by default, the duty of the lawyers to bring causes to justice. That was it! Dreamy eyed about the change and difference that lawyers can make to society (of course also influenced by Alan Shore from Boston Legal), I decided to pursue Law as my profession.

    Early in your career, you worked at several prestigious law firms before transitioning to work with Senior advocates like Mr. Akhil Sibal and Mr. K.K. Venugopal. How would you describe the cultural differences between these two environments, and how did you adapt to each?

    There are definite distinctions and also certain similarities in the working culture of a Law Firm when compared to a Counsel’s Chamber. 

    Starting with the distinction first, at a law firm, you are exposed to direct client dealings, extensive drafting and working with many counsels and senior counsels. You are involved with filing and getting matters listed, billing and preparing recording letters for the client. 

    On the other hand, working in a Senior Advocate’s chamber gives you a balcony view into the mind of the lawyer- her/his quirks, style of presentation, method of preparation and the ultimate act of reading the law and convincing the bench with arguments. Preparation of briefing notes involved detailed churning of legal research with factual analysis.

    Coming to the similarity– at both places, you are expected to work hard and stay abreast with the law and the legal system. The working hours don’t get better at either, and you learn and gain immensely at both!

    Therefore, whilst the scope of work for the junior may differ in a Law Firm when compared to a Senior’s chamber, the expectations from her/him to give their best- remains the same.

    Having worked closely with prominent Senior Advocates like Mr. K.K. Venugopal, what are some of the most valuable lessons you’ve learned from them, and how have those lessons shaped your approach to legal practice?

    Working with a venerated counsel like Mr. Venugopal- who is an institution in himself, was a guiding factor in me truly coming to love the law and understand the rigours and discipline that are basic tenets for a lawyer. Boss, as we all call him in his chamber, taught us that there are no shortcuts to success. Even today, whilst preparing for a matter, he refers to judgments and makes copious notes, with the same curiosity as he would have if he were reading it for the first time, despite having argued many of them himself and having applied them in several instances. During arguments, Boss could ask any question from the briefing junior, which was born from the facts stated in the file or beyond, which meant that we had to always be on top of things and be prepared for a volley of questions- sometimes tougher than what came from the bench itself. This taught us to be prepared beyond the file, to ask questions and analyse, to fact-check and to never argue on conjectures. Boss would rarely ever raise his voice at us and his disappointment was often remarked with a long sigh reverberating in a whistle, the consequence of which was far stronger than mere words. He taught us the discipline to reach court early irrespective of how late your matter was on board. He taught us to be fair and to act as an ethical officer of the court. He treats every colleague of his as an extension of his family. One instance that I will never forget was, when I was seeking a passover for him in Court as he was stuck before another bench, and the concerned Judge asked me to argue the matter instead. He came in the middle of my arguments, but patted me on my back and asked me to continue arguing and sat right next to me-that kind of encouragement to a young counsel starting out in their career meant a lot! Despite working so hard, boss also taught us to not take ourselves too seriously and to always remain curious. In his own words, he taught us that “to know that you don’t know is the beginning of knowledge.” I am truly blessed to be a part of his chamber- which has had a large part in shaping me as a lawyer. 

    Working with Mr. K.K. Venugopal on landmark cases like the Right to Privacy case must have been an enriching experience. Could you share some insights from your involvement in that case and how it has influenced your career?

    Being a part of the 9 Judge bench’s unanimous declaration of the right to privacy as a fundamental right definitely stands out for me as one of the most exhilarating experiences in my short stint as a lawyer. Days preceding and during the hearing were spent reading countless judgments, articles, international covenants, and expert views on the issue. As a student of law, partaking in thought-provoking arguments from some of the finest minds in the country- at bar and on bench, was outstanding. It exposed me to understand the many different silos that exist in the right to privacy, beyond its manifest existence in body integrity. As a counsel, I have applied the said doctrine in my matters dealing with data privacy and boundaries of authentication and digital records. We are all richer in our rights by the said decision and I couldn’t be more grateful for having been a part of this landmark case. 

    After gaining experience with top law firms and senior advocates, you made the transition to establishing your own practice. What motivated that shift, and what were some of the challenges you faced when starting your independent practice?

    Like any other counsel, I also dreamt of having my own independent practise and to put my training to task. So, after about 8 years of apprenticeship, and with a small handful of clients, I decided to take the plunge and went independent. The initial days were tough especially as the quality and quantity of work that comes to you as a fresh, off the hook, independent counsel is very different from what you may have done in the senior’s chambers or in firms. But the free time gives you an opportunity to read and update your knowledge base. Being on the panel for the Union of India at the time gave me the opportunity to work on diverse areas of law and appear in court regularly. Soon after, I was appointed as the Deputy Advocate General for the State of Chhattisgarh. As special counsel, I successfully represented the Special Task force in Rajasthan in a multi-cooperative society scam involving thousands of crores of Rupees, which added to my experience. When I look back, my takeaway has been to be patient, to keep up the hard-work, and to know that every opportunity and every win or loss is a golden ticket to learn something new. I am extremely grateful for my fears and experiences, which play a part in shaping me as a lawyer today. 

    As an Advocate on Record and now running your own practice in areas like Constitutional and Administrative Law, Arbitration, Data Protection etc. You’re clearly dealing with highly complex issues. Could you share one of the most interesting or challenging cases you’ve worked on, and how did you prepare for that case?

    A very interesting case that I recently argued was the 7 judges constitutional bench reference on the issue of sub-classification of reservation benefits to Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe seeking re-consideration of the decision in E.V. Chinnaiah v. State of Andhra Pradesh and Ors. [(2005) 1 SCC 394]. In order to justify the reversal of the earlier judgment required presenting the Hon’ble court with constituent assembly debates- to show the original intent of the constitutional framers. I argued that Compensatory discrimination, as a subset of Affirmative Action, has the preliminary goal of curbing discrimination and the ultimate goal of its eradication. I presented empirical data to show that Scheduled Caste as a group is heterogeneous in its form and acute disparity exists within the groups and treating them with the same brush of representation is antithetical to the concept of substantive equality. Several scholarly writings on the subject, such as Marc Galanter’s book-Competing Equalities: Law and the Backward Classes in India, J.H. Hutton’s book, Caste in India: Its Nature, Functions and Origins, celebrated Austrian Economist Friedrich A. Hayek’s work on the Constitution of Liberty, to name a few, came to my extensive aid. We are now in receipt of the landmark judgment, where my arguments have found mention, and which lays down the distinguished principle of sub-classification of reservation benefits as a facet of substantive equality. 

    Given the demanding nature of your work, especially your role as Counsel for the Union of India in the Supreme Court, how do you manage to maintain a work-life balance? What strategies do you use to recharge and stay passionate about law?

    I remember reading the quote somewhere that “The law is a jealous mistress and requires long and constant courtship. It is not to be won by trifling favors, but by lavish homage.” I couldn’t agree more- it takes away most of your weekends and expects you to burn the midnight oil. But the profession is also like riding a wave, some days are crazier than others-So in my free time, I love to read, spend time with my family and pursue my hobbies.  Also, the court calendar sets out long vacation periods, allowing us to travel or take time off, which for me, is the best energiser. Staying passionate about law comes from staying in tune with the changing times and also from rigorous reading and discussions. Even if I am not involved in a matter, I love watching cases being argued in court and to witness legal jurisprudence develop. Discussion with my colleagues in the office is an enriching exchange of fresh ideas. Legal conferences can also be a great venue to brainstorm and to learn from other’s experiences and discussions. 

    For young lawyers just starting out, particularly in the fields of litigation and international/domestic arbitration, what advice would you offer to help them navigate these complex areas and build a successful career?

    Young lawyers just starting out today have far more exposure and better understanding of the nuances of law and its practise, than I remember having, when I started out. The only thing that I sometimes find lacking in young lawyers is patience. I see young counsels diving into calling themselves specialists without knowing basic procedural laws. Also, whilst arguing matters in the Apex Court or doing big ticket arbitrations is a thrilling experience, learning from the ground carries you higher. Walking through the registries and learning how to get defects cured and getting matters filed and listed, to me, is as crucial as knowing how to argue a case. These learnings help you especially when you start out on your own and have to run an office and give time commitments to your client. In today’s time, being comfortable with technology is a must- both for litigation and Arbitration. Staying abreast with evolving law helps you stand out. AI based research may have made life easier, but it is crucial that the foundations are laid stronger and provisions in a statute are read before diving into research. In my opinion, perseverance, hard work and integrity are key ingredients to success for any and all. 

    Get in touch with Shraddha Deshmukh –

  • “Law and CS complement each other very well; however, my advice would be to first develop skills and a strong knowledge base, work on your communication/analytical skills and most importantly build a network of mentors for yourself.” – Sakshi Raizada, Legal Head & Corporate Secretary at MEIDENSHA CORPORATION.

    “Law and CS complement each other very well; however, my advice would be to first develop skills and a strong knowledge base, work on your communication/analytical skills and most importantly build a network of mentors for yourself.” – Sakshi Raizada, Legal Head & Corporate Secretary at MEIDENSHA CORPORATION.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    After completing your law degree in 2012, you decided to pursue a CS qualification. What motivated you to choose law as a career, and how has your CS degree contributed to your professional journey?

    I pursued my law and CS degree simultaneously. My father suggested enrolling in CS course alongside law as he had this preconceived notion that students who are academically disinclined, choose law. But as fate would have it, the combination of law and CS turned out to be a powerful skill set for me. During my academic years I began to realise the profound impact of law and how a well-established legal system can be used as a means for promoting social progress and addressing business challenges. After interacting with Company Secretaries, I began to see the role of CS as KMP which puts you in a position to drive and manage the board members/ stakeholders- decision makers and driving force of any corporation. The combination has played an imperative role in my professional journey as it bridges Law and Business. In my shoes of an Inhouse counsel, I can have a broader perspective of business challenges, industry development and how to navigate the business through legal landscape by formulating a strong legal structure for catering to increasing business demands, stakeholders’ investment which comes with potential liability exposure, and compliance requirements.

    In the beginning of your career where you assisted clients with secretarial services, corporate structuring, and compliance, what were the key learning experiences that shaped your approach in the early years of your career? 

    After completing my law and CS degree, I accepted an offer from a corporate consultancy firm Bansal & Co. My initial years in the industry were full of sprits, as I worked with renowned clients with various industries including insurance, pharmaceuticals, food, technology, manufacturing, and education. After a few years I moved to a Fashion TV, Paris (India office) as an assistant legal manager where I spent generous amount of time to learn and understand the complexity and challenges of a foreign entity to establish business in India. In Fashion TV, I was responsible for legal and regulatory compliances associated with business and to safeguard the interests of businesses by being compliant with India’s legal framework. 

    Early in my career, many of my batchmates joined as fresh graduates in different set ups. But over time, I noticed that only a few of them could survive the harsh reality in the legal profession. The legal field is undeniably demanding and exposes you to its share of challenges. And soon I realized that the only way to address these challenges is by ensuring we stay committed to our respective legal journeys. 

    My sole motive has been how to align the spirit of law with the business strategic approach to make legal compliance a tool which enables a business to expand and not to be considered as an obstacle.  But to implement that It’s also important not to give up, but to keep trying and influencing the business and the leaders and the senior management to bring about the positive and constructive changes which are very good for your organization. Basically, these are some of the learnings and the insights and the trends that I think are extremely important

    Having worked at Fashion TV and Bansal & Co. in a Legal Manager & CS role, you transitioned to a law firm later. How did the culture differ between these organisations, and could you share a particularly challenging case you encountered in your time at Gravitas Legal?  

    Shifting to a Law firm was a life changing decision and was quite a challenging environment to work into. This shift was starkly different from my earlier roles. I have had the privilege of working with exceptional lawyers/ mentors who have been or continue to be part of my journey.

    My role at Gravitas Legal proved to be the perfect foundation for the lawyer in me today. They taught me how crucial it is to pay attention to detail in drafting any kind of legal document and application of the law therein. Though it was difficult to manage the demanding nature and expectations of clients, I learned to have a broader and proactive approach to address the complexities of the business propositions which refined my skills. While handling the project finance transactions, I also got an exposure to hard core litigations in insolvency laws and got the opportunity to work on diverse cases which helped me build a strong foundation in corporate laws.

    My time in Gravitas was a humbling and eye-opening experience and after spending a few years, began my journey as an in-house counsel, armed with a balanced perspective from both worlds.

    In the context of contract management at Meiden T&D, a power transformer manufacturing company, how do you manage dispute resolution and mitigate the risk of litigation through the use of airlock supply contracts, and what strategies are employed to ensure seamless execution while avoiding disputes?

    In Meidensha, I am responsible for contract management which includes setting up legal processes and internal policies for all stages of contract including standardisation of all contracts. Being a manufacturing industry, most of our contracts are driven through subcontracting, it leads to many legal complexities and multiple litigations on back-to-back contracts. Such disputes are common in industries like construction, infrastructure, manufacturing, and service contracts where multiple parties are involved in the execution of one project. Hence recognition of legal rights makes it very challenging to litigate and mitigate risk.

    I strive to keep a proactive approach while executing the contracts considering the interest of both the parties and allocating the risk equally and fairly between the parties. Our contracts clearly set out terms such as KPI- (Key performance Indicators), clear scope of service, incorporating informal discussions, ADR clauses wherein pre litigation mediation between the parties are encouraged to avoid issues escalating to litigations. 

    Over the years of my experience in dispute resolution leading to corporate litigation, I have developed an understanding that the fate of any litigation significantly depends on the jurisdiction of the courts that have authority. In India, the judicial process is a long road which is lengthy, costly due to ceiling of counsel’s and court fees. Hence a thorough cost-analysis and financial implications also become part of strategic considerations. Wherever possible, I aim to explore alternative mechanisms for dispute resolution to achieve faster and mutually agreeable outcomes.

    However, I strongly pursue litigation cases where the dispute raises an important question of law that requires intervention and adjudication, or where ADR’s method might set an unfavourable precedent, thereby impacting the interests of the company. On the other hand, if the dispute involves a relatively minor contractual issue and resolution is in the best interest of the company, we recommend a settlement route which allows us to mitigate risks, preserve business relationships with our vendors and consumers.

    In your current role, how do you maintain operational efficiency and ensure a smooth workflow while preventing burnout within your team?

    I believe that an efficient team is an asset and that without collaboration nothing can be achieved at the Lead position where I am today.  For optimal efficiency, you have to be able to trust yourself and be extremely energetic while you upskill. I strongly believe It is very important to know your team, their goals, ambitions, strengths and weaknesses and one must really show your team that you love them, and you care for their growth as well. To prevent burn out, I make efforts for effective communication in understanding the personal and professional difficulties my teammates are going through via meetings and get-togethers to build trust and improve relationships. 

     As the Legal Head and Company Secretary of MEIDEN T&D (INDIA) LIMITED can you elaborate on how you manage your role? How do you stay updated with evolving regulatory requirements?

    As a Company Secretary and Legal Head, I am responsible for the overall legal affairs of the company which includes minimising legal risks and to ensure compliances are in order so as for Meidensha to tread along their inspiring journey.

    Currently, I am leading a legal and secretarial team of Meidensha Corporation, India, where I oversee both the legal and secretarial functions. I’m responsible for developing the company’s legal strategy, managing risk, and ensuring that our business growth is aligned with legal and regulatory frameworks.

    My legal responsibilities are quite broad and include overseeing the legal structure of the Company, mitigating legal risks, managing contracts, and providing guidance on employment law and corporate governance. I also handle regulatory compliance, disputes, and work on arbitrations and litigations. Additionally, I support law enforcement agencies when needed and ensure that compliance management becomes more robust. My role ensures that legal considerations are integrated into decision-making processes, helping drive sustainable growth while managing risks. On the policy front, I’m responsible for drafting, implementing the policies by engaging with regulators and responding to government regulators that affect our business. 

    For a manufacturing industry, the constant flux of statutory and regulatory regulations makes compliance management quite challenging hence it makes it imperative to be updated and on your toes. I actively pursue to set up a stable legal regulatory framework by being in touch with the industry experts, while preparing the opinion on day-to-day strategic management, by upskilling, by conducting regular audits, by using the compliance management tools etc.

    Given the demanding nature of your work environment, how do you manage to balance your professional and personal life? What activities or practices help you unwind and recharge?

    It is necessary to complete the work assigned and live up to your professional commitments, but on the other hand you must prioritize your personal life as well. I strongly encourage and maintain a healthy work life balance by setting boundaries at my workplace. I keep an approach to maintain a professional and personal balance by structuring the office work within 9 hours of schedule and not to stress of my work and my professional life in my personal time. When I am not working, I ensure that I spend quality time with my parents, friends, and with my loved ones, when you don’t stress of your work and your professional life.

    There are multiple ways to unwind. For me, Unwinding is taking regular mental health breaks by practicing meditation, by indulging in building new skill sets, by regular exercising, by travelling, going on treks, travelling etc. 

    What advice would you offer to young professionals aspiring to pursue careers in both Company Secretarial and Law, and who are interested in following a path similar to yours?

    To all the young minds, please note, pursuing a career in Company Secretarial and Law is a lifelong learning. Law and CS complement each other very well; however, my advice would be to first develop skills and a strong knowledge base, work on your communication/analytical skills and most importantly build a network of mentors for yourself. 

    Further, I would like to add- Don’t worry about the “How” yet. Don’t get frustrated if you don’t know how, It is not important to know everything at the start. Just take the first step if you have a clear goal in your mind, your path will be shown to you by your perseverance.

    Get in touch with Sakshi Raizada –

  • “Intellectual Property Law has been a passion which I have pursued. Almost everyday there is something new in the field, which challenges practicing professionals to re-think how laws are shaped and interpreted.” – Aarohan Bansal, Of Counsel at Archer & Angel Advocates and Legal Consultants.

    “Intellectual Property Law has been a passion which I have pursued. Almost everyday there is something new in the field, which challenges practicing professionals to re-think how laws are shaped and interpreted.” – Aarohan Bansal, Of Counsel at Archer & Angel Advocates and Legal Consultants.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    What inspired you to pursue a career in law, and what led you to specialize in intellectual property (IP), particularly in trademarks and copyright and designs?

    Getting into law school was a decision guided by my mother, who is an English teacher, and who made sure I had an excellent grounding and appreciation of the language, which has helped me in the field to a great extent. In my fourth year in college, I was lucky enough to work at an internship at a leading New Delhi law firm – Lall & Sethi. My internship at Lall & Sethi was an eye-opening experience, and seeing the practical aspects of advising brands on their trademarks, copyright and designs was a career shaping occurrence. Since then, intellectual property law has been a passion which I have pursued.

    Even today, after years of practice, the study of this field of law still excites me, since there is so much happening in terms of developments. Almost everyday there is something new in the field, which challenges practicing professionals to re-think how laws are shaped and interpreted. For example, the rising challenge of artificial intelligence is the most immediate and daunting challenge for IP lawyers, since it is a complete game changer in terms of how the law is practiced and implemented.

    The boundaries of intellectual property law touch almost each and every aspect of our lives today, from brands making sure we have safe food and medicines, to e-commerce providing us with almost everything delivered to our doorsteps, to characters and streaming platforms shaping how we entertain ourselves, to our how we earn our livelihoods and more.

    You began your career working with law firms in Delhi, handling intellectual property management for both multinational and Indian clients with global business interests. How did this early experience shape your understanding of IP, and in what ways did it influence the development of your practice?

    I have been fortunate enough to receive the opportunities to work in firms with global clients which has immensely added value to my career growth. I have also had the chance to gain invaluable experience through cross-border collaboration with multiple legal teams. Every company has its tailored methods of working, and as external counsel, learning and adapting to their style is important to be able to provide clear and actionable guidance.

    While the basics of IP remain the same, each and every client has its own distinct way of functioning, meaning that even a straightforward scenario can have unexpected outcomes. In one instance, we were advising the client to take enforcement action against a particularly slippery third party. However, despite our repeated advice, the client did not seem willing to go forward, leading to damages to their local business. It took a call with their senior leadership to understand and overcome their reluctance, which was stemming from a particularly bad case they had handled earlier in another country.

    Working with multinational companies teaches the importance of legal advice that extends beyond an India-centric perspective, to calculate the implications in the other countries that the company operates / functions. For Indian clients expanding abroad, practical advise which works well here in India does not always work well in other countries. In India, there are some deadlines which we know are extendable, in practice, but when we were advising on a deadline in Australia, it turned out to be a couple of weeks shorter than our estimation, due to an early holiday season, leading to a panicked last-minute filing for the Indian client.

    Can you share your experience working on the Trade Marks Manual project with the Controller General of Patents, Designs, and TradeMarks (CGPDTM) and International Trademark Association (INTA), and how did it contribute to deepening your expertise in IP? What were some of the key challenges you faced, and how did you approach resolving them?

    The Trade Marks Manual project, although it still remains incomplete, is a mammoth project on its own. This required distilling decades of office practices, condensing legal procedures, and mapping future changes to the practice, which is likely the reason why a final version has not yet been published by the Indian Trade Marks Registry. Even today, a draft version is available on the IPIndia website, to serve as a guide or a starting point, but it is not binding on its officers.

    My involvement with the project in its early stages meant working with teams of lawyers having experience in similar projects in various countries, and there was much to learn from their guidance. The INTA organisation has a very effective set of professional committees which are meant to share knowledge and advance the study of trademark law worldwide. I highly recommend young lawyers to try and join such committees, and making the most of such collaborations, since the committees are invaluable in terms of practical knowledge and mentorship opportunities. I am glad to say that my participation in the entire process gave me a lot to learn in terms of collaborating on a massive project.

    I do hope that the project is finalised in the near future, since it will serve as a guiding light for trademark practice for future lawyers, who can refer to the manual as a guide for common queries, and perhaps advance the study of this niche field of law.

    Having advised clients on trademark filing strategies in over 25 countries, what are the most important factors you consider when crafting a global filing strategy for international trademark protection?

    An effective filing strategy envisages multiple aspects which are important to a brand and a company, including cost, identifying risks, forecasting solutions, and practical, on-ground advice, and these aspects can generally require years of experience to get them right.

    Even so, it is quite impossible to predict any and all legal challenges which may arise, and quick and effective solutions, require close monitoring and actions. Assignments across multiple jurisdictions are generally very tricky to get it right, particularly when time is of the essence.

    Prior to 2013, filing trademarks outside India meant engaging local counsel. Since India acceded to the Madrid Protocol in 2013, this opened an entirely new avenue of trademark filings in other countries. Initial usage of the Madrid Protocol was low, and this in my opinion, still remains an area of growth in future. Even today, Indian companies can effectively utilise this system for quick and effective registrations abroad. This does not mean that this system is devoid of any risks, and proper legal advise should be sought before considering expanding a trademark portfolio abroad.

    Your success in trademark opposition cases across countries like the USA, Brazil, the EU, and the UK is impressive. How do you approach the preparation and defense of trademark opposition cases in such diverse legal landscapes?

    The creation of a worldwide legal strategy for Indian brands is a tough challenge, but must be done to ensure success in new markets. Each country has its own set of legislations, market forces, and pitfalls, which must be navigated for any brand. In my opinion, the most important step in ensuring success for a brand in a new country would be choosing a trusted local expert. I am glad to say that I have worked with brilliant lawyers in such countries which ensured that I was able to handle legal risks and challenges with positive outcomes for clients.

    I assisted a large Indian IT services company for their worldwide filings which led to a lot of challenges, particularly in navigating legal procedures of countries with advanced legal systems like the US, UK, EU, Brazil, Japan, Australia. The set of deadlines meant keeping constantly in touch with local counsels across multiple time zones and tracking deadlines across countries. This also meant anticipating needs in advance, and keeping multiple solutions forecasted, in case the local business decided that they needed to change their strategy.

    Working with multinational companies means that their brand identities and market strategies are already well-defined, however, working with Indian companies expanding internationally requires extensive groundwork to ensure success in foreign markets. An effective brand strategy which identifies, and balances risk means that solutions to looming problems can be thought of well beforehand. Trademark law stems from international treaties, which means that preparing defense of opposition cases can be done quite consistently. However, practical guidance from local counsel is absolutely indispensable. Brazil, for example, has a completely different procedure for trademarks, as compared to India, and opposition proceedings required extensive research and in-depth studying of local laws. The European Union, requires that adverse parties conduct settlement talks before starting opposition procedures, which is designed to reduce the backlogs on the EUIPO.

    You helped create a Geographical Indications (GI) training module for FICCI. What do you believe are the most critical elements of GI protection, and why is it especially important for India to focus on this area?

    Back when I was assisting in creating a knowledge module for Geographical Indications with FICCI, the act was fairly under utilized, and there was much work to be done in this field. I am glad to see that there are currently about 600+ registrations for various products since the inception of the act, for protecting GIs. India has an immense wealth of knowledge when it comes to products originating from various regions within the country. From Darjeeling Tea, which was the first registered GI, to Basmati rice, Lucknow Chikan Craft, Kullu Shawls, and more, each product is steeped in history and represents unique opportunities for communities to commercially exploit such products for the benefit of the entire region as a whole. Protecting the product ensures that the community reaps the benefits, consumers can identify the GI, leading to increased knowledge and development of the GI itself.

    There are still additional challenges to be overcome, in this field, as shown by the European Union, and China, which currently lead in the number of GIs registered worldwide. The European Union has shown the way in protecting and commercially exploiting their food & beverage products, which are protected under local laws, leading to immense commercial benefits to the producers of such products, particularly in export markets worldwide. I believe that there is an immense scope of expansion of Indian origin products, particularly to international markets, and this can start with the first step of seeking registration under the GI Act.

    The Indian Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT) is currently in the process of amending the GI Act, which will be a welcome improvement for the legislation.

    With such a demanding professional schedule, how do you unwind and maintain a work-life balance amidst your high-level commitments?

    Work life balance is very difficult to achieve, especially in the early years. This does not mean that one should not strive for it, but it may not always work out in the way that you expect. I think that this depends on a lot of circumstances, but most important is the kind of team that you work with. The times when I have been able to rely on my teammates have been good periods of time in terms of work life balance, and similarly, when their schedules demand it, I have stepped in to take over and manage work for them. Your team is quite important in terms of what it takes to have a good work life balance, since you cannot do everything on your own.

    Even then, working in law firms, there are certain days in which much more is expected, since work flow can be quite unexpected. There have been more than a few instances of all nighters, since deadlines need to be met, as well as calls in the wee hours, to accommodate schedules of people from around the world. Slowly you get to learn and understand what to expect, and you can predict busy or lean weeks / months to plan and manage your schedule well.

    My wife has been a blessing in managing my schedule and making sure everything gets done, no matter how busy it gets. She also has a job which is sometimes unpredictable, so we try and split responsibilities between us.

    What advice would you give to young professionals aspiring to follow your path and build a successful career in intellectual property law?

    During the beginning of my career, I had to devote long hours to research and learning. Whenever I came across something new, which was almost everyday, I made it a point to learn about it from whichever sources I could find information, such as bare acts, commentaries, caselaw, blogs, etc. My advice would be to learn about anything new by reading as much as possible. It may not make sense at first, but gradually the pieces start to fit together a few years later. IP law is about intuition and instinct, and not so much about memorisation or rote learning.

    IP laws may differ from country to country, but overall the concepts and fundamentals remain the same. Reading on blogs about practice in the US like TTABlog or EU such as IPKat or other countries also helps build your perspective on how the law should be practiced. Indian court decisions are becoming increasingly sophisticated, but reading foreign decisions is quite interesting, to see how each country’s jurisprudence is evolving.

    Another piece of advice is that every client offers a unique learning experience, and there is no piece of work which is too small at the beginning. Some of the most interesting cases I have worked on have been from start-ups. Advising a small client who relies on you completely requires a certain amount of teaching, and to teach anything is the best way to learn, since you are yourself applying the concepts into practice.

    In about 2015, I had the chance to study a foundational course in copyright law – covering not just the way it is implemented, but also why it was created. I would recommend that anyone who is interested to check out the course called CopyrightX, which is designed by the Harvard professor William Fisher, and is offered online, once a year to anyone. The course, although offered with a US based perspective, offers fascinating explanations on why the field of IP law was created, and what benefit does IP offer our society as a whole.

    Get in touch with Aarohan Bansal-

  • “What particularly appeals to me about IP law is that it is a field where creativity and innovation are protected. It’s fulfilling to contribute to the growth of creative endeavors and ensure that these efforts are legally protected.” – Surabhi Pathak, Intellectual Property Manager at Cat and Pillar, Singapore.

    “What particularly appeals to me about IP law is that it is a field where creativity and innovation are protected. It’s fulfilling to contribute to the growth of creative endeavors and ensure that these efforts are legally protected.” – Surabhi Pathak, Intellectual Property Manager at Cat and Pillar, Singapore.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    After completing your law degree, you pursued an LLM in Intellectual Property & Technology Law from the National University of Singapore. What motivated you to specialize in this field, and what aspects of IP law drew you to it specifically?

    During my undergraduate studies, I had the opportunity to intern in various areas of law. It was in my fourth year that I opted for Intellectual Property (IP) law as a specialization and completed my first IP internship at Remfry & Sagar. I thoroughly enjoyed the experience and realized that IP law was where my passion lay, leading me to specialize in it for my career.

    What particularly appeals to me about IP law is that it is a field where creativity and innovation are protected. I find it rewarding to be part of the process that helps individuals and businesses build and safeguard their brands. It’s fulfilling to contribute to the growth of creative endeavors and ensure that these efforts are legally protected, allowing them to thrive in a competitive market.

    Could you share your experience pursuing your specialization in Intellectual Property & Technology Law at the National University of Singapore? What advice would you give to students wishing to pursue a master’s degree? Additionally, what was the process like for you in applying and gaining admission to the university?

    I had a highly rewarding experience specializing in Intellectual Property & Technology Law at the National University of Singapore (NUS). The program provided me with invaluable opportunities to develop key skills, particularly in research paper writing, where I saw significant improvement.

    NUS also offered intensive courses taught by visiting faculty from prestigious institutions. I was fortunate to learn not only from the esteemed NUS professors but also from one professor from Harvard Law School and another from an esteemed Italian university, which was a truly enriching experience. One module that particularly stood out to me was The Fulfilled Life and the Life of the Law, which offered profound insights.

    The coursework was rigorous, with a significant amount of reading material, which required great discipline to stay focused. My advice to students considering a master’s degree at a foreign university is to form study groups early. Dividing assignments and teaching each other different sections is an effective way to manage the workload and stay on track.

    For the application process, I submitted a resume, personal statement, degree transcripts, official TOEFL score report (you can also take IELTS and a waiver can also be requested), and two letters of recommendation. I am deeply grateful to my professors for providing me with glowing recommendation letters.

    With the unwavering support of my parents and family, I was able to turn my dream of pursuing a career abroad into a reality. I was also fortunate to have a dear friend, who was pursuing her PhD at NUS, guide me through the entire application process and my journey at the university.

    Please note that the application process may have changed over time, so I recommend checking the latest details on NUS’s official website: https://law1a.nus.edu.sg/admissions/app_periods_forms.html.

    You started your career at a leading firm like Remfry & Sagar. What were some of the most important lessons you learned in the early stages of your practice, and what inspired you to develop an international career?

    One of the most important lessons I learned in my early career days was the critical nature of managing deadlines, as IP law is particularly deadline-driven. I had to adapt to prioritizing tasks and staying organized under pressure. This process involved considering various factors, such as critical deadlines, client-set timelines, time zones, and the estimated time required for each task. Ultimately, there is no one-size-fits-all approach; it requires navigating different permutations and combinations to ensure that everything is completed efficiently and on time.

    I also realized that working smart is just as important as working hard. It’s essential to optimize your approach, streamline processes, and focus on efficiency without compromising quality.

    Additionally, I learned the importance of maintaining a mindset of continuous learning. The legal landscape, especially in IP, is constantly evolving, and being open to new ideas and approaches has been crucial to staying relevant and delivering the best outcomes for clients.

    Another key lesson was the importance of delegating effectively. As a professional, it’s essential to recognize when tasks can be shared with others to maximize efficiency. Delegating responsibilities not only helps manage workload but also fosters teamwork and collaboration, which are crucial for success in any profession.

    My decision to work in an international setup was driven by my interest in how global legal frameworks intersect with diverse industries and cultures. From the outset of my legal career, I realized that the challenges and opportunities in today’s interconnected world often span multiple jurisdictions. This realization sparked my desire to expand my expertise beyond national boundaries.

    Additionally, working with international clients and understanding the complexities of cross-border legal issues was something I found both intellectually stimulating and professionally rewarding.

    As the head of a department at Mirandah Asia (Singapore) Pte. Ltd., managing trademark portfolios across six continents, how did you navigate the complexities of different legal systems?

    Navigating the complexities of different legal systems requires a solid understanding of each country’s IP laws, procedures, and practices. For example, while Letters of Consent are not accepted in Thailand, they are typically acceptable in Singapore. Therefore, it is essential to be aware of these regional differences before developing a strategy to overcome potential objections and ensure compliance with local requirements. Over time, I became familiar with the IP laws of different jurisdictions, but it helped to consult local experts from time to time to clarify any nuances.

    With experience in both the Indian and Singapore IP Regulations, what do you see as the key differences between the two? How do these differences impact your practice when managing international trademark portfolios?

    The Singapore IP regime is relatively faster compared to the India one. With respect to trademarks, in Singapore, a trademark application with no objections can proceed to registration in 6-9 months while in India it can take about 18-24 months.

    When it comes to the inherent registrability of marks, the approach in Singapore and India differs regarding the stylization of marks. In Singapore, stylizing a mark can often help avoid absolute objections, even when the mark includes descriptive terms. In contrast, India tends to be more rigid in its approach. Even if a mark is stylized, it might still face objections if it contains descriptive terms.

    Another important difference is the approach to citing earlier marks. In Singapore, it is rare for earlier marks to be cited as obstacles unless they are highly similar or identical. However, in India, the Registry has been known to cite even far-removed marks as potential conflicts, making the process more complex.

    These differences impact the management of international trademark portfolios, as brands operating in both regions must prepare for longer timelines and more complex objection handling in India, whereas Singapore offers a relatively smoother and faster registration process.

    Vis-à-vis copyright, while for both countries copyright is automatic upon creation, there is no formal system of registration of copyright in Singapore while there is one in India.

    As an Intellectual Property Manager, what challenges do clients face in global markets when it comes to trademark registration, and brand protection? Could you share a specific example of a case you’ve handled in this regard?

    One of the main challenges clients face in global markets when it comes to trademark registration and brand protection is that many countries have different trademark registration practices.

    Southeast Asian countries, in particular, can present significant hurdles.

    For example, Indonesia operates under a first-to-file system, meaning the first person to file a trademark application gains exclusive rights to it over the person who uses it first. As a result, trademark squatters often register well-known brands’ trademarks before the rightful owners do. Since trademark rights are territorial, these squatters demand compensation to withdraw or transfer the trademark to the legitimate brand owner.

    I have dealt with numerous such cases, often filing oppositions on behalf of clients. Fortunately, Indonesia accepts bad faith as a ground for opposition, which is helpful in cases involving well-known brands. However, for lesser-known brands, proving bad faith can be more challenging.

    Given your international practice across various global markets, how do you stay up to date with the latest trends in IP law and how do you incorporate these trends into your own practice?

    I keep myself informed by staying in touch with industry experts through conferences, networking on platforms like LinkedIn, and being an active member of IP organizations such as the International Trademark Association and the Institute of Singapore Trademark Agents.

    These resources provide valuable insights into the latest trends and developments, which I then incorporate into my work to ensure that clients receive the most current and effective advice. This is achieved by reviewing and adjusting my strategies to align with emerging developments.

    For example, if new regulations or rulings affect trademark protection, I make sure that clients are aware of these changes and adjust the strategies accordingly.

    As a mentor in the Law Alumni Mentor Program, what advice would you offer to younger legal professionals who aspire to build a successful career in Intellectual Property law?

    My advice to younger legal professionals aspiring to build a successful career in IP law is to first and foremost enjoy the subject, which will keep one motivated in the long run.

    Additionally, I recommend pursuing additional certifications or graduate programs to deepen one’s expertise, which can help specialize and stand out in the IP landscape.

    Finally, it’s important to balance work with enjoyment. IP law can be demanding, so finding time for hobbies or social activities is essential for maintaining a healthy work-life balance, which will ultimately support long-term success and satisfaction in career.

    Given the high demands of your legal career, how do you balance your professional responsibilities with personal obligations? What strategies do you use to recharge and stay motivated in your work?

    Balancing professional responsibilities in a high demand legal career with personal obligations requires effective time management. I make sure to prioritize my tasks and set realistic goals for both work and personal life.

    One of the key factors that helps me is having a strong support system, including family, friends, and colleagues—and I consider myself fortunate to have all of these. Having people to rely on for emotional support and a sense of community is crucial.

    Additionally, engaging in some physical activity helps to stay recharged. My personal favorite is playing badminton or cycling which help clear my mind, helping me during demanding times.

    Lastly, sometimes, a little getaway is all you need to recharge.

    Get in touch with Surabhi Pathak-

  • “With ever growing complexities in the business, it has become indispensable that a balanced approach is maintained between the requirement of the business, laws and my dual qualifications of CS and Law have helped me to find a win-win situation for both verticals.” – Gagan Preet Singh, Global General Counsel at Whitespan Business Solutions Private Limited.

    “With ever growing complexities in the business, it has become indispensable that a balanced approach is maintained between the requirement of the business, laws and my dual qualifications of CS and Law have helped me to find a win-win situation for both verticals.” – Gagan Preet Singh, Global General Counsel at Whitespan Business Solutions Private Limited.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    You have over 21 years of experience in dealing with complex legal issues across various industries. How did your career journey begin, and what motivated you to specialize in Corporate Law, Mergers, Acquisitions, and regulatory matters?

    I grew up in Delhi and my school & college times were during the 90’s. Those were the times when the most sought-after career paths were law, engineering, medicine or chartered accountancy. Though I am a Science graduate, I somehow could not create the interest within me to pursue Science or its related fields as a career option. 

    I lived near the North Campus of Delhi University. So, quite often after college would get over, me and my friends would stroll within the North Campus area. There, outside the Faculty of Law, I used to see students carrying and studying voluminous books. The sight of such books created a spark of interest in Law within me. I really got fascinated by these voluminous books. Many times, it happened that I would visit any random book stall and pick any random law book to see what is written inside. As I explored this further, this spark became stronger and stronger. Those were the moments when I decided that yes, Law would be a career field for me and the topic that enticed me the most was – corporate law.

    With this passion, I enrolled myself for Company Secretary and after qualifying as a Company Secretary, my first step of becoming a corporate lawyer was taken. I joined a corporate group and was assigned to handle the matters relating to corporate law. This was my first exposure to the theoretical and practical aspects of corporate laws and my journey began.

    After a few years, I prepared myself for the Faculty of Law, University of Delhi (D.U.) entrance exams. I cleared it out and got admission into the LL.B. degree course offered by the University of Delhi. With my hard work and dedication, I became a Law Graduate as well. With the passage of time and getting more and more exposure to the various fields of corporate laws, I developed an inclination towards mergers, acquisition and related regulatory matters. Today, with an experience of two decades, I am cherishing my journey as a corporate lawyer.

    As a law graduate from Delhi University and a qualified Company Secretary, how has your dual qualification helped shape your approach to addressing legal and business challenges?

    The dual qualifications of being a law graduate from Delhi University and a qualified Company Secretary has helped me immensely in navigating an approach towards solving a corporate challenge. I have been able to view the risks involved in a task both from the business as well as from the legal angle and thereby able to provide a pragmatic solution.

    The dual qualifications have helped me to navigate the complexities of corporate law with tact, ensuring compliance and simultaneously providing legal advice, and thereby contributing to the smooth functioning of the business. With ever growing complexities in the business, it has become very indispensable that a balanced approach is maintained between the requirement of the business and the requirement of laws. For any business to thrive, the requirement of maintaining a balanced approach is a must and the dual qualifications have helped me to find a win-win situation for both the verticals. 

    Having dual qualifications have also helped the corporate whom I worked with in terms of single window resolution [for (i) non-litigation matters; (ii) litigation matters; and (iii) corporate matters] besides controlling the cost aspects. 

    In your current role as Global General Counsel at Whitespan Business Solutions, what are your primary responsibilities and obligations, and how do you effectively manage them?

    As a Global General Counsel at Whitespan Business Solutions, my primary responsibilities are that of a (i) business enabler; (ii) legal advising through evaluation and mitigation of risks involved in the business; and (iii) managing compliance. As a Global General Counsel, I have to see that unnecessary hindrances are identified and avoided.

    The challenges in managing these responsibilities are not easy. While the crossing of paths of business strategy and legal requirements can never be avoided, the biggest challenge for me is to ensure, not only in Whitespan but every other corporate I have worked with, that this cross does not become a dead end. To keep both the internal as well as the external stakeholders satisfied calls for an ardent approach toward the work, ability to convince the parties involved and thereby providing a win-win solution for all. 

    You have handled several mergers, acquisitions, and joint ventures. Can you share an example of a particularly complex transaction and the key legal strategies you employed to ensure its successful completion?

    As I mentioned earlier that with the passage of time and getting more and more exposure to the various fields of corporate laws, I developed an inclination towards mergers, acquisition and joint ventures (I would give here a common term to these – corporate restructuring – for the ease of understanding). Today, having undertaken a decent number of corporate restructurings, I would mince no word in mentioning that this line of business is not easy. Each and every case of corporate restructuring is unique and different from the other one and challenging. For e.g.: if one is working in a corporate group say ‘X’ and the ‘X’ takes, within its group, corporate restructuring twice, each of these two cases will be different from the other. There will be few common sections obviously, processes may be similar, but the schemes for undertaking these corporate restructuring will vary vastly on the grounds of: (i) due diligence; (ii) pricing; (ii) communication process; (iii) cultural diversity; (iii) employee engagement; (iv) financial integration; (v) system and data integration; (vi) management integration to name a few. And to make a point, each of these exercises in itself is a huge task.

    I will quote one case for an acquisition which I handled. However, since I am bound by the confidentiality clause, I will not name the parties. So, this was a case where an international company wanted to purchase a major stake in an Indian company. Thus, when a cross-border transaction is involved, in addition to the applicable Indian laws, I also had to keep in mind the provisions of RBI / FEMA. I was the counsel for the Indian group in which the international company intended to acquire a stake. My first test began with due diligence. While we provided all the relevant records to the counsel for the international company, their list of seeking clarifications would not end. Realising this, I decided that I would employ tact, legal strategy and sympathy to cross this bridge. With these action steps in mind, I discussed the open points with the opposite counsel. And as it turned out, after a few rounds of discussion, the due diligence was complete.

    The next and the biggest challenge came in the form of transaction documents i.e. Share Purchase Agreement, Shareholders Agreement etc. While drafting international agreements, it is essential to approach the process with a strategist mindset which involves a good number of key considerations like conditions precedent, conditions subsequent, selection of jurisdiction which would come into every aspect of dispute in a transaction. Coming back to the transaction, I had really hard negotiations on almost all the major clauses like tag along rights, drag along rights, pre-emptive rights, right of first refusal, reserved matter and indemnity clause. This exercise was a great experience for me and provided me with good learning as well as sharpened my professional and personal skills since the negotiations on the clauses were very hard, fierce sometimes, reached deadlock stages a few times and the entire process of negotiations consumed almost 3 months. But in the end, I could get the documents to a stage which was a win-win situation for all the stakeholders involved in the capital raise process which documents were at the beginning more of a one-sided affair. And thus, the transaction went through successfully.

    You have extensive experience advising on corporate governance and regulatory issues under the Companies Act, FEMA, and SEBI. How have these frameworks evolved over the years, and what changes do you foresee in the near future?

    The corporate actions in any corporate in India are majorly regulated by three laws namely, (i) Companies Act, (ii) RBI / FEMA; and (iii) SEBI. While Companies Act and RBI / FEMA applies to all companies whether listed or unlisted, SEBI is for listed companies.

    My experience of dealing with these regulatory bodies has always been good. Right from the starting days of my professional journey till date, I have always found the regulatory bodies supportive. My take on these regulatory bodies is that the first duty the corporate must do is to comply in letter and spirit. Even if some compliance is missed out, don’t panic and take any otherwise decision. Approach the regulator and speak with them, they are always ready to help.

    Having the understanding of business requirements, the authorities of these regulatory bodies are always working hard to make the respective framework business friendly keeping in mind the ask of the time. 

    How do you ensure that businesses remain compliant with the evolving regulatory landscape, especially in high-stakes transactions such as mergers, acquisitions, or foreign investments?

    Working in the corporate, my understanding of business and law is that both complement each other. A business cannot be successful without compliance with law and there will be no requirement of law if there is no business. This equilibrium is also necessary for the economy of the country. Businesses have also realised that to attract capital for business requirements, staying compliant is of utmost importance. Obviously, no one would like to join hands with a business which is non-compliant or less-compliant with the applicable laws. No one would like to pump their money into a business which has regulators running after it on account of non-compliance. Who would want to risk their money? Not even a single person. So, if any person thinks that compliance is costly, please ask him / her to try non-compliance. The person will get the answer.

    To ensure the business remains compliant, I would suggest the following:

    1. Keep a track of regulatory updates.
    2. Create an effective compliance program within the organisation and educate the employees about the same.
    3. Develop policies and procedures for compliance.
    4. Implement internal teams to monitor compliance.
    5. Create a business continuity plan in case of any unforeseen happening.
    6. Regular status update to the management on compliance.

    With such a demanding professional schedule, how do you unwind and maintain a work-life balance amidst your high-level commitments?

    Well, well, well, this is a tricky question and the most discussed topic nowadays. (Smile). Professional life is always demanding but as a human, one has to take out time for his / her personal well-being as well. Where work is important, life is equally important. For me, it’s like two pans of a weighing scale. Sometimes one goes up and the other comes down. But it should not happen that one is always up and the other is always down. To unwind myself, I listen to songs and read books. Besides, I also like watching suspense movies. It is very important for anyone to take care of oneself, in whatever way he / she likes. And so do I. Enjoy your life (both professionally and personally). 

    What advice would you give to young professionals aspiring to follow your path and build a successful career in corporate practice?

    My advice to the young professionals is simple, both for professional and personal growth – work hard and do not procrastinate. Avoid taking short-cuts. Learn new things and wherever required, de-learn and re-learn. Explore territories which scare you. Continuous learning is essential since our profession is ever evolving. Stay updated to the best possible way you can. This will give you a lot of confidence to face others whether it is your company management or your client. Networking is vital for success nowadays. Try making a decent circle of professionals where one can share, discuss and learn. 

    Remember, each day teaches you something. Every person around you teaches you something, bad people give you lessons and good people give you memories. Learn the lessons and enjoy the memories.

    Get in touch with Gagan Preet Singh –

  • “Law was always a calling for me; the discipline, the analytical rigor, and the opportunity to impact society resonated with my drive for meaningful work.” – Manisha Tiwari, Advocate at Bombay High Court and Partner at International Maritime Law Chambers.

    “Law was always a calling for me; the discipline, the analytical rigor, and the opportunity to impact society resonated with my drive for meaningful work.” – Manisha Tiwari, Advocate at Bombay High Court and Partner at International Maritime Law Chambers.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    With over a decade of experience in various areas of the law, was law a planned career path for you, and what inspired you to specialize in corporate law, particularly in the maritime and international trade sectors?

    Law was always a calling for me; the discipline, the analytical rigor, and the opportunity to impact society resonated with my drive for meaningful work. My journey to specialize in corporate and maritime law, however, was shaped by my academic background and early exposure to international trade’s vast complexity. Earning my LL.M. in Maritime Law from the Indian Maritime University, where I graduated with a Silver Medal, gave me a solid foundation in both theoretical and practical aspects of maritime law. Corporate and international trade law present a unique set of challenges and rewards that only a global, multidisciplinary approach can address. This field offers a constant intellectual challenge and an opportunity to work at the intersection of law and global business, which I find immensely fulfilling.

    What do you consider the most pressing legal challenges that companies in the shipping and maritime industries face today, especially in the context of cross-border trade?

    Today, maritime companies are navigating a minefield of legal challenges, with compliance and risk management at the forefront. Companies face increasingly stringent environmental regulations—compliance with IMO standards on emissions, for instance, is now critical. Global trade tensions have also intensified the need for adaptable legal strategies, as tariffs, sanctions, and embargoes add layers of complexity to cross-border trade. Additionally, cybersecurity risks are an urgent concern as shipping operations become more digitized, making robust data protection policies and crisis management strategies essential. Having represented clients in international arbitration and cross-border disputes, I’ve seen firsthand how preparation and adaptability are key to meeting these multifaceted challenges.

    Given the evolving nature of corporate governance in India, how do you advise shipping and maritime companies to navigate compliance with both Indian and international regulatory frameworks?

    In today’s regulatory environment, I advise maritime companies to adopt a comprehensive compliance strategy that harmonizes Indian laws with international requirements. With my background in both Indian corporate law and international maritime regulations, I focus on creating frameworks that meet the stringent standards of bodies like the IMO while aligning with Indian regulatory mandates. Regular training and internal audits are invaluable for keeping teams aware of emerging compliance needs. It’s also critical for companies to build relationships with regulators and industry experts, as this fosters an environment of mutual understanding that aids in anticipating and preparing for regulatory changes.

    You have extensive experience in international arbitration. Can you discuss a particularly complex international trade dispute that you’ve been involved in, and the strategies you used to achieve a favourable outcome for your client?

    Well, there are many, but I’d like to share a notable case involving bunker fraud. This was issue with regards to the time charter party, where charterer hired a vessel on a six-month time charter, incurring losses exceeding million dollars due to severe underperformance (over consumption of fuel). Complicated by a penalty clause for early termination, the charterer sought expert guidance to mitigate potential legal risks.

    Our investigation uncovered a Cappuccino bunker fraud conspiracy (cappuccino effect is a type of fuel fraud that occurs when compressed air is introduced into fuel delivery hose during bunkering) involving the ship management company, bunker supplier, and crew. We responded with strategic, multi-jurisdictional legal action: 

    – Initiated criminal proceedings against the supplier in its concerned jurisdiction.

    – Filed parallel arbitration for damages against the owner and ship management company according to Charterparty Arbitration Clause. 

    – Secured the arrest of a sister vessel in admiralty to ensure payment.

    These coordinated efforts across three jurisdictions prompted the respondent to settle, securing justice and recovering our client’s losses. 

    How do you balance your dual roles as a practicing lawyer and a faculty member teaching maritime law? What are the most common gaps in legal knowledge relating to maritime law that you encounter among students and professionals, and how do you address these in your teaching?

    Balancing a legal practice with teaching at institutions like the Indian Maritime University and Narottam Morarjee Institute of Shipping requires a structured approach. Both roles feed into each other: my practice enriches my teaching, allowing me to bring real-world cases to the classroom, while teaching helps me stay sharp and analytical. One common gap I observe is a limited understanding of the global regulatory landscape—students often lack context on how international treaties like UNCLOS and IMO conventions interact with national laws. I address this by emphasizing a global perspective in my lectures, encouraging students to think beyond national boundaries, as maritime law is inherently international. This perspective prepares them to handle the legal and regulatory complexities they will encounter in practice.

    Given your extensive experience in Corporate, Shipping/Maritime & International Trade Law, what motivated you to become a Partner at International Maritime Law Chambers, and what were the initial challenges you faced?

    Joining International Maritime Law Chambers as a Partner was motivated by my commitment to advancing the field of maritime law in India and beyond. As a Partner, I wanted to not only lead complex cases but also mentor young lawyers interested in this specialized area. Initially, building a team that could meet the high standards we set for international arbitration and complex cross-border cases was challenging. Developing a reputation for excellence required establishing trust with clients, consistently delivering favorable outcomes, and positioning our firm as a trusted advisor in high-stakes matters. These early challenges have since translated into rewarding partnerships with clients and an exceptional team dedicated to the firm’s mission.

    How do you balance your corporate law practice and your role as an educator and trainer with your personal life?

    Balancing these responsibilities requires setting clear priorities and respecting my personal time. I believe in structured time management—segmenting the day for client work, research, teaching, and personal commitments. I am fortunate to have a supportive family and a team that enables me to manage my workload effectively. Maintaining a balanced life isn’t just about work—it includes time for self-reflection and rejuvenation, which are vital for sustaining the energy needed in a demanding profession. Ultimately, my roles as a partner, educator, and advocate are deeply fulfilling, as they allow me to make meaningful contributions while honoring my personal values and commitments.

    What advice would you offer to young aspiring lawyers who aim to excel in the field of maritime law?

    For aspiring maritime lawyers, a solid grounding in both Indian and international law is essential. I encourage young lawyers to invest time in understanding treaties, conventions, and the workings of regulatory bodies like the IMO, as maritime law is global by nature. Building expertise in arbitration and cross-border dispute resolution is equally critical, as maritime disputes often require these specialized skills. Finally, cultivate a mindset of continuous learning; maritime law evolves in response to global trade trends, and staying informed will differentiate you in this highly specialized field. As a faculty member, I always remind students that success in this field comes from both expertise and a commitment to lifelong learning. 

    Get in touch with Manisha Tiwari –

  • “The journey from being a fresh law graduate to establishing my own law firm has been one of growth, learning and resilience.” – Nikhil Kulkarni, Founder of Nikhil Kulkarni + Associates.

    “The journey from being a fresh law graduate to establishing my own law firm has been one of growth, learning and resilience.” – Nikhil Kulkarni, Founder of Nikhil Kulkarni + Associates.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Having a background in commerce, looking back, what inspired you to transition into law as a profession?

    Reflecting on my transition from commerce to law, it was driven by a deep-seated interest in understanding the systems that govern society and the desire to make a meaningful impact. My commerce background provided me with a strong foundation in analytical thinking, understanding corporate finance, problem-solving and understanding economic frameworks, which seamlessly complemented the logical and structured nature of law.

    My passion for detailed research evolved into a strong interest in the field of law, where I found a perfect outlet for my drive to explore and solve complex issues. The turning point in my academic career was realizing that law not only offered a dynamic and intellectually challenging career but also a platform to advocate for justice, resolve conflicts and contribute to societal progress. The ability to bridge commerce with law, especially in areas like corporate frauds and insurance law, further motivated me to take this path, blending my prior knowledge with the intricacies of legal practice.

    How did your role evolve over time at each of the organizations you worked with, particularly from Legalogic Consulting LLP to Nikhil Kulkarni and Associates? What were some of the key challenges you faced when setting up your own practice?

    Being a first-generation lawyer, my ultimate goal was always to start my own practice. The journey from being a fresh law graduate to establishing my own law firm has been one of growth, learning and resilience. At each stage, my role evolved as I gained more responsibility, honed my skills and expanded my understanding of the legal field.   All my previous experiences have helped me develop important skills such as client communication, legal strategy formation, preparing arguments for a case, problem solving skills, to name a few. Establishing my own practice marked a significant shift. I transitioned from focusing solely on legal work to also managing the operational, administrative, and business aspects of a law firm.

    Establishing one’s own legal practice requires a lot of patience, perseverance and hard work. Building a client base initially was challenging in the initial years, however maintaining a strong work ethic and providing consistent results to earn referrals helped us build a good client base. Building a competent team is also crucial so that all the diverse areas of practice are effectively managed. Juggling the responsibilities of a lawyer, leader and entrepreneur was also a challenge. But prioritizing tasks and delegating effectively helps in overall management of the firm. Each step of this journey has been a learning experience, and the challenges faced have shaped my practice into what it is today. Fortunately, all my clients have had faith in my legal acumen and my team at Nikhil Kulkarni & Associates have given favourable results to most of my clients.

    How have you navigated the cases in the insurance sector particularly in your role as an empanelled advocate for United India Insurance Company? What was the most interesting case you had to deal with and what were your preparation strategies?

    To deal with cases in insurance sector requires a lot of preparation, particularly the motor accident cases since in most of these cases, the insurance companies are ordered by courts to pay compensation to the victims. Hence, preparing a good defence to mitigate the liability of insurance company is paramount. I will share one of the interesting cases relating to motor accident, which acquired a lot of media attention also. In that case, the relatives of the motor accident victim submitted a fake insurance policy belonging to our client United India insurance to claim compensation from the said insurance company. We had to convince the hon’ble court that in such a case, it is the victim who has not approached the court with clean hands by submitting a fake insurance policy before the court. Our team thoroughly prepared the questions for cross examination and extensively researched on various judicial precedents to support our case. After a series of arguments, counter-arguments and recording of evidence, the court came to a conclusion that our client insurance company is not liable to pay compensation. This verdict is significant since in most of the MACT cases, the courts order insurance companies to pay compensation whereas in this case, we zeroed down the liability of insurance company.

    You’ve handled a wide range of criminal proceedings, including FIR quashing, bail, and anticipatory bail in both Sessions Court and the High Court. Can you share the most difficult case you’ve worked on and how you approached it?

    One of the most challenging cases I handled involved securing anticipatory bail for a client accused in a highly publicized fraud case. The stakes were high, as the accusations not only threatened my client’s liberty but also had severe professional and personal repercussions. The case involved allegations under the MPID Act, where obtaining anticipatory bail is difficult due to the nature of the offences, which are considered crimes against society at large. Courts typically adopt a stringent stance in cases under special statutes like the MPID Act and MCOCA, given their gravity and impact. Despite these challenges, through a strategic and persistent legal battle, we successfully secured anticipatory bail for our clients, safeguarding their rights and ensuring they could cooperate with the legal process without fear of immediate custody.

    We have encountered cases involving cross FIRs, where both parties file complaints against each other, often presenting contradictory versions of the same incident. One particularly challenging case involved a client accused in a molestation case. Securing the quashing of the FIR and related proceedings was especially difficult, given the stringent restrictions imposed by the Hon’ble High Courts and the Hon’ble Supreme Court on the accused’s right to seek such relief. Despite these challenges, through meticulous preparation and strategic advocacy, we succeeded in having the FIR and proceedings against our client quashed. This outcome not only reinforced our confidence in handling complex cross-FIR scenarios but also deepened our understanding of the nuanced approach required in such cases.

    Corporate fraud cases often involve intricate details. Can you share an example where your legal expertise helped uncover or resolve a complex corporate fraud case?

    One of the most challenging corporate fraud cases I handled involved a Private Limited company accused of financial irregularities and siphoning funds through shell entities. The allegations not only threatened investor confidence but also had serious implications for regulatory compliance and the company’s reputation. The case required navigating a complex web of legal frameworks, including the Companies Act, SEBI regulations, the Partnership Act, and provisions under the Indian Penal Code. The involvement of substantial public funds attracted intense scrutiny from regulatory authorities and the media, adding to the pressure.

    Handling such a case demanded a deep understanding of both civil and criminal laws, as the issues often overlapped in unexpected ways. I worked closely with auditors to meticulously analyse financial records, identify discrepancies, and trace the diversion of funds to various entities. My background in Commerce proved invaluable in understanding the transactions and their accounting implications, enabling me to navigate the complexities of the case with greater precision. Defending a company in such circumstances required strategic legal manoeuvring, proactive compliance measures and consistent engagement with stakeholders. We had to clearly defined our client’s scope of work and their specific roles in the alleged offence, which is a crucial aspect when dealing with frauds committed through companies or other entities.

    Your experience spans across multiple domains—civil, criminal, insurance, and corporate law. How do you manage and prioritize cases across these diverse legal areas?

    I believe in the philosophy “Jack of all trades, master of none, but oftentimes better than a master of one.” 

    In litigation, we often handle cases where multiple legal domains intersect. Clients may have access to various legal remedies including both of civil and criminal nature. Additionally, corporate law often involves litigation where companies must file or defend both civil and/or criminal cases. Therefore, to provide comprehensive legal solutions, it is essential to be well-versed in multiple areas of law. Corporate clients increasingly demand such all-encompassing legal services. Our firm has carved out a niche in this sector by combining a core corporate law practice with expertise in the litigation aspects of corporate law. We have a dedicated team of lawyers who specialize in diverse domains. My wife, a highly skilled lawyer, leads a team that handles much of our corporate work, including contract negotiation, drafting, contract management, general corporate advisory and handling employer-employee disputes.

    With such a diverse and demanding portfolio, how do you maintain a balance between your professional and personal life, especially considering your interests in football, music, and stock market analysis?

    I have always drawn inspiration from the famous lines of poet William Henry Davies: “What is this life if, full of care, we have no time to stand and stare.” A healthy work-life balance helps in personal well-being as well as professional performance. Everyone gets the same number of hours in a day; it’s how you manage and utilize your time effectively that determines your success. Hobbies are incredibly useful when we need a rejuvenation from our daily routine. Football serves not just as a passion but also a way to stay physically and mentally fit. Football helps me lead a disciplined routine and enhance team work skills beneficial to legal practice.  I have a keen interest in music and stock market analysis. Listening to music is an excellent stress buster. I also follow the stock market regularly.

    I started with stock market analysis and gradually shifted my focus towards investments, realizing that analysis alone—without practical application—won’t lead to desired results. Similarly, law is about translating theoretical knowledge into real-world solutions.

    How do you think the advancement of technology, particularly through AI and other innovations, is transforming the way lawyers and the judiciary operate, improving efficiency, accessibility, and decision-making processes?

    Technology has been significantly transforming the legal landscape in India, offering numerous benefits for both lawyers and the judiciary. The introduction of e-filing systems allows lawyers to submit petitions, affidavits and other documents online, reducing delays and the burden of physical paperwork. It makes accessing court services more convenient, especially for clients in remote areas. With the rise of video conferencing tools, courts have increasingly held virtual hearings, making justice more accessible and reducing the need for physical presence. This is especially beneficial in a country as vast as India where transportation and geographical barriers can delay proceedings. However, the District Courts face certain infrastructure issues which makes it difficult to adopt technology as Hon’ble High Courts and the Hon’ble Supreme Court. Technology is playing a pivotal role in transforming the legal field in India by enhancing efficiency, accessibility and transparency. It helps lawyers manage their workload, conduct thorough research and serve clients more effectively. For the judiciary, technology accelerates case management, improves accessibility and helps in reducing delays, ultimately contributing to a more efficient justice delivery system. The adoption of these tools continues to improve legal processes, making them faster, more accurate and widely accessible to all. Technology in law has also opened various avenues and accelerated the growth of Apps and websites like LawSikho and Superlawyers which give advocates a platform to showcase their skills and experiences. 

    What advice would you offer to young individuals aspiring to follow a similar career path as yours?

    Always consider yourself of the student of the law. The attitude of knowing everything, will only make you complacent. To grow your practise, you need to constantly evolve with changing times.  As a first-generation lawyer aspiring to build a career in litigation and having your own law firm, you may face unique challenges but you also have the potential to shape your path with determination and strategy. Building a strong foundation in terms of understanding the basic procedural laws such as Civil Procedure Code and Criminal Procedure Code (BNSS) is crucial for advocates. You must stay up to date with recent judgments and understand the changes in the laws. Plan your internships in advance and spend time in understanding the court procedures, drafting skills and client interactions. Networking is equally important in our field. Stay connected with your faculties, colleagues, batchmates and seniors. Technology in law is constantly growing, and this will create more opportunities for young lawyers, who are tech-savvy and adaptable to the changing times. It can open doors to opportunities and mentorship. Success in litigation is a marathon, not a sprint. Stay dedicated, seek knowledge at every opportunity, and be patient. The respect and recognition you earn will make the effort worthwhile.

    Get in touch with Nikhil Kulkarni –