Super Lawyer

Category: Law Firm

  • The intersection of technology and law has been a recurring theme in my career, and it’s a space that continues to excite and challenge me- G.V. Anand Bhushan, Founder, Bhushan Rajaram, Advocates & Consultants

    The intersection of technology and law has been a recurring theme in my career, and it’s a space that continues to excite and challenge me- G.V. Anand Bhushan, Founder, Bhushan Rajaram, Advocates & Consultants

    This interview has been published by  Priyanka Karwa and The SuperLawyer Team

    Sir, could you please share with our listeners what initially inspired you to pursue a career in law and how you navigated your way to specializing in Corporate, Intellectual Property, Technology, Litigation, and Real Estate laws?

    Certainly, the journey to a legal career is often as varied as the individuals who undertake it. In my case, I stumbled upon the field of law somewhat serendipitously. Like many young lawyers of my generation, I wasn’t particularly inclined towards math or science. However, I had a deep-rooted fascination with technology—I even built my own computers and was an avid proponent of open-source platforms, particularly Linux.

    As fate would have it, my graduation coincided with two significant developments in the Indian tech landscape: the enactment of the Information Technology Act and the onset of a multi-decade growth spurt in the Indian technology industry. These events were not just pivotal for the sector but also set the stage for my own career trajectory.

    The legal challenges posed by the burgeoning tech industry were both complex and novel, offering a fertile ground for specialization. My affinity for technology naturally led me to focus on Corporate, Intellectual Property, and Technology laws. Over time, as I gained more experience and exposure, I expanded my practice areas to include Litigation and Real Estate laws as well.

    While my entry into the legal profession may have been somewhat accidental, the path I’ve carved within it has been intentional and guided by a combination of personal interests and market opportunities. The intersection of technology and law has been a recurring theme in my career, and it’s a space that continues to excite and challenge me.

    Over your impressive 20-year career, you’ve gained extensive experience in General Corporate, Projects, Technology, and Dispute Resolution. Could you highlight some of the key milestones or projects that have played a pivotal role in shaping your expertise and career trajectory?

    One must always remember that competition is fierce. There is terrific talent in the market in the next generation of lawyers. There’s a saying in private practise “You are only as good as your last deal”. Lol, I remember being quite taken aback as a young lawyer when I first heard that! But if you understand that in this economy you always need to upskill to stay relevant and competent, you will be able to thrive. For me, that meant things like pursuing my master’s as a Fulbright scholar and exploring both opportunities in-house and as a Partner in Shardul Amarchand. For example, in Cognizant I was the lawyer hired to set up both the India and the wider Asia Pacific teams as General Counsel. At Shardul Amarchand, I was given the opportunity to start our Chennai office. That kind of entrepreneurial journey is something that I will always cherish. 

    You’ve held significant roles such as General Counsel and Board Member of Cognizant Technology Solutions Asia Pacific. Could you tell us about the challenges and rewards of managing diverse practice areas, resolving complex disputes, and advising on multi-million dollar technology deals?

    The scale of operations at Cognizant, one of the fastest-growing Fortune 500 companies, meant that even seemingly routine matters like EULAs, Labour issues or client Master Service Agreements (MSAs) involved high-stakes financial implications, often running into tens of millions of dollars. The urgency was palpable, and the need for effective prioritization and execution across diverse geographies in the Asia-Pacific region was paramount.

    My experience in private practice at Shardul Amarchand was marked by an intense performance culture. Clients often presented us with complex, unprecedented challenges. It’s worth noting that most large clients have highly sophisticated in-house teams, so when they seek external counsel, it’s typically for issues that are both novel and intricate. This necessitates original research and innovative problem-solving, skills that are indispensable in the legal landscape. Our office of 4 partners advised on Tech, Corporate, M&A, Real Estate and litigation matters. 

    The common thread between these diverse roles has been the critical importance of a strong, well-trained team. Whether it was navigating the complexities of multi-million dollar technology deals, resolving intricate disputes, or advising on regulatory compliance, the strength of the team was often the determining factor in the successful outcome of these endeavors. I’ve been fortunate to work with exceptional teams both at Cognizant and in private practice, and their contributions cannot be overstated.

    Throughout your journey, you’ve been hailed as a trusted legal advisor. What do you believe sets you apart in terms of building strong client relationships and delivering effective legal counsel?

    What distinguishes my approach in building robust client relationships and offering effective legal counsel boils down to two key elements: trust and capability.

    In today’s fast-paced business environment, clients are inundated with challenges and operate under immense pressure. They aren’t seeking a legal lecture; they’re in search of actionable solutions, a quantifiable assessment of risks, and a straightforward strategy for compliance. To earn their trust, it’s imperative to communicate in a clear and direct manner that aligns with their commercial objectives.

    The legal industry often falls into the trap of obscuring advice with layers of disclaimers and complex jargon. This not only dilutes the impact of our counsel but also hampers the decision-making process for the client. My focus is on cutting through the noise to deliver advice that is both clear and actionable.

    Consistency is the final, yet crucial, ingredient in this equation. Trust isn’t built overnight or through a single transaction; it’s cultivated over years of reliable and consistent service. The ability to consistently identify and mitigate client risks transforms a transactional relationship into a long-term partnership.

    You’ve received recognition from esteemed publications like Legal 500, Chambers, and Asian Legal Business. How has this recognition influenced your approach to your work, and what does it mean to you to be acknowledged by your peers in the legal industry?

    Recognition from esteemed platforms is an honor. I’m deeply grateful for it. In a competitive market where credibility is often scrutinized, these accolades serve as a valuable endorsement. Operating under my own name, Bhushan Rajaram, these recognitions act as a seal of approval, opening doors that might otherwise remain closed.

    However, it’s crucial to understand that these accolades are essentially a foot in the door, not a guarantee of sustained success. Clients today are incredibly savvy. They have a keen eye for expertise and can quickly discern whether an advisor possesses the depth of knowledge required to address their unique challenges. So, while the recognition is validating, it’s merely the starting line, not the finish.

    Lastly, could you leave our listeners with a piece of wisdom or a mantra that has guided you through your remarkable legal journey, and which you believe can resonate with those embarking on their own paths in the legal profession?

    Before we conclude, I’d like to share a guiding principle that has been invaluable to me on my legal journey—a piece of wisdom from my father that I believe will resonate with many of you.

    We live in a time where ambition and intelligence are in abundance, especially among young professionals. The drive to reach significant milestones—like making partner, buying a home, or achieving financial independence—often takes center stage. My father, however, offered a different perspective: “Life is not a checklist but a journey.”

    The relationships you cultivate, particularly with your life partner during these formative years, are incredibly enriching. These bonds are built on shared struggles and triumphs, and they often become your most reliable support system.

    So, as you ascend the ranks in the legal field, by all means, be ambitious and aim high. But also remember to live your life fully. The journey itself is just as important as the destination, and the relationships you form along the way make the journey all the more rewarding.

    Get in touch with G.V Anand Bhushan-

  • For a fully rounded practice of banking and insolvency laws, one should ideally also know about the disputes side of the practice of these laws- Shivani Sinha, Partner at Luthra and Luthra Law Offices

    For a fully rounded practice of banking and insolvency laws, one should ideally also know about the disputes side of the practice of these laws- Shivani Sinha, Partner at Luthra and Luthra Law Offices

    This interview has been published by  Priyanka Karwa and The SuperLawyer Team

    Can you share with us your journey in the legal field, from your early career as an Associate at Amarchand & Mangaldas to yourcurrent role as a Partner at Luthra and Luthra Law Offices India ? How did your experiences shape your path in law?

    My early career as an Associate was full of ups and downs, but one thing that stands out in my journey was that I was not scared of experimenting. I felt that if I don’t give something a chance, I would always regret it later thinking about it. It was indeed a mix of good luck and reward of hard work in academics that landed me my first job at Amarchand & Mangaldas, which was a dream job for most law students back then. I would be honest, it was kind of difficult to work as a fresher in Amarchand & Mangaldas since one had to rub shoulders with stalwarts of the profession but I would say it was a good start to my career since, out of my experiences with the firm, I learnt how a top lawyer goes about working on an assignment and is something I still follow. As a fresher I had the good fortune of getting exposure to multiple practice areas namely: banking and finance, general corporate and capital markets, however, I always wondered what it would be like to do litigation, argue in courts, and running an independent practice. My interest in Constitutional law, Civil Procedure Code was the catalyst which further drove me towards trying out litigation after a couple of years at Amarchand & Mangaldas and after a break of few months. Life as a litigant however, didn’t turn out to be as easy, I persisted through it for over a couple of years and only after being sure of being better at being a corporate lawyer than a litigant, I walked my way back into law firms. Since then I have been practicing banking and finance, and insolvency on a consistent basis and must add that have reaped rewards for this consistency in the form of career growth in these practice areas.

    You’ve been extensively involved in advising various stakeholders on corporate insolvency resolution processes. Could you tell us about a particularly challenging or interesting case you worked on, and how you navigated the complexities of restructuring and insolvency?

    I had the privilege of advising the Resolution Professional of the first dirty dozen matter (from the RBI list) which went into insolvency in July 2017- Jyoti Structures Limited (JSL). I was seconded on-site with the team of the Resolution Professional and cherish my wholistic yet very challenging experience with the team. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IB Code) was a very new law back then and was in very early phase of evolution with many rules/ regulations to be framed/ notified and with lack of judicial precedents for guidance. JSL had a huge debt size and very complex issues of law arose throughout in the assignment, which mostly had to be answered on spot or in a very quick turn-around time, and at times without the guidance of any codified law, merely based on experience of past mechanisms/ legal practices that existed in India before the enactment of the IB Code. On some issues, we used to also apply/ take guidance from insolvency precedents of foreign countries. Working on JSL was one of the most challenging phase of my professional life, as the lawyer within me had push to my limits of legal logic and read up a lot of stuff for answering queries related to an new/ evolving law.     

    Your experience encompasses a wide range of legal areas, from banking and finance to dispute resolution. How have you managed to develop expertise across such diverse domains, and how do these areas complement each other in your practice?

    I have always believed in specialisation in what one does, but at the same time as one gets senior in the profession, he/ she should have an idea about some of the ancillary practice areas as well. I started of as a banking and finance practitioner and later when the IB Code was enacted, I started practicing insolvency laws as well. I do contentious matters or disputes only to the extent it related to banking and finance/ insolvency laws. For a fully rounded practice of banking and insolvency laws, one should ideally also know about the disputes side of the practice of these laws. And this is how my experience has got spread across a few practice areas.

    The legal landscape is constantly evolving, especially in areas like fintech and insolvency. How do you stay up-to-date with the latest developments in these fields, and how do you anticipate future legal challenges in the banking and finance sector?

    I read a lot of online news/magazines and updates and have notifications activated for these on my phone. That’s the most common way of keeping oneself updated with changes in law and new case laws that come up. I do also read one of the pink newspapers on daily basis which really helps in knowing upcoming business treads of your practice area and at times also gives clues on which upcoming assignments to pitch for before clients. Keeping abreast with the regulatory changes that IBBI and RBI come up with and the monetary policy announcements of RBI help me in understanding/ anticipating the future legal challenges of the sector. And at times just general chat with bankers/ market participants also gives a hint about what tricky queries or situations will be thrown at you to find legal answers.

    You’ve advised on overseas direct investments and foreign exchange compliances. How do you see the global business environment shaping up for Indian conglomerates, and what are some key legal considerations they should keep in mind?

    The business landscape as far as overseas direct investments from India are concerned, is very interesting, because it essentially involves Indian companies globalising/ setting their foot in foreign countries and also Indians investing/ routing money outside India. With Indian economy doing well, the ODI trends also pick up and which also means a lot of foreign exchange flows out of India. The RBI through authorised dealer banks keeps a keen watch on these ODI transactions, the compliances and reporting associated with these. The most important legal consideration is formulation of transactional structure in such a way that it avoids round tripping concerns and also to advise the clients correctly about approval requirements from RBI/ authorised dealer banks in absence of which the clients may face a lot of issues including penalty from RBI.

    Your role has included advising clients on structuring for short-term money market investments and project financing. Could you share a success story where your legal counsel led to a significant positive outcome for your clients?

    During the pandemic period in 2020, I had the privilege of advising SBICaps Trustee in respect of structuring and operationalising the employee credit line guarantee scheme (ECLGS) launched by the Government of India for the benefit of NBFCs and MSMEs. The NBFCs in India were facing short term credit crunch which was in turn affecting the MSME sector. The scheme was for credit line of INR 30,000 crores and the funds were made available by RBI and guaranteed by Government of India. The scheme was a success and was further extended and continued with next versions in the subsequent months and years. The documentation for this transaction was one of its kind and the transaction structure had be harmonised with the requirements of the scheme. Funding to NBFCs was ensured by subscribing to short term money market instruments issued by them. It was one of its kind transaction that I have worked on in my entire career.

    You pursued various diploma and certificate courses alongside your academic and professional journey. How have these additional qualifications influenced your career growth, and would you recommend similar supplementary education to aspiring legal professionals?

    Yes, these diplomas not only help in building CV but also help in deep diving into a particular subject of law which is either not taught or not taught in enough detail at law school. It could also be out of specialisation interest that a student can take up these diploma/ certificate courses. These also help in utilising extra time constructively during one’s law school days. I would definitely recommend doing diplomas and certificate courses to students but they should be smart in choosing which ones to do as some of these courses could also be very expensive.

    From your time as a student at Symbiosis Law School to your current role, how has your perspective on the legal profession evolved, and what lessons have you learned along the way that you’d like to share with our audience?

    I come from a non-legal background so, as a college student in initial years, I used to think that legal profession is like any other profession. However, my journey so far as taught me that legal profession is much intense than most other professions. All of us learn new things everyday and in that sense are students for life, which also means that the profession demands a lot of hard work/ motivation to keep learning and therefore, in that sense, it is a difficult profession, but also extremely intellectually satisfying and enriching at the end of the day.

    As someone with a wealth of experience in India’s legal landscape, what advice would you give to fresh law graduates who are about to embark on their legal careers, especially those interested in areas like banking, finance, and insolvency?

    It’s important to pursue practice areas which one likes, and the earlier this is figured, the better it is for a law student or a law firm associate. In the initial years, an associate should do rotation/ secondments with the teams/ practice groups that they have interest in and then figure out which one(s) would they like to persist with. Students should do as many internships as possible and try out different practice areas, and if they are able to place their interest early enough, it could really help them in planning their careers better. For fresh associates who take up banking, finance or insolvency as a practice area, it is important for them to try and learn basics and keep abreast with all the legal developments. It is also important for a fresh associate to understand ‘why’ behind everything and for doing that they should not shy away from reading a lot of books/ cases/ articles etc. to start with.

    Get in touch with Shivani Sinha-

  • With technological advancement, the access to justice and quality education is more probable now then ever- Dr. Charu Mathur, Independent Counsel, Supreme Court of India

    With technological advancement, the access to justice and quality education is more probable now then ever- Dr. Charu Mathur, Independent Counsel, Supreme Court of India

    This interview has been published by  Priyanka Karwa and The SuperLawyer Team

    Ma’am,  please introduce yourself to our listeners and provide an overview of your current role as an Advocate-on-Record at the Supreme Court of India?

    Hi! I’m a mom, wife, daughter, sister and also a lawyer and a lifelong learner. I’m deeply privileged to practice as an Advocate-on-Record before the Supreme Court. AORs as original envisioned have a deep role in efficient functioning of the apex court. An AOR is personally responsible to the court; there’s reason why close proximity to Supreme Court complex is provided in SC Rules. The idea is an AOR must be available to assist the court. Since the inception we have around 3000 lawyers who became AOR. The year I cleared my AOR Exams, some 20-25 people made the cut. Earlier only 3 or 4 people could clear AOR Examination. I’m particularly not happy that since past few years over 250 people are made AORs. It is good that so many people are able to clear the examinations but then it also speaks volume about the quality of assessment and nature of question paper set. It is actually disheartening to see that some of the speakers who conduct the lecture series on behalf of SCBA/SCAORA actually give out complete paper. This to me lowers the sanctity of examinations.

    Coming back to my own journey, I come from a family of lawyers and some of them were elevated as judges as well. I did my LLB from LA Shah Law College, Ahmedabad. Right from my student days I worked under my senior Sh SN Shelat, Sr Adv and former AG of Gujarat. In my entire professional life, I have just one enduring motive that whatever I do or not do should bring glory to my senior- Sh SN Shelat and my father Justice NN Mathur; I pray that even accidently I should not do something that blemishes their fair name.

    Post marriage I moved to Delhi. My husband is a fellow AOR and represent few States before the Hon’ble High Court. He has also penned a book on GST, one of the earliest. I’m particularly proud of that. His book explains conceptual GST soundly. He is a man of few words but probably the sharpest person I have come across.

    You have an impressive academic journey with degrees in law, business laws, and even a Ph.D. in Legal Aspects of Pharmaceutical Patents. How did you find your way into the field of law and what motivated you to pursue such a diverse range of qualifications?

    I think the answer to this lies in my gender and role attributed by the society. As long as I can remember, I always wanted to be a lawyer. Constitution of India is my only sacred book. My mother retired as a Professor from Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur. So, I believe I have received some academically genes from her. As for my PhD and even AOR examinations I cleared while being a young mother. I absolutely believe in spending quality as well as quantity time with family. For me spending time with my son, reading to him was very important. I have read him many books multiple times. So, yes, at one point of time in my life reading to him and searching for books for him was my number one priority. I’m glad that our initial efforts turned him into a lifelong reader. He was judging MUNs at St Stephen’s and Hindu while he himself was a school kid. He did us proud by securing place to read Undergraduate law at Trinity College, University of Cambridge and topping the University in the 1st year. As for my own academic journey, I could devote time because I was master of my own time. I was privileged that as I was working with my husband I could decide on my own working hours and even choosing what I will work on what I will not. Saying all that, I do miss the fact that I could have advanced my litigation professional profile at better speed but it was the choice I made, so that it is.

    With over 20 years of experience as a practicing lawyer before the Hon’ble Supreme Court, you’ve handled a wide range of legal matters. Could you share some highlights or cases that have been particularly memorable or impactful in your career?

    Some of the memorable cases I can rattle is- my 1st appearance before the Supreme Court. It was a bail matter. My SLP was dismissed but not before the judge (Justice Rajender Babu) narrated the story of Bruce, the spider- try try again until you succeed.

    I remember arguing murder reference of Purshottam Dashrath Borate before the three judges bench headed by the Chief Justice. One case which I particularly remember was fighting for an old father against her daughter. I could secure win for the father. It was emotionally charged matter. We have been doing medical entrance examination matters fairly regularly. We have seen pre and post NEET era. We have got relief in many of these matters. However, seeing these matters closely, I really question our medical education. Just like AOR exams the bar is getting lower and lower. I do educational matters also. I’m counsel for some of universities as well. I’m happy that relying upon an earlier judgement (where I was part) in a subsequent Writ under Article 32 could change the way seats are allocated in PG AIIMS.

    You’ve also been involved in advisory work for various corporates and organizations. Could you elaborate on your role in providing legal counsel to corporate clients and startups?

    I’m fortunate to get the diverse work. I believe, startups need hand holding. Legal issues are complex and to navigate this maze they need some guidance. Sometimes only discussing the point help them see the point with greater clarity. I do help them on transaction side as well as in drafting and vetting agreements, and even in arraying partners for them.

    Your list of appearances before different high courts and your engagements as a speaker on various legal topics are extensive. Could you tell us about your motivations behind sharing your expertise through speaking engagements and publications?

    I have started taking out station matters. I derive great satisfaction by arguing before various High Court. Recently, we could persuade a High Court to quash demand notice worth Rs 12 Crores, in another High Court could persuade the court that the fault was not of the tax official but the assessee and could get notice issued against his discharged. Likewise in Delhi High Court could persuade the court for relief in arbitration matter.

    As for speaking engagement, I enjoy interacting with young law students and absorb their worldview.

    You’ve also been involved in e-learning content development and have written books on legal topics. Could you elaborate on your experience in creating educational content and how it helps in disseminating legal knowledge?

    Legal education is something close to my heart. With technological advancement, the access to justice and quality education is more probable now then ever. As a continuous lifelong learner, this is my way of giving back to society. 

    Lastly, what advice would you give to fresh law graduates who are just entering the legal profession? Are there any key lessons you’ve learned that you believe would be beneficial for them to know?

    Like each successive generation, this generation is far smarter than the previous one. It has more resources at its disposal. However, there is no substitute for in-depth understanding, reading and introspection. You must have sometime to reflect, assimilate knowledge. We are not machines who keep on downloading information, idea is to read and reflect. In my opinion, running around for internships is meaningless. First, have conceptual clarity, read case laws, read provisions. Now, with live streaming you can witness finest oral advocacy. 

    Get in touch with Dr. Charu Mathur-

  • The most important principle is to be open to all the work that comes one’s way, nothing is too small or too big, to work with sincerity and dedication and not to engage in wasteful comparative analysis-Rajat Moudgil, Dual Qualified Lawyer – Associate Partner P&A Law Offices

    The most important principle is to be open to all the work that comes one’s way, nothing is too small or too big, to work with sincerity and dedication and not to engage in wasteful comparative analysis-Rajat Moudgil, Dual Qualified Lawyer – Associate Partner P&A Law Offices

    This interview has been published by  Priyanka Karwa and The SuperLawyer Team

    Sir, please share with us how you initially became interested in the field of law and what led you to pursue it as a career?

    I became interested in the field of law because of my father. He is a litigation lawyer on the civil side. In his prime, he was one of the leading lawyers in the city (Jalandhar, Punjab). When I was young, I was always in awe of his legal practice. I grew up in an environment where his office and our residence would be bustling with clients, lawyers, clerks and stenographers. I liked the busy life of a litigation lawyer where clients from all backgrounds with diverse problems came to explore solutions to their problems. 

    I realized that the core of the legal profession is problem solving and I started getting interested in the field of law, with the higher objective of contributing to the justice delivery system. Now after being a part of this system for more than 10 years, I can easily say that law is an empowering profession that has the ability to bring actual change in people’s lives. 

    Could you tell us about your educational background and the significance of your LL.M. in Competition Law and Market Regulation from the National Law University, Delhi?

    I did B.A.LL.B (Hons.) from Panjab University, Chandigarh. Thereafter I proceeded to join my father in his litigation practice and learnt how to apply and practice law from the ground level. This phase in my life was the building block of my journey as a lawyer. I represented clients in all kinds of civil disputes that included possession disputes, matrimonial disputes, eviction matters, injunction suits, testamentary and succession disputes etc. For a period of three years I was also empanelled by the District Legal Services Authority which allowed me to represent the unrepresented in criminal trials. I was fortunate to get an opportunity to appear in criminal matters ranging from petty theft offences to murder trials. 

    However, after practising for 5 years, I wanted to move from private party litigation before District Courts to litigation that would be significant at the national level. In 2015, National Law University, Delhi came up with a new LL.M. specialization in Competition Law and Market Regulation, in addition to its usual LL.M. in Public Law. I thought specialization in a new and upcoming stream of law, even though the Competition Act was enforced in 2009, would allow me to garner new skills and help me in my endeavour to contribute to the legal system at the national level.  

    My LL.M in Competition Law and Market Regulation was interesting and fulfilling academically. Throughout my studies I realised the prime importance of my tenure as a litigating lawyer, for it was that experience which enabled me to understand competition law in application and not just theoretically. I also realized the difference in the attitude of institutions and students between State Universities like Panjab University and NLUs (at least the one I attended). In Panjab University the institution and students were primarily focussed on making a career in the judiciary or other government services. I must add that I too appeared for judicial exams in Delhi but could never go beyond the mains stage. Moreover, in Panjab University the focus was only on traditional subjects and new laws like Competition law, Insolvency and Bankruptcy etc were hardly included in the curriculum. At NLU Delhi, I witnessed students exploring different subjects and careers after graduation or LL.M. The teaching methodology and student assignments were also different at NLU Delhi in comparison to Panjab University. Another difference between traditional universities and law universities is the opportunity to interact with students from different faculties and departments. Traditional universities like PU allow students pursuing different subjects like law, arts, science etc to interact and associate. Moreover student unions are stronger and student body elections are significantly more important here.  

    Significance of the time spent in both the universities has been immense not just in the profession but in life. I made some lovely friends and even met my wife while studying at NLU, Delhi. 

    As someone who is qualified by both the Bar Council of India and the Law Society of Ontario, Canada, could you discuss the similarities and differences between practicing law in India and Canada?

    I have qualified for the bar in Ontario, Canada but have not practiced there. However, I can comment based on the qualifying examination I cleared and the requirements I need to fulfil to continue my license. I think the profession in Canada is regulated in a much better way than in India. To start with, the qualifying exams (barrister and solicitor) which everyone is required to clear to qualify as a lawyer is more challenging than the All India Bar Examination conducted in India. The exams are framed in a manner that tests the candidates on ethical and professional responsibilities, as well as legal knowledge. 

    Even after qualifying as a lawyer, all lawyers are required to complete several requirements like submitting annual reports, continuous legal training (Continuous Professional Development) etc, failing which lawyers are suspended from practice. These details are also published on the website for the general public to know. Overall the system aims to protect clients from unethical practices and rules and regulations are implemented better in comparison to India. 

    What are some of the challenges you faced while representing clients in antitrust-related matters before the Competition Commission of India and the courts? How did you overcome those challenges?

    Proceedings against these clients are pending either before the Competition Commission of India (CCI) or in appeal stage, so I’ll not be able to state much. However, I can say that antitrust proceedings in India are often based on perceptions and projections. Most of the times the prima facie view formed by the CCI before directing investigation is followed by the office of the Director General (DG) and again upheld by the CCI at the time of passing final orders. CCI often follows the market defined by foreign regulators in similar industries and is often not willing to adapt the market definition to Indian realities. I must add that lawyers also depend and rely on international jurisprudence to support or defend their cases. Despite the wide powers granted to the CCI to impose high penalties and dictate business decisions, the responsibility to establish contravention through evidence is quite low. The lack of transparency in CCI proceedings can also be a cause of annoyance at times. 

    Since the facts and proceedings are often complex, the Appellate Authorities also refrain from interfering in the primary questions of ‘definition of relevant markets’ and ‘market power enjoyed by parties.’ Although appeals have been allowed against CCI Orders but most of them have been allowed on procedural grounds.  Appeals on many important issues are pending before the Supreme Court. Though we are part of the system and are equally responsible for the delays in final adjudication of appeals, we try our best to be ready to meaningfully assist the Courts in deciding these important issues.  

    Apart from your work with P&A Law Offices, you have also served as a Senior Associate at the Competition Commission of India. Can you share your experience there and the role you played in analyzing merger notifications and investigating alleged anticompetitive practices?

    My tenure at CCI has played a vital role in my career. After finishing LL.M. I wanted to work at the CCI to understand its functioning. Unlike Courts, CCI has a very good setup where the Members are assisted by experts from legal, economics, accountancy and other fields. In fact, the decisions passed by the CCI are guided by the analysis and assessment done by these experts. Further, there are different divisions for merger control, antitrust enforcement, legal proceedings that include initiating and defending by CCI, economics, investigation etc. I was fortunate to have worked in different divisions. During my tenure I worked in the investigation divisions where we assessed and analysed cartels, anti-competitive vertical agreements and abuse of dominance related complaints. In fact the resale price maintenance case against Maruti originated from an anonymous complaint analysed by the investigation division. 

    The combination division dealing with merger control required me to collaborate more with counsels appearing on behalf of merging parties. CCI has a pro-business approach in merger control, however the division ensures that all combinations are notified as per the regulation and then vigorously pursues combinations where it is able to identify a harm arising out of the combination.  

    In addition to these divisions, I was attached to the office of one of the Members of CCI, where I was required to brief on matters from all divisions. 

    Lastly,  what advice would you like to give to fresh law graduates who are just starting their careers? What key lessons or principles should they keep in mind as they embark on their professional journey?

    The most important principle is to be open to all the work that comes one’s way, nothing is too small or too big, to work with sincerity and dedication and not to engage in wasteful comparative analysis. Young professionals should be willing to explore and learn different practices. I think law firms are exerting unwarranted pressure on young professionals to persist with only one field and the industry is needlessly focussing on specialisation. In fact even in a particular field, firms are demanding lawyers to be super specialized. For instance in Competition Law, lawyers are being categorized as enforcement specialists or merger control specialists. Specialisation or super specialisation is fine and may even be essential in the long run, especially in law firms, but fresh law graduates should be encouraged to develop skills and gain knowledge of different fields of law. 

    The core principles in law are the same across all fields and most of law is based on common sense. This is the reason why most senior counsels are able to represent clients across all fields of law. However, the industry and recruiters are not always willing to embrace young professionals who don’t specialize in one subject at the beginning of their careers. I can easily say from my own experience that all my different experiences, be it original side litigation, legal officer at an insurance company, association with CCI, competition law counsel at a law firm, have played an important role in understanding the legal system better and in practical application of different laws.  

    Get in touch with Rajat Moudgil-

  • Success in IP law comes more from understanding your clients’ businesses and being dedicated to protecting their interests- Vivek Vashi, Head of Intellectual Property and Contracts at GormalOne LLP

    Success in IP law comes more from understanding your clients’ businesses and being dedicated to protecting their interests- Vivek Vashi, Head of Intellectual Property and Contracts at GormalOne LLP

    This interview has been published by  Priyanka Karwa and The SuperLawyer Team

    Could you please share a brief overview of your journey in the legal field and how you ultimately ended up as the Head of Legal, IPR, and Contracts at GormalOne LLP?

    My journey in the legal field has been both exciting and fulfilling. I always had an interest in law from a young age as both my grandfather and father practiced law. They motivated me to pursue a degree in law, where I gained a comprehensive understanding of legal principles, regulations, and case laws. Along with my studies I also enhanced my knowledge on Cyber Laws and Information technology through a diploma and certificate. Thanks to the encouragement from my learned faculty at college, mentors, and fellow seniors I efficiently represented India at the International Model United Nations in London and participated in intra-collegiate moot court competitions. Through these experiences, I honed my critical thinking, research, analytical, and advocacy skills, which are essential for success in the legal profession. 

    While obtaining my law degree I delved into an internship with a prominent IP law firm, Aditya & Associates, for over 2 years, where I had the opportunity to work closely with experienced attorneys. This allowed me to apply my theoretical knowledge to real-world scenarios, familiarizing me with legal research, drafting documents and interacting with clients.

    After graduating, I pursued my Master’s degree in Intellectual Property from Cardozo, a top ranked New York Law school. Cardozo offered me global exposure and enabled me to navigate the intricate world of Intellectual Property rights, a legal landscape surrounding innovation and creativity. While pursuing my Master’s degree, I worked at CBS Corporation in New York where I had the opportunity to be immersed in the American work environment which further helped diversify my experience in protecting and enforcing Intellectual Property rights. 

    As I gained more experience, I took on increasingly complex cases and responsibilities, representing clients in negotiations, hearings and court proceedings while working as a junior advocate at M.P.Vashi & Associates. Additionally, collaborating with my colleagues and engaging in continuous professional development further enriched my legal acumen. 

    Presently, I am Head of Legal for Intellectual Property and Contracts at GormalOne LLP where I play a pivotal role in safeguarding the organization’s intellectual property, managing contractual relationships and developing legal strategies to support business growth and innovation.

    Over the years, I have had the privilege of contributing to significant legal victories, advising clients on intricate matters, and navigating the evolving landscape of laws and regulations. I have remained dedicated to upholding ethical standards and promoting justice while adapting to the dynamic nature of the legal field. 

    Looking ahead, my journey in the legal field continues to be a rewarding and intellectually stimulating endeavour. 

    You’ve undoubtedly achieved remarkable success in the field of IP law. What do you believe sets you apart from other IP lawyers in the field?

    I believe my dedication to understanding my clients’ businesses truly sets me apart. By immersing myself in their industries and objectives, I can tailor legal strategies that align with their unique needs giving them a competitive advantage. I am able to do so due to my diverse experiences that have given me a 360-degree view in gaining client rights and protecting client interests in intellectual property. Additionally, my commitment to staying up-to-date with the latest developments in-field has contributed to my success in securing favourable outcomes for my clients. 

    Intellectual property cases can be quite intricate. Could you share one of your most challenging intellectual property cases and walk us through how you navigated it?

    Certainly! One of the most challenging cases I worked on involved a complex Copyright infringement dispute between two industry giants. The technology in question was cutting-edge, and both parties were determined to win. To navigate this case, I worked cohesively with a multidisciplinary team of experts, including engineers and technical specialists, to thoroughly analyze the intricacies of the Copyrights in question. We strategically approached the case, focusing on key arguments and leveraging prior court decisions to bolster our position. Ultimately, through rigorous preparation and effective negotiation, we reached a favourable settlement for our client, avoiding lengthy litigation.

    The world of IP laws is ever-evolving. How do you manage to stay current with the rapid changes in IP laws and regulations?

    Staying updated with the dynamic world of IP is essential to providing excellent legal guidance. My love for literature around the globe with respect to inventions and legal measures, helps me to not only stay relevant but also ahead of the industry. I regularly attend industry conferences, participate in legal seminars, and engage in continuing legal education programs focused on intellectual property. Additionally, I am an active member of various IP law associations, where I network with peers and gain insights into emerging trends and best practices.

    In the digital age, intellectual property protection has encountered new challenges. In your opinion, what is the most significant challenge facing IP protection in this era of digitalization?

    The rapid digitization of information and ease of data sharing have created new challenges for IP protection. One of the most significant issues is the rise of online piracy and counterfeiting, which can severely impact the revenues and reputation of businesses and creators. Additionally, the global nature of the internet makes it challenging to enforce IP rights across borders. Addressing these challenges are the need of the hour and I urge international cooperation and practical solutions to safeguard intellectual property rights in the digital realm.

    Your journey from being a legal intern to an accomplished International Lawyer is inspiring. What advice would you give to aspiring IP lawyers who want to excel in this field?

    First and foremost, develop a strong foundation in intellectual property law through formal education and hands-on experience. Be curious and continuously seek to deepen your understanding of the ever-changing landscape of IP laws and regulations. Cultivate excellent communication skills, as effective advocacy for clients is crucial in this field. Additionally, never underestimate the value of networking and building relationships with peers, mentors, and industry professionals. Finally, remember that success in IP law comes more from understanding your clients’ businesses and being dedicated to protecting their interests.

    Achieving accolades like the “Top 25 Emerging IP Partner” at IP LEGAL DIGITAL CONFEX AT DUBAI – 2023 is remarkable. Could you tell us more about your thoughts and feelings when receiving such recognition?

    Winning the prestigious Top 25 Emerging IP Partner Award was an incredibly humbling and exhilarating experience especially considering the impressive pool of nominees. The selection of the best 25 partners was based on a comprehensive evaluation that encompassed key criteria such as partners’ notable accomplishments, overall reach within the industry, their significant impact on the intellectual property landscape, their forward-looking readiness for future challenges and their alignment with market demands. This recognition highlights winners’ exceptional contributions to intellectual property and their potential to shape its future.

    To be recognized among my esteemed colleagues and peers in the legal profession was truly an honour beyond words.

    Lastly, your journey has surely been an enriching one. Looking back, what motivated you to pursue law, and specifically intellectual property law? 

    As a child, I was fascinated with progressive innovation and creativity and as a teen, I was fond of big brands. As a young adult, I understood the impact brands and their marketing can have on shaping societal views and customer behaviour. This highlighted to me the significance of providing protections to intellectual property which led me to pursue a career in law, where I could help individuals and companies safeguard their innovations and contribute to the growth of technological advancements. 

    Get in touch with Vivek Vashi-

  • Good lawyers in this field will be versatile in their strategy, looking at how best to play the cards their clients have been dealt-Viren Mascarenhas, Partner at Milbank

    Good lawyers in this field will be versatile in their strategy, looking at how best to play the cards their clients have been dealt-Viren Mascarenhas, Partner at Milbank

    This interview has been published by  Priyanka Karwa and The SuperLawyer Team

    Please tell us about your journey in the field of law and how you ultimately specialized in alternate dispute resolution, international commercial and investor arbitration, and public international law?

    I grew up mostly in Mumbai, India, but I received a full scholarship to do my undergraduate studies in the United States.  While my first degree in Economics gave me a solid basis for understanding how the world works, I subsequently pursued a law degree with the idealistic, energetic goal of trying to change how the world worked, in particular, addressing inequities between the Global South and the Global North.  

    While in law school, I took all of the core and foundational classes, but chose my electives to be different international law classes, such as trade law, law of the sea, human rights.  Those classes set the stage for my subsequent career in international dispute resolution.

    You’ve worked with various prestigious law firms and organizations throughout your career. How did each of these experiences contribute to your growth and expertise in the field of international law and arbitration?

    Receiving an offer to serve as a law clerk to H.E. President Rosalyn Higgins at the International Court of Justice during the 2005 to 2006 judicial term felt like being at the pinnacle of my career at its very start!  The ICJ is colloquially known as the “UN Court” or the “World Court.”  The Court’s docket was full during my term.  I worked on armed conflict between the DRC and Rwanda, transboundary environmental issues between Argentina and Uruguay, and the massive Genocide Convention case between Bosnia and Serbia.  The clerkship confirmed for me that I wanted to focus on international law disputes in some fashion.

    Accordingly, I submitted applications into the UN system online for all open vacancies in international law.  Those applications—painstakingly prepared—would vanish into the ether.  I usually never heard back or would hear back over a year later that the vacancy had been filled!

    However, I had success with one application (and all it takes is one!).  In 2007, I relocated to Freetown, Sierra Leone, to work as a Legal Officer at the Special Court for Sierra Leone.  The tribunal had been established to adjudicate responsibility for the war crimes committed in the country during its conflict.  The experience was eye-opening. Substantively, I learned about the application of international criminal law and working at an international organization.  Personally, observing the plight of the survivors and victims of the atrocities instilled in me that we should always try our best to achieve the greater good. 

    Still, I was not sure I was ready for a long-term career as an international civil servant.  I wanted to explore the rigors of private practice with the goal of becoming a better-trained lawyer.  I chose from various offers to join the International Arbitration Group at Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, one of the best arbitration practices in the world, just before the Great Financial Recession hit in September 2008.  While at Freshfields, I got to work on some of the most complex investment and commercial arbitrations, particularly in the energy and extractives sector, such as Libananco v. Turkey, Burlington Resources v. Ecuador, and ConocoPhillips v. Venezuela.  Additionally, I did a ton of pro bono at the firm, representing individuals in asylum proceedings and providing legal advice on international human rights to prominent NGOs.  And, in my spare time (I did not sleep much, admittedly, when younger!), I was teaching at Columbia Law School.

    I felt that I had the best of all worlds—I was stimulated by complex commercial work; my matters had purpose; and I was able to interact with the best arbitrators in the world (Jan Paulsson!  Lucy Reed!) and the best young minds as well at Columbia Law School.  

    As a Partner at Milbank, you’ve been involved in a wide range of commercial arbitrations under various arbitral institution rules. Could you share with us a particularly challenging case you’ve worked on and how you navigated its complexities?

    To date, I have represented the government of Türkiye in five investment arbitrations over the course of my career.  Two cases stand out for me:  Cascade v. Republic of Turkey, ICSID Case No. ARB/18/4, and Ipek v. Republic of Turkey, ICSID Case No. ARB/18/18.  Of course, I cannot discuss anything that is legally privileged and/or confidential from those two matters.  But just a quick search in the public domain will reveal that these two disputes were profoundly important to Türkiye.  At a high level, the matters concerned the failed coup d’état of July 15, 2016, and pitted the Erdoğan administration against the followers of Fetullah Gulen.  So, issues of national security, terrorism, politics, and free speech were directly relevant to the two arbitrations.  Turkish outlets reported on these arbitrations as a fight for the heart and soul of Türkiye!

    After several years of intensely fought arbitration proceedings, Türkiye prevailed in both matters on jurisdictional grounds.  The tribunals found that the investors had committed an abuse of process by restructuring their investments to avail of bilateral investment treaty protection at times when their disputes with the government were underway or reasonably foreseeable.  

    These were immense victories that required me and my team to identify the legal elements of Türkiye’s defenses, and then marshal the evidence to demonstrate to the tribunals why those elements had been satisfied with the requisite burden of proof.  With regard to evidence, no stone was left unturned.  We reviewed publicly available sources extensively; interviewed government officials and witnesses from different ministries and agencies; and identified true experts who could opine on key issues related to the underlying matters.  But being technical about evidence is insufficient.  You have to present the facts and evidence in a narrative that is compelling, persuasive, and convinces the tribunal why to rule in your client’s favor.

    Your involvement in investor-state arbitration is quite notable, representing energy majors against several countries. Could you elaborate on the unique challenges and strategic considerations involved in these cases?

    Yes, I have represented investors in high-profile energy and mining disputes against governments all over the world, including Argentina, Azerbaijan, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Bolivia, Ecuador, Italy, Mexico, Nigeria, Peru, the Philippines, the Russian Federation, Timor-Leste, Uruguay, and Venezuela.  I have also been instructed by several governments in their investment arbitration disputes.  These cases can be very complex because of the multiplicity of government actors involved (for example, the Ministry of Energy may be the focal point, but acts by the President’s Office, the Ministry of the Environment, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and the Ministry of the Economy may also be relevant).  Government actors change over time, bringing in another layer of complexity.  Additionally, the heart of the dispute may not just be about politics (for example, reclaiming sovereignty over natural resources as the public policy goal of a government) but also economics (for example, high oil prices prompting implementation of windfall profit taxes or increased royalty rates).

    Good lawyers in this field will be versatile in their strategy, looking at how best to play the cards their clients have been dealt.  You likely will have to be technical (for example, reviewing administrative agency decisions to understand how environmental regulations relating to energy projects are implemented by local actors), creative (working with experts to construct a model of how the project would have been implemented but for the government’s alleged wrongful act), and comprehensive (seeing the story not just from the perspective of the government and the investor, but also impacted local communities and future generations). Ultimately, you have to understand the big picture yourself, and then figure out how to present that big picture to the tribunal clearly and compellingly.

    Besides your legal practice, you’re also an Adjunct Professor at Columbia University School of Law. How does teaching influence your own legal work, and what insights do you gain from engaging with students?

    I have been teaching as an Adjunct Professor at Columbia Law School for 14 years now, and I absolutely love it.  First, I went to CLS to obtain my JD, so being back on campus reminds me of how much I enjoyed my legal studies (and takes me back to my early 20s!).  Second, preparing for sharp, probing questions from my students keeps me on my toes.  I have to make sure I am fully up to date on the latest in international arbitration and am not just teaching from an outdated playbook.  Finally, listening to their views and perspectives makes me a better lawyer.  They may suggest novel ways of addressing a problem because they do not have preconceived notions.

    You’re actively involved in various organizations focusing on international justice, business and human rights, and more. How do these extracurricular roles complement your legal career and contribute to your personal mission?

     I went to law school with the idealistic goal of helping to make the world a better place!  Therefore, it has always been very important to me to be active in pro bono matters to help serve those who cannot afford access to justice.  I still remember the full panoply of emotions I felt as a second-year lawyer when I was able to secure asylum for my then-teenage client in the United States when he fled persecution in Colombia.  (He subsequently obtained his undergraduate degree from New York University and is now a successful teacher!).

    Given that I spend my time practicing public international law and international arbitration, I focus my pro bono and philanthropic efforts on those two areas where I have a comparative advantage.  That translates into work on international human rights and international justice.  I am proud to serve on the Board of Directors of The Global Justice Center, which focuses on gender-equality in post-conflict societies that is achieved through legal advocacy.  I am also a Director of International Independent Legal Advocates, which helps to level the playing field for developing and small countries who are negotiating complex multilateral treaties and lack the resources and time needed to be effective negotiators.

    By the way, all this work reinforces my own billable legal practice.  I am often approached by corporations or governments to work on commercial disputes that might implicate human rights issues.  For example, many of my extractives and energy matters concern not just economic issues of supply, demand, prices, force majeure, taxes, etc., but also environmental issues and consideration of impacted stakeholders such as indigenous communities in the relevant areas.  Some of the relevant experience I have gathered to take on these matters comes from my pro bono practice.

    You’ve been recognized with numerous accolades and awards for your contributions to the field. How does this recognition affect your approach to your work and your commitment to advancing international law and arbitration?

     You are kind to mention that I have received accolades for my work in international arbitration and as a lawyer generally.  I am always grateful for recognition from my peers, clients, and others for the work that I am doing.  And, at an earlier stage in your career when you are still establishing your bona fides, external accolades and awards can help convince clients that you have the wherewithal to lead their complex matters.  

    Ultimately, though, it is the work that matters.  Recognition usually comes from doing good work.  Doing good work usually requires hard work, dedication, and, frankly, plodding.  I spent many late nights focused on the task at hand—preparing for hearings, finalizing briefs—instead of dreaming about awards!  But I enjoy the “doing,” and the rest that might follow—recognition, accolades, whatnot—is (very enjoyable!) icing on the cake.  

    Lastly, with your extensive experience and success in the legal field, what advice would you offer to fresh law graduates who are just starting their careers, particularly those interested in pursuing a path similar to yours in international law and arbitration?

    Here is what I can suggest based on my experience.  

    First, be flexible.  I spent the summer between my first and second years of law school doing project finance at Milbank.  This seemed like a sensible practice area given that I was interested in development work and thought I would return to India/Asia to work.  However, I realized that I was more inclined to be a disputes lawyer, which led to the career I have described.  But now, two decades into my career, I am back at Milbank leading the international arbitration group.  Unsurprisingly, I spend a lot of time working with my project finance partners—but am not part of the project finance group!  After all, some of the mega projects that Milbank’s project finance team work on could run into disputes, either with the government (giving rise to investment arbitration), or between project company and contractors/subcontractors (giving rise to construction arbitration), or between the project company and offtakers (giving rise to commercial arbitrations). You never know how the story might unfold.

    Second, always, but especially when you are in the early stages of your career, be open to possibilities.  Within five years of graduating from law school, I had clerked at the International Court of Justice, served as a Legal Officer at the Special Court for Sierra Leone, and been a mid-level associate at a top law firm doing international arbitration. While I always had an eye to the future, I focused primarily on what I could learn from each of those amazing opportunities, which were all different from each other.  The result was a broad training in international law, on which I have built my private practice. 

    Third, try to get the most out of what is immediately in front of you, avoiding a “what next” way of thinking.  I was – and am! –ambitious, which sometimes translates into wondering what lies around the corner.  But the most enjoyable moments of my career are when I lose myself in my work—editing a complex section of the brief, preparing for and then undertaking a cross-examination at a hearing, reading the material and then engaging my students on the latest developments in international arbitration.  

    Relatedly, choose to do things because you enjoy them and not always because they could translate into career success.  For example, I studied conversational Spanish with a Venezuelan refugee in The Hague when I was clerking at the International Court of Justice out of a love for the language (based on reading English translations of books by Isabel Allende and Gabriel García Márquez in college) and a desire to work with refugees in the United States when I completed my clerkship.  Little did I know that my Spanish would come in handy later on when I embarked on several major investment arbitrations involving South American governments!  

    Fourth, do not be too hard on yourself.  A successful career is one that is built over time.  There will be ups but inevitably there will also be downs.  Some of those downs will be the consequence of things you cannot not control, at least in part.  Do your best based on the circumstances you find yourself in to change what you can and let go of the rest. 

    Get in touch with Viren Mascarenhas-

  • When faced with a dispute that covers multiple countries, it is best to rely on local expertise and blend it with your own knowledge of the client’s expectations to arrive at a holistic solution- Astha Negi, Partner at Fidus Law Chambers

    When faced with a dispute that covers multiple countries, it is best to rely on local expertise and blend it with your own knowledge of the client’s expectations to arrive at a holistic solution- Astha Negi, Partner at Fidus Law Chambers

    This interview has been published by  Priyanka Karwa and The SuperLawyer Team

    Can you tell us about your journey in the field of law and how you ended up specializing in intellectual property (IP) law?

    I never originally planned to study law. My parents were very keen on me sitting for the civil services examination, but I was not inclined towards it. After completing my schooling in Pune, ILS Law College seemed like a great option for college and fortunately, I was admitted. It was my father who inspired me to take up IP. We used to discuss his numerous patents that he had filed back in the day when he was a scientist and a professor at IIT. Our conversations revolved around plagiarism and authorship/ownership issues in works created in educational institutes..

    Before joining Fidus Law Chambers, you were part of a large IP firm in India, where you managed international trademark portfolios. How did that experience shape your career and expertise in trademark prosecution and contentious matters?

    At Anand and Anand, I had the opportunity to learn from some of the best brains in the industry. My work involved handling foreign filings and contentious matters outside India, which allowed me to connect with many law firms and foreign counsels. I built long-lasting relationships with them, and we continue to collaborate even today.

    Working on outbound matters taught me a lot. As a representative of my clients and their business, I had to consider costs, efficiency, and timelines for each case. I also had to navigate the challenges unique to each jurisdiction and present viable solutions to clients. This experience helped me gain valuable insights into practice and procedures in different countries, which I would have missed out on if I had continued to focus only on Indian-specific cases.

    As a Partner at Fidus Law Chambers, you supervise global trademark prosecution and contentious portfolios for your clients. Could you share some of the challenges you face in this role and how you tackle them?

    A one-size-fits-all approach never works when dealing with intellectual property (IP) on a global scale. When faced with a dispute that covers multiple countries, it is best to rely on local expertise and blend it with your own knowledge of the client’s expectations to arrive at a holistic solution. Another challenge that often arises is that, from a business perspective, clients prefer brand names that are easy for consumers to relate to, which means they may not make great trademarks. In such cases, the best solution is to conduct a comprehensive risk analysis and provide clients with various options to choose from. As a lawyer, you must always strive to find a middle ground.

    Achieving a 98% success rate in trademark contentious hearings in 2022 is an impressive feat. What strategies do you employ to ensure such remarkable results for your clients?

    It’s fairly simple for us. We spend hours preparing for each hearing, with written submissions that include robust timelines and case law. Credit also goes to our experienced team members, who are skilled in handling contentious hearings. We brainstorm before each hearing to decide on our strategy and argument, which has helped maintain our high success rate.

    You’ve filed trademarks in over 40 countries in 2022, which demonstrates a significant international presence. Can you highlight the importance of global IP strategies for businesses in today’s interconnected world?

    Today, businesses are no longer limited to local markets. Thus, having a robust global IP strategy is extremely important. There have been numerous cases of bad faith filings, where trademark squatters have obtained registrations for clients’ trademarks, and the clients were too late to apply. Businesses can take smart steps to protect their trademark rights. At the preliminary stage of brand checks, one doesn’t even have to engage lawyers. There are multiple databases and websites where any business can quickly check for identical or similar marks.

    Apart from your legal career, you are deeply passionate about promoting more women in the workforce and sports. Could you share some of your initiatives and experiences as a community ambassador, organizing and hosting games for working professionals, especially women, in Delhi/NCR?

    This is something I am deeply passionate about. I have always been interested in sports and fitness, but I struggled to find team members to play with. Fortunately, I discovered Hudle, a platform started by one of my seniors in college. Through Hudle, I was able to find groups and venues to play at. Last year, I started a group called “Sportsweekenders” in Noida. The group targets working professionals who enjoy team sports such as basketball, football, and badminton. The idea is to encourage more women to play team sports. We encourage men in the group to bring their wives, friends, and sisters to join. The biggest challenge I face in hosting games is retaining female players. Gender stereotypes in sports still prevail, and addressing this is a long and difficult fight.

    You have been recognized for your outstanding contributions to the field of IP law, such as being named one of the “Influential Women in IP” and receiving multiple recommendations from prestigious publications. How do you stay at the forefront of the industry and maintain your expertise?

    One has to keep evolving with the times. I have always been interested in emerging technologies and issues, and our opinions and strategies align with emerging trends. I encourage my team to come up with innovative solutions that can help our clients. Ultimately, there is no substitute for hard work and consistency.

    As an active member of INTA and Marques, you attend their annual conferences regularly. How have these memberships and conferences contributed to your professional growth and networking opportunities?

    Conferences are an excellent way to bond with peers, clients, and colleagues globally. Knowledge sessions offered at these conferences can facilitate personal growth and learning. As a member of INTA committees, I regularly attend committee sessions, which I find very helpful. The cultural diversity of these conferences is another plus point, as it can help you step out of your comfort zone.

    Could you share some key lessons or insights you gained from attending the trademark practitioners training course offered by the Japan Patent Office and the summer school in intellectual property laws at Xiamen University in China?

    The JPO training was intense. The group consisted mostly of lawyers from Asian countries. We analyzed IP laws in our respective countries and compared them with those of other countries. The summer school in Xiamen was enjoyable, as I got to experience life as a student in Xiamen. Our days were spent studying cases and going on field trips. Both experiences enriched me culturally.

    With your experience and success in the legal profession, what advice would you like to give to fresh law graduates who are starting their careers today, especially those interested in specializing in intellectual property law?

    Honestly, these days, freshers don’t need advice. They know exactly what they want and when they want it. Just be true and honest with yourself, make mistakes, learn from them, and eventually, you’ll end up doing something you love. For those who desire to get into intellectual property (IP), I suggest reading up a lot and subscribing to publications if you can. Some of the students who intern with us are very well-read, and it’s a pleasure to work with them. We regularly absorb such interns who show merit and hard work.

    IP is fascinating, and with emerging issues and technologies, it’s a whole new world out there, and the legal implications of these emerging laws are wide. We are blessed to be witnessing the future as some of the laws are now taking shape. This is a great time to be an IP lawyer.

    Lastly, looking ahead, what are your future aspirations and goals both professionally and personally, and how do you plan to continue making a positive impact in the legal and broader community?

    Professionally, I want to continue doing what I am doing. I want to lead with purpose and help the younger members of the firm become the best versions of themselves. Specifically, I want to mentor younger lawyers, especially female lawyers, as they navigate the challenging workspace, find balance, and become productive members of society.

    Personally, I want to build a bigger community of sports enthusiasts in my neighborhood, with more female participation from ages 30 and above.

  • When one puts their thoughts into words, it unlocks additional dimensions of knowledge-Dr. Sudhir Raja Ravindran, Founder, Altacit Global

    When one puts their thoughts into words, it unlocks additional dimensions of knowledge-Dr. Sudhir Raja Ravindran, Founder, Altacit Global

    This interview has been published by  Priyanka Karwa and The SuperLawyer Team

    Could you please share your journey and how you ended up pursuing a career in law after obtaining degrees in both engineering and law?

    I developed an interest in law while pursuing a Master’s Degree in Engineering from the Warwick Manufacturing Group at the University of Warwick. I was studying regulations relating to automobiles and how they affect innovation, which instilled in me an interest in further exploring and understanding the functioning of legal systems through academic pursuits.

    How do you believe your background in engineering complements your expertise in law, particularly in the realm of intellectual property?

    The diverse educational backgrounds in the fields of Engineering and Law contributed to bring about a range of perspectives in the practice and application of law. This amalgamation of knowledge facilitated the development of a systematic problem-solving approach, nurtured critical thinking skills, and enhanced the ability to provide adept counsel to clients across various industries. It does also help in understanding technology and innovations and their protection under the Intellectual Property regime. 

    As the founder of Altacit Global, a leading Indian law firm, could you tell us about the key factors that led you to establish your own firm and what unique challenges you faced as an entrepreneur in the legal industry?

    The founding impetus behind the establishment of Altacit Global was to create a firm capable of delivering international-caliber services to Indian clients, while fostering a culture of ethical practices. The foremost challenge at hand was to ensure the provision of consistent services on a considerable scale and across diverse geographic locations. This challenge extended to attracting and retaining premier talent, as well as establishing a platform that could foster and acknowledge excellence within a professional work environment. By embracing technology early on and maintaining a commitment to best practices, we have successfully positioned ourselves at the forefront of the spectrum, enabling us to serve esteemed clients.

    You are a regular speaker at universities and national and international conferences. How do you balance your professional commitments with your passion for sharing knowledge and insights with others?

    Professionals in all fields amass a wealth of experience and exposure to diverse facets and issues. This knowledge typically remains within an individual and is seldom shared unless direct interaction occurs through internships, apprenticeships or employment, reminiscent of the ancient gurukul systems. The act of imparting knowledge and contributing to the society from which we have gained is the principal impetus behind authoring articles, publishing books, and speaking. Furthermore, when one puts their thoughts into words, it unlocks additional dimensions of knowledge.

    Your achievements are truly commendable, and you have been recognized as one of the 100 legal luminaries of India and top 100 IP leaders of India. 

    When someone is passionate about their pursuits and excels in them, recognition will inevitably follow. Such recognition serves as a motivating force, propelling individuals to push their boundaries and embark on unprecedented journeys, ultimately leading to a profound sense of satisfaction.

    Your book “Intellectual Property Risk Management” delves into the process of identifying, assessing, and evaluating risks associated with intellectual property. What are some common misconceptions about IP risk management, and how can organizations better understand and address these risks?

    Law is an evolving domain that continuously adapts to the prevailing social, economic, political, and technological developments. The publications “Intellectual Property and Taxation” and “IP Acquisition in India – Tax & Legal Aspects” include chapters authored by various subject matter experts, serving as quick-reference guides and starting points for navigating the intricate landscape of law and its implications on the commercial aspects of intellectual property. The intangible nature of intellectual property poses challenges for all stakeholders within the intellectual property regime. Ensuring appropriate value derivation from intellectual property requires careful attention, distinct from other forms of property.

    The publication “Intellectual Property Risk Management” aimed to elucidate the inherent risks associated with intellectual property and strategies for their mitigation. However, the time has come to release updated versions of these publications to bridge recent developments.

    Lastly, with your extensive experience in the legal and intellectual property domain, what advice would you give to fresh graduates who aspire to make a mark in the legal field and potentially pursue a career in intellectual property law?

    It is of utmost importance for lawyers to remain abreast of developments, encompassing not only the legal field but also various aspects of life, such as technology, social dynamics, economic trends, and more. Grasping the implications of the law and effectively harmonizing economic interests with those of humanity holds immense significance.

    When the process of learning comes to a halt, the growth of the lawyer also stagnates. For law students aspiring to build a career in the realm of intellectual property, which resides at the intersection of technology, law, and economics, a preparedness for perpetual and lifelong learning is imperative.

    Get in touch with Dr. Sudhir Raja Ravindran-

  • Women possess an innate ability to empathise, communicate and offer solutions to bridge gaps, which could immensely help professionals in the field of law- Suhrita Majumdar, Partner at S. MAJUMDAR & CO. , Patent & Trademark Attorneys

    Women possess an innate ability to empathise, communicate and offer solutions to bridge gaps, which could immensely help professionals in the field of law- Suhrita Majumdar, Partner at S. MAJUMDAR & CO. , Patent & Trademark Attorneys

    This interview has been published by  Priyanka Karwa and The SuperLawyer Team

    Could you share with us the journey of how you ended up pursuing a career in law and specifically in the field of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)?

    Since childhood I aspired to become a lawyer. If I remember correctly, around the age of 14 or 15, I thought it would be most exciting to take up criminal law. Courtesy movies! However, as time progressed, I started taking interest in what my Father did. Having been in the practice of core IPR, my Father, Mr. S Majumdar, set up his firm in Kolkata, under the banner of S Majumdar & Co. at a young age.  

    Upon completion of my academics and trainings, I joined the firm in 2008 at the Head Office in Kolkata. Initially I focused on trade marks and had the liberty to expand the team, with his unwavering support. In 2011, I shifted to New Delhi to manage operations of the newly setup branch office. Since then, I have been based in New Delhi, with frequent work trips to other offices at Kolkata and Mumbai.

    Joining S. Majumdar & Co. in 2008, could you tell us about the initial challenges you faced ?

    Challenges are constant and manifold and as a professional, one has to be open to such challenges. In our practice, soon upon joining, I realised that to become a part of the team, I had to be more patient, perhaps because I was required to hear more and make my notes. Complying with internal deadlines was mandatory and it is still so. Therefore, I had to ensure that I complied with the various timelines set for each activity (including meetings, deadlines, other deliverables, or even casual lunch time chats).

    But I have realised that it is the initial challenges and how you deal with them which are critical to mould one’s outlook and also equip one to handle further challenges which come with additional responsibility entrusted to you by the firm or the client.

    Additionally, the field of IPR, especially litigation in IPR, has its own unique challenges.

    With over 15 years of experience in the field of law, could you share some interesting or memorable cases or clients that you’ve worked with?

    I take special interest in suits involving civil/criminal raids and each of them become memorable ones. Nevertheless, I can certainly not miss out on mentioning some of the worthy ones.

    Around 2009, I was fortunate to have had the opportunity to assist Mr. Majumdar in the first the then Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) case relating to staying operation of a patent. This was a dual sim mobile case, before the Customs Office, Delhi and the IPAB. In this case, the patentee managed to obtain a frivolous patent in respect of a multiple sim mobile phone. Basis such patent, he approached the Customs office for confiscating all dual sim mobile sets being imported to India by the leading mobile phone manufacturers. Consequently, all such manufacturers had to wait for a decision from the appropriate forum to ensure that such goods could be released and launched in the Indian market. The Indian Cellular Association (ICA) was actively involved in trying to provide relief to all these leading mobile manufacturers.

    Back in 2010, I was fortunate to be a part of the first GI litigation in India, concerning Darjeeling tea. The said litigation was initiated by the Tea Board of India against ITC Limited on the basis of their registered GIs including Darjeeling. The matter went on for years and was eventually decided in ITC’s favour. At the SLP stage, the Supreme Court did not get into the merits of the case and the matter was disposed of, with certain directions to the High Court.  In fact, the matter was to be decided by the Suit Court (in Calcutta) on the question of law of GI and Certification Trade Mark only, without going into a lengthy trial and examination of documents/ witnesses. The Judgement was pronounced orally by the Hon’ble Justice Sahidullah Munshi on February 2, 2018, dismissing the suit, and the lawsuit was decided in favour of ITC. The Court reiterated the findings of the interlocutory Court. The Court found that the Plaintiff’s registered GI and Certification trademarks are restricted to tea and the protection afforded by the same cannot extend to lounge services. The Court further observed that Tea Board had failed to establish a case of passing, dilution or unfair competition. The Court specifically held that Darjeeling being the name of a place cannot function as a regular trademark, and though Darjeeling may be famous for tea, Tea Board is not entitled to allege that Darjeeling cannot be used by any other traders for their own goods and services for goods/ services, other than tea.

    Referring to a couple of the recent decisions, in 2020, I was involved in a copyright infringement case concerning A Sirkar Vs B Sirkar, which was instituted before the Commercial Court, Alipore, Kolkata where about 7 jewelleries were copied in toto by the Defendants. We received favourable orders at all levels and eventually the suit was settled. This case was quite unique and interesting.   

    In another infringement case, before the Federal Court of Canada, through the local Counsels, we were successful in an infringement suit concerning the well-known trade mark AMUL. Amul was awarded damages of $10,000 for actions contrary to the Trademarks Act, $5000 for actions contrary to the Copyright Act and awarded costs of US$ 17,733, payable by the Defendants.  

    As an active participant in IPR awareness programs organized by various institutes in India, could you share some insights into the importance of raising awareness about intellectual property rights, especially in today’s digital age?

    Raising awareness has always been important considering that IPR is a powerful tool that stimulates innovation and creativity leading to economic development. It is essential that we are conscious of the efforts taken at the stage of innovation and creation, by this I mean is that before any IP is created, one has to ensure that there is no encroachment into the rights of a third party, especially in the digital age where we have access to a lot more content than before. Therefore, on the one hand, it is easy to copy and on the other, it is easy not to copy. For these reasons, awareness is important, especially amongst the younger innovators/creators, irrespective of the domain. Such discussions are always helpful, infact, in the process, we also get to learn so many new things happening around us.

    In fact, under the current regime, IPR is of very high importance, and we see a lot more happening in terms of spreading awareness, at all levels.      

    The field of law, particularly IPR, is constantly evolving. How do you stay up-to-date with the latest developments and trends in the industry to provide the best advice to your clients?

    Yes, considering that IPR is constantly evolving, it is important that we are updated with the latest decisions being passed by the various fora and follow various discussions on relevant platforms. Interacting with clients, attending various conferences, including global conferences, are important to help keep one updated with development and trends in the industry as well as the global scenario with respect to IPR. One after all needs to ensure they are able to keep pace with the rapid technological developments and in that context advise clients on the securing and enforcing of IPR.

    Recently, on August 5, SILF marked a significant milestone with the virtual inauguration of the SILF ladies group on the occasion of Lady Lawyers Day event. What is the scope of women lawyers in the profession?

    Recollecting words of Late Ruth Bader Ginsburg, “women belong in all places where decisions are being made. It shouldn’t be that women are the exception”.  

    Women possess an innate ability to empathise, communicate and offer solutions to bridge gaps, which could immensely help professionals in the field of law. Always remember, gender shouldn’t be a bar at any point in time considering that we have the same ability to deliver. In any case, irrespective of gender, the profession demands perseverance.

    I personally look up to some of the eminent lady Judges and lawyers who have greatly contributed to the profession. I also admire some in-house counsels I have personally worked with, who have been significantly contributing to the growth of the companies with their acumen.

    Referring to eminent personalities in the world of IP, Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Prabha Sridevan (Retd) and our current Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Pratibha Singh are great inspirations.  

    Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Prabha Sridevan (Retd) delivered some pathbreaking judgments during her tenure as the Chairman of the then IPAB.

    Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Pratibha Singh, with her extensive experience in IPR, has shown exemplary dedication in her judicial responsibilities. I am sure all IP practitioners acknowledge her untiring contributions to the creation of the IPD in Delhi High Court.

    Lastly, with your extensive experience and success in the legal profession, what advice would you like to give to fresh law graduates who are considering a career in IPR?

    IPR is vast and therefore, there are several opportunities available for law graduates. In fact, after having completed the IP course at the law school, one should consider IP internships to gather experience and also to see if the subject suits. Subsequently, one may choose a career in between Court and in-house practice.  

    Get in touch with Suhrita Majumdar-

  • Rather than existing in isolation, the law and its concepts should serve as tools to support individuals and enterprises-Neeha Nagpal, Founder, NM Law chambers

    Rather than existing in isolation, the law and its concepts should serve as tools to support individuals and enterprises-Neeha Nagpal, Founder, NM Law chambers

    This interview has been published by  Priyanka Karwa and The SuperLawyer Team

    Please share with us the journey of how you ended up becoming a lawyer? What  inspired you to pursue a career in law, and what were the significant milestones along the  way? 

    I believe that my current profession, which is being a lawyer, has chosen me in a way. I  did not actively grow up with a strong aspiration to become a lawyer. My father used to  emphasize the importance of understanding the laws of the land, which planted a seed  of interest in me. This ultimately led me to pursue a double major in Law and Business  Studies at the University of Warwick. However, the idea of being a lawyer and going to  court every day was not something I had planned for myself. 

    Despite this, I feel incredibly fortunate to have received mentorship from a young age,  from Mr. Arun Jaitley. Fondly referred to as ‘Arun Uncle’, he was a close friend of my  father and had a profound impact on my life and maybe somewhere hearing him regale  his court antics had a subconscious impact on the choice I ultimately made. Though, I  must say that I learnt it is from Mr Jaitley, I learnt the value of conducting oneself with sincerity while interacting with Clients. He always said, “There is no replacement for  sincere hard work in the profession!” 

    You have an impressive work history, with experience in various areas of law, including  Supreme Court litigation, arbitrations, and commercial transactions. How did you decide to  focus on these particular areas, such as insolvency, competition law, and white-collar  crimes?  

    My journey in the legal profession started out by getting involved with the team that  was working on the BMW Sanjeev Nanda Hit and Run appeal in Delhi High Court. Following that, I commenced working with Agarwal Law Associates [‘ALA’] in 2009,  where I dedicated a decade of my career until 2019. 

    During my tenure at ALA, I found myself amidst the unfolding 2G scam, a major  controversy at the time. I actively represented the Essar Group and its promoters in this  matter. Coincidentally, around the same period, the coal scam was also coming to light,  and I got the opportunity to contribute to that case as well. This involvement marked  the beginning of my increasing engagement in matters related to white-collar crime. 

    Since I set up NM Law Chambers with my Partner- Malak M Bhatt, in 2019, there has  been vast amounts of work related to white collar crime and insolvency coming our way. Hence,  NM Law Chambers is essentially focused on these areas of legal practice. 

    As I delved deeper into my legal pursuits, I realized an interesting overlap between  insolvency and white-collar crime, which subsequently directed my focus toward  insolvency matters.  

    Presently, I consider myself fortunate to collaborate with the Insolvency Law Academy,  where I’m actively engaged in working on a research paper pertaining to personal  insolvency law in India.

    Throughout your career, you’ve represented a diverse range of clients, including  prominent companies and individuals. Could you tell us about a particularly challenging or  memorable case that you worked on and how it impacted your approach to law? 

    Each legal case comes with its own unique set of challenges and trials.  At that time, the 2G scam stood as one of India’s most significant white collar /  commercial crime cases. It reshaped the landscape of bail jurisprudence and required a  reevaluation of legal norms. 

    Likewise, I was involved in an International Arbitration case centered around the  complex concept of advance loss of profit. This particular case demanded a high level  of dedication and had a steep learning curve due to its intricate nature. 

    However, one case that will forever hold a special place in my heart is the effort towards  decriminalizing homosexuality. I initiated this petition on behalf of my dearest friend,  motivated by the power of love. The impact of the resulting judgment on people’s lives  was truly profound. 

    Your work played a crucial role in the challenge to homosexuality laws in India, leading  to the decriminalization of homosexuality. Can you share the experience of working on such  a groundbreaking case, and what was the most rewarding aspect of being a part of it? 

    The petition was a laborious endeavor fueled by deep affection. I drafted and filed it on  behalf of my childhood friend. However, during the process of having him sign the  affidavit, a sense of concern clouded my thoughts.  

    This worry stemmed from the fact that, at the time of filing the petition, Section 377 of  the Indian Penal Code criminalized even consensual relationships between homosexual  individuals. Essentially, I was seeking his endorsement on an affidavit that essentially  labeled him as a criminal. This apprehension unsettled me. 

    Despite my concerns, we proceeded with the filing, and as they say, the rest is history! The most gratifying element of our triumph was the outpouring of tears of happiness  that filled the courtroom that day. I bore witness to countless individuals, many of whom  I had never met before, stepping forward to convey their elation and gratitude. This  experience was truly humbling and served as a poignant reminder that actions  undertaken for the sake of love, guided by love, hold the potential for tremendous  impact. 

    You have received recognition and awards for your contributions to the legal field, such  as the Forbes ‘Tycoons of Tomorrow’ Award and being featured in the ‘Forbes Powerlist 2021′  and BW Legalworld’s ’40 under 40’ Elite Lawyers. How do you stay motivated and focused on  achieving excellence in your work? 

    The transition from motivation to discipline is a straightforward one. When motivation  wanes, discipline becomes the driving force. Personally, I find a sense of satisfaction in  adhering to discipline and staying devoted to my commitments. 

    Recognizing the profound impact our work as lawyers can have on individuals’ lives and  freedom, I understand the paramount importance of responsibility in our profession. 

    Hence, it’s the combination of my innate dedication and the weight of responsibility that  serves as the anchor keeping me rooted and concentrated on my path. 

    Over the years, you have worked with various high-profile clients and handled complex  legal matters. What are some of the essential skills and qualities that you believe have been  critical to your success as a lawyer? 

    In my genuine perspective, individuals seldom seek the services of lawyers or doctors  willingly and by preference. Their circumstances, often far from favourable, compel  them to approach professionals in these fields. Therefore, our role as lawyers (or  doctors) is to respond with empathy and compassion, striving to alleviate some of the  burdens that accompany their difficult journey. 

    My approach centers on treating clients with understanding and warmth, aiming to offer  them a measure of comfort along their challenging path. This approach serves as the  core of my practice, and from there, positive outcomes tend to naturally unfold. 

    You have experience advising clients in media/TV show productions and commercial  transactions. How does your legal background come into play when dealing with such  business-related matters, and what challenges do you often face in these areas? 

    Recognizing the significance of an interconnected legal framework is crucial. Rather  than existing in isolation, the law and its concepts should serve as tools to support  individuals and enterprises. The initial step involves comprehending and appraising the  practical realities of commerce, and subsequently aligning legal elements with those  realities. Through experience accrued over time, professionals acquire the acumen to  discern which strategies are viable within comparable factual contexts. 

    The real challenge emerges in persuading clients to remain open-minded and flexible.  Encouraging them to eschew rigid expectations and steadfastly held positions can be  demanding, particularly when they are fixated on specific outcomes or contractual  terms. 

    As a founding partner at NM Law Chambers, you are responsible for managing and  leading a team. What advice do you have for young lawyers aspiring to become partners and  leaders in their respective law firms or legal practices? 

    Your effectiveness is inherently tied to the quality of your team. They constitute the  bedrock of your efforts. Thus, it becomes crucial to provide feedback and actively invest  in their growth and development. 

    In addition, it’s imperative to define your personal work ethic and values, and then  steadfastly adhere to them.  

    Personally, I prioritize responsibility and responsiveness towards my clients. Likewise,  at NM LAW CHAMBERS, our emphasis lies in delivering optimal performance, focusing on 

    efficiency and effectiveness. Rather than fixating on monetary gains, we view them as  a natural outcome of the dedicated work we undertake. 

    Throughout your career, you’ve witnessed the legal landscape evolve and change. How  do you keep up with the latest developments in law and ensure that your legal knowledge  remains up-to-date? 

    Read. Read. Read. Read.  

    There is no shortcut to that.  

    As someone with vast experience in the legal profession, what advice would you like  to give to fresh law graduates who are just starting their careers in the field of law? What  key principles or lessons have you learned that you believe could benefit them as they  embark on their own journeys in the legal world? 

    1. Knowledge is power 

    2. Don’t just work hard but work smart! 

    3. Time management is a valuable life skill and the faster one learns how to manage  their time, the happier one will be. 

    4. Happiness is a choice, we will make everyday  

    5. Define your own success. You cannot define your success by someone else’s  parameters or lens! 

    6. Take time out for yourself- most important. Do something small everyday that is just  for you. Be it a workout or play a sport or read for leisure. Me time is essential. 

    7. Family and friends are your life support system. Give them the priority they deserve. 

    8. Lastly, trust the process. Life always has a larger plan for all of us.