What motivated you to choose law as your career, and what factors influenced this decision? How did your time in law school further fuel your passion for the field and shape your aspirations moving forward?
Back when I decided to pursue law, I did not know what exactly my career graph would look like. I just knew that I had some of the characteristics and skills which lawyers require. I was a voracious reader. I was a deep thinker. And I was a good communicator. Writing and speaking well came naturally to me. Law school was an interesting experience. I prioritized building relationships from my early days. Right from my internship days. In fact, some of my good friends and professional connections today are people who I met while interning with different law firms and offices. So my passion for law grew as I interned with different law firms and offices. I enjoy deep research and writing as much as I enjoy public speaking, and therefore, I thoroughly enjoyed my internships, as well as extra curricular activities in law school. My confidence grew further when I represented my university in National Moot Court Competitions, and Model United Nations.
In the early stages of your career, as you worked with various lawyers and law firms on landmark cases, what was your experience like? What moments or particular cases helped deepen your understanding of the law and shaped your approach as you were learning the ropes? Is there a particular experience you’d like to share with our readers?
The early days of my professional journey, working with different chambers and firms, were indeed a grind. In the very beginning, you have to do a lot of grunt work. Yes, you have to understand the nitty gritties of legal procedures and filings. You initially learn to take notes meticulously, manage files, communicate efficiently with senior colleagues, office staff and clients. It’s only after this stage that you start getting more interesting work. I had an advantage in the sense that I worked with very small setups initially, so bigger responsibilities like drafting pleadings, briefing senior counsels and court appearances came to me sooner. In fact, in a little more than a year, I was managing client portfolios and cases myself. One of the chambers that I worked with had an interesting “anchor” system, which meant that every case was assigned to a particular associate, who was the “anchor” on that matter, and was almost entirely responsible for that case. I believe this is the best way for seniors to manage their offices, and younger lawyers to “learn the ropes” quickly.
Some of the cases that really broadened my understanding of law, its formation and application were landmark constitutional matters. This included matters like the petition challenging the constitutionality of the “Marital Rape Exception” and the petition seeking recognition of “Same Sex Marriages”. While working on these petitions, I got the opportunity to dive deep into various laws, including the Constitution itself, family laws, criminal laws, civil laws, property laws, public laws, citizenship laws and most importantly interpretation of statutory provisions by courts, and the courts’ take on laws made by the legislature that may otherwise seem to infringe upon fundamental rights, or violate the Constitution. These experiences helped me in handling other civil and commercial matters as well. Later on, when I shifted to Singh & Singh Law Firm LLP, the intellectual property law firm, originally founded by Hon’ble Justice Prathibha M. Singh and the Learned Senior Advocate Mr. Maninder Singh, the base that I had built in civil, commercial and constitutional laws, enabled me to pick up IP practice and its fundamentals rather quickly. All of this eventually compounded and enabled me to kickstart my own practice in Intellectual Property, Tech, Regulatory & Commercial Laws.
At Singh & Singh Law Firm LLP, you worked on a number of significant intellectual property cases, such as those involving counterfeit products and trademark infringement. What challenges did you encounter when dealing with unknown defendants and e-commerce platforms? How did your experience in these cases shape your approach to cases involving intermediary liability and technology laws?
That’s an interesting question. Acting against unknown defendants, especially counterfeiters, is a real challenge, for both aggrieved companies and the courts. This is because counterfeiters operate in an incredibly stealthy manner. There was one particular case, where we were representing a large pharma company, against unknown counterfeiters, who were listing counterfeits of our clients’ products on Flipkart. We fondly refer to unknown defendants in IP cases as Ashok Kumars, the Indian equivalent of “John Doe”. These Ashok Kumars would use the names and GST numbers of actual businesses, without their consent, to put up listings of counterfeits of our clients’ products. When our client went to the addresses of those businesses, they found out that their names and GST numbers were being misused by nefarious counterfeiters. These counterfeiters operate through a vicious nexus, and it becomes virtually impossible to trace them. So now the question is, what can be done in such cases?
When we approached the court, the first defendant in our lawsuit was “Ashok Kumar”. The second was Flipkart itself, and then we impleaded the businesses whose names and GST numbers were being misused. We got an injunction from the court, preventing the unauthorized usage of our client’s trade marks, and uploading of counterfeits on Flipkart. The court directed that whenever our client would inform Flipkart about any counterfeit listings, Flipkart would take down the listings within 24 hours of receiving the information. Further, both our client and Flipkart would file monthly compliance affidavits, with details of the listings reported and taken down. So this order was a step in the right direction, as intermediaries like Flipkart are normally only obligated to take down anything unlawful once they get a court order for each listing. Special orders like the one I’m telling you about are passed when there’s rampant and uncontrolled unlawful activity taking place on a platform, like the counterfeit listings. After this order was passed, we pressed that directions should be issued to Flipkart to take more proactive steps to prevent the listings of counterfeits on its platform, in light of the PUMA judgment. The case is still going on. All this information is available in the court orders available publicly, and articles reporting on them.
When handling domain name disputes before WIPO and NIXI, what critical factors should a business consider before pursuing a complaint or defending one? Can you walk us through a recent case you’ve managed in this area?
There are a couple of factors that need to be seen in such cases. One is regarding registration of the “domain name” as a trade mark. A domain name is also a trade mark. Hence, like other trade mark disputes, the party which has prior adoption and prior registration is at an advantage in such cases. Another factor that is seen is the intent behind the usage. Is it honest? Or is it dishonest usage to come closer to someone else’s brand name, to deceive customers?
The domain name dispute that I dealt with recently was quite interesting. It was with regard to cyber squatting. Cyber squatting is when someone registers a domain name without any intention of using it. Now why would someone do this? So that they can profit, when someone else who genuinely wants to use that domain name for their website comes forward, and is compelled to buy it from the cyber squatter. So I represented the genuine user against the cyber squatter. And we were able to settle the dispute in favour of our client. We were able to exert significant pressure because of the fact that our client’s trade name, which was the same as this squatter’s registered domain name, was already registered as a trade mark in more than 30 countries.
With growing global concerns about privacy, how do you guide clients in the tech and fintech sectors to ensure compliance with GDPR and other data privacy laws? Could you provide an example of a recent case where your team helped a client navigate privacy and regulatory challenges, especially with emerging technologies like blockchain or cryptocurrency?
Well, we start with the basics. Having a solid privacy policy in place. GDPR compliance is essential. Now that the enforcement of the DPDP Act is also around the corner, we need to make sure that we address that as well. We advise companies to also have privacy compliant agreements with vendors and other stakeholders, to prevent any breaches of sensitive data. We advise them to have responsible data protection officers and effective grievance redressal mechanisms in place that are in compliance with privacy laws.
When it comes to Cryptocurrency and Blockchain technology clients, we have advised them extensively on KYC regulations, Anti Money Laundering Regulations and Counter Finance Terrorism Regulations. Since a lot of these exchanges are set up in places like the British Virgin Islands and the Cayman Islands, compliance with the regulations that I’ve mentioned is essential in these jurisdictions. We also tailor their terms and policies accordingly. It really is fascinating.
As businesses increasingly operate on an international scale, how do you address cross-border IP and commercial law challenges, particularly for clients in highly regulated sectors like pharmaceuticals or fintech? What strategies do you use to ensure compliance with both Indian and foreign regulations?
It’s indeed true that businesses are increasingly operating on an international scale. Very recently, a client has approached us for IP filings and enforcement in several countries. One of the best mechanisms that we use for international IP filings is the Madrid Protocol. It allows an applicant to file for trade marks in several countries through a single application. So, one can file for trade marks through this mechanism in all the countries that accept Madrid filings. They just need a registered trade mark in one country as the base application. Although Madrid filing is expensive, it is still much more cost efficient than filing directly at each country’s national IP office, when you’re filing in several countries. Many large product based companies, such as pharmaceutical ones, operate in multiple countries, and such mechanisms are very helpful for them.
Although you can file through Madrid in several countries, the applications are eventually forwarded to the national IP offices of each country, where the registries may possibly raise objections, or third parties may file oppositions. To deal with such scenarios, we have a wide network of local IP counsels in several countries. We also utilize this network in case a client wants to file in a country that does not accept Madrid.
So that’s just international IP filings. Our network stretches across Asia, the Asia Pacific, Eurasia, Europe, Africa, the Middle East, Latin America and North America. I’ve met many of the fantastic IP counsels and firms in these countries personally, in the course of work and at international IP conferences. As far as contract drafting and advising on compliances for international clients is concerned, we do it ourselves, and rope in our affiliates and international partners across the globe for fine-tuning and on ground requirements.
What unique legal challenges do startups face when incorporating companies in India or abroad? How does your firm tailor its legal advisory to meet the specific needs of startups, especially in industries like e-commerce, technology, and fintech?
Startups, particularly tech startups, have diverse legal needs. One of the key stages where they require counsel is when they’re negotiating contracts with investors. They have to be very careful, not to relinquish control, and having a lawyer carefully draft their contracts and guide them in negotiations is crucial. Of course, having their IP in place is also essential. Many startups actually want us to apply for their IP at the very outset, as it helps them display authenticity and secure investments. One interesting, recent experience that I had, was drafting the contracts for an ed-tech startup, entering into a collaboration with another education company, to co-brand and offer courses to their customer base jointly. It was interesting as we had to draft the IP related clauses very strategically, to protect the interests of our client, in this co-branding venture.
Then, we also help them have appropriate policies in place and contracts, for employees, particularly with regard to confidentiality concerns, remuneration and benefits. If you’re asking me particularly about tech and fintech startups, we also advise them on specific regulations that apply to them, such as RBI regulations, NPCI regulations, the IT Rules, privacy regulations and the like.
Given your extensive experience, what advice would you offer to aspiring lawyers and law students who wish to build a rewarding and successful career in law?
I would say that this line of work requires a lot of patience, persistence, development of a thick hide, and a knack for understanding business as well as you understand the law. Withstanding pressure, paying close attention to detail, building relationships, staying focussed and the virtue of “giving more than you take”, in the initial years are most important. I also developed most of these traits over a passage of time, and am still growing. So I understand that it’s no cakewalk. One must keep at it.
Maintaining a balance between a high-pressure legal career and personal well-being is something many professionals struggle with. How do you manage to keep a healthy work-life balance, ensuring that both your professional commitments and personal life thrive without one overshadowing the other?
I don’t think this part is as hard as people make it out to be. Legal professionals are busy every day of the week. But as they grow in their careers, they get more control over their time. So it’s for you to make the most of your spare time, and manage your waking hours efficiently. I allot some of my spare time to fun activities that also contribute to my professional growth, such as going to social events, or making episodes for my YouTube Channel, called the “Utsav Mukherjee IP & Tech Law Show”. I also go sightseeing whenever I attend conferences in other cities or countries. I enjoy reading and also watch a nice movie or two over the weekend.
With over eight (8) years of distinguished experience in the field of law, including being an Advocate-on-Record (AOR), Supreme Court of India, what initially inspired you to pursue a career in law? What was the driving force behind your decision to join such a prestigious profession?
Studying law after school was never on my list; I loved Physics and Mathematics, so I chose “Science with Maths” after 10th grade. Simultaneously, I started preparing for IIT-JEE – a common choice for a Science student. One day, on my way to coaching, a traffic police officer stopped me, checked my documents, and made me wait 30 minutes without assigning any reason. I complied, unaware of my rights and the police officer’s powers. This incident sparked my interest in Political Science and Civics, which discussed the concepts of rights, duties, government, democracy, civil liberties, etc. I discussed this new interest with my parents, who were astonishingly supportive of my shift in career aspirations. In fact, it was my father (not a lawyer) who suggested me to pursue a career in law – a suggestion I was keen to explore. The idea that knowledge of the law could empower individuals became a driving force in my decision to pursue law. My father introduced me to a law student, who apprised me of CLAT and National Law Universities. Thereafter, I appeared for CLAT and secured admission to National Law University, Odisha in 2012—an achievement I deeply cherish.
How has your journey as an advocate evolved, contributing to your expertise and success in the field?
My journey has been both exciting and challenging. Despite being a first-generation lawyer, I’ve been fortunate enough to have great mentors—from college seniors to the seniors in the profession, especially my bosses—who have played a crucial role in shaping my career.
Towards the end of law school, I interned with the Supreme Court team at Karanjawala & Co., a top-tier law firm. I was lucky to secure a job there during my internship, marking the start of my career in law. As a fresher, I gained invaluable experience at Karanjawala —assisting in briefing senior advocates, preparing update emails for clients, managing paperwork, and analysing court cause lists. These foundational skills continue to help me till date. I would like to make a special mention of my senior Mr. Utsav Trivedi (now Managing Partner at TAS Law) for his guidance.
I later joined Luthra & Luthra Law Offices, the team of Mr. Faisal Sherwani, Partner. He was not just a boss, but a true leader—the one who leads by example. Mr. Sherwani has been instrumental in shaping my career and continues to do so. His passion for constitutional law once led to a discussion on the Supreme Court’s judgments on “basic structure doctrine”. This discussion inspired me to prepare for the Advocate-on-Record (AOR) exam. Mr. Sherwani himself is an AOR and I have learnt a great deal from him.
At Luthra, I handled diverse matters pertaining to property disputes, IT laws, motor vehicle laws, IP, and criminal law. I significantly honed my drafting skills during my time in Luthra. However, I always aspired to start my independent practice—an idea fully supported by Mr. Sherwani.
After starting my independent practice, I realized the need to refine my courtroom advocacy. Seeking mentorship, I joined the chambers of a prominent senior advocate, Mrs. Madhavi Divan (former Additional Solicitor General of India), who was kind enough to include me in her team. No discussion on my career trajectory would be complete without mentioning her contributions.
Madhavi ma’am has a strong work ethic and unwavering consistency in preparation and performance. Despite thoroughly reading briefs, I often felt underprepared in conferences with her, as her questions pushed my intellectual limits. Over time, I began following her line of arguments and anticipating her questions. While assisting her in various matters, including arbitration, insolvency, property disputes, constitutional matters, I learned key advocacy skills—when not to speak in court, how to gauge a judge’s mind, restructuring arguments on the spot, etc. Mrs. Divan has been instrumental in my growth, and I continue to learn from her.
Having worked with law firms and a senior advocate, what motivated you to establish your own practice? What were the initial hurdles you faced, and what inspired you to take the leap into independent practice, building a firm that reflects your values and legal expertise?
I think every advocate in dispute resolution aspires to argue before the courts. While working at top-tier law firms, I worked on high-stake matters and assisted in briefing senior advocates but rarely got the chance to argue—rightly so, as I lacked the skills then. However, the urge to start my independent practice never faded. Unfortunately, the demanding law firm schedule left little time to act on it.
Ironically, the Covid-19 lockdown gave me the opportunity to rethink my career path. Instead of picking up a new hobby, my then flatmate, Mr. Siddharth Jain (now my partner in our law firm), and I focused on taking up independent matters. We started by sending legal notices for corporate clients—companies looking for young lawyers who offered quality work at competitive fees. This instilled confidence in some clients, leading to the launch of our law firm, Jain & Saigal Law Offices, in September 2020.
Starting out wasn’t easy. The biggest dilemma was leaving a handsome retainer for complete uncertainty—a tough decision every entrepreneur faces. Renting office space, hiring associates, and managing operations brought hidden challenges we hadn’t anticipated. But our determination and positive attitude helped us navigate the journey and build something we truly believed in.
Starting your career as an associate in law firms and participating in high-profile and landmark insolvency cases must have been a significant learning experience. Could you share some key insights from these cases?
When I had entered into the profession i.e., in 2017, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) was in its early days. The Reserve Bank of India had identified twelve (12) highly stressed corporate debtors—the “dirty dozen”—for resolution under IBC. Given the stakes, litigation was inevitable, with cases reaching the Supreme Court of India to address legislative gaps and uncertainties in the law. Most of the law firms across the country were engaged in these high-profile matters.
My interest in insolvency law developed during law school days, even before IBC was enacted. I closely followed mechanisms like Corporate Debt Restructuring and Strategic Debt Restructuring, introduced after statutes such as SICA, SARFAESI, etc. failed to achieve the intended objective. Naturally, I wanted to work on the insolvency matters, and at Karanjawala, I was fortunate to be involved in cases concerning the “dirty dozen”.
Attending long-hour conferences with clients and senior advocates was invaluable. These conferences made me learn about different perspectives involved in preparing arguments to be presented before the courts. It is not just the provisions of the statutes and their interpretations, or researching the case laws, but also the business’ perspective. In addition to studying the laws applicable, it is equally important for an advocate to understand the intricacies of its client’s business. Laws are meant to regulate business and commerce and not to prohibit them. Thinking beyond legal texts and grasping real-world business implications was my biggest takeaway from these experiences.
Clearing the AOR exam is a remarkable achievement that speaks volumes about your legal acumen. How did you prepare for this challenging exam, and how has passing the AOR exam enhanced your legal practice, especially in terms of the quality of your representation and legal strategy?
Preparing for the exam was a nostalgic experience. I studied with my law firm partner and an ex-colleague and a friend I met in Mrs. Divan’s chambers. It felt like college days again—last-minute cramming and somehow making it through. We had organized our schedules efficiently, giving us a full twenty (20) days to prepare. Fortunately, friends who had cleared the exam in the past few years guided us well.
For me, self-study was the key. I had numerous notes and strategies from friends and other contacts, but they only added to my stress. What truly helped was analyzing past question papers, watching lectures by senior advocates, and studying the material available on the Supreme Court of India’s website. I am immensely grateful to the senior advocates who took time from their busy schedules to help us prepare through their lectures and notes.
It’s still early to assess how passing the exam has impacted my legal practice, as the results were declared just a couple of months ago. However, the “Supreme Court matters” section in my firm’s “list of matters” is growing noticeably. We remain committed to delivering our best while strictly adhering to the Supreme Court Rules, 2013, and the Apex Court’s directions for the AORs.
Representing a high-profile retired bureaucrat in criminal defamation matter, is certainly a critical responsibility. What key legal arguments did you present in this case, and how did you approach defending such a prominent individual against serious allegations, ensuring a successful outcome?
Unfortunately, this matter is sub-judice before the High Court of Delhi, therefore I cannot comment on this.
You have been representing homebuyers in multiple courts across Delhi in recovery proceedings initiated by banks against those unable to pay EMIs after being deceived by builders. Could you share the key legal challenges you faced in these cases and the strategies you employed to secure a favourable outcome for your client? Additionally, how do you foresee the evolution of laws surrounding homebuyers’ rights and real estate projects in India moving forward?
Despite multiple legal remedies available to homebuyers against builders under consumer laws, IBC, and RERA, they lack protection from banks’ recovery proceedings. Many homebuyers, after investing their savings and taking home loans for their dream house, continued paying EMIs, only to realize they had been duped by builders who never began construction or could not complete it in time. When some stopped paying the EMIs, banks initiated legal action(s) against them.
The clauses of the contract obligates the homebuyers to repay the banks. Therefore, one of the biggest challenges was to determine the appropriate legal forum and remedies to protect the clients from banks’ recovery proceedings. Approaching the Delhi High Court under writ jurisdiction was not fruitful, as the Delhi High Court denied exercising its writ jurisdiction in matters concerning rights of the homebuyers arising purely out of contracts. Thus, beseeching the Supreme Court’s inherent jurisdiction was the only recourse. Initially, the Supreme Court stayed proceedings against homebuyers, but it has now allowed the proceedings before DRT and other tribunals to continue—while prohibiting the issuance of recovery certificates. Additionally, the Apex Court has ordered a special investigation team to probe the nexus between banks/ financial institutions and builders.
The legal framework for homebuyers’ rights and real estate in India is evolving to enhance consumer protection and transparency. While RERA has strengthened safeguards, enforcement remains a challenge.
Moving forward, I anticipate further judicial and legislative developments aimed at addressing delays in project completion, streamlining dispute resolution mechanisms, and imposing stricter compliance requirements on builders and banks/ financial institutions. Additionally, the interplay between RERA, insolvency laws and consumer laws, particularly in cases where builders default, might see further clarifications to ensure that the homebuyers’ rights are prioritized.
There is also a growing demand for digitization in real estate transactions, which could lead to the integration of blockchain technology for property records and increased transparency in financial dealings. The state of Andhra Pradesh has already taken steps in this direction. The role of AI in addressing industry challenges remains to be seen.
Your unwavering commitment to the legal profession is truly inspiring. What has been the most rewarding aspect of your legal career so far, and what continues to fuel your passion for law? Additionally, what advice would you offer to the younger generation aspiring to build a successful career in law?
The most rewarding aspect of my legal career has been the journey of establishing my own law firm. Building my practice from scratch, navigating complex legal challenges, and progressively gaining clients’ trust has been both fulfilling and humbling.
As a first-generation lawyer, the challenges are constant and sometimes make me question my decision. However, these very challenges push me to improve, adapt, and thrive. The core driving force remains my fundamental duty—to listen to my clients’ concerns, provide them with the best possible solutions available under law, and represent them effectively before the courts.
I am not sure if I have gained enough experience in the profession to be able to give advices. However, there are a few personal thoughts I can share from my journey so far. As a professional, one needs to always show up and inspire confidence in one’s surroundings—this profession demands commitment, and it is important to rise to the occasion. I also believe that one should broaden one’s perspective beyond law. A fair understanding of business, economics, philosophy, and current affairs can make you a more effective lawyer. Additionally, never trust the shortcuts that would inevitably come your way. Success in any profession is a marathon, not a sprint! Lastly, there is no thumb-rule for success, every individual has its own trajectory. One must trust the process and continue to give one’s best, success and excellence will follow.
Balancing a demanding legal career with personal well-being is undoubtedly challenging. How do you manage to strike a harmonious balance between your professional responsibilities and personal life, and what strategies do you employ to ensure that both aspects thrive without compromising either?
Balancing a demanding legal career with personal well-being is undoubtedly challenging, and honestly, I often find myself struggling to fulfill my personal responsibilities. While I firmly believe that achieving harmony between professional and personal life is essential, I am yet to devise an effective strategy. It is something I am actively working on, especially because my mentors have always emphasized the importance of managing work in a way that ensures every aspect of life is taken care of. I hope that with time and effort, I will be able to strike that balance.
A legal career can hold different meanings for different people. What inspired you to pursue law as a career, and what was the driving force behind your decision to take this path? How did your journey through law school further ignite your passion for the field and shape your motivations for the future?
My journey to law began against the backdrop of family tradition pointing elsewhere. Three successive generations of civil engineers in my family (including both my parents), had established a legacy in public service and infrastructure – particularly, water supply, a cause to which both my father and grandfather had committed a large portion of their lives. While I was tempted to lean into this “flow” state, following them into a set career as an engineer working in infrastructure or environmental sciences, my interests as a student actually leaned towards aerospace engineering and all things space-related.
Frankly, it was my grandmother who ultimately inspired my legal path, and acted as a guiding light. It was in the late 1940s that she had graduated with a law degree from Government Law College, Mumbai (then-Bombay) having lost a few years to the Indian freedom movement. She continued to maintain kinships with notable alumni like Soli Sorabjee and Nani Palkhiwala whom she had met in study groups – on occasion she would narrate several anecdotes about them and their time at law college. Soon after graduating however, she chose family life over a demanding legal career – a decision she later expressed regret about before passing in 2024 at age 97. Despite never having practiced law as a member of the Bar, her legal training permeated her daily life. Her sharp wit, articulation and ability to debate confidently at length with eminent personalities and champions of industry left me with profound respect for the legal profession and even fostered a sense of reverence for litigating lawyers. There was something meaningful about pursuing a career she had not been able to follow.
Law school quickly dispelled my romantic and innocent notions about legal practice. No number of anecdotes or choice phrases could replace the intellectual rigour and stamina required for law school. Law school demanded a sharpened focus and genuine eagerness to learn, qualities that developed gradually during my studies. What transformed my experience were approachable professors, commercially relevant courses and real-world internships that revealed how legal strategy truly functions in practical application.
I became particularly interested in dissecting and analysing business structures and strategies in the form of case studies, similar to investigative journalism. I was taken in, almost jonesing on the access to information that legal training provided me – corporate filings, audit reports, public disclosures – told compelling stories that captivated me more than fiction. This fascination further accelerated me towards corporate law, built on the fundamental understanding of how legal frameworks shape industries and business strategy.
After completing your law degree, you chose to pursue a master’s from Durham University, United Kingdom. Given the number of esteemed institutions offering similar programs, what made Durham stand out as the ideal choice for you? Could you share how your experience there enriched both your academic and professional journey?
Choosing Durham University for graduate school was an easy decision. As one of the UK’s ancient universities alongside Oxford, Cambridge and St. Andrews – often collectively referred to as “Doxbridge” – Durham offered prestigious academic standing with its #4 UK ranking that year. This was a deciding factor as I was only looking for universities in the UK. Further, having missed application deadlines for Oxbridge, Durham represented excellence within my available options.
Another important consideration for me was the collegiate system at Durham that really attracted me – with each college maintaining its distinct history and culture. My acceptance to Castle College, Durham’s founding and oldest college was particularly transformative for me. The “Castleman” culture, shaped by centuries of tradition, encouraged by academic excellence and strong professional camaraderie was an unmatched value addition. Studying within a medieval castle – one that had served as a filming location for Harry Potter was an immersive experience in itself. Formal dinners in historical halls and galleries complete with ceremonial or academic gowns, connected learning to centuries of scholarly tradition.
Academically, Durham provided the perfect platform for refining and deepening my skills in commercial law. A key highlight was being taught Mergers & Acquisitions by Shaun Goodman, a Kirkland & Ellis’s London partner – easily one of the sharpest minds I had encountered. His nuanced perspective and practical insight into corporate acquisition strategy, execution modes and financing structures were invaluable. This blend of theoretical depth and real-world commercial application, prepared me for complex high stakes legal transactions that were around the corner for me in law firm life.
The Durham experience extended beyond coursework – instilling qualities that continue to shape my professional approach and work ethic: focus on analysis over verbosity or precedent, adaptability in unique situations, collegiality in professional relationships, and a broader sense of purpose and achievement in legal work. These elements remain foundational to my practice today.
In the early stages of your career, you had the privilege of working with several prestigious law firms, including Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas and Trilegal, as well as co-founding Digi-Smart Technologies. What were the pivotal learning moments during these formative years that not only deepened your understanding of the law but also set you on the path toward excellence in your profession?
My early years across law firms provided a crucible which forged my practice. At Trilegal, I was immediately thrust into representing a major multinational technology player interested in strategic acquisitions across the Indian tech sector as well as a USD 100 billion+ AUM private equity fund – both deploying approximately USD 8 billion in capital across Indian markets over a spread of deals in distinct sectors within aggressive timelines. This experience, building upon my foundational two years of private equity experience at Desai & Diwanji, revealed that excellence in complex high stakes transactions requires more than technical proficiency; it demands strategic vision that anticipates challenges before they materialize.
What proved invaluable to me was navigating these transactions with a lean, efficient, high performing team united by shared principles – rigorous work ethic (read: hard work), unwavering integrity and meticulous attention to detail. It became clear to me that the quality of collaboration often determines transaction success more definitively than individual brilliance. The diversity of perspectives and backgrounds among the exceptional professionals I worked with expanded my own professional toolkit exponentially, teaching me that legal solutions emerge not just from following set precedent but from creative problem solving. Our camaraderie naturally also seeped into our personal lives and I can’t underscore the importance of maintaining strong friendships while working in high stress settings.
At Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, assisting on a private equity buyout of a major education provider across the preschool to K-12 segment while simultaneously handling my first listed acquisition – a control deal in the highly regulated cement sector revealed the multidimensional nature of complex transactions that intersect with governance, policy and public interest. Both these matters inter alia required synchronising national, state, local and international regulatory frameworks while identifying inconsistencies between them. Dissecting legal risks several financial quarters in advance and advising on mitigation strategies and pragmatic solutions and structures. This experience crystalised my understanding that superior deal counsel must operate as regulatory cartographers – mapping jurisdictional and legislative complexities while charting clear paths forward.
Having worked at prominent law firms, such as Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas and Trilegal, what motivated you to transition into an in-house role with Euronet Worldwide, Inc? How did you perceive the cultural shift between working at a law firm and being part of a corporate in-house team, and how did your responsibilities evolve in this new environment?
My transition to an in-house role at Euronet was driven by a fundamental desire to participate in business strategy and decision making from inception rather than merely documenting or assisting with decision already made. While law firm practice offered technical depth, I found myself increasingly drawn to the strategic questions that precede formal legal engagement. Having already done a masters’ degree, an MBA seemed excessive and unaffordable and I had often heard inhouse roles being equated to an MBA education.
The cultural shift from law firm to inhouse was stark and multidimensional. In private practice, client interactions typically begin after commercial parameters are already established – the classic “deal is agreed in principle between principals, now it’s the lawyers job to document it” scenario. At Euronet, I experienced the inverse, legal counsel became integral to opportunity identification, market entry strategy and risk assessment months or even years before external counsel may be engaged or a term sheet even considered. This shift from a reactive to proactive counsel demanded developing “commercial intuition” – the ability to anticipate business or revenue implications beyond legal analysis.
This perspective aligns with what a senior partner at a previous firm I worked at once described as the evolution from “legal technician to business strategist”. It took a lot of effort to create trust for counsel to be seen as business enablers rather than gatekeepers, but once this trust was established, the rewards to the company and stakeholders were self-generating.
During my time at Euronet, the Asia-Pacific business presented unique opportunities, requiring legal support for double-digit growth across diverse markets in South East Asia and the Middle East in addition to India. To meet these demand, I worked to innovate our legal function along with leadership by establishing what I saw as a “quasi law firm” within the corporation, treating stakeholders as clients and legal team as service providers. We deliberately recruited attorneys with top-tier law firm experience from AZB, CAM and SAM who could maintain technical excellence of legal practice while developing commercial acumen and who had the necessary temperament and soft skills required to work in a fast paced multi-cultural international environment.
While Euronet was a NASDAQ listed US corporation operating in over 100 countries operating for nearly 30 years, I found that negotiating with technology giants such as Google, Amazon, Apple and Microsoft that were significantly larger and well-resourced required a dual perspective that included understanding not just contractual terms, commercial motivations and regulatory landscape but also strategic negotiation and cultivating perseverance. Collaborating with state owned enterprises, government bodies, DISCOMs, utility providers, SMEs and startups conversely required a different brand of lawyering.
Perhaps most rewarding was leading compliance and product counsel functions under the guidance of senior leadership. This involved direct and close interaction and engagement with regulators, LEAs, industry bodies and policy forums. The work often required pioneering approaches for fintech products with no established regulatory blueprint and involved constantly navigating regulatory grey zones with an informed view.
Ultimately, the transition taught me that exceptional in-house counsel must balance technical expertise with commercial pragmatism while maintaining integrity at all times.
What inspired you to establish your own practice, and what vision did you have for Frigg & Snotra? Were there any significant hurdles or obstacles you faced during the establishment of your practice, and how did you overcome them to build it into what it is today?
The inception of Frigg & Snotra emerged from a vision to create something fundamentally different in India’s legal services offering – a boutique practice that integrates legal expertise with strategic business advisory. Having worked both in prestigious law firms and as in-house counsel, I observed a persistent gap between pure legal advice and practical business implementation, particularly in technology, financial services, media, and emerging sectors. Our mission became building that crucial bridge between legal and commercial.
The name “Frigg & Snotra” was chosen from Norse mythology, symbolizing wisdom, foresight, and prudence – qualities we believed essential for modern legal practice. This foundation reflected our commitment to delivering counsel that looks beyond immediate legal questions to anticipate future challenges and opportunities.
Though we are only six months into this journey, the early stages have been both challenging and illuminating. As fundamentally a first-generation lawyer establishing an independent practice, the challenges were immediately apparent. The regulatory framework governing the legal profession in India places significant and legacy hurdles on marketing unlike other mature legal markets such as the United States of America – Bar rules prohibit lawyers from advertising or marketing services in ways that other professionals take for granted. This restriction made traditional client acquisition strategies impossible, requiring creativity in building reputation and visibility through relationship development.
Financial uncertainty was perhaps the most daunting aspect in the early months. Unlike established firms with predictable revenue streams, we faced the constant challenge of irregular payment cycles, with some clients delaying payments by 60-90 days or more. There is also the running risk of clients utilizing work product – detailed legal opinions or transaction documents – or taking them to other lawyers for execution without paying for the intellectual input. This has necessitated implementing a system of setting up advance payments and developing clear engagement terms that protect our interests while remaining client-friendly.
Building a client funnel without traditional marketing channels has demanded persistence and ingenuity from day one. We are focusing on creating specialized knowledge capital in emerging domains like fintech regulation, digital businesses, and cross-border transactions. This expertise-first approach is slowly but gradually attracting clients facing complex challenges that commodity legal services can’t adequately address.
Perhaps most challenging in these initial months has been establishing credibility as a new entity. We’re addressing this by adopting an agile, client-centric approach that emphasizes responsiveness and personalized attention that larger firms can’t match. This is beginning to build the trust that I hope will transform one-off engagements into lasting relationships.
We’re still at the beginning of our journey, with much growth ahead, but by remaining adaptable to evolving client needs while maintaining unwavering ethical standards, we’re working to transform these early challenges into the distinctive characteristics that will define our firm and practice in years to come.
Given your extensive experience in advising on complex IP license transactions, how do you foresee the future of intellectual property evolving in India, especially in the context of global transactions, and in light of emerging trends in AI and digital technologies?
India is at a critical crossroads vis-à-vis intellectual property (IP) as artificial intelligence (AI) and digital technologies reshape global businesses and transactions. As an advisor to technology companies for over a decade, I see several key developments in the near to mid-term future. India’s traditional IP framework anchored principally by the Patents Act, 1970 and the Copyright Act, 1957 was not designed for the AI era, creating significant gaps in protection, ownership and liability. The question of who owns AI-generated content remains particularly contentious and we are yet to see lasting judicial clarity on the subject (while several matters have already reached Indian courtrooms they are at no level of conclusion).
The Indian Patent office currently maintains that purely AI-generated inventions lack patentability. Considering the explosive growth in the use of AI for instance in life sciences, this approach is particularly concerning for AI-based IP inter alia in areas such as diagnostics, disease identification, drug and clinical trials where big data from healthcare providers, medical workers, hospitals, researchers and patients can be used to develop innovation, leaps and bounds quicker than using non-AI methods. A stable IP protection framework in this sector also has to be balanced with public access considerations. There is a general awareness over the critical role algorithms play in a data centric world. However algorithms and software currently face patentability challenges in India unless they demonstrate practical application within specified devices.
Harmonised IP protection is essential for cross border transactions. Even for emerging tech startups, a strong patent portfolio is one of the first items that provides investor surety that the company or team is working on a unique subject matter or value proposition. India may need to create entirely new IP mechanisms specifically designed for IP innovation – this is in line with recommendations of the parliamentary standing committee on commerce.
India has already done significant work on incentivizing startups to formally protect their IP and be an active participant in the patent ecosystem by creating fee exemptions or subsidies as well as providing for expedited processing times for startups as India prepares for an unparalleled wealth creation era. Some work still remains in bridging the legislative or judicial uncertainty in IP on emerging technologies. For businesses navigating this shifting landscape, I recommend ensuring robust contractual protections and safeguards for proprietary information and trade secrets, while parallelly monitoring policy developments. Corporations irrespective of scale may also actively engage (as industry stakeholders) with policymakers and legal experts to problem solve sector specific issues and concerns, with the ultimate goal of optimizing the emerging IP framework and striking a balance between clarity, protection and innovation.
Over the course of your distinguished career, what is one key lesson or insight that has stayed with you, and how has it shaped your professional journey? What advice would you give to younger professionals aspiring to build a career like yours, and what resources would you recommend for them to stay ahead of the curve in today’s fast-evolving legal landscape?
The most effective lawyers are those who position themselves at the intersection of legal expertise and business or commercial strategy. Legal counsel viewed in isolation rarely delivers optimal value. The ability to contextualize legal advice within commercial or existential realities facing clients transform regular counsel to indispensable advisor.
To borrow from Mr. Cyril Shroff, “Modern practice requires to be multilingual – fluent not just in law but in the language of business, technology and risk management”.
Another valuable habit is cultivating client empathy – the ability to genuinely understand your client’s motivations, constraints and unspoken concerns. This is a dimension of legal practice that cannot be automated or outsourced to artificial intelligence and remains the foundations on which exceptional legal careers are built historically, and will continue to be in the future.
If I was a younger legal professional I would embrace the technological transformation that is quickly reshaping legal practice. Tools such as lexum.ai, jurisphere.ai etc are simply the beginning. In terms of resources, I recommend looking beyond legal sources and engaging with trusted publications such as HBR, Mckinsey Quarterly and The Economist. For personal knowledge development, there is a wealth of knowledge based podcasts, and most podcasting platforms have great algorithms that guide self-discovery and often lead to deeper and meatier discussions. I find Business Wars by Wondery a great podcast to follow. Separately, I often use Google Scholar to read academic papers in emerging domains rather than an article and typically find more nuanced takes on issues. I use Notion to track my own learning and development.
The legal profession is known for its demanding nature, often making it difficult to maintain a work-life balance. As someone who has achieved great success in your field, how do you manage the pressures and responsibilities of your career while also prioritizing your personal well-being?
Me opining on work-life balance is like the Hindenberg calling someone a “hot mess”. The profession’s reputation for demanding schedules is well earned particularly in transactional practice where client emergencies and deal timelines often dictate rhythms and sleep cycles. However, lawyers maintaining work life balance isn’t an oxymoron like “affordable housing in Mumbai”. It just requires strategies slightly more sophisticated than explaining to your partner why a client call at 4 AM constitutes “quality time”.
Early in my career, looking at my seniors, I embraced the conventional wisdom that success required superhuman dedication – that sleep was optional and black coffee was a superfood. My “work life balance” consisted of consolidating closing documents while at a colleague’s wedding, hoping that I could catch his next one without a deliverable. I once found myself lugging a laptop up a mountain, choosing to carry it to review an SSPA offline instead of a camera tripod that I desperately needed to capture a view that I had trekked several hours to photograph.
My evolution towards sanity has involved several realizations: First, I have established my personal constitutional rights – non-negotiable elements that even the most demanding clients or matters cant amend. Every persons non-negotiables are different. For some it is morning exercise routines that are non-negotiable, for others it is playtime with their children or partners. A great irony I’ve noticed is that the most creative solutions to complex problems have emerged not during midnight office sessions but while watching terrible reality television or some other mundane activity constituting a break. Taking breaks actually improves critical thinking to the ire of legal purists.
The legal profession’s reverence for precedent shouldn’t extend to destructive work habits. Just because generations of lawyers before us sacrificed personal well-being on the altar of professional advancement doesn’t mean successive generations must continue this dubious tradition. Like typewriters and smoke filled cabins, some precedents deserve to be overruled.
The verdict? Balance isn’t perfectly achievable, but sanity is possible with boundaries, perspective, and the occasional ability to laugh at our profession’s most absurd demands.
With your remarkable expertise across multiple areas of law, including Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, White Collar Crimes, and Real Estate Laws, what initially inspired you to pursue a career in law? Looking back, could you also share how your internship experiences and time in law school influenced and shaped your decision to delve deeply into these complex legal fields?
My inspiration to pursue a career in law stems from a deep-seated passion for justice and the dynamic nature of legal practice. However, my journey into the intricate fields of Insolvency & Bankruptcy, White Collar Crimes, and Real Estate Laws has been profoundly shaped by the remarkable mentors and experiences I have had along the way.
I have been fortunate to have Mr Sumant Batra as my guru, under whose guidance I had the privilege of working at Kesar Das & Associates. Learning the nuances of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code under his tutelage was a transformative experience, reinforcing my commitment to mastering this ever-evolving field. His intellectual acumen and visionary approach continue to inspire me.
Additionally, Senior Advocate Mr Abhimanyu Bhandari has been a role model for me, and I greatly admire his exceptional legal acumen and courtroom presence. The invaluable guidance of Mr Pulkit Deora & Mr Aditya Shankar Prasad has also played a pivotal role in my professional growth, particularly in navigating the complexities of IBC.
My formative years in law school were further enriched by exceptional internship experiences under some of the finest legal minds in the country. I had the privilege of working under Senior Advocates such as Mr Salman Khurshid, Mr KTS Tulsi, and Mr Vivek Tankha, among others. Their mentorship not only honed my legal skills but also instilled in me the discipline, diligence, and perseverance required to excel in this profession. Their unwavering commitment to the law has always motivated me to strive for excellence.
Looking back, these experiences have not only shaped my legal career but have also reinforced my belief that law is not merely a profession but a lifelong pursuit of knowledge, advocacy, and justice. I remain committed to contributing meaningfully to the legal fraternity, continuously evolving with the ever-changing landscape of law.
During the early stages of your career, as you worked with various prominent law firms, what key experiences helped refine your understanding of specialized areas like Intellectual Property, Insolvency & Bankruptcy, and other subjects? How did these formative years contribute to honing your skills and preparing you to tackle high-profile cases in these areas?
During the early stages of my career, I was privileged to work with some of the most esteemed legal professionals, and these experiences played a pivotal role in refining my understanding of specialised areas such as Intellectual Property and Insolvency & Bankruptcy.
My interest in Intellectual Property law was sparked during my time at the chamber of Mr Salman Khurshid, where I had the distinct opportunity to work on a personal legal matter of his. This exposure provided me with invaluable insights into the intricate nature of IPR disputes and their strategic nuances. I was particularly fortunate to have the guidance of his associates, including Mr Aadil Singh Boparai, former Additional Advocate General of the State of Punjab, who ensured that I remained actively engaged in complex IPR matters. Their mentorship deepened my appreciation for the field and solidified my interest in intellectual property rights.
Similarly, my passion for Insolvency & Bankruptcy law developed during my tenure at IVY Law Offices. It was there that I had the privilege of briefing and observing stalwarts such as Mr Abhimanyu Bhandari and Mr Sumant Batra on IBC matters concerning prominent real estate giants. This first-hand exposure to high-stakes insolvency proceedings not only enhanced my technical knowledge but also sharpened my strategic thinking and advocacy skills in this domain.
These formative years were instrumental in shaping my legal acumen, allowing me to develop a structured, analytical approach to handling complex cases. They provided me with a strong foundation, preparing me to navigate high-profile matters with confidence and precision. Looking back, these experiences have not only influenced my career trajectory but have also reinforced my commitment to excellence in these specialised areas of law.
After working with esteemed law firms, what motivated you to establish your own practice? Were there any significant hurdles or challenges that you faced while setting up your firm, and how did you overcome them? Additionally, what was your vision behind taking this significant step in your career?
From the very outset of my legal career, I harboured a strong desire to work for myself, but I was conscious that before taking such a step, I needed to gain a thorough understanding of the law in specific areas. My time with esteemed law firms provided me with invaluable exposure, but I always knew that establishing my own independent practice would allow me to shape my professional journey in a way that aligned with my aspirations.
One of my foremost motivations for starting my own practice was my ambition to establish myself as an arguing counsel. I believed that stepping into independent practice was the ideal way to hone my advocacy skills and take on more significant litigation roles. Throughout this journey, I have been fortunate to have the unwavering support of my seniors, including Mr Aaditya Shankar Prasad, and my loved ones, who have always encouraged me during challenging times.
Of course, the decision to leave a well-salaried job to venture into independent practice was not an easy one. The financial uncertainty that comes with such a transition is daunting, but I was fortunate to have a few clients from my very first job, which provided me with a foundation to build upon. Instead of being deterred by the challenges, I remained focused on specific areas of law—particularly Insolvency & Bankruptcy and Real Estate disputes—that would allow me to generate work and grow my practice strategically.
My vision has always been clear—to establish myself as one of the finest litigation lawyers in the fields of IBC and Real Estate disputes. I am committed to continuous learning, refining my advocacy, and making a meaningful contribution to these specialised areas of law. The journey so far has been demanding yet deeply fulfilling, and I look forward to further strengthening my expertise and reputation in the years to come.
Your extensive expertise in Insolvency and Bankruptcy (IBC), particularly in cases involving companies such as Earthcon Universal Infratech and Unity Group, UNIBERA CIRP, and other CIRP cases have been widely recognized. From your experience, what are the most common challenges that businesses and creditors face in these proceedings? How do you adapt your approach to each unique case to ensure the best possible outcome for your clients?
My experience in handling Corporate Insolvency Resolution Processes (CIRP) for companies such as Earthcon Universal Infratech, Unity Group, UNIBERA CIRP, and several other real estate insolvency cases has provided me with deep insights into the challenges faced by various stakeholders, particularly creditors.
In real estate insolvencies, homebuyers and operational creditors often emerge as the primary victims of the litigation process. The insolvency framework, both legislatively and judicially, has traditionally prioritised financial creditors, leaving operational creditors in a precarious position. One of the most pressing challenges they face is their exclusion from the Committee of Creditors (CoC), which consists predominantly of financial creditors. This exclusion severely limits their ability to influence resolution plans, often resulting in minimal or, at times, no recoveries at all. The disparity in treatment has led to persistent concerns regarding the fairness of the insolvency resolution process and calls for reforms to ensure a more equitable distribution of assets among all stakeholders.
Each case presents its own set of complexities, and my approach is always tailored to achieve the best possible outcome for my clients. For operational creditors, the key lies in strategically asserting their rights within the existing legal framework while pushing for a more balanced interpretation of insolvency laws. This often involves challenging unfair treatment before tribunals and courts to ensure that their interests are not completely disregarded. For homebuyers, the focus remains on maximising recoveries through structured legal strategies and advocating for resolutions that safeguard their investments.
Navigating insolvency proceedings requires a combination of legal expertise, strategic foresight, and a deep understanding of financial intricacies. My goal is always to bridge the gap between legal provisions and practical realities, ensuring that my clients—whether operational creditors, homebuyers, or other stakeholders—receive the strongest possible representation to protect their interests in an otherwise complex and often unfavourable system.
You have handled several high-profile money laundering cases before the PMLA. Could you share the most challenging white-collar crime case you’ve dealt with and how you navigated the intricate legal challenges involved? What strategies did you employ to ensure a successful defense?
As a legal practitioner handling complex white-collar crime cases under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), confidentiality and discretion are paramount. While I cannot disclose specific details due to the sensitive nature of these matters, I can broadly share that I have worked on several high-profile cases, including a widely publicised airline scam, two major bank fraud cases, real estate-related laundering matters, and a case involving a prominent political figure who was a former Chief Minister of a state.
Each of these cases presented unique challenges, particularly due to the interplay of multiple statutes, cross-border transactions, voluminous financial records, and the rigorous scrutiny of enforcement agencies. Navigating such intricate legal complexities required not only a deep understanding of PMLA but also a strategic, multi-faceted defence approach.
Under the guidance of my esteemed seniors, I gained invaluable experience in tackling these high-stakes matters. The key to an effective defence in PMLA cases often lies in meticulously dissecting financial trails, challenging procedural lapses, and ensuring that the fundamental rights of the accused are upheld throughout the proceedings. A proactive approach—combining thorough legal research, forensic financial analysis, and strategic litigation—was instrumental in mounting a strong defence.
Beyond the legal technicalities, these cases reinforced the importance of adaptability and precision in white-collar crime litigation. Each matter provided a profound learning experience, further honing my expertise in handling intricate financial crime cases and reinforcing my commitment to delivering the highest standard of legal representation in this challenging domain.
As a legal advisor to CREDAI and with your extensive experience in real estate advisory, what do you consider to be the most pressing legal challenges facing the real estate sector in India today? How do you foresee the sector evolving, especially in terms of legal reforms and challenges in the coming years?
As a legal advisor to CREDAI and someone who has been deeply involved in real estate advisory and litigation, I have witnessed first-hand the evolving legal landscape of the sector. From the outset of my legal career, I was drawn to real estate law, and my expertise in this domain led to independent advisory roles for several prominent developers. Today, I have the privilege of advising over a dozen builders, guiding them through the intricate legal framework that governs this critical industry.
The real estate sector in India faces a myriad of legal challenges, many of which stem from regulatory uncertainties, compliance burdens, and financial complexities. One of the most pressing issues is the interplay between multiple laws—such as the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA), the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the SARFAESI Act, the Negotiable Instruments Act, and various criminal laws—each of which plays a significant role in real estate disputes. Developers often find themselves entangled in prolonged litigation, particularly in insolvency matters, while homebuyers and other stakeholders struggle with delays in project delivery. Ensuring a balanced approach that protects consumer rights while providing a viable legal framework for developers remains a crucial challenge.
In my role as an advisor to CREDAI, I have handled high-stakes cases worth billions of rupees, appearing before the Hon’ble High Court and the Supreme Court of India. These experiences have reinforced my belief that the real estate sector holds immense potential for growth, provided that both developers and policymakers work in tandem to create a more transparent and efficient regulatory environment. The government must take proactive steps to streamline approval processes, enhance dispute resolution mechanisms, and promote investment-friendly policies. At the same time, developers must ensure strict compliance with legal frameworks to build credibility and sustain long-term growth.
Looking ahead, I foresee significant legal reforms aimed at strengthening investor confidence and addressing the structural bottlenecks that often hinder real estate development. Countries like the UAE, particularly Dubai, have demonstrated how robust legal frameworks and government support can drive infrastructure growth and urban development. India must follow a similar trajectory by fostering a legal environment that encourages both domestic and foreign investments while ensuring fair treatment of all stakeholders.
For young lawyers, the real estate sector presents a strong foundation in the early years of practice. Given its interdisciplinary nature, I strongly recommend mastering key legal areas such as IBC, RERA, arbitration, SARFAESI, the NI Act, and criminal law, all of which are extensively utilised in real estate litigation. The sector is not only financially rewarding but also offers immense opportunities for those willing to navigate its complexities with diligence and expertise.
With your extensive and diverse experience in the legal field, what advice would you offer to young professionals who aspire to build a successful career in commercial litigation and high-stakes legal matters? What skills or mindset do you believe are crucial for excelling in these challenging areas of law?
For young professionals aspiring to establish a career in commercial litigation and high-stakes legal matters, my foremost advice would be to develop a strong foundation in key legal areas and cultivate the appropriate mindset to navigate the complexities of this profession. Building meaningful professional relationships, working diligently during law school, and dedicating oneself to internships are essential elements in laying the groundwork for a successful legal career. Engaging in continuous internships, contributing to legal scholarship through writing, and staying updated with the latest judicial developments are indispensable practices for any law student. These endeavours not only refine legal skills but also provide a competitive edge in an ever-evolving field.
To young lawyers, including those at the early stages of their careers, I would offer similar guidance—work with diligence and identify an environment where your skills and aspirations align. Understanding one’s own strengths and capabilities is crucial, as is recognising when and where to apply them effectively. Strategic application of one’s abilities at the right stage can make a significant difference in professional growth and success.
For those entering this field, I strongly recommend gaining proficiency in statutes that frequently intersect with commercial disputes, such as the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA), the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the SARFAESI Act, the Negotiable Instruments Act, and relevant provisions of criminal law. A thorough command of these statutes not only enhances legal acumen but also equips aspiring litigators with the requisite tools to handle complex financial and contractual disputes with confidence and precision.
Furthermore, it is imperative to acknowledge that, in the legal profession, financial success should not be the primary objective. Instead, establishing a strong reputation through dedication, resilience, and unwavering commitment to the practice of law is of paramount importance. Recognition and professional success follow those who invest in their craft with sincerity and perseverance. It is through consistent effort, integrity, and expertise that one truly distinguishes oneself in the legal profession.
Commercial litigation and high-stakes legal practice present immense opportunities for those willing to embrace the challenges. With the right mentorship, a commitment to continuous learning, and a strategic approach, young lawyers can carve a distinguished career in this demanding yet highly rewarding field. True success, recognition, and a lasting reputation are achieved not by seeking shortcuts but by consistently demonstrating excellence, ethical integrity, and an unwavering dedication to the law.
Given the demanding nature of your legal career, balancing professional responsibilities with personal well-being can be challenging. How do you manage to strike a harmonious balance between your professional and personal life, and what strategies do you use to ensure both aspects thrive without compromising either?
Balancing professional responsibilities with personal well-being is indeed a challenge in the legal profession, given its demanding nature. However, I firmly believe that a good lawyer must not only excel in their practice but also take care of every aspect of life to ensure long-term success and fulfilment.
For me, achieving this balance starts with mindful time management and setting clear priorities. While my professional commitments require unwavering dedication, I make a conscious effort to nurture my personal life as well. Travelling is something I truly enjoy, as it allows me to disconnect from the routine, gain new perspectives, and return with renewed energy. Spending quality time with my parents and staying in touch with loved ones are also essential aspects of my life, as they provide emotional support and grounding amidst a busy schedule.
Additionally, I have always been eager to meet new people and engage in social interactions, as I believe that meaningful conversations and diverse perspectives contribute immensely to both personal and professional growth. Beyond work, I ensure that I dedicate time to my physical well-being through regular exercise and sports, which help in maintaining focus, reducing stress, and enhancing overall productivity.
Ultimately, I believe that a well-rounded approach to life is key to excelling in the legal profession. By staying connected with loved ones, pursuing interests beyond work, maintaining a healthy lifestyle, and embracing new experiences, I strive to ensure that both my professional and personal life thrive without compromise.
With over a decade of experience in law, what initially drew you to this profession? Was it a deliberate choice from the beginning, or did it develop more organically over time? Also, how would you describe your time at National University of Juridical Sciences (NUJS – Kolkata)?
My path to law was a blend of intent and organic evolution, deeply influenced by the strong women in my family. Coming from a lineage where resilience and empowerment were ingrained, I grew up watching my great-grandmother, my grandmother—a dedicated nurse—and my mother, a high school teacher in a small village, fight for their rights and carve their own identities in society. Their strength and determination shaped my worldview and instilled in me the belief that women must assert themselves in every sphere, especially in professions where they are often underestimated.
From an early age, I was acutely aware of how society tends to give less importance to women’s ambitions and careers. However, my parents always encouraged me to be bold, firm in my convictions, and unwavering in integrity. Their teachings laid the foundation for my passion for advocacy—standing up for what is right and ensuring that justice is accessible to those who need it the most.
Growing up in a small town, I had no prior knowledge of NUJS. It was through a newspaper article that I first came across the institution. At that time, access to the internet was limited, and mobile phones were not commonplace. Intrigued, I wrote a letter to a Bengali newspaper seeking more information about NUJS and its law program. After reading about the college and understanding its potential, I became determined to pursue law after my 12th grade. I took the entrance exam, and to my surprise, I got selected—something I discovered only seven days after the results were published.
However, cracking NUJS was only the first challenge. As a student from a Bengali-medium background, adapting to the rigorous academic environment was daunting. The initial years were particularly tough, but the faculty at NUJS was incredibly supportive, helping me overcome my fears and language barriers. Despite these challenges, I never let adversity deter me. I used every opportunity to gain practical exposure, completing a dozen of internships across India during the entire law course. These experiences not only deepened my legal understanding but also prepared me for the real-world dynamics of the profession.
NUJS was truly a transformative experience. It provided the academic rigor and practical training that shaped my legal acumen. Surrounded by some of the brightest minds in the country, I learned to think critically, challenge the status quo, and embrace the complexities of the law. Watching legal dramas like Boston Legal during my time there further reinforced my passion for litigation, making me realize how powerful the law can be in shaping lives and businesses.
The friendships and professional relationships I built during my time at NUJS continue to influence my career today. It was here that I developed the resilience and strategic thinking that ultimately led me to establish my own law firm “Lex Meliora”—a decision driven by my unwavering belief in justice and my desire to make a tangible impact in the legal landscape.
During the early stages of your career, what experiences stood out as pivotal in shaping your skills and steering you towards success?
The early years of my career were a whirlwind of challenges and learning opportunities. One of the most pivotal experiences was working on high-stakes corporate transactions where I had to balance legal precision with business strategy. Drafting airtight contracts, negotiating deals, and handling litigation matters—all under immense pressure—taught me resilience and the importance of meticulous preparation.
Another defining moment was navigating complex intellectual property disputes for multinational companies, where I saw first hand how the right legal strategy could protect innovation and brand value. These experiences solidified my expertise in corporate and IP law while reinforcing my drive to make a tangible impact.
What motivated your shift from working in law firms and practicing with advocates to the corporate sector? How did you find the cultural differences between these environments, and how did you navigate them?
My shift from traditional litigation and law firms to the corporate sector was driven by a deeper aspiration—I didn’t just want to be a legal advisor; I wanted to be a strategic partner in decision-making. The corporate sector offered an opportunity to work at the intersection of law and business, where legal frameworks could be leveraged not just for compliance but as tools for growth, brand protection, and innovation.
During my tenure at Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL), I was primarily responsible for handling litigation related to intellectual property (IP) infringement and brand protection. This role reinforced how critical it is for companies to safeguard their brand reputation and enforce a zero-tolerance policy against infringers. At HUL, we adopted proactive legal strategies to mitigate risks, taking swift action against counterfeiters and unauthorized use of trademarks. I learned firsthand how legal mechanisms, when effectively utilized, could become a powerful shield against market threats and strengthen brand value in a competitive landscape.
Later, my experience at Flipkart deepened my understanding of the complexities of e-commerce operations and digital brand protection. With a vast marketplace involving thousands of brands and independent sellers, ensuring brand integrity in a rapidly evolving digital ecosystem was both a challenge and a priority. As part of the legal team, we designed and implemented strategic frameworks to detect and eliminate IP infringements while balancing the interests of both brands and marketplace sellers. The role required not just legal expertise but also cross-functional collaboration, working closely with policy teams, product managers, and enforcement agencies to create sustainable and scalable solutions.
The transition from law firms to in-house roles also came with a significant cultural shift. Law firms operate in a high-pressure, client-driven environment, where success is often measured by billable hours and case wins. In contrast, the corporate world focuses on long-term risk mitigation, compliance, and internal stakeholder alignment. Adapting to this environment required a shift in mindset—I moved from purely legal problem-solving to a solution-oriented, business-driven approach. Understanding the company’s commercial objectives became just as crucial as legal precision, and my role evolved to ensure that legal strategies aligned seamlessly with business goals.
This journey not only broadened my perspective on how businesses function but also solidified my expertise in brand protection, IP enforcement, and regulatory compliance in both traditional and digital marketplaces. It ultimately paved the way for me to return to litigation—this time as the founder of my own firm, where I could blend my corporate experience with my passion for advocacy, ensuring that businesses, innovators, and brand owners receive strong, strategic legal representation in an ever-evolving legal landscape.
In your experience working with data privacy and security issues in the Software as a Service (SaaS) sector, how do you incorporate emerging data protection laws like GDPR, CCPA, and the DPDP Act 2023 into your policy development strategies, and what measures do you take to ensure compliance and manage potential legal risks?
Data privacy and security in SaaS are evolving landscapes, and compliance isn’t just about ticking legal boxes—it’s about building trust. My approach to integrating GDPR, CCPA, and the DPDP Act 2023 into policy development involves:
Proactive Compliance Frameworks – Instead of reactive measures, I focus on embedding privacy by design into SaaS products from the outset.
Risk-Based Approach – Conducting Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs) to identify potential risks early.
Cross-Border Data Strategies – Given the global nature of SaaS, I ensure that data transfer mechanisms (such as SCCs and BCRs) align with international regulations.
Employee & Stakeholder Training – Compliance is as strong as the people implementing it. Regular training ensures that teams understand the nuances of these laws.
Incident Response & Risk Mitigation – Establishing strong breach notification protocols and working closely with cybersecurity teams to minimize risks.
The future of SaaS compliance lies in anticipation, not reaction. Laws like GDPR, CCPA, and DPDP Act 2023 are not static; they evolve with technology. I ensure my clients remain ahead of the curve by integrating AI-driven compliance, robust incident response, and adaptive policy frameworks, making data privacy a business enabler rather than just a regulatory hurdle.
As a strategic IP advisor, what were some of the key challenges you encountered in balancing robust IP compliance with the rapid growth of e-commerce and digital platforms?
As I was associated with one of the giant E-commerce Platform in India and was responsible for IP infringement domain charter, I realized the biggest challenge ine-commerce and digital platforms is striking a balance between innovation and regulatory compliance. The rapid growth of online marketplaces has introduced complex legal risks, requiring a multi-layered approachtoconsumer protection, intellectual property enforcement, fraud prevention, and regulatory adherence. Over the years, I have worked extensively in structuring legal frameworks to safeguard brands, consumers, and businesses operating within these platforms.
The biggest challenge in e-commerce IP compliance is balancing innovation with regulatory enforcement. The rapid growth of digital platforms has led to increased risks of counterfeit sales, trademark violations, deceptive advertising, and fraud. My approach focused on:
1. Proactive IP Enforcement – Implemented AI-driven brand protection tools, automated takedown mechanisms, and legal action against repeat offenders.
2. Robust Contractual Safeguards – Strengthened vendor agreements, advertising contracts, and platform policies to ensure compliance and minimize disputes.
3. Enhanced Seller Verification & Monitoring – Developed multi-step verification, KYC protocols, and fraud detection frameworks to prevent unauthorized listings and financial fraud.
4. Regulatory Compliance & Consumer Protection – Ensured adherence to global advertising laws, GST regulations, and e-commerce policies to prevent misleading claims and legal liabilities.
5. Strategic Collaboration & Adaptation– Worked with law enforcement, regulatory bodies, and internal teams to continuously update compliance frameworks in response to evolving threats.
By integrating technology-driven enforcement, strong legal frameworks, and collaborative strategies, I helped create a secure, compliant ecosystem that protects brands, consumers, and platform integrity.
By taking a multi-dimensional legal approach, e-commerce platforms can foster innovation while ensuring a secure and compliant ecosystem—one that safeguards consumers, protects brands, and maintains trust in the digital marketplace.
Staying ahead of these challenges meant continuously updating legal strategies to match evolving technologies and regulations. The approach needs to be proactive and collaboration with all the stakeholders are important to tackle such risk. Seller digital agreement, warning, verification, monitoring listings are highly crucial to maintain an integrated platform.
After gaining extensive experience with top legal firms, what inspired you to start your own practice? What were some of the biggest challenges you encountered in the early stages, and how did you overcome them?
After years in top legal firms, I realized that true fulfilment lay in autonomy, impact, and purpose. While the experience was invaluable, the constraints of bureaucracy, internal politics, and a misalignment with my values pushed me to take a bold step—starting my own practice. I wanted the freedom to advocate for justice without compromise and create a legal environment where integrity and excellence thrived.
However, the journey was not without challenges. Establishing credibility, managing finances, navigating litigation unpredictability, and gaining client trust were initial hurdles. With persistence, strategic networking, and a strong support system—my husband, Sandip Chakraborty, and best friend, Valerie Kithan, who are partner the firm with me—we built a practice grounded in trust, expertise, and client-first advocacy.
Looking back, stepping away from a toxic work culture was the best decision. It allowed me to reclaim my professional integrity and build something meaningful. Today, our firm stands as proof that when passion and courage align, they create something truly unstoppable.
As digital technologies advance, how do you foresee the intersection of Intellectual Property (IP) and Cyber Law influencing the future of data protection, online privacy, and digital rights enforcement?
As digital technologies advance, the intersection of Intellectual Property and Cyber Law is becoming one of the most dynamic areas of legal evolution. The increasing digitization of content, the rise of artificial intelligence, and the proliferation of cyber threats are forcing regulators, businesses, and individuals to rethink the legal frameworks governing ownership, privacy, and enforcement in the digital age. The rapid growth of AI, digital content, and cyber threats necessitates proactive legal frameworks to balance innovation with enforcement particularly in data protection, online privacy, and digital rights enforcement.
I believe there are a few key trends shaping the future:
Stronger IP Enforcement Against AI-Generated & Pirated Content
AI is accelerating content creation but also increasing digital piracy and misuse.
Companies will face increased liability for data breaches and cross-border cyber enforcement.
User-Centric Privacy & Digital Rights
Laws will give individuals more control over their digital footprints and personal data.
Emerging disputes over algorithmic bias, data monetization, and digital IP ownership (e.g., NFTs).
The future of IP and Cyber Law will be defined by a delicate balance between technological innovation and legal safeguards. The harmonization of global regulations, advancements in AI-driven enforcement mechanisms, and the proactive role of digital platforms will be critical in shaping a fair, transparent, and secure digital ecosystem. The challenge for legal professionals will be to stay ahead of emerging risks while ensuring that laws evolve in tandem with technological advancements.
Reflecting on your career, what project or initiative stands out as the most fulfilling?
I have had the privilege of working on multiple projects and initiatives, but one of the most fulfilling and high-impactexperiences was leading a complex cross-border IP litigation. This case involved securing brand rights across multiple jurisdictions, navigating intricate international IP laws, and addressing challenges posed by varying enforcement mechanisms. The litigation was particularly demanding, requiring strategic legal interventions, coordination with global legal teams, and in-depth jurisdictional analysis. However, the successful outcome not only protected the company’s innovation and market presence but also set a precedent for future IP disputes, reinforcing stronger brand protection strategies in the digital economy.
One of the most impactful and rewarding aspects of my career has been developing Digital Brand Protection Mechanisms, particularly leading a dedicated Brand Coalition Program for an e-commerce platform. This initiative was instrumental in safeguarding brands against unfair competition, counterfeit products, and trademark infringement, ensuring that intellectual property rights were upheld in the digital marketplace.
Moreover, collaborating with customs authorities, enforcement agencies, and the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI), I actively participated as a Speaker in conducting awareness programs to combat IP infringement. These initiatives not only empowered enforcement officials but also educated students and consumers on the risks of counterfeit goods, helping them make informed choices and avoid fraudulent products.
Beyond IP enforcement, I have also engaged in legal awareness programs in the healthcare industry, focusing on critical laws related to women and child protection. As a speaker at various industry forums, I have addressed key legal frameworks such as the Protection of Women from Sexual Harassment (POSH) Act, 2013, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012, and Medical Examination Guidelines under the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013. These sessions aimed at equipping healthcare professionals, including doctors and nurses, with the necessary legal knowledge to handle cases of sexual abuse and victim examination sensitively and in compliance with legal protocols. The intersection of law, business ethics, and social responsibility has been at the core of my work, making these experiences deeply fulfilling and reinforcing my commitment to legal advocacy and reform.
What advice would you offer to aspiring lawyers aiming to impact multiple areas of law like IP and Cyber Law?
For aspiring lawyers looking to make a meaningful impact in Intellectual Property and Cyber Law, my key advice would be to cultivate a mindset of continuous learning and adaptability. The legal landscape is constantly evolving, especially in the digital age, where technological advancements challenge traditional legal frameworks. Staying curious and informed about emerging trends—whether in AI-driven copyright issues, digital piracy, or evolving data protection laws—is essential for staying ahead in these dynamic fields.
Astrong foundation in technology is crucial for IP and Cyber Law practitioners. Understanding how blockchain, AI, and digital platforms operate enables lawyers to provide practical, forward-thinking legal solutions. The intersection of law and technology demands not just legal expertise but also technical awareness to navigate issues such as data security breaches, algorithmic bias, and digital rights enforcement.
Strategic networking is another powerful tool. Engaging with tech entrepreneurs, cybersecurity experts, and legal professionals opens doors to new opportunities and insights. Attending industry conferences, contributing to legal discussions, and collaborating on interdisciplinary projects can expand one’s professional influence and expertise.
Finally, adaptability is key. The most effective lawyers are those who not only understand the law but know how to applyit in real-world, business-driven scenarios. Whether it’s structuring IP licensing agreements, tackling e-commerce infringements, or shaping regulatory policies, being able to anticipate challenges and craft innovative legal strategies sets apart exceptional legal professionals in these fields.
Given the demanding nature of your profession, how do you maintain a healthy work-life balance?
Maintaining a healthy work-life balance in the legal profession is not about rigidly dividing time but about mindfully integrating work with personal well-being. I have learned that setting boundaries, prioritizing effectively, and embracing flexibility are key. Litigation and corporate advisory can be all-consuming, but I ensure that I carve out time for what truly matters—family, personal growth, and mental well-being. My husband, Sandip, and my best friend, Valerie, who co-founded the firm with me, have been my strongest pillars, reinforcing the importance of having a support system that shares your vision. I also believe in delegation and building a strong, self-sufficient team, which allows me to focus on high-impact work without burnout. Unwinding with books, traveling, and pursuing creative interests keeps me energized, and I make a conscious effort to disconnect from work when needed. Ultimately, balance is not about working less but about working smarter, knowing when to push forward and when to pause, ensuring that passion never turns into exhaustion.
Having a background in Business Economics, what inspired you to pursue a career in law? How was your experience during law school, and how did it shape your professional journey?
Law was not my first choice, nor was it the obvious path after studying Economics and Finance. My initial academic inclination was towards Finance, and I pursued it earnestly, even completing a Master’s degree. However, during my undergraduate years, I was introduced to Business Law and Company Law, subjects that I unexpectedly found both engaging and intellectually stimulating. I excelled in them, even receiving an award for my performance, which planted the first seed of curiosity about the law. That curiosity remained dormant until a friend encouraged me to attempt the Delhi University LLB entrance exam. Securing admission to the Campus Law Centre, Faculty of Law felt like an opportunity worth exploring, and once immersed in the study of law, I realized it was where I truly belonged.
Campus Law Centre was an eye-opening experience. Unlike my previous academic settings, it was a melting pot of individuals from different backgrounds, each with unique motivations – some preparing for civil services, others drawn to political or judicial service roles. Few, like me, were focused on litigation and active practice. Studying law in this environment expanded my perspective, making me more attuned to the socio-political landscape and the practical realities of the legal profession. It wasn’t just about learning the law from textbooks; some of the most insightful debates happened informally, in the ‘Bamboo Garden’ next to the canteen.
Beyond academics, law school imparted valuable lessons that have remained with me. It taught me the importance of being approachable to people from diverse backgrounds and recognizing that intelligence is not determined by fluency in English, especially in courts across the country where different languages are used for argument. It also deepened my understanding of the intricate relationship between law and the broader socio-political landscape. Above all, it reinforced the importance of perseverance, a quality that continues to guide me in my legal career.
You completed your Masters at Columbia Law School, New York. What motivated you to choose Columbia Law over other institutions, and how has your experience there influenced your career? How has this degree been advantageous in your legal practice?
I chose Columbia Law School for its strong focus on international arbitration and commercial law, fields I was keen to specialize in. Columbia’s arbitration faculty is among the best in the world, led by Professor George A. Bermann, Director of the Centre for International Commercial & Investment Arbitration, alongside Professors Kabir Duggal and Robert Smit. Their presence attracts leading professionals and practitioners to engage with students through guest lectures and lunchtime seminars, making Columbia a hub for arbitration discourse. The fact that Columbia is located in New York was an added advantage. The city’s vibrant legal ecosystem offers unparalleled exposure, from regular events at top-tier law firms to seminars and workshops organized by the NY City Bar and State Bar associations. Columbia Arbitration Day is another standout event, bringing together global stalwarts in arbitration to discuss the latest developments in the field.
Studying at Columbia reshaped how I approached the law. The learning environment encouraged critical thinking, collaboration, and exposure to global perspectives. With classmates from over 50 countries, discussions went beyond textbooks, offering insights into different legal systems and approaches. The faculty also made a lasting impact. For example, Professor Paul Shechtman, who taught Evidence and Criminal Adjudication, often used courtroom scenes from movies like ‘A Few Good Men’ and ‘12 Angry Men’ to explain legal principles, making learning engaging and memorable.
A key highlight was working as a Research Assistant to Professor Bermann, contributing to his book ‘Twilight Issues in International Arbitration’. This experience deepened my understanding of arbitration and reinforced the advantage of pursuing an LLM after gaining work experience. Unlike traditional academic programs, an LLM at Columbia is not about competition but personal and professional growth.
The degree has been invaluable in my legal practice, particularly in refining my approach to complex disputes and arbitration. It has also given me access to leading legal professionals across the globe. With cross-border transactions and disputes becoming increasingly common, it is essential to have access to legal knowledge that transcends jurisdictions. Having friends and colleagues working across different legal systems has been incredibly beneficial. For instance, very recently, in an international arbitration involving U.S. laws and a Delaware corporation, a corporate lawyer and dear friend from Columbia, well-versed in those laws, helped me strategize my approach to the dispute. This is just one of many such instances. Additionally, referral work from friends abroad has been an added bonus. I often serve as their point of contact in India, which has been mutually beneficial.
Most importantly, the degree has given me credibility, which is invaluable in my profession. With so many lawyers in the country offering, on paper, similar skillsets, the LLM and a foreign-bar qualification has helped me differentiate myself. It has ensured that clients view me in a different light, recognizing the value I bring to the table. In a competitive market, that distinction is crucial.
At J. Sagar Associates, you worked on a diverse range of matters, including constitutional law, corporate governance, insolvency etc. How did working across such varied legal domains shape your understanding as a lawyer? What were the experiences that have stuck by you?
JSA was my first job, and like any young lawyer, I was just learning the ropes. What made the experience truly enriching was the diversity of matters I was exposed to across various forums, including the Supreme Court of India. Unlike many large firms where junior associates rarely see the inside of a courtroom, JSA had a strong culture of ensuring its lawyers attended court regularly. This early exposure to court craft played a significant role in shaping my understanding of litigation.
Working on high-stakes, complex disputes meant that research was at the heart of everything we did. As juniors, we were expected to delve deep into legal principles, dissect arguments, and anticipate counterpoints. This process instilled in me the discipline of extensive reading, a habit that continues to serve me well. Another key advantage of being at a top-tier firm was the opportunity to interact with some of the finest Senior Advocates in the country. Sitting in case conferences with them, observing how they analysed a brief, structured their arguments, and approached strategy was an invaluable learning experience.
I was also fortunate to work under a mentor who was exceptional in corporate and contract law. His insistence on first-principles thinking kept me on my toes. I had to be thoroughly prepared before even approaching him for a discussion. This ensured that I developed a strong foundation in legal reasoning and analytical skills early on.
JSA’s marquee clients in the construction and banking sectors further honed my expertise in arbitration and financial law. Many of these cases laid the groundwork for my later specialization in insolvency and arbitration. The firm’s rigorous environment, 100+ hour weeks, working weekends, and months without a holiday was undeniably demanding. But it taught me the value of perseverance, attention to detail, and consistency – qualities that are indispensable for success in the legal profession.
As a Research Assistant at Columbia Law School, you contributed to drafting chapters for the book Twilight Issues in International Arbitration. How did this research experience deepen your understanding of international arbitration, and how have you applied these insights in your own practice?
Working with Professor George A. Bermann on ‘Twilight Issues in International Arbitration’ was an incredible learning experience. Every year, Professor Bermann takes on several research assistants, but only a select few get the opportunity to contribute to major projects like this book. I was fortunate to be among those chosen. The book was a four-year project, and during my time at Columbia, I had the privilege of assisting for a year alongside five other students.
Before this, I had read about international commercial arbitration but had little exposure to twilight issues. These are matters that lack clear legal authority, leaving tribunals to rely on ‘soft law’, general principles, or comparative approaches. Researching topics such as corruption, res judicata, iura novit curia, collateral estoppel, lis pendens, costs, and ethics helped me understand how arbitration functions beyond codified law. This experience also gave me a nuanced perspective on how different jurisdictions approach these unsettled issues and whether international standards are emerging.
One of the most unique aspects of the research was our access (albeit limited access), granted with Professor Bermann’s approval, to hundreds of confidential arbitral awards from the American Arbitration Association (AAA). Studying these awards provided rare insight into how tribunals across different legal traditions navigate twilight issues. It also deepened my understanding of international arbitration from a common law perspective, particularly the reasoning processes of U.S. based tribunals.
In my practice, this exposure has been invaluable. Many complex arbitrations involve legal grey areas, and my research experience has helped me anticipate how tribunals might handle such issues. Additionally, the ability to analyse arbitration decisions critically, especially in the absence of binding precedent, has shaped the way I strategize arguments.
While at IndusLaw, you represented clients in ad-hoc and institutional arbitrations, both domestic and international. How do you view the Indian arbitration framework in comparison to international arbitration mechanisms, and what do you think the future holds for arbitration in India?
At IndusLaw, I had the opportunity to work on a range of high-stakes arbitrations, including leading a major SIAC arbitration seated in Singapore. Collaborating with top global legal professionals and law firms reinforced my understanding of international arbitration frameworks and best practices.
While India has made strides in arbitration, it remains far from being a global hub. Judicial intervention, procedural rigidity, and the tendency to appoint retired judges often make arbitration as slow and expensive as court litigation. The frequent challenge of arbitral decisions in courts undermines the efficiency arbitration is meant to provide. Alarmingly, some public sector entities are even moving away from arbitration in their contracts.
The outlook is not entirely bleak. Both the government and the private sector are advocating for institutional arbitration, businesses are increasingly prioritizing settlements, and the rise in foreign investments is leading to adoption of more institutional arbitration clauses. For arbitration to progress meaningfully, young practitioners must refine their expertise through advanced education, specialized training, and practical experience. Additionally, India needs to foster a pool of specialist arbitrators with a deep understanding of modern commercial disputes, rather than relying predominantly on retired judges. With increasing cross-border transactions, Indian arbitration cannot function in isolation. It must align with international best practices to remain competitive and truly serve its intended purpose of efficient and effective dispute resolution.
What inspired you to establish Vidvat Legal? Leading complex litigation and arbitration matters across various forums, could you share some of the most challenging and impactful cases you’ve handled since founding your firm? What strategies do you adopt to manage high-stakes disputes and ensure a successful outcome for your clients?
Starting Vidvat Legal was a conscious decision driven by the need to push my boundaries as a lawyer. After years in top-tier firms, I had gained extensive experience handling high-stakes matters, honing research and drafting skills, and learning to navigate complex disputes. But I wanted to go beyond just being a skilled practitioner. I needed to understand the business side of law i.e., how to generate and retain clients, build long-term relationships, and create tangible value for those I represent. Equally important was the challenge of operating independently, without the built-in support systems of a large firm. Independence has also allowed me to explore areas I had never ventured into before, such as trust law, employment law, land law and constitutional matters.
One of the more challenging cases I handled after founding Vidvat Legal was representing a Sequoia-funded startup (operating in over 60 countries) in a SIAC arbitration seated in Singapore. The dispute, against a London-based customer, centred on claims for service fees, resource costs, and setup charges under the company’s master services agreement. The case’s multi-jurisdictional nature required navigating international arbitration frameworks and foreign contract laws. Midway through the proceedings, I led settlement negotiations and secured a favourable resolution of over USD 200,000. After the matter was resolved, I worked closely with the client to strengthen their master services agreement and localize employment contracts, ensuring they were more robust and better equipped to prevent similar disputes in the future.
Another impactful matter was representing (pro-bono) a batch of Delhi University students whose first-year examination results, conducted during COVID, had not been declared even as they approached their final year. The delay had severe consequences, preventing them from applying for higher studies and job opportunities. With college officials unable to resolve the issue, I studied university byelaws, and education guidelines to build a strong case. After petitioning the university, the matter gained traction, and during the pendency of the case, DU finally released the students’ grades, providing them the relief they had been waiting for.
Success in high-stakes disputes is not just about winning but about managing client expectations and mitigating risks. My approach is simple. Master the facts, conduct rigorous research to ensure well-founded arguments, and draft pleadings that are clear, concise, and structured for ease of comprehension. Keeping clients engaged with timely updates and feedback is crucial. In hearings, I focus on being articulate, respectful to the bench and opposing counsel, and ensuring that every argument serves a strategic purpose.
With your admission to practice in both India and New York, and now serving as an Advocate-on-Record at the Supreme Court of India, how do you navigate the differences between the legal systems of these two jurisdictions? How has practicing in both countries shaped your approach to legal matters, and what challenges or advantages have you experienced in doing so?
I do not actively practice New York law, but my understanding of it plays a crucial role in international disputes, especially those governed by common law principles. While the procedural aspects of different jurisdictions vary, at its core, law is about logical reasoning. Beyond the specific wording of statutes, common law principles remain largely consistent and are applied in similar ways by courts in India and abroad. Rather than navigating stark differences, my experience in both systems complements my practice and allows me to approach disputes with a broader perspective, particularly in cross-border matters.
Your legal expertise spans a broad array of fields, which is commendable. What advice would you offer young lawyers who aspire to build a diverse and successful legal career like yours? What skills, qualities, and mindset do you think are essential to thrive in today’s competitive and multifaceted legal environment?
Building a diverse and successful legal career begins with a strong foundation. While specialization has its advantages, early exposure to different practice areas provides a broader understanding of the legal landscape and equips you to handle complex, multi-faceted matters. The ability to think critically and apply legal principles across domains is invaluable, allowing you to refine your focus over time based on your strengths and interests. Success in law goes beyond knowledge of statutes and precedents. It requires a problem-solving mindset, adaptability, and a commitment to continuous learning. In a field shaped by evolving regulations and judicial trends, those who stand out are not just those who work hard but those who work smart by seeking mentors, building strong professional relationships, and finding ways to distinguish themselves in a competitive environment.
The reality of the profession is that it is not always a level playing field. Opportunities do not come equally to everyone, whether in securing internships, landing jobs, receiving promotions, or even in the way clients and courts perceive you. Merit is important, but it is not always enough on its own. Recognizing this early and focusing on positioning yourself strategically will help you navigate these challenges more effectively.
Commitment to the profession often comes at the expense of personal time, with long hours and urgent matters disrupting plans. Flexibility and resilience are necessary to thrive in this demanding environment. Despite the challenges, the intellectual stimulation, career growth, and the impact you can create make the sacrifices worthwhile. If you remain dedicated, disciplined, and focused, the legal profession will offer immense rewards in the long run.
Managing a demanding legal career while maintaining personal well-being is undoubtedly a challenge. How do you manage to strike a balance between your professional responsibilities and personal life, and what strategies do you use to ensure both aspects are in harmony?
Balancing a demanding legal career with personal well-being is an ongoing challenge, and I would not say I have mastered it yet. It is a constant effort, with some days feeling overwhelming and others more manageable. There is no perfect formula, but I have learned to prioritize based on impact. When it comes to case preparation or any matter that directly affects a client, I ensure that I dedicate the necessary time and focus. However, when it is about networking or attending outreach events, I make a conscious effort to prioritize my personal life, spending time with family and friends.
Time with family is something I deeply value, and I make it a point to take breaks whenever possible to step away from work and be with those who matter most. Even during busy periods, I find small ways to stay connected. For instance, while driving, I use the time to catch up with friends and family over calls, making the most of the uninterrupted hours in traffic. Striking a balance is not easy, but being intentional about how I spend my time helps ensure that both my professional commitments and personal well-being receive the attention they deserve.
With such a diverse range of skills and experiences, when you reflect on your journey, what were the pivotal moments that led you to choose law as a career? How did your time at Symbiosis Law School, Pune shape your legal interests, and which areas of law caught your attention early on?
Growing up in Shimla, a town known for its serene beauty and quality of life, I was fortunate to receive a good education. However, the opportunities for students to explore diverse interests and extracurricular activities were relatively limited. This changed when I moved to Delhi and joined Vasant Valley School, an institution renowned for its academic and extracurricular excellence. The shift broadened my perspective immensely.
At Vasant Valley, I actively participated in theatre, debates and business competitions, which helped me develop critical thinking, public speaking and teamwork skills early on. At the time, my plan was firmly set on pursuing entrepreneurship, an idea that took shape after I won an international business competition alongside my team, earning me a prestigious scholarship However, on the advice of teachers, peers, and family, I decided to also appear for law entrance exams while awaiting results from some top business schools. This decision, made at the last minute, turned out to be pivotal for my career path.
Joining Symbiosis Law School in Pune was a transformative experience. It was my first time living independently, away from the comfort of home and I found myself surrounded by incredibly intelligent peers. In Pune, I continued to explore my passions, albeit with some limitations. Theatre, which I had always loved, took a backseat, but I remained active in debating, public speaking and participating in moot court competitions. Representing Symbiosis at both national and international moot court competitions was a highlight of my time there, giving me invaluable practical experience and honing my legal acumen.
Law school also instilled in me a strong sense of community. The alumni network, which remains robust and supportive, has been an anchor in my journey in litigation. I was also fortunate to intern with some of the most respectable legal professionals, including Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Mr. Prashant Mehndi Ratta, Ms. Nandita Rao, and Mr. Sameer Oberoi. These internships were a window into the world of litigation and I liked the view! My law school experiences helped me discover my passion for law and I haven’t looked back since.
Having yourself pursued an LLM at the prestigious LSE, can you talk about your experiences studying there and also outline the advantages of getting a master’s degree?
The decision to pursue an LLM should not be made with the sole objective of securing a higher salary. An LLM is best pursued for the academic and holistic growth it offers. While it undoubtedly enhances one’s credentials, especially as an independent practitioner, it’s not a guaranteed pathway to higher financial rewards.
Initially, I hadn’t planned on pursuing an LLM, having interned extensively with my senior, Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul during law school, I was eager to start my litigation practice under his tutelage. However, at the encouragement of close friends, I decided to try my luck and applied to a handful of prestigious schools. To my surprise and delight, I was accepted into the London School of Economics & Political Science (LSE), an institution renowned for its remarkable legacy and association with eminent academics, lawyers and thought leaders, including luminaries like Dr. B.R. Ambedkar. Additionally, the central location of London, a global cultural and academic hub, was a significant factor in my decision.
I was also accepted and awarded a partial scholarship for taking residence at The Goodenough College, a highly selective residential college for distinguished graduate students from around the world. This scholarship made my decision to join LSE even more compelling as it would have significantly reduced my financial burden.
My experience at LSE was transformative. The faculty’s expertise and the rigorous academic environment pushed me to expand my intellectual boundaries. I delved deeply into subjects such as competition law, arbitration law, refugee law and international law, examining them through post-colonial and literary perspectives. These courses broadened my understanding of the law and shaped my approach to legal issues in a nuanced way. I was also fortunate to read under experts such as Dr. Chaloka Beyani, my supervisor, who is the former UN Special Rapporteur on the Human Rights of Internally Displaced Persons.
Equally enriching was my time at the Goodenough College, where I had the privilege of living amongst some of the brightest minds across various fields. Even our regular, dinner table conversations were intellectually stimulating and inspiring. Beyond academics, living in London allowed me to experience its vibrant cultural scene—world-class theatre, opera, orchestral performances—and explore Europe on a shoestring budget, further enriching my worldview.
The admissions process was rigorous but immensely rewarding. For aspiring students, my advice would be to focus on crafting a strong personal statement that highlights not just academic achievements but also a clear vision of how the LLM fits into your long-term goals. My journey to LSE taught me the value of taking unexpected opportunities and it’s a decision I’m deeply grateful for.
Prior to going independent, you worked alongside Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Senior Advocate. How did this experience enhance your legal expertise, and what valuable lessons did you gain from working with such an esteemed mentor?
When I first joined Mr. Kaul as an intern as early as 2012 I knew that I wanted to follow in his footsteps and be a litigator. I was in such awe of Mr. Kaul that I even kept the cause list from my internship days as souvenirs. Even when I chose to pursue my Masters in London, I knew I was never going to stay on and was going to come back to India to litigate. Which is why when I was invited to join Chambers with Mr. Kaul I was elated.
Working with Mr. Kaul was like a crash course in litigation and the art of advocacy- there are only a few, if any, who understand how to read the Court as well as him. Here, you can expect an extremely steep learning curve, where nothing short of perfection is expected from a Junior. We were always expected to add value to the brief by coming up with new arguments that even the solicitors missed out on. We were to pre-empt questions, whether direct or ancillary, that may fall from the Bench.
Equally important was the fact that Mr. Kaul‘s Chamber gave me invaluable colleagues who became my professional family, supporting me as I began my career and always a text message away whenever I needed to pick their brains or discuss strategy despite their own busy schedules. I will forever be grateful to Sir and my seniors and colleagues at the Chamber on who’s shoulders, today, I try to stand.
You have successfully argued some important cases before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, the NCLAT and the Delhi High Court. Could you walk us through the challenges you encountered while arguing and how you navigated them?
Each case presents its own unique challenges, but for a first-generation lawyer, especially one considered young in the profession, the hurdles are particularly distinct. Ours is a profession built on trust—trust from clients, peers, and, most importantly, the Courts. This trust must be earned, and for a young lawyer who is an unfamiliar face, the road can be difficult. Courts often view you with a degree of skepticism, and there is a natural resistance to accepting your arguments until you establish your credibility.
Arguing cases before forums such as the Supreme Court, the NCLAT, and the Delhi High Court has taught me that preparation is the key to overcoming these challenges. The only way to level the playing field—especially when appearing against eminent senior counsels—is to be thoroughly prepared, often better prepared than your opponent. Creativity and hard work are what help young lawyers stand out. When you can bring to the table insights or arguments that others, even with years of experience, might overlook, you begin to gain recognition.
Every appearance in court must be treated with the seriousness and dedication of a final hearing. There is no room for complacency. Judges often test the mettle of young lawyers by probing their understanding of the case and the law. If the court perceives even a hint of unpreparedness, it is likely to challenge you even more. Anticipating these challenges and preparing meticulously has been my strategy in navigating these situations.
One of the most significant lessons I’ve learned is that you must never allow yourself to be caught off guard. Being fully prepared not only helps in presenting your arguments convincingly but also helps you gain the court’s confidence. Over time, as you consistently demonstrate your competence and dedication, that initial resistance from the Court, gradually gives way to trust and acceptance.
While the challenges are real and sometimes daunting, they are also what drive me to work harder, think deeper, and perform better with each case. The journey of a young, first-generation lawyer is not easy, but it is incredibly rewarding when you start seeing the trust you’ve earned reflected in the court’s acknowledgment of your efforts.
You have been involved in a lot of pro bono work. What inspired you to dedicate time to legal aid, and how has this shaped your broader legal practice?
Law is often referred to as a noble profession and as officers of the court, our primary duty is to the cause of justice. For me, this principle has always been at the heart of my practice. I find enormous satisfaction in being able to provide my services to those in need, and I strongly believe that no person should be denied justice due to their financial constraints.
A significant portion of my practice has been dedicated to pro bono work. I was associated with the Delhi State Legal Services Authority (DSLSA) on the Criminal Panel for three years. This experience was both a profound learning opportunity and a stark reality check, as it exposed me to the vast inequalities in access to justice. It brought into sharp focus the glaring class divide in our country.
What struck me most during my time with the DSLSA was the reality that for the majority of Indians, litigation begins and ends at the trial courts. Even in a city like Delhi, where the High Court and Supreme Court are often less than 10 kilometres from any district court, access to justice remains out of reach for many. The economic and social barriers faced by individuals trying to navigate the legal system were a stark reminder of the responsibility we hold as lawyers.
Today, my private practice serves as a means to support my pro bono initiatives, allowing me to contribute meaningfully to society. I believe that as lawyers, we must recognize our obligation toward the community. Rendering services to those who cannot afford them is not just an act of charity—it is our duty to uphold the ideals of justice.
You’ve represented social media influencers and journalists in defamation cases against corporations. Given the fast-evolving nature of digital media, how do you approach defamation law in this context?
Freedom of speech and expression is one of the most vital facets of the fundamental rights enjoyed by individuals in India. Beyond being a constitutional guarantee, it is also recognized as a human right, forming the cornerstone of any democratic society. The right to express freely and without fear gives meaning to all other rights, making it essential to uphold. However, this right is not absolute and is subject to reasonable restrictions under Article 19(2) of the Constitution.
In my experience representing social media influencers and journalists in defamation cases, I have observed a worrying trend- powerful entities often misuse criminal and civil defamation proceedings to suppress fair and honest criticism. Freedom of speech in India, while constitutionally guaranteed, comes at a cost—it must be zealously protected from those who attempt to silence dissent or critique.
The rise of digital media has democratized the exchange of ideas like never before. Today, with greater means available to everyone to voice and exchange opinions without the institutional barriers that once limited public discourse, people are more empowered to engage in critical dialogue, satire, and even humour- all of which are essential for a healthy democracy. One must be mindful, however, that this freedom cannot be used to justify the spread of hate speech and malicious falsehoods.
My approach to defamation law in the digital age emphasizes striking a delicate balance. On one hand, it is crucial to safeguard freedom of speech and resist any attempts to weaponize defamation laws to curb legitimate critique, satire, or dissent. On the other hand, the right to reputation and privacy, both of individuals and corporations, must also be protected from truly defamatory or intentionally harmful statements.
Our society must develop a greater tolerance for humour, satire, and criticism while ensuring that boundaries are maintained to protect against harm caused by defamatory speech. In representing influencers and journalists, my goal is to advocate for the right to speak truth to power while promoting responsible discourse. The evolution of defamation law must adapt to this changing landscape, fostering an environment where free expression and accountability coexist.
Throughout your career, you’ve been invited to judge competitions, participate in panels, and deliver lectures. What role has mentorship and legal education played in your own professional journey, and how do you view the future of legal practice for young lawyers in India?
Mentorship and legal education have been integral to my professional journey, as they are for any lawyer striving to succeed in this noble profession. In law, one’s growth often relies on the guidance and wisdom of seniors, colleagues, and even opponents at the Bar.
My own journey has been deeply rooted in the mentorship I have received from my seniors and peers, as discussed previously. I have been fortunate to experience the kindness and support of both the Bar and the Bench, which has enabled me to make small but meaningful strides in my career.
Here’s where an interesting titbit comes to mind. Historically, in England, a lawyer qualified as a barrister and was called to the bar only after attending a series of formal dinners. While this tradition may seem unusual, it symbolized an important truth: the essence of legal education lies in the exchange of ideas and the wisdom shared by those who have walked the path before us. This spirit of learning continues in courtrooms, where lawyers and judges alike contribute to the collective growth of the legal community.
The law, being one of the oldest professions in the world, carries a rich tradition of passing the baton of knowledge from one generation to the next. For anyone who has attended court proceedings, it is evident that the legal fraternity operates as a community invested in nurturing young talent and preserving the integrity of the profession.
I view mentorship not just as an opportunity, but as a duty. One of the primary responsibilities of a lawyer is to carry forward this noble tradition by supporting and guiding the next generation. Whether through judging competitions, participating in panels or delivering lectures, I see these opportunities as ways to contribute to the ongoing dialogue of legal education and to help young lawyers navigate the challenges of a demanding profession.
As for the future of legal practice for young lawyers in India, it is both exciting and challenging. The landscape of law is rapidly evolving with technological advancements, the growth of niche areas like data privacy and fintech law, and increasing global interconnectivity. Young lawyers must adapt to these changes while staying rooted in the foundational values of the profession—integrity, diligence, and a commitment to justice.
As an Advocate-on-Record with extensive experience, what advice would you offer to young lawyers just starting out, particularly those interested in specializing in areas such as arbitration, company law, and bankruptcy?
I believe young lawyers embarking on their journey, particularly in specialized areas such as arbitration and bankruptcy, must approach their careers with a clear sense of purpose and dedication. Here’s my advice for those starting out:
Patience and Grit Are Essential: Success in the legal profession is a marathon, not a sprint. It requires unwavering patience and resilience. The journey can be slow, but perseverance and consistent hard work always pay off.
Prioritize Quality Work Over Monetary Gains: Early in your career, focus on gaining valuable experience and honing your craft. Money will follow as a byproduct of expertise and reputation.
Volunteer and Be Available: Offer to assist seniors on briefs and be available whenever they need help. The willingness to learn and support seniors demonstrates your commitment and eagerness to grow, which will open doors for mentorship and challenging opportunities.
Always Be Prepared and Professional: Every appearance in court, every draft you submit, is an opportunity to make an impression. Your reputation is built over years of consistent effort but can be lost in an instant. Never take any task for granted and always strive to be at the top of your game.
Stay Up-to date with the law: Laws specially like the IBC and Arbitration in India are still evolving and have not yet fully settled. Whether it’s new judgments, legislative amendments, or emerging trends, constant learning and staying up to date is a non-negotiable part of a lawyer’s journey.
Read the Travaux Préparatoires: To understand new laws like bankruptcy, it is essential to study the Travaux Préparatoires—the preparatory documents and discussions that shaped the legislation. For instance, the Bankruptcy Law Reform Committee (BLRC) Report, along with various Law Committee reports, provides invaluable insights into the origins and objectives of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). By examining these foundational documents, one can better grasp the reasons behind the law’s enactment and its subsequent amendments, leading to a deeper and more nuanced understanding of the IBC.
Adopt a Holistic Perspective: No law operates in isolation. Having a broad-based understanding of other areas of law and industries will provide context and depth to your practice, making you a more versatile and effective lawyer.
The legal profession is demanding, but it offers unparalleled opportunities for growth and impact. By focusing on continuous learning, maintaining the highest standards of professionalism, and demonstrating a commitment to the law, lawyers can carve out successful and meaningful careers in arbitration, bankruptcy, or any other field.
Given your demanding professional commitments, how do you manage to strike a balance between your career and personal life? Are there specific practices or strategies you use to maintain focus and well-being?
“Law is a jealous mistress” is a saying often repeated for its undeniable truth. To pursue a career in law, especially in litigation, one must be deeply passionate about the profession, as it tends to permeate every aspect of a lawyer’s life.
While striking a good-balance is often very difficult when court is in session, litigators are fortunate to have court vacations scattered throughout the year, and I make the most of these breaks by traveling. I make the most of such breaks and ensure to plan at least one trek and one surfing trip each year to help me disconnect and recharge.
On weekends, I enjoy attending plays and concerts in Delhi, which provides a creative and cultural outlet. Maintaining health is also a priority; I’ve recently started swimming 2–3 times a week, which helps me keep physically active.
Ultimately, striking a balance is about finding activities that allow you to unwind and maintain focus. For me, travel, the arts and physical activity are key to sustaining my well-being alongside my professional commitments.
With your extensive and impressive expertise in Intellectual Property matters, looking back on your remarkable career journey, what initially inspired you to pursue a career in law? What was the driving force behind your decision to specialize in the dynamic and specialized field of IP law, and how have you seen the field evolve over the years?
Growing up as a girl in Patna, a city full of ambitions, I always dreamed of making a difference. Growing up in a society where career paths often followed traditional expectations, I had ambitions that went beyond the norm. However, despite being surrounded by convention, I was fortunate to have parents and a brother who supported my aspirations and encouraged me to pursue my dreams. From an early age, I was determined to carve my own path and make a meaningful impact. I was driven by the idea that no matter where you come from, determination and passion can open doors to incredible opportunities. I have always been a creative person, drawn to ideas, innovation, and the power of original thought. That’s what led me to law because, at its core, law is about shaping and protecting ideas that can change the world.
As I delved deeper into legal studies, it was Intellectual Property (IP) law that truly captured my passion. It was thrilling to see how a single patent, trademark, or copyright could empower inventors, businesses, and creative minds worldwide. That realization fuelled my decision to specialize in this field. Also, while many areas of law are well-settled and fixed, IP law evolves constantly, adapting to technological advancements, new business models, and creative breakthroughs.
Over the years, I have witnessed how IP law has expanded from traditional patents and trademarks to addressing digital content, AI-generated works, and global enforcement challenges. It has transformed into a field that is deeply intertwined with the future of technology and business. Looking back, my journey has been about pushing boundaries, embracing change, and proving that creativity and ambition can redefine expectations. IP law continues to inspire me because it never stands still. It grows with society, with technology, and with the brilliant minds it seeks to protect.
Reflecting on the early stages of your career, from internships to your initial legal roles, what were some of the most formative experiences that helped shape your foundation in the legal profession, especially in IP law? How did these early challenges prepare you for your current success in this highly specialized area?
From the very beginning of my career, I had the opportunity to work at top-tier law firms, each playing a pivotal role in shaping my foundation in the legal profession. Every firm I worked at contributed uniquely to my growth, equipping me with the skills and confidence to navigate the complexities of IP law.
Starting with a strong litigation background, I developed a keen eye for detail and the ability to anticipate legal hurdles early on. As a fresher, meticulous attention to detail was the primary expectation, a skill I quickly honed while handling high-stakes IP matters. I was also encouraged to ask as many questions as possible, as my seniors often emphasized that “no question is stupid.” This supportive environment helped me shed any inhibition about seeking clarifications, allowing me to develop a deeper understanding of the law and intricate IP matters. These early experiences refined my analytical skills, strengthened my problem-solving approach, and laid a strong foundation for my career in IP law.
Over time, I was given direct exposure to client handling, allowing me to lead conferences and calls independently. This experience not only refined my communication skills but also solidified my confidence in the knowledge I had gained over time. It allowed me to apply that expertise effectively in my advisories, ensuring practical and strategic solutions for clients.
These formative experiences prepared me to take on greater responsibilities in my current senior role at RNA Technology and IP Attorneys. At RNA, I have had the opportunity to lead complex IP matters while also showcasing my expertise at international and national IP conferences, building strong professional networks. Additionally, my firm has encouraged me to contribute to the broader IP discourse through various publications, where I have explored pressing topics such as landmark international and Indian rulings and their impact on the Indian copyright and trademark landscape, brand challenges and counterfeiting in the nutraceutical industry, the impact of AI, IP, and data privacy in India’s growing medical tourism, the trends, regulations, and IP hurdles in the Indian pet food industry, and evidence admissibility in trademark disputes. What sets RNA apart is its commitment not just to the firm’s growth but also to individual professional branding. This support has allowed me to refine my expertise, expand my industry presence, and actively engage in thought leadership within the IP space. Each step in my journey has reinforced my passion for IP law and my ability to adapt to its ever-evolving landscape.
As someone with deep expertise in handling domain name disputes, particularly before NIXI, what are the key legal considerations that must be taken into account when addressing such issues? Could you share a particularly memorable or challenging case from your experience and how you navigated it, offering valuable insights for aspiring lawyers in this domain?
When addressing domain name disputes, several legal considerations must be taken into account:
The complainant must establish trademark rights over the disputed domain. Even if the mark is unregistered, demonstrating extensive use and brand recognition can strengthen their case.
The disputed domain name must be identical or confusingly similar to the complainant’s trademark. Minor variations, such as typo squatting, do not necessarily create distinctiveness.
The respondent may avoid liability if they can prove legitimate rights or a fair use of the domain, such as using the domain for a genuine business unrelated to the complainant’s brand; being commonly known by the domain name; and/or making non-commercial, fair use of the domain.
The complainant must prove that the domain was registered and/or used in bad faith, such as: acquiring it with the intent to sell at an inflated price or misleading consumers, phishing, or redirecting traffic to a competitor.
A respondent may defend their case by proving legitimate rights, such as using the domain for a genuine business unrelated to the complainant’s brand; being commonly known by the domain name; and/or making non-commercial or fair use of the domain.
In a high-profile INDRP dispute, I defended a client against a corporation alleging bad faith registration. Through strong evidence, we proved:
The domain had a legitimate, bonafide use.
The complainant knew of the domain but took no action (acquiescence).
Market research showed third-party usage of the complainant’s mark, weakening exclusivity claims.
Inconsistencies in the complainant’s prior trademark office positions further undermined their case.
The arbitrator ruled in our favor, reinforcing that trademark ownership alone does not guarantee domain rights.
For aspiring lawyers in this field, my advice is:
Assess legitimate interest. A trademark does not automatically grant domain rights. The complainant must prove bad faith registration and lack of legitimate interest on the respondent’s part.
Prior knowledge of the domain without action weakens the complainant’s case. Always advise clients to review old records, emails, or correspondence for any indication of prior knowledge. As lawyers, conducting online research, scanning publicly available documents such as publications, interviews, advertisements, etc. can uncover evidence of acquiescence.
Review past trademark claims and court proceedings to identify inconsistent pleadings of the parties.
Market research is crucial. A thorough investigation into how a mark is used across different industries can weaken a complainant’s exclusivity claim and help establish generic or descriptive use of a term.
Domain disputes are not won on allegations alone. Well-documented evidence, strong legal arguments, and meticulous research are essential to securing a favourable outcome.
With the growing importance of onlinebranding, domain disputes are becoming increasingly complex. Aspiring IP professionals must stay updated ondigital enforcement strategies, evolving domain name laws and policies, and international best practices to remain competitive in this space.
Managing global trademark portfolios is no small feat. What are some of the most significant challenges you encounter when dealing with international trademarks, and how do you navigate these complexities to deliver exceptional results for your clients? Could you share the most complex or fascinating trademark matters you’ve dealt with?
Well, managing international trademarks in India poses challenges due to jurisdictional differences, procedural complexities, and evolving legal standards. Key challenges and strategies include:
Classification Challenges: India follows the Nice Classification system, but jurisdictional variations in interpretation, overlapping classes, and administrative constraints can create uncertainties. Market practices and evolving product categories further complicate classification. Careful jurisdiction-specific analysis is essential.
Registrability Issues: Descriptiveness and genericness are interpreted differently across jurisdictions. A comprehensive clearance search can help assess registrability and mitigate objections.
Prior Use vs. First-to-File: Unlike strict first-to-file jurisdictions, India recognizes common law rights. Foreign brands without prior use may face opposition from local businesses. Proactive filings and documented use evidence are crucial.
Trademark Squatting: Unauthorized third parties often register well-known foreign brands in India. Legal remedies like oppositions, cancellations, and rectifications, along with watch services, help address potential infringements early.
Budget Constraints and cost-effective protection: Costs for trademark filings, renewals, oppositions, and enforcement can be unpredictable. A flexible budget should anticipate expansion needs and enforcement actions. Recommending prioritization of key markets and leveraging cost-efficient systems like the EU Trademark and WIPO’s Madrid System for multi-country filings can be beneficial.
Competitive Monitoring: Tracking competitor filings and industry trends is essential. Regular trademark database analysis helps businesses stay ahead of emerging market developments.
Record Maintenance: Outdated trademark records complicate enforcement and transactions. Prompt updates for assignments, name changes, and acquisitions ensure legal clarity.
Leveraging Technology: Manual processes slow portfolio management. AI generated tools enhance efficiency in searches, classification, and trademark monitoring.
M&A Due Diligence: Hidden conflicts or weak rights can impact acquisitions. Thorough due diligence, verifying ownership, status, and conflicts mitigate risks.
By addressing these challenges with strategic planning, businesses can efficiently manage global trademark portfolios while minimizing risks and costs.
One of the complex trademarks matters I handled involved a global brand facing objections from the Indian Trademark Office at the examination stage. Although our client’s brand had been adopted, registered, and widely used internationally long before, the objections were based on similar third-party trademark registrations that predated it in India. The key challenge was establishing the brand’s transborder reputation in India despite limited direct use. To build a strong case, we compiled extensive evidence, including global sales figures, media coverage, and proof of consumer awareness in India. We also examined international conferences where our client’s mark and product had been showcased, many of which were attended by Indian delegates, thus demonstrating brand exposure among potential consumers in India. Additionally, we submitted old correspondence from Indian entities inquiring about our client’s product under the disputed trademark. Through strategic arguments and well-documented evidence, we successfully secured the brand’s rights in India.
Trademark opposition and rectification petitions are complex and nuanced processes. How do you approach the preparation and management of these cases? What research tools do you rely on, and how would you assess the effectiveness of the trademark registry in resolving disputes in a timely manner?
My approach begins with comprehensive preliminary research, analysing the trademark’s history, including prior use, registrations, assignments, and any past opposition, rectification, or litigation. A strong opposition or rectification petition hinges on clear, compelling arguments. It is therefore crucial to assess the similarity or dissimilarity of competing marks through various legal principles, such as the Rule of Anti-Dissection and Dominant Feature, while also examining grounds like non-use, likelihood of confusion, bad faith adoption, misrepresentation, and inconsistent pleadings before judicial authorities and tribunals.
To establish prior rights and brand goodwill, I rely on market research, global brand reputation reports, advertisements, social media presence, publications, consumer recognition surveys, etc. Website archives, trademark journal publications, and business reports also help substantiate claims.
In terms of research tools, I extensively use trademark registry databases, WIPO’s Global Brand Database, EU trademark database, domain name databases, Registrar of Companies (ROC) records, social media searches, and online archives to track prior filings, international use, and potential conflicts. Litigation databases and court records are equally valuable in assessing past disputes involving the contested mark. Additionally, the use of AI-powered tools significantly enhances legal and trademark research, strategy-building and trademark monitoring to help identify potential conflicts more efficiently.
The Indian Trademark Registry has made improvements in handling disputes efficiently, particularly through digital filings and automation and open house helpdesk portal to address queries. However, challenges persist, including backlogs, procedural inconsistencies, lack of nuanced understanding of IP laws by hearing officers, and frequent adjournments, all of which delay swift resolutions. Despite procedural bottlenecks, leveraging technology alongside a well-researched and strategically argued case significantly increases the likelihood of a favourable and timely outcome.
As a respected leader managing a team of talented lawyers and paralegals, how do you ensure that workload distribution is both effective and balanced across your team, especially when dealing with high-stakes and intricate IP cases? How do you foster a collaborative environment to ensure your team works cohesively to meet client expectations and deliver top-tier results?
As a leader managing a team of skilled lawyers and paralegals, I believe in a strategic delegation approach, where tasks are assigned based on individual expertise, experience, and bandwidth.
I delegate legal drafting and opinion writing to my lawyers, ensuring they gain hands-on experience in core legal work. I thoroughly review their drafts, provide detailed feedback, and refine their arguments, helping them sharpen their legal reasoning and drafting skills. Where a matter demands deep legal analysis, I personally handle it to ensure accuracy and a strong legal foundation. For particularly complex or high-stakes cases, I seek insights from my partners, leveraging their expertise to strengthen our strategy. The paralegals support research, document and database management, basic drafting, and procedural filings, streamlining the workflow and allowing the team to focus on substantive legal work.
Collaboration is at the core of my leadership style. I encourage open communication and make it a point to ask my team, “What challenges are you facing, and how can I support you?” – a principle I learned from my husband. This approach also aligns with my firm’s core values and creates a friendly and supportive environment where challenges are addressed proactively, fostering both professional growth and efficiency. By maintaining clear guidance, open dialogue, and strategic delegation, I ensure that our team works cohesively to meet client expectations and deliver top-tier results.
To maintain balance and prevent burnout, I regularly assess workload distribution, keeping track of deadlines, case priorities, and individual capacities. Leveraging project management tools and AI-powered legal tech, we monitor case progress, streamline task allocation, and optimize efficiency, ensuring that no single team member is overburdened.
In pre-litigation enforcement, you play a crucial role in preparing legal notices, settlement proposals, and conflict resolution strategies. What key strategies do you employ to negotiate settlements before issues escalate into full-scale litigation? Additionally, what common pitfalls should companies be mindful of early on to avoid litigation concerning their IP assets?
Well, the goal is to resolve disputes efficiently while protecting the client’s IP rights. Before initiating any action, a detailed evaluation of the IP rights in question is a must. This includes assessing prior use, registrations, market presence, and the overall strength of the client’s position to determine the best strategy. A well-drafted cease-and-desist notice sets the tone for resolution. In fact, the language of the notice depends on the client’s approach. While it must be firm in asserting rights, it should also leave room for structured discussions. Rather than escalating conflicts immediately, I explore amicable solutions such as settlement options, coexistence agreements, licensing arrangements, branding/packaging modifications, or even buy-out options. This approach fosters dialogue while protecting legal interests. With courts increasingly emphasizing mandatory mediation in IP disputes, pre-litigation enforcement has evolved significantly. Many high courts, particularly the Delhi High Court, actively encourage mediation as the first step before litigation, recognizing its effectiveness in resolving complex conflicts. Whenever possible, I advocate for mediation or arbitration to secure cost-effective and swift resolutions, minimizing the burden of litigation. Beyond legal considerations, I believe it’s essential to weigh the commercial interests of both parties. An enforcement strategy should aim for long-term business viability rather than just short-term legal victories. By balancing legal rights with practical business solutions, disputes can often be resolved more efficiently while maintaining brand integrity and commercial relationships.
Many businesses make the mistake of launching a brand without conducting comprehensive trademark searches, leading to costly disputes and rebranding efforts. A thorough clearance search can prevent such legal complications. Weak IP contracts are another common issue. Poorly drafted agreements in licensing, joint ventures, or vendor relationships can result in ownership disputes. Clearly defining rights, obligations, and dispute resolution mechanisms is essential. Inconsistent brand use and failure to enforce trademarks can weaken legal rights over time, making regular monitoring and timely action against infringers crucial. Additionally, businesses often neglect to maintain proper evidence of trademark use, such as first use records, advertising, and consumer recognition, which are vital for defending exclusivity in disputes. Rushing into poorly negotiated settlements can also lead to recurring conflicts; settlement agreements should clearly define future use, licensing terms, and territorial rights to ensure long-term protection. By addressing these pitfalls proactively, companies can safeguard their intellectual property and minimize litigation risks.
Balancing the demands of a challenging legal career with personal life is undoubtedly a tough task, especially in such a high-pressure profession. How do you manage to maintain equilibrium between your professional commitments and personal well-being? Could you share some strategies that help you preserve your health and sustain a balanced lifestyle, even while excelling at the top of your field?
Maintaining equilibrium is not just about time management, it’s about setting priorities and boundaries. Efficient planning of work ensures that deadlines are without unnecessary last-minute stress. Delegation also plays a crucial role. I entrust responsibilities to my team while maintaining oversight, allowing me to focus on high-level strategy and complex legal matters. While the legal profession often demands round-the-clock availability, I try to carve out time for my family, my two adorable cats and my personal interests like travelling, reading and watching movies. Setting realistic expectations with clients and my team helps manage workload without burnout. Also, self-care is important. Whether it’s staying physically active, pursuing hobbies, or simply taking short breaks during the day, these small habits help sustain energy and focus. Additionally, having a strong support system, both professionally and personally, makes all the difference. At the end of the day, excelling in this profession is not just about working hard, it’s about working smart, staying innovative in your work and ensuring that both professional success and personal well-being go hand in hand.
Your broad expertise across various legal areas is truly commendable. For young lawyers looking to build a diverse and successful practice like yours, what key advice would you offer? What skills, attributes, and mindset do you believe are essential for navigating the competitive and multifaceted world of law, particularly in the ever-evolving field of IP?
Adaptability and continuous learning are key for diverse and successful practice in law. IP law evolves rapidly, so staying updated on legal developments and industry trends is essential. Strong research, analytical, and communication skills are crucial for presenting clear, persuasive arguments. Beyond technical expertise, a problem-solving mindset and commercial awareness set a lawyer apart. Clients value strategic, practical, and business-oriented solutions rather than just legal advice. Lastly, mentorship and networking open doors to invaluable insights and opportunities. Success in law comes from critical thinking, innovation, and integrity in navigating legal challenges.
How and why you decided to pursue law or make law your career. But along with that, when did you decide to get into civil and constitutional matters? What was your system and what kind of challenges did you face even before doing all this?
The most important thing is that law was never in my mind in my initial days of studies. I wanted to be a doctor. And yes, it is true that I am a second generation lawyer. So, my father remained a very noted criminal lawyer in Allahabad High Court. And then he got elevated to the bench. He remained a judge of Allahabad High Court. And after that he retired as a judge of Allahabad High Court. He became the law commission’s chairman, etc. And now he’s practicing as a senior advocate. So law was never intended. As it happens with many of us. So yes, but law is something, which I believe, which if I had not taken it as a career, then I would not have thrived this much. And I personally feel that law is the only thing which is meant for me. With the efflux of time, you always feel that you can do this, you can do that, but then I personally feel that law is the only one trait where you can achieve anything and everything. That’s one. Secondly, there is no monotony involved in this profession. Every day is a new day. And, every day is a new challenge. Every day is a new case. Every day you get to fight with your friends, your loved ones, your very close ones. And one more thing which is very important is that while we call it practice. It is something that nobody’s perfect. And, even my senior, Mr. SP Gupta used to say that we call it practice for the reasons that we practice it daily. And therefore, nobody’s perfect, even if you falter, if you fail, if you do not deliver properly, then there will be a new day, there will be another day, which is coming and you will succeed. So practice daily and practice with perseverance, practice with utmost devotion, you will succeed. I’m sure about it. So the second thing that you asked was the first hand experience of being a lawyer. So being a lawyer, I told you, this is the best trait one can enter. And for a new lawyer, it is important that in the initial days, he should invest maximum of his time in studies. Apart from preparing cases and preparing your briefs for the seniors and working with them. Doesn’t mean that everything has to be done by the senior. And one should not think that if I’m the last man sitting at the bench in the conference room, or maybe the last man standing in the courtroom along with the team, then my efforts will go unrecognized, nothing. If you’re working, you’re working hard, you will be recognized, your seniors, your immediate colleagues, and even judges. And there’s one more thing which I always remember of my beloved senior. He always used to tell me that when you enter the courtroom, do not try to impress the judge. Try to impress the seniors who are sitting in the courtroom. Because they will be the mouthpiece of yours. They will be talking about you in a thousand places. That this lawyer is doing good, this young lawyer has got good intent of law, etc. So, I personally feel, I develop my practice in this way only, that I never intend to impress upon a judge. My intent was to impress upon my colleagues. My senior advocates, my seniors, immediate seniors who are sitting in the courtroom and whenever I enter the courtroom, they always tell me that if he’s coming, he would be stating the correct facts. He would be placing everything with utmost clarity and without there being any form of deviation from the ethics and the principles which are norms set by our customary ethics and practices. So that’s important. One more thing which is very important, my senior always told me, a lawyer wins a case at his table and he loses the case at his table. It is not in the courtroom. The courtroom is meant for deliveries of your preparation. So to the young lawyers who are all joining the profession of law, it is important that they should try to invest more time on their table, whatever form of table they have, whatever form of chamber they have, big, small, whatever. If you invest your time on the case, preparing it and preparing it thoroughly. You’ll definitely win. You’ll definitely succeed.
Sir, we’ll continue with the aspect of your beloved senior, Mr. SP Gupta, former Advocate General of Uttar Pradesh, who has influenced your lawyering system. He provided you with a platform to grow and helped you shape your mindset on how to work. If you don’t mind, could you discuss some of the most important, challenging, or rewarding cases you handled under his mentorship, and the lessons you took away from those experiences?
See, when I joined Mr. SP Gupta, he was already at the pinnacle of everything. He was at the top of his field. So, when I joined him, I was extremely happy because it felt like a dream come true. I was joining someone whom I had read about in books. I believe the first case law I read during my law college days was Kesavananda Bharati and SP Gupta vs. Union of India. So, to join him, someone you’ve read about in books, was a much bigger thing for me.
When I joined Mr. SP Gupta, he was already a top-notch lawyer. He had previously served as the Advocate General twice in Uttar Pradesh, and when I joined him, he had just completed his tenure as Advocate General. When I joined him and almost left his chamber, that was when he became Advocate General again. From Mr. SP Gupta, we learned everything. Whatever my practice is, wherever I stand today, it’s all because of my senior. He taught us everything, right from the basics.
One thing I always remember about him is that he was very fond of everything in life, but he invested maximum time in reading books, journals, and other things. When I joined Mr. SP Gupta, he asked me one question that I still remember. He asked, “Do you read novels?” I said, “Yes, sometimes, not regularly, but often.” He then asked, “When do you read them?” I replied, “Usually in the evenings, or just before going to bed.” He said, “I want to see what kind of novels you read.”
I thought my senior was interested in my taste in reading, so I gave him extra books—ones that were not even related to me or the genre I typically read. I thought I would show him that I had a wide range of books. The very next day, I was very curious, and I asked him about the books. He said, “They’re in the store.” I asked, “What do you mean by the store?” He replied, “Those books will remain in the store, and they will not be given back to you.” I was surprised and asked why.
He said, “Instead of reading novels or fiction, you should keep a legal journal, a law journal—whether it’s weekly or monthly—by your bedside. Before you go to bed, you should read it daily.” I asked, “What kind of judgments should I read?” He replied, “Beggars are not choosers. You’re a beggar, you don’t have anything in your pocket. So, collect everything with both your hands and leave nothing behind. Start from page one and read through to the last page of the journal. Read it like a novel. For you, everything—the fiction, the thriller, the romance—everything is in that law journal.”
He recommended keeping two journals and reading them daily. Even if I don’t intend to practice in a particular field, like tax or company law, I should read it. His point was that reading was for preparedness, not necessarily for immediate specialization. It helps in learning how judges write, how law evolves, and eventually, one day, you’ll get a case related to something you have read before.
I followed this advice for a significant portion of my career. Though nowadays I don’t do this as much, given the online updates from sources like Live Law, Bar and Bench, and others, I still believe it’s a valuable practice. I would always recommend young lawyers to follow this approach. It helps them understand how things work in the courts and gives them insight into the functioning of the judiciary.
Another lesson I received from my senior was about the analogy of a grocery store. He always said that a lawyer’s chamber is like a grocery store. There are two types of grocery stores. One carries only a limited selection, while the other is a bigger store with a variety of options. If a customer asks for a chocolate in the first store, the reply would be, “Yes, we have a chocolate, take it.” In the second store, when the customer asks, “Do you have a chocolate?” the reply would be, “We have five brands of chocolate, and each brand comes with ten different flavors. Which one do you want?”
He asked, “Who would you choose?” The point was clear: preparedness is key. When a client comes to you and asks for something, you should have it ready to offer. A lawyer’s chamber should be like a well-stocked grocery store where you can offer solutions immediately.
He also emphasized that a lawyer should always be prepared. When a client asks for something, they shouldn’t be told, “Let me check if I have that.” Instead, you should be able to say, “Yes, I have it.” Preparedness is what clients look for, and it’s what makes you stand out.
These lessons—hard work and preparedness—have stayed with me. Mr. SP Gupta always told me that specialization comes after years of practice, after you’ve invested ten or twenty years into your career. Before that, the key is to be well-prepared in every field. Whether it’s tax, criminal law, or constitutional law—be prepared for anything that comes your way.
You were with your senior for quite some time and you decided to start your own law firm at a very early stage of your career. How did that happen? And what actually were your plans, or rather, what are your plans for moving forward, and the things that you are seeing nowadays?
In the legal profession, so many things have changed drastically, especially after COVID hit us. The kind of practice that you may have seen earlier and the kind of practice we now have – where do you see the legal practice going? And how have you equipped yourself with the new practice that has come up, especially the online aspect? Sure! Here’s the rephrased version without changing the meaning of the text:
Let’s start with the online aspect. After the COVID pandemic, we’ve entered a new normal, which includes the way we interact now. This is the new normal, and we all need to be prepared for it. As I mentioned earlier, technology has greatly evolved. While I still subscribe to journals and continue to read them, we’ve also shifted to digital means of gathering all types of information.
With this shift, it’s crucial to be clear about one thing: if you don’t keep up with technological advancements, you’ll become obsolete. You must adapt to these changes. That’s one point. Secondly, with the development of AI, there are many challenges. People see it as a helpful assistant, but I believe constant supervision is necessary. One should never rely entirely on AI because, at the end of the day, it remains artificial, while original thought should remain original. That being said, I strongly recommend that as technology changes, and as the ways and means of obtaining information evolve, you must stay in tune with these developments and remain aligned with them.
Regarding Mr. Gupta’s role in the development of my practice after I made the shift, I worked with him, interned with him, and then joined his chamber. I continued working with him until one day in 2012 when he was appointed as the Advocate General of Uttar Pradesh for the second time. It was his decision, not mine, because when you refer to someone as a senior, you must trust their judgment entirely. It’s their decision when the time is right for you to start your independent practice.
So, when he received this prestigious appointment, he called me and asked to discuss something with me. I went to his chamber, and he said, “Shivam, I think it’s time for you to start your independent practice.” At that time, I wasn’t very sure, because when you’re working with a senior, you have a shield. But when you start independently, that shield is gone, and you are accountable for everything. You’re responsible for everything that happens in your chamber. This was one of the challenges I faced after leaving Mr. SP Gupta’s chamber because once you’re independent, every decision, every case, and every outcome falls on your shoulders.
There are good days, but there are also bad ones. In the beginning, it’s hard to know when you’ll land in a good spot or a bad spot. But, as I said, it was his decision, and he believed I could develop into a good lawyer over the next ten years. So, I started my practice independently. Of course, there were benefits, like getting referrals and support, but ultimately it’s your responsibility to maintain and grow your practice. You might get nominated and appointed as a lawyer for any big firm, corporation, or entity, but that company or entity won’t retain you if you don’t perform well.
My senior recognized my potential and encouraged me to focus on the civil side of law. At that time, my father, who was a judge at Allahabad High Court, had restricted me and my brother from practicing criminal law. He had issued a strict instruction that we should not be seen on the criminal side of the Allahabad High Court, which was split into two blocks: one for civil matters and one for criminal matters. His reasoning was that if we were seen in the criminal side, we wouldn’t be allowed to continue in the chamber.
So, one of the reasons my senior recommended that I start my independent practice, particularly on the civil side, was because of my father’s directive. He believed that if I could establish myself in civil law, I could eventually practice on the criminal side too, though I’m not undermining the criminal side. Having experience in civil law gives you a better understanding of how things work, which can be helpful when dealing with criminal matters. I tried my hand at criminal law as well, but my main area of expertise has always been civil law, and I enjoy practicing in this area.
That’s how it happened. My senior’s recommendation was crucial in guiding my decision. As for the development of a law firm, my senior had once suggested that I move to Delhi to start practicing in the Supreme Court while my brother would continue in Allahabad. But this plan didn’t work out. My brother chose to move to the Supreme Court, and I stayed in Allahabad, but we decided to start a small law firm. My brother took charge of that, and the firm has been growing ever since.
Developing a law firm or a chamber is all connected to your practice. It’s about conceiving ideas and adapting to the evolving landscape. But I would say that having an independently established practice can sometimes be more rewarding than having a law firm. The growth of your practice depends on how you nurture it, and a solo practice can often be more fulfilling than being part of a larger law firm.
You’ve dealt with a versatile range of cases, which is not easy for anyone. You’ve ventured into many different, complex matters. How have you navigated through all of this, especially keeping in mind that you not only have to understand these cases but also help your clients understand what you’re doing? There must be some impactful cases that have shaped your career and changed your approach. Could you share a couple of such impactful cases?
As I mentioned earlier, when I started my practice independently, I was appointed by one of the most prestigious corporations in the state, the New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA). At that time, I was appointed as the standing counsel for NOIDA. In addition to NOIDA, I was also appointed for the Ghaziabad Development Authority, UP Power Corporation, and Kanpur Development Authority, along with several other corporations. However, NOIDA was the one corporation that was facing the highest number of litigations. If you recall, there was a significant full bench decision in the case of Gajraj Singh, which I was part of—not as the standing counsel for NOIDA, but as a respondent represented by my senior, where I was assisting him.
The Gajraj decision had a significant impact in the Allahabad High Court and essentially changed land acquisition litigation there. It was the biggest decision, and over 1000 cases were decided in that batch of petitions. As a standing counsel, the benefit you get is the variety of cases you handle, and you must manage and address everything yourself. As my senior always told me, if you work hard and focus on your table, you will succeed in every matter. I took this advice to heart and kept it simple. I always advise my juniors and colleagues that when you start something new in your career or practice, you should start from scratch.
Starting from scratch means buying a bare act, reading it, and understanding the content. From the bare act, you will get at least a basic idea of what you are working with. The next step is understanding the client’s case, followed by thorough research. I followed the same approach without any shortcuts to navigating complex issues—there’s no magic rule, just basics and whatever has been taught to you before. Additionally, I’ve worked on significant cases, including land acquisition cases and election petitions, representing top politicians in the state.
One case that stands out for me involved caste certificates being issued from outside the state to employees of NOIDA who had been working for 10, 15, or even 20 years. With changes in the corporation’s hierarchy, these certificates were questioned, and it was decided that these certificates, issued against the Supreme Court’s full bench decision (in the caste census case), would not be valid. NOIDA decided to terminate the services of 10 to 20 employees based on this issue. This matter went before a single judge at Allahabad High Court, with Honorable Mr. Justice AP Shahi presiding.
When I first appeared before the court, I believed the case was straightforward due to the Supreme Court’s ruling, but the Hon’ble judge was very cautious. He noted how harsh it seemed to question the caste certificates of employees who had worked for 15 years. I explained that it was an issue of legality, and the actions taken were correct. However, the court asked me to assist in finding a fair solution. After researching, I found that there was only one judgment related to the issue, given by the Goa bench of the Bombay High Court. The court ultimately used this judgment to rule against NOIDA, saying the caste certificate issue didn’t apply here, as the employees had valid connections to Uttar Pradesh.
Although I lost the case, the judgment had a significant impact on my career. The court appreciated my fairness, human approach, and my role as an officer of the court. The judgment, which was 14 to 16 pages long, devoted 8 to 9 pages to my arguments, which was a great acknowledgment. Even though I didn’t win, I believe I worked harder than anyone else, and I felt I had supported the cause of justice. As a lawyer, representing a respondent doesn’t always mean you should aim to dismiss the petition; instead, you should focus on achieving justice in whatever form it comes.
Another significant case I worked on involved an election petition. It was my first time being involved in such a matter, and it was an eye-opener about how civil trials and election petitions function. Unlike writ petitions, election petitions require careful consideration of the client’s version, defense, evidence, and procedural details. This case helped me understand the intricacies of civil law and the trial process, especially how evidence is presented and applied. This experience was incredibly important for my career.
Moreover, land acquisition cases have been a major part of my practice, especially due to my work with corporations. I became quite proficient in land acquisition law, especially with the advent of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation, and Resettlement Act, 2013. I was one of the first lawyers to argue the applicability of section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, which had been widely debated. My argument was that the use of “and” or “or” in this context should be understood properly. This argument was later accepted by the Supreme Court of India in the Indore Development Authority’s case. I consider this one of my key contributions to land acquisition law.
In summary, I’ve had extensive experience with land acquisition cases, election petitions, and several other types of civil matters, each leaving a significant impact on my career. And as I always tell my juniors, if you want to become an expert, start with the basics and work your way up from the bare act.
Does this sense of social responsibility extend to your pro bono work? You also serve as a counsel for the High Court Legal Services Authority. How important do you think legal aid is in ensuring justice is accessible, particularly for those who can’t afford legal representation? In today’s world, balancing such a demanding legal practice with pro bono work must be challenging. How do you manage both? The idea of pro bono work has always stayed with me, and I consider it something of an inheritance. My father also practiced pro bono work, and it was something we always did as part of our routine. If someone couldn’t afford our fees, we would still offer help without charge. I became associated with the High Court Legal Services Authority because a close friend of mine recommended it. He pointed out that while the District Legal Services Authority often doesn’t attract top-tier lawyers, the High Court and Supreme Court Legal Services Authorities have much better opportunities for those willing to help.
I’ve always believed that if you’re already doing a lot of pro bono work, there’s no need for anything extra. You’re already in your chamber daily, going to court, doing your job — it’s all part of your practice. Pro bono work provides internal satisfaction, knowing you’re contributing to society.
Additionally, I noticed that the panels of lawyers in pro bono cases often didn’t include top lawyers with good practices, so I thought I should break that barrier and get involved. I wanted others to see that a well-established lawyer could also participate and provide quality assistance. I’m glad that I took this step, as the High Court Legal Services Authority gives me a lot of cases — including jail appeals, writ petitions, and others — where my involvement is needed. When you do this work, it always feels good, and for me, if you’re a lawyer earning well, a portion of your practice should be dedicated to pro bono work.
You don’t necessarily need to be part of the High Court or Supreme Court Legal Services Authority to do pro bono work; any legal services panel or even independent work can be done on your own. I’ve always done this. If someone approaches me and tells me they can’t afford my fee, I’m happy to offer free assistance. It doesn’t matter to me because, as my father always used to say, “You’re not taking anything from them. You’re doing your work, and if you help others, perhaps God will remember you and bring more clients your way.”
This is something that happened to me once. A client I helped for free, who couldn’t pay my fees, later sent me ten cases with significant fee margins. You never know who you might help, and sometimes it comes back to you in ways you wouldn’t expect. Helping others in pro bono work doesn’t need special arrangements or recognition — it’s not something you need to broadcast. It’s a personal commitment, something you do for the right reasons, and it should be kept to yourself. That’s how I’ve always approached it.
You’ve also built a dedicated team of associates. What do you look for when selecting these associates, and how do you ensure that the culture of your firm remains intact while nurturing young legal professionals?
Personally, I believe that everything I’ve received from my senior, I should pass on to the younger generation. That’s one of my core beliefs. I interact with them and maintain a friendly relationship, but I also follow certain principles in my chamber. One such principle is that I don’t save their phone numbers unless they truly earn it. I tell every junior that you need to do so much that I should feel compelled to call you, to search for your number and reach out to you. This approach works well with the young lawyers who join my chamber. They all want to be on their senior’s “fast dial” list.
I also look for young lawyers who have the right passion and drive. I don’t ask about their law degrees or grades in exams. That’s not what matters to me. I conduct a simple interview, and if I sense genuine passion for the profession, they are with me. If you’re not pursuing the profession with the passion it requires, then you’re not with me. I’m a tough taskmaster, and I do scold my juniors when needed. They’re sometimes afraid of me because they know if they make a mistake, I will be very strict with them. But despite this, I remain friendly and approachable.
When I sit with my juniors, I do so with the clear intent of sharing everything I’ve learned, everything I’ve earned from my seniors. One thing I always try to instill in them is the importance of understanding concepts. I discourage rattofying. Even when reading books, statutes, or judgments, especially the CPC or the CRPC, I stress understanding the concepts behind them. I use the example of the CPC to explain that it’s organized in a particular manner, and you need to understand that structure. For instance, if someone were to ask where the written statement comes in the order of the CPC, and they said it was order one, I would expect them to immediately correct it, as it doesn’t belong there.
I encourage them to think conceptually, as I believe that if your concepts are clear, you will be able to understand everything. There’s no need to memorize everything in detail, especially since the bar exam is now an open-book exam, which is the right approach. You should know where to find the information, and that comes from having clear concepts.
I believe I have a great team of about 10 associates, five of whom are highly effective and work closely with me. I provide them with a lot of work and insights into how things should be done, and I think they’re doing well. I’m always available for my juniors, even if they’re not in my chamber. If you come across me and have a question or need help, I’m always ready to offer suggestions and any assistance they need.
The way you approach the mentoring process, it’s clear that your juniors not only learn from you professionally, but also grow personally. Speaking of personal growth, I’d like to touch on something increasingly important — mental health. Given the immense pressures of the legal profession, how do you maintain your mental well-being, and how do you ensure that your team is also taking care of their mental health?
As I mentioned earlier, I always try to maintain a friendly relationship with my team. I approach them like an elder brother and strive to remain insightful and supportive. While professional matters are important, I also believe in fostering personal connections whenever possible. When there’s time or space, I enjoy taking them out to restaurants or other places to help them relax and bond in a more friendly, informal setting. It’s important for them to feel good and maintain a positive state of mind.
Additionally, there’s a principle that my senior taught me, and I’ve followed it throughout my career. My senior never worked on Fridays, and I’ve adopted the same tradition. For the past 16 years, I haven’t worked on Fridays, with only a few exceptions, which I try to avoid. I prefer to handle most of my work on Saturdays, from morning to evening, so that my evenings are free to spend quality time with my family—my kids and my wife. This practice also helps clear my mind because, without time for yourself, constant work can negatively affect your mental well-being.
As you rightly pointed out, the post-COVID era has introduced many new challenges, and it’s crucial to prioritize your health. For any junior, if you’re not feeling well—whether physically or mentally—it’s important to speak up. In our profession, especially as a lawyer, you must be vocal. If you’re not able to speak up for yourself, how can you speak for your clients? If your senior isn’t interacting with you or isn’t providing the support you need, don’t hesitate to formally express it. It’s important to be open about your concerns.
Similarly, if your senior is friendly and approachable, always make sure to communicate your feelings. For your own mental health, whenever you’re finishing up for the day and leaving your chamber, avoid talking about work or courtroom gossip. Instead, focus on conversations that bring you joy and positivity—anything that lifts your spirits. This helps maintain a healthy balance.
It’s a difficult profession, and without proper mental health care, it becomes even harder to thrive.
Thank you, sir, for sharing these insights so openly. It’s not easy to talk about mental health, as many often dismiss it. But you’ve been very transparent about it. Yes, it’s crucial. I personally believe that 80 percent of lawyers in this country are under immense pressure. The workload can be overwhelming and mentally taxing, more so than other professions. It creates a lot of stress and trauma, and it’s not easy to handle. You need to be quick, clear, agile, and constantly prepared. This profession demands a lot from you.
If your mental health is compromised, it becomes very difficult to survive. Mental health encompasses physical health, emotional well-being, and happiness. If you’re thriving but are constantly unhappy, there’s no point in simply doing well if you’re not at peace. Even seniors should emphasize the importance of mental health. I always encourage my juniors to share any issues they may be facing. I ask them, “What’s going on? Why don’t you seem okay today?” It’s important to check in with each other.
With almost two decades of experience in law, what inspired you to pursue this profession, especially considering your background in an agricultural family? Could you share your law school experience and how it shaped your path in the legal field?
My journey into law was driven by a combination of personal ambition, resilience, and the unwavering support of my family. Coming from an agricultural background, legal studies were not a conventional path in my family. However, after facing setbacks in my early academic pursuits—particularly in my 12th-grade science exams—I took it upon myself to carve a new path. The decision to study law was not one of convenience but of deep-seated aspiration, coupled with an innate sense of justice and advocacy.
Being the first in my family to enter the legal profession required me to step out of my comfort zone. I left my rural hometown and moved to Bengaluru, where I pursued my law degree at Al-Ameen College of Law. My time at law school was transformative; it provided not only theoretical legal knowledge but also practical exposure that helped me understand the intricacies of the judicial system. Through academic rigor, moot courts, legal aid camps, and interactions with seasoned advocates, I developed a strong foundation in jurisprudence, constitutional principles, and litigation strategies.
More importantly, law school instilled in me a sense of discipline and perseverance—qualities that have been instrumental in shaping my career. The experience taught me that law is not merely about statutes and case law but about understanding human rights, justice, and the profound impact that legal decisions have on society. This realization further fueled my passion for the profession and set me on a path of continuous learning and advocacy.
How did your early years in practice shape your approach to law? Having worked in esteemed roles, such as with ARK Usmani & Associates, KN Subba Reddy & Vivek Subba Reddy Associates, and the Government of Karnataka, how did each position contribute to the development of your legal expertise?
The early years of my legal career were instrumental in shaping my approach to law. I firmly believe that the foundation of a successful legal practitioner lies in practical experience, mentorship, and an unwavering commitment to learning.
I began my legal journey at an early stage, immersing myself in internships, drafting, pleadings, and court procedures. Under the guidance of seasoned advocates at ARK Usmani & Associates, I learned the fundamentals of litigation, client counseling, and legal documentation. This experience provided me with firsthand exposure to the nuances of civil and criminal law, including how to build strong legal arguments and navigate complex case laws.
Working with KN Subba Reddy & Vivek Subba Reddy Associates further honed my litigation skills, particularly in high-stakes matters. Here, I developed a deeper understanding of procedural laws, cross-examinations, and trial advocacy, all of which proved invaluable in my subsequent roles.
My tenure with the Government of Karnataka marked a significant transition, as I shifted from private practice to public law. This role allowed me to understand the workings of the government, its legal framework, and the intersection between public policy and the judiciary. Engaging in government litigation, regulatory compliance, and policy interpretation broadened my perspective and helped me refine my expertise in constitutional and administrative law.
Each position I held played a crucial role in shaping my professional identity. They collectively reinforced my commitment to justice, legal precision, and ethical advocacy, ultimately guiding me toward a distinguished career in public service and independent practice.
With your experience across areas like Constitutional Law, Civil Law, Criminal Law, Corporate & Banking Law, and more, what was your experience like working as the Central Government Counsel at the High Court of Karnataka from 2015 to 2019? Could you share some key lessons or challenges faced during that period?
Serving as Central Government Counsel at the High Court of Karnataka from 2015 to 2019 was one of the most intellectually stimulating and professionally enriching phases of my career. Representing the Union of India (UOI) in complex legal matters required an in-depth understanding of constitutional provisions, statutory interpretations, and public policy frameworks.
One of the most significant aspects of this role was understanding and advocating for the government’s standpoint behind legislative actions and administrative decisions. Government litigation is unique because it does not only involve individual disputes but often concerns matters of public interest, governance, and national policy implementation. This role deepened my understanding of quasi-federalism, the intricate relationship between the Union and State governments, and the legal disputes that arise between them.
Key lessons from this period include:
1. Strategic Litigation & Policy Advocacy – Representing the government requires not just legal knowledge but also strategic thinking. I had to ensure that legal arguments aligned with the broader policy framework of the Central Government.
2. Balancing Judicial Review & Governmental Authority – A major challenge in government litigation is navigating cases where government policies are challenged under judicial review. Balancing the principles of legislative intent, constitutional validity, and public welfare was a crucial aspect of my role.
3. High-Stakes Litigation – Many cases I handled involved issues of constitutional interpretation, statutory challenges, and administrative law disputes. These matters required meticulous research and well-articulated legal submissions.
Overall, my tenure as Central Government Counsel provided me with a macro-level perspective on governance, public administration, and the critical role of legal professionals in shaping public policy through judicial processes.
As the Additional Advocate General for the Government of Karnataka, you’ve likely handled diverse cases. Which case has been the most rewarding for you in this role, and what strategies did you employ to manage such a complex matter?
Every case assigned to me by the Advocate General of Karnataka has carried its own significance and set of challenges. As Additional Advocate General, I have had the privilege of handling cases that impact public policy, constitutional interpretation, and fundamental rights.
One of the most rewarding aspects of this role has been the opportunity to argue cases that directly influence governance and legislative frameworks. Whether it involves challenges to state policies, high-value litigation, or cases concerning the rights of citizens, each matter requires a strategic, well-researched, and legally sound approach.
My strategy in managing complex cases is based on the following principles:
1. In-Depth Legal Research – Every case demands an exhaustive understanding of relevant precedents, legislative intent, and judicial interpretations. Research forms the foundation of any successful litigation.
2. Calm & Composed Advocacy – Courtroom advocacy requires not just legal acumen but also the ability to present arguments persuasively, counter opposing counsel effectively, and maintain composure under intense judicial scrutiny.
3. Team Collaboration & Case Management – Handling government litigation requires a coordinated approach. I work closely with government departments, legal teams, and policy advisors to ensure comprehensive representation.
4. Strict Adherence to Legal Ethics – As a legal representative of the government, I uphold the highest ethical standards, ensuring that justice is served while safeguarding the interests of the state.
In summary, each case I handle is a learning experience, a test of legal acumen, and an opportunity to contribute to the legal system in a meaningful way.
Final Words
Law is not just a profession—it is a responsibility, a commitment to justice, and a continuous journey of learning. Throughout my career, I have learned that perseverance, dedication, and ethical advocacy are the hallmarks of a successful lawyer.
For aspiring legal professionals, I always emphasize: “Master your craft, stay updated with evolving jurisprudence, and above all, uphold the integrity of the legal profession.”
I Would like to thank my colleague Advocate Mohammed Nawaz Shariff, for his valuable assistance rendered in completion of the interview.
