With over a decade of experience across various areas of law, do you believe law was always your destined path, or were there particular factors that steered you in this direction?
For me, it was a mix of both. While studying at Loyola School, Trivandrum, we had only two main options after school: engineering or medicine—there were no streams for humanities or commerce. I initially leaned towards engineering but decided to keep a backup. The year I finished school was the first year of CLAT, which consolidated various law entrance exams into one. Law seemed like a good alternative, partly because my father had a law degree, though he pursued a career in journalism.
Interestingly, I performed well in my engineering CETs but not in CLAT. Despite this, I was so fatigued by the STEM curriculum that the backup suddenly became my first choice. Eventually, I chose ILS Law College, Pune over GLC in Mumbai because my family felt more comfortable with Pune—though the reasons remain unclear to this day!
Once I joined ILS, I grew to love the idea of a career in law. After a few internships in Mumbai and New Delhi, I gravitated towards litigation. Mr. Kishore Vussonji at Kanga & Co., with whom I interned a few times, suggested I start practicing in New Delhi rather than Mumbai. I took his advice, and it was the right decision—Delhi has been very kind to me.
You began your legal journey at the office of an Advocate-on-Record (AOR) at the Supreme Court of India. How did this initial experience shape your understanding of the legal profession and influence your subsequent career choices?
Until recently, the ‘traditional’ path at the Supreme Court involved starting in an AOR’s office, then moving to a senior counsel’s chamber, and eventually starting independent practice. Though this route is no longer dogma, it’s the one I followed.
I interned with Mr. Senthil Jagadeesan, Senior Advocate, during my final year of law school. He offered me a position in his chambers post-graduation, which aligned perfectly with my goal to practice at the Supreme Court. His chambers was an AOR office then, and under his guidance, I focused on learning court processes, you know, getting familiar with the Supreme Court, drafting, and understanding the nuances of the profession—the ‘ropes’ as they say. This was foundational.
Later, I joined the chambers of Mr. Shyam Divan, a four-year stint that I consider transformative for me. Court craft is something you keenly watch and learn at a senior’s chamber—of course Mr. Divan’s style is inimitable, although I must confess many of us have tried in vain to copy it! Another thing we learnt by watching was the high degree of rectitude and integrity one had to maintain when acting as counsel—towards the court, clients & co-counsel, all. Finally, he would insist that you must always attempt to ‘elevate’ your brief as counsel, especially at the Supreme Court. It matters what you bring to the brief over and above what is written in it. These are lessons that have profoundly shaped my practice.
Can you share your experience of completing your LL.M. at Harvard Law School? What motivated you to choose this institution, and could you share with us the admission process and criteria for our young readers?
Harvard Law School was both enriching and humbling. I decided to pursue my LL.M. six years into my career, unlike many Indian applicants who apply straight out of college. Initially, I was hesitant because I didn’t want to lose my small but growing practice. Dr. Menaka Guruswamy, Senior Advocate, among other seniors at the bar encouraged me to consider it, and I eventually decided to apply to U.S. law schools for their rigorous yet compact programs.
The application process for most Ivy League schools is somewhat same, and involves submitting a strong statement of purpose, solid references, and academic essays. My SOP—which shouldn’t be a flamboyant CV—was a simple, personal essay. Personal essays, I had become fond of as a form having read its champions such as Didion, Sontag and Baldwin, so I felt that was the easier bit. Harvard required an additional academic proposal, which I based on my reflections about the Supreme Court’s role in post-conflict scenarios. This proposal evolved into my dissertation under the guidance of Dean Martha Minow, a renowned scholar in transitional justice.
I feel my time at Harvard was important to me for two major reasons. Academically, it gave me a framework and a language to express my already brewing concerns about the judicial process. I learnt from the giants of the Critical Legal Studies movement—Roberto Mangabeira Unger, Duncan Kennedy, David Kennedy & Mark Tushnet—and the ideas that were discussed in class spoke to my bare-bones thoughts and reflections. On a personal level, it gave me a huge cohort of friends, strewn all over the world doing great things, and some of whom I get to collaborate with every now and then. Both are important reasons, and I think I’m better off for having spent some time in the little town of Cambridge, MA.
After gaining significant experience working with various big names in the legal industry, you chose to start your own practice. What prompted this decision, what challenges did you face in the early stages, how did you overcome them?
In January 2022, I co-founded Godiyal & Manoharan Chambers with Samiksha Godiyal, a friend and colleague from Mr. Divan’s chambers who shared my vision for a chamber practice. Seniors encouraged us to go independent, and by then, we had experience managing independent briefs alongside chamber work.
The early challenges were universal: balancing roles as CFO, COO, and CMO while maintaining high standards of legal service. Putting in place systems and strategies has helped overcome these challenges, and prepare the chambers for the long game. New challenges always crop up, but they are welcome—they keep you sharp and motivated. One of our keen focuses is on more tech-integration in the processes, which we have been able to achieve to an encouraging extend benefiting service excellence, and the practice in general; keeps the chambers future-ready.
You’ve been involved in several landmark Supreme Court decisions, such as the marriage equality case, the Cauvery River dispute, the Right to Privacy case, and the decriminalization of consensual same-sex relationships. Could you share one particularly interesting case you’ve worked on and how you prepared for such a complex matter?
All these cases you have mentioned were very interesting to me and have resulted in mixed outcomes from the Indian Supreme Court. As we speak, we have dismissal from the court on our review petitions in the marriage equality case, something I have been involved in right from 2020 when the first petitions were filed in the Delhi High Court. All briefs are interesting briefs, some make news, others don’t, but that’s the beauty of having a generalist practice, one can never get bored!
The Cauvery River Water Dispute that you mentioned is the one that ended with a judgment from the Supreme Court in 2018. Now this is a niche area of law, inter-state river water disputes. There are about 10 or so in the history of the country, and I was able to be part of two—the other one was the Mahadayi river dispute among Karnataka, Maharashtra and Goa. This niche area of law involves complex questions of federalism, prior use rights, and equitable water distribution. The Supreme Court’s 2018 judgment marked its first appeal over a water tribunal’s decision. Preparation involved examining over 50 U.S. court decisions on river water sharing to distill first principles of equitable distribution. These principles helped guide the Supreme Court’s analysis of the tribunal’s award.
I suppose with climate change we will see more of these disputes not only of a domestic character but also at the global level. There will be more dams as countries try to achieve their national renewable energy goals, and more or less water in rivers to share owing to changing weather patterns. It’s an area of growing importance.
You had worked as counsel representing the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) before the Delhi High Court for about two years? What key challenges did you encounter in handling regulatory disputes, particularly in light of your experience representing a regulator?
Representing NCTE was my first experience as counsel for a statutory regulator. I found that judges respond well to state counsel if they are handy with timely instructions on most occasions, and at all times, fair and prepared. I think that was key to assisting the court from the State’s side.
Often regulatory disputes on the writ side of the high courts or specialised tribunals like APTEL or SAT have to deal with petitions seeking to compel the statutory regulator to do their job or petitions examining the correctness of adjudicatory decisions of the regulator. These are disputes related to the regulatory activity itself. The other cases, which I got to see a fair share of was, disputes on policy—which may enter courts as a vires challenge. My experience at Harvard where the policy-oriented approach is often reflected in case law was useful in litigating these disputes in our courts. Sound policy arguments, alongside technical legal points, are crucial in such cases.
On the private side of things, like for any other regulated entity in business you are looking out for the commercials while litigating. Something that we try to do at chambers is to understand that the commercials at stake in a case, the ‘pain-point’ so to say—legal arguments and strategies will flow accordingly.
As a member of the LAWASIA Human Rights Committee, could you share some of the key initiatives or challenges you have encountered in your role?
LAWASIA is a regional association of lawyers, judges, jurists and legal organisations, which advocates for the interests and concerns of the Asia Pacific legal profession. They’ve been around for over six decades, and is one of top associations of lawyers in the region. I’ve been a member for a few years now, and since February 2024, as part of its Human Rights Committee, I focus on the intersection of business and human rights.
Apart from being a brilliant network spanning across regions, LAWASIA hosts very significant conferences each year on various areas of the law, apart from its annual conferences. In February this year, LAWASIA along with the Nepal Bar Association is hosting the 5th International Human Rights Conference in Kathmandu. I am able to join friends who are excellent lawyers and scholars from Malaysia, Taiwan, Japan, South Korea & Australia in our committee and also, learn from folks who do brilliant work in Singapore, China, Vietnam and other jurisdictions in the region.
LAWASIA’s conferences and webinars provide invaluable insights into regional legal issues, emphasizing both shared experiences and unique challenges. Recently there was a discussion on “Human Rights at Sea,” where we heard from those advocating the cause of stateless fishing communities. These forums offer opportunities to learn and collaborate across jurisdictions.
As you have written a piece on mental health and the legal profession, could you share some key insights or recommendations on how the legal community can address these issues? Additionally, what role do you believe law firms and legal institutions should play in fostering a healthier work environment? On a personal note, how do you manage the balance between your personal and professional commitments?
Mental health interventions in the workplace are a dime a dozen. Addressing mental health begins with acknowledging the profession’s high-stress nature and fostering open conversations.
Discussions on mental health in the legal profession have significantly evolved since I wrote about the topic in The Caravan in 2016. Back then, it wasn’t a mainstream conversation, but now we see greater awareness, better vocabulary, and even acknowledgement from senior figures like chief justices.. So, that’s a good thing—but then as they say, talk is cheap.
I wanted to draw attention to the issue at the time—much like that famous ‘mission statement’ from Jerry Maguire (though thankfully, I didn’t lose my job over it like he did!). Meaningful change requires more than lip service. Judges and senior members of the Bar must lead serious discussions and implement effective systems to make the profession more accommodating.
Personally, I balance work by spending time with loved ones, enjoying music, and staying active. Remembering that work is only part of life—and learning not to take oneself too seriously—can make a big difference.
What advice would you give to young lawyers who aspire to build a successful career like yours? How should they approach planning their career trajectory and advancing in the legal profession?
Goodwill and relationships, and an overall commitment to excellence are invaluable in the legal profession. While financial success is important, pro bono work should not be overlooked—it’s equally rewarding. Success is personal and evolving. Take time to define success on your own terms—if you are able to do that, you’ve solved half the puzzle!
Reflecting on your extensive experience, what inspired you to pursue a career in law, despite not coming from a legal background? What motivated your decision to choose the Army Institute of Law for your studies? How did your time there shape your understanding of the law, and how did the integration of Army discipline with legal education influence your approach to practicing law?
The charm of uniformed service is unmatched. My grandfather was in the Police, and my father was in the Army. Litigation provides an opportunity to wear the band and gown, with no retirement age, and experience the thrill of a duel in an arena while cross-examining a witness, advancing final arguments, and even playing war games with the applications filed in a case! I was inspired to have such a way of life.
Army Institute of Law (AIL) offered a 5 year integrated law course. It was a residential Institute with a focus on sports, extracurricular activities, internships, and studies. Being from an Army background, I was certain AIL would nurture the students well.
I was told in the first year itself that one is wedded to law! Being a residential institute, the Professors acted as our guardians and guided us in all walks of life. We were asked to develop the habit of going through the latest law journals which made us understand the divergent views argued and a reasoned judgment on the subject. Moot Court Competitions were another aspect that was extensively undertaken in AIL.
The study of law with its application makes it more interesting. Discipline is a common feature in the Army and Law and AIL made us disciplined. The basic traits of being punctual, and being courteous to the Judge as well as the opposite counsel aids in daily practice. The art of advancing arguments is to throw light, not heat, which I learned from the Moot Court Competitions.
During your time in law school, you completed numerous internships. What were the most valuable lessons you learned from these experiences, and how did they help you build a strong foundation as you transitioned into real-world legal practice?
Internships are important to enable the student to see the diverse fields of law, be it litigation, working in a law firm, or taking teaching as a profession. Internships are a distinct feature on a CV and may enable a student to secure a placement.
My internships provided great learning experiences and helped me build valuable connections. My first internship was under Mr. R. Venkatramani who is the present Attorney General of India. I had the opportunity to witness the hearings in the Supreme Court during my first internship.
However, to gain exposure, I also interned with Titus and Co., Lall and Sethi, Singhania and Co., Juris Consultants, and the “Indian Society of International Law”.
What were your early experiences like working at a top-tier firm? What key lessons did you learn there, and how did those experiences shape the direction of your career?
I was fortunate to get placed in one of the best law firms, Remfry & Sagar. Late Dr. Sagar, the founder of the firm, valued the time of associates, and the firm’s working hours were 9 AM to 5:30 PM, with weekends off. The associates focused and worked diligently during this time rather than the practice in some firms where late evenings are usually spent in the Office.
It was a great experience to work with foreign clients and MNCs, I recall Japanese clients being the most punctual in conferences and responding to queries immediately. Needless to say, such clients expected a similar swift response.
I realized that the best a lawyer can ensure is punctuality and diligence toward the case entrusted by the client. Even in case of an adverse order, many clients retain the same lawyer to challenge the impugned order or judgment because they have witnessed the lawyer’s diligent work.
What motivated your decision to transition from working at a top-tier firm to starting your own independent practice? Given the stability of your previous role, what factors influenced this significant decision? Additionally, litigation is often described as thrilling and unpredictable. What aspects of litigation excite you the most, and how do you prepare for its inherent unpredictability?
It was a good experience to sit comfortably in the Ivory Tower and work for foreign clients. I learned a lot about Intellectual Property Rights. Mr. Ashwin Julka, who was the Managing Partner of the firm, trained me well both in the field of law and the art of dealing with clients.
However, I missed the thrill and charm of going to the Court on a daily basis and dealing with different subjects of law. I felt that a lawyer, just like an actor, should not confine themselves to limited roles! One should seek challenging roles as well and the focus should be on learning diverse subjects of law.
I started my Advocate-on-Record (AoR) training under the Late Mr. Satya Mitra Garg and Mr. Ashok Panigrahi who had worked in the Chamber of Venkatramani Sir previously. You may just consider how immense internships maybe even after several years of practice.
The thrill of a gladiator in litigation comes with some uncertainty. However, the law of averages aids a lawyer, and with grit, strategic patience, and proper networking, one can overcome the cloud of uncertainty.
How did your training under various Senior Advocates equip you for the demanding role of an Advocate-on-Record (AoR)? What were some of the major challenges you encountered in the early stages of your practice, and how did you navigate those obstacles?
In my training days, I drafted petitions concerning diverse fields of law which were either argued by the AoR or a Senior Advocate. As a lawyer, one realized that once a petition is filed, the scope of argument is limited to the grounds raised, and hence drafting a petition well was crucial, and annexing relevant annexures was important. That apart, it was essential to be privy to the Supreme Court Rules, leading cases as well as the latest Supreme Court Cases.
The challenge faced in the initial days of independent practice relates to getting clients. I realized that an invisible highway must be built for cases to flow from the respective High Courts and Tribunals. I built a decent network of connections – from lawyers who graduated from AIL to people I interned with. I was helped by Justice Manmeet Arora (then a lawyer), Abhijat Sir, and Ronny Sir in the initial years of my independent practice.
What led you to specialize in Arbitration, and what makes this area of law distinct in terms of its challenges compared to others? Could you share an example of a particularly challenging arbitration case you worked on, and how you prepared for it?
The time frame for making the Award under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is one year from the date of completion of pleadings and the scope of appeal is limited. Therefore, the Arbitration clause is one of the essential elements incorporated in most of the contracts between the parties inter se. Time is of the essence when filing and conducting cross-examinations in arbitration cases, and seeking an adjournment is akin to committing a sin!
One of the important Arbitration cases was regarding the denial of payment and the imposition of huge penalties which were imposed clandestinely. Since the other side failed to appoint an Arbitrator, the High Court appointed an Arbitrator.
It is said that “The truth is often shielded by layers of lies”. The other side filed an application seeking that the claims were fraudulent and hence it was out of the purview of the Arbitration proceedings. We countered by relying upon the wide definition of Section 17 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 which encompasses the alleged fraud as well. The judgment of Avitel Post Studioz Ltd. & Ors. v HSBC Pi Holdings (Mauritius) Ltd. was relied upon by us. The Arbitrator was pleased to dismiss the application with costs.
Interestingly, extensions of the contract were given by the other side. On this aspect, the concerned witness from the other side was cross-examined in detail. After some detailed cross-examination, the concerned witness admitted that extensions were due to the satisfactory services and after compliance with the terms and conditions of the contract. Concerning the issue of penalty, the other side was directed to produce the computation of the penalties as not even a Show Cause Notice was issued. We were able to demonstrate that the other side acted as an emperor with scant regard for the principles of natural justice. Furthermore, the quantum of penalty, though stipulated in the agreement, was excessive, burdensome, coercive, and against the principles of law contained inSection 74 of the Indian Contract Act, of 1872. The judgments of Fateh Chand v. Bal Kishan Das and Kailash Nath Associates v DDAwere relied upon by us.
The Arbitral Tribunal was pleased to award the amount due without any penalty along with interest and legal costs.
Being an AoR and handling your Chambers, you must carry significant responsibilities. How do you manage these responsibilities, and what strategies do you employ to unwind and relax after a long, stressful day?
An AoR has to be present in all the proceedings and even the SLP and applications are signed by the AoR, barring the affidavits. The SLP and applications have to be read diligently before filing and I ensure to attend all the proceedings. This has become easier with the online hearings and even the filings are online.
I am an avid golfer and do happen to meet different players on the Golf Course. Golf is a social game, so networking is natural. An opponent or a teammate in a game today turns out to be my client tomorrow! I would advise lawyers to pick up any one sport. Apart from health, it may be good for wealth, too!
Making the transition to litigation, especially after having a stable job, requires great courage. What advice would you give to law students who are currently navigating their legal journey and aspire to excel in the field? Furthermore, what resources would you recommend to keep them updated on the latest developments, particularly in arbitration law?
I concede that the initial days in litigation do not appear stable. However, in the long run, the life of an Independent lawyer is stable with no fear of losing a job! If that invisible highway is maintained well, cases are bound to travel from the respective High Courts.
My advice to students is to undertake diverse internships and start building connections from their first internship. Secondly, reading the latest law journals is another habit that would aid. In the field of Arbitration, the Indian Contract Act, of 1872 may be studied in detail and one may witness the proceedings in a Commercial Court.
Looking back at your journey from law school to becoming an Advocate-on-Record in the Supreme Court, how would you describe your evolution as a legal professional? What key qualities do you believe a law student should possess if they wish to become an AoR and succeed in litigation?
One has to be agile to adapt to the changing times in the legal profession. The online filings and online hearings sounded unreal pre-COVID time but have now become the norm. In the initial days, all the cases were undertaken by me but now one may weigh the cases and stop counting. In the legal profession, having a student mentality is essential and I don’t hesitate to learn something from my colleague or an intern who has researched well on the subject.
With sincerity, focus, and training for one year, it is not difficult to become an AoR. To excel in the legal profession, develop deep and unwavering commitment. Being an independent lawyer is a superpower – you would be a master of your time!
Lastly, Litigation is like planting a mango tree, which requires time for the tree to bear fruit. Do not compare such a tree with a plant whose flowers bloom within a month and wither away in a few days! Furthermore, the field of litigation is like a pyramid with limited competition at the top! With sincerity and focus any lawyer may reach the top.
With your broad expertise in areas such as Insolvency Law, Competition Law, Administrative Law, and more, could you share the story of how you first embarked on your legal journey? What inspired you to choose law as a profession? Was it a deliberate decision, or did your passion for law evolve gradually over time?
I did not think I would be a lawyer. So I’m a lawyer by chance but I’m glad that I pursued law because now that I think back I am sure it is my calling. I don’t think I could have been so happy doing anything else. As destiny would have it I got admission into ILS Law College, Pune and I can safely say that I spent the better part of my life there. I was fortunate to study under some excellent faculty like Dr. Jaya Sagade, Prof. Nilima Bhadbade and Prof. Smita Sabne to name a few. Their teachings and guidance have been invaluable to me.
You participated in the dual LLM program in Global Business Law at New York University School of Law and National University of Singapore. Could you kindly share your experiences during that time and also ponder upon how the program equipped you to navigate the complexities of international corporate and financial services law? What challenges did you encounter during the application process, and what impact did the Dean’s Award from New York University have on you?
I think I was extremely fortunate to be part of the NYU-NUS Dual Masters’ Program. It was truly one of a kind and we used to joke that we were part of a “limited edition”. Unfortunately, the Dual program has stopped. But it was a brilliant experience. It was very intensive and taxing to do two programs in one year because when one university was on break we would have the classes and exams for the other. But the faculty was top notch. We got to experience the best of both worlds and had a natural kind of insight into comparative law without even having that as an elective. There is often this debate about whether it is worth pursuing an LLM abroad if you want to come back and work in India and especially in Litigation and I would like to say that if you have the resources you should definitely pursue one. Personally I feel it broadened my horizons in ways I could not have imagined. The bonus is I made some lifelong friends. The Application process was very smooth. It was completely online and I don’t recollect any hassle. The Dean’s Award definitely helped me financially to be able to afford the program
In terms of learning, I was extremely fortunate to be able to do my dissertation on International Investment Law under Prof M. Sornarajah. At NUS I interacted and studied under some excellent faculty like Prof. Umakanth Varottil and Prof. Arun Thiruvengadam. For the NYU Program we had some legends like Prof. Jose Alvarez for International Investment Law and Prof Stephen Choi for M&A and Securities. There are so many things that I learned during the program which I am able to use in my practise today especially when it comes to subjects like Competition Law and International Arbitration Law , apart from principles of corporate and financial laws.
In the early stages of your career, you worked with a major corporation. How did you approach the legal intricacies surrounding the Copyright Act and Cable TV regulations during that period? What key takeaways from that experience helped shape the foundation of your career and propelled your professional trajectory?
I was lucky to work with some major corporations so early on in my career. It was a great learning curve for me. I dealt with several issues under the Copyright Act and Cable TV Regulations which were very relevant at the time. More than that, it helps me now immensely while dealing with in – house clients. I understand their issues and try to resolve them to the best of my ability.
After gaining valuable experience working in-house, what prompted your decision to transition to litigation, working alongside Senior Advocates? How did you find the shift between the two environments, and what major differences stood out to you?
I had a great learning experience working in – house but I always felt I was missing out on attending court. So I decided to finish my masters and switch to litigation. At that time the thought was if I don’t like it I can always go back. But I took to litigation like a fish takes to water. I loved coming to court and still do. It is what drives me. I feel like we make a difference to our client’s lives in whatever small way possible and that gives me a sense of purpose and immense satisfaction. The shift was not difficult, both have its pros and cons. But the working culture is very different. While working in – house my deadline was often completing a draft or sending an email. In litigation we are racing against time to secure bail or stop a demolition. So we cannot compare. Both are invaluable learning experiences.
I am immensely grateful to my seniors Mr. T. Srinivasa Murthy and Mr. Senthil Jagadeesan, who have been my Gurus and Mentors in this profession. I have literally learnt everything I know from them and I continue to work and learn from them.
After working with various legal entities, you went on to establish your own practice. What motivated you to take that leap, and what were some of the initial challenges you faced in setting up your own firm and how did you navigate them?
I cleared the Advocate on Record Exam and became an AOR of the Supreme Court and felt that I could start something on my own so my Partner Anandh K and I set up SA Law. It is based on our philosophy of doing good work and helping our clients. When we work in some other organisation we are always bound by their rules. Setting up my own practise gives me the freedom to do what I want both professionally and personally. It also helps me do other activities like teaching or interacting with law students and doing pro bono work without any pressure. In terms of the challenges we faced- we are both first generation lawyers from outside Delhi. We don’t have any Godfathers here. We have struggled and grown brief by brief and survived by word of mouth of our clients who have trusted us.
As a Founding Partner at SA Law and an AOR, you oversee a variety of practice areas, including land acquisition, civil rights, POSH (Prevention of Sexual Harassment), arbitration, and competition law. Could you share a fascinating case you’ve handled in the field of competition law and how you approached the complexities of such a case, especially for our younger readers looking to understand this area of law?
I think one of the biggest cases I have handled is the cement cartel case. The case is now pending before the Supreme Court. But I was fortunate to work on the case from the CCI stage to the appeals before erstwhile COMPAT and then NCLAT and now Supreme Court. Working on a case through all the stages is a great learning experience. I think one of the fascinating aspects of competition law is how much we rely on foreign judgments and concepts – both the US Anti-Trust Law and EU and also compare it with our own jurisprudence. I think my LLM came in very handy in dealing with this.
Your passion for teaching is evident in your contributions to judging moot courts, delivering guest lectures, and conducting seminars and workshops for law students. What advice would you give to aspiring lawyers who are just beginning their legal careers?
I don’t think I can give much advice- there are far more learned people for that. I would say enjoy your time at law school. Most of them would be doing the 5 year law course. When I look back at my time in Law College – I just remember that I had fun. I participated in all the activities in college both curricular and extra-curricular. It helped me make so many friends. And maybe I would say use that time to read and write a lot. 5 years is a long time. It is ok if you don’t have 10 internships in 5 years or don’t do many moot courts or write research papers. Of course, doing all this helps. But utilise the time doing something. I spent a good amount of time doing Purshottam and Firodiya Karandak in Pune which had a big Marathi Theatre Scene. It helped me learn one more language which is a life skill and comes in handy even today.
Perhaps I would add one thing – it is very easy to be enamoured by the profession when we are in college – especially when we hear Senior Advocates or Judges come to our college and talk and advise youngsters to pursue litigation. There is nothing wrong with that. Perhaps even I would give the same advice. But the initial years are tough. It is sometimes very easy to feel dejected, especially if you fall in the trap of comparison. Social media doesn’t help. Litigation is a marathon with very slow returns and requires a lot of consistent effort. And sometimes, even after a lot of hard work you may not get material returns or recognition. And that is ok. As long as you are able to feel satisfied that you are doing some good work, you should be ok with that. There are many loopholes in the system, all the more for women, but there are many good people as well- whether in terms of seniors, peers or mentors – there is no dearth of good people who will help you both personally and professionally and I think the camaraderie of the Bar is one of the best parts of this profession. Last but definitely not the least – there is no substitute for hard work. You may keep hearing about networking and legacy and luck and it is very easy to get lost in this hubris but there are no shortcuts to success.
As someone dedicated to staying at the cutting edge of legal developments and inspiring your colleagues to do the same, what do you consider to be the key emerging trends in your areas of expertise, such as Intellectual Property and Competition Law, particularly with the rise of Artificial Intelligence and technological advancements? How do you stay informed about these evolving fields, and what direction do you see them taking over the next five to ten years? Additionally, could you suggest any resources for our readers to stay up to date on the latest legal trends?
In terms of the latest trends – I think AI and its impact in different sectors and the legal nuances surrounding that would definitely be something over the next five and ten years. The other emerging trend is the DPDP Act and its enforcement and the complications that arise out of them. In terms of staying updated, I think there are way more resources now than we had, especially online resources. I would say the good old way of reading law reports is also invaluable.
How do you manage to balance your professional growth with your personal interests? What hobbies or activities do you enjoy that help you unwind and relax after a demanding day at work?
I think we always try to balance and if someone says that they have figured it all out then perhaps they are lying. But I try. I recently gave birth to my second child. So I am currently in the depths of everything postpartum, but I would say whatever time I have I like to spend with my children.
With your extensive and varied experience, what initially drew you to the field of law? Was entering the legal profession a conscious decision, or did a specific experience or event inspire you to pursue this path?
My journey into the legal profession was both a conscious choice and an organic evolution, shaped by my upbringing, intellectual pursuits, and lived experiences.
As a child, I was deeply influenced by my father, a Chartered Accountant (FCA) specializing in private tax law. His accounts of tribunal hearings, the complexities of his cases, and the challenges of client management intrigued and inspired me. A self-made man with exceptional intellectual and academic prowess (he was also a topper at Shri Ram College of Commerce) – his achievements became a blueprint for excellence and perseverance. It was he who instilled in me the qualities of discipline, perseverance, and intellectual curiosity, shaping my approach to both life and law.
Beyond his profession, he was a deeply philosophical man who, from my early years, personally guided me through Eastern philosophy, introducing me to the works of Swami Vivekananda, J. Krishnamurti, Paramahansa Yogananda, and Ramakrishna Paramahansa. These teachings became the bedrock of my ethical compass.
Initially, my academic path led me to literature, where I earned an honors degree in English Literature. This was a transformative period—literature’s deep engagement with human conflict, ethics, and justice refined my ability to empathize, analyze, and articulate complex ideas. Little did I know then that these skills would later become indispensable in my legal career.
Following my graduation, I entered the corporate world, which became both an eye-opener and a catalyst for change. While this phase refined my people and management skills – it also gave me exposure to contract negotiation, drafting agreements, mediations, employment issues and dispute resolution. Corporate workplaces in the early 2000s revealed a stark reality: the pervasive challenges of gender inequality, and workplace harassment, witnessing first-hand how these issues affected individuals, especially women in workplaces. It was here that I saw how the lack of legal awareness perpetuated these injustices, planting the seeds for my eventual pivot to law.
What ultimately solidified my decision to enter litigation, however, were deeply personal experiences— exposing me to the rigours of the justice system of the country. These experiences were both humbling and galvanizing, reinforcing the urgency of having strong legal advocacy for those who feel powerless.
In retrospect, law was never just a profession for me—it was a calling. It is what gives my life meaning and purpose as an individual and woman. It gives my life meaning and purpose, both as an individual and as a woman. I can’t imagine myself in any other field. Litigation is a tough career, but it fuels my passion and desire for learning, empowers me, and, most importantly, allows me to empower others in their pursuit of justice.
In the early stages of your career, working with various organizations, what experiences helped shape your understanding of the law? Which experiences were most influential in your growth and advancement in the legal field?
I was fortunate that in the initial stages of my career, I had the opportunity to hone my skills across a broad spectrum of courts, from the District Courts to the Appellate Courts. Practicing in District Courts provided me with a solid foundation in procedural laws, particularly in family law pertaining to matrimonial disputes, child custody and criminal law. I gained invaluable firsthand experience in criminal law jurisprudence understanding the initiation and progression of criminal cases inter-alia from the filing of FIRs to the conduct of trials and sentencing including anticipatory bails, regular bail and subsequently the natural transition to appellate work which encompassed appeal against conviction, first appeal from first order, commutation of sentence et all.
My practice before the High Court and Supreme Court significantly enhanced my understanding of appellate law, particularly in the area of writ jurisdiction Article 226, 227 and Article 32 of the constitution of India, which has become one of my areas of specialization. A noteworthy case during this period was a PIL before the Allahabad High Court, where the Hon’ble High Court banned the import of Khas Khas from Turkey. The petitioner represented by my senior had sought an investigation into these imports, which were linked to funding arms smuggling. The court’s decision underscored the critical connection between trade policies and national security. This journey eventually led me to white-collar crime cases, where the complexities of financial frauds and corporate misconduct required a nuanced and strategic approach. At the same time, drawing from my corporate background, I continued to work extensively on negotiation and arbitration. One notable case involved an arbitration matter for a company based in Laos, which required navigating cross-border legal and commercial complexities.
Furthermore, I have been extremely fortunate that in the early stages of my career, I had the privilege of learning from seasoned lawyers and Senior Advocates, which laid the foundation of my legal understanding. One of the most formative experiences was assisting Senior Advocate Ms. Meenakshi Arora in a dowry death case before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. This complex appeal against a conviction provided invaluable insight into criminal law, appellate advocacy, and, most importantly, the meticulous preparation required for a criminal appeal before the Apex court.
Equally impactful has been my work in corporate and company law, particularly with Petronet LNG Ltd. wherein I have drafted, prepared and represented the Board of Directors as well as MD & CEO of the company in matters pertaining to disciplinary proceedings and termination (board-related issues and compliance with the Companies Act, 2013) in writ petitions under Article 226 and Letter Patent Appeal. The notable case Rajeev Agrawal v. Union of India is another reported judgement wherein the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi upheld the legality of disciplinary proceedings initiated by the company. This case was among the first to interpret Section 178(2) of the Companies Act.
As counsel for Petronet LNG in the aforesaid matter, I’ve had the privilege of briefing some of the country’s most respected Senior (Sr.) Advocates, including Solicitor General of India Mr Tushar Mehta, Former ASGI Mr Sanjay Jain, Sr. Advocate Dushyant Dave, Sr. Advocate, Mr Sidharth Luthra and Sr. Advocate Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Sr. Advocate Mr Sandeep Sethi among others. These experiences have been instrumental in shaping my advocacy skills and understanding the nuances of working in high-stakes matters.
Another pivotal experience has been representing Uttar Pradesh Power Transmission Corporation Ltd. in diverse cases which has deepened my knowledge about Electricity laws, including the landmark case before the Hon’ble Supreme Court in relation to indirect taxes (labour cess) BOCW act 1996. In this reported judgement, the Hon’ble Apex court clarified that an arbitration clause does not bar remedies under Article 226 of the Constitution, even in contractual disputes. This judgment not only set a significant precedent but also taught me the importance of navigating the interplay between constitutional remedies and arbitration law. This matter, widely reported in law journals and magazines, gave me invaluable exposure to litigating across various forums including APTEL (Electricity Tribunal) Hon’ble High Court of Allahabad and Delhi, as well as the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India.
However, what I have come to appreciate the most about my legal journey is witnessing the dynamic evolution of the law and the enactment of significant legislations that have shaped the legal landscape. As a legal professional, witnessing the enactment of the POCSO Act, 2012 and Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act, 2013 (post the Vishakha Judgement), was a significant victory for child and women protection in India. Prior to this legislation, child abuse cases were inadequately addressed under the Indian Penal Code, which was hugely challenging as a lawyer because the older legislations did not address the various violations that a child is subjected to. The significant changes in arbitration law, particularly with the introduction of the Arbitrationand Conciliation (Amendment) Act of 2015 and subsequent amendments have made the enactmentaligned with international best practices. This constant evolution of the law, responding to societal needs and global benchmarks, has been rewarding to engage with as a legal professional.
What inspired you to establish your own legal practice? Were there particular challenges you faced initially, and what factors led you to take the leap into starting your own practice?
Establishing my own legal practice was non-negotiable for me, inspired by my late father’s vision and the values he instilled in me. A successful chartered accountant with a thriving private practice in tax law since the 1970s, my father exemplified the principles of hard work, a client-centric approach, empathy in the profession, and the importance of autonomy over one’s work and time. Watching him navigate his career left a lasting impression on me and shaped my aspirations.
While I eventually established my practice, I spent the initial decade of my career in the corporate world, working with firms that primarily served North American and UK clients. This global and multidimensional experience not only broadened my perspective but also honed essential skills like professionalism, clear communication, and efficient case management. I learned how to create detailed case status reports, track deliverables meticulously, and meet international standards for client servicing—all of which have become integral to my practice today.
These early experiences also reinforced the importance of building a practice that balances professionalism with empathy, ensuring that every client feels supported and understood.
Of course, there are challenging days. Despite significant strides toward gender equality, women are not “heard” enough in court rooms and remain underrepresented in the judiciary and in senior positions within law firms. This makes persevering in the profession undeniably tough, as pressure to prove one’s competence is undeniably higher for women in the legal profession. As one counsel aptly noted, “the bar is higher for us.”
That said, true joy in accomplishment comes from overcoming challenges and obstacles along the way.
Furthermore, having an independent practice allows me the autonomy to manage my own cases while still engaging with Senior Advocates in high-stakes matters and collaborating with senior counsels on national-level cases. Working with such seasoned professionals not only enhances my legal knowledge but also underpins the importance of maintaining integrity, professionalism, and a commitment to excellence in every case I handle.
This balance has been instrumental in my growth, enabling me to learn from the best while building my own path and niche in the profession.
In criminal law, particularly in cases involving white-collar crimes or financial frauds, how do you approach these complex issues? Could you share a particularly fascinating case that stands out to you?
First and foremost, it’s important to acknowledge that white-collar crimes are rarely straightforward. They often involve intricate layers of collusion, procedural lapses, and complex legal issues. Successfully navigating these cases requires meticulous preparation, strategic foresight, and the ability to adapt to evolving circumstances.
My approach begins with a disciplined process that I refer to as the “discovery phase.” This phase involves an intensive discussion with the client to thoroughly understand the factual matrix, their position in relation to the case, and the specific grievances they are seeking to address and the relief they are seeking. Reviewing all relevant documents, transactions, and communications is critical to uncovering the core issues and formulating a strategy.
When representing clients who are apprehended or incarcerated, the approach shifts slightly. My co-counsels and I have often visited clients in custody to gather complete information directly from them. Each case depends significantly on the nature of the client’s involvement—whether they are the aggrieved party seeking relief or a defendant in need of defense. This tailored approach ensures that we build a robust case strategy aligned with the client’s needs and the complexities of the matter.
Additionally, I place great importance on revisiting the relevant acts and applicable laws for each matter. It’s a habit I’ve observed even among the most seasoned counsels, such as Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, who I have observed in court emphasize the value of studying the bare act every time. This practice ensures clarity and precision in interpreting the law. Equally important is studying landmark judgments from the Supreme Court and High Courts on critical aspects of white-collar crimes. These judgments provide valuable insights, particularly on issues such as interpretation, recording of statements, admissibility of evidence, and bail considerations for accused and co-accused individuals.
This foundational work is critical in developing a robust legal strategy that not only addresses the immediate legal issues but also advise the clients on their legal remedies safeguarding their best interests. Maintaining the highest ethical standards and client confidentiality is paramount in these cases
As a first-generation lawyer—and a woman in this field opportunities to handle high-stakes, complex cases have not always come easily. I have been fortunate to work under the guidance of some of the finest legal minds, including Mr. Shishir Prakash Advocate, a fourth-generation lawyer, whose mentorship has been instrumental in shaping my approach to white-collar crime and associated criminal matters.
One case that stands out in my career was a complex financial fraud involving embezzlement of hundreds of crores involving a deemed university from a reputed Bank. We represented the bank. The case was multifaceted, requiring us to address systemic collusion, navigate ongoing investigations, and safeguard the bank’s interests.
Representing the bank, we uncovered evidence of collusion, the potential influence of the university and the sluggish pace of the police investigation and advised filing a petition in the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court for a court-monitored investigation through an SIT. The investigation resulted in 24 individuals being charge-sheeted, including senior university officials.
A key challenge was addressing the banking principle that unauthorized payments obligate indemnification. We presented the unique circumstances to the RBI, which deferred any indemnification until the trial concluded. Notably, the university refrained from filing recovery claims. The HOD of the university challenged the charge sheet under Section 482 CrPC before the High Court, which rejected the plea in a detailed judgment. The order was further challenged before the Hon’ble Supreme Court, which dismissed the SLP and directed the trial court to frame charges and expedite proceedings. As a result, the SIT completed the investigation, and 24 individuals were charge-sheeted, including key officials.
This case was a masterclass in handling the complexities of white-collar crimes. It required navigating criminal liability, regulatory compliance, and the intersection of civil and criminal law. The outcome safeguarded the bank’s interests and underscored the importance of proactive measures by financial institutions in addressing fraud.
Most recently, my involvement in the Chhattisgarh money laundering Liquor Scam has been a highlight of my legal career. This case, of significant national importance, involves allegations of money laundering and corruption spanning multiple jurisdictions. Representing key stakeholders required navigating civil, criminal, and PMLA and PC Act domains while managing overlapping investigations by the Enforcement Directorate (ED), Economic Offences Wing (EoW), and State Task Force (STF). Assisting Senior advocates such as Ms. Meenakshi Arora and Mr. Yatin Oza on this case has evolved and sharpened my legal acumen and jurisprudence of bail law in PMLA cases significantly.
Having worked on intellectual property rights and cyber law matters, how do you perceive the increasing significance and challenges of these areas in the digital age?
In a country where internet usage is growing exponentially—with India leading in social media consumption—the next generation must be prepared to navigate digital challenges responsibly. Cyber fraud and scam have off late become alarmingly common, with even close friends and family members falling victim, losing significant sums to scams.
Adding a new layer to this discourse is the emergence of Artificial Intelligence (AI). AI has brought incredible possibilities but also complex legal and ethical questions. For instance, Justice Pratibha Singh, a sitting judge of the Hon’ble Delhi High Court and a distinguished IP lawyer in her practice days, recently held a training session for lawyers at the Delhi High Court wherein she raised a thought-provoking question: If AI creates an original work, would it be protected under intellectual property laws, and if so, who would own the rights—the programmer, the user, or the AI itself? These questions are at the forefront of today’s legal discourse.
That said, there are immense positives to the integration of technology and AI into the legal field. I recently presented a white paper titled “Reimagining Justice in the 21st Century: AI and the Future of Judicial Decision Making” at the Ad Meliora 5 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Law, and Ethics, organized by the Christ Academy Institute of Law, Bengaluru. In my paper, I explored how AI could enhance judicial processes by improving efficiency, accuracy, and access to justice. At the same time, I raised pertinent questions: Can AI replace the empathic and intuitive dimensions of human decision-making? How can we balance the potential of AI with the necessity for human oversight in the judicial process? This exploration highlighted the duality of technology as both a tool for progress and a source of complex challenges.
My practical experience aligns with these broader reflections. One notable example is my work on enforcing intellectual property rights in the case of Dr. Kumar Vishwas vs. Zomato India & Ors., where I represented Dr. Kumar Vishwas in a landmark moment of my career. The Delhi High Court permanently restrained Zomato from using his iconic poem, *Koi Deewana Kehta Hai*, without authorization, underscoring the critical importance of protecting creative rights in the digital age. Similarly, my work with artists and creators has reinforced the importance of safeguarding intellectual property in a rapidly evolving digital landscape. For instance, I represented a Dubai-based artist in a copyright infringement case involving an advertising campaign by a leading jeweller in the country. I am pleased to report that we successfully averted protracted litigation by resolving the matter amicably through an out-of-court settlement. There are several matters but the moot point is that there is an urgent need for vigilance and robust legal mechanisms to uphold their rights in an increasingly interconnected world.
My work in these areas extends beyond litigation to education and advocacy. For example, I have conducted workshops for children from Grade 6 through senior school, helping them understand their internet rights and responsibilities. Topics such as cyberbullying, online privacy, and digital safety are crucial, especially when young children and women are disproportionately affected by cybercrime. In my view, Legal studies, particularly focusing on cyber law, should be made a mandatory part of senior school curriculums. One of the things I strongly advocate for.
With your experience practicing in both the Supreme Court and High Courts, how does the litigation process differ when representing clients at the Supreme Court compared to High Courts or tribunals? Additionally, how do you prepare for complex cases involving constitutional writs and appeals in criminal cases?
Practicing in both the Hon’ble Supreme Court and the Hon’ble High Courts has been a fascinating journey, as each forum demands a unique approach. The Hon’ble Supreme Court, the top court in the country primarily deals with matters of constitutional importance and substantial questions of law, requiring arguments that are concise, strategic, and grounded in precedent.
One striking difference is the time allocated to argue cases. In the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, particularly in special leave petitions (SLPs), lawyers often have just a matter of minutes to present their case and make an impact. This means every word, every argument, and every reference must be meticulously planned to resonate with the bench. It’s a test of precision and clarity. In High Courts, however, one generally has more time to build and present the case, engaging more deeply with the factual matrix and legal nuances. Furthermore, for constitutional writs, the focus is on articulating fundamental rights violations and aligning the arguments with constitutional principles. Criminal appeals require a meticulous examination of trial records, focusing on procedural lapses, evidentiary errors, or any miscarriage of justice that warrants appellate intervention. In appeals from High Court judgments, a thorough examination of the judgment is essential. One cannot mechanically file appeals simply to satisfy a litigant’s demand or burden the courts unnecessarily—a practice that often exacerbates the issue of judicial backlog.
I must mention that the role of an Advocate-on-Record (AOR) in the Supreme Court is pivotal to the success of any case, as they bear the responsibility of not only filing pleadings but also ensuring compliance with procedural requirements and maintaining a strategic approach to case management. Working with an AOR like Mr. Mohit D Ram, who brings unparalleled expertise and insight to the table, has been an invaluable experience. Working with AOR Mohit has reinforced the power of collaboration—where a strong, cohesive team enhances efficiency, sharpens legal strategy, and ultimately drives success in complex cases.
Representing clients in the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India comes with heightened responsibility, as it is often their last avenue for seeking relief. There’s a significant emotional and professional weight to delivering results in this forum.
In bail matters, however, which directly impact an individual’s liberty, the urgency and gravity of the situation demand swift filing and a well-prepared case that convincingly demonstrates why bail should be granted regardless of the legal forum. Here, Articles 21 and 22 become central to ensuring that due process and personal freedoms are safeguarded.
My process is rooted in thoroughness and organization. I prioritize gathering detailed information from my clients, ensuring no critical fact is overlooked. This includes a meticulous examination of evidence, careful drafting of submissions, and pre-emptively addressing potential challenges. I believe that a strong foundation of facts and a clear legal strategy are indispensable for success in any matter.
Ultimately, each case, regardless of the forum, is an opportunity to contribute meaningfully to the pursuit of justice.
As someone actively involved in pro bono work for child rights organizations like Pratyek.org.in and ICCHR, can you share more about your contributions to child protection under the POCSO Act? What drives you to focus your legal expertise on social causes, and how do you balance pro bono work with your other professional responsibilities?
Balancing pro bono work with my other professional responsibilities requires careful planning and time management. I allocate specific hours each week to pro bono cases and ensure that my commitments to paying clients and high-stakes matters are met without compromise. It’s not always easy, but I’ve found that the sense of purpose and fulfillment I gain from pro bono work invigorates me and enhances my overall practice.
I am privileged to be on the panel of Pratyek.org.in as part of their child protection team, where I provide legal guidance and advice on cases of child sexual abuse under the POCSO Act. My contributions include assisting in navigating the complexities of these cases to ensure that children receive the protection and justice they deserve. Recently, I conducted a workshop on the United Nations General Comment 27, focusing on access to justice for children and its implications. It was an opportunity to highlight how justice systems can be made more inclusive and accessible for young people.
Additionally, I contributed to the endorsement of the Election Commission of India’s 2024 guidelines on children’s involvement in election processes. This initiative focused on safeguarding children’s interests and ensuring that their participation, directly or indirectly, aligns with ethical and legal standards.
I also regularly provide legal advice to women aggrieved by domestic violence, particularly those from modest socioeconomic backgrounds, such as domestic workers and staff. It is shocking to see how many women are unaware of their rights and continue to endure violence and abuse at home. Even something as fundamental as securing their Streedhan—a legal entitlement meant for their financial security—is often overlooked or denied, leaving them vulnerable and without recourse. So one can imagine the lack of awareness pertaining to legal rights in our country and across spectrums.
I make it a point to speak to young girls whenever I get the opportunity, educating them about their legal rights and the importance of empowerment. In October 2023, I was invited to a university to conduct a workshop on Women’s Autonomy.
My passion for these causes stems from a deep belief that access to justice is a fundamental right, not a privilege.
I also take up causes independently, advocating for change where I see injustice. In 2022, I noticed that CBSE required students to mandatorily mention their father’s name on the OMR sheet, disregarding the realities of single-parent households and in violation of ABC Vs. State (NCT of Delhi), AIR 2015 SC 2569, which emphasizes that the welfare of the child is paramount, and the father’s name is not mandatory to be mentioned. Recognizing the discriminatory nature of this requirement, I wrote to CBSE and the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR). The Education Cell of NCPCR promptly took cognizance of the issue and wrote to CBSE, urging immediate action. They highlighted the mandatory inclusion of the father’s name as discriminatory against children raised by single mothers and referenced the Hon’ble Supreme Court’s judgment. Acting on these directives, CBSE revised their OMR sheets promptly.
Under my pro bono work, I represented an RWA President before the UP Pollution Board and assisting the residents of Sector 50 noida in presenting the residents’ plea against the construction of an upcoming mall in a residential area. These efforts reflect my ongoing commitment to advancing justice, inclusivity, and community welfare.
Given the demanding nature of your practice and your involvement in multiple legal domains, how do you maintain a healthy work-life balance?
For me, maintaining mental health is not just intentional—it’s an occupational necessity!
This is an issue I’ve written about in my article published on SCC Online, “Are Women in Litigation Disproportionately Affected by Mental Health Concerns? Unpacking the Intersection of Women, Litigation, and Mental Health.” In the piece, I discussed how women, particularly in litigation, face unique mental health challenges due to systemic biases and the high-pressure environment. But this isn’t just about women—it’s about the legal profession as a whole.
The legal profession, by its nature, exposes us to stress and emotionally intense situations whether it’s dealing with traumatic case histories, high-stakes decisions, or simply the pressure to always be at our best. Lawyers and judges often carry the emotional weight of the cases they work on, yet we’re expected to maintain this veneer of resilience. That expectation can make it difficult to seek support or even acknowledge the toll it takes.
Recognizing this gap, I started The Inner Lawyer, a pro bono initiative on social media to raise awareness about mindfulness and mental health within the legal community.
Personally, I was fortunate that my father introduced me to Vipassana meditation during my teenage years, which laid the foundation for mindfulness in my life. Meditation, journaling, listening to classical music (both Indian and western) and moments of quiet reflection are parts of my routine.
Lately, I’ve discovered that humor is one of the most powerful remedies for stress. As lawyers, we spend most of our days with a frown, whether it’s dealing with the intricacies of case law or the pressure of clients or opposing counsels or facing adversarial courtroom situations. So, when a Judge or a Senior Advocate lightens up the mood, it’s a welcome relief! Given the gravity of our profession, not taking life too seriously is a valuable perspective. I also enjoy watching light-hearted shows and stand-up comedy—it’s a great way to unwind and decompress! Zakir Khan and Jimmy O. Yang are among my favourites.
For young legal professionals aspiring to build a diverse and broad legal career, what advice would you offer based on your own experience and journey?
For young legal professionals, especially the first generation lawyers aspiring to build a diverse and impactful career, my advice is rooted in three key principles: purpose, preparation, and perseverance.
First, define your why. Ask yourself why you want to pursue law and what drives you. Is it the allure of courtroom drama, the intellectual challenge, or a deep desire to make a difference? Your purpose will be your compass, guiding you through the highs and lows of this demanding profession.
Second, invest in preparation. Law is a discipline that thrives on knowledge and understanding. Cultivate critical thinking. Read widely—beyond legal texts. Literature, philosophy, and history provide context to human behavior and the societies we serve. Works by Charles Dickens, Fyodor Dostoevsky, and even contemporary writers like Shashi Tharoor have shaped my perspective, as much as the jurisprudence of Isaiah Berlin, Joseph Raz, and Catherine MacKinnon. Law is deeply intertwined with life; the more you understand the world, the better you’ll serve it. Also, engaging with their philosophies adds depth to a lawyer’s understanding and personality – both.
Third, cultivate perseverance. Success in law isn’t just about intelligence; it’s about grit and the willingness to keep going when the path gets tough. This profession demands long hours, emotional resilience, and the ability to stay calm under pressure. And here’s something many young lawyers get wrong—it’s not about being aggressive or raising your voice to make your point. The best advocates I’ve seen are composed, clear, and persuasive, winning arguments with substance, not volume. Respect for the bench, seniors, and the legal process is non-negotiable—these relationships and values will shape your growth as a professional.
Finally, as lawyers, especially in today’s conflict ridden world and escalating disputes, we need to rethink the role we play. The world now needs more mediators, problem solvers, and those committed to finding resolutions. And Lawyers have the unique privilege of truly making a difference in someone’s life. Imagine mediating a family dispute, helping a couple opt for an amicable divorce instead of a contentious one, or counselling clients to pursue peace rather than retribution. As lawyers, we must assess whether a matter truly belongs in litigation or if it can be resolved through mediation or negotiation.
Ultimately, an aggrieved party looks up to the judicial system for a speedy resolution, not just representation or protracted litigation. It is our duty as officers of the court to also counsel our clients and discourage frivolous and malicious litigation because that not only clogs an already overburdened judiciary but in my view is a disservice to the country and the justice system.
As Justice Krishna Iyer put it: “Law is meant to serve the living and does not beat its wing in the jural void.”
Find your purpose, prepare diligently, and persevere—because the impact of a good lawyer extends far beyond the courtroom.
With over 15 years of experience, could you take us back to your academic journey, beginning with your time at the Faculty of Law, Delhi University? What inspired you to pursue a career in law, and how did studying at Kyushu University in Japan influence your approach to the legal field, particularly in the realm of international law?
My academic journey began at the Faculty of Law, Delhi University, where I developed a strong foundation in legal principles and discovered my passion for corporate law. I was drawn to the field because of its potential to solve complex business challenges while fostering growth and compliance.
Studying at Kyushu University in Japan was a turning point. Immersing myself in a different culture and legal system enhanced my understanding of international law and cross-border transactions. It taught me the value of precision, discipline, and a global perspective, all of which continue to shape my approach to the legal field. These experiences have been instrumental in building my career and refining my ability to navigate both local and international legal landscapes effectively.
Throughout the early stages of your career, you worked at several esteemed law firms in both India and Japan. What key experiences did you gain during this time that were instrumental in shaping your career path and refining your skills?
Working at full-service law firms in India and Japan provided me with unparalleled exposure to high-stakes transactions and diverse legal frameworks. In India, the fast-paced environment of firms honed my ability to think critically under pressure, manage complex deals, and collaborate with multidisciplinary teams. The emphasis on precision and delivering results in time-sensitive scenarios taught me the importance of efficiency and client-centric solutions. In Japan, I was introduced to a meticulous approach to law, with a focus on structure, compliance, and cross-border considerations. This experience deepened my understanding of international legal systems and enriched my ability to navigate the nuances of global transactions.
One of the most valuable lessons I learned during this phase was the importance of adaptability. Moving between jurisdictions and working with culturally diverse teams sharpened my interpersonal skills and broadened my perspective on problem-solving. These experiences were pivotal in shaping my career and continue to influence my approach to delivering comprehensive legal solutions.
What led you to specialize in corporate law, with a particular focus on mergers and acquisitions (M&A)? Were there any pivotal moments or turning points that reinforced your decision to choose this specialisation and have a multi-jurisdictional M&A practice?
My interest in corporate law, particularly M&A, stemmed from the dynamic nature of the field and its significant impact on businesses and economies. Early in my career, I was drawn to the challenge of structuring complex transactions, negotiating deals, and solving intricate legal issues that arise in M&A.
A pivotal moment was my involvement in my first cross-border transaction. The experience of navigating differing legal systems, cultural nuances, and regulatory frameworks was both challenging and deeply rewarding. It reinforced my decision to focus on multi-jurisdictional M&A, as it allowed me to combine technical expertise with strategic thinking.
Over time, I’ve found this specialization to be uniquely fulfilling, as it requires a balance of legal acumen, commercial awareness, and adaptability—qualities I’m passionate about cultivating and applying to every deal I work on.
With your experience in both India and Japan, how have these distinct legal environments impacted your approach to transactional work? What specific skills or insights have you gained from each jurisdiction that you now apply in your practice?
Working in both India and Japan has given me unique insights into how different legal environments shape transactional work. In India, the legal landscape is dynamic and fast-paced, which has taught me to think quickly and manage complex, high-volume transactions. It has also emphasized the importance of flexibility and adaptability when dealing with diverse stakeholders and varying business practices.
In contrast, Japan’s legal system is highly formal and meticulous, with a strong focus on the process, detailed documentation and compliance. This experience deepened my understanding of the importance of process, precision, thoroughness, and risk mitigation, particularly in cross-border transactions.
Combining these experiences, I now approach multi-jurisdictional transactions with a well-rounded perspective, balancing the need for agility in India with the emphasis on structure and diligence in Japan. This allows me to tailor solutions to clients’ needs in a variety of legal environments.
In your current role, you’ve worked across various industries, from luxury retail to electric vehicles and defense. What unique challenges do international companies in the electric vehicle sector face when establishing operations in India? Can you share an especially memorable or complex case you’ve handled in any of these industries?
Working with clients from various industries is always very rewarding as each sector and industry comes with its own unique requirements, challenges and solutions.
International companies entering the electric vehicle (EV) sector in India face several unique challenges, primarily around regulatory complexities, market dynamics, and infrastructure. One key challenge is navigating India’s evolving regulatory framework, which is still in the process of developing clear policies for EVs, particularly around subsidies, taxation, and incentives. Companies must ensure compliance with various environmental and safety standards while also anticipating future changes in the regulatory landscape. Additionally, the EV market in India is still in its nascent stages, and all stakeholders must address infrastructure concerns, including limited charging stations and supply chain issues related to battery production. The growing competition within the sector also means that companies need to create intellectual property, adopt new technology, innovative business models and engage with local partners who understand regional market dynamics.
Given these challenges, companies often need to work closely with local government bodies, business partners, and regulatory experts to ensure smooth market entry. This collaborative approach helps in navigating the complexities of the Indian market, ensuring that businesses can align their operations with both local opportunities and challenges. Understanding the market’s long-term trends, such as the growing emphasis on sustainability and electric infrastructure development, can also help companies develop more effective strategies.
In one case, I worked with an international retail brand planning to expand into India. The challenge was navigating the complexities of India’s FDI (Foreign Direct Investment) policies, particularly in the retail sector, where there are specific regulations around multi-brand retail and sourcing requirements. The client was keen on setting up flagship stores across major cities, but we had to carefully craft the entry strategy to ensure compliance with the local sourcing norms and ensure alignment with the client’s global brand standards. We have had similar experience with clients in the defence industry which continues to be heavily regulated and the regulations are very dynamic in nature.
These cases reinforced the importance of understanding local regulatory nuances, market realities and working closely with clients to craft a strategy that aligns with both global standards and local requirements. Such transactions are challenging but are also extremely rewarding experiences for us as a firm.
In multi-jurisdictional transactions, clients often face challenges arising from conflicting laws and regulations across different countries. How do you navigate these complexities when advising on cross-border mergers, acquisitions, and expansions? Can you provide examples of particularly intricate deals you’ve worked on, and the strategies you used to manage these challenges?
Navigating the complexities of multi-jurisdictional transactions requires a deep understanding of the regulatory and legal frameworks across different countries, and reliable partner firms in foreign jurisdictions. Clients often face challenges when laws and regulations conflict or vary significantly between jurisdictions. My approach begins with a thorough analysis of the legal landscapes in each relevant jurisdiction to identify key regulatory issues, such as antitrust concerns, foreign investment laws, and sector-specific restrictions.
For instance, when advising on cross-border mergers or acquisitions, I prioritize coordinating with local counsel in each jurisdiction to ensure compliance with the laws specific to each region, while also considering the overarching strategic goals of the client. This collaboration helps in mitigating risks related to legal incompatibilities and ensuring that the deal structure accommodates the different regulatory requirements. I also work closely with tax advisors to address any cross-border tax implications, which can vary widely depending on the jurisdictions involved.
One particularly intricate deal which we have recently worked on involved an Indian client acquiring a company in Europe. The challenge was dealing with conflicting foreign investment regulations and structuring the deal to ensure compliance with India’s ODI policies while addressing the strict regulatory environment of both jurisdictions on foreign ownership in certain sectors. Additionally, both jurisdictions had different corporate governance practices that required us to align the deal structure with local laws while maintaining the client’s global operational standards.
To manage these challenges, we adopted a phased approach—first by ensuring all local regulatory approvals were obtained, followed by aligning governance structures, and then addressing the cross-border tax issues. The key strategy was to maintain a constant dialogue with local regulators and key stakeholders, ensuring that the deal complied with both local and international legal frameworks without compromising the client’s objectives.
Having worked in rapidly evolving sectors such as electric vehicles, IT, and new technologies, how do you stay ahead of emerging regulatory changes and the legal challenges facing these industries?
Staying ahead of emerging regulatory changes in fast-evolving sectors like electric vehicles, IT, and new technologies requires a proactive approach. The trick is to make it a priority to continuously monitor industry trends and legal developments, and engage with regulatory bodies and industry experts. This allows you to anticipate changes and advise clients on potential risks before they materialize. Additionally, it helps to collaborate closely with clients to understand their business strategies, ensuring that legal solutions align with both current regulations and future trends.
By remaining well-connected with industry networks and regulatory authorities, one can provide clients with timely, informed guidance that helps them navigate the legal complexities of emerging technologies and evolving markets.
Looking back on your career, what advice would you give to aspiring lawyers who wish to follow a similar path, especially those interested in gaining international experience and working across multiple legal systems?
Looking back on my career, the most important piece of advice I would offer to aspiring lawyers is to work hard, remain curious and open to new opportunities. Gaining international experience and working across multiple legal systems requires a deep commitment to learning and adaptability. My advice would be to seek out diverse experiences early on, whether through formal education, internships, secondments, or working with teams that handle cross-border matters. Exposure to different legal frameworks not only enhances your technical knowledge but also sharpens your ability to think strategically and solve complex problems. In addition, developing cultural awareness and building strong professional relationships in different jurisdictions is crucial. Working in multiple legal systems isn’t just about understanding the law; it’s about navigating the cultural nuances that influence business decisions and legal outcomes.
Finally, be patient and persistent. International experience often requires flexibility and the willingness to step outside your comfort zone. But with determination, you can develop a unique skill set that sets you apart and positions you to handle increasingly complex, multi-jurisdictional matters.
Given the demanding nature of your work across multiple legal domains, how do you manage your role at the firm and your personal obligations effectively? What do you do to unwind and relax?
Balancing the demanding nature of my work with personal obligations requires careful time management and setting clear priorities. At the firm, I ensure that I stay organized by structuring my day and breaking down complex tasks into manageable chunks, which helps me meet deadlines without compromising the quality of work. I also rely on effective delegation when appropriate, collaborating with colleagues to share the workload and maintain focus on key matters.
Outside of work, I prioritize personal time by setting boundaries and carving out space for activities that help me unwind. Whether it’s spending time with family, reading, or staying active at the gym, I find that these activities allow me to recharge and maintain a healthy work-life balance. I also try to schedule regular breaks throughout the day to avoid burnout and keep my energy levels up. Maintaining this balance is essential for long-term productivity and well-being.
With your vast experience and accomplishments in the legal field, could you share what initially sparked your interest in law? Was there a defining moment that led you to pursue this career, and what drew you specifically to specialize in intellectual property law?
The greatest reason or inspiration for taking up law was my maternal grandfather who came from a family having many generations of lawyers including his father and uncles. My grandfather was himself a lawyer by qualification but joined the Sales Tax Department and retired as Commissioner of Sales Tax, Government of Maharashtra. He was extremely passionate about law and on behalf of the Sales Tax Department, briefed and closely interacted with many distinguished lawyers of his time including the then Advocate General Mr. H. M. Seervai whom he deeply admired. The countless anecdotes he narrated to me and the zeal he had for the legal profession had a profound impact on me, unknowingly and when the time came for me to choose my profession, law came as a natural choice.
While Law was in the family, Music, Literature and Art also ran deeply in my family, my mother being a Hindustani Classical Vocalist and my grandmother, a vocalist, poet, playwright and writer. They would often participate in seminars on copyright in relation to the fields of music, literature and art. I would accompany them and listen to the sessions with great interest. That sparked my curiosity and by the time I completed my graduation in law, I found IP to be a fascinating and an ever-evolving subject having an application across industries and I was convinced to take it up as my field of specialization.
You began your career as an Associate with a law firm. What were some of the key experiences during this early phase that helped deepen your understanding of the law, especially intellectual property law, and laid a solid foundation for your expertise in this area?
I began my career with a full-service law firm Desai & Diwanji where I mainly worked on corporate and commercial transactions. My experience in intellectual property law began when I joined my present firm in the year 2008. Exposure to myriad cases in the areas of IP prosecution, legal advisory, contentious matters, anti-counterfeiting, IP transactions etc. involving different kinds of IP including trade marks, copyright, designs and some aspects of patents, right in the beginning of my tenure, gave me many opportunities to research, learn, resolve issues and deepen my understanding of the subject. Also, I firmly believe that there can be no substitute for hard work in laying a strong foundation, especially in the initial years of your career. I spent a lot of time reading, researching, studying the suggestions of my seniors and colleagues which I continue to do as learning is a never-ending process and updating yourself from time to time ensures you never feel complacent or stagnant.
Throughout your career, you have worked on complex IP transactions in industries such as media, entertainment, pharmaceuticals, and FMCG. What do you believe are the primary challenges businesses face when dealing with commercial transactions involving IP rights?
As for already existing IP of the parties involved, gaps in IP ownership, lack of proper documentation for securing IP rights, third party claims to IP, vulnerability of registered IP to revocation are some challenges seen in commercial transactions involving IP rights. Similarly, while negotiating strategic collaborations or service contracts, differentiating between already existing IP and IP generated under the contract, deciding upon an ownership structure for the IP generated out of such services or collaboration could be challenging.
Your experience spans both domestic and cross-border IP disputes. How do international IP issues differ from domestic ones?
IP disputes per se, such as infringement, passing off etc., governed by Indian laws and taking place in India may not have material differences only by reason of one of the parties being a foreign entity. However, where these disputes emerge from cross-border contracts governed by foreign laws and have elements of IP protectable or enforceable under Indian laws, there could be challenges. Similarly, when an Indian entity wishes to enforce its IP rights against a foreign entity for acts done outside India, foreign laws may apply. Although IP laws worldwide have many commonalities, they are not completely harmonized. Concepts of authorship, ownership of IP, infringement, exceptions to infringement, availability of overlapping protection under different types of IP laws such as Copyright & Designs or Trade Mark & Designs, subject-matter of trade marks, copyright, designs or patents (more so in light of emerging technologies) might vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Accordingly, these disputes may have different nuances.
Could you share your insights from handling domain name disputes under ICANN’s UDRP? In addition, what role does arbitration play in resolving international IP disputes, particularly within frameworks like the ICC?
The domain name dispute resolution process under ICANN’s UDRP is effective particularly when disputes arise out of cybersquatting or prima facie bad faith registration of domain names. In my experience, this process has been cost effective, expeditious and helpful especially where the adverse party is not located in India or where the registrant’s name and address is not disclosed by domain name registrars. Institutional arbitration, such as under the ICC Rules, plays an important role in resolving multi-jurisdictional / international IP disputes. However, these are typically disputes arising out of contracts and lawyers play a crucial role in informing the arbitrator (who may be qualified in laws other than the governing law of the contract) of nuances in the laws that are applicable to the dispute.
Intellectual property is often crucial in mergers, acquisitions, and private equity transactions. How do you ensure that IP rights are effectively safeguarded during these processes, and what is their role in such transactions?
Intellectual property is often the driving force for most acquisitions, mergers and collaborations. Effectively identifying IP, particularly unregistered IP, ensuring a proper and seamless transfer of all IP, registered or unregistered in favor of the acquirer, designing an efficient IP matrix in cases of joint IP ownership / collaboration, identifying third party contribution, claims or rights in IP creation and devising appropriate techniques to secure all IPR through documentation and statutory filings are some aspects to be considered during such transactions.
What advice would you offer to aspiring IP lawyers or those considering a career in intellectual property law? Also, could you share some resources or strategies you use to stay current with global legal trends, particularly in the IP domain?
To aspiring IP lawyers, I would like to say that IP is a fascinating subject having many dimensions and is ever evolving particularly with newer and emerging technologies. IPR is relevant across industries and with the growing awareness of IP, career opportunities in this field are increasing. You could choose sub-areas of your interest to practice such as IP prosecution, litigation or transactions and advisory. However, aiming for holistic exposure to various kinds of IP cases especially in the initial years will certainly help in the long run. Needless to say, like in any other field, hard work and a well-balanced approach helps one grow in the profession and also as an individual. These days there are several online platforms, newsletters, digital publications and media offering information and updates on IP related transactions and disputes, both domestic and international. There are also many subscription-based databases where one can find articles, copies of judgments and orders for detailed reading.
As one of the youngest and most innovative minds in your firm, looking back, do you feel that law was always your intended career path, or was there a particular experience or influence that steered you toward this profession? Looking back, I feel that law was always destined to be a part of my journey. As a fourth-generation lawyer, I was immersed in an environment where discussions about justice, strategy, and advocacy were part of daily life. While my parents never pressured me to pursue this path, the legacy of law within my family naturally drew me in.
My grandfather deeply inspired me, Mr. Krishna Gopal Bansal, and my father, Mr. Shravan Kumar Bansal, whose unwavering commitment to justice and innovation left a lasting impression on me.
Accompanying them to their office as a child, I was captivated by their meticulous approach to every case and the respect they garnered from peers and clients alike. These experiences shaped my understanding of the legal profession as more than just resolving disputes; it’s about shaping lives, empowering communities, and upholding justice.
This profound sense of purpose motivated me to embrace the profession wholeheartedly. Today, as one of the younger members of my firm, I strive to honor this legacy while bringing a fresh, innovative perspective to an evolving field. My goal is to bridge the richness of tradition with the dynamism of modern legal practice, creating a meaningful impact for those I serve.
What initially drew you to Intellectual Property Law, and what motivated you to pursue an LL.M. (Pro.) in this area? How has your specialization in IP law contributed to your professional growth and success?
My interest in Intellectual Property (IP) Law was rooted in both family legacy and a personal fascination with the intersection of creativity, innovation, and legal protection. My great-great-grandfather once advised my grandfather to delve into IP law, planting the seeds for what has become a multi-generational practice in our family. Growing up in this environment, I witnessed how IP law empowers creators, safeguards innovation, and fuels economic progress, sparking my own curiosity and passion for this field.
Pursuing an LL.M. (Pro.) in Intellectual Property Law was a natural step in deepening my expertise. The program offered me a comprehensive understanding of the intricate frameworks governing IP law, from international treaties to emerging trends and strategic enforcement mechanisms. It also broadened my perspective, exposing me to global practices and equipping me with the tools to address the complex challenges of a rapidly evolving domain.
Specializing in IP law has been a cornerstone of my professional growth. It has allowed me to collaborate with innovators, businesses, and creators, helping them protect their ideas and transform them into impactful realities. This focus has not only strengthened my legal acumen but has also enabled me to carve a unique niche in a competitive legal landscape. It continues to offer diverse opportunities to contribute meaningfully to the intersection of law, creativity, and innovation.
With your extensive experience handling IP-related matters, could you share your journey from Trainee Associate to Managing Associate? How have your roles evolved over time at United & United, and what key lessons from your early years have had the most lasting impact on you today?
My journey from Trainee Associate to Managing Associate at United & United has been enriching and transformative. As a Trainee Associate, I was introduced to the foundational aspects of intellectual property law—conducting meticulous research, drafting applications, and assisting in litigation. Those early years were instrumental in shaping my understanding of the field and building a strong work ethic.
As I progressed, my responsibilities evolved significantly. As an Associate, I began managing cases independently, engaging directly with clients, and devising strategies to address complex IP matters.
Transitioning to a Senior Associate role further broadened my perspective as I took on mentoring responsibilities and played a more active role in developing firm-wide strategies.
As a Managing Associate, I oversee teams, handle high-stakes IP portfolios, and contribute to the firm’s vision of fostering innovation and excellence. Each role has brought new challenges and opportunities for growth, allowing me to refine my skills and leadership abilities.
The key lessons from my early years have left an indelible impact. I carry everyday principles such as attention to detail, clear communication, and continuous learning. Most importantly, I’ve learned that building strong relationships—with clients, colleagues, and industry stakeholders—is the cornerstone of long-term success in the legal profession.
Having represented leading brands in trademark and design matters, how do you adapt your legal strategies for clients across diverse industries? What unique challenges do you face when protecting trademarks for fashion and consumer goods brands specifically?
Representing leading brands across diverse industries requires a deep understanding of not only the law but also the unique market dynamics and creative nuances of each sector. My approach involves tailoring legal strategies to align with the client’s business goals, market position, and competitive landscape. By immersing myself in the specific industry’s trends, challenges, and consumer behaviour,
I can craft solutions that resonate with the brand’s identity and long-term vision. When it comes to fashion and consumer goods brands, the challenges are particularly distinct. These industries thrive on creativity, rapid trends, and high consumer engagement, which make their trademarks and designs both highly valuable and vulnerable. Protecting trademarks in these sectors often involves addressing issues like counterfeit goods, fast-paced design replication, and maintaining exclusivity in a saturated market.
Additionally, fashion and consumer goods brands frequently operate on a global scale, requiring vigilance against cross-border infringement and navigating varying legal frameworks in different jurisdictions. The challenge lies in ensuring comprehensive protection while enabling the brand to evolve and expand without unnecessary legal constraints.
To address these challenges, I focus on proactive measures such as securing robust IP portfolios, continuous monitoring for potential infringements, and leveraging technology-driven tools for enforcement. I also prioritize fostering strong client collaboration, ensuring that my legal strategies not only protect their rights but also enhance their market presence and brand equity. Ultimately, my goal is to help clients thrive in their respective industries by ensuring their creative assets are safeguarded and strategically positioned for sustained success.
Your expertise in international trademark law is highly regarded. What challenges do you face when securing global brand protection for clients, and how do you manage cross-border trademark disputes or registrations? Can you share a particularly challenging case that tested your skills in this area?
Securing global brand protection involves navigating a complex web of legal frameworks, cultural nuances, and market-specific challenges. Each jurisdiction has its own set of laws, procedures, and timelines, requiring a tailored approach to ensure effective trademark registration and enforcement. One of the primary challenges lies in harmonizing these diverse legal standards while maintaining consistency in brand identity and protection strategies.
Cross-border trademark disputes further amplify the complexity. Issues such as conflicting trademark rights, bad-faith registrations, and parallel imports often arise, particularly in regions where trademark squatting is prevalent. Managing such disputes requires a combination of strategic foresight, meticulous research, and collaboration with local counsel to ensure compliance with jurisdiction-specific rules while aligning with the client’s global objectives. One particularly challenging case that tested my skills involved securing a global trademark for a tech company launching an innovative product line. The brand name faced conflicting registrations in multiple key markets, including the U.S., Europe, and parts of Asia, where trademark squatters had preemptively filed for similar marks.
The case required not only legal acumen but also diplomatic negotiation skills to resolve disputes amicably and cost-effectively. In some jurisdictions, we pursued opposition proceedings and cancellation actions, leveraging evidence of bad faith and non-use. In others, we negotiated coexistence agreements to establish boundaries for trademark usage while protecting our client’s interests. Meanwhile, we implemented a robust monitoring system to prevent future infringements and bad-faith filings. This case underscored the importance of proactive planning, thorough due diligence, and creative problem-solving.
By strategically combining legal action with negotiation, we successfully secured the brand’s global footprint, enabling the client to launch their product line seamlessly. Ultimately, challenges in international trademark law demand a balance of legal expertise, strategic adaptability, and cultural sensitivity. My experience in this field has honed my ability to address these complexities while ensuring clients’ brands are well-positioned to thrive in the global marketplace.
Given that IP law is constantly evolving, how do you see the Indian legal landscape adapting to global changes? What is your opinion on the effectiveness of initiatives like the AI and ML-based Trademark Search Technology and IP Saarthi launched by the CGPTM and DPIIT?
Intellectual Property law is inherently dynamic, evolving in response to technological advancements, global trade practices, and the increasing significance of intangible assets. As a rapidly growing economy and innovation hub, India is adapting well to these global changes by modernizing its IP framework and aligning with international best practices.
Initiatives like the AI and ML-based Trademark Search Technology and IP Saarthi, launched by the CGPTM and DPIIT, are commendable steps toward enhancing the efficiency and accessibility of the Indian IP system. For instance, the AI and ML-based Trademark Search Technology has significantly streamlined the trademark registration process, reducing the time and effort required for preliminary searches. It reflects a forward-looking approach, leveraging technology to address challenges like backlog and accuracy in trademark examinations.
IP Saarthi, aimed at creating awareness and guiding stakeholders, can bridge the gap between innovators and the IP system, particularly benefiting startups and small businesses. It underscores the government’s commitment to fostering an IP-friendly environment by empowering creators with knowledge and resources.
While these initiatives are promising, their effectiveness will depend on consistent updates, widespread adoption, and adequate stakeholder training. The continued integration of advanced technologies and robust policy frameworks will ensure India remains competitive globally. As someone deeply invested in this field, I am optimistic about the transformative potential of these initiatives and look forward to seeing their long-term impact on the Indian IP landscape.”
In addition to your legal practice, you contribute to the legal community through seminars, publications, and mentoring. How do you view the role of legal education in advancing trademark law, and what advice would you give to young lawyers who want to specialize in this field? Can you also share some resources that students can refer to for staying updates on the latest legal trends in IP?
I firmly believe in the transformative power of knowledge, particularly in advancing trademark law and strengthening the intellectual property (IP) ecosystem. Education plays a crucial role not only in shaping the next generation of IP professionals but also in empowering key stakeholders to safeguard the rights of creators and businesses effectively. To that end, my team and I actively organize seminars, webinars, and training sessions, particularly for customs authorities and police personnel. By equipping them with a thorough understanding of IP law, we enable them to play a vital role in enforcing brand protection and combating counterfeiting. These efforts help ensure that government authorities are well-prepared to uphold the rights of brand owners. Equally important is our engagement with students and young lawyers who are eager to specialize in intellectual property law. Through mentorship programs, guest lectures, and interactive workshops, we aim to inspire and guide them to explore the immense opportunities within the IP sector. This field is not only a cornerstone of innovation and creativity but also a driver of economic growth in an increasingly knowledge-based global economy.
To young lawyers aspiring to specialize in trademark law, my advice is threefold:
Develop a Solid Foundation: Master the basics of IP law, including trademarks, patents, copyrights, and designs, as well as the intricacies of jurisdiction-specific regulations.
Stay Curious and Updated: IP law is constantly evolving due to technological advancements and globalization. Stay informed about new legal precedents, international treaties, and emerging trends in industries like AI, fashion, and technology.
Cultivate Practical Skills: Beyond academic knowledge, focus on skills like negotiation, litigation, and client management, which are crucial in real-world practice.
For students seeking resources to stay updated, I recommend:
WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization): A treasure trove of international IP resources, reports, and case studies.
IP Blogs and Journals: Resources like SpicyIP, LiveLaw, barandbench and Manupatra are a great source of IP Blogs, case studies and latest news.
Professional Networks: Engaging with IP-focused organizations like INTA (International Trademark Association) or participating in IP-related conferences is invaluable for networking and learning.
Books: Fostering the habit of regularly reading case laws, bare acts, and staying updated with the latest news is essential for delving deeper into the field of IP law.
By fostering knowledge at all levels—whether among government authorities, businesses, or students—I aim to contribute to a stronger and more secure IP ecosystem where brands, innovation, and creativity can flourish.
As the Managing Associate at your firm, you likely have significant responsibilities. How do you maintain a steady workflow while also balancing personal commitments and obligations?
As the Managing Associate at my firm, maintaining a steady workflow while balancing personal commitments requires a combination of organization, discipline, and clear prioritization. The key to managing both professional and personal obligations lies in setting realistic expectations and creating structured routines. In my professional role, I rely on effective time management tools and techniques, such as setting clear daily goals, prioritizing tasks based on urgency, and delegating where possible. This allows me to stay on top of deadlines, manage client expectations, and contribute to the growth of the firm. However, I also understand the importance of personal time for overall well-being and productivity.
I ensure that I set boundaries by dedicating time for personal commitments, whether it’s spending time with family, pursuing hobbies, or maintaining a healthy lifestyle. I’ve learned that balance doesn’t come from overloading one aspect of my life but by managing them in harmony. Maintaining this equilibrium also requires flexibility; there are days when work demands more time, and other days when personal priorities take precedence. What’s most important is remaining adaptable and staying grounded in both my professional goals and personal values. Ultimately, by fostering a disciplined approach to work and committing to self-care, I’ve found a rhythm that supports both my professional aspirations and personal happiness.
As a first-generation lawyer, what inspired you to pursue law as a career? Were there specific moments or experiences that motivated you to take this path?
As a first-generation lawyer, my journey into law was driven by a deep sense of purpose to stand up for justice and help those in need and underprivileged. I lost my father at the age of 16 which was a transformative moment for me personally. It taught me the value of resilience and perseverance, hard work and determination which eventually became guiding principles in my life.
To be honest, I initially aspired to become an actor or a journalist, as I have always been a creative and artistic person with a deep appreciation for creative pursuits and finer things in life.I remember that in school days we used to perform street Theatre in Association with “Jan Natya Manch”(Founded by Safdar Hashmi), Yuva Ekta Foundation(An initiative of Tehelka) for social causes and spreading awareness like Child Labour, Education and its importance, HIV, Corruption, Right to Information, Right to Education, Child marriage to name a few. I always wanted to do something for the society and I did not want to just stop at spreading awareness but also wanted to empower the underprivileged, give them a voice and make a difference in our society.
The vast experience I gathered from interacting with people from all walks of life and looking at their lives and challenges closely, coupled with the unwavering support of my mother and brothers, instilled in me a sense of purpose and determination to carve out my own path in the legal field. It would not have been possible without my family which is my biggest strength.
I believed I possessed the necessary skills that this profession demands and once introduced to courts and law as a field I felt a deep sense of belonging within the courts. This made law the ideal profession for me to channel my passion and drive to create a meaningful impact in society.
In the early stages of your career, you likely encountered both valuable learning opportunities and challenges. Can you share some key experiences that helped you build a strong foundation in law and influence your career path?
The initial years of my legal career were pivotal in shaping my understanding of the profession. I had the privilege of working under some of the most accomplished legal minds, each of whom contributed significantly to my growth. Starting in the chambers of Senior Advocate K.K. Manan provided me with a solid grounding in criminal law. During my time there, I learned the essentials of court craft and the nuances of legal practice, which played a crucial role in helping me overcome my initial hesitation in appearing before the High Court. This early exposure instilled confidence and prepared me for the challenges of litigation.
Later, my time with Mr. J Ajay Digpaul (before his elevation) and Ms. Arti Bansal allowed me to represent the Union of India/Central Government in significant High Court matters, further refining my skills in drafting, argumentation, and handling complex procedural frameworks. Working with them deepened my understanding of litigation and advocacy, while also reinforcing the importance of meticulous preparation and clarity in legal reasoning.
A defining phase of my career was working with my mentor, Mr. Saurabh Prakash, a disciple of the revered Shri Paramhansa Yogananda and an accomplished IIT Kanpur graduate in Chemical Engineering who transitioned to law. Under his guidance, I gained insights into diverse practice areas, including civil disputes, employment law, and writ petitions and diverse disputes including a Fake encounter case. He emphasized the importance of thorough preparation, reading files meticulously, conducting in-depth research, and crafting well-drafted pleadings, which he often described as the backbone of any case. During this period, I had hands-on experience drafting writ petitions, suits, SLPs, and contracts, among working on other diverse cases.
What truly stood out about Mr. Prakash was his unwavering commitment to maintaining the highest level of morals and ethics in the practice of law. He not only emphasized these principles but lived by them, setting an example for those under his guidance. He frequently reminded me to “always take the longer route in approaching a case, don’t look for shortcuts. While it may take more time, the learning it brings is invaluable.” This philosophy has been instrumental in shaping my approach to legal practice and my outlook on the profession.
Before entering the profession, I received valuable advice from a Judicial Officer, now a High Court Judge, who emphasized the importance of mastering civil law, drafting, and research before delving into criminal law. This guidance helped me lay a strong foundation for my career. Additionally, during a judicial internship with a now-retired judge of the Delhi High Court, I had the rare opportunity to view cases from the bench’s perspective. This experience gave me a deeper understanding of judicial reasoning and the critical role of precision and clarity in legal arguments.
These formative experiences taught me to approach every case with diligence, empathy, and unwavering integrity, laying the groundwork for a career defined by commitment to excellence and ethical practice.
After gaining significant experience with various law firms, what prompted you to establish your own practice? What were the driving forces behind this decision, and what challenges did you face when starting out?
Establishing KG Law Offices was born out of a desire to serve clients with a personalized and solution-driven approach. I wanted to build a space, a niche for myself that reflected my principles, provided personalized legal solutions, and addressed clients’ challenges with integrity and commitment and while having a relief-oriented approach.
Truth be told, starting out on my own and establishing independent practice was not without its hurdles, I literally had not many cases or briefs when I decided to go independent! While there were many raised eyebrows and my friends and colleagues being apprehensive about the step being too early to start out on my own , I was determined and had faith in God and myself. I just kept going on one day at a time.
There were significant challenges; right from building a client base, making a place for yourself, generating enough money to sustaining the practice, earning trust as a first-generation lawyer in this highly competitive environment, getting recommendations which I faced and had to overcome by sheer hard work and having a client centric and relief-oriented approach and needless to say delivering results and relief to clients.
The driving force behind this decision were all these experiences which reinforced my determination to carve a niche and create a firm where professionalism, empathy, and excellence guide every decision.
In this odyssey of self-discovery and finding my calling, I must say that every step of it has been equally humbling and rewarding, allowing me to contribute meaningfully to the profession and society which gives me a sense of satisfaction and fulfilment. I do not have any regrets or would not want to have it any other way.
This is one of my favourite quotes I live by !“Be Among Those who dare to follow their dreams”
Over the years, you’ve represented high-networth individuals (HNIs), NRIs, and international corporations. Could you share one of the most memorable cases and the strategies you employed to achieve successful outcomes?
One of the most memorable cases I handled involved an intellectual property rights dispute related to the works of a revered spiritual figure associated with one of the most prestigious Ashrams or monastic orders. This case was complex, as it spanned multiple jurisdictions and involved overlapping Indian laws, including personal laws, intellectual property rights law, and international law. Additionally, there was a critical need to balance the protection of intellectual property with the sensitivity of cultural and religious considerations, especially since the dispute had international implications.
A particularly valuable aspect of this case was the opportunity it gave me to engage closely with the lives of Sanyasis and Monks, allowing me to gain insights into their practices and teachings. This personal experience enriched my understanding of the subject matter and gave me a deeper appreciation of the spiritual context in which the legal dispute arose.
The complexity of the case was heightened by the fact that the legal framework governing Sanyasis, Monks, and Sadhus is relatively limited, especially when it comes to intellectual property disputes. The dispute was not related to immovable property, which is more commonly associated with religious institutions, but rather to intellectual property rights. In this context, the Sri Krishna Singh vs. Mathura Ahir case (1979) –AIR 1980 SUPREME COURT 707 which became the locus classicus on the laws concerning Sadhus, Yatis, and Sanyasis – proved to be pivotal. This landmark judgment of the Supreme Court of India extensively discusses various aspects of the legal status of Sanyasis and Yatis, and it provided critical guidance on how to approach cases involving religious figures and their intellectual property rights.
The decision of the Apex Court in Mathura Ahir became essential in shaping our strategy, as it was a key reference point for understanding the legal standing of the individuals involved and their rights. The judgment clarified multiple legal aspects that were directly relevant to our case, including the succession and rights of Sanyasis, and it provided invaluable precedents for addressing the unique challenges we faced.
The strategy we employed was comprehensive and meticulous. It involved in-depth legal research, careful documentation, and the alignment of the client’s objectives with the applicable laws. Our approach also emphasized clear communication and teamwork, with each team member contributing to the development of a strong case.
This case and how we evolved the strategy regarding the said case was a testament to the importance of hard work, thorough legal preparation, and collaboration. It underscored how a deep understanding of the legal and cultural context, coupled with a strategic use of relevant case law can resolve the most complex and sensitive legal matters.
It was a collaborative effort, where clear communication and attention to detail played a critical role. The successful resolution of this case reinforced my belief in the importance of clear communication, hard work, meticulous preparation, and team work.
You have handled cases for various clients, including public sector undertakings (PSUs). Can you describe a particularly complex issue you’ve dealt with while representing PSUs, and how does your approach differ in dealing with private clients?
One of the more challenging cases I handled for a PSU involved coordinating with multiple departments spread across different states, each with its own set of processes and jurisdictional hurdles. It was a test of patience and persistence, as aligning everyone on the same page while ensuring all legal and procedural requirements were met was no small task.
What made it particularly complex was managing the flow of communication between the PSU’s central office, regional branches, and external parties, all while adhering to tight timelines and keeping in mind the courts directives. To navigate this, I relied on a systematic approach, breaking the problem into manageable parts, using technology to stay organized, and maintaining open and frequent communication with everyone involved.
Ultimately, we achieved a favorable outcome, and the experience taught me the value of teamwork, clear communication, and strategic planning when representing organizations with such intricate structures. It’s cases like these that remind me how important it is to approach such cases with a steady hand and a collaborative mindset and how paying attention to detail becomes crucial.
Working with PSUs often involves a more structured and procedural approach. There are layers of approvals, formalities, and timelines that require careful management. On the other hand, private clients usually expect faster, more flexible, and tailored solutions. With private clients, it’s about being agile and adapting strategies to their specific needs, while with PSUs, it’s about patience, meticulous planning, and ensuring that everything aligns with institutional frameworks.
Each approach has its own challenges, but both have taught me to balance efficiency with attention to detail, which is essential in delivering the best outcomes.
In addition to your legal practice, you’re involved in social causes. Can you tell us more about your work with organizations like Jan Natya Manch and Yuva Ekta Foundation, and how you use your influence to raise awareness of important social issues?
My involvement with Jan Natya Manch, founded by the late Safdar Hashmi, was one of the most enriching experiences of my life. Under the guidance of Moloyshree Hashmi, I performed street plays addressing critical social issues like child labor, education, HIV awareness, corruption, the Right to Information, and child marriage, among others. Similarly, my association with the Yuva Ekta Foundation, an initiative of Tehelka Magazine, allowed me to connect with young minds and raise awareness about pressing societal concerns while pursuing my creative passions.
During my college years, I continued to explore my artistic side, performing in street theatre and full-length drama productions. I even ventured into professional acting and worked on a few ad films. However, as I approached the completion of my studies, I realized that my true calling was in the legal field. The sense of purpose and belonging I felt in courts and within the legal profession inspired me to fully dedicate myself to this path. Over the years, my passion and admiration for the field have only deepened.
As a legal professional, I firmly believe that our responsibility extends beyond the courtroom. Advocacy isn’t just about arguing cases—it’s about raising awareness and inspiring change in the society we serve. My involvement with these organizations was an expression of that belief.
Recently, my legal team and I worked on a significant case against a renowned educational institution in Delhi that had unlawfully expelled 30 students belonging to the Economically Weaker Section (EWS) category. We secured a favorable interim order, ensuring the students’ reinstatement. The judgment not only upheld the rights of these children under the Right to Education (RTE) Act but also sent a strong message to all schools in Delhi about the sanctity of a child’s right to education. No one should be denied their right to education—it’s a fundamental and valuable right that must be protected at all costs.
Such cases reaffirm my belief in using the law as a tool to bring about meaningful societal change and to stand up for those whose voices often go unheard.
Having faced numerous challenges along your journey, what keeps you motivated to continue striving for excellence in your legal career and contributing to the legal community?
My motivation comes from a deep sense of responsibility toward my clients and the legal profession. Throughout my journey, I have faced numerous challenges, but fortunately with the unwavering support of my mother and two elder brothers, and the blessings of my late father. Their encouragement, combined with the mentorship of individuals like Mr. Saurabh Prakash, has played a pivotal role in shaping my career due to which I was able to overcome these adversities and pursue my passion for law, charting my own path.
My family, faith, and mentors provide constant strength and guidance. An ardent devotee of Lord Shiva, I attribute my strength and success to my mother, my family, my guru (Shivji), my late father’s blessings, and the invaluable mentorship of Mr. Saurabh Prakash.
I find immense inspiration in knowing that my work can bring tangible relief and justice to my clients. Whether it involves mentoring young lawyers, addressing societal inequities, or advocating for those in need, every success reaffirms my dedication to the principles of fairness, integrity, and service.
This blend of professional purpose and personal fulfillment fuels my determination to continue growing and making a positive impact on both the legal profession and the community at large
With nearly a decade of experience, how do you foresee the future of the legal profession, particularly with the rise of technology? What steps are you taking to adapt to these changes?
Technology is transforming the legal landscape, making processes more efficient and accessible. At KG Law Offices, we embraced digitization early, moving away from traditional diaries to digital case management systems a long time ago, that is much before COVID, therefore we have evolved a system of case management of our own and don’t need expensive “Case management” Softwares and tools. We have leveraged technology and use Tools like e-filing, cloud storage, Digitization of case files and paperless operations. Some of the steps like “Efiling”,”Digital e- inspection” and “Video conferencing have really increased productivity and have showcased transparency and accountability but these are just limited to the metro cities and not remote areas of our country which are in dire need of a robust justice dispensation system and lack basic infrastructure. Its surprising that while we live in Metro cities and we see courts being digitised and everything available on a click of button, the remote areas and the rural areas are deprived of even basic infrastructure and are still in the archaic era and leveraging technology In such areas can really bring in a lot of progress and change the whole scenario.
While AI and automation are valuable tools, it is important to recognize their limitations. However, technology can only complement human intervention, it cannot replace the insight and empathy lawyers bring to their work. For instance, AI can streamline research but lacks the nuanced judgment required in legal decision making. We are committed to using technology responsibly to enhance transparency and accountability while ensuring that the human element remains at the forefront. Our goal is to use these advancements not just for operational efficiency but also to contribute to a more inclusive and effective legal system, bridging the digital divide
What advice would you give to aspiring lawyers, particularly those from non-legal backgrounds, who wish to follow a career path like yours? Additionally, could you recommend any resources that help them stay informed about the latest developments and trends in the legal field?
Aspiring lawyers, particularly those from non legal backgrounds, should approach the legal profession with patience, perseverance, and a deep commitment to continuous learning. Establishing oneself in this field requires resilience and a long term vision, much like planting a bamboo tree, which takes years to grow strong roots before it flourishes. Similarly, the initial 3-5 years in law are crucial for laying a solid foundation, building skills, and understanding the nuances of the profession.
It is important to acknowledge that practicing law can be challenging, especially for those without financial support. The profession often demands a substantial investment of time and effort before yielding tangible rewards. Salaries for fresh graduates are often modest, and the competition in the legal field is intense, with a significant increase in the number of practicing lawyers over the years. However, these challenges should not deter determined individuals from pursuing their dreams. With dedication, strategic planning, and a genuine passion for justice, success is achievable.
For those starting their journey, Staying up to date with Judgments , reading Judgments delivered by the Supreme Courts and High Courts of our country readily available on websites is an excellent resource for honing skills and staying informed about recent developments in law, you need not have expensive subscriptions to reporters , you can also effectively use the Libraries of the courts which are well equipped these days. Additionally, reading case law regularly, attending legal seminars, participating in moot courts, and engaging with experienced mentors can provide invaluable insights and most importantly being mindful of your company and who you hang out with also matters a lot. Aspiring lawyers should also focus on cultivating soft skills such as communication, negotiation, PR skills, client counselling, critical thinking, which are indispensable for a successful legal career.
Most importantly, never lose faith in your ability to make a difference, no matter your background. The legal profession is one of service and impact. Stay grounded, work hard, and remember that your integrity and dedication to the cause of justice will define your legacy in this noble profession. One should approach the profession with humility and a sense of service. Remember that our work is about helping people and assisting the courts as we are officers of the court and a crucial part of the justice dispensing system, it is not just about winning cases or making money solely.
Aspiring lawyers must always remember that integrity and principles are the foundation of this profession. Never compromise on your character or values for material gains, this is the golden thumb rule I firmly believe in and follow.
I have a guiding philosophy which I have devised and live by, which emphasizes not only professional success but also the ethical conduct and higher purpose of the legal profession.
As per me broadly speaking, the cases a lawyer handles can be categorized into three types, each serving a distinct purpose and contributing to one’s growth:
Cases for Name and Reputation: These cases, in essence, translate to “Ek kaam naam ke liye karo”—One of the goals is to work for reputation and recognition. These are cases that may not bring immediate financial rewards but provide unparalleled exposure and recognition. Handling such matters puts you in the spotlight, allowing you to showcase your talent and build credibility. I always advise aspiring lawyers that you could be the most talented individual, but without a platform and opportunity, your abilities might remain unnoticed. Moreover, as I often say, “Your network is equal to your net worth.” Lawyers must develop excellent PR skills to build connections and relationships in the profession.
Cases for a Cause or Pro Bono Work: These cases, as I see them, translate to “Ek kaam seva ke liye karo kisi ki madad ke liye”– work for service and for making a difference. Taking on cases to help those who are in need and are underprivileged without expecting financial compensation, is one of the most fulfilling aspects of this profession.The exposure and sense of fulfillment that comes from empowering someone through legal support are unmatched. Pro bono work reminds us of the higher calling of our profession—to seek justice and uplift the underprivileged.
Cases for Financial Empowerment : These cases translate to “Ek kaam paise ke liye karo”—work to earn and build your financial independence. While name and service are important, financial independence is equally vital. Handling cases that offer significant monetary compensation empowers you economically and boosts confidence, especially for first-generation lawyers. There is no greater joy than being self-made and financially secure. This is why I encourage young lawyers to begin accepting briefs even while working under a senior, provided the senior is supportive. I also urge mentors and seniors to provide opportunities to the younger generation, as it helps them grow professionally and personally.
Balancing these three types of cases in your career ensures not only professional growth but also personal satisfaction and a meaningful contribution to society. As lawyers, we must aim to uphold the nobility of our profession, maintaining a fine balance between serving others, earning a livelihood, and building a reputation that lasts a lifetime.
You have a varied educational background, beginning with a B.A. from Delhi University and later pursuing a law degree at Law College Dehradun. What prompted you to transition to a career in law?
My journey from Delhi University to Law College Dehradun was driven by a deep-seated desire to make a meaningful impact on society. While pursuing my B.A., I was captivated by the dynamics of governance, human rights, and justice systems. Law became the natural path to combine my academic interests with my aspiration to serve. It’s a profession that allows you to challenge societal injustices while empowering others—a responsibility I have always embraced with great passion.
You have worked as an Advocate and Legal Researcher in various courts in Delhi and Haryana, as well as with the Human Rights Commission, Tribunals, and Consumer Forums during your initial years of practice. What were the key learning experiences that shaped your career?
Those early years were transformative. Working across courts, commissions, and tribunals taught me the power of resilience, precision, and empathy in legal practice. I learned that every case, no matter how small, represents a life impacted by law. From drafting intricate arguments to navigating complex human rights cases, each experience honed my ability to analyze issues critically and offer pragmatic solutions. These formative years also reinforced my commitment to justice as more than a principle—it became my purpose.
You served as the Court Manager and CPIO at the National Green Tribunal (NGT) for six years. Could you share with our readers how you obtained that role and what your experiences were like working for a government organisation like the NGT?
My role at the NGT was a significant milestone. I was selected based on my judicial experience and my proficiency in legal administration. At the NGT, I had the privilege of streamlining court operations, managing Right to Information (RTI) requests, and contributing to the Tribunal’s mission of ensuring environmental justice. Working in a government organization taught me the value of efficiency, collaboration, and innovation in addressing urgent environmental issues. It was a rare opportunity to be at the intersection of law, governance, and sustainability.
With 14 years of diverse experience across various fields, you have also worked as a Teaching Associate (Law) at LBSNAA in Mussoorie, Uttarakhand. What inspired you to pursue a career in academia, and do you have plans to return to teaching in the future?
Academia is where knowledge meets inspiration. My tenure at LBSNAA allowed me to shape the legal perspective of future civil servants, which was immensely rewarding. Teaching is a two-way process—you give, but you also learn. It inspired me to think deeply about the evolution of law and its practical application. While my current focus is legal practice, I remain passionate about academia and hope to return to teaching, as empowering young minds is one of the most impactful ways to contribute to society.
Could you share your preparation strategies that helped you crack the Rajasthan Judicial Services Exam and become a Civil Judge and Metropolitan Magistrate?
Success in judicial services exams is not about rote memorization but mastering the art of analysis. I approached my preparation with a structured plan, focusing on understanding core legal concepts, landmark judgments, and procedural nuances. Consistent revisions, daily answer writing, and solving previous years’ papers were my pillars of preparation. I also cultivated a habit of staying updated with contemporary legal developments, as awareness of real-world issues is crucial for anyone aspiring to the judiciary.
Serving as a Judicial Officer in the Rajasthan Judicial Services must have been a challenging role, dealing with various court-related matters. What was the most challenging experience in that position of authority that you’d like to share with our readers?
One of the most profound challenges I faced was adjudicating emotionally charged family disputes. These cases are not just about applying laws; they require a delicate balance of empathy, fairness, and legal reasoning. As a Judicial Officer, every decision carries immense weight, impacting lives and shaping perceptions of justice. Those moments taught me the true meaning of responsibility and the need to approach every case with integrity and compassion.
After working as a Judicial Officer for three years, what led you to leave the Judicial Services to establish your own practice at the Supreme Court, handling civil, criminal, and service matters?
My transition from the judiciary to independent practice was guided by a desire to explore broader legal challenges and contribute to precedent-setting cases. The judiciary taught me the importance of impartiality and due process, which I now bring to my practice at the Supreme Court. Handling civil, criminal, and service matters allows me to address complex legal issues while advocating for justice on behalf of individuals and institutions alike. This shift has been deeply fulfilling, as it allows me to combine my judicial insights with advocacy.
What advice would you give to young aspirants who wish to pursue a successful career in law and Judicial Services?
To all aspiring lawyers and judicial officers: Stay curious, stay committed, and never lose sight of your purpose. Master the fundamentals of law, but also nurture qualities like resilience, empathy, and adaptability. For judicial aspirants, focus on clarity of concepts, regular practice, and an unwavering belief in yourself. Remember, this profession demands hard work, but it also offers unparalleled opportunities to make a difference. Always strive to serve justice with integrity, and success will follow.
Considering your background and early life experiences, how did those factors shape your understanding of the role of law in society and what made you eventually decide to pursue a career in law? Was there a specific event, experience, or person that influenced your decision to enter the legal profession?
I was the quintessential mischievous kid—the kind who was always on a teacher’s radar for all the wrong reasons. Academically, I was average, but I had a natural flair for connecting with people and forming relationships. I credit my family for seeing beyond the chaos and recognizing that my energy could be channelled into something meaningful and encouraged me to pursue law.
Coming from a business family with no legal background, I became a first-generation lawyer—a leap into the unknown. Stepping into the legal profession felt like finding the missing piece of a puzzle. The law, with its vast landscape and limitless opportunities for growth, resonated with me. It wasn’t just a career; it became a calling. Law, with its endless possibilities and avenues for growth, gave me hope that I could use my abilities to carve a small space for myself in this landscape.
During the initial phase of your career, you handled disputes for major corporate clients. Could you share some of the formative experiences that enhanced your understanding of the law and helped you to enhance your career trajectory?
I was fortunate enough to have worked with reputed litigation law firms throughout and have a diverse start in my career, experiencing the depths of civil, criminal, and commercial law. However, I sincerely believe that it was not just the big-ticket cases or influential clients that defined my journey—it was the groundwork, the nuts and bolts of practice and procedure, that shaped me.
I made it a point to immerse myself in the procedural workings of courts and tribunals—not just in Delhi but across other states too. This hands-on exposure is my strength, and has added layers to my understanding of legal practice.
A standout highlight of my journey has been regularly briefing some of the most prominent senior counsels across India on a variety of disputes. This experience led me to develop a deeper understanding of law, sharpened my skills and gave me the confidence to handle complex challenges with ease.
One of the greatest blessings in my journey was working under bosses who were absolute masters of their craft. They set the bar high and demanded nothing less than excellence. Their mentorship wasn’t just about honing my legal acumen—it was about instilling discipline and a drive for excellence. That rigorous training has been the cornerstone of the lawyer I am today.
After gaining valuable experience across different law firms and practice areas, what inspired you to take the leap and start your own law firm? What were some of the key challenges you encountered during the process of establishing your firm, and how did you overcome them?
I always knew I had the skills and drive to start and manage my own law firm. While my career trajectory was steady and promising in my previous roles, the entrepreneurial itch was impossible to ignore. It was not just about ambition—it was about carving out my own space and building something from the ground up. So, when the moment felt right, I took the leap of faith.
Starting out, the biggest challenge was managing expectations—both my own and those around me—and embracing the inherent uncertainty of going independent. The move from the steady comfort of a law firm job to the uncertainty of running my own practice was both challenging and exciting.
I knew the key to survival and growth lay in two things: generating work and delivering results. So, I channeled all my energies into building trust with clients in the smallest of assignments, ensuring every case I handled spoke for itself and turning every challenge into an opportunity to prove myself. As someone from outside Delhi with a non-legal background, establishing a full-service law firm here, has been a proud achievement for me. The desire to excel as an outsider fuels my determination even further.
You represent several prominent social media influencers, helping them navigate the legal complexities of the digital age. Could you share how the legal landscape for content creators has evolved, and how you support influencers in managing legal risks?
Social media influencers are the celebrities of the digital age, and the legal landscape around them is evolving rapidly—touching everything from IT and IP laws to even fundamental rights. With their massive follower base, influencers have a unique power to shape public opinion, making their actions resonate far beyond their screens.
My role is to help them navigate this complex terrain by ensuring they understand their rights, responsibilities and laws governing their space. The challenge lies in balancing freedom of speech with the legal and ethical boundaries of content creation. As online content becomes more unfiltered, conflicts are inevitable, and managing them goes beyond simply applying the law. I advise them on content and how to strike the right balance—protecting the integrity of their content while ensuring it doesn’t cross legal boundaries. In disputes, the focus shifts to safeguarding their fundamental right to free speech and the right of the public to have access to different perspectives.
One of your notable cases involved defending a prominent youtuber against Dabur India Limited’s allegations related to a video critiquing. Could you elaborate on the approach towards this case and how you balanced freedom of expression with addressing the company’s concerns?
This case highlighted the delicate balance between a content creator’s freedom of speech and the rights of others. For me, it was crucial to ensure that the YouTuber’s right to free expression wasn’t compromised. I was fortunate to work with a client who was not just willing but determined to fight for this right, recognizing its larger significance for creators and his audience.
At the same time, I understood the importance of avoiding unnecessary litigation that could drain resources and prolong conflict—something neither the YouTuber nor the company wanted. The natural and necessary path was to pursue an amicable resolution.
My focus was on preserving the educational value of the YouTuber’s video, which provided important insights on food and health to the public. After multiple rounds of rigorous negotiation from both sides, to achieve a settlement, we agreed to remove a few minor portions of the video that were the subject of the company’s IP disparagement claims, without prejudice to our client’s right to free speech. These changes did not affect the video’s core message or structure, allowing us to protect both the creator’s voice and the broader value of the content for society. This proposition was also acceptable to the Company, which led to a win-win situation for both sides.
You have advised and represented clients in high-profile criminal cases, such as the CBI chargesheet concerning a PSU tender scam. What are the critical factors you focus on when advising clients in such complex criminal matters, and how do you approach preparing for these high-stakes cases?
In criminal cases, even when companies stand accused, it’s the individuals who bear the weight, as the corporate veil often falls to reveal the human cost. The stakes couldn’t be higher, and this pressure is unlike anything else.
My first priority is to extract every minute detail from the client about the case—no matter how trivial it may seem. In criminal law, even the smallest piece of information could turn out to be a smoking gun or a declaration of innocence.
I also believe that it is equally important to manage expectations and give the client a realistic picture of the situation. Trust between client and counsel takes on a whole new level of significance in criminal matters. It’s not just about building a defense—it’s about standing calm and firm in the face of uncertainty, ensuring that every decision is informed and strategic.
A senior counsel once gave me advice I hold as gospel: to ensure the best defense, preparation must begin on day one. You should envision how the story ends for your client and craft the entire trial strategy around that vision.
What advice would you give to aspiring lawyers who wish to follow a career path like yours? Additionally, could you recommend any resources that help them stay informed about the latest developments and trends in the legal field?
Always see yourself as a student of law, not a master of law. The law evolves with society, and staying curious and adaptable is key. It’s just as crucial to understand your client’s needs as it is to understand the intricacies of a legal case. True innovation in legal practice comes when you bridge the gap between business realities and business laws. Equally, knowing how to connect with a judge’s perspective is vital. Sometimes, a case is not won by citing more precedents but by presenting solutions that create a win-win outcome.
Another important skill worth developing is the art of networking—it’s all about fostering meaningful relationships that can provide fresh perspectives and open doors to many opportunities.
For aspiring lawyers, staying updated and informed is easier than ever. Social media, news outlets and online legal platforms provide relevant updates on legal trends, making it simple to stay current. It is imperative to keep a close eye on these developments because a solid understanding of the world around you is essential—not just to stay updated but to offer sound advice to your clients.
With your career balancing both high-profile legal work and professional responsibilities, how do you manage your work-life balance? What strategies or practices help you maintain personal growth and stay motivated to excel in such a demanding and fast-paced field?
Speaking candidly, in our field—especially for independent practitioners—work-life balance often feels like a distant dream. However, with increasing awareness about its value, it’s worth making an effort to incorporate it, even in small ways. I personally am health conscious; I make it a point to monitor what I eat and stay consistent with my workouts to an extent, which keeps me disciplined and supports the demands of my rigorous professional life. During the court vacations, I like to travel. I also have a close-knit group of friends I regularly meet and spend time with.
