How would you introduce yourself to our readers, considering your diverse background in law, media, and entertainment, along with your successful stint as a model?
Hello, I’m Sudisha Mukherji. With over eight years of experience as a media and entertainment lawyer and IP attorney, my journey through the media industry has been both diverse and enriching. Prior to my legal career, I delved into the worlds of modelling and theatre. I modelled for renowned brands like Garnier, Lux, and Coke, and walked the ramp for various designers at fashion events such as the Bangalore and Pune Fashion Weeks. These experiences, alongside my legal studies, gave me a unique perspective enabling me to adeptly navigate the complexities of the media and entertainment sectors, both in India and internationally, with a deep understanding of their intricacies.
Your journey into the legal profession is quite intriguing. Could you share some key milestones and experiences that shaped your journey from being a model to becoming an esteemed media and entertainment lawyer? How did your experience in the fashion industry contribute to your current role as a media and entertainment lawyer?
My transition from modelling to law was marked by several significant milestones and enriching experiences. Winning MTV’s “Making the Cut Season 1” and being a finalist in Miss India East 2012 were key highlights. Additionally, my active participation in the theatre production ‘Stories in a Song’ offered me a profound insight into the intricacies of the fashion, media, and theatre industries. Meeting my mentor, Adv. Jamshed Mistry, during my MCom, led me to pursue law. Even before I enrolled in LLB, I was certain about specializing in a specific area of law i.e., media and entertainment. This early clarity and guidance have been pivotal in my legal career. These experiences coupled with mentorship have proven to be invaluable in my legal career.
The opportunity to work in fashion, media, and theatre industries equipped me with a deep and nuanced understanding of the inner workings of these sectors, enabling me to provide effective counsel to a diverse range of clients within the media and entertainment industry. This unique blend of practical industry knowledge and legal expertise allows me to approach each case with a comprehensive perspective, ensuring that I am not just a lawyer, but also a strategic advisor who understands the creative and business aspects of the media world.
Managing both legal practice and involvement in the Ethics Committee of Nowrosjee Wadia Maternity Hospital and Bai Jerbai Wadia Hospital for Children is impressive. How do you balance your professional commitments with your responsibilities in the healthcare sector?
My involvement with the healthcare sector, particularly with Nowrosjee Wadia Maternity Hospital and Bai Jerbai Wadia Hospital for Children, spans over six years. In this role, I serve as a Legal Expert on the Ethics Committee, focusing on ensuring adherence to good clinical practices for collaborative studies and research. This responsibility complements my legal practice rather seamlessly.
In all honesty, I don’t view my role in the healthcare sector as an additional task to manage; rather, it’s an integral part of my professional journey. My work with the Ethics Committee enriches my understanding of legal issues in healthcare. The skills and insights I gain from one sphere often benefit the other.
Balancing these commitments comes down to effective time management and a deep passion for both fields. The synergies between my legal practice and my role in healthcare governance allow me to navigate both areas effectively. My experiences in healthcare have provided me with a broader perspective on legal issues, enhancing my ability to advise clients with a more holistic approach. Therefore, rather than balancing two separate roles, I see them as complementary aspects of my professional life that enrich each other.
Your clientele includes a diverse range of entities, from production houses to hospitals. How do you navigate between such different sectors, and what challenges or rewards come with representing clients with varied interests?
Navigating between diverse sectors like production houses and hospitals presents its unique challenges and rewards, and my experience in both the media and healthcare industries plays a crucial role in this. One of the main challenges is the need to constantly adapt to the distinct legal landscapes of each sector. The media and entertainment industry, for instance, involves a lot of intellectual property, contractual, and compliance issues, while the healthcare sector demands a thorough understanding of medical ethics, privacy laws, and regulatory compliance. My background in both these areas allows me to transition smoothly between these different legal environments.
The rewards of representing such a varied clientele are immense. It provides me with a rich, multifaceted perspective on legal issues. Working with production houses keeps me connected to the creative and dynamic world of media, while my involvement with hospitals grounds me in the impactful and socially responsible realm of healthcare. This diversity in my work not only keeps it intellectually stimulating but also allows me to bring a unique perspective to the table, combining creative problem-solving with a deep understanding of regulatory frameworks. In essence, the variety in my clientele enhances my capability as a lawyer. It enables me to approach legal issues with a broader, more informed perspective.
Your journey involves a transition from a legal consultancy role to being an independent practitioner. What inspired you to take this leap, and how has it influenced the way you approach your work?
The decision to transition from a legal consultancy role to becoming an independent practitioner was not so much a choice as a necessity. At that time, I was struggling to find work that aligned with my interests and expertise. However, once I made the leap, thankfully, my practice started to grow organically through word-of-mouth recommendations and referrals.
This journey has profoundly influenced how I approach my work. One of the key aspects is my perspective on learning. I consider myself a lifelong learner; I learn something new every single day. This mindset has been crucial in my journey as an independent practitioner. I’ve learned everything on the job, and I’m deeply grateful to my mentors and seniors who have offered unwavering support, guidance, and encouragement. Their assistance was invaluable in the early days of my practice, and it remains just as important now, whenever I reach out for insight.
Being an independent practitioner has also instilled in me a sense of resilience and adaptability. It has pushed me to be more proactive in seeking opportunities, developing new skills, and expanding my network. This journey has not only honed my legal skills but also sharpened my entrepreneurial instincts. It has taught me the importance of building and maintaining relationships, understanding client needs deeply, and consistently delivering high-quality work.
In summary, the transition to independent practice has been a transformative experience. It has shaped me into a more versatile, knowledgeable, and resourceful professional, enabling me to offer more comprehensive and personalized legal services to my clients.
During your secondment with Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited on their digital vertical while working for ANM, how do you perceive the ongoing digital transformation in the media and entertainment industry, and what legal challenges and opportunities does it present?
The digital transformation in the media and entertainment sector, fuelled by online curated content platforms, broadens content variety, targeting diverse audiences. This shift brings legal challenges and opportunities in management of rights and online content regulation. Key areas include managing rights through agreements like co-production and licensing, and handling sensitive content and brand associations. Legal expertise is essential to navigate this evolving digital landscape, ensuring compliance and protecting interests amidst changing regulations and audience dynamics.
Beyond the legal realm, what hobbies or activities do you engage in to unwind and rejuvenate?
Outside of my legal career, I find joy and relaxation in spending time with my family and my two wonderful boys. One of my favourite activities is curating sensory bin activities for them, which is both fun and engaging. Additionally, I enjoy unwinding by taking long drives, and immersing myself in the world of books.
With your extensive experience in media and entertainment law, what advice would you give to aspiring lawyers looking to enter this dynamic and ever-evolving field?
To aspiring lawyers entering the field of media and entertainment law, I advise prioritizing mental health due to the field’s demanding nature, where everything often seems urgent. While it’s a learning-rich profession, remember that you can’t master everything at once. Taking time off for yourself is crucial to avoid burnout and maintain a healthy balance.
Can you share with our listeners the journey that led you to pursue a career in law, especially considering your impressive academic achievements at Amity Law School?
The journey that led me to law began in 11th standard when I chose Science with Computers only to realize that I have an interest in neither. Like many others, I was merely following the herd. Fortunately, my computer science teacher at Modern School sat me down and encouraged me to start law school training while pursuing science at school. The days I spent in law school training were most interesting and made me realize that I may have a genuine liking for legal subjects and reasoning. By the end of my final year at school, my entire section and my teachers knew that I was a science student preparing to become a lawyer.
I joined Amity Law School, Delhi (IP University) which at that time was in the top 10 law schools in India. I would prepare for my classes, ask way too many questions (sometimes even got punished for it), and worked hard for my exams. I would take time out to represent the law school in a few national and international moots and MUNs every year. After the first semester, I had topped the University, which was extremely encouraging and subsequently I received the Raja Rai Best Student of the Year award for all 5 years at law school. It was the first time I understood the meaning of the word aptitude. I was excited to move forward on this path.
How did your experience as a Law Clerk to Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and as an intern with HMJ (retired) S Muralidhar shape your perspective on the legal profession?
Working as an intern with Justice Muralidhar and as a clerk with Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul allowed me to gain insight into the life and cycle of arbitration cases at the Delhi High Court. While Justice Muralidhar handled the original side arbitration cases amongst others, Justice Kaul was handling the arbitration appeals. I had a front row seat in the Delhi High Court that enabled me to witness some of the best orators/Senior Advocates presenting their cases before some of the brightest legal minds.
In my internship with HMJ Muralidhar, I was responsible for preparing a Compilation of summaries of judgments delivered by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in that calendar year that contributed to the development of law. This proved to be an excellent exercise for a newly graduated law student as it provided me with further training in reading lengthy judgments in a short period of time and extracting its essence in a few short paragraphs. This, I believe, is a skill to be honed in every lawyer.
As a clerk to Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, my roster of responsibilities was a bit wider as I was responsible for checking the daily orders, sat in Court to hear arguments while noting important cases quoted, conducted extensive legal research in order to assist the Judge in dictating judgments and prepared the odd speech to be delivered by the Judge.
My experience at the Delhi High Court, working with two brilliant Judges allowed me to carefully observe court craft and court etiquette. It gave me a unique opportunity to understand the considerations that weigh with judges while deciding cases and also allowed me to stay updated with the latest caselaw on various legal issues, as they would be regularly quoted in the Court. It was helpful to maintain a diary of daily case proceedings and important notes during the course of my clerkship.
Your Master’s in Law at the University of Cambridge focused on International Law & EU Competition Law. How did this international exposure contribute to your understanding of the legal landscape?
To be a Masters student at one of the oldest most prestigious Universities in the world – (with arguably the most beautiful campus) – was a matter of great privilege as well as pride for me. It has contributed significantly to my growth, not just as a professional but also as a person. I was fortunate to be in a multicultural environment and to be taught by highly respected professors such as (late) Prof. James Crawford whose small groups sessions at the Lauterpacht Centre for International Law would be riveting to say the least.
It was a remarkable opportunity to understand the various facets of EU Competition law from experts such as William Allen, a former competition law partner at Linklaters, which I have consistently relied on in competition law cases in India. The masters not only contributed to my understanding of the legal landscape, but it broadened my horizons allowing me to be more confident and self-assured as a litigator in India.
At Cambridge, I was elected as the Student Council Representative at Darwin College which enabled me to voice the concerns of the students at Darwin and stand up for issues that mattered. After coming back from Cambridge, I have also been closely associated with the Oxford and Cambridge Society of India (having been elected on three successive Committees) organizing academic, social, cultural and sporting activities with Oxbridge alumni in Delhi.
How do you stay updated on the latest legal developments, especially in the dynamic field of competition law?
In order to stay updated with legal developments in competition law, I read some important competition law journals (Indian and foreign) as well as judgments from India, EU and US. I spent 2 months in Brussels in 2023 attending multiple conferences pertaining to the developments in EU competition law and competition law globally.
You transitioned from working in the Chambers of Aditya Narain to establishing your independent practice. What were the pivotal moments that led to this decision, and how has the experience been for you?
After completing my masters, I worked with Mr. Aditya Narain, Advocate (as he had a very strong background in antitrust) for 5 years and I was primarily involved in cases pertaining to competition law and consumer disputes. In fact, during the very first week back in India, I was assigned the Ericsson vs Intex/Micromax (Standard Essential Patents) case where Mr. Narain was appointed the Amicus Curiea by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court. It was the first case of such a nature dealing with the conflict between competition law and IP law.
Thereafter, I sat for the AOR exam in 2019, as I had always aspired to practice at the Supreme Court of India, even as a young law student. Once I cleared the prestigious AOR exam, I started my journey as an independent counsel and an Advocate on Record. To be an Advocate on Record, in my honest opinion, is one of the most fulfilling experiences for a lawyer as it presents you with opportunities to develop and present high stakes cases in the highest Court, pertaining to all subjects whether civil, criminal, constitutional etc. Often, the AOR dons different hats i.e. of a lawyer, clerk, typist, translator and that can be a bit exhausting. I have been fortunate to have been involved in some extremely interesting cases before the Supreme Court that have contributed to the development of law. This was always my dream.
Your current practice involves handling a variety of cases, including competition law, consumer disputes, constitutional law, insolvency & bankruptcy, and more. How do you manage to navigate such diverse legal areas effectively?
As an Advocate on Record practicing before the Supreme Court of India, one has to be open to learning diverse and complex laws in a limited amount of time. Not just learn, but with the right doses of legal research, one has to often master those laws in order to argue the case at the highest Court or even brief Senior Advocates on the matter. One needs to retain a sense of being a generalist. But as a law graduate, there cannot be a better avenue to learn and practice across such a diverse variety of legal subjects.
With the aid of some brilliant and hard-working colleagues, support from mentors as well as effective time management skills, it is possible to practice across such a wide array of legal subjects. It would be apposite to mention that with the evolution of technology and e-filing software’s/virtual courts, it has become much more convenient to practice as a litigator.
You recently represented a leading tire company in a significant challenge to a Competition Commission of India decision, resulting in one of the largest fines imposed by CCI. Can you share the key challenges you faced and lessons learned from this case?
It is indeed an honour to be a part of the tyre cartel case as I have had the opportunity to brief the brightest most well respected seniors such as Mr. Fali S Nariman and Mr. G Masilamani in the matter and work alongside some of the best competition law firms in the country. The matter is pending before the Supreme Court and therefore I would not be able to comment in detail about the case. However, I can say that the Competition Commission of India is one of India’s most robust and active regulators responsible for maintaining fairness in both the retail and online marketplace in India regulating matters pertaining to abuse of dominance and anti-competitive agreements. It is equipped with an investigative arm i.e. the Director General’s office that comprehensively and meticulously investigates matters pertaining to abuse of dominance and anticompetitive agreements.
In the tyre cartel case, unfortunately, the investigation report of the DG found evidence of existence of a cartel and the CCI passed a penalty order of around Rs. 1788 Crores against 5 tyre companies in the market for Truck and Bus bias tyres. This was one of the largest fines imposed by the CCI. The biggest challenge was to impress upon the Hon’ble National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, that this is one case where the DG and the CCI, both, have made some serious errors in calculating and comparing prices. Ordinarily, the decision of an expert body such as CCI is hard to challenge before the NCLAT, and even harder to have annulled by the Appellate Tribunal. However, in the tyre matters, we were above to demonstrate that the case set up by the DG and accepted by the CCI of price parallelism and cartel was ill-founded and factually incorrect. The DG and CCI had overlooked certain crucial details and numbers and those errors clearly demonstrated that no price parallelism existed and therefore no cartel existed in the market. It was one of the rare cases when the CCI admitted to making those errors (which seldom happens, as regulatory bodies such as the CCI are meticulous and comprehensive in their investigations). However, the NCLAT, while setting aside the CCI penalty decision, remanded the case back to the CCI for deciding the matter afresh in light of the errors made in the CCI decision. In my view, the NCLAT may have considered finally disposing of the matter instead of remanding it and therefore we have filed a limited challenge to the remand of the matter back to CCI. The CCI, of course, has challenged the entire decision of the NCLAT and both cross appeals are pending before the Hon’ble Supreme Court.
To sum up, the biggest challenge we faced in the matter was to show that the decision of the CCI was contrary to the facts as well as the settled law. We had briefed two of the leading seniors to argue on our behalf i.e. Mr. Mukul Roahatgi and Mr. Krishnan Venugopal who successfully represented our case before the NCLAT. What I learnt in the process was that in order to challenge any decision of any expert regulatory body, one must have tremendous research and preparation skills. The briefing for both the Senior Advocates was rather different and our team had to be attuned to their queries and styles prior to the briefing.
Having worked with notable judges, senior advocates, and in various legal capacities, how has mentorship played a role in shaping your career, and what advice would you give to aspiring lawyers on finding the right mentors?
Mentorship is a vital aspect of our profession, especially in litigation. I have had the good fortune of working with some of the best legal minds in the country, and I have most certainly learnt something from each one of them. There have been lessons on patience, legal ethics, hard work, humility, legal research, oration etc which have helped shape me, not just as an Advocate but also as a person.
I draw inspiration from Mr. Fali S Nariman, Sr. Adv (as do most lawyers) who I have had the opportunity to brief multiple times. Briefing Mr Nariman, as many would know, is never about fancy conference rooms and coffee machines. It is about hard facts, in-depth research into the law, reading your brief, re-reading your brief, re-re-reading your brief and culling out the crux of it. Until, every word of every sentence of every paragraph is not crystal clear, no pleading or note ought to be presented to the Court in his name. A clarity of thought, I learnt, is a crucial aspect for a lawyer, as only then can the pleading reflect such a clear thought and move a Judge to rule in one’s favour.
I learnt another very valuable lesson while briefing Mr. Nariman, something that he also writes in his book. It is that we must take the time out to think about our cases. What that means is that our level of commitment and passion should be such that whenever we have any spare time, we must think about our cases, discuss with colleagues and try and figure out whether there was a better way to present it or even develop it, whether there was an argument that we missed or an argument we took that may not work, how to respond to an argument the other side may make etc. This self-analysis forms the foundation of growth in the profession, in my view.
If an aspiring lawyer gets the luxury to choose a mentor, he/she should choose one who not merely knows the law well, but also encourages junior lawyers, gives them opportunities to argue and research, who is transparent and ethical in his/her conduct, discusses cases with his/her juniors, shares anecdotes and occasionally gives notes on how to improve.
For those who do not get the luxury of choice, just begin! Take any opportunity and start working. Regardless of how your mentor or senior is, there will be a lot to learn provided you are receptive, observant and inquisitive. Learn what you can and move on.
Considering your achievements and diverse experiences, what advice would you like to offer to fresh law graduates who are embarking on their legal careers today?
I remember briefing an extremely well respected Senior Advocate in Chennai High Court in a cartel case and I was convinced that a particular argument ought to be made by him. The Senior sensed my conviction and excitement but felt that the argument could be detrimental to our case. Only, I failed to understand his point and kept arguing to the contrary.
Young lawyers are often full of energy and confidence, ready to fight the fights and in that endeavor often become less receptive and flexible to other (often opposing) arguments. Sometimes we don’t know when to stop. Being too rigid may have some adverse effects in a Court of law, especially when a Judge strongly disagrees with your viewpoint. It is then that you must acknowledge the opposing argument and redirect yourself in order to meet that argument. Such versatility to maneuver ensures longevity as an orator and a litigator.
I would also add that in order to be a successful lawyer, one must read the latest judgments, and foreign Court decisions in an attempt to stay abreast. Maintaining a diary of relevant cases is something I have learnt from my seniors and it has saved me on a number of occasions. We must be polite and assertive in Court and never go to Court without reading the brief, even if it is to take a postponement on behalf of another lawyer because if experience has taught me that, on the day that you don’t prepare and go to Court, it is exactly on that day that the Judge will want to hear you argue. Last but not least, one of the most relevant pieces of advice I learnt from seniors and mentors, was not to lose hope in this profession, especially litigation. Litigation will test you, there will be days when you learn nothing (and more days when you will earn nothing) but the litigator must remain passionate, inquisitive and steadfast in his/her pursuit. ‘Just keep swimming’
Your academic journey includes studying law both in India and the USA. How did these diverse educational experiences shape your perspective on the legal profession, and how do you think it contributed to your success in the field?
While the principles of law are more or less the same everywhere, the manner in which the law is taught varies. It is however the overall experience that enriches you. In India, we studied law from the perspective of the statute and its applicability in different kinds of situations; in the USA we did case studies and advanced our reasoning of the applied law on such cases. What was different was the vast networking opportunities offered even at the institutional level in the USA when compared to India. Some of the friends I made then are now well established and recognized in the legal field and at senior positions in some of the top law firms and in-house.
With expertise spanning commercial litigation, arbitration, consumer protection, real estate, and more, how did you decide on such a diverse legal practice? Can you share a pivotal moment or experience that influenced your decision to specialize in these areas?
My initial interest as a student of law was on the corporate side. I was during the time fascinated (like many students) of the work that corporate lawyers did, the transactions, the numbers etc. But as destiny would have it, after enrolling at the Bar and working for one year as a corporate lawyer, one day in court was all it took. Since that first day in court, I have not looked back while I may admit that I still do general corporate work as well. With respect to specialization, while there was no specific pivotal moment as such, I never wanted to be limited to only one particular area. I have enjoyed all that the learning that the profession has had to offer me. While some may argue a specialization has its own advantages, which I do not doubt, I know that there are many people who feel limited in their ability/outreach because of the specialization whereas I on the other hand am very comfortable appearing before various judicial and quasi judicial fora in different kinds of matters. I am as comfortable appearing before a Consumer Commission in a consumer matter as I would be before the National Green Tribunal in an environment related issue or before the High Court or Supreme Court for a commercial/contractual dispute.
As the head of the “Japan Desk” at your Firm, you handle the firm’s Japanese practice. Could you elaborate on the challenges and rewards of managing international legal matters, and how does it tie into your broader practice areas?
Japan has been very close to my heart for a number of reasons. Not only is the country a close ally of India, the two nations have seen significant growth in bilateral relations through trade and commerce, culture and in the recent few years – cuisine. Anyone who has had the good fortune of being connected or has worked with Japan one way or the other would agree that the experience completely changes the person for the better. From the time I started more than 10 years ago to now, I can confidently say that it has been a rewarding experience. The Japanese build their relationships on trust and respect. If you can earn the respect of a Japanese person, you have earned yourself a lifelong friend. They are very thorough and extremely professional in their approach, which is what is also expected by them from their counsel. Unlike in India, where being late by 10 – 15 minutes for a business meeting and by almost an hour at parties is considered normal, Japanese value and respect your time. You will always see them arrive 10 minutes before the scheduled time so as to timely start the meetings. In case you require assistance, they will go out of their way to ensure that they can help you. Every trip to Japan or my interaction with a Japanese person has taught me something new. At the Firm we follow the policy of ‘Kaizen’ which means continuous improvement. We believe in the combined and collective talents of all our team members irrespective of position or rank, to propel growth of the Firm and to continuously improve ourselves in order to better cater to the needs of our clients. We advise and represent from time to time many Japanese companies including the sogo soshas in their business activities in India apart from hand holding companies that wish to come to India. Japan has a significant investment in the Indian market which is only going to grow with time and we are proud to be a part of this growth story.
You’ve had notable achievements, such as being one of the youngest Additional Advocate Generals and receiving recognitions like the 40 Under 40 Rising Star (2023) by Legal Era and 40 Under 40 (2022) recognized lawyer by BW Legal World. How do you balance leadership responsibilities with the demands of your legal practice, and how has this contributed to your professional growth?
What I am today is the blessing of my seniors who mentored me and my peers who gave me their wholehearted support. Like you cannot clap with one hand, similarly every success story cannot involve only one individual. I have been very fortunate to have been honed by some of the best mentors and seniors in the profession. Growth is never constant and every turn brings with it a new meaning. I was taught to take responsibilities head on from a young age and with such responsibilities also came leadership positions. After a certain stage in life, professional growth does not remain limited only to how well you can execute or how much business you can develop. Professional growth is how you are perceived by your peers and seniors in the profession, by your clients and friends from various walks of life, how much you have contributed back to society and how well you trained your juniors. Ultimately all these and more factors will shape and determine the growth of an individual.
As far as balancing leadership responsibilities with demands of the legal practice is concerned, it is all inter connected and you cannot fix timelines in a day for either one of them. As the great Mr. Fali Nariman, Ld. Sr. Advocate has said, for lawyers there is no start and end time. You cannot look at the watch and say it is time to go home.
Given your involvement in diverse leadership roles and professional activities, including being a former Member of the World Economic Forum’s Global Shapers Community and young leader of the Science & Technology in Society Forum (STS Forum) of Japan, how do you see the intersection of law and broader societal issues? How has this influenced your approach to your legal practice?
Law is one of the most noble professions, second only to that of medicine/doctor. To a great extent our legal system is based on our societal values and beliefs. Today our societal norms and values are seeing rapid changes and thanks to technological advances and social media, people are voicing their concerns more openly and are constantly connected. The Judiciary plays a very critical role in keeping a fine balance between past, present and future requirements of the evolving society. As officers of the court, it is our duty to the best of our ability, to represent and raise the voices of concern of our society, to be the voice of those who are unheard or have limited or no access to justice. The World Economic Forum as well as the STS Forum act as a strategic partner and platforms respectively for world leaders, policy makers, members of the business and professional community to come together, discuss and debate on a host of issues concerning our global society as a whole. The Global Shapers Community was promoted by Klaus Schwab to encourage and train the young leaders of tomorrow. We discussed, debated, raised concerns, held key discussions and representations with those in power, on a number of issues. The result was that we as individuals also got more sensitized to the ills of society and in one way or the other pledged to ourselves to try to make a difference. Similarly, the STS Forum is an excellent platform which discusses the environment, carbon footprint and the rapid growth of technology and AI all of which require regulations and safeguards. These discussions are important from a legal perspective as well as we are able to look at law concerning these areas not only from the point of view of what the law says but holistically for the larger good of society.
You’ve successfully represented the State of Rajasthan before the Supreme Court of India and the High Court of Delhi. Can you share a challenging case you’ve worked on and the strategies you employed to secure a favorable outcome for your client?
You need to do your best for the client. The outcome is the destiny of the client. There have been many challenging cases. But to briefly share, two in specific – one of the first cases that I had handled and was led by Dr. Manish Singhvi, Ld. Sr. Advocate, pertained to the exercise of powers of the Government in creation / demarcation/ reorganization of the boundaries of gram panchayats and panchayat samities under the provisions of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994. A constitutional question was involved as the Hon’ble High Court, contrary to the clear bar under Article 243(O), had interfered with the powers of the State Government to perform such exercise. As there was more than one notification, however all notifications connected with each other, the Hon’ble High Court in the impugned order while taking cognizance of the bar under Article 243(O) for one notification, held the other notifications to be void, therefore making the impugned judgment mutually contradictory. We had successfully argued in the Supreme Court that the constitutional bar would equally apply to all notifications and since the elections were around the corner had also obtained a stay on the order of the Hon’ble High Court. This was a matter of critical importance given the significance as well as the timelines. I remember the entire team had worked day and night to get the SLP ready and filed before the winter vacations of the Hon’ble Supreme Court.
Another interesting matter inter alia involved the argument on the applicability of the doctrine of “proof beyond reasonable doubt” / rules of evidence which govern a criminal trial, in a disciplinary/departmental enquiry. On behalf of the State, I had argued that unlike in a criminal trial, a disciplinary enquiry was not mandated to be governed by the rigor of the said doctrine and that only “preponderance of probabilities” was sufficient to establish guilt in a departmental enquiry. It was argued by the Respondent that since he was acquitted in a criminal trial therefore he should be reinstated in the services. On behalf of the State, while arguing on the applicability of the doctrine above mentioned to departmental enquiries a distinction was also made on the basis of an acquittal which was “honorable” and one which was on the basis of “benefit of doubt”. On the basis of law and arguments on facts, a favourable order was obtained for the State.
The strategy adopted for every matter is simple. Know your facts well. Read every document line to line, word to word and understand the implication. Once the facts have been mastered, read and analyze the law and then the judgments both in favour as well as against. Once all three things have been done, you will be in a better position to frame your arguments. I have always made hand written notes for my arguments by bifurcating various arguments and supporting each argument with relevant facts and case law. As an officer of the court it is also your duty to inform the court of any law (judgment) which may be against you and also to do our best to try to distinguish the facts of that matter from yours. Additionally, I always look at the Supreme Court first for judicial precedents. Being the top most court, the decisions are binding on all courts below. Further, in case you are relying on a judgment/order of a High Court or a Tribunal/Commission for matters before such forums, it is imperative to do a check on whether the order/judgment relied upon has been challenged/appealed or stayed or upheld. You do not want to be caught in a situation where you are relying on some law which is no longer applicable. But the first principle is to know your facts. If you are not fully aware of your facts you cannot apply the law. Last but not the least, you have to wear the hat of your client and think why certain contracts/clauses (in case of a commercial matter) were drafted. What was the intention? Once you understand this, you will be able to better understand and appreciate a document in the context of the issue at hand.
In addition to your legal pursuits, you are passionate about technology, automobiles, AI, and space science. How do these interests intersect with your legal career, and do they influence your approach to handling cases or advising clients in specific industries?
Not everything of interest or passion needs to intersect with the career. Having said that, AI is fast gaining importance in the legal field and we all need to be updated with the rapid changes in the field of technology as well as adopt them. AI is a great facilitator with respect to time management, case management and research. However, in the argument of AI vs the human brain, the latter will always prevail. Through technology, it has become easier to get more information to keep one better informed and better prepared. Since time is precious, we have consciously been using various interfaces for virtual conferences to avoid the need to travel either for the client or for the Firm’s counsels, unless absolutely necessary. The Chief Justice of India is a great source of inspiration and encouragement when it comes to technology. Thanks to his persistent efforts to make our judicial system technologically sound, we are able to represent more clients in multiple forums in a timely manner, clients sitting in far away places can participate in the proceedings and see first hand how their matter is progressing instead of solely relying on the word of the counsel, the pressure on physical infrastructure will also with time ease as more and more judicial and quasi judicial fora get technologically sound. With respect to advising clients in specific industries, since I like to understand about technology, I make a special effort to study and understand how my client’s business, machines, industry etc. works. If you are a commercial practice lawyer, it is very important for you to first understand your client’s business and its functioning. Once this is understood you will find yourself in a better position to represent the facts before a court. My other passions, such as automobiles or space science have nothing to do with the profession. I love cars from classic to modern. But I feel that automobile designers in their pursuit for making something different are losing the touch of designing beautiful cars that are pleasing to the eyes as they once were. The study of space and life beyond what we know, the thought that there are other life forms somewhere far away more advanced in every sense than us, has always fascinated me.
Finally, drawing from your diverse experiences and achievements, what advice would you give to law graduates entering the field today, especially those interested in pursuing a path similar to yours?
No path is easy or difficult. You need to have patience and give yourself time to grow. Today I see a trend where law graduates tend to quickly shift from one place to another within a span of 6 months to a year if not less. There is an assumption that one has learned everything one could in this time span. This is not correct. Knowing a particular section or 10 cases for reference is not knowing the law. To evolve as a lawyer you need to be consistent and stable. The sections will always remain, what will change is how you interpret and apply them to different fact situations. That is when you will derive a new meaning. Litigation is an exciting field. Everyday is a new day to learn, to absorb, to experience. My advice to the law graduates looking to enter into this practice would therefore be that they do not restrict themselves to only one court. They should gain experience in all courts. If someday you do not have a matter assigned, take out time and just sit in a courtroom and absorb the proceedings. Understand how the Courts are seeking clarity/asking questions, how the counsels are arguing, how the law is being applied. Specially sit in your respective High Court’s and if possible the Supreme Court and hear the arguments of some celebrated Senior Counsel’s. There is a great deal of learning. The more hands-on experience you will have the better you will learn. In addition to this, never stop reading. We have very good reference books on all areas of practice and subjects which explain concepts clearly. Take out at least one hour every day to spend on reading reference books as well as new cases to enhance your knowledge. Further and most importantly, practice your oratory and legal writing. No amount of knowledge will be beneficial if you cannot fluently put it on paper or argue in court. Last but not the least, take criticism or review in a positive way. The fact that your mentor/senior/colleague has taken out time to point out mistakes is a blessing in disguise meant for you to reflect on and improve.
Reflecting on your journey from law school to becoming an Advocate-on-Record at the Supreme Court, what were the pivotal moments that shaped your career?
“Qabza dila diya mujhe mere makaan ka
Mere jo hain vakil adeem-un-nazeer hain
Poochho jo unki fees, tou ab us makaan mein
Khud hazrat e vakil rihaaish-pazeer hain.”
-Anwar Masood
(English Meaning-
“My lawyer helped me get possession of my house.
He is blessed with unmatchable foresight. The fees, however, were so high that it cost me to cover the house itself.”
The aforesaid lines I came across in my law school days stirred a profound transformation within me, redirecting my aspirations from a corporate job towards the realm of practicing law and aiding those in need as much as possible. I harbored a persistent dream of exerting every effort to alter the public perception of advocates for the better.
Though my odyssey of the profession of law commencing from law school has not been an easy one but an arduous endeavor. As I was a Hindi Medium Student, even in Law school I encountered myriad problems. I got back in two subjects (English and Economics) in my inaugural semester. My peers hesitated to form a moot team or collaborate on articles with me, exhibiting their professional reservations despite amicable personal relations. In that time some latent sense of inferiority had pervaded my psyche. I don’t blame anyone for this. As humans, everyone wants to be with the best, which I was certainly not in the sight of my colleagues. I decided to fight this and transcend these challenges. I made all possible attempts to hone my linguistic prowess after reading various literature and Judgements. I started writing various articles on different topics. I decided to become the only Speaker in Moot Court competitions to conquer the fear of facing the judges. Colleagues now started trusting me for all kinds of work. Ultimately, I topped my last semester and earned the accolade of Student of Excellence. While I secured a few placements, I opted to practice law in Delhi. I joined the office of my senior with a stipend of Rs. 10,000/- in the Supreme Court of India. However, this was not enough to survive. I also realized that learning the trial court work for any first-generation lawyer is highly essential. Thus, I used to work in Trial Court from 9 am to 6:30 PM and earn Rs. 10,000/-, take personality development classes from 7:30 PM to 9 PM (Monday to Saturday) and earn Rs. 5,000/-, and then work for the Supreme Court drafting from 10 PM to 2 AM and earn Rs. 10,000/-. These circumstances fortuitously instilled in me resilience to confront challenges with unwavering resolve. I also initiated pro bono law classes for the underprivileged students for the preparation of Judicial Services Preparation from 2016. When people around reposed trust in me, they gave a few really challenging cases to fight. I tried my best and the same resulted in fortifying the trust of people in me. I decided to write an AOR exam in 2023. My foundational academic expertise, cultivated through instructing judicial services aspirants, facilitated success in the AOR examination. In the legal profession, while supreme intelligence may be optional, mastery of patience remains an indispensable requisite.
As someone who handles diverse cases, including civil and criminal, could you share an experience that was particularly challenging and how you navigated through it?
Allow me to recount a pivotal case, which was like a litmus test for my tenacity and devotion to the legal profession. It was my first big case, which I got by god’s grace merely after seven months of my practice. I had a very small office in Pocket -2, Mayur Vihar Phase-I, Delhi. It was the evening of 12th of February 2016, which unfolded a narrative that would indelibly mark my legal journey. A group of around 8 to 10 people entered my office and told me that the Government of Delhi was cutting thousands of trees in the green belt area of Sector 15-16 Trilokpuri in order to build flats for the people whose land had been seized by the Delhi government for the Nizamuddin Metro project. Their plea was urgent, as the matter was slated for final arguments in the High Court on February 14. They implored me to initiate proceedings before the National Green Tribunal (NGT) on February 13 and concurrently file an Impleadment application in the High Court on February 14.
Those people divulged to me that since they were unable to get other advocates to file the matters in such a short duration for a reasonable amount of fee, which led them to seek my assistance. They further asked me if I would be able to file the case in such a short duration before NGT and in the High Court. Undaunted, I seized this opportunity without a moment’s hesitation and said “Yes”. Despite lacking experience in filing Original Applications before the NGT and possessing no format for such applications, I committed myself to the challenge. They endowed me with three hundred pages of representation and other notices in Hindi. I enquired about the format of Original Application with other friends. My inquiries among legal peers yielded no guidance, as they were unacquainted with NGT proceedings.
I knew that it was a daunting task to go through the entire file and draft the application in a 12-hour window. I read the file till 5 AM the next day. I thought it was impossible for me to complete the same. I thought of giving up. I was quite broken. Faced with exhaustion and contemplation of capitulation, I discerned a divine test of my dedication to the legal profession. Resilience prevailed, I again started working and completed the draft by 10 AM without any sleep. I filed the matter before NGT after serving the copy of the case to five different counsels on the other side. I mentioned the matter and after fearless arguments secured the stay from NGT on the same day. Next day again I could not sleep because I had to file an impleadment application before the Hon’ble High Court. I filed the application just in time and it was allowed by the Hon’ble High Court. The bench, after giving me a patient hearing, held that it is the duty of the Government to provide home to the aggrieved persons but not at the cost of cutting trees.
This case not only introduced me to local communities but also attracted independent clients seeking my advocacy. I share this experience as a testament to the crucible moments faced by young advocates. In the face of adversity, it is imperative to rise, sprinting with unwavering determination, for it is the endurance forged in such crucibles that propels young advocates forward in this demanding profession.
Your book, “Iudexcracy vs Democracy: Revisiting Fourth Judges Cases,” is noteworthy. What motivated you to write it, and what key message do you hope readers take away from it?
My fervent inclination to contribute to this work predates the NJAC case escalation to the Apex Court. As a law student, I harbored a profound interest in Constitutional law, initiating my engagement with the field early on. With guidance from seniors in Law school, I started writing articles and presenting papers from my first semester itself. In the beginning of sixth semester, my team participated in a Moot Court competition centered on Judicial Appointments and the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC). Later in my final year, I thought of extending the research on Judicial Appointments and NJAC through my dissertation. When I graduated from law school and started practicing law in Delhi, I found that the 99th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2014 along with NJAC Act had been passed in Parliament and the same had been challenged in the Supreme Court. My co-author (who was interning in the Supreme Court at that time) and I diligently used to observe daily proceedings every day from 10.30 AM to 4 PM captivated by the profound legal minds presenting eloquent submissions. Amidst this intellectual panorama, we envisioned ourselves as solitary islands, fervently desiring to contribute our perspectives to this ongoing debate. Our initial intention evolved into a more concrete idea – encapsulating our insights in the form of a book. Then, we were astonished to see the voluminous judgment consisting of more than 1,000 pages. Undeterred, we scrutinized it meticulously, identifying flaws that spurred our decision to conduct a critical analysis. The book meticulously explored judicial appointment procedures in other nations, drawing comparisons with the Indian context. It articulated arguments both for and against the basic structure doctrine, delving into its genesis. Additionally, the book elucidated arguments supporting the constitutionality of the NJAC with few suggestions. The book lauded the dissenting opinion of HMJ Chelameswar and called him an unsung hero because he was the only judge who fearlessly maintained in his dissenting opinion that there is “nepotism” in the judiciary.
Winning the Atam Samman and the Udbhav Cultural Award reflects your significant contributions to the legal field. How do you handle the balance between a successful legal practice and your role in academia?
I am really humbled and honoured to receive these awards. It is my deep interest in academia which has given wings to my legal practice granting me a multifaceted perspective. When any academician studies any law subject for teaching the student, he studies that from beginning to the end. Thus, whenever I find any case to represent in Court be it Civil or Criminal, where interpretation of any provision is required, I in the dual capacity of academician and practicing lawyer can see various angles which may sometimes be overlooked by few practicing lawyers. As far as I have researched, almost all legendary advocates and Judges have been great academicians. For instance, Shri Nani Palikwala, despite his busy practice, used to devote his time to teaching law to students and was a part-time Lecturer at Government Law College, Bombay. He endeared himself to students by his clear exposition of the subject—always with a dash of humour and eloquence (At that time he was lecturing on the Evidence Act.).
I would like to narrate one of my real stories which is connected to academics and legal practice. In the year 2017, when I was waiting for my item to reach before one Single bench in Delhi High Court, one of my colleagues at the Bar was making his submissions before the Court that he sent the representation to the Government. Then the Ld. Judge posed him a question that, “When a Communication of proposal and acceptance is complete and under what provision of law is it provided?”
Then my colleague at the Bar started referring to some Judgements. The Court specifically pointed out that it does not want judgement but provision of law. When the counsel could not answer, Court posed the same question to the members of the bar present in Court to be answered. Upon receiving the opportunity I raised my hand and answered the question, as at that time I was teaching my students Indian Contract Act, 1872 only. The court, acknowledging my response, expedited my case, demonstrating the tangible benefits of a robust academic foundation in legal practice. I believe that the marriage of academia and legal practice is indispensable for cultivating a flourishing and enduring legal career.
Your involvement in guiding judicial services aspirants pro bono is commendable. How important do you believe it is for legal professionals to contribute to legal education and mentorship?
If you have knowledge, let others light their candle in it.-
Margaret Fuller
There is really a dire need in the Society of the “good legal professionals”. I regularly interact with Law students across the country. I feel that they really want to study and aspire to be good advocates but lack proper guidance and mentorship, causing them to veer off course in their pursuit of legal excellence. Problem is many law students are neither given proper practical insights by their law college nor guided by any experienced law professional. One can become a good legal professional only when one gets proper guidance, right mentorship and proper exposure to the law field. Study confined to four walls of law school is not sufficient. One must dive into the ocean of cases to understand the real intricacies and interpretation involved in Law. It is the bounden duty of all experienced legal professionals to extend a guiding hand and to give back to Society whatsoever limited they have. It is the duty of the Law professionals to instill the sense of honesty, integrity and confidence in the young minds for their future. This noble profession demands a commitment to service rather than a mere quest for financial gain, and imparting these values to aspiring lawyers is pivotal. I request all law professionals through this platform to treat law students with respect even if they don’t know anything. They don’t know that is why they are students. Don’t neglect or demean them even if they do not have the basic understanding of law. They would be natured and nurtured through your profund guidance.
You recently spoke at TEDx. Could you share the central theme of your talk and any key takeaways you want the audience to remember?
My TEDx talk was not related to Law or the legal profession. It ventured beyond the legal sphere. The title of my talk was “Why we need to relearn the art of Crying”. It was related to the perception with which we should see the world. I have discussed why we need to let go of our ego, and why it is required to leave everything on nature when we have already acted and when our true faith and the situation has gone beyond karma. I discussed how this nature gives you everything without even demanding it. My talk emphasized the superpower of crying. It explains why respect and power of this world lies under softness (in Hindi “Komalta”) and not under hardness (in Hindi “Kathorta”), and thus why you need to be soft and gentle. I would to place the Urdu couplet from Habib Jalib which matches my TEDx talk and is apt for the people with ego considering themselves as God specifically in the field of law:
“tum se pahle vo jo ik shaḳhs yahāñ taḳht-nashīñ thā
us ko bhī apne ḳhudā hone pe itnā hī yaqīñ thā”
“ab vo phirte haiñ isī shahr meñ tanhā liye dil ko
ik zamāne meñ mizāj un kā sar-e-arsh-e-barīñ thā”
Outside of your legal endeavors, what are your personal hobbies or interests that help you unwind and find balance in your busy schedule?
Beyond the legal realm, I find solace in playing Chess. It is like a booster dose for me. I also love indulging in the rich tapestry of Indian Philosophy (Bharatiya Darshan) from Charvak Darshan to Mimansha Darshan etc. In my free time I also read old Hindi Literature. Nowadays, I have immersed myself in the world of Munshi Premchand as I am reading his novel namely Gaban. It soothes my mind as it takes me to the old lifestyle of the village and makes it dreamy and nostalgic at the same time.
What advice would you give to aspiring legal professionals, considering your own experiences and the evolving landscape of the legal field?
I will give the following advice:
Find your right mentor:
The first and one of the most difficult challenges for any young advocate who wants to dive into law practice is to find his/her right mentor who is not only a good lawyer but also a good human being. A mentor who gives his juniors the opportunity not only to seek adjournments and conduct research but also to argue some small matters in the beginning of his practice. A mentor who does not disrespect his juniors and can show his junior the right path and guide him in case of any need. Thus, the journey of finding the right mentor should start from the first year of law school itself.
Read Judgements consistently:
Cultivate a practice of reading judgments every day. There should not be even a single day when you have not read any judgement. Take small judgements in the beginning and not the long judgements like “Keshavanada Bharti (1973)” or “K. S. Puttaswamy (2017)”. Completing small judgements will boost your confidence. Keep reading it for 6 months without having any expectation. Reading judgements will improve your drafting skills, court language, legal vocabulary, interpretation of law, knowledge, and communication of law.
Do anything and everything to improve your communication Skills:
Recognize that effective communication is as vital as legal knowledge, with the ability to express ideas clearly a hallmark of a successful lawyer.
Try to have positive social media presence specially if are first generation lawyer:
Harness the power of social media specially if you are First generation lawyer, but with caution, ensuring accurate and verified information to avoid negative repercussions.
Try to start your practice from Trial Court or at least learn the work of Trial Court specially if you are First Generation Lawyer:
There are a very limited number of cases which come to the Supreme Court. Thus, the first-generation lawyers who start practicing in the Supreme Court find it difficult to survive after four to five years of practice as they get very few cases. I have witnessed many first-generation lawyers leaving practice and joining firms or companies with meagre salary because of high instability in their legal practice leading them to depression and anxiety. Thus, as far as my opinion and experience is concerned, for first-generation lawyers, gaining experience in Trial Court work is crucial for survival and growth in the legal profession.
Embrace hard work, dedication, and patience:
These virtues are the cornerstone of success in the legal profession, fostering resilience and long-term prosperity.
Could you share a bit about your professional journey, from your early days in the legal field to your current role as General Counsel at Kotak Alternate Asset Managers?
I still remember that when I started my career as an intern, the first task assigned to me was to draft a joint venture agreement and I had no clue what to write in the contract other than the name of the parties ! Unfortunately there was no google to help so it took me a week to do my research and then draft my first contract at work which was quite appreciated.
I’ve grown up with middle class values and started my professional journey from ground up, whether it was drafting contracts or plaints, attending courts, doing legal research or conducting due diligence exercises.
Subsequently, my international experience of leading complex cross border M&As as well as handling litigations in foreign courts further helped me in taking a more holistic approach on various legal issues.
Legal profession has gone through a sea change in the last two decades. Advent of technology and evolving regulatory framework has made the profession quite interesting. While complexities may have increased, the fundamental principles remain the same.
As someone who has successfully navigated the realms of litigation, dispute resolution, and complex investment banking transactions, how do you approach the challenge of balancing these contrasting worlds, and what strategic approaches have you found effective in doing so?
It’s just like when we are in school, we learn all the subjects with the object of excelling in each one. As a chartered accountant I love finance and numbers that helps me understand complex business transactions, while law has been my passion. So I’ve always adopted a holistic approach towards managing litigations as well as investment banking transactions. I believe that every contract, at inception itself needs to be analysed with the “what if this were to test the courts” scenario to ensure it is robust.
You’ve been a key player in numerous cross-border M&A deals, private equity transactions, and capital market transactions. What insights can you share about the evolving landscape of such transactions, and how do you stay ahead of the curve in this dynamic environment?
M&A and private equity deals have definitely become more complex and that is because the business landscape is dynamic and the regulatory framework has to keep up with the changing pace. But the root of even the most complex deal is a simple business transaction. The effort should be to understand that underlying basic transaction and the rest will fall in place.
Technology is another aspect that one needs to imbibe in the legal profession, as early as possible, to stay ahead of the curve. Use of central repositories, data analytics tools, AI have become a necessity for developing and analysing various alternatives for strategic decision making.
Your involvement in the CII panel for insolvency and bankruptcy laws showcases your thought leadership. How do you contribute to industry forums, and what motivated you to recently publish a research paper on IBC in the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Board’s publication “Anusandhan” (2022)?
I regularly contribute to various industry forums through paper presentations in various seminars and conferences, writing articles in books and journals, providing my inputs on policy matters to market regulators and government bodies through discussion papers etc. This also helps me in staying updated on the latest market as well as regulatory trends.
I have been actively practising and advising on matters relating to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) for quite some time now and my research paper on IBC, which got published, was an attempt to discuss the emerging trends in the bankruptcy law.
You’ve achieved notable success in NPAs recovery and litigation at Kotak Mahindra Bank. What challenges do you typically face in these areas, and what principles guide your approach in dealing with complex cases?
Litigations whether in relation to contractual breaches or NPA recoveries are like edge of the seat thrillers which keeps you hooked on to them till the climax i.e till a final court verdict is not received. One has to pursue each matter diligently on its own merits till the last. Like one of my seniors once aptly put it “there are only a few arrows available with you in your armoury, the trick is to know which one to shoot and when to shoot”.
Apart from your professional achievements, you’ve been awarded the “Super Mentor” in the ‘Evolve’ Mentoring Program at Kotak Mahindra Bank. How do you approach mentorship, and what advice do you offer to mentees aspiring to succeed in the legal and banking industries?
“Evolve” was an excellent initiative by Kotak Mahindra Bank, in which there was a mentor assigned to each mentee for a year. The aim was to create an informal, meaningful and interactive relationship between the mentor and the mentee to ensure that the mentee is able to utilise the practical insights from the learnings and experience of the mentor.
I believe it’s very important that one constantly shares one’s learnings and experiences with their team members and younger colleagues. This is a two way process in return one also gets to learn from their experiences.
Now, as the General Counsel at Kotak Alternate Asset Managers, what aspect of your current position excites you the most, and how do you foresee the future of PE in India evolving?
Being a part of the strategic decision making process and acting as a business enabler is quite exciting. The role of the General Counsel is that of a “solution provider” and not that of someone who merely “identifies a problem”. Everyday brings new challenges and learnings, so I feel like a student going to school and eager to learn something new.
The PE industry has just started shaping up in India and galloping its way to stand in line with banks and NBFCs as a major source of capital for the industry. A lot can be credited to the “India Story” and the continuous economic reforms coupled with conducive regulatory framework that has drawn the investors towards alternate assets (PE investments). Kotak Alternate Assets, being the largest domestic asset managers today manages assets way over USD 18 billion ( AUM exceeding USD 18 billion). What is now required is that this momentum should carry on.
How do you unwind or indulge your personal interests to maintain a healthy work-life balance, and could you share a bit about your hobbies or leisure activities?
I like reading and watching movies. One can relate to a lot of work life scenarios from books and movies and they can serve as a good break out from the monotony. My other passion is sports, and whenever I get a chance, I play badminton and squash. It’s a natural stress buster.
Given the evolving landscape, how do you see technology influencing the legal profession, especially in areas like alternative assets?
Technology now plays a key role in the legal profession and alternative assets is no exception. We leverage standardized templates for most of the routine contracts and maintain centralized repositories. Proactive communication with all stakeholders is a must to ensure clarity and consistency throughout the investment lifecycle. With continuous risk analysis, transparency, and data-driven insights, we optimize efficiency and resource allocation. One can remain ahead of the curve by continuously learning and embracing emerging technologies.
Given your extensive experience and expertise, what suggestions or advice would you offer to the upcoming generation of legal and financial professionals, especially those aspiring to take on leadership roles in the industry?
I believe that to be a successful professional one has to have a fire in the belly and eyes on the target. A constant hunger for work and learning and by working I mean working smartly, hard work is a given.
Can you provide a brief overview of your journey in the field of law, from your educational background to your current role as an in-house Legal Advisor?
My journey began with a passion for Indian civil services, steering my interest towards law despite an initial background in mechanical engineering. Pursuing a law degree from the University of Pune, I prioritized learning over grades, delving deep into various legal dimensions through diplomas, certifications, and practical experience. Working extensively in real estate law before completing LLB, I continued to expand my expertise in diverse legal areas—Civil, Criminal, Family, Consumer, Cooperative, Commercial, Labour, and Finance.
Joining a Pune-based law firm with a broad spectrum of cases but limited manpower allowed me to rapidly acquire extensive knowledge. Transitioning to a corporate role in a Singapore based company, specializing in commercial, legal, and financial advisory for startups, exposed me to a new realm of laws such as Corporate, Intellectual Property Rights (IPR), and Cyber Law.
Currently, as a Legal Advisor in a cluster of companies, I handle multifaceted legal responsibilities spanning litigation management, corporate agreements, Real Estate law, IPR, Data Privacy, compliance, and due diligence.
In your experience at Bluebox Consulting Pte. Ltd. in Singapore, how did you handle entity creation, management, and dissolution, especially in the context of startup operations?
During my tenure at Bluebox Consulting Pte. Ltd. in Singapore, I navigated entity creation, management, and dissolution within the startup landscape. Singapore’s legal and corporate procedures are notably straightforward, featuring user-friendly applications and streamlined processes that were quick to grasp and integrate into operations. Compared to India, the procedures are notably simpler and less cumbersome. Working closely with government agencies like ACRA & IRAS was a delight; their support further emphasized Singapore’s business-friendly ecosystem, which I found particularly favourable.
How have skills such as Legal Research, Due Diligence, and Litigation Management been crucial in your day-to-day Work, and can you share a specific example where these skills were instrumental?
In my current role, the company faces diverse litigations including SCC under section 138 of NI Act 1881, labor law cases, Special Civil suits, RCAs, among others. An instance that highlights the importance of my legal research skills occurred during a specific litigation where we needed case law to challenge the plaintiff’s authority to file the suit. Despite involving external counsel, my legal research proved pivotal. I uncovered relevant Case Laws that not only addressed the pertinent legal points but also showcased instances where the same individual involved in our case had committed a similar act in different cases across various High Court jurisdictions. This comprehensive research significantly contributed to our case strategy and defence.
As someone with expertise in Contracts & Negotiation, what advice would you give to professionals entering negotiations for international agreements?
For professionals entering negotiations regarding international agreements, I would emphasize the critical role of dispute resolution and jurisdiction clauses. Litigation costs in foreign countries such as the US and Singapore can be exceptionally high. Hence, incorporating arbitration clauses can significantly save on expenses and prove to be a more cost-effective solution.
You have pursued various certifications, including a diploma in “US Corporate Law & Paralegal Studies.” How have these certifications enhanced your legal knowledge and skills in practice?
These certifications I pursued, particularly the diploma in “US Corporate Law & Paralegal Studies,” have been immensely beneficial both in my current role and in my freelance endeavours. In my job, I frequently handle a diverse range of corporate agreements, many originating from foreign countries, necessitating a deep comprehension of international laws and procedures. This certification has served as a strong theoretical foundation that greatly supports and informs the practical work I undertake on a day-to-day basis.
Pursuing a Diploma in Mergers & Acquisition is an interesting choice. How do you see this specialization shaping your future roles or contributions to your current position?
Enrolling in a Diploma in Mergers & Acquisitions is a strategic investment in futuristic skills and opportunities. With India experiencing rapid growth, witnessing a surge in startups and companies undergoing transformations, there is a burgeoning demand for M&A and related expertise. I foresee this specialization playing a pivotal role in future roles or contributions, as M&A, being an extensive domain, already contributes, to some extent, to my current role, and I anticipate it will continue to be an asset as the complexities of M&A transactions become more prevalent in the professional landscape.
Working at Prof. Vijayrao Kale & Associates, you dealt with a variety of litigation matters. Can you share an experience that significantly impacted your approach to legal advocacy?
Sometimes, circumstances unexpectedly come to one’s aid. Learning directly from senior lawyers can be challenging, especially for first-generation lawyers like myself. In such situations, one must proactively seek opportunities and glean as much knowledge as possible despite facing repeated denials, frustration, and dissatisfaction.
Fortunately, during my tenure at Prof. Vijayrao Kale & Associates, I encountered a wealth of diverse litigation cases at various stages. Despite the limited number of Advocates available to handle these cases, this situation placed a substantial burden and responsibility on me as a newcomer in the field. This pressure, however, became a catalyst for my intense learning process, and I embraced it wholeheartedly. Within a remarkably short span, I absorbed an extensive amount of knowledge and procedural insights. I acquired insights that an average lawyer might not gain even after five years in the field, all within a mere 1-2 years.
While the pay scale was disappointing, the experience and knowledge gained were invaluable. This challenging environment became the breeding ground for exponential growth in my understanding and practical experience within the legal sphere.
Considering your diverse experience in law, what general advice would you give to fresh graduates entering the legal profession today?
Considering the diversity of experiences in law, my advice to fresh graduates venturing into the legal profession today revolves around the distinction between theoretical knowledge and its practical application. While understanding substantive law might seem more accessible, grasping procedural laws—often intricate and challenging to remember—poses a hurdle for beginners, especially first-generation lawyers.
Newcomers commonly struggle in acclimating to law practice due to insufficient revision of procedural laws. In my view, it is crucial for budding legal professionals to focus on memorizing procedural laws—prioritizing the relevant and frequently used ones—right from the outset of their practice. This foundational understanding significantly eases the comprehension of court procedures and accelerates progress towards higher levels of learning within the field.
Lastly, I would like to quote Roy Bennett for the first-generation lawyers,
“Your hardest times often lead to the greatest moments of your life. Keep going. Tough situations build strong people in the end.”
Could you share your journey into becoming a legal and social work professional, emphasizing how your professional and personal experiences have shaped your path?
My journey into the fusion of law and social work has been intertwined with personal experiences, academic pursuits, and a deep-rooted desire to effect positive change in society. I started my career in 2013, after completing a degree in Law and Post-Graduation in Social Work. Over the last decade I have had the opportunity to work with government organisations, NGOs, private sector organisations and law firms in various capacities which has made my professional journey more meaningful & richer and quintessentially varied from most people in our line of work.
My perspective has been significantly shaped by my parents, who have consistently demonstrated a strong commitment to giving back to society. Witnessing their compassion and advocacy for what is right has deeply influenced my own values and beliefs. Further I always believed and has been quoted by Oprah Winfrey that “the key to realising a dream is to focus not on success but significance, and then even the small steps and little victories along your path will take greater meaning”
Since joining Law Veritas: North in 2021, you’ve independently led the litigation department of the Firm. Share insights based on your personal experience regarding the journey towards attaining professional success.?
I hold the belief that the success of individuals within an organization is directly correlated with the quality of the work environment. Upon joining Law Veritas: North in 2021, I initially had reservations about committing to a law firm, uncertain about exclusively focusing on litigation, especially the one that predominantly dealt with banking and insurance. However, adhering to the notion that nothing happens by chance but rather as preparation for greater things, I embraced the opportunity.
Initially, my decision to work at Law Veritas: North was rooted in logistical convenience. As a new mother, proximity to home was a priority for maintaining flexibility in my professional pursuits. Since joining Law Veritas North, I’ve experienced a work environment that is both challenging and supportive. I’ve received substantial support in achieving my professional goals within the organization, and my mentors have not only acknowledged but also actively promoted and encouraged my specific area of interest. Additionally, the trust and acknowledgment extended to me by my seniors served as a catalyst for improved performance. This, in turn, strengthened my commitment to steering the litigation department towards success.
I also hold the view that passion and authentic interest in one’s work are essential and serve a pivotal role in setting goals and achieving success. Additionally, the continuous refinement of skill sets has become vital in reaching professional goals, particularly in areas such as networking, knowledge enhancement, technological adaptation, effective communication, leadership, initiative, and persistent hard work and dedication.
Managing diverse responsibilities, from civil and criminal litigations to community development initiatives, requires effective balance. How do you navigate these various roles, and what challenges have you encountered?
The process that may appear as navigating between roles actually, feels organic to me. In litigation, being selective about the type of work one engages in can be challenging. Regardless of the nature of the case, every case and every story holds numerous perspectives and untold truths about human life.
Navigating between cases as an advocate presents a multitude of challenges that require careful consideration and adept management. One such challenge lies in the diversity of legal matters an advocate encounters. Each case comes with its unique set of facts, legal intricacies, and client needs. This necessitates a constant need for adapting one’s approach, strategies, and legal arguments to suit the specific nuances of each case. Furthermore, the time constraints imposed by multiple cases can be demanding. Effectively managing and prioritizing cases while ensuring each client receives the necessary attention requires strong organizational and time management skills. Juggling the intricacies of various legal issues, court appearances, and client interactions requires a delicate balance to ensure the best possible outcomes for each case. However, it’s crucial to bear in mind that achieving this balance often involves the collaborative efforts of a team, and success is truly achieved when all members work in harmony.
Additionally, the emotional toll of dealing with diverse and often sensitive legal matters is a substantial challenge. Advocates frequently encounter clients facing distressing situations, and maintaining empathy while remaining professional is crucial. Striking this balance requires emotional resilience and a nuanced understanding of the human aspects intertwined with legal issues. Moreover, staying updated on the evolving legal landscape, precedents, and statutory changes across different areas of law is vital. This continuous learning process ensures that advocates are well-equipped to provide the most effective representation and counsel to their clients.
Beyond the legal realm, your passion lies in advocating for social causes. Could you share a specific initiative or project that is particularly close to your heart, and why?
I have a profound passion for social issues, particularly with respect to child rights, which holds a special place in my heart. To advance this cause, I have actively involved myself in initiatives related to education, child health care, adoption etc. Through my efforts, my aim is to foster a fair and inclusive social environment for children across all segments of society.
What adds to the significance of children for me is their vulnerability and complete dependence on others. Children have the potential to instigate positive change in numerous aspects of life. With appropriate guidance, education, and nurturing, they can evolve into responsible and compassionate individuals, making positive contributions to their communities and the global society. Ensuring their safety and creating a nurturing environment are fundamental societal responsibilities. To echo the words of Kailash Satyarthi, the Nobel Peace Prize laureate, “Every single minute matters, every single child matters, every single childhood matters.”
Can you elaborate on the specific aspects of CSR and adoption that have had a notable impact on your approach and understanding of the legal landscape?
In the realm of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), companies often align their practices with legal requirements, recognizing that adherence to laws and regulations is an essential aspect of responsible business conduct.
Furthermore, ensuring compliance with local, national, and international laws becomes imperative for businesses to fulfil their CSR commitments. As they embark on CSR activities, business entities must be cognizant of and adhere to these legal frameworks. The integration of CSR commitments into contractual agreements and legal documents further underscores the connection between CSR and law. For example, companies may incorporate specific clauses related to environmental sustainability, fair labour practices, or community engagement in their contracts. Failure to meet these CSR obligations carries the potential for legal consequences. Therefore, the relationship between CSR and law is intricate, encompassing various facets such as legal compliance, regulatory frameworks, contractual obligations, and the management of legal risks associated with social and environmental impacts. By incorporating CSR into their business practices, companies align themselves with legal expectations, fostering a more responsible and sustainable business environment.
My tenure at the Central Adoption Resource Authority (CARA) provided a structured environment where I consistently prioritized children’s safety and well-being. Managing the entire litigation and legal aspects of inter-country adoptions added an exciting dimension to my role. It exposed me to intricate legal issues, particularly from a foreign policy perspective, and involved collaboration with external affairs agencies and international organizations.
Legal safeguards in adoption extend protections to adopted children, guaranteeing them equivalent rights and privileges to those of biological children. These rights encompass inheritance, medical access, and the entitlement to information about their adoption history, maintaining confidentiality, and more. Moreover, adoption agencies, whether public or private entities globally, are bound by legal regulations. These laws describe licensing prerequisites, ethical standards, and procedures that adoption agencies must adhere to, ensuring the legality and ethical integrity of the adoption process. It is crucial to highlight that the legal procedure extends to post-placement supervision, a measure taken to ascertain the well-being of the child within the adoptive home.
Hence personally these experiences have helped to broaden my overall understanding of various laws, different approaches and strategies involved in the procedure.
In your profile, proficiency in legal technology is mentioned. How do you see the integration of technology impacting the legal profession, and how have you embraced it in your practice?
The fundamental transformation of the legal profession is underway through the integration of technology, giving rise to a wave of innovations that amplify efficiency, precision, and accessibility. This impact extends across multiple aspects of legal practice, including a revolution in legal research, the automation and management of documents, enhanced communication and collaboration, and an increased focus on cybersecurity and data protection. Adapting to this changing technology is an essential need of the hour for professional as personal growth.
You’ve received a scholarship for an international workshop on “End Of Life Care” and have diverse experiences. Can you elaborate on your experience and learning?
At the Summer University in Lausanne, Switzerland, where I was awarded a scholarship, I delved into a comprehensive study of ‘End of Life Care,’ exploring its social, psychological, and legal dimensions. Exposure to this program at the University enlightened me about the rights of individuals facing the end of life, regardless of whether it was due to old age, critical illness, or other reasons. Key topics included diverse legal frameworks, varied end-of-life care practices in different countries, honoring the wishes of the dying, palliative care, socio-psychological support for family members, and the dignified treatment of deceased individuals. These discussions and exchanges not only highlighted the current global health practices and legal considerations but also emphasized the need for a systemic approach in addressing the care of vulnerable individuals, considering the cultural nuances of each country.
With your diverse experiences, what advice do you have for aspiring lawyers and professionals looking to make a positive impact on society through their legal careers?
Addressing ICFAI University, Jharkhand as a Keynote Speaker representing Law Veritas: North in a panel discussion on ‘Advocacy as a Profession: Prospects & Challenges’ on the eve of Advocate’s Day last year, I highlighted advocacy’s pivotal role amid today’s information complexities. Advocates serve as catalysts for change, bringing attention to issues that may otherwise be overlooked or ignored or miscommunicated. The use of legal technology, artificial intelligence, and online platforms can streamline legal research, improve case management, and facilitate communication between advocates and their clients.
In present scenario a whole lot more skills are required to establish yourself like:
Effective Communication skills: Mastering the art of communication is fundamental. It involves not just speaking but also active listening and empathetic understanding.
Creative Problem Solving: In the complex legal world, creative solutions often pave the way for resolving intricate issues. A flexible, innovative approach is invaluable.
Analytical and observational skills- Attention to detail is key. The ability to analyze information critically and observe nuances can significantly impact legal strategies and outcomes.
Reading- Cultivating a habit of continuous learning through reading is invaluable. It not only expands knowledge but also refines approaches to various legal challenges.
Networking- Building professional networks is crucial for success. Collaborations, mentorships, and connections can open doors to opportunities and growth.
Negotiation Skills: The art of negotiation is a powerful tool. It involves finding common ground while advocating for your client’s interests.
My father’s insightful advice resonates deeply,“In this profession, be prepared to work harder than the money you receive.”Hard work, dedication, and a commitment to the cause are vital.
As advocates, our approach to these challenges should embody unwavering determination and resilience. Let us continue to champion the voices advocating for positive change, working together towards a more equitable and just future for all.
We are extremely delighted to have you with us for this interview. To start, could you please introduce yourself and share the inspiration behind establishing Pravah Law Offices?
Thank you for having me. I have been a Delhi-based practising lawyer since 2017. The bulk of my practise is at the Supreme Court, which is also the forum where I learnt the maximum work as an associate with my mentors, Ms. Haripriya Padmanabhan and Mr. Gopal Sankaranarayanan.
‘Pravah Law’ is the official designation of my law chambers. The primary motivation behind establishing it was to foster a distinct professional identity that resonates with my core values and expertise, to enhance the efficiency and organization of my practice.
Being awarded the Vice-Chancellor’s Gold Medal for ‘Best Male Student’ is a remarkable achievement. How has your academic journey, including your time at National Law University, Delhi, influenced your approach to law and legal practice?
Getting the Vice-Chancellor’s Gold Medal was a big confidence booster because of what it signifies: it is awarded to two students from each batch, male and female, who graduate with the best all-round performance. Incidentally, even at my school’s farewell function, I was awarded the ‘Best All-Rounder’ trophy—something I cherish more than any other recognition I’ve received. I enjoy being able to handle multiple activities and projects together. In college, I was an avid sportsperson, musician and mooter (in that order) with an interest in many other extra-curricular activities.
As regards academics, those five years were formative. My teachers at NLU Delhi were outstanding in terms of how much they pushed us. For instance, we were made to prepare bulky, complex judgments and other texts within tight deadlines—not just read the material, but also form polished opinions about it. This seemed impossible back then. We kept complaining about being forced to meet unrealistic standards! But I realise with every passing day as to how much edge those exercises can give you in a profession where reading is everything and everything is to be read. I owe a lot to NLU Delhi.
Your LL.M. at the University of Michigan Law School was accompanied by the prestigious Michigan Grotius Fellowship. How did this international exposure shape your perspective on law, and what key lessons did you bring back to your practice in India?
It was a terrific experience. UMich gives you the freedom to design your course by choosing any combination of subjects. So, besides my law subjects (media law, freedom of speech & religion, equality law etc.), I selected a few subjects situated at the intersection of law and philosophy, which significantly contributed to my intellectual growth. My teachers were excellent and my classmates were intelligent and accomplished, which made classes engaging and challenging. It was exactly the kind of quality I wanted in my higher education.
Looking back, my most important learning in Ann Arbor was that there’s always another way—to think of a legal problem, articulate an argument, research case law, and even draft a memorandum—if only one is willing. I find that many colleagues here are used to old methods that may no longer work, at least not as effectively as one would like. The mere willingness to try another way can produce great results. And it requires no earth-shattering effort; sometimes, it is as simple as learning a new technological tool, shortening your drafts, using visual representations (graphs instead of paragraphs), making a LinkedIn profile, or even writing an email that you thought would be futile.
Law Vaarta is a unique blend of Hindi and English, making legal discussions more accessible. What inspired you to start this podcast, and how has the response been from your audience?
I believe that law is not as elusive as it is made out to be. Every citizen is capable of understanding the law, provided it is explained in simple language. Unfortunately, discussions around the law on TV and other media are either superficial or too technical-sounding. That is why I felt that a platform is required where complex legal issues are explained in straightforward language without losing their complexity.
I am delighted with the response the podcast has received. People have been kind in their appreciation as well as criticism, both of which are aimed at improving the quality of the content. I’m learning new things about content creation on the go. In 2024, I intend to increase the reach of the podcast through interactive content that will cater specifically to law students and young litigators, in the hope that litigation can become a more accessible profession.
Your research covers various topics, from constitutional rights to online gaming legislation. What upcoming research projects or areas of interest are you currently exploring?
Over the past couple of years, I have picked up an interest in empirical research on judicial behaviour. I am currently working on two projects relating to preventive detention and one on India’s abortion law. All three projects are geared towards understanding the behaviour of the Supreme Court and High Courts in cases involving the fundamental rights of citizens. For instance, in the preventive detention research, I am trying to map the speed with which our constitutional courts act in habeas corpus petitions against illegal detentions.
The Right to Receive Information is an upcoming publication. Can you give our readers a sneak peek into what conceptual problems you explore in this piece?
In the post-emergency years, the Supreme Court infused many fundamental rights with expansive content. The right to receive information was a product of this exercise. The Supreme Court held that the right to “speak” under Article 19 of the Constitution includes the right to “know”. I find this to be somewhat of a logical jump. There is no doubt that an informed citizen will exercise their right to free speech more meaningfully, but it is hard to agree with the proposition that there is no right to free speech without full or proper information about the subject matter. Anyway, the paper mainly explores the judicial approach to the right to receive information over the years, first, on whether the right is horizontal or vertical, and second, on whether there are any additional grounds on which the right to receive information can be restricted over and above the grounds listed in Article 19(2). The paper finds that the judicial approach on both counts has been thoroughly inconsistent and requires clarity.
On a personal note, outside the legal realm, what are your hobbies or activities that bring you joy and relaxation?
I try and do everything that interests me: poetry, sports, music and beyond. Lately, I have been exploring coding to automate some of my daily tasks as a litigator, which would help me save time on clerical work and focus on the more substantive aspects of the law.
Looking ahead, what are your future goals or aspirations for Pravah Law Offices
As the chamber’s work grows, increasing the size of the team has been on my mind. In fact, Pravah Law recently finished one round of hiring. To my good fortune, I have generous mentors and supportive clients, and I am sure the chamber will grow rapidly with their blessings.
Other than that, I endeavor that Pravah Law remains ahead of the curve in terms of technological infrastructure and awareness. I believe lawyers must upgrade and upskill every year. Artificial intelligence is making path-breaking advances by the minute, and I do not doubt that lawyers will have to catch up to stay relevant.
Considering your multifaceted journey, what advice would you offer to aspiring lawyers, especially those who are interested in a diverse legal practice or engaging in legal academia?
‘Advice’ is a tricky concept. Everyone comes from a different context and must figure out their own ways. But I would pass on the following helpful pieces of advice that I have followed:
“Litigation is 10% intelligence and 90% diligence.”
What prompted you to do Law? and then, what prompted you to move to corporate law? And at the end in the whole journey. What made you establish Agama Law associates?
The question of why law has always intrigued me, dating back to a remarkably early age of around 12 or 13. At that point, my understanding of the legal field was limited, and there were no familial ties to the profession. Nevertheless, something about law captivated me deeply. As a voracious reader during my childhood, I found the prospect of a career where continuous learning was inherent and extended throughout one’s professional life to be highly appealing.
The realization that law touches every aspect of life dawned on me as I grew older. Unlike professions such as medicine, pharma, or engineering, which often specialize in a single domain, the legal profession offers a unique insight into multiple facets of life. Whether practicing medical law, which requires a profound understanding of medicine, or delving into criminal law, where a high understanding of criminal psychology is crucial, the multifaceted nature of law continues to be a source of excitement.
Moreover, my enthusiasm for law extends to the generalist role I currently embrace. In a landscape where specialization is often emphasized, my passion lies in exploring diverse areas of law. This inclination was evident from an early stage, a decision supported by my father. This generalist approach allows me to navigate through various legal territories and maintain a broad perspective, which I find both stimulating and fulfilling.
Reflecting on my journey, the inception of my legal career was marked by this passion and a commitment to continuous learning. It’s a journey that has been shaped by a love for reading, an excitement for the multifaceted nature of law, and a deliberate choice to remain a generalist in a world that often leans towards specialization.
My legal journey commenced under the mentor-ship of a senior counsel, renowned as the leading shipping lawyer in the country at that time. The realm of shipping law was exceptionally thrilling and lucrative, akin to a gold mine in the legal landscape. Although disputes were relatively scarce due to the industry’s prosperity, my exposure was comprehensive. From witnessing ship arrests to navigating shipbuilding contracts, the experience was enlightening. As junior members in a senior’s office, understanding the intricacies of queuing matters and gauging the dynamics of working alongside a seasoned professional fueled my desire to explore beyond the apparent tip of the iceberg.
Subsequently, my journey led me to a solicitor setup, where the practice encompassed both litigation and non-litigation matters. This phase afforded me a diverse range of experiences, delving into project finance and mergers and acquisitions (M&A). Engaging in IPO-related work and handling white-collar matters in the court provided a well-rounded exposure. Frequenting both Criminal Court and the High Court for writ petitions enriched my understanding of legal processes.
Transitioning to a role at AZB marked a grounding experience, characterized by the demanding quality of work and the competitiveness inherent in the firm’s culture. The challenges posed in managing time constraints and a myriad of responsibilities served as a valuable learning curve. This stint prompted a process of unlearning certain approaches, fostering personal and professional growth.
My inclination towards connecting with people on an individual level led to the establishment of Agama. Originating in a single room, this venture symbolizes my quest to reach out independently and make a tangible impact. The journey, from the initial mentorship in shipping law to navigating diverse legal landscapes, has been characterized by continuous learning, adaptation, and the pursuit of meaningful connections.
Your experience spans various sectors, from manufacturing to healthcare. Is there a specific industry that you find particularly intriguing or challenging, and why? And how do you break the boundaries and enter that challenge, because this is for the ones who are entering this amazing field of law as you mentioned.
For lawyers, such as myself, who adopt an industry-agnostic approach, the legal landscape presents a diverse and expansive canvas. Personally, I’ve been fortunate to accumulate a wealth of varied experiences across different sectors. Among the most dynamic and engaging areas of law today is the realm of general corporate law.
Within general corporate law, several sectors stand out as particularly exciting. One such burgeoning industry is logistics, encompassing a spectrum of aspects, from real estate to road and vehicle-related laws. The logistics industry has witnessed remarkable growth, with emerging players like micro-mobility companies and port operators contributing to its dynamism. Advising clients in this field involves addressing a wide range of issues, including labor matters, especially those with an IT-centric focus. Additionally, logistics offers opportunities to provide counsel on data protection and navigate complex cross-border challenges. The sector also presents instances of high-quality arbitration, especially concerning transport, customs, and international trade.
Another compelling and niche area that is currently witnessing the development of legal jurisprudence is the regulatory framework surrounding renewable energy. In this domain, there are relatively few lawyers in the country specializing in this evolving field. Personally, I have been privileged to work on projects related to renewable energy, particularly in assisting a client in setting up solar farms in India. This experience has spanned a broad spectrum, involving M&A, regulatory compliance, and labor issues, making it a truly comprehensive and rewarding endeavor over the past one and a half years.
In the context of fostering growth and cultivating relationships with clients, particularly within the framework of your own firm, could you share insights into how you went about establishing these connections? What strategies did you employ when encountering unfamiliar individuals whom you identified as potential valuable clients for your firm? Additionally, could you elaborate on the foundational values that guided your approach in engaging with clients and ultimately contributed to the development and current standing of your firm?
The foundation of any long term relationship lies in unwavering mutual trust and mutual value addition. For us, as lawyers, trust is given where we uncomplicate. If businesses can trust us to unwind the complexity in a stressful situation, as fast as possible, instead of taking them deeper down the web of intricacy – we have justified our existence. Navigating the intricacies of being a good lawyer revolves around a crucial ability: the aptitude to unravel complex problems and present them in simplistic terms, particularly from the client’s perspective. The foremost skill lies in understanding the client’s desires, pinpointing their current pain points, and crafting viable solutions.
Some of the most renowned lawyers often exhibit this proficiency, breaking down intricate legal matters into comprehensible points for their clients. The challenge arises from the fact that clients may express their problems differently due to a lack of legal understanding. Lawyers need to bridge this gap by deciphering the true legal issues beneath the client’s articulated concerns.
Ultimately, being an effective lawyer hinges on a clear comprehension of what the client wants, an astute understanding of their present challenges, and the ability to provide feasible solutions. The task extends beyond legal expertise, requiring effective communication and translation of legal intricacies into practical and accessible terms for the client.
Certainly, the process involves two distinct facets: understanding clients and acquiring clients. Acquiring clients, relatively, is the more manageable aspect. It often necessitates showcasing one’s abilities, effectively communicating in the client’s language, and establishing a level of comfort that encourages collaboration.
In the contemporary legal landscape, companies tend to engage with multiple legal professionals for diverse needs, disrupting the traditional model where a single firm handled all legal matters. As a result, lawyers need to adapt to this shift and recognize that not every point of contact transforms into a client. Identifying whether a client is attainable, either from the client’s perspective or the lawyer’s, is a nuanced evaluation.
Understanding clients, on the other hand, delves into the core of their challenges and aspirations. It involves deciphering the key issues they face and determining whether the proposed legal solutions align with their objectives. The crux lies in comprehending what the client aims to achieve and guiding them toward feasible solutions. This task stands out as the most intricate part of the process.
While legal documentation and transaction structuring are essential components, they primarily serve as logistical elements. However the foundational value is to get at the core of what a business needs but is not able to put into words. The value is also to minimize logistical efforts, and hence costs, as far as dispensable without compromising on risk-protection. The true essence lies in grasping whether our efforts effectively contribute to realizing the client’s goals. Therefore, the key to success in the legal profession lies in the nuanced understanding of both acquiring and understanding clients, ensuring that legal services align with and contribute to the client’s desired outcomes.
Could you elaborate on how you navigate the delicate balance between intricate legal nuances and the broader business context when serving in an advisory role? Specifically, when recommending clients to others, how do you manage this equilibrium, considering that clients hold the reins in decision-making, and advisory services revolve around facilitating their processes and needs?
As an advisor, I have an obligation to multiple coordination points – the individual seeking advice, the organization the individual is representing, and then the criticalities that both the representing individual as well as the organizational governance may not have full awareness or understanding of and may not have planned to address, yet. It’s crucial to align these aspects. For instance, a client might approach us for a lease agreement, but upon deeper discussion, we may discover they lack essential commercial terms. In such cases, our role evolves beyond legal drafting, extending to advising on business risks and strategic decisions.
While some clients seek legal interpretations, others welcome comprehensive business advice. The distinction lies in understanding their specific needs. Some engagements involve academic legal exercises, while others delve into strategic business decisions. Being part of this decision-making process is equally enjoyable for us.
As an advisor, the key is intuitive understanding—discerning whether clients merely seek legal input or require a deeper exploration of their business context. This process takes time and builds on familiarity, similar to understanding friends. Ultimately, aligning with clients’ objectives is paramount in offering effective advisory services.
Your focus on process-driven risk management systems for startups is noteworthy. What key principles do you believe are crucial for startups to establish a sustainable foundation in terms of legal compliance?
Sustainable business foundations would involve managing foresight and mapping the pie that a business is trying to negotiate for itself, well in advance. In the sharply agile market that we are witnessing in all sectors thanks to tech advancement and artificial intelligence, a business that desires to sustain itself for any amount of term that is markable, the bare minimum requirement is to cover for risks and obligations that will flow much in advance. Mature entrepreneurs have that foresight to an extent, but fledgling start ups don’t. This is where our experience – and the systems and in-built processes that has led to within our advice – comes in.
When startups seek advice, we often encounter two distinct types. Firstly, there are mature entrepreneurs who have prior experience in the field and are advancing their ventures. Dealing with them is relatively straightforward as they possess a solid understanding of the workings, time-frames, and compliance risks. They proactively ask the necessary questions, making the consultation process smoother.
On the other hand, there’s a different category of startups – those with innovative products or disruptive ideas seeking funding and eager to establish and run their systems. Handling these startups requires a unique approach. With mature entrepreneurs, conversations can delve into advanced levels, as they are already aware of the eventual need for compliance. In such cases, simplifying their journey is achievable by providing checklists and connecting them with essential professionals like company secretaries and chartered accountants. We have a well-established network of professionals with whom we collaborate, facilitating these connections.
For the latter type of startups, there is a need for a more persuasive approach. Convincing them of the importance of compliance is crucial. As legal advisors, our role primarily involves guiding them on compliance requirements rather than directly handling compliance matters. By effectively communicating the necessity of adherence to regulations, we aim to bridge this understanding gap and help them navigate the intricacies of legal compliance. Ensuring success in the startup landscape today is imperative, especially considering the vast reach of the Internet. I recently came across an intriguing insight in a doctor’s room that resonates with this—suggesting that if you trust Google for health advice, you might as well ask Google to cure you. In today’s digital age, startups often grapple with misconceptions, and my role involves investing time upfront to dispel any misinformation and guide them in understanding the landscape.
One key area I find crucial is steering startups towards sustainable investments. Beyond mere compliance, many startups, in their early stages, inadvertently sacrifice significant equity and rights. The true victory, in my perspective, lies in assisting startups to secure sustainable investments that will propel the company forward without compromising its core interests. This involves strategic steps to avoid pitfalls and foster the company’s long-term growth.
In my experience, every startup journey unveils distinct challenges and perspectives, which continually enriches my understanding of the dynamic startup ecosystem. It’s fascinating to approach each situation with an open mind, as the nuances and intricacies vary, offering fresh perspectives and learning’s with every new collaboration.
Mergers and Acquisitions form a significant part of your practice. Could you share a memorable experience or deal that posed unique challenges and how you navigated through them?
The turning point in my approach to M&A came when as part of one deal, I had said a big unequivocal “No” on behalf of our clients to one of the deal terms. The counter-party, a significant figure in a large group, was humble and kind enough to not come back aggressively to that position but encourage a dialogue. Which is when it really sunk in how much more are we as “facilitators” instead of hurdles, on deal making, as lawyers. And the art of negotiation is something we can’t ever have honed enough – there’s always some new interpersonal aspect to learn about. Despite his stature, he was kind and humble, encouraging a dialogue to resolve the issue. Such experiences reshape one’s perspective, emphasizing the importance of effective negotiation. Therefore,, when it comes to mergers, the crux, for me, lies in negotiations. This has been the most significant learning for me over the past decade. Working with an entire team provides a certain level of comfort due to the presence of seniors and super seniors. However, the true learning comes from actively negotiating a transaction and seeing it through, which I believe is a crucial skill for lawyers. My advice to young professionals is to actively seek opportunities where they can lead or negotiate transactions rather than being a part of a larger team.
In our practice, we have instilled this philosophy from the beginning. Regardless of their seniority, all associates are encouraged to actively participate in negotiations and discussions. This exposure ensures that they grasp the context of the deal and understand the dynamics involving clients and counter-parties.
One challenge in today’s M&A landscape is the post-deal closures, especially in mergers. While closing the deal itself is significant, the groundwork post-merger is equally crucial. Nowadays, many companies handle this in-house or enlist the help of consultants, making it essential for lawyers to understand the entire process.
Lastly, for young professionals aspiring to excel in M&A, I recommend dedicating effort to understanding the regulatory landscape. Regulatory filings, particularly under the Competition Act, offer a unique perspective. Arguing why a particular combination is not detrimental to competition provides valuable exposure that significantly enhances one’s understanding of M&A in the Indian legal context. If time permits, M&A is an excellent avenue for learning the diverse facets of law.
Your contributions to various publications and your recognition as a thought leader reflect your commitment to sharing insights. What motivates you to contribute, and how do you stay ahead in an ever-evolving legal and business landscape?
Lawyers often claim they don’t read enough due to the fast-paced nature of the legal landscape. However, staying ahead requires continuous reading, networking, and engaging with the legal community. Isolation isn’t conducive to legal work; interacting with peers, meeting business professionals, and fraternizing with others are essential for effective practice.
In terms of recognitions, accolades, and awards, one values recognition for their writing. Encouraging everyone in the company to write, regardless of seniority, expands minds and provides a broader perspective. Writing on various subjects not only benefits the company but also enhances the individual’s understanding of the overall legal landscape. It is most satisfying being approached for stories on POSH and labor-specific law over the past ten years by leading magazines. This recognition, despite not being a senior labor lawyer, is particularly meaningful.
It would do well to acknowledge the significance of industry magazines and editorial efforts, such as IBLJ, for recognizing lawyers. This recognition makes younger lawyers feel like a vital part of the legal community and boosts morale, especially when attempting to create something parallel to established setups. The credit goes to those in editorial roles who contribute to highlighting the achievements and perspectives of lawyers outside the traditional legal hierarchy.
Your recognition as a finalist for “Woman Lawyer of the Year 2023” and other prestigious awards is impressive. How do such recognitions impact your approach to your work, and what advice do you have for young lawyers aspiring to make a mark in the legal field?
Personally, every morning when I wake up, the motivating factor is knowing that clients rely on me. There’s nothing more inspiring than the realization that I can contribute to their businesses. Additionally, my team is waiting for me each day, and our discussions about ongoing issues drive me to be there for them as we work to advise clients. It’s a dynamic mix of client needs and team collaboration that fuels my motivation.
Speaking of recognition’s, it’s a relatively recent trend. When we left law school, there weren’t as many accolades for lawyers. While I value these recognition’s and they undoubtedly make one feel good (who wouldn’t want to be called a top lawyer in the country?), it’s crucial for young professionals to understand the importance of building their CVs continuously. Every task, from writing an article to advising a client, should be documented. Keeping a record of your learning experiences allows for recollection when needed, whether for award submissions or networking. This proactive approach helps people remember you, and at our firm, we ensure everyone records and reflects on their work regularly. It’s about considering what could have been done better, what went right, what went wrong, and identifying areas for improvement. In the fast-paced world, reflective practices might not always be feasible, but being mindful of this can significantly contribute to personal and professional growth, fostering a sense of pride and accomplishment.
In an era of increasing data concerns, you’ve been actively involved in data protection agreements. How do you assist clients, especially those in software creation, in navigating data protection compliance and mitigating associated risks?
In today’s globalized business landscape, privacy has become a crucial factor due to the vast amount of data available to businesses. The handling of data is emerging as a key cost-driving factor, influencing how companies operate. For instance, there is a shift towards keeping data within specific geographical boundaries, like storing Indian data in India and EU data in the EU, driven by government directives, especially in developed countries. While some governments mandate these practices, in India, it’s often seen more as a compliance requirement.
Our approach to reviewing data protection agreements or privacy documents varies based on the client. With Indian clients, we emphasize the need for compliance, advising against drafting anything they can’t adhere to or might require additional funds for compliance. Privacy is considered non-negotiable, and non-compliance, especially for European clients, can result in significant fines. We often assist clients dealing with European parties but processing data in India, guiding them through transfer impact assessments to ensure compliance.
The introduction of the Data Protection Act (DPA) is expected to enhance the infrastructure for protecting citizens’ privacy. However, we acknowledge that the existing Information Technology Act and rules, if implemented effectively, could serve a similar purpose. Enforcement, though, remains a challenge due to the complexity of procedures, such as involving the cyber cell or the legal system. With the DPA, many principles are being codified into law, reflecting legislative intent. While this might not drastically alter the groundwork for companies, it does offer more avenues for data subjects to seek enforcement.
Beyond your professional achievements, what personal interests or activities contribute to your growth and well-being outside the legal realm?
I believe, like many lawyers, I do face challenges when it comes to taking care of my health. I wish I could prioritize my well-being more and achieve a better balance. However, what takes up the majority of my time is my family, as we have a fairly large one. Balancing work and family is a constant challenge, but we make efforts to promote healthier eating habits within our family.
For me, mental well-being is crucial, considering the demands of the legal profession. Small things at home can become sources of stress, so learning to switch off when at work and using tools like reminders helps manage personal commitments. Technology, in this sense, plays a significant role in helping me stay organized, reminding me of tasks such as buying a gift for my son.
While it’s challenging, I’ve learned to establish boundaries between work and home life. Despite the difficulty in today’s fast-paced world, I make an effort not to work when I’m at home. Being part of a family of professionals, with my husband also being a lawyer, helps create routines that prioritize family time, especially on weekends.
Achieving this balance is different for everyone, and I acknowledge that it’s not an easy task. Personally, I wish I could find more time to read nonfiction, as I used to read several books a year, and now finding time for even one or two is a challenge. However, it remains something I’d love to prioritize in the future.
We are delighted to have you for this interview. To kick things off, could you please introduce yourself and share what led you to pursue a career in law, especially with a focus on arbitration and civil-commercial litigation?
Thank you for having me. I am R.V. Prabhat, an engineer who transitioned into the realm of law, now practising independently in Delhi with a focus on civil-commercial laws, constitutional matters, and arbitration law. My journey into law was somewhat serendipitous. During engineering, a family property dispute piqued my interest in the field of law. This experience, combined with my keen interest in current affairs and policy, steered me away from conventional engineering paths towards a legal career. I am a first-generation lawyer with no direct or indirect background in law.
The choice did not seem logical to close relatives and well-wishers at the time, but if you are clear in your head what you want to do at the end of the day, that more or less settles the issue. Today, I am happy I took the plunge.
I chose to pursue law at the prestigious Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur. The thrill of interpreting laws, formulating arguments, and persuading judges to see things from your perspective is exhilarating. It is this intellectual challenge and the dynamic nature of litigation that cemented my decision to build a career in litigation.
Throughout my law course and subsequent internships, I was consistently drawn to the complexities and nuances of arbitration and commercial disputes. With a background in engineering, I was drawn to the analytical aspects of legal disputes, and arbitration offered a dynamic arena where technical knowledge often plays a crucial role. The satisfaction of unravelling complex legal scenarios and advocating for a client’s position is unparalleled. This passion for litigation and a desire to make a meaningful impact in the legal landscape continue to drive my career as a litigator.
With degrees in engineering and law, as well as completing the Executive Level of the Company Secretary course, your educational background is quite diverse. How has this multidisciplinary foundation influenced your approach to handling legal cases?
My multifaceted educational journey has been pivotal in shaping my approach to legal practice. The analytical skills honed during my engineering degree is invaluable, especially when dealing with cases involving complex technical details. It enables me to dissect intricate issues and understand the underlying mechanics of a dispute, which is often critical in technical litigation cases.
Further, the insights gained from the intermediate level of the Company Secretary course have deepened my understanding of corporate governance and compliance.
This multidisciplinary background empowers me to view legal issues through a wider lens, considering various angles and potential implications that might not be immediately apparent. Beyond my formal education, I maintain a keen interest in history, current affairs, technological advancements, and policy changes. I firmly believe that the practice of law is based on continuous learning.
Overall, the combination of technical knowledge, corporate governance insights, and a broad interest in various disciplines has helped me to bring a unique and comprehensive approach to handling legal cases, often leading to more holistic and effective solutions for my client
As an accomplished author in the legal field, your commentary book on Arbitration Law has received praise from eminent jurists. What inspired you to venture into legal writing and how does it complement your legal practice?
Writing, for me, has always been a profound way to crystallise and disseminate my experiences and insights gained through legal practice. The acclaim my commentary on Arbitration Law received, notably from esteemed jurists, was both humbling and affirming. I owe a debt of gratitude to Eastern Book Company, and particularly to Mr. Sumeet Malik, for their pivotal role in the success of the book.
The act of writing, in my view, is an exercise in clarity and rigour. It exposes any logical inconsistencies in one’s understanding and compels a thorough comprehension of the subject matter. This process of writing and articulation began during my law school days, under the mentorship of Prof. Dr. Uday Shankar.
In the legal profession, where direct advertising of one’s capabilities is not allowed, writing serves as a vital medium for a lawyer to showcase expertise and contribute to the broader legal discourse. It is a pathway through which the world gets to know and understand our legal acumen and perspectives.
Moreover, the legal profession and academia are intertwined. The depth of knowledge required for writing and the very process of organizing and presenting one’s thoughts in writing contribute significantly to a lawyer’s ability to reason and argue with clarity and coherence. In essence, my venture into legal writing is not just a parallel academic pursuit; it complements and enriches my legal practice, offering a platform for continuous learning and intellectual growth.
You’ve been empanelled as legal counsel for prestigious organizations like ONGC, ECL, NHPC, and NCL. How does your role as Senior Panel Counsel for Union of India contribute to your professional growth, and what unique challenges does it present?
As a first-generation lawyer, these roles have provided me with a consistent platform to present cases in court, which is invaluable. As in any profession, the maxim ‘practice makes perfect’ holds particularly true in law. Regular court appearances have honed my advocacy skills and deepened my understanding of legal nuances. Working with government departments has introduced me to the complexities of bureaucratic decision-making processes. Navigating these intricacies has been both challenging and enlightening, significantly enhancing my comprehension of governmental legal frameworks as well as my understanding over administrative law and constitutional law principles. This experience is instrumental in broadening my perspective, enabling me to see cases from both private and public viewpoints. Understanding the motivations and constraints of government entities offers a unique vantage point that enriches my legal strategies for private clients. The learning derived from balancing the interests of private clientele against public responsibilities is profound. It’s not just about legal knowledge; it’s about developing an intuitive understanding of varying perspectives and leveraging this insight to craft more effective and nuanced legal strategies. This dual perspective is invaluable.
You’ve written on diverse legal topics, but your article about “Balancing Act: Reassessing the Safe Harbour Provisions In the Age of Digital India and Global Connectivity” caught our attention. How do you stay updated on emerging issues in the legal landscape, especially in areas like technology and data protection?
Staying current with the rapid advancements in technology and data protection is indeed crucial in the modern digital era. To ensure that I am up-to-date with these evolving legal areas, I actively engage with a variety of academic sources, frequently attend seminars, and participate in legal forums dedicated to technology law and data protection. This field, by its very nature, is dynamic and constantly evolving, which necessitates a commitment to continual learning and a proactive approach to stay informed about the latest developments.
In 2023, the transformation of the Data Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Bill into an Act marked a significant milestone with profound implications on everyday life and legal practice. My involvement in the constitutional challenge of the Aadhaar Act before the Supreme Court’s constitutional bench provided me with a unique perspective on these matters. This experience was instrumental in developing a deeper understanding of data protection laws in India.
From the early stages of the conceptualization of the DPDP Bill, I have been closely monitoring and analysing its development and continuously engaging with subject matter. Keeping pace with these changes is not just a professional requirement but a personal interest, as these advancements shape the legal landscape in which we operate and have far-reaching effects on society as a whole.
What upcoming projects or areas of law are you excited about, and what goals do you envision for your practice in the coming years?
My legal practice, characterized by its dynamic nature and diverse challenges, keeps me thoroughly engaged. As an independent practitioner, there is an inherent need to balance current commitments with a forward-looking approach towards emerging areas of law. I am particularly excited about delving deeper into the realm of technology laws, specifically focusing on the Digital India Act and the Data Protection and Digital Privacy (DPDP) Act and Constitutional law. My objective is to contribute significantly to the existing legal landscape through comprehensive writing projects in these domains.
Having recently passed the Advocate on Record (AOR) exam, a major focus for me in the coming years is to increase my presence in the Supreme Court and various High Courts. I aim to seize every opportunity to argue and present matters at these higher judicial forums, enhancing my skills as a litigator.
In addition to my practice, I am passionate about sharing my knowledge and experience in legal education. I am currently teaching a course on Alternative Dispute Resolution at IIM Bodh Gaya, and I plan to expand my teaching engagements to other law and business schools. This involvement in academia is not just about imparting knowledge; it’s a reciprocal process where teaching sharpens my understanding and argumentation skills, ultimately enriching my capabilities as a counsel.
Overall, my vision for the future encompasses a blend of active legal practice, scholarly writing, and academic contributions, each reinforcing the other in my quest to become a more effective and knowledgeable legal professional.
You’ve successfully represented multinational companies in high-stakes arbitration disputes. What unique challenges do such cases pose, and how do you navigate the complexities of international legal matters?
Representing multinational companies in high-stakes arbitration disputes has been a journey filled with unique challenges and profound learning experiences. There are 3-4 cases, each in a different domain of law, which have not only improved my skills as a lawyer but also gave me the required confidence to have a sense of self-belief to compete and sustain at the highest level.
One of the most pivotal experiences in my career was a complex construction arbitration against a public sector undertaking (PSU), which I handled at a relatively early stage of my career. This opportunity, graciously provided by my former senior, was a significant turning point. It imparted lessons and insights that years of working under a senior or within a firm might not have offered. As is often said, the most profound learning comes from first-hand experience. The responsibility of representing a client in such high-stakes scenarios necessitated an extraordinary commitment, leading me to dedicate countless nights in pursuit of a successful outcome. This particular arbitration dispute played a crucial role in shaping my journey as a legal counsel.
Another defining moment was my involvement in a constitutional challenge before the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court. The process of daily briefings and brainstorming sessions with some of the most esteemed senior counsel in the field, coupled with the experience of appearing before the nation’s highest court, reinforced my belief in my capabilities to perform at the topmost level of the legal profession.
A piece of wisdom from the octogenarian Mr. Fali Nariman, as mentioned in his seminal autobiography, has been a guiding light and holds me in good stead in my approach to legal problem-solving. He advises “Always remember, it is better to spend more time thinking about a case than merely reading the brief”. This approach has consistently helped me in unravelling complex legal issues, allowing me to develop more comprehensive and effective strategies for my clients.
In sum, navigating through the complexities of domestic and international legal matters in high-stakes arbitration cases demands not just a deep understanding of legal principles but also the ability to think innovatively and persevere through challenging circumstances.
What’s your favourite thing about living in the capital city, and do you have any go-to spots or activities that you enjoy in your free time?
Living in New Delhi offers a blend of vibrant culture and intellectual stimulation. The city provides endless opportunities for exploration and relaxation. For me, the true essence of New Delhi lies in its diversity and the myriad experiences it presents.
In my free time, I find great joy in simple yet fulfilling activities. I often indulge in sports, which serve as a perfect counterbalance to the mental rigors of legal practice. Engaging in physical activities provides a much-needed mental refresh.
Another passion of mine is reading, and there’s no better place for this than Bahrisons’ in Khan Market. It’s a haven where I can immerse myself in the world of books, often losing track of time.
When it comes to unwinding, I’m not particularly fixated on specific spots; for me, it’s more about the company I’m with. Exploring New Delhi’s diverse culinary scene with friends is something I thoroughly enjoy. The city’s gastronomic landscape is as diverse as its culture, offering everything from local street food to high-end dining experiences. It’s these moments of shared meals and conversations that I cherish the most.
In essence, living in New Delhi is about embracing the city’s dynamic character. This city always has something new and exciting to offer, making every experience unique and enjoyable.
For aspiring lawyers looking to specialize in arbitration and civil-commercial litigation, what advice would you give based on your own experiences and the evolving landscape of legal practice?
Drawing from my experiences and the ever-changing legal landscape, I would emphasize that patience, self-belief, and hard work are fundamental. Litigation is a field where rewards and recognition often come over time, not overnight.
One valuable piece of advice that has been handed down to me by my seniors, and which I find particularly relevant, is the importance of focusing on the present. Commit to learning something new each day. A practical way to do this is to read at least one case law daily. This steady, incremental learning will compound over time, significantly enhancing your legal acumen.
Set your goals high, aim for the peak, but do not be daunted by the journey ahead. Instead of being overwhelmed by the distance you have yet to travel, find solace and motivation in each step you take forward. Seek mentorship and guidance whenever possible; the insights and advice from experienced practitioners are invaluable.
Remember, no opportunity for learning is too small or insignificant. Embrace every chance you get to grow, be it through complex cases or seemingly minor legal tasks.
Stay humble and grounded. Keep your friends close. Maintain strong relationships with your peers and colleagues.
Swami Vivekananda’s words resonate deeply in this context: “There is nothing in this universe that goes to waste.” Channel your energies positively, maintain steadfast faith, and be assured that your efforts will lead to success.
