Could you share the thought process behind starting this consultancy? What inspired the idea, and why did you choose this particular name?
In an era of prestigious law firms with legendary names, I wanted to create something different, something that directly conveyed our expertise. That’s why I chose “The Contract Consultants.”
Throughout my career, I realized that contracts are the heart and soul of any business. Well-drafted contracts protect companies from legal expenses, arbitration, mediation, and compliance issues. Businesses that want to excel should prioritize strong contracts.
Our expertise lies in contracts, and we wanted our name to reflect that. The idea behind this name is simple: you focus on growing your business while we handle your contracts and documentation.
What challenges did you face in choosing law as a career, especially when your choices were questioned? With 12 years of experience, how has your journey shaped you?
I’ll keep it brief. I’m originally from Ranchi, and my house was next to the High Court. Seeing lawyers in their black coats from childhood fascinated me and made me admire the profession.
However, where I come from, law wasn’t considered prestigious, it was often seen as a fallback option. My entire family had a science background, and my brother is a major in the Indian Army. So, my decision to pursue law was unconventional.
The first challenge was convincing my family. My father supported me and encouraged me to take the AILET exam. Once I joined law school, I realized the vast opportunities the field offers beyond just becoming a judge or starting a practice.
I studied law at MS Ramaiah College of Law in Bangalore. Moving from a small town to a metropolitan city was a transformative experience. It broadened my perspective, shaped my career choices, and helped me evolve as a person.
I started in litigation, then shifted to corporate law. Over time, I realized my true passion was making an impact and building something of my own. For me, success isn’t just about financial gains—it’s about standing for what you believe in. My journey has been a gradual process of discovery, with each experience reinforcing my commitment to law.
Given your expertise in contracts, particularly in e-commerce, what are the most common pitfalls businesses face? How have you helped address them?
As a lawyer, two crucial questions guide my approach: What? and How?
E-commerce businesses often make the mistake of copying existing terms and conditions or privacy policies without considering their specific business model. There are different categories: intermediaries, B2C, and B2B platforms, each requiring tailored contracts.
Some common issues include:
Dispute Resolution: Many businesses fail to include clear dispute resolution mechanisms in customer-facing contracts.
Liability Limitations: Companies don’t define liability properly, leaving them exposed to unexpected claims.
Regulatory Compliance: Ensuring compliance with laws like India’s IT Rules, Consumer Protection Act, and FDI regulations is crucial
A well-drafted contract should align with the business model, define liability, include compliance measures, and ensure trade secret protection. Boilerplate clauses are everywhere, but strategic customization is what mitigates risk.
With rapid technological changes, how have you adapted your approach to risk management and contract negotiations?
Contracts have evolved significantly over the last decade, especially with AI and data privacy regulations.
Previously, a simple NDA was considered sufficient for confidentiality. Now, contracts must explicitly define data privacy, data breaches, data transfers, and liability for AI-generated outcomes.
Key changes include:
Precise Confidentiality Clauses: Defining what constitutes confidential information and outlining penalties for breaches.
Regulatory Adaptability: Contracts must allow for amendments in response to legal and technological developments.
Cross-Border Compliance: Understanding GDPR, CCPA, India’s DPDPA, and other international privacy laws.
Businesses need contracts that are both legally robust and flexible enough to adapt to evolving regulations.
What key provisions do you focus on when drafting Master Service Agreements for tech companies?
Many businesses focus on boilerplate clauses (indemnity, liability, termination, governing law) but overlook critical details.
Commonly missed elements include:
Auto-Renewal Clauses: If not properly structured, businesses might get locked into contracts they wanted to exit.
Audit Rights: Allowing unlimited audits can expose sensitive trade secrets and confidential information.
Scope of Work Clarity: Vague scopes lead to increased work without additional compensation.
Early Termination Provisions: Without structured termination clauses, companies may be forced to pay the full contract value despite early exits.
A well-drafted MSA should protect both short-term and long-term business interests while ensuring flexibility.
How do you ensure contracts maintain clarity and legal safety in new markets with evolving regulations?
Compliance is all about understanding “What?” (laws and regulations) and “How?” (implementation).
We conduct gap analyses, risk assessments, and compliance roadmaps to ensure businesses remain compliant. Using a Red-Amber-Green framework, we prioritize urgent risks while addressing lesser risks systematically.
When entering new markets, businesses must understand:
Applicable data protection laws (e.g., GDPR, CCPA, DPDPA).
Cross-border contractual obligations.
Industry-specific compliance standards.
We focus on ensuring that contracts align with regulations while maintaining operational flexibility.
How has ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) evolved, and how do you incorporate it into contracts?
Dispute resolution isn’t just about litigation, it’s about economic viability and preserving business relationships.
Key considerations:
Cost-Benefit Analysis: Is the dispute worth pursuing, or would negotiation be a better option?
IP Disputes: Clearly defining IP ownership in contracts reduces conflicts.
Confidentiality Protections: Preventing trade secret exposure during audits or negotiations.
Effective ADR clauses ensure disputes are resolved efficiently, preserving business continuity.
How do you stay updated with constant legal and regulatory changes?
It’s about building a habit.
Weekly Review Checklist: I set aside time to track key developments.
Webinars & Newsletters: Staying connected to legal platforms and industry experts.
Peer Discussions: Conversations with colleagues provide fresh insights.
Being proactive ensures we anticipate legal changes rather than just reacting to them
Balancing Corporate Life & Mental Well-being
How do you maintain work-life balance while thriving in a corporate environment?
Mental well-being is key. Work culture matters more than the company name. A great manager and team make a huge difference.
Prioritize mental health over money. Financial success is meaningless if you’re mentally exhausted.
Corporate life isn’t just about earning; it’s about personal growth.
The best professionals aren’t just technically skilled; they are resilient, self-aware, and mentally strong.
From Head Girl at Modern School Vasant Vihar to an Associate at A&O Shearman in London how do you reflect on your journey?
Looking back, it hasn’t exactly been a straight line, but I don’t think I’d change anything. Being Head Girl at my high school was probably my first experience juggling twenty things at once – academics, debates, sports, painting, dancing, leadership (and occasionally trying to stop people, including my notorious best friend, from bunking classes). I loved being involved in everything, which has sort of stayed with me.
In my final year, apart from juggling the many responsibilities that came with being the Head Girl, I was also a national-level runner and represented the state in competitions across the country. At the time, I remember wanting to take it up professionally and hoped to be the next PT Usha, so I dedicated most of my time to training. I also won a sports scholarship.
When the board results came, I didn’t hit the 95% mark that’s so often treated as the golden ticket. At the time, I thought that meant I’d missed out. But because of all of my achievements, I got admission to Lady Shri Ram College to study Philosophy which turned out to be exactly what I needed. I didn’t know it then, but Philosophy shaped the way I think: it made me comfortable with ambiguity, taught me how to structure arguments, and to ask “why” until something actually made sense. I loved it a lot, and ended up being among the top scorers in the University. It also turned out to be very good prep for a future degree and career in law.
After law school at Delhi University, I clerked for Justice A.K. Sikri at the Supreme Court. I then went on to Cambridge for my LLM, and from there joined Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, where I worked in hardcore litigation and both international and domestic arbitration. Later, I moved to London first at a U.S. firm focusing on international arbitration, and now with A&O Shearman, where I’ve been part of the Litigation and Investigations team. I’m currently on secondment with the firm’s Regulation & Conduct team, which has given me a very different (but equally valuable) perspective on how institutions think about risk, regulation, and conduct.
It’s been a mix of the unexpected and the intentional but somehow, it’s all added up.
You took on a fairly serious internship while still a student. What made you do that, and what did you take away from it?
During my first year of college, I interned with Justice Anup Bhambhani, who was then a senior advocate practicing at the Delhi High Court and Supreme Court. It was a long-term internship that I somehow balanced alongside lectures and college life but I really wanted to get stuck in early.
It was an eye-opener. I was exposed to serious matters criminal, commercial, and constitutional that eventually reached the highest courts in the country. I did a lot of research and drafting work and got to see legal strategy taking shape in real time. He was the best first mentor anyone could ask for, generous with his time, exacting in the best way, and genuinely invested. They say if your first boss is a good boss, you’re lucky I definitely was.
That experience grounded me early. It helped me see law not just as a subject but as something real, dynamic, and impactful. I think it also gave me the confidence to keep pushing for more, even when things felt intimidating.
And then a clerkship at the Supreme Court with Justice Sikri right after law school, which was your first step into the full time professional legal world. What was that like?
The transition from law school to the Supreme Court was like being dropped straight into the deep end – but in the best way. As a clerk to Justice Sikri, I had a front-row seat to some of the most important legal debates in the country. What struck me most was the sheer discipline and clarity with which he approached even the most complex matters. Every footnote, every comma, had to have a reason.
He was also incredibly open to ideas. I was fresh out of law school, but he always made space for me to question things, to offer my own perspective, and to learn by doing. It taught me the value of precision, yes but also how to look beyond the black letter of the law to the human impact of legal reasoning. That lesson has stuck with me far beyond the court, and I’ll always be grateful to him for cementing my love for the law.
You pursued an LLM at Cambridge right after. What drove that decision, and what was it like?
After the intensity of the clerkship, I wanted to step back and immerse myself in deeper academic thinking. Cambridge had always been something of a dream. I applied, not expecting much, and was genuinely shocked when I got in and that too with scholarships from the Cambridge Trust and the Pratibha M. Singh Foundation.
My time there was everything I hoped for – demanding, inspiring, and also very grounding. I studied international law, information law, advanced private law alongside peers from all over the world. We’d debate the ICC’s latest decisions in the morning, spend afternoons trying (and failing) to punt without falling into the Cam, and evenings at formal dinners where I’d shamelessly sneak in a bottle of Tabasco. It was serious learning with a light touch, and it pushed me to see law in a much more global and comparative way.
After Cambridge, you returned to India and joined Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas (CAM). What was that experience like?
CAM was where I properly learned how to be a litigator. I joined the disputes team and was in court or before a tribunal pretty much constantly arguing, drafting, thinking on my feet. It was full throttle, but I loved it. There’s something about being in the thick of it – scrambling to prepare for a hearing at midnight, getting cross-examination notes ready under pressure – that really forces you to trust your instincts.
I had incredible mentors during that time. Raunak, the partner in the team, was great and generous with his time, and my brother-in-law Aditya – also a lawyer, and at the firm then – was (and still is) someone I lean on for ideas, prep, and perspective. The exposure to substantive matters early on really gave me the confidence to speak up, take ownership, and grow quickly.
You then moved into international arbitration at a U.S. firm in London. What was the shift like?
It was a big transition – procedurally, stylistically, culturally. The focus there was on large-scale international arbitration, so the pace was still fast, but the rhythm was different. Less shouting in courtrooms, more strategic planning in very long Zoom calls.
What I really appreciated was the collaborative nature of cross-border work. You’re often balancing legal regimes, time zones, and business interests at once. I worked closely on issues tied to enforcement risk, and it gave me a clearer sense of how legal exposure often begins long before any formal dispute arises. That experience planted the seed for what’s now a strong interest in how businesses are regulated, the many risks involved, how to mitigate those risks, and when things go south – how best to serve your clients. It also showed me how lawyers can play a proactive role in every stage of that process.
What have you worked on at A&O Shearman, and what are you doing now in your secondment?
At A&O Shearman, I joined the Litigation and Investigations team, where I’ve worked on a range of matters: commercial litigation, internal investigations, and regulatory enforcement issues. Several of those matters touched directly on financial crime, fraud, and misconduct, and I found myself increasingly drawn to the investigative and regulatory angles of our work.
That interest is what led me to take up a secondment with the firm’s Regulation & Conduct team which is part of the risk and compliance function. The role is very strategy-focused – I help assess how emerging regulatory developments might impact the business and its clients, contribute to internal compliance frameworks, and think through conduct from both a legal and cultural lens.
It’s been fascinating to sit at the intersection of law, risk, and policy, and to understand how large institutions manage internal controls, reporting obligations, and reputational exposure. The secondment has also deepened my interest in working with legal systems that are evolving to meet increasingly complex financial, financial crime, regulatory and technological risks. Its given me a much clearer sense of how clients experience and navigate legal risk internally and I am looking forward to bringing that perspective into my disputes, investigations and regulatory practice, where I can apply it with sharper insight and impact.
Outside law, when you were in India you co-founded a teaching academy. Can you tell us about that?
Yes – this is something very close to my heart. My grandmother is a retired schoolteacher who wanted to keep teaching. So, we started small: just a borrowed desk in a neighbourhood temple, a few local kids, and a lot of chalk dust.
It grew faster than we expected. Over the years, we’ve taught more than 1,000 students, all from families who couldn’t otherwise afford extra help. We now have a proper space, a volunteer teaching team, and a small but thriving community.
Even now, from London, I stay involved however I can, mentoring, supporting the team, and helping raise funds. It’s a constant reminder that education doesn’t need to be fancy to be powerful. It just needs to be consistent, kind, and rooted in belief.
Your journey cuts across court work and litigation, arbitration, investigations, and regulatory compliance. What connects it all?
The through-line, I think, is clarity. Whether I’m helping a client frame a case, analysing documents related to an investigation, or advising on conduct risks – it’s about unpacking complexity and making it manageable.
I’ve always been drawn to roles where law intersects with regulation and reputation, especially in high-stakes or high-impact contexts. The kind of work where one wrong move has real consequences, whether it’s a financial crime allegation or a governance failure. That’s what excites me where investigations, compliance, and tech-driven legal thinking all meet. It’s an area I’d love to keep building in.
And finally, what advice would you give to someone starting out, especially if they feel they’re not on the “perfect” path?
I’d say – forget perfect. It doesn’t exist. When I didn’t get the course I thought I wanted in undergrad, I felt like I’d already fallen behind. But that so-called “detour” changed everything. So be open. Your path doesn’t have to look like anyone else’s.
Ask for help. I’ve learned so much just by reaching out to people who were one or two steps ahead of me. And when you’re in a position to, pay that forward.
Also: keep perspective. Law can be intense, and it will stretch you – but it’s also a long game. Take the work seriously, but don’t let it swallow the rest of your life. Keep reading, travelling, painting, running, resting – whatever makes you feel like a person. That part of you will make you a better lawyer, and a much better colleague!
And finally, keep saying yes. Even when it is daunting, even when you feel unprepared, put your hand up. Some of the most defining parts of my journey came from saying yes to opportunities I wasn’t sure I was ready for. That’s how I stumbled into Philosophy first and later into areas of law I never expected to love, commercial disputes, regulatory work, investigations, financial crime and the influence of technology in law, these have shaped the way I think today. So take the chance. Sometimes the things you grow to love and the strengths you didn’t know you had are waiting just on the other side of that first ‘yes’.
What initially inspired you to pursue a career in law, particularly at a prestigious institution like University College London (UCL)? What factors influenced your decision to choose UCL, and how would you describe your academic and personal experiences there?
I always wanted to be a lawyer – even before I understood what a lawyer really does. I have no explanation as to why except guessing that it could be the unconscious conditioning of watching my father (Dr. A. Francis Julian – a Senior Advocate), and hearing stories of my grandfather (who was a lawyer in the erstwhile State of Travancore). I was never consciously influenced to take up the profession by my father. All options were always open. My sister (A dentist and a children’s author) and I were encouraged to explore and see where our intellect and abilities would take us – somehow I always found my way back to the Law.
This clarity (or blinkered view, if you will) allowed me to focus early on where and how I wanted to study law. I was very clear that I wanted to study law abroad. I had set my sights on going to a law school in the USA. The first time I wrote the LSAT, my scores were not too great. So I decided to take a gap year and write it again. The second time I also wrote the LNAT (the UK equivalent of the LSAT). In the second round, I managed a decent score, and also got scholarships to a couple of good universities in the USA. However, my LNAT scores were comparatively much better and I was offered a place at UCL.
Prof. (Dr.) C. Rajkumar (Founding Vice Chancellor of O.P. Jindal Global University) was another profound influence on me from early in my life. I’ve known him from my school days when he used to frequent our home as a law student at Faculty of Law, Delhi University. His stellar academic achievements were inspirational and it was something I tried to emulate. He also counselled and mentored me extensively during the law school admissions process. His time then was especially precious as it was around the same time that OPJGU was being established !
Seeing the historical relevance of the UCL Law Faculty to India (due to some very famous Indian alumnus, including Mahatma Gandhi), I knew this was where I wanted to go.
UCL was a completely different experience after a bachelors degree at Loyola. I struggled a bit initially due to the massive amount of self-study required, but managed to get a decent grade. Life at UCL was not limited to lectures and libraries. The university’s location in the heart of London provided countless opportunities to engage with the city’s cultural and social scene. I learnt the law but more importantly, I learnt a lot about life in my three years there. However, as much as I loved the city, I didn’t envision myself living there in the long term. So I decided to return to India on completion of my degree.
After completing your law degree, you pursued an LLM in International Dispute Resolution at Queen Mary University of London (QMUL). What motivated you to specialize in this field, and how did your time at QMUL shape your professional trajectory? In what ways has this specialization influenced your career?
An LLM is often considered as a purely academic pursuit, unsuited and unnecessary for those in Court litigation. That view, in my opinion, could not be more wrong. The practice of law has become greatly specialised. Having technical expertise is necessary and needed to stand out as a lawyer. Litigation itself is a vast field, and every field of law has its own form of adversarial litigation, whether before a court, a tribunal, or an arbitrator.
QMUL has some of the best faculty in the world when it comes to international arbitration, they are not only academics but also full-time practitioners who have practical experience. They had excellent insights to share during the discussions in the tutorials.
In the early stages of your legal career, you worked with Mr. Salman Khurshid. What were some of the most valuable lessons and insights you gained from that experience ?
Working with Mr. Salman Khurshid was a defining experience in my professional and personal life. Mr. Khurshid (Salman Sir to us) is probably one of the most large hearted persons I have had the opportunity of knowing. He is, of course, a very fine lawyer but above all he is a gentleman and a statesman in the truest sense, he embodied dignity, compassion, and the uncompromising need to ensure justice is done.
As his chamber member, I got an opportunity to work on a variety of matters – Constitutional, commercial, criminal, arbitrations- before various judicial fora – the Supreme Court of India, various High Courts, NCLT, NCLAT, TDSAT, COMPAT, etc.
Days were spent in Court (this was before the advent of virtual hearings), evenings in the Office. 10-12 hour work days were the norm. But the hardest worker in the office was the head of chambers himself. It was often the case that we would prepare copious notes and go to his house late in the evening to brief him for the next day, only to find him reading the files. This was apart from the various responsibilities he discharged as a leader in the Congress party.
Being one of the sought after Senior Counsels in Delhi, he was also a generous paymaster, giving all his chamber members a rather generous retainer coupled with regular bonuses. We were also actively encouraged to take on independent matters and permitted to use the office facilities for our own personal practice.
Ours was also a chamber that was very diverse. We had chamber members from at least 10 states in India. We also had a higher number of first generation women lawyers than male lawyers. Of the 20 or so chamber members, only 5 (including me) were male and only 2 were second generation lawyers.
Among the many lessons I learnt from my five years (2014-2019) at Mr. Khurshid’s chambers, the one I recall the most is that respect can only be earned, never demanded.
I have tried my best to emulate these important lessons in mentorship and leadership in my practice as well. Of the four three associates I have had the privilege of working with at Julian Law Offices, all are first generation lawyers, three are women lawyers. One of them is presently doing her LLM in the UK.
Additionally, being a father to two daughters makes me more conscious of the need to ensure the profession is more welcoming to women. If either of them decide to enter the profession, they need more women role models to look up to.
What inspired you to establish your own law practice? What vision guided you in founding your practice, and what were some of the key challenges you encountered during this journey?
Starting my own practice was a natural trajectory of my career path. Being a law practitioner’s son – I had ready access to a chamber at the Supreme Court, I had a network to tap into, I had a well stocked library of commentaries and law reports at my disposal, and most importantly – credibility capital. These, of course, only get you so far.
At the end of the day, if you are not able to deliver in Court, a last name – no matter how famous- will not get you very far. Furthermore, the profession is a rather close knit community and any professional mishaps are rarely forgotten. Having a recognisable last name only increases the scrutiny of your conduct in Court. One is judged much more harshly if one comes from a family of lawyers. Reputations built over a lifetime can be destroyed in a day. For every successful second generation lawyer, there are ten who never made it out of their parents’ shadow.
One challenge I faced in establishing my practice was to ensure a steady supply of clientele. Practicing solely at the Supreme Court is not feasible unless one has a ‘feeder’ high court from where one can get a steady supply of matters for appeals.
This was the reason I expanded my practice to the Madras High Court in 2021. Having a lot of personal and familial connections in the city, it was a natural move. So far the move has proved
Furthermore, my wife and I felt it was a better place for our daughters to grow up in, compared to Delhi.
You frequently represent clients at the Supreme Court of India. What are unique challenges of advocacy at the Supreme Court, and what strategies do you employ to address them?
Practice at the Supreme Court of India is unlike practice at any other Court in India. Majority of matters filed at the Supreme Court are Special Leave Petitions (SLPs) under Article 136 of the constitution of India – about 93% according to a recent study. Since this is a completely discretionary jurisdiction, there is no certainty of the appeal being admitted.
The judges hear about 70 SLPs on Mondays and Fridays (the two days designated for hearing fresh SLPs). The average time granted to make your case in an SLP is about 93 seconds. As counsel one is expected to start in medias res assuming the bench has looked through your petition in detail. You have to know exactly what to say, how to say and (most importantly) when to say it. Brevity is the order of the day and there is no room for any oratorical faff.
Another important aspect of Supreme Court practice is drafting. Clarity and Concision are essential. The importance of having a short and concise synopsis cannot be stressed enough. If you cannot state your case in one and half pages of double spaced size 14 font, you have an uphill battle. Early in my career, I used to draft long-winded synopses. I learnt the hard way that this rarely works.
If one reads biographies of some of India’s greatest litigation lawyers (MC Setalvad, Palkhivala, Fali Nariman, etc) you will often find that the common thread in their advocacy is brevity – in pleadings and oral advocacy.
Your reputation as a Supreme Court counsel is built on the success in getting SLPs admitted. It is also the way to get a foot in the door so that longer oral submissions can be made when both parties are before the Court and the SLP or Appeal (once leave is granted) is heard at length.
A good way to build and protect your reputation at the Supreme Court is to never appear in or file frivolous or meritless SLPs. With adequate experience, one can make a reasonably accurate prediction of whether or not an SLP will be admitted. The SLP should either have legal merit or there should be some grave injustice which is apparent. Without either of these, filing an appeal purely at the instructions of a client is unfair to everyone involved – to the Court as it wastes precious judicial time, to yourself as you will cut a sorry figure in Court, and to your client who ends up wasting resources better spent elsewhere.
This can be challenging to do, especially early in your career when it can be tempting to take up every case that comes your way (been there, done that!), But over time you realise that your credibility is built not only on the cases you appear in but also those you don’t appear in. As an Advocate, your duty is not only to your client but also to the Court. Considering the heavy burden on Indian Courts, judges never appreciate their time being consumed by meritless cases.
As an arbitration practitioner and a member of the prestigious Chartered Institute of Arbitrators London, what are some of the major challenges in arbitration in India?
Wiser and more experienced minds have spent much ink on the problems and challenges plaguing Indian Arbitration. Suffice it to say that we cannot continue to run arbitration like courts. We need more non-judge arbitrators.
Another crucial point is that many businesses, particularly in smaller cities and towns, remain unaware of the advantages of arbitration. With cheaper and faster ODR options available, there are now ways to get low value disputes adjudicated in a faster and efficient manner. Furthermore, there is a need for structured training programs to equip practitioners, arbitrators, and legal professionals with specialized skills in arbitration law and practice
Another major challenge is post award proceedings. Even though most section 34 challenges fail, the rigmarole of challenge and then enforcement makes arbitration a daunting prospect. Even though it is ultimately much faster than a civil court, post award proceedings are a dampener.
What advice would you offer to young lawyers aspiring to build a diverse and successful practice? What key skills, qualities, and mindset do you believe are essential for thriving in the competitive and multifaceted legal profession?
I am still a ‘young lawyer’ by any measure! And, I am still learning how to build a diverse and successful practice.
That said, these are three things which I feel have really helped me in in my personal and professional life. Firstly, cultivate a reading habit. Read widely, especially non-law books. Fiction, non-fiction, history, humour, mystery – there’s something for everyone. As lawyers, we tell stories (strictly non-fiction!), adhering to certain strict rules, but stories nevertheless. Reading greatly improves the capacity to put complex facts in a coherent manner highlighting aspects that are relevant to your case.
Secondly, building a great network. The importance of building a good network is crucial for lawyers, especially in India where one cannot market or advertise in any way. A great way to do this is to pursue and cultivate interests outside the law – play sports, join a book club, pursue interests outside the law, take an active interest in your local community.
Thirdly, find a good mentor. Ideally someone who’s professional qualities you see yourself emulating. And when the opportunity arises, be a good mentor to others as well. I have had the privilege of watching and learning from some excellent mentors. Mr. Promod Nair, Senior Advocate Karnataka High Court, deserves special mention as someone who has been a good friend, mentor, and guide to me.
Balancing the demands of a high-pressure legal career with personal well-being is no easy task. How do you maintain a healthy work-life balance ?
As a litigation counsel, the demands of the profession can be relentless. There are no fixed working hours, the pressure to consistently perform is high, and unlike salaried positions, there’s no guaranteed monthly income — though the expenses remain constant. This makes litigation a high-stress career, often not very kind to one’s mental and physical health.
It’s easy to get consumed by the profession, which is why setting clear personal and professional boundaries early in your career is so important. I firmly believe in prioritising rest, family time, and personal interests without guilt. It’s essential to create space for yourself beyond your work identity. Personally, I avoid carrying work home with me. I’d rather stay late, finish what needs to be done at the office, and keep my home a space of peace and relaxation. This helps maintain a healthy separation between professional responsibilities and personal life.
Additionally, taking care of one’s physical well-being is equally important. A balanced diet, regular exercise, and proper sleep aren’t luxuries — they’re necessities for surviving and thriving in this demanding profession. Over time, I’ve realised that discipline in these small, daily habits make it possible to build a sustainable, fulfilling legal career – and life.
Having achieved consistent success in your career as an Advocate-on-Record, what initially inspired you to pursue a career in law? Was there a particular factor or event that led you to choose this field?
I am eternally grateful to the team of Superlawyer for having me over. I truly appreciate their endeavor in providing a gridline which is constantly transmitting and distributing incredible experiences of the legal professionals generated during their journey from struggle to success.
Now coming to this question, landing myself in the field of law was more of a compulsion than choice as I never took interest in science or mathematics. I, though, pursued commerce in 10+2 but then at that juncture I didn’t see myself enjoying a career in the field of commerce down the line. Being born and brought up in a small town of Chhattisgarh i.e., Baloda Bazar, we were exposed to limited career options as available now so the sector that remained within my periphery was humanities.
Ultimately, the option boiled down to law for two reasons. One is my father is practicing law in the District and Session Court at Baloda Bazar so I have grown up around the musty smell of files, and with gossip regarding bar and bench at the dinner table which I feel that subconsciously pushed me into this field of law. Another reason is that I was into debating during my school days, and in the year 2012, a movement led by Mr. Anna Hazare for Lokpal Bill had caught the limelight all around. While researching on those topics, I was enjoying watching the parliamentary debate by the titans of the bar i.e., Late Mr. Arun Jaitley, Dr. AM Singhvi to name a few. Their art of persuasion was mesmerizing to that extent that my conscience at that fag end of teenage swept me in this field without much introspection or analysis.
During the early stages of your career, you interned with several lawyers and worked on research papers covering topics like IPR and Arbitration. How did these internships and research experiences shape your understanding of the law, and in what ways did they contribute to your professional growth?
In this regard, I convey my sincere thanks to my alma mater ILS Law College, Pune. The rich legacy and alumni network that our college holds, facilitated me to attract the bundle of skillful internships. Further, its faculty and the vast library played a vital role in developing our legal acumen. At that juncture, we were suggested by the seniors to intern with the Non-Governmental Organizations in the 1st year then at the District and Sessions Court in the 2nd and 3rd Year followed by the internship at the Constitutional Court or a law firm in the 4th and 5th year. Following that path, it gave me an idea as to where my passion lies, and provided me a short glimpse of practical exposure as to how law learned in the classroom unfolds in the courts.
In so far as research experience is concerned, we were fortunate enough to be guided by few of the country’s best legal minds who were also serving or served as a member of Law Commission of India or International Law Commission or were authors of the classical commentaries on law of contract, administrative law etc. Their lessons helped me in understanding the fundamental jurisprudence and interpretation of law.
After gaining experience working with renowned law firms in an Associate capacity, handling arbitration, litigation, and court appearances, you transitioned to independent practice as an Advocate/Counsel before the High Court of Chhattisgarh. What motivated this shift, and what cultural differences did you observe between working at firms and practicing independently?
The shift was motivated by the following quote which I read somewhere while commuting from my accommodation to office in Mumbai Local ie. “If you don’t design your own life plan, chances are you’ll fall into someone else’s plan. And guess what they have planned for you? Not much.”
Another motivation was the grandeur of counsel practice that I observed in the original side of Bombay High Court during my stint with the law firm Naik Naik and Co., Mumbai. The uniqueness, integrity and ethics that I discovered in the Bombay Bar was par excellence.
With specific reference to the cultural difference, I would say that working at a law firm is essential for a young law professional because the law firms create a base for litigation and imbibes discipline. By being in direct touch with the client, an associate or fresh law graduate gets first-hand experience of litigation as to how correspondences are built between the parties to strengthen their cases in the dispute. Once the dispute is ripened for resolution in the Court or Tribunal then the independent advocates are engaged to put forth the submission especially in Tier 1 city.
Another major cultural difference is the receipt of a fixed amount at the end of every month while working with the law firm. People who support this route justifies that law students who are paying a hefty sum for their legal education these days are entitled to work with firms while learning the foundation of this profession, however those who oppose say that fixed pay check at the end of month kills the desire to learn law. I favor the former over the latter in the current scenario as there are a majority of lawyers who go brief less for very long duration while going independent and at the same time, they are discharging their obligation towards educational loans. Such circumstances develop severe frustration as it makes survival very hard for young lawyers.
Your tenure at VSA Legal, particularly in drafting and arguing Special Leave Petitions and Writ Petitions before the Supreme Court of India, has been impactful. How has this experience shaped your approach to dispute resolution and regulatory practice, especially in landmark cases like the Chhattisgarh reservation case and the invalidation of the tricycle tender process?
Credit for that impact goes to those three partners cum mentors of VSA Legal. While observing the dogged and clever advocacy of Mr. Sumeer Sodhi, ingrained with in-depth scholarly knowledge and incessant painstaking effort of Mr. Aman Nandrajog while preparing for arguments and industrial ingenuity of Mr. Varun Tankha gave me courage to handle high stakes litigation independently without any fear and prejudice.
Starting your own practice is a significant leap. What were your thoughts and motivations behind taking this step, and what challenges did you face in the initial stages of setting up your independent practice?
The onset of Covid 19 from 2020-2022 was a major blow to my plan of going independent. It brought a lot of confusion with regards to place and area of practice to commence. I introspected a lot and researched on the market where I found the dearth of advocate-on-record in the Supreme Court of India to represent the accused facing financial crunch or litigant in the tier-3 or tier 4 cities. Without any trial, the accused are languishing in jail for years by giving up after the refusal of their application for release on bail before the High Court. The helplessness of a plethora of government employees facing termination or litigants losing their land without any cause are hesitating to approach the Supreme Court of India owing to high costs and travelling expenses. In view thereof, I decided to put my efforts to qualify for the Advocate on Record Examination, and serve the needful in these areas to the best of my ability.
Waiting for work was the biggest challenge I faced post establishing my office in Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. The local briefing counsel wasn’t able to muster the courage to engage me as I was barely 5 years into the practice, however, time, humanity and hard work became the best healer to overcome that challenge.
Clearing the Advocate-on-Record (AOR) examination is a major milestone. What aspects of the AOR exam did you find most challenging, and what strategies did you use to prepare effectively for this prestigious qualification? Additionally, how has the AOR designation influenced your professional practice?
Indeed, it is a major milestone. During preparation, the reading of entire 64 landmark cases (now 86) was although worthwhile but cumbersome, and during appearance, the preparation of 4-5 drafts in the limited time of 4 hours was a tedious task.
I made my notes by analyzing the previous year’s question papers and referring to the latest law on it. I also divided my schedule for 2 months’ preparation as per the subjects. I diligently attended the lectures conducted by the exam cell as well as the Supreme Court Advocate on Record Association. Focusing on the drafting during my training, and assisting the clerk in filing documents or curing defects provided clarity in the procedure which is generally tested in the practice and procedure paper.
Being the only AoR qualified from Chhattisgarh this year brought me closer to some leading practitioners in the State as well as from my previous place of work i.e., Mumbai who are bestowing their valuable trust upon me to represent their clients before the Supreme Court of India.
Throughout your distinguished career, maintaining a healthy work-life balance must have been essential. What strategies have you employed to achieve this, and what advice would you offer to others looking to balance their professional ambitions with personal commitments?
Realization of the importance of work-life balance came to me when I got admitted in the hospital for a treatment of mosquito bitten disease which severely affected my body due to low immunity. Though achieving perfect work-life balance is far cry in our profession, doing pranayam, kriyas and yogas with a balanced diet helped me tremendously in getting my house in order. Another concern which I am trying to resolve these days is excessive screen time which sometimes causes brain fog or affects memory power. I would just advice that the first wealth is health followed by the immediate family. It is therefore, spare 2-3 hours for the health and family along with a minimum 6 hours’ sleep to rejuvenate yourself.
With your extensive experience across various areas of law, your advice would be invaluable to aspiring legal professionals. What guidance would you offer to students aspiring to build a successful legal career? Are there particular resources or strategies you would recommend for them?
Mentorship: Law is very similar to life as it throws a lot of surprises which may not be in good taste many times. To tackle or navigate in a journey, one must always find a mentor who can unselfishly hold your hands. I am always indebted to my encouraging mentors in the profession i.e., Ms. Manisha Karia, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court of India, Managing Partners and former colleagues at Naik Naik and Co. including but not limited to Mr. Ameet Naik, Mr. Abhishek Kale, Mr. Avdhoot Prabhu and Ms. Swati Singh for showing me light at the end of the tunnel.
Drafting and reading skill: Whether its corporate or litigation, one must shed its toil, tears and sweat at the initial days of career in improving their drafting skills. I am grateful to my mentors who suggested me to spend some time in Bombay for learning this invaluable skill as some of the country’s best draftsman are sitting there. Another important aspect is cultivating the reading skills from first year in the law schools especially the concepts such as property, crime and punishment, democracy etc. which has been borrowed into our system from the foreign land.
Discipline and Ethics: are the values that is vanishing into thin air in the profession. Touts, corruption in the judiciary, nepotism etc are putting negative impact. Without taking much care about such professional evils, one must always be truthful to himself/herself by following seven lamps of advocacy crystallized by Edward Abbott Parry. Whenever feeling low, take out and read some autobiography of the giants in the profession which will make you realized that you are not alone to struggle in this road to success.
Law is a jealous mistress – Lastly, success in the profession demands a lot of sacrifice. To keep yourself going on in the journey, one must remember the quote by John Scott i.e., To succeed as a lawyer, a man must work like a horse and live like a hermit.
Last but not least my advice to our law aspirant is embodied in the locus classicus of poem “If” by Rudyard Kipling i.e.
With over a decade of experience in the legal field, what initially inspired you to pursue law as a profession? What were the key factors that influenced your decision to enter this career path?
From a young age, I found myself deeply intrigued by the concepts of justice and fairness. The initial spark that inspired me to pursue law came from observing how the law could be a powerful tool to bring about positive change and ensure that everyone’s voice is heard. I remember watching courtroom dramas in old Hindi movies and reading about the interesting cases that shaped history. These moments left a lasting impression on me and fuelled my desire to become a part of that world.
Several key factors guided my decision to enter the legal field:
Growing up, I always felt a strong sense of justice and a desire to stand up for others. The thought of helping individuals navigate the complexities of the legal system and fight for their rights was incredibly motivating.
Law offers a unique blend of intellectual rigour and continuous learning. I was drawn to the challenge of analyzing complex issues, crafting persuasive arguments, and staying updated with ever-evolving legal precedents. The idea of using my analytical skills to solve real-world problems was both exciting and fulfilling.
At the core of my decision was a genuine desire to make a positive impact on society. Whether through litigation, policy-making, or community outreach, I wanted to contribute to creating a fairer and more just world. The ability to influence meaningful change and help those in need was a driving force behind my career choice.
Throughout my journey, I was fortunate to have mentors and role models who embodied the values I aspired to uphold. Their dedication, integrity, and unwavering commitment to justice inspired me to follow in their footsteps. Their guidance and encouragement played a pivotal role in shaping my path.
Ultimately, my decision to pursue law was a combination of personal passion, intellectual curiosity, and a heartfelt commitment to making a difference. The legal profession has allowed me to channel my strengths and values into a career that is both challenging and rewarding.
During the early stages of your career, you had the opportunity to work with several esteemed advocates and law firms. What were some of the most formative experiences from this time that shaped your practice, and are there any particular moments or lessons that continue to inspire you today?
Working with esteemed advocates and prominent law offices in the early stages of my career was an incredible learning experience that profoundly shaped my practice. One of the most formative experiences was my time at Anand & Associates, where I had the privilege to work on very interesting cases under the guidance of Mr. Sanjeev Anand, Senior Advocate and Mrs. Kajal Chandra, Advocate. Such experiences taught me the importance of meticulous preparation and attention to detail. Watching seasoned advocates dissect complex legal issues and craft compelling arguments was truly inspiring.
Another pivotal moment was when I collaborated with Mr. Narendera M. Sharma, Advocate, a renowned figure in International Commercial Arbitration Laws. His mentorship and guidance were invaluable. He instilled in me the significance of ethical conduct and the need to uphold the principles of justice at all times. He often reminded me that behind every legal matter lies a person with real emotions and struggles, and it is our duty to represent them with compassion and integrity.
Additionally, working with a diverse group of talented individuals, each bringing their unique perspectives and expertise, reinforced the idea that the best solutions are often the result of collective effort. This experience taught me the value of effective communication, mutual respect, and the power of a united team.
Overall, these experiences have instilled in me the values of diligence, empathy, teamwork, and a steadfast commitment to justice. They continue to inspire and guide my practice, reminding me of the profound responsibility and privilege it is to be a legal professional.
After gaining experience with various law firms and professionals, you chose to establish your own practice. What motivated you to take this step, and what were some of the key challenges you faced in building P.A.M.S. Legal?
The decision to establish my own practice, P.A.M.S. Legal, was driven by a combination of personal ambition, professional growth, and a desire to create a firm that aligns with the values and vision of my other Partners of the Firm. After gaining valuable experience with various law firms and working alongside esteemed professionals, I felt a strong pull towards building something of my own—a place where I could fully integrate my principles, creativity, and client-centric approach. Key challenges included managing resources, establishing a reputation, handling administrative tasks, and attracting top talent. Despite these obstacles, building P.A.M.S. Legal has been incredibly rewarding and fulfilling.
Given the diversity of cases you handle, including partition suits, trademark infringement, and contractual disputes, what are the critical issues you come across while handling cases related to trademark infringement?
Handling trademark infringement cases involves several critical issues, including proving that the defendant’s use of the mark causes consumer confusion, ensuring the trademark is legally valid and registered, and gathering sufficient evidence of infringement. Defenses such as fair and bonafide use and prior use must be addressed, and it is essential to calculate and prove damages while seeking appropriate remedies. Navigating jurisdictional complexities and effectively enforcing trademark rights across various regions also pose significant challenges. These issues require a comprehensive and strategic approach to protect and uphold trademark rights effectively.
In matters concerning oppression, mismanagement, and creditors’ winding-up procedures before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), how do you approach these cases? Could you also share some of the more complex challenges you’ve encountered in Insolvency and Bankruptcy proceedings?
When handling cases of oppression, mismanagement, and creditors’ winding-up procedures before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), my approach is systematic and client-focused. I begin with a thorough analysis of the company’s financial health and gather detailed evidence to support claims. Crafting a robust legal strategy and ensuring clear communication with clients are essential steps. Effective negotiation and mediation skills are crucial to navigating these complex matters and achieving favourable outcomes.
In Insolvency and Bankruptcy proceedings, we often encounter complex challenges such as accurate asset valuation, managing competing creditor claims, uncovering fraud and misconduct, and balancing the interests of various stakeholders. These challenges require a blend of legal expertise, strategic planning, and effective communication to navigate successfully.
Could you share insights from some of the more intricate arbitration cases you have worked on, particularly those involving international or institutional arbitration? How do you manage challenges such as the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards? Additionally, as a trained mediator, what do you see as the future of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in India?
Arbitration cases, especially those involving international or institutional arbitration, often present complexities such as jurisdiction issues, choice of law, and language barriers. Institutional arbitration requires adherence to specific rules and the careful selection of arbitrators, which can significantly influence outcomes. The enforcement of foreign arbitral awards is facilitated by the New York Convention, yet challenges persist with local court procedures and public policy considerations.
As a trained mediator, I envision a bright future for Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in India. ADR methods, including mediation and arbitration, are gaining momentum due to the overburdened judiciary and the growing demand for quicker, cost-effective dispute resolution. In India, the growing popularity of ADR methods is driven by an overburdened judiciary and government initiatives aimed at promoting quicker, cost-effective dispute resolution. The future of ADR in India appears promising, with an increasing number of trained mediators and arbitrators and a focus on developing a more efficient and effective dispute resolution ecosystem. Government initiatives and legislative reforms are promoting ADR, with the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (with recent amendments) and the Mediation Act, 2023, being a notable example.
Looking ahead, I foresee an increase in the number of trained mediators and arbitrators, which will enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of ADR processes. As ADR becomes more ingrained in the legal culture, it will provide parties with more amicable solutions and reduce the litigation backlog. Overall, the future of ADR in India is promising, with continued growth and improvement in the ADR ecosystem.
What resources, tools, or methods do you use to stay informed about the latest developments in Intellectual Property Law, as well as in other areas such as civil and consumer law?
To stay updated on Intellectual Property Law, civil law, and consumer law, I use:
For law students or young professionals looking to specialize in Intellectual Property Law, what advice would you offer? What skills and qualities do you consider essential for success in this field?
For law students or young professionals looking to specialize in Intellectual Property Law, I recommend building a solid foundation through relevant courses and practical experience, staying updated on legal developments, and engaging in professional networks. Essential skills include attention to detail, analytical thinking, research proficiency, strong communication, problem-solving abilities, technical knowledge (especially for patents), negotiation skills, and maintaining high ethical standards. These qualities will help you excel in the dynamic field of IP law.
What initially got you into law, and how did law school shape that path?
I actually started out studying History at Hansraj College and that played a bigger role in my legal journey than I realised at the time. History trains you to look at events from multiple perspectives, analyse cause and effect, and question accepted narratives, which is surprisingly similar to how lawyers think. When I got into law school, that background helped me connect the dots faster especially when it came to reading judgments or understanding how legal principles evolved.
But what really drew me in was litigation seeing how the law, theory and strategy all come together in a live forum. Law school gave me the foundation, sure, but it was the exposure — moots, internships, the energy of the courtroom that really cemented my interest in dispute resolution.
You started your career at Luthra & Luthra, what were those early years like?
Luthra was intense, but in the best possible way. From day one, you’re thrown into the deep end with big-ticket arbitrations and high-stakes matters. One of my earliest matters was a large infrastructure arbitration, and I still remember burning the midnight oil, poring over volumes of documents and prepping witness statements. It taught me that every detail matters, and that being thorough is non-negotiable. But more than that, it shaped how I think — not just about legal issues, but about strategy, how to read the room, how to anticipate what the other side might do.
Now as Partner Designate at C&S Partners, how have those experiences shaped your current approach?
I think the biggest shift has been in perspective. When you’re younger, you’re focused on mastering the law, getting the argument perfect. Now, it’s more about seeing the full picture — what the client really needs, what the commercial implications are, how to get to a solution without over-complicating it. The rigour from firms like Luthra definitely shaped my work ethic, but I’ve learned to balance that with flexibility and pragmatism. Clients want clarity — and a path forward. That’s what I try to bring to the table now.
You were involved in the Raffles Design International arbitration. What are your thoughts on how India handles foreign-seated arbitrations now?
That case was really interesting — it dealt with whether Indian courts can grant interim relief in support of foreign-seated arbitrations. The Delhi High Court’s ruling was quite progressive and set the tone for similar cases later. It’s encouraging to see Indian arbitration law evolving, especially in how courts are supporting the process rather than hindering it. That said, there’s still some inconsistency, and the system isn’t perfect — but the direction we’re heading in is the right one. Institutional arbitration still needs more buy-in, but we’re getting there.
You’ve advised fintech clients under FEMA and PMLA. What trends are you seeing there?
It’s definitely become a tighter regulatory environment, especially for payment gateways and e-commerce platforms. There’s a lot of focus now on cross-border flows, data trails, KYC processes — things that weren’t top of mind for startups a few years ago. What I often see is businesses scaling fast, but the compliance infrastructure doesn’t keep up. And that’s where trouble starts. A lot of our work now involves helping clients plug those gaps before they snowball into investigations.
You’ve handled international arbitrations under SIAC rules. How do Indian clients experience that compared to domestic forums?
There’s definitely a learning curve. International arbitration is much more structured and documentation-heavy. Indian clients sometimes find it overwhelming — the timelines, the formal tone, the costs. But they also appreciate the discipline and neutrality that come with it. What we do is act as a bridge — help them navigate the process, simplify the legalese, and make sure they’re not caught off guard. Documentation is a big challenge — we often have to reconstruct a paper trail that’s been loosely kept. So, we start early on that front.
What advice would you give to younger lawyers entering dispute resolution?
Be consistent and be curious. You don’t have to be brilliant right away — just be the person who shows up, delivers on time, and asks good questions. Watching court arguments taught me more than any textbook — how seniors frame things, how judges respond. Also, build your fundamentals — research, drafting, reading judgments — that’s your toolbox. And don’t chase glamour early on. Focus on being reliable — that’s what builds trust and gets you bigger opportunities.
Litigation can take over your life. How do you manage that balance now?
It’s something I’ve had to work on consciously. In the early years, especially at Luthra, there was a lot of pride in pulling all-nighters and being available 24/7. But over time, you realise it’s not sustainable. Now, I try to be more intentional with time plans, delegate when needed, and switch off when I can. Having a good team is a huge help. You stop feeling like you’re carrying it all alone. And when you do take time off, actually disconnecting helps you come back sharper.
Coming from a commerce background, what inspired you to transition into law as a career? Were there any specific experiences or moments that steered you in this direction and set you on this remarkable path?
During my later years at school, I was inclined towards commerce and economics. However, once I started pursuing a Bachelor of Commerce degree at the University of Delhi, I realised that I was particularly fascinated by business and company laws. I delved deeper into the subject and spoke with individuals who were pursuing careers in law. It was then that I knew this was the field I wanted to study.
In the second year of my LL.B. at the Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, I encountered arbitration for the first. While interning at a law firm in Delhi, I was asked to assist with an ongoing arbitration case. Beyond providing access to an early resolution of commercial disputes, arbitration offered systematic and streamlined processes and neutrality. I was immensely impressed by the concept of an alternative forum for dispute resolution, especially in a country like India where the courts are burdened with pending litigation. This initial experience sparked my interest in becoming an arbitration practitioner.
With guidance from my mentors, I gained further experience in this field and began working as a disputes lawyer at Luthra & Luthra Law Offices.
You completed a degree of Master of International Economic Law, Business, and Policy from Stanford Law School, USA. How has this specialized education enriched your career? What aspects of the program at Stanford were particularly valuable for you, and did you encounter any challenges during your studies? How would you describe your overall experience there?
When I applied for an LL.M. at Stanford, I saw it as an option to broaden my horizons. I did not want to limit my exposure to only international arbitration. I had read about a variety of innovative courses at Stanford, such as International Business Negotiations, Regulating Artificial Intelligence, Data: Privacy, Property and Security, Facilitation, etc. I wanted to take these courses in addition to the traditional subjects and have a well-rounded experience. I am glad that my instincts paid off. For instance, International Business Negotiations involved teams from Stanford and another law school in a simulated corporate transaction over a period of three months. As an arbitration practitioner, I had never experienced the negotiation aspect of a transaction. This course provided insight into the commercial aspects of the contractual clauses that I regularly encounter in my work.
In addition to offering versatile courses, Stanford’s small class-size offered numerous opportunities to engage in rich and meaningful discussions with a brilliant set of individuals and learn more about their experiences in their respective jurisdictions. However, it was also challenging to be there. When surrounded by brilliance, it is natural to experience self-doubt at times. Fortunately, Stanford has an excellent faculty and counselors who helped me navigate these challenges.
Overall, my year at Stanford was the best investment of my life. I thoroughly enjoyed being on campus, attending classes and guest lectures, socialising with peers, and occasionally taking small trips to the beautiful parts of California!
In the early stages of your career, you worked as an associate with various firms in India. What key learning experiences from that time played a pivotal role in shaping your career trajectory? Can you recall any specific instance that was especially impactful for you?
A great benefit of studying law in Delhi was the access to full-time and part-time internships throughout most of the year. I interned at several law firms during my LL.B., which taught me many skills that are highly valued in junior lawyers. While education is crucial, having the right mentor is equally important. I was fortunate to be mentored by some of the nicest and most talented lawyers in Delhi.
I began my career as an associate with Mr. Gaurav Bahl, an excellent mentor who significantly shaped my professional path. Working with him prepared me for the next step in my career: joining a law firm. I joined Luthra & Luthra Law Offices and worked with the disputes team for the next three years. During this time, I handled arbitration matters, commercial litigation cases, and occasionally argued smaller cases in court. While it was fascinating to work on a variety of legal issues in office, it was exhilarating to argue cases before judges. Sometimes, hard work paid off in the form of favourable judgments and orders. At other times, there were invaluable lessons. To this day, working in the field of law brings me immense joy, and I would not trade it for the world.
One of the most enriching experiences at the law firm was when my partner encouraged me to handle an appeal before the Supreme Court in a matter involving complex securities law. Before addressing the legal issues, it was crucial to work closely with technical experts to understand the intricacies of the futures and options market and the role of their business. Looking back, I vividly remember how much I enjoyed working outside my comfort zone on complex legal issues and resolving them. However, achieving a favourable judgment would not have been possible without deep diving into the commercial aspects of the case. As a disputes lawyer, I believe the best results for your client can be achieved by understanding their needs and the needs of their business. Whenever I get a new case, I invest a considerable amount of time in understanding the client’s business and what a desirable outcome looks like for them.
After your time in India, you transitioned to an international practice, working with Freshfields in Dubai. How did you manage the cultural shift and navigate the complexities of international law, especially in the realm of dispute resolution? How do the legal environments in Dubai and India differ, particularly in handling arbitration and cross-border disputes?
During my LL.M., my career counsellor at Stanford encouraged me to explore global opportunities alongside my job search in the United States. The US market is challenging, and only a few firms are interested in international law graduates. I connected with several professionals, meeting arbitration practitioners over coffee in San Francisco and New York, and through virtual meetings via Zoom. During one such interaction, I came across Freshfields’ six-month trainee programme. I applied and was accepted after a couple of interviews. The programme served as a springboard for my international career. Freshfields sometimes hires from their pool of trainees, and that’s how my six-month stint turned into a full-time associate position.
Dubai is truly an international legal market. The international arbitration team comprised lawyers from different parts of the world and advised clients from several jurisdictions. The style of working was unlike what I had experienced in India, but I was fortunate to find kind and patient mentors and teammates. I worked on multi-jurisdictional arbitrations, which offered the opportunity to collaborate with local counsels from India, England, the Middle East, Australia, and other regions. On several matters, the teams included colleagues from different jurisdictions, making networking and collaborating within the firm quite easy.
It was a challenge to unlearn the traditional Indian style of drafting and embrace the US-style simple and succinct legal drafting. Moreover, the scale of the matters necessitated the use of technology, so I learned how to utilise emerging legal-tech tools to make my work more efficient. I believe it was important to approach my job with an open mind – it really makes your life easier.
A great aspect of working with an international law firm was that my work was not limited to commercial arbitration. From time to time, I engaged in investment arbitration, investigations, and non-contentious legal work. My favourite part, though, was working as a tribunal assistant in several alternative dispute resolution cases involving the International Tennis Integrity Agency and the Basketball Arbitral Tribunal.
Currently, in your role at Allen Overy Shearman Sterling LLP in Germany dealing in International Dispute Resolution, you handle complex international commercial arbitration and cross-border disputes. What do you find to be the most challenging aspect of managing such disputes, and can you share a specific case that stands out as a significant learning experience?
I have been working at A&O Shearman since February 2024. My decision to move to Germany was motivated by personal reasons, and it was a difficult choice. I was seeking to join a team with an international practice, not limited to commercial arbitration. Over the past 14 months, I have already worked on post-M&A disputes, energy disputes, investor-state issues, and investigations.
A challenging aspect of working in the German legal market is dealing with the German language. Many contractual disputes are governed by German law, and important commentaries and case law are only available in German. Moreover, Germany is a civil law country, and the concepts can be quite different from common law. Therefore, as an arbitration lawyer, I work closely with German law experts. This collaboration provides me with an opportunity to dive into a different legal system and learn more about civil law. It is quite fascinating!
Recently, I advised on claims under a warranty and indemnity insurance in an M&A transaction. This has been a great learning experience, as I had not dealt with this issue before. It is an emerging area of disputes, and there is only limited literature on its practical aspects. As a lawyer, you must read all you can and trust your instincts. I am doing that, and it is helping me develop expertise in a niche area of law.
As someone who has built an illustrious career in international arbitration, what advice would you give to young professionals aspiring to follow a similar path? How can they position themselves early on to excel in this competitive field, and are there any specific resources or strategies you would recommend for deepening one’s knowledge of international arbitration?
First and foremost, I highly recommend gaining internship experience during your LL.B. Reading books and writing exams at law school is very different from how law functions in practice. My internships helped me realise that I wanted to specialise in dispute resolution, with a focus on arbitration.
Then, pursuing an LL.M. is a significant financial commitment. It should be viewed as an investment that may or may not yield immediate results, so it is important to remain open to all possibilities. I cannot emphasise enough on the importance of networking during your year abroad. An LL.M. is not just about studying law; it is also about developing and refining skills that will help you grow as a professional. Invest considerable time in researching law schools to find the one that meets your individual needs.
For students, I would highly recommend participating in moot court competitions. There are several arbitration-specific moot courts held both in and outside India (e.g. VIS Arbitration Moot, Frankfurt Investment Arbitration Moot, Sports Arbitration Moot). These competitions not only provide an opportunity to learn about arbitration in practice, but also to network with students and professionals from other cities and countries.
For young professionals, the easiest way to deepen your knowledge of international arbitration is by reading journal articles and blog posts on arbitration cases (e.g., Kluwer Arbitration, GAR) and staying updated with the developments in this field. Attending lectures and conferences on arbitration is also highly beneficial – not only for learning more about the law but also for engaging in meaningful conversations with arbitration practitioners. LinkedIn often features opportunities and scholarships to attend conferences abroad, offering a great chance to broaden your horizon before committing to an LL.M. or a job with a law firm abroad.
Given your demanding role, how do you maintain a healthy balance between your professional and personal life? Are there any hobbies or activities you engage in to relax and recharge?
Maintaining a work-life balance is a significant challenge in the legal profession. As a young professional, I often overlooked this crucial aspect. However, in recent years, I have started to take it more seriously. I greatly appreciate the work culture in Germany, where there is strong emphasis on both physical and mental well-being. This supportive environment has encouraged me to take better care of myself while continuing to excel as a lawyer.
For relaxation, I enjoy reading fiction and listening to music. Occasionally, I take holidays and plan weekend trips with family or friends to the mountains or other European cities. I also try to exercise regularly and eat healthy. Most importantly, I ensure that I take a break on weekends, unless an urgent matter requires my attention.
With such an impressive and diverse career, what do you see as the next challenge or opportunity you would like to pursue? How do you envision your career evolving over the next few years, and what legacy would you like to leave in the field of international arbitration?
As an India-qualified lawyer working with international law firms, I have had the privilege of navigating diverse legal landscapes and engaging with a variety of complex cases. The next challenge I am eager to pursue is acting as an arbitrator. In the past, I have thoroughly enjoyed being a tribunal assistant, and I am excited to experience the decision-making aspects once again.
In the coming years, I aim to contribute significantly to both the academic and practical discourse on international arbitration through publications, speaking engagements, and participation in global forums. Additionally, I aspire to mentor young lawyers, particularly those from underrepresented regions, and provide training to help them navigate the complexities of international arbitration.
With nearly 16 years of distinguished experience in the legal field, what initially motivated you to pursue a career in law? Which aspects of the profession have resonated with you the most, and how did your time in law school contribute to shaping your legal journey?
My taking up law as a career path was unexpected, considering that I had taken up science in 12th standard. While preparing for various entrance examinations, I was introduced to a book on law by my dad. The questions there sparked my curiosity, and I loved how everything was reason and logic based, which prompted me to pursue law.
Law School provided a crucial foundation. I participated in moot courts during my college days, where I discovered the excitement of building a case, researching legal propositions, advocating and thinking from either side, and arguing the case before judges, which is ultimately what shaped my choices after law school.
Having completed your LL.M. at New York University with a focus on Competition, Innovation, and Information Law, what factors influenced your decision to choose this particular program and university? How has your experience at NYU shaped your career, and how has this advanced degree contributed to your professional growth?
Having started my career in a top tier Intellectual Property Law firm, I always wanted to pursue an LL.M. in the same field. As NYU was offering an integrated course covering these subjects, I knew that was the right course for me given the new legal challenges that we face in the ecosystem of rapidly changing technologies.
My experience at NYU was extremely rewarding as it afforded me the opportunity to engage with lawyers from diverse backgrounds and jurisdictions.
At the outset of your career, you worked with a renowned firm. What were the key experiences during this time that significantly enhanced your understanding of the law, and how did these early experiences help shape your career trajectory?
I was fortunate to have had a diverse portfolio of matters early in my career which provided me with better and practical understanding of the various IP laws. Each case I worked on and every mistake I made were valuable learning experiences that contributed to my growth.
I vividly remember my first case, which centered around infringement of an iconic and classic Bollywood film. Attention to detail in the documents proved pivotal in securing a favorable order for us – a learning that I have carried along till date. Similarly, each day in court is a new experience, which has helped me grow, and continues to teach me something new every single day.
With your extensive experience in negotiating and drafting music licensing agreements, how do you approach negotiations with international platforms such as Spotify, Apple Music, and TikTok? What challenges do varying jurisdictions present in these types of negotiations, and how do you navigate them?
My approach to any negotiation, not just for music agreements, is to understand the four key elements of the deal and of the partners involved i.e. Who, What, Why, and How.
First, identifying the ‘Who’ involves studying the counterparties and their role in the negotiation. For music licensing, this could be a music publisher, record label, or tech platform, each approaches a negotiation differently.
Next, understanding ‘What’ entails grasping the underlying technology or platform, including what the usage of music is like and what are the business needs and objectives of my client.
The ‘Why’ pertains to why and for what purpose the legal rights are needed, such as copyright, mechanical rights, or sync or publishing licenses.
Lastly, recognizing ‘How’ involves aligning the deal with your client’s business needs and objectives.
By comprehensively addressing these factors, I have been able to navigate the complexities of music licensing negotiations.
As a legal advisor to major media and entertainment clients like T-Series, how do you balance intellectual property protection with the evolving legal landscape surrounding IP in the entertainment sector?
As outside counsel, it’s essential to align my thinking with the client’s objectives while ensuring compliance with the law. Technology is dynamic and constantly evolving and hence, the only solution is to deliver innovative, out-of-the-box solutions that bridge the gap between intellectual property law and the business needs of a client.
Given your substantial expertise in advising clients on privacy and information technology laws, how do you evaluate the impact of India’s rapidly expanding digital economy on privacy regulations and intermediary liability issues?
India’s growing digital economy presents both exciting opportunities and significant challenges in the areas of privacy and intermediary liability. As the country moves toward greater digitization, the sheer volume of personal data being generated and processed has increased multifold. This growth puts more pressure on privacy regulations to ensure that individuals’ personal information is adequately protected from misuse. There is also a greater need to ensure effective regulation in relation to collection, storage and sharing of personal information by various entities. The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 addresses some of these concerns on paper but only time will tell how the Act protects personal data.
Regarding intermediary liability, digital platforms like social media, e-commerce, and content-sharing services face greater scrutiny nowadays on their role in regulating user-generated content. India’s digital economy requires privacy laws that are flexible and proactive, as well as clear guidelines on intermediary liability to ensure that platforms operate responsibly while fostering growth in the digital sector.
With your experience in managing and leading teams of lawyers, what do you believe are the most essential qualities for driving strategic decision-making in complex legal matters, particularly those involving emerging technologies and cross-border negotiations?
The most essential qualities are a solid grounding in legal fundamentals, staying current with evolving laws and technologies, the ability to distill relevant facts from complexity, and strong teamwork and communication skills to align all stakeholders effectively.
What advice would you offer to law students aspiring to build a career like yours, particularly in the fields of intellectual property and data protection? What skills or qualities do you consider crucial for success in these areas, and how can aspiring legal professionals best prepare for this path?
My advice is to know the ABCs of the law you intend to practice. Don’t be afraid to make mistakes—just make sure you learn from them. Stay curious, not just about changes in Indian law but also global developments and never hesitate to ask questions. Attention to detail and analytical thinking are key. No one is perfect, but if you can harness these skills with consistency and a willingness to grow, you’ll be well on your way.
Drawing from your extensive experience in resolving high-stakes litigation, what intellectual property strategies would you recommend to businesses particularly in the technology sector seeking to protect their IP while navigating the complex legal landscape in India?
To protect intellectual property in businesses, companies should adopt a proactive IP strategy that includes identifying the IP in various products, securing protection through timely registration of patents, trademarks, copyrights, and designs early on. Having regular IP audits and clear licensing policies and systems in place and lastly, monitoring infringement including initiating swift enforcement actions.
What pivotal moments influenced your decision to become a lawyer and CS, and how did your early experiences of life shape your career path?
The roots of this inspiring journey trace back to a tiny village in Odisha, nestled about 200 kilometres from Bhubaneswar. It was a place of simplicity and resilience, where school was held beneath the open sky, under the shade of a sprawling tree. When the rains came, they did not just wash the earth but also brought unexpected holidays, for there was no roof to shield the lessons.
Saturdays were special—they were days of collective effort and community spirit. The boys fetched water from nearby tanks, while the girls prepared the schoolyard, smoothing the earth with cow dung collected from the village. By Monday, the grounds were dry and ready to welcome another week of learning.
In this setting, where challenges were woven into the fabric of daily life, a young dreamer’s path began to take shape. The journey from studying under a tree to standing in corporate boardrooms reflects a life sculpted by grit and determination, rooted deeply in those formative experiences.
What inspired your decision to become a lawyer and CS, especially given your humble background? How did this journey shape your growth and influence those around you?
From a small village in Odisha to a disciplined boarding school, the journey was a test of resilience and determination. Limited to education until class seven in the village, the young dreamer moved to a nearby town, adapting to the rigor of boarding school life—waking at 4 a.m., managing chores like grocery shopping, and balancing academics. These experiences instilled independence and discipline.
Graduation brought a pivotal realization—the need to break free from constraints through education. This drive led to the bold decision of pursuing both company secretaryship and law simultaneously, an extraordinary feat accomplished with unwavering focus. Success transformed my life, taking me from humble beginnings to corporate boardrooms—a true testament to grit and ambition.
How has your transition from independent CS practice to working at a law firm to serving as an in-house counsel shaped your career? What do you enjoy most about your role?
My journey has been one of exploration and growth, shaped by diverse experiences across India. After completing my early education in Odisha, I moved to Chennai for my CS and later to Delhi to finish the course. These transitions exposed me to India’s rich diversity and built adaptability.
I began as an independent practitioner CS in Delhi, handling IPOs, mergers, and corporate actions. This entrepreneurial phase was rewarding, but I sought to expand my horizons. Moving into corporate law firms, I leveraged my CS expertise to deliver client-centric solutions, which set me apart.
My transition to in-house counsel began at Bharti Delmonte, working under inspiring mentors and gaining corporate strategy insights. Joining Vodafone during its historic acquisition of Hutchison was transformative, with a decade spent managing complex litigations, arbitrations, and large-scale challenges in telecom.
then at NIVEA, FMCG leading legal functions for a global brand has been a dynamic and fulfilling chapter. Each role has enriched my perspective, blending entrepreneurial spirit, legal acumen, and strategic leadership.
After two decades of experience working with major corporations, what significant changes have you observed in corporate legal practices, particularly in compliance frameworks and dispute resolution mechanisms?
Over two decades, I’ve witnessed significant shifts in corporate legal practice, especially in compliance and dispute resolution. Companies like Vodafone demonstrated the importance of strong ethical foundations and robust compliance frameworks, aligning processes with a clear vision. Their dedication to excellence was reflected in hiring outstanding professionals and anticipating challenges years ahead.
Recently, advancements in technology have streamlined compliance and dispute resolution mechanisms, improving transparency and efficiency. Coupled with a culture of ethics and governance, these developments have transformed the legal landscape. The combination of visionary leadership, structured policies, and exceptional talent remains the driving force behind corporate success today.
How do global corporations, especially multinationals, approach dispute resolution differently?
Litigation would always be the last resort for MNCs. It disrupts relationships and business continuity, so companies focus on resolving disputes amicably be it with governments, vendors, suppliers, or customers.
Multinationals emphasize customer-centric solutions. For instance, customer satisfaction was paramount. If a customer faced network issues, we responded with apologies or compensations rather than assigning blame. This empathy-first approach reflects their understanding that business thrives on happy customers.
Globally, companies also prioritize efficient mechanisms like mediation and arbitration, ensuring conflicts are resolved swiftly while preserving relationships.
Multinationals succeed not because of their global stature but because they create trusted brands, deliver value, and ensure compliance. It’s this forward-thinking, customer-first philosophy that drives their success with their leadership, empathy, and processes.
How do you handle intellectual property and brand protection for a Global brand you served?
Intellectual property is vital for innovation, identity and brand longevity, it begins with securing patents, trademarks, trade dress, and designs to convert creativity into valuable assets. Innovation drives product development, and legal measures ensure every aspect—from packaging to product shape—is meticulously protected.
Proactive strategies, such as monitoring markets for counterfeiting and unauthorized use, are critical in preserving brand integrity. Collaborating with enforcement agencies and implementing stringent safeguards are key, especially in diverse markets like India were consumer dynamics demand vigilance. This approach ensures the longevity of the brand, upholding its reputation and trust across generations and geographies.
Sir, how do you share your experience and impart education to new entrants in the legal field? What process do you follow to guide interns and inspire them to develop passion for the profession?
Internships are essential for shaping future legal professionals. At our office, we actively host interns sent by law colleges, consistently engaging two to three interns each month. We assign them meaningful projects, encourage research, and foster collaboration, ensuring they gain practical insights that prepare them for successful careers.
My advice to young lawyers is simple: the legal profession is a marathon, not a sprint. Patience, continuous learning, and adaptability are key. Success lies in understanding legal principles while addressing business complexities effectively. The challenge—and opportunity—is to merge theoretical knowledge with real-world solutions.
Mentorship and exposure to seasoned professionals are invaluable in this process. Personally, working with stalwarts in multinational companies has shaped my journey, proving that growth comes through steady, purposeful learning and commitment over time.
Sir, would you like to share some memorable achievements or recognitions from your career that had a significant impact on you and your approach to the kind of work that you have been doing?
Ups and downs are part of every professional journey. Sometimes, despite your best efforts, outcomes may not favour you—like a lawyer who wins and loses cases or a doctor who saves lives but cannot save all.
In my experience, one notable case involved a complex arbitration dispute. The matter escalated to the Supreme Court and back to arbitration, stretching over 15 years. For seven of those years, I was actively handling it, and by then, 30 crore rupees had already been spent on a 100-crore dispute. Such cases highlight the challenges and costs of prolonged litigation—it’s a fight that can go on endlessly if parties don’t seek resolution.
On the other hand, there have been many rewarding moments. For instance, in a recent case, one of our competitors was disparaging our brand. We took them to court and secured a landmark order from the Delhi High Court, which stands as a testament to the power of focused legal strategy.
My guiding principle, inspired by the Gita, is Kamrany vadhikaraste Ma Phaleshu Kada Chanan “Do your duty without worrying about the results”. The result is always a byproduct of consistent effort, dedication, and making the best use of available resources. Whether in tough challenges or noteworthy recognitions, this belief keeps me focused on delivering my best.
You’ve pursued dual qualifications as a company secretary and a lawyer. How has this combination benefited your career, and what advice would you give to learners following the same path?
The combination of being a company secretary and a lawyer is incredibly powerful. Company secretaryship provides deep insights into business operations, taxation, management, governance, and organizational behaviour. However, it doesn’t cover areas like civil law, criminal law, constitutional law, or jurisprudence—fields that are integral to legal practice. Law complements this by equipping you with a thorough understanding of the legal system.
When you combine the two, you gain a unique ability to bridge business challenges with legal solutions. This synergy is highly valued by companies, especially those requiring professionals to manage both roles efficiently. Many organizations prefer hiring individuals with dual qualifications to meet regulatory requirements while optimizing resources.
For learners, my advice is to see this combination as a long-term investment. It’s a strategic advantage that not only opens doors to versatile career opportunities but also helps you excel in leadership roles. The key is to approach your career with patience, commitment, and the understanding that success comes from integrating knowledge and applying it effectively over time. This is undoubtedly one of the best professional combinations for aspiring legal and corporate professionals.
What unique legal challenges have you faced in the skincare industry, especially when transitioning from telecom to FMCG?
Moving from telecom to skincare was a significant shift. Telecom revolves around services, technology, and infrastructure, like optical fibres and towers, while skincare is product-focused with manufacturing, supply chains, and distribution at its core.
The regulatory landscape is vastly different. Telecom is governed by sector-specific regulators, whereas FMCG and cosmetics must adhere to the Drugs and Cosmetics Act and legal metrology rules. The skincare industry, often treated like pharmaceuticals, requires strict compliance to ensure product safety and consumer trust.
Adapting to this new framework took time—about six months to fully absorb the nuances of manufacturing, distribution, and FMCG regulations. While some aspects like contracts and compliance were familiar, learning the specifics of product-centric laws and supply chain operations was essential.
Skincare demands understanding Skin Science, rigorous compliance, strict adherence to regulatory standards, and a deep understanding of its unique challenges and competition landscape. With focus and adaptability, I’ve successfully navigated this dynamic environment, ensuring robust compliance and operational excellence.
Outside of your professional life, what are some personal interests or hobbies that contribute to your overall well-being and work-life balance? How have you found that peaceful space for yourself?
Earlier, I was passionate about cycling, but I had to stop due to safety concerns in Mumbai. I then shifted to yoga, which has been transformative for me over the past couple of years. Yoga, along with meditation, helps me unwind and maintain a sense of balance. Swimming is another activity I enjoy whenever I get the time—it’s both relaxing and energizing.
Reading and listening to blogs are integral parts of my life as well. In our profession, staying informed is crucial, and I find reading to be both enriching and calming. When I have a longer break, I indulge my passion for travel—especially road trips. One of my most memorable adventures was driving from Mumbai to Ladakh; Mumbai to Kanyakumari by road with a GC friend, exploring India’s beauty by car.
These hobbies—whether yoga, swimming, reading, or traveling—serve as my personal escape. They not only help me recharge but also motivate me, adding meaning and joy to my life beyond work.
Sir, your legal career spans a diverse array of practice areas, including criminal and civil litigation, writ petitions, and domestic arbitrations. Reflecting on your journey, what initially inspired you to pursue law as a career, and how did you cultivate expertise in such varied areas of law?
Looking back, my journey into law wasn’t driven by a single “aha” moment, but by a gradual and irresistible fascination towards it. What first drew my attention was my fascination with going to courts. There was something about the atmosphere, the energy and the way arguments unfolded, that captivated me from the start. Watching advocates argue complex matters with clarity and conviction inspired me to be part of this legal world. This fascination soon turned into a deeper interest towards law. What truly sealed it for me, though, was participating in several moot courts during law college. That’s where I for the first time experienced the thrill of legal research, strategy, and structured argument. Mooting gave me that rush, which made the law feel alive. It sparked a passion that’s been hard to resist ever since.
One of the most valuable lessons I picked up early on was learning to argue a case from both sides. It not only strengthens your understanding of the law but teaches you empathy, critical thinking, and the ability to anticipate and respond. These skills are crucial in any type of litigation be it civil, criminal or arbitration.
As for cultivating expertise across varied practice areas, there’s no shortcut. For me it’s been a deliberate process deeply rooted in constant reading and curiosity. I ensure that I not only read statutes and judgements but also apply those laws to hypothetical scenarios. It’s my way of pressure-testing the law and developing a deeper, more intuitive grasp of it. It sharpens interpretation, builds a nuanced understanding of law and prepares me to handle diverse cases with confidence. It also keeps me in a constant zone of learning, which is essential because the law is always evolving.
Can you share your journey from law school to the early years of practice? What challenges did you encounter when starting out in the legal profession, and how did you navigate those obstacles to establish yourself in your practice areas?
My journey from law college to the profession has been shaped by discipline, resilience, and a relentless desire to carve my own space in the legal world. Being a first generation lawyer, I come from a background where nothing was handed on a silver platter and from day one, I knew I had to work harder than most if I wanted to make it in the legal world and the journey still continues.
While studying law in college, I worked part time as a Karate instructor, juggling classes, internships and training. Balancing all this meant my days often started well before sunrise and ended well past midnight, but the discipline taught me how to manage time, stay grounded and never lose sight of my goals.
Before I formally entered the profession, I had already completed approximately three years of internships with a litigator because I wanted to be as ready as possible when the first opportunity came, and it eventually did, I was selected at Solomon & Co., a place that has shaped me significantly and allowed me to grow in arbitration, civil and criminal litigation. The principle which I followed as a student and an intern continued at the firm as well which was to never say no to any work. Even when a task or assignment felt beyond my comfort zone, I saw it as a chance to grow.
What I have learned is that success in law doesn’t come easy and certainly doesn’t come from shortcuts, it comes from showing up everyday, putting in the work and being willing to learn, unlearn and grow. I still carry the same hunger today, and I believe that as long as that fire burns, the journey will remain exciting.
Your career at Solomon & Co. has been marked by impressive growth, from Associate to Senior Associate, and now Associate Partner. What were the key milestones, accomplishments, or lessons that have contributed to your rise within the firm? How do you view your current role as an Associate Partner in shaping your long-term goals and aspirations within the firm?
My journey at Solomon & Co. has been defined by consistent growth, strong mentorship of my seniors and a deep-rooted passion for dispute resolution. From joining as an Associate to now working as an Associate Partner, every step has brought with it new challenges, learnings and opportunities that shaped me both professionally and personally.
Some of the key milestones in this journey include handling high stakes litigation, managing and nurturing a diverse team, and successfully building and maintaining client relationships. Each role I have taken on has reinforced the value of strategic thinking, clear communication and adaptability. These skills are fundamental for navigating the dynamic world of dispute resolution.
As an Associate Partner, my focus has expanded to including mentoring junior team members, broadening our practice areas, and actively participating in business development initiatives. It’s a role that demands not just legal acumen but also vision, patience and leadership and the same also aligns perfectly with my long-term goal of contributing meaningfully to the firm’s legacy, while continuously evolving into a well – rounded leader.
I am especially grateful for the trust and responsibility placed in me by Solomon & Co. and particularly by Mr. Aaron Solomon, our Managing Partner and other Partners at Solomon & Co with whom I have worked, their mentorship and support have played a pivotal role in my growth. The learnings and trust reposed by the firm helps me and continues to motivate me while raising the standards of work in my team and across practice areas ensuring the best possible client service.
The road ahead is exciting, and I look forward to continuing to grow with Solomon & Co. while making a lasting impact in the field of litigation and dispute resolution.
With your extensive experience in domestic arbitration, what do you consider to be the key elements for a successful arbitration process in India? How do you prepare for an arbitration hearing, and what are some common misconceptions clients have about arbitration that you make sure to clarify for them?
With the evolution of arbitration law and practice in India, a successful domestic arbitration hinges on a few key elements.
First and foremost, clarity in the arbitration agreement is essential. Many disputes begin with ambiguities in the arbitration clause itself, be it the seat, governing law, or the process for appointment of arbitrators. A well drafted arbitration clause reduces the scope for preliminary procedural challenges and delay.
Secondly, efficiency and preparedness are critical. Unlike court proceedings, arbitration gives parties greater control over timelines and procedure. To make the most of this, it’s important to have a focused strategy right from the statement of claim/defence stage, with clearly defined issues, timelines, and a vision of how the matter should proceed. When I prepare for an arbitration hearing, I focus not just on the legal merits but also on the narrative as to how to present a case in a concise and persuasive manner. Understanding the tribunal’s style and anticipating procedural objections or evidentiary challenges are all part of the preparation. Arbitration is often document – heavy, so organizing the record meticulously and preparing a tight chronology helps the tribunal follow the case seamlessly.
As for client expectations, one common misconception is that arbitration is always faster and cheaper than litigation. While it often is, especially when managed well, that’s not universally true. I also find that clients sometimes think arbitration is informal or less serious whereas in reality, it can be just as rigorous and adversarial, especially in complex commercial matters.
Another myth is that the arbitrator will find a middle ground to resolve the dispute. I always clarify that arbitrators are bound by law and evidence, and their role is adjudicatory, not conciliatory. Ultimately, the goal is to demystify the process for clients, set realistic expectations, and execute the strategy with precision and integrity.
You regularly appear before various judicial and quasi-judicial forums, including Magistrate Courts and the Bombay High Court. How do you adapt your legal strategies to suit the procedural differences in these distinct forums?
Each forum whether it is the Magistrate’s Court or a quasi-judicial tribunal, or the Bombay High Court has its own procedural framework, pace, and expectations. Adapting legal strategy to suit these differences is not just important but also essential for effective advocacy. In Magistrate Courts, proceedings tend to be more procedural, and form driven. The focus is often on compliance with statutory timelines, procedural filings, and the careful presentation of evidence especially in criminal complaints or cases under the Negotiable Instruments Act. Here, precision in pleadings, attention to procedural nuances, and consistent follow-up are key. Oral arguments are usually brief and factual, and the focus is on moving the matter through its procedural stages efficiently.
In contrast, when appearing before the Bombay High Court, especially on the original side, the approach is significantly different. Matters here involve a broader canvas such as complex commercial disputes, writs, appeals etc., requiring deeper legal analysis, structured submissions, and often layered case law support. Strategy here includes anticipating judicial thinking, being well-versed with recent precedents, and presenting arguments with clarity and brevity to match the Court’s time constraints.
At the core of my approach is a simple principle: form must follow function. Strategy is tailored not only to the forum, but also the nature of relief sought, the urgency involved and the profile of the adjudicator. One size never fits all.
As an experienced litigator who frequently handles high-profile cases, could you share a particularly complex or high-stakes litigation that you’ve managed? What were the main challenges involved, and how did you craft a successful strategy for your client?
One of the more complex matters I have handled involved representing a landowner, where we are defending a Suit and connected litigation concerning a large-scale redevelopment project in Mumbai. The dispute revolves around the ownership of land and other issues.
The main challenge lay in the multi – forum nature of the dispute: while the core issue is being adjudicated by the Suit Court, there are parallel proceedings before Magistrate’s Court, Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Land Revenue Officers etc.
Given the commercial and reputational stakes, the pressure to act swiftly and strategically was high. My approach was to first disentangle the overlapping legal issues and create a unified litigation roadmap. I worked closely with the client to identify his core priorities, staying adverse enforcement actions etc.
We focused on defending the grant of ad-interim reliefs from the High Court, which set the tone of the rest of the proceedings. What is important is a mix of legal precision and tactical patience. We avoided combative stance where unnecessary and instead leveraged procedural opportunities to bring the other side to the table for Mediation.
Cases like this reaffirm that high stakes litigation isn’t about winning, its about knowing when to push and when to pause.
With your wealth of experience across multiple areas of law, you are in a unique position to guide aspiring legal professionals. What advice would you offer to law students and young lawyers, particularly those looking to build a successful career in dispute resolution? Are there any key skills, resources, or strategies that you believe are essential for success in this field?
Dispute resolution is a deeply rewarding field, but it demands patience, precision, and perseverance. For law students and young lawyers aspiring to build a career in this area, my first piece of advice would be: embrace the grind. Litigation is not about instant gratification, it’s a slow build, where every draft, every appearance, every client interaction contributes to your growth.
Foundational skills like legal research, drafting, and court etiquette are non-negotiable. The ability to think analytically, anticipating judicial thinking, communicate clearly, and adapt to different forums is what makes a good Advocate. Early on, focus on understanding procedural law, it’s the spine of litigation. You may know the law, but if you don’t know how to apply it procedurally, you’re at a disadvantage.
I also encourage young professionals to observe courtroom proceedings, even when they’re not arguing. There’s no better classroom than a courtroom. Watch how seasoned counsel frame their submissions, how judges respond, and how strategies shift in real time. Over time, this exposure will shape your own courtroom style.
In terms of resources, commentaries, live cases, and judgments are vital but so are podcasts, lectures, and articles that give you practical insights. Law is no longer just about black-letter rules; it’s about staying curious, current, and commercially aware.
One underrated skill is client management. Understanding your client’s priorities, maintaining transparency, and managing expectations are as important as your legal strategy. After all, dispute resolution isn’t just about fighting, it’s about solving.
Finally, build your credibility. That comes from consistency, honesty, and being dependable not just with seniors or clients, but with your team as well. Reputation in this field is earned slowly. If you’re willing to put in the hours, keep learning, and stay grounded, dispute resolution offers you a career of intellectual challenge and professional impact.
Achieving a work-life balance in a demanding profession like law can be challenging. Given the pressures of high-stakes litigation and various professional commitments, how have you managed to maintain a balance between your career and personal life?
Work – life balance in the legal profession is a constant work in progress, especially in litigation, where the unpredictability of court dates, client emergencies and deadlines often spill over into personal time. I haven’t cracked it yet, but over the years, I have learned to manage the chaos.
What has helped me the most is being fully present wherever I am. When I’m in court or working on a case, I give it my undivided attention. But once I step away from that space, I consciously switch off, even if it’s just for a short walk, dinner date or watching one episode of a show on any OTT platform. Those moments of disconnection actually recharge me and help me return to work with better focus.
I have also learned the value of prioritizing ruthlessly. Delegation, trusting my team and setting realistic expectations have been key to avoiding burnout. Spending time with loved ones, traveling when possible and pursuing personal interest keeps me grounded. They are essential for mental clarity and long – term sustainability in a profession that can be all consuming.
Most importantly, I have realised that the balance isn’t about spending equal time, its about being aligned with what matters most in each moment. Some weeks will tilt towards work and others towards personal time. As long as I don’t lose sight of the people and passions outside the profession, it all evens out in the long run.
