Coming from a commerce background, what inspired you to transition into law as a career? Were there any specific experiences or moments that steered you in this direction and set you on this remarkable path?
During my later years at school, I was inclined towards commerce and economics. However, once I started pursuing a Bachelor of Commerce degree at the University of Delhi, I realised that I was particularly fascinated by business and company laws. I delved deeper into the subject and spoke with individuals who were pursuing careers in law. It was then that I knew this was the field I wanted to study.
In the second year of my LL.B. at the Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, I encountered arbitration for the first. While interning at a law firm in Delhi, I was asked to assist with an ongoing arbitration case. Beyond providing access to an early resolution of commercial disputes, arbitration offered systematic and streamlined processes and neutrality. I was immensely impressed by the concept of an alternative forum for dispute resolution, especially in a country like India where the courts are burdened with pending litigation. This initial experience sparked my interest in becoming an arbitration practitioner.
With guidance from my mentors, I gained further experience in this field and began working as a disputes lawyer at Luthra & Luthra Law Offices.
You completed a degree of Master of International Economic Law, Business, and Policy from Stanford Law School, USA. How has this specialized education enriched your career? What aspects of the program at Stanford were particularly valuable for you, and did you encounter any challenges during your studies? How would you describe your overall experience there?
When I applied for an LL.M. at Stanford, I saw it as an option to broaden my horizons. I did not want to limit my exposure to only international arbitration. I had read about a variety of innovative courses at Stanford, such as International Business Negotiations, Regulating Artificial Intelligence, Data: Privacy, Property and Security, Facilitation, etc. I wanted to take these courses in addition to the traditional subjects and have a well-rounded experience. I am glad that my instincts paid off. For instance, International Business Negotiations involved teams from Stanford and another law school in a simulated corporate transaction over a period of three months. As an arbitration practitioner, I had never experienced the negotiation aspect of a transaction. This course provided insight into the commercial aspects of the contractual clauses that I regularly encounter in my work.
In addition to offering versatile courses, Stanford’s small class-size offered numerous opportunities to engage in rich and meaningful discussions with a brilliant set of individuals and learn more about their experiences in their respective jurisdictions. However, it was also challenging to be there. When surrounded by brilliance, it is natural to experience self-doubt at times. Fortunately, Stanford has an excellent faculty and counselors who helped me navigate these challenges.
Overall, my year at Stanford was the best investment of my life. I thoroughly enjoyed being on campus, attending classes and guest lectures, socialising with peers, and occasionally taking small trips to the beautiful parts of California!
In the early stages of your career, you worked as an associate with various firms in India. What key learning experiences from that time played a pivotal role in shaping your career trajectory? Can you recall any specific instance that was especially impactful for you?
A great benefit of studying law in Delhi was the access to full-time and part-time internships throughout most of the year. I interned at several law firms during my LL.B., which taught me many skills that are highly valued in junior lawyers. While education is crucial, having the right mentor is equally important. I was fortunate to be mentored by some of the nicest and most talented lawyers in Delhi.
I began my career as an associate with Mr. Gaurav Bahl, an excellent mentor who significantly shaped my professional path. Working with him prepared me for the next step in my career: joining a law firm. I joined Luthra & Luthra Law Offices and worked with the disputes team for the next three years. During this time, I handled arbitration matters, commercial litigation cases, and occasionally argued smaller cases in court. While it was fascinating to work on a variety of legal issues in office, it was exhilarating to argue cases before judges. Sometimes, hard work paid off in the form of favourable judgments and orders. At other times, there were invaluable lessons. To this day, working in the field of law brings me immense joy, and I would not trade it for the world.
One of the most enriching experiences at the law firm was when my partner encouraged me to handle an appeal before the Supreme Court in a matter involving complex securities law. Before addressing the legal issues, it was crucial to work closely with technical experts to understand the intricacies of the futures and options market and the role of their business. Looking back, I vividly remember how much I enjoyed working outside my comfort zone on complex legal issues and resolving them. However, achieving a favourable judgment would not have been possible without deep diving into the commercial aspects of the case. As a disputes lawyer, I believe the best results for your client can be achieved by understanding their needs and the needs of their business. Whenever I get a new case, I invest a considerable amount of time in understanding the client’s business and what a desirable outcome looks like for them.
After your time in India, you transitioned to an international practice, working with Freshfields in Dubai. How did you manage the cultural shift and navigate the complexities of international law, especially in the realm of dispute resolution? How do the legal environments in Dubai and India differ, particularly in handling arbitration and cross-border disputes?
During my LL.M., my career counsellor at Stanford encouraged me to explore global opportunities alongside my job search in the United States. The US market is challenging, and only a few firms are interested in international law graduates. I connected with several professionals, meeting arbitration practitioners over coffee in San Francisco and New York, and through virtual meetings via Zoom. During one such interaction, I came across Freshfields’ six-month trainee programme. I applied and was accepted after a couple of interviews. The programme served as a springboard for my international career. Freshfields sometimes hires from their pool of trainees, and that’s how my six-month stint turned into a full-time associate position.
Dubai is truly an international legal market. The international arbitration team comprised lawyers from different parts of the world and advised clients from several jurisdictions. The style of working was unlike what I had experienced in India, but I was fortunate to find kind and patient mentors and teammates. I worked on multi-jurisdictional arbitrations, which offered the opportunity to collaborate with local counsels from India, England, the Middle East, Australia, and other regions. On several matters, the teams included colleagues from different jurisdictions, making networking and collaborating within the firm quite easy.
It was a challenge to unlearn the traditional Indian style of drafting and embrace the US-style simple and succinct legal drafting. Moreover, the scale of the matters necessitated the use of technology, so I learned how to utilise emerging legal-tech tools to make my work more efficient. I believe it was important to approach my job with an open mind – it really makes your life easier.
A great aspect of working with an international law firm was that my work was not limited to commercial arbitration. From time to time, I engaged in investment arbitration, investigations, and non-contentious legal work. My favourite part, though, was working as a tribunal assistant in several alternative dispute resolution cases involving the International Tennis Integrity Agency and the Basketball Arbitral Tribunal.
Currently, in your role at Allen Overy Shearman Sterling LLP in Germany dealing in International Dispute Resolution, you handle complex international commercial arbitration and cross-border disputes. What do you find to be the most challenging aspect of managing such disputes, and can you share a specific case that stands out as a significant learning experience?
I have been working at A&O Shearman since February 2024. My decision to move to Germany was motivated by personal reasons, and it was a difficult choice. I was seeking to join a team with an international practice, not limited to commercial arbitration. Over the past 14 months, I have already worked on post-M&A disputes, energy disputes, investor-state issues, and investigations.
A challenging aspect of working in the German legal market is dealing with the German language. Many contractual disputes are governed by German law, and important commentaries and case law are only available in German. Moreover, Germany is a civil law country, and the concepts can be quite different from common law. Therefore, as an arbitration lawyer, I work closely with German law experts. This collaboration provides me with an opportunity to dive into a different legal system and learn more about civil law. It is quite fascinating!
Recently, I advised on claims under a warranty and indemnity insurance in an M&A transaction. This has been a great learning experience, as I had not dealt with this issue before. It is an emerging area of disputes, and there is only limited literature on its practical aspects. As a lawyer, you must read all you can and trust your instincts. I am doing that, and it is helping me develop expertise in a niche area of law.
As someone who has built an illustrious career in international arbitration, what advice would you give to young professionals aspiring to follow a similar path? How can they position themselves early on to excel in this competitive field, and are there any specific resources or strategies you would recommend for deepening one’s knowledge of international arbitration?
First and foremost, I highly recommend gaining internship experience during your LL.B. Reading books and writing exams at law school is very different from how law functions in practice. My internships helped me realise that I wanted to specialise in dispute resolution, with a focus on arbitration.
Then, pursuing an LL.M. is a significant financial commitment. It should be viewed as an investment that may or may not yield immediate results, so it is important to remain open to all possibilities. I cannot emphasise enough on the importance of networking during your year abroad. An LL.M. is not just about studying law; it is also about developing and refining skills that will help you grow as a professional. Invest considerable time in researching law schools to find the one that meets your individual needs.
For students, I would highly recommend participating in moot court competitions. There are several arbitration-specific moot courts held both in and outside India (e.g. VIS Arbitration Moot, Frankfurt Investment Arbitration Moot, Sports Arbitration Moot). These competitions not only provide an opportunity to learn about arbitration in practice, but also to network with students and professionals from other cities and countries.
For young professionals, the easiest way to deepen your knowledge of international arbitration is by reading journal articles and blog posts on arbitration cases (e.g., Kluwer Arbitration, GAR) and staying updated with the developments in this field. Attending lectures and conferences on arbitration is also highly beneficial – not only for learning more about the law but also for engaging in meaningful conversations with arbitration practitioners. LinkedIn often features opportunities and scholarships to attend conferences abroad, offering a great chance to broaden your horizon before committing to an LL.M. or a job with a law firm abroad.
Given your demanding role, how do you maintain a healthy balance between your professional and personal life? Are there any hobbies or activities you engage in to relax and recharge?
Maintaining a work-life balance is a significant challenge in the legal profession. As a young professional, I often overlooked this crucial aspect. However, in recent years, I have started to take it more seriously. I greatly appreciate the work culture in Germany, where there is strong emphasis on both physical and mental well-being. This supportive environment has encouraged me to take better care of myself while continuing to excel as a lawyer.
For relaxation, I enjoy reading fiction and listening to music. Occasionally, I take holidays and plan weekend trips with family or friends to the mountains or other European cities. I also try to exercise regularly and eat healthy. Most importantly, I ensure that I take a break on weekends, unless an urgent matter requires my attention.
With such an impressive and diverse career, what do you see as the next challenge or opportunity you would like to pursue? How do you envision your career evolving over the next few years, and what legacy would you like to leave in the field of international arbitration?
As an India-qualified lawyer working with international law firms, I have had the privilege of navigating diverse legal landscapes and engaging with a variety of complex cases. The next challenge I am eager to pursue is acting as an arbitrator. In the past, I have thoroughly enjoyed being a tribunal assistant, and I am excited to experience the decision-making aspects once again.
In the coming years, I aim to contribute significantly to both the academic and practical discourse on international arbitration through publications, speaking engagements, and participation in global forums. Additionally, I aspire to mentor young lawyers, particularly those from underrepresented regions, and provide training to help them navigate the complexities of international arbitration.
With nearly 16 years of distinguished experience in the legal field, what initially motivated you to pursue a career in law? Which aspects of the profession have resonated with you the most, and how did your time in law school contribute to shaping your legal journey?
My taking up law as a career path was unexpected, considering that I had taken up science in 12th standard. While preparing for various entrance examinations, I was introduced to a book on law by my dad. The questions there sparked my curiosity, and I loved how everything was reason and logic based, which prompted me to pursue law.
Law School provided a crucial foundation. I participated in moot courts during my college days, where I discovered the excitement of building a case, researching legal propositions, advocating and thinking from either side, and arguing the case before judges, which is ultimately what shaped my choices after law school.
Having completed your LL.M. at New York University with a focus on Competition, Innovation, and Information Law, what factors influenced your decision to choose this particular program and university? How has your experience at NYU shaped your career, and how has this advanced degree contributed to your professional growth?
Having started my career in a top tier Intellectual Property Law firm, I always wanted to pursue an LL.M. in the same field. As NYU was offering an integrated course covering these subjects, I knew that was the right course for me given the new legal challenges that we face in the ecosystem of rapidly changing technologies.
My experience at NYU was extremely rewarding as it afforded me the opportunity to engage with lawyers from diverse backgrounds and jurisdictions.
At the outset of your career, you worked with a renowned firm. What were the key experiences during this time that significantly enhanced your understanding of the law, and how did these early experiences help shape your career trajectory?
I was fortunate to have had a diverse portfolio of matters early in my career which provided me with better and practical understanding of the various IP laws. Each case I worked on and every mistake I made were valuable learning experiences that contributed to my growth.
I vividly remember my first case, which centered around infringement of an iconic and classic Bollywood film. Attention to detail in the documents proved pivotal in securing a favorable order for us – a learning that I have carried along till date. Similarly, each day in court is a new experience, which has helped me grow, and continues to teach me something new every single day.
With your extensive experience in negotiating and drafting music licensing agreements, how do you approach negotiations with international platforms such as Spotify, Apple Music, and TikTok? What challenges do varying jurisdictions present in these types of negotiations, and how do you navigate them?
My approach to any negotiation, not just for music agreements, is to understand the four key elements of the deal and of the partners involved i.e. Who, What, Why, and How.
First, identifying the ‘Who’ involves studying the counterparties and their role in the negotiation. For music licensing, this could be a music publisher, record label, or tech platform, each approaches a negotiation differently.
Next, understanding ‘What’ entails grasping the underlying technology or platform, including what the usage of music is like and what are the business needs and objectives of my client.
The ‘Why’ pertains to why and for what purpose the legal rights are needed, such as copyright, mechanical rights, or sync or publishing licenses.
Lastly, recognizing ‘How’ involves aligning the deal with your client’s business needs and objectives.
By comprehensively addressing these factors, I have been able to navigate the complexities of music licensing negotiations.
As a legal advisor to major media and entertainment clients like T-Series, how do you balance intellectual property protection with the evolving legal landscape surrounding IP in the entertainment sector?
As outside counsel, it’s essential to align my thinking with the client’s objectives while ensuring compliance with the law. Technology is dynamic and constantly evolving and hence, the only solution is to deliver innovative, out-of-the-box solutions that bridge the gap between intellectual property law and the business needs of a client.
Given your substantial expertise in advising clients on privacy and information technology laws, how do you evaluate the impact of India’s rapidly expanding digital economy on privacy regulations and intermediary liability issues?
India’s growing digital economy presents both exciting opportunities and significant challenges in the areas of privacy and intermediary liability. As the country moves toward greater digitization, the sheer volume of personal data being generated and processed has increased multifold. This growth puts more pressure on privacy regulations to ensure that individuals’ personal information is adequately protected from misuse. There is also a greater need to ensure effective regulation in relation to collection, storage and sharing of personal information by various entities. The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 addresses some of these concerns on paper but only time will tell how the Act protects personal data.
Regarding intermediary liability, digital platforms like social media, e-commerce, and content-sharing services face greater scrutiny nowadays on their role in regulating user-generated content. India’s digital economy requires privacy laws that are flexible and proactive, as well as clear guidelines on intermediary liability to ensure that platforms operate responsibly while fostering growth in the digital sector.
With your experience in managing and leading teams of lawyers, what do you believe are the most essential qualities for driving strategic decision-making in complex legal matters, particularly those involving emerging technologies and cross-border negotiations?
The most essential qualities are a solid grounding in legal fundamentals, staying current with evolving laws and technologies, the ability to distill relevant facts from complexity, and strong teamwork and communication skills to align all stakeholders effectively.
What advice would you offer to law students aspiring to build a career like yours, particularly in the fields of intellectual property and data protection? What skills or qualities do you consider crucial for success in these areas, and how can aspiring legal professionals best prepare for this path?
My advice is to know the ABCs of the law you intend to practice. Don’t be afraid to make mistakes—just make sure you learn from them. Stay curious, not just about changes in Indian law but also global developments and never hesitate to ask questions. Attention to detail and analytical thinking are key. No one is perfect, but if you can harness these skills with consistency and a willingness to grow, you’ll be well on your way.
Drawing from your extensive experience in resolving high-stakes litigation, what intellectual property strategies would you recommend to businesses particularly in the technology sector seeking to protect their IP while navigating the complex legal landscape in India?
To protect intellectual property in businesses, companies should adopt a proactive IP strategy that includes identifying the IP in various products, securing protection through timely registration of patents, trademarks, copyrights, and designs early on. Having regular IP audits and clear licensing policies and systems in place and lastly, monitoring infringement including initiating swift enforcement actions.
What pivotal moments influenced your decision to become a lawyer and CS, and how did your early experiences of life shape your career path?
The roots of this inspiring journey trace back to a tiny village in Odisha, nestled about 200 kilometres from Bhubaneswar. It was a place of simplicity and resilience, where school was held beneath the open sky, under the shade of a sprawling tree. When the rains came, they did not just wash the earth but also brought unexpected holidays, for there was no roof to shield the lessons.
Saturdays were special—they were days of collective effort and community spirit. The boys fetched water from nearby tanks, while the girls prepared the schoolyard, smoothing the earth with cow dung collected from the village. By Monday, the grounds were dry and ready to welcome another week of learning.
In this setting, where challenges were woven into the fabric of daily life, a young dreamer’s path began to take shape. The journey from studying under a tree to standing in corporate boardrooms reflects a life sculpted by grit and determination, rooted deeply in those formative experiences.
What inspired your decision to become a lawyer and CS, especially given your humble background? How did this journey shape your growth and influence those around you?
From a small village in Odisha to a disciplined boarding school, the journey was a test of resilience and determination. Limited to education until class seven in the village, the young dreamer moved to a nearby town, adapting to the rigor of boarding school life—waking at 4 a.m., managing chores like grocery shopping, and balancing academics. These experiences instilled independence and discipline.
Graduation brought a pivotal realization—the need to break free from constraints through education. This drive led to the bold decision of pursuing both company secretaryship and law simultaneously, an extraordinary feat accomplished with unwavering focus. Success transformed my life, taking me from humble beginnings to corporate boardrooms—a true testament to grit and ambition.
How has your transition from independent CS practice to working at a law firm to serving as an in-house counsel shaped your career? What do you enjoy most about your role?
My journey has been one of exploration and growth, shaped by diverse experiences across India. After completing my early education in Odisha, I moved to Chennai for my CS and later to Delhi to finish the course. These transitions exposed me to India’s rich diversity and built adaptability.
I began as an independent practitioner CS in Delhi, handling IPOs, mergers, and corporate actions. This entrepreneurial phase was rewarding, but I sought to expand my horizons. Moving into corporate law firms, I leveraged my CS expertise to deliver client-centric solutions, which set me apart.
My transition to in-house counsel began at Bharti Delmonte, working under inspiring mentors and gaining corporate strategy insights. Joining Vodafone during its historic acquisition of Hutchison was transformative, with a decade spent managing complex litigations, arbitrations, and large-scale challenges in telecom.
then at NIVEA, FMCG leading legal functions for a global brand has been a dynamic and fulfilling chapter. Each role has enriched my perspective, blending entrepreneurial spirit, legal acumen, and strategic leadership.
After two decades of experience working with major corporations, what significant changes have you observed in corporate legal practices, particularly in compliance frameworks and dispute resolution mechanisms?
Over two decades, I’ve witnessed significant shifts in corporate legal practice, especially in compliance and dispute resolution. Companies like Vodafone demonstrated the importance of strong ethical foundations and robust compliance frameworks, aligning processes with a clear vision. Their dedication to excellence was reflected in hiring outstanding professionals and anticipating challenges years ahead.
Recently, advancements in technology have streamlined compliance and dispute resolution mechanisms, improving transparency and efficiency. Coupled with a culture of ethics and governance, these developments have transformed the legal landscape. The combination of visionary leadership, structured policies, and exceptional talent remains the driving force behind corporate success today.
How do global corporations, especially multinationals, approach dispute resolution differently?
Litigation would always be the last resort for MNCs. It disrupts relationships and business continuity, so companies focus on resolving disputes amicably be it with governments, vendors, suppliers, or customers.
Multinationals emphasize customer-centric solutions. For instance, customer satisfaction was paramount. If a customer faced network issues, we responded with apologies or compensations rather than assigning blame. This empathy-first approach reflects their understanding that business thrives on happy customers.
Globally, companies also prioritize efficient mechanisms like mediation and arbitration, ensuring conflicts are resolved swiftly while preserving relationships.
Multinationals succeed not because of their global stature but because they create trusted brands, deliver value, and ensure compliance. It’s this forward-thinking, customer-first philosophy that drives their success with their leadership, empathy, and processes.
How do you handle intellectual property and brand protection for a Global brand you served?
Intellectual property is vital for innovation, identity and brand longevity, it begins with securing patents, trademarks, trade dress, and designs to convert creativity into valuable assets. Innovation drives product development, and legal measures ensure every aspect—from packaging to product shape—is meticulously protected.
Proactive strategies, such as monitoring markets for counterfeiting and unauthorized use, are critical in preserving brand integrity. Collaborating with enforcement agencies and implementing stringent safeguards are key, especially in diverse markets like India were consumer dynamics demand vigilance. This approach ensures the longevity of the brand, upholding its reputation and trust across generations and geographies.
Sir, how do you share your experience and impart education to new entrants in the legal field? What process do you follow to guide interns and inspire them to develop passion for the profession?
Internships are essential for shaping future legal professionals. At our office, we actively host interns sent by law colleges, consistently engaging two to three interns each month. We assign them meaningful projects, encourage research, and foster collaboration, ensuring they gain practical insights that prepare them for successful careers.
My advice to young lawyers is simple: the legal profession is a marathon, not a sprint. Patience, continuous learning, and adaptability are key. Success lies in understanding legal principles while addressing business complexities effectively. The challenge—and opportunity—is to merge theoretical knowledge with real-world solutions.
Mentorship and exposure to seasoned professionals are invaluable in this process. Personally, working with stalwarts in multinational companies has shaped my journey, proving that growth comes through steady, purposeful learning and commitment over time.
Sir, would you like to share some memorable achievements or recognitions from your career that had a significant impact on you and your approach to the kind of work that you have been doing?
Ups and downs are part of every professional journey. Sometimes, despite your best efforts, outcomes may not favour you—like a lawyer who wins and loses cases or a doctor who saves lives but cannot save all.
In my experience, one notable case involved a complex arbitration dispute. The matter escalated to the Supreme Court and back to arbitration, stretching over 15 years. For seven of those years, I was actively handling it, and by then, 30 crore rupees had already been spent on a 100-crore dispute. Such cases highlight the challenges and costs of prolonged litigation—it’s a fight that can go on endlessly if parties don’t seek resolution.
On the other hand, there have been many rewarding moments. For instance, in a recent case, one of our competitors was disparaging our brand. We took them to court and secured a landmark order from the Delhi High Court, which stands as a testament to the power of focused legal strategy.
My guiding principle, inspired by the Gita, is Kamrany vadhikaraste Ma Phaleshu Kada Chanan “Do your duty without worrying about the results”. The result is always a byproduct of consistent effort, dedication, and making the best use of available resources. Whether in tough challenges or noteworthy recognitions, this belief keeps me focused on delivering my best.
You’ve pursued dual qualifications as a company secretary and a lawyer. How has this combination benefited your career, and what advice would you give to learners following the same path?
The combination of being a company secretary and a lawyer is incredibly powerful. Company secretaryship provides deep insights into business operations, taxation, management, governance, and organizational behaviour. However, it doesn’t cover areas like civil law, criminal law, constitutional law, or jurisprudence—fields that are integral to legal practice. Law complements this by equipping you with a thorough understanding of the legal system.
When you combine the two, you gain a unique ability to bridge business challenges with legal solutions. This synergy is highly valued by companies, especially those requiring professionals to manage both roles efficiently. Many organizations prefer hiring individuals with dual qualifications to meet regulatory requirements while optimizing resources.
For learners, my advice is to see this combination as a long-term investment. It’s a strategic advantage that not only opens doors to versatile career opportunities but also helps you excel in leadership roles. The key is to approach your career with patience, commitment, and the understanding that success comes from integrating knowledge and applying it effectively over time. This is undoubtedly one of the best professional combinations for aspiring legal and corporate professionals.
What unique legal challenges have you faced in the skincare industry, especially when transitioning from telecom to FMCG?
Moving from telecom to skincare was a significant shift. Telecom revolves around services, technology, and infrastructure, like optical fibres and towers, while skincare is product-focused with manufacturing, supply chains, and distribution at its core.
The regulatory landscape is vastly different. Telecom is governed by sector-specific regulators, whereas FMCG and cosmetics must adhere to the Drugs and Cosmetics Act and legal metrology rules. The skincare industry, often treated like pharmaceuticals, requires strict compliance to ensure product safety and consumer trust.
Adapting to this new framework took time—about six months to fully absorb the nuances of manufacturing, distribution, and FMCG regulations. While some aspects like contracts and compliance were familiar, learning the specifics of product-centric laws and supply chain operations was essential.
Skincare demands understanding Skin Science, rigorous compliance, strict adherence to regulatory standards, and a deep understanding of its unique challenges and competition landscape. With focus and adaptability, I’ve successfully navigated this dynamic environment, ensuring robust compliance and operational excellence.
Outside of your professional life, what are some personal interests or hobbies that contribute to your overall well-being and work-life balance? How have you found that peaceful space for yourself?
Earlier, I was passionate about cycling, but I had to stop due to safety concerns in Mumbai. I then shifted to yoga, which has been transformative for me over the past couple of years. Yoga, along with meditation, helps me unwind and maintain a sense of balance. Swimming is another activity I enjoy whenever I get the time—it’s both relaxing and energizing.
Reading and listening to blogs are integral parts of my life as well. In our profession, staying informed is crucial, and I find reading to be both enriching and calming. When I have a longer break, I indulge my passion for travel—especially road trips. One of my most memorable adventures was driving from Mumbai to Ladakh; Mumbai to Kanyakumari by road with a GC friend, exploring India’s beauty by car.
These hobbies—whether yoga, swimming, reading, or traveling—serve as my personal escape. They not only help me recharge but also motivate me, adding meaning and joy to my life beyond work.
Sir, your legal career spans a diverse array of practice areas, including criminal and civil litigation, writ petitions, and domestic arbitrations. Reflecting on your journey, what initially inspired you to pursue law as a career, and how did you cultivate expertise in such varied areas of law?
Looking back, my journey into law wasn’t driven by a single “aha” moment, but by a gradual and irresistible fascination towards it. What first drew my attention was my fascination with going to courts. There was something about the atmosphere, the energy and the way arguments unfolded, that captivated me from the start. Watching advocates argue complex matters with clarity and conviction inspired me to be part of this legal world. This fascination soon turned into a deeper interest towards law. What truly sealed it for me, though, was participating in several moot courts during law college. That’s where I for the first time experienced the thrill of legal research, strategy, and structured argument. Mooting gave me that rush, which made the law feel alive. It sparked a passion that’s been hard to resist ever since.
One of the most valuable lessons I picked up early on was learning to argue a case from both sides. It not only strengthens your understanding of the law but teaches you empathy, critical thinking, and the ability to anticipate and respond. These skills are crucial in any type of litigation be it civil, criminal or arbitration.
As for cultivating expertise across varied practice areas, there’s no shortcut. For me it’s been a deliberate process deeply rooted in constant reading and curiosity. I ensure that I not only read statutes and judgements but also apply those laws to hypothetical scenarios. It’s my way of pressure-testing the law and developing a deeper, more intuitive grasp of it. It sharpens interpretation, builds a nuanced understanding of law and prepares me to handle diverse cases with confidence. It also keeps me in a constant zone of learning, which is essential because the law is always evolving.
Can you share your journey from law school to the early years of practice? What challenges did you encounter when starting out in the legal profession, and how did you navigate those obstacles to establish yourself in your practice areas?
My journey from law college to the profession has been shaped by discipline, resilience, and a relentless desire to carve my own space in the legal world. Being a first generation lawyer, I come from a background where nothing was handed on a silver platter and from day one, I knew I had to work harder than most if I wanted to make it in the legal world and the journey still continues.
While studying law in college, I worked part time as a Karate instructor, juggling classes, internships and training. Balancing all this meant my days often started well before sunrise and ended well past midnight, but the discipline taught me how to manage time, stay grounded and never lose sight of my goals.
Before I formally entered the profession, I had already completed approximately three years of internships with a litigator because I wanted to be as ready as possible when the first opportunity came, and it eventually did, I was selected at Solomon & Co., a place that has shaped me significantly and allowed me to grow in arbitration, civil and criminal litigation. The principle which I followed as a student and an intern continued at the firm as well which was to never say no to any work. Even when a task or assignment felt beyond my comfort zone, I saw it as a chance to grow.
What I have learned is that success in law doesn’t come easy and certainly doesn’t come from shortcuts, it comes from showing up everyday, putting in the work and being willing to learn, unlearn and grow. I still carry the same hunger today, and I believe that as long as that fire burns, the journey will remain exciting.
Your career at Solomon & Co. has been marked by impressive growth, from Associate to Senior Associate, and now Associate Partner. What were the key milestones, accomplishments, or lessons that have contributed to your rise within the firm? How do you view your current role as an Associate Partner in shaping your long-term goals and aspirations within the firm?
My journey at Solomon & Co. has been defined by consistent growth, strong mentorship of my seniors and a deep-rooted passion for dispute resolution. From joining as an Associate to now working as an Associate Partner, every step has brought with it new challenges, learnings and opportunities that shaped me both professionally and personally.
Some of the key milestones in this journey include handling high stakes litigation, managing and nurturing a diverse team, and successfully building and maintaining client relationships. Each role I have taken on has reinforced the value of strategic thinking, clear communication and adaptability. These skills are fundamental for navigating the dynamic world of dispute resolution.
As an Associate Partner, my focus has expanded to including mentoring junior team members, broadening our practice areas, and actively participating in business development initiatives. It’s a role that demands not just legal acumen but also vision, patience and leadership and the same also aligns perfectly with my long-term goal of contributing meaningfully to the firm’s legacy, while continuously evolving into a well – rounded leader.
I am especially grateful for the trust and responsibility placed in me by Solomon & Co. and particularly by Mr. Aaron Solomon, our Managing Partner and other Partners at Solomon & Co with whom I have worked, their mentorship and support have played a pivotal role in my growth. The learnings and trust reposed by the firm helps me and continues to motivate me while raising the standards of work in my team and across practice areas ensuring the best possible client service.
The road ahead is exciting, and I look forward to continuing to grow with Solomon & Co. while making a lasting impact in the field of litigation and dispute resolution.
With your extensive experience in domestic arbitration, what do you consider to be the key elements for a successful arbitration process in India? How do you prepare for an arbitration hearing, and what are some common misconceptions clients have about arbitration that you make sure to clarify for them?
With the evolution of arbitration law and practice in India, a successful domestic arbitration hinges on a few key elements.
First and foremost, clarity in the arbitration agreement is essential. Many disputes begin with ambiguities in the arbitration clause itself, be it the seat, governing law, or the process for appointment of arbitrators. A well drafted arbitration clause reduces the scope for preliminary procedural challenges and delay.
Secondly, efficiency and preparedness are critical. Unlike court proceedings, arbitration gives parties greater control over timelines and procedure. To make the most of this, it’s important to have a focused strategy right from the statement of claim/defence stage, with clearly defined issues, timelines, and a vision of how the matter should proceed. When I prepare for an arbitration hearing, I focus not just on the legal merits but also on the narrative as to how to present a case in a concise and persuasive manner. Understanding the tribunal’s style and anticipating procedural objections or evidentiary challenges are all part of the preparation. Arbitration is often document – heavy, so organizing the record meticulously and preparing a tight chronology helps the tribunal follow the case seamlessly.
As for client expectations, one common misconception is that arbitration is always faster and cheaper than litigation. While it often is, especially when managed well, that’s not universally true. I also find that clients sometimes think arbitration is informal or less serious whereas in reality, it can be just as rigorous and adversarial, especially in complex commercial matters.
Another myth is that the arbitrator will find a middle ground to resolve the dispute. I always clarify that arbitrators are bound by law and evidence, and their role is adjudicatory, not conciliatory. Ultimately, the goal is to demystify the process for clients, set realistic expectations, and execute the strategy with precision and integrity.
You regularly appear before various judicial and quasi-judicial forums, including Magistrate Courts and the Bombay High Court. How do you adapt your legal strategies to suit the procedural differences in these distinct forums?
Each forum whether it is the Magistrate’s Court or a quasi-judicial tribunal, or the Bombay High Court has its own procedural framework, pace, and expectations. Adapting legal strategy to suit these differences is not just important but also essential for effective advocacy. In Magistrate Courts, proceedings tend to be more procedural, and form driven. The focus is often on compliance with statutory timelines, procedural filings, and the careful presentation of evidence especially in criminal complaints or cases under the Negotiable Instruments Act. Here, precision in pleadings, attention to procedural nuances, and consistent follow-up are key. Oral arguments are usually brief and factual, and the focus is on moving the matter through its procedural stages efficiently.
In contrast, when appearing before the Bombay High Court, especially on the original side, the approach is significantly different. Matters here involve a broader canvas such as complex commercial disputes, writs, appeals etc., requiring deeper legal analysis, structured submissions, and often layered case law support. Strategy here includes anticipating judicial thinking, being well-versed with recent precedents, and presenting arguments with clarity and brevity to match the Court’s time constraints.
At the core of my approach is a simple principle: form must follow function. Strategy is tailored not only to the forum, but also the nature of relief sought, the urgency involved and the profile of the adjudicator. One size never fits all.
As an experienced litigator who frequently handles high-profile cases, could you share a particularly complex or high-stakes litigation that you’ve managed? What were the main challenges involved, and how did you craft a successful strategy for your client?
One of the more complex matters I have handled involved representing a landowner, where we are defending a Suit and connected litigation concerning a large-scale redevelopment project in Mumbai. The dispute revolves around the ownership of land and other issues.
The main challenge lay in the multi – forum nature of the dispute: while the core issue is being adjudicated by the Suit Court, there are parallel proceedings before Magistrate’s Court, Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Land Revenue Officers etc.
Given the commercial and reputational stakes, the pressure to act swiftly and strategically was high. My approach was to first disentangle the overlapping legal issues and create a unified litigation roadmap. I worked closely with the client to identify his core priorities, staying adverse enforcement actions etc.
We focused on defending the grant of ad-interim reliefs from the High Court, which set the tone of the rest of the proceedings. What is important is a mix of legal precision and tactical patience. We avoided combative stance where unnecessary and instead leveraged procedural opportunities to bring the other side to the table for Mediation.
Cases like this reaffirm that high stakes litigation isn’t about winning, its about knowing when to push and when to pause.
With your wealth of experience across multiple areas of law, you are in a unique position to guide aspiring legal professionals. What advice would you offer to law students and young lawyers, particularly those looking to build a successful career in dispute resolution? Are there any key skills, resources, or strategies that you believe are essential for success in this field?
Dispute resolution is a deeply rewarding field, but it demands patience, precision, and perseverance. For law students and young lawyers aspiring to build a career in this area, my first piece of advice would be: embrace the grind. Litigation is not about instant gratification, it’s a slow build, where every draft, every appearance, every client interaction contributes to your growth.
Foundational skills like legal research, drafting, and court etiquette are non-negotiable. The ability to think analytically, anticipating judicial thinking, communicate clearly, and adapt to different forums is what makes a good Advocate. Early on, focus on understanding procedural law, it’s the spine of litigation. You may know the law, but if you don’t know how to apply it procedurally, you’re at a disadvantage.
I also encourage young professionals to observe courtroom proceedings, even when they’re not arguing. There’s no better classroom than a courtroom. Watch how seasoned counsel frame their submissions, how judges respond, and how strategies shift in real time. Over time, this exposure will shape your own courtroom style.
In terms of resources, commentaries, live cases, and judgments are vital but so are podcasts, lectures, and articles that give you practical insights. Law is no longer just about black-letter rules; it’s about staying curious, current, and commercially aware.
One underrated skill is client management. Understanding your client’s priorities, maintaining transparency, and managing expectations are as important as your legal strategy. After all, dispute resolution isn’t just about fighting, it’s about solving.
Finally, build your credibility. That comes from consistency, honesty, and being dependable not just with seniors or clients, but with your team as well. Reputation in this field is earned slowly. If you’re willing to put in the hours, keep learning, and stay grounded, dispute resolution offers you a career of intellectual challenge and professional impact.
Achieving a work-life balance in a demanding profession like law can be challenging. Given the pressures of high-stakes litigation and various professional commitments, how have you managed to maintain a balance between your career and personal life?
Work – life balance in the legal profession is a constant work in progress, especially in litigation, where the unpredictability of court dates, client emergencies and deadlines often spill over into personal time. I haven’t cracked it yet, but over the years, I have learned to manage the chaos.
What has helped me the most is being fully present wherever I am. When I’m in court or working on a case, I give it my undivided attention. But once I step away from that space, I consciously switch off, even if it’s just for a short walk, dinner date or watching one episode of a show on any OTT platform. Those moments of disconnection actually recharge me and help me return to work with better focus.
I have also learned the value of prioritizing ruthlessly. Delegation, trusting my team and setting realistic expectations have been key to avoiding burnout. Spending time with loved ones, traveling when possible and pursuing personal interest keeps me grounded. They are essential for mental clarity and long – term sustainability in a profession that can be all consuming.
Most importantly, I have realised that the balance isn’t about spending equal time, its about being aligned with what matters most in each moment. Some weeks will tilt towards work and others towards personal time. As long as I don’t lose sight of the people and passions outside the profession, it all evens out in the long run.
With your distinguished and extensive legal career, could you share the initial catalyst that sparked your passion for law? Was there a defining moment or experience that led you to pursue this field, or did your interest develop gradually over time?
I arrived at my career choice after exploring various options and narrowing down the ones that did not align with my interests or goals. In other words, I kind of chose this career by crossing out everything I did not want to do but once I chose my career path, I dedicated myself fully to it. I consistently worked hard to develop my skills and grow within the field.
Looking back at the early stages of your career, what were some key experiences that significantly enhanced your understanding of the law? How did these formative moments influence the direction and trajectory of your professional journey?
In the early stages of my career, the key learnings came from actual exposure to client work which also included litigation where observing court proceedings and drafting pleadings gave me a strong understanding of the real-world application of legal principles. On the corporate front, client interactions and negotiations helped me understand legal documents from a business perspective. I learnt that no client is looking for a lengthy memo full of disclaimers. Clients seek practical, commercial and easy to implement legal advice. While a strong understanding of the law is of the utmost importance, it is crucial to find business friendly solutions for the client.
Another defining moment for me was winning the International Bar Association’s Aviation Law Committee’s Annual Scholarship in 2017 and travelling to Sydney for the Annual Conference. This included an opportunity to make a presentation before senior legal professionals. The IBA conference brings together thousands of legal professionals from across the globe. The opportunity to interact with senior lawyers from different jurisdictions helped me understand the legal trends, opportunities and challenges faced by lawyers in different parts of the world. It also helped me improve my communication skills by engaging in panel discussions and networking events. Most importantly, I made many global connections that I truly cherish.
I have also been lucky to find mentors who trusted me when I was a young lawyer trying to understand the nuances of legal practice. Mona Bhide, Managing Partner, Dave & Girish & Co. and Ramesh Vaidyanathan, Managing Partner, BTG Advaya have been instrumental in shaping my growth by not only providing guidance on navigating complex legal issues but also invaluable insights on balancing personal and professional growth.
Your practice involves advising both multinational and domestic corporations on various corporate and commercial matters. Could you outline some of the primary challenges companies encounter when doing business in India, and how do you assist them in overcoming these obstacles?
Doing business in India, entails navigating a complex regulatory landscape. Any person looking to invest in India must perform due diligence to ensure that they can invest in the planned activities. It is important to include sufficient contingencies in planning and timelines for setting up business in India. Indian company laws and labor laws set out extensive operational requirements, and non-compliances can lead to fines, penalties, and criminal liability, including liability attaching to directors and management of the Indian company. The key to successfully doing business in India is to have experienced legal advisors and compliance managers and maintain an annual audit checklist.
Corruption risks in India are generally perceived to be high due to the bureaucratic environment, particularly in specialized sectors such as government procurement and real estate. I advise my clients to clearly communicate the company’s ‘zero tolerance’ policy towards corruption and institute whistleblower and anti-bribery training programs for India-specific projects.
India’s tax regime is complex and evolving, with stringent compliance requirements. The nuances of Indian tax laws and documentation requirements can significantly impact transaction structures. Failure to address these tax considerations early can lead to unexpected tax costs, compliance delays, and potential legal challenges, ultimately derailing business objectives. A proactive approach to Indian tax planning is essential to avoid surprises and safeguard strategic goals.
As an external member of Internal Committees under the anti-sexual harassment law, what are the key legal considerations companies should keep in mind when establishing these committees? How do you ensure they effectively address complaints and foster a safe working environment?
The Prevention of Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (“POSH Act”) requires an employer to set up an Internal Committee (“IC”) at each office of an organization employing ten or more employees to hear and redress grievances pertaining to sexual harassment. There must be a minimum of four IC members including a senior level woman employee as the Presiding Officer, two other members from employees and an external member. While the minimum requirement is to have four IC members, it is advisable for the IC to have an odd number of members to effectively address any conflicts that may arise.
Further, it is important to sensitize employees and train IC members about the requirements of the POSH Act. Many companies rely on online training platforms for employee education but conducting at least one in-person workshop every year led by a professional expert in this field can offer employees and the IC a comprehensive understanding of the POSH Act. Some key aspects that the IC must keep in mind while addressing sexual harassment complaints is that sexual harassment is not just about the man’s intent but the women’s perception, the IC must follow principles of natural justice and provide fair opportunity to both the parties to make their submissions, act in an unbiased manner as per due process, maintain confidentiality and ensure non-retaliation at all times. The IC must document/record every aspect of the enquiry process and adopt an empathetic, objective and fair approach.
With your extensive experience in aviation law, particularly regarding aircraft registration and deregistration, what are some of the primary legal and regulatory challenges in these processes? How do you support your clients in ensuring compliance with aviation regulations?
Registration of an aircraft is a comparatively easier process, but clients often face challenges during deregistration and repossession of aircraft. In case of leased aircraft, once an application is received from an aircraft lessor being the irrevocable deregistration and export request authorization (IDERA) holder in the prescribed format, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (“DGCA”) must deregister the aircraft within 5 working days. However, the airport operator must be paid the dues relating to the aircraft if the same are unpaid. Similarly, any other entity that has outstanding dues pertaining to the aircraft may also submit their claims to the DGCA. In cases where the lessee refuses to make the above payments, the lessors often end up paying them on behalf of the lessee and thereafter recovering them from the lessee is often an expensive and time-consuming process.
India acceded to the Cape Town Convention in 2008, but an enabling legislation was not passed. As a result, some domestic laws such as the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC”) conflicted with the provisions of the Cape Town Convention. If an airline filed for bankruptcy (such as the recent Go First case) the lessors were prohibited from repossessing their aircraft during the moratorium period. However, by way of a notification that was issued in October 2023, aircraft and aircraft equipment were exempted from the moratorium provisions under the IBC. Also, the Cape Town Convention Bill is presently awaiting Presidential assent to become the law. Once, the Cape Town Convention Bill is passed, it will accord supremacy to the Cape Town Convention and will streamline the process for deregistration and repossession of aircraft from India.
I assist my clients by providing them with regulatory and compliance support, assisting them in liaison with the DGCA and other regulatory authorities, assisting with drafting and reviewing transaction documents such as aircraft purchase and lease agreements and advice on structuring of transactions and risk mitigation strategies.
In your practice involving airline operations, what are some of the most frequent consumer grievances, and what legal frameworks exist to address these issues?
Most consumer grievances relate to delays, cancellations and refunds. The DGCA has launched the “AirSewa” web-portal/mobile application to deal with passenger grievances. The Civil Aviation Requirements also provide for facilities/compensation to be provided to passengers by airlines due to denied boarding, cancellation of flights and delays in flights. Passengers can file grievances related to delays, cancellations, etc., on the AirSewa portal. The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 also provides for remedies for passengers to claim compensation for any deficiency in the services provided by the airlines.
As the Senior Vice Chair of the Aviation Law Committee of the International Bar Association and Chair of the India Wing of the International Aerospace Women’s Association, how do you envision the future of Indian aviation?
The aviation industry in India has emerged as one of the fastest growing industries in the country and has recovered from the Covid-19 pandemic with passenger numbers exceeding the pre-COVID levels. With disposable income in India growing, the demand for air travel will only keep increasing. To cater to the growing demand, the airlines in India have huge order books and the Government of India has been working towards increasing the number of airports. The success of Indian aviation will depend on infrastructure development to support the growing demand, policy reforms to meet global expectations and availability of skilled labor. Investments in emerging technologies with a focus on sustainability will also be an indispensable consideration for the growth of the industry.
For aspiring law students who wish to follow a similar career path, what advice would you offer in building a successful legal career? In today’s evolving legal landscape, especially with the growing impact of technology, what skills or personal attributes do you consider most vital for achieving long-term success?
The key to building a successful legal career is to have a strong understanding of core legal principles. I would advise law students to intern in different practice areas and gain experience in both litigation and corporate law. This will help in understanding the full spectrum of legal work from courtroom procedures to commercial drafting and negotiations. Early exposure to different practices also helps in discovering one’s interests and strengths. Internships also provide an opportunity to build professional relationships, and this may open doors to future job opportunities. Further, we live in a fast-paced world driven by technology and it’s a lot easier to stay updated today. One should inculcate a habit of reading every day to stay abreast of legal developments.
Throughout your career, what strategies do you employ to maintain a healthy work-life balance, and what advice would you offer to others seeking to balance career ambitions with personal responsibilities and community involvement?
Maintaining a healthy work-life balance is not always easy but you have to put that on your priority list. There will be days when you manage work better and there will be days when you manage your personal life better, there is no perfect balance. Prioritizing and having a written to-do list helps me to identify and focus on the most important tasks each day. Over the years I have also learnt the importance of saying ‘no’ without feeling guilty. If you ever feel overwhelmed by the increasing workload that could result in stress or reduced productivity, I suggest having an open conversation with your seniors.
It is also important to build a strong support system. Having colleagues you can trust and rely on and having a family that supports your aspirations and well-being is the biggest blessing. Finally, invest in self-care. Try to find some time to exercise, sleep well and take that holiday that is on your bucket-list to re-energize yourself. Remember that you cannot pour from an empty cup.
Your impressive journey in the legal field is truly inspiring. Whatfirst motivated you to pursue a career in law, and were there anypivotal moments or formative experiences that influenced yourdecision to embark on this path?
My introduction to law was due to my father. He was in the administrative services. While in service, he was posted as an Additional Collector in Pune. The charge required him to conduct appeals arising from revenue authorities. I would see him study the case, read law, dictate orders, which fascinated me. He would often say that having knowledge of law is extremely crucial for every citizen and empowering. That stuck with me.
I was always interested in social science and hence took up Arts stream in junior college. Those two years in Ferguson College, Pune, helped me gain a basic understanding of what law as a subject would entail. I had a wonderful professor of Political Science in Fergusson, she motivated me to study law. Fergusson also conducted lectures and talks by luminaries in the profession, which further inspired me.
With a decent score in 12th board exam and with a State Scholarship, I qualified for admission in the prestigious ILS, Pune.
Your decision to pursue an LL.M. in Corporate Law at Queen MaryUniversity in London is a remarkable step in your career. Whatspecifically attracted you to this area of specialization, and how didyour experience there differ from studying in India? Could you shareany memorable moments from that time?
Subjects such as corporate governance and investment in developing countries were of particular interest to me. So I decided to explore further through a Masters program. Queen Mary, University of London, had one of the best LLM programs.
When I went there, the college offered induction sessions, offering the students to attend classes of all subjects and then take a final call. Having attended various lectures and upon having a basic understanding of the structure and the modules, I decided to opt for LLM in Corporate Law, which included corporate governance and investment in developing countries.
Exposure to a different education system was interesting, as it promotes deeper understanding of the subject, with extensive reading lists. The attempt is to introduce a student to both sides of any given concept and promote analytical thinking. London is a melting pot of international students, interaction with people from diverse backgrounds gives you perspective and appreciation for ideas and expressions of a problem.
The techniquesI learnt during LLM, of reading and research, continue to help me in practice as well.
Your career has clearly been shaped by a wealth of experience. In theearly stages of your professional journey, what were some keyexperiences that helped refine your skills, particularly in ArbitrationLaw, and deepened your understanding of the field?
I was introduced to arbitral proceedings quite early in my career. In my experience, one should not confine oneself to only a particular subject of law. A holistic experience is necessary, especially court appearances and knowledge of trial. What truly helped me was observing hearings in Court Rooms. The lessons one can take away by simply sitting in court and observing court proceedings are massive.
Having been involved in a variety of suits, writ petitions, and trials,your diverse experience speaks volumes. Which case stands out asone of the most interesting, and how did you navigate it?
One of the cases which I dealt with, in early years of my independent practice, was that for Wardha Municipal Council. The issue involved was regarding a works contract and whether the disputes arising out of a work contract can fall within ambit of MSMEDAct,2006. The stage at which the brief came to me was when the order of the lower court rejecting relief under Section 9 Petition was stayed by the Hon’ble High Court. When I read through the papers, I engaged with the executive engineer, who was in charge of the project on behalf of the Council and tried to understand how the contract actually worked. Having realised that it was a composite contract, I re-visited the legal definition of the term “works contract” and the jurisprudence regarding the same. The jurisprudence on the issue was settled by a judgement of the Hon’ble Apex Court and the Hon’ble High Court Bombay, observing that a works contract is a composite contract and hence will not be governed by provisions of the MSMED, Act, 2006. The other issue involved was whether an MSME can take benefit of the MSMED Act, retrospectively, as it registered itself after being awarded the contract. The matter was heard extensively and the Hon’ble Court was pleased to hold in my favour. Subsequently, various High Courts followed the said judgement.
What was interesting about the matter was the research aspect as also the interest I developed in understanding the MSMED, Act, 2006. The Act being an important and beneficial piece of legislation, I was intrigued by it and by researching more, I have also dwelled into writing articles on varied aspects of the MSMED Act.
With your extensive background in handling numerous arbitrationmatters, what do you foresee for the future of arbitration in the country,and how do you see technology influencing the ADR process and itsmechanisms?
I believe that given the current socio-economic status of our country, globalization and with the aim is to make our country a hub/center for international arbitration, the scope and importance of ADR process is going to be massive. Another reason is the fact that it is less time consuming and cost effective. Speaking of commercial disputes, with compulsory pre-mediation requirements under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, I have seen a large number of commercial disputes being settled at pre-mediation stage. May it be commercial disputes or private disputes, the parties involved will always prefer an effective solution to their problems, which is offered by ADR. Having said that, it is also necessary that institutional arbitrations and mediations are promoted. The advantage that such institutional centers would hold, is availability of technical experts, who can help resolve issues in an effective manner.
Technology and its development has been positively impacting all professions, including the legal profession. Post COVID-19, the comfort and ease in conducting proceedings virtually, has grown immensely. The same is convenient and cost effective. Technology has also given impetus to ODR (Online Dispute Resolution) and one can see a rise in ODR.
Your role as a visiting professor at both NUJS and Government LawCollege Mumbai adds an incredible dimension to your already impressivecareer. What motivated you to take on this role, and how does itcomplement your independent legal practice?
During COVID 19 and the Lockdown, I had an opportunity to co-author an article with a friend of mine, which was carried in the Asian Business Law Journal. It was this article which caught the attention of one of the members of NUJS and they approached my friend and me to conduct lectures.
May it be NUJS or GLC, Mumbai, in both the cases I realised that students are extremely well read and aware. The Internet facilitates immediate access to information. The only edge a lecturer has, is the practical experience of how law is interpreted and applied by Courts of Law.
While preparing for the lectures, I referred to various commentaries and reading materials, which helped me brush up my knowledge. The experience has been extremely enriching. I have thoroughly enjoyed it.
Given your wealth of experience across various areas of law, youradvice would undoubtedly be invaluable to aspiring legalprofessionals. What guidance would you offer to students looking tobuild a successful career in law? Are there specific resources orstrategies you would recommend?
Over the years I have realised that litigation requires a lot of persistence, reliance and tests you at all times. However, it is one of the most satisfying professions.
My senior Mr. M.M. Vashi (Senior Advocate), would always stress on the necessity of reading your brief cover to cover and have a thorough research. He would always maintain that the skill of a lawyer always lies in sticking a fine balance between being an officer of the court and presenting your case persuasively. The fear of the outcome is natural but that shouldn’t deter you from putting forth your case in the best and the most fair manner possible.
This advice continues to guide me as an independent practitioner.Observing and hearing court proceedings is another excellent way of learning both the law and court craft.
Throughout your distinguished career, what strategies have you used tomaintain a healthy work-life balance? What advice would you give toothers striving to balance their professional ambitions with personalcommitments?
It’s extremely important to have a supporting family and good friends, both , within and outside the profession. My family has always been a motivating and an anchoring factor in my life.
During down time, especially on a Friday evening, my other lawyer friends and I often go out to explore different cafes in the city.
I am personally a great believer in leading a healthy lifestyle and having a dedicated fitness regime. My workout sessions are like mediation for me. It not only helps as a stress buster but is also refreshing. I truly believe that if one is looking for longevity in any profession a healthy body and mind is crucial. It brings in the required discipline, a sense of routine and dedication, essentially, all attributes necessary for a steady career, in whichever opted field.
I would surely recommend making concrete efforts in carving out some “me time”, honing a hobby, which helps you unwind and refresh.
Having built a successful legal career and currently being an AOR, what initially inspired you to pursue law? Was there a defining moment that confirmed your decision to embark on this profession? Additionally, how did your experience at Symbiosis Law School Pune contribute to shaping your legal journey?
Honestly, law was not my first choice. I initially wanted to join the army as I was into sports and athletics. However, nobody in my family has been in the forces and everyone I had or looked up to was a professional working in different areas. My parents are entrepreneurs and my elder brother had already chosen IT and Engineering sector, which was considered very rewarding then. I had the option of wanting to do something different and got all the support from my family. By class 12th I ended up eliminating the army option. I had narrowed down my choices to business administration or law. Back in 2011 law was still a lesser-known option for students and there was some novelty in the prospects of joining a law school. At that time, I was lucky because one of my cousins had joined RGNUL, Patiala in 2009, and I also got some very positive feedback from him regarding the subjects for the course. Few of my very good friends had also started their preparation for law entrance in class 11 and an interaction with them, and looking at the past law school entrance test papers interested me enough to sit for these exams. I ended up writing a couple of these exams and joined Symbiosis Law School, Pune, which was the best decision I ever made. Symbiosis played an instrumental role in shaping my journey. The kind of exposure I got there by interacting with people from different backgrounds, participating in moot court competitions and other extracurriculars really helped me grow both personally and professionally.
As you began your legal career, what were some of the key learning experiences that shaped your path? Starting as an Associate with a litigation office, what were the pivotal moments and challenges that were faced by you?
Despite my urge to sound positive and encouraging, I must admit that the initial years were quite tough. As a first-generation lawyer in a new city, everything felt overwhelming—getting nervous before every matter, second-guessing my drafts, worrying about whether my seniors would approve, etc. But I was lucky to have some great mentors who have been very supportive and have led by example to instill in me the values and importance of consistent hard work, developing an eye for detail and being clear in thought and words.
After transitioning to another firm and handling a variety of cases, including landmark Supreme Court cases for homebuyers, could you share your experiences from these cases? Specifically, what challenges did you face while representing homebuyers, and how did the judgment/order, particularly regarding the definition of homebuyers as ‘financial creditors’ under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, affect their rights?
After working for almost a year at the office of a Senior Advocate, I moved to PSP Legal in 2017, where my legal career really picked up pace. At PSP we handled a lot of cases for aggrieved homebuyers across the NCR region. When I had joined in 2017, the prevalent option with the homebuyers was to go under the consumer protection regime. However, the process had its own limitations where although the homebuyers were successful in obtaining decisions in their favour, yet there were constraints in having them executed against the real estate entities. Needless to say, we faced tremendous opposition from the real estate players to refuse enforcement, often citing poor financial health of the sector as a whole.
We had also explored other legal remedies where criminal proceedings were also initiated on behalf of the homebuyers against a few promoters of the real estate entities for their criminal actions where all monies of the homebuyers had been siphoned off for their personal gain.
The laws around insolvency and its application to the real estate sector were still evolving at that time. However, we took charge and had initiated IBC proceedings against several established real estate players. Again, there was severe resistance against these actions, and the proceedings were dragged across several forums (NCLT, NCLAT, Delhi High Court and Supreme Court) in a relatively small amount of time, and we were fortunate to represent the homebuyer interests in all these proceedings.
The big breakthrough came when the Supreme Court confirmed that homebuyers are financial creditors under the IBC, in Pioneer Urban Land and Infrastructure Limited & Anr. v. Union of India &Ors. (2019). In this case we faced an initial setback as the Supreme Court had stayed all NCLT proceedings under IBC against the real estate builders initiated by the homebuyers. Finally, this judgment came as a big relief for the homebuyers and the homebuyers were confident in initiating similar proceedings across the country.
The whole journey (which is still ongoing), involving working non-stop in preparation for days, has been very rewarding. The cause of the homebuyers has become something very close to my heart, as some of our clients had put in their entire life savings and were left with nothing—not even legal clarity on how to fight back. To play a small part in their betterment, and in the development of the law was very satisfying. These cases also put a spotlight on PSP’s practice in this niche area of law.
With your extensive experience in both arbitration and real estate law, how do you foresee the future of these areas evolving, especially considering the continuous changes in regulations and legal developments?
In real estate law, there is still a lot of uncertainty especially with conflicting court rulings on similar issues. Whether it is RERA or the Consumer Protection Act, we also have to deal with situations where there are overlapping remedies under different legislations, and it becomes an important factor for advising on solutions to a particular legal problem. However, considering that the legal framework in the sector, especially under RERA, is still nascent, we are hopeful that critical issues (like construction of stalled projects, issues with banks disbursing loan amount directly to the builder without any due diligence and enforcement of the orders/directions) would be ironed out soon.
Arbitration has a lot of potential, but it is still expensive and not as efficient as it was designed to be. There is a lot of talk about India becoming a global arbitration hub, but we have got some ground to cover in terms of legal reforms and meeting the practical challenges.
Another big challenge is enforcement/execution of decisions, which is native to both real estate law and arbitration. Even after you win a case, enjoying the fruits of the decision can take years. The Supreme Court’s judgment in Periyammal (Dead) Through Lrs & Ors. v. V. Rajamani & Anr. Etc. (2025) is a step in the right direction as it has brought much needed reform and accountability in how lower courts/tribunals handle execution matters. However, how these directions are carried out into actions by the executing courts (especially in the face of shortage of judges and court staff, and judicial pendency) is something which we must look out for.
Becoming an AOR is a significant achievement. What motivated you to take the exam, and what steps did you take to prepare and succeed? How has becoming an AOR enriched your legal practice?
The AoR exam and the system of representation only through AoRs has a reputation of its own—and rightly so. I found the exam to be tough, mostly because you need to know the procedural aspects of law inside out, and it requires you to write longhand answers, which we are not used to any more after college.
What pushed me was the desire to have a separate identity at the Bar. As a first-generation lawyer, becoming an AoR felt like a major personal and professional milestone. Initially, as I was slowly getting familiar with the practice at the Supreme Court, I realized that being enrolled as an AoR would be a good value addition to my career and would give me a foothold towards perhaps setting up my own practice in the future.
The preparation for the AoR exam takes time so you must be consistent towards digesting the mandatory reading material, including study several landmark judgments which are part of the exam syllabus. However, I liked the process of preparation as it makes you pause and revisit several fundamental concepts, particularly for understanding procedural law and constitutional law principles, which are often missed out in the humdrum of day-to-day practice. It also helps in being updated with the recent developments in several topics of law.
Since qualifying, I have noticed a positive difference in how clients and colleagues perceive my work and me as a lawyer, which is very encouraging.
Can you discuss your experience of appearing and arguing before the Supreme Court in a case where the Court directed the CBI to place before it an action plan to probe the nexus between banks and real estate developers? What were the key legal challenges, and how does this ruling impact the protection of innocent homebuyers?
This litigation battle started during the pandemic in 2020, when homebuyers were facing a double-edged sword: while the builders were delaying the delivery of units on time, and the banks were also aggressively trying to recover against the home-loan amounts. The homebuyers were faced with a very peculiar situation that although the banks had disbursed more than 70% of the sanctioned loan amount directly to the real estate builders, and progress in construction of the projects was barely significant. This left the homebuyers in a situation where they do not have their homes (and often paying rent for their current accommodation) and also having to repay the EMIs of their home loans.
We first approached the Delhi High Court, which granted interim relief in early 2022 but ultimately, we lost the battle before the Delhi High Court. Later, the litigation reached the Supreme Court in 2023 after the High Court dismissed the petitions and the SC not only extended the protection but also rightly appreciated the issue and ordered the CBI to investigate the possible builder-bank nexus.
The biggest challenge was to highlight that this was not just a legal issue—it was a human one as thousands of families were suffering. Thankfully, the Court took a balanced view. It did not rush to conclusions but made it clear that if any wrongdoing is found, action would be taken against the builders and the concerned banks. For the homebuyers, this was a huge moment—they finally felt like their voices were actually heard.
With your diverse experience across various legal sectors and your practice at the Supreme Court, what advice would you give to aspiring lawyers who wish to specialize in these fields? What skills or personal traits do you believe are critical for success in the legal profession?
My biggest piece of advice would be that do not compare your journey with others. Everyone has their own pace, and there is no single “right” way to succeed in this profession. I believe that one must stay honest, work hard, and be patient. Also in the early years, try exploring different areas of law. That experience will help you figure out where your strengths and interests lie. Lastly, never stop learning—every case file, every court hearing and every client interaction teaches you something new and you should embrace it with open arms.
Throughout your distinguished career, how have you managed to maintain a healthy work-life balance? What advice would you offer to others trying to balance their professional goals with personal responsibilities?
Balancing work and life in this profession is tricky—it is easy to let work take over everything. For me, weekends and short breaks have been very important in unwinding—whether it is catching up with family, taking a short trip, or just disconnecting for a bit. Apart from all that, what keeps me motivated of late is maintaining a fit and healthy lifestyle, and now I have been an amateur long-distance runner for the past couple of years.
My advice to others would be that do not wait for a “perfect” time to take a break. Start small—an evening off, a Sunday without work, a mid-week chilling session with college friends—and build from there. Over time, it makes a big positive difference in your overall personality.
Law is often regarded as both intellectually stimulating and socially impactful. What inspired you to pursue a legal career, and was there a pivotal moment or personal experience that influenced this decision?
The term, ‘Advocate’, unlike a lawyer or law graduate, always used to amuse me since it’s all about championing causes. While growing up, I was almost always appreciated for my ‘gift of gab’, innovative thinking, problem-solving abilities, and my flair for writing.
Additionally, my role models and famous personalities about whom I liked to read, namely Dr. BR Ambedkar, Chittaranjan Das, Robin Sharma, Abraham Lincoln, Fali Nariman, etc. were all lawyers.
On a lighter note, my love for Hindi movies with exaggerated and over-dramatized courtroom-scenes might have subconsciously sown the seeds of embarking on the path of rendering legal services and making a difference to the infamous “taareekh-pe-taarekh” system.
After completing your master’s degree, you embarked on an academic career. What motivated you to take this path, and what valuable learning experiences did you gain during that time?
My intellectual curiosity got me bitten by the ‘research-bug’, which motivated me to share with aspiring lawyers my learning-takeaways and enthusiasm for new knowledge in this dynamic domain of law.
It is pure delight to witness my students get empowered and blossom into successful legal professionals, Magistrates, etc. and receive heartfelt messages from them on Teachers’ Day and invites to their weddings. No fee can match that feeling of joy.
My brief teaching-stints at CLC (DU), HILSR (Jamia Hamdard), MAIMS (GGSIPU), and NorthCap University gifted me with diverse exposure, pan-India network, and the golden chance to positively impact young and bright minds.
Your background as an Assistant Professor and NET-qualified academic in law is impressive. How did you blend your teaching methods with real-world legal practice, and how did your students benefit from your diverse experience in litigation, consulting, and working with corporate and government organizations?
Creative interpretations of law, interactive case study-discussions, narration of courtroom-anecdotes and real-life client-handling experiences made my sessions interesting, I was told.
Guest interactions and internship opportunities with those in my circle, event-sponsoring through my firm, etc. were additional benefits for the students.
I have been blessed to have had responsive seekers as my mentees, most of whom resonated with my passion for breaking barriers as a first-generation lawyer, being unapologetically self-made, and experimenting with research on law in multidisciplinary shades.
Could you give an overview of the role and contributions of a Resource Person working with various MNCs, organizations, and NGOs?
Mainly, the common thread comprises assisting them with navigation through legal complexities in their daily workings, observance of relevant compliances, urgent legal support, policy-making and risk-management strategies.
With a client base that includes MNCs, MSMEs, and educational institutions, how do you approach legal consulting for large corporations versus smaller businesses? What unique challenges do you face when working with startups compared to established companies, and how do you tackle those?
The focus changes, and approach to legal problems also gets affected thereby.
It is my observation and experience that startups and smaller businesses focus more on short-term productivity and long-term rapid growth, while larger establishments aim at steady and consistent momentum. The former may be achieved through innovative and tailormade solutions that are cost-effective and sector-specific, while the latter require transaction advisory, stable plans for dispute-resolution, calculated policy-modifications to suit changing times or industry trends or amendments in regulations/laws.
Could you share your perspective on the role of mediation in dispute-resolution in India, and how its dynamics have evolved over the years? Additionally, how has technology contributed to simplifying the proceedings?
From our age-old panchayat system to the popular ‘Lok Adaalats’, and from the mandatory pre-litigation mediation under the Commercial Courts Act of 2015 to the recently passed Mediation Act of 2023, this simple-yet-effective out-of-court settlement technique of dispute-resolution has witnessed an evolving landscape in India and is here to stay with a promising future.
I personally feel that it offers an expeditious means to reach amicable and self-binding solutions to legal problems.
With technological progress nowadays, ODR (online dispute-resolution) through SAMA, AGAMI, and other such portals is the pleasant reality to experience the magic of mediation sitting anywhere in India.
As a partner at MKA Legal and the head of LAWGYSTIX Foundation, what is your approach and vision for your legal practice? What has been one of the most challenging cases you have dealt with so far, and how did you manage it?
Bridging gaps between the industry and academia, and awakening students of law to their ‘social engineer’ Advocate self has been my vision for enjoying a ‘rule of law’ based society around us.
A holistic, multi-disciplinary, ethical and humanistic approach has always worked wonders for me and kept me grounded.
Though all matters present unique challenges, I personally cherish the one through which I learnt nuances about powers of the Trial Court hearing Criminal Revision. It wasn’t a cake-walk to get a 1100+ day-limitation condoned in the interest of justice, and to get the charge successfully modified in a murky cross-case involving factual elements of modesty-outrage and attempt to murder. Working on cases related to men’s rights in false complaints under the PoSH law, or intriguing IPR advisory have also been full of learning.
Client probing, issue analysis, brief preparation, witness examination (if the matter is at trial level), applying knowledge of human psychology, engaging in avid research etc. enable us to effectively assist Courts in delivering justice while helping oneself evolve as a practising counsel.
I am deeply indebted towards my mentors in chamber litigation, namely Late Sh. LK Upadhyay, Senior Advocates Gopal Subramaniam, Priya Hingorani, and Anil Sapra who have all nurtured and guided me in their special ways.
You’re not only a successful legal professional but also an image consultant, soft skills educator, and energy healer, among other roles. What strategies have you used to maintain a healthy work-life balance? What advice would you give to others trying to balance career aspirations with personal responsibilities?
Donning multiple hats keeps me on my toes, and the various things I do help me get my ‘battery-recharge’ when needed.
Though the Indian law prescribes certain boundaries for licensed Advocates, I have experienced that all domains of knowledge have the ability to fuse into one another, provided we know how to use the integrated version.
Following the Hindu way of life and being a practitioner of Nichiren Buddhism, I surrender to cosmic plans for my own inherent wisdom and infinite potential to unleash when necessary. So, no specific strategies.
On the personal front, my parents are my biggest strength, with my mentors being my compass, friends being my biggest cheerleaders, and marriage being a great teacher.
Live in constant gratitude, and learn from everyone and everything. There might be crooked turns and deep pits on your way, but see dreams, set your goals, have a vision, wake up to your unique mission every morning, maintain a loving heart, work for others’ growth alongside your own, and keep moving ahead.
Once your work becomes your real fuel, your spiritual engine will keep you motivated and wisely guided towards healthy habits and holistic approach towards life.
With your extensive experience across various areas of practice and academia, what advice would you offer to students aspiring to build a career like yours? Additionally, could you recommend some resources to help them stay informed about the latest legal trends?
From the standpoint of honing your skill-sets as a lawyer, be a voracious reader, aim at polishing your legal language, keep pace with latest developments, take the study of jurisprudence and statutory interpretation seriously.
Rest, from a macro perspective, I would only suggest- focus on the soul’s progress, and the rest will smoothly follow. And trust the divine to unravel your life purpose, since whatever happens, happens for the best.
As regards resources, the Universe has no dearth of those. However, as they say that, “Beauty lies in the eyes of the beholder”, be a life-long learner and coachable mentee whose appetite is not restricted to judgments, news, interviews, amendments, debates, conferences, publications, social media content, MOOCs, etc.
Use your superpowers wisely, and the world will be your playground. Always remember that life is precious, and good karma is the eternal, indestructible currency.
With your impressive and extensive background in law, what initially sparked your passion for pursuing a legal career? Was there a specific moment or experience that motivated your decision, or did your interest gradually evolve over time?
My passion for a legal career ignited during my early twenties, sparked by a single, transformative experience. I was working a summer job at a local nonprofit when I sat in on a community meeting where a pro bono lawyer was helping a group of tenants fight an unjust eviction. The way that lawyer wielded the law, calmly dismantling the landlord’s arguments with precision and turning a seemingly hopeless situation into a victory for those families, was nothing short of inspiring.
It hit me then: the law wasn’t just a set of rules; it was a tool to level the playing field and give a voice to those who might otherwise be silenced. I started reading everything I could about legal precedents and civil rights, and I found myself drawn to the intellectual challenge of untangling complex problems.
Law school only amplified that drive, as I discovered the satisfaction of building a case and seeing it through. Over the years, what began as a spark of admiration has matured into a deep-seated passion for using my skills to advocate, solve problems, and uphold justice—whether in the courtroom or beyond.
Given your varied internship experiences at prestigious firms, how did these formative experiences shape your legal perspective? How did they guide your eventual decision to specialize in arbitration and energy law, which have become key pillars of your practice?
My internships at prestigious law firms provided a robust foundation for my legal perspective and career trajectory. V. Shekhar Mohan, a distinguished Senior Advocate, was the first in this fraternity to guide me when I was in my first year, mentoring me throughout my five years of college during my internship with him; tragically, his passing during COVID-19 was a profound loss to the legal community, where he had served as a Special Tax Counsel and amicus curiae in numerous matters before the Supreme Court.
I also interned in corporate law, where I assisted in drafting agreements and gained insight into the intricacies of business transactions—an experience that honed my analytical skills. Subsequently, I have interned at leading laws firms of India including Khaitan & Co, Amarchand Mangaldas (now Shardul Amarchand and Cyril) , Luthra & Co (Now Split into Luthra and Saraf) specializing in real estate law, where I engaged with property transactions and regulatory frameworks, deepening my appreciation for precision and detail. My most formative experience came during an internship focused on mergers and acquisitions, where I contributed to due diligence and risk assessments for large-scale corporate deals. The intellectual rigor and strategic thinking required in that environment profoundly influenced my approach to problem-solving.
Upon graduating, I joined the office of the Additional Solicitor General at the Delhi High Court, where I spent several years immersed in high-stakes litigation and advisory work. This role exposed me to complex constitutional and public policy matters, refining my advocacy skills and broadening my understanding of legal systems at the intersection of law and governance. Following this, I transitioned to private practice at leading law firms, where my focus shifted toward arbitration and the regulatory sector, particularly energy and petroleum law. My early exposure to arbitration during internships resonated with me, as I valued its efficiency and resolution-oriented nature—qualities well-suited to the corporate and M&A work I had encountered.
In the energy domain, I developed expertise in regulatory frameworks, including the operations of DISCOMs and the tariff-setting processes overseen by electricity commissions, which involve navigating intricate balances of cost, compliance, and policy. These experiences collectively shaped my specialization.
The internships instilled a versatile skill set and curiosity for complex legal challenges, while my tenure at the ASG office provided a rigorous grounding in advocacy and public law. Together, they guided me toward arbitration and energy law, which now form the cornerstones of my practice, blending practical dispute resolution with the dynamic regulatory landscape of critical industries.
Your involvement in assisting senior counsels on landmark constitutional matters and public interest litigation is truly commendable. Could you provide insights into your approach when handling high-profile constitutional cases, particularly those involving the Union of India or challenging critical policy decisions?
My approach to handling high-profile constitutional cases and public interest litigation, particularly those involving the Union of India or challenging critical policy decisions, is grounded in rigorous legal research, strategic collaboration with senior counsels, and a steadfast commitment to upholding constitutional integrity. Over the years, assisting senior counsels on landmark matters has equipped me with the tools to navigate complex legal frameworks, anticipate executive responses, and advocate effectively for justice.
One notable instance was my involvement in the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) matter concerning Bhushan Steel, where I assisted senior counsel in addressing allegations of financial misconduct involving the diversion of funds through associated companies. My role included analysing extensive financial evidence to support arguments on corporate accountability within constitutional and statutory bounds—an exercise that demanded precision under intense scrutiny.
Similarly, I contributed to arbitrations between the Government of India and other countries, where I helped interpret treaty obligations and domestic laws like the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. These cases often required ensuring India’s sovereign interests were robustly defended, drawing on precedents like White Industries to address enforcement delays, blending constitutional and international law perspectives.
I’ve also assisted in cases where procedural challenges arose, such as matters before tribunals that could not proceed due to an incomplete quorum. For instance, I worked with senior counsels on disputes where the absence of requisite tribunal members stalled adjudication, requiring us to strategize interim reliefs or push for administrative resolutions under constitutional provisions like Article 14 and 21. These experiences underscored the importance of adaptability and leveraging judicial oversight to address systemic gaps.
In another significant case, I supported senior counsel in a citizenship matter involving a Pakistani citizen visiting India. This involved dissecting the Citizenship Act alongside Article 14, balancing national security with individual rights. The Rakesh Asthana matter at the CBI was equally impactful. I assisted the ASG involving Sathish Sana Babu in the money laundering case related to the controversial meat exporter Moin Qureshi.
Currently, I’m engaged in two critical PILs. One seeks approval for regulated stem cell therapy under Article 21, where we’ve achieved a milestone with the High Court granting permission for its use in autism cases. My role involves coordinating with medical experts and advocating for a broader regulatory framework, aligning public health with constitutional rights.
The second, still pending, addresses the tragic death of a child due to alleged negligence by GNCTD hospitals and schools. We’re examining lapses in duty of care, drawing on precedents of state liability, and seeking both compensation and structural reforms—though the case remains unresolved due to ongoing proceedings.
Across these matters, my approach remains consistent: anchor arguments in constitutional doctrine, collaborate closely with seniors to refine strategy, and pursue outcomes that balance individual rights with public interest. Whether addressing Union policies, tribunal delays, or systemic negligence, I aim to ensure the law serves as a robust instrument for accountability and equitable relief.
What inspired you to take the bold step of establishing your own practice? Was there a particular vision or experience that motivated you to venture into entrepreneurship within the legal field, and how has this decision shaped your professional journey?
The decision to establish my own practice was a bold evolution, sparked by a wealth of professional experiences and the transformative guidance by the seniors I have worked with.
In my early years, Maninder Acharya, Senior Advocate, laid the bedrock of my legal journey. She instilled in me the essentials—ethical practice, thorough preparation, and professionalism—equipping me with the resilience and integrity needed to navigate the initial challenges of a legal career.
Later, it is Dama Seshadri Naidu, Senior Advocate and former judge of the High Courts of Hyderabad, Kerala, and Bombay, who inspired me to take the entrepreneurial leap into chamber practice. His mentorship elevated my capabilities, sharpening the advanced skills that now define my independent work. His influence is profound and multifaceted. A seasoned jurist turned advocate, he brought a rare blend of judicial insight and courtroom mastery to his mentorship. Having served on three High Courts, he adjudicated complex constitutional and regulatory disputes, and his return to practice as a Senior Advocate in 2021—arguing before the Supreme Court—demonstrated a fearless adaptability that he urged me to emulate.
He saw chamber practice as the ultimate test of a lawyer’s mettle, and he took it upon himself to refine my abilities to meet that standard. He sharpened my drafting skills, insisting on clarity and precision. His feedback was exacting: ‘A good lawyer argues; a great lawyer persuades,’ he’d say, pushing me to craft submissions that were not just sound but compelling.
He also honed my advocacy skills, emphasizing the art of oral argument. His tenure as a judge had given him an uncanny ability to spot weak links, and he trained me to pre-empt them. Beyond technical skills, he instilled a strategic mindset—how to read a case’s broader implications, a perspective honed from years of authoring judgments. His passion for legal education, evident in his guest lectures at judicial academies and it inspired me to deepen my own research, ensuring my arguments were rooted in robust precedent and policy. He pushed me to lead these cases independently, refining my drafts to withstand scrutiny and my arguments to drive systemic change.
Establishing my own practice was the culmination of this journey. Dama Seshadri Naidu’s vision—that a lawyer’s true strength lies in autonomy—aligned with my desire to focus on constitutional advocacy, arbitration, and regulatory reform, passions forged through energy and petroleum law work. His training empowered me to tackle the cases with expert collaboration.
This path is demanding—building a practice requires grit—but with his mentorship, it’s become a platform to effect change on my terms, reflecting the excellence he demanded.
As an Advocate on Record at the Supreme Court of India, how do you navigate complex legal issues in representing clients in arbitration and cases under the Arbitration Act? Can you share examples of particularly challenging cases that tested your legal expertise?
As a recently appointed Advocate on Record at the Supreme Court of India, I draw on years of handling matters before the apex court to navigate complex legal issues in arbitration and cases under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. My approach hinges on a deep dive into statutory frameworks, a strategic grasp of judicial restraint, and relentless preparation to represent clients effectively—whether in arbitration disputes or broader civil litigation. The Supreme Court’s nuanced oversight demands precision, and my role as an AoR amplifies my responsibility to streamline filings and argue with clarity, honed over time through challenging cases.
One case that tested my expertise was an election matter under the anti-defection law in the Tenth Schedule. Representing a party contesting a legislator’s disqualification, I grappled with interpreting ‘voluntarily giving up membership’ against merger exceptions. Another arbitration matter involved a clause drafted to exclude ‘financial defaults’ from arbitration, limiting remedies to civil courts. I argued under Section 11, citing Vidya Drolia v. Durga Trading Corporation, to sever arbitrable disputes while preserving parallel remedies—a tightrope walk of contract interpretation and jurisdiction.
An SLP against a Section 37 order under the Arbitration Act posed a steeper challenge. The appellate court had upheld an arbitral award my client deemed unconscionable, and the Supreme Court’s minimal interference narrowed my window. I crafted the plea around ‘patent illegality’ under Section 34, distilling a dense record into a focused argument, testing my ability to balance arbitration’s finality with judicial review. Contempt matters have been equally demanding, especially when my client faced direct contempt. In one instance, a senior official’s public defiance of a court order triggered suo motu proceedings. Defending required navigating the Contempt of Courts Act, securing compliance through apologies, and arguing proportionality—stretching the diplomacy and advocacy under fire. Complex property civil suits have also been a significant part of my practice, often involving intricate interpretations of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC).
Execution proceedings further complicate matters. Enforcing arbitral awards and court decrees—whether against reluctant parties or tangled assets—often faces resistance, like in a case where a decree holder struggled to attach property due to third-party claims.
As an AoR, I now channel these lessons into tackling the Supreme Court’s exacting standards, ensuring complex issues—from arbitration to CPC-driven suits—find resolution through rigorous, client-focused advocacy.
In your experience representing DISCOMs, transmission companies, and PSUs before various courts and tribunals, what are some of the key challenges you face in interpreting and enforcing the Electricity Act, 2003? How do you ensure that your clients comply with its evolving regulations?
Key Challenges in Interpreting and Enforcing the Electricity Act, 2003
Unclear Rules and Provisions:
The Electricity Act, 2003, aims to modernize India’s power sector by encouraging competition and consumer benefits, but some of its sections—like those governing open access to transmission lines or setting tariffs—are not clearly defined. This lack of clarity often leads to disagreements between companies, regulators, and consumers, resulting in legal battles before courts or tribunals like the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL). For example, terms like “non-discriminatory access” can be interpreted differently, creating confusion.
Frequently Changing Regulations:
The power sector is dynamic, with new rules, amendments, and policies introduced regularly by the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC), State Electricity Regulatory Commissions (SERCs), and the Ministry of Power. For instance, requirements like renewable purchase obligations (RPOs) or grid stability standards evolve over time. Keeping up with these updates is tough, especially when court rulings may not yet reflect the latest changes, leaving companies uncertain about compliance.
Financial Struggles of DISCOMs:
Many Distribution Companies (DISCOMs) face significant financial losses due to high operational costs, unpaid bills, and subsidies they must provide. This financial strain makes it challenging to invest in infrastructure upgrades or meet regulatory mandates under the Act, such as reducing losses or adopting new technologies. Transmission companies and PSUs also face pressure to balance profitability with public service obligations.
How Compliance is Ensured
Staying Updated with Changes:
Companies must actively monitor updates to the Electricity Act, regulatory notifications, and judicial decisions. This involves reviewing orders from CERC, SERCs, and government policies to ensure their operations align with the latest requirements.
Relying on Expert Guidance:
Legal and technical experts play a key role in interpreting complex provisions of the Act and advising on compliance. For instance, they help navigate tariff disputes or ensure adherence to open access rules, reducing the risk of penalties or legal challenges.
Training and Awareness:
Regular training programs for employees—covering topics like regulatory obligations, renewable energy targets, or consumer rights—help ensure that staff understand and implement the Act effectively. This is especially important for frontline teams dealing with customers or grid operations.
Strategic Planning and Execution:
Companies develop long-term plans to meet mandates, such as integrating renewable energy sources or reducing transmission losses. This might involve upgrading infrastructure, improving billing systems, or securing funds to address financial gaps, ensuring they comply with both the letter and spirit of the Act.
By addressing these challenges with proactive measures, DISCOMs, transmission companies, and PSUs can better navigate the complexities of the Electricity Act, 2003, and its evolving framework
You’ve represented a diverse range of clients, from builders and road contractors to energy companies. What are the most significant legal hurdles these industries face, particularly in terms of contract disputes, compensation claims, and force majeure events especially during challenging times like the pandemic?
Contract Disputes
Construction Industry (Builders and Road Contractors): Contract disputes often arise due to delays in project timelines, cost overruns, or disagreements over scope of work. For instance, builders may face conflicts with clients or subcontractors over incomplete payments or quality of materials, while road contractors deal with government agencies disputing milestones or penalties for delays. Ambiguities in contract terms—like unclear deadlines or variation clauses—frequently escalate these issues.
Energy Companies: DISCOMs, transmission firms, and PSUs often encounter disputes over power purchase agreements (PPAs), tariff adjustments, or delivery obligations. For example, a DISCOM might argue with a generator over pricing during low demand, while transmission companies face disputes with contractors over infrastructure delays. Rigid contract terms can complicate renegotiation during unforeseen events.
Compensation Claims
Construction Industry: Builders and road contractors often file compensation claims for additional costs incurred due to delays, such as extended equipment rentals or labor expenses. However, proving entitlement to compensation is tough—clients or government bodies may reject claims citing inadequate documentation or failure to mitigate losses. During the pandemic, claims surged due to halted work, but proving the extent of loss was a hurdle.
Energy Companies: Energy firms, especially DISCOMs, face compensation disputes with consumers or suppliers. For instance, consumers may demand refunds for outages, while generators seek payments for idle capacity during low demand (e.g., pandemic lockdowns). Regulatory caps on tariffs and financial distress often limit their ability to settle claims, leading to prolonged litigation.
Force Majeure Events (e.g., Pandemic)
Construction Industry: Force majeure clauses—covering events like natural disasters or pandemics—are critical but often poorly defined in contracts. During COVID-19, builders and contractors struggled to invoke these clauses to excuse delays or seek extensions, as clients argued that pandemics weren’t explicitly listed or that mitigation wasn’t attempted. Courts had to interpret whether lockdowns qualified, creating inconsistency in rulings.
Energy Companies: Energy firms faced similar challenges. For example, DISCOMs saw demand plummet during lockdowns, triggering disputes with generators over “take-or-pay” obligations in PPAs. Invoking force majeure was contentious—generators argued it didn’t apply to payment duties, while DISCOMs cited revenue losses. Regulatory interventions, like moratoriums, added complexity to enforcement.
Common Challenges Across Industries
Proving Causation and Loss: Both sectors struggle to link delays or losses directly to events like the pandemic, requiring detailed evidence (e.g., timelines, financial records) that’s often incomplete.
Cash Flow Strain: Compensation delays or disputed payments worsen financial pressures, especially for contractors and DISCOMs already operating on thin margins.
Regulatory Uncertainty: Shifting government policies—e.g., pandemic relief measures or tariff revisions—create confusion, making compliance and dispute resolution harder.
Addressing These Hurdles
Clear Contracts: Drafting precise terms for scope, timelines, and force majeure events reduces ambiguity.
Documentation: Maintaining robust records of delays, costs, and mitigation efforts strengthens claims.
Negotiation: Early dialogue with counterparties can resolve disputes before they reach courts.
Legal Expertise: Engaging specialists helps navigate complex regulations and precedents, especially during crisis.
With your vast exposure to both national and international legal practices, what advice would you offer to aspiring young legal professionals who wish to pursue complex commercial litigation, particularly in sectors like infrastructure, energy, and regulatory law?
Advice for Aspiring Legal Professionals
1. Build a Strong Foundation in Core Skills
Master Contract Law: Commercial litigation in infrastructure and energy hinges on contracts—whether it’s construction agreements, power purchase agreements (PPAs), or regulatory tariffs. Understand how to draft, interpret, and challenge contract terms, especially clauses like force majeure, liquidated damages, and termination rights.
Sharpen Research and Analysis: Cases in these sectors often involve technical details (e.g., grid stability, project delays) and evolving regulations. Develop the ability to dig into statutes like the Electricity Act, 2003, or international standards like FIDIC contracts, and connect them to case facts.
Hone Advocacy Skills: Whether before courts, arbitral tribunals, or regulators like CERC, persuasive communication—both written (pleadings) and oral (arguments)—is key. Practice clarity and precision to stand out.
2. Specialize Early, but Stay Versatile
Pick a Niche Focus on infrastructure (e.g., roads, real estate) or energy (e.g., renewables, DISCOMs) to build expertise. These sectors have unique challenges—land acquisition disputes in infrastructure or tariff battles in energy—that reward deep knowledge.
Understand Regulatory Law: Regulatory bodies (e.g., SERCs, NHAI) heavily influence these industries. Learn how they function, their rules, and how judicial review works (e.g., APTEL rulings). This sets you apart in litigation involving policy interpretation.
Adapt Internationally: Global projects often use frameworks like FIDIC or involve cross-border disputes. Familiarize yourself with arbitration under ICC or UNCITRAL rules, as infrastructure and energy cases increasingly go international.
3. Get Hands-On Experience
Work with Firms or Seniors: Join a law firm or assist a senior advocate handling commercial litigation in these sectors. Exposure to real cases—say, a road contractor’s delay claim or a DISCOM’s tariff dispute—teaches practical nuances no textbook can.
Engage with Tribunals: Shadow or clerk at forums like APTEL, NCLT, or arbitral panels. You’ll see how technical evidence (e.g., project timelines, financial losses) is argued and adjudicated.
Take on Pro Bono or Small Cases: Early in your career, handle smaller disputes (e.g., consumer energy complaints) to build confidence and courtroom experience.
4. Understand the Business Side
Learn the Industry: Litigation isn’t just about law—it’s about the client’s world. Study how infrastructure projects are financed (e.g., PPP models) or how energy markets work (e.g., renewable integration). This helps you craft arguments that align with commercial realities.
Think Beyond Winning: Clients value solutions—settlements, renegotiations—that save time and money. Develop a problem-solving mindset alongside litigation skills.
5. Stay Ahead of Trends
Track Policy Shifts: Laws and regulations evolve—think renewable energy mandates or infrastructure funding schemes. Read government notifications, industry reports, and case law updates to anticipate legal challenges.
Embrace Technology:
AI tools, e-courts, and data analysis are transforming litigation. Learn to use them for research, case management, or presenting evidence.
6. Build Resilience and Networks
Prepare for Complexity: These cases can drag on for years, involve multiple parties, and demand stamina. Cultivate patience and attention to detail—success often lies in outlasting the chaos.
Network Actively: Connect with peers, industry experts, and regulators at seminars or bar associations. Relationships open doors to mentors, clients, and insights into sector-specific disputes.
Given your extensive involvement in both procedural and strategic aspects of legal representation, how do you successfully balance the demands of appearing before high courts, tribunals, and arbitration proceedings, while also maintaining a fulfilling personal life?
1. Prioritize and Plan Strategically
Case Management:
Handling high courts, tribunals (like APTEL), and arbitration proceedings requires juggling tight deadlines and complex preparations. Prioritize tasks by urgency and impact—focus on filing deadlines or key hearings first, delegating research or drafting where possible. Use tools like case management software to track schedules across forums.
Time Blocking: Reserve specific hours for court appearances, client meetings, and strategy sessions, while carving out non-negotiable personal time—say, evenings for family or mornings for exercise. Planning ahead ensures neither sphere is neglected.
2. Leverage a Strong Support System
Professional Team: Rely on junior advocates, paralegals, or associates to handle procedural filings, initial drafts, or evidence collation. For example, while arguing a tariff dispute before a high court, delegate tribunal paperwork to the team. This frees up mental bandwidth for strategic thinking.
Personal Network: Lean on family or close friends for emotional grounding. A quick dinner with loved ones or a weekend getaway can recharge you, making it easier to return to a contentious arbitration with focus.
3. Master Efficiency Without Sacrificing Quality
Preparation Discipline: High-stakes forums demand thoroughness—whether it’s mastering a construction delay claim for an arbitration or a regulatory challenge in a tribunal. Develop a streamlined process: skim key documents first, then deep-dive into critical issues. This saves time while keeping arguments sharp.
Travel Smart: Frequent appearances across cities mean travel. Use downtime—flights or train rides—to review briefs or unwind with a podcast, blending productivity with relaxation.
4. Set Boundaries and Protect Personal Time
Say No When Needed: Decline non-essential commitments—like an extra case with a tight deadline—if it risks burnout or family time. For instance, after a grueling week at the Supreme Court, politely defer a new client pitch.
Unplug Regularly: Switch off work calls or emails during designated personal hours. A Sunday hike or movie night without interruptions can feel as rewarding as winning a case.
Take Short Trips: Whenever you get a breather—say, a long weekend or a gap between hearings—plan a short trip. A quick drive to a nearby hill station or a day by the beach can refresh you, offering a mental reset from the grind of legal battles.
5. Integrate Passion and Purpose
Find Meaning in Work: Strategic wins—like securing compensation for a road contractor or defending an energy company’s tariff—can be energizing. When work feels purposeful, it’s easier to justify the long hours and stay motivated.
Personal Fulfilment:
Pursue hobbies or causes outside law—gardening, mentoring students, or charity work. These outlets provide joy and perspective, balancing the intensity of legal battles.
6. Stay Physically and Mentally Fit
Routine Matters: Long days in court or arbitration can drain you. Exercise (even a 20-minute walk), eat well, and sleep enough to sustain energy. A sharp mind wins cases and enjoys life.
Stress Management: Techniques like meditation or journaling help process the pressure of a lost motion or a tough cross-examination, keeping you steady for both work and home.
Given your distinguished and extensive legal background, could you share what initially sparked your passion for the law? Was there a particular defining moment or experience that influenced your decision to pursue this path, or did your interest gradually develop over time? Additionally, how would you reflect on your time at NUSRL in shaping your legal journey?
Just like any other student fresh out of school, I was clueless as to what to pursue as a career. In my family, everyone had pursued different areas of interest with Noah’s arc being my grandfather, Mr. Jaluram, who himself was a senior advocate and one of the founding members of the Rajasthan High Court Bar at Jodhpur. He started practicing law in the year 1956 along with legal luminaries and politicians like Nathuram Mirdha and many more. His reputations transcends generations and his social connectivity which initially inspired me to pursue law with added guidance by my elder brother Mr. Chakra Vardhan Singh who introduced me to CLAT. I think the decision to pursue law was innate in me as I always had curiosity to understand the logic behind legality and illegality, law enforcement and its interpretations and checks and balances of the Executive. This inquisitiveness with legacy factor always led my inclination towards pursuing the law.
Reflecting back on my legal journey and role at the National University of Study and Research in Law (NUSRL), Ranchi requires altogether a complete day. It was an exhilarating experience and complete college life I could have asked for. Those five years were not only the blessings but also gave full authority to be responsible and drive my life to the present day. During those five years, with the supportive faculties, we as one of the foundation batches had privilege and autonomy to pursue everything of our interest including Moot, MUNs, Debates, Research, field visits. Though we had privileges, we had our fair share of challenges as well including funds shortage of university, lack of permanent campus initially and ever changing hostel addresses, lack of alumni base and much more. During those five years, classmates became friends who are now family, had kept my interest in the law and to develop the same in times to come. I am so grateful and thankful for each and every one at NUSRL who have in their unique way contributed in the journey. Navigating those five years with such wonderful experiences has been a blessing for the lifetime and have paved my career path.
Following your graduation, you pursued a master’s degree in corporate and commercial law. What motivated you to specialize in this particular area, and how has this specialization influenced the trajectory of your career?
Since I had decided to pursue litigation and more specifically in the field of corporate and commercial law it was imperative to further pursue a master’s degree in corporate and commercial law. Therefore it required special and technical skills, knowledge which would go along with my area of interest and also I joined master’s degree to live college life again. It was a very enriching experience to pursue master’s degree having practical knowledge in hand and at the same time active academic discussions with the faculties. It was also an experience through which I came across other like-minded people from different backgrounds who ultimately helped in getting diverse opinions on certain topics. I aspire for more academic pursuit in the times to come.
Looking back at the early stages of your career, particularly during your tenure as in-house counsel at Wipro, what key experiences significantly enriched your understanding of the law? How did these formative experiences shape the direction and trajectory of your professional journey?
To find myself interning in Wipro with their Consumer Care and Lighting Division was true serendipity for law student like me. It had a very strong impact on trajectory of my career and if given the chance to repeat one experience, my first priority would be interning at Wipro. I had very supportive and informative sessions from legal team of Wipro including Mr. Sudipta Mukherjee (presently in legal counsel at Daimler-Mercedes), Mr. Amit Mathur (presently legal counsel at Amway), Ms. Rovena David (presently legal counsel at Titan), Mr. Vishal Mittal (presently consultant at Tattvika) and Mr. Manoj Jain (Ex- General Counsel – Wipro Enterprises). Admittedly, it was the perk of being the youngest in the team and fresh out of college that these mentors helped in shaping my career and enabling me to take independent decisions.
Each one of them provided me with the exposures at an early stage of my career by sharing their valuable experiences, enabling me to interact with top management and board meetings with a lot of guidance to navigate through the first and foremost phase of my career. Experiences at Wipro has led me to where I am today.
Having worked with several companies in an in-house capacity before co-founding your own firm, what prompted you to establish your own practice? Were there any particular challenges or hurdles you encountered during the initial stages of building your firm?
Our law firm, KAY & Partners is not a result of a recent collaboration but the seeds of this project were planted back in his college days (intentionally or unintentionally). It is a dream of every college friend that they must start something together, so that the life we lived during the college days can be continued. Likewise, Akshay Uppal who was a financial planner for our teams during various intra-University league matches and foods fests also happens to be my business partner now. While the same Kushagra Srivastava who survived the terrors of the monkeys all across our Rishikesh trip is also a partner of the same venture. Harshit Singh Sisodia has been a silent but vigilant actor all around. So it is a college love story which has turned into a marriage for lifetime.
To start any project, everyone faces various challenges, we have had our fair share of challenges. The first and foremost challenge we faced was we all four were having been placed in different cities and it was difficult to initialize and plan the roadmap of the firm. Though it was a challenge but there was an opportunity to get together in hindsight. Another challenge we faced was recurring expenses and financial management, but thanks to the Clients we have they were right on time and till today we are holding onto our clients very close to us.
As an experienced litigator in commercial, civil, and criminal law, what have been the most challenging cases you’ve handled, particularly in the domain of intellectual property litigation and prosecution?
In intellectual property matters, every matter is significant and has importance as such matters directly affects the businesses. IP litigations are technical in the sense that until and unless the lawyer does not understand the nuances of the business, it becomes very difficult to litigate in the IP litigations especially Trademark cases. Lower judiciary needs to be sensitised with IP laws as IP litigations are prominently dealt with by only a few High Courts. It becomes very difficult to explain the dynamic nature and concepts of IP laws at a lower judiciary level.
Apart from this acquisition of trademarks and IP is also one of the aspects which require careful due diligence and one over side may result into imperfect title in the IP rights it is equally important to have the preventive actions in place including trademark watches which should protect the trademark rights before it is being spilled over to another entity-in-interest.
To recall, one of the interesting yet challenging cases was during my stint at one of the companies wherein an allegation in respect of trade dress and design infringement coupled with comparative advertisement and trademark tarnishment was central issue in the litigation. As most of the IP litigations are critical and reputational matters for the marketing team, therefore I had to rigorously understand the marketing side of the case and marketing terminologies, concepts of marketing and financial implications of such litigations. At such a nascent stage of my career though it was exhilarating, I also had my restless moments because of the gravity and potential significant impact that such litigations can have on the businesses. Yet again I am thankful to my mentors who enabled me to navigate through such situations and prepare the matter for litigation.
I would like to share another anecdote wherein an acquisition was on the verge of completion however it had come to our knowledge that the trademark that we were acquiring was an encumbered one. This information was missed by our advising reputed Indian law firm and foreign law firm. This information was of the nature which could have terminated the ongoing acquisition proceedings, but we were able to resolve the situation by taking an expeditious route of rectification of records to perfect the title. All in all I must say all experiences and my mentors have taught me how to be business friendly and be businesses’ lawyer rather than minding my lawyers business.
In your experience handling insolvency proceedings, what alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms do you typically utilize to guide clients through these complex situations? Furthermore, how do you foresee the future of ADR evolving in the Indian legal landscape?
In my opinion it is important to have an effective ADR mechanism in place in this present complex business conditions. It is imperative for a business to thrive in conducive conditions where quick and simplified dispute resolution mechanisms are placed in by the government. One of such ADR mechanisms which has been introduced by the government is under MSME Act, 2006. MSME Act provides for an MSME facilitation cell which can be very crucial for resolution of disputes pertaining to MSMEs. It is important that such mechanisms are effective only if it gets due attention and supervision from government and Higher Courts respectively. MSME facilitation council, if provided considerable support and due acknowledgement, can result in effective resolution of commercial disputes which in effect decreases the burden of Courts which are otherwise engaged and overburdened with other litigations.
As India is aspiring to be one of the biggest economies in the world it needs to have effective dispute resolution mechanisms. Achieving such an ambitious yet needful goal, India must have lucrative, speedy and accessible dispute resolution mechanisms. If need arises, Presiding Officers and Arbitrators must be trained to hear and preside over the disputes of specific natures. Additionally, institutional arbitration can play a significant role in such scenarios. It is highly expected from the government and judiciary to promote and develop a conducive environment for evolution of arbitration and ADR mechanism and jurisprudence. Needless to say it would also require efforts from entire legal fraternity including academicians, in house counsels, lawyers, government officers to promote and help in development of jurisprudence around ADR mechanisms in India
What advice would you offer to aspiring law students who aim to follow a career path similar to yours? What skills or qualities do you believe are essential for success in this dynamic and increasingly important area of law?
The first and foremost advice that I would like to give to inspiring law students aiming to follow or pursue a career path in corporate or as in house counsels in the present set of world would be to engage in the internships and training activities with them. It is equally important to make such internships count and have their presence felt in the organization through their work and dedication which should result in the recurring internship and ultimate engagement with the company. Corporates, law firms, lawyers do not expect thorough knowledge of law from a law student, however it is expected from them to be diligent, faithful and updated in respect of the area of law that they are dealing. In this dynamic and increasingly important area of law I believe and recommend for the young graduates and inspiring law students to stay updated, read and read a lot and first understand the business and the requirements of the business or their Clientele. Once they understand the requirement and the nature of the relief/opinion that they (business or Clientele) expect, gravity or urgency of such relief or opinion, it is important to deliver based on such a requirement to their expectation within the set timelines. In this dynamic and increasingly important economic environment it is equally important to deliver the legal services professionally and at par with global standards.
Balancing a successful career with commitments to public service and education is no easy task. How do you maintain a healthy work-life balance, and what advice would you offer to others who seek to strike a similar balance between their professional ambitions and personal responsibilities?
To be honest it becomes very difficult to maintain public services and personal responsibilities and professional ambitions together. As a lawyer one needs to have a healthy work life balance and at the same time be social. Though it differs from person to person what is their mantra for healthy work life balance, we at KAY and Partners have decided that we should not only offer a healthy work life balance to ourselves as the partners but also to each and everyone associated with the firm. It is equally important that due to such search decisions the interests of our clients are not hampered. Effective delegation and supportive team members at KAY & Partners is paramount to my healthy work life balance. I must thank all present and past teammates for their efforts and support to achieve what we have done today.
Allow notifications