Super Lawyer

Tag: Commercial Law

  • “For me, law has always been more than a profession; it’s a way to create meaningful change.” – Pooja Dua, Founder of Law Chambers of Pooja Dua.

    “For me, law has always been more than a profession; it’s a way to create meaningful change.” – Pooja Dua, Founder of Law Chambers of Pooja Dua.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Ma’am, you have extensive experience in litigation, arbitration, and white-collar crime. What initially drew you to law as a career? How has your approach evolved over the years?

    I was drawn to law by a deep interest in how it shapes society and protects rights. From the start, I saw it as more than just statutes, it’s about people, justice, and creating real impact. Over the years, my approach has evolved from simply arguing cases to offering holistic solutions. Handling complex disputes in arbitration, construction, corporate matters, and white-collar crimes has taught me to blend legal strategy with commercial insight and human understanding. Today, I focus on resolving conflicts in a way that is not only legally sound but also practical and aligned with my clients’ broader goals.

    Having completed your law degree, what motivated you to focus on arbitration and alternative dispute resolution, and how did your education shape your career trajectory?

    My interest in arbitration and alternative dispute resolution grew during law school, but it truly took shape during an internship with BHEL, where I was first introduced to the practical side of arbitration. Seeing how complex commercial disputes could be resolved more efficiently and collaboratively outside traditional courts left a deep impression on me. This experience, combined with my Advanced Diploma in ADR from NALSAR, strengthened my resolve to pursue this field. It taught me to view disputes not merely as battles to be fought but as challenges to be resolved strategically, with solutions that balance legal precision and business realities. That foundation has shaped my career path, enabling me to build a strong practice in construction arbitration, commercial disputes, and complex contractual matters, where I focus on delivering outcomes that are both effective and commercially viable.

    You founded your own practice, handling complex and high-stakes matters. Which early experiences laid the foundation for establishing your independent practice, and what challenges did you face in building it?

    My early work in litigation and arbitration, particularly before High Courts, tribunals, and arbitral forums, laid a strong foundation for building my independent practice. A pivotal part of this journey was my longest professional association with H&A Associates, where I had the privilege of working under the guidance of Mr. S.W. Haider, one of the finest mentors one could have. His mentorship and insight shaped my understanding of complex legal strategy and advocacy at a very early stage. During this period, I gained vast experience handling high-stakes disputes, including those involving major government authorities such as Indian Railways, NHAI and CPWD. This experience gave me the confidence and capability to establish Law Chambers of Pooja Dua. Although building an independent practice came with challenges from creating a strong client base to managing multifaceted matters each milestone strengthened the firm’s foundation. Today, it stands as a multi-specialty practice known for handling intricate disputes with legal precision, strategic foresight, and client-centric advocacy.

    Your practice spans both domestic and international arbitration, particularly in infrastructure, construction, and industrial projects. How do you navigate the strategic and procedural differences between domestic and international arbitration?

    Domestic and international arbitrations may share the same foundation, but they demand very different approaches. In domestic matters, especially in infrastructure and construction disputes, the focus is on procedural efficiency and aligning with Indian laws and judicial precedents. International arbitration, on the other hand, brings in added layers different institutional rules, cross-border legal issues, cultural nuances, and enforcement across jurisdictions. My experience in both has taught me to adapt quickly and plan strategy from the outset, ensuring the process is not only legally sound but also practical and commercially effective for my clients.

    Having handled a variety of cases, could you share a particularly challenging dispute or arbitration, and how you approached dealing with such a high stake matter?

    One of the most challenging matters I handled was a multi-crore construction arbitration against a government authority, involving complex technical issues, strict contractual timelines, and significant financial exposure for my client. The stakes were extremely high both commercially and reputationally. My approach was to go beyond pure legal strategy: I collaborated closely with engineers and technical experts, dissected every contractual clause, and built a case theory that combined legal strength with technical clarity. Anticipating and countering the other side’s arguments well in advance proved crucial. Ultimately, our meticulous preparation and strategic advocacy led to a favourable award, reaffirming my belief that success in high-stakes disputes lies in deep preparation, multidisciplinary collaboration, and a solutions-oriented mindset.

    In an era of rapidly evolving commercial, technological, and regulatory landscapes, how do you stay ahead in advising clients on emerging legal challenges, and what trends do you foresee in dispute resolution and commercial law?

    In today’s fast-changing commercial and regulatory environment, staying ahead means thinking beyond the present. I focus on continuous learning tracking legal developments, technological shifts, and global best practices and aligning that knowledge with my clients’ evolving business needs. The future of dispute resolution will be shaped by specialisation, digitisation, and stronger institutional frameworks. We’re moving toward faster, tech-enabled processes, AI-assisted case management, and a more collaborative approach to resolving cross-border disputes. I believe the next decade will redefine how law interacts with business and my goal is to help clients not just adapt to these changes but use them as an advantage, turning legal foresight into strategic strength.

    For young lawyers aspiring to specialize in arbitration and corporate disputes, what key skills or experiences would you recommend prioritizing early in their careers?

    For young lawyers aspiring to build a career in arbitration and corporate disputes, my biggest advice is to focus on the fundamentals, strong research, precise drafting, and clear communication but never lose sight of the bigger picture. This field is about more than just legal knowledge; it’s about strategic thinking, commercial awareness, and the courage to take ownership of complex problems. Seek out every opportunity to observe proceedings, assist in drafting, and work closely with mentors. Those experiences will shape you far more than textbooks. My own journey was deeply influenced by the mentors I learned from, and that guidance was invaluable. Most importantly, stay curious and resilient. Arbitration is a constantly evolving space, and those who keep learning and adapting will find themselves not just practising law, but shaping it.

    Beyond your professional work, you are engaged in advisory roles with foundations, universities, and industry clients. How do you view the role of pro bono work and community engagement in a high-pressure legal career?

    For me, law has always been more than a profession; it’s a way to create meaningful change. My involvement with NGO’s and various universities allows me to use my legal skills beyond the courtroom, whether it’s empowering women, raising awareness about rights, or mentoring young lawyers. I also remain closely connected to Amity Law School, Noida, my alma mater, by engaging with students and contributing to alumni initiatives, something that allows me to give back to the institution that laid the foundation for my career.

    Alongside this, I work closely with real estate developers, industry leaders, and major brands on long-term retainers, advising them on projects that shape urban landscapes and impact lives at scale. Balancing high-stakes commercial mandates with community-focused initiatives keeps me grounded and reminds me why I chose this profession, to serve, to protect, and to make a difference. These diverse experiences not only add purpose and perspective to my work but also make me a more strategic and empathetic lawyer.

    Looking back at your career so far, what key lessons or principles have guided your practice in complex litigation, arbitration, and white-collar crime, and how would you advise the next generation of lawyers to approach similar challenges?

    Looking back, one of the most important lessons my career has taught me is that there are no shortcuts in law,  success is built on unwavering commitment, deep preparation, and continuous learning. Whether dealing with complex litigation, high-stakes arbitration, or white-collar crime matters, I have always approached every case with integrity, precision, and perseverance. Equally crucial is the ability to look beyond statutes — to understand the human, commercial, and strategic dimensions that shape every dispute.

    My journey, from working under the exceptional mentorship of Mr. S.W. Haider at H&A Associates collaborating with legal firms like Panda Law, and ultimately establishing Law Chambers of Pooja Dua, has reinforced the value of resilience, curiosity, and purpose at every stage. Each experience has contributed to the lawyer I am today and strengthened my belief in the transformative power of the law.

    To the next generation of lawyers, my advice is simple: master the fundamentals, seek out mentors who challenge and guide you, stay curious, and always remember that the law’s ultimate purpose is to serve and deliver justice. Embrace challenges as opportunities, not obstacles, and let hard work and integrity be the cornerstones of your practice. If you do that, you won’t just succeed, you’ll help shape the future of the legal profession.

    Get in touch with Pooja Dua –

  • “The future belongs to companies that proactively manage risks, draft robust agreements, and embrace arbitration as a tool to secure their interests.” – Abhijeet Gathraj, Founder of Gathraj & Co.

    “The future belongs to companies that proactively manage risks, draft robust agreements, and embrace arbitration as a tool to secure their interests.” – Abhijeet Gathraj, Founder of Gathraj & Co.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Sir, you’ve built an impressive and diverse practice, spanning corporate, commercial, and dispute resolution matters. What inspired you to establish your own firm, and what has been the most defining challenge in leading it?

    The decision to establish my own firm was born out of a deep conviction that law should be practised with independence, integrity, and an unwavering focus on client trust. I always envisioned creating a practice that was not only about providing legal advice but also about becoming a trusted partner in my clients’ journeys, helping them navigate complexities with clarity and confidence. This dream was not easy to pursue—it meant stepping out of my comfort zone, taking risks, and proving myself in a market already dominated by established players and multi-generational professionals.

    The most defining challenge was earning credibility in those initial years. With limited resources and no big name to lean on, every client I secured was through persistence, sleepless nights, and consistent delivery of results. It was a struggle marked by countless rejections, long hours, and sacrifices. Yet, these challenges shaped me into the professional I am today—resilient, determined, and deeply committed to excellence.

    You dropped out of Chartered Accountancy after giving 4 good years to it before pursuing law. What motivated you to transition into law, and how has your strong commerce background shaped your perspective and strategy in handling complex commercial disputes? 

    Dropping out of Chartered Accountancy (CA) was a nightmare for my family. After giving 4 long years pursuing CA, one fine day I decided that my calling is into Dispute Resolution and the very fact of appearing in court, preparing arguments and representing the other side of the dispute motivated me to transition into law. Accountancy background gave me a strong foundation in numbers, corporate structures, and financial regulations, but I realised early on that the “why” behind every transaction lay in the law. I wanted to go beyond balance sheets and immerse myself in the world of contracts, disputes, and advocacy, where strategy and persuasion could alter outcomes. The transition was not easy, but it felt natural. I was drawn to the dynamic nature of legal practice, where every case presented a new challenge and an opportunity to make an impact.

    My commerce background has been invaluable in my legal career, and pursuing one of the toughest accountancy courses prepared me for the hard work that is required in the legal profession. It allows me to see disputes not just as legal problems but as business realities. When handling complex commercial matters, I can dissect financial nuances while aligning them with legal strategy. This dual perspective gives me an edge in cross-border disputes, shareholder conflicts, and regulatory advisory, where understanding the commercial heartbeat is as crucial as the legal framework.

    In the early phase of your career, which experiences were most formative in laying the foundation of your practice, and what advice would you offer to students who are in that phase?

    The early phase of my career was defined by struggle, humility, and relentless hard work. I vividly recall handling matters that brought in little financial reward but demanded every ounce of preparation and commitment. Those small victories—whether drafting pleadings late into the night or representing clients who had no one else to stand for them—taught me the real meaning of responsibility and the power of trust people place in their lawyer.

    To students, my advice is simple: there is no shortcut to success, and neither is there any alternative to hard work. Never cheat your client and always be honest. Believe in yourself, focus on building your skills and resilience in the early years, rather than chasing titles or monetary gains. The foundations you build now: discipline, diligence, and the ability to think critically, will carry you throughout your career. 

    This profession rewards patience and persistence far more than instant success.

    As an empanelled attorney for multiple foreign consulates and high commissions, you handle roles that require immense precision and discretion. How do you balance these legal nuances, and what challenges have you encountered in representing such esteemed clients?

    Being empanelled with a few of the foreign consulates, high commissions, and foreign missions in India itself is an honour and privilege, as very few practising advocates and firms get this opportunity and not all. Representing NRI clients in their legal disputes itself is challenging and a responsibility that goes beyond routine practice. Every communication, every piece of advice, has to be meticulously crafted, knowing that the stakes often extend beyond the client to international relations and reputation.

    The greatest challenge has been balancing urgency with accuracy. Foreign clients and NRIs operate on strict timelines, and there is no room for error. I have often worked overnight to deliver outcomes that meet both the legal requirements and the client expectations. These experiences, though demanding, have shaped my ability to remain calm under pressure and deliver with unwavering focus.

    Having made significant contributions to dispute resolution and commercial law, what emerging trends do you foresee in cross-border disputes and arbitration involving Indian companies over the next five years?

    In the coming years, I foresee arbitration becoming the preferred mode of dispute resolution for Indian companies engaged in cross-border business. The global push for speed and enforceability, coupled with India’s growing recognition as an arbitration hub, will make this trend even stronger. I also anticipate a rise in disputes around technology, data, and e-commerce as businesses continue to expand into digital markets.

    Another trend will be the increasing need for companies to become contract-conscious. Too often, businesses treat contracts as formalities rather than safeguards. In cross-border contexts, this can be catastrophic. The future belongs to companies that proactively manage risks, draft robust agreements, and embrace arbitration as a tool to secure their interests.

    Your commitment to legal education through judging moot courts and client counselling competitions is commendable. Which skills do you believe law students should prioritise to stay future-ready and uphold the high standards expected in today’s profession?

    The profession today demands much more than just knowledge of statutes. The most future-ready lawyers will be those who can think critically, research deeply, and communicate with clarity. In a world where technology is advancing rapidly, adaptability and tech-savviness will be key. Students must be prepared to embrace new fields such as fintech, AI, and compliance law, while still mastering the fundamentals of litigation and arbitration.

    Above all, integrity is the cornerstone of this profession. Skills can evolve and be learned, but values remain constant. A lawyer who is trusted for their honesty, dedication and commitment will always stand apart, regardless of the changes the profession undergoes.

    Looking back at your career, could you share one of the most challenging cases you’ve handled so far? What were the key complexities involved, and how did you navigate them?

    One of the most challenging cases I have handled in my career involved a transnational child custody dispute, where I was appointed by a City Council in the UK to represent the interests of a 14-month-old child who was placed under foster care. The case was uniquely sensitive—not only did it involve intricate questions of international jurisdiction and child welfare, but it also carried an immense emotional weight. My role was to secure an interim order for the safe transit of the child to India, which required balancing legal precision with humanitarian urgency.

    Convincing the District Court of First Instance to hear the matter on an urgent basis was no easy task. The odds were against us—procedural hurdles, the complexity of cross-border custody laws, and the natural caution courts exercise in such delicate matters. I vividly recall preparing the case under extraordinary time pressure, knowing that every moment’s delay had real-life consequences for a child’s future. The hearing was conducted on a working day between Diwali and the New Year, a period when courts are generally overburdened, which added another layer of difficulty.

    What made this matter truly defining was the responsibility it placed on me—not just as a lawyer, but as a human being. I had to persuade the court that this was not just another legal dispute but an urgent humanitarian concern that required immediate judicial intervention. Ultimately, the case taught me that persistence, empathy, and the ability to rise above procedural roadblocks are what define a lawyer in moments of true challenge. It remains etched in my memory as a reminder of why I chose this profession—to make a tangible difference when it matters the most.

    As a registered trademarks attorney, your expertise in intellectual property is widely recognised. How do you see IP laws evolving in India and globally, and what guidance would you give students aspiring to excel in this dynamic field, both in terms of skills and professional values?

    Intellectual property is one of the most dynamic areas of law today, both in India and globally. With the rise of digital markets, I foresee stronger frameworks for online infringement, greater protection of trade secrets, and increasing international harmonisation of IP laws. India, too, is rapidly maturing in this space, and the opportunities for young professionals are immense.

    For students aspiring to specialise in IP, my advice is to go beyond statutes and cultivate an understanding of industries like technology, pharmaceuticals, and media. IP law is about protecting innovation, and one cannot protect what one does not understand. At the same time, cultivate patience and precision—IP is often a long game where persistence and values matter as much as knowledge. Read landmark judgments on IP laws and get a hold of the principles decided by the courts in such judgments.

    Reflecting on your journey from studying law at Gujarat University to becoming a trusted advisor for consulates and leading corporates, you’ve taken on highly varied and demanding roles. How do you balance these professional responsibilities while maintaining your personal life and well-being?

    Balancing professional responsibilities with personal life has been one of my greatest struggles. In the early years, work consumed every waking hour, and personal time was a luxury I could not afford. But over time, I realised that sustainability in this profession requires more than just hard work—it requires balance, discipline, and self-care.

    Today, I consciously prioritise three things: utmost discipline in managing my time, delegation to empower my team, and detachment to ensure I don’t carry every professional battle home. My family has been my strongest anchor, reminding me of the importance of perspective. At the end of the day, success has meaning only when it is achieved without losing oneself in the process.

    Get in touch with Abhijeet Gathraj –

  • “Courtroom practice teaches you quickly that law is not just about theory but about how you apply it in real, practical situations.” – Shubhnit Hans, Founder & Managing Partner at Hans Law Associates.

    “Courtroom practice teaches you quickly that law is not just about theory but about how you apply it in real, practical situations.” – Shubhnit Hans, Founder & Managing Partner at Hans Law Associates.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Having over a decade of experience now, what were the initial years of your practice like? What inspired you to choose law as a career, and how did law school help shape the foundation of your professional journey?

    It’s been 10 years in this profession, yet the early days feel like just yesterday, when I was practicing in Delhi and learning to navigate the world of black and white. It didn’t take long to realize that this profession is far more about practicality than pure theory. Knowing the law and mastering your case file is essential, but equally important is understanding the judge, not personally, but in terms of their courtroom approach: their patterns, reactions, and preferences. From the very beginning, I developed the habit of sitting in court and observing judges closely. That practice, simple as it may seem, has proven invaluable throughout my journey as an advocate. 

    I come from a small town in Haryana called Karnal, where I completed my schooling. After that, I pursued my law degree at Amity University, Noida. My legal journey began with a litigation office in New Delhi, where I practiced for almost four years. In 2018, I moved to Chandigarh to start my own practice. As a first-generation lawyer, it was important for me to establish my name in my hometown, where I felt more connected and grounded. It wasn’t easy, there were no set plans, and no one in my family had a legal background. It all started when a cousin suggested corporate law while I was preparing for my 12th boards in 2010. I gave the entrance exams, got selected at Amity, and the rest unfolded from there.

    You began your career as an associate, handling a wide range of civil litigation and domestic arbitration matters. How did this early exposure influence your approach to complex disputes, and what key skills proved most valuable in the formative years of your practice?

    In the initial years of my practice as an associate, I was fortunate to be exposed to a wide range of civil litigation and domestic arbitration matters. This diversity of work taught me very early on that no two disputes are ever alike. Each case requires a tailored approach in terms of a legal strategy. What shaped me the most was learning how to balance theory with practicality. The law may be uniform, but its application depends on the facts, the forum, and often the perspective of the judge or tribunal. Observing court proceedings, understanding patterns of arguments, and seeing how small details could shift the direction of a case gave me a very grounded view of dispute resolution.

    As a first-generation lawyer, what motivated you to establish your independent practice? What vision did you have when you started, and how has it evolved over time?

    As a first-generation lawyer, what motivated me most to establish my own practice was the desire to build something independent, driven purely by merit, hard work, and client trust. Starting out, I had no legacy to rely upon and that became my greatest strength. It pushed me to focus on credibility, consistency, and results from the very beginning. My initial vision was quite simple: to create a practice that delivered practical, solution-oriented advice rather than just theoretical legal opinions and dragging each and every client to Court even if it could be settled outside the court. That was when Hans Law Associates was established. Over time, that vision has evolved into building a full-service firm where teamwork, innovation, and long-term client relationships are at the core.

    You have represented clients before the Punjab and Haryana High Court, consumer forums, RERA, and various tribunals. How has this diverse litigation experience enhanced your understanding of dispute resolution across different legal platforms?

    Representing clients before the Punjab & Haryana High Court, consumer forums, RERA, and various tribunals has given me a broad perspective on how dispute resolution functions across different platforms. Each forum has its own procedure, pace, and expectations, for instance, the High Court demands sharp legal reasoning and precedent-based arguments, while consumer forums and RERA focus more on quick, pragmatic relief to aggrieved parties. Ultimately, this cross-forum exposure has made me a more versatile advocate, able to approach disputes not just from a legal standpoint, but from a strategic, client-centric perspective.

    You have handled matters before the Haryana Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority, and several other tribunals. What unique challenges have you encountered in this specialized field, and how do you navigate them effectively?

    Handling matters before the HREAT, HRERA, Pkl, and other tribunals has been both challenging and rewarding. Real estate law, especially under the RERA framework, is indeed a booming area of practice. With rapid urbanization and increasing consumer awareness, disputes in this sector are growing both in volume and complexity. The unique challenges I’ve faced include balancing the interests of buyers and developers, staying updated on any recent precedents as it is a very new law and most importantly, ensuring enforcement of orders. While RERA was designed to be consumer-friendly, practical hurdles often arise in execution. I’ve found that navigating this space requires not only sound legal knowledge but also adaptability and persistence. This blend of legal precision and pragmatic follow-through has allowed me to add real value to clients in this fast-growing field.

    As a mediator at the Punjab and Haryana High Court, how do you see ADR evolving in India? In your experience, what advantages does mediation or arbitration offer compared to traditional litigation?

    As a mediator at the Punjab and Haryana High Court, I have witnessed how Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is rapidly evolving in India. With rising pendency in courts, ADR is no longer an alternative but an essential tool for timely and effective justice.

    The recent “Mediation for the Nation” drive initiated by the Hon’ble Supreme Court reflects this growing recognition. By encouraging parties to resolve disputes amicably, the judiciary has underlined mediation’s role in reducing litigation, promoting harmony, and ensuring quicker resolutions. I myself have seen a rise in settlements after the said initiative.

    In my experience, mediation preserves relationships and empowers parties to design their own solutions, while arbitration offers efficiency, confidentiality, and subject-matter expertise. Both provide speed, practicality, and satisfaction compared to traditional litigation that may take years. With institutional support and initiatives like Mediation for the Nation, ADR in India is poised to become a truly transformative mechanism for access to justice.

    You have drafted agreements for a variety of clients, including music and production companies as well as professionals like psychologists. What key challenges do you see in the entertainment sector, and how can these be addressed proactively through careful contract drafting?

    Drafting agreements in the entertainment sector brings its own set of unique challenges. Unlike traditional contracts, these often deal with creative rights, intellectual property, royalties, confidentiality, and moral rights, all of which can be highly sensitive and prone to disputes if not defined clearly. One of the biggest challenges is the ambiguity around ownership of content, whether it lies with the creator, the producer, or the platform. Another is the lack of awareness among artists and professionals about the long-term implications of exclusivity clauses, revenue-sharing models, and termination rights. Proactive solutions lie in clear, precise, and balanced drafting. 

    What advice would you give students aspiring to enter the legal profession, and what resources would you recommend to help them stay ahead in a constantly evolving field?

    My advice to students aspiring to enter the legal profession is to focus on fundamentals and be patient enough to adapt. Courtroom practice teaches you quickly that law is not just about theory but about how you apply it in real, practical situations. Developing habits like observing proceedings, reading judgments daily, and sharpening communication skills goes a long way. It’s a never ending learning process. I see a lot of individuals backing out from the profession as it may not satisfy you monetarily but once you understand the responsibilities that come with it, I am sure we are ready to go a long way. I’d also recommend building a mentor network and learning from senior advocates and peers. In a constantly evolving field, the ability to keep learning, unlearning, and relearning is the best resource you can carry with you.

    Balancing a demanding legal career with personal life can be challenging. How do you manage stress, maintain focus during high-stakes matters, and create balance between your professional and personal responsibilities?

    Balancing a demanding legal career with personal life is indeed challenging, but I’ve learned that discipline and perspective makes the difference. During high-stakes matters, I manage stress by preparing thoroughly as confidence in your case reduces anxiety. I also practice detachment after court hours, giving time to family, fitness, and spirituality, which keeps me grounded. For me, balance isn’t about strict separation but about ensuring that both professional duties and personal responsibilities get the attention they deserve. This balance not only helps me stay focused but also makes me more effective in my practice.

    Get in touch with Shubhnit Hans –

  • “Technology today is the key source to research and development, a way by which people can now know, read, understand the aspects and issues in real estate and business transactions.” – Deepanshu Garg, Founder of Legal Assist.

    “Technology today is the key source to research and development, a way by which people can now know, read, understand the aspects and issues in real estate and business transactions.” – Deepanshu Garg, Founder of Legal Assist.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    With your specialization in real estate transactions and property registration, what initially drew you to this niche area of law, and how has your interest evolved over the years?

    I have grown up in a family of lawyers, who are involved in this niche practice of law for the last 40 years. I am 4th generation in this side of practice. The environment, the discussions in family and social gatherings, watching of news roam around real estate and the law; the knowledge amongst citizens on the aspect of “how important is legal consultation before dealing in real estate transactions”; the growing real estate disputes in the family as well as in the market; the challenges faced by the citizens in the property registration process; the lack of future estate planning; etc., which gave me a good kick to enter into law, focus on this side and to scale up the practice to new boundaries.

    Through your practice, you have often highlighted the gap between property registration and ownership rights. What are the most common misconceptions people have when dealing with property transactions in India?

    From the very starting, I have strongly believed that people are unaware or ignorant of about the most important aspect when dealing with property transactions i.e. “Title Legal Due Diligence”.  This is the “laying foundation”. The money which people pay to buy a property, what exactly is that money for – is it the physical structure or the land on spot? Practically speaking, for people these are the two aspects only but wait, that value is actually weighed from “title ownership documents” which people execute and get registered. And that’s the major misconception prevailing amongst people. Even law clearly says, “Buyers beware”. If there is a discrepancy in the documents, the value you paid for that property is nothing more than a zero. 

    Another related misconception is that people believe drafting a document when dealing with property is “basic and regular and can be drafted on a set performa”, but no, there is no set performa prescribed anywhere in law. Any such document is a “contract” amongst the parties which govern their transaction and has to be drafted on case-to-case basis and on specific circumstances surrounding the entire transaction, overall considering the law.

    As the Founder of Legal Assist, a digital platform dedicated to property and business legal services, what inspired you to establish your practice, what were the key challenges you encountered in building it, and how do you envision technology transforming the future of property law practice? 

    Since many years now, the property registration appointment process has been made online, which is not only cumbersome but time taking too. It is not easy for a layman to take an appointment for registration. Further, we daily see the growing disputes arising in real estate transactions and business running. We further see the irregularities and unprofessional surroundings in the conveyancing field of practice of law.

    All this triggered me to develop an online platform where I can render my knowledge on the issues circumventing the real estate industry & transactions, property registrations, business industry & transactions, to help them and to make them cautious of their legal rights, obligations and safeguards. The major key challenges were to not be able to cover “all aspects/ issues” since they are vast in nature and the other was to actually make people believe in “what are the most important aspects” in real estate and business transactions. 

    Technology today is the key source to research and development,  a way by which people can now know, read, understand the aspects and issues in real estate and business transactions. Moreover, technology is the source to transparency and accountability, as by way of technology, things are not far away to come under one roof and better control of the government, assuring people more safety, trust and “ease of doing business”.

    Your work involves complex areas such as estate planning, inheritance, wills, and succession disputes. What are the most pressing issues clients face in matters relating to inheritance, and how do you guide them through emotionally sensitive cases?

    The most pressing issues I see are the disputes arising among the legal heirs after the death of deceased person who died intestate or without any future planning or without informing about his/ her assets to his/ her legal heirs and further, disputes arising in cases even where a deceased  left a WILL/ any other testament.

    Our approach of guidance is focussed initially on amicable settlement through mediation and consultation and if not this, by suggesting an equitable outcome, after considering the law from all four corners and the circumstances in hand, in a manner which rules out future disputes.

    Estate and succession planning is often overlooked until a dispute arises. What practical steps do you believe individuals should take early to avoid future litigation?

    Life is so uncertain these days. The most important aspect which I feel today is for a person to have a must is to initially have a broad family discussion amongst all members and align amicably whatever a person owns amongst his/ her family members. Then I believe in an equalization policy amongst members. If all the members accept this discussion, the family shall execute an Memorandum of Family Settlement incorporating the contents of such amicable understanding. Further, members, in such case or otherwise if family amicable understanding is not arrived at or possible, shall compulsorily make a testament/ WILL for writing down their wish in “clear terms” to be followed by each member after the death of the testator.

    If there’s less tunning amongst the family members and the above aspect cannot be worked out, then the best possible way is to distribute the assets during the lifetime only so that the respective beneficiary holds the same without any claim or objection from others.

    As someone who started with internships at leading law firms and later built independent practice, what lessons from those formative years still influence your approach to law and property related disputes?

    Clear understanding of law and being upgraded with current legal precedents; using the tool of mediation and conciliation; not merely focussing on making money but alongside guiding the client with result oriented approach. However small the matter or dispute may be, 100% efforts and hard work shall always be put.

    Property and inheritance laws are constantly evolving with new judicial precedents and legislative changes. How do you stay ahead of these developments, and what recent trends do you see shaping this field in India?

    My approach is to give daily an hour or more in watching the news, studying current market scenarios, blogs, judgments. By this, I am able to incorporate and utilize this knowledge in my practice practically.

    The upcoming centralized digitalized unique platform where property registration, all connected data such as data from Municipal Corporation/ Development Authority etc. will be inter-connectedly available and will be incorporated with ease of doing business policy of the government. The development of digital courts for NI Act cases, MSME Samadhan Portal, Pre-litigation process in commercial cases, Mediation Act, etc. are great initiatives of the government for early disposal of recovery matters. By such initiative and upcoming legal developments, people are becoming more aware about their rights and obligations.

    With such a diverse practice covering real estate, inheritance, litigation, and consultancy, what advice would you give to young lawyers who want to build a specialized yet well-rounded career in property and succession law?

    Thorough understanding of the real estate market and laws covering this industry is a must. The initial aspect is to be able to practically understand the “trends” of “disputes” in industry, thereby doing research in the light of actual circumstances and find out all the possible solutions to the problem and then picking up the best reasonable one. What is the best approach “practically” must be the concern always.

    Get in touch with Deepanshu Garg –

  • “Litigation is not a one-time choice; it’s something you must choose every single day despite the distractions and difficulties.” – Yashwant Singh, Advocate -on- Record at the Supreme Court of India.

    “Litigation is not a one-time choice; it’s something you must choose every single day despite the distractions and difficulties.” – Yashwant Singh, Advocate -on- Record at the Supreme Court of India.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Growing up in Siliguri, far from the conventional legal hubs, what influenced your decision to pursue law, and how did your years at Chanakya National Law University shape your early perspective on the profession?

    Growing up in Siliguri and studying at Don Bosco School shaped me in many ways. At home, the environment was always encouraging. I was an average student in academics, but active in debates, quizzes, and other co-curricular activities. With the benefit of hindsight, those experiences built my confidence- something I still consider as my biggest asset. Initially, I was preparing for a career in engineering, but somewhere along the way, I realized it wasn’t something I could truly be passionate about. My parents stood by me wholeheartedly. It was then that I decided to choose law.

    My years at CNLU were truly defining. Coming from a younger NLU, we were always conscious that we had to work harder to stand out. A new institution brought with it both challenges and opportunities, and much like our university, we were eager to carve out our own space in the larger scheme of things. Those 5 years taught me the importance of taking ownership of one’s plans and seeing them through. Most importantly, CNLU gave me the final clarity that litigation – with all its pros and cons- was the path I really wanted to pursue. That conviction has guided almost every professional decision I have made thereon.

    In the initial phase of your career, you worked closely with the litigation team for over four years. What were some of the most formative experiences during this time, particularly in handling matters related to taxation, constitutional, and regulatory law?

    I began my career with the litigation team at PDS Legal, New Delhi, under Mr. Tarun Gulati. I had interned there during law school and was fortunate to receive a pre-placement offer in my final year. As someone new to both the city and the profession, I found tremendous support from my team and colleagues, who helped me settle in and grow.

    The foundation of my advocacy was built at PDS Legal- right from drafting and preparing a matter to eventually presenting it in court. If there is one lesson I particularly carry from those years, it is that effort alone is not enough; planning and organisation are equally critical. Clients and colleagues alike value a professional who is methodical in approach. My seniors were patient and supportive, and my peers were always helpful, which kept the momentum going in what could otherwise have been a daunting phase. Looking back, my time at PDS Legal not only gave me the skills but also the confidence and clarity to eventually venture out and establish my independent practice.

    Transitioning from a structured law firm environment to establishing your independent practice in 2021 must have been a pivotal moment. What motivated this move, and what were the initial challenges and learnings in setting up on your own?

    I had always wanted to establish my own practice. The satisfaction of building something of your own is unparalleled, and that desire kept me motivated. At the same time, my early days in litigation taught me that there is only so much you can prepare from the sidelines – you have to take the plunge, start from scratch and build gradually.

    The switch was not easy. Coming from a law firm where I was constantly working on heavy matters to suddenly having only a handful of briefs was a stark contrast. It is natural to have doubts and question your decision. But if you ask me, the real trick is to hang in there. Independent litigation is a choice you make every single day, despite the distractions and the reasons that may tempt you to leave. In the end, this profession rewards perseverance and patience. If you stay the course and keep developing yourself, things do fall into place.

    Since then, you have handled a wide spectrum of commercial, criminal, and civil disputes. Could you share one of the most challenging cases from your independent practice that significantly strengthened your confidence as a litigator?

    It is difficult to pinpoint a single case that became the fulcrum of my practice. For me, it has been a series of moments that reassured me I had made the right choice in setting up independently. One such matter was when a doctor’s license to practice had been suspended by a High Court in a contempt proceeding. I had the opportunity to lead the matter in the Supreme Court, and we managed to secure the desired relief. That case gave me something invaluable at that stage- acknowledgment, financial stability, and, most importantly, confidence as a litigator.

    Another turning point was when I first started handling criminal matters. Having had little exposure to criminal law during my time at the firm, those cases initially felt daunting. But they also reinforced a simple truth: in litigation, effort makes all the difference. If you are willing to put in that extra bit of preparation, you will eventually find your footing. Both these experiences strengthened my belief that perseverance pays, and that independent practice, though challenging, was the right path for me.

    In 2025, you achieved the distinction of becoming an Advocate-on-Record. What inspired you to pursue this qualification, how was your preparation journey, and in what ways has the AoR title impacted your practice and professional opportunities?

    Becoming an Advocate-on-Record was always a clear goal for me once I started my independent practice. Practising in Delhi makes you realize very early how competitive the profession is, and that the Supreme Court is the final stop for matters from across the country. When you pitch for mandates in the Supreme Court, the first question often asked is- Are you an AoR? If your answer is no, it does have a bearing, especially with clients outside Delhi. Qualifying the exam, therefore, gives you that foot-in-the-door and instills an additional layer of confidence in clients.

    Preparing for the exam definitely demands seriousness. Like most who clear it, I had to balance practice with study, which sometimes may get a bit difficult. I was fortunate to have friends and seniors who supported me—whether with study materials or helping me manage my matters. But I believe one thing must be acknowledged: preparing for the AoR exam is in itself an enriching experience. Irrespective of the result, you come out a better professional.

    Alongside your practice, you often engage with law students through moots and guest lectures. How do you view the balance between active practice and mentoring the next generation of lawyers?

    I genuinely enjoy interacting with students- there’s always a fresh perspective and a new learning to take away. Having been on that side of the spectrum myself, I know how good it is to have people from the profession engage with you. Judging moots or delivering guest lectures is also a great way to sharpen my own legal acumen, whenever you discuss an issue, you inevitably end up learning too. Balancing it with active practice is not always easy, but whenever I get the opportunity, I truly enjoy taking it up.

    Looking ahead, with your growing independent chamber and experience across varied domains, what vision do you hold for your practice over the next decade, and what advice would you offer to young lawyers aspiring to build a career in litigation?

    For me, every professional is a brand in himself, and the journey is really about improving that brand each day. My vision over the next few years is to evolve as a reliable practitioner and to build a team that is known for being effective and dependable in the legal community. Reputation in this profession takes years to build but can be lost in a moment, so the aim is to grow steadily, sincerely- and also to enjoy the process along the way.

    I don’t think I am in a position to give advice, but I can share my story. If there’s one thing I have learnt, it is that this profession rewards patience, perseverance, and planning. At the same time, litigation is not a one-time choice; it’s something you must choose every single day despite the distractions and difficulties. And while doing all of this, it is equally important to have fun and enjoy the process- because that’s what makes the journey worthwhile.

    With new legal developments and judicial precedents emerging almost daily, how do you keep yourself updated on the latest trends and ensure that your practice stays aligned with the evolving legal landscape?

    For me, curiosity and social consciousness are an asset in this profession. A lawyer should always be curious about the things happening around him, both inside and outside the courtroom. I genuinely enjoy reading, and I feel any lawyer who enjoys reading will always have an edge. We live in an age where information is power, and with technology, access to that information has become much easier than it used to be. There are plenty of platforms today that help us stay updated with what’s happening around.

    But beyond books and screens, our courts themselves are exciting places to learn. I’ve often found that indulging in conversations in the corridors, sometimes over a simple cup of coffee, leaves you walking away with more insight than you bargained for. That in itself sounds like a good deal ! 

    Get in touch with Yashwant Singh –

  • “I began without grand design, yet my early immersion in constitutional law revealed something compelling: a practice that could simultaneously satisfy intellectual rigor and serve consequential social purpose.” – Siddharth Sijoria, Advocate at Supreme Court of India.

    “I began without grand design, yet my early immersion in constitutional law revealed something compelling: a practice that could simultaneously satisfy intellectual rigor and serve consequential social purpose.” – Siddharth Sijoria, Advocate at Supreme Court of India.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Looking back, what motivated you to pursue law as a career? Did you have a particular vision for yourself when you first started, and were there any formative incidents or mentors who significantly shaped your path?

    Law discovered me rather than the reverse. During my formative years, I found myself deeply absorbed in poetry and literature—disciplines that demand precision in interpretation, sensitivity to nuance, and the ability to wield language as both artistic expression and analytical instrument. Law emerged as the natural culmination of these inclinations, a field where critical reasoning and linguistic precision determine outcomes of profound consequence.

    As a first-generation lawyer, I navigated without inherited wisdom. My education came through careful observation and, ultimately, through the extraordinary fortune of mentorship. During law school, I joined the chambers of the late T.R. Andhyarujina as an intern, spending afternoons and evenings there while attending classes. After graduation, I transitioned to full-time practice under his guidance. His influence proved transformational.

    Mr. Andhyarujina embodied a particular philosophy: that sustainable excellence emerges not from momentary brilliance but from disciplined preparation. His observation—”What a brilliant mind accomplishes in twenty minutes, a methodical mind achieves in thirty, provided it commits to the work”—became foundational to my approach.

    I began without grand design, yet my early immersion in constitutional law revealed something compelling: a practice that could simultaneously satisfy intellectual rigor and serve consequential social purpose. That understanding continues to inform my work today.

    Your LL.M. at Central European University offered a deeply comparative and international perspective on constitutional law. How did this global exposure influence your understanding of Indian jurisprudence?

    My constitutional law foundation was established during my Supreme Court years, working on landmark cases that revealed the sophistication of Indian jurisprudence—particularly our Basic Structure Doctrine, which represents one of India’s most profound contributions to global constitutional thought. When I decided to pursue advanced study, I received offers from several prestigious institutions but chose Central European University, which offered me a scholarship and possessed an unparalleled focus on comparative constitutional analysis.

    The academic experience was transformative. My thesis examined how the Basic Structure Doctrine operates across India, Colombia, and Benin—three democracies grappling with similar challenges of constitutional preservation against majoritarian excess. What emerged was striking: Indian constitutional jurisprudence commands extraordinary international respect. Our Supreme Court’s reasoning isn’t merely cited abroad—it actively shapes constitutional interpretation in courts from Bogotá to Johannesburg.

    This revelation fundamentally altered my understanding of constitutional practice. Indian constitutional law isn’t an isolated national phenomenon but part of a global conversation about democracy, rights, and institutional design. The comparative methodology I learned—analyzing how similar constitutional challenges are resolved across different legal traditions—has become central to how I approach constitutional interpretation. It revealed that while constitutional texts may be national, constitutional principles increasingly transcend borders.

    Working under T.R. Andhyarujina exposed you to landmark constitutional cases. How did that experience shape your litigation philosophy, particularly in handling complex constitutional matters?

    Mr. Andhyarujina approached constitutional interpretation with scientific rigor. He demonstrated that constitutional adjudication represents not rhetorical exercise but systematic methodology—testing state action against established principles while defining the proper relationship between governmental authority and individual liberty.

    The cases themselves were instructive. Yakub Memon v. State of Maharashtra engaged fundamental questions of due process in death penalty jurisprudence, particularly the safeguards surrounding curative and mercy petitions at the final stage. Subramanian Swamy v. Union of India tested the constitutional validity of criminal defamation, requiring the Court to balance free expression with the reputational rights protected under Article 21, and ultimately upholding criminal defamation as a reasonable restriction. State of Karnataka v. Selvi J. Jayalalitha reaffirmed that even a sitting Chief Minister enjoys no immunity from prosecution, emphasizing constitutional accountability. RBI v. Jayantilal N. Mistryadvanced transparency under the RTI Act, holding that the RBI, as a public regulator, cannot shield information behind claims of fiduciary duty. Union of India v. V. Sriharan clarified the distribution of remission powers, underscoring Union primacy in matters implicating terrorism or CBI investigation. Nabam Rebia v. Deputy Speaker addressed the Governor’s discretionary powers in state politics, reaffirming that—save in narrow constitutional exceptions—Governors cannot act independently of ministerial advice, thereby strengthening federalism and the principle of separation of powers.

    Each matter reinforced constitutional law’s practical consequences. Whether protecting individual liberty, defending democratic discourse, ensuring governmental accountability, or preserving federal balance, our arguments carried implications extending far beyond immediate parties. That methodology—meticulous preparation, analytical precision, unwavering constitutional fidelity—continues to guide my approach to complex constitutional matters today.

    After completing your master’s degree, you returned to India and chose to start practice independently. What motivated you to take that path, and what were the major challenges you faced in building your practice?

    I had always aspired to establish my own independent practice. In my view, every lawyer, sooner or later, has to  build their own chamber to truly establish themselves in the profession. Having already gained valuable experience at the Supreme Court and various High Courts, I felt it was the right time to take on greater responsibility. When you practice independently, you are directly accountable to your client—successes and failures alike rest on your shoulders. Unlike in a traditional chamber, where you are guided step by step in filing, drafting, or tracking matters, going independent compels you to learn these processes innately while carrying the full weight of client expectations.

    I went on to establish offices at the Madhya Pradesh High Court, primarily at the Gwalior and Indore Benches, while continuing my work in Delhi. Over the years, I have also been entrusted with significant responsibilities. I was appointed as Additional Advocate for the State of Maharashtra in the Krishna River water dispute following the formation of Telangana. I have been empanelled as Counsel for the State of Madhya Pradesh, and I also regularly represent institutions and industry bodies, including the Indian Association of Hallmarking Centres and other organisations connected with hallmarking regulation. Each of these experiences has enriched my practice and strengthened my resolve to continue balancing litigation with advisory work across diverse forums.

    After building a successful independent practice, what led you to join Clavius Legal? How do you envision the firm’s role in India’s evolving legal landscape?

    After years building independent practice—including state government representations and my appointment as Additional Advocate for Maharashtra in the Krishna River dispute—I reached a threshold where the matters I was handling demanded institutional sophistication commensurate with their complexity and global dimensions.

    Clavius Legal represented something distinctive in the Indian legal market: a boutique firm with genuinely international standards and integrated practice architecture. Aside from a very busy arbitration and white-collar crime practice that is marked by both scale and the magnitude of mandates we handle, we are building a public law, regulatory, and policy practice that increasingly intersects with our dispute resolution work. As India becomes increasingly central to the global economy, legal challenges no longer respect traditional practice boundaries. Modern disputes involving sovereign asset recovery actions, multinational enforcement investigations, or cross-border regulatory matters require teams capable of seamlessly integrating constitutional law, dispute resolution, regulatory expertise, and international legal cooperation.

    The firm’s vision aligns perfectly with contemporary realities. Today’s complex transnational matters—whether involving sovereign states, multinational corporations, or international arbitration—demand scale and sophistication that isolated practitioners simply cannot provide. Working as part of global teams on complex transnational cases has become the norm rather than exception. Our integrated model reflects this understanding: constitutional principles inform commercial disputes; regulatory compliance intersects with international law; dispute resolution increasingly involves multiple jurisdictions and enforcement mechanisms.

    As Practice Co-Chair for both Dispute Resolution and Public Law, Regulatory & Policy, my role involves ensuring that these different practice areas work seamlessly together. When we’re handling a cross-border investigation, for instance, it might simultaneously involve regulatory compliance issues, dispute resolution, and constitutional questions about procedural fairness.

    Alongside litigation, you have maintained an active presence in writing, teaching, and research. How do these engagements complement your courtroom practice?

    In my early years, I often read columns by eminent lawyers who could distill complex legal issues into short, sharp pieces. When I first attempted to write during my college days, I realized how difficult it actually was. Over time, and after several failed attempts, I began publishing articles in newspapers. That discipline of concise writing has greatly helped me in practice, especially in drafting synopses for the High Court and Supreme Court, where the ability to present arguments briefly and persuasively is crucial.

    I have always believed that writing, research, and teaching are integral to legal practice. They keep one updated on developments in the law while also strengthening analytical clarity. Even today, I remain engaged in such work—most recently with the Commonwealth Lawyers Association and the Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar Centre, where we are working on a series of publications to mark 75 years of the Indian Constitution. Academic engagement and international conferences also provide opportunities to exchange ideas and learn from colleagues worldwide, which in turn enriches my courtroom advocacy.

    Teaching forces intellectual discipline—you cannot explain constitutional principles clearly unless you have mastered them yourself. Writing requires precision of expression. Both skills prove indispensable in advocacy, where clarity is paramount and time is often scarce.

    How does your international engagement, particularly through the Commonwealth Lawyers Association, enhance your practice?

    My role as Co-Chair of the Young Commonwealth Lawyers Organisation provided invaluable exposure to legal challenges across fifty-four jurisdictions while building networks essential for contemporary practice. The position involved creating platforms for professional dialogue, organizing training programs, and facilitating knowledge exchange.

    The collaboration opportunities proved particularly meaningful. Meeting the President of the Gambian Bar at our Goa conference led to involvement in constitutional amendment projects and subsequently to representing the Bar against Maiden Pharmaceuticals after contaminated cough syrup exports tragically caused over seventy children’s deaths in Gambia. These experiences underscore how international engagement enriches domestic practice while building capabilities essential for cross-border matters.

    This global perspective has become indispensable in modern practice. Matters routinely involve multiple legal systems—whether handling sovereign asset recovery actions, managing international arbitrations, or coordinating transnational enforcement proceedings. Working as part of global legal teams requires a deep understanding of how constitutional principles, due process requirements, and legal procedures translate across jurisdictions.

    Your practice spans constitutional law, criminal law, arbitration, and regulatory disputes. How does your constitutional grounding influence your approach across these varied areas?

    For me, the Constitution is not confined to writ petitions—it is the foundation that underpins every area of law. Whether I am arguing a criminal matter, an arbitration, or a regulatory dispute, I see the Constitution as the lens through which questions of fairness, due process, and accountability are assessed.

    In criminal cases, constitutional protections—like liberty, dignity, and safeguards against abuse of process—guide how I build defenses. Due process requirements are particularly crucial when representing individuals in white-collar investigations or enforcement proceedings, where constitutional safeguards must be rigorously protected against arbitrary state action. In arbitration and regulatory disputes, constitutional values inform arguments about equality, reasonableness, or the limits of executive power when regulatory aspects are involved.

    Even highly technical cases, such as hallmarking compliance or river water disputes, ultimately return to constitutional principles: how authority is exercised, whether discretion is checked, and whether justice is delivered consistently with rule of law.

    This constitutional grounding provides a unifying framework across diverse practice areas. Modern legal challenges increasingly span multiple disciplines—a regulatory investigation might involve constitutional law, enforcement proceedings, and policy advocacy simultaneously.

    What has been among your most challenging cases, and what lessons did they offer about modern legal practice?

    Every case brings its own challenges, but two stand out for me personally. The December 2021 nationwide protests by hallmarking centers presented extraordinary challenges. When the Bureau of Indian Standards suddenly imposed stringent compliance requirements—demanding costly upgrades while vesting broad discretionary authority in regulators—the entire industry faced potential shutdown. Courts typically hesitate to intervene in technical regulatory matters, yet representing an entire industry carries immense responsibility. Securing comprehensive protection from the Delhi High Court provided crucial relief during a critical period.

    Another case involved defending an individual falsely implicated in criminal proceedings. Drawing on Paramveer Singh Saini v. Baljit Singh—which mandates preserving police station CCTV footage to prevent custodial abuse—I convinced the Madhya Pradesh High Court to direct production of crucial evidence. The case illustrated how constitutional protections, when effectively invoked, can provide genuine relief against injustice while reinforcing due process fundamentals.

    Both matters demonstrated essential lessons about contemporary practice. Effective advocacy increasingly requires understanding technical regulatory frameworks alongside constitutional protections. Moreover, the scale and complexity of modern legal challenges make collaboration across practice areas not merely beneficial but necessary.

    What advice would you offer young lawyers aspiring to excellence in litigation and public law?

    Legal advice cannot be universal—every practitioner navigates unique circumstances and opportunities. However, certain principles prove consistently valuable. Young lawyers must cultivate genuine confidence grounded in rigorous preparation. Establish clear professional vision and develop systematic approaches for achieving defined objectives.

    Preparation remains paramount in litigation. Master both factual details and legal doctrine comprehensively. I learned through experience never to study only provisions directly relevant to immediate arguments—judges frequently pose questions whose answers lie in statutory sections you might otherwise overlook. Complete command of governing law and factual circumstances enables confident responses to both complex inquiries and seemingly simple questions.

    Cultivate disciplined reading habits, careful observation skills, and systematic preparation methodologies. Seek meaningful mentorship—finding seniors willing to teach makes a profound difference, though such opportunities often involve timing and persistence.

    Most importantly for contemporary practice, embrace collaborative approaches. Modern legal work transcends traditional boundaries. Constitutional challenges require understanding of regulatory frameworks; white-collar defense involves international enforcement cooperation; policy advocacy often connects to enforcement proceedings. Working as part of global teams on complex transnational cases demands ability to collaborate seamlessly across practice areas while maintaining doctrinal precision and constitutional grounding.

    Above all, remain perpetually curious about legal developments and committed to continuous learning.

    How do you maintain perspective and balance in such a demanding profession?

    Constitutional law provides inherent perspective. Regular engagement with fundamental questions of governance, liberty, and justice situates individual cases—regardless of complexity—within larger frameworks of professional purpose and social consequence.

    I sustain balance through continued teaching, writing, and mentoring activities. These pursuits remind me that legal practice ultimately serves purposes transcending individual professional achievement—service to clients, to institutional integrity, and to constitutional democracy itself.

    The collaborative nature of modern practice also helps. Complex matters require coordination across multiple disciplines, transforming pressure into shared intellectual engagement. Whether ensuring due process protections in enforcement proceedings or defending constitutional principles in regulatory matters, this collegial approach makes demanding challenges stimulating rather than merely stressful.

    Ultimately, remembering that constitutional law concerns human dignity and democratic governance provides both grounding and meaning beyond professional success. That larger purpose sustains one through the most demanding cases while reinforcing why this work matters.

    Get in touch with Siddharth Sijoria –

  • “Every other legal challenge is simply a puzzle that must be solved, and there’s always a solution!” – Meghana Aggarwal, Independent Legal Advisor.

    “Every other legal challenge is simply a puzzle that must be solved, and there’s always a solution!” – Meghana Aggarwal, Independent Legal Advisor.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    What inspired you to pursue a career in law? Was there a defining moment or influence that steered you in this direction?

    Having an analytical mind, I tend to find reason in, and a solution to everything. From my early-teen years, the idea of problem-solving always seemed appealing. When you add to that my love for reading, language and interpretation, a career in law was an easy and natural decision.  

    What was your experience like at Georgetown University Law Centre while pursuing your Master of Laws, and what motivated your choice to specialize in Energy and Antitrust law?

    A year at Georgetown was an immensely fulfilling and transformational experience. I had only two years of work-experience under my belt at the time, and I was able to exponentially build on that experience. Most of the courses I studied were based on discussions around practical issues and current affairs. Solution-oriented thinking and discussion was not just encouraged but mandated. Additionally, as most of the students in the LLM course were also international students with several years of work experience, the discourse was truly informative and enlightening not just professionally, but culturally as well. It was especially interesting to engage in conversation with people of different nationalities and learn how their culture shaped and continues to shape the legal landscape in their country.

    The choice to pursue energy and antirust at the time was motivated by several factors; I had prior experience of working in those sectors in India, the principles of energy and antitrust remain similar through the globe, and the robust regulatory framework in the United States. It was my intention to continue working in commercial law, so it was an apt choice. Since then, even though my area of practice has evolved beyond energy and antirust, the learning and experience from Georgetown are constant aids in my work.

    You began your career working on matters before the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, particularly involving tariff disputes and State Electricity Regulatory Commissions. What were some of the formative experiences during this time that deepened your understanding of the energy sector and shaped your legal career?

    The energy sector was a completely unknown domain for me when I began my career, which meant that every aspect of the sector was new. However, the most challenging and fascinating aspect was the sheer amount of technical knowledge and understanding of the sector that was required to be able to effectively deliver on a matter. We would often joke that we learn more engineering than law in this sector!

    After gaining substantial experience working with leading law firms and Senior Advocates, you eventually set up your own independent practice. What drove this transition, and what challenges did you encounter in the early stages of establishing yourself?

    The decision to work independently was a result of wanting to do something different. Having gained experience in chamber practice and firms, I wasn’t ready to go in-house but was sure that I wanted to expand work outside of a typical firm set-up. It definitely has been and continues to be challenging in almost every aspect imaginable! The most interesting challenge I faced in the early stages was getting used to being directly accountable to clients, as opposed to being part of tiered set-up in an office. Additionally, working independently means that you don’t say no to any kind of work, regardless of the fact that you may not have prior experience in similar subject-matter. Therefore, you are almost swimming in the deep-end, as the effort, motivation and discipline are completely different when the responsibility of generating business and delivering on a client’s expectations are solely on you.

    Having advised clients across a wide range of sectors including EPC, Energy, Telecom, Software, AI, and General Corporate, any common challenge(s) that unites all the sectors?

    The only common challenge that truly unites all sectors is demanding clients! Building client relationships, delivering on and managing client expectations is crucial to the legal profession. Every client is demanding, sometimes without truly understanding the complexities of the issue at hand. Every other legal challenge is simply a puzzle that must be solved, and there’s always a solution! 

    In your work with the UAE telecom regulator on drafting the policy for Radio Frequency (RF) drive testing, how did you navigate the legal and technical complexities, especially around national compliance, data privacy, and telecom operators’ requirements? 

    Well, the answer to this is a fairly simple and obvious one, really. We worked in collaboration with a global consulting firm, and the team responsible for executing this project comprised highly skilled experts from the legal and regulatory domain. Numerous discussions and iterations of the policy over months of work lead to policy that is currently in force in the UAE. This, for me, was one of the most exciting projects as a lawyer, as instead of always learning and interpreting the law, I was writing it (albeit for a different jurisdiction)!

    For young lawyers aspiring to build a career in law and/or and independent practice, what advice would you offer? Are there specific skills, areas of focus, or resources you consider essential for excelling in this field?

    There are several skills that may be useful in this profession, however the most important one in my opinion is the ability to learn. One must always be open to learning from any and every source, especially since law is one of the most dynamic professions ever and affords us the opportunity to not restrict ourselves to one sector only.   

    Practicing law can be both intellectually demanding and time-intensive. How do you maintain a healthy balance between your professional responsibilities and personal life? What are your favourite ways to unwind after a long day?

    The beauty of working independently is that one is only answerable to the client, so as long as work gets done, one can decide their own hours! Many people make their work their identity and that was all I had seen of lawyers when I was much younger in the profession. I wasn’t going to allow myself to do that, so I continue to create a slow, simple and full life that allows me time for hobbies and such! As for unwinding after a long day, it always includes a good meal and some music or a show/movie. 

    Get in touch with Meghana Aggarwal –

  • “In the legal profession, you remain a student for life, the moment you stop learning is the moment you stop growing.” – Shivansh Soni,  Associate Partner at Zentrum Law Partners.

    “In the legal profession, you remain a student for life, the moment you stop learning is the moment you stop growing.” – Shivansh Soni,  Associate Partner at Zentrum Law Partners.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Your legal journey spans a wide range of practice areas. Looking back, what initially inspired you to pursue a career in law? How did your education at the National Law Institute University, Bhopal lay the foundation for your professional growth, and what enabled you to pursue litigation?

    I had always aspired to join the defence services or become a professional athlete. However, a few months into my 11th standard, I realized that science and mathematics never truly interested me. Juggling academics with my sporting commitments seemed futile, and I eventually decided to switch to commerce for my 12th board exams. This shift effectively closed the door on a future in the armed forces. With no strong pull towards any particular subject, becoming a lawyer in the Army emerged as the only practical path forward—and that’s how my journey into the field of law began.

    Having spent my entire school life immersed in playing tennis and football, I was never much of a bookworm, nor did I venture into co-curricular activities like debating or writing. Naturally, the transition to NLIU Bhopal was overwhelming in the initial few trimesters. NLIU had a vibrant culture of mooting and debating, attracting some of the brightest minds from across the country, making it a place that truly challenged and fostered growth. It was only towards the end of my second year, after I had fractured my leg, that I finally participated in a national moot court competition. Although our team lost in the semi-finals, the experience proved to be a stepping stone that changed my outlook entirely, it finally felt like fitting in. From that moment on, I immersed myself fully in everything NLIU had to offer, from participating in moots, ADR competitions, parliamentary debate and internships at law firms, organisations, and chambers of advocates and senior advocates. I explored them all. 

    A defining moment came during my internship with an Advocate-on-Record, where I had the opportunity to work on the Sahara Case before the Hon’ble Supreme Court. Witnessing Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal’s arguments firsthand captivated me and truly inspired me to pursue litigation. 

    Having explored various areas of legal practice through internships and competitions, I consciously decided not to sit for campus placements and instead commit to a career in litigation. As fate would have it, four months before graduation, a senior I had met during an internship connected me with Advocate Jai Sahai Endlaw, who was looking to hire his first junior. Three months before graduation, I received confirmation—securing the next step in my journey and allowing me to truly enjoy my final trimester at NLIU.

    In the formative years of your career, you worked closely with several prominent Advocates and a Senior Advocate. What were some of the key takeaways from those mentorships, and how did those early experiences shape your litigation style, influence your professional values, and help you diversify your expertise across such varied legal domains over time?

    Naturally, I wasn’t fully prepared for the challenges that lay ahead. Moving to a Tier-1 city on a litigation salary, coupled with the relentless workload of a busy chamber, often left me questioning myself. However, it was the growth and learning I could see within myself under Jai Sir’s guidance that kept me going. Being the only junior during the initial months had its own exhausting drawbacks, but in hindsight, the exposure and opportunities I received were unparalleled compared to any of my batchmates at that time. Beyond his deep subject knowledge, it was Jai Sir’s meticulous approach to case preparation and his courtroom demeanour that became lifelong lessons for me. Most importantly, it was the trust he placed in me that made all the difference. Within just one week into the profession, I was entrusted to argue an application before the District Court. By the end of my two years in his office, I had cross-examined witnesses, concluded final arguments, and independently handled pro bono matters—experiences that gave me immense confidence and cemented my decision to pursue litigation.

    Building on that foundation and experience, I decided to work with a Senior Advocate as the next step before eventually starting my own independent practice. Consequently, after sending tailored emails to few seniors whom I had observed at the Delhi High Court, I was fortunate to be given an opportunity by Senior Advocate Amarjit Singh Chandhiok, who had a profound impact on my professional approach and values. Chandhiok Sir’s stature in the profession and at the Bar was something I had not witnessed before. With over five decades of practice, having held top positions at the Bar and for the government, and having trained over 400 associates, many of whom are now Judges of High Courts, Senior Partners, or General Counsels, his chamber provided a truly unmatched learning environment. I often refer to his chamber as a Gurukul rather than a traditional law office, a place that not only produced skilled and responsible lawyers but also instilled in them a lifelong commitment to never shy away from hard work 

    Apart from them, I have also been fortunate to have the continued support of seniors and faculty from NLIU and individuals I worked for during internships, specifically Manmeet Kaur and Rohan Sharma of Karanjawala & Co., who have been equally instrumental in ensuring that I remained on the right path at every turn.

    Coming to the diversification of work that you had mentioned: I am essentially practicing across all subject matters handled by the offices I’ve been part of. Civil and commercial litigation itself covers a wide ambit of practice areas. However, I believe that if one learns to understand the bare acts and regulations of a particular code, while gaining relevant experience in that area, practicing across different areas becomes less daunting. The real challenge lies in staying updated with the constant legal developments in each field. Moreover, I believe it is crucial to diversify and expand your subject knowledge when managing your own independent practice. Subject matter expertise certainly has its advantages and can help secure corporate roles, but for a court-based practice, having a broad understanding of major laws and a strong command of legal fundamentals is absolutely essential.

    Your work at Zentrum Law Partners and as empanelled counsel for major PSU’s and Financial institutions has placed you at the forefront of commercial litigation and arbitrations. How has this exposure refined your understanding of corporate litigation within the Indian legal framework?

    After concluding my time at Chandhiok Sir’s chamber, I spent the next eight months meeting with individuals, identifying market gaps, and laying the groundwork to build my own clientele. I essentially positioned myself as a travelling advocate, offering services across Madhya Pradesh and Delhi. My previous work experience, coupled with subject knowledge of specific practice areas such as Construction Arbitrations, SARFAESI Laws, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, and IPR laws, not only gave me an extra edge during empanelment interviews and meetings with companies, PSUs, and banking institutions, but also helped ensure a regular workflow. As a result, I began receiving assignments from a range of organizations and individual clients, and soon found myself frequently traveling across cities, with airports and railway stations becoming extensions of my office.

    With a better understanding of market requirements and the commercial world, I realized that having an individual practice would only take me so far. Therefore, to scale the practice and broaden the range of services offered, I eventually partnered with Zentrum Law Partners as an Associate Partner, where I now head a division of their litigation and dispute resolution practice, overseeing matters across Madhya Pradesh and Delhi. 

    There is no doubt that the trust placed in me by all has provided immense exposure and the opportunity to work across diverse subject areas, different jurisdictions and with diverse entities. Having represented state-owned PSUs, banks, private companies, and individual clients, I am constantly involved in commercial aspects of their operations, working in new areas of law, and therefore learning and growing on a daily basis. For instance, while representing IOCL, I had the opportunity to engage with laws related to the Oil and Gas sector. Similarly, representing IDBI Bank and other companies has given me exposure to matters involving white-collar crimes and company law practice. As I move further along in this journey, not only has the scope of learning widened, but my conceptual understanding of “corporate litigation” has also become significantly more refined.

    Having worked in the sports industry, what are the areas of sports law that you specialize in, and how do these align with your broader commercial law practice; particularly in relation to contract management, negotiation, and regulatory compliances?

    Sports have been the most integral part of my journey so far, and therefore working in this sphere has always been more of a passion project than anything else. Plus, being part of the national circuit in lawn tennis once, I was not only a sufferer of systemic issues but also witnessed several incidents of doping violations and arbitrary actions by Sports Associations that effectively ended athletes’ careers.

    Moreover, the sports industry, owing to its autonomy from direct government interference, operates in a very different and often complicated manner. Issues such as monopolistic policies by federations and the limited rights available to athletes and other stakeholders make the landscape even more challenging. To address these multifaceted issues, I founded a sports development initiative last year called ‘Project Yogya’ (https://projectyogya.com), a sports development initiative aimed at providing holistic support to athletes, with a strong focus on legal education and advocacy.

    As part of this initiative, we invited applications for the empanelment of professionals working in the sports industry and received a substantial response. As of today, we have empanelled over 14 sports law practitioners, amongst other professionals, across the country, each specializing in different areas, covering regulatory compliance, doping matters, contract management / negotiations, intellectual property disputes, and more. The objective has been to make a collective effort by specialists for the greater good of the sporting community. 

    On a personal front, I currently advise various stakeholders including sports associations, athletes, teams, and sports management companies on a wide range of issues, contractual disputes, disciplinary proceedings, election-related matters, and doping cases, among others. For me, this work is not just limited to legal representation; it’s about giving back to a field that has shaped who I am.

    Having completed your mediation accreditation from the Straus Institute at Pepperdine University, what were your key takeaways from that experience, and how do you see their practical relevance and application in India’s growing ADR ecosystem, particularly in light of recent statutory developments?

    Completing my mediation accreditation from the Straus Institute at Pepperdine University, in collaboration with SAGE Singapore, was a truly transformative experience. Beyond the fundamentals of mediation, the program offered deep insights into the psychological, societal, and cultural factors that play a crucial role in effective dispute resolution. Alongside practical training for mediating disputes across diverse areas, including commercial, family, employment, and community matters, we explored Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) techniques and strategies for cross-border mediation, with particular emphasis on addressing cultural sensitivities. 

    While the academic and practical learnings were deeply enriching, it became clear that both the U.S. and Singapore were operating in a far more evolved systems of dispute resolution, in contrast to India, that due to its litigation-centric approach that has been unable to make way for mediation, is suffering significantly due to judicial backlogs and unnecessary delays in resolving disputes. However, the enactment of the Mediation Act, 2023 marks a crucial shift towards mandatory mediation in all commercial disputes. The real challenge lies in its practical implementation of the law, as such mediation is often still treated more as a formality than as a genuine opportunity for faster, cost-effective resolution. The recent Lodha Group family settlement, however, serves as a strong example of the potential benefits of mediation even in complex, high stakes matters.

    Drawing from these learnings, I have also made a conscious effort to encourage parties to resolve disputes amicably wherever possible. I have successfully facilitated mediation in numerous disputes, including trademark conflicts, industrial disputes, debt recovery cases, and sensitive marital matters. Moreover, my accreditation has proved especially valuable in advising on sports-related disputes, where the close-knit and interdependent nature of the industry, combined with inherent power imbalances against athletes and professionals makes mediation critical. It not only helps preserve essential relationships but also ensures swift, practical outcomes that protect the careers and interests of athletes, coaches, and other stakeholders.

    Based on your roles with institutions like IDBI Bank and Central Bank of India, what are the key challenges these banks face concerning rising defaults and non-performing assets (NPAs)? Additionally, how can the legal framework be innovated or strengthened to better support their stability and growth?

    In my experience working with institutions like IDBI Bank and Central Bank of India, I have observed that the growing volume of defaults and accumulation of non-performing assets (NPAs) are driven by multiple factors, specifically due to significant gaps in credit assessment, window dressing, willful defaults, and misuse of legislative frameworks to delay or evade repayment. Despite mechanisms like the SARFAESI Act and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), the recovery process remains lengthy and complex, often leading to deterioration in asset value over time. 

    Additionally, with the increase of incidents of filing false insolvency applications, fraudulent practices, money laundering and financial manipulation, the financial institutes have further been burdened, while also impacting the economy.  In my opinion, while strict adherence to the existing statutory framework and its prescribed timelines is essential, there must also be a parallel emphasis on strengthening borrower credit evaluation and post-sanction monitoring frameworks. Only with robust internal controls and timely enforcement can financial institutions effectively manage risk and contribute to a healthier credit ecosystem.

    What drove you to pursue an LL.M. in Corporate and Finance Law at Jindal Global Law School? How did the program deepen your analytical approach to complex issues such as financial restructuring, cross-border transactions, and regulatory compliance?

    During the COVID-19 lockdown, I took the opportunity to deepen my understanding of Company Law and Insolvency Law, particularly from a corporate law perspective. Having previously worked on matters in these areas, my interest was naturally drawn toward exploring them in greater depth. Enrolling in a course at Jindal, I was pleasantly surprised by how well the faculty lived up to the institution’s reputation, delivering the material with exceptional clarity, practicality, and insight. The experience significantly enhanced my grasp of complex issues such as financial restructuring and regulatory compliance, both of which are central to corporate operations in India. The knowledge I gained has since played a vital role in broadening my legal perspective and strengthening my practice.

    With your extensive and diverse experience in litigation, arbitration, and sports law, what advice would you offer to young lawyers aspiring to build a sustainable career in litigation? Are there particular skills, habits, or resources that you believe are essential for long-term success in the legal profession?

    With a modest practice of seven years at the Bar, I wouldn’t claim to have unlocked the formula for long-term success in the profession just yet. However, based on my observations of several legal luminaries and mentors I deeply admire, one truth stands out: there is no substitute for hard work and perseverance. In the legal profession, you remain a student for life, the moment you stop learning is the moment you stop growing.

    Beyond that, identifying an area of genuine interest and steadily building a practice around it, while maintaining a strong command of core legal principles, is key to staying relevant. In India, there is no dearth of legal disputes and much like in medicine, the demand for skilled, ethical professionals remains constant. Regardless of the path or specialization one chooses – the scope for meaningful growth in this profession continues to be immense.

    Get in touch with Shivansh Soni –

  • “At the end of the day, if you are not able to deliver in Court, a last name -no matter how famous- will not get you very far.” – Antony R Julian, Founder and Principal at Julian Law Offices.

    “At the end of the day, if you are not able to deliver in Court, a last name -no matter how famous- will not get you very far.” – Antony R Julian, Founder and Principal at Julian Law Offices.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    What initially inspired you to pursue a career in law, particularly at a prestigious institution like University College London (UCL)? What factors influenced your decision to choose UCL, and how would you describe your academic and personal experiences there?

    I always wanted to be a lawyer – even before I understood what a lawyer really does. I have no explanation as to why except guessing that it could be the unconscious conditioning of watching my father (Dr. A. Francis Julian – a Senior Advocate), and hearing stories of my grandfather (who was a lawyer in the erstwhile State of Travancore). I was never consciously influenced to take up the profession by my father. All options were always open. My sister (A dentist and a children’s author) and I were encouraged to explore and see where our intellect and abilities would take us – somehow I always found my way back to the Law.

    This clarity (or blinkered view, if you will) allowed me to focus early on where and how I wanted to study law. I was very clear that I wanted to study law abroad. I had set my sights on going to a law school in the USA. The first time I wrote the LSAT, my scores were not too great. So I decided to take a gap year and write it again. The second time I also wrote the LNAT (the UK equivalent of the LSAT). In the second round, I managed a decent score, and also got scholarships to a couple of good universities in the USA. However, my LNAT scores were comparatively much better and I was offered a place at UCL. 

    Prof. (Dr.) C. Rajkumar (Founding Vice Chancellor of O.P. Jindal Global University) was another profound influence on me from early in my life. I’ve known him from my school days when he used to frequent our home as a law student at Faculty of Law, Delhi University. His stellar academic achievements were inspirational and it was something I tried to emulate. He also counselled and mentored me extensively during the law school admissions process. His time then was especially precious as it was around the same time that OPJGU was being established !

    Seeing the historical relevance of the UCL Law Faculty to India (due to some very famous Indian alumnus, including Mahatma Gandhi), I knew this was where I wanted to go. 

    UCL was a completely different experience after a bachelors degree at Loyola. I struggled a bit initially due to the massive amount of self-study required, but managed to get a decent grade. Life at UCL was not limited to lectures and libraries. The university’s location in the heart of London provided countless opportunities to engage with the city’s cultural and social scene. I learnt the law but more importantly, I learnt a lot about life in my three years there. However, as much as I loved the city,  I didn’t envision myself living there in the long term. So I decided to return to India on completion of my degree.

    After completing your law degree, you pursued an LLM in International Dispute Resolution at Queen Mary University of London (QMUL). What motivated you to specialize in this field, and how did your time at QMUL shape your professional trajectory? In what ways has this specialization influenced your career?

    An LLM is often considered as a purely academic pursuit, unsuited and unnecessary for those in Court litigation. That view, in my opinion, could not be more wrong. The practice of law has become greatly specialised. Having technical expertise is necessary and needed to stand out as a lawyer.  Litigation itself is a vast field, and every field of law has its own form of adversarial litigation, whether before a court, a tribunal, or an arbitrator. 

    QMUL has some of the best faculty in the world when it comes to international arbitration, they are not only academics but also full-time practitioners who have practical experience. They had excellent insights to share during the discussions in the tutorials. 

    In the early stages of your legal career, you worked with Mr. Salman Khurshid. What were some of the most valuable lessons and insights you gained from that experience ?

    Working with Mr. Salman Khurshid was a defining experience in my professional and personal life. Mr. Khurshid (Salman Sir to us) is probably one of the most large hearted persons I have had the opportunity of knowing. He is, of course, a very fine lawyer but above all he is a gentleman and a statesman in the truest sense, he embodied dignity, compassion, and the uncompromising need to ensure justice is done. 

    As his chamber member, I got an opportunity to work on a variety of matters – Constitutional, commercial, criminal, arbitrations- before various judicial fora – the Supreme Court of India, various High Courts, NCLT, NCLAT, TDSAT, COMPAT, etc. 

    Days were spent in Court (this was before the advent of virtual hearings), evenings in the Office. 10-12 hour work days were the norm. But the hardest worker in the office was the head of chambers himself. It was often the case that we would prepare copious notes and go to his house late in the evening to brief him for the next day, only to find him reading the files. This was apart from the various responsibilities he discharged as a leader in the Congress party. 

    Being one of the sought after Senior Counsels in Delhi, he was also a generous paymaster, giving all his chamber members a rather generous retainer coupled with regular bonuses. We were also actively encouraged to take on independent matters and permitted to use the office facilities for our own personal practice. 

    Ours was also a chamber that was very diverse. We had chamber members from at least 10 states in India. We also had a higher number of first generation women lawyers than male lawyers. Of the 20 or so chamber members, only 5 (including me) were male and only 2 were second generation lawyers. 

    Among the many lessons I learnt from my five years (2014-2019) at Mr. Khurshid’s chambers, the one I recall the most is that respect can only be earned, never demanded.

    I have tried my best to emulate these important lessons in mentorship and leadership in my practice as well. Of the four three associates I have had the privilege of working with at Julian Law Offices, all are first generation lawyers, three are women lawyers. One of them is presently doing her LLM in the UK.

    Additionally, being a father to two daughters makes me more conscious of the need to ensure the profession is more welcoming to women. If either of them decide to enter the profession, they need more women role models to look up to. 

    What inspired you to establish your own law practice? What vision guided you in founding your practice, and what were some of the key challenges you encountered during this journey?

    Starting my own practice was a natural trajectory of my career path. Being a law practitioner’s son – I had ready access to a chamber at the Supreme Court, I had a network to tap into, I had a well stocked library of commentaries and law reports at my disposal, and most importantly – credibility capital. These, of course, only get you so far. 

    At the end of the day, if you are not able to deliver in Court, a last name – no matter how famous- will not get you very far. Furthermore, the profession is a rather close knit community and any professional mishaps are rarely forgotten. Having a recognisable last name only increases the scrutiny of your conduct in Court. One is judged much more harshly if one comes from a family of lawyers. Reputations built over a lifetime can be destroyed in a day. For every successful second generation lawyer, there are ten who never made it out of their parents’ shadow.  

    One challenge I faced in establishing my practice was to ensure a steady supply of clientele. Practicing solely at the Supreme Court is not feasible unless one has a ‘feeder’ high court from where one can get a steady supply of matters for appeals. 

    This was the reason I expanded my practice to the Madras High Court in 2021. Having a lot of personal and familial connections in the city, it was a natural move. So far the move has proved 

    Furthermore, my wife and I felt it was a better place for our daughters to grow up in, compared to Delhi.

    You frequently represent clients at the Supreme Court of India. What are unique challenges of advocacy at the Supreme Court, and what strategies do you employ to address them?

    Practice at the Supreme Court of India is unlike practice at any other Court in India. Majority of matters filed at the Supreme Court are Special Leave Petitions (SLPs) under Article 136 of the constitution of India – about 93% according to a recent study. Since this is a completely discretionary jurisdiction, there is no certainty of the appeal being admitted.

    The judges hear about 70 SLPs on Mondays and Fridays (the two days designated for hearing fresh SLPs). The average time granted to make your case in an SLP is about 93 seconds. As counsel one is expected to start in medias res assuming the bench has looked through your petition in detail. You have to know exactly what to say, how to say and (most importantly) when to say it. Brevity is the order of the day and there is no room for any oratorical faff. 

    Another important aspect of Supreme Court practice is drafting. Clarity and Concision are essential. The importance of having a short and concise synopsis cannot be stressed enough. If you cannot state your case in one and half pages of double spaced size 14 font, you have an uphill battle. Early in my career, I used to draft long-winded synopses. I learnt the hard way that this rarely works. 

    If one reads biographies of some of India’s greatest litigation lawyers  (MC Setalvad, Palkhivala, Fali Nariman, etc) you will often find that the common thread in their advocacy is brevity – in pleadings and oral advocacy. 

    Your reputation as a Supreme Court counsel is built on the success in getting SLPs admitted. It is also the way to get a foot in the door so that longer oral submissions can be made when both parties are before the Court and the SLP or Appeal (once leave is granted) is heard at length. 

    A good way to build and protect your reputation at the Supreme Court is to never appear in or file frivolous or meritless SLPs. With adequate experience, one can make a reasonably accurate prediction of whether or not an SLP will be admitted. The SLP should either have legal merit or there should be some grave injustice which is apparent. Without either of these, filing an appeal purely at the instructions of a client is unfair to everyone involved – to the Court as it wastes precious judicial time, to yourself as you will cut a sorry figure in Court, and to your client who ends up wasting resources better spent elsewhere. 

    This can be challenging to do, especially early in your career when it can be tempting to take up every case that comes your way (been there, done that!), But over time you realise that your credibility is built not only on the cases you appear in but also those you don’t appear in. As an Advocate, your duty is not only to your client but also to the Court. Considering the heavy burden on Indian Courts, judges never appreciate their time being consumed by meritless cases. 

     As an arbitration practitioner and a member of the prestigious Chartered Institute of Arbitrators London, what are some of the major challenges in arbitration in India?

    Wiser and more experienced minds have spent much ink on the problems and challenges plaguing Indian Arbitration. Suffice it to say that we cannot continue to run arbitration like courts. We need more non-judge arbitrators.

    Another crucial point is that many businesses, particularly in smaller cities and towns, remain unaware of the advantages of arbitration. With cheaper and faster ODR options available, there are now ways to get low value disputes adjudicated in a faster and efficient manner. Furthermore, there is a need for structured training programs to equip practitioners, arbitrators, and legal professionals with specialized skills in arbitration law and practice

    Another major challenge is post award proceedings. Even though most section 34 challenges fail, the rigmarole of challenge and then enforcement makes arbitration a daunting prospect. Even though it is ultimately much faster than a civil court, post award proceedings are a dampener. 

    What advice would you offer to young lawyers aspiring to build a diverse and successful practice? What key skills, qualities, and mindset do you believe are essential for thriving in the competitive and multifaceted legal profession?

    I am still a ‘young lawyer’ by any measure! And, I am still learning how to build a diverse and successful practice. 

    That said, these are three things which I feel have really helped me in in my personal and professional life.  Firstly, cultivate a reading habit. Read widely, especially non-law books. Fiction, non-fiction, history, humour, mystery – there’s something for everyone. As lawyers, we tell stories (strictly non-fiction!), adhering to certain strict rules, but stories nevertheless. Reading greatly improves the capacity to put complex facts in a coherent manner highlighting aspects that are relevant to your case.

    Secondly, building a great network. The importance of building a good network is crucial for lawyers, especially in India where one cannot market or advertise in any way. A great way to do this is to pursue and cultivate interests outside the law – play sports, join a book club, pursue interests outside the law, take an active interest in your local community. 

    Thirdly, find a good mentor. Ideally someone who’s professional qualities you see yourself emulating. And when the opportunity arises, be a good mentor to others as well. I have had the privilege of watching and learning from some excellent mentors. Mr. Promod Nair, Senior Advocate Karnataka High Court, deserves special mention as someone who has been a good friend, mentor, and guide to me. 

    Balancing the demands of a high-pressure legal career with personal well-being is no easy task. How do you maintain a healthy work-life balance ?

    As a litigation counsel, the demands of the profession can be relentless. There are no fixed working hours, the pressure to consistently perform is high, and unlike salaried positions, there’s no guaranteed monthly income — though the expenses remain constant. This makes litigation a high-stress career, often not very kind to one’s mental and physical health. 

    It’s easy to get consumed by the profession, which is why setting clear personal and professional boundaries early in your career is so important. I firmly believe in prioritising rest, family time, and personal interests without guilt. It’s essential to create space for yourself beyond your work identity. Personally, I avoid carrying work home with me. I’d rather stay late, finish what needs to be done at the office, and keep my home a space of peace and relaxation. This helps maintain a healthy separation between professional responsibilities and personal life. 

    Additionally, taking care of one’s physical well-being is equally important. A balanced diet, regular exercise, and proper sleep aren’t luxuries — they’re necessities for surviving and thriving in this demanding profession. Over time, I’ve realised that discipline in these small, daily habits make it possible to build a sustainable, fulfilling legal career – and life. 

    Get in touch with Antony R Julian –

  • “Unlike other professions, law practice is mostly regional and for those aspiring to have a more International appeal, they could, besides pursuing an LLM abroad, consider taking the Bar exams and qualifying in other jurisdictions such as UK, US or Singapore.” – Mohammed Shadaan Saipillai, Founder & Partner at Calibre Legal.

    “Unlike other professions, law practice is mostly regional and for those aspiring to have a more International appeal, they could, besides pursuing an LLM abroad, consider taking the Bar exams and qualifying in other jurisdictions such as UK, US or Singapore.” – Mohammed Shadaan Saipillai, Founder & Partner at Calibre Legal.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Having over two decades of experience and initially coming from a commerce background, what inspired you to pursue a career in law? How has your commerce degree influenced and complemented your legal career?

    It was because of my commerce degree and my evolved liking towards company and commercial law modules, that I decided to pursue law. Pursuing law degree was never in the scheme of things until the final year of my commerce degree in the year 1997. While my friends were wanting to make progression by pursuing MBA, I chose to be different and decided to tread the uncharted territory. I aspired to become a first-generation lawyer and started preparing for the law entrance exam with a lot of dedication. To be able to compete with thousands of law degree aspirants and to successfully pass the entrance examination in the open category, made me more confident in pursuing law as my career. By pursuing a full time 3-year commerce degree from The New College, University of Madras and thereafter, 3-year law degree from Government Law College, Madras, I believe I was able to take advantage of both the degrees to full extent. Further, my law degree helped me learn company and commercial law modules in greater detail with in depth learning of not just the statutes but also the jurisprudence behind them as well as the settled judicial precedents.

    Your LLM in International Finance from Queen Mary University of London undoubtedly played a pivotal role in shaping your approach to corporate law. How did this advanced education enhance your ability to advise multinational clients on cross-border financial and regulatory matters? What made you choose Queen Mary University, considering its prestigious reputation?

    I completed my law degree and enrolled in 2001. My plan initially was to join a good senior counsel to learn and practice on the litigation side. I joined the office of Mr. G. Masilamani, Former Advocate General of Tamil Nadu and Addl. Solicitor General of India. After two years of litigating in courts, I joined a leading National law firm (Chennai office) in the year 2003 to pursue my interest in corporate and commercial law practice. Although I was harbouring the desire to pursue my Master of Laws (LLM), I was too busy working and got around to take the bold decision much later in 2010. I had already put in over 9 years of experience and was a Senior Associate in the law firm. It was a strategic decision for me to pursue LLM to get out of my comfort zone and better my chances of being promoted to Partner position. Pursuing LLM at Queen Mary University of London (QM) was one the best decisions that I made. I chose QM for many reasons including: (i) it is one among the Russel Group of Universities, (ii) highly ranked for law, (iii) renowned faculty, and (iv) centrally located in London. The whole experience living in London and learning from the best faculty was a rewarding experience. And when I returned to India, equipped with an LLM from QM and based on my past work experience, I found there were a lot more opportunities with other National law firms coming my way. Fourteen years later, LLM degree still comes in very handy especially when working on cross border mandates dealing with foreign counsels including inhouse General Counsels (GC’s) as it adds to the credibility and enhances the international appeal. As more and more Indian organisations look at expanding their businesses abroad, I am able to benefit domestic clients seeking assistance in foreign jurisdictions through leveraging on the foreign lawyer contacts across the globe developed at QM.

    Throughout the early stages of your career, you gained invaluable experience working with both national and international organizations. Can you share some of the defining moments or key experiences that significantly contributed to your deep understanding of the law and propelled your career to such remarkable heights?

    Be it working with Senior Counsel as a junior advocate, to working for leading law National firms as Partner, to working in the US for a top tier firm for a few months, each and every experience has been a great learning experience for me. Working for Holland & Knight LLP in Atlanta, Georgia, as a foreign lawyer trainee, afforded me the opportunity to work within a team of 30 lawyers on a large M&A transaction. This opportunity gave me a deep insight on the hard-working culture among lawyers in the US. Through my experiences spanning 24 years working for law firms to eventually founding Calibre Legal, I believe I have done the full circle and I have learnt important values including adhering to good professional ethics, hard work and client satisfaction. 

    As the Founder and Managing Partner of Calibre Legal, you have not only built a successful law firm but also positioned it as a leader in the industry. What motivated you to take the bold step of starting your own firm, and how have you witnessed the legal landscape evolve, particularly in Chennai?

    Having joined a law firm in 2003 when the concept of law firms was at a nascent stage in Chennai, I have witnessed the evolution of the legal landscape from close quarters. Chennai clients were predominantly relying on senior counsels and individual litigating practitioners. However, this scenario has changed leaps and bounds. With newer legislations including amendments to existing statutes, coming into force and with the focus shifting towards compliance and good corporate governance, clients are realising the importance of seeking legal advise prior to entering into any transaction to protect themselves from future litigation rather than approaching an advocate when they have already landed in legal issues. Further, the clients are increasingly realising the importance of working with a team of lawyers in a law firm enabling them to avail end to end legal support across diverse practice areas. As regards starting Calibre Legal, having already put in 18 years of experience and with a passion to provide National law firm standard legal service in a boutique set up to the MSME sector companies, I believed that it was the right time to set up Calibre Legal in the year 2019. Our founding principles are (i) Responsive – emphasising on client satisfaction embracing high levels of Partner accessibility and responsiveness, (ii) Resourceful – engaging dedicated professionals to achieve client objectives, and (iii) Reliable – building strong client relationships through providing commercially oriented reliable legal solutions. Our focus is always on our clients and their expectations and due to their invaluable testimonials, Calibre Legal has been ranked in the recent past by leading International agencies such as India Business Law Journal (IBLJ), Asian Legal Business, Legal 500 and Chambers and Partners. 

    As a qualified Solicitor of the Supreme Court of England and Wales, your dual qualification is a testament to your exceptional legal acumen. How has this unique qualification enhanced your ability to advise clients across multiple jurisdictions, and how do you navigate the complexities of bridging the differences between Indian and English legal systems in your practice?

    London is a leading jurisdiction for International arbitration involving International Chamber of Commerce Rules of Arbitration and is relevant in cross border transactions. Being dual qualified helps significantly especially considering my desire to collaborate with UK based solicitors and barristers to help domestic clients seeking appropriate recourse in the UK. Considering the commonality in common law jurisdiction plus with an LLM degree from the UK, qualifying as a UK solicitor was a natural choice. And because of this qualification, I am not just assisting domestic Indian companies with cross border transaction but also being retained by middle-east based organisations to assist with resolution of International commercial disputes.

    You’ve advised high-profile clients such as Firstinsight Technologies and GP Strategies, guiding them through India’s intricate regulatory framework. Can you share some of the key challenges you faced while helping these multinational corporations establish operations in India and how you effectively navigated these challenges with your vast expertise?

    One of the significant concerns for any multinational company (MNC) is to be able to navigate through the complex legal landscape in India. Typically, the GC or inhouse legal team of any MNC would reach out to a law firm in the local jurisdiction to advise them in relation to, amongst others, the foreign direct investment, tax implications, the various RBI compliances, reviewing employment law contracts and policies from an India law perspective. Assisting MNC’s in relation to setting up operations in India are one of the Firm’s core practice area. With our vast experience in hand holding MNC’s, we are able to anticipate their concerns and queries and are able to provide them the right legal advise and assistance. Labour and Employment laws is another area of concern as an organisation cannot simply hire and fire an employee who is in the workman category. For one of our MNC clients looking to terminate the services of an employee suspected of financial irregularities, we assisted them through providing them end to end legal support in drafting a detailed show cause notice, advising them on the due process and until the employee voluntary resigned from employment. This was a sensitive matter for them and we were advising their HR team based out of Singapore and the GC based in the US in addition to the key officials based in India. 

    One of your significant client mandates involved advising RX Ventures LLC in relation to a commercial dispute with an Indian entity. Given your exceptional track record in dispute resolution, what were the primary challenges in this project, and how did you utilize your expertise to address these effectively, ensuring a successful outcome?

    Dispute Resolution and litigation is another core area of our practice. The way we approach litigation is that we use it as a last resort to get the parties to the negotiating table to resolve their dispute. No client, particularly an International client, wishes to engage in protracted litigation as it is time consuming and expensive. When RX Ventures LLC (RXV), which is a US based company, approached us to recover a substantial sum of money outstanding from an Indian entity, we advised them on the recourse available including under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and under the Commercial Courts Act. These laws are a big boon to businesses and ensure that the disputes are resolved in a time bound manner. Based on the circumstances of the case, we advised RXV regarding initiating proceedings under the Commercial Courts Act (Act) and filed an application for Mediation under the Act. The Mediation process went on for 3 months and at the end of it, the parties reached a settlement and the settlement money was recovered by our Client in less than 6 months. Our client had initially thought that it would take several years to recover the money and was pleasantly surprised at how quickly he could recover the outstanding payment.  

    As a respected member of both the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and The Law Society in the UK, your career has undoubtedly set a high standard for others to follow. What advice would you give to aspiring law students who dream of achieving an international legal career like yours? What resources do you rely on to stay ahead of industry developments, ensuring that your knowledge remains cutting-edge?

    Aspiring law students must bear in mind that law practice is akin to playing a test match cricket as opposed to a T20 game. There are no short cuts and they must be prepared to put in a lot of hard work and work towards learning the nuances of the profession and law with patience and perseverance in order to achieve success. Unlike other professions, law practice is mostly regional and for those aspiring to have a more International appeal, they could, besides pursuing an LLM abroad, consider taking the Bar exams and qualifying in other jurisdictions such as UK, US or Singapore. As regards keeping oneself abreast with legal developments, in addition to updating oneself on case laws, it would help to subscribe to various International legal directories including IBLJ, Legal 500, Chambers and Partners, Legal Era and Mondaq. With the increasing role of Artificial Intelligence, research has become a lot easier but it is important to take time out to read and update oneself. 

    Balancing the demands of a highly successful legal career with personal life is no small feat. Your ability to thrive in both areas is truly inspiring. How do you manage to maintain a healthy work-life balance while ensuring that both your professional commitments and personal life are equally prioritized?

    Rather than work-life balance, I like to call it work-life integration. It is all about prioritising on what is important at that point in time and giving your 100% to the task at hand. In addition to work and family, it is important for legal professionals to ‘externalise’ themselves that includes attending and speaking at conferences and being part of networking organisations as these help with building client contacts. Further, I strongly believe in the ‘Givers Gain’ philosophy that only when you give back to the society generously – whether it is time, knowledge or support, you ultimately receive more in return. I have recently founded and working towards strengthening ‘Startup LEAP’, which is a non-profit legal aid programme to help provide information and guidance to those beginning their entrepreneurial journey. I also volunteer my time at Anjuman-E-Himayath-E-Islam, which is an orphanage with over 800 children and also serve as part of the leadership team in a couple of social organisations including my alma mater, Don Bosco Egmore school alumni association. 

    Get in touch with Mohammed Shadaan Saipillai –