Super Lawyer

Tag: Family law

  • “At the end of the day, I truly believe that we become lawyers in the real sense only when we stand beside those who genuinely need us.” – Priyanka Borana, Advocate at Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur.

    “At the end of the day, I truly believe that we become lawyers in the real sense only when we stand beside those who genuinely need us.” – Priyanka Borana, Advocate at Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    You began your academic journey with a background in commerce and CS before pursuing your LL.B. What inspired this transition, and how did your early education shape your understanding of law?

    Honestly, law wasn’t something I had planned from the beginning. I was sitting with my mother one day, completely confused about what to do next. I told her I wasn’t really interested in commerce, and she laughed and said, “Hamare ghar mein koi lawyer nahi hai, aur tumhara toh waise bhi ladai-jhagde ka dimag chalta hai — law kar lo.” It was said jokingly, but somehow it stayed with me. The very next thing I knew, I had taken admission in Madhusudan Law College.

    Once I started studying law, I realised how naturally it connected with the way I think — questioning, reasoning, and standing up for what feels right. My commerce and CS background gave me a habit of thinking logically and paying attention to detail, which later helped a lot in legal drafting and understanding case records. Looking back, that light-hearted moment with my mother actually became the turning point of my life.

    During your initial years of college and early practice, what key lessons or experiences prepared you for active litigation? Was pursuing litigation something you had always envisioned for yourself?

    To be very honest, during college I was never one of those overly serious law students. I used to bunk classes quite often and sit under the neem tree with friends. I was very active in co-curricular activities- debates, events, organizing functions, but attending regular lectures was never really my thing. At that time, I hadn’t even imagined that I would actually take up litigation one day.

    Things changed when I moved to Jodhpur in 2016. In 2018, I joined the trial court, and honestly, it was a tough beginning. I had no friends here, no contacts, and I didn’t know how I was going to find my place in a completely new professional circle. Those initial months: almost eight to nine, were all about learning by observing and surviving through small but meaningful experiences.

    Later, I shifted to the High Court, and that’s when I realised that maybe this was exactly where I was meant to be. Looking back now, I feel choosing litigation was one of the best decisions I’ve made. It challenged me, shaped me, and made me value the strength that comes from starting all over again in a new city, purely on your own effort.

    You have been practicing at the Rajasthan High Court across diverse areas such as commercial law, property disputes, arbitration, and criminal matters. How did you build versatility across these domains and manage all matters effectively?

    Over time, I’ve handled a variety of matters, from commercial and property disputes to arbitration and criminal cases, but if I’m being honest, criminal litigation is my real zone. It naturally suits my personality. I’ve always been someone who believes in standing firm, not getting intimidated, and saying things as they are. That fearless side of me connected very well with the criminal side of practice.

    In criminal law, you learn to read people, their behaviour, mindset, and what drives them. Understanding how a criminal thinks or reacts is not just about law; it’s about human psychology, and that’s what makes it so fascinating. It gives you a different kind of edge and maturity as a lawyer.

    For female lawyers especially, criminal litigation adds a certain strength to your personality, it teaches you how to hold your ground in tough spaces. Over time, I’ve realised that while I enjoy working across different branches of law, criminal litigation brings out the most fearless and analytical version of me.

    You have also been actively contributing as a pro bono lawyer. What motivates your involvement in public service, and how have these experiences shaped your understanding of access to justice?

    I’ve always felt that the purpose of being a lawyer shouldn’t just be limited to luxury litigation or earning money. Somewhere, we tend to forget that the law was made for people who actually need its protection the most. Around my own neighbourhood, I’ve seen so many individuals who quietly suffer because they don’t even know their rights, they simply don’t have the awareness or resources to seek help.

    That’s why I take my legal aid work very seriously. The Legal Services Authority often appoints me in such cases, and I consider it both a duty and an honour. One case that really stayed with me was an MTP (Medical Termination of Pregnancy) matter involving a minor rape victim from a very difficult background. She was completely unaware of the legal process, and time was crucial. Managing that case made me realise how powerful our profession can be when used with empathy and urgency.

    At the end of the day, I truly believe that we become lawyers in the real sense only when we stand beside those who genuinely need us. The real purpose of this profession lies in restoring someone’s faith in the law. When people see that justice can actually protect them, their trust in the system grows stronger, and that trust, once earned, is the most meaningful reward a lawyer can ever receive.

    As a panel advocate for the Rajasthan State Legal Services Authority, what has been one of the most challenging cases you’ve handled, and how did you navigate it?

    Every legal aid matter has its own challenges, but one case that I will never forget was before a Division Bench. I was representing the respondent father in a matter involving a 9-month-old baby who had been given in adoption without informing the natural mother.

    Even though I was appearing for the respondent, the case affected me deeply. When the court finally directed that the baby be handed back to the natural mother, the entire courtroom turned emotional. On one side stood the mother who had given birth, and on the other, the woman who had cared for the baby and nurtured her for months. Watching both of them break down was heart-wrenching.

    That day reminded me that law isn’t always about right or wrong, sometimes it stands between two truths, two emotions, and two lives. Even the Hon’ble Bench remarked that while everyone felt the pain, law is law. That moment taught me that as lawyers, we must carry empathy with firmness, to feel the human side of justice while still upholding the legal one.

    Alongside your legal practice, you have written articles for reputed publications on issues such as gender equity and the experiences of women in law. What inspired you to explore these themes, and how do you see the role of women evolving within the legal profession?

    Whatever I’ve written so far has come from what I’ve actually seen and felt inside courtrooms, not from theory, but from daily experiences. I’ve seen how small things, which often go unnoticed, slowly create barriers for women in this profession. Everyone talks about gender equity, but very few actually address the uncomfortable truths behind it.

    Through my writing, I’ve tried to reflect what many women advocates silently feel but don’t say out loud. These are thoughts that belong to all of us — I’ve just tried to put them into words. Because if we don’t speak, how will anyone know where the problem truly lies?

    Yes, things are changing, but the pace is slow. Still, I genuinely believe that women are no longer just part of the legal system — we’re shaping it, questioning it, and giving it new meaning. And if my articles can make even one person pause and think about these realities, I feel I’ve done something worthwhile as both a lawyer and a writer.

    You have represented clients before multiple forums, including the Rajasthan High Court, Commissions, and Tribunals, and have also appeared in various Public Interest Litigations. What is your perspective on the evolving scope of PILs and their significance for the legal community?

    Public Interest Litigation, in its true sense, is a beautiful concept — it allows the court to hear those who otherwise have no voice. I’ve been fortunate to work as amicus curiae in matters like the Nari Niketan case and the suo motu matter related to stray animals, both of which dealt with genuine issues that directly impacted public welfare. These cases made me realise how meaningful PILs can be when handled with sincerity — they push real change, bring accountability, and ensure that the law reaches beyond individuals to society at large.

    But the truth is, over time, I’ve also seen how this concept is being diluted. Many people now file PILs without proper groundwork or genuine cause — just to gain attention or to keep their names in circulation. Because of such misuse, even genuine petitions sometimes don’t get the seriousness they deserve. That’s the sad part — when the noise of the unnecessary hides the voice of the necessary.

    As lawyers, we carry a responsibility to preserve the sanctity of PILs. If we treat it with respect and care, it can remain one of the strongest instruments of justice in our system. For me, being appointed amicus and working on causes that truly matter has been both humbling and grounding — it reminds me that law is at its best when it serves humanity, not headlines.

    With experience spanning civil, criminal, and commercial practice, what moments have most shaped your perspective toward the practice of law?

    When I look back, I feel even small incidents can shape your entire perspective as a lawyer. I still remember one moment from my early days in practice. I had just joined my senior’s office, and one day, my matter was listed before a Division Bench. I requested an adjournment because I didn’t have the file — the staff had taken it, assuming it wouldn’t be listed.

    But the court refused and said, “No adjournment. Madam Borana, how long will you keep asking for adjournments?” For a second, I went blank. I said, “My Lords, I have no instructions to argue.” The Bench replied, “We’ll give you the file, you argue.”

    That moment hit me hard. I gathered courage and said, “My Lords, it’s not that I don’t argue — I just never got the opportunity in your court. You may ask me any facts from the file, and I’ll answer.” That one push changed everything. Later, I realised the judges weren’t being harsh — they were motivating me. And interestingly, the same judge today appreciates my work the most.

    That incident boosted my confidence and reminded me that sometimes the courtroom itself becomes your best teacher. Every tough moment, every unexpected challenge — they all prepare you quietly for what’s next.

    What core principles have guided you throughout your career, and what advice would you offer to young lawyers aspiring to build an independent practice in the High Courts?

    This profession tests you in every possible way, emotionally, mentally, and even morally. What has always guided me through it all are three simple principles: honesty, preparation, and patience.

    Honesty — because in the end, the court can always sense your intent.
    Preparation — because confidence in the courtroom doesn’t come from personality alone; it comes from the hard work you put in behind the scenes.
    And patience — because growth in litigation doesn’t happen overnight. You have to show up every single day, learn, observe, and keep your calm even when things move slowly.

    My advice to young lawyers is simple — don’t wait for confidence; build it through preparation and persistence. Read your files as if they’re your responsibility, not just your assignment. Respect the court, stay consistent, and never let rejections shake your foundation.

    As for myself, I wish to continue strengthening my independent practice and focus on matters that hold both legal and human value. Law, for me, is not about fame or success — it’s about ensuring that justice is not just delivered but also felt.

    Get in touch with Priyanka Borana –

  • “Technology today is the key source to research and development, a way by which people can now know, read, understand the aspects and issues in real estate and business transactions.” – Deepanshu Garg, Founder of Legal Assist.

    “Technology today is the key source to research and development, a way by which people can now know, read, understand the aspects and issues in real estate and business transactions.” – Deepanshu Garg, Founder of Legal Assist.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    With your specialization in real estate transactions and property registration, what initially drew you to this niche area of law, and how has your interest evolved over the years?

    I have grown up in a family of lawyers, who are involved in this niche practice of law for the last 40 years. I am 4th generation in this side of practice. The environment, the discussions in family and social gatherings, watching of news roam around real estate and the law; the knowledge amongst citizens on the aspect of “how important is legal consultation before dealing in real estate transactions”; the growing real estate disputes in the family as well as in the market; the challenges faced by the citizens in the property registration process; the lack of future estate planning; etc., which gave me a good kick to enter into law, focus on this side and to scale up the practice to new boundaries.

    Through your practice, you have often highlighted the gap between property registration and ownership rights. What are the most common misconceptions people have when dealing with property transactions in India?

    From the very starting, I have strongly believed that people are unaware or ignorant of about the most important aspect when dealing with property transactions i.e. “Title Legal Due Diligence”.  This is the “laying foundation”. The money which people pay to buy a property, what exactly is that money for – is it the physical structure or the land on spot? Practically speaking, for people these are the two aspects only but wait, that value is actually weighed from “title ownership documents” which people execute and get registered. And that’s the major misconception prevailing amongst people. Even law clearly says, “Buyers beware”. If there is a discrepancy in the documents, the value you paid for that property is nothing more than a zero. 

    Another related misconception is that people believe drafting a document when dealing with property is “basic and regular and can be drafted on a set performa”, but no, there is no set performa prescribed anywhere in law. Any such document is a “contract” amongst the parties which govern their transaction and has to be drafted on case-to-case basis and on specific circumstances surrounding the entire transaction, overall considering the law.

    As the Founder of Legal Assist, a digital platform dedicated to property and business legal services, what inspired you to establish your practice, what were the key challenges you encountered in building it, and how do you envision technology transforming the future of property law practice? 

    Since many years now, the property registration appointment process has been made online, which is not only cumbersome but time taking too. It is not easy for a layman to take an appointment for registration. Further, we daily see the growing disputes arising in real estate transactions and business running. We further see the irregularities and unprofessional surroundings in the conveyancing field of practice of law.

    All this triggered me to develop an online platform where I can render my knowledge on the issues circumventing the real estate industry & transactions, property registrations, business industry & transactions, to help them and to make them cautious of their legal rights, obligations and safeguards. The major key challenges were to not be able to cover “all aspects/ issues” since they are vast in nature and the other was to actually make people believe in “what are the most important aspects” in real estate and business transactions. 

    Technology today is the key source to research and development,  a way by which people can now know, read, understand the aspects and issues in real estate and business transactions. Moreover, technology is the source to transparency and accountability, as by way of technology, things are not far away to come under one roof and better control of the government, assuring people more safety, trust and “ease of doing business”.

    Your work involves complex areas such as estate planning, inheritance, wills, and succession disputes. What are the most pressing issues clients face in matters relating to inheritance, and how do you guide them through emotionally sensitive cases?

    The most pressing issues I see are the disputes arising among the legal heirs after the death of deceased person who died intestate or without any future planning or without informing about his/ her assets to his/ her legal heirs and further, disputes arising in cases even where a deceased  left a WILL/ any other testament.

    Our approach of guidance is focussed initially on amicable settlement through mediation and consultation and if not this, by suggesting an equitable outcome, after considering the law from all four corners and the circumstances in hand, in a manner which rules out future disputes.

    Estate and succession planning is often overlooked until a dispute arises. What practical steps do you believe individuals should take early to avoid future litigation?

    Life is so uncertain these days. The most important aspect which I feel today is for a person to have a must is to initially have a broad family discussion amongst all members and align amicably whatever a person owns amongst his/ her family members. Then I believe in an equalization policy amongst members. If all the members accept this discussion, the family shall execute an Memorandum of Family Settlement incorporating the contents of such amicable understanding. Further, members, in such case or otherwise if family amicable understanding is not arrived at or possible, shall compulsorily make a testament/ WILL for writing down their wish in “clear terms” to be followed by each member after the death of the testator.

    If there’s less tunning amongst the family members and the above aspect cannot be worked out, then the best possible way is to distribute the assets during the lifetime only so that the respective beneficiary holds the same without any claim or objection from others.

    As someone who started with internships at leading law firms and later built independent practice, what lessons from those formative years still influence your approach to law and property related disputes?

    Clear understanding of law and being upgraded with current legal precedents; using the tool of mediation and conciliation; not merely focussing on making money but alongside guiding the client with result oriented approach. However small the matter or dispute may be, 100% efforts and hard work shall always be put.

    Property and inheritance laws are constantly evolving with new judicial precedents and legislative changes. How do you stay ahead of these developments, and what recent trends do you see shaping this field in India?

    My approach is to give daily an hour or more in watching the news, studying current market scenarios, blogs, judgments. By this, I am able to incorporate and utilize this knowledge in my practice practically.

    The upcoming centralized digitalized unique platform where property registration, all connected data such as data from Municipal Corporation/ Development Authority etc. will be inter-connectedly available and will be incorporated with ease of doing business policy of the government. The development of digital courts for NI Act cases, MSME Samadhan Portal, Pre-litigation process in commercial cases, Mediation Act, etc. are great initiatives of the government for early disposal of recovery matters. By such initiative and upcoming legal developments, people are becoming more aware about their rights and obligations.

    With such a diverse practice covering real estate, inheritance, litigation, and consultancy, what advice would you give to young lawyers who want to build a specialized yet well-rounded career in property and succession law?

    Thorough understanding of the real estate market and laws covering this industry is a must. The initial aspect is to be able to practically understand the “trends” of “disputes” in industry, thereby doing research in the light of actual circumstances and find out all the possible solutions to the problem and then picking up the best reasonable one. What is the best approach “practically” must be the concern always.

    Get in touch with Deepanshu Garg –

  • “I have learned that in matrimonial litigation especially highly contested and long-pending matters mediation is often the most effective tool.” – Rajiv Rajpurohit, Family Law Practitioner at the Courts of Ahmedabad & Pune.

    “I have learned that in matrimonial litigation especially highly contested and long-pending matters mediation is often the most effective tool.” – Rajiv Rajpurohit, Family Law Practitioner at the Courts of Ahmedabad & Pune.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    You’ve mentioned that your advent into the field of law was almost accidental, as you initially planned to pursue an MBA in Pune but were influenced by friends studying law. How did that unexpected shift shape your career path and your approach to the profession?

    I completed my schooling at a Government school in Rajasthan. In 2006, I moved to Pune for further studies. As everyone knows, Pune is often referred to as the “Oxford of the East.” At that time, Business Administration was in high demand, so after completing my schooling, I pursued a BBA in Pune. During those days, I had a few friends and acquaintances who were studying at various law schools. In the evenings, we would often meet for tea or simply hang out. They would share their experiences about academic activities, court visits, and legal studies. Listening to them gradually developed my interest in law, and I began considering admission to the field. Before enrolling in law school, I worked with the Symbiosis Group for a few months. However, when the time came to make a final decision whether to pursue an MBA or law. I was not fully confident and remained unsure. It was then that my father guided me towards pursuing law. With his approval and encouragement, I finally decided to enroll in law school. Most importantly, till date, my father has been a constant source of motivation and support, especially during a difficult phase when I felt like giving up legal practice and considering another career path. His encouragement has always kept me going.

    You have conducted highly contested divorce cases, resolved long-pending disputes through mediation, and handled matters ranging from custody to NRI divorces. How challenging is it to navigate cross-border family disputes, particularly NRI divorces, and what key stakeholders are usually involved?

    I have been practicing law since 2013, Over the years, I have handled hundreds of matrimonial disputes and cases in Ahmedabad, Pune and Mumbai, and have also appeared before several Hon’ble High Courts in India also before the Hon’ble supreme court of India. One common aspect in matrimonial disputes whether contested or mutual consent, whether involving NRIs, is that they often revolve around key issues such as claims of alimony, division of immovable assets, child custody, and other financial considerations. In such matters, the role of a lawyer is not limited to representing a client in court; it is also about guiding all stakeholders toward what is reasonable and achievable. In NRI divorce cases, the first challenge is often the logistical aspect ensuring the presence of parties or enabling their participation through virtual hearings, which most courts now facilitate. In mutual consent divorces for NRIs, the process can be straightforward once formalities are understood and complied with as per the law and procedure. From my experience, NRIs are usually clear about their terms, conditions, and settlement formulas, but it becomes the lawyer’s job to draft, execute, and present those terms in a legally sound manner so that there are no future disputes, particularly regarding child custody or financial obligations, another is regarding the if any joint property in foreign country and one of the spouse is in India and not looking for forward to go back., when I talk about long pending divorce cases I recall one particular case where a client had been contesting a matter for years. And later after a few years he came to me with the mindset of “ that he would only like to contest” rather than resolving it. After understanding his case history, I advised him that litigation should be the last resort, and that he should first try to settle the matter through communication either directly, via lawyers, or through mediation. Initially hesitant, he eventually followed my advice. Within three months, the matter was resolved amicably, something that could have been achieved years earlier had proper guidance been given. From my practice, I have learned that in matrimonial litigation especially highly contested and long-pending matters mediation is often the most effective tool. The key is to fully understand the facts, the parties’ financial capacities, the complexity of the issues, and the emotional aspects, and then to guide the stakeholders toward a reasonable middle ground. I firmly believe there should never be a point where a lawyer loses hope of settlement. Keeping that hope alive until the very end, unless a final order is passed, is essential in family disputes.

    With over a decade of experience before the Family Courts and High Courts in both Gujarat and Maharashtra, what procedural differences have you observed while practicing in these jurisdictions?

    This is indeed a very important question, because understanding procedural differences is crucial when practicing in different jurisdictions. Yes, there are significant differences between Gujarat and Maharashtra, and I have learned a great deal from working alongside lawyers in both states. When it comes to procedures, there are differences in the prescribed formats for filing applications, the method of preparing compilations, and the specific documentation requirements. The process for exhibiting documents also varies slightly between the two jurisdictions. In family matters, I have observed differences in the conciliation and mediation processes. The filing procedure itself also differs. For example, in Maharashtra, one can file a matter without physically going to court; everything can be done virtually through the court portal. Even the administration of an oath can be completed virtually by uploading a video, which is not the same in Gujarat. These procedural nuances highlight the importance of adapting to local practices while ensuring compliance with the law.

    Your practice emphasizes amicable, reconciliation-focused solutions. What trends have you noticed in the growing use of ADR in matrimonial disputes, and how do you see it shaping the future of family law?

    Yes, I strongly believe that there should be amicable solutions in matrimonial disputes because it is ultimately a question of precious time of life. If one is able to take a timely decision and resolve the dispute, it is far better than letting it remain in court for years, which rarely leads either party anywhere. However, it is important that both parties are willing to be reasonable with each other, even while keeping their differences, and remain focused during mediation. Nowadays, I see that even the Hon’ble Supreme Court actively promotes mediation in many matters. In my experience, Family Court judges also often take the initiative to speak with both parties, understand their concerns, and encourage amicable settlements. If the parties show willingness, mediation can be a highly effective tool. Such solutions can be facilitated by any authority through various methods, including formal mediation or counselling. Sometimes, emotions run high and parties are initially unable to take rational decisions. However, after proper counselling, they are often in a better position to make fair and reasonable decisions. Therefore, irrespective of the situation, I always advise that Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) and amicable settlements should be explored, as they are often the best way to ensure a fair and lasting resolution.

    You began your career as a Legal Associate under senior advocates before founding your own firm. What lessons from those early years continue to guide your courtroom strategy today?

    Yes, I began my career working with a lawyer who had many years of experience. I learned a great deal from advocates during my time in Pune and later in Ahmedabad. One of the key lessons I have learned is that if you wish to succeed as a litigation lawyer particularly in matrimonial matters, which often involve divorce, custody disputes, alimony, maintenance, and domestic violence, the first and foremost skill you need is to listen carefully to your client. You must understand where the real problem lies, while also respecting the emotional circumstances of the parties. I have also learned that you should never be judgmental when listening to clients. Instead, your role is to ensure you understand their circumstances fully. From my seniors, I learned the importance of proper drafting and being thoroughly prepared with arguments. I recall that when I was assisting senior lawyers, they would take detailed notes point-by-point and spend hours preparing final arguments for divorce cases. Contrary to the perception that matrimonial litigation is straightforward, I have found it to be complex, involving significant factual and legal research, especially since family disputes often involve many incidents that form the grounds for divorce. As per High Court and Supreme Court judgments, it is essential to keep updating oneself on recent case law. I have made it a habit to learn continuously from court proceedings, by listening to arguments and closely studying judgments.

    What motivated you to establish your own practice, and what vision did you have for it in the beginning? How did you overcome the initial challenges?

    It is always a challenge to choose litigation as a career after completing law. Initially, I opted for corporate work, but later my father motivated me to practice in court. He advised me to go to the court every day, whether I had a brief or not. I had no contacts who could help me enter the field of litigation, so I followed my father’s advice. I began visiting the court daily and interacting with lawyers. Eventually, I met one of my professors from my graduation days, who was also a practicing lawyer. I sought his help and asked if I could join his office. He told me that he didn’t have many matters at that time but could refer me to someone else. He gave me a reference to another advocate in Pune. When I went to meet this advocate, he asked me just one question: “When do you want to start?” My answer was, “I can start right now.” He immediately agreed and told me I could join and start working. I didn’t even go back home. I began working on the brief that very day. The second thing he told me was, “You will have to work hard, I will take care of your basic needs and concerns.” That assurance gave me the confidence I needed, and that is how my journey began. And this is how my journey started for my first client. One thing I learned early on is that you never know where clients will come from. They may walk in from anywhere, even from the court corridors. Sometimes, they may watch you argue in court, be impressed with your performance, and later ask for your contact details. In this profession, your performance is what pays you both in the form of clients and valuable contacts.

    What inspired you to choose matrimonial and family litigation as your primary specialization, and how has working in this niche shaped your perspective on law?

    Yes, my interest gradually shifted towards matrimonial law. Since I started my practice, I used to accompany my senior in family court matters assigned to me. Most of these cases, particularly matrimonial disputes, involved domestic violence and divorce. Slowly and gradually, this became my primary practice area. Although I have also handled other matters, over time my focus has increasingly been on matrimonial disputes and family matters. While I would not call it a specialisation, with experience I have gained significant exposure in this field. As I have already stated, dealing with matrimonial matters is not easy. It requires a great deal of skill, patience, and the ability to handle sensitive human emotions. I believe this area of law has immense potential, and one should continue to explore, understand, and work in depth within family and matrimonial matters

    Having such a diverse practice now and over a decade of experience, what advice would you give to new entrants in the field of law?

    All entrants in the field of law must be prepared to work hard, especially in the initial stages. One should not assume that any particular branch of law is not worth exploring. If an opportunity comes your way, it should be accepted and explored, as it may eventually lead to your mainstream practice. Therefore, do not make up your mind too early or immediately after graduating from law school. Take up different matters, handle them diligently, and if needed, seek guidance from experienced senior lawyers or practitioners in that particular area. Learn from each experience, as this gradual exposure will help you discover your true area of interest and expertise.

    Managing a practice across two jurisdictions can be demanding. How do you balance professional commitments with personal life, and what activities help you unwind and recharge?

    Yes, certainly, sometimes it requires motivation, but right from the beginning I chose to practise in two jurisdictions. As far as personal life is concerned, it goes without saying that law is a profession where, especially in the initial years, one has to compromise on personal life and carry the pressures of professional responsibilities. Being a noble profession, law demands complete dedication and 100% commitment. There is no other option but to prioritise professional life first. After a certain number of years, personal life also finds its balance, as family members begin to understand the efforts and challenges of a lawyer’s journey. Eventually, it becomes a routine. So yes, whether personal or professional, at the end of the day, life goes with the flow, and with time one learns how to manage both.

    Get in touch with Rajiv Rajpurohit –

  • “In today’s legal environment, being a litigator is not just about knowing the  law but it is about being responsive, reading people, handling pressure and  adapting quickly.” – Reshma Mutha, Practicing Advocate at Bombay High Court.

    “In today’s legal environment, being a litigator is not just about knowing the  law but it is about being responsive, reading people, handling pressure and  adapting quickly.” – Reshma Mutha, Practicing Advocate at Bombay High Court.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    In the initial phase of your career, you worked with various lawyers  and practiced in areas like MCOCA, PMLA, PITA, DV Act, PCA, etc.  What has been one of the most endearing experiences from that time? 

    One of the most endearing experiences from the early phase of  my career was witnessing the practical application of legal principles in  complex cases like MCOCA, NDPS, PCA, PMLA, etc. where  constitutional safeguards and procedural nuances played a crucial role. I  distinctly recall filing and handling a writ petition for a minor girl, Sakshi challenging the denial of her admission to FYJC (First Year Junior College)  under the HSC Board despite her selection on merit through the First  Come-First-Served (FCFS) round of the online admission process for the  academic year 2019–2020. Sakshi had been allotted a seat in the reputed  institution of the city, Mithibai College, Mumbai, but was arbitrarily denied  admission despite vacancies. After the Hon’ble Bombay High Court  stepped in, Sakshi got admission in Mithibai College, Mumbai, based on  her merit. The Court’s decision made sure that she received the education which she deserved and was treated fairly. This matter marked my first independent appearance, wherein I undertook the drafting of the petition,  completed the filing process and conducted the arguments before the Court  and ultimately secured a favourable order for the minor girl, ensuring  justice was served. The learning process was challenging, but those early  years built the foundation for my independent practice and taught me to  appreciate both the complexity of law and its real impact on people’s lives.

    Coming from a B.Sc. background, what made you choose law as a  career? How has your B.Sc. degree helped you in the legal landscape? 

    Though I pursued B.Sc. out of academic interest, my growing curiosity about social systems, justice, and access to rights gradually pulled  me toward the field of law. During my undergraduate years, I became  aware of the lack of legal awareness in everyday life, especially among  women and marginalized communities. Motivated by this, I had filed a few RTI applications seeking information on public issues for instance, the  persistent problem of non-functional street lights around our girls’ hostel  area, drainage issue, etc. and these small steps that gave me a sense of law’s  power to create transparency and accountability. These experiences shaped  my decision to take up law not just as a career, but as a means to contribute  meaningfully to society. That is when it hit me that law could be a  powerful tool for change. My science background has actually helped a lot.  It trained me to think clearly, work methodically and solve problems step  by step. This approach really comes in handy when dealing with complex  legal issues, especially in white-collar crimes and statutory offences with  precision, clarity, and a structured mindset. 

    What motivated you to establish your own practice after gaining  significant experience with various lawyers? Were there any hurdles  you faced, and how did you navigate them? 

    After a few years of working with experienced lawyers, I reached  a point where I wanted to build a practice that reflected my personal values like empathy, integrity, and client-centric advocacy. The desire for doing  something on my own and deeper involvement in each case naturally led  me toward independent practice.

    Being a first-generation lawyer, living in a city like Mumbai, away from  home, the journey was not easy. Building client trust, managing court  appearances alone, and handling all the administrative aspects of running  a practice were significant challenges. Yet, with time, I started getting good at matters and the real reward was the satisfaction of helping someone get  justice which made every effort worthwhile. 

    The biggest hurdle came during the Covid-19 pandemic. Just as I had  started practicing independently, the nationwide lockdown brought  everything to a halt, especially in Mumbai. It felt like starting all over  again. But with patience, hard work, and the trust of my clients and family, I slowly rebuilt my practice from scratch. Consistency, strong networks,  and a growing support system helped me bounce back. That phase tested  my patience and resilience, but ultimately strengthened my commitment to  the profession. 

    What has been one of the most interesting or challenging cases you’ve  encountered so far, and how do you prepare for such a matter? 

    One of the most challenging cases I have handled was a bail  application in a double murder case which I have argued before the  Bombay High Court and secured bail (BA/2666/2021). The gravity of the  offence under Section 302 IPC meant I had to be extremely thorough. I  spent a lot of time going through the FIR, charge sheet, forensic reports  and witness statements and every detail mattered. 

    In such sensitive or complex matters, I have learned that preparation is not just about reading the case file. It is about thinking a few steps ahead. I try  to anticipate what the other side might argue, apply my mind to the facts  and legal issues and dive into relevant laws and precedents that can support the case. I also spend time planning how I will present the matter in court, not just what to say, but how to say it clearly and confidently. 

    At the same time, I make it a point to understand the client’s background  and the full story behind the case. Knowing their situation, emotions and  what is at stake helps me build a stronger, more grounded argument. After  all, law is not just about rules, it is about people. That human side really  matters in how you approach a case. 

    While dealing with various Criminal Law, Constitutional Remedies,  and White-Collar Crimes over the years, what are some of the common  issues you frequently encounter in criminal law cases? 

    One of the most common issues I have come across, especially  in criminal law, is procedural lapses. Whether it is a delay in filing the FIR,  improper collection of evidence from the crime scene, recording statements  of the witnesses, non-compliance with mandatory provisions like Section  41A of Cr.P.C., these lapses often become crucial in bail arguments and  trial strategy. 

    Another recurring challenge is the lack of awareness, both among accused  persons and complainants, about their rights, laws of the country and legal  remedies. Many clients approach us after having already made statements  without legal assistance, or worse, not understanding the implications of  their actions. 

    In white-collar crime cases, what stands out is the volume and complexity  of documentation. These matters require not just legal knowledge but a strong grip over financial data, transaction trails, statutory compliance and  application of mind. Misunderstandings often arise due to overlaps  between civil and criminal liability, and part of our job becomes explaining the legal position in simple terms, both to clients and, at times, even to  investigating officers. 

    What really helps is a combination of legal preparation and practical  insight, understanding the ground realities, staying updated with the law  and evolving jurisprudence and maintaining clear, consistent  communication with clients at every stage. 

    When handling highly sensitive matters, especially those involving  social evils like atrocities against women, how do you manage both the  procedural aspects and the emotional sensitivity of the case? How does  this affect your personal stress and mental health? 

    Cases involving atrocities against women are some of the most  emotionally intense and legally demanding matters I handle. On one hand,  you have strict procedural timelines like filing complaints before appropriate authorities, ensuring protection, custody and maintenance 

    orders, gathering evidence and on the other hand, you are dealing with  someone’s trauma, fear and often a complete breakdown of trust in the  system. 

    What I have learned is that you have to create space for both. I approach  the procedural side with precision, ensuring that no technical lapse  weakens the case. At the same time, I spend time building a rapport with  the client, making them feel heard and safe, explaining to them about their  rights and legal remedies available to them. Sometimes that means just  being present and not rushing the conversation. Trust plays a huge role in  such matters. 

    Emotionally, these cases do take a toll. It is hard to stay completely  detached when you are witnessing the real impact on someone’s life right in front of you. I have had moments of helplessness, especially when  systemic delays frustrate the client. To manage the stress, I try to set  boundaries after work hours, talk to family members and peers who  understand the space and stay grounded in the thought that I am doing my best, I can within the framework of the law. 

    Over time, I have realized that empathy does not weaken your professional  edge and rather it strengthens your advocacy, especially in cases where  legal issues are closely connected to real-life experiences. 

    You played a pivotal role in a case where the Bombay High Court  ordered a re-investigation into a fatal road accident after four years.  What were the key legal and strategic challenges in convincing the  Court to reopen the case, and how did this decision impact the victim’s  family and the broader discourse on delayed justice? 

    Yes, this was a deeply emotional and legally challenging case for  me. The biggest hurdle was that the case had already been closed with the  deceased, my client’s son who was wrongly named as the sole accused in  the FIR and chargesheet. It had been more than four years since the  accident, and no steps were taken by the police to trace the actual offender  viz. a 10-wheeler container truck driver that had caused the accident and  fled the scene. 

    The turning point for me was gathering and presenting strong evidence, particularly CCTV footage of the accident spot from which the  involvement and negligence of the truck driver could be established.  Strategically, I had to convince the Court that the original investigation was  not only flawed but had caused additional trauma to a grieving mother who was fighting to clear her deceased son’s name from the FIR and  chargesheet. 

    The Hon’ble Bombay High Court ordered a fresh investigation which led  to correction of procedural errors and ultimately, the withdrawal of all  baseless allegations against the deceased. This decision brought long awaited closure and dignity to the victim’s family. More importantly, it  reinforced the judiciary’s role in correcting institutional lapses and revived  public confidence in the justice delivery system. It was not just a legal win  but it was personal justice. More broadly, this case sends a strong message  that even delayed justice is not denied justice. 

    What guidance would you offer to law students and aspiring litigators  hoping to chart a path like yours? Is there a particular mindset, skill  set, or approach you believe is essential in today’s dynamic legal  environment? 

    The first thing I would say is, there is no fixed formula for  success in litigation. My path will be different from yours, and that is  completely normal. What really makes a difference is sticking with it,  being patient, staying consistent, and showing up every day, even when it  feels like nothing is happening. That is when growth is quietly taking place. 

    In today’s legal environment, being a litigator is not just about knowing the  law but it is about being responsive, reading people, handling pressure and  adapting quickly. So, while courtroom exposure is important, equally important is the ability to listen carefully, communicate clearly and write  persuasively. Even a well-drafted writ petition can set you apart. 

    One thing I always recommend to students is, utilise your time by doing internships with diverse lawyers, trial court practitioners, senior counsels, NGOs. Observe how they work, not just what they say in court. These early  learnings will shape how you think and practice later. 

    And finally, believe in the long game. Litigation takes time. You may have  to wait to argue your first matter or sign your first client. But if you are honest with your work, keep learning and stay grounded, opportunities do  come. 

    Balancing professional commitments with impactful social  engagements is no small feat. As General Secretary (Co-incharge of  Nashik Region & Women Advocates’ Cell) with the MPCC, while also  actively delivering legal awareness sessions and mentoring young law  students, how do you manage your time and maintain personal well being amidst such a dynamic schedule? 

    Honestly, it is a constant balancing act and I am still learning!  What helps me the most is planning and setting clear priorities. I make sure  to block time in my week for legal work, social initiatives, student  mentoring etc.  

    But I have also learned that it is okay to say no sometimes. I used to feel  guilty about turning down opportunities, but now, I remind myself that  quality matters more than quantity, whether it is in court or during any activity. 

    To manage personal well-being, I try to find small moments in life like  taking a walk, going for a trek, grabbing a cup of tea with colleagues, or  just switching off from screens for a bit. It really helps. I also lean on my  support system – my family, friends and even co-workers who keep me  grounded and remind me to pause and recharge when things get hectic. 

    It is busy, yes, but when you truly care about both your profession and your  interest, you somehow find the rhythm that works for you.

    Get in touch with Reshma Mutha –

  • “The cornerstone of this profession is passion. Be genuinely passionate about the law and the pursuit of justice.” – Chaitanya S.G., Partner at Chaitanya & Nithyananda Advocates.

    “The cornerstone of this profession is passion. Be genuinely passionate about the law and the pursuit of justice.” – Chaitanya S.G., Partner at Chaitanya & Nithyananda Advocates.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    The field of law is intellectually rewarding yet comes with its unique set of challenges. What initially inspired you to pursue a career in law, and what continues to motivate you on this journey?

    My journey into the field of law began right after my 12th grade when I chose to pursue my LL.B (5-year course) at KLE Society’s Law College. Initially, I aspired to join the Indian Armed Forces, driven by a deep-seated desire to lead and serve. However, my struggle with mathematics and science meant that clearing the NDA exams was not in my destiny. I vividly remember sitting in solitude, reflecting on my strengths and weaknesses. It was during those moments of introspection that I realized my passion for reading and writing—two things that had always been close to my heart. This realization sparked the decision to pursue law. Although I did briefly consider journalism, my inclination towards the structured reasoning and the sense of justice that law offered steered me in this direction.

    Coming from a family with no legal background, convincing my parents to support my decision was no small feat. Yet, the very moment I stepped into the law classroom, I knew I had found my calling. I was immediately drawn to the subjects and spent countless hours in the law library, which felt like a sanctuary of knowledge. From day one, I was resolute that my journey as a lawyer would be guided not merely by the ambition to win cases, but by the deeper purpose of resolving disputes and restoring harmony.

    Participating in moot courts and debate competitions further solidified my passion, providing me with an inexplicable high. Two books that profoundly influenced my perspective were My Experiments with Truth by Mahatma Gandhi and Roses in December by M.C. Chagla. Their writings inspired me to see the law not just as a profession, but as a powerful instrument for social change.

    Now, sixteen years since I first walked out of the gates of law college and into the courtroom, that initial excitement remains undiminished. The thrill of crafting arguments, the challenge of persuading a judge to consider a perspective against the odds, and above all, the joy of representing the underprivileged and witnessing the smile of relief when justice is served—these are the moments that keep me going and motivated. For me, the law is not just a career; it is a calling, a journey to bring justice and dignity to those who seek it.

    In the early stages of your career, you had the opportunity to intern and work with several prominent organisations and senior advocates. Could you share some of the most enriching experiences from that period? Are there any insights or principles you learned then that continue to guide your practice today?

    In the initial years of my legal education, the concept of internships was virtually non-existent—at least in my college. Our curriculum did not mandate internships, and the very idea of interning was something I stumbled upon almost by chance. I remember the first time I heard about internships; I was genuinely thrilled at the prospect of working on real-world cases and putting my theoretical knowledge to the test.

    Interestingly, I did not follow the conventional path of interning under senior advocates or established law firms. My first real exposure to corporate law came through the encouragement of a very close friend, Karthik Kannappan, who was my senior in college and had secured a position as a legal associate in an MNC. He not only persuaded me to explore corporate law but also recommended me for an internship. This was quite a breakthrough, considering that major corporations and MNCs traditionally reserved internship slots for students from National Law Schools. For me, getting that opportunity felt monumental.

    Another significant internship experience was with an LPO, where I worked on preparing chains of title for Hollywood movies. It was an eye-opening experience that introduced me to non-litigation work and gave me a glimpse into American laws—a perspective that would later shape my appreciation for international legal frameworks.

    I vividly recall my conversation with Sanjay Bhatia, my Head of Department at the LPO, during my final days of internship. When I requested him for a few words of wisdom, he humorously remarked, “Hard work is the stepping stone for more hard work.” Though said in jest, that statement resonated with me and has been proven true time and again throughout my career.

    If I have learnt any insights or principles that continue to guide my practice today it is that, if I am sincere in my heart and put in the hours of hard work without the immediate expectations of money or fame, the profession becomes not just rewarding but truly beautiful. The early years of toil and perseverance lay the foundation for a career that is both intellectually and spiritually fulfilling.

    Having begun your career in the corporate sector, what inspired your transition into litigation and eventually led you to establish your own firm? What were some of the initial challenges you encountered, and how did you overcome them?

    Three months before my final semester exams in law school, I secured a position with a startup LPO. With the blessing of my beloved Principal, I began working even before completing my degree. By the time my results were announced, I had already been promoted to Team Lead, managing a team of ten lawyers. Our primary task was contract drafting as part of a pilot project for a UK-based client who was building automation software for legal documentation. It was a thrilling start—high-pressure deadlines, intricate contract terms, and a steep learning curve. Yet, within a few months, the work grew monotonous.

    Back in law college, I had harboured a dream of standing tall and presenting my arguments in Court Hall 1 of the Supreme Court of India. That vision seemed to fade with each passing day in the corporate environment. One fine day, with sheer conviction and a heart full of ambition, I put in my papers, bidding farewell to the corporate world once and for all. I took the leap to establish my own law practice—an audacious decision that stemmed from my unwavering confidence in my drafting and argumentative skills.

    The initial days, however, were not without challenges. The most daunting of all was understanding procedural law. Despite relentless reading, the layers of procedural intricacies remained elusive. It felt as though I had to reinvent the wheel, learning the ropes one step at a time. For the first three years of my independent practice, I focused exclusively on criminal cases. Over time, I began to appreciate the nuances of the Criminal Procedure Code, witnessing firsthand how the principles I had studied unfolded in real-world scenarios. I saw the wheels of justice in motion and felt a profound sense of purpose.

    I must express my deep gratitude to the entire fraternity of the Advocates Association, Bengaluru. Whenever I sought guidance, there was always a senior colleague willing to help—selflessly and without expectation of remuneration. This collective spirit of learning and mentorship was instrumental in my growth.

    There came a point when I felt I was being stereotyped as a “criminal lawyer.” Although I cherished the title, I was eager to explore the civil side of practice with the same intensity and passion. It was then that I met my mentor and guru, Sri. K.V. Narasimhan. He took me under his wing, polished my skills, and guided me through the labyrinth of civil litigation. I consider myself a disciple to him, and even today, I seek his guidance with the same reverence. His mentorship is a debt of gratitude I shall carry for a lifetime.

    The transition from corporate law to litigation, and the subsequent establishment of my own firm, was driven by an unyielding belief in my abilities and the support of the legal fraternity. Those formative experiences not only shaped my career but also solidified my commitment to the ideals of justice and advocacy.

    You have appeared and argued in a diverse range of matters, including writ petitions, civil and criminal disputes, and public interest litigations across various judicial forums. Could you tell us about a particularly complex or memorable case you handled, and how you approached its legal or procedural intricacies?

    Over the course of my career, I have had the privilege of handling numerous cases spanning writ petitions, civil and criminal disputes, and public interest litigations. While each case carries its own significance, there is one case that stands out as particularly complex and memorable—not just for its legal intricacies, but for its far-reaching implications on the privacy and constitutional rights of over 140 crore Indians.

    In 2019, I was approached by Col. Mathew Thomas, a retired Indian Army Officer, who sought my legal opinion on a certified copy of a contract entered into between the President of India, represented by the Director of Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), and certain private companies headquartered in the United States. As a trial advocate primarily focused on courtroom practice, my initial impression was that this was just another contract review. However, as I delved deeper into the document, I was astounded to discover the magnitude of its implications.

    The agreement, dated back to 2010, was executed on a mere ₹500 stamp paper, which seemed oddly insignificant considering the enormity of what it entailed. The contract granted these American private companies—some of the largest defence contractors to the U.S. Government and various international agencies involved in global surveillance, spying, and espionage—unfettered rights to USE, STORE, COLLECT, PROCESS, AND TRANSFER the biometric and demographic data of Indian citizens collected during Aadhaar enrolments. This wasn’t just routine information; it involved highly sensitive data, including fingerprints, iris scans, and personal demographic details of millions of Indians.

    As I pored through the clauses, it became alarmingly clear that these defense-linked corporations were given sweeping access and control over critical personal data of all Indians without adequate safeguards or oversight. Effectively, the contract enabled foreign entities deeply tied to global surveillance networks to potentially exploit or misuse this information, posing severe risks to India’s data sovereignty and the privacy rights of its citizens.

    Realizing the gravity of the matter, I promptly filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka and appeared as a counsel on behalf of Col. Mathew Thomas, challenging the legality and constitutional validity of the agreement. Given the critical nature of the issue, the High Court, in its wisdom, granted us the liberty to move the matter before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India.

    Although this was not my first appearance before the Hon’ble Chief Justice of India as I had the privilege of appearing in earlier matters as well, this case carried a different weight, a deeper resonance, because it wasn’t just about a dispute—it was about safeguarding the very essence of privacy and national integrity.

    The Hon’ble Supreme Court, after considering the submissions, remanded the matter back to the High Court of Karnataka for further consideration, and the matter is now pending adjudication. The experience reinforced my belief in the power of law as a protector of civil liberties and as a beacon of justice for the common man. For me, this case is a reminder that the true essence of legal practice transcends mere arguments; it is about upholding the sanctity of individual rights and the sovereignty of our nation.

    This case remains etched in my memory not just for its scale and complexity, but for the realization that as advocates, we hold the profound responsibility to safeguard the rights and freedoms of society at large, often against formidable odds.

    With extensive experience across multiple domains such as Negotiable Instruments, Consumer Protection, Insurance, and Revenue matters, how do you adapt your legal strategy when appearing before quasi-judicial authorities as compared to regular courts, where do procedural nuances differ?

    The essence of legal strategy, whether before quasi-judicial authorities or regular courts, is rooted in a fundamental principle: learning never ends. This is precisely why the legal profession is called a “practice.” Mastery over subjects of law is not merely beneficial—it is the foremost duty of a lawyer. Over the years, I have embraced every opportunity to study new areas of law, constantly expanding my knowledge base. I truly believe that the moment one claims there is nothing more to learn is the very moment one begins to stagnate in this profession.

    When it comes to quasi-judicial authorities, the strategy is simple yet profound: understand the core of the problem and the root cause of the dispute. If these foundational aspects are grasped well, I believe half the battle is already won. My years of practice have taught me that irrespective of the forum, if you are well-versed in the Civil and Criminal Rules of Practice, you are effectively equipped to navigate most procedural nuances.

    Of course, quasi-judicial authorities bring their own procedural peculiarities—whether it’s the summary nature of proceedings under the Negotiable Instruments Act, the consumer-friendly mechanism under the Consumer Protection Act, or the evidentiary flexibility permitted in Insurance and Revenue matters. Each of these specialized forums is birthed from distinct legislative enactments, and their procedural requirements reflect the legislative intent to deliver faster, more focused justice.

    To adapt effectively, I ensure that I invest time in understanding the specific procedural mandates and jurisdictional subtleties of these forums. While it is true that procedural lapses can sometimes occur, I firmly believe that with proper study and preparation, these can be minimized, if not entirely avoided. My approach has always been to meticulously understand the enactments governing these bodies, thereby positioning myself to present my arguments seamlessly, whether it be in front of a tribunal, commission, or an appellate authority.

    In summary, my strategy is underpinned by relentless learning, deep understanding of the core dispute, and rigorous preparation tailored to the procedural framework of the forum I am appearing before. I consider it not just a strategy, but a philosophy of practice.

    Election petitions are often intricate and high-stakes in nature. What are some of the key legal considerations to keep in mind while arguing such matters? If possible, could you share an experience from a case you’ve handled in this area?

    Election Petitions are a unique category of legal proceedings governed by the Representation of the People Act, 1951, wherein the High Court assumes the role of the Election Tribunal. These matters are distinct, as the trial is conducted before the High Court itself, unlike other civil or criminal matters. Key legal considerations while arguing Election Petitions include Locus Standi, Grounds of Challenge, Strict Adherence to Procedure, Burden of Proof, Speedy Disposal. Under Section 81 of the Act, an Election Petition can only be presented by any candidate at the election or any elector. As per Section 2(e) of the Act, an elector is defined as any person whose name appears in the electoral roll of the constituency and is free from disqualifications under Section 16 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950.

    One particularly memorable case that I handled in this regard was the challenge of a Biennial Election to the Rajya Sabha. A Member of Parliament had been unanimously elected, and his nomination was contested by a voter on grounds of material suppressions in his affidavit. The challenge, however, was that the petitioner was not an elector as per the Act.

    The Representation of the People Act, under Section 81(1) Explanation, defines an elector as someone entitled to vote at the election, even if the person did not actually cast a vote. In this case, there was no voting at all—the election was unanimous. All candidates were sponsored by political parties, and hence, MLAs and MLCs were the only recognized electors.

    I represented the petitioner before the High Court, arguing that the “explanation is not a rule; an explanation cannot defeat the purpose of the enactment; and an explanation cannot override the definition.” I put forth the contention that I, as the petitioner, was the elector’s elector—a voice for the common man who is ultimately the foundation of electoral democracy. I argued that the spirit of the legislation was to enable challenges to irregularities and that the unanimous nature of the election should not bar the electorate from questioning it.

    As anticipated, the High Court dismissed the petition, not on the merits but purely on locus standi. But for me, the true journey began when I moved the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, appearing before the Hon’ble Chief Justice. I argued vehemently, challenging the conventional understanding of the Explanation to Section 81. Although the Hon’ble Supreme Court was not inclined to allow my prayer, I walked out of the courtroom with a profound sense of satisfaction—a victory of learning, strategy, and courage to stand up for what I believed in. The hours of rigorous preparation, studying every nuance of the Representation of the People Act, and foreseeing every possible counter-argument gave me an unmatchable treasure of knowledge.

    In retrospect, while the case did not result in a favorable verdict, it was a landmark experience for me—proof that the real triumph sometimes lies in the fight, not just the outcome.

    What advice would you offer to young professionals and law students aspiring to build a career in this field? Are there any books, resources, or habits you would recommend that helped you in your own journey?

    I believe that offering blanket advice to young professionals and law students would be superficial because each individual comes from a distinct family and societal background that shapes their present circumstances. However, through my own journey, I have discovered certain habits and principles that I would strongly recommend to anyone aspiring to build a career in law.

    The cornerstone of this profession is passion. Be genuinely passionate about the law and the pursuit of justice. There will be times when financial and personal constraints may make you question your path. Despite those moments of doubt, the secret to becoming a good advocate is to persevere even when the odds are against you. Never give up; your persistence will be your greatest ally.

    There is no shortcut in law. Make it a habit to read at least four hours a day. This should include not just legal texts but also judgments, commentaries, and even works of literature that sharpen your articulation and depth of understanding. The law is ever-evolving, and staying updated is not just an advantage—it is a necessity.

    Law can be an all-consuming profession. It is intense, demanding, and at times, overwhelming. Developing hobbies outside of law—whether it’s playing a sport, writing, traveling, or painting—provides a much-needed escape and helps in maintaining mental balance. These hobbies act as a sanctuary when the weight of the profession becomes too heavy.

    One thing that is often overlooked is physical and mental health. Eat well, because brains need fuel to think. An empty stomach leads to fatigue, loss of focus, and poor decision-making. Sleep well, because your sharpness and ability to argue effectively are heavily dependent on rest. The mind is your greatest tool; take good care of it.

    Finally, take time to celebrate your victories—both big and small. If you are someone who does not find joy in life, chances are you won’t find joy in the profession either, because for an advocate, the profession becomes life. Embrace it, enjoy it, and let it be your passion. Learn to enjoy the journey of learning. It is not the cases you win or lose that define you, but the person you become in the process.

    Balancing a demanding legal practice with personal life can be challenging. How do you manage your professional responsibilities while also making time for yourself? What do you do to unwind and stay rejuvenated?

    Time is a man-made construct. I have deeply understood this, and that understanding forms the very basis of how I manage both my professional and personal life. For a busy man, there is always time for everything; for a lazy, pessimistic procrastinator, there is only shortage and dearth.

    I begin my day with something that brings me immense joy—cooking. I am a good cook, and I start each morning in the kitchen, preparing breakfast and lunch for my wife and daughter. It is my way of setting a positive tone for the day—nurturing my family before stepping into the world of law.

    One day a week, I completely disconnect from work and dedicate that time to playing leatherball cricket. It’s my way of feeling like a kid again, venting out all the stress, and just enjoying the pure thrill of the game. Sports, I believe, is a fantastic way to stay rejuvenated and grounded.

    Travel is another escape I hold dear. Once or twice a year, I go on bike rides—a passion that I cherish deeply. In 2021, I went solo from Kanyakumari to Jammu, covering the entire stretch over 18 days. It was a journey of solitude, reflection, and freedom that I hold close to my heart.

    I also sketch, doodle, and paint occasionally. Playing with colors is incredibly refreshing for me, offering a creative outlet that’s far removed from the rigors of legal battles. I am a lover of Carnatic music and an ardent listener. During my college days, I used to play the violin, although the demands of practice have left me with little space to pursue it actively now.

    Of late, I have embraced creative writing. I recently published my fiction novel, Tales of Lawyer Ramachandra Shastry, which has been a deeply fulfilling journey. I also won the 21st Century Emily Dickinson Award from Book Leaf Publishing Co. for my collection of poems titled How to Lose Your Keys and Find Yourself – Poems for the Beautifully Flawed. It consists of 30 acrostic poems that reflect on philosophy and life. I have also completed a philosophical work on Advaita, which is due for publishing soon.

    For me, life is a balance of passion, purpose, and play. Each role I take up—as a lawyer, a writer, a cook, a traveller, and a cricketer—nourishes a different part of me. It’s not about managing time; it’s about embracing it.

    Get in touch with Chaitanya S.G. –

  • “Knowledge, reputation and success are built slowly, case by case, argument by argument.” – Tejasva Mehra, Practicing Advocate at Supreme Court of India.

    “Knowledge, reputation and success are built slowly, case by case, argument by argument.” – Tejasva Mehra, Practicing Advocate at Supreme Court of India.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    With almost a decade of experience and an established practice today, what initially inspired you to pursue a career in law? Was becoming a lawyer always part of your plan, or did you come to it gradually over time?

    I decided to pursue law relatively early in life because I always felt a deep desire to do something meaningful for the society at large and to create a real impact. I grew up witnessing my mother devoting 16 to 18 hours of her day in public service. I would wake up every morning to find our drawing room full of people who had come to discuss their concerns and problems. Watching her tirelessly listen to them and help them find a way forward left a profound impression on me. It taught me the value of empathy, responsibility and standing up for others.

    Although I am a first-generation lawyer and had no direct access to the legal world, I was fortunate to interact with some of the finest lawyers in the country. I was always in awe of their distinct personalities and eloquence, their command over the law, awareness of the social issues and the sheer force of conviction with which they carried themselves. Their work inspired me and somewhere deep within, I knew this was the path I wanted to pursue. 

    But perhaps what sealed my destiny was my Nanaji, who always dreamed of seeing me as a practicing lawyer. He was a great admirer of Sh. Nani Palkhivala, and he often spoke of his brilliance, his courtroom charisma and the respect he commanded. That admiration became a seed that grew within me. It aspired me to follow in the footsteps of those who use the law not just as a profession but as a powerful instrument of change. 

    After completing your law degree, you pursued a Master of Laws (LLM) at the University of California, Los Angeles, specializing in Entertainment, Media, and Intellectual Property Law, along with Pretrial Criminal Litigation. What motivated you to choose UCLA and these specific specializations? How did your education there differ from legal education in India, and were there any challenges you faced during the application process?

    I chose to pursue Intellectual Property and Entertainment Laws for my master’s because these areas of law have an increasing global importance and have a universal character, often protected and harmonized through mutually signed international treaties. Its global relevance and increasing demand particularly appealed to me. 

    I chose Criminal Pretrial Advocacy as my minor because I have always been deeply interested in understanding the criminal justice systems across different jurisdictions. It gave me an insight to the jury system followed in the US and for our assignments, I also got a chance to visit the LA County Superior Court to witness trials of the ongoing cases. 

    As for my choice of UCLA School of Law, the decision was significantly influenced by the advice of my Guru, Hon’ble Justice A.K. Sikri. He guided me to prioritize the strength of the faculty of an institution. UCLA offered exactly that – an exceptional faculty with real world experience, especially in the fields of IP and Entertainment Laws. Being located in the heart of Hollywood, UCLA provides unparalleled access to professors who have worked with major studios and production houses, offering a practical and industry-oriented education. It also offered unique networking and internship opportunities. 

    In terms of education, there was a significant difference from India. I felt that the curriculum and teaching at UCLA emphasised more on critical thinking, in depth research and practical application than the rigid curriculum followed in India. The lectures at UCLA were more interactive with active participation of the students, critical analysis and continuous assessment through assignments, mock trials and presentations. Also, the strictness towards plagiarism is something which I feel needs to get implemented in our Indian education system. 

    The early stages of a lawyer’s career often shape one’s understanding of the law. Looking back at your journey, whether as a legal researcher/ law clerk under Justice A.K. Sikri at the Supreme Court of India or as a Legal Associate at Shakti Vahini NGO, what are some of the pivotal experiences that helped form the foundation of your legal career?

     I feel blessed and honoured to have worked under Justice A.K. Sikri as his law clerk/ legal researcher. The experience was not just professionally enriching, but deeply transformative on a personal level as well. Other than the fact that I got to work on some of the most sensitive and high profile cases at the time, I learnt a lot about being humble in life and honest towards your work. Justice Sikri carries a rare blend of deep legal wisdom and an open inquisitive mind. Despite his towering stature in the legal field, his extremely hectic and intense work schedule, he was always approachable and would often encourage a discussion and be open to an independent thought. He fostered an environment where I felt valued and confident even though I was fresh out of law school. I truly believe that my time working as a judicial clerk under Justice Sikri was the perfect start to my legal journey – a rare combination of rigorous legal work, inspiring mentorship and invaluable interactions. My time working under him really helped me boost my confidence and learn the most important lessons of life – work hard and be humble. 

    As I said, I always wanted to serve the society and make an impact, Shakti Vahini helped me to achieve that and the experience I got was profoundly transformative. Shakti Vahini is working towards strengthening women and child rights in India. During my tenure working at Shakti Vahini, I got an opportunity to work on several cases involving minors who were trafficked in Delhi from all parts of the country and exploited for prostitution, child labour and child marriages. I provided legal assistance and representation to these victims once they were rescued and also got an opportunity to be a part of various rescue operations, their counselling sessions and rehabilitation process. I also engaged in legal research and authored papers assessing the shortcomings in our legal system and proposed reforms aimed at making the justice system more efficient, accessible and sensitive to the needs of these minor victims who are extremely vulnerable. I had just returned from the US after completing my masters when I decided to commit my time to pro bono work and got this opportunity. This was a real eye-opener. It reshaped my perspective and exposed me firsthand to the disturbing realities faced by society’s most vulnerable, deepening my commitment to justice and reform. 

    During your time as a Senior Associate at Rajiv Mohan Law Offices, you were involved in high-profile criminal cases. Could you share some of the most challenging aspects of handling one such complex case, particularly with respect to the legal intricacies of laws such as the IPC, NDPS Act, PC Act and PMLA?  

     During my time working under Sh. Rajiv Mohan, I received hands-on training in the nuances of criminal trial practice which included right from preparing for bails, arguments on charge to crafting effective cross-examinations and strategically developing a defence throughout the course of a trial. I also got an opportunity to work on appeals in several high profile cases where the accused were convicted of most heinous offences. His meticulous approach to each stage of a criminal case gave me an invaluable foundation in trial advocacy. One of the most enriching aspects of this experience was the open discussions and brainstorming sessions every evening. The evenings before witness examinations were spent drafting and refining questions often dictated by him with great precision and purpose. It was during these sessions that I truly grasped the art of cross-examination. He often emphasized: “Always know what not to put to a witness.” That single line has stayed with me and shaped the way I think about courtroom strategy. His deep knowledge of medical jurisprudence added another layer to the learning. As a former Senior Special Prosecutor, he brought with him a rare insight into how the prosecution builds its case which helped me learn how to analyze a case not just as a defence lawyer, but from the perspective of the State as well. This dual perspective greatly sharpened my analytical abilities. Mr. Rajiv Mohan also mentored me in navigating cases involving special statutes and complex areas like bail under NDPS Act for commercial quantity or under PMLA, helping me understand how to overcome the stringent twin conditions laid down under Section 37 and 45 respectively. Additionally, as the jurisprudence around the PMLA was evolving at the time, he explained the developing bail laws and the strategic nuances involved in those cases. 

    Among all the cases, it was the murder trials or appeals that intrigued me the most. Observing and participating in the cross-examination of eye witnesses, medical and forensic experts, and investigating officers gave me a deep appreciation of how facts, law and courtroom psychology converge in a trial.The four years that I spent working under Mr. Rajiv Mohan taught me that in the courtroom, it is not just about law, it is about human behaviour, precision and above all, preparation.

    Would also like to mention and thank Mr. Abhimanyu Kampani for playing a pivotal role and trusting in me.

    Having worked with various legal entities, what ultimately drove you to establish your own legal practice? What challenges did you face when starting out, and how did you overcome them?

    Starting my independent legal practice was undoubtedly one of the toughest decisions I have made in my professional journey. In the legal field, there is no clear benchmark that tells you when the “right time” to branch out on your own has arrived. I feel in our profession the decision is highly personal and often requires you to look inward, trust your instincts and take a leap of faith.

    For me, the decision came after a lot of careful thought and self-assessment. I was fortunate to have built a decent clientele base and had secured a couple of clients on retainer basis, which provided a much-needed cushion of financial stability. This base was extremely important because it gave me the confidence that I would not be starting from absolute scratch as I had work that could sustain me as I navigated the uncertainties of independent practice.

    That being said, the journey has not been without its hardships. There were times when I was appearing only two-three times a week in contrast to two-three times a day while I was working with Mr. Rajiv Mohan. There were moments of real struggle and self doubt. However, I have come to realise that the only way forward is to believe in yourself, stay honest and work hard. 

    I firmly believe that the support of one’s family, particularly that of my mother and my wife has been absolutely crucial. Their unwavering encouragement, emotional support and constant belief in my abilities have provided me with the confidence and clarity needed to pursue this challenging path. Their presence has not only been a source of personal reassurance but has also allowed me to remain focused and resilient at times of professional uncertainties.

    Another major factor that encouraged me to take this step was my appointment as a Legal Aid Counsel on the Sessions Court panel with Delhi State Legal Services Authority (DSLSA). I genuinely feel that this appointment was a game changer. Not only did it allow me to gain access to a wide variety of cases including many heinous and high-stakes matters but it also gave me the invaluable opportunity to serve those who truly needed help but lacked the resources to hire legal representation. Representing underprivileged litigants added a new dimension to my practice and brought a deep sense of purpose to my work.

    Looking back, I realize that starting my independent practice was not just a professional move but it was a test of belief in myself. At some point, you have to back yourself, trust in the foundation you have built and have the courage to step into the unknown. It hasn’t been easy but it has been deeply rewarding.

    In cases involving the Prevention of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO), what are some of the most significant challenges you’ve encountered while addressing the complex legal aspects of such sensitive cases?

    Defending a POCSO (Protection of Children from Sexual Offences) case is extremely challenging and demands high emotional quotient. One of the primary reasons is the statutory reverse burden of proof under Section 29 of the POCSO Act. This provision presumes the guilt of the accused once certain foundational facts are established, thereby shifting the burden onto the defence to disprove the allegations. This is a significant departure from the general principle of criminal law where the burden of proof always lies on the prosecution to prove the guilt beyond resoluble doubt. As a defence lawyer, this reversal requires you to strategize your case very differently which means every piece of evidence, every inconsistency and every contradiction must be highlighted with utmost precision.

    Moreover, POCSO cases involve victims who are minors and that brings its own set of sensitivities and responsibilities. Cross-examining a child witness is one of the most delicate tasks a lawyer can undertake. Unlike regular cross-examinations where a more aggressive or confrontational approach may be employed to test the credibility of a witness, here, you have to strike a fine balance. You must be extremely respectful and gentle in your demeanour while still being assertive enough to bring out inconsistencies, contradictions or improbabilities in the testimony. It requires a heightened level of alertness which means that you need to listen very carefully to the nuances of the child’s statements, their body language and the overall circumstances under which they are testifying. Further, courts are also far more protective of minor witnesses, and rightly so. Thus, every question must be carefully framed, keeping in mind the emotional and psychological vulnerabilities of the child. Working on such cases requires not just sharp legal skills but also a great deal of emotional intelligence, patience and empathy.

    As Senior Panel Counsel for the Union of India, you’ve represented various ministries before the Delhi High Court in several legal proceedings. What are some of the most complex legal issues you’ve faced in this role, and how do you manage the intricacies of government representation?

    My appointment as a Senior Panel Counsel is a relatively recent and significant development in my career. It also marks my formal debut into civil litigation. Most of the matters I handle in this role are service-related cases i.e. disputes pertaining to appointments, promotions, transfers, disciplinary actions, pensionary benefits and other service related disputes involving government employees.

    Engaging in civil litigation, particularly service matters, brings with it a whole new dimension of legal practice. These cases require a deep understanding not only of legal principles but also of administrative procedures, departmental rules and government policies. Preparing for these matters involves careful scrutiny of service records, government orders, circulars and applicable service rules. Every case demands a meticulous approach. What makes this responsibility even more serious is that, as a Senior Panel Counsel, I am representing the Government of India and hence it carries immense responsibility and expectation. Every appearance, every submission and every argument must reflect the highest degree of professionalism, preparedness and integrity because it is the sovereign that you are representing. You are expected to defend the government’s actions wherever they are legally sustainable and also to fairly advise when a case ought to be conceded or settled in the interest of justice. 

    One of the unique aspects of this engagement is the presence of departmental officials from the concerned Ministry or Department who are often present to assist during the preparation and hearings. Their assistance is invaluable as they provide important background information, factual clarifications and access to departmental records which might otherwise be difficult to obtain in regular litigation. At the same time, as counsel, I have to exercise independent judgment in assessing the strength of the case, guiding the officials and ensuring that the position taken before the court is legally tenable. This new role has been both challenging and exciting.

    With your background you’re committed to serving the people of India in alignment with the principle of ‘Satyameva Jayate.’ How do these values influence your approach to legal advocacy? Additionally, what advice would you give to aspiring young lawyers who hope to achieve similar success in the legal field?

    In a profession where the pressures are immense and the temptations to take shortcuts can be strong, staying true to the pursuit of truth ensures not only professional integrity but also personal satisfaction and long-term success. Hence, my belief in the principle of “Satyamev Jayate” (which translates to “Truth Alone Triumphs”). It is the very foundation upon which I approach every case, every client interaction and every argument in court.

    To all young and aspiring lawyers, my sincere advice is simple yet uncompromising: there are no shortcuts in this profession. Legal practice demands a tremendous amount of patience, perseverance and hard work. Knowledge, reputation and success are built slowly, case by case, argument by argument.

    Be humble, Be honest and work hard. 

    With your demanding professional commitments, how do you maintain a healthy work-life balance and prioritize your personal well-being while managing such a wide range of responsibilities?

    Maintaining a healthy work-life balance is something that is crucial, especially in a profession as demanding as law, where we have frequent long work hours and constant deadlines. It is essential to understand that while dedication to your work is important, your well-being is the foundation that supports everything else including your performance, your relationships and your long-term success.

    To be honest, at this point in my career, I have not been able to maintain the kind of balance I would ideally want. Building an independent practice, handling sensitive matters and representing clients to the best of my ability have often meant that personal time, fitness and mental relaxation have taken a back seat. However, with time and experience, I have realized that burnout is real, and without consciously making space for your own health both physical and mental it becomes difficult to sustain the level of excellence we all aspire to achieve. I am now committed to prioritizing myself and my well-being more consciously which means setting clearer boundaries. I recognize that nurturing my health is not just good for me but also essential for the quality of work I deliver.

    Get in touch with Tejasva Mehra –

  • “When you see the hours of toiling while doing research, making drafts and constructing arguments in the office yielding results, the adrenaline rush of a favourable outcome, however small or big it may be, is what keeps me consistently inspired.” – Uday Bedi, Independent Practitioner.

    “When you see the hours of toiling while doing research, making drafts and constructing arguments in the office yielding results, the adrenaline rush of a favourable outcome, however small or big it may be, is what keeps me consistently inspired.” – Uday Bedi, Independent Practitioner.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    What initially inspired you to pursue a career in law, and were there any specific events or formative experiences that shaped your decision to embark on this journey? Reflecting on your law school years, how did your education influence your understanding of the law, and how did it help you develop a foundational approach to legal practice?

    Even though I was in the science stream, I was never drawn to any of the subjects. I saw myself getting intrigued with current affairs and news in the public domain. In school, I used to take part in Youth Parliament competitions where we used to debate laws which lay the foundation for me to study law. I also always found myself to be an advocate for rights of people from a young age. I also saw myself getting drawn to opportunities of public speaking. Law as a profession sat in the middle of all my interest areas, hence it became an obvious choice for me. 

    I went to O.P. Jindal Global University gave me immense exposure that shaped my world view and opinions. Unlike someone who always wanted to find a reason to stay out of the classroom in School, I mostly stayed in the library or classroom in law school. We had a vast and impressive library and an endless scope for learning which I made good use of. I took every opportunity to expand my horizons so I even took a summer course to study at University of Oxford on international human rights which gave me an opportunity to learn from people across the world their outlook towards human rights and how differently in India we perceive the same rights given our socio-economic background. These experiences helped shape my thinking and become more adaptable and accommodative. I chose my internships and moot court competitions according to the subjects I had studied so that I could get into more depth about those subjects. Soon into law school I realised I wanted to get into litigation and I wanted to be in Court arguing matters regularly so I chose to intern with different offices that were active in High Court as well as trial courts. I took electives and courses that would assist me in areas of constitutional, criminal and civil law, all of which were litigation intensive spheres. The things I learnt in these courses are still relevant in the work that I do and being diligent during law school years has proven to be one of my greatest allies in my professional career. 

    Beginning your career as an Associate at the Chambers of Advocate Ankur Sood must have been pivotal experience in your professional journey. Could you share some of the most valuable lessons and experiences you gained during this early phase, and how did you navigate the challenges of building your reputation as a young lawyer amidst the fast-paced world of legal practice?

    They were most certainly the most transformative years for me as a lawyer. As I always dreamt of having an office of my own, the first valuable lesson I got was the importance of having good professional ethics and organisational skills. I saw my seniors being applauded by clients as well as colleagues for their remarkable abilities to manage an office. The second valuable lesson I got was the importance of having a simple yet impressive legal draft. Easy and well organised drafts always strike a chord with the clients and are designed to make law and justice easily accessible which is a vital legal right of the people. The third valuable lesson I got was that there was no alternate to being well-researched and well-read before appearing in Court. I remember I was once asked in the High Court to argue a matter on my own, barely one month into practice while I was only expecting to take a Passover for my senior. However, being put on the spot and made to argue gave me a massive confidence boost and I never looked back because I learnt that it was only upon me to build my own reputation in the fraternity and that nothing would spread word of mouth faster than my own abilities in the Court. Being a young first generation lawyer is not easy, therefore, I grabbed every opportunity to develop a new relation or a new client because I had the confidence in my ability to do justice to my client. No doubt I faltered at times but I was a quick learner and I did not let any shortcomings ever bog me down. I did not shy away from doing cases that did not pay at all or paid very less as long as they were matters of areas of law that I found interesting and had the confidence to deliver in. The profession requires unrelenting hard work and long hours which I was willing to put in because I saw every hour being put in the work as being a way to hone my skill. We are always learning to be more convincing in court which is a place where we stand alone to represent our own craft. I started my independent office just before COVID-19 struck, however that period came as a blessing in disguise for me as I started appearing in different courts all over the country thanks to the VC facility. Good luck and hard work have both paid off in my case.  

    Transitioning from a focus on civil law to specializing in criminal litigation presents a significant shift in approach and skillset. How did this shift refine your abilities in handling complex criminal cases, particularly high-stakes matters like those related to murder, theft, and the Prevention of Money Laundering Act? Can you describe a particularly challenging case that you came across on the criminal side?

    The most important skills in either area of law are your ability to be diligent with the facts and preparedness with the latest law on the subject. I feel as a lawyer you are anyway taught to wear different hats at different times so you automatically learn to have different approaches to any given situation. Dealing more with criminal cases taught me the value of being brief and direct, something that is lost in the pleadings of civil cases. It can be challenging to move from the civil and commercial side to the criminal side because of the habits developed in civil law to be as detailed and explanatory as possible. For instance, in civil law, you cannot lead evidence beyond your pleadings, so one tends to expand and leave room for directing the case in a particular direction. But largely, both parties are aware about the broad ambit of the case of either party. There is no such concept in criminal law, nor is there scope for filing pleadings at trial. You uncover a criminal case like a plucking petals from a flower, i.e. you keep on opening up your case one layer at a time to check which strategy is giving you the best result. Whether you are prosecuting or defending, it is very important to not delve into detailed merits of the case in the early stages of a criminal case so as to avoid giving away your strategy. 

    I don’t believe in calling any matter having a higher stake than the other because every client comes to you with the hope that you are their last hope. As a nation, we are not very litigation friendly and my experience is that in most cases people come to lawyers when they have no more avenues in front of them. As a litigating lawyer, every day in court is a day involving high stakes because the orders passed on a daily basis form a basis for the final judgment that you are expecting in the case. 

    One particularly challenging case that I have seen on the criminal side is one which I am currently handling. This case involves an alleged GST fraud where the accused is alleged to have prepared forged documents for creation of fake GST registrations in order to pocket large sums of money thereby causing losses of many crores to several persons whose GST details have been allegedly forged. The defence of this person rests on proving that it is not his usage of the laptops that has caused any of the fake GST registrations but rather it is the act of a different person who has impersonated or gained illegal access to my client’s laptop to create the fake registrations. An offence of this nature would be covered under Section 467 IPC which contains a punishment of life imprisonment and therefore becomes an extremely crucial matter that involves knowing technical know-how and the interplay of law and technology. 

    After gaining invaluable experience working with prominent legal minds, what inspired you to establish your own practice? What were some of the key obstacles you encountered while setting up your independent practice, and how did you overcome them to build a sustainable and successful legal career?

    I think almost everyone enters the field of chamber litigation with a dream to run their own office and I was no different. I was lucky to have an amazing set of mentors who gave me the confidence in a short span of 3 years to venture out independently. While there is no right formula to this, I had two critical factors in mind while starting my own office. The first was confirming with myself whether I knew what advice to give to a client who came to me with any kind of legal query. It required knowing what next steps were to be taken in any kind of litigation in order to strategize for the client. This confidence I had got because of a wide variety of cases that I had dealt with before different fora in a span of three years and I had already seen many cases go from the first date till the date of judgment so I was sufficiently abreast with what was required at each stage. I did not feel the need for any more handholding in terms of what lay next in any kind of litigation. 

    The second was the frequency of my appearances in court. I did not want to start my own practice and spend the majority of my days at home or in the office. When I saw that I had sufficient work that would require me to give more importance to it than I could give to my senior’s office, I thought it fit to move on. From the first month of when I went independent, I had 15 appearances in a month in different courts which I thought was a decent tally to be on my own. 

    Key obstacles that I faced were the anxiety of finding more work and building connections. For first generation lawyers, finding work is often tough. I was not in the habit of going out to network and find work. Luckily work flowed in at a decent pace for me as word of mouth spread and many law school friends of mine from other states reposed great faith in me to pursue litigation for their clients in Delhi. In the initial phase, the pace of growth was slow and the outbreak of COVID-19 proved to be a period that required a lot more hard work to be able to sustain a practice. During COVID-19, I spent the first six months gorging on legal commentaries and SCC Online in order to expand my knowledge base. To cut costs, I used to manage the filings by myself and did not keep a clerk until it became essential for me to hire someone. I made many judgment compilations on key legal points that are of great help till today. 

    When handling complex criminal cases, especially those involving multi-jurisdictional issues, what strategies do you employ to navigate the legal intricacies of different courts and jurisdictions?

    Different courts and jurisdictions often mean that the rules of procedure as well as general practices of courts and investigating agencies differ. We have in our country several different wings of investigating agencies and all of them have entirely separate rules of functioning. Scandinavian legal theorists propounded that the life of law is not logic but experience. This is best exemplified when one is faced with multi-jurisdictional issues. Different jurisdictions bring with them challenges and frameworks that are prevalent only within that jurisdiction and the best way to deal with them is to fit in your case within that framework. Every Court has its own procedures, customs and practices. It has to be seen whether any party is indulging in forum shopping in order to invoke different jurisdictions to suit one set of procedures or practices. 

    I am currently dealing with a matter that spans across three states with multiple investigating agencies involved. At the outset, it is always important to look at whether the case is even maintainable under multiple jurisdictions. It is then important to check for overlaps and conflicts in the different jurisdictions and see if they can help in identifying loopholes found during different investigations. For instance, I am handling a case where statements given by one witness to different investigating agencies are contrary to each other fundamentally and a comprehensive reading of the same would allow us to safeguard our client from prosecution in both jurisdictions.  

    In litigation, every step that you take becomes a matter of public record and it is very difficult to hide missteps taken along the way. Therefore, it becomes very crucial to be fully aware about the expected reliefs in any given jurisdiction and to file appropriate pleadings in order to minimise the risks of unfavourable outcomes. 

    Given your extensive experience across a wide spectrum of judicial and quasi-judicial forums from the Supreme Court to specialized tribunals, how do you craft your litigation strategy specifically for RERA matters? In your view, what distinguishes real estate litigation under RERA from traditional civil or commercial disputes?

    RERA disputes come in various forms, i.e. judicial as well as administrative. These proceedings are largely summary in nature, i.e. there are no trials or leading of evidence or cross examination etc. in the traditional sense. Real estate litigation can be very complex because it requires a specific expertise in knowing local land laws, environmental laws, understanding of developmental contracts, builder buyer agreements and also understanding the interplay between government departments and private entities. Since it is a fairly recent legislation, there are several areas of law that remain unexplored and it allows for more room to have fundamental jurisprudential arguments. 

    For instance, I am currently working on a dispute that involves a developer who has abandoned a project and is looking to develop a different project on the same land by seeking new investments. Several key issues arise in this case, such as (a) whether a developer which has failed to deliver a project should at all be allowed to migrate to a different project on the same parcel of land. If yes, what sort of limitations can be placed on the developer for the second phase of development. If no, what happens to the parcel of land and how does one take a project towards deregistration; (b) whether a developer can be allowed to migrate to a different project on the same parcel of land without first satisfying the claims of its original allottees/buyers.  It is also interesting to see how and before which forum these questions can be decided. I would put these cases in the hard category of cases because they require a very in depth analysis of RERA and its objectives and its interplay with other laws because often the plain language of the legislation does not provide all answers.

    One very key factor that is always in mind is that RERA was not only enacted for the purposes of solving real estate litigation, but also for the enhancement of the real estate sector in this country which I feel plays a vital role in strategizing how to go about resolving a dispute. We are often faced with questions that pertain to public policy and socio economic reform. Sometimes, apparent and evident contractual remedies may not be the correct remedies under RERA and therefore our pleadings and arguments are designed in a manner to suit the objectives of RERA Act.

    However, I must add that due to the proceedings being summary in nature, these disputes are usually faster to resolve than traditional civil and commercial suits. So one strategy always is to simplify pleadings and make concise arguments. Earlier, RERA orders were executed through different authorities that was leading to long delays but RERA has recently been given the power to execute its own orders which can often turn out to be a challenge and therefore we are constantly finding ways to shorten the execution proceedings to ensure speedier justice to the people who have secured orders in their favour. 

    What has consistently inspired you to pursue a career in law, especially given the high-pressure demands of litigation? How do you maintain a healthy balance between your professional responsibilities and personal well-being, ensuring sustained performance without burnout?

    There is no greater satisfaction than a good day in Court. When you see the hours of toiling while doing research, making drafts and constructing arguments in the office yielding results, the adrenaline rush of a favourable outcome, however small or big it may be, is what keeps me consistently inspired. I also find that litigation allows one to wear so many hats in a day and puts lawyers in a unique position to understand different walks of life and allows us to have key insights into other professions. For example, doing medical negligence cases allows lawyers to not only learn the legal standards of medical negligence but also widens our horizons to understand hospital procedures. A simple cheque bounce dispute could make one get into understanding the internal workings of corporations etc. which I feel is rarely available to people in any other profession. The high pressure of litigation is therefore well-compensated by the diverse set of skills/knowledge that one learns on the job. 

    In a profession such as litigation, you have to learn to accept unpredictability. A seemingly jam-packed day often turns out to be completely free and vice versa. It is therefore important to find moments every now and then to do activities that lower down stress levels and ensure sustainable working models. I ensure personal well being by remaining physically active by playing a sport or regular exercise. I also like to meet my travel goals to help with the exhaustion of a high pressure job. It would be a good idea to not give up on pursuing hobbies and to take out time for them as and when the opportunity is available instead of waiting for a weekend to clear the schedule up. Lastly, in order to avoid a burnout it is essential to ensure that there is no conflict or doubt in your mind about practising law. 

    With your diverse and accomplished legal journey, what guidance would you offer to aspiring legal professionals? Are there particular strategies, learning resources, or a roadmap you would recommend for law students and young lawyers who aspire to excel in litigation or corporate advisory practice?

    It is very important for young lawyers and law students to enter the field of litigation. I especially feel that more female law students must strive to enter the field of litigation as it will go a long way to break gender based barriers. I personally feel that there is room for female lawyers to enter the field of criminal litigation to ensure more gender sensitive dealing of criminal matters. So, I would really encourage young lawyers to come to Court and join litigation. However, this encouragement comes with certain disclaimers. First and foremost, I would advise every young legal professional to be sure of their key skills and capabilities because litigation and corporate advisories require a completely different set of skills to finesse. There is no substitute for a voracious appetite for studying and reading in litigation because it is very important to remain up to date with latest developments in the law and also having the skill to place the developments in the historical context of how the law has been shaped over the years. Lawyers are bombarded with information and documents day in day out and they are expected to be abreast of all developments and therefore presence of mind with a willingness to grasp more is a sine qua non for every litigator. 

    The second skill is learning professional etiquettes which is helpful not only at the bar but also with the clients. As the legal profession is a noble one, it is very important to uphold the highest sense of loyalty to clients as well as the Courts and know that short cuts and convenience must never take precedence. This is extremely important to uphold the dignity of the profession. Lawyers must protect this dignity through their conduct at all times. 

    The third advice would be to remain inquisitive. It is very important for a legal professional to understand the meaning, scope and applicability of any legal problem before him or her. This curiosity and inquisitive nature will allow room for creative uses of the law which is extremely important especially now that the world is transforming and artificial intelligence is percolating all walks of life. 

    Get in touch with Uday Bedi –

  • “As a first-generation lawyer, my journey into law was driven by a deep sense of purpose to stand up for justice and help those in need and underprivileged.” – Kunal Gosain, Founding Partner at KG Law Offices.

    “As a first-generation lawyer, my journey into law was driven by a deep sense of purpose to stand up for justice and help those in need and underprivileged.” – Kunal Gosain, Founding Partner at KG Law Offices.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    As a first-generation lawyer, what inspired you to pursue law as a career? Were there specific moments or experiences that motivated you to take this path?

    As a first-generation lawyer, my journey into law was driven by a deep sense of purpose to stand up for justice and help those in need and underprivileged. I lost my father at the age of 16 which was a transformative moment for me personally. It taught me the value of resilience and perseverance, hard work and determination which eventually became guiding principles in my life. 

    To be honest, I initially aspired to become an actor or a journalist, as I have always been a creative and artistic person with a deep appreciation for creative pursuits and  finer things in life.I remember that in school days we used to perform street Theatre in Association with “Jan Natya Manch”(Founded by Safdar Hashmi), Yuva Ekta Foundation(An initiative of Tehelka) for social causes and spreading awareness like Child Labour, Education and its importance, HIV, Corruption, Right to Information, Right to Education, Child marriage to name a few. I always wanted to do something for the society and I did not want to just stop at spreading awareness but also wanted to empower the underprivileged, give them a voice and make a difference in our society. 

    The vast experience I gathered from interacting with people from all walks of life and looking at their lives and challenges closely, coupled with the unwavering support of my mother and brothers, instilled in me a sense of purpose and determination to carve out my own path in the legal field. It would not have been possible without my family which is my biggest strength.

    I believed I possessed the necessary skills that this profession demands and once introduced to courts and law as a field I felt a deep sense of belonging within the courts. This made law the ideal profession for me to channel my passion and drive to create a meaningful impact in society.

    In the early stages of your career, you likely encountered both valuable learning opportunities and challenges. Can you share some key experiences that helped you build a strong foundation in law and influence your career path?

    The initial years of my legal career were pivotal in shaping my understanding of the profession. I had the privilege of working under some of the most accomplished legal minds, each of whom contributed significantly to my growth. Starting in the chambers of Senior Advocate K.K. Manan provided me with a solid grounding in criminal law. During my time there, I learned the essentials of court craft and the nuances of legal practice, which played a crucial role in helping me overcome my initial hesitation in appearing before the High Court. This early exposure instilled confidence and prepared me for the challenges of litigation.

    Later, my time with Mr. J Ajay Digpaul  (before his elevation) and Ms. Arti Bansal allowed me to represent the Union of India/Central Government in significant High Court matters, further refining my skills in drafting, argumentation, and handling complex procedural frameworks. Working with them deepened my understanding of litigation and advocacy, while also reinforcing the importance of meticulous preparation and clarity in legal reasoning.

    A defining phase of my career was working with my mentor, Mr. Saurabh Prakash, a disciple of the revered Shri Paramhansa Yogananda and an accomplished IIT Kanpur graduate in Chemical Engineering who transitioned to law. Under his guidance, I gained insights into diverse practice areas, including civil disputes, employment law, and writ petitions and diverse disputes including a Fake encounter case. He emphasized the importance of thorough preparation, reading files meticulously, conducting in-depth research, and crafting well-drafted pleadings, which he often described as the backbone of any case. During this period, I had hands-on experience drafting writ petitions, suits, SLPs, and contracts, among working on other diverse cases.

    What truly stood out about Mr. Prakash was his unwavering commitment to maintaining the highest level of morals and ethics in the practice of law. He not only emphasized these principles but lived by them, setting an example for those under his guidance. He frequently reminded me to “always take the longer route in approaching a case, don’t look for shortcuts. While it may take more time, the learning it brings is invaluable.” This philosophy has been instrumental in shaping my approach to legal practice and my outlook on the profession.

    Before entering the profession, I received valuable advice from a Judicial Officer, now a High Court Judge, who emphasized the importance of mastering civil law, drafting, and research before delving into criminal law. This guidance helped me lay a strong foundation for my career. Additionally, during a judicial internship with a now-retired judge of the Delhi High Court, I had the rare opportunity to view cases from the bench’s perspective. This experience gave me a deeper understanding of judicial reasoning and the critical role of precision and clarity in legal arguments.

    These formative experiences taught me to approach every case with diligence, empathy, and unwavering integrity, laying the groundwork for a career defined by commitment to excellence and ethical practice.

    After gaining significant experience with various law firms, what prompted you to establish your own practice? What were the driving forces behind this decision, and what challenges did you face when starting out?

    Establishing KG Law Offices was born out of a desire to serve clients with a personalized and solution-driven approach. I wanted to build a space, a niche for myself that reflected my principles, provided personalized legal solutions, and addressed clients’ challenges with integrity and commitment and while having a relief-oriented approach. 

    Truth be told, starting out on my own and establishing independent practice was not without its hurdles, I literally had not many cases or briefs when I decided to go independent! While there were many raised eyebrows and my friends and colleagues being apprehensive about the step being too early to start out on my own , I was determined and had faith in God and myself. I just kept going on one day at a time.    

    There were significant challenges; right from building a client base, making a place for yourself, generating enough money to sustaining the practice, earning trust as a first-generation lawyer in this highly competitive environment, getting recommendations which I faced and had to overcome by sheer hard work and having a client centric and relief-oriented approach and needless to say delivering results and relief to clients. 

    The driving force behind this decision were all these experiences which reinforced my determination to carve a niche and create a firm where professionalism, empathy, and excellence guide every decision. 

    In this odyssey of self-discovery and finding my calling, I must say that every step of it has been equally humbling and rewarding, allowing me to contribute meaningfully to the profession and society which gives me a sense of satisfaction and fulfilment. I do not have any regrets or would not want to have it any other way.

    This is one of my favourite quotes I live by ! “Be Among Those who dare to follow their dreams”

    Over the years, you’ve represented high-networth individuals (HNIs), NRIs, and international corporations. Could you share one of the most memorable cases and the strategies you employed to achieve successful outcomes?

    One of the most memorable cases I handled involved an intellectual property rights dispute related to the works of a revered spiritual figure associated with one of the most prestigious Ashrams or monastic orders. This case was complex, as it spanned multiple jurisdictions and involved overlapping Indian laws, including personal laws, intellectual property rights law, and international law. Additionally, there was a critical need to balance the protection of intellectual property with the sensitivity of cultural and religious considerations, especially since the dispute had international implications.

    A particularly valuable aspect of this case was the opportunity it gave me to engage closely with the lives of Sanyasis and Monks, allowing me to gain insights into their practices and teachings. This personal experience enriched my understanding of the subject matter and gave me a deeper appreciation of the spiritual context in which the legal dispute arose.

    The complexity of the case was heightened by the fact that the legal framework governing Sanyasis, Monks, and Sadhus is relatively limited, especially when it comes to intellectual property disputes. The dispute was not related to immovable property, which is more commonly associated with religious institutions, but rather to intellectual property rights. In this context, the Sri Krishna Singh vs. Mathura Ahir case (1979) –AIR 1980 SUPREME COURT 707 which became the locus classicus on the laws concerning Sadhus, Yatis, and Sanyasis – proved to be pivotal. This landmark judgment of the Supreme Court of India extensively discusses various aspects of the legal status of Sanyasis and Yatis, and it provided critical guidance on how to approach cases involving religious figures and their intellectual property rights.

    The decision of the Apex Court in Mathura Ahir became essential in shaping our strategy, as it was a key reference point for understanding the legal standing of the individuals involved and their rights. The judgment clarified multiple legal aspects that were directly relevant to our case, including the succession and rights of Sanyasis, and it provided invaluable precedents for addressing the unique challenges we faced.

    The strategy we employed was comprehensive and meticulous. It involved in-depth legal research, careful documentation, and the alignment of the client’s objectives with the applicable laws. Our approach also emphasized clear communication and teamwork, with each team member contributing to the development of a strong case.

    This case and how we evolved the strategy regarding the said case was a testament to the importance of hard work, thorough legal preparation, and collaboration. It underscored how a deep understanding of the legal and cultural context, coupled with a strategic use of relevant case law can resolve the most complex and sensitive legal matters.

    It was a collaborative effort, where clear communication and attention to detail played a critical role. The successful resolution of this case reinforced my belief in the importance of clear communication, hard work, meticulous preparation, and team work. 

    You have handled cases for various clients, including public sector undertakings (PSUs). Can you describe a particularly complex issue you’ve dealt with while representing PSUs, and how does your approach differ in dealing with private clients?

    One of the more challenging cases I handled for a PSU involved coordinating with multiple departments spread across different states, each with its own set of processes and jurisdictional hurdles. It was a test of patience and persistence, as aligning everyone on the same page while ensuring all legal and procedural requirements were met was no small task.

    What made it particularly complex was managing the flow of communication between the PSU’s central office, regional branches, and external parties, all while adhering to tight timelines and keeping in mind the courts directives. To navigate this, I relied on a systematic approach, breaking the problem into manageable parts, using technology to stay organized, and maintaining open and frequent communication with everyone involved.

    Ultimately, we achieved a favorable outcome, and the experience taught me the value of teamwork, clear communication, and strategic planning when representing organizations with such intricate structures. It’s cases like these that remind me how important it is to approach such cases with a steady hand and a collaborative mindset and how paying attention to detail becomes crucial.

    Working with PSUs often involves a more structured and procedural approach. There are layers of approvals, formalities, and timelines that require careful management. On the other hand, private clients usually expect faster, more flexible, and tailored solutions. With private clients, it’s about being agile and adapting strategies to their specific needs, while with PSUs, it’s about patience, meticulous planning, and ensuring that everything aligns with institutional frameworks.

    Each approach has its own challenges, but both have taught me to balance efficiency with attention to detail, which is essential in delivering the best outcomes.

    In addition to your legal practice, you’re involved in social causes. Can you tell us more about your work with organizations like Jan Natya Manch and Yuva Ekta Foundation, and how you use your influence to raise awareness of important social issues?

    My involvement with Jan Natya Manch, founded by the late Safdar Hashmi, was one of the most enriching experiences of my life. Under the guidance of Moloyshree Hashmi, I performed street plays addressing critical social issues like child labor, education, HIV awareness, corruption, the Right to Information, and child marriage, among others. Similarly, my association with the Yuva Ekta Foundation, an initiative of Tehelka Magazine, allowed me to connect with young minds and raise awareness about pressing societal concerns while pursuing my creative passions.

    During my college years, I continued to explore my artistic side, performing in street theatre and full-length drama productions. I even ventured into professional acting and worked on a few ad films. However, as I approached the completion of my studies, I realized that my true calling was in the legal field. The sense of purpose and belonging I felt in courts and within the legal profession inspired me to fully dedicate myself to this path. Over the years, my passion and admiration for the field have only deepened.

    As a legal professional, I firmly believe that our responsibility extends beyond the courtroom. Advocacy isn’t just about arguing cases—it’s about raising awareness and inspiring change in the society we serve. My involvement with these organizations was an expression of that belief.

    Recently, my legal team and I worked on a significant case against a renowned educational institution in Delhi that had unlawfully expelled 30 students belonging to the Economically Weaker Section (EWS) category. We secured a favorable interim order, ensuring the students’ reinstatement. The judgment not only upheld the rights of these children under the Right to Education (RTE) Act but also sent a strong message to all schools in Delhi about the sanctity of a child’s right to education. No one should be denied their right to education—it’s a fundamental and valuable right that must be protected at all costs.

    Such cases reaffirm my belief in using the law as a tool to bring about meaningful societal change and to stand up for those whose voices often go unheard.

    Having faced numerous challenges along your journey, what keeps you motivated to continue striving for excellence in your legal career and contributing to the legal community?

    My motivation comes from a deep sense of responsibility toward my clients and the legal profession. Throughout my journey, I have faced numerous challenges, but fortunately with the unwavering support of my mother and two elder brothers, and the blessings of my late father. Their encouragement, combined with the mentorship of individuals like Mr. Saurabh Prakash, has played a pivotal role in shaping my career due to which I was able to overcome these adversities and pursue my passion for law, charting my own path. 

    My family, faith, and mentors provide constant strength and guidance. An ardent devotee of Lord Shiva, I attribute my strength and success to my mother, my family, my guru (Shivji), my late father’s blessings, and the invaluable mentorship of Mr. Saurabh Prakash.

    I find immense inspiration in knowing that my work can bring tangible relief and justice to my clients. Whether it involves mentoring young lawyers, addressing societal inequities, or advocating for those in need, every success reaffirms my dedication to the principles of fairness, integrity, and service. 

    This blend of professional purpose and personal fulfillment fuels my determination to continue growing and making a positive impact on both the legal profession and the community at large

    With nearly a decade of experience, how do you foresee the future of the legal profession, particularly with the rise of technology? What steps are you taking to adapt to these changes?

    Technology is transforming the legal landscape, making processes more efficient and accessible. At KG Law Offices, we embraced digitization early, moving away from traditional diaries to digital case management systems a long time ago, that is much before COVID, therefore we have evolved a system of case management of our own and don’t need expensive “Case management” Softwares and tools. We have leveraged technology and use Tools like e-filing, cloud storage, Digitization of case files and paperless operations. Some of the steps like “Efiling”,”Digital e- inspection” and “Video conferencing have really increased productivity and have showcased transparency and accountability but these are just limited to the metro cities and not remote areas of our country which are in dire need of a robust justice dispensation system and lack basic infrastructure. Its surprising that while we live in Metro cities and we see courts being digitised and everything available on a click of button, the remote areas and the rural areas are deprived of even basic infrastructure and are still in the archaic era and leveraging technology In such areas can really bring in a lot of progress and change the whole scenario.

    While AI and automation are valuable tools, it is important to recognize their limitations. However, technology can only complement human intervention, it cannot replace the insight and empathy lawyers bring to their work. For instance, AI can streamline research but lacks the nuanced judgment required in legal decision making. We are committed to using technology responsibly to enhance transparency and accountability while ensuring that the human element remains at the forefront. Our goal is to use these advancements not just for operational efficiency but also to contribute to a more inclusive and effective legal system, bridging the digital divide

    What advice would you give to aspiring lawyers, particularly those from non-legal backgrounds, who wish to follow a career path like yours? Additionally, could you recommend any resources that help them stay informed about the latest developments and trends in the legal field?

    Aspiring lawyers, particularly those from non legal backgrounds, should approach the legal profession with patience, perseverance, and a deep commitment to continuous learning. Establishing oneself in this field requires resilience and a long term vision, much like planting a bamboo tree, which takes years to grow strong roots before it flourishes. Similarly, the initial 3-5 years in law are crucial for laying a solid foundation, building skills, and understanding the nuances of the profession.

    It is important to acknowledge that practicing law can be challenging, especially for those without financial support. The profession often demands a substantial investment of time and effort before yielding tangible rewards. Salaries for fresh graduates are often modest, and the competition in the legal field is intense, with a significant increase in the number of practicing lawyers over the years. However, these challenges should not deter determined individuals from pursuing their dreams. With dedication, strategic planning, and a genuine passion for justice, success is achievable.

    For those starting their journey, Staying up to date with Judgments , reading Judgments delivered by the Supreme Courts and High Courts of our country readily available on websites is an excellent resource for honing skills and staying informed about recent developments in law, you need not have expensive subscriptions to reporters , you can also effectively use the Libraries of the courts which are well equipped these days. Additionally, reading case law regularly, attending legal seminars, participating in moot courts, and engaging with experienced mentors can provide invaluable insights and most importantly being mindful of your company and who you hang out with also matters a lot. Aspiring lawyers should also focus on cultivating soft skills such as communication, negotiation, PR skills, client counselling, critical thinking, which are indispensable for a successful legal career.

    Most importantly, never lose faith in your ability to make a difference, no matter your background. The legal profession is one of service and impact. Stay grounded, work hard, and remember that your integrity and dedication to the cause of justice will define your legacy in this noble profession. One should approach the profession with humility and a sense of service. Remember that our work is about helping people and assisting the courts as we are officers of the court and a crucial part of the justice dispensing system, it is not just about winning cases or making money solely.

    Aspiring lawyers must always remember that integrity and principles are the foundation of this profession. Never compromise on your character or values for material gains, this is the golden thumb rule I firmly believe in and follow. 

    I have a guiding philosophy which I have devised and live by, which emphasizes not only professional success but also the ethical conduct and higher purpose of the legal profession. 

    As per me broadly speaking, the cases a lawyer handles can be categorized into three types, each serving a distinct purpose and contributing to one’s growth:

    • Cases for Name and Reputation: These cases, in essence, translate to “Ek kaam naam ke liye karo”—One of the goals is to work for reputation and recognition. These are cases that may not bring immediate financial rewards but provide unparalleled exposure and recognition. Handling such matters puts you in the spotlight, allowing you to showcase your talent and build credibility. I always advise aspiring lawyers that you could be the most talented individual, but without a platform and opportunity, your abilities might remain unnoticed. Moreover, as I often say, “Your network is equal to your net worth.” Lawyers must develop excellent PR skills to build connections and relationships in the profession. 
    • Cases for a Cause or Pro Bono Work: These cases, as I see them, translate to “Ek kaam seva ke liye karo kisi ki madad ke liye”– work for service and for making a difference.  Taking on cases to help those who are in need and are underprivileged without expecting financial compensation, is one of the most fulfilling aspects of this profession.The exposure and sense of fulfillment that comes from empowering someone through legal support are unmatched. Pro bono work reminds us of the higher calling of our profession—to seek justice and uplift the underprivileged. 
    • Cases for Financial Empowerment : These cases translate to “Ek kaam paise ke liye karo”—work to earn and build your financial independence. While name and service are important, financial independence is equally vital. Handling cases that offer significant monetary compensation empowers you economically and boosts confidence, especially for first-generation lawyers. There is no greater joy than being self-made and financially secure. This is why I encourage young lawyers to begin accepting briefs even while working under a senior, provided the senior is supportive. I also urge mentors and seniors to provide opportunities to the younger generation, as it helps them grow professionally and personally. 

    Balancing these three types of cases in your career ensures not only professional growth but also personal satisfaction and a meaningful contribution to society. As lawyers, we must aim to uphold the nobility of our profession, maintaining a fine balance between serving others, earning a livelihood, and building a reputation that lasts a lifetime.

    Get in touch with Kunal Gosain –

  • “Be consistent, work steadily, even when success seems distant and most importantly, remain determined, litigation is not an easy path, but it is one that rewards those who persevere.” – Kunal Kumar, Independent Counsel.

    “Be consistent, work steadily, even when success seems distant and most importantly, remain determined, litigation is not an easy path, but it is one that rewards those who persevere.” – Kunal Kumar, Independent Counsel.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    What motivated you to pursue a career in law, and what factors influenced  your decision to enter this field? 

    While I was a PCM (Science with Mathematics) student in school, I always knew  that engineering or any science-related field wasn’t my calling. At the same time,  my family never imposed their aspirations on me, thus allowing me to focus on  what truly resonated with me. 

    What stood out to me about the law was its dynamic nature and its potential to  impact society. During my senior year of school, I had the opportunity to meet  one of my father’s friends, now a reputed senior advocate. He shared how the  profession is not just about arguing cases in court but about shaping the law,  resolving disputes, and bringing meaningful changes to people’s lives.  “Curiosity, consistency, and determination,” he said, “are the pillars of success  in the legal field.” Those words struck a chord with me and broadened my  understanding of what a career in law could entail. Choosing law was not just  about ambition; it was about aligning my interests with my strengths. I’ve always  been drawn to structured reasoning, persuasive communication, and finding  creative solutions to challenges. 

    Looking back, my decision to pursue law feels both deliberate and intuitive,  shaped by personal experiences, influential encounters, and the freedom to  chart my own course. It wasn’t a single moment but a combination of factors that  made me realize that law was where I could thrive and make a meaningful  impact. 

    You went on to pursue your LL.M. in Dispute Resolution from the Straus  Institute at Pepperdine University, California (2015), where you were  awarded the prestigious Straus Fellowship Award of USD 25,000. What was  the driving force behind choosing this institution for your Masters? 

    During my bachelors in law, I had the privilege of interning with Mr.  Veeraraghavan Inbavijayan, one of the foremost arbitrators in the field, who  became both a mentor and an influential figure in my professional growth. This  internship, although conducted online in 2013—when digital internships were  not as widely recognized as they are today—was an incredibly rewarding  experience. Mr. Inbavijayan tasked me with researching and preparing detailed  notes on various case laws pertaining to construction, maritime, and  commercial disputes, areas in which he was actively serving as an arbitrator. The  real value of this internship came not just from the legal research, but from the  unique opportunity to observe the intricate process of arbitration from a neutral,  impartial perspective.

    This exposure gave me invaluable insights into how arbitration operates as a  mechanism for dispute resolution. What stood out to me the most was the  flexibility inherent in the process, which allows parties to resolve conflicts in a  more streamlined, cost-effective manner compared to traditional litigation. The  freedom arbitration affords to the parties, especially when it comes to choosing  the governing laws and procedural rules, deeply fascinated me. This flexibility  allows for the customization of the proceedings, making it an appealing choice  for complex, multi-jurisdictional disputes that require tailored solutions. The  dynamic nature of arbitration, coupled with its efficiency, was exactly what I was  looking for in the field of law. 

    It was during this time that I became certain that arbitration and dispute  resolution were the areas I wanted to specialize in. This passion led me to pursue  an LL.M. in Dispute Resolution from the Straus Institute at Pepperdine University  in California. I chose Pepperdine not only because of its reputation as a leading  institution in the field of dispute resolution and its leading ranking, but also  because of its practical, hands-on approach to teaching and its strong emphasis  on international arbitration and resolving disputes. The Straus Institute’s unique  curriculum, combined with its faculty of esteemed professionals who have made  significant contributions to the field, made it the ideal place for me to further my  knowledge and skill set. The opportunity to study under experts in the field, while  also engaging with a diverse, international student body, further solidified my  decision. My experience at PepperdineUniversity, particularly being awarded the  prestigious Straus Fellowship Award of USD 25,000, gave me both the academic  foundation and the practical tools to excel in this field. It was a pivotal step in  shaping my career as a dispute resolution professional, and I look back on it as  one of the most transformative periods of my professional life. 

    During your early career, what valuable insights did you gain from your  internships in Dubai, particularly regarding international arbitration? How  were they different from the law firms in India? 

    During the early stages of my career, I had the opportunity to intern at several  prominent law firms in Dubai, which provided me with invaluable insights into  international arbitration, particularly in the context of the Middle East and cross border disputes. These internships were pivotal in shaping my understanding of  the practical aspects of arbitration and the unique challenges faced by  practitioners in a globalized legal environment. 

    One of the most significant takeaways from my time in Dubai was the exposure  to the complexity of multi-jurisdictional arbitration cases. Unlike India, where  many arbitration matters are still in the process of evolving, Dubai is known for  being a hub for international arbitration due to its strategic location and modern  infrastructure. The Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) and the Dubai  International Arbitration Centre (DIAC) offer a dynamic and highly regulated  environment for resolving disputes that involve parties from different legal systems. I had the opportunity to work on cases involving international  commercial disputes, construction contracts, and trade agreements, often  involving parties from diverse backgrounds and legal traditions. This taught me  the importance of understanding and navigating the cultural, legal, and  procedural differences that impact the way arbitration is conducted in different  parts of the world. 

    The most striking difference I noticed between law firms in Dubai and those in  India was the level of global exposure and the emphasis on handling cross border disputes. In Dubai, arbitration is seen as a preferred method of dispute  resolution, and the legal landscape is highly international, with professionals  from all over the world practising together. This globalised atmosphere made it  clear that international arbitration requires not just expertise in local law but also  a deep understanding of international conventions, and the nuances of various  national legal systems. The law firms in Dubai, where I interned, placed a  significant emphasis on teamwork and collaboration with international partners,  which helped me develop a more holistic view of the legal process. 

    In contrast, the firms in India, while still handling complex arbitration cases, were  more focused on domestic laws and issues that were more localised,  particularly due to the legal framework in India being still relatively in its  development phase compared to more established jurisdictions. Arbitration in  India often involved navigating a system that had a more procedural and  statutory focus, with a stronger emphasis on litigation and court involvement in  certain cases. This made the experience in Dubai refreshing, as I was exposed to  a more streamlined and flexible approach, where the role of arbitration centres  and the autonomy of the arbitrators were much more pronounced. 

    Overall, these internships in Dubai not only broadened my knowledge of  international arbitration but also deepened my appreciation for the importance  of adaptability, cultural sensitivity, and global legal practices in today’s  interconnected world. The exposure to both global legal practices in Dubai and  the evolving legal landscape in India has given me a comprehensive  understanding of how arbitration can function on both local and international  stages. 

    How was your experience at Pepperdine University, California? Were there  any other courses which were not strictly related to arbitration? How was the  experience of learning different from the law school you attended in India? 

    My time at Pepperdine University in California was an enriching and  transformative experience. Studying at the Straus Institute for Dispute Resolution exposed me to a world of legal education that was dynamic,  interdisciplinary, and practical. One of the courses which was not strictly arbitration  related, and which I truly enjoyed was ‘Mediation – Theory and Practice’, which  was taught by one of the most reputed professors at Pepperdine. The professor’s expertise and real-world experience made the class not only intellectually  stimulating but also deeply insightful. I came to appreciate how mediation, as a  dispute resolution process, can often be more valuable than arbitration,  especially in cases where preserving relationships and finding mutually beneficial solutions are paramount. While arbitration is structured and often  adversarial, mediation allows the parties to have greater control over the  outcome. In mediation, the role of the mediator is not to impose a decision but  to facilitate a dialogue that helps the parties reach their own resolution. This  process, which emphasizes collaboration, negotiation, and empathy, is  especially valuable in disputes involving long-term relationships, such as family  businesses or international partnerships. I found that in many cases, mediation  can help preserve ongoing relationships that could be irrevocably damaged  through arbitration or litigation. For example, in a commercial dispute between  two family-owned businesses, mediation could have been a better approach to  help the parties maintain their business relationships while resolving their legal  issues amicably. 

    Another course that had a profound impact on me was Cross-Cultural Conflict  and Dispute Resolution, which taught me the importance of understanding how  culture influences the way people approach conflict and resolution. This course  was particularly relevant in the context of international arbitration, where the  parties often come from diverse cultural backgrounds. I learned that cultural  differences can significantly impact negotiation styles, communication, and  even perceptions of fairness. For instance, I discovered that in some cultures,  maintaining harmony and avoiding confrontation is more important than directly  addressing the issue, while in others, a more direct, assertive approach is  preferred. A great example of this is the difference in conflict resolution  approaches between Western and Eastern cultures. In the West, particularly in  the United States, a direct, problem-solving approach to conflict is common,  with a focus on resolving issues quickly and efficiently. In contrast, many Asian  cultures, such as those in Japan and China, place a higher value on maintaining  face and relationships, often preferring a more indirect, collaborative approach  to resolving disputes.  

    The educational experience at Pepperdine was vastly different from the law  school I attended in India. In India, while the legal education is rigorous, it tends  to be more focused on theoretical learning and the application of Indian law, with  a strong emphasis on preparing students for the Indian legal system. The  approach at Pepperdine, on the other hand, was much more interactive,  practical, and globally oriented. The emphasis on skills like negotiation,  mediation, and understanding cross-cultural differences was something that  added a whole new dimension to my legal education. I appreciated the  interactive classroom environment, where we engaged in simulations, role playing exercises, and discussions with peers from diverse legal backgrounds.  This collaborative learning approach was a refreshing change from the more  traditional, lecture-based style that I was accustomed to in India.

    Moreover, the diverse student body at Pepperdine University, representing  various nationalities and legal systems, provided a unique opportunity to learn  not just from professors but also from peers. This multicultural environment  enriched my understanding of international dispute resolution and made me  more aware of the complexities involved when resolving conflicts between  parties from different legal traditions and cultural contexts. 

    What motivated you to establish your independent litigation practice in  2020, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic? How did the transition  from large firms to independent practice unfold, and how did you manage the  shift? 

    Since the beginning of my law career, I was certain that I wanted to eventually  establish my independent practice. While working with several reputed law firms  and distinguished lawyers, I gained invaluable insights into the intricacies of legal  practice, but I always envisioned carving my own path. By 2020, I felt confident  that the time was right to take this step. 

    Launching an independent practice during the COVID-19 pandemic presented  its own set of challenges. The legal landscape had shifted dramatically, with  virtual hearings becoming the norm and access to clients and courts being  heavily restricted. Yet, I saw this as an opportunity to adapt, innovate, and build  a practice rooted in resilience and client-centric solutions. 

    I distinctly remember my first case under my independent practice—a  matrimonial dispute. A wife approached me after her husband had filed a divorce  petition on the grounds of cruelty and had even gone so far as to challenge the  legitimacy of their child. It was an emotionally charged and legally complex case,  especially since the opposing counsel presented substantial evidence to  support their claims. 

    With a methodical approach, I focused on crafting a strategy that emphasized the inconsistencies in their arguments while drawing attention to the factual and  emotional dimensions of my client’s situation. After meticulous research,  evidence collation, and persuasive arguments, we succeeded in securing  reasonable maintenance for both the wife and child. Additionally, we were able  to successfully defend the allegations regarding the child’s legitimacy as well as  the grounds he had taken for filing the divorce petition. Eventually, the parties  resolved their differences amicably and opted for a mutual consent divorce. 

    That case was pivotal for me—not just because it was my first as an independent  lawyer, but also because it reinforced the realization that independent practice  requires a broad-based approach. While arbitration had always been a key focus  for me, this experience made me realize the importance of diversifying my areas  of expertise to serve a wider spectrum of clients. The transition from large firms to independent practice wasn’t without its hurdles. From setting up an office and building a network of clients to manage administrative responsibilities single handedly, it required immense dedication and adaptability. However, the sense  of autonomy and the ability to directly impact clients’ lives made the journey truly  fulfilling. 

    Could you describe some of the arbitration cases you handled in your experience over the years?  

    Throughout my legal career, I have had the opportunity to handle a diverse array  of arbitration cases spanning commercial, maritime, construction, and other  specialized disputes. My work has taken me across various jurisdictions and  arbitration forums, including proceedings governed by the rules of SIAC, LCIA,  ICC, and DIAC, among others. 

    One notable segment of my practice involves construction disputes, which often  require a deep understanding of technical issues, contractual frameworks, and  project-specific challenges. Many of these disputes are governed by FIDIC  contracts, where issues such as delays, price variation, cost overruns, defective  work claims, and contract terminations frequently arise. For instance, I  successfully represented a client in a complex arbitration concerning a multi million-dollar infrastructure project. The dispute revolved around delay penalties  and other related issues and allegations under the FIDIC Silver Book. My  approach combined a meticulous analysis of technical reports with a robust  presentation of the contract’s terms, ultimately securing a favourable arbitral  award for my client. 

    Another compelling case I worked on involved an international arbitration under  LCIA Rules. This dispute was unique, revolving around the ownership and  authenticity of a painting by a renowned artist. It was a fascinating blend of legal  and art historical issues, requiring close collaboration with art experts,  authentication agencies, and valuation professionals. Navigating through  conflicting expert testimonies, I was able to establish the authenticity of the  artwork and protect my client’s ownership rights, leading to a successful  resolution of the dispute. 

    My experience also extends to maritime arbitration cases, where I have dealt with disputes involving charter party agreements, cargo claims, and shipbuilding  contracts. One such case involved a dispute over demurrage claims under a  charter party agreement, where my ability to interpret contractual clauses and  maritime regulations proved critical in achieving a favourable award for my  client. In addition to these, I have handled several high-stakes commercial  arbitrations, often involving breaches of contract, shareholder disputes, and  joint venture agreements. Each case has contributed to my understanding of  arbitration as a dynamic and multifaceted process. I remain committed to delivering effective and pragmatic solutions for my clients in this ever-evolving  field.

    Having handled various matrimonial cases in your independent practice,  what significant trends or changes have you noticed in matrimonial laws? 

    In my experience handling a wide array of matrimonial cases, one of the most  frequent inquiries from clients revolves around questions like, “Do I have to pay  alimony to my wife?”, “Can I file for divorce?”, “How much maintenance can I  expect?”, etc. While these questions are valid, the answer is often one of the  most quintessential lawyerly responses: “It depends.” Matrimonial law does not  operate on a one-size-fits-all formula. Alimony, maintenance, and divorce  settlements hinge on a variety of factors, including but not limited to: The  financial standing and status of the families involved, The standard of living  enjoyed by the couple during the marriage, The financial needs of the wife and  children (if any), The income sources and earning capacities of both parties.,  Educational qualifications and professional opportunities are available to both. 

    It is crucial to emphasize that just because a wife earns more than her husband,  it does not automatically disqualify her from seeking maintenance. The courts  adopt a balanced approach, taking into account the overarching principles of  fairness and justice. One recurring question I encounter, particularly from male  clients, is: “Why are matrimonial laws so wife-centric?” This perception is  shaped, in part, by social media narratives/influencers that often paint a one dimensional picture. It’s important to understand that laws like the Protection of  Women Against Domestic Violence Act are designed to address systemic and  pervasive issues of abuse that continue to exist across many regions in India,  especially in non-urban areas where such incidents frequently go unreported. 

    At the same time, I acknowledge that not every case filed by a wife is genuine.  Instances of misuse of these laws do occur, leading to false allegations against  husbands. However, this does not undermine the broader objective of such  legislation. Trusting the judiciary to scrutinize and differentiate between genuine  and false claims is imperative. A case that exemplifies this nuanced approach  involved a husband with negligible income compared to his wife, who was a high earning professional. Despite the apparent disparity, the court granted  maintenance to the husband (and not the wife!) under the Hindu Marriage Act,  recognizing his genuine financial dependence and needs. The takeaway here is  that matrimonial disputes are inherently complex, and the determination of  alimony, maintenance, or grounds for divorce varies significantly from case to  case. It is always advisable for individuals to consult a qualified lawyer for  tailored legal advice, rather than relying solely on information found online or  anecdotal accounts. 

    Reflecting on your journey, what advice would you offer to students and/or young lawyers who are just starting out in their legal journey? 

    A piece of advice I’d offer to young lawyers and students embarking on their  legal careers is this: “Follow the law, not the money.” In the initial stages,  particularly in litigation, the financial rewards may seem modest compared to other legal fields. But the real value lies in the experience you gain, the lessons  you learn, and the skills you develop during these formative years. Litigation demands hard work, patience, and resilience. You may take on cases that  don’t pay much, or even refer cases to seniors or colleagues, but ensure that you remain actively involved. Follow up, understand the intricacies of each matter, and use every case as a learning opportunity. Remember, the more  cases you immerse yourself in, the sharper and more seasoned you’ll become  as a litigator. 

    I was once told: “Curiosity, consistency, and determination are the pillars of  success in the legal field.” These words have stayed with me throughout my  career. Stay curious, delve into the nuances of the law. Be consistent, work  steadily, even when success seems distant. And most importantly, remain determined, litigation is not an easy path, but it is one that rewards those who  persevere. 

    So, to all young lawyers: don’t give up. The early years may feel overwhelming,  but with time, effort, and a genuine passion for the law, you will find your place in this profession. Success in litigation is not measured overnight; it’s a  journey of constant growth, built one case, one argument, and one lesson at a  time.

    Get in touch with Kunal Kumar –

  • “My advice for aspiring lawyers is to focus on three core principles: master the basics, stay informed about legislative changes, and remember that work ethics, integrity, and perseverance are non-negotiable and key to building trust.” – Nitin Parihar, Founding Partner at Meridian Law Chambers.

    “My advice for aspiring lawyers is to focus on three core principles: master the basics, stay informed about legislative changes, and remember that work ethics, integrity, and perseverance are non-negotiable and key to building trust.” – Nitin Parihar, Founding Partner at Meridian Law Chambers.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    As a highly experienced legal professional with over 12 years in the field,  what initially inspired you to pursue law, and how did your early years shape this decision? Kindly reflect on your time at law school.

    My decision to pursue law was driven by a strong sense of justice and a desire to help people understand their legal rights in a system that can often feel overwhelming. Growing up in a family where my grandfather was a police officer and my father an advocate, I witnessed situations where legal awareness and timely assistance could have made a difference. This understanding inspired me to become an advocate. My early years were marked by an interest in understanding human conflicts and resolving disputes fairly.

    However, my experience at the law school was transformative. My professors played an important role in cultivating my curiosity for constitutional and dispute resolution matters, which remain central to my practice today. Looking back, I can say the early learnings and guidance shaped my analytical abilities, sharpened my understanding of the legal system, and introduced me to the practical side of the law. Indeed, the experience served as a foundation that gave me the knowledge and the confidence to enter this profession.  

    How did working with Senior Advocate Mr. Sunil Sethi impact your early career, and what key lessons did you learn?

    Working with Senior Advocate Mr. Sunil Sethi was a defining period in my career. He taught me how to develop a meticulous eye for detail and the importance of presenting a case with clarity and conviction. He has a very calm personality, which has influenced my attitude towards life and my profession significantly. Under his guidance, I learned to build strong legal arguments rooted in logic and evidence, which proved invaluable in courtrooms.  

    Mr. Sethi’s dedication to his clients and ethical practice further taught me the significance of trust and professionalism in the legal field. Additionally, watching him handle complex cases with precision inspired me to adopt a similar approach in my independent practice.

    What inspired you to establish Meridian Law Chambers in 2022, and what were your main goals for founding the firm? 

    After years of experience in independent practice and working with senior legal stalwarts, I founded Meridian Law Chambers in 2022. I started the venture with a vision of creating a law firm that offers effective legal solutions while maintaining personalised client attention. When I began, I wanted to build a team capable of addressing modern legal challenges across sectors like infrastructure, banking, real estate, and defence. However, my primary goal was to address the gap between specialised legal services and a client-centric approach. Today, I am proud to bring the vision to reality. The team has been adept at leveraging expertise across litigation, arbitration, and advisory to deliver tailored solutions to all our clients. 

    How do you balance leadership responsibilities with your advisory and consultancy roles as Head of Meridian Law Chambers?

    During my journey, I have learned that balancing leadership and legal roles requires an effective time management strategy and a collaborative team structure. This insight encouraged me to ensure that responsibilities are well-delegated within the firm so that every case and client receives undivided attention. I oversee major cases personally while empowering my associates to handle specific aspects of litigation, advisory, and due diligence.  

    Over the years, by maintaining open communication, mentoring my team, and prioritising strategic matters, I have tried to balance my leadership responsibilities alongside my advisory roles. Hence, you can say that the journey so far has been about trusting the team while staying deeply engaged with the firm’s overall direction.

    Can you describe your role as Standing Counsel for the Reserve Bank of India in Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh and the challenges you face? 

    As Standing Counsel for the Reserve Bank of India, my role involves representing the RBI in key litigation matters, protecting its interests, and ensuring compliance with changing financial and regulatory frameworks. The primary challenge I often face pertains to addressing complex financial disputes and the need to stay ahead of changing legal and economic landscapes.

    Throughout my career, my go-to approach to face these challenges has been through proper research and clear advocacy. I have always believed that it is vital to understand the nuances of financial regulations and their interplay with the judicial process to defend a client’s interest. The approach continues to help me uphold the institution’s interests and its beliefs successfully.

    What are the significant legal challenges faced by hydropower and infrastructure projects in India, and how do you ensure compliance as a consultant?

    Historically, hydropower and infrastructure projects in our country face several challenges, particularly those related to regulatory clearances, land acquisition disputes, environmental concerns, and contract enforcement issues. 

    Additionally, delays in obtaining permits and disputes over compensation often create hurdles for such projects. As a legal consultant, it is my duty to ensure compliance by conducting comprehensive due diligence, analysing risks, factoring in evolving environmental laws, and advising clients on regulatory frameworks. This approach has helped me draft contracts that account for contingencies to mitigate risks while maintaining compliance with legal and environmental mandates.

    Could you share your approach and strategies in the case pertaining to the termination of the Chairman of Jammu and Kashmir Bank? 

    In this particular case, I had the opportunity to represent the Reserve Bank of India, which is a proud and significant assignment. Since the matter pertained to the termination of the chairman of a reputed bank, it was a high-stakes case for me with wide-reaching implications. Typically, in high-stakes litigation, there is little to no room for errors. So, I had to be extra cautious with my approach.

    I focused my strategy on the legal and regulatory framework governing the case and combined the findings with detailed research. However, I made sure my strategy inclined more towards presenting a clear and factual argument for this sensitive case without jeopardising procedural and substantive legal principles. 

    What advice would you give aspiring lawyers to succeed in today’s competitive legal environment? 

    My advice for aspiring lawyers is to be confident about your abilities and focus on three core principles: first, master the basics like how to start legal research, draft documents, and conduct court procedures. Next, you must stay informed about the legislative changes and legal trends. Lastly, remember that work ethics, integrity, and perseverance are non-negotiable and key to building trust with clients. Above all, I advise them to be open to challenges and learn from both success and failure to ensure a successful career in the legal profession. 

    How do you maintain a healthy work-life balance, and what motivates you to write alongside your busy practice?

    To be honest, it is quite challenging to balance work and personal life in this profession. However, I try to prioritise spending quality time with my family and indulge in activities that help me rewind and recharge. Over time, maintaining clear boundaries, delegating tasks, and managing time efficiently have helped me strike a much-needed balance in my life. 

    Writing and researching contract law, consumer law, and cyber law is my passion, which I take seriously. However, what excites me the most is that my insights and contributions to legal discourse could help others understand their legal struggles better.

    Get in touch with Nitin Parihar –