Super Lawyer

Tag: NLU Jodhpur

  • “I read somewhere that you only know about a subject matter, if you have the capability to teach on that topic even to a layman.” – Shivesh Aggarwal, Counsel at Trilegal.

    “I read somewhere that you only know about a subject matter, if you have the capability to teach on that topic even to a layman.” – Shivesh Aggarwal, Counsel at Trilegal.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Having graduated from NLU Jodhpur with a specialization in Business Law (Hons), what first motivated you to pursue law, and how would you describe your overall experience at law school?

    Definitely a great question to start with – as I feel whatever skills I have gained to move forward in my life originated during my stint at NLU Jodhpur. In terms of motivation to pursue law, just like most of us, I took CLAT in 2012 only with the hope of securing an additional safety net, although I was initially more inclined towards pursuing something in mathematics or accounts (as I’ve always had that weird fascination with numbers). However, by God’s grace, when I got through and was admitted to my super-welcoming university, I promised to myself to not disappoint whoever has sacrificed and/or cheered for me in my journey. I distinctly remember my mom’s eyes suddenly becoming moist at the railway station when I told her that it’s time for her to board the train back to our hometown and I need to head back to the campus to set up my room and start with my studies. I knew then that I don’t have an option to screw it up this time. There are times when you must win – and I thought that that time had arrived.  

    Without compromising on my grades, I participated in whatever competitions the university was offering and eventually realised my inclination towards research and mooting. I met the bestest of the people in the university who fortunately have now become family for me. Even today, me and my friends randomly reminisce about our time in college with loud and unstoppable cheers, whether we’re in the car, in a restaurant or even in a different country! I was also lucky enough to meet seniors who gave me all the right advice that I have kept with me till date. 

    If I have to sum up my journey at NLU Jodhpur, I will give any amount to go back and relive those 5 years from 2012 to 2017 – of course, with the same set of people.  

    Starting your career with one of the biggest firms is a remarkable achievement. What was your experience like in the early stages, particularly while working on matters involving gaming start-ups, credit services, and Aadhaar-related compliance? 

    I started with Luthra and Luthra Law Offices in July 2017. Initially, I would get a little scared especially when I would listen to those convoluted discussions amongst my seniors on a particular matter. But I knew I just had to hang in there and realised quickly that all this profession requires from you is time and hard work, and hence, I was all game for that. Also, as the only son, I had made peace with the fact that moving abroad to study and work was not an option and that I had to be around for my parents. It was my time to give back and their time to enjoy, although I believe there’s nothing a son/daughter can do to repay whatever his/her parents have sacrificed. 

    In terms of cases/matters, since it was mostly a corporate advisory and restructuring team, the kind of work that I would get was extremely challenging and thought-provoking. I remember working on detailed memorandums for gaming start-ups offering fantasy leagues and VR gaming to the public, which would entail studying their proposed new business in detail and thinking of everything under the sun that may become applicable to them then and even later. Similarly, as a first/second year associate, apart from assisting on standard corporate and commercial queries, I would be asked to research on business ideas which were fresh then with no market precedent, such as e-gold, loan services by fintech companies, Aadhaar-based authentication, informal credit scoring etc. All these turned out to be super helpful for me and invigorated me to assist clients with out-of-the-box ideas and solutions. 

    In fact, whenever a FEMA query would be assigned to me, apart from obviously reviewing the framework governing the subject, I would have a habit of opening the index of the FEMA Manual and reviewing the listed items closely and to go to the relevant regulations that would appear to even be remotely applicable. In hindsight, this exercise has helped me a lot in strengthening my basics of FEMA and has given me the confidence to address most of the complicated structuring scenarios quickly.  

    In your current role, you advise on cross-border transactions such as those by Japanese conglomerate in various sectors such as infrastructure, manufacturing and renewable energy. How do you address the differences in legal regulations across jurisdictions especially in upcoming sectors?

    It is always an enriching experience to assist and deal with clients from other jurisdictions such as Europe and Japan. Each client’s behaviour turns out to be different in terms of expectations from a law firm, deadlines, level of practical advice needed and their degree of preparedness for extreme circumstances. This assessment of clients’ requirements is something that one becomes aware of with time, after working with clients from multiple jurisdictions. In fact, if a matter is referred to by a foreign law firm, then our scope sometimes becomes limited to the requirements that the referring law firm may have, and all communications typically get routed through the firm. 

    With respect to the difference in legal regulations, the basic guiding principles likely remain the same (such as those governing commercial arrangements), they start differing depending on the sectors. For instance, sectors which are heavily regulated by the government such as defence, pharmaceutical, renewable energy, telecom etc. turn out to be fairly distinct from how they are regulated in other jurisdictions. Ultimately, we are required to focus on how the activities in the Indian territory (of a foreign company, its subsidiary or a standalone Indian company) will be governed, apart from other specific cross-border transactions (such as mergers, exports/imports, inbound and outbound investments etc.). 

    What inspired you to write on diverse legal topics, and how do you balance creativity with the demands of corporate law? Have insights from your writing shaped the way you approach your professional work? You have also published a poetry book on social issues. How has that influenced your urge to write professionally and at a personal level? 

    I believe writing really helps you understand the topic to its core, because you are required to take an additional responsibility for your understanding of the subject vis-à-vis the general public. It leaves very little room for any vagueness or conjectures, especially on settled areas of law. Further, writing on legal topics gives you an opportunity to also highlight areas of law which require attention of or clarification from the governmental authorities, with the hope that it would eventually reach the concerned official and necessary changes/clarifications would be made.

    I have also generally been fond of writing, even on non-law topics. It has gradually turned out to be therapeutic for me, especially during times when I wish to say something but not out loud. I mostly quote the following by Stephen King from his memoir: “Words create sentences; sentences create paragraphs; sometimes paragraphs quicken and begin to breathe.” It has just helped me really appreciate that writing (whether on a professional front or otherwise) can really assist you in making those invisible, super-minor but important changes in your professional field and the general world.  

    You advised a UAE-based advisory company in acquiring a partial stake in a manufacturing company in Hyderabad. What were the key legal and commercial considerations you had to balance while structuring this cross-border transaction?

    I think unlike a standard securities purchase transaction, this deal turned out to be convoluted given the already existing activities of the target Indian company (with diverse shareholders sitting in the company and the company being subject to multifarious licensing requirements under environmental, customs, labour and land laws). Firstly, the diligence itself took almost 3 months with the team working day and night just to gobble up thousands of documents and finally presenting the legal issues for discussion. Frankly, it became one of those deals which was dependent on resolution of a few legal issues as a condition.  

    Additionally, the transaction became murkier as we realised that the target company was also on the verge of insolvency. Hence, we were required to closely track the ongoing insolvency proceedings and keep a check on the timing of the transaction. We were also exploring if the client may rather wait it out and act as a resolution applicant once the target’s corporate insolvency resolution process commences. 

    What advice would you give to the younger generation of lawyers, and what resources would you recommend that can make a real-world difference in shaping their perspectives?

    I read somewhere that you only know about a subject matter, if you have the capability to teach on that topic even to a layman. My recommendation always is to never rush into giving answers on a particular query/subject (if time permits), but rather to understand the rationale behind introduction of the specific law/provision in the first place. Once the legislature’s intention is clear, it becomes much easier to remember the principle, and accordingly, advise the client towards the right goal. 

    In terms of resources, apart from keeping abreast with the latest legal developments, it is extremely important to be aware of the business and geopolitical climate. Hence, do not shy away from taking all necessary subscriptions of informative magazines and journals, and do treat them like your OTT subscriptions. It is always a delight to read comprehensive articles which analyse a sector, an issue, a governmental order, a court decision etc., in detail. Some of the magazines/platforms I strongly recommend are The Ken, Finshots, HBR and The New Yorker.  

    How do your personal hobbies help you maintain work-life balance, and what lessons from your non-professional pursuits have you been able to apply to your legal practice?

    Given the time that is required in our profession, it usually becomes difficult to manage personal hobbies with the incessant workflow. Hence, I have made peace with the fact that each day won’t permit me to pursue my hobbies to the extent I would want to. However, on all days, irrespective of the work pressure, I at least pull out 30-35 minutes for myself which are devoted towards something that I really enjoy because ultimately that is what all the work is for (i.e., to make myself capable to enjoy). 

    Through my non-professional pursuits, while I think I have with time realised the need to give importance to my hobbies without completely disregarding them because of work pressure, one important character trait that I have developed through my extra-curricular activities is resilience. For instance, on days when I go out for my exercises in the morning, as soon as I complete the goals for the day, it gives me a positive sense of achievement and that faith to keep pushing and to understand the power of ‘one more’. I have tried to apply the same principle even on the professional front to keep trying to push boundaries and becoming indefatigable (especially during pressure times). 

    What guiding motto or philosophy has consistently stayed with you throughout your journey, shaping both your personal and professional life? Looking ahead, what vision do you hold for the future of your practice and the kind of impact you aspire to create through your work? 

    I think the most important thing that I wish to communicate is to stay fit and healthy. In the end, nothing would matter if your body starts reacting instantly to fatigue and stress, which would make you gloomier and disheartened. By fitness, it is not only taking care of your physical health by exercising and eating healthy (of course, a chicken biryani or golgappa at calculated times won’t hurt), but also mental health. Try giving yourself at least those 15 minutes during which you acquire that void, and which transport you to a place that makes you smile (even though in imagination). 

    Secondly, keep exploring yourself and trying to acquire skills. If such a skill helps you both professionally and personally, nothing better. If you have INR 10,000, don’t rush logging into Amazon or go to a Rare Rabbit/Mango store, but rather consider investing that amount in learning a new skill. That decision would likely give you more returns than purchasing a new gadget or a piece of cloth. I learned of this concept called ‘autotelic’ as per which, at times, you need to do something for the sake of doing it. Try applying this in anything that you’re practising/learning, and you’d surely notice the magic of investing in yourself. 

    Lastly, never stop loving yourself and others and remaining grateful to your fate for giving you whatever you have today. This feeling has always helped me remain committed to my work, whatever the case may be. 

    Get in touch with Shivesh Aggarwal –

  • “Media and IP law is a fascinating field – creative, fast-moving, and filled with opportunities, but it also takes time to find your footing.” – Thomas Joseph, Vice President – Legal at ITW Consulting Pvt. Ltd.

    “Media and IP law is a fascinating field – creative, fast-moving, and filled with opportunities, but it also takes time to find your footing.” – Thomas Joseph, Vice President – Legal at ITW Consulting Pvt. Ltd.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    With over a decade of experience behind you, what initially drew you to the field of media, entertainment, and technology law as your niche area of practice? Were there any specific instances or experiences in your early career that inspired this choice?

    While I was pursuing my undergraduate studies in law, I found myself naturally drawn to intellectual property law. It was the subject that most piqued my interest and felt aligned with my strengths, which led me to pursue a master’s degree specializing in IP law. I would say that I chanced into the niche of media and entertainment, rather than setting out with a deliberate plan.

    While at BananaIP Counsels, a boutique IP law firm based out of Bengaluru, where I started my career, an opportunity came up for a secondment with Yash Raj Films Pvt. Ltd., one of the most prominent film production houses in India. I happened to be available at the time and willing to make the move from Bengaluru to Mumbai. That secondment turned out to be the defining moment in my career – it exposed me to the world of media and entertainment law in a very hands-on way and sparked an enduring interest in the field.

    Over time, that interest organically expanded into the technology space, mirroring the broader industry shift from traditional theatrical models to digital streaming and content distribution. It’s been a rewarding journey watching the intersection of IP, media, and tech evolve – and being able to grow along with it.

    What motivated you to pursue law as a career in the first place? How was your experience pursuing your LL.M. in Intellectual Property Law at NLU Jodhpur, and in what ways has that specialization shaped or benefited your professional journey?

    I’d have to be absolutely transparent here: I’d be lying if I said I always wanted to be a lawyer. Growing up, I explored several career paths, and even when the time came to make a serious decision, I didn’t have a clear plan. Like most parents, mine nudged me toward becoming an engineer or a doctor. But the problem was, I was genuinely terrible at math and chemistry. To this day, integration, differentiation, and organic chemistry remain terrifying concepts! That’s when the idea of law entered the picture – something that seemed respectable enough to satisfy my parents (especially since my father was once a lawyer), and doable enough for me to take a chance on.

    That’s how I ended up in law, and while my entry wasn’t driven by some lifelong calling, I’ve loved every moment of it since. The learning process, the anxiety of the early years, the timidness in client calls, the thrill of my first contract closure – it’s been a rewarding journey in every sense.

    Pursuing my LL.M. in Intellectual Property Law at NLU Jodhpur was a pivotal experience. I still vividly remember stepping onto campus and being immediately overwhelmed by the sheer intellectual energy around me. While I already had a budding interest in IP law, the environment at NLU Jodhpur – exceptional professors, a rigorous curriculum, and fiercely bright batchmates – amplified that interest manifold. Some of my most valuable lessons came not just from the faculty, but from my peers, who constantly challenged me to think sharper and work harder.

    The academic foundation I received there has consistently supported me in my professional life, especially during complex negotiations. The theoretical grounding in IP law has helped me back my legal arguments with confidence and clarity. I truly credit NLU Jodhpur for deepening my interest in intellectual property and for equipping me with the tools that continue to shape my practice to this day.

    You began your career with a prominent IP law firm. How did that experience help deepen your understanding of intellectual property law, and what aspects of that role proved to be particularly beneficial in building your foundation?

    I began my career with BananaIP Counsels, a boutique IP law firm based in Bengaluru. For any young lawyer keen on intellectual property law, I’d say it’s one of the best places to start – and that’s coming from firsthand experience. The kind of exposure and practical learning I received there helped build a solid foundation that I continue to rely on to this day.

    In the initial months, I was completely immersed in trademarks, copyrights, and designs, primarily focused on registration and prosecution work. BananaIP managed a massive portfolio for clients across diverse sectors, most of which were still at the prosecution stage. I was part of a two-member team handling the entire portfolio, which meant I was thrown into the deep end very early on. It was intense, but incredibly enriching. That level of responsibility so early in my career helped me develop a strong grip on the basics and a sense of confidence in client-facing work. One of the things I particularly enjoyed was engaging with clients, understanding their businesses, their concerns, and helping them make informed decisions. 

    The first contract I ever worked on was a software development agreement, and it was anything but simple. At the time, I felt like I was stretching every intellectual muscle I had, even though in hindsight, my contribution was probably quite limited! Still, I remember enjoying the process thoroughly – it was a taste of what was to come.

    The secondment with Yash Raj Films, as I mentioned earlier, was a turning point. It marked my entry into the world of film production agreements, artist contracts, licensing and merchandising arrangements – areas I wouldn’t have accessed so early in my career if not for that opportunity. I firmly believe that I have had takeaways from each and every contract that I have worked on, and the negotiations around them.

    While I may not have applied it consistently over the years, one lesson from my time at BananaIP that has stayed with me is the understanding that a contract doesn’t need to be 50 or 100 pages long to be effective. I learned this early on under the guidance of Dr. Kalyan C. Kankanala, the Managing Partner. With the right language and clarity, even a concise document can robustly protect a client’s interests. It’s a principle I continue to keep in mind with every deal I work on.

    After your time with the law firm, you transitioned into in-house legal roles. What prompted that shift, and what differences did you observe in terms of work culture, responsibilities, and expectations between law firm and corporate legal environments?

    The engagement with Yash Raj Films (YRF) gave me an initial taste of the in-house life – though not entirely, since it was still a secondment. I was technically still a firm representative, embedded within a corporate setup. That said, I was dedicated exclusively to YRF and found myself enjoying what seemed like the relatively comfortable pace of an in-house role. Being in the media and entertainment space definitely had its allure as well, and I was keen to explore the other side. 

    But I soon realised how misleading that perception was!

    When I eventually transitioned into a full-fledged in-house role, I quickly understood that the challenges are very real – just different from those in a law firm setting. Gone were the days where I could present multiple legal options to a client and leave the final decision to them. As in-house counsel, you’re not just an advisor – you’re a stakeholder. The responsibility to safeguard the organisation’s interests rests squarely on your shoulders, and that burden isn’t one to be taken lightly.

    You have to own every piece of advice you give, make judgment calls with clarity, and ensure that risks are mitigated to the greatest extent possible. It’s a role that demands both precision and accountability.

    While I do sometimes appreciate not having to worry about business development targets – something law firm lawyers are always chasing – I’ve also come to understand just how critical relationship building is within an in-house setup. Whether it’s negotiating a contract or resolving a dispute, trust and rapport with internal teams and external partners make all the difference in getting things done efficiently.

    During your time at Sony Pictures Networks, you dealt with a wide range of legal responsibilities, from content acquisition and syndication to anti-piracy and artist engagement. What were some of the major legal or strategic challenges you encountered in that role?

    My time at Sony Pictures Networks was incredibly enriching and dynamic. I was brought on board specifically to handle the legal work for Sony’s sports network of channels – a significant shift from my prior experience, which had been largely focused on films. That transition itself was a steep learning curve. Sports broadcasting brought with it a whole new set of commercial structures, rights frameworks, and timelines. But it also offered a fantastic opportunity to expand my understanding of the broader media ecosystem and quickly adapt to a fast-paced, high-stakes environment.

    We had a very lean team at Sony, which came with its advantages. The exposure I received there was tremendous—not only in terms of the volume of work but also the variety. Fortunately, Sony as an organisation extended to me the flexibility to go beyond sports, and I had the opportunity to work on transactions related to entertainment content as well—both regional and international. This included production agreements, satellite service arrangements, IT services, and more. It gave me a well-rounded perspective of the business and the interconnectivity between various content verticals.

    The breadth of work – from content acquisition and syndication to anti-piracy, platform distribution, marketing, and brand partnerships – meant that no two days were ever the same. I particularly enjoyed working on contracts related to Sony’s digital streaming platform, SonyLIV. It was exciting to be part of the team navigating the legal landscape for a platform that was growing rapidly and experimenting with new formats, content categories, and user engagement models. Drafting and negotiating deals for SonyLIV required a different lens, one that considered evolving consumption patterns, dynamic digital rights, and a constantly shifting regulatory backdrop.

    One of the major legal and strategic challenges I encountered was in the area of content acquisition and syndication, particularly in navigating the complexities of rights management across multiple platforms and territories. With the growing dominance of digital platforms and shifting consumer behaviours, it became crucial to ensure that the licensing frameworks we were working with were future-ready, accounting for evolving monetisation models like OTT distribution, catch-up rights, and platform-specific windows. Negotiating these deals required a strong grasp of both legal nuance and business strategy, especially when dealing with high-value content.

    Anti-piracy was another area that stood out as both challenging and rewarding. The legal framework was only part of the solution – what truly made a difference was working cross-functionally with technical teams, content security partners, and external counsel to develop a holistic strategy. We had to move fast, be proactive, and often act under significant time pressure to protect high-value broadcast properties from unauthorised distribution online.

    Overall, my time at Sony helped sharpen my commercial acumen just as much as my legal skills. I was fortunate to work alongside brilliant business and creative minds, and I walked away with a deeper understanding of how to structure deals that are legally sound, commercially viable, and operationally practical.

    As Vice President – Legal now, you manage complex global commercial contracts across industries like media, gaming, and cryptocurrency. How did you navigate legal challenges in emerging and often uncertain areas like cryptocurrency, where the regulatory framework is still developing?

    As Vice President – Legal at ITW Consulting Pvt. Ltd., a leading sports marketing consultancy, I’ve had the opportunity to work across a wide spectrum of sectors, including cryptocurrency platforms and brokers. While our core domain is sports marketing, our client base is incredibly diverse, and increasingly includes players from emerging sectors like crypto who are keen on expanding their market footprint through promotional campaigns and activations.

    One of the more nuanced legal challenges in this space has been navigating the advertising and marketing compliance landscape for crypto-related clients. The regulatory framework around cryptocurrency in India continues to evolve and remains somewhat fragmented, particularly in the context of promotion and advertising. This makes it critical for us to be proactive and cautious when facilitating campaigns for such clients, especially those involving high-visibility assets like athlete endorsements, jersey branding, and on-ground activations during major sporting events.

    Advertising, particularly in the crypto space, is highly dynamic. Over the past couple of years, we’ve seen increased scrutiny from regulators and self-regulatory bodies like the Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI). The ASCI guidelines, for instance, mandate that all crypto-related ads carry specific disclaimers, avoid misleading statements, and are framed in a way that ensures consumer awareness of the associated risks. These requirements apply not just to traditional media but also to digital formats, influencer-led promotions, and branded content.

    In our role, we take it upon ourselves to closely monitor regulatory developments and ensure that the marketing campaigns we help structure are fully compliant. This involves vetting creatives, advising on appropriate language and disclaimers, coordinating with talent managers to ensure alignment with endorsement regulations, and flagging any potential reputational or legal exposure to both the client and the sporting entities involved.

    What makes this particularly challenging is the pace at which the landscape changes. We’ve had instances where guidelines were updated mid-campaign cycle, requiring real-time legal intervention and rapid reworking of campaign material. It has reinforced the need for agility and close coordination between legal, creative, and client servicing teams.

    Overall, the experience of working with crypto clients has sharpened our ability to operate within uncertain legal terrain while still enabling effective, compliant brand campaigns. It’s an ongoing balancing act – protecting the interests of all stakeholders while allowing innovation in the way brands engage with sports audiences. 

    Currently, your company operates across jurisdictions such as the UK, UAE, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh. How do you handle cross-border legal compliances, especially when it comes to reconciling differing regulatory standards, managing jurisdictional risks, and ensuring contractual consistency? 

    At ITW, our operations span multiple jurisdictions including the UK, UAE, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh, each with its own unique regulatory and commercial landscape. Managing legal compliance across these markets requires a combination of structured internal processes, a proactive risk management approach, and at times, collaboration with reliable local counsel. 

    Our approach typically begins with in-depth legal research to understand the local regulatory environment and identify key areas where local laws diverge from Indian law or from each other. This helps us tailor our contractual structures accordingly and flag jurisdiction-specific risks early in the deal cycle.  Where matters are particularly nuanced, sensitive, or enforcement-heavy, we do supplement our internal research with guidance from trusted local counsels. However, we remain deeply involved in the interpretation and application of such advice to ensure it aligns with our business context and deal objectives.

    One of the core challenges is reconciling differing regulatory standards, particularly around areas like advertising laws, data protection, taxation, anti-bribery, and foreign exchange regulations. The first step is always jurisdictional risk mapping: understanding where local laws diverge significantly from Indian legal standards or from each other, and identifying areas that may require bespoke contractual treatment. 

    We mitigate these risks by working closely with experienced local counsel in each jurisdiction, especially when it comes to structuring agreements, reviewing campaign compliance requirements, or interpreting local laws that impact talent contracts, IP rights, or payment flows. We also build jurisdiction-specific clauses into our contracts, ranging from governing law and dispute resolution mechanisms to regulatory compliance representations and exit rights, ensuring each agreement is not only enforceable but also commercially viable across markets.

    Contractual consistency across jurisdictions is another key priority. While commercial terms may vary, we maintain a common legal backbone for our master service agreements, advertising agreements, and IP licensing documents. This standardisation ensures internal clarity and operational ease, while still allowing flexibility for local adaptation.

    Additionally, we’ve institutionalised internal legal review protocols for cross-border deals, including multi-tier approval processes, and regular compliance check-ins with our business and finance teams. 

    Ultimately, operating across borders requires striking a balance between legal risk management and commercial pragmatism. Our goal is to be a business enabler, facilitating seamless execution while ensuring that every deal aligns with both global compliance standards and local legal realities.

    Looking back, what has been one of the most challenging cases or experiences you’ve faced in your legal career, and how did you overcome it? Also, how do you stay updated with the ever-evolving landscape of IP and technology law?

    I’ve always found answering the first question quite challenging. Unfortunately, I wouldn’t be able to give you a straight answer in this instance either. All I can say is that whenever I’ve faced challenges during the course of my career, they felt at the time like insurmountable mountains – situations I had no idea how I’d navigate. Some of those I managed to overcome; in many others, I failed miserably. But with the benefit of hindsight, I now view those moments through the lens of what they taught me. Often, I find myself wondering if they were really as daunting as they seemed back then. What has remained with me are the lessons – whether it was about managing expectations, communicating under pressure, or simply learning how not to handle a situation. Every experience has contributed to shaping how I approach my work today.

    As for staying updated with the ever-evolving landscape of IP and technology law, I try to stay curious and consistent in my learning. I regularly track regulatory updates, case law developments, and global trends through a mix of legal journals, newsletters, and reliable blogs, both domestic and international. I also find that industry-specific reports and thought pieces published by consulting firms often provide valuable insight into how law intersects with business strategy in tech and media.

    Most importantly, I learn a lot through practical exposure, by working on transactions that push the boundaries of existing frameworks and force me to explore new interpretations. In many ways, the clients and teams I work with keep me on my toes more than any publication can. Conversations, negotiations, and even internal debates often lead to the most meaningful learning moments.

    What advice would you offer to young lawyers or law students aspiring to enter the dynamic fields of media and IP law? Are there any values, habits, or skills they should focus on developing early in their careers?

    If I had to give one piece of advice to young lawyers or law students aspiring to enter the world of media and IP law, it would be this: stay curious and stay patient.

    It’s a fascinating field – creative, fast-moving, and filled with opportunities, but it also takes time to find your footing. You might start out doing what seems like routine or administrative work, but those early experiences often lay the strongest foundations. Be open to learning from everything, even the smallest tasks.

    Develop the habit of reading – contracts, case law, industry news. Understanding how the law interacts with business, creativity, and technology is key in this space. At the same time, work on your communication skills. You don’t just need to know the law – you need to be able to explain it clearly to people who may not.

    Another thing I’d say is: don’t be afraid to ask questions. Some of the best learning I’ve had came from simply being curious enough to say, “I don’t understand, can you explain?” Over the years, I’ve also found that when younger colleagues or interns ask me questions, it often leads to discussions that help me reflect and learn as well. Sometimes, their questions challenge assumptions or bring in a fresh perspective I hadn’t considered. Those exchanges are some of the most rewarding parts of the job, and a reminder that learning is always a two-way street.

    And finally, be kind, to yourself and others. Law can be intense, and it’s easy to get caught up in chasing the next big thing. But if you focus on doing good work, being dependable, and staying grounded, the rest has a way of falling into place.

    There’s no one path to success in this field, and that’s the beauty of it. So take your time, build your skills, and don’t forget to enjoy the ride.

    Lastly, given the demanding nature of your work, how do you strike a balance between your professional and personal life? What does unwinding or relaxing look like for you?

    To be honest, that’s something I’m still figuring out. Striking a balance between work and personal life doesn’t come naturally to me – disconnecting from work can be difficult, especially when you’re fully invested in what you do. Thankfully, I have a very strict (albeit quite understanding) wife and the cutest one-year-old who keep me in check and remind me when it’s time to log off.

    Unwinding, for me, is all about the simple joys – spending time with my family, catching up with friends, planning a quick trip, or just having a quiet evening at home. I enjoy reading, and I try to stay active through football, badminton, and more recently, pickleball (was just curious to know what the fuss was all about, but I’ve grown to really like it).

    Balance is still a work in progress, but I’m grateful for the people and little routines in my life that help me step away from the legal grind and recharge.

    Get in touch with Thomas Joseph –

  • “I encourage younger lawyers to develop a deep understanding of the law, cultivate strong communication and advocacy skills, and maintain a high level of professionalism in their practice.” – Ishaan Chhaya, Partner at Revera Legal.

    “I encourage younger lawyers to develop a deep understanding of the law, cultivate strong communication and advocacy skills, and maintain a high level of professionalism in their practice.” – Ishaan Chhaya, Partner at Revera Legal.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    After over 13 years of experience in representing clients in disputes, through arbitration and court proceedings, can you tell us what initially inspired you to pursue a career in law? What motivated you to establish your professional journey in this field?

    My initial outlook towards law was fraught with ignorance – in school, one never saw it as an option. Law opened up as a career when I fortunately received admission into National Law University, Jodhpur and decided to join on my parents’ insistence. As time passed and as my studies progressed, having already been a voracious reader, I became drawn to the intellectual challenges and problem-solving aspects that the legal profession offers. I realised that law pervades almost every aspect of life and society which leads to learning new and interesting things every day. Once I graduated, the satisfaction of being the means for clients to secure their rights provided (and still provides) the drive for my legal practice..   

    Having gained substantial experience at law firms such as Phoenix Legal, and Tuli & Co., how has your approach to dispute resolution evolved over time? What unique perspectives have you brought to Revera Legal in your current role as Partner?

    Over the years, my approach to dispute resolution has evolved from a purely academic and legalistic approach to a more holistic and practical one. I have come to realize that effective dispute resolution requires not only a deep understanding of the law but also a keen awareness of the commercial and practical realities facing my clients. I believe in taking a proactive and solution-oriented approach, working closely with my clients to develop strategies that not only achieve their legal objectives but also align with their business goals. At Revera Legal, I have brought this perspective, along with my extensive experience in handling complex commercial disputes, to provide our clients with comprehensive and commercially sound legal advice and representation.   

    You’ve handled high-profile arbitration cases, including disputes in an LCIA-administered arbitration. What legal strategies did you employ to address the complexities of fraud and misrepresentation allegations in international arbitration, and how do you navigate challenges arising from differing governing laws and jurisdictions in cross-border disputes?

    Proving fraud requires demonstrating that the person committing fraud acted with intent to deceive, which can be difficult to establish through evidence in a civil trial. Fraud cases often involve intricate fact patterns and transactions, making it challenging to present a clear and concise case to the arbitral tribunal. In arbitrations involving fraud and misrepresentation, I therefore focus on building a strong evidentiary foundation. This includes meticulous document review, financial analysis, and engagement of forensic experts if needed. I also carefully analyse the arbitral tribunal’s procedural rules and the applicable law to tailor my arguments. In cross-border disputes, navigating jurisdictional and governing law issues requires a thorough understanding and crafty application of conflict-of-laws principles. In fact, as I speak, we are currently preparing for a potential dispute which presents an interesting conflict between Indian and US jurisdictions

    In the case of National Insurance’s claim against Chubb European Group under a  reinsurance policy, what challenges did you face when representing the insurer before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission?

    The National Insurance case presented a unique challenge as to whether the scope of consumer disputes includes reinsurance disputes. To address this, our team at the time. I  focused on demonstrating that the reinsurance policy in question was not being used for commercial purpose but rather a means for National Insurance to protect itself from significant losses that may affect its bottomline in the event that it settles a large insurance claim. The challenge was that to an untrained eye it would appear that an insurer, being in the business of providing insurance, was simply leveraging its reinsurance cover for receiving heftier premia in its insurance policies. We drafted submissions based on the specific terms of the policy and reinsurance notes, IRDAI regulations governing reinsurance in India, industry practices, , and relevant case law to show that obtaining a reinsurance policy is not used for generating profit but rather acts as security for unforeseen losses to the insurer. A final decision in the matter is pending I believe and I hope that the foundation that we created in the case years back, leads to the Hon’ble Commission ruling that an insurer is a consumer of reinsurance coverage and therefore can file a consumer complaint against its reinsurer.

    Drawing from your experience in providing pre-arbitration strategic advice for a FIDIC-based contract with the Ministry of Defence, what are the critical considerations when preparing the client for such disputes and future arbitration proceedings?

    A fundamental strength of FIDIC contracts is their emphasis on clearly defining and allocating risks between the employer and the contractor. When advising on FIDIC-based contracts, I first emphasize proactive contract management to mitigate potential disputes. This includes ensuring clear documentation of all project-related communications, adherence to contractual timelines and procedures, and prompt identification and resolution of any ambiguities or disagreements within the framework provided by the contract. However, should the case proceed to arbitration  the focus always remains on building a strong case file,  which needs in depth identification, analysis and organization of evidence much prior to invocation., Successful claims (or counter-claims) in such an arbitration and often depend on lawyers efficiently and accurately synchronizing and linking timelines, technical evidence and contractual provisions before formulating the statement of claims or defence.

    Your commitment to fostering diversity within the legal profession is admirable. How do you ensure that aspiring lawyers receive the mentorship and opportunities needed within your firm? What key qualities do you look for when mentoring young lawyers, and what guidance do you offer them as they navigate their legal careers?

    At Revera Legal, we are committed to fostering a diverse and inclusive work environment. We provide aspiring lawyers with mentorship opportunities, training programs, and challenging assignments to help them develop their skills and advance their careers. When mentoring young lawyers, I look for qualities such as intellectual curiosity, strong work ethic, and empathy with a client’s position. I encourage younger lawyers to develop a deep understanding of the law, cultivate strong communication and advocacy skills, and maintain a high level of professionalism in their practice. Irrespective of personal or professional difficulties throughout their career, lawyers must foremost ensure that their client’s best case is presented.

    Given the demands of your career and leadership position, how do you personally manage to maintain a work-life balance? Additionally, how do you encourage your team to prioritize a healthy work-life balance while excelling in their professional roles?

    Maintaining a work-life balance is crucial for both personal well-being and professional success. Though this appears to be a difficult endeavour in the practice of law, which requires constant attention, reading and mental exertion, do attempt and encourage proper time management,  and distribution of responsibilities amongst the team to the extent possible. Lawyers are always doing a lot of heavy lifting, whether in court practice or transactional negotiations. In such a situation, having a  flexible work environment, rewards and recognition for achievements and drawing boundaries between work and personal life ensures sustainable growth in the profession. 

    In your view, what role will technological innovation play in shaping the future of the legal profession, particularly in the areas of arbitration and dispute resolution?

    Technological innovation is transforming the legal profession as I knew it at the inception of my career, and I believe this trend will continue to accelerate. In arbitration and dispute resolution, we are seeing the rise of online dispute resolution platforms, the use of artificial intelligence for document drafting and review as well as the adoption of virtual hearings by courts throughout the country. I also see that several lawyers and esteemed judges have altogether stopped using paper, instead using tablets and laptops in court, all of which are helpful in organizing, reviewing and carrying voluminous files, and are certainly friendly to the environment. In fact, I believe even notarial services are now being offered online, which are helpful when parties are located in far flung jurisdictions or locations. These innovations have the potential to make the dispute resolution faster, more efficient, cost-effective, and accessible. I am excited to embrace these advancements and leverage them in my firm and practice.

    Get in touch with Ishaan Chhaya –

  • “The most crucial skill for law students is strategic legal analysis combined with effective communication.” – M Abhijnan Jha, Partner at Lex Praxis.

    “The most crucial skill for law students is strategic legal analysis combined with effective communication.” – M Abhijnan Jha, Partner at Lex Praxis.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    What motivated you to pursue a career in law, and what inspired you to choose the B.P.Sc (Hons.) LLB (Business Law Hons.) program at National Law University, Jodhpur? Looking back at your law school years, what are some key experiences that have had a lasting impact on you?

    Growing up, I admired my father, a police personnel, whose commitment to justice and integrity deeply influenced me. Watching him serve the people with courage and dedication inspired me to pursue a career in law. Additionally, I was fascinated by courtroom dramas and legal stories portrayed in movies, which sparked my curiosity about the legal system and advocacy.

    I chose the B.P.Sc (Hons.) LLB (Business Law Hons.) program at National Law University, Jodhpur, because I was deeply interested in subjects like Political Science, Sociology, and Psychology. Their focus on understanding human behavior, societal dynamics, and governance aligned perfectly with my passion for law and justice. This interdisciplinary approach not only matched my interests but also provided a strong foundation for pursuing a career in law. During my law school years, participating in moot courts, insightful internships, and collaborating on research projects helped me develop strong analytical and advocacy skills. These experiences, combined with my early inspirations, shaped my approach to solving complex legal challenges.

    How did your early experiences at A&A Law Office, particularly in corporate and project finance, contribute to shaping your understanding of joint ventures, regulatory frameworks, and due diligence in commercial transactions?

    My early experiences at A&A Law Office played a crucial role in shaping my understanding of joint ventures, regulatory frameworks, due diligence, and intellectual property in commercial transactions. As it was a small law firm, I was involved in a wide range of legal work, from corporate and project finance to intellectual property matters. This exposure taught me how to assess risks, navigate complex regulatory requirements, and ensure IP protection. These experiences provided a solid foundation for strategic legal advisory and commercial law dynamics.

    How has your expertise in intellectual property law influenced your corporate advisory work, particularly when handling trademarks, copyrights, and design matters? What are your thoughts on the future evolution of intellectual property rights in the coming years?

    My expertise in intellectual property law has significantly influenced my corporate advisory work, especially when handling trademarks, copyrights, and design matters. It enables me to provide strategic guidance on brand protection, licensing, and enforcement, ensuring clients’ intellectual assets are safeguarded while maximizing commercial value. This knowledge also enhances contract drafting, due diligence, and risk assessment in corporate transactions. 

    Additionally, being a member of some of the world’s most prestigious organizations, such as the International Trademark Association (INTA), International Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property (AIPPI), Asian Patent Attorneys Association (APAA), and World Intellectual Property Forum (WIPF), has significantly contributed to my professional growth. These memberships have provided valuable opportunities to engage with global legal experts, stay updated on international IP trends, and expand my professional network. They have also enhanced my strategic insights and knowledge, enabling me to offer well-rounded and globally relevant legal advice.

    Looking ahead, I believe the rapid growth of digital commerce and emerging technologies like AI and blockchain will redefine IP rights. This evolution will demand adaptive legal strategies, international collaboration, and enhanced regulatory frameworks to address complex cross-border IP issues.

    Drawing from your experience in the real estate sector, what were some of the most difficult aspects of drafting and negotiating construction contracts and joint development agreements?

    Drawing from my experience in the real estate sector, some of the most challenging aspects of drafting and negotiating construction contracts and joint development agreements involved navigating complex regulatory compliance, risk allocation, and aligning the interests of multiple stakeholders. Ensuring clear terms on project timelines, payment structures, and liability clauses required meticulous attention to detail. Additionally, balancing legal safeguards with commercial feasibility while managing client expectations demanded strategic negotiation skills and effective communication. These challenges enhanced my problem-solving abilities and contract management expertise.

    Could you describe one of the most challenging cases you’ve handled so far and share your approach to navigating the complexities involved in that case?

    One of the most challenging cases I handled involved complex intellectual property litigation with cross-border implications. It required navigating conflicting jurisdictional laws and strategic enforcement of trademark rights. To manage this, I conducted in-depth legal research, collaborated with international counsel, and crafted adaptive litigation strategies to protect client interests. I focused on proactive risk management and effective communication to resolve disputes efficiently. This experience reinforced the importance of strategic foresight, agility, and resilience in high-stakes legal matters.

    What are some of the major challenges that businesses in the real estate sector are facing today? Additionally, how has the role of arbitration and other alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms evolved in this sector?

    Businesses in the real estate sector today face challenges like regulatory complexities, fluctuating market dynamics, land acquisition disputes, and financing constraints. Navigating compliance with environmental laws and urban development regulations also adds to the complexity.

    Arbitration and other Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanisms have become increasingly popular in this sector due to their cost-effectiveness and faster resolution compared to traditional litigation. ADR provides flexibility, confidentiality, and specialized expertise, making it a preferred choice for resolving real estate disputes efficiently.

    As someone who has played a pivotal role in high-stakes cases as both a Partner and Counsel, what do you think is the most crucial skill that law students should focus on developing to succeed in the legal field? Also, are there any resources you would recommend to help them stay updated on legal trends and developments?

    The most crucial skill for law students is strategic legal analysis combined with effective communication. They should also develop negotiation skills, adaptability to emerging technologies, and resilience in high-pressure situations. Writing articles, case notes, and thought leadership pieces not only sharpens analytical abilities but also enhances visibility in the legal community.

    I have authored over 20 publications in reputed journals, which has significantly contributed to my understanding of complex legal issues and trends. To stay updated on legal trends, I recommend using LinkedIn for networking and industry insights. Resources like CiteCase, Bar and Bench, Live Law, Manupatra, and College Law Review Journals provide comprehensive legal updates, case analyses, and emerging legal issues. Engaging with these platforms helps build a strong foundation and keeps one informed about the latest legal developments.

    Given the demanding nature of your professional commitments, how do you manage to strike a balance between your work responsibilities and personal life?

    Balancing professional commitments with personal life is achievable through strategic time management and leveraging technology. I have automated my legal processes and maintain a paperless office, enabling me to work efficiently from anywhere as a mobile lawyer. This flexibility allows me to manage tasks on the go while staying organized and responsive. By embracing digital tools and maintaining a disciplined schedule, I maximize productivity while also ensuring time for personal well-being and family, achieving a harmonious work-life balance.

    Could you kindly share the insights and experiences you’ve gained throughout your entrepreneurial journey?

    In addition to my legal career, I have always been passionate about entrepreneurship. I founded InCourt News in 2015, which gained recognition as one of the best mobile applications to have, featured in various magazines for its innovative approach to legal news delivery, and was later acquired by a legal marketplace. I also ventured into the skilling sector with “Skill Funds,” founding startups aligned with the Skill India Mission, aimed at empowering youth with industry-relevant skills. These experiences have enriched my leadership abilities, strategic vision, and problem-solving skills, complementing my legal expertise with an entrepreneurial mindset. Currently, I am running my law firm, Lex Praxis, leveraging my diverse experiences to provide strategic legal solutions.

    Get in touch with M Abhijnan Jha –

  • “In essence, the law’s ability to safeguard rights and bring justice fuelled my passion, and I remain steadfast in my commitment to upholding these principles.” – Kunal Sharma, Partner at Singhania & Co. LLP.

    “In essence, the law’s ability to safeguard rights and bring justice fuelled my passion, and I remain steadfast in my commitment to upholding these principles.” – Kunal Sharma, Partner at Singhania & Co. LLP.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Your educational background spans a range of fields, from M. Com and LLB to Company Secretary (Executive) and an LLM in International Trade Laws and WTO. What motivated you to pursue a career in law, and why did you choose to specialise in International Trade and WTO during your LLM? 

    My decision to pursue a career in law stemmed from the profound realization that lawyers hold one of the most influential roles in shaping not only society but also the economy, industry, and politics on a global scale. The weight of responsibility carried by legal professionals, whose work directly impacts individuals, communities, and the broader environment, deeply resonated with me. This sentiment was strongly reinforced during my childhood when a neighbour, wrongfully accused, was forced to endure repeated visits to the police station. Witnessing this firsthand highlighted the immense difference that legal support can make during distressing and complex situations. This experience solidified my belief that the power of legal knowledge, combined with the ethical responsibility it entails, is what inspired my journey into law.

    In essence, the law’s ability to safeguard rights and bring justice fuelled my passion, and I remain steadfast in my commitment to upholding these principles.

    As for my choice to specialize in International Trade Laws and WTO during my LLM, it was driven by my keen interest in the global market, international politics, and economic policies. I have always been fascinated by the intricate workings of international commerce and governance. I wanted to equip myself with a solid understanding of the fundamental norms, agencies, and regulatory standards that shape global trade, ensuring that I am well-prepared to support businesses operating in an interconnected world.

    Could you walk us through your career progression, starting from your early days as a Junior Associate to your current role as a Partner at Singhania & Co LLP? What were some of the most valuable lessons you learned in the early stages of your practice that have influenced your professional journey? 

    My professional journey has been an enriching experience, shaped by diverse roles and exposure across multiple jurisdictions. I have had the privilege of working with three listed companies and two top-tier law firms, gaining legal expertise in India, the UAE, and Africa. My career began in litigation, which laid the groundwork for a comprehensive understanding of dispute resolution. Over time, I transitioned into the corporate and regulatory domains, acquiring hands-on experience in areas like real estate, corporate laws, intellectual property rights, projects, project finance, technology, M&A, EPC contracts, and FEMA compliance.

    In my early roles, I served as the legal head for zones spanning West Bengal, Rajasthan, North and East India, and Delhi NCR for leading housing finance companies. This phase gave me practical insights into regulatory compliance, litigation, and real estate transactions. My tenure at Amarchand Mangaldas & Suresh A. Shroff, and later with Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas and Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, further refined my expertise in corporate transactions and advisory work. Before joining Singhania & Co LLP, I gained international exposure working with a Dubai-based conglomerate with operations in Miami, the Middle East, Europe, and eight African countries.

    This diverse journey, spanning five cities and engaging with varied sectors, has been a transformative experience. It has equipped me with a strong legal foundation, strategic thinking, and the ability to navigate complex legal landscapes effectively—skills that I bring to every professional engagement.

    You have extensive experience in structuring, strategizing, and negotiating transaction documents across multiple sectors. Can you discuss a particularly challenging deal and how you overcame the challenges? 

    One of the most challenging deals I worked on involved a multi-jurisdictional M&A transaction for exploration of iron ore deposits that required navigating conflicting regulatory frameworks across India, Africa, and Dubai, and involved government representative, multinational mining giant. The primary challenge was aligning the interests of stakeholders while ensuring compliance with diverse legal systems. By fostering open communication among parties, engaging local legal experts, and adopting a phased negotiation strategy, we successfully closed the deal. This experience underscored the importance of adaptability, cultural sensitivity, and a solution-oriented approach.

    You’ve worked on transactions across various jurisdictions, including Africa, Dubai, and India. What are the unique legal and cultural challenges you face when dealing with cross-border deals? 

    Navigating cross-border transactions requires a combination of legal expertise and cultural sensitivity. For example, while structuring agreements in African jurisdictions, addressing legal ambiguities is often critical, as is fostering trust through strong personal relationships, especially given the significant involvement of government liaisons and multinational stakeholders, including European influences. Similarly, in Dubai, aligning with DIFC and free zone regulations, adhering to Sharia law, and respecting local business customs are essential. Success in these transactions is not just about technical proficiency but also about understanding and adapting to diverse cultural and regulatory landscapes.

    Ultimately, the ability to engage with local norms, working practices, and mindsets strengthens relationships and significantly enhances the chances of successful negotiations and seamless transactions.

    How do you manage the complexities of advising clients on international legal frameworks, especially when dealing with issues like FDI, foreign exchange regulations (FEMA), and local laws in emerging markets?

    Advising clients on international legal frameworks, such as FDI policies, FEMA regulations, and local laws, requires not only a deep understanding of evolving regulations but also a strong network of global legal experts. This task is often more challenging than it appears, as the legal environment has become increasingly dynamic and complex over time. My approach is to first understand the client’s specific needs and then ensure alignment with the applicable laws. When necessary, I also guide clients to take corrective steps to achieve compliance. Industry norms play a crucial role, as they often drive changes in regulations over time, which must be carefully considered while structuring advice.

    Breaking down intricate legal requirements into actionable steps and delivering clear, pragmatic solutions is at the heart of my practice. By combining legal knowledge with strategic foresight, I ensure my clients remain compliant while safeguarding their interests, especially in the context of emerging markets. Ultimately, success in this field comes from balancing legal expertise with a nuanced understanding of industry trends and regulatory shifts.

    Having led teams in multiple roles, from Manager (Legal) at DHFL to Partner at Singhania & Co, what is your approach to managing legal teams? How do you ensure high levels of productivity and collaboration within your team? 

    Leading legal teams have underscored the importance of clear communication, strategic delegation, and fostering a collaborative, trust-driven environment. I prioritize understanding each team member’s strengths, aspirations, and areas of interest, which helps me align individual goals with collective objectives. Encouraging ownership of work, while providing guidance and support, empowers the team to approach tasks with passion and responsibility. Regular knowledge-sharing sessions and open discussions keep the team updated, motivated, and aligned with evolving legal trends.

    By cultivating a culture of trust, mutual respect, and continuous learning, I have consistently seen high levels of productivity, innovative problem-solving, and seamless collaboration, ensuring exceptional outcomes for clients and individual growth for team members.

    You’ve advised clients on issues like data mining and trademark infringements on websites. In your view, what are the biggest emerging legal challenges in the technology space, and how do you see them evolving in the next 5-10 years?

    The technology landscape is advancing at an unprecedented pace, bringing forth multifaceted challenges such as data privacy, cybersecurity, and the regulation of AI and blockchain technologies. Emerging concerns, including cross-border data transfers, digital copyright infringement, and the intricacies of smart contracts, highlight the growing complexity in legal documentation and compliance. Over the next 5-10 years, these issues will necessitate the formulation of robust policies, standard operating procedures (SOPs), and multi-jurisdictional frameworks to address the regulatory gaps many are still grappling with today.

    Irrespective of the nature of a business—be it a sole proprietorship or a publicly listed company—or whether one is an individual or an entity, technology is profoundly impacting and will continue to reshape every sphere of life and profession. This digital transformation spares no domain, making it imperative for everyone to adapt to the rapid pace of change. As lawyers and policy influencers, we bear a greater responsibility to engage with technology, society, and industry in a way that ensures the outcomes of this technological advent are beneficial to all, rather than resulting in exploitation. It is our duty to ensure that the legal frameworks and policies we shape foster innovation while safeguarding against undue risks and inequities, creating a more equitable and sustainable future for all.

    The legal profession itself is undergoing a transformative shift, especially post-COVID, where technological fluency has become indispensable. The era of delegating technological tasks solely to juniors is long past—modern lawyers must actively skill up to adapt to this digital transgression. As legal practitioners, agility, foresight, and a proactive approach will be essential to effectively navigate this evolving landscape and remain relevant in the globalized legal domain.

    What advice would you offer to the younger generation aspiring to succeed in the field of Corporate Law, given your extensive experience? 

    For freshers starting their careers in law, my advice is simple: first, build a strong foundation by mastering the basics of law, whether in corporate or litigation. A solid understanding of legal principles will set the stage for your career. Stay curious and proactive about learning, especially in emerging fields like technology, cross-border transactions, and regulatory developments. Equally important is building relationships—networking with clients and colleagues will play a big role in your growth, as trust and communication are key to success.

    For mid-level lawyers, it’s time to focus on deepening your expertise in a specific area and honing your skills. Whether it’s corporate law, litigation, or a niche practice, developing specialization will help you stand out and become a trusted advisor. Be proactive in managing client relationships, taking ownership of complex cases, and looking for new business opportunities. In addition, focus on improving your efficiency—balancing technical knowledge with client-focused, practical solutions will be crucial as you progress in your career. Ultimately, whether you’re a fresher or mid-level lawyer, success comes from a combination of knowledge, integrity, and a client-first approach.

    Get in touch with Kunal Sharma-

  • “My journey has been one from experiment to passion. As a business lawyer, it’s not just about saying ‘yes’ or ‘no’—it’s about providing solutions that operate in the best interest of the business, while also mitigating risks.” – Puneet Vyas, Lead Legal Counsel at Hitachi Energy

    “My journey has been one from experiment to passion. As a business lawyer, it’s not just about saying ‘yes’ or ‘no’—it’s about providing solutions that operate in the best interest of the business, while also mitigating risks.” – Puneet Vyas, Lead Legal Counsel at Hitachi Energy

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    Could you share the story of how you began your career in law? What motivated you to pursue this path, and how has your journey evolved from your early days at Gujarat State Petroleum Corporation Ltd to your current role at Hitachi Energy?  

    It has been a journey from experiment to passion. Although I had opted for Science and Maths when I was doing higher secondary in School, I was clear I would not pursue engineering and wanted to try my hand at something different. I tried getting admitted to a few merchant navy schools. Thereafter, found law to be an exciting upcoming career choice. 

    Pursuant to taking exams at various law schools (pre-CLAT era), I was admitted to the National Law University Jodhpur. The Hon’ble Vice Chancellor, Mr. N L Mitra, had a truly inspiring vision for the law school. It was my first meeting with Mr Mitra, post-admission, that gave me confidence that I had made an excellent choice. 

    I had done my specialization in IPRs and however fate had other plans. I opted to join a company as an in-house counsel.  My first job at GSPC Legal Department, taught me the 3 most relevant capabilities, an in-house lawyer should possess (1) Attention to detail (2) Reading the facts at hand, meticulously (3) Research skills. 

    From GSPC I moved to BHEL at their Corporate Office in New Delhi. BHEL is a mammoth organization, with numerous law officers. The variety of work and the exposure at BHEL was incomparable. I handled numerous disputes along with International arbitrations as well. I had the opportunity to brief and to interact with Senior Counsels quite frequently. 2016, I moved to the Industry Sector Division of BHEL, which was more focused on new businesses and I got to work on agreements pertaining to renewables and e-mobility. This gave a new insight, wherein the focus shifted from being a lawyer to becoming a Business lawyer. Business lawyers are not only supposed to provide opinions in ‘YES’ or ‘NO’, but to provide solutions that can operate in the best interests of the Business. 

    Same journey of developing self as a specialist Business Lawyer continued to my current role at Hitachi Energy. With the varied experiences of working and Government organisations as well as Private firm, the perspective as a lawyer has improved and the focused attention is on Business requirements, at the same time highlighting the risks involved and providing mitigation solutions to the said risk. Therefore, a journey which had started as a student looking for career choices, to an experienced In-house counsel is enriching and could not have asked for better experience 

    After completing your law degree, you joined Gujarat State Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Was that simply an opportunity that came your way, or had you already decided that you would focus on corporate legal work rather than pursuing a career in litigation? What factors influenced your choice at that stage?  

    As I have already mentioned, I chose to join a company as a Corporate Lawyer. I did not want to get into litigation since I don’t belong to a lawyer’s family. During Campus recruitment I got offers from Zydus Cadila and GSPC. GSPC being energy sector, seemed a more lucrative choice. The factors that influenced my choice were (1) Getting a career choice, wherein Litigation is not involved (2) GSPC being in Petroleum/energy sector, which is most promising sector even as on date. (3) Getting to know nuances of working a public sector.

    Reflecting on your experience representing NLU Jodhpur in the 12th Inter-American Human Rights Moot Court Competition, how did this experience shape your approach to real-world legal challenges? Do you see any parallels between moot court competitions and your work today?  

    I went as a researcher and obviously, the experience was outstanding in terms of providing an exposure to interact with teammates from all across the globe. Also, exposure of knowing perspective of international judges and panellists was more than what anyone could have asked as a student. A moot court competition cannot be compared to and real life work, however, if it’s a real life situation or a competition, practice and preparation are the key to be successful in your deliverables. 

    Given your vast experience in contract negotiations and dispute resolution, what are some of the most significant lessons you’ve learned that you believe could benefit the next generation of legal professionals?  

    Contract negotiations are not yet that developed in India as compared to Cross jurisdictional negotiations. The opportunity of Legal to Legal interaction is comparatively lesser. From the other party the person negotiating can be Contract Manager, Procurement head or even a Marketing person. Therefore, the key is patience and also translating your legal acumen into a language that is understood by the other person, irrespective of his field. Logical and clearly articulated reasons are the key to successful negotiations. 

    In case of negotiations with Lawyers, the key is to stick to your course of argument and to provide a reasoning which cannot be denied. Opposite side lawyers are also generally more focussed on resolving the deadlock because that is what is expected in a business organization. Cross Jurisdictional negotiations are generally based on other factors such as culture etc. that can influence the negotiations. 

    Your experience includes handling both domestic and international arbitrations. How do you approach the complexities of these cases, and what advice would you give to young lawyers aspiring to specialize in arbitration?  

    It is sad that arbitrations have neither proven to be cost effective, nor do they save on time. We are defending a Section 37 application in respect of arbitration award that was passed 10 years back. As a business organization, the huge costs incurred in Arbitration can be huge hit to the business. Therefore, emphasis should be more on pre-arbitration dispute resolution mechanisms such as mediation/conciliations. The contractual conciliations are also given more importance and the decision of the conciliation panel is also given relevance. All these mechanisms have grown in importance because of the costly resolution that arbitration offers. 

    How important is it for legal professionals to have a global perspective in today’s interconnected world?  

    Global perspective is most important for lawyers these days. This not only opens up opportunity for cross jurisdictional hiring, however in a managerial role the expectation is to be conversant with laws of Jurisdictions the business operates. Therefore, it is not an additional qualification but mandatory expectation in a business firm working in different jurisdictions. 

    Along with the above, India offers a talent HUB who can cater to different Jurisdictions. Like engineers and other professionals, Lawyer Hubs are also being developed across organizations who can cater to different jurisdictions. Young aspirants therefore having cross jurisdictional expertise have good chances of being absorbed in MNCs. 

    Recovery proceedings and insolvency cases are critical areas of your expertise. How do you navigate the intricate legalities involved in these proceedings, and what role does innovation play in resolving such disputes effectively?  

    Litigation strategy formation is the key for any success. Once a dispute/situation is at hand, the key is to analyse all the pros and cons and to evaluate best course of action. This analysis includes reviewing the costs involved, the time a probable action would take and also will the desired objective be met if a proceeding is opted. The insolvency although not a recovery proceedings, has been proven to be a very effective measure to deter companies to pay genuine dues. Interim injunctions also have proven to be a effective coercive measure against the parties, so that desired results are obtained. 

    The legal profession can be demanding and stressful. How do you maintain resilience and mental well-being in such a high-pressure environment? Any hobbies you pursue that help you to unwind?

    Mindfulness is key for every lawyer. “We live in times where we forget the Present” . Lawyers are poor listeners and also with the ever increasing pressure, the mind is constantly at work. Therefore, overthinking cannot be avoided. Mindfulness activities such as meditation and other mindful activities can help train the mind to be focussed on the problem at hand. Stress is caused when you are thinking about a problem or for issues you have no control. Once mindfulness is inculcated as part of daily practice, stress can be reduced tremendously. There is also no stress when you actually love what you are doing at work. 

    Disclaimer – Views expressed are personal to Puneet Vyas and does not represent views of Hitachi Energy.

    Get in touch with Puneet Vyas-

  • “Life is what happens to you when you are busy making other plans” – From Medicine to Mastery in Law: Rajvendra Sarswat, Independent practitioner & Senior Standing Counsel for Union of India

    “Life is what happens to you when you are busy making other plans” – From Medicine to Mastery in Law: Rajvendra Sarswat, Independent practitioner & Senior Standing Counsel for Union of India

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    Could you please help our readers get to know you better by sharing how you came into the field of law? We’d love to hear about your journey, who inspired you to join the legal profession, and the challenges you faced initially.  

    Many of us will agree that growing up in the nineties, there used to be primarily two career choices every student had to make at a certain stage, either medicals or engineering, and similarly I was also in the same mainstream preparing to be a doctor someday. Law was surprisingly introduced to me by my brother which intrigued me when I explored more about it as a profession. As I always believe in the quote that ‘life is what happens to you when you are busy making other plans’. I joined National Law University, Jodhpur as its first batch student and graduated in the year 2006 with Corporate Law Honors in B.B.A. LL.B. and thereafter joined Kanga & Company, Mumbai and also worked with Majmudar & Partners, Mumbai till close to 2011 end. While working with these firms it was purely general corporate, M&A and PE transactional work with almost negligible work related to litigation and the learning I received from both these places left a significant impression in my approach towards work. My initial years into litigation were very challenging and every new case I got was accepted as a blessing. I was appointed as amicus curiae or Court commissioner in many Public Interest Litigations during my initial years which gave me the opportunity to appear regularly before the court and to make myself relevant. I was always open to any area of law and focused myself to take each case as the most important and crucial for me for building myself as a litigation lawyer.   

    As Senior Standing Counsel for Union of India, GST, Central Excise / Customs, what are the key challenges you face in representing such a broad spectrum of governmental interests?

    The most fascinating part of representing tax department in the High Court is that mostly the controversies involved are interpretational issues where constitutional validity is under question and having serious implications wherein invariably I get the chance to argue against the best and top tax lawyers of the country, which I believe is a valuable learning experience for me. As we know that the Goods and Service Tax law is new and evolving so many issues are nascent and completely innovative in its challenge which is a constant learning experience. One has to keep in mind the complexity of Laws, diverse stakes, managing the litigation coupled with the factor in change in the policy. However, balancing the government’s interests with the broader public interest can be a delicate task. Ensuring that legal actions align with public expectations and serve the overall welfare of the society is important. Navigating these challenges requires a deep understanding of legal intricacies, effective communication skills, strategic thinking, and the ability to adapt to dynamic legal landscapes.

    We want to understand how different the study of law is compared to the practice of law. What was the most challenging aspect of transitioning from academic learning to actual legal practice?  

    What we study in law school is a very fundamental yet primitive part of law. The actual application and understating of the practical aspects of law comes only when we enter in the profession. As a first generation lawyer, the journey is altogether different and difficult because you inherit nothing and have to build everything from scratch but the good part is that you have an empty canvas and you are the artist. A fresh law school graduate who wishes to enter into litigation should always start with fundamental and practical aspects including the process of filing or curing of defects therefore I also advise to start from trial courts for at least two years before practicing in higher forums. Nowadays it’s good to see that law schools are also focusing on practical learning aspects other than just theoretical teaching. Applying legal principles to real cases, clients, and situations requires a different skill set than memorizing legal theories. In academia, the emphasis is often on analysing case law and statutes. However, in practice, building strong client relationships, effective communication, and understanding client needs become crucial. Developing these interpersonal skills can be challenging for some. In a practical legal environment, time management becomes critical. Meeting deadlines, handling multiple cases simultaneously, and managing client expectations require efficient time management skills that may not be as emphasized in academic settings. And, most importantly grappling with ethical dilemmas, maintaining client confidentiality, and upholding professional conduct standards are integral parts of legal practice that go beyond academic discussions of legal ethics. I also happen to be a guest faculty at a few law universities. I also give lectures at many intuitions and this helps me keep my own learning in the game.     

    How do you approach the complexities of constitutional writs compared to other types of legal matters you handle, and what strategies have proven most effective for you?  

    The unique feature of writ jurisdiction is that it’s an extraordinary remedy and how you can convince the court to get a favourable order depends upon how innovative and ingenious you can be. In my experience of being into litigation, I believe there is only one strategy and that is there is no strategy. You have to be quick on your feet, well prepared and thoroughly researched. One of the key focuses should be on the drafting because there may not be occasion for you to change your pleadings in the later stage if you have missed out a crucial fact or legal ground. You must know what to speak and more importantly what not to speak. Court crafting is an art and it takes patience and keen openness for observing to learn on a daily basis which cannot be taught but has to be learnt. By combining thorough legal research, precise drafting, effective oral advocacy, and a deep understanding of constitutional principles, handling constitutional writs can be approached with the rigor and strategic insight they demand. This ensures that the complexities of these cases are navigated effectively, maximizing the chances of a favourable outcome. When I joined litigation, I ensured to be in the court and get the chance to hear senior advocates arguing their matters because one can learn a lot from mere observation as to how a particular case was presented and how the questions of the court were replied back. 

    What innovations or changes would you like to see in the Indian judicial system to improve efficiency and fairness in legal proceedings? Additionally, what steps are you personally taking or planning to take to help achieve these improvements?   

    We are presently in a rapidly growing and evolving legal system. Before the covid pandemic, none ever imagined the idea of having courts running online where lawyers and even litigants were attending courts from home. Now we have a seamless virtual platform where any lawyer can not only do the filing but also attend the court. We just need more adaptability and openness to it. However, that is mostly at the High Court and Supreme Court or other higher forums, which needs to be adopted at all the levels. This requires proper infrastructure and training. Once this is achieved, service of process, examination of witness, inspection etc. many such procedural aspects which delays the justice dispension system can be curtailed. We are currently transitioning our entire office from physical file to digital file and do not carry physical file to the dias. This way we have access to the entire office record, documents and relevant judgments with ease even if we are travelling. 

    You transitioned from being an associate to a legal head and then switched back to a senior associate role. What differences did you observe in both practice areas during these transitions, and what motivated your move back to the litigation?  

    You cannot compare being an associate in a corporate non-litigation firm with being an in-house counsel with any corporate organisation with having your independent practice as they all work within their uniquely peculiar sphere. The kind of work you do, the atmosphere you work in, the people you deal with on a daily basis, the issues you have to handle independently, they all are different and distinct. The initial journey is always difficult, nonetheless, they all have their own challenges and benefits. After graduating from law school; my primary interest was to work with a good corporate law firm, either in Delhi or Mumbai. I got a chance to work with two very reputed firms in Mumbai and a brief period to be legal head of a public limited company. However, after working for a few years I realised the quench of working on my own started bubbling up. I remember I had visited the High Court once for a matter related to one of my relatives and after observing the lawyers and court room, from there the idea of starting my own practice triggered inside. It was a very difficult and risky decision to take after investing years into Mumbai and then coming back to Jodhpur coupled with the fact being a first generation lawyer, but somehow I took the plunge. My initial few years as a litigation lawyer were difficult with self-doubts and fear as to who will give me work and how will I sustain; but I also believe that such fear keeps you motivated too.

    Mr. Sarswat, transitioning from prestigious firms to independent practice is often a significant milestone. Could you share how your independent practice is evolving, and which specific areas of law are you currently focusing on? Additionally, what qualities do you look for in interns who seek to work under your guidance? Any suggestions you would like to give them?

    I practice primarily constitutional writs, civil, arbitration and a few criminal matters too. Public Interest Litigation has inspired me to a significant manner which lead me to file and appear in many such PILs involving public issues around me, where we have been successful to get very favourable orders from Court either as the counsel or as the amicus curiae. We also do a lot of arbitration practice. The qualities which I aspire and look for in anyone who is willing to join litigation is patience, persistence and hard work. There is no shortcut in this profession and if one can maintain that, the sky’s the limit. I firmly believe that every person has a unique journey and the only comparison you should have is with yourself as to what you were one year back in the past. I find young lawyers getting impatient, which is inevitable though, but this is a lifelong building profession and takes time. One has to be well prepared with facts and position of law, latest judgment on the issue involved. If you are sincere and hardworking, you will automatically stand out and become noticeable. If one can manage to do that, one will be picked up at the right time from the right people and the path will appear. Lastly, never be too focused that you miss out little opportunities at the corner of your eyes and if you wish to take litigation as a serious and primary choice of profession, then only join it otherwise don’t start it with as plan B.

    Outside of law, what hobbies or personal interests do you pursue that help you maintain a balanced perspective?  

    I love to read and travel. I believe the more you read and travel, the broader perspective you achieve about various aspects of life. One should have a habit of reading at least 15-20 pages daily, other than office work. I also write and paint at times. Every new place you visit, teaches you a lot about yourself as a person too. I also love running and keeping myself physically fit because a healthy body can only give you a healthy mind. I love to listen to old school music and my favourite bands or artists are U2, Bob Dylan and all time legends Kishore Kumar and Jagjit Singh.  

    Get in touch with Rajvendra Sarswat-

  • “Don’t resist any new experience or challenge, it is only in the deep end that we really learn how to swim”- Tishampati Sen, Counsel at the Supreme court of India

    “Don’t resist any new experience or challenge, it is only in the deep end that we really learn how to swim”- Tishampati Sen, Counsel at the Supreme court of India

    This Interview has been published by Pragya Chandni and The SuperLawyer Team

    Can you share with us how your journey into law began? What inspired you to pursue a career in this field?

    My journey with law started only incidentally. As a child finishing high school, all I knew of what I wanted to do – was join the corporate world, and be a corporate honcho – I wanted to walk in my father’s rather large shoes – as I had always seen him as a top corporate executive. But I soon learnt that engineering was not for me. No matter how hard I  tried – I just didn’t grasp the concepts for JEE exams, while for my friends it was a piece of cake. Then someone told me of a few prominent corporate executives who were actually lawyers by training. Since I had always been a debater, the common opinion was that I would do well in law. That is what I wanted to do, complete my LL.B., do some work, pursue an MBA and then proceed with life. But clearly life had other plans. I started enjoying reading law in law school, and started performing well in Moot Court competitions. But even then I had no plans of pursuing law post my LL.B. Then one day in an international arbitration competition held in Delhi, I was awarded the best speaker, and more significantly, a scholarship to National University of Singapore for an LL.M. No one, in their right mind, can let such an opportunity go by and so that is how I went ahead and pursued my LL.M, even with no intention of continuing with law. When I returned to India, I decided to work in a law firm for about a year (or two) before I would go ahead for my MBA – as previously planned – but my tryst with law, started at JSA under Mr. Sumanto Basu, and that is when I fell in love with law, and with being a lawyer. I saw large corporations, value and plan entire business strategies based on the advice given by Mr. Basu, who in turn based his advice on the work done by us! That realisation was empowering and humbling at the same time. After this, there was no looking back.

    You graduated from NLU Jodhpur and then pursued your LL.M from the National University of Singapore. How did your academic experiences shape your career in law, especially in international commercial laws?

    Both NLUJ and NUS have had significant contributions to my life. These institutions helped create the foundation for the legal acumen, and the understanding of the principles of law and practice. I owe a lot to NLUJ of course, the fundamentals of our legal understanding, the basic concepts of law, jurisprudence, drafting and advocacy was taught to us, and ingrained in us by the alma mater. NLUJ taught us research methodology, how to articulate one’s opinion coherently in articles, and the art of persuasion – through moot court competitions. The plinth on which I have built my practice, was created at NLUJ. But I think even beyond the academic training, NLUJ played a very big role in the development of my personality. I don’t think law school, at the undergrad level especially, should be looked at only as a place to read and learn law. Much more importantly, this is a place where you’re mixed into a melting pot, and you learn a lot about yourself, and your relationship with the world. 

    NUS, because I was much older when I went there, and also because the LL.M. is only for a year or so – is where the focus was predominantly on academic rigour. I had the opportunity to sharpen the understanding and application of the laws. In an international LL.M., one is reading foreign law, which may or may not be relevant later. But that is precisely why an LL.M may be important. It trains you to read and comprehend all sorts of legislations – even those which you may not be able to relate to. What was very different in NUS for me, was the way examinations were held. Most of the exams were open – book exams, they didn’t want to assess one’s memory, but one’s understanding of the concepts. This forced me to learn to comprehend and articulate faster, rather than just mug things up. The LL.M. also taught me that there are multiple viewpoints available for the same issue, and that it often varies based on what one’s life journey has been and the culture / society one has been exposed to. This also became relevant and useful when interacting with other lawyers and arbitrators in the international context.

    Starting your career at J Sagar Associates, you worked on both the transactional and litigation sides of law. How did this dual experience influence your professional development and perspective as a lawyer?

    There is a marked difference in the way transactional lawyers and litigating lawyers deal with clients and with the mandate before them. In both, of course, you keep the client and the client’s interest at the forefront, but there is a difference in the approach. On the transactional side, the focus is on advice and in enabling the client to get a deal done. One is often batting for the client, against another party but, importantly, towards a common goal, i.e., arriving at an agreement, which is mutually beneficial to both the parties involved, and which will govern the relationship of the parties going forward. The understanding of the industry, the Client’s business, its weaknesses and needs, governs your advice and actions. 

    Whereas in litigation, it is almost always adversarial, where one has to strive to defeat the other side and their version –  in order to make one’s own client win. Here, the facts of the case, the law, and the specific personality of the court / tribunal, are what reign supreme in the mind of the advocate. Of course, this is overly simplified, and a generalisation, but that there is a difference in the approach is clear. I can happily say that I thoroughly enjoyed both sides of the coin, but it is the litigating and adversarial side of the practice that I love. The fact that I have received invaluable training from prominent people in both these fields in JSA, I feel I have widened my viewpoint and perspective as a lawyer, which has helped me to grasp issues in a matter, and also comprehend the business realities which cause the clients to make certain decisions. Some of the law firms require freshers to be on rotation, and go through various practice areas for the first 6 – months or so. Given my experience, I think it’s wonderful and long may it continue. 

    You’ve had the opportunity to work under prominent figures like Mr. Vipin Nair and Mr. Gopal Subramanium. How did these experiences and mentors impact your approach to practicing law and handling significant cases?

    My seniors have not merely had an impact on my approach to practicing law, they have all shaped me into the lawyer and the person I am today. My practice, and how I present myself in court and to other advocates / clients, is entirely a reflection of all my mentors and seniors. I have had a number of mentors in my life, but significantly, I must mention Mr. Sumanto Basu – who took me under his wing when I was an absolute fresher and who then taught me not just how to practice law, but even how to conduct myself. Mr. Amar Gupta – who was instrumental in my transition to litigation and who planted in me the love for litigation and court craft. Mr. Vipin Nair and Mr. P.B. Suresh taught me the tips and tricks of independent practice, advocacy, effective drafting and most importantly demonstrated how important it is to build a rapport with the Bench, other members of the bar and the court staff. From Mr Gopal Subramanium, of course, as a very senior and eminent senior counsel, I learnt how a person of his stature prepares for matters, deals with the pressure, the adulation and the criticism, and keeps the dignity of the Court and the need of the matter at the forefront. 

    Your practice covers a wide range of areas including corporate litigation, arbitration, and consumer law. How do you manage such a diverse portfolio, and what challenges have you faced in balancing these different specializations?

    It isn’t about managing a diverse portfolio, I have a practice that covers a wide range of areas, purely because I enjoy a wide range of subjects and each area comes with its own style of pleading, practice, and its own jurisprudence. It is a lot more enjoyable (at least for me), and the issues and the clientele that I interact with are also dynamic and different. As far as I am concerned, it keeps the hunger and the attraction for the law and litigation going. Having said that, I must clarify that having a wide practice area is not unusual, there are several other counsels as well, who practice in several fora and we regularly meet each other in different courts. Those predominantly practice in one type of practice area, do so probably because they have attained true expertise in that field of law and therefore are now required to devote most of their time assisting the courts, and advising clients, in that area of legal practice.

    You have been involved in several landmark cases, such as the class action matter involving data privacy and the whistleblower suit. Could you tell us more about these cases and what they mean for the legal landscape in India?

    Both of these matters that have been mentioned, are sub – judice, and so I don’t want to get into them in detail. But in short, the data privacy matter is an interesting one, where medical data entrusted with a cloud storage service provider went missing. The service provider took the defence that no liability can be attributed to it, since it provided a back – up only in the more expensive version of its service. The complainant therein was aggrieved by this position since the complainant felt that such a defence cannot be taken when data (and sensitive data such as this) has been admittedly lost based on the negligence and internal glitch of the service provider. Recognizing that this will be an issue for all those who have not taken the more expensive version of the service, a consumer complaint, with an application to treat the same in the interest of the class of consumers was filed. The National Commission passed certain significant orders in the matter (although the matter is pending adjudication), the issue is now before the Supreme Court. 

    Clearly this is an important issue because this not only deals with the sensitivity with which data must be dealt with, but also as to whether a class action proceeding can be maintained for an issue such as this. With data becoming the currency in the new world, matters such as this, would certainly become relevant for the law to develop appropriately. 

    The whistleblower matter is another interesting matter, where a person brought to the attention of the internal management of a large MNC that unethical practices were rampant within the organisation. Pursuant to an internal investigation, the admitted whistleblower was terminated from the employment on the ground that he too had been involved in the said unethical conduct. The whistleblower filed a civil suit challenging the said termination claiming that this is an attempt to penalise the person for blowing the whistle internally. He has also filed a Writ Petition bringing to the attention of the Court the fact that the law in India is woefully inadequate as far as according protection to whistleblowers is concerned while several countries have robust laws to protect whistleblowers and to prevent retaliatory conduct. A Judgment of the court in this regard, will certainly have a major impact and may actually cause the law and businesses to provide realistic mechanisms to prevent unethical conduct and to protect those who wish to speak out against such conduct. 

    As someone who has achieved considerable success in the legal field, what advice would you give to fresh law graduates who are just starting their careers?

    Its very nice of you to say so, I don’t know if I can be said to have achieved considerable success – as yet, but if I had to share a couple of my learnings with fresh law graduates, it would be this:

    Know your subject and the law very well. Please read the law. This includes being updated with the recent judgments and reading the bare acts. I have come to learn that knowing the law really well puts you at an advantage on any side of the practice. There is simply no substitute for it and those who really become prominent, almost always, have a strong command on their subject and are armed with a profound knowledge of the law.

    Not many really know what is good for them, and what they are meant to be, especially so, when you’re a fresh law graduate, and your only understanding of the legal world is through limited internships and maybe SUITS! Therefore take on all experiences wholeheartedly. Don’t resist any new experience or challenge, it is only in the deep end that we really learn how to swim. Plus, it is the ability to see a problem or a legal issue, from various viewpoints and perspectives, that sets one apart from the rest and that ability is honed especially by having a varied bouquet of life experiences. So don’t sweat the small stuff and dive – in deep.  

    Get in touch with Tishampati Sen-

  • Change is never brought about overnight, it is small efforts made by various people across professions genders and age groups which contribute to the growth of a country – Shohit Chaudhry, Advocate-on-Record at the Supreme Court of India

    Change is never brought about overnight, it is small efforts made by various people across professions genders and age groups which contribute to the growth of a country – Shohit Chaudhry, Advocate-on-Record at the Supreme Court of India

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    Shohit, could you take us through the beginnings of your career in law? What inspired you to pursue a career in law, and what were some of the initial challenges you faced as you embarked on this journey?

    I graduated from National Law University Jodhpur, in 2008. I was very clear that I wanted to do litigation. I joined the offices of Mr. Neeraj Malhotra, (now a Senior Advocate), in Delhi. I worked with him for a year and learnt the basics of litigation. Thereafter, I worked as the member of the legal team of Central Vigilance Committee on Public Distribution System of food grain, a committee appointed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India under the chairmanship of Justice (Retd.) D.P. Wadhwa, retired judge of the Supreme Court in the Right to Food Case. The Committee was required to submit a report on the functioning and maladies of the PDS in the entire country and suggest remedies in order to improve the system. The Committee was required to visit the States and prepare a report on each State separately. I visited a total of 9 states across the country in a period of 7 months. The exposure was immense, however, it took me away from litigation.

    I then worked with Zeus Law Associates for 1.5 years and started getting experience in high-stake matters. In August, 2011, I left and started taking on independent work. Alongside, I worked with The Chambers of Law under Mr. Dinesh Chand Mathur, Senior Advocate and Mr. Mohit  Mathur (now a Senior Advocate). This office taught me all the criminal law I know today. In May 2012, I became independent, completely. 

    The challenges I faced in my journey were all to do with the real world. Thanks to the curriculum of our University, we were taught laws, public speaking and were comfortable in appearing in Court from the first day itself. However, I did not know networking, how to get a new Client or how to retain a Client. I am a first-generation litigator and have had to happily work for everything I have. I always believe that there is space for merit and that is the quota I target. I was taught to question everything and seek advice from subject-matter experts. Thus, I did. I spoke to parents, friends, colleagues, and coaches on all that our formal education does not teach us. 

    As the President of the NLUJ Alumni Association, you play a significant role in fostering connections and opportunities for alumni. What inspired you to take on this responsibility, and what initiatives have you undertaken to strengthen the alumni network?

    The National Law University, Jodhpur, is a relatively young institution and we are a very young alumni body. Our first batch passed out in 2006 and our oldest alumni may not be over the age of 41. In June, 2020, when we had a lot of time on our hands, our alumni, a number of whom were in a WhatsApp group, started debating on the usefulness and outreach of the Alumni Association. It is then when I realised the generational difference in the thought process of a graduate of 2006 and that of 2020. The only way to keep such a diverse group united was to bring them under the umbrella of the Alumni Association. 

    Our first election was in 2021. I had the option of becoming the President, however, I chose to become the Secretary, as I realised that the maximum amount of work was to be done by the Secretary. In the next elections, in 2023, I became President. The work that we undertook on behalf of the National Law University Jodhpur Alumni Association (NLUJAA) was – 

    But this is just the beginning. We are in the process of raising our game and increasing the number of activities of the Association. 

    Your work profile spans across various areas of law, from civil and criminal to corporate and constitutional matters. Which aspect of law do you find most challenging yet rewarding to navigate, and why?

    I most enjoy the challenge when the chips are stacked against me. The field of law does not matter. It so happens, I mostly represent the underdog – the parents against the school, the pilot against the airline, the homebuyer against the real estate giant, the poor man in judicial custody, the person seeking to enforce the right against the State and so on.

    A lot of times you have a very tough case and the Court is against you and the other side is packed with senior lawyers. It is at such times when your preparation and court craft matters, when as you argue and contest the case, you actually see the expression of the Court change, the opposing lawyers fumble, and the Court realising that you actually have made out a good case where perhaps there was none. 

    The beauty of matter is the journey it undertakes – how each step in a litigation contributes to the victory at last. 

    You’ve been involved in drafting and amending rules for the Delhi High Court, among other prestigious appointments. Can you share some insights into the challenges and opportunities you encountered during these processes?

    Being part of the team which drafted the Delhi High Court (Original Side) Rules, 2018, has been an honour and the most rewarding assignment of my career, so far. I was the youngest in a team comprising the then Acting Chief Justice of the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi, the Hon’ble Judges presiding over the Original Side of the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi and Senior Advocates. When we litigate, we only represent the interests of one side. However, when we legislate, like we did with these Rules, you have to strike a balance with all sides – the bar, the bench, the litigant, the system and of course, the country. 

    It was a massive learning process. For about 6 months, I used to spend a few hours every day on the formulation of these Rules.  It was a privilege, having got an opportunity to do this after spending only 9 years at the bar. I was the point of contact for all the constituents of the Committee and had to keep the answers handy at all times. I used to prepare for the meetings of the Committee like we prepare final arguments for our matters. Queries used to fly thick and fast and we were required to be ready with answers. 

    I had an opportunity to understand, perceive and observe how Judges and senior lawyers, all with a wealth of experience, discuss and debate the nuances of law. 

    I was rewarded with being Nominated by the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi as Counsel to represent the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi, before various fora. 

    In your media coverage, you’ve addressed significant legal issues ranging from aviation safety to real estate disputes. How do you approach communicating complex legal concepts to the public and media, ensuring accuracy and clarity?

    Simple. People don’t read. You have to make them read. One of my seniors said, your draft should be so simple, even a common man can read it. That is what my endeavour is. Every time a journalist calls me to understand something, I try and break it down in a manner that even a common man with a non-legal background can understand. 

    Your contributions to landmark judgments like ‘Pioneer Urban Land and Infrastructure Limited v. Union of India’ have had a profound impact. What role do you believe legal professionals play in shaping societal norms and policies through such cases?

    The success of Pioneer Urban Judgment ultimately led the government to amend the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. I believe all lawyers do their fair share of work which is towards a cause or an advancement of society. However, influencing policy in an evolving system is the best gift we can give in our profession. 

    Change is never brought about overnight. It is small efforts made by various people across professions, genders and age groups which contribute to the growth of a country. Law is one of the most powerful professions in the world. Apart from doing their day-to-day work, a number of lawyers wear several hats. They are part of societies, boards of Companies, political bodies, governments, sports associations, charitable organizations etc. and are often at the helm of these organizations. One way is to influence society by their actions in each of these organizations. Another is changing the legal system for the bar, bench, litigants and legal professionals by participating in various exchanges of ideas when invited by the Government, the Courts and organizations working in this space. It is easy to complain, however, very few reach out to the system and bring to the knowledge of the relevant person, the challenges being faced. The moment you do so, very often a solution presents itself. The system is designed to work, however, it always requires a fresh perspective. 

    As someone deeply involved in legal education and mentorship, what steps do you believe law schools can take to better prepare students for the practical aspects of legal practice?

    Universities must endeavour to bridge the gap between the theoretical aspects of education and practical use in the real world. They must increase interaction between alumni and students from the perspectives of different fields. This is applicable to all professions and more so, in law. 

    Law Schools must make internships mandatory as that provides exposure to the life of a real professional. Fortunately, our University has a robust system for internships. However, sometimes 5th year students of certain Law Schools have come for internships who have never entered Court. It is their first legitimate internship and they appear clueless. Mentoring them is tougher as they have lesser exposure. 

    For our University, we are in conversation and are in the process of increasing the number of guest lectures by our alumni who are leaders in their respective fields. We are also attempting to increase the exposure of our students to fields of law which are not taught in detail in law schools or are barely touched upon. 

    Could you share a memorable experience from your journey as an advocate-on-record, perhaps a case that presented unique challenges but ended with a satisfying outcome?

    Few instances come to mind – 

    1. A landlord despite being successful in the High Court was unable to get his property vacated from his tenant. We were before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India having assailed an interim order. The Court stated that the matter had to go back to the High Court. I politely pleaded but to no avail. However, the other side was anxious and in their impatience they said that the matter does not even deserve to go to the High Court. The Judges were not happy and enquired as to the reasons. They then heard the entire matter. They were not satisfied with the arguments of the tenant; were satisfied with mine. Directed the tenant to vacate within a year. My Client was pleasantly shocked. He had been waiting for his property to be vacated for decades. 
    1. We were representing the minority Directors of a Board who were being oppressed and suppressed by the majority in their Company. When the file came to me, in 2012, we had been under fire from the Delhi High Court and the Company Law Board and had various orders passed against us. We were fire-fighting every day. We spent the first two months only getting our house in order, filing replies, filing Applications, and making various compliances, as directed by the Court. We then started going on the offence, filing positive Applications and securing small relief(s) for our Client. After 4 months, we got an order by which our Client got hold of certain valuable information and was able to change the composition of the Board of Directors. For the first time, my Client had the upper hand. The other side settled immediately. 
    1. 5 students were made to sit in the library because their parents were opposing the illegal increase of fees by the School. Matter was ongoing before the Court. An Application was prepared overnight and filed. I argued that everything can be compensated or made good later, however, students missing their classes on the issue of fees was simply not acceptable. The Court ripped into the School and reinstated the students.  
    1. The audit by the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India of the accounts of the Commonwealth Games Village (CWG) was directed by the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi on our insistence. It revealed a lot. The matter is still pending in Court, so no more comments on that. 
    1. Getting directions to conduct the elections of the Boxing Federation of India, when the people in power were refusing to do so.  

    Outside of your legal practice, do you have any hobbies or interests that help you unwind or maintain a work-life balance?

    I am someone who gets bored very easily. So every now and then I take up a new project. I always believe we should always do something which is bigger than ourselves. Work is constant but variety makes it interesting. In litigation, the diverse fields that I work in, ensure that no day is boring. 

    Beyond litigation, I was part of an international networking organization for 2.5 years (2014 to 2016). In 2014, I did a personal development course which is modelled on life transformation. It opened my mind to the endless possibilities in my life. Since then I have not stopped working on myself. For more than 10 years now, I have been consulting a Life Coach.

    The Delhi High Court (Original Side) Rules, 2018, was a project that came my way in 2017-2018. Thereafter, I try to contribute to the Hon’ble High Court in whichever way possible and as and when I am called upon. It has been a wonderful opportunity to work for the Delhi Arbitration Weekend, 2023 and now 2024. I have now started getting involved in my school alumni group. I also have a few things in the pipeline, however, I will share once they happen. 

    Other than this, I love to travel, however, the details of the same will probably be longer than this interview. I love watching Cricket and follow the game passionately. I am a movie-buff and extremely social. 

    Given your vast experience and success in the legal field, what suggestions or advice would you offer to aspiring law students who are just beginning their journey into the legal profession?

    My constant advice to students is that their decision should be based on 3 criteria – (i) Location (ii) Area of Work and (ii) Money. Please consider what is important for you and decide accordingly. 

    If you want to practice in the Supreme Court, however, you are required in your home city as your parents have certain medical needs, then compromise on your location. Once that is resolved then make the move. Similarly, in case you want to do litigation, however, money is important for you, it is not a bad idea to work for a couple of years doing transactional work with a law firm or work in-house, save your money and then move on litigation. 

    It is likely that at a given point of time, you may not get all three, but that’s fine. Prioritise. Bide your time. You will eventually get where you want to be. 

    Get in touch with Shohit Chaudhry-

  • “While specialization is necessary, I strongly believe this approach is prejudicial to the interest of fresh graduates or ones with a couple of years of experience”- Anuj Bhandari, Advocate-on-Record, Supreme Court of India

    “While specialization is necessary, I strongly believe this approach is prejudicial to the interest of fresh graduates or ones with a couple of years of experience”- Anuj Bhandari, Advocate-on-Record, Supreme Court of India

    This Interview has been published by Pragya Chandni and The SuperLawyer Team

    Could you please share with our listeners how your journey in law began? What inspired you to pursue B.Sc. LL.B. (Corporate Law Hons.) from the National Law University, Jodhpur?

    It’s a fairly interesting story. To be true, being from a family of lawyers and judges, my father never wanted me to be a lawyer. For the final two years of my schooling I was preparing for engineering and did not even fill the forms for law entrance examinations. After clearing the entrance test for Engineering, while depositing the fee in an engineering college in Bangalore, I felt that I don’t want to be an Engineer and rather, want to become a lawyer. Hence, I requested my father to not deposit the fee and expressed my willingness to prepare for the law entrance examination. Being from Rajasthan, NLU Jodhpur was my first preference and luckily, I cleared the entrance next year. 

    Your experience spans both litigation and corporate law. What led you to choose a career path that includes extensive practice in the Supreme Court and various other courts and tribunals?

    After my graduation from NLUJ, I was fortunate to get placed with Amarchand Mangaldas, Mumbai. I was part of the Funds Team and was involved in structuring venture capital funds. One year in Amarchand gave me hands-on experience and confidence to take up corporate work which would benefit me later in my career. However, I couldn’t see myself doing only corporate work for the rest of my life and shifting to litigation was better sooner than later. I therefore shifted to Delhi and started with a litigation journey. 

    Beauty about having an independent practice is that one is not confined to a particular forum or field of law and can push boundaries. Delhi being hub of litigation work, there are ample of opportunities in various courts and tribunals. One has to rather restrict himself from taking up work in multiple forums. I try to confine myself to the Supreme Court, but work naturally spills over to the High Court and various Appellate Tribunals. 

    You’ve worked in diverse areas such as banking, arbitration, constitution, consumer, debt recovery, and more. Could you elaborate on how you found your niche within the legal profession and the areas that resonate with you the most?

    Trend lately has been on super specialization in law. The law firms have dedicated teams to handle one subject or even one area of the subject. This trend is seen more in Tier-1 and Tier 2 law firms.  While specialization is necessary, I strongly believe this approach is prejudicial to the interest of fresh graduates or ones with a couple of years of experience.  In my view, any young lawyer should not specialise at an early stage of his career, rather a lawyer should have an experience to deal with as many subjects, fields and branches of law as possible. It not only gives an overall better understanding of law but also gives the ability to apply principles, precedents, and concepts from one field to another. Interplay of various subjects of law is an important tool which needs to be understood and applied both in courts and while undertaking advisory work. 

    I encourage my juniors to take up matters across various forums and subjects and not confine themselves to any particular field. While allocating work as well, I  ensure that my team gets to work on different subjects. I believe it not only helps them to have confidence in undertaking new assignments but will also aid them later on in their career.

    From being an associate at Amarchand Mangaldas & Suresh A. Shroff & Co. to becoming a partner at Pricus Legal LLP, can you discuss the pivotal moments and experiences that shaped your career trajectory?

    Getting through Amarchand in college placement was one of the most memorable moments of my life. It was nothing short of a dream coming true, and of course it was financially highly rewarding. I was awed by the corporate culture, high profile clients and of course the stakes involved. However, having worked there for a year, I couldn’t find my calling in corporate work. As a result, I took the difficult decision of resigning from the firm and shifting to Delhi.

    I was fortunate to get a chance to work in the chamber of Mr Parag Tripathi, Senior Advocate, who was also Additional Solicitor General of India at the time. He is one of the finest orators and sharpest minds in the legal fraternity. I am proud to be part of his chamber and couldn’t have prayed for a better ‘Guru’. Working in his chamber gave me a chance of working on thousands of cases. Every day over 20 matters were listed which were split amongst 4–5 juniors. On an average each junior had to brief sir in 4 to 5 cases everyday. Every briefing used to be like a short moot court for us where we had to be ultra precise and to the point in our briefing yet making sure we don’t miss out anything relevant and at the same time answer a volley of questions. Doing this for nearly 4 years prepared us well for anything the future had to offer. 

    I took yet another difficult decision to leave the chambers of Mr. Parag Tripathi and started my practice in the later part of 2012. Subsequently,  I also cleared the Advocate-On-Record exam in 2015. 

    Having handled litigation both for individuals as well as companies, over the years, I started getting corporate advisory work as well. As we were getting corporate advisory and transactional work alongside litigation, we decided to formally incorporate Pricus Legal LLP to better manage and handle corporate work.

    Being from a litigation background, I find that the way a litigating lawyer perceives things even in any corporate transaction or documentation is very different from a corporate lawyer. Experience in litigation comes in handy to foresee possible disputes and loopholes. Therefore, as a matter of practice in our firm all corporate advisory/transaction has to go through the litigation team as well.

    As a registered Advocate-on-Record in the Supreme Court of India, you have been involved in several landmark judgments. Could you share one or two cases that you found particularly challenging or significant in your career?

    An interesting case which comes to mind is that of Bhagwan Singh v. Dilip Kumar where son of sitting MLA was involved in gang rape of a minor and was granted bail by the High Court on the ground that FIR was lodged nearly over a year after the incidence and there was no direct evidence to connect the accused with commission of alleged crime. I was representing the minor victim who approached the Supreme Court against grant of bail by the High Court. We were able to persuade Hon’ble Supreme Court to set aside the bail on the ground that High Court can’t look into the evidence at the stage of bail and should confine itself to criteria like seriousness of offence, statement of prosecutrix, likelihood of influencing the trial et cetera while deciding the bail. Judgement makes an interesting read.

    Another decision which I recollect is that of Ravi Khandelwal versus Taluka Store in which we challenged an order passed by the Larger Bench of the High Court in a reference involving question of interpreting Section 14(3) of Rajasthan Rent Control Act which provided a protection to the tenant against any suit for eviction for the first five years of tenancy. The Supreme Court overturned the conclusion of Larger Bench of High Court holding that even if a suit is filed within five years of commencement of tenancy, but during the pendency of suit five years lapse, the defect in the suit stands cured and the protection granted is achieved. However, what was more interesting was that the Hon’ble Supreme Court directed eviction of premises directly even when the appeal of the tenant was pending before the Single Judge of the High Court. Direction of eviction directly by the Supreme Court even while appeal on merits was pending before the High Court to my mind is unprecedented.

    You’ve been a panel lawyer for various esteemed organizations. How did these associations come about, and how does being a panel lawyer for such entities impact your legal practice?

    Getting any panel is fairly difficult, particularly in initial years of practice. Working in the office of ASG, all of us were empanelled with the Union of India which opened the doors for panels of other PSUs. One panel thereafter led to another over the years. Even though these panels are not usually financially very rewarding, they give an opportunity to appear and argue before the court and provide a constant source of work. In initial stages when individual clients are scarce, panel work comes in handy and ensures regular appearances before the court. 

    With your extensive experience in various legal domains, including banking, insurance, constitutional law, and more, how do you balance staying versatile with the need for deep specialization?

    There is a saying that clients choose lawyers specialization. As I mentioned earlier, I strongly believe that lawyers, particularly in litigation, should not get specialised early in their career. It is only after a few decades of practice and incidentally handling a particular kind of cases more than others, that lawyers would get specialised on their own in a particular field. Personally, I would any day choose to do a variety and different kind of work every day rather than get super specialised in any particular field. One of the reasons why I shifted from corporate to litigation was to do a variety of work, but I think that’s a very personal choice.

    Lastly, considering your journey and achievements, what advice would you like to give to fresh law graduates who are about to embark on their legal careers? What are the key lessons you’ve learned that you would like to share with them?

    I would strongly advise young lawyers to explore different fields of law for the first few years of their career before choosing and settling into one which matches their aptitude and liking. Fresh graduates should not be reluctant to change their field, particularly in the first few years of their career and do something which they can call their calling. As one progresses into his career it becomes exponentially difficult to venture into these experiments.

    I also highly recommend that every fresh graduate should start his career with litigation and rough it out in courts at least for sometime. It is only then one understands actual application of law and gives a perspective completely different from mere theoretical understanding. Even if eventually, they decide to move into a corporate setup, the experience in litigation will give them immense confidence. Getting into a super specialized team right out of college is not something I would recommend. Legal Profession is not a 5 year long but a 50 years long career and the initial few years should be an investment on oneself.

    Get in touch with Anuj Bhandari-