Super Lawyer

Author: Donnie Ashok

  • Indian Institute of Corporate Affairs, Mediation Project

    Indian Institute of Corporate Affairs, Mediation Project

    Indian Institute of Corporate Affairs (IICA) is in the process of setting up India International Mediation Centre (IIMC), the first of its kind in India for handling various domestic and cross border commercial disputes at pre and post litigation stage. As a first step in its initiative, IICA proposes to carry out a series of mediation training across India (Delhi, Mumbai, Ahmedabad, Hyderabad, Kolkata, Chennai and Gauhati).

    The team responsible for conduct of the training program is headed by Dr. Vijay Kumar Singh, head of the School of Corporate Law and Associate Professor at IICA. Vijay has previously worked as Deputy Director (Law) at Competition Commission of India. He is a trained mediator from The International Centre for Alternative Dispute Resolution (ICADR). He is also a certified trainer on “Managing Disputes and Difficult Conversations on the Board” by Centre for Effective Dispute Resolution (CEDR) and the IFC Corporate Governance Group.

    Vijay is assisted by Anuroop Omkar and Kritika Krishnamurthy as consultants for the course. While Anuroop is a trained mediator from USA and Europe, Kritika is trained from The International Centre for Alternative Dispute Resolution (ICADR). They are Fellows of World Mediation Organization (WMO), Berlin, Germany. Anuroop is the youngest mediator appointed by Delhi Dispute Resolution Society, Ministry of Law and Justice, New Delhi.

    In this interview, they talk about

    • The need for mediation as a means of dispute resolution and its future in India
    • Their upcoming training programme and what they hope people will gain from it
    • The number of different types of people in different fields that will benefit from both their training programme and mediation skills in general.

     

    Tell us a bit about your team

    Vijay: Our team is headed by Dr. Bhaskar Chatterjee, Director General and CEO of Indian Institute of Corporate Affairs (IICA). Dr. Chatterjee is an ex IAS officer and has introduced the concept of CSR in India, as the first principles of CSR for the Public Sector Enterprises were written during his tenure as Secretary, DPE. His work experience has given him wide exposure in negotiation and experience of the fallacies of dispute resolution mechanisms prevalent in India. He believes corporate India is in great need of mediation which saves not only time and money but also goodwill of disputants. I am the Course Director for the training program. I am also the Head of School of Corporate Law at IICA. Before IICA I was working as a Deputy Director at the Competition Commission of India. Anuroop Omkar and Kritika Krishnamurthy are our course consultants. They are practising corporate lawyers, mediators and co-authors of the book ‘The Art of Negotiation and Mediation- Wish Bone, Funny Bone and Backbone’ by LexisNexis.

     

    What made you conceive the idea of mediation training and International Centre of Mediation when arbitration and litigation are the most accepted ways of dispute resolution?

    Vijay: Time and again we harp on the fact of the overburdened courts in India and the escalating cost of undertaking arbitration which many times leads to court appeals. India is on the way of becoming the global business hub of the world. We are strong propagators of the ‘ease of doing business’ but our rankings are dismal. Most foreign investors and joint venture partners are hesitant of the Indian market because of the stories they have heard of long drawn litigations in India. We need an efficacious dispute resolution mechanism for commercial disputes and mediation is the right fit. Mediation has a success rate of 80-85% in developed jurisdictions. Businesses shall get the chance to negotiate a solution to their own disputes with promise of full confidentiality. But there is lack of trained mediators in India who truly understand the essence of what mediation should be as an experience for disputants. We are on the lookout of promising mediators who can help disputants settle differences in a relaxed, informal atmosphere without prejudice. Hence, the mediation trainings- to train and empanel mediators for our proposed mediation centres.

     

    Where do you plan to set up the International Mediation Centre?

    Vijay: Of course, we would like to begin with our home ground which is New Delhi. But if we get the right talent pool and collaborations, we wish to set up mediation centres all over India; particularly in the cities where the trainings are planned- New Delhi, Mumbai, Ahmedabad, Hyderabad, Chennai, Kolkata, and Gauhati for the businesses in the North East of India. In our second phase, we may also target other industrial and emerging business centres in India.

     

    Does this training have any correlation to the NCLT & NCLAT that has been recently brought into force replacing the CLB, which would also exercise powers available with High Courts earlier in certain company law matters?

    Vijay: The pioneering step of commencement of National Company Law Tribunals and Appellate Tribunal has already been taken on June 1 this year. Section 442 of Companies Act, 2013 provides for resolution of company law disputes before the tribunals through mediation. Most of the disputes which come under these provisions are shareholder disputes, oppression and mismanagement, winding up of company owing to inability to pay debts, etc. I think these disputes are apt for resolution through mediation since the parties have a lot at stake and there is scope for win-win solutions and beneficial commercial arrangements through assisted negotiations. If given an opportunity we would be glad to assist the NCLT and NCLAT in mediation of these disputes. We also wish to promote pre-litigation of commercial disputes in India.

     

    Where all are the trainings happening and what is the duration of each training?

    Kritika: The trainings shall follow the international certification format of 40 hours. The training shall be for 6 days from 2 PM onwards at the following places:

    New Delhi: 19-24 July, 2016

    Mumbai: 25-30 July, 2016

    Hyderabad: 31 July-5 August, 2016

    Ahmedabad: 1-6 November, 2016

    Kolkata: 7-12 November, 2016

    Gauhati: 13-18 November, 2016

    Chennai: 19-24 November, 2016

     

    What should the course participants expect from the training program?

    Anuroop: Participants should expect skill based learning. Becoming a mediator requires a psychological change in your perception towards disputes. We cannot bring about this change in the participant’s mindset through only one-sided classroom teaching. The training program will also have extensive mock mediation practice and other skill based exercises to engage the participants in the training process and give the participants an actual practical insight into the practice of mediation. The training will equip the participants to deal with difficult disputants and deadlocks in negotiation. These skills are not just useful for a mediator but any corporate professional.

     

    For whom shall this training be beneficial to attend?

    Kritika: The training is for any person who wishes to become a mediator. It is not necessary for them to be a practising lawyer since we all face disputes and negotiate in everyday life. However, here is a tentative list of persons for whom this training shall be beneficial:

    • Judges
    • Advocates
    • In house counsels
    • Chartered Accountants
    • Company Secretaries
    • Cost & Work Accountants
    • Bureaucrats & public servants
    • Members of National Tribunals
    • Members of National, State and District Consumer Forums
    • Professional Students
    • Faculty (Law, CA, CS, Management, Commerce etc.)
    • Bankers
    • Members and employees of various sector regulators
    • Social Workers
    • Entrepreneurs & Working Professionals
    • HR and Management Professionals

    We welcome both active practioners and superannuated professionals

     

    Who will be Training faculty for the Mediation Training and why?

    Vijay: Avv. Stefano Cardinale shall be the Master Trainer for all the training programs. Avv. Cardinale is currently a member of the order in Rome and Barcelona, where he practices as a lawyer, professional negotiator, mediator, international management consultant and trainer. He is external independent expert of the EU Commission. He runs his own law firm Legal and Consulting International with offices all over the world. He has been guest speaker in international conflict management and mediation lectures at the World Trade Center of San Diego, at University of California San Diego (USA), at the American Chamber of Commerce of Milan, at the International Development Law Organization, at Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, at Verona University, at Padova University (Italy), at Kharkov Law School (Ukraine), at Bar Council of India Golden Jubilee Celebrations in 2012 (India).

    The co trainers for the training program shall be practicing mediators from India so that the participants shall get exposure to the international best practices of mediation as well as their applicability in the Indian scenario.

    A tree cannot flourish unless we nourish its roots. Mediation needs to be taught by actively practising international mediators so that the first batch of commercial mediators for the India International Mediation Centre understand the right approach and mindset required to conduct mediation. Mediation fails many times not for any other reason other than faulty practises and hasty mediators. We wish to avoid that. Mediation has set best practices and if we introduce them in India with required customization, it will soon catch up in India. But we need good international exposure.

     

    Where do you see mediation as a practice of dispute resolution in next 5 years’ time?

    Anuroop: With increasing popularity and success of campaigns such as Startup India, Stand up India and Make in India, India is developing a new brand of entrepreneurs. They are looking for innovative dispute resolution mechanisms which will allow them constructive closure in disputes so that they can devote more time in business development. Business houses will any day choose a mechanism where they have a say in the outcome over a mechanism where there is a win-lose result. If India can learn to recycle, we can also learn to make business out of disputes. With the changing face of corporate India, the dispute resolution mechanism shall also have to keep pace. In the next five years, we see mediation as the ‘Go-to Mechanism’ for commercial disputes in India.

     

    Any advice for the future commercial mediators of India?

    Anuroop: Mediation has been widely accepted as one of the most preferred dispute resolution mechanism in the world. It has got an acceptance because of its broad elements which includes empathy towards disputants, time effectiveness, confidentiality and win-win solution. Various countries in the world have gone upto legislate mediation as a mandatory practice before resorting to the judicial system. My advice to the future mediators would be- in order to effectively and efficiently advice both domestic and international business houses in India we should understand that time, money and confidentiality hold a great importance to them. Keeping that in mind, we should advise them and structure their various contracts and agreements with an effective dispute resolution clause with mandatory mediation before resort to any other dispute resolution mechanism.

     

     

     

  • Sanjay Hegde, Senior Advocate, on building a legal practice, arguing on landmark cases and on legal journalism

    Sanjay Hegde, Senior Advocate, on building a legal practice, arguing on landmark cases and on legal journalism

    Mr. Sanjay R Hegde, is a Senior Advocate at the Supreme Court of India. He began his illustrious career back in 1989 while working as a lawyer with M/s Mulla & Mulla & Craigie Blunt & Caroe Solicitors. He gained his LL.M while at work and thereafter moved to Delhi to practice in the Supreme Court in the Chambers of Senior Advocate Mr. G. Ramaswamy. During this period he worked on several high profile cases, appeared for the Government of Indian before an international arbitral tribunal and from 1996 to 2004 was on the Union of India’s arguing panel before the Supreme Court. He also worked for a decade as the Advocate on Record for the State of Karnataka and thereafter focused on private practice. He has frequently engaged in legal journalism including appearing on television panels and writing as a columnist for newspapers.

    In this interview, he talks to us about:

    • His career choices and the reasoning behind them.
    • His experiences in the various roles and offices he has assumed over the years.
    • His opinions on miscellaneous topics – the importance of mooting and writing for students, ADR in International Law and legal journalism.
    • His advice to law students while studying, practicing and moulding their careers.

     

    Please elaborate on the motivating factors which helped you in choosing legal studies.

    I assume you mean, why did I decide to study law? Well, in our days, choosing a career in law, was not a matter of choice but circumstance. Often one did not set out to become a lawyer, but did drift into the profession after exhausting most other avenues. My father was a lawyer as was his uncle and grand-uncle. So as the first of five children, of a not very successful lawyer, a legal career, while available was not necessarily a first choice. I did law, while working in a computer company and studying for the civil services examination. I also did an LL.M simultaneously while working with Mulla & Mulla.

     

    Please tell us about how you decided to pursue litigation. Were you considering any other opportunities?

    I got selected by the UPSC for a non-IAS service, which I kept on hold for a couple of years, while I started out in the Supreme Court with the then attorney general Mr.G.Ramaswamy who was my guru in court-craft. I had been a debater and a quizzer in my times, so a quiet life behind my desk in a solicitor’s firm (that’s what we called corporate law then), did not appeal to me. It had to be courtrooms or nothing in my case.

     

    How were your years in college? Did your study prepare you in any way for real-life practice in Courts?

    When I see kids in law schools these days (my son included), prepare so hard with presentations and papers, I am reminded of how little I did in college. I did spend good time in my law college in Bombay (K.C.Law) making friends and eating sandwiches from Ramesh Sandwichwala. My life as a law student, was evening classes after work in my computer company’s administrative job. I attended classes which had good teachers and neglected other subjects. I passed the examinations with undistinguished marks and often found that I scored badly in subjects which I knew well by studying original texts. In those days, examiners had got used to answers mugged up from guides (three test papers) and original stuff may have fazed some of them. Suffice to say, the course did not prepare me for life in court, but I did learn a bit by tagging along with my father and his friends.

     

    What should a law student do, in your opinion, to shape up his profile for litigation?

    Practice simple things like public speaking and elocution. You would be surprised to see how badly some people express themselves in court, and how judges are grateful to any lawyer who can clearly state the problem, before attempting to persuade them to his side. Some experience of dramatics and the stage are also useful. Both Kapil Sibal and Rajeev Dhavan, had experience in theatre which went a long way towards making a courtroom presence.

     

    How important do you think Mooting and Academic Writing are for a Law Student aspiring to become an Advocate?

    Both are very important. Mooting helps you deconstruct issues, prepare memorials and briefs and present them to trained minds. Writing is even more important. An ability to clearly express oneself in writing, in simple sentences, is the hallmark of a good mind. While taking people on board, I am more likely to choose, someone who can give me a quick written note, than someone who can turn a wonderful phrase in conversation.

     

    After your enrolment at the Bar in 1989, you worked in Mumbai for a period of three years. How did these formative years mould you as a lawyer?

    They taught me about handling corporate client problems, and how to turn around work reasonably quickly. More importantly they taught me the value of friends in the profession and the constant peer-review that always accompanies life at the bar.

     

    You have a rich experience of working under Mr. G Ramaswamy, Senior Advocate and former Attorney General. You have also assisted several distinguished Senior Advocates at the Supreme Court. Please tell us about your work under them.

    Each senior advocate addressing the court, is essentially a performing artiste. At the end of the day, he is not so much concerned with the judgment which is the judge’s job. He is concerned that his performance was the best that could be summoned from within him and that it best expressed all the points in his client’s favour. Mr Ramaswamy had an amazing depth of knowledge and experience, which enabled him with a bare instruction on facts, to argue for hours and place a case in its entire legal perspective. He had the ability to hear a whispered phrase as an instruction from the advocate by his side, and to know exactly what was meant and what needed to be said. In other words, an amazing pickup on the fly. I find the same ability in Sibal and Rohatgi, as well as Salve and Fali Nariman. The latter two also share the breadth of learning that GR had, and Mr Nariman particularly is almost oracular in his wisdom. Among the others I have instructed Mr Sorabjee, stands out for his ability to hit all the right notes without making it seem too heavy, Mr Ashok Desai’s ability to paint a picture and scrap through to a conclusion without angering anyone is a gift to be envied. The late Goolam Vahanvati must be mentioned for his understated, efficient manner of delivery and his incredible ability to turn around written submissions and pleadings in a very short time.

     

    Many students aspire to practice at the Supreme Court and High Courts. Should a student first practise at the Trial Court to learn the nuances, or is it fine to start at a High Court itself?

    I’d say go wherever there is enough work to keep you occupied. Do not get hung up because you hang around the superior courts, do not feel low in the lower courts. A good grounding in the trial courts, stands you in good stead thereafter. Mr Ramaswamy spent 11 years in the trial courts before moving to the Madras High Court and his base in civil and criminal law, gave him an advantage over his peers who had been appellate court lawyers throughout.

     

    What are the differences that you see between a practice in a High Court and a practice in the Supreme Court?

    The Supreme Court has greater turnover and greater mortality. In the Supreme Court, you prepare a lot, only to see it destroyed in a two minute performance. High courts are more relaxed but more time consuming.

     

    What is your opinion on the recent judgement of the Supreme Court which upheld the ‘Collegium’ system?

    (Mr Hegde had appeared for Union of India In Re: Special Reference 1 of 1998 i.e. The Third Judges’ Appointment Case).

    I did assist Mr Sorabjee the attorney general in the Third Judges case. That judgment and the current one, all revolve around independence of the judiciary. Can we have independent judges, if their appointments are made by politicians? The court is part of the political system in a manner of speaking, how far can you keep routine politics away. Has insulating judges, resulted in the creation of a self-perpetuating jurocracy? My personal opinion is that the striking down of the NJAC, is a good blow for judicial independence, especially in an era of majoritarian politics.

     

    How effective, in your opinion, are Alternative Dispute Resolution mechanisms in International Law?

    (Mr Hegde has appeared before an International Arbitral Tribunal for the Union of India.)

    Well my case was the Government versus Suzuki Motor Corporation which was essentially a private contractual dispute. But in public international law, in the absence of pre-decided judicial forums, alternate dispute resolutions are often the only options available.

     

    sanjay-hegde-2

    Could you elaborate on your experiences as an AOR for Government of Karnataka?

    (Mr Hegde has been an Advocate-on-Record for the Government of Karnataka at the Supreme Court for a period of ten years, during which he handled many sensational and landmark cases, like the Kaveri and Krishna Water Disputes, Rajkumar Kidnapping case, Swami Shraddhananda case etc.)

    It was personally exhausting, tough and immensely educative all at once. As long as one was not bothered about being adequately paid for the effort, working for the state made me the all-round lawyer that I am. I learnt Criminal law and indirect taxation on the job. A wealth of memories include a chief minister being hauled up for contempt, a chief secretary’s perjury prosecution being stayed, a godman or two being kept in jail for a long period of time. I remember early on Rajkumar being kidnapped and the state preparing to release his associates, till Justice Bharucha yelled, “If you can’t govern constitutionally, then quit”. A few years after the incident, some of the same associates, got death sentences in appeal, where the TADA court had given life imprisonment. So many memories require a book and not a question.

     

    Other than the Supreme Court, you have appeared before various fora, how is a practice before these Tribunals different? What is your opinion on “Tribunalisation”?

    (Mr. Hegde has appeared before many such tribunals as CESTAT, TDSAT and NGT.)

    Tribunals are more specialised areas and often the monetary impact is much heavier than normal courts. I do think that tribunalisation is the way to go, though courts have increasingly frequent misgivings. After all judges can’t know everything about complicated technical decisions, but experts in these fields can make decisions if judicial members control the fairness of the process.

     

    You are a designated Senior Advocate of the Supreme Court of India. How is the life of a Senior Advocate different from a normal Advocate? How do you manage the responsibility?

    A senior advocate is a bit like a taxi for hire, for day and date only. If the ride is not smooth he is unlikely to be hired again. But flippancy apart, the biggest responsibility is to give the client and the briefing lawyer, a pre-view of how the case is likely to be appear to the eyes of a judge. A good senior will in all probability leave you with a forecast of how the game will play out in the court and should advise you on your best options, including the negotiating of a settlement if one is possible. Unfortunately people come to seniors at the last minute to try for a win but not for the available reasonable option, of a realistic assessment of their chances in court.

     

    You are a well-known newspaper columnist and Television Panelist on pressing legal issues. What, in your opinion, is the future of legal journalism as a career, for aspiring people?

    There is a great demand for people who can decode legal processes and put it in simple terms that an ordinary viewer or reader can understand. We still have to develop a culture of great legal reporters in the mould of an Adam Liptak, a Joshua Rozenburg or a Dahlia Lithwick. Indian reporters, out of fear of contempt laws, often tend to get into bare bones reporting of fact, without too much accompanying analysis.

     

    Students tend to take up plush Corporate Firm jobs, as they find the prospect of an initial struggle at the Bar scary. What would be your message to them?

    They are right to choose whatever makes them comfortable. After all many of them are first generation lawyers, who have spent fortunes on their education and need to start earning as soon as possible. However a law school must provide you with the ability to make decisions and see them through to fruition. If litigation is your thing stick by it, keep working away, offer your services free if needed, to lawyers who are too busy or too tired to attend hearings. If you keep pegging away, cracks will appear in seemingly closed doors and you will make it. Keep going without getting disappointed or turning to drinks and the like, and you will find your niche from which to grow.

     

    What advice would like to share with our readers who are mostly young lawyers and law students?

    Be curious, read a lot, keep writing from time to time, but argue everything, every time, even if it is within yourself. For a lawyer, the unargued life is not worth living. Have fun and stay within the boundaries of truth. The world will accept you and find a use for you.

     

     

    This interview was taken by: Shreesha Kailankaje, IV year, GNLU, Gandhinagar

  • Amit Cowshish, Partner, Dua Associates, on practicing in Defence Law and serving as a Financial Advisor (Acquisition) in the Ministry of Defence

    Amit Cowshish, Partner, Dua Associates, on practicing in Defence Law and serving as a Financial Advisor (Acquisition) in the Ministry of Defence

    Amit Cowshish, served the Indian Defence Accounts Service in various capacities and retired in 2012. Having studied M.A. and M.Phil in Political Science from the Jawaharlal Nehru University, and qualified in Law from Delhi University, Amit had also received a Diploma in Alternative Dispute Resolution from the Indian Law Institute.

    amit-cowshish-2Amit went on to serve on deputation with the Ministry of Defence, first as Under Secretary and later as Additional Financial Advisor & Joint Secretary and Financial Advisor (Acquisition) & Additional Secretary. He also served as Commissioner for Departmental Inquiries on deputation with the Central Vigilance Commission. He is a presently a Distinguished Fellow with the Indian Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses, and is presently a Partner with Dua Associates, Advocates and Solicitors.

    In this interview, he talks to us about:

    • Working in the arena of Public Administration;
    • His work with the Defence Accounts Department;
    • His responsibilities with the Minsitry of Defence; and
    • His post-retirement transition to a life in corporate law.

     

    What influenced you to choose law as your profession? Where did you pursue the same?

    Law runs in the family. My father was a lawyer, and so was his father. Both my daughters are lawyers, as well. I had great admiration for the profession right from my early days in school. Destiny took me elsewhere, but after retirement I have returned to the fold, as it were.

    I studied law at the evening centre of the Delhi University while I was in service.

     

    You hold a pre-degree diploma in the Russian and Persian languages. How did you develop an interest in learning languages?

    Apart from Hindi and English, we were taught Punjabi at school.  I picked up Urdu as it was the language used by a large segment of the local population, and used in the courts. That got me interested in languages. So, when I got an opportunity, I decided to learn a couple of foreign languages as well.

     

    What steered you into the area of public administration?

    These are institutes where serving government officers are sent for mid-career courses. I was fortunate to have been sent for the courses run by IIPA (Indian Institute of Public Administration) and NDC (National Defence College).

     

    Do tell us about your journey as part of the Defence Accounts Department.

    I got the opportunity to serve at different stations; travelled far and wide within India; gained vast experience in financial management in defence.

     

    What were your main responsibilities as the Controller of Defence Accounts?

    Controllers of Defence Accounts are responsible for various functions related to accounting, payment, audit and financial advice in relation to the military establishments located within the jurisdiction of the organizations they head.

     

    What was the biggest challenge you faced in your role?

    Being a finance person is, in itself, the biggest challenge in any organization!

     

    What were the different tasks involved in the posts of an Under Secretary, Additional Financial Advisor & Joint Secretary, and Financial Advisor (Acquisition) & Additional Secretary?

    As Under Secretary, I was responsible for matters related to pension policy for the armed forces. As Additional Financial Advisor, my work was related to financial matters concerning the organizations assigned to me as well as defence planning and budget.

    As Financial Advisor (Acquisition), I was associated with all capital acquisitions for the armed forces and the Indian Coast Guard.

     

    How did you come to be associated you with the drafting of the Defence Procurement Manual 2009? Did having a legal qualification help with the same?

    This task was assigned to me, probably because at that point of time I was associated with revenue procurements. Yes, my legal qualifications did help.

     

    amit-cowshish-1

    How is it that you came to join Dua Associates as a Partner?

    I joined Dua Associates after my retirement from the Indian Defense Accounts Service in 2012, to keep myself engaged in meaningful work.

     

    Was it difficult to adapt to a corporate firm after having worked for long in public administration?

    The transition was smooth; I did not face any difficulty.

     

    Defence being a very niche sector what would be your advice to young lawyers working in defence matters?

    There is not much of a difference as regards keeping abreast of the latest developments whether one is handling the defence sector or any other sector. To make a beginning, one has to develop general familiarity with the subject, study the existing policies and procedures, follow the developments reported in the media and law journals, keep an eye on the official announcements, and pay special attention to the judgements concerning one’s areas of interest. Attending seminars and other events related to defence matters also helps.

     

    Do you work only on defence related projects at Dua?

    No, the work I do is not confined to defence related projects.

     

    amit-cowshish-1

    Would you consider taking a few lectures on Defence law and material procurement if invited?

    Certain statutes like the Army Act, the Air Force Act, the Navy Act and the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act are specific to the armed forces. There are other statues, rules and regulations like the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, the Companies Act, and policies concerning FDI and exports, etc., which also have a bearing on legal issues concerning the defence sector. However, there is no specific law concerning defence procurement/acquisition by the Ministry of Defence. Defence purchases are primarily governed by the Defence Procurement Procedure and Defence Procurement Manual.

    I would be happy to talk on defence procurement policies and procedures of the Indian Ministry of Defence.

     

    Being a very niche sector what would be your advice to young lawyers working in defence matters?

    Broadly, legal professionals can contribute with regard to service and contractual matters. It is important that those who are interested in these areas not only keep themselves updated about the applicable laws, rules and procedures, but also acquire a good understanding of the organisational ethos of the armed forces, coast guard, border roads, etc., as well as acquaint themselves with the functioning of the defence industry.

  • Abhishek Sudhir, Dean, IFIM Law College, on qualifying in law from the UK and on legal academics

    Abhishek Sudhir, Dean, IFIM Law College, on qualifying in law from the UK and on legal academics

    Abhishek Sudhir graduated from The University of Birmingham in 2008 and went on to pursue an LL.M at the University College of London. While there, he pursued Civil Litigation, Jurisprudence, Intellectual Property Law, and Company Law as a part of his general LL.M. His British legal education ended with a BPTC for procedural training in 2011 to appear before a Court in the English system.

    Having returned to India, he pursued academia and teaching at Jindal Global Law School as among the student’s favorite professor. Following his departure from the same, he was recruited as the Dean for IFIM Law College in Bangalore. He has also published on a wide variety of topics and was called upon to deposed before the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Law and Justice on the Judicial Appointments Bill.

    In his interview, he talks about;

    • What drove him to pursue the profession
    • His experience with a legal education in the UK
    • The differences between the two systems and the teaching styles
    • His journey as a law student, and subsequently as a barrister
    • The necessary traits and qualities required by legal professionals and law students today

     

    How would you like to introduce yourself to our readers?

    Well, I’m 29 years old. I currently serve as Dean at IFIM Law College which is located in my hometown and India’s IT capital Bangalore. I hold three degrees in law, all from the United Kingdom. I am a Barrister from Gray’s Inn, London and I am also enrolled with the Karnataka State Bar Council as an Advocate. I am a freelance journalist and write most often for Scroll, an online news publication. I follow/support the Indian cricket team and Arsenal, two entities that have caused me a significant amount of pain and suffering over the years!

     

    abhishek-sudhir-3

    Tell us about your childhood and pre-college life. Was it your lifelong dream to be in the legal profession?

    I had a very unconventional childhood. I was raised by my maternal grandfather, who was and continues to be a source of immense support. I was obsessed with cricket and made it my life’s mission to play for India one day, quite an unrealistic dream that my grandfather supported by sending me to yearlong coaching camps for about 6-7 years. When I was about 14, I gave up on this ambition as I was nowhere close to making it and decided to “grow up”.

    Around this time I fell in love with “The Practice”, a popular American TV show that you could say was the “Suits” of my generation. The Practice, unlike Suits which has nothing to do with the law, delved into the intricacies of being a trial lawyer in the United States. The handling of the rules of evidence, the art of cross-examination and its depiction of criminal trials floored me. The cast was brilliant and they just looked so cool when they all walked the corridors of the courtroom in their fancy suits. It was the swagger associated with being a lawyer, at least in popular culture, which drew me to the profession.

     

    Your legal journey started in 2005 and that too from a foreign law school. Why did you choose a foreign law school over national law schools?

    The answer is very simple: I did not make it to any of the national law schools! Those days there was no CLAT, there were only five national law schools and you had to write individual entrance tests. I prepared for the exam with a friend of mine from school, but both of us were lackadaisical in our approach to the exams. The difference was that he was among the top 5 ranks in both the NLS Bangalore and NALSAR exams, while I was nowhere close to him.

    Not making it to one of the national law schools took its toll on me and I felt I had to prove that I belonged, that I was good enough, and not making it was just an aberration. I chose the University of Birmingham to do a 3-year LL.B for two principal reasons: first, they gave me a generous scholarship, and second, it was recognised by the Bar Council of India. So I started out in 2005 to redeem myself for the poor performance in the entrance tests, by leaving home at the age of 19 and starting afresh. It was a life-changing decision and it paid off handsomely.

     

    How is the curriculum of a foreign law school different from an Indian one?

    That’s a slightly tricky question to answer as there is no uniformity in curriculum design in Indian law schools. If I were to compare the approach to curriculum design at a State University with that adopted at an English law school, I would say there is quite a huge difference. For starters, English law schools do not teach any procedural subjects. They focus entirely on substantive law, as there are separate professional courses [Legal Practice Course (LPC) for those who want become solicitors and the Bar Professional Training Course (BPTC) for those who want to become barristers] that teach procedural law.

    Another stark difference is the emphasis on reading articles and papers written in academic journals as opposed to merely focusing on the sections in any given Act or chapters in a textbook. One further area of divergence is the minimal amount of time allocated to in-class teaching. In-class lectures are usually delivered to 100-150 students at a time. This is always followed up with tutorials where students, in groups of 10 to 15, are expected to engage with a hypothetical problem based on the in-class lecture. These tutorials are about an hour long and are usually conducted by PhD or post-doctoral students.

    There is no concept of rote learning at a foreign law school and the approach is very much centered on directed learning. The expectation is that the student will come prepared to class. That being said, no one (including the lecturers and tutors) cares if you do not do the required reading. The student is treated as a responsible adult and it is this ethos that is typified in the curriculum design.

     

    Tell us briefly about your law school experience.

    I attended three different law schools during my time in the U.K., but I would like to dwell on the three years I spent doing an LL.B at the University of Birmingham, which is one of England’s older centres of higher learning. The first year I was like a fish out of water as I was studying complex subjects like Jurisprudence and Land Law. In my first semester I was hauled up for plagiarism; I simply did not know what a citation was and I did not have the ability to construct an argument of my own. I remember getting 38 out of 100 in my very first research paper and failing European Union law by a couple of marks; those were trying times.

    In my first year I worked several part-time jobs, went out most nights and hardly ever went to class. I changed my lifestyle completely and this bore dividends as my results started to pick up in the second year. I went from getting an upper second (second class) to getting an upper first (first class) in all my subjects. This trend continued into my third year and I got a first (distinction) in every subject. I was awarded a distinction in the dissertation on Hindu Law that I wrote in my final year and this gave me immense satisfaction. I had come a long way from not knowing what plagiarism was.

    The credit for my transformation goes not to me or any professor, but to the structures in place at the University. England’s higher education system, central to which is the curriculum design, is geared to ensure that a diligent student succeeds and is given every possible opportunity to excel. It’s quite simple really: work hard or fall by the wayside.

     

    abhishek-sudhir-1

    Where did you pursue your LL.M from? What considerations should one keep in mind before deciding whether and where to do an LL.M?

    I had LL.M offers from the University of Warwick and University College London (UCL). At the time, Dr. Upendra Baxi was teaching at Warwick and this was a huge attraction. Nevertheless I chose UCL, primarily because it had a richer history and pedigree than Warwick, in addition to being located in the legal capital of the world, London. UCL also had a much bigger selection of subjects to choose from, with faculty from Oxford, King’s College and Cambridge teaching on the LL.M as visiting professors.

    The standard piece of advice people give LL.M aspirants is “make sure you are clear about which area you want to specialize in and chose the University that excels in your chosen area”. I disagree with this line of thought.

    If you have completed 5 years of legal study in India, then doing an LL.M from the U.K. or any foreign University is likely to be a completely new and alien experience. While I had three years in the U.K. before doing an LL.M, most students from India are thrown into the deep end within a few days of starting the LL.M. So it’s really important that you pick a University that has a track record of taking in Indian students and helping them acclimatize. Some Universities that come to mind are Warwick, King’s College, UCL, Cardiff, National University of Singapore, George Washington,  and NYU in the United States.

    Also, choose a General LL.M as it will give you the flexibility to study a wide array of subjects. Unless you’re from the top 5 NLU’s, it is unlikely that you have been exposed to Anglo-American teaching pedagogy and studying diverse subjects will give you much more exposure then studying four subjects dealing only with intellectual property or corporate law.

     

    After completing your education, you qualified as a Barrister-at-law. Tell us about the procedure and your experience.

    Becoming a Barrister was the fulfillment of a childhood fantasy. History was my favourite subject in school and I really enjoyed studying about the freedom movement. Some of the titans of India’s struggle for freedom, like Nehru, Gandhi, Jinnah and Sardar Patel were all Barristers. So I wanted to be one too! It seems quite silly now, but about a decade ago it was a real ambition of mine.

    In 2005, I decided to become a student-member of Gray’s Inn. Each aspiring Barrister must belong to an Inn, which is essentially his professional home and “dine” at the Inn 12 times. Historically, members of each Inn ate together, lived on the grounds of the Inn and, most importantly, worked together. I chose Gray’s as it is the smallest of the four Inns. Ambedkar, constitutional scholar K.T. Shah, former Chief Justice A.N. Ray and former Speaker of the Lok Sabha Somnath Chatterjee were all members of Gray’s Inn.

    In addition to becoming a member of the Inn, I enrolled in the Bar Professional Training Course (BPTC), which is a rigorous diploma programme that one has to complete before being “called” to the Bar. The BPTC was a once in a lifetime experience, as I was trained for countless hours in advocacy, negotiation, client counseling, examination-in-chief and cross-examination of witnesses. In July 2011, a ceremony was held at the Hall in Gray’s Inn, where I was “published” Barrister. My name appeared in The Times the next day. It was really special.

     

    What kinds of cases were mainly seen in the courts of England and what was your main area of practice there? What, if any, are the differences between England and India’s judicial system?

    My first job in England saw me working for a firm that dealt with civil litigation. Most of the cases concerned personal injury, the proverbial “slip and fall” cases. I then moved on to work for pro bono organisations that helped individuals who had court hearings but did not have legal representation. I got to take part in proceedings before the Queen’s Bench (High Court) and the Court of Appeal. Finally, I represented clients before the Social Security and Employment Tribunals as a trainee Barrister.

    Believe it or not, the common man in India has far greater access to legal representation than people in England. Litigation costs are unbelievably high and lawyers lack the human touch. Individuals who do not have the resources generally don’t get their day in court and are at the mercy of the legal aid authority. That being said, once you do get your day in court in England, you are more or less guaranteed a timely outcome. The overhaul of the Civil Procedure Rules in England has ensured this, whereas we in India, with our archaic and broken Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, continue to move at a snail’s pace.

     

    After around 6-7 years you came back to India to pursue you a career in legal academia. Was it pre-planned or was there some other reason?

    Coming back to India was pre-planned. I always wanted to practice in India. In January 2012, I passed a set of qualifying exams conducted by the Bar Council of India for people like me who were Indian nationals with foreign law degrees. In June 2012, I was enrolled as an Advocate, but due to some health issues my career had to take a backseat for almost 2 years. In January 2014, I joined the Jindal Global Law School (JGLS) as a research associate and was promoted to assistant professor in three months. It turned out to be the most rewarding experience of my career thus far, with great highs and some lows.

     

    You have deposed before the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Law and Justice on the Judicial Appointments Bill. Tell us about your experience.

    Being given an opportunity to depose before the Committee restored my faith in Indian democracy. I wrote a 20 page memo to the Committee, with suggestions on how they could improve the functioning of the proposed National Judicial Appointments Commission. I appeared before the Committee and had the opportunity to interact with the likes of Ram Vilas Paswan, who I must say is one of the most articulate politicians I have come across. The Chairman of the Committee sought me out after the proceedings and complimented me on my performance. It’s an experience that I look back on very fondly.

     

    You have various publications in academic journals and news organizations. What skills should one develop to write good research papers and articles?

    The only way you can become a better writer is by writing continuously. If you think it, write about it. And make sure you get published. Only when you publish can you gauge what the wider world thinks of your writing, as feedback is invaluable. I write an email with the same amount of thought and effort that I put into writing an article for Scroll or The Hindu. Everything you write should pay homage to the printed word, which is a thing of beauty. Even when I use Whatsapp, I craft my messages carefully!

     

    You have recently been appointed Dean at IFIM Law College. Tell us about your plans for the law school going forward.

    I am trying to implement everything I learnt in the U.K. at IFIM Law College with the support and guidance of the founder Mr. Sanjay Padode and the Principal Dr. Venugopal. Two things distinguish IFIM Law College are our emphasis on mooting from the first year itself and obtaining internships for each one of our students. We have developed a vibrant mooting culture, and each of our students has taken part in domestic and international moots. We have been able to obtain internships for almost all of our students four weeks before the start of the internship cycle.

    All in all IFIM Law College will be a student-centric law school. If they don’t grow, we don’t grow. So we will do everything in our power to ensure that our students develop into holistic, employable and socially responsible legal professionals. Being given the opportunity to setup a law school from scratch is a rare privilege in itself, but being given such a chance at the age of 29 is a rarity. I want to repay the faith the management has shown in me by making IFIM a prime destination for legal education.

     

    You have handled both litigation and teaching. Which one is more challenging and interesting?

    Litigation, in India at least, is a game of chess, with its adjournments and stalling tactics. Teaching is outcome-oriented and your performance is measured by how your students perform academically. While in litigation you are often dealing with one or two judges at the most; as a teacher you are dealing with hundreds of students, with varied backgrounds and learning needs. As a teacher, you need to satisfy a lay audience of people in their teens to their early twenties, each with their own idiosyncrasies and moods. Throw in the thankless job of being the Principal, Dean or Director along with teaching responsibilities and litigation starts looking a little easier.

     

    What advice would you like to give to our readers?

    No advice. I would like to share my favourite quote with them: “You must go on, I can’t go on, I’ll go on.”- Samuel Beckett.

  • Mayank Aggarwal, litigation lawyer, NLSIU, Bangalore on litigation after law school

    Mayank Aggarwal, litigation lawyer, NLSIU, Bangalore on litigation after law school

    Mayank is a graduate of the ’14 batch of the NLSIU. Following his multiple achievements on and off the field, he received the Alyosha Kumar Gold medal for excellence in sports and extra-curricular activities at his convocation ceremony. He went on to work with Adv. Yudhishtir Kahol as an associate/junior advocate and subsequently with RHA Legal as an associate.

    Mayank’s interest in criminal litigation within the country, aided by his experience with pro bono work, gives him an added insight into the career path of any aspiring litigant. His multi layered exposure to evidentiary burdens, witness examinations, and all the other aspects of a complete trial from the grass root level.

    In this interview Mayank talks to us about;

    • His experience at NLSIU, both inside and outside the classroom
    • Taking up litigation right after law school
    • The importance of internships
    • Work experience at RHA Legal

     

    How would you introduce yourself to our readers? Tell us about life after NLSIU.

    I am a legal practitioner and consultant based out of Delhi, working across forums with special interest in criminal litigation, both legal and non-legal aspects of criminology and pro bono work for people who can’t afford legal representation. I graduated from National Law School of India University, Bangalore and have been litigating ever since. Presently, I am working as an associate in the Litigation & Dispute Resolution vertical of RHA Legal, an emerging law firm at Delhi.

     

    What motivated your decision to study law. Were there alternate career options you had considered?

    The decision to study law was more a result of a process of elimination than a matter of choice. After studying science for two years in 10+2, I was fairly certain that I did not want to write the IIT-JEE exam, unlike everyone else in my class at School. My father is a practicing lawyer and I had a fair idea about what a lawyer does on a day-to-day basis. Unlike a major chink of the population (fed on a copious diet of dramatic and caricaturised versions of lawyers on-screen), who have seen lawyers as those sneaky people, who, with their underhand tactics, save the guilty and should not be messed with. I was lucky to have greater perspective in this regard.  I believe, more than anything else, this privileged knowledge and insight into a lawyer’s life might be one of the key reasons behind so many second and third generation lawyers entering this amazingly empowering and engaging profession.

     

    Tell us about your time at NLSIU. Any fond memories or anecdotes you would like to share with us?

    At the risk of belabouring the obvious, I would say I had the time of my life at college. Not only because NLSIU is a very good academic institution but for the people and the work culture the place had and helped all of us imbibe. I was a very shy person before college; the place played an important role in shaping my personality, ideals, and value systems. I particularly relish the wonderful camaraderie, especially at display in hostels; all of us bound together through the chaos of project submissions and last minute exam readings, trying to beat some impossible deadlines and collaborative efforts on research projects for class.

    mayank-aggarwal-2

    While at university, you took a keen interest in sports. How did you manage to balance the academic rigours of the trimester system at NLSIU?

    (Mayank captained the university cricket team, tennis team, squash team, badminton team and helped organize “Spiritus” which is the largest law school sports fest in India)

    Due to my pre-college involvement and background in sports, my interest in organisation as well as participation in various sports came naturally. Moreover, NLS has a thriving sporting culture, and being surrounded by people who are juggling both ECAs (not limited to sports) and academics  is inspiring in itself. Further, the insane effort put in all around the year by the Sports Committee, including the painstaking process of scheduling events around academic commitments of multiple batches, is no simple feat and actually helps ensure enthusiastic participation all year around without really jeopardising academics. I believe they are doing an incredible job in keeping the sporting tradition at NLSIU alive and I feel proud to have been part of it during my brief stay.

     

    What would you advise a student who wishes to excel at sports too in law school, considering time management or risk of injuries are valid issues most students face at law school?

    I believe that playing any kind of sport helps in acquiring the mental toughness to deal with the unpleasant situations you often face in your professional life, apart from keeping you physically fit, which I would say is critical especially in such a sedentary profession. More than anything else, I think sports reveal character and that’s why some friendships forged on the field during those crunch situations and the respect earned on the ground stay with you for times to come.  As regards the second part, injuries are part of any sportsman’s life and with a variety of sports to choose from, an individual may choose the ones s/he feels comfortable to engage in.

    Tell us about the internships you pursued while at university. How did you choose where to intern? What led you to start practising soon after graduation, considering a lot of your peers would have joined firms?

    I was quite clear from the beginning that I was going to pursue litigation as a career. My internship choices were driven by this. I interned with various lawyers across courts and forums, including a lot of trial court experience. I tried to keep a wide base in the beginning which I later narrowed down to fields of specialisation. I just prefer litigation over corporate firm practice as I feel more comfortable in this role, which might be due to the different skill sets involved in the two.

     

    mayank-aggarwal-1

    How does one decide which Court to start practising in after graduating if one wishes to litigate. How necessary is it to have a mentor/guide at the start of your practise?

    Frankly, I don’t think there is any right way of going about it. From the interaction I have had with my peers and seniors and my personal experience, I think a lawyer should just make the most of whatever he has to work with. I personally chose to start practising from the district courts right after graduation, which I continue to do till date, as I wanted to develop an understanding of legal procedures from the ground up. Moreover, given that I wanted to specialise in criminal law I didn’t really have a choice as the exposure to evidence and the various stages and facets of criminal trial can’t be obtained at appellate stage directly. I don’t know how important a mentor is but having someone who believes in you can be very helpful, especially when you come straight out of college. This assumes greater importance in a country like ours where practice and procedure can sometimes be so diverse that you tend to question if you were studying the right courses. I think feeling inadequate and lost in the initial phase is a very common phenomenon, so either find someone who helps you go through it or grow thicker skin!

     

    You have worked extensively on criminal matters while interning and after graduation. What are the various opportunities here and what made you gravitate towards criminal practise?

    After working on a variety of matters during my internships I personally found myself more inclined to work on criminal matters due to some personality traits, including, possibly, a flexible moral fibre. Other contributing factors in this decision were the enabling power of a criminal lawyer, the gravitas and immediate impact a good criminal lawyer has on lives. The cases you deal with are sometimes actually a matter of life and death- how many professions can you say that about?  I also think my internships with Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Sr. Advocate and watching him in action in court had a lasting impact. Furthermore, my work at the chamber of Adv. Yudhishtar Kahol was particularly enriching and fulfilling; observing Kahol sir cross-examine witnesses and interpret evidence was a sublime experience and  cemented my love for criminal litigation. The fact that both these counsels had dealt primarily anti-corruption matters, which generally involve generous volume of paperwork and an equally large number of witnesses to be examined, gave me amazing exposure to the evidentiary aspect of trial in a very short time for which I am indebted to both these offices.

     

    Soon after graduating, you worked as a junior advocate for a year and then decided to join RHA Legal, who are relatively new. Tell us about RHA Legal, the kind of work they generally deal with and what made you join them.

    RHA Legal is a start-up law firm which focusses on Intellectual Property Rights, Corporate advisory, and Litigation & Dispute Resolution practice. I am primarily attached to the Dispute Resolution vertical branch of the firm headed by partner Ajit Sharma, who does a lot of criminal litigation including white collar crimes apart from a diverse civil practice across various forums viz. Supreme Court, High Courts, NGT and Central Administrative Tribunal.  Rajiv Kr. Choudhry heads the IPR team, which inter alai does some highly technical advisory work on patent law and copyright.

    RHA Legal being a small firm, I have had the opportunity to work with both these teams and my experience here has been extremely fulfilling and enriching. The focus is on the creation of an extremely supportive and enabling work culture that has been built by the partners for everyone who works with them including the associates and the interns.  As compared to a larger setup, I believe a smaller firm gives you ample opportunity to be involved in the problem solving process from the very beginning, and that too at multiple levels including client handling, issue spotting and strategizing. Thus, giving you better perspective, far greater responsibilities and a more hands-on experience, which can prove to be vital for any litigating lawyer.

     

    What have you been tasked with in your tenure here? What is an average work day like in your life?

    From the very first day of my joining the Firm, I have enjoyed a very broad base role which included sitting through client meetings, researching on legal issues, flagging legal propositions in the case at hand, lot of drafting opportunities and some face time in the Court as well. The level of faith reposed in me, especially with regard to quality of work entrusted to me, is tremendous and I consider myself fortunate to work in such an enabling setting with some very talented and supportive seniors and colleagues. The work hours are manageable and vary according to the volume of work.

     

    Tell us about the Trial Courts at Delhi and your experience in working there. Why do you think it is an interesting avenue for graduates to pursue? Tell us about your experience with pro bono work.

    Although Trial Court work is very exciting and in fact crucial for a criminal litigator, the biggest obstacle I faced is the massive chasm between the practice and what is taught at Law School.  The one unique opportunity which a litigating lawyer has over all others, is the ability to make a difference at a very early stage. I have had the good fortune of working on some pro bono cases with Vertical Legal, a dispute resolution firm working out of Delhi. The firm has a steady real estate advisory practice, but has a dedicated team taking up pro-bono matters including a Sunday-only Legal Clinic imparting free of cost legal advice to all and sundry. I trust that apart from being a learning opportunity, it is a humbling and a supremely fulfilling experience. I have been involved in this work since my fourth year of law school and I must say I am very proud of what we have been able to accomplish since then. Some of the work we did was also reported recently in the media, including a piece in the reputed Caravan Magazine on a case relating to ill-treatment of migrant labourers in Punjab. This case also made me realise the extremely effective role that the media, and good journalism in general, can play by taking up socially relevant stories and contributing to the solution, which does not always lie in the legal sphere.

     

    What are your goals for the immediate future?

    I don’t have any elaborate goals for the near future. I would love to continue in my current setup and learn as much as I can in the process. Litigation, they say, requires patience and perseverance; I currently feel that I am stocking up on both.

     

    mayank-aggarwal-5

    What would be your parting message to our readers, especially those who wish to litigate?

    They say, “Litigation is not a profession, it is a way of life” and with each passing day I am appreciating the aptness of this statement. Although I feel I am not old or wise enough to give advice, I will pass on something which a very wise man once told me- “Litigation involves industry, and lots of it. Don’t do it for the money, there are exponentially easier ways of making money 🙂”.

  • Ketan Mukhija, Senior VP at SREI, on role and skill sets required to work in an in-house position

    Ketan Mukhija, Senior VP at SREI, on role and skill sets required to work in an in-house position

    Ketan Mukhija graduated from NALSAR, Hyderabad in the year 2007. He has worked in foreign law firms like Jones Day and Herbert Smith. Thereafter, he returned to India and worked with two Indian law firms at responsible positions. At present, he works as the Senior Vice President (Legal) of SREI Infrastructure Finance Limited, one of the largest infrastructure financing firms in India.

    In this interview Ketan talks about:

    • His career trajectory from working in US & UK and then to India
    • Working in an in-house position as a career option for young lawyers
    • Structure of an in-house legal team in a large company
    • Role of an in-house counsel
    • Skillsets required to work in an in-house position

    Click here to read our earlier interview with Ketan.

    Please share with us your journey so far.

    It is has been a fascinating journey so far.

    After graduating from NALSAR, I started working in the western hemisphere and slowly and gradually, moved towards the eastern. I commenced my career with a firm called Jones Day which is an International Law Firm (ILF) based out of the United States, and has multiple offices across the world. I was working as part of the Merger & Acquisitions and Strategic Alliances team there. Thereafter I moved to Herbert Smith Freehills (HSF) in London. I got a dual qualification to practice as a solicitor in England & Wales within the United Kingdom.

    At HSF, I was working with Equity Capital Market Division, and got an excellent opportunity to work on big transactions. I was involved in the acquisition deal of Land Rover and Jaguar by Tata, which was a tremendous experience. While working for HSF, I had also advised Bradford and Bingley, which is UK’s biggest buy-to-let lender. The recession had just set in, so we represented and advised Bradford and Bingley on tracing of capital, drafting of prospectuses and related documentation.

    Thereafter, owing to personal reasons, I had to shift to New Delhi where I worked for a relatively short stint with two firms, Vaish Associates and Luthra & Luthra Law Offices in senior positions. It was a good experience because working for Indian clients was different where the work areas are generaI as far as the corporate area is concerned. In US and UK, we have very focused and super-specialized areas. In Indian firms, you pretty much pick up a generalist experience and set of transactions. Accordingly, the major areas that I worked on included corporate restructuring, PIPE transactions, private equity, banking finance and energy infrastructure. Overall, I got a good all-round experience at both firms following which I got the opportunity to work with SREI Infrastructure Finance Limited as the Sr. Vice President (Legal, Corporate Strategy and Planning).

    SREI Group is one of the largest infrastructure financing conglomerates in India, having assets worth USD3 billion approx under its management and with almost over hundred entities as sister concerns. It is a huge group which is being held and managed under the auspices of the Kanoria Foundation.

    Many young lawyers want to become in-house counsels and are opting to work as in-house counsels directly after law school. How do you see this as a career path?

    There are a few things which we have to bear in mind. There is some form of uniformity and inconsistency in terms of working in law firms. On the other hand, an in-house counsel has to be flexible according to the organization he/she wants to work with. In the M&A division or capital markets division of any other big firm, the type of work is somewhat on similar lines, depending on the transaction at hand. However, each company has a different structure. The philosophy of a company, organization, structural configuration and the hierarchy will be very different from that of a law firm. Before I shed some light on the content side or the method side, a word of advice for people who aspire to be an in-house counsel, they should do some background research on the type of company they want to work for. In the past, companies used to look for a person who had 15-25 years of experience in the same industry. However, that is changing. Young lawyers are being recruited by companies who are creating immense value and changing the traditional setup.

    It is important to note that, as an in-house counsel, you must know that your role will be more than just a legal adviser; you will be given a much-diversified responsibility which may not be strictly legal in nature. Here, the client is your financial team, commercial team and you are not catering to the entire world but ensuring that there is organic or inorganic growth within the organization, and you undertake the roles of a dispute preventor, cost controller and the right business partner in the literal sense. So, you should keep all the aforementioned points in mind before joining a company as an in-house counsel.

    If you want to generalize the structure of an in-house legal team in a  large company, how will you do that?

    With the caveat, that no two organisations have the same structure. I would like to give an example from the structure in the SREI Group. Under SREI Group, for every legal entity, there is a corporate legal and corporate compliance at each level because the regulator mandates these. A listed company needs to comply with several regulations by different regulators. There is constant interaction with Security Exchange Board of India (SEBI), which supervises all major activities of a company. If there is an acquisition or a potential change in the management of a listed company, everything has to be regularly and periodically intimated to SEBI and the stock exchange where the company is listed. Therefore, the compliance divisions ensure the conformity with the regulators and the RBI. The SREI Group is regulated by the RBI as an infrastructure finance company (IFC). So, we have a lot of interaction with the RBI on fairly regular basis. It is crucial to have a compliance division to ensure that we comply with the existing legal and regulatory framework.

    Almost all companies have a risk management team. The risk management team usually takes the form of an internal audit or a legal audit division. As a company with multiple associate/subsidiary entities, it has to ensure that the internal contractual arrangements and shareholding is managed properly, and there exists a system of checks and balances between the various entities at all levels to ensure that you are minimizing risks at every stage. So, the risk management division assumes a lot of importance.

    There is also a corporate legal at each entity level. On a daily basis, in an operative contract division, there are employment contracts, non-disclosure agreements, term sheets, securities documentation, memorandum of understanding and collaboration agreements which the corporate team needs to look at and thoroughly negotiate with the counterparties.

    A financial institution has many recovery matters, possession matters, civil matters, DRT matters, risk management, compliance, internal audit, etc, so it is important to have a robust litigation division.

    Moreover, at the group level, you have a strategy and planning team that drives and co-ordinates with all the aforementioned divisions.  It is the strategy team which drives the processes substantively across these 4-5 teams. The set up is mature in our organization but it varies with every organization, but this is typically what I have seen in Indian multinational corporations.

    What is the role of an in-house counsel in an organisation? How is it different from working in a law firm?

    The role of a general counsel is in the nature of a true business partner who works as a i) preemptive risk mitigator, ii) cost controller for legal expenses and iii) remedy agent in case there is a legal issue. A General Counsel has a role which is similar to a general physician, who would identify the issues in hand and should be able to guide the business functions in a right direction in case of any legal issues, rather than implementing every function himself/ herself.

    It is important to understand what the scope, ambit and role of an in-house counsel look like. There can be various divisions and verticals in the legal department. You have to involve yourself in the strategic decision-making process of the organization and for that, you need to know the legal risks and help streamline the processes within the organization to ensure that the key issues and the legal matters are being monitored and scrutinized. Then you have to take the strategic decisions keeping in mind the philosophy and the interests of the organization. So one of the key things is actual to be in coordination with the management of the company or the business heads of the company to ensure that all the decisions are taken by keeping in mind the legal risk that can potentially arise. You have to work on commercial transactions with external counsels and law firms to help us on an ad-hoc or retainer basis. If you have a defined skill set, you have to wear the business hat and think like a business head and try to create value at each step. It is important that as an in-house counsel, you should have the ability or skillsets required to set up the right structures to achieve a high level of operational efficiency and continuous improvement of organization and business, the methods ensuring incorporation of the best practices, creating awareness, development of functional centres of excellence and the ability to work under pressure. As an in-house counsel, you should be in a position to handle critical issues which are sensistive or confidential in nature. You have to be fully equipped, informed and in a position to handle that. So the idea is to integrate the legal advice with the business requirement and create value for the organisation. A person has to be a generalist, must have good grasping power, has to be flexible because litigation can change colors tomorrow. Working in an in-house role can be very different from working in a law firm. In a law firm, you might work on one area of law throughout your life, but the variety of work in an in-house function is extremely wide. You have to be very flexible and good to learn and grasp so that you can learn about the collaboration between the corporation office and various group companies optimizing the value of the corporate entity.

     

    What are the skills sets required to become an In-House Counsel?

    The skill sets have to be both technical and soft skills. You must have the judicious amalgam of the soft skills as well which is very much required because you will be dealing with very stringent timelines and some unexpected kind of pushbacks. When you are dealing with non-lawyers and people from other departments, you will have to be slightly more versatile and more efficiency oriented to ensure that they understand the tone of your language. It is important that you understand both their business requirement and you convey your legal provisions. This is one of the key skillsets that one must possess if they want to work in an in-house role.

    The organization will go on forever, and no person is indispensable in an organization. So it is important to standardize the procedure and processes in line with the business requirements to ensure efficiency and seamless delivery of advisory legal opinion. It is important to have standard points, or starting points or denominators or basis, wherein the position or philosophy of the company is clearly laid down. Those philosophies guide the operations and decision making over the years. So standardization and uniformization are very important.

    It is also crucial to have the ability to drive the processes, because deriving economic value and savings for the organization by bringing in the subject matter expertise and skill sets can only make meaning when you have a high level of operational efficiency.

    For example, if a company wants to embark on an M&A transaction, the law firms will be doing a set of documentation, the technical team and other teams will be doing their own due diligence and submit their report. Everybody has his or her compartmentalized job of work customized to the transaction. However, as a sole point of contact with all stakeholders, you as an in-house counsel should be able to soak all the information from everyone, give it the right shape and ensure that they mold and cast well in the framework that you want.

    You need to stay updated with the latest changes in the position of law so that you can give the best perspective advice from a commercial perspective to the top management.

    What should be the role of a legal head in case of a regulatory vacuum/ grey areas in law?

    While advising the business verticals to act on areas where there are regulatory vacuum or grey areas, a general counsel has the role to pre-empt the risk in a calculated manner and put the same before the business verticals. However, in cases where the existing legal framework is inadequate or fails to meet the current market scenario, it will be important to put forward the problem with the government agencies, either through industry bodies/ associations like ASSOCHAM or individually. Whenever a new law is proposed, generally the government provides a window period of 60-90 days during which the stakeholders can voice their concerns about the new law. It is important that the problem or concerns are clearly identified and proposed solutions are put forward in such cases. These solutions can be based on industry best practices around the world or based on ground realities or the market sentiments.

    Please give your views about the trend in the Indian companies on having a large in-house legal team.

    The trend is towards having a robust in-house function as well. The mantra of any firm is to increase their revenue and decrease the cost. I think having a robust in-house team works much better for me than hiring a law firm every now and then because that is an expensive affair. If you have a good in-house team, then the cost can be curtailed quickly and to a large extent. Because, when you talk about International Law firms, for a simple agreement they will charge you huge amounts. Now, if you have equipped lawyers who have global exposure and are good negotiators, I think they can play a role both in increasing revenue as well as cost preventers to a colossal extent. It is important to have in-house experts in finance, investment, taxation laws who can form the right opinion. One can take help of external consultants, when the volume is huge or when the work needs to be done at different locations, and it is not possible for the internal team to be present at different places. The idea should be to ensure that the person understands the business because that is where it adds value. Consultants will come as an outsider, but here you know the aspirations and expectations and can lead the best optimal advice. So I think the trend is very encouraging, fruitful and also sinks with the simple market logic. It aligns the incentives and disincentives of the promoters. So it is a market-driven kind of move.

    Is there any other aspect you would like to add on to the discussion?

    The role of a General Counsel or a Senior Corporate Counsel is also that of a behavior analyst of the corporate systems. Now there are so many rules to manage the entire litigation, rules to manage the complete compliance kind of platform, rules to administer the contracts. You have to make use of the technology, behavioral skills, core competencies, evolve right system of checks and balances within the organization, and I think that’s the requisite kind of skill sets. and I can probably end by saying that today’s evolving business scenario in the changing market, the role of a corporate counsel is very meaningful in the sense that they are becoming the true partners of the business unit and the company and, to drive the strategy towards higher growth, development, higher bottom lines and top lines. The role of a General Counsel is critical because he work at every stage with CFO, CIO, CMO, and CTO and acts as the point person for the top management. It is important that he gives the right advice to the top management which would drive the strategy for the company. In today’s scenario the role of a general counsel looks very promising.

     

  • Prem Rajani, Managing Partner, Rajani Associates, on building a firm practice and experience in corporate law

    Prem Rajani, Managing Partner, Rajani Associates, on building a firm practice and experience in corporate law

    Prem Rajani graduated from Government Law College in 1990 and is now the Managing Partner of Rajani Associates which was established in 1999. In this interview he talks to us about:

    • His time in law school and how facets of the profession have evolved with time.
    • The importance of moots, debating and internships.
    • Building a corporate law firm profile.
    • Working in Structuring and M&A deals.
    • Advice for young lawyers today.

     

    How would you like to introduce yourself to our readers, most of whom are university going law students in India?

    Currently I am the Managing Partner of Rajani Associates. Rajani Associates is a full-service law firm based in Mumbai and established in November 1999. The Firm has been involved in domestic and international practice in nearly all fields of corporate law as well as commercial litigation and property law. The Firm closely works alongside firms in the US, Europe, Middle East, South East Asia and Australia to meet the needs of our global clients. Our areas of practice are Corporate & Commercial, Mergers & Acquisitions and Competition Law, Banking and Finance, Domestic and International Capital Markets, Private Equity, Corporate Litigation and Arbitration, fund Formation, Real Estate & Trusts, Projects and Project Finance, Technology, Media & Telecom and Intellectual Property rights, Corporate Debt Restructuring, Structuring, Anti-Bribery and Corruption.

     

    Tell us about your life before you joined law school. What made you gravitate towards law?

    Immediately after finishing with school and college (commerce faculty from Jai Hind College) I joined Government Law College. The paramount factor that made me take up law was my father’s business that had a lot of dependency on solicitors for preparation of legal documents. Alongside my studies, very early on, I started assisting my father with his business and as a result often met many solicitors. The manner in which solicitors conducted themselves fascinated me. I started getting drawn to legalities and the documents that were being prepared. There came a point that I became so passionate about the profession that I had no doubt left in my mind that a solicitor is all I wanted to be.

     

     

    You graduated from GLC in 1990. How were the days? What would you advise our readers is the ideal things to look to get out of university, other than a degree?

    During my time law firms did not retain interns for summer/winter training and as such work training for most of us did not happen till we joined a law firm as an article for solicitor examination training. Most of us therefore very seriously attended college and read books from the library. Today the trend has changed. Young students are getting a chance to intern at a variety of established law firms giving them a chance to know and practice law outside of books and may be college attendance has taken a backseat. However I don’t necessarily mean that in a bad way. I only do wish to suggest to the younger generation that along with collecting work experience they must spend more time reading Bare Acts and established commentary books rather than simply relying on test papers to clear examinations, because after all knowledge of Law is paramount and irreplaceable. The opportunity to participate in moot courts as a student is also great and every student must to his or her best ability try and participate in them, whether as the research team or on the argument team. Lastly, irrespective of which branch of Law one wants to profess, it is my sincere belief and advice that every law student must spend the first two-three years of his or her career practicing hardcore litigation.

     

    What were your areas of interest in the law? Did you engage in extracurricular activities while in college?

    During my college days my areas of interest were predominantly the Transfer of Property Act, Income Tax Act and a few other substantial laws (such as the Contract Act, Trust Act, Sales of Goods Act, and Negotiable Instrument Act). Somehow, I was not very inclined towards the constitution of criminal Laws. As mentioned above, in my opinion moot court competitions, mediation competitions and debates are extremely important both in terms of gaining knowledge and to get over stage phobia. I used to stand up and address the judge as well as counter the opponent quite comfortably, all of which assisted in my overall development.

     

    How must a law student decide on choosing his internships?  What criteria did you follow if any?

    As I stated earlier, during the initial days a student must try to do more of litigation and property Law and accordingly select law firms established in these practice areas. In my opinion, an understanding of these Laws builds a good foundation for the general practice of Law. However if a student is already decided and is highly focused on a specific branch of Law (such as IPR) then the student must select a law firm accordingly.

     

    Tell us about your internship experiences while at university. How did they aid your development?

    The concept of internship did not exist during my college / university days. What existed and what I did sign up for was articleship (a specialized training programme required to pursue the examination of solicitors). I for one had a wonderful experience during my articled days. I was fortunate to have not one but three brilliant seniors. The experience and exposure I received was unmatched and changed my entire perception towards how Law is understood, applied and practiced. During my articleship days there was no access to computers or search engines (life without which is unimaginable by many youngsters today). All research was based on the traditional style of referring to books and a physical library and most often but not self-interpretation. It helped us lawyers from those days to hone our research skills, develop our sense of interpretation and most of all gain an all-round knowledge on various topics of Law.

     

    What led you to gravitate towards Structuring and M&A practice? What opportunities may one find in this area?

    During 1990 private equities and IPOs did not exit much and as such the corporate world mostly comprised M&A activities. Structuring became a natural choice (and is now a hobby) considering the complex Laws, most of which keep changing from time to time and the fact that no single transaction can be considered  keeping in mind only one single statue. M&A transactions at all points require the analysation of various Laws. For instance issue of a convertible security must be analysed under the Companies Act, the FDI Policy, SEBI Regulations (for a listed company) and Income Tax Act and in certain cases special statutes such as the Banking Act, Insurance Act etc.

     

    Prem-Rajani-2

    You were well placed after graduation with the then new Foreign Exchange laws coming in post 1991, an area you focus on. Having seen the law evolve and various sectors open up, how did this first-hand experience prove valuable?

    I am perhaps one of the few fortunate lawyers who saw the evolution of FDI from 1991 till date. Not only was I amongst those lawyers practicing the Law in 1991 but was also amongst those few who were then working in a corporate law firm. There has been a material shift from what Laws were in 1991 and what the FDI Laws are in 2016. One good aspect has been that during the past 25 years despite several Governments coming up no Government has reversed the FDI Policy. If at all, each Government has systematically liberalised the policy. The current Government has also been quite active and liberalised the policy significantly within the last 2 years. However, liberalisation at each stage has been well guarded and though one may find that there are still some restrictions, under the given economic situation of the country and the globe at large, personally I feel some of the restrictions and regulations are necessary in the interest of the nation.

    As for my personal experience, I have first hand witnessed the initiation and then the journey of FDI in this country. It has given me the advantage of knowing and understanding each stage of liberalisation. I have had the chance to follow why a certain sector was so heavily guarded and why certain sectors have slowly and gradually been liberalised together with the thought process for each change. All of this has made my journey as a lawyer very exciting.

     

    You have been ranked by Chambers and Partners and IFLR1000 as a leading lawyer for M&A in India. Could you tell our readers more about what this practice entails, for anyone who may be interested in taking it up?

    As stated earlier M&A is an interesting field of Law and one needs to have an overall 360 degrees view and knowledge of the various direct and ancillary Laws involved. For instance, in case of acquisition of a listed company by another listed company one needs to analyse the applicable provisions of the Companies Act, SEBI Takeover Regulations, Insider Trading Regulations, Listing Regulations, FDI Policy (in case there is a significant foreign shareholder) Competition Act, Income Tax Act, Stamp Act and in the event the target company is engaged in any specific sector (viz Banking, Insurance) then those specific statutes also need to be studied. Along with all of this, there is also always a complex grid of transaction documents to be drafted or reviewed. All of this needs proper synchronization amongst various service providers to ensure that both parties to the deal eventually get what they have bargained for.

     

    You founded a law firm that is doing very well today. What challenges do you think someone who wishes to start a firm or independent practice is likely to face? What would you advise them to do to mitigate such circumstances?

    The challenges faced by me when I started this law firm in November 1999 are different then what are faced by start-ups today. During 1990s, in a year only two or three new firms were registered or formed, while currently there are almost twelve to thirteen new law firms coming up each year. During 1990s, most founders /partners would usually have 10 to 15 years experience before starting their own firm; but of late I have seen that there are some of the law firm’s with partners having 5 to 7 years of experience. Some of the young law firms start out on the promise or assurance of a handful of clients and that is exactly where these law firms should be cautious, in as much as one cannot start the law firm on the strength of 4-5 clients promising some business. Also all clients at the end of the day expect quality work and at no cost should that be compromised on due to inexperience or the lack of a team.

     

    prem-rajani-1

    Rajani Associates has consistently been ranked at the top in dealing with Asia-Pacific M&A. Has there been a specific push towards this sector and how have you remained the best?

    We are thankful that we continue to be ranked in the top in dealing with Asia-Pacific M&A. There is no specific push towards this sector. It is just that our work speaks for itself backed by the good wishes and recommendations of our clients and occasionally the counter parties in a transaction.

     

    As Managing Partner of the firm, what is an average day at work like? We would love to hear about the day-to-day responsibilities that need to be handled by someone in your position.

    I am usually in the office by 9:30 -9:45 a.m. and leave around 10:00 p.m., which is nearly 12 hours in the office. Though the Managing Partner, I still enjoy hands on work in any transaction, more particularly transactions that involve conceptualisation and structuring (whether Corporate or Litigation) and at times negotiations. During the day, in addition to working on some transactions, I also need to devote time to meet clients as well as discuss office related issues with the partners and occasionally also spend time with some associates. All of this goes towards grooming budding lawyers that are the future. No doubt there is a support staff, but there are occasions when some decisions do need my intervention. In addition to all this I enjoy speaking at Seminars (which requires me to spend more time reading and updating). And above all is the updates in Law. I spend my weekends reading the latest in Law, be it judgements or reforms in statutes or policies.

     

    What advice do you have for fresh graduates who are entering law firms as an associate? What can they be expected to be judged on?

    As I stated earlier, my advice to the fresh graduates is that they must spend at least the first two – three years in pursuing a litigation practice and amongst other substantial statutes they must read and understand Transfer Property Act, Sale of Goods Act, Trust Act etc. These mother Acts form the basic foundation of knowledge which sadly most of the young generation of lawyers are choosing to skip in the lure of directly studying and practicing the specialised statutes. Specialised statutes are very important but without the basic knowledge of substantial statues, young lawyers will find interpretation and drafting a legally enforceable document a bit challenging.

     

    Finally, what is your parting message for our readers?

    Unlike some of the other professions (Medical, Engineering, MBA) that have a high entry barrier requiring extensive hard work even before graduation, the legal profession has fewer entry barriers. Challenges for lawyers begin after they pass Law. The statutes keep changing from time to time, new judgements keep updating interpretations from time to time and more importantly one’s own ability to interpret Law develops from time to time. A lawyer is required to read and update himself or herself on a daily basis and throughout his or her professional career. A lawyer must have the passion for reading and must be open for different views or interpretations.

  • Tarunabh Khaitan, Associate Professor, Oxford Univ, on pursuing BCL, M.Phil and D.Phil from Oxford, being a visiting scholar at NYU

    Tarunabh Khaitan, Associate Professor, Oxford Univ, on pursuing BCL, M.Phil and D.Phil from Oxford, being a visiting scholar at NYU

    Dr. Tarunabh Khaitan is an alumnus of the 2004 batch of NLSIU, Bangalore and a recipient of the prestigious Rhodes Scholarship. After completing his masters (BCL) from Oxford University, Tarunabh decided to pursue higher studies, he completed his M.Phil and D.Phil from Oxford in 2007 and 2010 respectively. Tarunabh is an Associate Professor at Oxford currently, he teaches Constitutional Law and Jurisprudence to undergraduates, Discrimination Law to graduates, and supervises research in his areas of interest.

    In this interview he talks about:

    • Studying at NLSIU and at Oxford.
    • Building a profile and SOP for pursuing further studies at the best universities.
    • A bit about the
    • His experience working as an Associate Professor at Oxford and as a visiting scholar at New York University.

     

    How would you like to introduce yourself to them?

    I am an academic working on law and legal theory.

     

    Did you have lawyers in your family or in close proximity? How did you come to touch with law?

    I don’t have any lawyers in my family. Where I grew up law wasn’t something one aspired to. A more urbane cousin passed on the law school prospectus and I gave it a go—entirely serendipitous. This chanced encounter with the law motivated my discussions with Shamnad Basheer on the need for diversity in law schools. I am very pleased to see his dynamism and energy in taking the IDIA (Increasing Diversity by Increasing Access) project from strength to strength.

     

    How was your law school experience at NLSIU? Do you recall your first day at the Halls of Residence? Would you like to share any observation/memory from those days?

    I loved my time in law school, largely because of the friends I made, and because that is where my political education happened. My politics and history classes and my internship with Aruna Roy’s Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS) early in my law school career were particularly instructive. These early influences have continued to shape my thinking and career ever since.

    I don’t recall my first day at law school, but I was probably very nervous and convinced they made a mistake in letting me in. Everyone else seemed cleverer. In hindsight, despite many positives, I don’t think law school challenged me enough academically. With some honourable exceptions, most courses required minimal effort, and reading cases or articles was entirely optional. I got a lot out of those five years and wouldn’t change that for anything else, but Indian law school needs to do a lot more to deliver on their primary mission of teaching law to young minds, and to help them think independently about the law.

     

    What were your areas of interest during your graduation? How did you go about developing expertise and knowledge in these areas?

    I was interested in public law and human rights law. My interest in these fields has continued, although I engage with them through a theoretical lens mostly.

     

    How do you think a law student can build up his profile to get through to top-notch universities like Oxford? What should one do differently in college if he wants to pursue higher studies after graduation?

    Most people in law school are very clever. Effort and motivation is the main thing that makes a difference. Most postgrad universities care about academic excellence alone. If you want to join the academy, more important than strategically designing your profile is to have a genuine love for scholarship—if you have that craving, you are likely to do the right things. So it is useful to ask yourself why you want to join the academy, what you think the role and purpose of a university is, and whether and how your personal goals interact with the point of scholarship.

    That said, investing in learning how to write well can help. Indian law schools typically require you to do a lot of writing, but good feedback on improving your style, structure, argument and content is rare. I learnt the importance of clear, simply-communicated scholarship during my time at MKSS rather than at law school. To paraphrase a conversation over a dinner with Aruna Roy some 15 years ago, I remember her telling me that a polity needs good scholarship, but one that is readily intelligible. It was an important lesson.

     

    What was your area of study during your masters at Oxford? What was the academic pressure like and did you find time to engage yourself in other activities?

    I focussed on jurisprudence, human rights, constitutional theory and the penal system for my BCL. My doctoral research was on discrimination law theory, which was eventually published by OUP last year.

     

    How did you take the decision to pursue higher studies? How did you go about choosing the programme and the university?

    Like Edward Said, I believe that the role of an intellectual is to speak truth to power. It is the truth-seeking purpose of scholarship that underscores the importance of academic freedom. As for choosing Oxford, I got a scholarship to go there: that mostly did it.

     

    What was your first reaction on learning that you are being awarded the Rhodes scholarship? Do you recall the first few days and the interview?

    I was very happy, as one would expect. It has been a while (more than a decade), but I think most questions were character-oriented.

     

    How did you go about writing your résumé and most importantly, your Statement of Purpose?

    Not sure what résumé I submitted then, but I have come to realise the importance of short résumé, no more than one and a half sides. Selection panels include busy people, who have little more than a few minutes to make an initial judgment. Be kind to them, give a clean, professional résumé with your most important achievements. For the SOP, get as much feedback as you can on early drafts—from friends, family, professors, anyone whose opinion you care for. Make every sentence mean something. Keep it direct, personal, and honest. Don’t do platitudes.

     

    What would be your advice to our young readers who would like to apply for Rhodes scholarship in future? What all does it take to have a brilliant profile good enough for the Rhodes?

    I don’t think there is a formula. Rhodes scholars are a very diverse bunch, and there are many different ways to succeed. It is also important to remember that while the Rhodes Scholarship is valuable, it is not the only available door. While the role of luck cannot be discounted, if you have worked hard, something worthwhile should turn up. Being at an elite law school is already a position of immense privilege, one that secures opportunities not available to many others.

     

    How was your experience at Oxford? What are the classes and professors like? Are the classes more interactive?

    Oxford undergraduates are taught mainly in tutorials where 2 students meet a tutor for an hour once a week to have a pre-submitted essay dissected in detail. The contact hours are few—an undergraduate student typically gets 12 hours of tutorial in total in an 8 week term. But the intensity of exposure is staggering: there is no place to hide, not for the student, nor for the tutor. Lectures are mostly optional and students choose to go if they like the lecturer. Graduate students are mainly taught in larger seminars of 10-15 students, although they also get a limited number of tutorial exposure. The mainstay of the student experience here is the astonishing amount of self-study expected from students. A typical undergraduate student will normally read about 6-10 cases and 4-8 journal articles every week—graduate students read even more.

     

    tarunabh-khaitan-2

    How rigorous was the academic schedule? Would you say a doctorate from Oxford can help make a good grounding for a career in academics?

    Research students don’t have any schedule, it is really important to be self-disciplined and be passionate about your research to keep going. Research can be a lonely and daunting process, and your relationship with your supervisor is the key. I was lucky to have a great supervisor in Nick Bamforth, I also know people who were less fortunate. A good doctorate is increasingly becoming absolutely essential to a career in legal academia. I would recommend prospective research students to make early informal contact with potential supervisors. Doctorates in the UK tend to take a lot less time than they do in the US.

     

    How is your experience of teaching at Oxford? Which subjects do you teach? How are the current batches of students whom you teach?

    I currently teach constitutional law and jurisprudence to undergraduates, discrimination law to graduates, and supervise research in my area of interest. I find that teaching feeds into my research in interesting ways, and with the best students, I frequently learn as I teach.

     

    Do tell us more about the Global Research Fellowship Scheme, 2016 and your experience at NYU.

    I am on sabbatical for the rest of this calendar year. I am currently visiting the law school at the University of Melbourne, and plan to spend a few months later in the year at New York University. It is just a time to get out of Oxford, learn a bit about how things are done at other universities, and get some research time without the pressures of teaching.

     

     

  • Avaantika Kakkar, Partner, Competition Law, Khaitan & Co., on challenges and landmarks of a career in corporate law

    Avaantika Kakkar, Partner, Competition Law, Khaitan & Co., on challenges and landmarks of a career in corporate law

    Avaantika Kakkar, a 2003 graduate of Indian Law Society’s Law College, Pune, is currently a Partner at Khaitan and CO., heading its Competition and Antitrust Law practice. Soon after graduating, she published her book, “A Perspective on Product Liability Law and Consumer Safety”, and she continues to take active interest in academia, especially if it is linked to Competition Law. In this interview, she tells us about:

    • The passion for indulging in research and how it helps build character;
    • Getting one’s work published;
    • The challenging path to success in a niche area like Competition law;
    • The nature of a corporate job; and
    • The importance of balancing personal and private life (with some great musical recommendations to help students find the crucial balance).

     

    How would you like to introduce yourself to our readers?

    Simply, I am Avaantika.

     

    What would you like to share with our readers about your time spent at ILS Pune, both within and beyond the classroom? How did the city itself play a part in your legal education?

    ILS Pune has a fantastic library – that was my favourite hang-out. It’s a college that allows you to be what you want to be and in my time, at least, we had a very supportive and encouraging faculty. We had visiting professors who were practicing lawyers with superb independent reputations, and they allowed us glimpses into what it would be like to practice law.

    One may miss the perpetual ‘internships’  that colleges in other cities offer, but at ILS, the good part is that you have all that time for a real, college life, and you use your vacations for internships and practical exposure.

    About Pune – what can I say? I love the city and keep going back! It accommodates my beautiful Alma Mater, in the heart of the city, with its own scenic hill-side (which students and teachers of the college along with the residents of Pune have to defend against the occasional threats of flyovers and by-pass roads!).

    I lived on what constituted both sides of the city back then – ILS and CAMP area (the cantonment). The city has expanded, and too much has changed, however there is always FTII, MG Road, East Street, Marz-O-Rin and THoaks (Thousand Oaks, for the uninitiated)!

     

    During your time spent there, what, if any, extra-curricular or co-curricular activities did you take up? How did the same affect your learning experience and prepare you for the legal sector?

    Moot courts and debates, of course. But what I enjoyed most was writing – I finished my book on product liability in India while I was in college. Of course, I felt it was ahead of its time and was never the bestseller that I had intended it to be but, yes – writing it, editing it, and finally, getting it published was a great learning curve. This has helped in moulding the writer in me, and I remain deeply involved with the publication initiatives at Khaitan & Co, and I type really fast!

     

    Did you always have a passion for research or was it an acquired taste? What specific experiences or circumstances lead you to write your book on product liability and consumer safety?

    I always had a passion for research – still do.

    I guess I wrote on the subject because, in my naïve-student-mind, I felt that this was a subject on which very little had been written, and I was inspired with all that sparkle in the law of torts.

     

    What advice would you give our readers looking to enter academia and publish their own work?

    It really depends on what you are looking to publish. There are many opportunities now, with online publications for short essays and articles that make it easier than it was. I had managed some publications in international law journals that solicited legal writing by students. There is also self-publishing, whether through e-books or traditional methods (but I would use that after exhausting all other options). Law book publishers are always on the look-out for more subjects and good writing. In fact, they still receive, read and respond to unsolicited manuscripts. Then, there is the Big 6 (or whatever the number is now) and the option of publishing great reference texts or non-fiction through them, but these would have to be extremely meaningful and insightful works that interest the publisher commercially.

     

    How would you say research publications impact one’s understanding of the law and the legal system? Further, how does the same impact one’s employability or desirability to prospective employers?

    Research publications help one dive deep into the subject – you become alert to nuances and learn to articulate your thoughts. I think that ours is a field that will always value clear-thinking individuals who are able to get to the depth of a problem (and also out of it!). Quality publications (or writing) are often an ask of almost every practice, including Khaitan & Co. and Nishith Desai Associates (where I worked for a brief period).

     

    avaantika-kakkar-2

    Given your extensive work with Competition Law in India, what would you like to share with our readers about the same as a relatively newer area of law in India?

    Competition Law is exciting because it’s a developing law in India. We are a nascent jurisdiction and it is great to be so deeply involved in the creation of precedent. The really challenging (and thrilling) aspect of competition law is that it puts you in direct touch with the conduct of, and incentive for, businesses across sectors. It’s a great practice area for lawyers who like research – one aspect of this law is that both the regulator and the practitioners look for precedent from jurisdictions that have been around much longer.

     

    About antitrust and competition law in general, what experiences, internships, or other activates would you say are essential to anyone looking to specialise in this field, during or after law school?

    It helps to have studied the subject extensively (this is true for most practice areas, actually). The challenge is that the subject is not always formally taught in Law Schools so one has to look for online courses or specialised short courses, which are a good start.

    I also think that a background in M&A, general corporate and commercial laws, or litigation experience, goes a long way in making a comfortable transition into this super-specialised field.

     

    How do you see the future of competition law in India as, and what would you advise those looking to enter the same field? To what extent do you see it as a niche area within the general sphere of corporate practise?

    Yes, competition law could be a niche practice, but I think that the general sphere constitutes an overlap of corporate practice (of course) as well as litigation, commercial laws, data protection, and intellectual property laws, at the very least. I actually see the practice of competition law as rather a melting pot of all of these practice areas. Also, it is already becoming a standalone practice across the firms that were first movers in this area and in the future, I see it as a very important constituent of full service law firms. I also see a future for boutique competition law firms – in the more distant future.

     

    When and how did you identify competition and antitrust law as your specialization? How did your career path or trajectory change after that?

    (Avaantika worked earlier at Udwadia & Udeshi in their general corporate advisory, and later moved on to broader corporate and commercial matters at Nishith Desai Associates)

    My varied background and diverse experience with complex corporate structuring, advisory work on the commercial side, transactions on the secondary market, my exposure to listing work as well as going private (delisting transactions) and the time that I spent on structured finance and the contentious matters that I was involved with, have all helped me work as a competition lawyer who has some value add.

    I know that today, there is a strong emphasis on specialisation from the day that students graduate – I think this is an unfortunate development of our times, and I was lucky that I had mentors, great guidance and the opportunity to choose specialisation when I had had at least 6 years of varied experience across practices.

    My career path is largely in line with what one may expect. Competition law allows for intellectual satisfaction and deep academic fulfilment.

     

    What would you like to share with our readers about the general work environment and the demanding nature of a corporate sector job?

    (As a partner at Khaitan & Co Avaantika has led multiple mergers and acquisitions, and acted as an advisor on many transactions and joint ventures, etc.)

    It’s the same everywhere, really. I don’t know of any job that does not demand a deep mental and physical commitment from you. It helps if you let this great profession define who you are. At some level, it impacts who you are as a person, which is not always a bad thing.

    Take some time off, read, get some exercise (or, watch a movie!), spend time with your family, but be equally focussed and committed to your profession.

    I haven’t really found the answer to how one copes with the demanding nature of a job – the truth is, you just have to find balance whenever you can, and it isn’t a very precise scale that you weigh your experiences on!

    It is obviously great to cultivate hobbies and have interests outside of work but there will be days, in fact, weeks and sometimes a few months, when it will be maddening! This is also where the organisation that you work with comes into play – do they care?

     

    What would you like to say about the trade off, if any, between a personal life outside the office and effort required to make it as an advocate?

    Law is a bad wife. But, she makes a good mistress, right? You have to be there for her!

    The law, the practice of medicine and at least a few other jobs (rather professions), do require us to be on our toes, work hard, work smart and do what it takes to stay relevant. This is a constant, unending process (I am sure most senior, successful doctors and lawyers would vouch for this).

    It helps to surround yourself with family (and friends) that support your passion and your ambition – this is often tougher than finding balance at work (because we don’t always get to choose our families!).

    Having said this – prioritise your work. Prioritise your life. I don’t think that we can lead a life without regrets, but regret is an avoidable circumstance! Some things are pretty obvious – I, for instance, would take no pride in describing how I missed out on important moments in my life or with my family. But, at the same time I take great pride in my work and am unapologetic about its excruciating demands – my work defines who I am – this is who I hold myself out to be – there is therefore, no scope for any misrepresentations!

     

    Finally, what would be your parting message for our readers, most of whom are law students and young lawyers?

    Work hard, work smart – most of all, enjoy what you do. Give in to the effort that it requires, don’t feel sorry for yourself and try not to take yourself too seriously.

    I love advising students to read (possibly listen to) Baz Lurhmann’s words. Also, listen to The Gambler by Kenny Rogers – let it play in your head and guide you as you make the choices that will come to define you, as an individual and as a professional.

  • Aditya Shamlal, Partner, GameChanger Law Advisors, on career experience in Sports Law

    Aditya Shamlal, Partner, GameChanger Law Advisors, on career experience in Sports Law

    Aditya Shamlal graduated from the National Law School India University in 2008. He has worked as an Associate at Amarchand Mangaldas and thereafter at the Chambers of Raj Panwani. He is at present a Senior Consultant at GameChanger Sports Ventures, a Partner at GameChanger Law Advisors and Managing Editor at gamechangerindia.com. In this interview he shares his insights on:

    • Choosing law as a profession
    • His time at NLSIU
    • Working at GameChanger, India
    • Experience in Sports Law

     

    How would you like introduce yourself to our readers who are mostly law aspirants, law students and young lawyers?

    I am a graduate of NLSIU, Bangalore, Batch of 2008. I have, during my 7 plus years since graduation, gained experience and worked in various practice areas within the legal industry, such as corporate and commercial law, environmental law, technology law, sports law and dispute resolution. I am an avid sports enthusiast and do regular research and writing within the sports law domain.

     

    Did you always want to be a lawyer? Did you have lawyers in your family or among relatives who motivated you to pursue law?

    As a child or even till I was 14-15 I never really thought much about a career and I don’t think I was particularly ambitious either. I was quite content with playing sports with my friends, playing video games and studying when required to. The first profession I seriously thought of was law.

    However, I did not have any lawyers in my family or even among distant relatives. No one in my family really knew what being a lawyer meant. I first discussed this with my family in 2001-2002 and their only idea of a lawyer (and consequently mine) was an advocate who practiced in the courts.

     

    What inclined you towards the field of legal education? Can you recall any specific incident that made you choose law as a career?

    My favourite subjects in school were English and Social Studies. Our civics course had chapters on the Constitution of India and that first got me interested in the ‘law’. By the time I was 14-15 years old, I had displayed a higher aptitude for English, History, Political Science and Economics over Math and Science. My school at that point of time did not offer arts courses as an option for the 12th Board examination. I was left only with the options of commerce or science and chose science to ‘keep my options open’.

    Sometime in 2002, my English teacher, who herself was an LLB graduate from Delhi University, suggested I consider law as a possible career option, as she felt I had an aptitude for it. This got me thinking about law seriously, and after doing a bit of research on the options available and the exams to be written, I decided to go ahead and write the legal entrance exams.

     

    How would you describe your experience as a student at NLSIU? How instrumental was NLSIU in shaping up your legal career?

    NLSIU was a great place to study law. While NLSIU, like every other institution in India, has its own problems and issues, those 5 years completely changed the direction of my life.

    I believe NLSIU has been extremely instrumental in shaping the legal career of almost all its graduates and the NLSIU alumni community is now understanding that, and consequently are more invested in the institution than before. NLSIU has churned out leaders in advocacy, law firms, companies, public policy institutions, academia, social work and quite recently in entrepreneurship as well. This would not have been possible without the institution providing a conducive atmosphere for learning. In addition, the institution has also provided us with other building blocks (such as exposure to so many different situations, the ability to build powerful networks, development of communication skills etc.) that have stood us in good stead way after our graduation. Therefore, there is much reason to be grateful to NLSIU!

     

    What were your areas of interest during your graduation? How did you go about developing expertise and knowledge in these areas?

    Economics, Company Law, Intellectual Property Law, International Law were the courses I enjoyed the most during college, I would be lying if I said I went around developing any sort of expertise in these areas during my college days, apart from during internships, which necessitated doing reasonably in-depth research with respect to real world circumstances and scenarios.

    Most of my extra-curricular activities were centred around sports whether it organisationally or in the form of participation. I played basketball briefly for the university team, and otherwise participated yearly in inter-batch sports activities like basketball, football, tennis and table tennis. I was also on the sports committee for a year.

     

    Tell us about the internships you pursued when at law school. What kind of work did you get to do during internships? Did law school equip you enough for internships?

    I did mostly litigation internships with NLSIU Alums in the Supreme Court and Delhi High Court for my first 3 years in law school. In my 4th and 5th years I did more corporate internships by interning at law firms and at banks. The education at law school, whether relevant or not specifically with respect to subject matter, in general armed me with the tools I needed to tackle any legal problem thrown at me during my internships.

     

    Right after graduation you joined as an Associate in the New Delhi offices of Amarchand Mangaldas. Tell our readers what was your work profile at this Law firm? What did an average day of work look like?

    I joined the erstwhile AMSS, Delhi in 2008 and worked there for a period of 2 years. As a fresh graduate in a large law firm it is sometimes tough to hit the ground running. Often you were put in a practice area you did not understand and it can be quite a challenge coming to grips with the major legal issues and nuances of a particular practice area.

    As a junior resource you work profile includes doing all of the ground work in the form of research; preparing first drafts of opinions, legal memos and agreements; conducting due diligence exercises; maintaining files, taking minutes at meetings, assisting your immediate reporting senior associate or your partner in whatever way possible. An average day in Amarchand is quite hectic, you are almost always occupied with most of the tasks I have already mentioned.

     

    Please tell our readers what was the procedure you followed for your applications to the big law firms?

    We had a robust recruitment committee during my years in law school, and the big law firms, both Indian and from the UK, were recruiting actively from NLSIU. We routed our job applications through our recruitment committee and some students had already landed jobs through pre-placement offers on the basis of internships.

     

    aditya-shamlal-2

    You have further worked in litigation for about 2 years. Kindly in brief share these experiences with our readers.

    After walking into NLSIU in 2003, joining a litigation practice in 2010, was my biggest eye opener. During my time at AMSS, I had the opportunity to work on all kinds of projects, but due to the way large corporate firms are structured, my client or ‘real world’ exposure was fairly limited and junior resources in large firms are generally sheltered and insulated from the big bad world.

    Juniors in Litigation, especially outside of the larger firms, have no such protection afforded to them. You are quite literally thrown into the deep end, whether it is drafting, or filing a suit or petition, sitting in client meetings and gleaning facts from your clients, sitting with senior lawyers and briefing them. In litigation, every one of your skills is tested thoroughly. Whether it is the hard legal skills of drafting or research or soft skills in managing client expectations and dealing with the registry, all your work and life experience will come into play when working in litigation and therefore, to me at least, it was one of the more challenging experiences of my life.

     

    Take our readers through this wonderful transition and journey you have experienced and kindly share your legal insights in sports issues.

    (Thereafter Aditya joined GameChanger Law Advisors as a Senior Consultant and as the Managing Editor of gamechangerindia.com and finally became Partner of GameChanger Law Advisors.)

    GameChanger Law Advisors (a legal advisory practice) and GameChanger Sports Ventures (a consultancy and online web magazine on the business of sport) was founded by Amrut Joshi (NLSIU, Batch of 2003) in the year 2011. I was always interested in sports law and sports businesses and most of my friends knew of that interest. I was put in touch with Amrut through a common friend and I wound up joining both the law firm and the consultancy in 2012. Initially, it was just the two of us in the law practice.

    GameChanger Sports Ventures was conceptualized as a sports business consulting firm to provide niche consulting services to the sports industry (such as sponsorship consulting, social media marketing, and other advisory services). While Amrut and I were responsible for shaping the content platform i.e. gamechangerindia.com, Prantik Mazumdar (who is a reputed digital marketing consultant in Singapore) was leading the execution of all consulting assignments.

    The idea was to bootstrap the sports consulting venture with revenues earned from a pure play law practice (i.e. from GameChanger Law Advisors) and from a social media consulting practice (in Prantik’s case). We straddled our corporate and commercial law practice with GameChanger Sports Ventures’ work for the first few years. However, due to Amrut’s and my legal experience, the law practice continued to get stronger (as a result of a strong startup ecosystem in both Bangalore and New Delhi), and we eventually pivoted to a model where we were exclusively focusing on pure-play legal services, which included assisting clients on Angel/VC investment transactions, technology licensing transactions, commercial contracting, sports law and employment law advisory All the while, we have continued to retain our focus on servicing clients in the startup and sports industries.

     

    Please tell our readers about GameChanger Law Advisors, its area of operations, services offered. What was the thought process behind joining GameChanger Law Advisors?

    GameChanger Law Advisors, is a boutique commercial law practice that is focused on servicing clients in the Startup, Sports and SME ecosystem. We currently have full-fledged offices in Bangalore and New Delhi. Our core areas of practice are:

    • Corporate and Commercial Law Advisory;
    • Employment Law Advisory;
    • Angel and Venture Capital Investments;
    • Mergers and Acquisitions;
    • A specialised practice supporting the Technology and Media industries; and
    • A specialised practice supporting the Sports Industry.

    The thought process behind joining GameChanger Law Advisors was that I wanted to work in industry areas in which I am interested. In addition, I had a unique opportunity to build a law practice that is modern, contextual and meritocratic in its outlook. The decision was borne out of that interest, it was an instinctive decision taken after weighing all the pros and cons of leaving an established practice area and attempting to develop and carve out a niche for ourselves.

    Company Law applies equally to any company irrespective of the industry it does business in. Our value addition as corporate and commercial legal counsel stems from the fact that we strive to obtain a deep understanding of our clients’ businesses and their commercial considerations and pinpoints, while rendering our services. The fact that Amrut and I were able to obtain a substantial amount of first-hand non-legal business experience also helps us when we share our experiences with Founders of startups now. As much as it is a cliché, we believe that we will only be successful and relevant to our clients if we provide advice that is practical and not merely by reading to them the plain letter of the law. .

     

    How did your interest grow towards sports law as this an area less travelled by corporate lawyers?

    I used to watch and play quite a few sports growing up. Watching and reading about sports like Football and Basketball got me thinking about how sports are a reasonably structured business in the West. Sports as a business in India was only unlocked in the early 90’s with lucrative TV deals for cricket broadcast and sky high endorsements for Sachin Tendulkar. Even as recently as the early part of the last decade, sports business in India was equated with just cricket. Since then however, the business of sport in India has evolved gradually. The last few years has seen the advent of leagues in sports such as Football, Kabaddi, Hockey, Badminton and Tennis. These leagues are now spawning a professional ecosystem, which comprises not just the players but also other stakeholders such as sponsors, franchise owners, broadcasters, infrastructure providers, coaches, medical staff, player agents etc.

    The growth of this ecosystem has also gradually increased the demand for specialised legal services to support different stakeholders in the sports industry. Sports Law, in our view, is “applied law”, and is a discipline that requires a good working knowledge of several other bodies of law such as contract law, constitutional law, administrative law, intellectual property law and company law. You cannot be a good sports lawyer unless you are a good lawyer!

     

    How is the work life at GameChanger Law Advisors and how do you maintain the work and family life balance?

    We strive hard to maintain a work-life balance at GameChanger. However being a young firm, with a growing client base, work-life balance is sometimes a luxury that we cannot afford. Those situations notwithstanding, we try to make sure that we don’t unnecessarily keep long hours. We try and make sure that the entire team gets a complete break on Saturdays and Sundays so that we are fresh and ready to deal with new challenges at the beginning of every week! Being a small team, we are also flexible with leave and holiday requests- the team tries its best to cover up for any person who is on leave/vacation, so that the vacation/leave can be used for its actually intended purpose! Having said that, if there are unavoidable situations at work, which require us to be available for clients at late hours or on weekends, our team members are game to accept such challenges too!

     

    You have various publications on sports law to your credit. Kindly share your experience with young readers and how your interest was drawn to this field.

    Publications are something which I didn’t really take to seriously in Law School. I didn’t attach to much importance to it at that point of time as I viewed it as an exercise which requires too much effort for no tangible result. Only once I started working did I realise the value in writing. Legal writing truly hones your theoretical skill and grasp over the subject at hand. In addition, it helps you to express your views, strive towards paying attention to detail and reach a target audience that is relevant to your practice. As a firm, GameChanger Law Advisors puts a lot of emphasis on legal writing, not just in the field of sports law, but also other areas of law such as corporate law, administrative law, employment law and contract law.

    If I have any advice for a young law student, it would be to use the opportunities during college life to get published as much as possible. If a subject interests you, write about various topics that are current and relevant to the legal debates of the day. It is an extremely handy skill-set to have and something which in my view will never go to waste.

     

    Do you have any plans to pursue higher education in the future specially in sports laws?

    No current plans to pursue higher education, in sports law or otherwise, though I would love to do a sports law related LL.M so I would not rule that out for the future if the opportunity ever presents itself.