Super Lawyer

Category: AOR

  • “Tax laws, though complex, ultimately test your reading and interpretational skills. If a lawyer learns tax law in earlier stage of their career then they can read and interpret any other laws with less effort.” – Anurag Soan, Advocate on Record at the Supreme Court of India.

    “Tax laws, though complex, ultimately test your reading and interpretational skills. If a lawyer learns tax law in earlier stage of their career then they can read and interpret any other laws with less effort.” – Anurag Soan, Advocate on Record at the Supreme Court of India.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Coming from a science background, what experiences led you to pursue a career in law and ultimately gain admission to Symbiosis Law School, Pune?

    In Tier II cities [like Bhopal], engineering and medical streams were the most sought after graduation qualifications. Going with the flow, I opted PCM as the stream in 11th & 12th standard and prepared extensively for competitive exams like IIT and AIEEE for two years. However, I realised that my core acumen is more suited for law where I can perform and achieve better as compared to hardcore technical streams like engineering. I found law to be attractive, expressive and more relatable. When I conveyed the same to my parents, they happily supported my decision and gave me free hand to do whatever I felt comfortable in life. My father, who himself was heading the Editorial department at a PSU and an avid reader, knew that the legal profession is a dignified and respectable profession, and motivated me to take the chance at law, though a less opted path at that time. On a lighter note, 3 Idiots was also released in 2009 and it gave a clear message that unless you are a Rancho, it is okay to go for course correction like Farhan or Rastogi, so I also had some kind of validation for taking a leap of faith. In 2010, I appeared for various Law Entrance Examinations and cleared Symbiosis Entrance Test [SET] with AIR 49. I happily joined Symbiosis Law School, Pune which was the best decision of my life.  

    How was your experience working at three tax law firms in New Delhi? What influenced your decision to specialize in Tax Law, and what early experiences helped deepen your understanding of the legal field?

    As a law student, I didn’t have many things under control such as choice of internships and specific teams where I wanted to intern. The foundation of one’s inclination towards a specific field of law is built through the work done during law school such as moots, research papers etc. 

    My influence towards the tax laws began when I participated and won the Nani Palkhivala Research Paper Competition in 2013 [3rd year of Law School] on ‘Advance Pricing Agreements’ [International Taxation]. At the prize distribution event [in GLC Mumbai] I had the privilege to briefly interact with Retd. Justice Sanklecha [Heading the tax roster bench of Bombay High Court at that time] and Sr Adv. Soli Dastur [a doyen in Bombay High Court tax circle] who motivated me to explore tax practice in future. However, I never had any exposure to tax laws at that time. Out of my 11 internships during law school, I then interned for more than 4 months in PDS Legal Bombay to understand the aspects of ‘direct tax litigation’ under Mr Nishant Thakkar and Ms. Jasmin Amalsadvala. During internships, I regularly attended proceedings before the Bombay High Court and observed many prominent seniors arguing the cases before the High Court. It was the exposure to Courtrooms during my internships that inspired me to become an arguing counsel. Though I got placed from College at a Company in Mumbai, I chose to go for tax litigation at Delhi.

    In 2015 when I joined my first Firm [Reina Legal], I started practicing indirect tax litigation, which had a much wider base than direct tax litigation as Indirect taxation at that time covered laws like VAT, Service Tax, Excise, Customs etc.. My mentor Mr. Gajendra Maheshwari trained me from scratch and gave me arguing opportunities in tax matters before the Tribunals and High Courts which is quite rare in the current era. It was a rocket start for a fresher who was dreaming to become a litigator one day. He taught me things like a younger brother and corrected my mistakes with compassion.

    When I joined Advaita Legal [best friend firm of KPMG] in 2017, I had the privilege to work with stalwarts of indirect taxes such as Mr. Sujit Ghosh [Now Sr. Adv, SC], Mr. A R Madhav Rao and Mr. Sudipta Bhattacharjee [now at Khaitan & Co.]. I learnt many new concepts while working under my seniors as to how a problem is approached and how a strategy is devised which brings a relief to the client. They were live databases of the jurisprudence on indirect taxation and taught me the foundation and history of each dispute. Tax disputes are as old as the laws are being in existence, thus the evolution of jurisprudence bears huge history. 

    Thereafter, I joined DMD Advocates [formerly Dutt and Menon] in 2019 where I joined the team of Mr. Tushar Jarwal. It was like working with Special Forces. One aim, no error was the policy. I was expected to prepare the matters within a limited time frame without compromising on quality. Working under Mr. Jarwal was more of a training of mind that every case has to be won at any cost and we have to give 200% to the case. The preparations for the matters were so thorough that there was no room for error, whatever may be the query which may come from the Hon’ble Bench or the opposite counsel. War scale preparation would be an appropriate description for the same. In my understanding, knowledge is something which one continues to gather and accumulates but the way of execution and getting results is something which changes your perception towards the work. This policy was applicable irrespective of worth of matter, whether it was a 10,000 crore tax dispute or a pro bono matter for a poor retired employee, mindset has to be the same. Discipline and devotion to work is something which I cherished in the team.

    In nutshell, the experiences in the three firms developed my overall mindset and personality, be it knowledge or quick execution. It led to the creation of an independent human being and a lawyer who was ready to face the challenges in the coming future.

    How briefing of Sr Counsels takes place in high stake tax matters? Having had the privilege to work with prominent senior counsels like Harish Salve, Arvind Datar, S Ganesh, N Venkatraman how did these experiences shape your approach to law? What valuable lessons have you learned from them that you apply in your own legal practice?

    The fate of any case being weak or strong is based on its drafting and presentation of correct facts and law. But the magic comes when it is being argued by arguing counsels using their experience, court craft and convincing skills. At the High Court and Supreme Court, the stakes are usually high, and the drafting counsels usually try to incorporate all the legal arguments for their cases. On the other hand, Senior Advocates know that which precise legal point will turn the tides in Clients favour. This is a skill acquired by years of practice and there is no shortcut to it. The entire art before the Court is to present the most complex situation in simple words so that each and every person in the courtroom can understand and relate to it. It is the crystal clear presentation, in the shortest possible time, by Senior Advocates that makes them so special.. 

    During briefing, the briefing counsels are expected to explain the entire case to the Seniors crisply so that they understand the issue and initiate their thought process. This involves preparation of comprehensive briefing notes and compilations for the Senior Advocates so that they can scan the relevant details and accurately present the case before the Court. 

    While working with some of the leading Senior Advocates I learnt that thinking out of the box is very relevant as the case may not be covered by any existing precedent and the Hon’ble Court is required to be persuaded in a manner which yields a positive outcome. The situation is more difficult when there are existing precedents but against us. In such situations, the burden is on us to distinguish and make out a case for the client. Further, I clearly learnt that every matter is build block by block and there is no jumping to the conclusion howsoever easy the issue may appear. The facts are analysed in detail and documented, the applicable laws are checked with amendments along with their legislative intent. Post this grounds and prayers are structured. If this foundation is strong then it becomes much easier to persuade the Hon’ble Court and results are better.      

    After gaining significant experience at various law firms, you chose to start your own practice. What prompted this decision, and as a first-generation lawyer, what challenges did you face in the early stages and how did you overcome them?

    Independent practice arms a lawyer to drive a matter according to his own acumen, understanding and experience. Unlike a Firm structure where every step is scrutinised at multiple levels, such is not the case in independent practice. The entire responsibility is on your shoulder to take the case to its logical end. I chose independent practice as it gave me the stage to argue before the courts on an independent basis. The sooner you start the easier it is. I am not over quoting by making a reference to a movie named “The Judge” wherein Robert Downy Junior [& other lawyers] used to feel nauseous before each court hearing due to the extreme pressure of courtroom. Such situations are real because the Hon’ble Judges may ask questions from anywhere in the brief and it is on the arguing counsel’s shoulder to satisfy the queries of the judge. The stage fear is real till you get used to it. It is a dive which every aspiring litigation lawyer is required to take and believe me there is never a perfect time for the same. 

    Having worked with different distinguished lawyers in the industry, I was able to understand the pattern and art of executing a case from drafting to final arguments. In my previous firms I had handled complex tax litigations which prepared me to face any challenge which may come in future.  

    In initial years of independent practice you are one man army who will have to handle the drafting, filing, arguing, client handling etc. on your own. This is time consuming but necessary also. Another hurdle is the infrastructure which is required to operate a full time litigation chamber. But this is the time when your good deeds pay back. Your previous interns, colleagues, relatives refer you cases. Independent practice is one man show but built on many peoples support and trust based on you by well-wishers. 

    For freshers and aspiring independent litigators, the most important aspect in litigation is to not get demotivated and keep struggling. There will be days with no work but that time can be utilised in going to courts and networking. The Internet is free, one can write articles and keep his/her presence alive. The entire game of litigation is to never leave the game. There will be financial hit initially but if that period is crossed then you will realise that it is the best decision of life.

    You successfully cleared the AOR exam in December 2022 on your first attempt, after studying a broad range of laws beyond tax. How does being an AOR impact your legal practice, and can you share some tips or tricks that you employed for clearing the exam for our readers?

    Before preparing for the AOR examination, taxation law was my lifeline and core expertise. There was never any need to understand any other procedural laws like CPC or CRPC as Tax Adjudication system have their own hierarchy and own dispute resolution system. For example, adjudication starts with Commissioner, against which appeal goes to Commissioner (Appeals), followed by appeal in Tax tribunals and then to High Court and Supreme Court. The tax laws are code in itself and there is hardly any requirement to make reference outside such statutes.

    On the other hand, the AOR examination is all about knowing the powers and limits of the Supreme Court. Such knowledge or procedure is an outcome of the Constitution, Supreme Court Rules, 2013 and the judicial precedents. The judicial precedents can be from any stream of law, for example a famous matrimonial disputes case laid down the jurisprudence on Review and Curative jurisdiction of Supreme Court [Rupa Ashok Hurra v Ashok Hurra]. A case of sexual offence on social worker, led to the laying down of guidelines for sexual harassment by Supreme Court expanding the scope of judicial activism [Vishakha v State of Rajasthan]. A case on Taxation on denatured alcohol led to the expansion of doctrine of prospective overruling [Synthetics and Chemicals v State of UP].

    It is immaterial as to which area of law one had specialised before appearing for the AOR exam. One needs to know everything from the perspective of working for the Supreme Court. Bare minimum knowledge of each subject is necessary if one is aiming to appear for the AOR exam.  

    There are two cheat codes which I followed during my examination preparation as I only had three weeks to prepare due to my hectic schedule at the office. First, pattern of last five year question papers. And Second, lectures conducted by SC Registry and SCAORA. If one blindly follows these two methods then it is easy to decipher as to what are the expectations of the examination body. Since I had considerable experience in drafting SLPs, Writs before the Supreme Court during my tenure at previous firms, the drafting examination paper was not a big challenge.  

    After becoming an AOR, having read/acquainted with the major/relevant laws, I got the confidence to take up any matter and execute the same as the AOR examination preparation clears up your core concepts and builds your ability to think on first principles. Though, legal field is an ocean in itself, clearing the AOR exam gives a sense of confidence and completion. 

    Can you share one of the most fascinating cases you’ve worked on so far? How did you prepare for such a complex and intriguing case?

    I have majorly represented companies before the High Courts and Supreme Court in tax matters. In such cases, human emotions are not involved and ultimately the companies are benefitted or take a hit as a ‘corporate entity’. However, when you deal with cases involving life and liberty of an individual, then the real heat is involved. A win or a loss strikes you personally as you tend to feel elated when the outcome is positive or you tend to feel guilty/sad when the outcome is negative. These emotions are very personal and impacts the mindset of a lawyer. 

    I recently did a pro bono case, wherein my house maid informed that her neighbour’s new born daughter is missing after being forcibly taken from her parent’s custody. The parents were labourers and uneducated and had been trapped in a child trafficking racket/syndicate. Neither the police nor any NGO was ready to provide any assistance to the poor parents. Everyone had a perception that parents are part of the racket and are equally guilty. Until I met the parents, I was also reluctant to take this case as my conscience was not allowing me to defend someone who is remotely involved in any form of child trafficking. However, when I met the parents, my views changed and I deciphered that it was a case not only involving a child trafficking racket but also a case of police brutality/custodial torture on parents who were victims in true sense. We immediately moved a habeas corpus petition before the Hon’ble High Court and got the matter listed on the same day. Subsequently, the 14 day old baby was traced and handed over to the parents. Parents were also given protection from police subject to their participation in the investigation. I learnt my lesson that as a lawyer having a pre conceived notion is not appropriate and one must perform his/her duty to defend its client. For me it was an emotional moment when I saw the baby girl being rescued who could not have survived without her mother. Sometimes the profession gives you the chance to become  Sunny Deol [of Damini Movie] and you should never think twice to accept such a role. To rise and fight for the weak is what about legal profession is for.     

    With continuous reforms in Indian Taxation laws, how do you see the landscape evolving? How do you stay informed about the latest trends, particularly in taxation, and can you recommend any resources for our readers?

    The concept of tax is simple. The government needs money to run the country. Tax statutes keep on evolving to tax such transactions which involve some sense of commerce or business. On the other hand, the assessee or the tax payer will always try to claim a benefit or rebate or deduction on such taxes. This fight is never ending. For example when crypto currencies or online gaming were introduced in the country the tax departments were quick enough to issue notices to levy GST on such transactions. It is at this point when the lawyers come into picture and question the procedures or the levy itself in light of the constitution and the applicable statute. Writs are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution to contest such demands and this cycle goes on. A tax lawyer is hired for the fact that the client may be saved from paying taxes but in accordance of the law and within legal mandates.

    There are dedicated portals like taxsutra, taxmann, taxmanagementindia etc. which keep on sending the updates on a daily basis. When you are in practice, one can easily relate as to which update is relevant with respect to his/her brief. Also, these portals publish articles by industry professionals which keeps you updated about recent disputes and litigation.

    Tax Law is a specialized field. What advice would you give to young, aspiring lawyers who wish to pursue a career in taxation?

    Tax laws, though complex, ultimately test your reading and interpretational skills. Generally speaking, if a lawyer learns tax law in earlier stage of their career then he/she can read and interpret any other laws with less effort. For example when you have already completed a marathon then you will never find a 5K or 10K run a challenge. When you have already tackled the most complex statute you will find some ease in interpreting the other laws.

    Some of the legendary lawyers in the history of Indian Legal System were/are primarily from tax background, such as Nani Palhivala, Harish Salve, Arvind Datar. 

    Balancing a demanding legal career with personal life can be challenging. How do you manage to maintain a healthy work-life balance while meeting the demands of your profession?

    In the beginning of career, I used to work like a frontline soldier. I hardly cared about my health and routine and gave preference to myself only on Saturday and Sundays which were off days in Court. Those days also went in partying or meeting friends.  However, after 6-7 years, this disbalance showed impact on health with weight gain and also high levels of stress and cholesterol. This reduced overall efficiency and had a deep impact on mind. The main issue with beginning any exercise is that if your mind is cluttered or stressed you will find exercising as a burden. Therefore, the first step I took was to reorganise my thought process and then started mild exercises at home. COVID 19 was an eye opener and made me think that if I am not exercising still, being at home then it is entirely my lack of motivation as I was anyway saving 2-3 hours of travelling in lockdown. Therefore, I gradually started challenging myself and started doing pushups. Began with 2-3 in a day to 100 pushups in a day. I started to monitor my heart using a smartwatch and started full-fledged gym. Now this has become a routine. Half of the day is already won when you achieve that adrenaline rush at Gym in the morning. I also play badminton on weekends which is an amazing way to hangout with friends and release stress. 

    However, sometimes when there are back to back hearings in Court across the week, this routine has to be moulded and I try to compensate by lifting some extra kilos on the weekends. On a lighter note, there are many seniors in the Supreme Court who run from court to court faster than the much younger generation. If you cannot keep up your pace with them at a younger age then it is high time to introspect your health.

    Get in touch with ANURAG SOAN –

  • “Anyone who seeks to build a career in Law must learn to master time management, particularly in a dynamic field such as litigation.” – Hiresh Choudhary, Advocate on Record at Supreme Court of India and Partner at C&S Law Chambers.

    “Anyone who seeks to build a career in Law must learn to master time management, particularly in a dynamic field such as litigation.” – Hiresh Choudhary, Advocate on Record at Supreme Court of India and Partner at C&S Law Chambers.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    What initially inspired you to pursue a career in law, and what factors influenced your decision to enrol at the National Law Institute University in Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh?

    When I decided to pursue a career in law, my understanding of the legal profession was limited to what happens in courtrooms. The idea of litigation seemed quite appealing to me. While I have since discovered a number of other facets of the legal profession, I remain enamoured with a disputes oriented practice. 

    The decision to enrol at NLIU Bhopal was quite an easy one. When I was applying to law schools, it was ranked in the top five universities in the country. They also had an excellent faculty and a vast alumni network. 

    After 3 years of practice, what motivated you to pursue an LL.M. at Columbia Law School? Additionally, could you elaborate on the admission process, particularly for young aspirants in the field of law?

    While an undergraduate program provides a broad survey of the various areas of law, a postgraduate degree such as the LLM enables one to dive deeper into specific areas and even undertake a comparative analysis. Practising for a couple of years before applying to universities allowed me the opportunity to narrow down my areas of interest through a process of elimination. I was keen to attend Columbia Law School because of its flexible approach to its curriculum. Students get complete freedom to choose any of the courses offered by the Law School and even other schools at the University. Given my interests in arbitration law, I was also quite keen to take the International Commercial Arbitration course taught by the legendary professor George Bermann. 

    From what I understand, most law schools look for candidates who have a clear vision of their academic and professional goals and are able to describe exactly how the LLM can help them achieve those goals. It also helps to have a balanced CV that can demonstrate a mix of academic excellence, extra-curricular interests and work experience. 

    Having worked with a prestigious law firm for three years before pursuing your Masters, how did this experience contribute to your professional development and shape the trajectory of your legal career?

    In my opinion, the first few years of practice greatly influence your career trajectory. This is the time when you develop a work ethic which inevitably tends to mirror that of your seniors. I spent three years at Wadhwa Law Chambers in the team led by Mr. Anirudh Wadhwa, who has been a great mentor to me. Working in his team exposed me to a wide range of cases and provided ample opportunities to take independent charge of cases. He also encouraged me to apply for the LLM. It is a testament to our rigorous professional training that all my colleagues from WLC continue to excel in different roles, most of whom have now set up successful independent practices. I still enjoy a great relationship with Mr. Anirudh Wadhwa and we often brief him as counsel in several cases. 

    In 2021, after gaining vast experience you decided to establish your own practice. What inspired you to take this step, and what were the initial challenges you faced when setting up your own legal practice?

    Starting my own practice was always part of the plan, but timing a major decision such as this is quite tricky. Everyone has different ideas about it. I set up C&S Law Chambers with Surbhi Sharma when we felt confident in our ability to effectively advise clients without supervision. 

    It has been rewarding and challenging in equal measures. On the work front, the challenges were along expected lines. But we were also confronted with unexpected challenges across the other dimensions of running a practice, such as managing client relations, building a team, setting up office infrastructure, hiring staff, etc. We are constantly learning and finding ways to navigate such challenges. 

    Clearing the Advocate on Record (AOR) examination is a remarkable accomplishment. What aspects of the AOR exam did you find most challenging, and what steps did you take to successfully prepare for this prestigious examination?

    The AOR exam is considered challenging for a couple of different reasons. First, you become eligible for it only after 5 years of practice. This means that you are now entering that phase in your career where you are expected to take independent responsibility for the cases you are working on, whether or not you run your own practice. Finding the time to study for the exam becomes the primary challenge. The second challenge is that the exam is a handwritten one. This can seem insignificant but plays a huge role. After spending years mastering typing speed and accuracy, one has to now go back to writing by hand. Even the petitions for the drafting exam have to be written by hand. It took a lot of practice to get used to writing by hand while maintaining speed and legibility. I started preparing for the exam around 2 months in advance and whenever possible, tried to spend a couple of hours studying for the exam in the evening after completing the work for the day. 

    You have represented parties in both international and domestic arbitration. Could you provide an example of a particularly complex arbitration case under ICC or VIAC rules? What was your role in the process, and what were the key challenges you faced in navigating international arbitration laws?

    I can discuss a recent case where we secured a favourable award for an Indian company against a Vietnamese company in a Vietnam seated arbitration. This was a case for recovery of certain unpaid dues arising out of a contract for supply of equipment for a hydropower plant. Since the agreement was governed by Vietnamese law, we had to first engage a Vietnamese firm to represent the client. We also had to spend a fair amount of time trying to understand the structure of Vietnamese commercial law and the remedies available to parties so as to assist the client in taking the right call. 

    We advised the client to institute arbitration proceedings under the arbitration rules of the Vietnam International Arbitration Centre (VIAC). Interestingly, the VIAC Rules permit the parties to invite witnesses to attend the hearing and even submit fresh documents or evidence during the final hearing. During a marathon final hearing that went on for 11 hours from 7 AM (IST) to 6 PM, the Respondent introduced several fresh factual arguments in an attempt to suggest that the equipment supplied by my client was failed to meet the technical specifications. Rather than seeking time to respond, we took the collective call to address these new submissions in the same hearing. I had to then act as a real-time link between the client’s team in India and the Vietnamese lawyers who were addressing the Tribunal. We were able to work with the client to provide point wise response to all the fresh submissions – all within the 2 hour lunch recess. Thankfully, the Tribunal passed the award in our favour. 

    Now we are navigating the fresh challenges that arise with enforcement of the award. I think the key take away is that each case comes with its own unique challenges and there are no easy cases. But that is what makes our work so engaging. 

    You were involved in challenging the constitutionality of the Haryana State Employment of Local Candidates Act, 2020. How did you approach preparing for such a challenging case, and what strategies led to a favourable outcome? 

    It would not be proper to go into the merits of this case since an SLP is still pending before the Hon’ble Supreme Court. I can only discuss my involvement in the case, which was one of the best learning experiences of my career so far. 

    We were representing one of the two main petitioners (both associations of industries in different districts of Haryana) who had challenged the Act before the Hon’ble Punjab and Haryana High Court. Working on cases such as this is always a team effort. We must credit the client for taking a bold decision and promptly providing us with the necessary instructions and supporting documents. At the time of drafting the Petition, we had to do a broad review of all the possible arguments and incorporate them as grounds of challenge. Then we worked with our colleagues practising in Chandigarh, who advised us on the applicable procedures and helped us in briefing the senior advocate. Finally, the most important role was that of the senior advocate, Mr. Akshay Bhan. He quickly grasped the case and was excellent in his arguments. He also guided our research in the right direction and we learned a lot working with him. 

    Given the demanding nature of your practice, how do you manage to maintain a balance between your professional responsibilities and personal life?

    I like to limit the number of hours that I work in a given day, since there is a noticeable dip in my productivity beyond that. Of course, there are situations of extreme urgency where we need to file applications seeking interim relief and time is of the essence. But those situations are exceptions rather than the rule. 

    It also helps that we run a digital office with little to no requirement for any physical documents. There is no need to stay in the office, even where urgent work requires putting in a few extra hours. I can always go home for the day, spend some time with my family, reset mentally and then continue my work from where I left it. I advise our associates to follow a similar approach to the extent possible. 

    What advice would you offer to law students aspiring to build a successful career in law? Are there any specific resources, tools, or practices you regularly rely on when navigating the complexities of the legal profession?

    Anyone who seeks to build a career in law must learn to master time management, particularly in a dynamic field such as litigation. Your plan to work on a given task is always in tension with time spent in courts, the timelines imposed by courts and tribunals in different cases, response time of clients, instructions of senior advocates and the case load of your own team members. You have to constantly reassess what requires your immediate attention and how much time you can afford to spend on a given task. I like to plan all the work that needs to be done for a given month, then split the tasks into different weeks and take a call on a daily basis as to what requires immediate attention on a given day. This allows sufficient flexibility to work on any urgent tasks that may come up while still meeting my weekly goals.

    Law school certainly provides a flavour of this time management dilemma through the challenge of juggling your time between course readings and other activities such as competitions, sports, clubs, etc. One can get better at time management by thinking more intentionally about it and testing out different strategies. 

    Get in touch with Hiresh Choudhary –

  • “For me, the beauty of being a lawyer lies in the constant pursuit of excellence and the privilege of contributing to a profession that holds justice at its core.” – Advocate on Record Supreme Court of India and Founding Partner at ARCAS LAW.IN.

    “For me, the beauty of being a lawyer lies in the constant pursuit of excellence and the privilege of contributing to a profession that holds justice at its core.” – Advocate on Record Supreme Court of India and Founding Partner at ARCAS LAW.IN.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Your extensive experience and diverse areas of practice are highly admirable. What motivated you to choose a career in law, and what factors influenced your decision to pursue this profession?

    Choosing a career in law was a decision driven by both inspiration and a deep sense of purpose. Over the years, my journey in this profession has only deepened my appreciation for its intellectual rigor and dynamic nature. The legal field is an ever-evolving landscape, and even after a decade of practice, I find myself constantly learning and adapting. Whether it’s interpreting new statutes, analysing evolving precedents, or crafting arguments, the law demands a mindset that embraces lifelong growth and curiosity.

    What continues to motivate me is the unparalleled opportunity to think critically, solve complex problems, and make a meaningful impact on society. The challenges posed by each case remind me of the importance of staying engaged, asking questions, and honing my skills. This profession is not just about mastering the law but about continuously striving to better understand its nuances and applications in a changing world. For me, the beauty of being a lawyer lies in the constant pursuit of excellence and the privilege of contributing to a profession that holds justice at its core.

    After completing your Law degree, what led you to choose the University of Glasgow for your LL.M. in Intellectual Property and Digital Economy? What aspects of this specialization interested you, and how did the university’s teaching approach stand out to you?

    After completing my 5 year course from Institute of Law, Nirma University, I started practising before the Rajasthan High Court and gained some valuable experience. It was during this time that I realised that it was the right time for me to devote some additional time towards academics. Since Intellectual Property was my major subject in law school and I had developed a peculiar interest in it I decided to look for universities offering post graduate degree course in this subject. A few major considerations for me while deciding the university were firstly of course the curriculum and the professors but as I started with my list of universities, apart from the above the next few considerations which came were the cost of living and the expenses to be incurred apart from the tuition fee. While I got offers from University of Manchester, Edinburgh and Warwick, I finally selected the University of Glasgow for it having the most advanced course module which dealt with Intellectual Property in Digital Economy. My course included subjects of brand protection, moral rights in copyright which was also the subject of my thesis at the University. 

    As far as the teaching pedagogy of the University of Glasgow I should admit that I was literally taken aback in the initial weeks as the classrooms were more of discussions where students coming from different backgrounds used to share their insights and their understanding of the subjects. The professors used to share articles and course materials beforehand and the classes usually happened in a manner where the floor was left open for discussion on the understanding of the subject and for sharing the analysis of the material. A significant part of the discussions in the class was having students from different backgrounds where they would shed light on the laws as in their respective countries. I had the privilege of discussing the Indian IP laws and I should say that some of our judgments particularly on fair use of copyrighted material specially course books and patents applications for generic medicine were quite a hit amongst the class. I believe the type of teaching approach followed at the University was absolutely outstanding as in most of the discussions there were no wrong answers, just observations, analysis and critiques by students which helps in gaining a new perspective, something which cannot be done if the classes are merely discussing the views of the authors. 

    As you were starting your career, what were some key experiences that served as valuable learning moments and have stayed with you throughout your journey?

    When I had just begun my practise, a very kind senior of mine told me that as a lawyer, its your duty towards the client as well as the Court that you should always be thoroughly prepared, you should know the facts of the case, the applicable substantive and procedural laws and the relevant judgments on the subject. This commitment to diligence has been my guiding principle. One of the most valuable lessons I’ve gained is that no two cases are alike, and each case presents an opportunity to learn and grow. Whether it’s through direct mentorship, observing senior counsel in court, or engaging in discussions with colleagues, every experience has contributed to honing my legal acumen.

    These experiences, coupled with the guidance from mentors, have shaped the lawyer I am today, and I continue to carry them with me in every matter I handle.

    What inspired you to establish your own practice, Arcas Law? What were some of the early challenges you faced, and how did you overcome them?

    This is something I believe every first generation lawyer dreams of the moment they enter the profession. I have been blessed to have worked with some of the most brilliant minds in this profession who were kind enough to not just help me grow but also taught me the nuances of practice of law and more than anything the art of advocacy. I truly and most humbly believe that having a good senior by your side is the single most important thing in this profession. There are numerous occasions where you just want someone to guide you to the right direction and that is what inspired me. I have been closely associated with people who I have seen working very hard in established law offices and firms and I have seen them set up their own offices and that just lit a spark in me that I too wanted to follow their path. Now that I think of it, I just wanted to be like them because I admired them so much. 

    Initially, yes there are few things which need attention and once you make the switch from being in an office to having your own office it is only then that you figure them out. I was lucky that my colleagues and staff were very accommodative and adjusted well to the change. From day one in our office we had a few ground rules which I carried forward from my previous office where the work is aptly delegated and divided amongst the staff, we have regular meetings to discuss the ongoing work and to also discuss about the functioning in the office, and all of which helps in streamlining and getting work done at the right pace. 

    With your extensive experience as an AOR before the Supreme Court of India and representing high-profile clients such as Mahindra & Mahindra and ICICI Bank, is there one case that particularly stands out as memorable? If so, could you share your experience dealing with that case and how you prepared for it, with our readers?

    I have always believed that no matter is ever big or small and that every case or brief deserves the same amount of respect and dedication. As a matter of practise at our office we always strive to strike a balance between the type of cases that we take up, so on one hand while we are dealing with matters relating to commercial interest of companies and other matters involving substantial transactions, on the other hand we also have matters which we take up on pro -bono basis and  more often than not that it is the latter type which always stands out for me in terms of being memorable. 

    I can tell you about a few recent ones that our office dealt with and I am very happy to share that in one of them the Hon’ble Supreme Court settled the law with respect to the offense of abetment vis-à-vis the offense of bigamy. In this matter we were appearing for the wife whose husband allegedly got married for the second time. However, the Hon’ble High Court allowing the petition filed by the relatives of the second wife held that bigamy is not an offense of wider amplitude and thus there can be no question of its abetment and allowed the Petition thereby setting aside the summoning order. Interestingly, the Petitioner in this case first approached the Legal Services Committee which rejected her case saying that there are no grounds to interfere with the judgment of the High Court as it is on sound principles of law. 

    When the Petitioner approached us we ran through the papers and found that the observations of the High Court were completely uncalled for. We decided to take up the case pro bono and during its preparation our entire office was busy collating judgments and going through commentaries on abetment and bigamy and once we were done we had judgments ranging from 1902 to 2024 covering the subject. We argued our case before the Hon’ble Apex Court and the Bench of the Hon’ble Chief Justice was pleased to note that the observations of the High Court on bigamy were in teeth of the judgments of this Court and further also set the principle that the offense of abetment to bigamy is applicable and can be imposed when conditions are met. 

    Similarly we had another case where we were appearing pro bono for a deaf and mute person and our challenge was that the disability of the person cannot be used as a ground to deny him his basic rights. In order to research for the same we went through a lot of literature on sign language and even the different types of symbols & signs and also learnt how the same sign used can have different meanings as this sign language varies in regional languages. I would say it is always the preparation of these cases that is the most memorable part for me.

    Given your specialization in Intellectual Property law and the growth of e-commerce and technology-driven businesses in India, how do you envision the future of intellectual property protection in the digital economy?

    Every industry player, be it in any kind of industry, wants to make sure that their product or service be associated with their name or mark or their brand and that the customer should not come looking for the service or the product but should come for the name. This is where the role of intellectual property comes in. It is a very vast subject and the implications it can have on one’s business are huge.

    The digital economy is characterised by its global outreach which involves innovations at a rapid pace and places huge reliance on intangible assets. Thus, having a robust and strong IP presence is at the heart of every business strategy. 

    In this dynamic environment, the most important thing that people or consumers look for is authenticity and trust. Intellectual property is literally the backbone of these attributes as it creates a foundation that allows business to distinguish themselves in this crowded digital marketplace. 

    A strong mark creates that bridge of trust between a business and its consumers which is more relevant than ever in the e-commerce era and technology driven sectors as the physical interaction with the product is almost zero and the decision hinges particularly on the reputation and goodwill associated with the brand. 

    But when we talk of the future of IP in this digital economy it hinges on and is intrinsically tied to the ability of stakeholders to adapt to new challenges. On one side we have the global reach of the digital marketplace but we also need to keep an eye on the amplified risks associated with IP infringement in the digital space and as we witness the evolution of AI, there is no dearth of methods that can be used to exploit the gaps in IP protection. I would say that any business that takes Intellectual property as a strategic asset will not only be in a position to safeguard its innovations but will also be able to cement its place in the digital economy. 

    In your experience with real estate law, what do you believe is the biggest challenge facing developers and homeowners in India today?

    I think the aspiration of owning a home contributed a lot towards the development of real estate laws. In fact there was a time when everyday the newspapers used to be filled with advertisements of new housing and commercial projects coming up which would boast about their spacious apartments, extra facilities like gyms, spas, and landscaped gardens. Homebuyers and investors, lured by these promises, poured significant resources into these projects, often viewing them as secure and high-yielding investments.

    However, the real estate market is not immune to macroeconomic factors. Over time, rising inflation, increasing construction costs, and growing interest rates created a ripple effect that significantly impacted the financial ecosystem of this sector. One of the most critical challenges that emerged was the cyclical nature of defaults. A delay or default in payments by homebuyers often strained the liquidity of developers, causing them to default on their financial obligations, including project completion. Conversely, when developers failed to deliver on time, homebuyers faced financial distress, particularly those servicing home loans. 

    The result is a pervasive sense of mistrust and financial instability, which has triggered a flood of legal disputes between developers and homeowners and the same has thus manifested across various legal forums like consumer commissions, RERA and even NCLT. 

    A key challenge that becomes a major issue in the real estate sector is the financial interdependence of buyers and developers. Sometimes delays in payment can cause a domino effect and the entire project suffers. Additionally this sector is also exposed to certain broader economic and policy issues such as land acquisition, inflation, market fluctuation which add to the complexity. 

    Another key challenge for developers is navigating the different regulatory frameworks. While legislations such as the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA) aim to ensure transparency and accountability, compliance can be burdensome, particularly for smaller developers. On the other hand, homeowners often face the challenge of enforcing their rights in the face of delays, substandard construction, or outright abandonment of projects. For many, the legal process can be daunting, time-consuming, and financially draining.

    What advice would you offer to young lawyers who aspire to have a successful career like you as an AOR? How can they best prepare for success in these fields, and what challenges should they anticipate?

    The transition from law school to practice can be very overwhelming. Early in the career, lawyers may often feel that the financial returns are not to be commensurate with the effort that is being put in. To all the young lawyers and students reading this I would say patience and perseverance are very crucial in this phase. Litigation demands unwavering commitment, discipline and adaptability. A litigation office often operates like a fire brigade where unexpected challenges arise and immediate action is required. Litigation often involves juggling multiple cases with overlapping deadlines. Time management and prioritization are critical. 

    As an AOR, drafting pleadings and petitions is a significant part of your role. Meticulous research and clear, concise drafting can make or break a case. Cultivate the habit of reading judgments critically and understanding the reasoning behind them. At the same time, young lawyers need to work hard to familiarise themselves with the emerging technologies and be savvy with legal research platforms, case management software, e-filing systems, and virtual court proceedings. 

    To build a successful career as an AOR or as a lawyer preparation and persistence are key. While preparation will always remain first, the art of presentation is as important. Pay attention to how senior lawyers argue their cases in court. Learn the art of persuasion, and work on your confidence and communication skills. 

    Given the demands of your profession, how do you manage to unwind and maintain a healthy work-life balance?

    The profession has its perks. Many would agree that as lawyers, we are fortunate to have the benefit of scheduled vacations—once during the summer, once in the winter, and a handful of breaks throughout the year. While our work philosophy is firmly grounded in the “work comes first” principle, we are also mindful of the challenges posed by such a demanding profession. Balancing personal well-being alongside professional responsibilities is essential.

    For me personally, travel plays a significant role in unwinding and recharging. I’ve discovered that I am more of a “lazy traveller,” someone who eagerly looks forward to new destinations but ends up spending most of the vacation relaxing, sleeping, and taking it slow. This approach allows me to truly disconnect from the pressures of work and focus on re-energizing myself. Whether it’s exploring a new place or simply enjoying a change of scenery, taking time off helps me return to my practice with a renewed sense of purpose and clarity.

    Get in touch with Arpit Gupta –

  • “What truly drew me to the field of Law was its dynamic nature and the intellectual challenge of navigating intricate commercial disputes.” – Prateek Mishra, Advocate-on-Record at Supreme Court of India and Principal at EP Advocates.

    “What truly drew me to the field of Law was its dynamic nature and the intellectual challenge of navigating intricate commercial disputes.” – Prateek Mishra, Advocate-on-Record at Supreme Court of India and Principal at EP Advocates.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    With over 10 years of experience in commercial litigation and arbitration, what initially inspired you to pursue a career in law, and how has your professional journey evolved over time?

    My parents were not from a legal background, and as such, the inspiration to take up law did not come from my immediate environment. However, during my formative years, I found that my acquaintances in the legal profession always displayed an unwavering sense of purpose. I also remember getting inspired by the views that Mr. Rajeev Dhavan, Senior Advocate, would express on public issues, all rooted in constitutional values, and without any fear of the popular opinion. This, coupled with a deep disinclination towards pursuing a career in engineering, made law a natural choice.

    During my time at NLIU Bhopal, I developed a particular interest in international arbitration, which is reflected in my dissertation on jurisdictional aspects of international investment arbitration. What truly drew me to this field was its dynamic nature and the intellectual challenge of navigating intricate commercial disputes.

    Over the years, my practice has evolved from focusing purely on arbitration to encompassing a broader spectrum of dispute resolution. My experience at Luthra & Luthra helped shape my approach to complex commercial litigation. When we started EP Advocates in 2020, I focused greatly on disputes involving insurance law and insolvency, which is something I had already extensively undertaken in the past as well. Now, my role as an Advocate-on-Record at the Supreme Court has added another dimension to that practice. The evolution has been organic, driven by a desire to provide comprehensive dispute resolution services to clients.

    You completed your LLM at Queen Mary University of London, specializing in International Commercial Arbitration among other areas, what drew you to this specialization, and how was your experience at the university?

    My choice to pursue an LLM at Queen Mary was deliberate, given its renowned reputation in international arbitration. QMUL and MIDS Geneva are the only programmes that I had applied for. The program’s focus on comparative and international dispute resolution perfectly aligned with my academic interests and professional aspirations. I particularly valued the exposure to diverse perspectives, studying under leading practitioners and scholars in the field. The experience was transformative – I graduated with distinction in my dissertation on ‘The Relevance of Local Remedies in ICSID arbitration,’ and the program’s practical approach to complex international disputes has significantly influenced my practice. The modules provided insights that I apply to this day.

    With respect to your current focus, could you share some of the most challenging disputes you’ve encountered and how you managed the complexities of those cases?

    Some of the recent disputes, where we have prevailed include: (i) in insolvency, we were able to negotiate a settlement for certain homebuyers whose rights had been extinguished by the Resolution Plan, when the matter was pending before the Supreme Court – the challenge was that the Resolution Plan had already been approved by the NCLT and NCLAT; and 

    (ii) in insurance, before an arbitral tribunal, we were able to successfully defend an insurance company against a commercial entity on the quantum of claims that had to be paid – the challenge for our team was more with respect to adopting the best strategy for our arguments, given that the case involved various issues of ‘industry practice’ and voluminous documentation.

    In these cases, and even otherwise, I have found that one does not have to ‘manage’ complexities, if they are avoided. I believe complexities can be avoided if:

    1. you can anticipate and discuss with your clients, the difficulties in their case, and explore the possible arguments and solutions;
    2. simplify the case, present facts and arguments in a manner that is holistic but concise, and do not present a complicated picture without a solution;
    3. stick to first principles throughout the case and justify your arguments and pleadings using those principles.

    Having worked with a leading law firm for over six years before establishing your own practice, what were some key lessons learned early in your career, and what motivated you to start your own firm?

    My six years at L&L Partners were instrumental in shaping my understanding of dispute resolution and law practice. Leading a young disputes team at the Mumbai office taught me invaluable lessons about team management, client relationships, and strategic dispute resolution. One key lesson was the importance of understanding not just the legal aspects, but also the commercial implications of every dispute for the client. The decision to establish my own practice stemmed from a desire to provide a more personalized service to clients. The experience of independently handling major mandates under the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code and leading significant arbitrations in areas of construction law gave me the confidence to take this step.

    What were some of the initial challenges you faced while founding your practice at EP Advocates, and how did you navigate them?

    Starting EP Advocates in 2020 came with its unique set of challenges. The primary challenge was establishing a new practice during the pandemic, which required adapting to remote working while maintaining the highest standards of legal service. We focused on building a lean, technology-driven practice that could deliver sophisticated legal solutions efficiently.

    Another significant challenge was transitioning from a large law firm setup to building systems and processes from scratch. However, this also presented an opportunity to implement modern practice management techniques and create a more agile organization. Within two years, we successfully built a strong client base including major entities like National Insurance Company Limited, Dish TV India Limited, BSNL, and NTPC Limited, validating our business model and approach.

    Given that you are an Advocate-on-Record before the Supreme Court of India, could you share with us some significant cases ?

    Being qualified as an Advocate-on-Record has been a significant milestone. Even prior to becoming an AOR, I was a part of teams that handled significant arbitration-related cases. One notable matter involved advising the Petitioner on issues relating to appointment of arbitrators given the inter-connected nature of several agreements, each of which had a separate arbitration clause. The judgment in that case is now a leading decision on appointment of arbitrators in international arbitrations under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act.

    Recent cases, as an Advocate-on-Record, have involved representing a leading bank in Special Leave Petitions (SLPs) filed by debtors challenging eventual court-ordered auction of properties. With respect to insolvency, I recently had the privilege of representing one of the impleadment parties in a Civil Appeal titled Ayush Agarwal v. Jaypee Infratech Limited & Others, where the Supreme Court’s intervention ensured that rights of certain active homebuyers did not get extinguished by a Resolution Plan.

    You have represented major clients in complex disputes. What are some unique legal challenges faced during long-drawn litigation, and how do you help navigate these?

    Long-drawn litigation presents multiple challenges, particularly in maintaining consistency in approach while adapting to evolving circumstances. One key challenge has been managing the intersection of public policy considerations with commercial interests.

    We help clients navigate these challenges through:

    1. regular strategic reviews and updates on regulatory changes;
    2. proactive risk assessment and mitigation strategies;
    3. maintaining clear communication channels.

    For instance, in insurance matters, we’ve developed specialized approaches for handling claims under various policies, from Standard Fire & Special Perils to Bankers’ Indemnity Policies, always keeping in mind the evolving regulatory landscape.

    What advice would you give to law students or young professionals aspiring to build a career in areas of insurance or insolvency law? How should they prepare to handle high-stakes disputes and gain expertise in this area?

    My advice would be threefold:

    First, develop a strong foundation in commercial laws. Understanding the business aspects is as crucial as knowing the legal provisions.

    Second, gain practical exposure through internships and hands-on experience. The field of insolvency law, in particular, requires understanding practical aspects of business operations. Insurance law requires a good understanding of how insurance companies handle claims, and what regulations apply, and one must know these irrespective of the side they appear for.

    Third, stay updated with evolving regulations and judicial interpretations. Both insurance and insolvency laws in India are rapidly evolving, and staying current is crucial.

    I would also emphasize the importance of developing strong analytical skills and the ability to handle pressure, as these areas often involve time-sensitive, high-stakes matters.

    With your extensive professional commitments, how do you manage to balance your personal life with the demands of your legal practice?

    Maintaining work-life balance in a demanding practice requires disciplined time management and efficient delegation. Technology has been a great enabler – we’ve implemented systems that allow for effective remote working while maintaining high service standards.

    I believe in building strong teams and empowering them to handle responsibilities effectively. This not only ensures better service delivery but also helps maintain a sustainable work environment. Regular team meetings and clear communication channels help manage workload efficiently.

    Additionally, I make it a point to stay involved in academic activities, such as conducting lectures at law schools. These activities provide a refreshing break from practice while contributing to the legal community.

    Get in touch with Prateek Mishra –

  • “The ability to work hard, good recollection capacity, vivacity, positive attitude are what I feel some of the most important qualities for a litigation lawyer” – Nishant Kr. Srivastava, Advocate-on-Record at Supreme Court of India and the Founder & Managing Partner at Actus Legal Associates & Advocates.

    “The ability to work hard, good recollection capacity, vivacity, positive attitude are what I feel some of the most important qualities for a litigation lawyer” – Nishant Kr. Srivastava, Advocate-on-Record at Supreme Court of India and the Founder & Managing Partner at Actus Legal Associates & Advocates.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    As an Advocate-On-Record (AOR) and with over a decade of experience in the field of law, what initially inspired you to pursue a career in law, and how did your passion for the legal field evolve over the years?

    Honestly speaking, it was destined for me to become a lawyer! I had been a Civil Services aspirant after my Graduation and had also reached till the Interview stage the Civil Services Exam (CSE) conducted by UPSC. In 2005 I joined Law Centre-II (at that time evening classes at Atma Ram Sanatan Dharma College) of the Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, Delhi during the later period of my CSE preparations. However, in the same year I once again cleared the Prelims and had to write my UPSC Mains and the dates coincided with my First Semester Law exams and I had to make a choice. I chose the UPSC Mains over the law exam and so did not attend the law classes resulting in shortage of attendance and my not being able to fill the form and appearing in the exams. 

    Later on in 2009, I again joined the Faculty of Law, but this time the Campus Law Centre (CLC), Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, Delhi. 

    Coming from a relatively small city i.e., Gorakhpur (UP), I, for the first time, realised during my preparation period in Delhi that law is just not only a respectable career option, but also Delhi is the best place for anyone who has no other support system/ a first generation lawyer, apart from her/his own hard work and competence. 

    Also, from the college days, my friends used to tell me that I was good at communication- both oral as well as written, and once my attempts at CSE were over in 2006, I was faced with a grim situation and I was required to find a career option, where I could utilise my strengths to support my choice of career. And at this time law as a carrier option looked to me as the best career option, looking at my ability to study for long hours (honed during my CSE preparation days) and a good communication skills, especially in English, and having my earlier small brush with the study of law made the decision to pursue law as a career option a forgone conclusion. 

    In the early stages of your career, you worked with trial court seniors and also managed your independent practice, handling cases across all the three tiers of the courts in Delhi-trial, High Court and the Supreme Court of India. What were the most valuable lessons you learned during this phase that helped shape your career path?

    In my 2nd year at the CLC became the Student Convenor of the Seminar & Discussion Society of the CLC, apart from being one of the Student Editors of the Delhi Law Review (DLR), the renowned Journal published by the Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, Delhi, and I was also one of the Student Convenors of the Legal Aid Society of CLC. This gave me enough exposure and opportunity to meet and initiate an informal conversation with some of legal legends and top jurists of the country. It was during those discussions and interactions, I realised that being a first generation lawyer, I must know the basics and go for an organic growth and progression in my career- from trial works to appellate works. When all my Batchmates were planning to join some of the top lawyers and chambers in the Supreme Court and the High Court, I was searching for a good trial court senior, by the time I completed my course.

    Building a career in litigation can be challenging, especially as a defense lawyer dealing with white-collar crimes. What were the initial obstacles you faced, and how did you navigate and overcome them to establish yourself in this competitive field?

    Usually in any case involving allegations of a white collar crime, the accused is a well to do person having all the facilities, including a battery of lawyers. In such a scenario, initially it was difficult to make such risk aversion taking people to convince that I can handle their case well and have the requisite competence and skills, however I think what worked for me was the fact that in the courts whenever I was acting as a defense counsel, even in smaller cases, I used to give my 100% and used to put more hard work than many of the established lawyers would have put. This became noticeable not only to the Presiding Officers, Additional Public Prosecutors, Niab Courts and the police officials, but also to the litigants waiting for their cases to be called. This gave me visibility. Also, I enlisted myself with the South District Legal Aid Society (DLSA-South) in the initial days and rendered my services to the best of my abilities  as a Legal Aid Counsel (LAC) in those matters where the poor accused persons, because of lack of wherewithal, were unable to get good representation in the courts. 

    When handling both ad-hoc and institutional arbitration cases, what core skills and strategies do you rely on? Can you share an example of a particularly difficult arbitration case that you were able to resolve successfully?

    I would honestly say that Arbitration is akin to an exalted Civil Trial. And if one doesn’t have the experience of conducting trials, especially in civil cases starting from drawing up the case from the scratch and skill in cross-examination of witnesses, that is going to be a big handicap for the lawyer intending to succeed in the field of arbitration. Fortunately, I started my career in the beginning years in trial courts, apart from frequent appellate and HC/ SC/ NCDRC works. And this decision to start from the trial courts was only because I was fortunate enough to interact with the stalwarts and who and who of the Indian legal system during my Law Faculty days as the Student Convenor of the Seminar & Discussion Society of the CLC. It was one unanimous piece of advice, as a student of law, I had received from them, i.e., to know the basics and to learn the trial works, especially being a first generation lawyer and an outsider in Delhi. 

    In my first Arbitration case, the seat of which was in Kolkata, West Bengal, before the Ld. Sole Arbitrator Sh. Sushanta Chatterjee (who recently passed away), former Judge Calcutta High Court, where the Respondent had, citing a big theft at their site because of the alleged deficiency of service and dereliction of duty on the part of my client (a Manpower Supplier), had withheld payments of my client. Much depended on the veracity of the story of theft as alleged by the Respondent. At that point of time, my first-hand experience at cross-examination stood in good stead in Kolkata and I was able to show/ expose that the alleged theft never took place and it was a just ploy on the part of the Respondent to not to pay the dues of my client. This clinched the case in my favour and I won the Award for my client.

    In defending clients in cases involving economic offenses, such as those handled by the EOW, CBI, or ED, what do you believe are the key considerations in crafting an effective defense strategy? Could you highlight a case that was particularly interesting to you?

    Usually, and if I may say, invariably, the EOW and CBI has a penchant for filing voluminous chargesheet and enlist 30/50/85 witnesses, if not more. And here there is enough scope of contradictions and loopholes. As a defense lawyer representing an accused, I am not required to prove that my client is innocent beyond reasonable doubt, since the same is the burden of the Prosecution and not the accused. A careful reading of the chargesheet and statements particularly of the key witnesses, gives sufficient points and opportunities to show to the Court that there is difficulty in accepting the case of the prosecution and there are doubts and contradictions and there are two views possible and after that I leave the rest to the Court to decide. In fact in many EOW cases, I have got my clients discharged at the initial stage itself. Obviously, the knowledge about the latest judgment is something, inter alia, which clinches the decision in your favour. In an interesting case being tried u/s 420 IPC, the CBI has summoned on a single day a number of witnesses. The trial had started almost 6/7 years after the case was registered. By that time many witnesses were not traceable and those who had come had shifted to different places outside Delhi and had travelled to Delhi from distant places. That very day, due to the sheer number of witnesses (complainants) and the heavy board of the court concerned, matter was getting adjourned. The witnesses showed reluctance to come again for the examination in chief and cross-examination. At that point of time, I was able to get them to compromise and get their statements recorded. On that single day most of the witnesses compromised with the accused and the case became very weak. Later on, in the cross examination of the few remaining witnesses, I was able to show that the prosecution was not able to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt.

    You are highly regarded for your expertise in matrimonial disputes and family law. How do you view the changing landscape of women’s rights in matrimonial cases, and what are the major challenges you come across while dealing with matrimonial cases?

    Unfortunately, matrimonial disputes are one of the fastest increasing legal disputes in India, at least in Metropolitan cities like Delhi. The ability to adjust and let go of certain things, which at the first place should not have been an issue at all, I am sorry to state, has become more and more scarce these days. Intervention of the family members, especially because of the instant calls and the tendency of the people to “create evidence” has weekend the mutual trust and faith a couple ought to have for any marriage to work. I am happy to see that the Courts in Delhi have become more and more gender neutral, especially in the matters instituted under the various provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The same is the situation in cases instituted under s.144 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) (old s. 125 CrPC). Over implication of the relatives and distant relatives in DV Act matters by the aggrieved are being frowned upon by the Judicial Magistrates. 

    The major challenge, I think, is the lack of cogent and convincing evidence in matrimonial disputes, since most of the allegations pertain to something which had happened within the four walls of the matrimonial home. And this many a time, gives opportunity to a party to level baseless and sometimes ridiculous allegations!  I am also especially sad to see how the children suffer due to the mutual fight between their own parents. I strongly  feel that any lawyer handling such matrimonial cases must be a sensitive person herself/ himself because that is the only thing which might help the litigating couple who are blinded by their mutual distrust and hate towards each other and who would go to any extent to prove that the other person was wrong and he/she has been wronged. 

    As the founder and managing partner of Actus Legal Associates, how do you effectively manage a team of 7-10 lawyers while ensuring consistent performance and a steady flow of work across the firm?

    I believe in self-control and believe that no one can help a person who is not willing to help herself/ himself. So, I always try to make my colleagues and juniors realise that they have to take responsibility and deliver the results. Litigation, among other legal areas of practice and when compared with other areas of practice in law, is very demanding. Only highly motivated people can survive in litigation. 

    I believe in situational leadership and delegation. Once the expectations are clear and one is clear with the facts of the case at hand, I trust my team to deliver the results. Discussions and deliberations and constant evaluation of the progress of the cases we are handling through our own internal mechanism, I think helps us to ensure consistent performance and steady flow of work across the firm.

    For young lawyers aspiring to specialize in litigation, arbitration, or criminal defense in India, what advice would you offer? What key skills and personal qualities do you believe are essential for success in these areas of law?

    Your this question is precisely the same question, which as a law student and the Student Convenor of the Seminar & Discussion Society of the CLC, I used to ask the Legal Luminaries, since I was one coordinating and inviting those Supreme Court and High Court Judges and the doyens of the Bar to the CLC for events, lectures and conferences and many a time, I used to get some free time with these seniors in the profession. Since many of them were alumni of CLC, the chats were pretty friendly. I was told invariably by everyone I had put this question, that I must know the basics and spend some initial years learning trial work, both civil and criminal and this is what I will advise the young lawyers aspiring to specialize in litigation, arbitration or criminal defense in India. 

    Inter alia, the ability to work hard, good recollection capacity, vivacity, positive attitude and what I feel are some of the most important qualities for a litigation lawyer, I also feel that a litigation lawyer must be ready and be there in the court much before the court starts. Being before time, gives sufficient time to once again go through your file, talk to the client and be abreast with facts of the case at hand. Many times, your ability to keep an open mind and not acting only as per your strategy made last evening, just being alive to the requirements and queries of the court, carries the day for you. Ability to network with people outside your profession is also one of the important skills and qualities, I believe are essential for success in these areas of law.

    Looking back at your career, what has been your most fulfilling case, and what were the learning experiences that you’d like to share with us?

    In one of the matrimonial disputes cases, where both the parties had married with each other after their unsuccessful first marriage and had a baby born out of this second marriage, I played a crucial role to ensure that the matter is settled through mediation in which there was no intervention of the families of both the parties. Actually, I sensed during the initial days of my engagement as a counsel for one of the parties that the real culprit for the impasse were the parents of both the parties and the couple were having almost cordial relationship and it was only because of the unintended but damaging interference by the parents from both the sides, the relations had become strained to the extent that one of them had filed a petition for divorce on the ground of cruelty. I impressed upon the Ld. Family Court to send the matter (despite I having been drafted the WS and carrying the same in my hand to the Court) to the Mediation Centre and be taken up under the supervision of the most experienced Mediator and the parents of both the parties be strictly barred from entering the Mediation Room. That worked! The moments the parents were barred from interfering, the couple was able to come to an amicable settlement and resolve their grievances. I am happy to inform you that as on date those warring couples are living happily together with their beautiful child. 

    The experience which I gained here was that a lawyer must also be a good listener, especially in family matters and the best way to resolve a matrimonial dispute is amicable settlement. Dehors the din, usually matrimonial matters are more about small issues generally connected with adjustments and if one is able to point out and target and resolve those small issues, many families may be saved from disintegration and ending up in divorce.

    Get in touch with Nishant Kr. Srivastava –

  • “My takeaway from my journey in the field of law has been to be patient, to keep up the hard-work, and to know that every opportunity and every win or loss is a golden ticket to learn something new.” – Shraddha Deshmukh, Advocate-on-Record at Supreme Court of India.

    “My takeaway from my journey in the field of law has been to be patient, to keep up the hard-work, and to know that every opportunity and every win or loss is a golden ticket to learn something new.” – Shraddha Deshmukh, Advocate-on-Record at Supreme Court of India.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    You completed your Bachelor in Civil Law at Brasenose College, University of Oxford. Was law always the career path you envisioned for yourself and what motivated you to pursue law as a profession?

    My tryst with law was accidental. I had lost my Civics book, a day prior to my final exams in school. My father sat me down with a copy of the Constitution of India and spoke about Keshvananda Bharti. Whilst reading through the charter on Fundamental rights and duties, I came across the wide powers of the courts as enforcers and protectors of rights and therefore, by default, the duty of the lawyers to bring causes to justice. That was it! Dreamy eyed about the change and difference that lawyers can make to society (of course also influenced by Alan Shore from Boston Legal), I decided to pursue Law as my profession.

    Early in your career, you worked at several prestigious law firms before transitioning to work with Senior advocates like Mr. Akhil Sibal and Mr. K.K. Venugopal. How would you describe the cultural differences between these two environments, and how did you adapt to each?

    There are definite distinctions and also certain similarities in the working culture of a Law Firm when compared to a Counsel’s Chamber. 

    Starting with the distinction first, at a law firm, you are exposed to direct client dealings, extensive drafting and working with many counsels and senior counsels. You are involved with filing and getting matters listed, billing and preparing recording letters for the client. 

    On the other hand, working in a Senior Advocate’s chamber gives you a balcony view into the mind of the lawyer- her/his quirks, style of presentation, method of preparation and the ultimate act of reading the law and convincing the bench with arguments. Preparation of briefing notes involved detailed churning of legal research with factual analysis.

    Coming to the similarity– at both places, you are expected to work hard and stay abreast with the law and the legal system. The working hours don’t get better at either, and you learn and gain immensely at both!

    Therefore, whilst the scope of work for the junior may differ in a Law Firm when compared to a Senior’s chamber, the expectations from her/him to give their best- remains the same.

    Having worked closely with prominent Senior Advocates like Mr. K.K. Venugopal, what are some of the most valuable lessons you’ve learned from them, and how have those lessons shaped your approach to legal practice?

    Working with a venerated counsel like Mr. Venugopal- who is an institution in himself, was a guiding factor in me truly coming to love the law and understand the rigours and discipline that are basic tenets for a lawyer. Boss, as we all call him in his chamber, taught us that there are no shortcuts to success. Even today, whilst preparing for a matter, he refers to judgments and makes copious notes, with the same curiosity as he would have if he were reading it for the first time, despite having argued many of them himself and having applied them in several instances. During arguments, Boss could ask any question from the briefing junior, which was born from the facts stated in the file or beyond, which meant that we had to always be on top of things and be prepared for a volley of questions- sometimes tougher than what came from the bench itself. This taught us to be prepared beyond the file, to ask questions and analyse, to fact-check and to never argue on conjectures. Boss would rarely ever raise his voice at us and his disappointment was often remarked with a long sigh reverberating in a whistle, the consequence of which was far stronger than mere words. He taught us the discipline to reach court early irrespective of how late your matter was on board. He taught us to be fair and to act as an ethical officer of the court. He treats every colleague of his as an extension of his family. One instance that I will never forget was, when I was seeking a passover for him in Court as he was stuck before another bench, and the concerned Judge asked me to argue the matter instead. He came in the middle of my arguments, but patted me on my back and asked me to continue arguing and sat right next to me-that kind of encouragement to a young counsel starting out in their career meant a lot! Despite working so hard, boss also taught us to not take ourselves too seriously and to always remain curious. In his own words, he taught us that “to know that you don’t know is the beginning of knowledge.” I am truly blessed to be a part of his chamber- which has had a large part in shaping me as a lawyer. 

    Working with Mr. K.K. Venugopal on landmark cases like the Right to Privacy case must have been an enriching experience. Could you share some insights from your involvement in that case and how it has influenced your career?

    Being a part of the 9 Judge bench’s unanimous declaration of the right to privacy as a fundamental right definitely stands out for me as one of the most exhilarating experiences in my short stint as a lawyer. Days preceding and during the hearing were spent reading countless judgments, articles, international covenants, and expert views on the issue. As a student of law, partaking in thought-provoking arguments from some of the finest minds in the country- at bar and on bench, was outstanding. It exposed me to understand the many different silos that exist in the right to privacy, beyond its manifest existence in body integrity. As a counsel, I have applied the said doctrine in my matters dealing with data privacy and boundaries of authentication and digital records. We are all richer in our rights by the said decision and I couldn’t be more grateful for having been a part of this landmark case. 

    After gaining experience with top law firms and senior advocates, you made the transition to establishing your own practice. What motivated that shift, and what were some of the challenges you faced when starting your independent practice?

    Like any other counsel, I also dreamt of having my own independent practise and to put my training to task. So, after about 8 years of apprenticeship, and with a small handful of clients, I decided to take the plunge and went independent. The initial days were tough especially as the quality and quantity of work that comes to you as a fresh, off the hook, independent counsel is very different from what you may have done in the senior’s chambers or in firms. But the free time gives you an opportunity to read and update your knowledge base. Being on the panel for the Union of India at the time gave me the opportunity to work on diverse areas of law and appear in court regularly. Soon after, I was appointed as the Deputy Advocate General for the State of Chhattisgarh. As special counsel, I successfully represented the Special Task force in Rajasthan in a multi-cooperative society scam involving thousands of crores of Rupees, which added to my experience. When I look back, my takeaway has been to be patient, to keep up the hard-work, and to know that every opportunity and every win or loss is a golden ticket to learn something new. I am extremely grateful for my fears and experiences, which play a part in shaping me as a lawyer today. 

    As an Advocate on Record and now running your own practice in areas like Constitutional and Administrative Law, Arbitration, Data Protection etc. You’re clearly dealing with highly complex issues. Could you share one of the most interesting or challenging cases you’ve worked on, and how did you prepare for that case?

    A very interesting case that I recently argued was the 7 judges constitutional bench reference on the issue of sub-classification of reservation benefits to Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe seeking re-consideration of the decision in E.V. Chinnaiah v. State of Andhra Pradesh and Ors. [(2005) 1 SCC 394]. In order to justify the reversal of the earlier judgment required presenting the Hon’ble court with constituent assembly debates- to show the original intent of the constitutional framers. I argued that Compensatory discrimination, as a subset of Affirmative Action, has the preliminary goal of curbing discrimination and the ultimate goal of its eradication. I presented empirical data to show that Scheduled Caste as a group is heterogeneous in its form and acute disparity exists within the groups and treating them with the same brush of representation is antithetical to the concept of substantive equality. Several scholarly writings on the subject, such as Marc Galanter’s book-Competing Equalities: Law and the Backward Classes in India, J.H. Hutton’s book, Caste in India: Its Nature, Functions and Origins, celebrated Austrian Economist Friedrich A. Hayek’s work on the Constitution of Liberty, to name a few, came to my extensive aid. We are now in receipt of the landmark judgment, where my arguments have found mention, and which lays down the distinguished principle of sub-classification of reservation benefits as a facet of substantive equality. 

    Given the demanding nature of your work, especially your role as Counsel for the Union of India in the Supreme Court, how do you manage to maintain a work-life balance? What strategies do you use to recharge and stay passionate about law?

    I remember reading the quote somewhere that “The law is a jealous mistress and requires long and constant courtship. It is not to be won by trifling favors, but by lavish homage.” I couldn’t agree more- it takes away most of your weekends and expects you to burn the midnight oil. But the profession is also like riding a wave, some days are crazier than others-So in my free time, I love to read, spend time with my family and pursue my hobbies.  Also, the court calendar sets out long vacation periods, allowing us to travel or take time off, which for me, is the best energiser. Staying passionate about law comes from staying in tune with the changing times and also from rigorous reading and discussions. Even if I am not involved in a matter, I love watching cases being argued in court and to witness legal jurisprudence develop. Discussion with my colleagues in the office is an enriching exchange of fresh ideas. Legal conferences can also be a great venue to brainstorm and to learn from other’s experiences and discussions. 

    For young lawyers just starting out, particularly in the fields of litigation and international/domestic arbitration, what advice would you offer to help them navigate these complex areas and build a successful career?

    Young lawyers just starting out today have far more exposure and better understanding of the nuances of law and its practise, than I remember having, when I started out. The only thing that I sometimes find lacking in young lawyers is patience. I see young counsels diving into calling themselves specialists without knowing basic procedural laws. Also, whilst arguing matters in the Apex Court or doing big ticket arbitrations is a thrilling experience, learning from the ground carries you higher. Walking through the registries and learning how to get defects cured and getting matters filed and listed, to me, is as crucial as knowing how to argue a case. These learnings help you especially when you start out on your own and have to run an office and give time commitments to your client. In today’s time, being comfortable with technology is a must- both for litigation and Arbitration. Staying abreast with evolving law helps you stand out. AI based research may have made life easier, but it is crucial that the foundations are laid stronger and provisions in a statute are read before diving into research. In my opinion, perseverance, hard work and integrity are key ingredients to success for any and all. 

    Get in touch with Shraddha Deshmukh –

  • “The legal profession demands not just brilliance but a deep sense of responsibility. I’ve always believed that a lawyer’s word should carry as much weight as a legal document.” – Kanhaiya Singhal, Advocate-on-Record at the Supreme Court of India and Founder of Kanhaiya Singhal Law Office.

    “The legal profession demands not just brilliance but a deep sense of responsibility. I’ve always believed that a lawyer’s word should carry as much weight as a legal document.” – Kanhaiya Singhal, Advocate-on-Record at the Supreme Court of India and Founder of Kanhaiya Singhal Law Office.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    You completed your B. Com (Hons.) degree in 2002. How did your background in commerce shape your decision to pursue a career in law?

    Ah, actually I never dreamt or thought to become an advocate and did my graduation in Commerce to become a Chartered Accountant. Somehow, when I was about to start my studies for CA Exams, I was advised by my Uncle who is a CA himself to choose law as a career. He was of the view that an Advocate has the capability to represent the Client for fervently. I had a passion for justice as I belong to a sub-rural area of Uttar Pradesh and during my schooling days and so of college days, I had seen many such instances of injustice. I will say thanks to almighty to allow me to do graduation in Commerce as the skills and understanding of financial systems and economic principles, which I developed while pursuing my B. Com (Hons.) degree, later proved to be crucial in handling intricate income tax and benami matters. My choice of studying law was certainly not my choice, however, since after completion of my studies of law, pursuing the practice of law was/is not just a career choice for me and in fact, it is a commitment to contribute towards building a fairer society.

    After enrolling as an advocate with the Bar Council of Delhi in 2006, how did your early career experiences help you navigate the challenges of becoming a prominent legal professional?

    My early years in practice were like stepping into a rigorous legal boot camp.My senior was a very humble person and he always allowed me to appear in Courts and during my 4 and half year stint as an associate in his office, I got the opportunity to travel throughout the Country and had appearance in almost more than half of the High Courts of Country. I had the benefit of doing arbitration, civil and services including Telecom dispute cases. Every brief, every court appearance sharpened my skills. I remember juggling diverse matters, from criminal matters to intricate civil matters. This exposure taught me resilience and the art of crafting compelling arguments. More importantly, it imbibed a sense of humility and the understanding that every case, no matter how small, deserves meticulous attention.

    As a Special Public Prosecutor for the Income Tax Department under the Income Tax & Black Money Act, what has been your experience handling cases in this role?  

    Representing the Income Tax Department has been both challenging and fulfilling. Each case is a battle against financial complexities and ingenious tax evasions. I have been entrusted with the task of prosecuting several high profile cases like Gautam Khaitan, Sanjay Bhandari etc. I have the privilege to be appointed as Special Counsel by the Ministry of Finance to represent prosecution matters at Bhopal as well. So, what I learnt is that, the Officers who are the work force behind these prosecution matters, meticulously examine their cases which is generally the result of hard work and patience. The role of Public Prosecutor does not remain stringent to the documents provided but also to personally examine the merits/demerits and properly opine. Being the SPP, I had the occasion to provide several key opinions which were very well appreciated and the same carried satisfaction in terms of intellectual well being.  

    As a lawyer with almost two decades of experience, what personal values and principles have guided you throughout your career, and how do you continue to motivate yourself amidst challenging cases?

    Integrity and diligence are my north stars. The legal profession demands not just brilliance but a deep sense of responsibility. I’ve always believed that a lawyer’s word should carry as much weight as a legal document. Motivation, for me, comes from the pursuit of justice, knowing that my efforts can shape lives, industries, and sometimes even policies.

    As an Arbitrator with the Delhi International Arbitration Centre (DIAC), how do you approach the arbitration process? Could you also share any particularly challenging arbitration cases you have handled and your key findings in that case?

    Arbitration is about adjudication of disputes while keeping in mind the sound principles of law, public policy with efficiency. My approach is to foster collaboration while adhering strictly to legal principles. One challenging case related to arbitration is still pending before the Hon’ble Division Bench of High Court of Delhi, however, upto limited extent, i can elaborate by pointing out that the  biggest challenge to arbitration is larger time being taken at the stage of objection u/s 34 & further appeal u/s 37 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act. 

    Given the demanding nature of your practice and responsibilities, how do you unwind and balance your personal commitments alongside your professional obligations?

    Balance is key, though it often feels like an art rather than a science. I find solace in reading, both legal and non-legal literature, and spending quality time with family. Occasionally, a quiet walk or a weekend getaway helps reset my mind, allowing me to return to work with renewed vigor. I love to travel.

    How does your law firm KSLO foster an environment of collaboration and continuous learning within the firm to maintain its standing as a multi-disciplinary legal expert?

    KSLO thrives on a culture of mentorship and innovation. I always wanted to develop a law firm which would provide easy solutions to its clients and assistance seekers. We actively encourage our team to engage in cross-disciplinary training and discussions. Every team member is both a student and a teacher, sharing insights from diverse cases. This collaborative approach ensures that we stay at the forefront of legal expertise. I am planning to expand more by having offices in different cities of our country. 

    As a first-generation lawyer, what advice would you give to young law students and aspiring lawyers who wish to excel in the field of litigation and public law?

    My advice? Embrace the grind litigation brings in your life. Litigation is a marathon and not a sprint. Don’t forget success comes to those who combine patience with persistence. Never stop learning as laws evolve, and so must you. Most importantly, stay grounded as your integrity and reputation will be your strongest assets in this profession. Last but not the least, stay for a firm time with one good senior who can guide you in the profession. 

    Get in touch with Kanhaiya Singhal-

  • “Reflecting on this journey, from a small-town upbringing to standing before the Supreme Court, fills me with both immense satisfaction and a renewed sense of resolve.” – Aakarshan Aditya, Advocate-on-Record, Supreme Court of India.

    “Reflecting on this journey, from a small-town upbringing to standing before the Supreme Court, fills me with both immense satisfaction and a renewed sense of resolve.” – Aakarshan Aditya, Advocate-on-Record, Supreme Court of India.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    With over 13 years of extensive legal experience as an Advocate and over 6 years as an Advocate on Record at the Supreme Court of India, what inspired you to choose law as your career path? 

    The inspiration to pursue law came from multiple sources. My mother is a significant influence— she joined the legal profession at the age of 45, once my elder brother had joined the Army, my elder sister was in college pursuing medicine, and I was transitioning from Class 10 to 11. Her resilience and passion greatly inspired me. Growing up, I was also deeply interested in reading newspapers and absorbing information. This habit nurtured my analytical thinking and my drive to stay informed, traits that have greatly helped me in my legal career; I became fascinated by the stories of lawyers and how their work shaped society. The idea that lawyers could make such a difference, combined with the intellectual challenge and professional independence aligned perfectly with my aspirations and personality, making law the ideal career choice for me.

    What motivated you to start your own practice after completing your law degree, and what were some of the initial challenges you encountered while setting up? 

    Once you choose to become a practicing lawyer, the natural progression is to set up an independent practice. The real challenge, however, is deciding when to take that step. For me, the motivation was always there—it was a matter of timing. I started as a chamber junior, gradually assisting other lawyers on case-to-case basis, and eventually became an Advocate-on-Record in 2018, which marked my readiness to embrace independent practice. Every stage before that was preparation, building the skills and confidence needed to take the plunge. 

    A key factor in making the transition successful is cultivating strong professional relationships. In our profession, seniors often move on to more complex and high-value cases as they gain experience, leaving opportunities for younger lawyers to handle the work they previously did. If you maintain positive relationships and avoid burning bridges, seniors are more likely to trust you with cases or clients they can no longer manage, providing you with both work and credibility. 

    The challenges of independent practice are significant. Financial uncertainty, ensuring timely client payments, and retaining clients require tact and effort. Additionally, during slow periods, staying productive is crucial. These moments should not feel like “off days.” Instead, they are opportunities to improve skills, network, and prepare for future cases. Success in independent practice requires resilience, adaptability, and consistent effort to navigate uncertainties and grow. 

    Given your diverse legal practice, could you share a particularly challenging constitutional law case you have argued before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India? What strategies did you use in preparing for the case? 

    One of the most challenging constitutional law cases I argued before the Hon’ble Supreme Court involved the arbitrary exercise of legislative and executive powers in notifying sporting events as “Events of National Importance” under the Sports Broadcasting Signals (Mandatory Sharing with Prasar Bharti) Act, 2007. The case raised critical questions about the violation of Article 14 of the Constitution, focusing on the lack of objective criteria for determining such events, which led to inconsistencies and arbitrariness in notifications. 

    The case attracted significant attention as it directly impacted the sports broadcasting industry, threatening the revenue models of major broadcasters who relied on exclusive rights. During the admission hearing, the courtroom saw intense arguments from several senior advocates representing the broadcasters, emphasizing how arbitrary classifications undermined their profitability and autonomy. 

    Our challenge focused on the absence of transparent guidelines, arguing that such notifications disregarded constitutional principles of equality and fairness. Drawing comparisons with global best practices, such as the “anti-siphoning lists” in Australia and “listed events” in the UK, we highlighted how these systems balanced public access with commercial interests. 

    Preparation of the case, required multi-faceted approach to address its complexity and ensure a robust argument. This began with in-depth legal research, focusing on judicial precedents related to Article 14, comparative analysis of global practices, including the “anti-siphoning lists” in Australia and “listed events” in the UK, to highlight the lack of transparency and objectivity in the Indian framework. A meticulous review of the notifications issued under the Act revealed inconsistencies, demonstrating how events of significant public interest were excluded while less important ones were arbitrarily included. Collaborative brainstorming with colleagues helped refine arguments and anticipate counterpoints, especially given the presence of senior advocates representing major broadcasters. Mock arguments further ensured clarity and precision in presenting key submissions. The strategy also involved framing the issue as one that extended beyond commercial concerns, emphasizing the public interest in accessing culturally significant events. 

    Can you share some impactful experiences from the “Lawyers on Borders” project that demonstrate the critical role of legal support for soldiers and their families? 

    The “Lawyers on Borders” initiative, launched by the KhushHal Bharat Public Charitable Trust in collaboration with VanGuard Legal, addresses the legal challenges faced by serving and retired Indian Armed Forces personnel and their families. Since November 2023, it has provided free legal consultancy, litigation support, and educational resources to over 50 soldiers and their families, covering civil, criminal, service, and consumer matters. Leveraging its extensive network and technology, VanGuard Legal operates a dedicated helpline, offers pro bono advisory services, and provides litigation support on a needs basis at most reasonable fees. Regular updates are shared via helplines, emails, Google Meet, and WhatsApp, ensuring convenience and accessibility even for soldiers in remote areas. This initiative embodies a commitment to safeguarding the rights and dignity of those who serve the nation, delivering legal solutions with the professionalism of a top-tier law firm. 

    How do you manage the dual responsibilities of being an Advocate on Record at the Supreme Court and leading VanGuard Legal? What challenges do you face in balancing both roles effectively? 

    Managing the dual responsibilities is undoubtedly demanding, but it is also deeply fulfilling. It requires careful planning, thoughtful delegation, and a sharp focus on priorities. I ensure my court work and client commitments are well-structured, allowing me to give focused attention to both roles. At VanGuard Legal, I am fortunate to have a dedicated and capable team that manages day-to-day operations, while I oversee strategic decisions and maintain the quality of our services. To ensure efficiency, my chamber and the firm operate as separate entities from distinct physical spaces. 

    Balancing time and energy can be challenging, particularly during peak litigation periods or when handling complex cases. However, open communication with and within the team and leveraging technology have been crucial in streamlining processes and ensuring that both roles align seamlessly. What inspires me the most is the work we are doing at VanGuard Legal, especially through the Lawyers on Borders project. It is more than just legal work—it feels like a way to repay our debt to the country and give back to those who serve us selflessly. This sense of purpose keeps me motivated and committed to making a meaningful impact. 

    How has your experience as an Advocate on Record at the Supreme Court contributed to the growth of your professional practice, and how do you keep yourself updated on the latest trends in the legal field? 

    It has profoundly enhanced my professional practice, allowing me to deepen my understanding of complex legal issues while honing my skills in drafting, advocacy, and strategy. It has also pushed me to develop my intellectual and cognitive faculties, sharpening my ability to analyze and address intricate cases. Representing a diverse range of clients at the highest judicial forum has strengthened my confidence, broadened my professional network across the country, and exposed me to the multifaceted challenges of the legal profession. 

    Beyond professional growth, this journey has enriched me personally. Becoming an AOR brought with it the honor of representing my peers as an elected member of the Supreme Court Advocates on Record Association—a responsibility I hold close to my heart. Securing the runner-up position in the first Hackathon organized by the Hon’ble Supreme Court was another milestone that reinforced my belief in innovation and teamwork. 

    Reflecting on this journey, from a small-town upbringing to standing before the Supreme Court, fills me with both immense satisfaction and a renewed sense of resolve.  

    To stay updated on the latest trends in the legal field, I make it a point to actively follow landmark judgments, legislative developments, and esteemed legal publications. Engaging in discussions with peers and participating in seminars, lectures and other programmes organised by SCAORA, SCBA and other platforms allows me to exchange ideas and gain fresh perspectives. I also rely on technology to access global legal resources, which keeps me informed and well-prepared for the evolving challenges of the profession. 

    In my free time, I enjoy exploring emerging tools like GPTs and similar platforms, where I engage in debates, discussions, and predictive analyses of legal and broader issues. While no one can predict the future with certainty, these interactions offer fascinating insights into the potential directions the profession might take. It excites me to imagine how legal practice could evolve and to prepare myself for those changes. At the same time, this exploration serves as a refreshing intellectual exercise, keeping me curious and forward-looking. 

    As a mentor to younger lawyers and law students, what advice do you offer to those aiming to build a successful career in litigation and corporate practice? 

    Start by mastering the fundamentals of law, developing strong drafting and research skills, and gaining hands-on experience through internships in diverse areas. Ideally, start from the Trial Courts moving up to Higher Courts. Work under experienced mentors who can guide you and help refine your skills while navigating the challenges of the profession. Communication and interpersonal skills are critical—both for courtroom advocacy and collaborative corporate work. Stay updated on legal developments, leverage technology to enhance your efficiency, and actively network with seniors and peers to create opportunities rather than waiting for them to come to you. Success, especially in our profession takes time, so be patient, persistent, and disciplined. Treat each day as a new opportunity—finish what you start, avoid procrastination, and tackle challenges with calm determination. Take pride in your profession, remain mentally agile under pressure, and continuously train yourself to be a powerhouse of knowledge and eloquence. Always maintain humility in your interactions, even as you take confidence in your growing abilities. This is a lifelong learning process—embrace it with passion, adaptability, and integrity, as your reputation and commitment to excellence will ultimately define your success. 

    How do you manage the demands of being an Advocate on Record and leading your firm, while also maintaining balance with your personal obligations? 

    We all operate within the same 24-hour framework, balancing the demands of personal and professional life. However, how effectively we use these hours determines our success and well-being. These days, many people adopt irregular routines, staying up late and following inconsistent sleep schedules. While a number of conversations these days often emphasize flexibility in choosing one’s schedule, the reality is that our profession demands a disciplined and structured approach to time management. 

    While it is essential to identify your own personal rhythm—understanding when you are most productive and at your best, however, a time-tested approach for our field is adhering to the principle of “early to bed and early to rise.” This routine not only ensures physical health but also sharpens mental clarity and focus, both of which are non-negotiable for success in the legal profession. Good health and wisdom form the bedrock of this career, and financial success inevitably follows when these two are in place. In a demanding profession like ours, maintaining discipline in your daily routine is not just advisable—it is essential for sustaining long-term excellence and balance.  

    One essential quality every lawyer should cultivate is the ability to switch between their professional and personal modes, even more so when family members or close friends are also part of the legal profession, such as in husband-wife, parent-child, or sibling relationships. While it is natural for discussions about law to spill over into personal spaces, it is equally important to consciously step out of your “lawyer mode” when you are with your family and friends. 

    Learning to disconnect from the professional mindset allows you to nurture your personal relationships, which are your greatest sources of strength, comfort, and happiness. Your loved ones offer the emotional balance and support needed to thrive in a demanding profession. By creating boundaries between your professional and personal life, you ensure that your personal relationships remain fulfilling and unaffected by the pressures of work, ultimately contributing to both your mental well-being and professional success.

    Get in touch with Aakarshan Aditya-

  • “The Legal profession demands hard work, dedication, perseverance, and a great deal of patience. While it is undoubtedly challenging, it is equally fascinating and rewarding.” – Yoothica Pallavi, Advocate on Record at Supreme Court of India.

    “The Legal profession demands hard work, dedication, perseverance, and a great deal of patience. While it is undoubtedly challenging, it is equally fascinating and rewarding.” – Yoothica Pallavi, Advocate on Record at Supreme Court of India.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Coming from a science background, was pursuing law a deliberate decision for  you? How did you prepare to gain admission to Chanakya National Law University,  Patna? 

    This question brings back a wave of nostalgia, and I find it hard to decide where  to begin—it’s quite a story. I belong to a generation where most students were drawn  towards either medicine or engineering. After completing my 12th in 2007, I, too, took  a gap year to prepare for engineering entrance exams. In 2008, I had secured admission  to an engineering college through my AIEEE rank. 

    However, my father, an IITian himself, always had a keen interest in law that ultimately  inspired me to consider law as a profession. 2008 was also, if I recall correctly, the  inaugural year of the CLAT examination. At his encouragement, I decided to take the  exam, and soon after, I found myself admitted to CNLU, Patna—without having spent  even a single day in an engineering classroom. 

    My father often says, “Law is nothing but science,” and it wasn’t long after stepping  into this noble profession that I realized how true this is. Law is fundamentally rooted  in logic and reason. Looking back, I am grateful for the redirection and for discovering  a field where I truly belong. 

    You have significant experience in education law and have represented clients in  cases such as the NEET UG Test 2024 case. What do you believe are the most pressing  legal challenges currently faced by students and educational institutions in India? 

    Talking in legal context, students are among the most vulnerable segments of  society, and it deeply concerns me when they are forced to seek relief through the courts.  I have had the privilege of representing and seeking relief for several students who, after  completing their MBBS degrees from foreign universities, were denied eligibility  certificates by the National Medical Commission (NMC). This certificate is essential  for appearing in the Foreign Medical Graduate Examination (FMGE), which is a  prerequisite for practicing medicine in India. Unfortunately, in some cases, the NMC  denies these certificates due to non-fulfilment of specific conditions. 

    The situation is particularly distressing for students who, after investing more than five  years to earn their MBBS degrees, find themselves unable to practice in India due to  technicalities. These students are left with no choice but to approach the courts. 

    Similarly, I have encountered cases where students are denied admission or faced issues  related to unfair examinations, such as those arising in NEET-UG 2024. For instance, I  had the opportunity to represent tribal students from Meghalaya in the NEET-UG 2024 dispute.

    On the other hand, educational institutions also face significant challenges, particularly  regarding recognition from regulatory bodies like the University Grants Commission  (UGC) or the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE). One particularly  intriguing case I am currently handling involves a dispute over granting recognition for  a dual-mode university (for running conventional and open courses both) to a university  with “Open” in its name. 

    In addition to these issues, there are numerous disputes concerning fee regulation,  inadequate infrastructure, reservations, and other systemic challenges within the  education sector. These matters highlight the pressing need for robust policies and a  student-centered approach to ensure that education serves its intended purpose  effectively. 

    In your early years of practice, you worked with various advocates and law firms,  handling diverse areas such as Constitutional Law, Civil Law, Arbitration Law, and the  Law of Limitation. How did these experiences shape your approach to litigation, and  what key lessons did you take away from them? 

    When I joined law school, one thing I was certain about was my desire to practice  in courts. I never had any second thoughts about it. However, when I initially entered  the profession, adapting to court life was quite challenging. During those early years, I  was exclusively practicing in the Delhi High Court as I was working under the guidance  of Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Mini Pushkarna, who was then Standing Counsel for Municipal  Corporation of Delhi. I was fortunate enough to have regular appearances before the  High Court on a daily basis and that gave me confidence and encouragement to handle  the matters in Court even in adverse situations. I have many anecdotes also which I would never forget. 

    However, contrary to what it may seem to beginners, litigation is not solely about  appearing in court and presenting arguments. It encompasses much more. The process,  from drafting a case to getting it listed before the court, is a journey in itself. Litigation  also involves various registry-related tasks, which are crucial for any lawyer to learn  and understand. In my experience, I firmly believe that a lawyer first has to become a  clerk to grasp the basics of the profession and its importance one would realise after  beginning her/his own practice. It didn’t take long for me to realize the immense  physical and mental effort required in this field. 

    Another vital lesson I learned over time—though I underestimated its significance in  the beginning—is the importance of client handling. As lawyers, we are not only  officers of the court but also advocates for our clients’ interests. Effective client  management is a core skill for building a successful legal practice. A lawyer must  understand client’s needs, build trust, communicate effectively, and provide advice  within ethical boundaries. 

    Currently, at Indus Law Associates, you handle litigation and arbitration before the  Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, the Delhi High Court, the Meghalaya High Court and  various District Courts. Can you share one of the most challenging cases you’ve  encountered, and how did you approach your preparation for it? 

    While working in my current office, I have had the opportunity to handle a variety  of cases across different forums. Among the most notable were two cases involving  students who were denied eligibility certificates after completing their MBBS degrees  in Ukraine. Securing favourable orders in these matters was particularly challenging. 

    Primarily practicing in civil litigation, I faced a unique challenge while handling a  criminal case in the District Court. This bail matter involved allegations of forgery and required navigating proceedings from the Magistrate Court to the District and Sessions  Court. The case provided me with valuable insights into the fundamentals of criminal  law. Additionally, it offered the rare experience of visiting Tihar Jail for a client meeting,  which further broadened my professional exposure. 

    I am also handling election petition before the Hon’ble High Court of Meghalaya, which  has been a challenging and enriching experience. This case has allowed me to explore  a new area of law, delving into its intricacies and technicalities, thereby by broadening  my experience.  

    Could you explain your experience in arbitration, particularly your role in  representing clients such as the Meghalaya Urban Development Authority? How do you  ensure effective representation in arbitration as compared to traditional litigation? 

    Arbitration and litigation are fundamentally different methods of dispute resolution. Arbitration offers an efficient and flexible approach, making it particularly  suitable for commercial disputes. In contrast, litigation is generally preferred for cases  requiring public scrutiny due to its broader scope. 

    For a lawyer, excelling in arbitration demands a deep understanding of the field’s  complexities, especially the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. While the Act may appear  concise, it raises numerous intricate legal questions. Arbitration is often more complex  than litigation, requiring extensive time, effort, and meticulous attention to  documentation and record-keeping, which are critical to the process. 

    Evidence is pivotal in arbitration proceedings, making cross-examination one of the  most essential advocacy skills for arbitration lawyers. 

    Representing government clients in arbitration adds another layer of responsibility.  Cases involving government entities, such as MUDA, necessitate a careful balance  between safeguarding public interest and protecting public funds. These matters often 

    involve substantial sums of money and require adherence to public policy  considerations, given their sensitive nature. 

    Arbitration indeed, is challenging but also interesting.  

    What do you find most fulfilling about your practice as an Advocate on Record,  and what motivates you to continue pursuing this challenging and demanding  profession? 

    Becoming an Advocate on Record (AoR) in the Supreme Court was a significant  milestone in my legal career, something I had always aspired to achieve. The journey  to earning this title was not without its challenges, particularly as I became an AoR in  2020 during the height of the Covid-19 pandemic. It was a time of rapid digital  transformation in the judiciary, and adapting to the newly introduced procedures was  initially challenging. However, this digital shift proved to be a great relief and a stepping  stone toward a more efficient system. 

    A common misconception about AoRs is that they function merely as filing agents for  the Supreme Court. While it is true that an AoR must be well-versed in the Court’s  procedural rules, I soon realized that their role goes far beyond filing documents. Early  in my practice, there was an expectation that my involvement would be limited to  lending my name and signature. Fortunately, with the guidance of my seniors, I quickly  understood the deeper purpose and responsibility of an AoR. 

    AoRs are not just intermediaries; they are the “face of the case” before the Hon’ble  Supreme Court. This role demands accountability, and a deep understanding of the  matter being presented. The Supreme Court itself has recently underscored the critical  responsibilities of AoRs, issuing strict guidelines to ensure that cases are filed and  presented with the utmost diligence and professionalism. 

    Beyond the procedural responsibilities, the designation of “AoR” brings a sense of  professional recognition and respect. It is both a privilege and a significant  responsibility. The journey as an AoR is undoubtedly challenging, but it is also  immensely rewarding, offering the opportunity to make significant contributions in  delivery of justice at the highest level. 

    Considering the demanding nature of your legal career, how do you manage to  balance your professional duties with personal commitments? 

    Litigation is undoubtedly a demanding profession, requiring unwavering dedication and the ability to work under constant deadlines. As a lawyer, the work never  truly ends—court hours are followed by preparation for the next day’s cases, client  meetings, drafting, and various other responsibilities.

    For me, balancing this rigorous professional life with personal commitments, especially  as a mother, presents new challenges every day. Maintaining a work-life balance is  crucial, but I won’t deny that there are moments of panic and stress. 

    However, I firmly believe that in both personal and professional spheres, no one can do  it all alone. Teamwork plays a vital role in navigating challenges and achieving success.  I am incredibly fortunate to have a strong support system—both in my personal life and  in my professional circle. Their encouragement, collaboration, and assistance enable me to meet the demands of my profession while fulfilling my responsibilities at home.  Without their support, it would have been nearly impossible to strike this balance and  carry out my duties effectively. 

    What advice would you give to young lawyers looking to follow a similar career  path in litigation and arbitration? 

    This profession demands hard work, dedication, perseverance, and a great deal of  patience. While it is undoubtedly challenging, it is equally fascinating and rewarding.  Be willing to learn from failures and adapt to the demands of each case. Never  compromise on integrity and ethics.  

    Keeping oneself updated with legal developments and regularly reading and analysing  judgments is indispensable. It is one of the critical skills necessary for excelling in  litigation, enabling lawyers to stay informed, craft stronger arguments, and navigate the  evolving legal landscape effectively. 

    On a lighter note, this profession also gives the benefit of the summer and winter  vacations. These small breaks offer lawyers a well-deserved opportunity to relax,  unwind, recharge, and prepare for the challenges ahead. 

    Get in touch with Yoothica Pallavi-

  • “The legal profession grants creative and financial freedom, but true success comes when one learns to focus on enhancing their lawyering skills without indulging in comparisons.” – Rishi Raj Sharma, Advocate-on-Record at the Supreme court of India and Founder of Law Chambers of Rishi Raj Sharma.

    “The legal profession grants creative and financial freedom, but true success comes when one learns to focus on enhancing their lawyering skills without indulging in comparisons.” – Rishi Raj Sharma, Advocate-on-Record at the Supreme court of India and Founder of Law Chambers of Rishi Raj Sharma.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    What inspired you to pursue a career in law, and how did you begin your journey in this field? What motivated you to establish your own practice in 2016, and what challenges did you face in the initial stages?

    Belonging to the family of civil servant, I was influenced by prominent members of legal fraternity who were family acquaintances. When I was around 9-10 years old, my father pursued LLB course from Agra University (though he never practised), which gave me access to judicial precedents that I used to read as bed-time stories. Being academically inclined, I was pursuing the IIT-dream, when I came across Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mocking Bird, which fructified my decision to pursue law. 

    My parents readily agreed to allow me to pursue law with the condition that I get admitted to one of the top law schools. I missed NLSUI-Bangalore seat by a whisker. However, I got selected in almost all other top law schools in country, but decided to join ILS Law College-Pune. During my five-years at law school, I worked hard on academics as well as all extra-curricular and sports activities. During college vacations, I did my internships with law firms, senior advocates, and high court judges for my all-round development as a complete lawyer.

    With an initial focus on work-discipline, I joined Remfry & Sagar, where I had an illustrious career for nearly five years. My memorable tenure at Remfry & Sagar taught my punctuality and sharpened my comprehension skills, which I feel are the key essentials for every good lawyer. Thereafter, for short periods, I joined few other legal offices, law firms, senior advocates, etc. to learn court-craft and get an exposure on the variety of work on offer in the market, and then, I set up my own chamber practice in the year 2016. With my experience, I advise that in our country, the legal profession is structured in a manner that one gets complete creative and financial freedom for work and growth only in self-owned law-firm/chamber practice. However, being a first-generational lawyer, the biggest initial challenge that I faced was handling clients and sometimes the lack of them. My advice to every aspiring and young lawyer is to not indulge in comparative analysis, and instead focus on enhancing the lawyering skills, and success will follow.  

    How did your time working with former Solicitor General Mr. Ranjit Kumar and former Additional Solicitor General Mr. Sanjay Jain shape your legal acumen? Can you share some insights from your time working with them?

    Both these two gentlemen are God’s men, and my two gurus, and legal legends in the true spirit. They have completely different lawyering kills and court-craft, but humbleness and kindness are common to them. When you spend long hours with someone together, especially your teacher/guru, a special bond develops with them. My life is deeply indebted to both of them in a lot many ways. Having worked elaborately with both of them, I say that Ranjit Kumar sir has an orthodox teacher-pupil like approach, where for gaining true knowledge, one has to first completely surrender and unlearn everything. Whilst Sanjay sir has a rather modernized approach, to teach and learn at the same time. 

    Can you share some insights and experiences from handling high-profile cases like Lajpat Nagar Bomb Blast case or the 2G scam?

    My third guru, Uttam Datt sir has taught me that all cases are equally important. The nature of court forum and the nature/gravity of the case should neither cause anxiety/over-keenness, nor deserve any special attention/concession. I do my best in every case and opportunity that lands at my door step. It is the small steps we take on daily basis that prepares us for the one large big step. Certainly, Rome was not built in a day. In my short career of fifteen years, God has been kind enough to provide me the opportunity to be associated with several high-profile cases defining legal jurisprudence in the country. I am grateful to Sanjay Jain sir for providing me with the opportunity to be involved in several high-profile cases such Lajpat Nagar Bomb Blast, 2G scam, and Antrix-Devas. All high-profile cases come with the baggage of voluminous court records and long-sitting hours. The happiness and satisfaction achieved by success obtained in these high-profile cases has no bounds and cannot be measured. 

    What are the unique responsibilities and challenges of being an Advocate-on-Record at the Supreme Court of India? Could you describe a typical day in your life as an Advocate-on-Record, and how do you manage the demands of such a prestigious and demanding role?

    Being an Advocate-on-Record at Supreme Court of India is a prestigious designation for any lawyer. We must understand that Supreme Court is the final frontier for all litigation disputes, and therefore, the biggest responsibility and challenge faced is to meet the expectation of clients. With the court hearings being conducted via hybrid mode – physically/virtually, and considerable infrastructure development, appearing before the Court has been made easier for the lawyers as well as the litigants. However, for listing of the case, one has to coordinate with the Registry, which since past few months has not been functioning at optimal level. Though the silver lining in the dark clouds is that some changes are lined-up, and we can expect things to improve in near future. 

    My chamber-practice is very structured and organized. Having an efficient and loyal clerk like Anand-ji helps.  We are planned/prepared in all our cases a week before the court-date, courtesy which I am able to appear before two-three different courts in a day. In my initial days of practice, I would be working 15-16 hours a day. However, things have changed post-COVID. Now, as opposed to the general practice of law chambers starting work post 4:00 pm, I start my work day at 7:30 am, and try to finish the major drafting work by 9:30 am. Courts are attended to from 10am to 4:30pm. The time available between court hearings is spent on reading case files, legal research, client meetings, etc. After court hours, 5:00pm to 6:30pm is spent on preparing for the next day or some client meetings. Unless there are some urgent pressing work commitments, I do not attend to any office work after 7:00pm. On a daily basis, 30 minutes is specially dedicated on reading the latest judicial precedents as bed-time reading.   

    As a legal advisor to media companies and projects like the documentary series “HUNT FOR THE INDIAN MUJAHIDEEN”, how do you balance creative freedom with legal compliance?

    Contrary to popular belief, the only role lawyers play in media and corporate houses is to red flag possible legal hurdles and issues, and suggest ways to avoid any hurdles/issues by making changes in the document, script, characterization, dialogues, nature of depiction / representation, drafting / vetting agreements/ NOCs / disclaimers etc. with the objective of retaining the creative freedom for the artists, who are essentially your clients. The final outlook of the visual content created and the market reception of the same is not in domain of the lawyer, whose job is to be handle and avoid all legal objections / possible legal objections from all sections of the society. This is relatively easier for fictional works, but for documentary works a lot of time is spent verifying the sources, whilst the problematic areas from lawyer perspective are inspirational works and biographical works.   

    Outside of your legal career, what hobbies or interest do you pursue, and how do they help you maintain a work-life balance?

    Litigation practice is a full-time job and serious work. I do not get time for pursuing hobbies and interests. I am immensely fond of reading and playing chess, but it has been a decade since I read a novel or played chess at club-level. All my days are structured and planned about a fortnight in advance. Whatever limited time I get from work, I spend with my family and go out for shopping, movies, social gatherings, temple visits, picnics, long-walks, sports, vacations, etc. During winters, I do play sports like badminton, cricket, and hockey at club-level. As a rule, I keep one day a week exclusively for family. I do cook once a week, which calms my mind.  

    Are there any specific legal reforms or policy changes you are passionate about advocating for, based on your experience in the field?

    My litigation practice is diverse to include civil, corporate and criminal matters, both at original and appellate levels. I strongly believe that the drastic changes need to be made in the judicial system to make it speedier. Justice delayed is Justice denied. We need more competent Judges at District Court level. All civil and criminal trials should be done on day-to-day basis. All cases should be processed chronologically. Hefty costs should be imposed for seeking adjournments. There are numerous judgements by Supreme Court and High Courts on this issue, but in ground reality, things still move at snail pace. 

    What trends do you foresee shaping the future of legal practice in India, and how are you preparing your firm to stay ahead of these trends?

    I feel law firm practice will be way forward. However, independent counsels / people with small chamber-practice will never be out of work. The focus is to keep enhancing the lawyering skills on daily basis. People with top skills are never out of work, be it in any field.  

    As someone with significant experience, how do you approach mentorship and leadership within your firm and broader legal community? What advice would you give to young aspiring lawyers who are just starting their legal careers and looking to make significant impact in the field?

    At this stage, mentorship are big shoes for me to fill. In the past, I have visited quite a few colleges to share my experience with the students. I am accessible to all young lawyers for guidance and advise, and many of them do consult me from time to time. My general advice to everyone aspiring to be a litigation lawyer is to keep head down, learn, work, and be patient for at least 8-10 years. As opposed to other professions, the legal profession requires considerable maturity, compassion, and years of skill and learning. I would suggest them to not compete with anyone or to do comparative analysis or to be influenced by social media influencers, and rather they must try to be a person with substance, and an empty noisy vessel.  

    Get in touch with Rishi Raj Sharma-