Super Lawyer

Category: Partners, General Counsels and Senior Advocates

  • “Teaching is one of the best ways to learn. It gave me the ability to view complex cases with a broader perspective and has immensely helped in my practice.” – Surya Senthil, Partner at Surana & Surana International Attorneys India

    “Teaching is one of the best ways to learn. It gave me the ability to view complex cases with a broader perspective and has immensely helped in my practice.” – Surya Senthil, Partner at Surana & Surana International Attorneys India

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    You began your legal journey under the mentorship of Advocate Radhakrishnan. How did that experience shape your foundational years, and how have those early lessons influenced your practice today? Could you please walk us through your journey?  

    To say the truth, I am fortunate to have two learned seniors who have mentored me. As soon as I passed out of law school, I was propelled by a passion for justice and was initially attracted towards Criminal law practise. My first Senior Late Advocate R. Radhakrishnan used to say that, though I may not continue my law practise in Cuddalore, a district headquarters in the State of Tamilnadu and will eventually move out to Madras High Court, nevertheless, the short stint of Law practise in District and lower courts where one will learn basic advocacy, nuances of conducting a trial and client handling, will help me in the long run career of an advocate. Today I realise the foresightedness of my Senior, when I practically see that I have an edge over others while conducting the trials.

    My first senior helped me understand the art of choosing the right questions to be asked in cross-examination by identifying the loopholes in the evidence given by a witness and drawing a comparison with the documents and statements made by them. Further, I learnt from him the exercise of mentally charting the course of a cross-examination rather than writing it on a piece of paper in question format, unlike most practitioners.

    I used to keenly observe the trials he conducted in criminal cases, wherein he would walk the witness through simple questions based on accepted facts and slowly make the witness comfortable. At this point, he will lead the witness to walk into the trap of reliability where the witness will become at his ease and real self. Subsequently, he will gradually shift the gear and ask about the pertinent contradictions in his statement to elucidate the truth of the witness. Though in criminal cases it worked well I was very sceptical as to how it would work in civil or commercial cases, but to my astonishment, it has worked very well and notably even in a few of my cases the opposite party whom I have cross-examined, has immediately after the cross-examination has proposed for a settlement and the matters have been settled.

    I started my second innings of advocacy under my Senior PS Surana before the Madras High Court in the year 2004 focussing on Intellectual Property law practice. My second senior not only taught me the nitty-gritty of civil litigation, but also the importance of attention to detail and essential qualities to become a successful lawyer. On the personal front, he is also my spiritual guide who has made a significant awakening in realising my inner potential, by practically living through the values of detachment, fearlessness and minimal materialistic needs. For example, though he could afford a luxurious car, he used to always have value-for-money cars. These observations made me realise that there are bigger and better achievements in one’s life rather than going for materialistic comfort.

    As someone who transitioned between academia and active practice, what unique insights did you gain from teaching law, and how did it enhance your approach to complex cases later in your career?  

    Though I was to resume my Court Practice, after the completion of my Master’s in Law, I was pulled into teaching, by my mentor in the NLSIU, Professor Dr. N L Mitra who was not only an academician of excellence but also a Jurist with profound thinking and deep understanding of commercial laws. Just after completing my master’s from NLS, I was offered a teaching job by Professor Mitra at the newly found National Law University, Jodhpur in the year 2003. This was his dream project where for the first time in India courses including BSc LLB and BCom LLB were offered in addition to the traditional BA LLB. 

    I was offered to teach the law of Torts and Commercial Transactions for undergraduate students and Trademark and Copyright laws for Post Graduate students. Though I have taught only for a short stint of 18 months, it was a great experience for me and those students whom I taught are still fond of me and maintain a good relationship with me even today. In my opinion, the teaching profession has still not received its due recognition with lucrative pay and societal respect, which in turn will attract the best talent. It is noteworthy to mention the commendable move by the Bar Council of India to relax its rules in making leading practitioners’ contributions to academia, by way of recognising ‘Professors of Practice’. This transition is only a beginning, and I strongly believe that we still have a long way to go.

    My first takeaway from my teaching experience comes from my exposure to International Jurisprudence, especially the evolution of law from the American courts and the English courts, which immensely helps me to trace the evolution and march of law in a particular subject. This understanding gives me a better perspective, which when presented before our Courts aids them, in interpreting the law more convincingly.

    My second takeaway from the teaching experience is the learning of effective use of case law research tools and the habit of being updated with current legal events. In the era of the internet and the availability of an enormous amount of knowledge in any given field from online resources to students, modern Teachers of law must use these online tools.

    Further, I always feel that ‘Teaching is one of the best ways to learn’.

    Your pro bono work, such as the case advocating for the retrospective regularization of a Tamil Nadu government driver, is commendable. What lessons did this case teach you about the power of law in changing individual lives?

    There are two driving forces I get as a lawyer, when I do pro bono works. Firstly, I get the satisfaction that by using my legal knowledge and acumen, I can get a relief for a person whose rights have been affected by the system since he is not able to defend himself or get the services of a lawyer due to his economic and/or social background. This also comes from my brought up, where my mother always supports the underdogs in any given situation. The next level of satisfaction arising out of pro bono work is when I attempt to challenge a particular law or proposition of law propounded by a case law which in general perception is not conformity with the equity and good conscience. 

    My first pro bono case was for a driver, who was working in Government of Tamil Nadu and has worked under my father, when he was in service. He came to meet my father knowing that I have become an advocate, and he wanted my help to fight his case, as he is not a financial position to engage a lawyer. I fought that service matter for retrospective regularisation from the date of his joining in the service and got a successful order before the Madras High Court.

    I realised the power of the Court especially the Constitutional Courts, to alter a person’s destiny when I handled a case in 2011. A second-year student from Madras Dental college approached me saying that she has scored 200/200 in physics and chemistry and 196 in Biology but was not able to secure an admission in MBBS and therefore got admitted in BDS in Madras Dental College. Subsequently the TN Govt had brought in a G.O wherein any student studying in a professional course and has Witten an improvement exam conducted by TN Higher Secondary Board gets an improved score , then he/she can secure admission in a better professional course on merits as per his/her choice, without having any impediment of studying in another professional course. In that student’s case, she gave the improvement exam and scored an improved score of 200/200 in Biology also. She then applied for MBBS, and she was called for counselling to get admitted in Madras Medical college for MBBS. In the middle of counselling, her candidature was cancelled, based on an order passed by the First Bench of Madras High Court quashing the said Govt. Order as unconstitutional.  I was able to relate myself personally to this as I myself joined an engineering course but had to forcefully discontinue that when I wanted to pursue medicine, as the law at that point stated that one has to discontinue a professional course before the commencement of the semester exam, if they wish to pursue another professional course or one has to wait for 3years after the completion of the first professional course to pursue the 2nd professional course. 

    The rationale given in support of this rule is that if anyone discontinues a professional course in the middle of the Course then that seat cannot be filled and goes waste. Further, another argument put forth was that Government spends a considerable amount to make any student study a professional course and by quitting in the middle, the student is wasting the money spent on his/her studies by the Government. 

    However, the said GO, Government had relaxed that rule and allowed any students to discontinue in the middle of his/her first professional course to join or pursue another professional course of his/her choice if he/she is otherwise eligible. However, the First Bench of the Madras High Court believed that GO was unconstitutional and struck it as violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. 

    The student was not keen on challenging as she was already into BDS and bet the odds-on uncertainty. Therefore, I took up the matter as pro bono and convinced my friend Mr. Senthil Jagadeesan who was an AOR then, now a designated Senior Counsel in Supreme Court, and engaged Retired Justice Nageshwar Rao, then a designated Senior Counsel to appear in this matter. We were able to convince the then Chief Justice of India Justice K.G. Balakrishnan, on the point that if a person is determined to study a particular professional course, then he/she would anyway do it after the mandatory cooling off period and therefore such restriction does not seem to be rationale and serve any purpose.

    This particular case was an eye opener for me and I realised the enormous power vested by the Constitution on the High Courts and Supreme Court to mould a suitable relief to the deserving, which made me realise the power of the court to alter a person’s destiny and in which along with the judge, a lawyer also gets to plays a small but vital role.

    Serving on the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB), you played a key role in landmark decisions, including setting royalty rates for music composers and lyricists. How did these decisions impact the intellectual property landscape in India, and what challenges did you face during such high-profile cases? 

    Intellectual Property Appellate Board served as a specialized tribunal to adjudicate matters pertaining to intellectual property laws and as an appellate body it provided for appeals against decisions of IP offices. I served under Hon’ble Mr. Justice Manmohan Singh of the Delhi High Court (Retd) and gained a significant experience in contributing the bench towards the effective adjudication of complex intellectual property issues. In my tenure of 8 months, was part of the bench deciding on the rate of royalty and the right of claiming it by the IPRS in respect of the broadcast of lyrics and music underlying sound recordings by FM Radio Stations in India. The hearings took place continuously for 28 days and all leading Senior counsels like Mr. Mukhul Rohtagi, Mr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul among others, appeared for the parties to present their arguments. We have judiciously examined their legal arguments, analysed the case laws stated and interpreted the legal provisions pertaining to copyright licensing in India and delivered an order recognising the rights of lyricists and music composers to claim royalties based on the 2012 amendments to the Copyright Act, 1957.  I am glad that the Chairman of IPAB had allowed me to pronounce the order.    

    As a Copyright member of IPAB, we were mandated to fix the Royalty rates by 31-12-2021, before the expiry of the rates fixed by Copyright Board. During that exercise, under the able guidance of Hon’ble Mr. Justice Manmohan Singh, Chairman of the Board, we have not only fixed the royalty rates but also applied the position of law as it stood by recognising the right of the music composers and lyricists through the Copyright Amendment Act 2012. Notably, this order was subjected to judicial scrutiny by way of writ petitions before the High Courts of Bombay and Delhi and subsequently has received affirmations from these Hon’ble courts attesting to the soundness of the decisions made by the IPAB.  

    While adjudicating as a member of IPAB, though for a shorter period, I felt that I have a strong sense of justice and a desire to play a direct role in upholding justice and ensuring the fair application of the law. Though as a member of the bar, I made my earning for my living and contributed my bit to the society and legal fraternity, I have not got the fullest personal satisfaction of making a positive impact on society when compared to my sitting as a part of the Bench.

    Your work has touched both legal practitioners and the broader community. How do you believe your role as a litigator and advisor contributes to helping businesses and individuals protect their intellectual property while fostering innovation?

    As IP practitioner, my foremost duty is to sensitise my client on the value of creating an IP, the significance of lawfully protecting it and to reap the benefits out of it. As it is a negative right, creating a limited monopoly rights for one’s intellectual efforts, it is also my bounden duty to give a fair warning to my client, not to abuse such power by trying to create an absolute monopoly out of it. This delicate balance must be imbibed in the minds of an IP creator/client to fully utilise the IP laws to its letter and spirit. This is the role of an advisor played by me towards my client for fostering innovation and strategic growth in their business. 

    Once, my client’s IP right has been rightfully oriented under the existing IP regime, thereafter my role as a litigator begins in guarding the IP of my client at all possible ways. In my experience, either at the Cease-and-Desist stage or at the Pre suit mediation stage (as mandated by Section 12 A of the Commercial Courts Act) itself matters have resulted in settlement due to the rightful presentation of facts on how the infringer is infringing my client’s IP.

    With the current generation of legal professionals seeking to specialize in areas like intellectual property, what key skills and knowledge areas do you think are crucial for their success in this domain?  

    According to me, specialising in an area like IP needs a broader perspective and an in-depth understanding of the laws. Further, IP laws constantly evolve due to the ongoing International Trade talks through WTO and subsequent normalisation of IP laws in addition to the emerging jurisprudence of IP due to the interpretation by Courts in accordance with the Countries’ specific needs. 

    As a practitioner, one must subscribe to latest journals or website which keeps updating the latest jurisprudential developments along with commentary or viewpoints of the eminent authors. One should also organise/attend conferences and seminars where peers in the field are given a platform to share and brainstorm ideas that have evolved in IP practise. 

    As a legal expert in intellectual property law, how do you see IPR playing a critical role in today’s business landscape, especially in India’s growing tech and innovation sectors?  

    Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) plays a crucial role in shaping the business landscape, especially in a rapidly growing economy like India. Here are some key points highlighting the importance of IPR in India’s technology and innovation sectors.  IP laws encourage innovations by providing legal protection for inventions and innovations, which incentivizes individuals and companies to invest in research and development. This is particularly significant in sectors like Information Technology, Biotechnology, Health care and Renewable Energy. 

    A robust IPR regime is essential for the growth of startups and small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). SMEs play a vital role in stimulating the economic growth, providing employment opportunities for large number of people and promoting grass root level innovations which normally results in lot of products which will ease our living and improve our comfort. This potential of the SMEs as a trigger for economic boom is realised by the Government and has the Govt taken lot of measures to promote and support MSME’s at the State and the Central level through various policies and implementation of beneficial schemes.

    By harnessing Intellectual Property and protecting it, companies can have a competitive edge over others in the market. A strong IP culture in their organisation is essential for Indian companies that are looking to leave their footprint Globally and to compete with the MNC giants.

    When we talk about IPR regime and IPR enforcement they are two parts of the same structure. While India has made significant strides in strengthening its IPR regime, challenges remain in terms of enforcement and awareness. A sound strategy to address the issue of enforcement can further enhance the effectiveness of the IPR regime in India, which in turn will attract FDI that will result in economic boost leading to creation of high value jobs. 

    Introduction of commercial courts is one such bold step taken by the Government of India to bring in an effective and efficacious dispute resolution mechanism for the business disputes including IPR related disputes. In my opinion, India’s evolving Commercial Court’s litigation and practice is a strategic move that will promote an environment of growth for technology and innovation sectors. As the country continues to grow, a robust IPR system with proper enforcing mechanism, will be pivotal in sustaining this momentum and ensuring long-term economic prosperity.

    With such a dynamic and demanding legal career, how do you unwind in your personal time, and what hobbies or activities do you pursue to maintain balance and recharge?  

    I unwind by watching movies regularly on weekends, mostly humour or action genre. I also have the habit of listening to music on the way to home and office. Once in 3 or 4 months, I venture out for Trekking, Hiking or biking which rejuvenates me. I have completed the Leh to Manali bike expedition with my wife in 2006 and alone in 2023, which I would say one of most enchanting as well as enduring trip. I have also travelled by car from Chennai to Chardhams with my Parents for a 22-day long pilgrimage tour covering many temples on the way including the famous Siddheswara temple, Kashi, etc. I have climbed multiple times Chaturagiri hills, Agasthya hills, Parvatha malai, Velliangiri hills, Tirupathi hills etc. to name a few.

    Trekking allows you to connect with nature, experience diverse flora and fauna, and enjoy breathtaking view and reminds us about the destruction mankind has done to mother nature in the name of unsustainable development and growth. The serene and picturesque environment of hill stations can significantly reduce stress and anxiety. Being in the nature and breathing the fresh air, boosts mental clarity, improve the general mood and brings inner peace. Once you practise this regularly then you will develop a connection with the universe which will provide a deep sense of fulfilment which cannot be expressed by words until one experience it personally. From health perspective, trekking or hiking in hilly uneven terrains is equal to a tough work out and burns more calories and develop endurance the body. Trekking can be a family activity also, I used to go with my friends, niece and nephews. After marriage, my wife who is a pillar of strength and a guiding factor in all my activities either professional or personal, used to accompany me. 

    You’ve had the opportunity to interact with both senior legal luminaries and upcoming law students throughout your career. What common threads do you see between these generations of legal minds, and how do you think legal education should evolve to address future challenges?

    Definitely, more sharper minds are coming into the profession after the emergence of 5 year Integrated professional course and National Law Schools. Common threads between these generations of legal minds are to protect the rights and defend the vulnerable section of the society. Legal Education also tries to modernise its curriculum to be more practical and legal practitioners should be brought in to interact with students to share their practical knowledge.

    Compared to 30 years ago, when I completed law, the internship opportunities offered by universities today are more structured and systematic whereby it gives a plethora of exposure and versatile experiences. For example, nowadays universities provide a structured guidance wherein first year students are expected to do an internship with an NGO, second year students are expected to do an internship with companies and from 3rd year onwards they can intern with a lawyer or law firm, and they can intern twice a year. Universities should play a vital role in continuous legal education in collaboration with Bar Council/ Bar Association for a structured two-week course on specialised areas such as Arbitration Practise, IP Practise etc for the practising advocates to keep them updated in their respective fields. Further, just like how medical colleges have attached hospitals and patients treated by the final year house surgeons, Law Universities should also facilitate legal aid clinics in law colleges, in which under the guidance of professors, students can provide free legal aid. 

    Get in touch with Surya Senthil-

  • “A positive approach is a must while working in a team. ‘You’re almost there’ is always better than ‘you cannot do it.'” – Ritin Vatrana, Legal Counsel -Corporate Litigation, Piramal Capital & Housing Finance Limited

    “A positive approach is a must while working in a team. ‘You’re almost there’ is always better than ‘you cannot do it.’” – Ritin Vatrana, Legal Counsel -Corporate Litigation, Piramal Capital & Housing Finance Limited

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    You started your legal career in 2007 after completing your BALLB (Hons.) from Kurukshetra University. What motivated you to choose law as your career, and could you walk us through your journey from those early days to where you are now?  

    My entry into the Legal field was very much certain since I am a third generation Lawyer. My grandfather practiced in Labour Laws, my father is still practicing in District Courts Patiala and hence my parents had already decided during my childhood about my profession and hence I entered the field. Initially, I started learning the procedures followed in court and the ground realities of the Legal field where I came to know about how to apply what I learnt in my degree. For this, I actually went through the entire degree subjects 4-5 times again doing self-study in order to get a deep knowledge of the subjects so that I can have better understanding of the cases I got to handle. Slowly and gradually, I developed my own understanding in law and by that time I was able to handle the cases independently. Being a trial lawyer, handling the evidence part was most challenging and most interesting as well. I started cross examining the witnesses independently and luckily many cases went my way. However, in Patiala there wasn’t much to learn about since there was hardly any variety in the cases we got; mostly there used to be Cheque bounce matters, matrimonial disputes, NDPS etc. and those cases were very much cyclostyled and my eagerness to learn wanted me go out and do something new in the field. 

    You began your law practice at the Patiala district courts, where your father was a well-established professional. How did working in the district courts shape your approach to law, and what key lessons did you take away from those early formative years?    

    My time in the Courts was extremely important. Being a legal professional, the most important thing is to know how to draft a legal document and an in-house Counsel is always expected to have very crisp drafting skills which would go on to protect the interest of the organization. Further, being meticulous, attention to detail, presence of mind, patience and calculated aggression were the key qualities I learnt during my practice days.

    You mentioned your encounter with the Legal Head of CIPLA, which inspired your transition into corporate law. What about that interaction made you decide to shift from litigation to becoming an in-house counsel?  

    As I had stated, in one of my cases related to CIPLA, I met the in-house counsel of the company and had a great conversation with him about how things go as an in-house counsel and what are the prospects. He told me that as an in-house, he came across several types of different cases and that made his knowledge in the field vast and comprehensive and to add to that the biggest incentive was the opportunity to travel. Afterwards, I discussed it with my elder brother, who was already working in corporate and he also reiterated a similar view. That was perhaps the trigger point of me looking to shift to the Corporate. It took me quite a while to get my first opportunity in a large organization. The first one month was like a roller coaster but gradually I managed to get into the system and started understanding corporate governance and that was perhaps the turning point of my life both professionally and personally as it gave me so much energy to work and live round the clock. Leaving the comfort zone was tough initially but once you are out of it, THERE BEGINS THE LIFE.

    What advice would you give to young legal professionals who aspire to transition from litigation to corporate in-house roles, especially those aiming to work with large multinational corporations?

    Ever since I have started my journey with the corporate, I have met many legal professionals eager to know how things work in the sector. Many are under the myth of “Corporate Slavery”. I shared my experiences with them of how I managed PAN India litigation and contracts of my first Company single handedly. From working for 4-5 hours a day in practice to working 16-18 hours in corporate was an eye opener and a huge confidence booster. I only advise the youngsters to look for excellence and not results early on. Law is a vast field and to move on in this field, not only you need to know the law, but how and where to apply it and this requires both theoretical as well as practical knowledge. In-House Counsels do a whole lot of drafting work including contracts, complaints, notices etc. Litigation lawyers hardly get to know about drafting of contracts and hence i advise them to find some good books pertaining to contract drafting if they have any plans to shift to the sector.  

    You’ve been involved in arbitration cases with values ranging from ₹50 lakh to ₹300 crore. What are some key skills a lawyer needs to successfully handle such high-stakes cases, and how do you manage the pressure?  

    When the stakes are high, the pressure is high as well but as a legal professional, my job is to find the law point and the circumstances favouring my organization so that I can benefit them or at least prevent any loss. The skills I learnt in practice also lets me foresee the tentative result sometimes and that helps us to plan accordingly. The thing with high stake matters is that you need to thing out of the box sometimes to get the desired results and for that you need to have strong legal knowledge but also to know the ground realities. 

    With over 17 years of legal experience and handling high-pressure cases, how do you manage work-life balance, and what advice would you give to legal professionals to avoid burnout?  

    In my previous organization, I did go through that burnout because of the urgencies involved. The stakes were high and time was less and that is when you learn and develop a strong temperament. Sometimes, there were late hour calls and emails but I had set a time for my “homework” so that I can give time to family and household works too and me being a travel bug, occasional holiday was always going to be there. To add to that, I am an early riser and a cyclist so every morning an hour’s ride would freshen me up with all the energy to go hard for the day.

    In your view, how important is interdisciplinary knowledge, such as understanding business or finance, for a successful legal career in the corporate world?

    Corporate is all about business and finances and whosoever is working in corporate needs to know about it. During my stint with Isgec Heavy Engineering, I learnt a lot about International Business processes as to how contracts of supply work and how the conditions are set by the companies and where to negotiate. I was naive back then but going through so many Contracts of Supply, Erection and Commissioning and those tender documents was another experience. Especially when I was told that the documents drafted by me are going to Russia or Dubai; it sometimes gave me goosebumps but it made me work harder and to get a better understanding about the subject. 

    You’ve managed a team of 40 lawyers in your current role. What leadership qualities do you think are essential for managing a successful legal team, and how do you mentor young lawyers under your guidance?  

    My job is to allocate the work to empanelled lawyers. Generally, I have a 5-10 conversation with the lawyer to understand his understanding on the subject and if he is a newcomer or unaware about the topic, I provide him/her with the relevant information along with legal provision and let them prepare the draft and as they say, a lawyer’s calibre can be judged by his drafting skills and so i always advise youngsters to draft the document from scratch and avoid doing copy paste; you’re never going to learn copying and pasting. Drafting skill to a lawyer is like a sword to a warrior.  Further, a positive approach is a must while you work in a team. “you’re almost there” is always better than “you cannot do it”. 

    Looking ahead, what emerging legal trends do you think will significantly impact the corporate legal landscape, and how should aspiring legal professionals prepare for them?  

    The advent of technology has really brought a huge window for legal professionals to enter the corporate world. Earlier, the legal professionals were limited to law practice, judiciary or teaching but now the upcoming generation is proactive and are perhaps 5-7 years quicker than ours. Nowadays, in-house Counsel’s job is not limited to civil, consumer, criminal laws or contract laws; Technology laws, Artificial Intelligence, Intellectual Property Rights, Data Privacy laws have taken over and in the coming times, knowledge about these is going to play a key role. So, I always advise the aspiring professionals to keep getting some knowledge in the fields as they are going to play a pivotal role in carving them a successful in-house Counsel. 

    Get in touch with Ritin Vatrana–

  • “In the courtroom, it’s not about the length of arguments but the merits—crisp and to the point is my mantra for success.” – Neetica Sharma, Partner at MV Kini Law Firm

    “In the courtroom, it’s not about the length of arguments but the merits—crisp and to the point is my mantra for success.” – Neetica Sharma, Partner at MV Kini Law Firm

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    Can you take us through the journey of how you started your legal career, from your early days at Maharishi Dayanand University to becoming a Partner at MV Kini Law Firm?  What made you choose law as your career initially?

    I come from a small city, and I completed my LLB from a small town as well, though Maharishi Dayanand University has always been considered a reputable institution for law courses. Growing up in a small town presents its own set of challenges. When I pursued my LLB, a career in law was typically seen as either practicing in district courts, securing a government job like ADA, or preparing for the judiciary. But I had bigger dreams — I wanted to move to Delhi and carve a different path for myself.

    As a first-generation lawyer, I had to find my own way. The lack of proper resources and guidance, especially compared to those from metro cities, made things difficult for me. My journey began with working in an LPO (Legal Process Outsourcing), where I worked for a brief period. At the time, LPOs were booming.

    After a year, I transitioned to the corporate sector, but I quickly realized it wasn’t where my passion lay. I’ve always been drawn to the courts, so I made the decision that for me, law meant “litigation,” and that’s what I truly wanted to pursue.

    I eventually applied to my current firm, and after years of hard work and dedication, I am now a Partner here. However, the journey was far from easy — it wasn’t a bed of roses. What kept me going was my commitment to hard work, my dedication, and my unwavering love for the courts.

    You’ve appeared before various legal forums, including the Supreme Court, High Court, and Arbitral Tribunals. Could you share the key differences in how cases are presented, argued, and decided across these different courts, and how you adapt your approach based on the forum you’re in?  

    Definitely, there is a difference in how we present and argue cases before different forums, such as Arbitral Tribunals, High Courts, and the Supreme Court. In my view, the key difference is that with each advancing stage, arguments become more concise.

    For instance, when presenting a case before an Arbitral Tribunal, a counsel needs to lay out the case in as much detail as possible. Every relevant factual detail must be presented to the Tribunal without fail. However, when it comes to the High Court, the focus shifts to explaining why an award is flawed in law and how the challenge fits within the legal grounds or criteria.

    Finally, when arguing before the Supreme Court, the presentation should be as brief and precise as possible. The synopsis of the Special Leave Petition (SLP) essentially encapsulates the entire case, and it should be drafted in a manner that allows the judge to grasp the case without needing to delve further.

    As someone who is proficient in handling mainstream commercial litigation, what are some of the emerging challenges in this field, and how should legal professionals prepare to tackle them?  

    Nowadays, commercial dealings are centred around arbitration. Almost every contract agreement includes an arbitration clause, with one of the primary objectives being to secure a speedy remedy that avoids the procedural complexities of court proceedings. However, we are gradually drifting away from the advantages of arbitration. Arbitration proceedings are increasingly resembling court processes, as arbitral tribunals adopt similar procedures. In my view, this should not be the case. If arbitration starts functioning like a court, what is the point of having an arbitration clause?

    I began handling arbitrations in 2010 and have attended almost hundreds of proceedings since then. The way arbitration was conducted back then was very different from how it is now. It was more party-friendly than compared to the current scenario. As a lawyer, one must continuously learn and be open to accepting changes, as the arbitration process evolves over time.

    Your successful representation of NHAI in several landmark cases has set significant legal precedents. Could you share the key factors that contributed to your success in these cases?

    For me, the key factor that helped me getting success in the cases is “to be focussed on the issue”. Just be thorough with the facts, updated on the law point and be very relevant in the arguments. I personally don’t believe in the length of arguments; I believe in the merits of arguments. For me “crisp and to the point” is the mantra. 

    Further, when it comes to arbitration/dispute resolution, law is getting stricter with regard to court’s interference so whenever an award is challenged, it’s very important to just focus on the key points of the case where courts can interfere rather just presenting a long history of case when courts can only deal with question of law. Further, I believe to give a right advice/opinion to my clients and do not encourage habitual litigation. 

    You’ve led litigation teams for several years. How important do you think mentorship is in the legal profession, and what role has it played in shaping your career? Do you actively mentor young advocates?  

    Mentorship is very important in every field. It gives a certain kind of confidence and motivation. I remember I was so naïve when I joined this profession. I have also had my own struggles of coming from a small city. So, I always try to make sure that young lawyers joining the firm get my support, mentorship. I believe in Teamwork.   

    Not every case ends in success. Can you share an experience where the outcome was not in your favor? How did you handle that, and what lessons did you take from it?  

    I have been representing government clients mostly and have been appearing on behalf of the government in very high-stakes and complex matters. I will not feel shy to say that success rate of government is less in comparison to private parties in commercial matters. So, I also have an experience of not getting the outcome in my favour. But what I have learnt is that our approach should be defend or fight for our client to a maximum level possible. In dispute resolution/Commercial litigation, specially in Arbitrations, outcome is not always in the form of black-and-white. For eg. defending a client and getting 5 out of 8 claims rejected is also a win to an extent. In the same way, getting an award of 100 crores out of the claimed amount of 150 crores, is also a win. 

    As a leader in your field, what is your vision for the future of arbitration and litigation in India? What reforms or changes do you believe are necessary to improve the efficiency of the legal process?  

    Without any doubt, future of litigation in India is commercial litigation. After acknowledging the need of developing a strong dispute resolution mechanism in India, amendments of 2015 and 2019 were made in Arbitration and Conciliation Act and Commercial Courts act was introduced. The way Commercial Courts Act has simplified the process of litigation in commercial disputes is commendable. 

    Arbitration has been a continuously growing filed. However, it comes with its own challenges which require to be addressed practically. First and foremost is regarding the cost involved in the arbitrations as arbitration these days has become a luxury litigation. In my view, 3 issues which require immediate attention are: Cost effectiveness, procedural simplification and impartiality. 

    As a female partner at a prestigious law firm, what challenges, if any, have you faced in the male-dominated legal industry, and how have you overcome them? What advice would you offer to women aspiring to reach leadership positions in law?  

    I have been lucky enough to not face any gender-based discrimination at my organisation. However, there is one challenge which I have always felt in this profession is Networking. A male lawyer can easily go out with clients, have a professional dinner (which many a times ends up getting more work) but a female lawyer has to consider many things before doing any such networking. So, even if we don’t face any man-made discrimination but some natural discriminations are there in our society. 

    My advice to young women lawyers is that just keep going, no matter how many struggles come in your way. 

    Given your extensive workload and responsibilities, how do you manage to balance your professional life with your personal life? What do you do to recharge and maintain a healthy balance?  

    Legal profession is a very demanding profession and there is no chance of negotiation. So, to balance it out with my personal life, I try to finish up my work by 7.30 pm and that’s only possible with proper planning. Though our profession is full of surprises when it comes to work but I try to plan everything which makes it possible for me to wrap up major portion of my work by 7.30 pm. Another thing is that I always prefer to reside near office area which helps me save travelling time. 

    When it comes to health, litigation lawyers unlike corporate lawyers remain physically active by walking entire day in court which is a benefit to us. I am not a gym or fitness enthusiast, but I try to do 30 mins brisk walk in my colony park. Whenever I get some more time, I try to do little bit of running. I have also successfully run Delhi Half Marathon (21 kms) twice. 

    Apart from physical health, mental health is equally important. Everybody can see your physical illness, but nobody sees your mental illness. And due to “work pressure” and for some “no work”, lawyers are more vulnerable to it. I am a mental health advocate and want to do something more concrete in this area to spread mental awareness.

    Get in touch with Neetica Sharma-

  • “Lawyers make a unique contribution to corporate life, earning respect as professionals and influencing the company’s strategic priorities while upholding ethics and integrity in all decisions.” – Nitin Mittal, General Counsel at Signify (Formerly Philips Lighting)

    “Lawyers make a unique contribution to corporate life, earning respect as professionals and influencing the company’s strategic priorities while upholding ethics and integrity in all decisions.” – Nitin Mittal, General Counsel at Signify (Formerly Philips Lighting)

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    You have an impressive journey- starting from your early days as counsel for Evergreen International Limited – Furniture Export industry to your current role at Signify Innovations India Limited (Formerly Philips Lighting India Limited) What were some pivotal moments that shaped your professional path?

     “First of all, thank you for the opportunity to share my journey. My professional path began long before I became a qualified lawyer and CS. While studying, I worked at a securities advisory firm and later at a consulting firm, engaging in a diverse range of tasks. I’ve always had a passion for innovation, hard work, growth, and learning. From my early struggles, I learned the importance of working hard and putting your heart and mind into whatever task comes your way, without worrying about money, job titles, or other benefits.

    There were several pivotal moments in my career. The first was in early 2003 when I worked at a manufacturing plant in Himachal Pradesh. This experience exposed me to various challenges and opportunities in a manufacturing setup, where I dealt with a wide range of legal and financial issues. I remember working on the shop floor for two weeks during a workers’ strike. This experience provided a solid foundation for my career, as working in a manufacturing plant requires a highly disciplined, structured, and efficient environment, which is also very demanding. My then-CEO advised me to take at least one round of the entire production process every day to learn about plant functioning, a piece of advice I cherish to this day. This taught me the concept of ‘Management by walking around.’ Since the company was also listed, I learned the value of having robust processes and systems to ensure compliance.

    During that time, I was inspired by my CEO to read ‘The Goal’ by Goldratt, which introduced me to the theory of constraints and how addressing bottlenecks can increase overall efficiency and help achieve business goals. This gave me a much better understanding of the production process.

    The second transformative point was when I had the opportunity to work at OSRAM, a German company. There, I was finally able to demonstrate my potential and expertise in various areas of legal, compliance, and governance. OSRAM was part of Siemens then, and I was part of the Siemens India compliance team, working on establishing the initial compliance program in India. I am grateful to have been part of the India compliance team at that time, which gave me a solid foundation in the compliance domain. I also worked on several complex litigations and M&A transactions.

    My last significant change was moving to Philips Lighting in 2016, which was transformative in every sense. Philips Lighting (now Signify) is the world leader in lighting and the largest lighting company in India. Here, I have had the opportunity to work on groundbreaking deals and transactions, making a real difference in helping the business achieve its strategic goals in line with the #BrighterLivesBetterWorld brand vision.”

    What do you love most about your current role at Signify?  What are some unique legal challenges you face in the lighting products and services industry? 

    “At Signify, the company values its people, and I am proud to be part of such an innovative and energetic team. In my current role, I lead the Legal, Compliance, and Governance function for the Greater India and Pacific region. I love my position as General Counsel and Company Secretary because each day brings new challenges that allow me to showcase my expertise and skills, ultimately benefiting the company.

    I handle a wide range of topics daily. For instance, last week, I advised on potential sales deals in systems and services for India and the Pacific, which involved contract reviews and risk mitigation. I also dealt with high-stakes criminal litigations, arbitration matters, commercial disputes, and compliance advisories on anti-corruption practices. Additionally, I structured an incentive program, managed a board meeting and a shareholders meeting, finalized the annual report with the board of directors’ agenda, worked on potential corporate transactions, and advised on compliance investigations with our regional team and global experts. I also conducted training for the Pacific region on anti-corruption, anti-trust, privacy, conflict of interest, and other compliance topics, and provided advice on deal structuring, corporate law matters, and other legal and integrity issues.

    Each day presents a new opportunity to work on diverse issues and demonstrate how law shapes key decisions within the organization.”

    Did you always want to become a lawyer? What made you choose law as a profession? 

    “I became a lawyer quite by chance, as my career path evolved serendipitously. Initially, I was drawn to the finance sector and aimed to combine my CS qualification with a CFO role. However, over time, my skills and interests shifted more towards law and compliance, leading me to focus on this area. In the end, I’m glad I chose law as my profession. Lawyers make a unique contribution to corporate life, earning respect as professionals and influencing the company’s strategic priorities while upholding ethics and integrity in all decisions.”

    With over two decades of experience in the legal field, what major shifts have you observed in corporate legal practices, especially in compliance and contract drafting?  What has been the role of technology in advancing these changes?

    “I believe the core principles for a lawyer remain unchanged: providing quality and timely advice without fear or favor. However, the legal profession is now much more recognized for its contribution and value to business decision-making compared to two decades ago.

    I also observe a significant shift towards digitalization in areas such as contract management, compliance approvals, and the automation and digitization of board and shareholder meetings. AI is increasingly being used to support counsels with research, drafting, presentations, and memos for any jurisdiction worldwide, as well as handling routine advice through bots.

    The successful General Counsel of the future will be one who leverages AI to drive efficiency and automation while balancing the use of digital tools with sound judgment and experience. Technology cannot replace the nuanced judgment that comes from years of experience, especially in complex legal matters such as litigation, contract negotiation, legal advisory, and other areas where the law is not black and white.”

    You have been honoured and recognized for your efforts across prestigious platforms like Global Legal 500 Power List, Indian Bar Association, BW Legal world etc. how have they impacted the way you and your approach to work?

    “These recognitions are a testament to the opportunities provided by the companies I have worked for and to my team who have been part of this journey. They humble me and inspire me to strive for excellence in everything I do, alongside our dynamic team at Signify. They also place a responsibility on me to mentor my team and other colleagues within the fraternity, sharing the insights and learnings I have gathered over my 22-year professional journey.”

    Can you share a personal development or mentorship experience that significantly impacted your career trajectory?  

    “I was influenced by many people over the years. I would call it silent mentoring, as there was no formal mentorship, but I learned a great deal through observation, intense reading, and practice. At various stages of my career, I had the privilege to learn from my supervisors and they had a transformative influence on my development and career, such as the CEO and CFO of Cosmo Films at that time ( on importance of processes/ governance/ diligence), the CEO of Cosmo Ferrites( importance of knowing the manufacturing process), and later the CFO and legal colleagues of OSRAM all over the world( gathered solid foundation on compliance, litigations, contractual matters, and overall development). At Signify, I have learned immensely from all the India CEOs, my global legal colleagues, and my team members 

    I also learnt a lot from diverse books I read over the years- whether on history, biographies, leadership, self- development, and even on fiction. Each book shaped my thoughts and I gained from the experience. 

    I greatly valued the training programs by the Siemens Compliance team and OSRAM over the years, which provided a strong foundation in core compliance topics. Additionally, a leadership program by Signify in partnership with Harvard Business School was highly beneficial.”

    You pursued various qualifications in law – including Masters in Business laws, Criminology, apart from LLB and Company Secretaryship (CS). What makes you keep learning even at this settled stage in your career? 

    I always consider myself a “student of law.” The field of law is ever-evolving, with continuous developments requiring constant learning in new areas of legal changes, judicial precedents, innovative problem-solving methods, and understanding emerging challenges. Staying relevant necessitates being on our toes. Throughout my career, I’ve identified and bridged learning and skill gaps by enrolling in various courses. My most recent course in criminology was driven by the rise in white-collar crimes and the trend of converting civil matters to criminal cases. More importantly, I developed a deep interest in this area of law.

    I continue to broaden my knowledge in emerging legal fields, particularly digital law, AI, and the criminal justice system. I have a keen interest in constitutional law, not only in India but also in other countries like the US. I enjoy reading works by various authors such as Austin, the late Fali Nariman, Gautam Bhatia, and Rohan Alva. In the future, I hope to extensively study the constituent assembly debates that shaped our Constitution.

    Given your extensive involvement in various legal and academic roles, how do you manage to balance your professional responsibilities with personal life? What strategies do you employ to maintain this equilibrium?

    The life of a lawyer can be quite stressful at times, with each decision having a significant impact on the company and its employees. The reputation of the company and the liberty of its employees can be at stake. Our job often requires long hours and even working on weekends, especially during crises. However, I don’t view this as an encroachment on my personal time, as my primary duty as a lawyer is to protect the company and its employees, even if it means going above and beyond.

    With over two decades of experience, I have developed an intuitive sense of which areas require more of my attention, allowing me to balance my work accordingly. As we are a lean department with a lot to do, I try not to work late into the evening and focus on personal interests unless something critical arises.

    I maintain a disciplined morning routine, incorporating daily runs, walks, yoga, and meditation. I also make time for daily reading on diverse topics before ending my day. This practice enriches my experience with different thoughts, areas, and philosophies.

    I believe in the following shloka from the Bhagavad Gita (2.48): “Perform your duty equipoised, O Arjuna, abandoning all attachment to success or failure. Such equanimity is called yoga.”

    What advice would you give to young legal professionals aspiring to excel in corporate law, especially in areas like compliance management and dispute resolution? Also, How does Signify support young learners in gaining practical experience?

    My advice to young lawyers is to ensure you understand the basics of law and gain an in-depth understanding of its principles and practices. Once you have a solid foundation, applying the law in diverse situations becomes easier. Areas like compliance management require a deep knowledge of legal nuances, so building a strong foundation is crucial. For dispute resolution, working with a dispute lawyer for a few years helps build a strong base in court procedures, practical issues, and quick thinking.

    In recent years, I have been deeply moved by the teachings of Lord Krishna, particularly this verse from the Bhagavad Gita: “कर्मण्येवाधिकारस्ते मा फलेषु कदाचन । मा कर्मफलहेतुर्भूर्मा ते सङ्गोऽस्त्वकर्मणि” (“You have a right to perform your prescribed duty, but you are not entitled to the fruits of action. Never consider yourself the cause of the results of your activities, and never be attached to not doing your duty”).

    A key skill for a lawyer is judgment, which can only come from experience and working on difficult and diverse matters. Judgment takes time to develop and cannot be achieved through shortcuts; young lawyers need to nurture this skill to see it blossom in future years.

    At Signify, we have a robust culture that encourages our young lawyers to learn on the job, take initiative, learn from others, and have the flexibility to shape their careers. There is no hierarchy in our company, and any employee is free to reach out to top management for support or guidance, who are always willing to help. We encourage risk-taking, active collaboration, speaking up, and most importantly, always taking initiatives. I have had the privilege of learning from both senior management in business and legal.

    Get in touch with Nitin Mittal-

  • “Leadership isn’t about rank; it’s about professionalism, setting an example, and teamwork. Whether in the field or the office, that’s what builds commitment and trust.” – Ronen Avner, Tax Partner at Herzog, Fox & Neeman

    “Leadership isn’t about rank; it’s about professionalism, setting an example, and teamwork. Whether in the field or the office, that’s what builds commitment and trust.” – Ronen Avner, Tax Partner at Herzog, Fox & Neeman

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    You have an impressive academic background in law and accounting, coupled with your experience in the Field Intelligence Corps. Can you share with us what inspired you to pursue a career in tax law, and how your journey has evolved from your early days as a legal intern to becoming a Partner at Herzog, Fox & Ne’eman?

    My path to tax law began at university. However, with Israel having the highest density of lawyers per capita in the world, I wanted to have something extra to stand out. My interest in finance led me to pursue an accounting degree alongside law. I enjoyed almost all of my legal courses, but tax law stood out and felt like the perfect combination of my interests. Additionally, in tax practice, both areas of expertise (law and accounting) come together, allowing me to maximize the use of my knowledge and capabilities.

    Becoming a partner at Herzog, Fox & Ne’eman, Israel’s leading law firm, was a goal I set from the start. After law school at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, which is probably the best law faculty in Israel, I was allowed to intern at Herzog, and even though I left for a few years to complete my CPA qualification, I was determined to return. That persistence, combined with hard work and dedication after rejoining the firm, eventually promoted me as a partner in the tax department.

    Your experience as a commanding officer in the Field Intelligence Corps must have provided you with unique leadership skills. How has your military background influenced your approach to leading teams and managing complex tax cases? Could you please share your experience as a commanding officer?

    While there are key differences between leading military teams and legal teams, the core principle remains the same: leadership isn’t about rank; it’s about professionalism, setting an example, and teamwork. If your team looks up to you and knows you have their best interests at heart, they’re more likely to be motivated and committed to the work.

    My military experience also taught me that pushing a team too hard can backfire. There’s a fine line between creating a disciplined, professional team and overwhelming them. This balance is something I carry with me when managing legal teams today. Another key takeaway from military service is perspective. After leading teams under life-threatening conditions, I’ve developed a calmness in office life. Having experienced the intensity of field command, I received tools (such as the importance of preparations, practice, meeting timelines, etc.) that helped me stay more focused in the face of tough client meetings or deadlines. In my opinion, understanding this balance is crucial for every legal practitioner.

    Could you please describe some of the most challenging tax cases you’ve handled, particularly those involving international aspects like MAPs (Mutual Agreement Procedures) and APAs (Advance Pricing Agreements)?

    Dealing with multinational enterprises, aggressive tax authorities, and multi-million-dollar tax assessments can be complex, but that’s what makes these cases so interesting. Over the years, I have been involved in numerous tax audits, many of which eventually developed, per Herzog’s recommendation, into MAPs. One case involved an Israeli subsidiary of a major US tech company. The Israel Tax Authority (ITA) claimed that the Israeli company transferred all its functions, assets, and risks (FAR) to its non-Israeli parent company shortly after its acquisition. This argument is raised by the ITA against almost every Israeli company acquired by a multinational group. The ITA’s position, which we believed was baseless, resulted in a USD 40 million tax assessment. After the taxpayer’s administrative appeal was rejected by the ITA, we took the case to the Israeli District Court. At this stage, we also recommended the taxpayer initiate a MAP. After years of litigation and negotiations, the ITA eventually admitted to the US Competent Authorities that it could not support its arguments and dropped the assessment entirely, accepting the original tax returns.

    Another interesting international case I handled did not require a MAP, fortunately, but demonstrated some of the challenges that global activities of multinational enterprises (MNEs) create from a tax perspective. In this case, we had to convince the ITA of the appropriateness of a complex transfer pricing method, which resulted in most Israeli revenue and potential profits being attributed to other group entities. The case involved an Israeli subsidiary of a European-based multinational group. The group implemented a complex transfer pricing methodology called the Residual Profit Split Method (RPSM) for allocating profits among group entities based on their contributions to the business. After multiple meetings, the ITA accepted the methodology and its implementation and upheld the company’s tax filings. This was especially challenging, considering the fact that the ITA’s ability to audit the worldwide implementation of the transfer pricing methodology by the group was limited.

    How do you stay updated with the ever-evolving tax laws and regulations both in Israel and internationally? Are there specific resources or practices that you rely on to maintain your expertise?

    Staying up to date is crucial for every law practitioner, especially in the dynamic field of tax law. I follow newsletters from top law and accounting firms in Israel and abroad, keep an eye on updates from the ITA, review court cases weekly, and attend both local and international tax conferences. 

    At Herzog (and also PwC Israel, where I worked for two years), we encourage our teams to stay updated and hold periodic update meetings. We have regular team discussions to review new developments, which help everyone stay sharp. Personally, I make it a point to dedicate at least one hour a week to reading and catching up on new developments. I also try to learn as much as I can from my team and partners: if I overhear an interesting discussion between partners, I try to participate, even if it’s not billable (yes, billable hours aren’t everything!).

    Additionally, outside of formal meetings, I often discuss cases and ideas with colleagues. These discussions are invaluable for staying current in such a fast-changing environment.

    You’ve been involved in drafting responses to the Israel Tax Authority’s circulars and proposed legislation. What role do you think legal professionals should play in shaping tax policy, and how do you approach this task?

    Tax law is intricate, and changes in one area can have a ripple effect on others, impacting various aspects of taxpayers’ business activities. That’s why legal professionals must be involved in shaping tax policy. The Israel Tax Authority has significant expertise, but legal practitioners bring insights from daily interactions with clients and authorities. This practical experience is invaluable for refining policies and regulations.

    When working on policy, I believe it’s important to broaden our perspective beyond just clients’ interests. We need to think about what’s best for the taxpayers, the business community, and the overall relationship with tax authorities. Constructive feedback from legal professionals can lead to better, more balanced tax laws and policies. Working on legislation allows practitioners and regulators to collaborate, fostering relationships that may later be beneficial for more efficient tax audits.

    Throughout your career, you have mentored teams and led significant tax projects. What key lessons have you learned that you believe are crucial for young legal professionals entering the tax field today?

    My advice is simple: aim high and always strive to do your best. Surround yourself with the best people, challenge yourself, and continually seek improvement. The best way to grow is by pushing yourself, whether through challenging tasks or by working with top professionals, which often goes hand-in-hand with studying or working at highly-ranked universities or firms.

    Also, never underestimate the value of learning from those around you. You can learn from anyone—a boss, a colleague, even representatives of the tax authorities. Every task, no matter how small, is a learning opportunity. Pay attention to details, understand the bigger picture even if your task is limited, and don’t be afraid to ask questions when the time is right.

    Looking forward, what do you see as the biggest challenges and opportunities in the field of tax law, particularly in the context of digital economies and global trade?

    The ever-increasing global trade and the digitization of commerce present significant challenges and opportunities in tax. On one hand, businesses can now operate in markets and jurisdictions previously inaccessible. Additionally, tax authorities are offering incentives to encourage companies to relocate. On the other hand, new regulations like the OECD’s BEPS project, especially Pillar 1 and Pillar 2 rules, are adding layers of complexity to tax planning and compliance for multinational enterprises. These trends will require tax professionals to be more creative than ever, developing a deep understanding of clients’ business activities and becoming familiar with global tax regimes to provide the best advice.

    AI technologies could also significantly impact the tax field. While tax authorities are in the early stages of using machine learning and big data, it’s likely only a matter of time before these tools are more widely adopted in audits. This will create challenges for taxpayers but also open new opportunities for professionals prepared to navigate these changes.

    With your demanding career and significant responsibilities, how do you find time to unwind? What are some of your favorite ways to relax and recharge outside of work?

    Maintaining work-life balance is a challenge, but I’ve learned that it’s essential. Early in my career, I had a rule of not working at home, even if it meant long hours at the office, late nights, etc. At a certain point, I decided to change my approach. Now, I wake up earlier to exercise, tend to my garden, and spend time with my dog before starting the day. I also make it a point to have dinner with my family, recharging before diving back into work later in the evening. This balance has made a significant difference.

    Get in touch with Ronen Avner–

  • “My journey has been one from experiment to passion. As a business lawyer, it’s not just about saying ‘yes’ or ‘no’—it’s about providing solutions that operate in the best interest of the business, while also mitigating risks.” – Puneet Vyas, Lead Legal Counsel at Hitachi Energy

    “My journey has been one from experiment to passion. As a business lawyer, it’s not just about saying ‘yes’ or ‘no’—it’s about providing solutions that operate in the best interest of the business, while also mitigating risks.” – Puneet Vyas, Lead Legal Counsel at Hitachi Energy

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    Could you share the story of how you began your career in law? What motivated you to pursue this path, and how has your journey evolved from your early days at Gujarat State Petroleum Corporation Ltd to your current role at Hitachi Energy?  

    It has been a journey from experiment to passion. Although I had opted for Science and Maths when I was doing higher secondary in School, I was clear I would not pursue engineering and wanted to try my hand at something different. I tried getting admitted to a few merchant navy schools. Thereafter, found law to be an exciting upcoming career choice. 

    Pursuant to taking exams at various law schools (pre-CLAT era), I was admitted to the National Law University Jodhpur. The Hon’ble Vice Chancellor, Mr. N L Mitra, had a truly inspiring vision for the law school. It was my first meeting with Mr Mitra, post-admission, that gave me confidence that I had made an excellent choice. 

    I had done my specialization in IPRs and however fate had other plans. I opted to join a company as an in-house counsel.  My first job at GSPC Legal Department, taught me the 3 most relevant capabilities, an in-house lawyer should possess (1) Attention to detail (2) Reading the facts at hand, meticulously (3) Research skills. 

    From GSPC I moved to BHEL at their Corporate Office in New Delhi. BHEL is a mammoth organization, with numerous law officers. The variety of work and the exposure at BHEL was incomparable. I handled numerous disputes along with International arbitrations as well. I had the opportunity to brief and to interact with Senior Counsels quite frequently. 2016, I moved to the Industry Sector Division of BHEL, which was more focused on new businesses and I got to work on agreements pertaining to renewables and e-mobility. This gave a new insight, wherein the focus shifted from being a lawyer to becoming a Business lawyer. Business lawyers are not only supposed to provide opinions in ‘YES’ or ‘NO’, but to provide solutions that can operate in the best interests of the Business. 

    Same journey of developing self as a specialist Business Lawyer continued to my current role at Hitachi Energy. With the varied experiences of working and Government organisations as well as Private firm, the perspective as a lawyer has improved and the focused attention is on Business requirements, at the same time highlighting the risks involved and providing mitigation solutions to the said risk. Therefore, a journey which had started as a student looking for career choices, to an experienced In-house counsel is enriching and could not have asked for better experience 

    After completing your law degree, you joined Gujarat State Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Was that simply an opportunity that came your way, or had you already decided that you would focus on corporate legal work rather than pursuing a career in litigation? What factors influenced your choice at that stage?  

    As I have already mentioned, I chose to join a company as a Corporate Lawyer. I did not want to get into litigation since I don’t belong to a lawyer’s family. During Campus recruitment I got offers from Zydus Cadila and GSPC. GSPC being energy sector, seemed a more lucrative choice. The factors that influenced my choice were (1) Getting a career choice, wherein Litigation is not involved (2) GSPC being in Petroleum/energy sector, which is most promising sector even as on date. (3) Getting to know nuances of working a public sector.

    Reflecting on your experience representing NLU Jodhpur in the 12th Inter-American Human Rights Moot Court Competition, how did this experience shape your approach to real-world legal challenges? Do you see any parallels between moot court competitions and your work today?  

    I went as a researcher and obviously, the experience was outstanding in terms of providing an exposure to interact with teammates from all across the globe. Also, exposure of knowing perspective of international judges and panellists was more than what anyone could have asked as a student. A moot court competition cannot be compared to and real life work, however, if it’s a real life situation or a competition, practice and preparation are the key to be successful in your deliverables. 

    Given your vast experience in contract negotiations and dispute resolution, what are some of the most significant lessons you’ve learned that you believe could benefit the next generation of legal professionals?  

    Contract negotiations are not yet that developed in India as compared to Cross jurisdictional negotiations. The opportunity of Legal to Legal interaction is comparatively lesser. From the other party the person negotiating can be Contract Manager, Procurement head or even a Marketing person. Therefore, the key is patience and also translating your legal acumen into a language that is understood by the other person, irrespective of his field. Logical and clearly articulated reasons are the key to successful negotiations. 

    In case of negotiations with Lawyers, the key is to stick to your course of argument and to provide a reasoning which cannot be denied. Opposite side lawyers are also generally more focussed on resolving the deadlock because that is what is expected in a business organization. Cross Jurisdictional negotiations are generally based on other factors such as culture etc. that can influence the negotiations. 

    Your experience includes handling both domestic and international arbitrations. How do you approach the complexities of these cases, and what advice would you give to young lawyers aspiring to specialize in arbitration?  

    It is sad that arbitrations have neither proven to be cost effective, nor do they save on time. We are defending a Section 37 application in respect of arbitration award that was passed 10 years back. As a business organization, the huge costs incurred in Arbitration can be huge hit to the business. Therefore, emphasis should be more on pre-arbitration dispute resolution mechanisms such as mediation/conciliations. The contractual conciliations are also given more importance and the decision of the conciliation panel is also given relevance. All these mechanisms have grown in importance because of the costly resolution that arbitration offers. 

    How important is it for legal professionals to have a global perspective in today’s interconnected world?  

    Global perspective is most important for lawyers these days. This not only opens up opportunity for cross jurisdictional hiring, however in a managerial role the expectation is to be conversant with laws of Jurisdictions the business operates. Therefore, it is not an additional qualification but mandatory expectation in a business firm working in different jurisdictions. 

    Along with the above, India offers a talent HUB who can cater to different Jurisdictions. Like engineers and other professionals, Lawyer Hubs are also being developed across organizations who can cater to different jurisdictions. Young aspirants therefore having cross jurisdictional expertise have good chances of being absorbed in MNCs. 

    Recovery proceedings and insolvency cases are critical areas of your expertise. How do you navigate the intricate legalities involved in these proceedings, and what role does innovation play in resolving such disputes effectively?  

    Litigation strategy formation is the key for any success. Once a dispute/situation is at hand, the key is to analyse all the pros and cons and to evaluate best course of action. This analysis includes reviewing the costs involved, the time a probable action would take and also will the desired objective be met if a proceeding is opted. The insolvency although not a recovery proceedings, has been proven to be a very effective measure to deter companies to pay genuine dues. Interim injunctions also have proven to be a effective coercive measure against the parties, so that desired results are obtained. 

    The legal profession can be demanding and stressful. How do you maintain resilience and mental well-being in such a high-pressure environment? Any hobbies you pursue that help you to unwind?

    Mindfulness is key for every lawyer. “We live in times where we forget the Present” . Lawyers are poor listeners and also with the ever increasing pressure, the mind is constantly at work. Therefore, overthinking cannot be avoided. Mindfulness activities such as meditation and other mindful activities can help train the mind to be focussed on the problem at hand. Stress is caused when you are thinking about a problem or for issues you have no control. Once mindfulness is inculcated as part of daily practice, stress can be reduced tremendously. There is also no stress when you actually love what you are doing at work. 

    Disclaimer – Views expressed are personal to Puneet Vyas and does not represent views of Hitachi Energy.

    Get in touch with Puneet Vyas-

  • “My need for intellectual challenge and a sense of justice led me to law, and with dual qualifications, I can now bridge different legal systems and cultures, offering nuanced advice to both domestic and international clients.” – Gunjan Chhabra, Partner at MRP Advisory

    “My need for intellectual challenge and a sense of justice led me to law, and with dual qualifications, I can now bridge different legal systems and cultures, offering nuanced advice to both domestic and international clients.” – Gunjan Chhabra, Partner at MRP Advisory

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    Congratulations on your new role as a partner at MRP Advisory. Could you share some insights into your journey from Law School to becoming a dual-qualified legal professional? What inspired you to pursue Indian and UK qualifications, and how will these qualifications enhance your role at MRP Advisory?

    My journey into law began unexpectedly from a science background, where I initially aimed to become an engineer. However, my need for intellectual challenge and a sense of justice led me to law. The pursuit of both Indian and UK qualifications was driven by a desire to gain a comprehensive understanding of global legal systems and to enhance my ability to handle complex cross-border disputes. These qualifications not only broaden my legal perspective but also allow me to offer nuanced advice that bridges different legal systems of law and cultures. At MRP Advisory, this dual qualification will enable me to better serve our domestic clients in contracts with foreign substantive law and international clients, ensuring expert navigation of diverse legal challenges with a well-rounded approach.

    With over a decade of experience in commercial litigation and arbitration, what motivated you to join MRP Advisory at this point in your career? How do you anticipate the firm’s focus and resources will impact your work in the arbitration landscape, both in India and internationally?

    Joining MRP Advisory is an exciting new chapter in my career, motivated by the firm’s reputation for innovation and its robust approach to construction and infrastructure disputes. The firm’s emphasis on leveraging cutting-edge resources and its commitment to a global perspective align perfectly with my background in domestic and international arbitration. At MRP Advisory, I anticipate that our collective expertise and resources will enhance our ability to tackle complex arbitration disputes and further strengthen our position in both the Indian and international arbitration arenas.

    Given your extensive experience representing clients before both national and international arbitration tribunals, how do you plan to leverage this expertise in your new role at MRP Advisory? Are there specific strategies you intend to employ when handling disputes in different arbitration forums, such as ad-hoc versus institutional arbitration?

    In my new role at MRP Advisory, I plan to leverage my experience by adopting a tailored approach to different arbitration forums. For ad-hoc arbitration, I will focus on flexibility and adaptability, ensuring that our strategies align with the specific needs of each case. For institutional arbitration, my approach will emphasize utilizing the established rules and procedures to streamline the process and enhance efficiency. By combining these strategies, I aim to deliver effective resolutions and uphold the firm’s high standards in both national and international disputes.

    Your profile highlights significant expertise in FIDIC contracts. How do you see your knowledge in this area contributing to MRP Advisory’s practice, especially in the context of construction law and dispute resolution? 

    I believe that my expertise in FIDIC contracts will significantly contribute to MRP Advisory’s construction law practice by providing deep insights into the complexities of international construction agreements. FIDIC contracts, with their intricate clauses and global usage, often present unique challenges in dispute resolution. I hope that my knowledge will help the firm navigate these complexities, ensuring that we offer precise and informed advice. This expertise will be integral in managing construction disputes effectively, enhancing our ability to represent clients in both contract management, contractual negotiations and dispute resolution processes.

    Having served as an arbitrator and mediator at various organizations, including the Court of Arbitration for Art and Sama, how will these experiences influence your approach to mediation and arbitration in your new role? What key factors do you believe will contribute to successful outcomes at MRP Advisory, and how will you ensure impartiality and fairness?

    My experiences as an arbitrator and mediator have provided me with a nuanced understanding of the arbitration process and the importance of impartiality. In my new role I hope that these experiences will guide my approach to mediation and arbitration, ensuring that I apply best practices and maintain fairness throughout. Key factors for successful outcomes include a thorough grasp of the subject matter, effective communication, and a commitment to neutrality. I will continue to uphold these principles by carefully balancing the interests of all parties and applying a detailed and reasoned approach to each case.

    You were honored with the “Pioneering Women Leadership Award.” What challenges have you faced as a woman in the legal field, and how have these experiences shaped your approach to leadership and mentorship at your new firm?

    The “Pioneering Women Leadership Award” is a testament to the challenges I’ve faced and overcome as a woman in law. I plan to continue to foster a culture of inclusivity and mentorship. 

    Considering your extensive background in arbitration and mediation, What trends or factors do you believe will drive this shift, and how will the firm position itself in this evolving landscape?

    Yes, the increasing complexity of disputes and the desire for more efficient, cost-effective resolution methods are driving this shift. ADR, particularly arbitration and mediation, offers flexible solutions that can accommodate the needs of modern businesses. We are well-positioned to leverage these trends by continuing to enhance our ADR capabilities and adopting innovative approaches to meet the evolving needs of our clients.

    Outside of your legal career, what hobbies or activities do you pursue to unwind and stay balanced? How do these personal interests contribute to your overall professional life, and do they influence your approach to your new role at MRP Advisory?

    To maintain balance, I believe it is important to engage in mindfulness practices, exercise, and creative activities such as painting. These activities can help manage stress and maintain a clear, focused mind. This in turn contributes to effectiveness in handling complex legal matters. Creative pursuits offer a valuable outlet for relaxation and creative thinking, which enhances overall problem-solving abilities.

    Get in touch with Gunjan Chhabra-

  • “Life as a lawyer is a test match, not a T-20. Keep putting your head down, work, and trust the process.” – Prashanth Shivadass, Partner at Shivadass & Shivadass (Law Chambers)

    “Life as a lawyer is a test match, not a T-20. Keep putting your head down, work, and trust the process.” – Prashanth Shivadass, Partner at Shivadass & Shivadass (Law Chambers)

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    Can you share what initially inspired you to pursue a legal career and how this journey has shaped your professional philosophy?  

    My introduction to law happened in my 7th or 8th grade (around 2002) – my father was arguing a matter before the High Court – I knew nothing about what a Court is, what a lawyer does or for that matter, even what a Judge did. I was curious because I wanted to know what my dad did for a living.

    It was a tax matter that he and his team were arguing – I didn’t quite understand the matter because I went on the 3rd day of their arguments, so a large part of the matter had been argued. But I understood the underlying transaction and the business model.

    This pulled me into reading newspapers, especially the business section, to understand the changing aspects of the business environment, new technologies etc. I decided then, that science and aspects of science, are not my cup of tea and to pursue arts and commerce, which eventually led to law (clubbed with my very menial academic scores). 

    Studying for an examination and/or interviews has never been a strong suit of mine, so cracking anything in the first instance was out of the question – which is why, I liked the concept of doing something with ‘practice’ – I played cricket when I was in school and university (under-graduation and graduation), so I know the impact of practising before a game. I think of law the same way, where a Courtroom is a beautiful playground where there is an interpretation of something in black and white against the backdrop of the kind of businesses – law catches up with changing business experiences.

    My philosophy for practising law is based on everyday practice and reading – there is no escaping hard work and long hours, no matter which generation relays this out – there is no denying that there needs to be a balance between work and life, but there will be many instances where work will take away many vacations and time away from life and family, so choose well.

    Your academic credentials include a Master’s degree in Competition Law from Queen Mary University of London. How has this international education influenced your practice, and what value do you think global exposure brings to a lawyer’s career?

    Interestingly, many seniors I spoke to during my law school days and the first two years of my practice, said a master’s degree in law was completely unnecessary to practice in Indian Courts. But 2 years into practice, I got so engrossed in work, with long hours and no breaks, and that was when I had a moment of realization that led me to think – I like working and the long hours, but the longer I stretch this out, the harder it will be to come out and become a full-time student with a lot of time on my hands.

    I then decided to maybe take a couple of years when I could (luckily with no financial and other obligations), to study something I wanted and also, see a part of the world, meet different people across the world, understand different cultures, learn different business models, firm models etc. To this day, I value and cherish my period in London and the connections I made then.

    I think a master’s degree abroad is good and valuable when you have a specific goal in mind – I wanted to study Competition Law (from an EU and UK perspective) and understand how the Magic / Silver Circle law firms work, how the ‘Chamber’ model works in the UK. Plus, I like driving and travelling, so there was no better place than the UK for me (even considering the cost, since it is significantly cheaper than the US).

    You have a rich background in various areas of law, including Competition and Antitrust, Corporate and Commercial laws, Taxation etc. Could you share how you developed such a diverse expertise, and what drew you to specialize in these specific fields?

    Antitrust was and continues to be my first love, I fell in love with it in law school because there is a very balanced economic approach to it. Unfortunately, I do not practice it as much as I would like, but I do keep up with its evolution. 

    The other intriguing area that is coming up and that has excited me for a while is data protection – especially, with the current growth of AI – it will be very fascinating to bring out a fine line between right and wrong, in this technologically advanced society.

    Tax for me is a much-liked inheritance – having started with despising the area because of its complexities, my growth in law has been because of tax matters. I have over time, grown into and loved tax, with these same complexities it creates. 

    I think coming to like a subject/area in law, is intensely personal. I know lots of friends, who love doing original civil and criminal work since it gives them a different kind of joy – muddled in facts and evidence, interpretation of a different area of law and procedure daily etc. – different Courts of practice (original, appellate, quasi-judicial), city of practice etc. also make for a decision. 

    But if I were to specialise in a certain area, I’d give myself a good 5 years, before I can even begin to think that I have a hold on the subject.

    Your firm, Shivadass & Shivadass (Law Chambers), is known for its work in Litigation (taxation, commercial etc.), Corporate Law etc. How do you approach building a specialized practice in these areas, and what advice would you give to young lawyers aspiring to excel in these fields?

    Building a practice is convoluted. Some factors are beyond control (time, place, resources etc.), but quality of work and staying updated with the law is always within one’s control. Sometimes, a pragmatic approach towards the question of law and the transaction goes a long way in assisting both the Client and the Court.

    I’ve also noticed that knowledge sharing by way of writing articles, and books, helps dissipate your point of view of a certain area or provision of law. This also gives people a chance to gauge their understanding of law and personality.

    Unfortunately, building a practice takes a long time. But should lawyers choose to build a core practice, my advice would be to let your growth in that area be ‘organic’ – it will be more credible that way. Avoid instant marketing and instant gratification, because as a field, instant gratification in law tends to break you more than you would think.  

    Having worked with top law firms and the office of the Solicitor General of India, how did these experiences shape your perspective on the practice of law, and what key learnings have you carried forward into your own firm? Please share your experience.

    For this question, I will consider my experience from both my internship and practice perspective – be it firms, companies or chambers (including the SG’s office). 

    You garner different perspectives of law when you either intern or work. Big law has never fascinated me much, but I’ve always wanted to learn how big law functions – administratively i.e., marketing, practice area development, quality of work and output, deadlines, team structure, management structure etc., as opposed to a chamber practice, where your quality is determined by your legal prowess and how you present the case before a Court – the marketing here, is your presentation and skills before a Court, which spreads more by way of word of mouth, often the older marketing tactic.

    Having become a lawyer and spent nearly 12 years so far, I have now come to terms with what areas I want to specialise in and how I want to take this forward. Therefore, while driving this ethos for our ‘boutique firm’, I draw a fine balance between a law firm model and a chamber model. It’s been a great learning and there is so much more to learn – but I don’t shy away from making mistakes because, for me, mistakes are the only way to test your ideas.

    As a trained Carnatic classical singer and a state-level cricket player, how do you balance your demanding legal career with your hobbies, and do you believe these interests contribute to your professional success?

    I honestly wish I’d kept up with my singing and/or my cricketing abilities – to date, I feel I’ve spent more time on work and law than my hobbies, which is not a good sign. Frankly, having a passion/hobby outside of law is of real benefit. 

    While people do say that work is passion etc., I must admit, there are situations in my very small career, where reading books, musical therapy (be it in the form of listening to new music styles or immersing yourself in age-old classics) or catching a small practice game or tapping a few balls in the nets, helps clear your mind off negative energy, which tends to be a lot more in this industry.

    We get stuck with trying to achieve a great deal, too soon, that we fail to realise that life as a lawyer is a test match (that ends on day 5 at 4.30 PM) and not a t-20 that ends in 3 hours. Teamwork and building a team (any team), is the fulcrum of any sport. 

    Music, on the other hand, brings out the creative energy and strength in a person, which helps in clear thinking and concentration. I often ignite my spiritual side with a little of MS Subbulakshmi and some Carnatic music daily, which then moves to some Indie-rock, classic rock etc. It also gives you a sense of calm in toxic situations and keeps your emotions in check.

    This has helped me in various ways to keep that balance and I genuinely encourage everyone, not just lawyers, to have these hobbies (and just think of them as hobbies and not ‘side hustles’). This keeps you grounded. 

    With your extensive experience, what do you consider to be the most important skills or qualities that a lawyer should develop to succeed in litigation?

    By default, every lawyer has to read – there is no escaping. You may have a team either giving their comments on an agreement or briefing you on a matter (post discussions with Clients) – but unless you pick up the draft or file to read and make your notes, it will never survive the quality you want to achieve and build a name for yourself. We have to read for life, so the sooner this realisation hits, the better. We must strive to constantly read, and there is enough for everyone who wishes to absorb. Reading also makes your life easy when drafting, presenting a case before Court or simply, comprehending a bulky file in a time-efficient manner.

    The second skill is to use simple but effective words and learn the art of presentation and speaking. A lawyer should never have visible ‘stage fright’ – you may be shaking with fear within, but strong oratory skills and clarity of thought, take you a long way.

    The third and rather important skill is to treat ‘time’ as a dear friend –‘time’ can make or break you. Usage of time effectively and efficiently is an art in itself and respecting time is another. We cannot strive to have a silk gown within 10 years of being an advocate and yet, not use 24 hours effectively and efficiently. 

    I take whatever pending work I have to Court, for instance – while waiting for a matter, I read up on new cases, correct opinions and other drafts and/or, watch proceedings and note down similar cases that are being argued, which can be used as a precedent for some of my cases. I trust the process and patiently wait for my time to shine, while choosing all along, to keep putting my head down and working.

    You’ve been involved with a wide variety of matters across different forums / Courts. How do you navigate complexities of different matters across these forums? 

    A few years ago, I was in Court as part of a batch matter and the leading Senior Advocate on the matter was sitting beside me. Out of curiosity, I asked him, ‘Sir, do you think the matter will end today?’. He smiled, looked at me and said ‘Just remember, every matter has its fate and destiny’. I’ve come to realise that line today when on certain days, the Bench is with you and then flips completely the very next day. There are also situations, where you may be close to a disposal of a matter, but the matter never reaches and is not picked up for the next 6 – 8 months.

    Amongst other things, which is reading the file (concrete factual aspects, the law and the application of law to facts), making your notes etc., some other things we keep in mind is the language of the Judge i.e., the Judge’s view on an area or subject of law, their insistence on procedure, decorum in Court, manner of presentation, grip and handle on the subject, etc. 

    We don’t realise it often, but Judges today are under the immense pressure of workload – it is never an easy task being a Judge; social media only brings out one side of it but there is a side that only arguing counsels know – on an average day, each Judge (of whatever position), works at least 16 – 18 hours. It is sometimes inhumane but that is the reality. If you keep this in mind, you know how to navigate in a Court viz., your facts, arguments and the law. Being always prepared is never a bad thing – 5 minutes is enough to turn a case around and get a positive order from the Courts.

    Given your extensive experience, what advice would you offer to young legal professionals aspiring to become litigating lawyers?

    I know this will be hard for many to read – but give litigation a chance. I do understand that the hard work and long hours with menial pay are not as attractive as the fancy pay and lifestyle of big law or a corporate law firm – but if one can push themselves, there isn’t a place to be at, other than a Court. The money, name/fame, and adoration, that you receive from Judges, peers etc., is unmatched.

    The second is to never take a file/matter, lightly – even if it is just for an adjournment/Passover or the fact that it is ‘just a matter at consumer court’ or ‘just a civil court hearing’. Every matter, of whatever nature, is absolutely important to your credibility as a litigator. 

    Third – find a mentor; a mentor who is willing to take risks with you, a mentor who not only guides you but allows you to fail and learn, a mentor who gives you opportunities. Unfortunately, such mentors may not be in a position to pay you much – but, when you have such opportunities, you can create your own brand, perhaps even get some of your cases to cover up the balance in terms of pay.

    Get in touch with Prashanth Shivadass-

  • “Every day is an opportunity to learn something new. Embrace it, cherish it, and let it inspire you,” From Chef Aspirations to IP Law Powerhouse – Navreet Kaur, Partner at Ashwathh Legal

    “Every day is an opportunity to learn something new. Embrace it, cherish it, and let it inspire you,” From Chef Aspirations to IP Law Powerhouse – Navreet Kaur, Partner at Ashwathh Legal

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    Can you share with us how your journey in the field of law began after graduating from the Army Institute of Law, Mohali? What initially drew you to Intellectual Property law? And we would also love to know what inspired you to make a career in Law.

    I graduated from the Army Institute of Law in 2012 and began my career at S.S. Rana and Associates that same year, working under the guidance of Mr. Vikrant Rana. Mr. Rana’s extensive knowledge and experience in intellectual property law left a lasting impression on me. Although my work initially focused on the opposition department, I gained valuable insights into strategy, meticulous drafting, and vetting of written pleadings from him and my dearest colleague, Ms. Meenal Khurana. What I cherished most during my time at the firm were the friendships I formed, many of which I still hold dear. They say the friends you make at your first workplace remain for life, and in my case, it holds.

    Law wasn’t my first career choice; I dreamt of becoming a chef. Life, however, had different plans. I’ve always been the type to question things, to ask too many questions, as those who know me can attest. So, naturally, law felt like the perfect fit for someone like me. Plus, I’ve developed a knack for delving into the nitty-gritty details, over-researching, and finding solutions – it just clicked.

    Entering the field of intellectual property law was a stroke of luck. I developed a passion for IP during my college years, but it wasn’t until I joined S.S. Rana that I truly fell in love with it. The dynamic nature of IP law presents new challenges and opportunities for learning every day. They say, “Every day is an opportunity to learn something new. Embrace it, cherish it, and let it inspire you.”

    You spent eight years at Saikrishna and Associates working with the Trade Marks Prosecution Team. What are some of the most significant cases or projects you worked on during this period?  Also could you please share insights on your time at Saikrishna & Associates?

    After a rewarding tenure of less than two years with S.S. Rana, I joined Saikrishna and Associates in 2014, where I had the privilege of working under the exceptional guidance of Mr. Pushpam Jha. Mr. Jha’s profound knowledge and unwavering support in prosecution practice were instrumental in my professional growth. Under his mentorship, I gained comprehensive exposure to trade mark, copyright, and design prosecution.

    Initially joining as an Associate, I was promoted to Senior Associate in 2018 and remained with the firm until 2022. During this period, I worked with a diverse clientele across various sectors, including media and entertainment, FMCG, beauty, and pharmaceuticals.

    One of the most memorable experiences was managing a significant portfolio for a cosmetic client grappling with extensive infringements. This involved addressing identical applications not only within the core class but also across multiple other classes. I played a pivotal role in strategizing, clearing the Trade Marks Register, and maintaining vigilant oversight of potential infringements. This experience was incredibly enriching, providing me with profound insights into portfolio management and strategic enforcement.

    Another notable project involved an international portfolio in the automobile sector, encompassing over 800 marks. When the portfolio was handed over to me, it was fraught with challenges. My team and I dedicated several months to addressing and resolving these issues, ultimately streamlining the portfolio and enhancing its global compliance. This endeavour significantly bolstered my confidence and broadened my understanding of international trademark laws.

    At Ashwathh Legal, your expertise expanded to include media, entertainment, and publishing. How have you navigated these new domains, and what unique challenges have you encountered? 

    With nearly a decade of experience in intellectual property prosecution, I recognized the importance of evolving and broadening my professional horizons. The vast expanse of knowledge in the field offers endless opportunities for growth and development.

    Building on my background in IP, I have ventured into advising production houses on potential projects and representing authors to safeguard their rights. This transition has not only extended my professional reach but also enriched my understanding of the industry. Engaging with these new facets of IP has provided me with a broader perspective and a more comprehensive skill set, allowing me to contribute effectively across diverse areas within the field.

    Given your experience with global trademark prosecution, what are some of the biggest challenges you face with cross-border IP issues, and how do you address them? 

    One of the most significant challenges we encounter in international trademark practice arises from differing jurisdictional principles, particularly between “first-to-file” and “first-to-use” systems.

    In India, which follows a common law tradition, the “first-to-use” principle prevails. This means that if you can provide evidence of the first use of a trademark, you generally hold superior rights to that mark. In contrast, many countries operate on a “first-to-file” basis. In these jurisdictions, the right to a trademark is granted to the first party to apply, regardless of who used the mark first.

    This discrepancy often leads to difficulties, especially in jurisdictions like China and Nepal, where “first-to-file” rules can pose substantial challenges. If another individual or entity files for your trademark in such countries, it becomes significantly more difficult to secure registration or to expunge the mark.

    To mitigate these challenges, I always advise my clients to allocate a separate budget for these jurisdictions. This proactive approach helps in managing potential risks and safeguarding their trademark rights effectively.

    Can you share any specific strategies or practices you use to maintain a healthy work-life integration, particularly as a working mother in a demanding profession? 

    Balancing a demanding career as a lawyer with the responsibilities of being a parent is an incredibly complex challenge, and finding a true equilibrium can be elusive. The nature of legal work often requires long hours and flexibility, and this can be especially difficult when unexpected situations arise, such as a child’s illness or urgent court deadlines.

    Becoming a mother has deepened my understanding of the difficulties involved, which are often only fully appreciated once experienced firsthand. While it’s easy to acknowledge the challenges from the outside, living them is a different reality.

    As a lawyer, the work often lacks clear timelines or boundaries, making it a continuous commitment. I am still navigating this balance and learning to prioritize effectively. Each day presents new challenges, and the key is to focus on what is most important at any given moment.

    Being a single parent adds another layer of complexity, making the balancing act even more demanding. Despite the difficulties, I am committed to managing both roles as best as I can, continually adapting to meet both professional and personal priorities.

    As a leader and mentor in your firm, what qualities do you believe are essential for nurturing the next generation of lawyers? Additionally, what specific qualities do you look for in interns or fresh graduates when selecting them to join your team?

    As a mentor and leader, I believe that patience is essential, especially when guiding new team members and interns. It is important to provide them with the time and support they need to learn and grasp concepts thoroughly. I also encourage them to cultivate their own patience and to approach their learning with a focus on accuracy and understanding.

    Equally important is the ability to listen to colleagues and to ask questions whenever something is unclear or seems amiss. Learning is a continuous process, and there may be aspects that even I am not fully aware of. Encouraging a culture where questioning is welcomed and valued helps everyone grow.

    I seek individuals who are not only eager to learn but also possess the courage to challenge the status quo and think outside the box. A willingness to question and innovate is essential for both personal and professional development.

    What are some personal and professional milestones that you are particularly proud of, and how did you achieve them? Also what are your aspirations for your career and for the growth and development of Ashwathh Legal?

    Personal Milestones: I take immense pride in having the strength to stand up for myself and make the difficult decision to leave a broken marriage. Choosing to create a better environment for my child, away from a fractured home, was a significant step toward ensuring her well-being and future.

    Professional Milestones: For me, success isn’t defined by awards or titles. Instead, I measure my growth by the knowledge I’ve accumulated and the respect I earn from my peers. If colleagues and former associates feel comfortable reaching out to me for guidance and value my input, that signifies true success. Knowing that I am approachable and that positive things are said about me behind my back reaffirms my belief that humility and respect are the real markers of achievement.

    I am proud of the professional reputation I’ve built and strive to continue being this person—one who values knowledge, approachability, and mutual respect.

    Have you been involved in any pro bono work or community service related to your field, and if so, can you share some experiences and their impact on you and the community?

    I often provide free advice on trademarks, whether to paying clients or those who may not be in a position to engage my services financially. My primary goal is to offer accurate and helpful guidance rather than focusing solely on monetary compensation. I believe that the value of my experience and knowledge extends beyond just earning money.

    Sometimes, it’s more important to be a good person and contribute meaningfully to others’ understanding than to prioritize financial gain. By consistently offering sound advice and support, I uphold the true purpose of my expertise and maintain a commitment to helping others.

    How do you balance the traditional aspects of Intellectual Property law with the increasing importance of digital IP, such as domain names, online content, and digital media rights? Also Can you share any innovative practices or approaches you’ve implemented in your work?

    Balancing traditional aspects of IP law—such as trademarks, copyrights, and patents—with the growing significance of digital IP involves integrating both domains into a cohesive strategy. Traditional IP rights provide the foundation for protecting brand identities, innovations, and creative works, while digital IP covers newer challenges related to online content, domain names, and digital media rights.

    Unified Strategy: I maintain a comprehensive IP strategy that includes both traditional and digital elements. For instance, when handling trademarks, I ensure that registration and protection extend to relevant digital platforms, including social media and domain names.

    Cross-Disciplinary Knowledge: Staying updated on the latest digital trends and legal developments is crucial. I continuously educate myself on emerging issues such as digital rights management (DRM), online content distribution, and cybersecurity to address new challenges effectively.

    Integrated Approach: In practice, I integrate traditional IP protection with digital strategies. For example, I may combine trademark registration with domain name monitoring and enforcement to ensure a client’s brand is safeguarded across both physical and digital spaces.

    Innovative Practices and Approaches:

    Digital Monitoring Tools: Implementing advanced digital monitoring tools has been a game-changer. These tools help in tracking unauthorized use of trademarks, domain name squatting, and infringement of digital content across various platforms. Real-time alerts and analytics enable prompt action and mitigation.

    Block chain for IP Protection: Exploring block chain technology for IP protection has been an innovative approach. Block chain can offer secure and transparent records for copyright ownership and transactions, reducing the risk of piracy and unauthorized distribution.

    Collaborative Platforms: Utilizing collaborative platforms and legal tech tools for IP management enhances efficiency. These platforms streamline processes for managing IP portfolios, conducting due diligence, and coordinating with international counsel.

    Educational Workshops and Webinars: Conducting workshops and webinars for clients and colleagues on digital IP issues helps in raising awareness and providing practical insights. These sessions cover topics such as digital rights management, social media IP enforcement, and best practices for protecting online content.

    Customized IP Solutions: Offering tailored IP solutions that address both traditional and digital aspects ensure comprehensive protection. For instance, creating specific strategies for digital content creators, e-commerce businesses, or tech startups helps in addressing their unique needs and challenges.

    When developing Intellectual Property strategies for clients, what factors do you consider to ensure their brands are not only protected but also positioned for growth and sustainability? 

    Understanding Client Objectives and Market Position:

    Business Goals: Align the IP strategy with the client’s overall business objectives. Whether they aim for market expansion, product innovation, or brand differentiation, the IP strategy should support these goals.

    Market Analysis: Conduct a thorough analysis of the client’s industry, competitors, and market trends. Understanding where the client stands and where they aim to go is crucial for crafting a strategy that supports growth.

    Comprehensive IP Protection:

    Trademarks: Ensure that trademarks are registered in all relevant jurisdictions and classes to cover the client’s products or services. Consider protecting variations and related brand elements to avoid potential conflicts.

    Patents: For clients with innovative products or technologies, secure patent protection to safeguard their inventions. This includes evaluating patentability, conducting freedom-to-operate analyses, and considering international patent filings if applicable.

    Copyrights: For creative works such as software, literature, or artistic content, ensure proper copyright registration and enforcement strategies to protect against unauthorized use and infringement.

    Designs: Protect unique product designs through design patents or industrial design rights as appropriate.

    Digital and Online Presence:

    Domain Names: Register relevant domain names, including variations and common misspellings, to secure the client’s online identity and prevent cybersquatting.

    Social Media: Develop a strategy for protecting the brand across social media platforms. This includes monitoring for unauthorized use and addressing potential conflicts promptly.

    Digital Rights Management (DRM): Implement DRM strategies to safeguard digital content and ensure compliance with licensing agreements.

    Growth and Expansion Planning:

    Geographic Expansion: Consider the client’s plans for international expansion and ensure IP protection strategies are adaptable to new markets. This may involve registering trademarks, patents, and copyrights in additional jurisdictions.

    Product Line Diversification: Plan for future product or service diversification by evaluating and protecting new innovations or brand extensions. This helps in maintaining a strong IP portfolio as the business evolves.

    Risk Management and Enforcement:

    Monitoring and Enforcement: Implement monitoring systems to track potential IP infringements and unauthorized use. Develop enforcement strategies to address violations effectively, including legal actions if necessary.

    IP Audits: Regularly conduct IP audits to assess the strength and coverage of the IP portfolio. This helps in identifying potential gaps and ensuring that IP assets are managed effectively.

    Leveraging IP for Business Development:

    Licensing and Partnerships: Explore opportunities for licensing IP assets or forming strategic partnerships. Licensing agreements can generate revenue and expand market reach, while partnerships can enhance brand visibility and growth.

    IP Valuation: Assess the value of IP assets for purposes such as fundraising, mergers, or acquisitions. Understanding the economic value of IP can support strategic business decisions.

    Compliance and Ethical Considerations:

    Legal Compliance: Ensure that the IP strategy complies with local, national, and international IP laws and regulations. This includes adhering to legal requirements for IP registration and protection.

    Ethical Practices: Maintain ethical standards in IP enforcement and management. Avoid aggressive litigation tactics and focus on constructive resolution of disputes.

    Get in touch with Navreet Kaur-

  • “The reality is that law isn’t about flashy suits or truckloads of money; it’s about resilience. The initial years are tough, but perseverance will always reward the committed” – Pinak Mitra, Partner at DMG India Law offices LLP

    “The reality is that law isn’t about flashy suits or truckloads of money; it’s about resilience. The initial years are tough, but perseverance will always reward the committed” – Pinak Mitra, Partner at DMG India Law offices LLP

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    Hello and welcome, everyone! The SuperLawyer’s team is excited to bring you yet another insightful session today. If you are seeking inspiration through diversification and unwavering dedication, look no further—today’s guest embodies both.

    We are honored to welcome Advocate Pinak Mitra, a respected figure in the legal community.

    For those joining us today, let me briefly introduce our esteemed guest. Advocate Mitra is a distinguished lawyer at the High Court of Calcutta, serving as Counsel for the State of West Bengal. He is a distinguished Member of the International Council of Jurists and a National Board Member of the Indian Lawyers Association—yet this is just the beginning of his impressive journey.

    With a dynamic practice spanning criminal law, constitutional law, consumer law, medico-legal issues, family law, and matrimonial disputes, Advocate Mitra’s legal expertise is truly vast. He continually upskills himself, delving into intellectual property law, and navigating the intricacies of economic offenses.

    We are thrilled to have you with us today, sir. Thank you for graciously accepting our invitation and joining us to share your knowledge. Welcome, Advocate Mitra!

    Thank you so much, Akash.

    Sir, let’s begin with a topic that resonates with many young lawyers. Litigation, as we know, is a challenging path, and it can feel overwhelming, especially for those just starting out.

    Given your remarkable achievements in this field, could you share with us how you navigated this journey and what drew you to pursue a career in litigation? We would love to hear about your experiences and the key insights that shaped your path

    Actually, for me, law was never my first choice. I wanted to study medicine and become a doctor. Law was my second option. The reason I chose between medicine and law was that I wanted to be a professional and not have a job where I worked under an employer. I didn’t want to be just another employee. That’s precisely why medicine and law were my two options. After failing to crack the medical exams, I shifted my focus to law.

    I managed to get into law, took the entrance exams—though without much preparation—and got into the Department of Law at the University of Calcutta for a five-year BA LLB course. Initially, it was very boring because we had several papers related to humanities, and I came from a science background. The first and second years were especially dull since we didn’t have semester exams at that time in Calcutta University. But once we started with the law subjects, things slowly became more interesting.

    After graduating and joining court, I realized the stark contrast between what I had heard, seen on TV, and the reality. It’s very different from the common notion that lawyers are flashy people earning truckloads of money. The reality is that it’s a tough nut to crack, especially in the initial years, where you need a lot of resilience to sustain yourself.

    I’ve seen many of my batchmates join court after graduating from law school, but within two or three years, their initial energy fizzles out. The struggle is real, especially when you see friends from other fields, like engineering or MBA, earning decent salaries, enjoying job security, buying cars, and investing. Meanwhile, someone who studied law and joined litigation finds it incredibly difficult, not just to sustain themselves, but even to ask family members for basic expenses to travel to court.

    It’s quite embarrassing to ask for small amounts of money just to sustain yourself when you’re 24 or 25 years old and should ideally be independent. And when you see your friends with steady salaries, negativity can easily creep in. It’s challenging not to get depressed or bogged down by these realities and to just keep going. This is why some people, despite their potential, eventually give up or lose the patience to hang on after a few years. That’s the biggest challenge anyone entering litigation has to face.

    Thank you, sir. Your insights are truly grounded in the practical realities that many face at the start of their careers. I believe the motivational mantra you shared at the beginning of this interview—to persist, remain resilient, and stay dedicated—will resonate deeply with everyone listening today.

    Now, moving on to the next question: Your career has spanned the judicial hierarchy, from the trial courts to the High Court and eventually to the Supreme Court. Could you share with us your journey through these stages? Any memorable experiences, key moments, or valuable insights you’d like to pass on from your progression through these courts?

    Yes, so I’ll tell you. During my five-year tenure in law school, I only did two internships. The first was as a judicial intern under a Supreme Court judge, and the second was in a trial court for three months. I didn’t have the chance to intern in the high court. There was a stark contrast between my experiences in the Supreme Court and the trial court.

    I really enjoyed my time at the Supreme Court, watching the stalwarts of law argue, and I learned a great deal from them. On the other hand, when I returned to the trial court, especially in West Bengal, I found it very difficult to understand what was happening. What I was reading in my books didn’t seem to align with the reality of the trial court. There wasn’t much synchronization between the two. I’ve even heard judicial officers mention that each trial court seems to have its own separate procedures, which, as a law student, was quite shocking for me to hear and witness.

    Now, that’s one side of the story. As far as the High Court and the Supreme Court go, particularly the Calcutta High Court, the standard there is exceptionally high and has been maintained over the years. Bengalis, as a community, are very academic in nature, which leads them to always engage in legal discussions and have a deep understanding of the nuances of law, both in letter and spirit.

    In my opinion, if you’re practicing in the Calcutta High Court, dealing with complex legal issues or arguing a matter in the Supreme Court becomes relatively easier because of the high standards upheld here.

    Now, coming back to the trial courts—without any offense, I have to say there are some brilliant trial court advocates in our state and across India. However, the problem is that their work often goes unrecognized because the judgments from trial courts are rarely reported. Even though they sometimes do a fantastic job, trial court lawyers don’t receive the recognition they deserve.

    That’s another side of the story. The second aspect is that a law student or candidate must decide early on which area of practice they want to pursue. For example, if someone is interested in constitutional law, then the trial court is not an option, and they must focus on building their practice in the High Court or the Supreme Court.

    On the other hand, if someone is passionate about trial court work, including examination and cross-examination, they should focus on trial courts or the original side of the High Court, where suits are filed and heard. So, it all depends on personal preference. One should first choose their area of practice and then make a decision accordingly. Also, gaining some internship experience in both trial courts and high courts is crucial to understand if they like the setup and environment because, ultimately, after graduation, they need to blend into that environment and become part of it.

    In order to make an informed decision, it’s important to get a heads-up about these things beforehand. Otherwise, one might spend three or four years practicing in the High Court only to later realize they prefer trial court work. In such cases, they could end up losing two or three years of their practical life, even though they would have gained valuable experience.

    That’s the problem. Experience-wise, they would certainly benefit, but in terms of establishing their own practice, they might lose those crucial years.

    Sir, how was your experience when you first argued, represented, or took on a matter in the Supreme Court? Could you share what it was like transitioning from the state level to the Supreme Court?

    During my internship at the Supreme Court, I had the unique opportunity to see a side of the Court that most lawyers don’t—working behind the scenes with a Supreme Court judge. This was especially insightful before the miscellaneous days, which are Mondays and Fridays. I saw firsthand how the research is done, and I gained an understanding of the level of preparation and efficiency involved when judges handle SLPs (Special Leave Petitions).

    Usually, these hearings last just a few seconds, and at that time, we had to prepare a short note outlining the legal point involved so that the judge could quickly frame his mind. Everything moves very fast, and this experience was incredibly valuable during my internship.

    The second significant experience was when I joined the bar at the High Court. At that time, the Criminal Motion Bench was headed by Justice Bagchi for a considerable period, and he was extremely fast. We had to be quick and precise in presenting ourselves, and that definitely helped me when preparing for SLP admissions as well. The way Justice Bagchi conducted motion admission hearings at the Calcutta High Court was very similar to how the Supreme Court handles SLP admissions.

    This experience proved invaluable. You must know your brief inside out because you won’t have time to fumble through papers during the hearing. Even in a heavy matter, you might only get one minute to present, and there are always super seniors in the field of law arguing.

    As a young lawyer, it’s particularly challenging to get an audience with a Supreme Court judge. You have to make an impact right away, like hitting a six on the first ball. That’s my approach to it.

    Thank you so much, sir, for sharing these insights. This discussion feels like a technical workshop with all the nuances you’re imparting. I’m certain that individuals in independent litigation practice who aspire to reach the highest levels will greatly benefit from the wealth of experience you’ve brought to this session today.

    Sir, your experience extends beyond India, encompassing both local and global perspectives. If your awe-inspiring trajectory were to be anchored in specific professional virtues, what would those virtues be? And would you be willing to share them with junior professionals?

    When it comes to professional virtues, I would highlight three key qualities. First is discipline. There is no substitute for discipline; you need to maintain a fixed routine and adhere to it. This principle applies across all fields—law, politics, Bollywood, and beyond. Successful individuals, regardless of their profession, follow a rigorous and disciplined lifestyle.

    The second quality is hard work, coupled with staying updated. Hard work is crucial, and it includes keeping abreast of developments in your field. Nowadays, we don’t wait for a Supreme Court bound volume to arrive; updates are provided through various websites and legal articles. Supreme Court decisions are reported within the same day. Embracing technology and staying informed is essential; otherwise, you risk being outpaced by your opponents if you aren’t up-to-date.

    The third quality is the ability to build good public relations skills. In the legal field, especially as a lawyer, connecting with people socially is vital. Initially, clients may come through your relatives, friends, or referrals from teachers. Your network grows over time through these connections. Just as in medicine, where a patient’s choice of doctor is influenced by reputation and referrals, the same holds true for law. Effective social skills help in client acquisition, which in turn drives your success.

    To summarize, discipline, hard work, and strong interpersonal skills are interconnected. Discipline ensures you stick to your routine, even on slow days. Hard work involves both effort and staying updated. Building social connections helps in gaining clients, which requires continued hard work. Each quality supports and enhances the others, creating a successful professional path.

    Given that you have continually upskilled yourself through various courses and degrees, and considering the current legal landscape with its transformative changes across sectors, what are your thoughts on the legal and technological upskilling of lawyers? How should they adapt to these changes, and how significant is this process within the legal profession?

    Regarding the integration of technology into the legal field, I believe it is no longer a choice but a necessity. Whether we like it or not, we have to adapt.

    For instance, I recently visited the Supreme Court, which has nearly gone completely paperless. In contrast, the Calcutta High Court still relies heavily on paper and bulky briefs. During my recent appearance at the Supreme Court, my advocate on record provided me with a digital copy of the SLP. Even though I have a tablet and a MacBook, I am accustomed to holding a physical brief. Nonetheless, I tried to go paperless and use the digital copy.

    It’s a matter of habit; initially, it was a bit challenging. I can only imagine the difficulties faced by senior members of the bar, who have been trained to handle physical books and documents. Personally, I still prefer having an SCC (Supreme Court Cases) in hand rather than reading judgments on a screen. It may be easier on the eyes, but we must embrace technology.

    Furthermore, technology helps us stay updated. Without it, we would miss out on current developments. For a lawyer to grow and evolve, accepting technology is essential.

    During the COVID-19 pandemic, courts adopted a hybrid model of physical and virtual hearings. After the pandemic, some high courts moved away from this model, but the Supreme Court mandated that hybrid hearings continue. This has been beneficial, though there is still some resistance to accepting virtual appearances. However, technology allows lawyers who are unwell or cannot afford junior lawyers to participate virtually and seek adjournments without harming their clients.

    Technology has also improved court processes. Orders are now uploaded to the high court servers and e-courts, eliminating the need for certified copies. Additionally, we can now view which cases are being heard in which courtrooms via our phones, which was not possible in the past. This advancement saves time and effort compared to earlier practices where one had to physically check courtrooms or rely on clerks.

    Another significant benefit of virtual hearings is that clients can observe their representation and proceedings. This transparency helps address issues where clients have been misled about hiring senior advocates or other concerns. Clients can now view hearings and understand the proceedings better.

    In summary, technology is crucial in the legal field today, and there is no way to proceed without it in the current age.

    Sir, what is the constant drive or motivating force that sustains you in your profession? Is there a particular philosophy or mantra that you believe in?

    I have been quite inspired by the story of Mr. Ram Jethmalani. He has been a guiding force for me. During my internship days, I saw him argue a case in the Supreme Court on the principles of bail, and I was awestruck by his aura. After that, I read about him—his struggles and his journey as a lawyer—and I was fascinated by how he transformed himself.

    Outside the realm of law, I would also say I have been inspired by the journey of Mr. Shah Rukh Khan. He has been a role model for me, not just as an actor but as a personality as well. His journey is incredible. These people have had a profound impact on my journey as a lawyer. They have motivated me, especially when I see how they faced failures and bounced back.

    If you look at the trajectory of any successful person, they go through ups and downs. Even Mr. Amitabh Bachchan, the legend of Bollywood, experienced highs and lows, and his transformation later in life is remarkable. Figures like these—successful individuals in their respective fields—should serve as a motivation for others. Whether it’s sports, Bollywood, film, politics, or the legal field, their journeys and the challenges they faced can guide and inspire aspiring individuals.

    Their stories have been a tremendous source of inspiration for me and have helped me in my own journey.

    On that note, sir, a demanding profession like law can certainly take a toll on mental health. How do you manage the pressure of work while maintaining your personal space? Are there any hobbies, interests, or general routines you follow to strike a balance that you’d like to share?

    Yes, law is very taxing. It is extremely demanding on our mental health as well, because it takes at least 14 to 15 hours of our daily life. Apart from that, you need time for your daily activities—sleep, rest, and spending time with your family. Unfortunately, if you’re in the field of law, especially as a litigating lawyer, you don’t get much time with your family. That is one of the hardest parts. You don’t get time to hang out with friends either.

    Initially, you might, but as you become busier, the profession consumes a lot of your time, so you won’t be able to do that. Sometimes it becomes overwhelming. You might feel like taking an evening off to watch a movie or go out with friends or family, but then you remember you have cases the next day and need to study. You’re forced to study, and it can become very difficult and, at times, even depressing. I wouldn’t say it doesn’t. That’s one aspect—if you’re busy.

    The other aspect is if you don’t have work, which many lawyers experienced during COVID. The pandemic was a huge eye-opener for everybody. Most courts weren’t functioning properly at first, though they eventually moved to a hybrid model and virtual hearings. But initially, it wasn’t like that.

    So, for almost two years, many lawyers didn’t have work. At that time, it was very depressing and mentally challenging for lawyers to sustain themselves and take care of their families. Our profession is already very uncertain. I might have a very busy week now, and the next week, I could be completely without work.

    During that free time, how you channel your thoughts is very important. It takes a huge mental toll on every serious lawyer because the insecurity looms large. As for me, I used to enjoy reading as a hobby. But after joining litigation, the profession has taken that hobby away from me. Now, in my free time, I hardly read books because I’m already reading so much during the day. So instead, I’ve taken to watching a lot of content on OTT platforms, which I enjoy.

    Another principle I’ve maintained during my 10 years of practice is not going to court during the vacations. Many people work through the vacations, but I’ve made it a point not to work during the three vacations we have in Calcutta. For the good part of that time, I spend it with my family.

    I love traveling a lot, so whenever I get the opportunity, I leave the city and go somewhere to spend some time. Traveling helps keep me refreshed. We have such an amazing country with so much to offer, and I love exploring the length and breadth of it. So, that’s how I unwind.

    Since you’ve been involved in various editorial and pedagogical activities, where you’ve interacted with both students and practitioners, how do you think this involvement has enhanced your legal acumen and expertise? Additionally, how much do you enjoy these activities alongside your primary role in litigation?

    Yes, actually, I would say it is very helpful, even for the growth of an individual as a lawyer. Let me share an anecdote: during my early years of practice, and even more recently during the COVID period, I used to mentor some law students, including my interns. Apart from them interning with me, I would teach them about the practical aspects of the legal field and different statutes that aren’t covered in their syllabus.

    I also gave them basic insights into how cases are filed, conducted, and so on. In addition, I was involved in editing journals for CHN at one point in time. This experience was helpful in two main ways. Firstly, for the purpose of editing, I had to go through judgments passed by various courts. In the process of reading those judgments, I was constantly updating myself as a lawyer.

    Secondly, reading judgments for editing purposes allowed me to cover a lot of material in a short span of time. This not only increased my reading speed but also improved my ability to quickly identify the key portions of a judgment.

    Thirdly, dealing with different aspects of law—whether with law students or fellow lawyers—helped me revise what I had learned earlier, either during law school or later in practice. For example, while I may have studied the Domestic Violence Act or the Negotiable Instruments Act thoroughly during my college days, in practice, we mostly focus on a few sections like Sections 138 to 143, 143A of the NI Act. However, when discussing the entire statute with a student or fellow lawyer, it forces you to revisit and refresh your knowledge of the full text.

    In a way, by teaching others, you’re also learning and revising. This helps to reinforce your understanding of the law and ensures you don’t forget important sections. So, it definitely aids in personal growth and keeps you sharp as a lawyer.

    Thank you, sir. As a concluding note, could you please share your long-term plans, particularly in light of your impressive involvement with various professional legal groups and associations? What are your long-term goals?

    This is a very difficult question for me to answer. In terms of long-term plans, as an individual, I aim to advocate for the cause of law to a certain extent. I also plan to author a few books in the field of law, which I will likely begin working on soon. These books will offer a more practical insight into certain aspects of law, focusing on topics that I choose. The goal is for these books to be beneficial not only for law students but also for legal practitioners.

    There are numerous books on various legal topics available in the market, but I’ve observed that some of them exist just for the sake of being there. They don’t provide a proper or meaningful insight into the areas of law they cover. That’s one side of it. On the other hand, I have a long-term plan to establish a legal institute that imparts practical legal training to students.

    When or how this institute will materialize, I can’t say. It may never happen, or it could happen in the near future, but I believe it’s very important. Many people who enter law school are not from legal backgrounds, and the five years of legal education often don’t provide sufficient practical knowledge. That’s my perspective on that.

    Additionally, many law colleges today focus on ensuring students complete a set number of internships, but it doesn’t necessarily mean that students are learning anything valuable during those internships. It has become more of a target-oriented task—complete the internship, get the certificate, and move on.

    However, in reality, interns who come to courts or law offices aren’t truly learning much. I regularly have interns at my law office, and it’s a practice in my office to interact with them after a week or so. I make sure to ask for their feedback on their previous internships—whether it was in someone else’s chamber or a law firm—and also about what they have learned while working with me. If they come here, they should leave with something productive that will help them in their careers.

    These are the aspects I want to focus on as part of my long-term plans in the field of law. So, let’s see where this journey takes me.

    A very big thanks from the entire team of SuperLawyer. Thank you so much. 

    Thank you, Akash, for having me. It was truly a pleasure to discuss various aspects of our day-to-day professional lives and to share a glimpse into how I maintain balance in my personal life as well. I’m confident that young lawyers will find value in this, as it will help them gain a better understanding of the practical realities in the legal field. Thank you once again for having me.

    Get in touch with Pinak Mitra-