You have a demonstrated history in corporate commercial litigation, particularly in insolvency laws, arbitration, and commercial disputes. What initially inspired you to pursue a career in law, and what drew you specifically to these areas of practice?
Once I started with law school, regular brainstorming sessions in a group was something which I got inclined to, and it always helped me in achieving appropriate results subject to the long enjoyable hours of work and preparations.
Initially, the idea of law school was to begin a law firm journey on the corporate side but as fate decided, I always ended up with internships with litigation teams.
As destiny worked, I commenced my career with a litigation chamber where I worked upon and assisted the seniors in matters pertaining to different facets of law. However, arbitrations and insolvency always got my interest. Till today, my workload primarily focuses on insolvency and arbitrations but has over the time also expanded to regulatory, civil and criminal laws as well.
The early years in the legal profession can be particularly demanding. When you began your career, what were some of the initial challenges you faced, and what insights did you gain from overcoming them?
I believe that litigating lawyers are on probation till the time they are litigating lawyers owing to the level of uncertainty. ??? This needs a better explanation.
The most common challenges which every new lawyer faces (specially those like me who do not come from a legal background) is in getting appropriate answers to “what” and “why” of the legal profession and the answers to the said questions vary from lawyer to lawyer which often creates further dilemma upon discussions with the fellow lawyers. This dilemma is resolved differently by every person in their own way as there are no set formulae or a defined path to go forward in this profession. Every lawyer has his own storyline.
Despite having a positive outlook to life, I would admit that the initial years of my practice were tough in terms of coping up with the pressure, getting overwhelmed before every hearing even when I was not appearing before the court and only assisting and especially looking at my colleagues who, as per my understanding, were doing better etc.
However, I was lucky to have the support of a few great friends and mentors who guided me smoothly through all the difficult paths and further helped me in shaping my career as well as understanding the perspective of law.
I would say that till today, the struggle of a litigating lawyer continues which is perpetual. Every day is a new learning curve, a new challenge, a new perspective to the fact situation. However, I am in a better place professionally continuing with the thought that there is no short cut to achieving your goals but hard work, sincerity and dedication to the profession along with working smartly (given the latest AI tools and technology at one’s disposal) helps you grow in the legal profession.
How are construction arbitration matters typically approached in your experience, particularly those you’ve handled independently? If you could share the key challenges you faced and how you addressed them?
Construction Arbitrations specifically in India as compared to other jurisdictions are an assortment full of contentious points like price escalation, variation in quality/quantity or both, technical hindrances, delay etc. The said matters being highly technical in nature require a streamlined approach with a proper understanding of the tenders and its clauses. The key challenges which are usually faced during such proceedings are dependent upon how diligent the party being represented was during the tender/contract implementation stage as maintenance of proper records and communications plays a very important role in the outcome. Furthermore, high-stake construction arbitrations, specially where cross border parties are involved, require specific experts for delay analysis, claim preparation which are over and above the expertise of most of the lawyers. For instance, delay analysis can be done by an expert in several ways basing on the agreement between the parties which would include but is not limited to – As Planned vs As Built method, Time Impact Analysis, Window Analysis etc.
You’ve been involved in several landmark judgments under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. What was it like to be part of such high-stakes litigation, and how did you prepare both legally and strategically for these cases?
Every case, especially which concerns the Insolvency regime is a high-profile case these days as it is an infant law as compared to other laws and is evolving day by day mostly by way of precedents. The fate of the company is largely dependent on the successful resolution. While working on a high-stake matter, either independently or while being associated with an office, the simple approach which I have always relied upon is firstly know your facts and file. Knowing facts clearly and being able to reproduce/argue them concisely is something which gives your case a clarity. Once there is clarity to the facts of the case, the law is applied “skilfully”.
In representing real estate, trading and textile companies under the IBC, what common legal and operational hurdles have you observed? Based on your experience, what proactive measures can these companies take to better navigate insolvency proceedings?
While dealing with such matters, the common issues which arise are always lack of contemporaneous communication to safeguard the interests of the party we represent. Owing to lack of such communications and proper compliances, several sound companies suffer. Timely and sound legal advice during the regular day to day functioning of the company also plays a crucial role. The role of lawyers has expanded considerably to not just advise on law but to advise companies on business transactions and to protect the business interests.
Leading a team of associates alongside an Equity Partner in complex arbitration and insolvency matters can be quite demanding. How do you approach team management and foster a collaborative working environment that ensures efficiency and high-quality outcomes? Additionally, what key qualities or skills do you value most in your team members?
Once a lawyer reaches at one point in his or her career, delegation and sharing of work load with the team becomes essential. To have a streamlined and disciplined working environment having proper quality standards while meeting stringent deadlines, it is mandatory that the responsibilities are shared equally and delegated amongst the team which eventually also creates a sense of responsibility towards the assignment.
The first and foremost skill we look for in a candidate joining our team is an ability to take decisions and take up responsibilities individually. Secondly, is the zeal to take up litigation and work around the “not talked about” adversities of the profession. A team grows when a member of the team grows individually and eventually when the set backs are approached collectively with a positive mind set with an enthusiasm to keep moving ahead.
When representing prominent real estate developers before arbitral tribunals and High Courts, what key strategic considerations shape your approach? Additionally, are there any resources that you regularly rely on and would recommend to others in the field?
The disputes which real estate developers and their promoters are privy to are diverse in nature which would include applicability of criminal laws, insolvency laws in certain cases, RERA compliances etc. The main strategic approach to deal with such matters at hand requires a lawyer to deal with all the cases at priority and with due efficiency as on one pretext or the other, the said cases will be linked or will be dependent on each other either on facts, law or the way proceedings are conducted.
A proper way to deal with such cases where there is multiplicity of litigation, it is advised to have a brief background of each case so that nothing inconsistent is submitted. Particularly, for matters concerning real estate industry, EPC Contracts etc, commentaries like Building and Engineering Contact by PC Markanda and others can be used apart from usual research tools such as SCC Online, Manupatra etc..
With your wide-ranging experience in litigation and corporate commercial litigation, what advice would you offer to law students or early-career lawyers aspiring to succeed in this profession, especially those looking to build careers in corporate litigation? Are there any resources, habits, or mindsets that you consider essential in today’s legal landscape?
There is no hard and fast rule for pursuing the professional per se, however, some changes in the daily execution may prove to be beneficial. Every other lawyer, may it be a senior or a beginner in the profession, develops their own way of drafting, arguing etc however, being connected to the fellow lawyers, knowing all the amendments, new precedents always acts as a stepping stone and a boost to the knowledge. Furthermore, build trust and rapport with the mentors, team and colleagues which eventually will be a big part in the long-standing journey. It is very important to build a solid foundation to understand the proceedings, laws and procedures.
It is helpful if you assess at an early stage that if you’re passionate about litigation and towards pursuing it further and if yes, then be patient while continuously evaluating yourself qua the performance.
A story of success is always backed by a story of failure and trials.
Given your demanding professional commitments and deep involvement in high-profile cases, how do you maintain balance between your personal and professional life? Are there any core principles or philosophies that guide you in both spheres?
Being a lawyer always comes along with its own set of challenges such as long working hours. There is no shortcut to it as it is a service industry which is very dynamic and ever evolving and whereby everything is based on the efficiency and quality of the service provided.
The work life balance and the outlook one looks at differs from person to person, however certain habits which should be taken up early in the profession are that one should be able to set boundaries between work and personal life while setting deadlines. Time management and efficient organisation ensuring the allocation of work and time are important. Lastly, flexibility is the key for successful implementation of the above two points as it helps a person to adapt and adjust the schedule as and when required.
What inspired you to pursue a career in law? Was there a particular moment or influence in your life that steered you in this direction?
During my school years, I developed interests in Social Studies, particularly History and Political Science. I was always intrigued by topics like civil and political rights, the Constitution, and the legal and regulatory framework that governs societies. However, when it came time to choose my stream in Plus-2, I opted for Science. This decision was heavily influenced by my parents, who believed that a background in Science would keep more academic and career options open. They often said that while one could shift from Science to Commerce or Humanities, the reverse was much harder. At the time, I wasn’t entirely happy with that decision. I felt disconnected from the subjects I was passionate about and often regretted not pursuing Humanities. But in hindsight, I now appreciate the wisdom behind my parents’ advice. Studying Science has given me the ability to grasp scientific and technological concepts with relative ease—an advantage I now value immensely. As I progressed through my Plus-2 education, it became increasingly clear that my true interests did not lie in Science. I found myself disengaged and uninspired, and I realized that continuing in this field would not fulfil me intellectually or personally. Transitioning to legal studies felt like a natural and inevitable step—a return to the subjects I was genuinely passionate about. Some of the then contemporary developments garnered my attention towards law, policy and governance. I was fortunate to have studied at JSS Law College, Mysuru, as it opened up many opportunities to explore along with like-minded friends and classmates.
What drew you to specialize in Energy Laws during your LL.M. at the University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun? And now, as you pursue a Ph.D. at Gujarat National Law University, how has that academic journey shaped your legal perspective?
My inquisitiveness towards learning law led me to explore emerging and specialised areas which were niche and still developing at that point in time. After completing my graduation, I found my interests and inclination towards International Law and Diplomacy, Dispute Resolution like Mediation and Conciliation, Financial Markets, Energy laws among others. Very few universities in India, at that point in time, offered courses beyond the traditional subjects and Energy laws garnered my interest and drew me to explore and learn more about it. Continuing with the studies, I understood the legal framework in the energy sector, specifically Oil and Gas, Power sector has tremendous potential for professional practice and in academic research. Under the guidance of my supervisor Prof. (Dr.) Shanthakumar, Director, GNLU, I am working on a Regulatory framework for the Upstream Hydrocarbon sector in India, by re-examining the present framework.
Reflecting on your early years in the legal field, what formative experiences deepened your understanding of the law? Are there any moments or mentors that continue to resonate with you today?
After completing graduation and post-graduation, I gained varied and meaningful experience working under the guidance of my senior – Mr. S. Srinivasa Murthy, in Bengaluru. This foundational experience got me acquainted with nuances of litigation and client interaction. After working for a year, I had an opportunity to do Clerkship at the High Court of Karnataka. I was fortunate to work under the mentorship and guidance of Hon’ble Justice B.V. Nagarathna (now judge of the Supreme Court), then Judge at High Court of Karnataka. This Clerkship marked a major turning point for my career. It offered intricacies of judicial decision making, including interpretation of law and assessing its applicability in varied factual context. The most profound learning however, was, understanding how a judge approaches any matter, the temperament required to listen and analyse many cases on a daily basis. Clerkship opportunities, both at the High Courts and the Supreme Court, offers unparalleled insights for law graduates. The work entails preparing synopsis, case briefs, research and identifying applicable precedents, assisting in preparing articles, speeches among other duties. Clerkship fosters a deep sense of judicial discipline, highlights ethical boundaries, procedural clarity and broader appreciation of the role that courts play in delivering justice across broad spectrum of matters.
During your time at CEERA, NLSIU, you were involved in high-impact research and consultancy projects for institutions such as the MoEFCC, ISRO, and the Directorate of Municipal Administration. Could you share some insights into your experience there, and how your contributions influenced these projects?
Working as a Teaching Associate at CEERA, NLSIU, Bengaluru, I had the privilege to work in legal academia and research. Under the mentorship of Prof. (Dr.) Sairam Bhat and Prof. (Dr.) M.K. Ramesh, I was involved in workshops, conferences, classroom teaching, legislative drafting, and legal research. This hands-on experience, including client consultations and litigation work, enriched my academic delivery and deepened my understanding of law in practice. Collaborating with government departments such as the Directorate of Municipal Administration (GoK) and contributing to major legislative projects like the Climate Bill and Municipalities Bill provided valuable insights into policy and governance. CEERA has actively contributed in legal and policy reforms, implemented by the Government and its various departments. My time at CEERA was instrumental in shaping my perspective as a legal academic and researcher, and I was fortunate to learn from a diverse network of dedicated peers and professionals.
What motivated you to establish your own legal practice? What were some of the major challenges you encountered, and how did you navigate them?
Since 2022, I have been managing my independent legal practice in Jayanagar, Bengaluru, alongside my partner Mr. Vivek Raviprakash and our team of associates. Having been actively involved in client interactions early in my career, establishing my own chambers was a natural progression aligned with my passion for litigation. A key challenge has been building and sustaining a reliable clientele—an aspect many in independent practice will recognize. While acquiring clients is challenging, maintaining long-term relationships truly reflects a firm’s strength and professionalism.
Another systemic issue is the judicial backlog or ‘docket explosion,’ which has increased delays in case resolution. This challenge, however, has catalyzed the growth of alternate dispute resolution methods like arbitration and mediation, offering more efficient alternatives.
Drawing from both academic and litigation experience, I see a clear need to bridge the gap between legal education and practice. Initiatives such as moot courts, law fests, and intercollegiate sport events offer valuable platforms for students to gain exposure, build networks, and enhance their understanding beyond classroom learning. Encouraging such engagement fosters holistic growth and better prepares students for the realities of the profession.
You’ve appeared before a range of judicial and quasi-judicial bodies, from the High Court and other Tribunals. In your work on matters involving education and reservation policies, is there a particular experience that was challenging for you? How did you approach its legal and constitutional aspects?
Litigation, by its nature, involves addressing both simple and complex issues that often arise from the friction between societal expectations and the existing regulatory framework. Two important cases stand out, as it ultimately led to changes in laws and guidelines. One such case is Sripathi G. v. Union of India and Others (2024:KHC:43993-DB), where the petitioner, a former member of the District Consumer Commission, was barred from practising before any Consumer Commission in India under Rule 11(2) of the 2020 Model Rules. This restriction was arbitrary and without justification. Upon challenging the rule, and shortly after notice was issued, the Central Government amended the provision, effectively removing the prohibition and restoring professional rights to retired members.
Another notable case was Priyanka Patil v. Kendriya Sainik Board and Others (2023 SCC OnLine Kar 1), which involved constitutional issues of gender rights and discriminatory policy. The petitioner, daughter of a martyred ex-serviceman, was denied employment reservation benefits due to a clause that restricted ESM identity cards for female dependents only “till marriage or disability,” while no such condition applied to male dependents. The Karnataka High Court struck . down Clause 5(c) of the Guidelines as violative of Articles 14 and 15 of the Constitution. Following the judgment, the Kendriya Sainik Board revised its guidelines, establishing a more gender-equitable policy.
When approaching any matter, it is essential to strategize and compile all relevant documentation. Tools such as filing RTI applications for procuring official records, effective coordination with authorities, and timely communication via letters, emails, and notices are vital in building a strong case. In matters involving the constitutional validity of central guidelines, ensuring all necessary parties are included helps prevent procedural delays and keeps the focus on the core issue.
With your extensive background in both litigation and academia, what key advice would you give to young lawyers starting out, especially those who aim to bridge courtroom practice and policy engagement?
Based on my experiences since law school, I would like to reassure students who feel anxious about their future that a legal education opens up a wide array of opportunities. It is essential to take internships seriously, using them not just for exposure but also to develop key professional skills. In today’s evolving landscape, the legal profession is incredibly versatile and intersects with almost every sector of society. Career options range from traditional paths like the judiciary, advocacy, and clerkships, to roles as policy and legislative consultants, members of the armed forces through the JAG branch, corporate legal professionals, in-house counsels, Academics and Teaching, and ADR specialists such as arbitrators, mediators, and conciliators, Insolvency Professionals and freelancing. Emerging fields like legal tech, energy laws, AI and data privacy among other upcoming areas present promising prospects.
The key lies in staying vigilant and proactive in identifying and pursuing these opportunities. My own journey over the past years in practice has been both fruitful and enlightening. I firmly believe that maintaining an academic inclination enriches one’s understanding of the law and enhances professional growth. It also enables legal practitioners to engage meaningfully with stakeholders beyond the courtroom, contributing to broader conversations in their areas of interest. I am a firm believer that Academicians must be permitted to practise and appear in courts, as that would enhance the academic standards throughout the country.
Given the high-pressure nature of legal work, especially when balancing court cases and government consultancy, how do you take care of your mental health and sustain your well-being?
One of the key lessons I have learned through my professional journey is the importance of coordination, team-building, and effective delegation. These elements are crucial not only for achieving sustained performance but also for long-term growth. The support of family plays an equally vital role in navigating the demands of the legal profession. I am fortunate to have the unwavering support of my friend and wife, Geethanjali K.V., an IP law practitioner, with whom I often engage in enriching discussions that broaden my perspectives on both law and life.
To manage the pressures that come with the profession and life in general, I have found it essential to maintain a balanced routine. Personally, cooking and working out serve as meaningful outlets that help me de-stress and stay grounded. Ultimately, I believe that when one is committed to the profession, it has a way of giving back—providing purpose, resilience, and fulfilment.
I’ll start with the very, very important, and first and pertinent question, how and when did you decide to become a Barrister and an Advocate? And how was your journey? When did it start and how is it going? What kind of challenges have you faced still now?
Thank you for the question. Coming from Delhi, obviously it being the litigation hub, my school was right near the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court.
So it was always on the way to school. I would see the courts, the lawyers. It was very intriguing to me. And then, a funny anecdote, when I was in 11th or 12th, I remember I had taken commerce with maths and I was so traumatized with maths. Then the next question came, where can I make money where math won’t be required and I don’t have to use trigonometry.
So there were few options which came out of which, again, law came, so I thought, might as well. Maybe that’s destiny. So that was the main reason why I started with law. It was a very stupid excuse, I must say, but everything’s written. I went to the UK. I was in University of Warwick where I did my undergrad, LLB. Unlike India, there what you do is you learn the substantive law in your undergrad. That is your LLB. That’s for three years. And then you either become a barrister or a solicitor, wherever you learn the procedural aspects. So solicitors are the ones who work in law firms. They are the ones who interact with the clients who make your witness statements or draft your petition. Barristers are a bit of a different side of the disputes.
Barristers are the ones who have the right of audience. That means they’re the ones who argue in court. So the training to be a barrister is quite different. It’s more about reading skills. It’s more of technicality and more into law. I mean, I’m sure both require their own sets of skills. Being a solicitor on the original side and being able to deduce that evidence from the client is a separate art, which barristers don’t have to do because then the paperwork already comes to them and you have to apply your brain just towards the right affording suspect.
So I was trained to be a barrister there, which opened my insights a lot. The way of education that we got there was quite different. Coming from a CBSE background where in our board exams, we were required to write probably a 300 word essay and suddenly entering into this university where within the first week I’m given an assignment to write a 3000 word essay.
It was challenging for all of us. I still remember, okay, so I wrote that essay and then they were like, but this is already there in the book. Like, what do you want? Law is already there and I’m giving you the law. And that’s where they taught me what analytical thinking was. And I think it was very important. Honestly, coming from the CBSE background, I did find it a bit disadvantageous, initially.
Took me a year to grasp and understand how this functions, how the essay writing functions, how do you write 5,000 words when you can do the same for 500 words. That’s also an art. Yeah, it was a very different form of education system. Some things I would say they should learn from India and some things I would really suggest India should learn from them.
Like when I was trying to be a barrister, we used to have recorded sessions of cross-examination or examination in chief or client handling. The biggest thing is client handling. What questions do you need to ask your clients while also protecting yourself under the ethical rules?
Like a simple thing if you’re doing mainly criminal trials. You won’t ask him a question, did you do it? Because the moment you say that and he answers that question to you, you can’t now take a not guilty plea. So ethical standards also come around, I’m sure. So these are things I’m not saying people have mal intention or anything, but these are things that need to be taught.
Problem is, I don’t see in Indian law schools that are being taught, I was fortunate enough to have been taught that. And whenever I have interns, I always tell them that when you’re talking to a client, be very careful because it is a double edged sword. Anything and everything that they reveal to you, though it is bound by attorney client privilege, but you also have the advocates Act and you need to be careful in navigating your way through both of them, by using it harmoniously.
So these are a few things that I learned there, how it was different. Then obviously after doing law, I was really motivated to come back to India because I love my country. I love the way things function. It may be chaotic, but I love the chaos. So I decided to take that leap of faith and coming back to India. I remember I was with Mr.Ciccu sir, in Delhi for a couple of years, one and a half years or so, where, I mean, I was exposed to the world of arbitrations, which was a very new ballgame. And, considering I was a barrister, so I had the license to practice in arbitration, so until I get my formal license in India to practice, so that way it was better for me to do that.
A very good experience in international arbitrations. And then I moved to Bombay, took another leap of faith, left my hometown Delhi, and then moved to a completely different city, the financial capital of India. It was an eyeopener. It taught me a lot. AZB was amazing that way. The work was high pressure, I won’t lie, but what you learn in a short span of time is invaluable because you have such volumes of cases and the type of cases.
There are humongous disputes for hundreds and thousands of crores. How a big firm functions, how 20 lawyers put their brain in one case. And, yeah, I mean, it was a very good learning process and that way Bombay has been kind and cruel at the same time. It always uses the carrot and stick story.
If you screw around, you’ll get beaten. If you’re nice, you get that carrot. So yeah, it’s been a good journey so far.
Keeping that in mind, in the early stages of your career, you gained invaluable experiences with Senior Advocate, Ciccu Mukhopadhaya, the kind of challenges you may have faced because you were transitioning from UK to India and the way it works over here, how did these kind of experiences contribute to your understanding of the kind of arbitrations that we do on national, or rather domestic level and international arbitration; so how do you see your transition along with the transition of arbitration itself?
I mean, true, like you said, arbitration has scaled great heights in India.
When I moved from the UK, I remember doing some internships in mini pupilages in the UK especially. The most notable one was Blackstone Chambers that I was there, I was fortunate enough to assist the seniors that time. The Queen’s Council now King’s councils in the Gina Miller case, though, not an arbitration, but it was Gina Miller is the famous Brexit case.
So there I saw barristers sitting one entire month on one case. So as a new law student, that is something very new, how well prepared you all are, and even the competition is as well prepared. India has a very different work game. I’m not comparing the two of anything about competency or quality.
Both require a different set of skills. They are shocked when they see Indian senior counselors appearing in five cases in a day. They’re like how is this possible? Here one barrister is sitting for an entire month for one case. How is this person doing five appearances in one day. It’s shocking to know. It requires a different set of skills to do. When I started litigation, the moment I came back to India, that switch was quite different.
It was shocking. It was amazing how in chaos they are still functioning properly. That was an eye opener how this is happening. Now, specific context of arbitrations. During that time, international arbitrations were growing. Now I foresee a dip in the arbitrations because of a lot of things.
A, how the government is also taking a not so pro arbitration stand now, with more than INR 10 crores of government contracts removing the arbitration clause. Stamp duties being imposed on awards. Very high stamp duties, especially like now, the recent Maharashtra Stamp Act, so it will hinder arbitration going forward. Considering also the list of non arbitrability of disputes being expanded.
It has come to a point. It feels like sometimes nothing is applicable. But yeah, talking about that golden period when I was here with Ciccu sir, very amazing. It was like dust. So anywhere you hit a case law is gonna get settled about different parts of things, be it seat versus venue obligations, be it pre-enforcement deposits.
And then set aside the definition of patent illegality being expanded and then again being narrowed down, the stamping of arbitration issue. These all are really enthralling issues which have been taken the course of arbitration in India. Specifically with Ciccu sir, I was fortunate to assist him in international arbitrations.
The most fond memory I have was when I went to Paris with him for a CIAC arbitration. So the biggest question everyone asked was, oh, why Paris if it’s CIAC? So the seat and venue argument again comes out there that Paris was the venue, that Singapore is the seat, substantive law is theIndian contract Act.
So three 3 types of law, procedural, substantive, and the seat (jurisdictional). So it was enthralling to witness how SIAC functions at an international level. We had all the top arbitrators in the world in that, the biggest names that you can understand, how professionally it was being conducted, how every line was being transcribed, was very important to see.
And the best part was in the night, our job was to inspect if everything’s written is right or not, because by chance there’s an issue. Then how witnesses were cross examined, how the Chinese walls were always maintained regardless of how they are based, that there is no intimidation or anything going on.
It was a very good experience and you learn different facets of law. When you go for enforcement or set aside how Singapore views it and how India views it. India, I would still say has a bit more broader scope than Singapore, but maybe it’s needed because it’s different geographical, geopolitical, demographic issues that we have here.
Considering now that argument, which is going on in the Supreme Court regarding, section 34, that is a set aside application should they be allowed to modify the award. Now that is something which is, I don’t know what the Supreme Court’s going to say because I have views on both sides.
If you allow them to modify it, then very well, because otherwise what happens, the moment you set aside, you go back to clock zero and you stop. But the moment you get the power, the modify, then what’s the point, there is a normal court proceeding where you’re giving appellate powers. So it’s a very difficult thing. The scope in India, and at least in the last 10 years since the amendment has come, the act after 96 close to 18 years, that amendment came 18, 19 years. Since then, a lot of things have changed. Arbitration was booming. Maybe with these recent amendments or the government stand and the highest stamp duty, it may take a hit. But if you want to have India as a very high on the charts on the ease of doing business, we have to be pro arbitration.
So that is my takeaway from the last 7 to 8 years of practice in arbitration.
How did you decide to start your own law firm, your own chambers, and what was the motivation behind it? And the kind of challenges? I’m pretty sure you must have faced. We request you to share some of those with the kind of solutions that you came up with because you started this at such an early age. It’ll be very beneficial for our learners to understand how they can also brush themselves to go through this particular path.
Sure. I mean, I was fortunate enough to become a barrister at the age of 21, 22. So I was quite young when I already had all the accolades. I had an undergrad and I had a barrister degree. I was just 22. So I moved to India at that time. I was one of the youngest in the course also there, everyone else is 26, 27 or 29.
I was the only kid there. So it helped me mature up faster because the people around me are all 5, 7 years elder to me. I was in AZB. Like I said, the matters were so big that 20 lawyers are working on it. But then somehow I just felt that I’m not getting to do the work that I wanted. Because of such magnanimity, you’re not able to do the entire work.
Though everyone is given a specific job, otherwise it’s not going to get done. Only the partner knows the entire case holistically. Otherwise, you all are doing your separate job as needed. So I realized that, let me just understand this. And, I really have the hunger to learn and do cases from start to finish.
I’ll make the index and make the list of dates and draft the petition. I want to argue also. Everything I wanted to do. I want to do it. So I had that little kid in me who never thought things through that time, I was young, so maybe, one day I just decided that no, I don’t want to be a small part of a big project.
I’d rather do the entire project by myself regardless of how small it is. The kid in me never sought advice from anyone also, it was just a pure instinct move and I left. And life taught me a lot of things that way. One case led to another. One thing I learned, you need to be fearless. Fearlessness and stupidity have a very thin line, so you got to be careful there as well.
You got to take your steps slowly, but calculative, but also not be scared. Because the moment you venture out in independent practice, there are a lot of things that you need to be careful of. It’s not just your ego that you want to do it alone. It’s the client’s case at risk. Sometimes it is their freedom if you’re doing bails, sometimes it is their hard earned money if you’re doing a civil case, sometimes it is their house if you’re doing a redevelopment agreement and the issues that come around there, it is their house. If you do it wrong now he’s going to be homeless. So there’s a lot of pressure also, high stake pressure there. You should never be afraid of asking help from anyone. Never think that if you’re asking from help, maybe you’re getting demeaned.
Your job is to ask for help. I remember catching anyone in the Bombay Bar and going and meeting and started talking to them. I still remember 4 years ago, my first office was the High Court library. Because, I couldn’t afford to buy so many books. All these books are very expensive.
Bombay real estate is very expensive. Anywhere you go to rent an office, it’s really expensive. And I was that time around 25, 26, and I didn’t feel right to take money from my father. I’m an independent guy and I had my savings a little bit from a AZB, I thought, let me venture this out. So I’ve seen it from the ground up.
From my days of having my first office in the High Court library with the rotating chairs, whoever sat in your chair, has sat now. So no fixed office that way. So I would think positively, I’d say I have many offices and I have a huge collection of books, which is for free. So that’s where it started.
One thing led to another. You got to be courageous. You got to learn throughout your life. Like you said, I’m very young and I would consider myself to be a student of law forever because law is something where you learn something new every day. Today I may know the law and the other person might come up with a new argument, which is intriguing.
Then I’ll learn something. And the same thing even I have done. Sometimes I might think this is a very foolish argument, but I have won the case on that. I don’t know how judge saw sense in it. Maybe I wasn’t seeing it. So it was a very enthralling experience. Because I didn’t have foresight of which type of case is going to come to me, any client who would repose faith in me and took over that case.
So maybe that way I became fortunate enough to have a very expansive field of practice. I remember doing IBC, oppression mismanagement. I remember having a client who came to me for Armed Forces Tribunal. I have nothing to do with Armed Forces Tribunal, like I’ve been only a commercial litigation lawyer.
It was a very enthralling experience. Then I remember a friend came to me for his share subscription agreement, and lucky for him, he got selected by the Y Combinator and now he has raised a hundred million. So through his journey, like when he was in the nascent stage I did that share subscription, but every round he came back to me because then I understood the startup game, how it is going, what are the common pitfalls businesses face?
What are the challenges founders face? What are the challenges investors face? What are the regulatory requirements that they always overlook? What are the employment law requirements that they generally overlook? And I’m a very big fan of tech, so I keep a note of all of it. So it’s a very good database for me also to sit and analyze across industries so that way the other startups also started.
So they started with the STEM toys and gaming, gambling, then drone tech, health tech. And as lawyers, one thing I’ve always suggested is not just about the law. It is you need to understand the industry better than your client, because then only he’s going to respect you. Only when you know his industry better than him is when he’ll understand, okay, you understand my problem genuinely.
It’s not just the law that you’re telling me. This even online I can see. So it’s very important for you to understand the industry that they’re in. What is the issue in that industry? Because how you say, what is a startup? It’s a innovative or an inventive way of finding solution to a problem. Now, first you should see why haven’t other people done it?
Is it so difficult? Are you Einstein? How did you come up with this? There should be some issue why they’re not doing it. Is there a legal issue? Does the law not allow It? Are the taxes too high? Are the cess too high in that industry? Maybe there’s a high GST. Maybe that’s why it’s not working. Maybe something like Bitcoin where the government is only not clear whether it’s legal or illegal, but yet put 28% tax on it.
So the model is only not viable. So all these things you need to advise clients, even though you’re not expected to know this, but you will only be able to serve your client to the best of interest when you know all these things. So that’s what I’ve learned in my humble experience till now.
It has been a good journey. I hope it gets better.
We would request you to share your experience about how you get called to the Bar by The Honourable Society of Gray’s Inn, the kind of things that one has to do in his or her legal career for that particular qualification of getting as a barrister, it’ll also help the learners, and I would request you also, in case you have some insight about the SQE qualifications, which usually Indian lawyers can qualify and register themselves over there and practice in UK because you already have seen that particular world, there is a possibility that we’ll get to know more about it, obviously from the firsthand experience?
Sure. I mean, I can’t comment much on SQE, but SQE is always, that’s a solicitor route. I think they have changed the name also now. They keep on changing names. Can’t help it. Even for a barrister, during my time it was BPTC.
Now it is BVC, BFC. I don’t know. They keep on changing God knows for what reason, but yeah solicitor is obviously the easiest way for Indians. If you’re going to migrate to the UK. You won’t get right of audience. solicitors don’t have right of audience. You can practice in the lowest court that is a magistrate court or the crown court.
But not above that, above that you need to take another exam or something through which you may get a right of audience. But having said that, for Indians, generally people who are going there, if you think a law firm is the safest bet for you, of course, you would rather do the SQE than do the barrister because obviously you have jobs in law firms which are better paying and more secure.
You might have to work a lot. But obviously it’s way more secure and you have a fixed pay. Coming to the barrister side. First, I’ll just give you a highlight of the process, at least during my time how it was. For us, if we had to do an undergrad in the UK, LLB and then do this, or there’s one more thing called GDL, that is a one year, super law course, as I call it. So we do all the subjects in one year, all the major subjects are trust, law, contract law, Tort law, and criminal. These are the major ones, which everyone has to do. There may be some electives you’ll have to take, but all within one year, so very daunting. For Indian lawyers maybe you can write to the Bar Standards Board, that is the BSB, there to seek an exemption, saying that you have studied, that India is also a common law jurisdiction. How contract law is an act given by them. Mostly the principles. The principles are the same everywhere, in any common law jurisdiction. So if we can make an argument and show that you have some years of practice and seek an exemption from doing the GDL or anything, then comes the course or the BPTC course, maybe whatever the new acronym that they have put in now, I don’t know. So in that, what happens is that, A is that you get into that course. Second is you become a member of one of the four inns of court. So that’s Gray’s Inn, Middle Temple, Inner Temple and Lincoln’s Inn. So from Lincoln’s Inn, you have our Jawaharlal Nehru, from Middle Temple you have Sardar Patelji, from Gray’s Inn we have Mr.Ambedkar. That’s why personally, I had chose Gray’s Inn because of that, since it was the smallest and the youngest. Lincoln’s Inn is the oldest and the biggest. There comes your Inner temple where you had Gandhiji. So, I mean, you become a member of these four inns of court. Some people have their interview process also.
It’s a process that you need to apply, get recommendations. Interviews are being conducted and then you are admitted as a member of the inns of court. So now to get the big call to a bar, you need to do 12 qualifying sessions in the inns of court, which can range from dinners to moots to lectures to trial to mock trials, anything. These all happen in their ancient old halls, which are like all 500 years old or 600 years old. Halls like if you have seen Harry Potter, how they dine. So that dining shoot has happened in Lincoln’s Inn. So that’s how we all barristers used to dine. We all used to go on our big gowns.
And then there’s your master’s table where there’s the king’s councilors and the queen’s councilors and the guests for that time dinner or lecturers come and then we all would sit in sets of two students and two practicing barristers. So that way we could also communicate. We would get to know people in the fraternity.
We get to know their experience. They might also impart some wisdom to us. It was nice. Then comes the hardest part, which are the exams. So your course starts sometime in September and till May, so roughly 6 months, 6 to 8 months. During this period from Jan onwards, your exams will start.
So every month expect to have 3 exams. The exams would be like arbitration. And here all the procedural law comes. Like, remember when I told you the substantive as an undergrad, procedure is there, so your CRPC, CPC, arbitration. Then comes your opinion writing, drafting, cross-examination, examination in chief, presenting an application.
Then comes ethics. So these all courses are there, and you have to get a minimum 60% in each to pass. No one gets above 80, so you need to fall in that middle bracket of 60 to 80. They fail you by one mark also. And the first thing that you hear when you enter the barrister courses, look to your left, look to your right 30% will run away by next month. That is a normal thing. But yeah, it’s fruitful. The experience is fruitful and when you come out you also see the change in you, how your skills have been sharpened, how pinpointed questions you ask and how you present yourself in court. Before the course and after the course are a very different experience.
And I can say this because I know lawyers who were lawyers in Brazil, Argentina, Mexico, and they have come here and done this course, they’ve been practicing for 10 years. They themselves shared that their skills are now sharpened.
You’ve had exposure to global jurisdictions through your legal journey — what major changes did you notice in yourself through this process, and what motivated your return to India? How did you navigate the transition back, and did your familiarity with Delhi help? Additionally, how did you develop the skill of reading clients and understanding the psychology behind cases and businesses?
So, like I said, these are courses that have to be taught in India. So we were taught this day in and day out, so every week we used to have a recorded lecture, like I’m sitting with a professional actor and doing cross-examination or interview of the client, conducting an interview of when he or she has come and told me like I have to prep them for the cross-examination tomorrow.
So I’m like, okay, come, let’s sit. I’ll ask you a few questions you have to answer. You need to understand what question not to ask. And you’re trained in? These things are very important. People in India always say we will learn through practice. Even if I was in India, I would also like to learn through practice, I can read about it.
But I didn’t know there were books like these. There are very nice books written out there regarding opinion writing or client management or conducting cross-examination, even for pleadings. I remember the first book I bought was How to Plead Without Tears. I’m forgetting the author, but that was the title of the book, the first book I borrowed from the library.
So these are things, like I said, when I was in India, I didn’t know of this. Once I went there and when a professional actor, and usually the teachers are the ones who are practicing barristers, so these are part-time teachers, technically they’re only coming for that one course. And then going back to their practicing scene.
So they would give their personal anecdotes, give you more wisdom, and that is very important in shaping my ideology also. Second thing is how in India people take a lot of their friends, family cases. Though it is not illegal, the Advocates Act only doesn’t allow you to appear for blood relatives.
But generally what they taught me and why I clearly agree was especially in litigation, if not corporate, is you should be fully independent. The moment you have a client in litigation with whom you have a personal relation or anything, it’s not that it is illegal or anything, I would say that your judgment is clogged because then you start taking it personally.
And also you are not being true to the ethical values because if you see your duty towards the court is paramount, it’s above your duty towards the client. That’s what the advocates act also says. When you have somewhat vested interest. I’m not saying monetary only because he’s your friend, maybe you’re a bit more emotional about that case.
Maybe it’s your relative, you’re a bit more emotional. It clouds your judgment. You’re not able to understand the counter-arguments, and that’s when the other lawyer who is totally independent will get the better of you. Because more often than not in court, you can write 10,000 pages of pleadings.
The judge is only gonna listen to you, to the council. So 90% is a council, 10% obviously, you can’t plead facts, which you haven’t submitted in your pleadings, but as to law especially. Unless you are independent, your judgment will be clogged. And that’s my personal experience . And that’s the main thing that I was taught there.
And I completely agree with that.
Over the course of your career, you have appeared in various cases at the Supreme Court of India as well, which are of significant matter. If you don’t mind sharing some of the highlights of a few intriguing cases, also, the kind of complexities and how you navigate through that whole process.
Because as you were trained to do that particular research at length, how have you made sure that you do it in a limited period of time that is given to you, and how have you navigated the whole process?
Actually more than that, I would add one more. Not just a limited period of time, but also the limited period of speaking time that you get in the court.
The Supreme court is a very different practice than any other court, unless you are a very known face of how like the big stalwarts are, the court wants to listen to them. Everyone in the audience also wants to listen to them. When Mr. Sibal talks, Mr. Singhvi talks, all these all these are like songs when they’re talking, we are like please keep going, even if it is for hours because we get to learn so much from them.
When someone like me steps in, who still has only one or two gray hair, they don’t listen to you. They’ll give you probably 2 minutes, 5 minutes if they are generous, or maybe it’s very contentious. The longest I’ve gone is half an hour, and as we know, 9 out of 10 cases are thrown on the pre notice change. In the Supreme Court there’s a very old saying, if you have notice issued then 80% of the case is won. Then you get to know if your true counsel, if you’re able to get the case dismissed after the notice is issued, because getting the notice issue is a very high threshold. Something like the Supreme Court, I mean cases which are very close to my heart is one I remember I argued, Lieutenant’s matter.
I was fortunate enough to appear before the Additional Solicitor General of India. We had a lot of heated arguments. It was a matter of Article 21 right to life. My client was paralyzed and he was being invalidated from service and also asked to leave the hospital. Where will a paralyzed man go?
That was the biggest thing. Where do we let the paralyzed man go? We can’t just leave him on the streets. So that was a very interesting argument. He brought in Article 21. We used a little bit of our own brain process, like they were throwing him out of the hospital. And I started asking for a release, which relates to US surgery.
I took them to the US and the judge, I remember Deepanker Dutta was there and he’s like, you want surgery in the US? Where do you think you are? This is in India, like this, do you think we send everyone to the US? So then I was like, okay sir, please give it to me in AIMS only then. He’s like he is already in a government hospital now, I was like but they’re removing him, and he’s like no, no, he can be there. That’s what I ultimately wanted.
So it was good. So that was one case that I’m really proud of. That was my first pro bono case. I thought at least I did whatever I could for the client, unfortunately he is no more. Then another, I remember my first case was against Mr. M.R.Shah, it was small, I mean, I won’t consider it small that way. It was a very small point of law where the workers were supposed to be given compensation.
Poor workers were being tortured and tormented. Somewhere in 2002 during construction, they fell. One person severed their hand, 20 people fell like that, and the contractor and the agency weren’t giving them their insurance amount. I remember I appeared before Mr.M.R.Shah And no one appeared for the respondents.
He asked me pinpointed questions. And before me, mine was serial number 11, I remember, the first 10 were dismissed. First 10 were dismissed, or no one got notice issued. I was there and the respondents didn’t appear. He grilled me for 10 minutes and I was like, why is this guy doing this to me?
These are poor people. And I was still young. I was just 26, 27 years old. These are poor people, they deserve their thing, unnecessarily this appeal has been filed too after a delay, and the High Court for reasons best known to them allowed the appeal. So after I filed this, he grilled, grilled, grilled.
Then suddenly I saw an order where he has given me, he has issued notice, and he has written some good things about me like counsel vehemently argued. So these small pleasures of life that you enjoy. You like why you are doing this job. Law is something which is…, I mean, sure monetary aspect is there, but you can’t join this profession, especially litigation if you are just looking at the monetary aspect because more often than not, you will have many clients who cannot afford, but you really wanna help them because ultimately they have no other way to get justice.
So council practice is very different, and if you’re only looking at the monetary aspect, I would suggest don’t get to council practice that easily unless you have a lot of monetary support.
I’m pretty sure you must have gone through a lot of these kinds of exciting cases where you not only learn, but others also have learned from you. Can you share your experience about advising the investors and acting as an external legal counsel, especially for drone tech manufacturers, and you are also involved in the agricultural sector, the drone use in the agricultural sector.
How have you approached that? What kind of due diligence is conducted? The kind of agreements that are made, or how do you actually address the issues or challenges in these legal fees, which are actually emerging industries. How have you gotten into this and how do you see that technology is going to be a change factor for legal practice itself?
See, tech is coming and everywhere, everything nowadays tech is being added. Legal tech is there. Drone tech is there. The other day I met someone who was into spiritual tech. I don’t know what that means. I dunno what that means but I’m intrigued to know, like you specifically asked about drone tech.
And actually recently I met another client, which is into anti drone tech. He is like everyone’s making a drone, I’ll make an anti drone. So it’s very interesting what’s going on. Specifically if you talk about agritech in combination with drone tech, a lot of things come in, A, obviously licensing. You can’t just fly a drone.
You need your DGCA license. You need licensed pilots, you need trained pilots. You need a proper training school. You need to make sure that the data that you are collecting, you have taken consent. Consent is most important. And, the DPDP act, though it has come, the rules haven’t come, so you’re not able to enforce it.
Some people have already found loopholes. Some people are like, okay, tech as if it is online, I’m gonna write a ticket for it, and then process the data. So unless case laws come, we can’t navigate through all this. A lot of SPDI rules, information tech. Now drones are also flying. Now a lot of times happened like, had an instance scenario where the drone fell and it burned the entire crop.
Who is liable? Insurance company saying we are not liable to pay because we covered the drone catching on fire and falling while we are not responsible for this crop. And fortunately, unfortunately, everything was dry grass. What do you do? The villagers have tied the pilot who had come to fly the drone.
They’re not leaving him, giving the money back. So these are complex issues which come around. You have to navigate, you have to get proper insurance and such things. You need to make sure that the testing for the drone is right. The pilot who’s been given the drone is safe, secure, properly licensed.
The data that you’re using, you have full consent to, not only to collect, but also to monetize it. Otherwise, tomorrow you might have a claim from the landowner who will say, I’m also part owner of this data. Such complications are always going to come. You need to make sure that there’s a proper title towards those drones as well.
A lot of people imagine that the drone falls where it is, the drone is 10 kilometers away from you. A lot of people take the parts and run away. That also happens. Someone say, this is mine. So security also has to be taken care of. It’s a very niche industry that you need to take care of. I need to also, every time, sit with the founders and see what their vision is.
Is your job just to spray pesticides through a drone? Covering 20 kilometers? Fair. Is your job also to put an infrared camera and see what is the output of this? Where all is the pesticide spraying, where it is spraying, where the output coming is less or more. All these are important issues which need to ask the founders as to how they are gonna navigate.
Do they plan on having this and monetizing this, or they just want to set up a company? So all these questions need to ask in accordingly, different, different acts coming. So it has to do a lot with what the founder’s vision is. If you have very low business capacity and very low investment, maybe just a simple drone with the pesticide you will need to just spray it.
You wanna go through a high tech process, output data, input data, get every small thing about the crop. Is this crop good, viable? What vegetable should grow there? This all requires a lot of SPDI rules. DPDP rules, information tech rules. A lot of things happen.
Given your diverse national and international experience, what advice would you offer to legal aspirants entering tech-related fields, especially in terms of necessary qualities, strategic preparation, and managing mental health alongside the demands of a legal career?
See, obviously, law, especially litigation as a profession, I would suggest only do it if you have the passion for it. And especially when you are independent, like how I am. Work-life balance has no meaning only. If you don’t have work, you’ll be sitting in anxiety.
If you have work, you’ll be very grateful to God and you’ll work till 4 am also. So for me, I just can’t relate to it. Maybe when I was working in a law firm, yeah. I would say, oh, why am I getting called at 2:00 AM in the night? I don’t wanna work, I wanna sleep. Now I get a call at 2:00 AM the night. Yes, of course I’ll be there.
So it’s very different perspectives. The day I left and I saw I’m loving what I’m doing, I work any hour because I get that excitement. Until you’re getting that excitement, everything seems like a chore then I mean, you won’t wanna do it as and when you like. So only enter this profession if you have that passion. Second, you have to keep your diet very well, because the problem with this is we are in a desk job.
This is all a desk job, so use bound to gain weight, especially the way things are out here now. Eating outside, unhealthy, unfiltered, questionable oil food. It’s going to take a toll on your mental health because the only way your physical health is fine is when this is going to be fine. And considering with so much involvement of technology and everything, mental health does take a huge shift.
So always suggest everyone to keep everything disciplined. Learn to work out for at least half an hour a day. Eat healthy, eat home food. Best part, nothing will happen. If you eat home, you eat puri at home, it’s fine as long as it’s home food. The outside oil you don’t know what’s in there, They’re cooking in the same oil for 10 days.
Second, obviously the passion has to be there and everything ultimately flows from the Constitution. I have it right here. This is the father of everything, every time you have a doubt. What is this law? I’m not understand. Read from where it has come. It has to come from the Constitution, only the Constitution gives that authority, the power to make that law. So the day you understand Constitutions. All your issues regarding complexity of laws will go and any new law which also comes, you will know how to understand it if you understand the Constitution. So every law student, I always suggest that constitutional law is not just for someone who practices in the red jurisdictions or only the Supreme Court.
It is for everyone because you could be doing corporate anything, but to interpret that statute, you need to understand the Constitution, and this is the golden rule for everything.
Your academic journey has clearly provided a strong foundation for your legal career. Could you kindly share how these early academic experiences influenced your decision to pursue law, and what valuable lessons you gained during that time?
From a very early age, I was fortunate to be surrounded by the world of law. My father, Mr. R.K. Wadhwa, a practicing lawyer, served as a constant source of inspiration and familiarity with the legal system. Law, in that sense, didn’t come to me as a sudden career decision, it seeped into my life gradually. The exposure at home planted the seed, even though, at one point, I had briefly considered exploring a different path.
Thereafter during my days in Modern School, where I made a somewhat unconventional choice to pursue Humanities, at a time when the stream was often misunderstood or even looked down upon. But I had no inclination toward Physics, Chemistry, or Math. I was genuinely drawn to subjects like Political Science and Psychology, which resonated with my interests. It was during this period that my interest in law was truly solidified. My School also offered an intellectual environment. Being surrounded by accomplished alumni, including legal luminaries, only deepened my resolve.
My journey continued at Amity Law School, which was still in its formative years, I belonged to the fifth batch. The atmosphere was dynamic; our seniors had built the foundation for various extracurricular societies, and soon, the baton was passed to us. I was deeply involved in debates, and with encouragement from peers and mentors, I went on to found the Amity Law School Debating Society. My passion for expression and the performing arts led me to also co-found the Music and Theatre Society and become part of the Cultural Society. I actively participated in national-level moot court competitions, and led contingents representing ALS at institutions like NALSAR, BITS Pilani, and Symbiosis Pune.
I also realised that sometimes it’s not the ‘Big Wins’; But, the small victories that matter. Around my Fourth year, Amity didn’t have its own logo at the time—it functioned under the larger Amity University banner. But that lack of identity stirred something in me. I wanted ALS to have its own unique presence. With support from then-Director Maj. General Nilendra Kumar, I conceptualized and designed the official logo for ALS.
Having gained valuable experience through various internships and legal research positions in the early stages of your career. Would you be able to share some of the most impactful or memorable experiences from that period and how they helped shape your understanding of the law?
Internships were where theory met reality for me. I had the chance to intern with a wide variety of legal offices, law firms, individual practitioners, and chambers. Each setting brought with it a unique learning curve, and I quickly realized that no amount of classroom education could substitute for the practical experience of being in court. In courts, you’re constantly thinking on your feet. You’re taught to use every resource at your disposal—even when you walk into a courtroom with seemingly nothing. The unpredictability trains you to stay alert, adaptable, and resourceful.
After graduating, I spent some time working with my father in the trial courts. It was a hands-on experience that introduced me to the ground realities. My father had a purely criminal practice, he was mostly briefed from the defence side to conduct cross-examinations which in a way, gave me deep insights into trial work and how a criminal case is methodically built. It was an education like no other. He used to tell me “Agar aap vakalat ko 2 din chhodoge to wo aapko 4 din peeche karegi.” —if you step away from law for two days, it will set you back by four. And I felt the truth of that every time I missed a day in court. Sometimes, even when you might not have a matter of your own, you still have to come to court even if you spend the day just sitting in the court library or listening to arguments in someone else’s matter; that can at times teach you more than a lecture ever could.
Soon after, I began assisting Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog in the High Court. He had this saying that stuck with me: “If you’re good at law, you hammer the law. If you’re good at facts, you hammer the facts. If you’re good at neither, you hammer the table.” It was humorous on the surface, but layered with insight. The latter is one of the most important characteristics to have in a lawyer, where you put forward your submissions to the Court knowing you might not be very strong either on the facts or on the law. This is where your oratory skills and imaginations are used the most.
The early years are all about being a sponge. You absorb everything, from your seniors, your peers, your juniors, and even opposing counsel. Every moment in court, even the bad one’s like every heated exchange, every procedural hiccup prepares you for tomorrow. At times you might just be learning what not to do the next time around. Whether you’re waiting for your matter to be called or spending time in the Bar Room listening to seasoned lawyers dissect a point of law—it’s all part of your training.
Having worked alongside numerous esteemed Advocates and Senior Advocates, what inspired you to establish your own practice? If you don’t mind sharing, were there any particular challenges you faced when setting up your own firm in the initial stages?
Although I had worked with seniors in the field for some time including my Father, I still had the urge to carve out something of my own. I wanted to build my own practice that reflected my ideals and my name.
Of course, it wasn’t easy. The initial phase was lean, money was tight, clients were few, and everything had to be managed singlehandedly. I didn’t have a team, or even support staff. No clerk, no office boy. I was everything rolled into one; I was managing the files, doing the drafting, attending court, and at times, even cleaning out my office. But that struggle, in hindsight, is what keeps you grounded and makes you realise your worth. Despite those strenuous years, I would not trade it for anything. Having your own practice comes with a sense of freedom which would give me the space to shape my identity as a lawyer.
Twelve years on, I still consider myself a student of the profession. Every single day teaches you something new. What I’ve come to realize is that a litigation office is a lot like a household. While you might think of yourself as the head of the family, it’s the clerk who keeps the house running (who actually governs everything and makes you feel the void if on leave), It’s the seniors who offer perspective and grounding, and Your colleagues (the infamous Juniors, as people call them in this profession); they help you out the most when you’re in an uncomfortable situation before a Judge and teach you things which even a senior can’t teach you. These lessons, some learnt the hard way, have formed the cornerstone of my independent practice. And even with all the unpredictability, I wouldn’t trade this journey for anything.
Your involvement in pro bono work across a variety of legal sectors is truly commendable. What motivates you to take on such cases, and if you would be willing, could you share a specific instance where your pro bono work made a significant difference in someone’s life?
Pro bono work has always held a deeply personal significance for me. I believe that if the legal profession has given you the privilege of a voice in a courtroom, the least you can do is use it for those who cannot afford to be heard. Every human doesn’t come with resources, but everyone needs to be represented; and I do believe that having some degree of privilege, it is our bounden duty to represent their side of the stories and some of those stories stay with you forever.
The least a lawyer can do is give back to the society; because every client/ litigant who is seeking legal assistance cannot afford to spend heavily on counsel. I’ve learned from my seniors that no brief should be refused on the grounds of scale or fee. No matter is too small, and every litigant deserves a chance. That ethos continues to guide my practice.
One such case was that of a man, whose young son, about 21-year-old boy, working as a young air conditioning technician for DTC Buses, was brutally murdered in broad daylight. The father, who was a rickshaw driver, and his wife, had been running from one police station to another, and despite the gravity of the crime, no FIR had been registered. They were absolutely desolate and hopeless and not in a position to afford any legal representation. They came to me through a Local Help who knew me as somebody who would be willing to help them. I wanted to help them in whatever way I could extend. You can’t take empathy out of this profession.
Another matter that stands out was a case involving slum demolition. Entire families approached me, numbers running into 100s; their homes, slums were to be demolished overnight and entire families were to be displaced, without notice or recourse. My entire Team sat through the Night and we got relief the next day. The gratitude and blessings that those people felt is something that reminded me why I did and what I did in the first place. These were more than just legal battles; Situations like these reaffirmed my belief that the law must be a tool for justice, not just procedure.
With your extensive experience working with high-profile clients and handling numerous reported judgments, could you share a particularly interesting or noteworthy case that has had a lasting impact on you professionally?
One of the most impactful cases I handled came just a year and a half into my legal practice. A senior lawyer referred the matter to me, since the client was in an urgent and vulnerable situation. It involved a French national, residing in the UK, who had been in a live-in relationship with an Indian man. They had a child together, and by mutual agreement, the child would visit the Father’s family in India for short periods. However, during one such visit, the father refused to let the child return. The mother, distraught and left with no recourse, flew to Delhi to seek legal assistance. That’s when I was brought on board.
I had never handled a Habeas Corpus petition before, but we knew we had to act quickly. We spent the night researching and drafting the petition. We mentioned the matter urgently the next day. The father eventually appeared before the court, bringing the child with him. One of our other prayers was seeking the custody of the Child for the mother, but the court was initially hesitant, as the scope of habeas corpus petitions is generally limited. However, we showed precedents which recognized that in exceptional circumstances, custody could be addressed within Habeas proceedings.
The court, after hearing our arguments, showed indulgence in the facts; The court also intervened to ensure the mother’s visa extension was considered on priority, so that she could stay in India and contest the proceedings. Within just two to three hearings, the matter was settled in our favour, and the child was allowed to return to the UK with the mother.
The matter gave me immense confidence and encouragement; I realised that there was no substitute for research and preparedness. It was our research that had come to the aid of our client. The emotional weight of that case was also immense, not just for the parties involved, but for me as well.
There have been moments in my career when I was confident of my case, of the facts, of the law and still lost. And then there have been matters where I thought I was fighting a losing cause, only to have gotten a good order. I have learnt something fundamental through all this; sometimes, your job isn’t just to win; it’s to show up, speak up, and stand firm, even when the outcome seems uncertain. You may be fighting an uphill battle, but your presence and persistence can make all the difference. These experiences have been humbling and invaluable. They’ve taught me to never take anything for granted in this profession.
As a Panel Counsel for the Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee, you’ve made meaningful contributions to welfare initiatives, especially for foreign national prisoners. What led you to focus on this area, and what unique challenges do foreign prisoners face in India? Could you share any insights from a recent case or initiative in this field?
My time with the Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee has taught me many important lessons and given me an opportunity to work for many causes. One case that stood out involved a convict who had suffered a life-altering accident while working inside a jail-run paper factory. He lost three fingers due to the lack of safety protocols. Prior to my involvement, multiple writ petitions had been filed on his behalf, but no concrete outcome was achieved. When the matter finally came to me, we argued that while prisoners may not be treated at par with civilian workmen under certain compensation laws, they still possess fundamental and civil rights. If an injury occurs while working inside prison premises, there is a duty on the State to ensure compensation and adequate medical care. The Court was kind to accept our submissions and framed guidelines for compensating prisoners who suffer such injuries. In my opinion it was a small but significant step toward justice behind bars. That case was a reminder that dignity and rights do not stop at the prison gate.
Some causes find you before you go looking for them. My work with foreign national prisoners began that way, through my role as a Part of the Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee, I came across cases involving foreign national Prisoners, many of whom faced long incarcerations and still faced uncertainty about their dates of deportation. These individuals faced a unique and often overlooked set of challenges. Most had no local support, no financial means, no access to translators, and in many cases, no consular assistance. Something as basic as arranging for a surety or providing a permanent Indian address became insurmountable obstacles to their release. The legal system, while well intentioned, can become an alien labyrinth when you’re navigating it in a foreign land with no resources or familiarity. Justice cannot be selective. It cannot favour those with access and leave behind those without. If our system is to remain just and equitable, we must ensure that everyone, regardless of nationality or status, is afforded due process and humane treatment.
During my time as DHCLSC, I also had the opportunity to visit the FRRO, we witnessed the Overcrowding in the centre, and saw the deplorable state of affairs, where some foreign nationals are there for more than 6 months, and some for many years altogether, which in my opinion should absolutely not be the scenario. We came across multiple facets that in our opinion require interventions and corrections. In our role, we even made a report and we submitted the same to the DHCLSC.
Your dedication to social causes, including fundraising and various welfare activities, is truly admirable. What inspires you to invest time and energy into these causes, and how do you manage to balance your professional commitments, social work, and personal life?
Giving back has never felt like an obligation; it’s always felt like a natural extension of my work. A large part of that comes from my upbringing. My father was also active in bar politics. I had never seen him turn his back on a cause, on a fellow lawyer in need of aiding the causes he believed in.
That influence shaped my own sense of responsibility. In my limited capacity I have tried to aid causes I could contribute for; from assisting fellow lawyers in need during Covid crisis or organising Blood Donation Camps and contributing to other initiatives. For me, legal work and social work are not separate silos—they’re deeply intertwined.
Of course, balancing your personal lives and litigation isn’t always easy. The days are long, and the stress of litigation can be unrelenting. But having a strong, dependable team makes all the difference. My office operates like a family. In jest, but also in truth, I often say, your clerk is like your spouse, and your colleagues are your children. Everyone has a role, everyone supports the other, and somehow, the whole house runs.
Time management and alignment of values are essential. When you genuinely care about what you’re doing, the work, even the long hours, starts to feel purposeful. And that purpose sustains you. You don’t just show up to win cases, you show up to make a difference.
Social commitments don’t compete with my professional life, they enrich it. In my opinion, this profession requires you to be social, connecting with people is necessary to growing in the profession.
With your wealth of experience across diverse legal fields, you are uniquely positioned to offer guidance to aspiring legal professionals. What advice would you offer to law students and young lawyers who wish to pursue a career in litigation? Are there any resources or approaches that you believe are essential for success in today’s legal environment?
Litigation is not for the faint-hearted. It tests your patience, your resilience, often all at once. You will walk into court with a well-prepared brief and walk out feeling like you know nothing. You will lose cases you believed were great and win cases you had given up on. It humbles you. And it should. Be prepared to consult everyone—your seniors, your peers, even your juniors. I’ve learned valuable lessons from colleagues younger than me, simply because they were looking at the problem from a fresh angle. Don’t let ego get in the way of learning. This field rewards humility far more than bravado.
There will be days when you feel lost, when a judge pulls you up harshly, when you’ve stayed up preparing and things still don’t go your way. That’s okay. As a lawyer, your duty is that of a messenger between the client and the bench. Your role isn’t to take matters personally, but to do justice to the brief entrusted to you, to the best of your ability and conscience. You’re a professional messenger between your client and the bench. You have a responsibility of not upsetting either of the Two.
The courtroom has also taught me to never underestimate the importance of humility. No court is too big and no matter is too small (I guess that’s what they say). It’s a bounden duty of any court to treat all matters at an equal pedestal. We, as officers of the court, our submissions should always be respectful, well-prepared, and mindful of the board of the court. If you’re concise, clear, and courteous, even the busiest bench will give you a fair hearing, every court/judge will have indulgence in your case.
I have learnt an invaluable lesson: litigation is never a race amongst individuals or a sprint—it’s a marathon. Each lawyer begins from a different starting point. It’s a field that will exhaust you, test your patience. Reaching every milestone would again make you realise that you’re still far away from the end point. You just have to keep at it.
As technology continues to evolve, its impact on the legal sector, particularly in criminal law, is becoming increasingly significant. How do you see the future of law unfolding in this regard? In your view, how are courts and the legal system adapting to these changes, and what potential challenges or opportunities do you foresee as a result?
I remember observing how things worked during my father’s time—everything was handwritten, typewriters clacked away in the background, and court files were carried in bundles tied with redband. The charm of old-school advocacy still lingers, but there’s no denying that the tools of the trade have transformed. Today, virtual hearings, e-filings, digital courtrooms, online legal research, and case tracking platforms have become the norm. The pandemic accelerated this shift, making digital competence a necessity rather than a choice. For many of us, adapting to this new normal was challenging, but also eye-opening.
Courts are adapting. Judges are becoming more comfortable with hybrid systems. Filing and listing procedures are becoming more streamlined. But as we digitize, we must also confront the digital divide. A significant portion of the bar, especially in district courts, continues to struggle with basic connectivity, lack of infrastructure, and limited digital literacy. For justice to remain accessible, we cannot allow technology to become a gatekeeper. It must be an enabler.
A fair and inclusive legal system cannot only serve those fluent in English, comfortable with apps, or having high-speed internet. The evolution of legal practice must be sensitive to those left behind. We need infrastructural support, training initiatives, and perhaps most importantly, the will to ensure that no lawyer or litigant is excluded simply because they don’t have access to a screen.
What initially inspired you to pursue a career in law, and were there any specific events or formative experiences that shaped your decision to embark on this journey? Reflecting on your law school years, how did your education influence your understanding of the law, and how did it help you develop a foundational approach to legal practice?
Even though I was in the science stream, I was never drawn to any of the subjects. I saw myself getting intrigued with current affairs and news in the public domain. In school, I used to take part in Youth Parliament competitions where we used to debate laws which lay the foundation for me to study law. I also always found myself to be an advocate for rights of people from a young age. I also saw myself getting drawn to opportunities of public speaking. Law as a profession sat in the middle of all my interest areas, hence it became an obvious choice for me.
I went to O.P. Jindal Global University gave me immense exposure that shaped my world view and opinions. Unlike someone who always wanted to find a reason to stay out of the classroom in School, I mostly stayed in the library or classroom in law school. We had a vast and impressive library and an endless scope for learning which I made good use of. I took every opportunity to expand my horizons so I even took a summer course to study at University of Oxford on international human rights which gave me an opportunity to learn from people across the world their outlook towards human rights and how differently in India we perceive the same rights given our socio-economic background. These experiences helped shape my thinking and become more adaptable and accommodative. I chose my internships and moot court competitions according to the subjects I had studied so that I could get into more depth about those subjects. Soon into law school I realised I wanted to get into litigation and I wanted to be in Court arguing matters regularly so I chose to intern with different offices that were active in High Court as well as trial courts. I took electives and courses that would assist me in areas of constitutional, criminal and civil law, all of which were litigation intensive spheres. The things I learnt in these courses are still relevant in the work that I do and being diligent during law school years has proven to be one of my greatest allies in my professional career.
Beginning your career as an Associate at the Chambers of Advocate Ankur Sood must have been pivotal experience in your professional journey. Could you share some of the most valuable lessons and experiences you gained during this early phase, and how did you navigate the challenges of building your reputation as a young lawyer amidst the fast-paced world of legal practice?
They were most certainly the most transformative years for me as a lawyer. As I always dreamt of having an office of my own, the first valuable lesson I got was the importance of having good professional ethics and organisational skills. I saw my seniors being applauded by clients as well as colleagues for their remarkable abilities to manage an office. The second valuable lesson I got was the importance of having a simple yet impressive legal draft. Easy and well organised drafts always strike a chord with the clients and are designed to make law and justice easily accessible which is a vital legal right of the people. The third valuable lesson I got was that there was no alternate to being well-researched and well-read before appearing in Court. I remember I was once asked in the High Court to argue a matter on my own, barely one month into practice while I was only expecting to take a Passover for my senior. However, being put on the spot and made to argue gave me a massive confidence boost and I never looked back because I learnt that it was only upon me to build my own reputation in the fraternity and that nothing would spread word of mouth faster than my own abilities in the Court. Being a young first generation lawyer is not easy, therefore, I grabbed every opportunity to develop a new relation or a new client because I had the confidence in my ability to do justice to my client. No doubt I faltered at times but I was a quick learner and I did not let any shortcomings ever bog me down. I did not shy away from doing cases that did not pay at all or paid very less as long as they were matters of areas of law that I found interesting and had the confidence to deliver in. The profession requires unrelenting hard work and long hours which I was willing to put in because I saw every hour being put in the work as being a way to hone my skill. We are always learning to be more convincing in court which is a place where we stand alone to represent our own craft. I started my independent office just before COVID-19 struck, however that period came as a blessing in disguise for me as I started appearing in different courts all over the country thanks to the VC facility. Good luck and hard work have both paid off in my case.
Transitioning from a focus on civil law to specializing in criminal litigation presents a significant shift in approach and skillset. How did this shift refine your abilities in handling complex criminal cases, particularly high-stakes matters like those related to murder, theft, and the Prevention of Money Laundering Act? Can you describe a particularly challenging case that you came across on the criminal side?
The most important skills in either area of law are your ability to be diligent with the facts and preparedness with the latest law on the subject. I feel as a lawyer you are anyway taught to wear different hats at different times so you automatically learn to have different approaches to any given situation. Dealing more with criminal cases taught me the value of being brief and direct, something that is lost in the pleadings of civil cases. It can be challenging to move from the civil and commercial side to the criminal side because of the habits developed in civil law to be as detailed and explanatory as possible. For instance, in civil law, you cannot lead evidence beyond your pleadings, so one tends to expand and leave room for directing the case in a particular direction. But largely, both parties are aware about the broad ambit of the case of either party. There is no such concept in criminal law, nor is there scope for filing pleadings at trial. You uncover a criminal case like a plucking petals from a flower, i.e. you keep on opening up your case one layer at a time to check which strategy is giving you the best result. Whether you are prosecuting or defending, it is very important to not delve into detailed merits of the case in the early stages of a criminal case so as to avoid giving away your strategy.
I don’t believe in calling any matter having a higher stake than the other because every client comes to you with the hope that you are their last hope. As a nation, we are not very litigation friendly and my experience is that in most cases people come to lawyers when they have no more avenues in front of them. As a litigating lawyer, every day in court is a day involving high stakes because the orders passed on a daily basis form a basis for the final judgment that you are expecting in the case.
One particularly challenging case that I have seen on the criminal side is one which I am currently handling. This case involves an alleged GST fraud where the accused is alleged to have prepared forged documents for creation of fake GST registrations in order to pocket large sums of money thereby causing losses of many crores to several persons whose GST details have been allegedly forged. The defence of this person rests on proving that it is not his usage of the laptops that has caused any of the fake GST registrations but rather it is the act of a different person who has impersonated or gained illegal access to my client’s laptop to create the fake registrations. An offence of this nature would be covered under Section 467 IPC which contains a punishment of life imprisonment and therefore becomes an extremely crucial matter that involves knowing technical know-how and the interplay of law and technology.
After gaining invaluable experience working with prominent legal minds, what inspired you to establish your own practice? What were some of the key obstacles you encountered while setting up your independent practice, and how did you overcome them to build a sustainable and successful legal career?
I think almost everyone enters the field of chamber litigation with a dream to run their own office and I was no different. I was lucky to have an amazing set of mentors who gave me the confidence in a short span of 3 years to venture out independently. While there is no right formula to this, I had two critical factors in mind while starting my own office. The first was confirming with myself whether I knew what advice to give to a client who came to me with any kind of legal query. It required knowing what next steps were to be taken in any kind of litigation in order to strategize for the client. This confidence I had got because of a wide variety of cases that I had dealt with before different fora in a span of three years and I had already seen many cases go from the first date till the date of judgment so I was sufficiently abreast with what was required at each stage. I did not feel the need for any more handholding in terms of what lay next in any kind of litigation.
The second was the frequency of my appearances in court. I did not want to start my own practice and spend the majority of my days at home or in the office. When I saw that I had sufficient work that would require me to give more importance to it than I could give to my senior’s office, I thought it fit to move on. From the first month of when I went independent, I had 15 appearances in a month in different courts which I thought was a decent tally to be on my own.
Key obstacles that I faced were the anxiety of finding more work and building connections. For first generation lawyers, finding work is often tough. I was not in the habit of going out to network and find work. Luckily work flowed in at a decent pace for me as word of mouth spread and many law school friends of mine from other states reposed great faith in me to pursue litigation for their clients in Delhi. In the initial phase, the pace of growth was slow and the outbreak of COVID-19 proved to be a period that required a lot more hard work to be able to sustain a practice. During COVID-19, I spent the first six months gorging on legal commentaries and SCC Online in order to expand my knowledge base. To cut costs, I used to manage the filings by myself and did not keep a clerk until it became essential for me to hire someone. I made many judgment compilations on key legal points that are of great help till today.
When handling complex criminal cases, especially those involving multi-jurisdictional issues, what strategies do you employ to navigate the legal intricacies of different courts and jurisdictions?
Different courts and jurisdictions often mean that the rules of procedure as well as general practices of courts and investigating agencies differ. We have in our country several different wings of investigating agencies and all of them have entirely separate rules of functioning. Scandinavian legal theorists propounded that the life of law is not logic but experience. This is best exemplified when one is faced with multi-jurisdictional issues. Different jurisdictions bring with them challenges and frameworks that are prevalent only within that jurisdiction and the best way to deal with them is to fit in your case within that framework. Every Court has its own procedures, customs and practices. It has to be seen whether any party is indulging in forum shopping in order to invoke different jurisdictions to suit one set of procedures or practices.
I am currently dealing with a matter that spans across three states with multiple investigating agencies involved. At the outset, it is always important to look at whether the case is even maintainable under multiple jurisdictions. It is then important to check for overlaps and conflicts in the different jurisdictions and see if they can help in identifying loopholes found during different investigations. For instance, I am handling a case where statements given by one witness to different investigating agencies are contrary to each other fundamentally and a comprehensive reading of the same would allow us to safeguard our client from prosecution in both jurisdictions.
In litigation, every step that you take becomes a matter of public record and it is very difficult to hide missteps taken along the way. Therefore, it becomes very crucial to be fully aware about the expected reliefs in any given jurisdiction and to file appropriate pleadings in order to minimise the risks of unfavourable outcomes.
Given your extensive experience across a wide spectrum of judicial and quasi-judicial forums from the Supreme Court to specialized tribunals, how do you craft your litigation strategy specifically for RERA matters? In your view, what distinguishes real estate litigation under RERA from traditional civil or commercial disputes?
RERA disputes come in various forms, i.e. judicial as well as administrative. These proceedings are largely summary in nature, i.e. there are no trials or leading of evidence or cross examination etc. in the traditional sense. Real estate litigation can be very complex because it requires a specific expertise in knowing local land laws, environmental laws, understanding of developmental contracts, builder buyer agreements and also understanding the interplay between government departments and private entities. Since it is a fairly recent legislation, there are several areas of law that remain unexplored and it allows for more room to have fundamental jurisprudential arguments.
For instance, I am currently working on a dispute that involves a developer who has abandoned a project and is looking to develop a different project on the same land by seeking new investments. Several key issues arise in this case, such as (a) whether a developer which has failed to deliver a project should at all be allowed to migrate to a different project on the same parcel of land. If yes, what sort of limitations can be placed on the developer for the second phase of development. If no, what happens to the parcel of land and how does one take a project towards deregistration; (b) whether a developer can be allowed to migrate to a different project on the same parcel of land without first satisfying the claims of its original allottees/buyers. It is also interesting to see how and before which forum these questions can be decided. I would put these cases in the hard category of cases because they require a very in depth analysis of RERA and its objectives and its interplay with other laws because often the plain language of the legislation does not provide all answers.
One very key factor that is always in mind is that RERA was not only enacted for the purposes of solving real estate litigation, but also for the enhancement of the real estate sector in this country which I feel plays a vital role in strategizing how to go about resolving a dispute. We are often faced with questions that pertain to public policy and socio economic reform. Sometimes, apparent and evident contractual remedies may not be the correct remedies under RERA and therefore our pleadings and arguments are designed in a manner to suit the objectives of RERA Act.
However, I must add that due to the proceedings being summary in nature, these disputes are usually faster to resolve than traditional civil and commercial suits. So one strategy always is to simplify pleadings and make concise arguments. Earlier, RERA orders were executed through different authorities that was leading to long delays but RERA has recently been given the power to execute its own orders which can often turn out to be a challenge and therefore we are constantly finding ways to shorten the execution proceedings to ensure speedier justice to the people who have secured orders in their favour.
What has consistently inspired you to pursue a career in law, especially given the high-pressure demands of litigation? How do you maintain a healthy balance between your professional responsibilities and personal well-being, ensuring sustained performance without burnout?
There is no greater satisfaction than a good day in Court. When you see the hours of toiling while doing research, making drafts and constructing arguments in the office yielding results, the adrenaline rush of a favourable outcome, however small or big it may be, is what keeps me consistently inspired. I also find that litigation allows one to wear so many hats in a day and puts lawyers in a unique position to understand different walks of life and allows us to have key insights into other professions. For example, doing medical negligence cases allows lawyers to not only learn the legal standards of medical negligence but also widens our horizons to understand hospital procedures. A simple cheque bounce dispute could make one get into understanding the internal workings of corporations etc. which I feel is rarely available to people in any other profession. The high pressure of litigation is therefore well-compensated by the diverse set of skills/knowledge that one learns on the job.
In a profession such as litigation, you have to learn to accept unpredictability. A seemingly jam-packed day often turns out to be completely free and vice versa. It is therefore important to find moments every now and then to do activities that lower down stress levels and ensure sustainable working models. I ensure personal well being by remaining physically active by playing a sport or regular exercise. I also like to meet my travel goals to help with the exhaustion of a high pressure job. It would be a good idea to not give up on pursuing hobbies and to take out time for them as and when the opportunity is available instead of waiting for a weekend to clear the schedule up. Lastly, in order to avoid a burnout it is essential to ensure that there is no conflict or doubt in your mind about practising law.
With your diverse and accomplished legal journey, what guidance would you offer to aspiring legal professionals? Are there particular strategies, learning resources, or a roadmap you would recommend for law students and young lawyers who aspire to excel in litigation or corporate advisory practice?
It is very important for young lawyers and law students to enter the field of litigation. I especially feel that more female law students must strive to enter the field of litigation as it will go a long way to break gender based barriers. I personally feel that there is room for female lawyers to enter the field of criminal litigation to ensure more gender sensitive dealing of criminal matters. So, I would really encourage young lawyers to come to Court and join litigation. However, this encouragement comes with certain disclaimers. First and foremost, I would advise every young legal professional to be sure of their key skills and capabilities because litigation and corporate advisories require a completely different set of skills to finesse. There is no substitute for a voracious appetite for studying and reading in litigation because it is very important to remain up to date with latest developments in the law and also having the skill to place the developments in the historical context of how the law has been shaped over the years. Lawyers are bombarded with information and documents day in day out and they are expected to be abreast of all developments and therefore presence of mind with a willingness to grasp more is a sine qua non for every litigator.
The second skill is learning professional etiquettes which is helpful not only at the bar but also with the clients. As the legal profession is a noble one, it is very important to uphold the highest sense of loyalty to clients as well as the Courts and know that short cuts and convenience must never take precedence. This is extremely important to uphold the dignity of the profession. Lawyers must protect this dignity through their conduct at all times.
The third advice would be to remain inquisitive. It is very important for a legal professional to understand the meaning, scope and applicability of any legal problem before him or her. This curiosity and inquisitive nature will allow room for creative uses of the law which is extremely important especially now that the world is transforming and artificial intelligence is percolating all walks of life.
Your legal journey spans a wide range of practice areas. Looking back, what initially inspired you to pursue a career in law? How did your education at the National Law Institute University, Bhopal lay the foundation for your professional growth, and what enabled you to pursue litigation?
I had always aspired to join the defence services or become a professional athlete. However, a few months into my 11th standard, I realized that science and mathematics never truly interested me. Juggling academics with my sporting commitments seemed futile, and I eventually decided to switch to commerce for my 12th board exams. This shift effectively closed the door on a future in the armed forces. With no strong pull towards any particular subject, becoming a lawyer in the Army emerged as the only practical path forward—and that’s how my journey into the field of law began.
Having spent my entire school life immersed in playing tennis and football, I was never much of a bookworm, nor did I venture into co-curricular activities like debating or writing. Naturally, the transition to NLIU Bhopal was overwhelming in the initial few trimesters. NLIU had a vibrant culture of mooting and debating, attracting some of the brightest minds from across the country, making it a place that truly challenged and fostered growth. It was only towards the end of my second year, after I had fractured my leg, that I finally participated in a national moot court competition. Although our team lost in the semi-finals, the experience proved to be a stepping stone that changed my outlook entirely, it finally felt like fitting in. From that moment on, I immersed myself fully in everything NLIU had to offer, from participating in moots, ADR competitions, parliamentary debate and internships at law firms, organisations, and chambers of advocates and senior advocates. I explored them all.
A defining moment came during my internship with an Advocate-on-Record, where I had the opportunity to work on the Sahara Case before the Hon’ble Supreme Court. Witnessing Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal’s arguments firsthand captivated me and truly inspired me to pursue litigation.
Having explored various areas of legal practice through internships and competitions, I consciously decided not to sit for campus placements and instead commit to a career in litigation. As fate would have it, four months before graduation, a senior I had met during an internship connected me with Advocate Jai Sahai Endlaw, who was looking to hire his first junior. Three months before graduation, I received confirmation—securing the next step in my journey and allowing me to truly enjoy my final trimester at NLIU.
In the formative years of your career, you worked closely with several prominent Advocates and a Senior Advocate. What were some of the key takeaways from those mentorships, and how did those early experiences shape your litigation style, influence your professional values, and help you diversify your expertise across such varied legal domains over time?
Naturally, I wasn’t fully prepared for the challenges that lay ahead. Moving to a Tier-1 city on a litigation salary, coupled with the relentless workload of a busy chamber, often left me questioning myself. However, it was the growth and learning I could see within myself under Jai Sir’s guidance that kept me going. Being the only junior during the initial months had its own exhausting drawbacks, but in hindsight, the exposure and opportunities I received were unparalleled compared to any of my batchmates at that time. Beyond his deep subject knowledge, it was Jai Sir’s meticulous approach to case preparation and his courtroom demeanour that became lifelong lessons for me. Most importantly, it was the trust he placed in me that made all the difference. Within just one week into the profession, I was entrusted to argue an application before the District Court. By the end of my two years in his office, I had cross-examined witnesses, concluded final arguments, and independently handled pro bono matters—experiences that gave me immense confidence and cemented my decision to pursue litigation.
Building on that foundation and experience, I decided to work with a Senior Advocate as the next step before eventually starting my own independent practice. Consequently, after sending tailored emails to few seniors whom I had observed at the Delhi High Court, I was fortunate to be given an opportunity by Senior Advocate Amarjit Singh Chandhiok, who had a profound impact on my professional approach and values. Chandhiok Sir’s stature in the profession and at the Bar was something I had not witnessed before. With over five decades of practice, having held top positions at the Bar and for the government, and having trained over 400 associates, many of whom are now Judges of High Courts, Senior Partners, or General Counsels, his chamber provided a truly unmatched learning environment. I often refer to his chamber as a Gurukul rather than a traditional law office, a place that not only produced skilled and responsible lawyers but also instilled in them a lifelong commitment to never shy away from hard work
Apart from them, I have also been fortunate to have the continued support of seniors and faculty from NLIU and individuals I worked for during internships, specifically Manmeet Kaur and Rohan Sharma of Karanjawala & Co., who have been equally instrumental in ensuring that I remained on the right path at every turn.
Coming to the diversification of work that you had mentioned: I am essentially practicing across all subject matters handled by the offices I’ve been part of. Civil and commercial litigation itself covers a wide ambit of practice areas. However, I believe that if one learns to understand the bare acts and regulations of a particular code, while gaining relevant experience in that area, practicing across different areas becomes less daunting. The real challenge lies in staying updated with the constant legal developments in each field. Moreover, I believe it is crucial to diversify and expand your subject knowledge when managing your own independent practice. Subject matter expertise certainly has its advantages and can help secure corporate roles, but for a court-based practice, having a broad understanding of major laws and a strong command of legal fundamentals is absolutely essential.
Your work at Zentrum Law Partners and as empanelled counsel for major PSU’s and Financial institutions has placed you at the forefront of commercial litigation and arbitrations. How has this exposure refined your understanding of corporate litigation within the Indian legal framework?
After concluding my time at Chandhiok Sir’s chamber, I spent the next eight months meeting with individuals, identifying market gaps, and laying the groundwork to build my own clientele. I essentially positioned myself as a travelling advocate, offering services across Madhya Pradesh and Delhi. My previous work experience, coupled with subject knowledge of specific practice areas such as Construction Arbitrations, SARFAESI Laws, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, and IPR laws, not only gave me an extra edge during empanelment interviews and meetings with companies, PSUs, and banking institutions, but also helped ensure a regular workflow. As a result, I began receiving assignments from a range of organizations and individual clients, and soon found myself frequently traveling across cities, with airports and railway stations becoming extensions of my office.
With a better understanding of market requirements and the commercial world, I realized that having an individual practice would only take me so far. Therefore, to scale the practice and broaden the range of services offered, I eventually partnered with Zentrum Law Partners as an Associate Partner, where I now head a division of their litigation and dispute resolution practice, overseeing matters across Madhya Pradesh and Delhi.
There is no doubt that the trust placed in me by all has provided immense exposure and the opportunity to work across diverse subject areas, different jurisdictions and with diverse entities. Having represented state-owned PSUs, banks, private companies, and individual clients, I am constantly involved in commercial aspects of their operations, working in new areas of law, and therefore learning and growing on a daily basis. For instance, while representing IOCL, I had the opportunity to engage with laws related to the Oil and Gas sector. Similarly, representing IDBI Bank and other companies has given me exposure to matters involving white-collar crimes and company law practice. As I move further along in this journey, not only has the scope of learning widened, but my conceptual understanding of “corporate litigation” has also become significantly more refined.
Having worked in the sports industry, what are the areas of sports law that you specialize in, and how do these align with your broader commercial law practice; particularly in relation to contract management, negotiation, and regulatory compliances?
Sports have been the most integral part of my journey so far, and therefore working in this sphere has always been more of a passion project than anything else. Plus, being part of the national circuit in lawn tennis once, I was not only a sufferer of systemic issues but also witnessed several incidents of doping violations and arbitrary actions by Sports Associations that effectively ended athletes’ careers.
Moreover, the sports industry, owing to its autonomy from direct government interference, operates in a very different and often complicated manner. Issues such as monopolistic policies by federations and the limited rights available to athletes and other stakeholders make the landscape even more challenging. To address these multifaceted issues, I founded a sports development initiative last year called ‘Project Yogya’ (https://projectyogya.com), a sports development initiative aimed at providing holistic support to athletes, with a strong focus on legal education and advocacy.
As part of this initiative, we invited applications for the empanelment of professionals working in the sports industry and received a substantial response. As of today, we have empanelled over 14 sports law practitioners, amongst other professionals, across the country, each specializing in different areas, covering regulatory compliance, doping matters, contract management / negotiations, intellectual property disputes, and more. The objective has been to make a collective effort by specialists for the greater good of the sporting community.
On a personal front, I currently advise various stakeholders including sports associations, athletes, teams, and sports management companies on a wide range of issues, contractual disputes, disciplinary proceedings, election-related matters, and doping cases, among others. For me, this work is not just limited to legal representation; it’s about giving back to a field that has shaped who I am.
Having completed your mediation accreditation from the Straus Institute at Pepperdine University, what were your key takeaways from that experience, and how do you see their practical relevance and application in India’s growing ADR ecosystem, particularly in light of recent statutory developments?
Completing my mediation accreditation from the Straus Institute at Pepperdine University, in collaboration with SAGE Singapore, was a truly transformative experience. Beyond the fundamentals of mediation, the program offered deep insights into the psychological, societal, and cultural factors that play a crucial role in effective dispute resolution. Alongside practical training for mediating disputes across diverse areas, including commercial, family, employment, and community matters, we explored Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) techniques and strategies for cross-border mediation, with particular emphasis on addressing cultural sensitivities.
While the academic and practical learnings were deeply enriching, it became clear that both the U.S. and Singapore were operating in a far more evolved systems of dispute resolution, in contrast to India, that due to its litigation-centric approach that has been unable to make way for mediation, is suffering significantly due to judicial backlogs and unnecessary delays in resolving disputes. However, the enactment of the Mediation Act, 2023 marks a crucial shift towards mandatory mediation in all commercial disputes. The real challenge lies in its practical implementation of the law, as such mediation is often still treated more as a formality than as a genuine opportunity for faster, cost-effective resolution. The recent Lodha Group family settlement, however, serves as a strong example of the potential benefits of mediation even in complex, high stakes matters.
Drawing from these learnings, I have also made a conscious effort to encourage parties to resolve disputes amicably wherever possible. I have successfully facilitated mediation in numerous disputes, including trademark conflicts, industrial disputes, debt recovery cases, and sensitive marital matters. Moreover, my accreditation has proved especially valuable in advising on sports-related disputes, where the close-knit and interdependent nature of the industry, combined with inherent power imbalances against athletes and professionals makes mediation critical. It not only helps preserve essential relationships but also ensures swift, practical outcomes that protect the careers and interests of athletes, coaches, and other stakeholders.
Based on your roles with institutions like IDBI Bank and Central Bank of India, what are the key challenges these banks face concerning rising defaults and non-performing assets (NPAs)? Additionally, how can the legal framework be innovated or strengthened to better support their stability and growth?
In my experience working with institutions like IDBI Bank and Central Bank of India, I have observed that the growing volume of defaults and accumulation of non-performing assets (NPAs) are driven by multiple factors, specifically due to significant gaps in credit assessment, window dressing, willful defaults, and misuse of legislative frameworks to delay or evade repayment. Despite mechanisms like the SARFAESI Act and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), the recovery process remains lengthy and complex, often leading to deterioration in asset value over time.
Additionally, with the increase of incidents of filing false insolvency applications, fraudulent practices, money laundering and financial manipulation, the financial institutes have further been burdened, while also impacting the economy. In my opinion, while strict adherence to the existing statutory framework and its prescribed timelines is essential, there must also be a parallel emphasis on strengthening borrower credit evaluation and post-sanction monitoring frameworks. Only with robust internal controls and timely enforcement can financial institutions effectively manage risk and contribute to a healthier credit ecosystem.
What drove you to pursue an LL.M. in Corporate and Finance Law at Jindal Global Law School? How did the program deepen your analytical approach to complex issues such as financial restructuring, cross-border transactions, and regulatory compliance?
During the COVID-19 lockdown, I took the opportunity to deepen my understanding of Company Law and Insolvency Law, particularly from a corporate law perspective. Having previously worked on matters in these areas, my interest was naturally drawn toward exploring them in greater depth. Enrolling in a course at Jindal, I was pleasantly surprised by how well the faculty lived up to the institution’s reputation, delivering the material with exceptional clarity, practicality, and insight. The experience significantly enhanced my grasp of complex issues such as financial restructuring and regulatory compliance, both of which are central to corporate operations in India. The knowledge I gained has since played a vital role in broadening my legal perspective and strengthening my practice.
With your extensive and diverse experience in litigation, arbitration, and sports law, what advice would you offer to young lawyers aspiring to build a sustainable career in litigation? Are there particular skills, habits, or resources that you believe are essential for long-term success in the legal profession?
With a modest practice of seven years at the Bar, I wouldn’t claim to have unlocked the formula for long-term success in the profession just yet. However, based on my observations of several legal luminaries and mentors I deeply admire, one truth stands out: there is no substitute for hard work and perseverance. In the legal profession, you remain a student for life, the moment you stop learning is the moment you stop growing.
Beyond that, identifying an area of genuine interest and steadily building a practice around it, while maintaining a strong command of core legal principles, is key to staying relevant. In India, there is no dearth of legal disputes and much like in medicine, the demand for skilled, ethical professionals remains constant. Regardless of the path or specialization one chooses – the scope for meaningful growth in this profession continues to be immense.
What initially got you into law, and how did law school shape that path?
I actually started out studying History at Hansraj College and that played a bigger role in my legal journey than I realised at the time. History trains you to look at events from multiple perspectives, analyse cause and effect, and question accepted narratives, which is surprisingly similar to how lawyers think. When I got into law school, that background helped me connect the dots faster especially when it came to reading judgments or understanding how legal principles evolved.
But what really drew me in was litigation seeing how the law, theory and strategy all come together in a live forum. Law school gave me the foundation, sure, but it was the exposure — moots, internships, the energy of the courtroom that really cemented my interest in dispute resolution.
You started your career at Luthra & Luthra, what were those early years like?
Luthra was intense, but in the best possible way. From day one, you’re thrown into the deep end with big-ticket arbitrations and high-stakes matters. One of my earliest matters was a large infrastructure arbitration, and I still remember burning the midnight oil, poring over volumes of documents and prepping witness statements. It taught me that every detail matters, and that being thorough is non-negotiable. But more than that, it shaped how I think — not just about legal issues, but about strategy, how to read the room, how to anticipate what the other side might do.
Now as Partner Designate at C&S Partners, how have those experiences shaped your current approach?
I think the biggest shift has been in perspective. When you’re younger, you’re focused on mastering the law, getting the argument perfect. Now, it’s more about seeing the full picture — what the client really needs, what the commercial implications are, how to get to a solution without over-complicating it. The rigour from firms like Luthra definitely shaped my work ethic, but I’ve learned to balance that with flexibility and pragmatism. Clients want clarity — and a path forward. That’s what I try to bring to the table now.
You were involved in the Raffles Design International arbitration. What are your thoughts on how India handles foreign-seated arbitrations now?
That case was really interesting — it dealt with whether Indian courts can grant interim relief in support of foreign-seated arbitrations. The Delhi High Court’s ruling was quite progressive and set the tone for similar cases later. It’s encouraging to see Indian arbitration law evolving, especially in how courts are supporting the process rather than hindering it. That said, there’s still some inconsistency, and the system isn’t perfect — but the direction we’re heading in is the right one. Institutional arbitration still needs more buy-in, but we’re getting there.
You’ve advised fintech clients under FEMA and PMLA. What trends are you seeing there?
It’s definitely become a tighter regulatory environment, especially for payment gateways and e-commerce platforms. There’s a lot of focus now on cross-border flows, data trails, KYC processes — things that weren’t top of mind for startups a few years ago. What I often see is businesses scaling fast, but the compliance infrastructure doesn’t keep up. And that’s where trouble starts. A lot of our work now involves helping clients plug those gaps before they snowball into investigations.
You’ve handled international arbitrations under SIAC rules. How do Indian clients experience that compared to domestic forums?
There’s definitely a learning curve. International arbitration is much more structured and documentation-heavy. Indian clients sometimes find it overwhelming — the timelines, the formal tone, the costs. But they also appreciate the discipline and neutrality that come with it. What we do is act as a bridge — help them navigate the process, simplify the legalese, and make sure they’re not caught off guard. Documentation is a big challenge — we often have to reconstruct a paper trail that’s been loosely kept. So, we start early on that front.
What advice would you give to younger lawyers entering dispute resolution?
Be consistent and be curious. You don’t have to be brilliant right away — just be the person who shows up, delivers on time, and asks good questions. Watching court arguments taught me more than any textbook — how seniors frame things, how judges respond. Also, build your fundamentals — research, drafting, reading judgments — that’s your toolbox. And don’t chase glamour early on. Focus on being reliable — that’s what builds trust and gets you bigger opportunities.
Litigation can take over your life. How do you manage that balance now?
It’s something I’ve had to work on consciously. In the early years, especially at Luthra, there was a lot of pride in pulling all-nighters and being available 24/7. But over time, you realise it’s not sustainable. Now, I try to be more intentional with time plans, delegate when needed, and switch off when I can. Having a good team is a huge help. You stop feeling like you’re carrying it all alone. And when you do take time off, actually disconnecting helps you come back sharper.
Coming from a commerce background, what inspired you to transition into law as a career? Were there any specific experiences or moments that steered you in this direction and set you on this remarkable path?
During my later years at school, I was inclined towards commerce and economics. However, once I started pursuing a Bachelor of Commerce degree at the University of Delhi, I realised that I was particularly fascinated by business and company laws. I delved deeper into the subject and spoke with individuals who were pursuing careers in law. It was then that I knew this was the field I wanted to study.
In the second year of my LL.B. at the Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, I encountered arbitration for the first. While interning at a law firm in Delhi, I was asked to assist with an ongoing arbitration case. Beyond providing access to an early resolution of commercial disputes, arbitration offered systematic and streamlined processes and neutrality. I was immensely impressed by the concept of an alternative forum for dispute resolution, especially in a country like India where the courts are burdened with pending litigation. This initial experience sparked my interest in becoming an arbitration practitioner.
With guidance from my mentors, I gained further experience in this field and began working as a disputes lawyer at Luthra & Luthra Law Offices.
You completed a degree of Master of International Economic Law, Business, and Policy from Stanford Law School, USA. How has this specialized education enriched your career? What aspects of the program at Stanford were particularly valuable for you, and did you encounter any challenges during your studies? How would you describe your overall experience there?
When I applied for an LL.M. at Stanford, I saw it as an option to broaden my horizons. I did not want to limit my exposure to only international arbitration. I had read about a variety of innovative courses at Stanford, such as International Business Negotiations, Regulating Artificial Intelligence, Data: Privacy, Property and Security, Facilitation, etc. I wanted to take these courses in addition to the traditional subjects and have a well-rounded experience. I am glad that my instincts paid off. For instance, International Business Negotiations involved teams from Stanford and another law school in a simulated corporate transaction over a period of three months. As an arbitration practitioner, I had never experienced the negotiation aspect of a transaction. This course provided insight into the commercial aspects of the contractual clauses that I regularly encounter in my work.
In addition to offering versatile courses, Stanford’s small class-size offered numerous opportunities to engage in rich and meaningful discussions with a brilliant set of individuals and learn more about their experiences in their respective jurisdictions. However, it was also challenging to be there. When surrounded by brilliance, it is natural to experience self-doubt at times. Fortunately, Stanford has an excellent faculty and counselors who helped me navigate these challenges.
Overall, my year at Stanford was the best investment of my life. I thoroughly enjoyed being on campus, attending classes and guest lectures, socialising with peers, and occasionally taking small trips to the beautiful parts of California!
In the early stages of your career, you worked as an associate with various firms in India. What key learning experiences from that time played a pivotal role in shaping your career trajectory? Can you recall any specific instance that was especially impactful for you?
A great benefit of studying law in Delhi was the access to full-time and part-time internships throughout most of the year. I interned at several law firms during my LL.B., which taught me many skills that are highly valued in junior lawyers. While education is crucial, having the right mentor is equally important. I was fortunate to be mentored by some of the nicest and most talented lawyers in Delhi.
I began my career as an associate with Mr. Gaurav Bahl, an excellent mentor who significantly shaped my professional path. Working with him prepared me for the next step in my career: joining a law firm. I joined Luthra & Luthra Law Offices and worked with the disputes team for the next three years. During this time, I handled arbitration matters, commercial litigation cases, and occasionally argued smaller cases in court. While it was fascinating to work on a variety of legal issues in office, it was exhilarating to argue cases before judges. Sometimes, hard work paid off in the form of favourable judgments and orders. At other times, there were invaluable lessons. To this day, working in the field of law brings me immense joy, and I would not trade it for the world.
One of the most enriching experiences at the law firm was when my partner encouraged me to handle an appeal before the Supreme Court in a matter involving complex securities law. Before addressing the legal issues, it was crucial to work closely with technical experts to understand the intricacies of the futures and options market and the role of their business. Looking back, I vividly remember how much I enjoyed working outside my comfort zone on complex legal issues and resolving them. However, achieving a favourable judgment would not have been possible without deep diving into the commercial aspects of the case. As a disputes lawyer, I believe the best results for your client can be achieved by understanding their needs and the needs of their business. Whenever I get a new case, I invest a considerable amount of time in understanding the client’s business and what a desirable outcome looks like for them.
After your time in India, you transitioned to an international practice, working with Freshfields in Dubai. How did you manage the cultural shift and navigate the complexities of international law, especially in the realm of dispute resolution? How do the legal environments in Dubai and India differ, particularly in handling arbitration and cross-border disputes?
During my LL.M., my career counsellor at Stanford encouraged me to explore global opportunities alongside my job search in the United States. The US market is challenging, and only a few firms are interested in international law graduates. I connected with several professionals, meeting arbitration practitioners over coffee in San Francisco and New York, and through virtual meetings via Zoom. During one such interaction, I came across Freshfields’ six-month trainee programme. I applied and was accepted after a couple of interviews. The programme served as a springboard for my international career. Freshfields sometimes hires from their pool of trainees, and that’s how my six-month stint turned into a full-time associate position.
Dubai is truly an international legal market. The international arbitration team comprised lawyers from different parts of the world and advised clients from several jurisdictions. The style of working was unlike what I had experienced in India, but I was fortunate to find kind and patient mentors and teammates. I worked on multi-jurisdictional arbitrations, which offered the opportunity to collaborate with local counsels from India, England, the Middle East, Australia, and other regions. On several matters, the teams included colleagues from different jurisdictions, making networking and collaborating within the firm quite easy.
It was a challenge to unlearn the traditional Indian style of drafting and embrace the US-style simple and succinct legal drafting. Moreover, the scale of the matters necessitated the use of technology, so I learned how to utilise emerging legal-tech tools to make my work more efficient. I believe it was important to approach my job with an open mind – it really makes your life easier.
A great aspect of working with an international law firm was that my work was not limited to commercial arbitration. From time to time, I engaged in investment arbitration, investigations, and non-contentious legal work. My favourite part, though, was working as a tribunal assistant in several alternative dispute resolution cases involving the International Tennis Integrity Agency and the Basketball Arbitral Tribunal.
Currently, in your role at Allen Overy Shearman Sterling LLP in Germany dealing in International Dispute Resolution, you handle complex international commercial arbitration and cross-border disputes. What do you find to be the most challenging aspect of managing such disputes, and can you share a specific case that stands out as a significant learning experience?
I have been working at A&O Shearman since February 2024. My decision to move to Germany was motivated by personal reasons, and it was a difficult choice. I was seeking to join a team with an international practice, not limited to commercial arbitration. Over the past 14 months, I have already worked on post-M&A disputes, energy disputes, investor-state issues, and investigations.
A challenging aspect of working in the German legal market is dealing with the German language. Many contractual disputes are governed by German law, and important commentaries and case law are only available in German. Moreover, Germany is a civil law country, and the concepts can be quite different from common law. Therefore, as an arbitration lawyer, I work closely with German law experts. This collaboration provides me with an opportunity to dive into a different legal system and learn more about civil law. It is quite fascinating!
Recently, I advised on claims under a warranty and indemnity insurance in an M&A transaction. This has been a great learning experience, as I had not dealt with this issue before. It is an emerging area of disputes, and there is only limited literature on its practical aspects. As a lawyer, you must read all you can and trust your instincts. I am doing that, and it is helping me develop expertise in a niche area of law.
As someone who has built an illustrious career in international arbitration, what advice would you give to young professionals aspiring to follow a similar path? How can they position themselves early on to excel in this competitive field, and are there any specific resources or strategies you would recommend for deepening one’s knowledge of international arbitration?
First and foremost, I highly recommend gaining internship experience during your LL.B. Reading books and writing exams at law school is very different from how law functions in practice. My internships helped me realise that I wanted to specialise in dispute resolution, with a focus on arbitration.
Then, pursuing an LL.M. is a significant financial commitment. It should be viewed as an investment that may or may not yield immediate results, so it is important to remain open to all possibilities. I cannot emphasise enough on the importance of networking during your year abroad. An LL.M. is not just about studying law; it is also about developing and refining skills that will help you grow as a professional. Invest considerable time in researching law schools to find the one that meets your individual needs.
For students, I would highly recommend participating in moot court competitions. There are several arbitration-specific moot courts held both in and outside India (e.g. VIS Arbitration Moot, Frankfurt Investment Arbitration Moot, Sports Arbitration Moot). These competitions not only provide an opportunity to learn about arbitration in practice, but also to network with students and professionals from other cities and countries.
For young professionals, the easiest way to deepen your knowledge of international arbitration is by reading journal articles and blog posts on arbitration cases (e.g., Kluwer Arbitration, GAR) and staying updated with the developments in this field. Attending lectures and conferences on arbitration is also highly beneficial – not only for learning more about the law but also for engaging in meaningful conversations with arbitration practitioners. LinkedIn often features opportunities and scholarships to attend conferences abroad, offering a great chance to broaden your horizon before committing to an LL.M. or a job with a law firm abroad.
Given your demanding role, how do you maintain a healthy balance between your professional and personal life? Are there any hobbies or activities you engage in to relax and recharge?
Maintaining a work-life balance is a significant challenge in the legal profession. As a young professional, I often overlooked this crucial aspect. However, in recent years, I have started to take it more seriously. I greatly appreciate the work culture in Germany, where there is strong emphasis on both physical and mental well-being. This supportive environment has encouraged me to take better care of myself while continuing to excel as a lawyer.
For relaxation, I enjoy reading fiction and listening to music. Occasionally, I take holidays and plan weekend trips with family or friends to the mountains or other European cities. I also try to exercise regularly and eat healthy. Most importantly, I ensure that I take a break on weekends, unless an urgent matter requires my attention.
With such an impressive and diverse career, what do you see as the next challenge or opportunity you would like to pursue? How do you envision your career evolving over the next few years, and what legacy would you like to leave in the field of international arbitration?
As an India-qualified lawyer working with international law firms, I have had the privilege of navigating diverse legal landscapes and engaging with a variety of complex cases. The next challenge I am eager to pursue is acting as an arbitrator. In the past, I have thoroughly enjoyed being a tribunal assistant, and I am excited to experience the decision-making aspects once again.
In the coming years, I aim to contribute significantly to both the academic and practical discourse on international arbitration through publications, speaking engagements, and participation in global forums. Additionally, I aspire to mentor young lawyers, particularly those from underrepresented regions, and provide training to help them navigate the complexities of international arbitration.
What pivotal moments influenced your decision to become a lawyer and CS, and how did your early experiences of life shape your career path?
The roots of this inspiring journey trace back to a tiny village in Odisha, nestled about 200 kilometres from Bhubaneswar. It was a place of simplicity and resilience, where school was held beneath the open sky, under the shade of a sprawling tree. When the rains came, they did not just wash the earth but also brought unexpected holidays, for there was no roof to shield the lessons.
Saturdays were special—they were days of collective effort and community spirit. The boys fetched water from nearby tanks, while the girls prepared the schoolyard, smoothing the earth with cow dung collected from the village. By Monday, the grounds were dry and ready to welcome another week of learning.
In this setting, where challenges were woven into the fabric of daily life, a young dreamer’s path began to take shape. The journey from studying under a tree to standing in corporate boardrooms reflects a life sculpted by grit and determination, rooted deeply in those formative experiences.
What inspired your decision to become a lawyer and CS, especially given your humble background? How did this journey shape your growth and influence those around you?
From a small village in Odisha to a disciplined boarding school, the journey was a test of resilience and determination. Limited to education until class seven in the village, the young dreamer moved to a nearby town, adapting to the rigor of boarding school life—waking at 4 a.m., managing chores like grocery shopping, and balancing academics. These experiences instilled independence and discipline.
Graduation brought a pivotal realization—the need to break free from constraints through education. This drive led to the bold decision of pursuing both company secretaryship and law simultaneously, an extraordinary feat accomplished with unwavering focus. Success transformed my life, taking me from humble beginnings to corporate boardrooms—a true testament to grit and ambition.
How has your transition from independent CS practice to working at a law firm to serving as an in-house counsel shaped your career? What do you enjoy most about your role?
My journey has been one of exploration and growth, shaped by diverse experiences across India. After completing my early education in Odisha, I moved to Chennai for my CS and later to Delhi to finish the course. These transitions exposed me to India’s rich diversity and built adaptability.
I began as an independent practitioner CS in Delhi, handling IPOs, mergers, and corporate actions. This entrepreneurial phase was rewarding, but I sought to expand my horizons. Moving into corporate law firms, I leveraged my CS expertise to deliver client-centric solutions, which set me apart.
My transition to in-house counsel began at Bharti Delmonte, working under inspiring mentors and gaining corporate strategy insights. Joining Vodafone during its historic acquisition of Hutchison was transformative, with a decade spent managing complex litigations, arbitrations, and large-scale challenges in telecom.
then at NIVEA, FMCG leading legal functions for a global brand has been a dynamic and fulfilling chapter. Each role has enriched my perspective, blending entrepreneurial spirit, legal acumen, and strategic leadership.
After two decades of experience working with major corporations, what significant changes have you observed in corporate legal practices, particularly in compliance frameworks and dispute resolution mechanisms?
Over two decades, I’ve witnessed significant shifts in corporate legal practice, especially in compliance and dispute resolution. Companies like Vodafone demonstrated the importance of strong ethical foundations and robust compliance frameworks, aligning processes with a clear vision. Their dedication to excellence was reflected in hiring outstanding professionals and anticipating challenges years ahead.
Recently, advancements in technology have streamlined compliance and dispute resolution mechanisms, improving transparency and efficiency. Coupled with a culture of ethics and governance, these developments have transformed the legal landscape. The combination of visionary leadership, structured policies, and exceptional talent remains the driving force behind corporate success today.
How do global corporations, especially multinationals, approach dispute resolution differently?
Litigation would always be the last resort for MNCs. It disrupts relationships and business continuity, so companies focus on resolving disputes amicably be it with governments, vendors, suppliers, or customers.
Multinationals emphasize customer-centric solutions. For instance, customer satisfaction was paramount. If a customer faced network issues, we responded with apologies or compensations rather than assigning blame. This empathy-first approach reflects their understanding that business thrives on happy customers.
Globally, companies also prioritize efficient mechanisms like mediation and arbitration, ensuring conflicts are resolved swiftly while preserving relationships.
Multinationals succeed not because of their global stature but because they create trusted brands, deliver value, and ensure compliance. It’s this forward-thinking, customer-first philosophy that drives their success with their leadership, empathy, and processes.
How do you handle intellectual property and brand protection for a Global brand you served?
Intellectual property is vital for innovation, identity and brand longevity, it begins with securing patents, trademarks, trade dress, and designs to convert creativity into valuable assets. Innovation drives product development, and legal measures ensure every aspect—from packaging to product shape—is meticulously protected.
Proactive strategies, such as monitoring markets for counterfeiting and unauthorized use, are critical in preserving brand integrity. Collaborating with enforcement agencies and implementing stringent safeguards are key, especially in diverse markets like India were consumer dynamics demand vigilance. This approach ensures the longevity of the brand, upholding its reputation and trust across generations and geographies.
Sir, how do you share your experience and impart education to new entrants in the legal field? What process do you follow to guide interns and inspire them to develop passion for the profession?
Internships are essential for shaping future legal professionals. At our office, we actively host interns sent by law colleges, consistently engaging two to three interns each month. We assign them meaningful projects, encourage research, and foster collaboration, ensuring they gain practical insights that prepare them for successful careers.
My advice to young lawyers is simple: the legal profession is a marathon, not a sprint. Patience, continuous learning, and adaptability are key. Success lies in understanding legal principles while addressing business complexities effectively. The challenge—and opportunity—is to merge theoretical knowledge with real-world solutions.
Mentorship and exposure to seasoned professionals are invaluable in this process. Personally, working with stalwarts in multinational companies has shaped my journey, proving that growth comes through steady, purposeful learning and commitment over time.
Sir, would you like to share some memorable achievements or recognitions from your career that had a significant impact on you and your approach to the kind of work that you have been doing?
Ups and downs are part of every professional journey. Sometimes, despite your best efforts, outcomes may not favour you—like a lawyer who wins and loses cases or a doctor who saves lives but cannot save all.
In my experience, one notable case involved a complex arbitration dispute. The matter escalated to the Supreme Court and back to arbitration, stretching over 15 years. For seven of those years, I was actively handling it, and by then, 30 crore rupees had already been spent on a 100-crore dispute. Such cases highlight the challenges and costs of prolonged litigation—it’s a fight that can go on endlessly if parties don’t seek resolution.
On the other hand, there have been many rewarding moments. For instance, in a recent case, one of our competitors was disparaging our brand. We took them to court and secured a landmark order from the Delhi High Court, which stands as a testament to the power of focused legal strategy.
My guiding principle, inspired by the Gita, is Kamrany vadhikaraste Ma Phaleshu Kada Chanan “Do your duty without worrying about the results”. The result is always a byproduct of consistent effort, dedication, and making the best use of available resources. Whether in tough challenges or noteworthy recognitions, this belief keeps me focused on delivering my best.
You’ve pursued dual qualifications as a company secretary and a lawyer. How has this combination benefited your career, and what advice would you give to learners following the same path?
The combination of being a company secretary and a lawyer is incredibly powerful. Company secretaryship provides deep insights into business operations, taxation, management, governance, and organizational behaviour. However, it doesn’t cover areas like civil law, criminal law, constitutional law, or jurisprudence—fields that are integral to legal practice. Law complements this by equipping you with a thorough understanding of the legal system.
When you combine the two, you gain a unique ability to bridge business challenges with legal solutions. This synergy is highly valued by companies, especially those requiring professionals to manage both roles efficiently. Many organizations prefer hiring individuals with dual qualifications to meet regulatory requirements while optimizing resources.
For learners, my advice is to see this combination as a long-term investment. It’s a strategic advantage that not only opens doors to versatile career opportunities but also helps you excel in leadership roles. The key is to approach your career with patience, commitment, and the understanding that success comes from integrating knowledge and applying it effectively over time. This is undoubtedly one of the best professional combinations for aspiring legal and corporate professionals.
What unique legal challenges have you faced in the skincare industry, especially when transitioning from telecom to FMCG?
Moving from telecom to skincare was a significant shift. Telecom revolves around services, technology, and infrastructure, like optical fibres and towers, while skincare is product-focused with manufacturing, supply chains, and distribution at its core.
The regulatory landscape is vastly different. Telecom is governed by sector-specific regulators, whereas FMCG and cosmetics must adhere to the Drugs and Cosmetics Act and legal metrology rules. The skincare industry, often treated like pharmaceuticals, requires strict compliance to ensure product safety and consumer trust.
Adapting to this new framework took time—about six months to fully absorb the nuances of manufacturing, distribution, and FMCG regulations. While some aspects like contracts and compliance were familiar, learning the specifics of product-centric laws and supply chain operations was essential.
Skincare demands understanding Skin Science, rigorous compliance, strict adherence to regulatory standards, and a deep understanding of its unique challenges and competition landscape. With focus and adaptability, I’ve successfully navigated this dynamic environment, ensuring robust compliance and operational excellence.
Outside of your professional life, what are some personal interests or hobbies that contribute to your overall well-being and work-life balance? How have you found that peaceful space for yourself?
Earlier, I was passionate about cycling, but I had to stop due to safety concerns in Mumbai. I then shifted to yoga, which has been transformative for me over the past couple of years. Yoga, along with meditation, helps me unwind and maintain a sense of balance. Swimming is another activity I enjoy whenever I get the time—it’s both relaxing and energizing.
Reading and listening to blogs are integral parts of my life as well. In our profession, staying informed is crucial, and I find reading to be both enriching and calming. When I have a longer break, I indulge my passion for travel—especially road trips. One of my most memorable adventures was driving from Mumbai to Ladakh; Mumbai to Kanyakumari by road with a GC friend, exploring India’s beauty by car.
These hobbies—whether yoga, swimming, reading, or traveling—serve as my personal escape. They not only help me recharge but also motivate me, adding meaning and joy to my life beyond work.
Sir, your legal career spans a diverse array of practice areas, including criminal and civil litigation, writ petitions, and domestic arbitrations. Reflecting on your journey, what initially inspired you to pursue law as a career, and how did you cultivate expertise in such varied areas of law?
Looking back, my journey into law wasn’t driven by a single “aha” moment, but by a gradual and irresistible fascination towards it. What first drew my attention was my fascination with going to courts. There was something about the atmosphere, the energy and the way arguments unfolded, that captivated me from the start. Watching advocates argue complex matters with clarity and conviction inspired me to be part of this legal world. This fascination soon turned into a deeper interest towards law. What truly sealed it for me, though, was participating in several moot courts during law college. That’s where I for the first time experienced the thrill of legal research, strategy, and structured argument. Mooting gave me that rush, which made the law feel alive. It sparked a passion that’s been hard to resist ever since.
One of the most valuable lessons I picked up early on was learning to argue a case from both sides. It not only strengthens your understanding of the law but teaches you empathy, critical thinking, and the ability to anticipate and respond. These skills are crucial in any type of litigation be it civil, criminal or arbitration.
As for cultivating expertise across varied practice areas, there’s no shortcut. For me it’s been a deliberate process deeply rooted in constant reading and curiosity. I ensure that I not only read statutes and judgements but also apply those laws to hypothetical scenarios. It’s my way of pressure-testing the law and developing a deeper, more intuitive grasp of it. It sharpens interpretation, builds a nuanced understanding of law and prepares me to handle diverse cases with confidence. It also keeps me in a constant zone of learning, which is essential because the law is always evolving.
Can you share your journey from law school to the early years of practice? What challenges did you encounter when starting out in the legal profession, and how did you navigate those obstacles to establish yourself in your practice areas?
My journey from law college to the profession has been shaped by discipline, resilience, and a relentless desire to carve my own space in the legal world. Being a first generation lawyer, I come from a background where nothing was handed on a silver platter and from day one, I knew I had to work harder than most if I wanted to make it in the legal world and the journey still continues.
While studying law in college, I worked part time as a Karate instructor, juggling classes, internships and training. Balancing all this meant my days often started well before sunrise and ended well past midnight, but the discipline taught me how to manage time, stay grounded and never lose sight of my goals.
Before I formally entered the profession, I had already completed approximately three years of internships with a litigator because I wanted to be as ready as possible when the first opportunity came, and it eventually did, I was selected at Solomon & Co., a place that has shaped me significantly and allowed me to grow in arbitration, civil and criminal litigation. The principle which I followed as a student and an intern continued at the firm as well which was to never say no to any work. Even when a task or assignment felt beyond my comfort zone, I saw it as a chance to grow.
What I have learned is that success in law doesn’t come easy and certainly doesn’t come from shortcuts, it comes from showing up everyday, putting in the work and being willing to learn, unlearn and grow. I still carry the same hunger today, and I believe that as long as that fire burns, the journey will remain exciting.
Your career at Solomon & Co. has been marked by impressive growth, from Associate to Senior Associate, and now Associate Partner. What were the key milestones, accomplishments, or lessons that have contributed to your rise within the firm? How do you view your current role as an Associate Partner in shaping your long-term goals and aspirations within the firm?
My journey at Solomon & Co. has been defined by consistent growth, strong mentorship of my seniors and a deep-rooted passion for dispute resolution. From joining as an Associate to now working as an Associate Partner, every step has brought with it new challenges, learnings and opportunities that shaped me both professionally and personally.
Some of the key milestones in this journey include handling high stakes litigation, managing and nurturing a diverse team, and successfully building and maintaining client relationships. Each role I have taken on has reinforced the value of strategic thinking, clear communication and adaptability. These skills are fundamental for navigating the dynamic world of dispute resolution.
As an Associate Partner, my focus has expanded to including mentoring junior team members, broadening our practice areas, and actively participating in business development initiatives. It’s a role that demands not just legal acumen but also vision, patience and leadership and the same also aligns perfectly with my long-term goal of contributing meaningfully to the firm’s legacy, while continuously evolving into a well – rounded leader.
I am especially grateful for the trust and responsibility placed in me by Solomon & Co. and particularly by Mr. Aaron Solomon, our Managing Partner and other Partners at Solomon & Co with whom I have worked, their mentorship and support have played a pivotal role in my growth. The learnings and trust reposed by the firm helps me and continues to motivate me while raising the standards of work in my team and across practice areas ensuring the best possible client service.
The road ahead is exciting, and I look forward to continuing to grow with Solomon & Co. while making a lasting impact in the field of litigation and dispute resolution.
With your extensive experience in domestic arbitration, what do you consider to be the key elements for a successful arbitration process in India? How do you prepare for an arbitration hearing, and what are some common misconceptions clients have about arbitration that you make sure to clarify for them?
With the evolution of arbitration law and practice in India, a successful domestic arbitration hinges on a few key elements.
First and foremost, clarity in the arbitration agreement is essential. Many disputes begin with ambiguities in the arbitration clause itself, be it the seat, governing law, or the process for appointment of arbitrators. A well drafted arbitration clause reduces the scope for preliminary procedural challenges and delay.
Secondly, efficiency and preparedness are critical. Unlike court proceedings, arbitration gives parties greater control over timelines and procedure. To make the most of this, it’s important to have a focused strategy right from the statement of claim/defence stage, with clearly defined issues, timelines, and a vision of how the matter should proceed. When I prepare for an arbitration hearing, I focus not just on the legal merits but also on the narrative as to how to present a case in a concise and persuasive manner. Understanding the tribunal’s style and anticipating procedural objections or evidentiary challenges are all part of the preparation. Arbitration is often document – heavy, so organizing the record meticulously and preparing a tight chronology helps the tribunal follow the case seamlessly.
As for client expectations, one common misconception is that arbitration is always faster and cheaper than litigation. While it often is, especially when managed well, that’s not universally true. I also find that clients sometimes think arbitration is informal or less serious whereas in reality, it can be just as rigorous and adversarial, especially in complex commercial matters.
Another myth is that the arbitrator will find a middle ground to resolve the dispute. I always clarify that arbitrators are bound by law and evidence, and their role is adjudicatory, not conciliatory. Ultimately, the goal is to demystify the process for clients, set realistic expectations, and execute the strategy with precision and integrity.
You regularly appear before various judicial and quasi-judicial forums, including Magistrate Courts and the Bombay High Court. How do you adapt your legal strategies to suit the procedural differences in these distinct forums?
Each forum whether it is the Magistrate’s Court or a quasi-judicial tribunal, or the Bombay High Court has its own procedural framework, pace, and expectations. Adapting legal strategy to suit these differences is not just important but also essential for effective advocacy. In Magistrate Courts, proceedings tend to be more procedural, and form driven. The focus is often on compliance with statutory timelines, procedural filings, and the careful presentation of evidence especially in criminal complaints or cases under the Negotiable Instruments Act. Here, precision in pleadings, attention to procedural nuances, and consistent follow-up are key. Oral arguments are usually brief and factual, and the focus is on moving the matter through its procedural stages efficiently.
In contrast, when appearing before the Bombay High Court, especially on the original side, the approach is significantly different. Matters here involve a broader canvas such as complex commercial disputes, writs, appeals etc., requiring deeper legal analysis, structured submissions, and often layered case law support. Strategy here includes anticipating judicial thinking, being well-versed with recent precedents, and presenting arguments with clarity and brevity to match the Court’s time constraints.
At the core of my approach is a simple principle: form must follow function. Strategy is tailored not only to the forum, but also the nature of relief sought, the urgency involved and the profile of the adjudicator. One size never fits all.
As an experienced litigator who frequently handles high-profile cases, could you share a particularly complex or high-stakes litigation that you’ve managed? What were the main challenges involved, and how did you craft a successful strategy for your client?
One of the more complex matters I have handled involved representing a landowner, where we are defending a Suit and connected litigation concerning a large-scale redevelopment project in Mumbai. The dispute revolves around the ownership of land and other issues.
The main challenge lay in the multi – forum nature of the dispute: while the core issue is being adjudicated by the Suit Court, there are parallel proceedings before Magistrate’s Court, Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Land Revenue Officers etc.
Given the commercial and reputational stakes, the pressure to act swiftly and strategically was high. My approach was to first disentangle the overlapping legal issues and create a unified litigation roadmap. I worked closely with the client to identify his core priorities, staying adverse enforcement actions etc.
We focused on defending the grant of ad-interim reliefs from the High Court, which set the tone of the rest of the proceedings. What is important is a mix of legal precision and tactical patience. We avoided combative stance where unnecessary and instead leveraged procedural opportunities to bring the other side to the table for Mediation.
Cases like this reaffirm that high stakes litigation isn’t about winning, its about knowing when to push and when to pause.
With your wealth of experience across multiple areas of law, you are in a unique position to guide aspiring legal professionals. What advice would you offer to law students and young lawyers, particularly those looking to build a successful career in dispute resolution? Are there any key skills, resources, or strategies that you believe are essential for success in this field?
Dispute resolution is a deeply rewarding field, but it demands patience, precision, and perseverance. For law students and young lawyers aspiring to build a career in this area, my first piece of advice would be: embrace the grind. Litigation is not about instant gratification, it’s a slow build, where every draft, every appearance, every client interaction contributes to your growth.
Foundational skills like legal research, drafting, and court etiquette are non-negotiable. The ability to think analytically, anticipating judicial thinking, communicate clearly, and adapt to different forums is what makes a good Advocate. Early on, focus on understanding procedural law, it’s the spine of litigation. You may know the law, but if you don’t know how to apply it procedurally, you’re at a disadvantage.
I also encourage young professionals to observe courtroom proceedings, even when they’re not arguing. There’s no better classroom than a courtroom. Watch how seasoned counsel frame their submissions, how judges respond, and how strategies shift in real time. Over time, this exposure will shape your own courtroom style.
In terms of resources, commentaries, live cases, and judgments are vital but so are podcasts, lectures, and articles that give you practical insights. Law is no longer just about black-letter rules; it’s about staying curious, current, and commercially aware.
One underrated skill is client management. Understanding your client’s priorities, maintaining transparency, and managing expectations are as important as your legal strategy. After all, dispute resolution isn’t just about fighting, it’s about solving.
Finally, build your credibility. That comes from consistency, honesty, and being dependable not just with seniors or clients, but with your team as well. Reputation in this field is earned slowly. If you’re willing to put in the hours, keep learning, and stay grounded, dispute resolution offers you a career of intellectual challenge and professional impact.
Achieving a work-life balance in a demanding profession like law can be challenging. Given the pressures of high-stakes litigation and various professional commitments, how have you managed to maintain a balance between your career and personal life?
Work – life balance in the legal profession is a constant work in progress, especially in litigation, where the unpredictability of court dates, client emergencies and deadlines often spill over into personal time. I haven’t cracked it yet, but over the years, I have learned to manage the chaos.
What has helped me the most is being fully present wherever I am. When I’m in court or working on a case, I give it my undivided attention. But once I step away from that space, I consciously switch off, even if it’s just for a short walk, dinner date or watching one episode of a show on any OTT platform. Those moments of disconnection actually recharge me and help me return to work with better focus.
I have also learned the value of prioritizing ruthlessly. Delegation, trusting my team and setting realistic expectations have been key to avoiding burnout. Spending time with loved ones, traveling when possible and pursuing personal interest keeps me grounded. They are essential for mental clarity and long – term sustainability in a profession that can be all consuming.
Most importantly, I have realised that the balance isn’t about spending equal time, its about being aligned with what matters most in each moment. Some weeks will tilt towards work and others towards personal time. As long as I don’t lose sight of the people and passions outside the profession, it all evens out in the long run.
