Super Lawyer

Tag: Constitutional law

  • “As a lawyer, I have the chance to advocate for people’s rights, help those who need it most, and work toward a fairer society.” – Sudipto Sircar, Advocate-on-Record at Supreme Court of India

    “As a lawyer, I have the chance to advocate for people’s rights, help those who need it most, and work toward a fairer society.” – Sudipto Sircar, Advocate-on-Record at Supreme Court of India

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Your legal journey spans nearly a decade, during which you’ve handled a wide array of cases. Could you share what initially drew you to the field of law and if there were any particular experiences or influences that guided you toward this path?

    When I reflect on my journey into law, I can’t point to one single moment or experience that set me on this path. It was more like a gradual, almost magnetic pull. You could say it was a slow evolution, starting from my desire to pursue a career in journalism after my 10th class board exams. At one point, I was seriously thinking about a career in music – I’ve always loved playing the bass guitar, and during my final school years, I would practice for hours, often losing track of time and neglecting my studies and preparations for the law entrance exams. There were nights when I’d be lost in my music, while my textbooks sat untouched.

    But then came a pivotal moment. One evening, my father sat me down with a look of concern and said, “You need to make a decision. Choose a path.” And that was the wake-up call I needed. Sure, I still play the bass with as much passion as ever – it’s my way to unwind after a busy day in the courtroom. By day, I’m a lawyer, and by night, I’m a bassist. It’s quite the balance, one that keeps me grounded and inspired.

    What draws me to law is its ability to make a real difference. As a lawyer, I have the chance to advocate for people’s rights, help those who need it most, and work toward a fairer society. It’s not always glamorous, and it’s definitely not as simple and straightforward as it might seem from the outside—there are challenges, frustrations, and setbacks along the way. But despite all that, it’s about using the law to level the playing field, ensuring everyone is heard and treated fairly. At the end of the day, it’s about creating tangible change, and that’s something I find deeply fulfilling.

    In the early stages of your career, working as an associate must have been a valuable learning experience. Having worked with big names, could you highlight a few key lessons or insights that significantly shaped your understanding of the law and contributed to your professional growth?

    I say now in hindsight, particularly for pursuing a long-term career in litigation, but the hardest (and the most important) part of starting your journey in this profession is finding and joining a good Chamber. It can literally decide the course and quality of your career. Honestly, being a first-generation lawyer, I did not have this understanding at the time, but I am grateful as to how life has worked out. I have had the good fortune of working under Mr. A.D.N. Rao (he was an Advocate-on-Record during my days under him) and Mr. Shyam Divan, Senior Advocate, and it has been (and continues to be) an amazing journey.

    If I had to highlight the key lessons I’ve learned, it would be threefold. First, it all comes down to hard work. It’s not always easy, and yes, it means sacrificing weekends and putting in long hours. But the more you give, the faster you learn. It’s the foundation for everything that follows.

    Second, embrace the diversity of work, especially when you’re just starting out. The more varied your tasks, the broader your understanding of the field. It’s in the variety that you truly grow.

    And lastly, be ready to take responsibility for your mistakes, no matter how tough it is. Whether it’s a scolding from a senior over a drafting error or a misstep in court, don’t let it bruise your ego. Mistakes will happen—there’s no way around it. What matters is acknowledging them, learning from them, and using those lessons to become better. Every mistake is a step forward if you let it teach you.

    Having appeared before both the Supreme Court of India and several High Courts, you’ve dealt with a wide range of legal issues. How do you approach preparation for such high-stakes cases, especially those requiring in-depth legal analysis and argumentation? What’s one crucial skill you believe every legal professional should cultivate early in their career?

    When preparing for high-stakes cases, especially those requiring complex legal analysis, my approach is grounded in thoroughness and meticulous planning. First, I immerse myself in the facts of the case—ensuring that I fully understand every detail before moving to the legal aspects. I believe that every great argument begins with understanding the context. Once I have that, I turn to the law itself—scouring precedents, statutes, and legal commentary. I approach each piece of research with a critical eye, looking for nuances that might not be immediately obvious but could make or break an argument.

    Beyond the legal research, I focus on refining my arguments by simulating different scenarios and anticipating possible challenges. This helps me stay flexible and confident in court, ensuring that I can respond effectively to unexpected questions or shifts in direction. 

    As for one crucial skill, I would say it’s the ability to think critically and analytically. Developing the habit of breaking down problems into their core components and approaching them with a clear, logical mindset is essential. This skill doesn’t just help in court—it’s what will guide you through the toughest cases and the most complicated legal challenges. Cultivating this skill early in your career will set the foundation for everything else that follows.

    Your practice covers a wide spectrum of areas, including compliance, agreement drafting, IPR protection, and more. Looking back, what has been the most challenging case you’ve worked on, and what strategies did you employ to navigate the complexities of that matter?

    There have definitely been many challenging cases! And let’s be honest, the definition of a “challenge” evolves as you grow. When I first joined the Bar, even my first appearance before the Supreme Court (just a mentioning, mind you) felt like a monumental task. Now, after a few years, I’ve worked on plenty of complex matters, so the “challenge” isn’t necessarily in the complexity anymore—it’s more about maintaining the same level of attention and quality across every case. It’s like trying to keep your enthusiasm for a TV show after the 10th season… You just have to keep the energy up!

    But if I had to pick one instance that stands out, it would have to be the Ram Mandir dispute. It was my first day under Shyam Divan Sir, and he handed me the small task of diving straight into over 200 volumes of pleadings and evidence. And, mind you, this was pre-COVID days—so we’re talking about physical volumes here, the kind that could double as gym equipment. And later, it turned out that by the end of the week, I was required to prepare the first draft of the Written Submissions. 

    Needless to say, I ended up spending my nights in the office, burning the midnight oil every day from the very first week. And honestly, I loved every minute of it. I was grateful for the trust Shyam Sir had placed in me, and I was determined not to let him down. Looking back, I can confidently say that it was one of the most intense but fulfilling experiences of my career. If you ask me now, I wouldn’t trade that first week in his Chamber for anything!

    In your advisory role with various companies, especially in the telecom sector, you deal with a constantly changing regulatory landscape. What are some of the biggest challenges you face in this area, and how do you navigate the evolving regulations to ensure compliance?

    The biggest challenge is keeping up with the ever-changing regulatory landscape. It’s like trying to catch up with a moving train, except the train keeps changing direction and speed. The simple solution I’ve found is to read—constantly. I devour multiple newspapers and magazines (and thank goodness for Magzter, which has been a lifesaver for both domestic and international updates), and I make it a point to regularly check the websites of regulatory bodies. They’re the first to spill the tea, so I’ve got to be there.

    But beyond just staying updated, ensuring compliance is a constant back-and-forth with various departments. I’ll admit, it’s like trying to decode a puzzle at times, but the experience has generally been positive. Most bureaucrats, when approached with an issue, are surprisingly understanding and willing to help clarify things. They get that regulations can be tricky, and they’re usually happy to work towards a solution. I always tell my clients to steer clear of litigation unless absolutely necessary. With regulatory work, litigation should always be the last resort—sort of like trying to use a sledgehammer to crack a nut. It’s far more effective to talk it through first.

    Your work in environmental law, particularly as assisting the Amicus Curiae in major Supreme Court cases, speaks to your deep commitment to this field. What first sparked your interest in environmental litigation, and what drives you to keep contributing to this area? Furthermore, how do you assess the evolution of environmental jurisprudence in India, particularly in the context of judicial interpretations of laws like the Forest Conservation Act and the Environmental Protection Act?

    To be honest, I didn’t set out to specialize in environmental law or mining law when I first entered the profession—it just happened. It all started because Mr. A.D.N. Rao is the Amicus Curiae in several landmark environmental cases [T.N. Godavarman Case (Forest Conservation Case), M.C. Mehta (Taj Trapezium Case), Goa Foundation (Goa Mining Case), Common Cause (Orissa Mining) and Samaj Parivartana (Karnataka Mining Case)]. He was also very active before the National Green Tribunal. So naturally, I was more than happy to assist him in these high-profile cases. It was chaos, but it was one heck of a learning experience. Mr. Shyam Divan is also the Senior Amicus in Samaj Parivartana.

    Fast forward, when I joined Mr. Shyam Divan’s chamber, my work on Samaj Parivartana continued. In fact, some of my colleague’s joke that this case is what officially got me into the Chamber, since it’s how Shyam Sir got to know me—thanks to my constant presence at briefings with A.D.N. Sir. Alongside that, under Shyam Sir, I also became heavily involved in the Krishna and Cauvery River water disputes, which was a whole new world of learning.

    Through all of this, I can now confidently say I’ve by now internalized environmental law, mining law, and water disputes law. All the major judgments and orders from these cases are by now permanently etched in my brain.

    As for the evolution of environmental jurisprudence in India, I think we’re entering a new phase. In the 1980’s and 1990’s, right up until 2014-2015, the Supreme Court was basically the environmental superhero, swooping in with orders and directions that the government had to follow— It was practically the Court which was running the show.

    But now? Things are shifting. This new phase sees the Court stepping back a bit. Why? Well, for one, many of the major environmental issues the Court was grappling with have been resolved or are winding down. Secondly, we now have a dedicated Environmental Tribunal, which takes up a lot of the heavy lifting that the Supreme Court used to earlier. And, of course, the government is playing its part too, providing more clarity in compliance—though some might argue that this clarity is more developer-friendly than environment-friendly, but that’s a debate for another day.

    The bottom line is, the Court has moved from being the enforcer of environmental laws to more of a law interpreter, and I think it’s striking a balance between being pro-environment and pro-development. It’s no longer just the hammer; it’s more like the guide. And I think the Court is doing a good job of maintaining an equilibrium.

    Enforcing occupational health and safety regulations in India, particularly with respect to the OSH&WC Code, 2020, presents several challenges. From your perspective, what are the key hurdles in ensuring effective enforcement of these regulations? Additionally, could you shed light on your role as a legal consultant in finalizing the standards under the OSH&WC Code, and how your involvement helped shape these regulations?

    The biggest hurdle in enforcing the OSH&WC Code? Well, it’s like trying to run a marathon with one shoe—it’s all about infrastructure and resources. On the bureaucratic side, there are still far too many vacancies in government departments, and that’s not changing anytime soon. On the industry side, especially in the MSME sector, it’s a whole other ballgame. Large corporations can foot the bill for compliance, but for micro and small enterprises? It’s like throwing another weight onto an already overloaded backpack. And let’s not forget, many of these enterprises operate in the informal sector, which only makes enforcement more challenging. This has been a long-standing issue, and there is no quick-fix magic wand in the Code or the regulations that will suddenly solve it overnight.

    As for my role as a legal consultant, I was brought in when the regulations were getting fine-tuned for submission to the Ministry. And let me tell you, it was a race against time. I practically set up camp at the Headquarters of the Director General Factory Advice Service & Labour Institute (DGFASLI) in Bombay for an entire week. It was me and a team of experts from across the country, working long hours, getting up at the crack of dawn and going till evening, vetting every line of the regulations. We worked even during the weekend. But the real fun for me began when the day’s work was over. I stayed up late into the night fixing all the errors and amendments we had discussed for the portion that was completed, so that the next day, there was an updated draft before the team to confirm and finalise.

    On the first night, the DGFASLI staff got a bit of a shock to find me still working past regular office hours into the night. The night guard practically kicked me out of the building so that he could lock up. So the next day, I spoke to the Director and got permission to keep a room in the main building open and running with the guard staying awake to lock up after me. I am pretty sure he was cursing his luck to be stuck with me at night, but hey, we got the job done!

    But in the end, it wasn’t just about hitting deadlines—it was about shaping regulations that could make a real difference and make life a little easier for everyone in the industry. Sure, there were some late nights and a few cups of coffee that felt more like lifelines, but the experience was fulfilling, and I’m proud to have played a part in it.

    With increasing focus on technology, sustainability, and corporate responsibility, how do you see the future of environmental law and occupational safety evolving in the next decade? What emerging trends do you think young lawyers should be preparing for? Also, what advice would you offer to young professionals aspiring to excel in law, particularly in fields you’re deeply engaged with?

    If you asked me what’s changed the most in environmental law, I’d say it’s paper. Pre-COVID, we were practically drowning in it, with piles of pleadings that could take over entire tables, with additional mini towers on the side. Big environmental litigations often run into thousands of pages. But with e-filing and PDFs taking over, paper use has drastically reduced. It’s still a bit of an adjustment for me. I still prefer scribbling down notes on paper with a pen during final arguments, but overall it’s better for the environment, and the back and arms, which were practically crying from the weight of all those files. 

    Looking ahead, I see compliance becoming even more central to environmental law and occupational safety. With technology, sustainability, and corporate responsibility gaining traction, the pressure to comply with environmental standards will only increase. Add to that the rise of AI, and we’re looking at a future where regulations and compliance will be handled more efficiently (but no less seriously) than ever before.

    For young lawyers entering this field, I think the biggest trend to prepare for is the shift towards smaller offices. Technology has already made it possible for lawyers to do what used to require an entire team of stenographers, typists, clerks, and assistants. When I started out, if you didn’t have a good stenographer, you were essentially behind the curve. Now, you can draft petitions on your laptop without needing anyone else to type them out. The upside? It means less overhead costs, making it easier for junior advocates to set up their own practice. The downside? Fewer jobs in law chambers, because there’s less need for large teams to manage all the paperwork.

    So, what does this mean for fresh law grads? It means adaptability will be your best friend. If you’re tech-savvy, you’ll have an edge. But, and this is important, you can’t just rely on the machines. AI might help with drafting and research, but nothing beats good old-fashioned brainpower and creativity when it comes to solving legal problems. Similarly, technology may assist with legal procedures, but it can’t replace the art of persuasion or the nuanced skill of court craft. Those come with experience—and time.

    So my advice to young professionals is two-fold: First, be a sponge—absorb as much knowledge as you can, and do it fast. The legal world is changing, and you need to keep pace. Second, as you adapt, don’t forget the fundamentals. Stay curious, stay sharp, and remember that no amount of technology can replace the value of your own thinking. And, of course, no matter how advanced AI gets, it will never be able to match your charm in the courtroom. That’s the stuff that wins cases.

    As both a legal consultant and advocate-on-record, you manage a broad range of responsibilities. How do you maintain a work-life balance in such a demanding profession? Are there particular habits or practices you’ve adopted to stay focused and energized in this high-pressure field?

    It’s tricky, for sure. But I didn’t enter this field by accident—so I’m not about to complain. The reality is, work-life balance in law is more of an ideal than a constant state. It’s hard to achieve it when your schedule is always in flux, whether you’re waiting in court or running to brief a Senior Advocate. There’s also the drafting, vetting, and admin work that’s part of the daily grind.

    But here’s the thing—there will never be enough hours in the day to do everything. So instead of stressing over the balance, I focus on making time for what truly matters. I make sure to spend time with my wife and family, because that’s the best way I know to recharge. I’m also a philatelist, and I try to dedicate at least a little time each week to that hobby, even if it’s just 30 minutes.

    Beyond that, I walk and meditate when I can. Some days I miss them, and that’s okay. But I also use my car rides—whether I’m heading to the office or coming home—as a chance to think through the day ahead or unwind after a busy one.

    So no, I don’t have a perfect “work-life balance” in the typical sense. But I do make time for the things that keep me focused and energized in a profession that demands a lot.

    Get in touch with Sudipto Sircar –

  • The Endless Journey of Learning and Growth: Why a Career in Law Keeps You Forever Young –  Mayuri Raghuvanshi, Advocate on Record (AOR) at the Supreme Court of India.

    The Endless Journey of Learning and Growth: Why a Career in Law Keeps You Forever Young –  Mayuri Raghuvanshi, Advocate on Record (AOR) at the Supreme Court of India.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team


    Having such immense experience in diverse fields, can you share the story behind your choosing law as a career and what kind of moments or experiences have motivated you to continue for almost two decades now?

    Well, I think simply because one life is not enough for law. Every day passes by, and you know you have learned something new. There will not be a single day in this profession where you will not go to bed with a feeling that you have learned something new today. And yet when you try to ask yourself, do I really know the subject, the answer will definitely be no, because it’s vast, it’s huge, and it is dynamic.

    For example, several of the subjects we practice today, we have not studied in law college. They are new to us, and we learn every day. And the profession, I mean, now, of course, there are various aspects. Once you have your law degree, there are various ways in which you can put your legal education to use. But even if we are just talking about litigation alone, every day you will learn something new. I have been doing this for almost two decades, as you rightly pointed out, but there are still so many areas of law that are new to me, and I’m still looking for an opportunity to learn and grab that.

    So I think that’s the romance of law. That’s the whole idea and the fun of being a lawyer: you learn every day. I mean, look at it like this — suppose I were in a different profession, you would have called me a middle-aged woman, but I’m a toddler in the profession still. We have a very long professional life that keeps us young and alive, and that’s the beauty of the profession. That’s why it’s all worth it.
    When we were in school, the usual thing was that if you’re a good student, you would study science. So, I also wanted to believe that I was a good student. I took maths with biology as a subject in class 12, which clearly shows that I was confused and not very clear about what I wanted to do. But yes, everybody said, we have to now sit for the competitive exam. I had though had one advantage, my parents had studied law. And I think by far, I have, in that sense, inherited my father’s passion for law, for the subject. So, I remember my evenings were earmarked for me with my father. And once, where I think what sparked the interest was when I was in class 7th or 6th, my father was reading Lord Denning’s closing chapter. And he would come back, and, you know, I still have a very vivid memory of the time he would spend with me asking me what I was doing. He would sit on the corner of a sofa and just sit with a book, and perhaps he was so engrossed in reading it.

    I thought, who is this bald man who has eaten up all my time? I wanted to know who this bald man was, not knowing that who actually Lord Denning was. And that’s where I started actually going through his books and all. So, very often it happens that we are interested in, or we choose a field because we have a role model, and we want to become something, we want to become a lawyer. So, we want to study law. In my case, it was the other way around. I was so confused about what I wanted to study and what I really enjoyed reading. Today, I am able to articulate it, but when I was a young girl, I had difficulty in articulating or understanding my own interest.

    So, while I was interested in stories, history, and all sorts of books around me, when I looked at even science subjects like Math, Physics, Chemistry, and Biology, the ones I was reading to score marks, it was more out of a curious interest. My hobby or the time when I had to recreate or my leisure was all filled with all kinds of books. My father once pointed out to me that, “Look here, this is your bent of mind. This is what you should look at making your profession.” So I would write poems, I would read poems, I would do things, but I was really never able to understand it. And as I was telling you, I did clear an engineering entrance exam.

    And a day before I cleared, and interestingly, when we were in school, the whole quest about getting into a law college — there weren’t so many law colleges then — and my father is the old-world person in that sense of the term, believing that if you want to study law, you should have certain maturity. He says, “You can’t teach fundamental rights to a 17-year-old boy.” That’s how he looked at it. So, when I first started expressing myself that I wanted to study law, my father was of the view that I should do a graduation program in any subject I wanted and then take up a three-year law course. Because, as he still believed, how could a 16-year-old person understand jurisprudence or what is a fundamental right? And he would always tell me, “To understand the right to life, you have to live a life.”

    There were some five-year law colleges that had come up. So, I finally managed to convince my father to let me sit for an entrance exam. Or, if I can recollect correctly, there was National Law School, Bangalore, which I could not appear for because by the time I convinced my father, the dates had closed. So, the only entrance exam I took was for Symbiosis. In those days, there was only one Symbiosis, which was in Pune and affiliated with Pune University. It wasn’t even a deemed university then. I remember I had my entrance exam at Teen Murti Bhavan, and I enjoyed the entrance exam like anything. I knew the answers at the back of my hand.

    See, Maths, Physics, those legal deductions, when you were studying Math in class 12, were like baby steps. It wasn’t difficult at all. General knowledge — I realized that’s where I really understood that I knew almost everything. For example, there was this question, “What does Parliament consist of?” I knew that it was Rajya Sabha, Lok Sabha, and the president. There were questions on legal news and current affairs, and I knew all of that. I remember when my name came up, I was at serial number eight on the list.

    So, when I went to my father and said, “Let’s go for this,” and that’s where my mentor, Dr. Akilen Pandey, played a very important role in my final decision. Because, all said and done, even in those days, someone would call you a fool for giving up engineering and studying law. But I was glad I was surrounded by people passionate about law, who were able to guide me and show me how beautiful the subject was. And once I was in college, I remember after the first class, I called up my father and said, “I finally know what I’m going to study for the rest of my life.” My soul had found its place. So, for me, it was more about the passion for law. Even today, you know, while I am a lawyer, I practice law in court, it’s not about what I want to become; it’s always the subject that is the core of everything I do. It’s the love for the subject that takes precedence over everything else.

    I enjoyed it, actually. You know, there are two exams that I enjoyed thoroughly. One was my law entrance and the other was my advocate-on-record exam. Even if a bomb would have dropped outside, I would have cared less. I would have perhaps continued participating in the process.


     Ma’am, at the very start of your career, you had the option of joining esteemed advocates like Advocate Gopal Subramanium. How did that experience shape your approach towards law, your research, and the way you work today?

    You know, the most important thing in a lawyer’s life is the chamber they start from. I had been exceptionally blessed because of the people I worked with, particularly in the initial years. In our profession, we say that the horse is from which stable—that’s your genealogy, your pedigree. And I am very lucky in that way because that’s what shapes you. On the face of it, it may look like we were just assisting them, but the relationship between a senior and junior is very much like a parent and child.

    When you are a baby, you hate everything that your parents say. You disagree with them. You don’t understand why they’re doing something. Sometimes, you find them irrational. But as you grow up, you begin to realize why they behave the way they do. And to your nightmare, you’ll realize that you’ve also turned into them.

    So, in a way, there are things, like for example, Mr. Subramanium’s chamber — I can bet you, you go to any junior who has come from that office, you will see we all have a style of preparing a note that we take to court. This is the note we used to prepare for sir. I still don’t know how to read a file or go to court without a note in my hand. Now, of course, my notes have shifted to electronic notes, but even today, while I use LiquidText and its features, I still make my note. All my files have a note. It’s a very typical thing, and I can bet any junior today from Mr. Subramanium’s chamber would not have a note in their file. We don’t know how to read our files without the note.

    So, it’s like I just said, this is one thing we’ve all imbibed. We’ve all imbibed certain traits, the way we work, the way we think. For example, Mr. Subramanium was an early riser. He would start early in the morning. Now, most offices work late into the night. I have, by default, become an early morning person. I can start early because he worked that way. So we got acclimatized to the way he worked.

    Those things you may not realize like I didn’t realize it for a very long time, but now, when I sit back and reflect, I think I’m always more comfortable starting early rather than doing something late at night. I like to read my files, revise them early in the morning, or have a meeting with clients in the morning rather than late at night.

    So, it defines almost everything. And it’s not just the people you work with — we also have the benefit of working with some of the stalwarts in the profession, assisting them. Every time we assist them, there’s something you learn from them. By just observing them, watching them. If you ask me, the person who actually teaches you the law is the judge sitting on the other side. That person, and if you want to learn the procedure, the person sitting in the registry will teach you the procedure. So, these two people are actually our gurus in that sense, because we learn while interacting with them. They are the best teachers, actually. The judges are the best teachers in that sense.

     Ma’am, you practically take out all that guru factor from everywhere you go—from the registry to judges, to even your juniors, and seniors. Obviously, everyone has their own style. How did you choose your style, and when did you decide to start your own practice? What kind of motivation was behind all of it? Because it’s not always easy, I would say, to make the decision to go independent and start a whole firm for yourself. When and how did you decide to take that step?

    So, there wasn’t a particular moment when I decided. I started working at my first chamber, which was an advocate-on-record’s chamber. I had the advantage of being clear in my head that if I wanted to practice in the Supreme Court, I needed to become an advocate-on-record (AOR).

    I knew it would take me five years, but effectively six, because our results in Pune University were declared in June, so by the time we got our certificates and enrolled, it was July. The AOR rule requires you to complete one year of training after four years of enrollment before taking the AOR exam. For us, post-April enrollments meant an additional year, so it became a six-year process for me. I started preparing for the AOR exam during this time.

    My journey began in the chamber of an advocate-on-record. After that, I got an opportunity to work with Mr. Subramanium. Back then, he was Solicitor General, and his practice was focused entirely on Supreme Court work. I worked with him for a while, but the exposure I gained was mainly in the Supreme Court.

    By 2009, after three years of practice, I realized I had zero experience in original side work, trial courts, or High Courts. The only forum I’d worked in was the Supreme Court. However, being based in Delhi, I had the advantage of having access to various courts and tribunals, and I was eager to learn. I started taking up work from different people and assisting whenever I could in trial courts, learning things I hadn’t done before, like drafting plaints.

    Then, Mr. Sanjay Ghosh came into the picture, and his practice in the High Court gave me my first exposure to original side work. I also started volunteering for arbitration proceedings, marking them on my calendar and following them as if they were my own cases, even though I had no client or fee.

    By the time I became an AOR, I had some matters here and there. But once I passed the exam, my practice truly began to take off. One major benefit of being an AOR is the liberty it offers—you can take on a case pro bono and still handle everything, from drafting to arguing, without needing to depend on anyone else. This flexibility allowed me to build a practice independently and create opportunities for myself.

    Ma’am, there are times when people question this aspect as well that if you keep doing things for free, when will you start charging? I’m just stating what has often been said. How have you navigated such challenges and strategized your practice? What suggestions would you have for newcomers or people who want to create their own path? You’ve worked in such diverse areas like service laws, company laws, taxation, civil, constitutional law, etc. How have you managed all of that?

    One of the best strategies is not to let an opportunity slip by, even if it seems like something that cannot be monetized immediately. Sometimes, what appears to be free work today can translate into valuable opportunities later.

    For example, when the Sexual Harassment Act was passed in 2013, many organizations struggled to set up their sexual harassment committees. Some of my clients from PSUs reached out to me for advice, and though I didn’t charge for it initially, I helped them understand the new rules and how to form committees. It seemed like free work at the time, but it eventually led to more billable work, and what started as a small thing turned into a significant opportunity.

    It’s important to note that this doesn’t mean you should work for free indefinitely. In fact, it’s essential to know your worth and charge for your time when it’s appropriate. But early in your career, you must recognize that sometimes giving away a bit of your expertise for free can build trust and open doors.

    For instance, my pro bono work with the All India Judges Association started in 2014. Although I wasn’t paid, that work led to other opportunities. Similarly, the work I did for free or at a minimal rate built a foundation for my practice to grow.

    The key here is not to have a myopic view of your career. Understand that, as a lawyer, you are not an employee. You are an entrepreneur. It’s different from a regular job where you can clock in and clock out. As a lawyer, particularly if you’re aiming to be an arguing counsel, you need to realize that you’re in charge of your own success.

    Once you understand this, everything becomes easier. You won’t get caught up in the conventional expectations of time sheets or packages. You’ll embrace the ups and downs of the profession because you’re building your own practice, and that mindset will ultimately make the journey smoother.

    Ma’am, you have also been involved in a lot of gender awareness initiatives, especially your role in the internal complaint committee under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act and your position as an external member for organizations such as Rashtrapati Bhavan. What kind of challenges do you face when addressing gender sensitization issues, particularly concerning sexual harassment prevention? How do you assist or advocate for individuals in overcoming these issues, especially with more women entering the workforce in various environments? How have you addressed these challenges under your supervision?

    There are two main aspects to the work I’ve done. First, gender sensitization is a subject I’m deeply passionate about. In fact, I’m currently pursuing a PhD in feminist jurisprudence, an area of growing interest for me as I continue working on these issues. I’ve had the opportunity to engage with this law in three capacities: as a lawyer, where I represent clients in court; as a member of an internal committee, adjudicating complaints under the law; and through conducting awareness workshops, which I love doing. These workshops have been conducted in various institutions, each with its own unique challenges.

    One of the biggest challenges is that, as a country, we’re still not entirely clear on what constitutes sexual harassment from a legal standpoint. For example, the Vishakha guidelines were established in 1997, and although the 2013 Act is essentially a continuation of those principles, the law remains quite skeletal. It states that sexual harassment includes any unwelcome advance, but what qualifies as an advance is not clearly defined. In the virtual world, what might be considered a form of sexual harassment could be something as simple as sending a WhatsApp message or insisting on a cup of tea when someone is uncomfortable. It’s unclear how these actions should be categorized.

    Another issue is the diversity of workplaces – the law applies to a law firm, a school, a multinational company, and even Anganwadi workers, each with distinct sensitivities. For example, in multinational companies, a simple gesture like a peck on the cheek may not be seen as problematic, but in other workplaces, it may be inappropriate. So, determining where the line is between workplace conflict and sexual harassment is often not easy. The definition of sexual harassment is still a point of confusion, even within legal circles.

    I’ll give you an example. In 2015, the Ministry of Women and Child Development came out with a handbook categorizing various incidents as “sexual harassment,” “may or may not be,” or “definitely not.” However, this handbook is just a guide and not legally binding. So, even though it can help, it still leaves room for confusion in how to conduct inquiries and address harassment cases.

    A particularly common mistake is when people try to substitute their own sensibilities for the person making the complaint. For example, if a woman reports that a man tried to touch her, a person might dismiss it as just a handshake. But we need to understand whether the person making the complaint is genuinely uncomfortable with it. This has been a difficult concept for many, including judges, to grasp. The challenge is to put aside your own sensibilities and view the case from the perspective of the individual making the complaint. We need to ensure we’re not dismissing their feelings just because we would have acted differently. It’s essential to have training that allows us to understand these issues in layman’s terms so that people can really apply these systems with clarity.

     Ma’am, you’ve stated that you’ve gone paperless and, in your words, you’ve become a semi-technology-equipped lawyer. With more of our lives going online, such as court appearances and meetings, do you think we’re addressing online harassment in the same way we’re addressing physical harassment? In particular, the psychological impact of online harassment, which can be unforeseen, and what steps are being taken to address that?

    That’s a great question. In fact, Rajasthan High Court recently ruled that the concept of “workplace” under the Sexual Harassment Act should also apply to virtual spaces. This means that online meetings and virtual workplaces are covered under the Act, which is a step in the right direction. The issue is now clear: even online harassment is covered. There’s also international precedent, with countries like Australia issuing similar guidelines during the COVID-19 pandemic. Many organizations have updated their sexual harassment policies to ensure that online platforms, emails, and WhatsApp groups are covered.

    The challenge is that people often still don’t recognize that online harassment exists. It’s difficult for many to comprehend that harassment can happen without any physical contact. Even in situations where we’re having a conversation online, harassment can occur. That’s why sensitization is so important. People need to understand that harassment isn’t just about physical actions—it’s about respecting another person’s comfort level.

    It’s also crucial to recognize that sexual harassment doesn’t always involve a clear sexual offense. Many people confuse harassment with sexual offenses, simply because the word “sexual” is involved. Some individuals believe that their actions, such as making a comment or joking, are harmless because they don’t intend to cause harm. But it’s not about intentions; it’s about whether the other person feels uncomfortable. Understanding each other’s sensibilities is key to creating a respectful environment, whether online or offline.

    Ma’am, balancing your roles as an advocate, faculty member, and the head of your law firm is incredibly demanding. There’s also the aspect of mental health in this profession, something that isn’t often discussed. How do you manage to balance all of these responsibilities? What advice would you give to young professionals entering this field, which is both demanding and stressful?

    You’ve raised an important issue. The most important thing for a successful lawyer is good mental health, but we don’t talk about it enough. As lawyers, people come to us with problems—emotional, financial, personal—and we bear that burden too. Balancing all the different roles you mentioned requires resilience. For me, it’s essential to find time to laugh, stay positive, and not get overwhelmed. Burnout is a real issue, especially with the long hours we often work. Many of my students, after about 10 years in practice, experience this burnout.

    The first thing I would advise young professionals is to pay attention to your health—both mental and physical. Don’t skip meals, don’t compromise on sleep, and make sure you’re doing something that rejuvenates you, whether it’s exercise, reading, or even just watching a movie. I often ask my interns when the last time was that they went out for dinner or watched a movie. Many of them are so stressed out they don’t even want to talk about it. It’s important to take a step back and realize that life isn’t just about work.

    As women in this profession, there’s also the issue of “pipeline leakage,” where many women drop out between the ages of 30 and 45, especially when they’re balancing career and family life. It’s a challenging time, and the profession doesn’t always make it easy. But for me, having a supportive environment at home has been a huge privilege. I live with people who are gender-neutral and more progressive than I could ever claim to be, which makes a huge difference.

    I always tell young lawyers that there’s no rush. The profession is long, and you don’t need to achieve everything by the age of 30 or 35. Take care of your mental and physical health, and enjoy what you do. If you enjoy your work, it won’t feel like a burden.

    Ultimately, work-life balance is individual. Everyone has their own version of balance, and you have to find what works for you. For me, teaching gives me a different perspective and rejuvenates me to come back to my litigation work. So, I stay busy, but I enjoy everything I do. And that’s the key: to find joy in your work and make time for fun along the way.

    Get in touch with Mayuri Raghuvanshi –

  • “I believe an inherent interest and love for the Law, coupled with deep reserves of patience is an absolute essential if choosing to pursue litigation.” – Aditi Tripathi, Advocate-on-Record at Supreme Court of India.

    “I believe an inherent interest and love for the Law, coupled with deep reserves of patience is an absolute essential if choosing to pursue litigation.” – Aditi Tripathi, Advocate-on-Record at Supreme Court of India.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    With over a decade of experience now, what initially sparked your interest in pursuing a career in law? Was it a deliberate decision to enter the legal profession, or was there a specific event or experience that inspired you to take this path?

    I never had to look for inspiration beyond home. My father, Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi, was a first generation lawyer, who in turn was encouraged to pursue law by Prof. N. Madhava Menon, the architect of modern legal education in India. Watching my father burning the midnight oil in preparation for matters, and listening to his stories about particularly challenging days in court was always fascinating. Even as a child I could glean that here was a career that encouraged inculcating intelligence, quick thinking, and an ongoing quest for knowledge coupled with an element of public service. 

    By the time I was at the cusp of entering college, my father was elevated to the bench, which gave me fresh and unprecedented insight into the gruelling demands of the profession, not only as part of the Bar, but even on the Bench. Having an innate inclination towards humanities over the sciences, I loved studying history and political science and ultimately, decided to appear for the law school entrance exams.

    During my time at NUJS, Kolkata I endeavoured to gain a broad spectrum including during internships. In my penultimate year of law school my elder sister, also a lawyer, advised that I apply for an internship with Amarchand & Mangaldas & Suresh A. Shroff & Co., New Delhi (now Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas/SAM). I interned with the Litigation and Disputes Resolution practice area at AMSS. I assisted the associates in active matters with research and drafting. It was exciting and challenging, and led me to realise that litigation was my true calling. Having liked my work, AMSS recruited me while I was still in my 5th year.

    Having worked with several distinguished legal chambers and law firms, how did these early experiences shape your approach to legal practice? Are there any key lessons or insights that you gained from these experiences that continue to inform your work today?

    My litigation journey started with the Litigation and Disputes Resolution Team at AMSS. AMSS is one of India’s top-tier law firms, while you feel fortunate to be a part of the organization, life at a law firm is gruelling. The long hours, in a high pressure environment is ‘baptism by fire.’ However, working at one of the leading law firms of the country, I learnt to emulate the industry’s best. Law firms give you great exposure, both at a professional and personal level. Handling high stakes matters, I inculcated critical thinking, which makes for a good lawyer, and as a solicitor, I also mastered skills like time and client management. The most important skill I imbibed at AMSS was attention to detail. Another learning from Mrs. Pallavi S. Shroff, the Managing Partner was to always be prepared with the brief, even if you are the junior-most lawyer on the matter. She guided young lawyers to learn every aspect of the matter, including the most fundamental things like ensuring no typographical errors, correct pagination of briefs, preparing proper case compilations, and brief management. Even now in the era of digitisation, these skills continue to serve me well and have set high standards for my final work product.

    Wanting to be in courts more regularly, I joined the Chambers of Mr. Paras Kuhad, Senior Advocate and Former Additional Solicitor General of India. The experience at a senior’s chamber after a law firm was equally if not more challenging and demanding. The most important insight Mr. Kuhad provided was that as a litigator one has to marshall the facts of a brief. Arguments may be subjective, depending on the side you are defending, but not the facts. In court, I frequently see Judges calling upon young counsels to apprise them on the facts of a petition. Judges are always encouraging of juniors who are well prepared. As a young counsel, to receive a compliment from the court is an unparalleled feeling, and goes a long way in building your confidence. This also instils a sense of ownership towards the brief.

    I also had the privilege of being a part of Mr. P.S. Narasimha, Senior Advocate’s chamber (as he then was). While the volume of work made it a high pressure work environment, it was also the most ideal office, with an exceptionally congenial atmosphere. The biggest insight I garnered during my time there was that – with the right attitude and guidance, people thrive and are encouraged to show up and give their 100% every day. As a part of Mr. Narasimha’s office, I worked on matters, which engaged the attention of the nation. Observing Mr. Narasimha, I learnt that keeping your composure, no matter the complexity of the brief, is the touchstone of a good lawyer, and also of a good human being.

    Undoubtedly, the common thread running through all the offices I have been a part of is that there is no substitute for hard work in our profession. 

    After gaining experience with various legal entities, you chose to establish your own practice. What motivated this decision, and what challenges did you face in the early stages of building your independent practice?

    While mentorship under a Senior Advocate helps lay the foundation to your foray into the practise, it is still a bubble. I had already received a taste of solicitor practise, and realised I enjoyed being a litigator more. Therefore, instead of going back to a law firm, I dove into the deep end.

    I decided to go independent while the world was still overcoming the rigours of the pandemic. It was daunting, and there were difficult days. Work was slow and sporadic. After being accustomed to working at a 100 miles an hour, 7 days a week, for close to a decade, this was a new normal. I had to make peace with a different pace. As a silver lining, I got time to prepare for the Advocates-on-Record Exam, which I cleared in 2022.

    The idea is not to get disheartened. Litigation is a patience game, and the patient are surely rewarded. 4 years later, slowly yet steadily, work and clientele has grown, and life has come a full circle. The familiar hectic nature of the practise, 7 days a week is back. I have come to relish it as I now get to work on my own terms. 

    Being an Advocate on Record, what are some of the most challenging legal issues you have encountered? How do you approach representing the Government in the Supreme Court, and can you share an example of a significant matter you handled for the Union?

    The Advocate-on-Record is a bridge between the clients and the court, ensuring compliance with legal formalities and maintaining the integrity of the judicial process. Managing client expectations along with the strict scrutiny from the Court is a fine balance to be struck on a daily basis.

    As Panel Counsel for Union of India, the challenge arises from the multifaceted nature of litigation involving the Government of India. Representing the government requires a nuanced understanding of both legal and administrative issues, with the added pressure of ensuring that the legal positions are consistent with existing policy and legislative frameworks. In cases involving matters of national significance — such as land acquisition, criminal laws, or fiscal regulations — the government’s stance must be defended without compromising on constitutional principles. One dons two hats in such cases, i.e., that of a counsel and also an officer of the court. The responsibility and care when drafting on behalf of the government is also greater. This demands an in-depth grasp of public law, detailed preparation, and an ability to respond swiftly to dynamic legal developments in a high-pressure and high-stakes environment.

    My approach to high-stakes matters involves meticulous preparation and intelligent strategizing. One has to be ready for all possible questions that fall from the Bench. By being proactive, I work towards achieving favourable outcomes even in the most complex issues and questions of law.

    You represent a variety of public-sector organizations. How do the legal challenges differ when representing government-owned entities compared to private clients? What strategies do you employ to address complex issues, particularly when public interest is at stake?

    The most significant challenge is striking a balance between the rights of individuals, the existing policy framework and the larger public interest, especially in cases that involve public welfare or environmental protection. In such cases, stakes are often high, and the outcome can have far-reaching consequences. Additionally, interpretation of laws, particularly in unchartered questions of law and in evolving social and political landscapes, add a layer of complexity that requires constant adaptability and precision.

    You have represented clients in arbitration cases involving significant monetary stakes. Can you elaborate on your approach to high-stakes arbitration and the strategies you employ to achieve favourable outcomes? Additionally, how do you navigate the complexities of cross-border disputes, especially those involving international arbitration bodies?

    In high-stakes arbitration, my approach centres on a deep understanding of the legal nuances, the facts of the case, and the business interests of my clients. With significant monetary stakes involved, my priority is to build a strategy that is both legally sound and strategically astute.

    First, I focus on thorough case preparation. This means not only understanding the applicable law in-depth but also conducting a meticulous review of the evidence, the contract terms, and any prior communications that could impact the dispute. I always anticipate potential challenges and prepare pre-emptive responses. At the same time, I try to understand my client’s broader goals—what outcome they are hoping for beyond just the legal victory—and this informs how I present the case.

    A key part of my strategy is identifying and leveraging early opportunities for settlement or negotiation. Arbitration, while a powerful tool, can be a time-consuming and costly process. If we can settle on favourable terms, I pursue that route, ensuring my client secures a win without unnecessary delays. I assisted Mr. Narasimha in drafting the Mediation Bill under the aegis of the Supreme Court Mediation and Conciliation Project Committee. In the course of the same, I realised the merits of Mediation in assisting clients finding speedy resolutions to their disputes, while the courts grapple with pendency. However, when arbitration is the only viable option, I embrace it fully and leave no stone unturned in presenting the case at its strongest.

    In terms of navigating the complexities of cross-border disputes, especially involving international arbitration bodies, I recognize that each jurisdiction has its own unique set of rules and procedural nuances. My approach to cross-border disputes is based on a clear understanding of both the international arbitration framework and the local legal systems at play. This includes knowing the procedural rules of the institution governing the arbitration, anticipating enforcement challenges, and managing any potential jurisdictional issues that arise.

    International arbitration requires a blend of legal expertise and global perspective. I pay careful attention to jurisdictional choices, as these can have a profound impact on the outcome. A robust understanding of public international law, private international law, and the evolving trends in international dispute resolution ensures that I can effectively navigate the complexities of cross-border disputes and craft arguments that resonate with international tribunals.

    Finally, I focus on maintaining effective communication with all stakeholders involved, including clients, opposing counsel, and arbitrators. Building trust and confidence in my representation is critical, especially in high-stakes matters where the pressure is intense.

    Looking back, what has been one of the most interesting or difficult cases you have handled? How did you approach and navigate the complexities of that particular matter?

    While every case presents its own complexity, in the past couple of years, I have had the privilege of being part of legal teams appearing before Constitution Benches of the Supreme Court. It is incredible. The matters that stood out for me are – the Ayodhya Ramjanmabhoomi Dispute, In Re: Article 370 (the abrogation of Article 370), and the Aligarh Muslim University Minority Status dispute. Apart from being some of the leading cases of their time, these matters also provided the unique opportunity to assist and learn from some of the finest legal minds of our time.

    The learning curve in such cases is undoubtedly steep. In such matters, I learnt that one has to navigate two aspects of the matter – One is the preparatory aspect. Each of these matters were highly contentious, with voluminous pleadings, running into thousands of pages. The facts as well as the dispute itself, in each of these cases also presented the unique challenge of spanning decades. There was also the challenge of tight timelines. While the sheer size of the pleadings can initially feel very daunting, it is important to understand that to be able to effectively assist a Senior Counsel in trimming down all the weight to come up with the best arguments, one’s role as a briefing counsel assumes great significance. The briefing counsel has the task of setting up the foundation for the arguments to be put forth by the Senior Counsel. Here, one gets the opportunity to be creative and come up with novel arguments in support of the brief. For this, one has to be well-versed with the matter including facts, arguments, documents and pleadings – both in support of and against one’s case. 

    It may seem like an oversimplification but in my experience, the only way to do that is to take it head on and get into the depth of the brief. The devil is in the details. The preparatory part of the matter can be gruelling with long hours of research, reading, refining and reshaping of arguments. Of course, it helps that the courts have become committed to going paperless and that makes handling the records in such cases much easier.

    The second aspect is the hearings. Constitution Bench matters pose the challenge of being time-bound, which means the matters may be heard on a day-to-day basis, often spanning many days, from morning to evening. As a briefing counsel, one not only has to keep up with the arguments of the day, note the questions and observations falling from the Bench, but also prepare for the next day, alongside assisting the senior in refining arguments as the matter progresses. Cases of such magnitude and public importance, help develop promptness, lateral thinking and the ability to handle pressures.

    Having worked in both private practice and public sector legal roles, how do you view the evolving landscape of Indian legal practice, particularly in fields such as arbitration and regulatory disputes? How do you see the role of legal practitioners evolving with the advent of technology into the sector?

    The most striking facet of the Indian legal landscape is its dynamism and constant evolution. The ease with which we have been able to navigate hearings before Constitutional Benches of the Supreme Court, such as the ones I mentioned before, is evidence of our profession’s adaptability and the efficacy of going paperless.

    The Indian legal sector is undergoing a period of rapid transformation, driven by both domestic shifts and global developments, and I see this as a golden opportunity for young practitioners like myself.

    In arbitration, India has become an increasingly attractive hub for both domestic and international arbitration, with courts taking steps to reduce delays and create a more favourable environment for dispute resolution. Government of India’s focus on strengthening arbitration laws through reforms, has been vital in this evolution. I also believe that the growing emphasis on institutional arbitration, alongside India’s position within global arbitration networks, will elevate the country’s standing as a leading arbitration venue.

    Regarding regulatory disputes, India’s economic growth and regulatory framework are becoming more complex. Areas like competition law, antitrust, and environmental regulations are seeing increasing levels of scrutiny. Government initiatives to streamline regulations through digital platforms, like the Ease of Doing Business reforms, have also led to a surge in litigation, especially involving corporate governance, compliance, and tax matters. These regulatory shifts require legal professionals to stay ahead of developments and offer creative, proactive solutions to clients who are navigating these dynamic environments.

    In my view, the role of legal practitioners in India is evolving in exciting ways due to the integration of technology. Legal tech tools, artificial intelligence (AI), and data analytics are already reshaping how we research, draft, and even negotiate. The use of AI for contract analysis, predictive legal outcomes, and managing case precedents is quickly becoming standard practice. For young lawyers, this means we need to become proficient with emerging technologies to stay competitive. 

    At the same time, technology provides opportunities to streamline processes, reduce costs, and improve the efficiency of legal services, which can be particularly valuable in high-stakes disputes and regulatory matters where timelines and costs are often significant concerns.

    Furthermore, technology is also facilitating greater access to justice, especially through platforms that enable online dispute resolution (ODR). This is a significant shift in the way legal services are being delivered, and I think it will greatly benefit sectors such as arbitration, where parties can engage in virtual hearings, consultations, and settlements. From a strategic perspective, these technological advancements allow legal practitioners to work more effectively, handle higher volumes of work, and cater to a more global client base.

    While technology will drive efficiency, I firmly believe that the need for human judgment, creativity, and expertise will always be central to legal practice. The ability to navigate complex regulatory environments, understand nuanced legal principles, and build persuasive arguments for arbitration cases or regulatory disputes cannot be replaced by technology. As such, the evolving role of lawyers will likely involve leveraging these technological tools to enhance their practice while continuing to hone traditional legal skills.

    What advice would you give to aspiring legal professionals looking to build a career similar to yours, particularly those interested in litigation, arbitration, and constitutional law? Are there specific areas of law or skills they should focus on to thrive in today’s legal environment? Additionally, could you recommend resources to help them stay informed about the latest legal developments?

    It’s heartening to see the competitiveness and acceptability Law as a profession has achieved. It is also wonderful to see the diverse avenues available to law graduates these days, as compared to the time when I went to law school. But I believe with respect to some aspects of the profession, the more things change, the more they remain the same. This is especially true for litigation as a preferred choice of career for young legal professionals. I believe an inherent interest and love for the Law, coupled with deep reserves of patience is an absolute essential if choosing to pursue litigation. 

    A career in litigation is like a 5-set tennis match. It is important to remember that it is a marathon and not a sprint. To win, one needs to invest time and hard work, while keeping in sight the larger picture. While you may win or lose a particular point, you have to move on and continue to play the next point to win the game, the set and the championship. Similarly, each brief that a client comes to you with, each order, favourable or adverse is a lesson and the building block for sharpening your skills and honing  your court craft. The learning never stops. Recently, Mr. Sidharth Luthra, Senior Advocate, happened to see me during arguments. He met me after and gave me very sound advice – the outcome of a matter is a combination of many factors, and it does not matter whether you win or lose. The important thing is to be on top of the matter and give your best. Hence, one must remain committed to putting in the hard yards and give your best shot at every juncture. 

    Another advice I would like to give to aspiring legal professionals is to initially try and gather as much varied experience as possible. In the initial years it is better to be a jack of all trades. Many young law graduates these days on being asked what their preferred career trajectory is, tend to answer that they would like to pursue a full-time career in one field of law such as arbitration, intellectual property, technology law, etc. While an interest in a specific field of law and clarity in the early years is great, however, the legal arena is ever-expanding. For a well-rounded development as a good litigator, it is advisable to have a general approach so as to learn as much as possible. 

    As for keeping oneself informed, about the latest legal developments, there is no dearth of information, especially in the era of social media and dedicated portals that update latest legal pronouncements and developments in real time. That being said, one must guard against falling prey to the tendency of the “3-second attention span” and scrolling culture. The idea is not only to be aware but well-informed. Therefore, it is important to read, not just the news flashes but the very judgments and reflect on the same. I am somewhat old school that way and have found in my experience that books and commentaries are great allies when wanting to understand the evolution of the law, and achieve greater clarity on principles of law.

    With your career balancing both high-profile legal work and professional responsibilities, how do you manage your work-life balance? What strategies or practices help you maintain personal growth and stay motivated to excel in such a demanding and fast-paced field?

    Managing work-life balance in a demanding career requires a combination of personal discipline and regular self-reflection. The hard truth is, the practise of law is not for the faint-hearted. Personally, the concept of work-life balance has eluded me throughout the better part of my career. That being said, court vacations provide a welcome opportunity for respite, offering precious time to reconnect with family and loved ones. Beyond these breaks, I believe it is essential to cultivate at least one hobby or interest outside of work. My mother encouraged me to take up gardening. Spending time in my garden is my favourite way to destress. I also find travel rejuvenating. It helps to reset perspectives and makes returning to the demands of the daily rigmarole more manageable. I also try to catch up on reading. Not just the law books, but good old literature. Sports is also a great way to get centered. I love to swim, play tennis and practice yoga. I try to be regular, even on working days. I recently picked up ballroom dancing. While one’s career is undeniably important, it is only with a healthy body and a healthy mind that one can give their best.

    Get in touch with Aditi Tripathi –

  • “Laws are always changing and something new or the other is coming up always which will keep you on your toes irrespective of however many years you may have spent in this profession.” – Amrita Panda,  Advocate-on-Record at Supreme Court of India.

    “Laws are always changing and something new or the other is coming up always which will keep you on your toes irrespective of however many years you may have spent in this profession.” – Amrita Panda,  Advocate-on-Record at Supreme Court of India.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    With over a decade of experience in the legal field, what initially inspired you to pursue a career in law? How did your time at National University of Juridical Sciences, Kolkata, influence your understanding of the law and shape your career path?

    In school I used to love reading Perry Mason and John Grisham. Perry Mason navigating through difficult witnesses with elan and convincing the jury of the innocence of his client caught the fancy of a dreamy eyed teenager, and thus, with no family background in the subject I went to write the NUJS entrance exam. In college I actively participated in tons of moot court competitions and the adrenaline rush I got every time I was bombarded with questions from moot court judges (who are never kind!), made me realise that litigation was my calling. Every single internship of mine was a litigation internship and quite a few with Mr. Satish L. Maneshinde, Sr. Adv. in Bombay who in my eyes, was and still is, the real life Perry Mason. 

    My time at NUJS widened my horizons and gave me an insight into perspectives about litigation in other parts of the country, and then also globally. Ranking as one of the top institutions for law, NUJS saw a lot of talent from across the country. Being exposed to such versatile talent taught me to become open-minded not just about the profession, but also about life in general. And then of course the exposure I received from participating in several moot court competitions and internships, ultimately helped me realise my calling and shaped my career path. 

    After completing your law degree, you chose to pursue an LL.M. in Commercial and International Dispute Settlement at Queen Mary University in London. What drew you to this specific area of specialization, and how did your experience there differ from studying in India? Can you share some memorable experiences from that time?

    From my second year in college, I started participating in leading moot court competitions in international commercial arbitration. So my exposure to the subject started as early as second year of college, and now about 60% of my practise is commercial arbitration. Arbitration is a relatively new subject, at least in India which has grown at a jet speed in the last decade. In India we learnt the foundation of the subject, its origin in India, etc, but I chose the course at Queen Mary, University of London since it offered a very practise-centric course. We were taught by leading practitioners in the field and about 80% of our evaluation was hands-on training by the doyens in the field globally. While participating in the Vis East Moot we had read articles authored by Prof. Julian Lew and Constantine Partasides who were demi gods in the field for me. So imagine being taught by them at Queen Mary where they would teach a topic through real life experiences and anecdotes. My time at Queen Mary gave me the assurance I needed to remain in practise. 

    What motivated you to start your own practice, and what were the key challenges you encountered in those early stages? How did those formative experiences help shape the direction of your career? Additionally, how has your role as an AOR influenced your professional journey?

    Being a first generation lawyer, litigation was of course no cake walk, and that too in Delhi where I started in 2012, in a city that was absolutely new to me. I was fortunate to be mentored by Mr. Rajshekhar Rao, Sr. Adv. during my initial days in Delhi. After my time in his chamber, Debesh, my husband, pushed to start my own practise. With his support and encouragement, I decided to take the plunge, and since then I have not looked back. Setting up a practise in Delhi has been an uphill task, but I am blessed with very good seniors and mentors who have always looked out for me. I have also had very supportive clients who have been the best reference for me, and slowly yet steadily I managed to establish a very very tiny foothold in this city. 

    Becoming an AoR in 2022 was a good decision. I feel the AoR badge opens up more avenues, especially as a first-generation lawyer. You become acceptable and eligible for certain empanelments as an AoR and in Supreme Court, as young counsel, if you are arguing your own brief, judges definitely acknowledge that. 

    When preparing for complex cases before the Supreme Court of India, what is your approach? What has been one of the most interesting cases you’ve handled, and how did you approach it especially if you could share insights that might benefit young readers?

    Usually by the time a matter reaches the Supreme Court, it has been through several rounds of litigation and all possible issues would have been thrashed multiple times in the Courts below. In such a scenario, identifying that one point which will convince the Supreme Court to interfere in the matter, is the real challenge. 

    In 2017 – 18 I was doing a Civil Appeal before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India which was arising from the Satyam Scam issue and it involved interpretation of SEBI’s Insider Trading Regulations. This matter involved analysing the securities law aspect as well as connect criminal law aspects arising from the alleged transactions. This was probably one of the most challenging, yet rewarding matters in my career so far, not just because of the complexities involved in the matter, but also because final arguments before the Supreme Court took place in this matter happened in about 2 weeks after I had delivered my son. Because of the complexities involved, we were not in a position to take adjournments in the matter and having prepared the matter with so much labour with leading senior advocates over the last few months, I was reluctant to give up on this matter. 

    Ten days after closing final arguments in the matter, the judgment by the Supreme Court has probably been a victory in my career that I cherish the most purely because I know the kind of odds I faced not just dealing with the complex legal issues within a very short timeframe, but also dealing with my personal situation. This matter taught me that hard work is always rewarded irrespective of the odds, and if you have been dedicated with your work, the universe conspires in miraculous ways to fulfil your dreams. 

    You’ve handled numerous outstation cases across various High Courts and Tribunals throughout the country. What motivates you to take on cases beyond your local jurisdiction, and how would you describe your experience working in different courts?

    As a first generation lawyer, I always joke about the fact that I am ready to argue a matter even before a lamp-post! I was just delighted to get the opportunity to argue, the location of the Court mattered little to me. Being an outsider to Delhi, I started getting some briefs before the Calcutta High Court, Bombay High Court, etc in the initial days of my career. Gradually my practise developed in such a way that I have appeared before most high courts of the country, I have also appeared in several district courts and Tribunals outside Delhi. I feel out-station appearances gives you an insight into peculiar cultures of different courts and enriches you as a lawyer. Also, arguing matters before different high courts as a young counsel has given me recognition with judges who have later been transferred to other High Courts or the Supreme Court, and with counsels of those Courts who have thereafter referred matters to me in Delhi. 

    Given your trial experience before the Competition Commission of India, how do you see the role of the Competition Act in regulating business practices in India, and what challenges do various entities face in ensuring compliance with its provisions? 

    The Competition Commission of India has been playing a very active role in monitoring business enterprises in India irrespective of their size and spread of operations. In fact in 2023 the Hon’ble Supreme Court held that all Public Sector Undertakings also come within the purview of the Competition Act, 2002. In recent times CCI has passed ample orders and judgments in different cases in relation to the alleged anti-competitive conduct by Google. Upon coming to a finding of anti-competitive conduct, CCI is imposing large penalties on business giants like Meta. All of this I think goes on to infuse a sense of predictability and certainty in the market. With the regulator playing such a pro-active role it goes a long way in gaining the confidence of the business community and provides a secure and encouraging environment for smaller new and emerging business entities. 

    As an arbitrator appointed by the Delhi High Court, what has been one of the most challenging arbitration cases you’ve handled? In your opinion, how do you foresee the future of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) evolving, particularly with the increasing integration of technology into the legal field?

    I have been most fortunate to have been appointed as an Arbitrator by some judges of the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi. Sometimes as counsel, we do not realise the challenging task that judges shoulder day in and day out, coming prepared for so many matters and then listen to both counsels contend their sides and then arrive at a conclusion which is sound in reasoning and backed up by authorities so as to minimise the prospect of a challenge. The role as an Arbitrator is a mini trailer of what the judges do everyday and it makes you realise how difficult and daunting it can be to sit in that chair. 

    As a counsel in the latest 7 judge bench matter of the Supreme Court in the field of arbitration, I was witness to the Hon’ble Supreme Court overturning its decision of the 5 judge bench in less than a year in In Re: Interplay between Arbitration Agreements under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, and playing a pro-active role in upholding India on the global stage as the new hub for commercial arbitration. What was most stunning is that for the hearing which continued over a week, with voluminous submissions made by the stalwarts in the field, there was not a single paper in the courtroom. The room did not seem inundated with reams of paper which is what used to be the normal in every courtroom until even a few years back. All judges and counsels were relying on their respective devices and the matter continued seamlessly over a week. I think a silver lining at the end of Covid 19 has been the openness to technology which has surely made the legal fraternity more environment friendly. 

    Representing doctors in matters related to the constitutional validity of the West Bengal Clinical Establishments Act must have been a demanding experience. Could you elaborate on your approach to the case and the challenges you encountered while navigating the constitutional aspects of the matter?

    Considering that public health and medical profession as a field are adequately regulated by parliamentary legislations being an Entry under List 1 of the Constitution, this Act had been challenged on various grounds as being repugnant to parliamentary legislations and being violative of the Constitution. Being a daughter of a practising doctor, this matter was more of a personal matter for me. When a writ petition had been filed before the Hon’ble Supreme Court by the group of doctors, the Supreme Court sent the matter back to the High Court for the High Court to take a preliminary look at the constitutionality of the Act. Before Calcutta High Court the constitutional aspects were very well appreciated, the enactment much watered down and in fact, as on date in fact the Hon’ble High Court has passed several orders where the powers of the Regulatory Commission under the Act has been significantly watered down and several Orders and Advisories passed by that Commission are repeatedly quashed by the Hon’ble High Court on inter alia on grounds of being unconstitutional. 

    With your diverse roles as an AOR, Arbitrator, and counsel in high-stakes constitutional cases, what do you believe is the most important quality law students should develop to succeed in the legal profession? Additionally, can you recommend resources that would help them stay updated on the latest legal developments?

    I think the most important asset in litigation is patience. I have seen many talented legal minds quit the profession due to lack of patience. This profession is a slow burner, so you will always have a slow start. But if you have the patience and the family support to struggle through the initial few years, this profession is also very rewarding. I don’t think you can ever feel that you have reached your peak in the profession. Laws are always changing and something new or the other is coming up always which will keep you on your toes irrespective of however many years you may have spent in this profession. I keep joking that the Supreme Court is probably one place where you will find the fittest grey hair running around like teenagers all day. In my early years in the profession, I had the opportunity to assist Mr. Fali Nariman, Sr. Adv. in a few matters. The twinkle in his eyes every time we would find an argument to counter the other side was no different from a 5 year old who has just figured out all the pieces in his jigsaw puzzle. 

    One thing I always keep learning from the younger lawyers is the ease with which they embrace technology. I have benefitted hugely by gracing technology into my daily work life, but I can also say that it would have been impossible without the tutoring from my very able younger colleagues in the office. These days all resources are available online and now with AI coming in, soon legal research will probably become even easier than what it is now. But a word of caution for younger lawyers, to always verify content generated by AI. At least till now AI has not been able to replace the human excellence and inter-personal nature which I think is the bedrock of our profession. 

    Given the intense nature of your professional commitments, how do you manage to maintain a balance between your professional responsibilities and personal life?

    I don’t think it is possible to balance the two. I feel we are always juggling between professional responsibilities and personal life and struggling to ensure that the ball does not drop. At all points of time, you need to prioritise one over the other and make a decision which you can justify, at least to your conscience. As a mother to a 6 year old, I realise the importance of being present for my son. But what I am most grateful for is that he realises that his mother is a happier person, hence a happier mother (who he finds easier to mould!) if she has had a good day at work. Our profession allows us to take vacations at fairly regular intervals and luckily most of our vacations coincide with school holidays giving us ample opportunity to enjoy quality time with family. That is how we manage to keep the circus going! 

    Get in touch with Amrita Panda –

  • “What keeps me drawn to the profession of Law is how justice is truly poetic, not just in its finality but also in the journey that it takes to get there.” – Dr. Divyadeep Chaturvedi, Advocate on Record at Supreme Court of India.

    “What keeps me drawn to the profession of Law is how justice is truly poetic, not just in its finality but also in the journey that it takes to get there.” – Dr. Divyadeep Chaturvedi, Advocate on Record at Supreme Court of India.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    With your broad experience as an AOR in the legal field, what first inspired you to pursue a career in law, and what continues to ignite your passion for it today?

    The law was not my first love, but like all great romances, it found me when I least expected it. Growing up in a small town, I saw justice as a distant grand ideal, often out of reach for those who needed it the most. At a very young age, I was able to observe and acknowledge the invisible establishments that do not allow equality to breed in society. What keeps me drawn to this profession is how justice is truly poetic, not just in its finality but also in the journey that it takes to get there. Justice, like a perfect poem, is not merely written but felt, its weight resting in the space between reason and longing. I grew into the law much like one grows into the rhythm of an unfamiliar but haunting melody. It wasn’t love at first sight, but somewhere between its Shakespearean tragedies and Wildean wit, I found my art, one that demands precision, patience and the perfect closing. 

    After completing your law degree, you went on to pursue a Master of Laws in Advanced Studies in Public International Law, specializing in International Criminal Law, at Leiden University. What led you to choose this specific university and specialization? Could you share some highlights from that experience with our readers?

    Leiden University has a rich history in international law, and its faculty includes some of the most distinguished names in the field. My decision to specialize in International Criminal Law stemmed from my deep interest in justice beyond national borders. I developed a keen interest in the evolution of this specialised field of law that addresses mass atrocities, often referred to as “crimes of crimes”. Leiden University was therefore, the only University where I had applied for my Masters as it also offers an insight into the practical aspects of international criminal law in action aided by its proximity to most of the international criminal tribunals. One of the highlights of my time there was studying under Prof. William Schabas and Prof. Carsten Stahn who was also my thesis supervisor. The experience not only deepened my understanding of legal principles but also broadened my world view on justice and accountability.

    Early in your career, you had the opportunity to intern in various insightful environments, domestic and international. Could you reflect on some of the most memorable experiences from these internships and jobs that helped shape your understanding of the law? Are there any key lessons from that time that have stayed with you?

    Early in my career, I was fortunate to intern in diverse and intellectually stimulating environments, both in India and internationally, each shaping my understanding of the law in unique ways. Working with Mr. J.N. Mathur, Senior Advocate and then Additional Advocate General of Uttar Pradesh, exposed me to the complexities of constitutional and administrative law, while my time with Ms. Indu Malhotra, Senior Advocate at the time and who later became a Judge of the Supreme Court of India, deepened my grasp of arbitration and commercial litigation. Under the guidance of Late Mr. Pawan Sharma, erstwhile Standing Counsel (Criminal) for the State of NCT, Delhi, as well as under the guidance of Ms. Manisha Bhandari, I developed an understanding of criminal law, both at the trial and appellate stages. Beyond the courtroom experiences, I had the rare privilege of being awarded the Spic Macay Scholarship that led me to working with the Tibetan Government in Exile in Dharamshala, where I engaged with human rights and international law issues and had the profound honor of meeting His Holiness The Dalai Lama. This was also a unique and humbling experience as I stayed with the monks in H.H. The Dalai Lama’s monastery in Dharamshala during my tenure there. 

    Perhaps one of the most defining experiences of my early career was my time at the Office of the Prosecutor at the United Nations Special Tribunal for Lebanon, where I had the invaluable opportunity to contribute during a pivotal moment – the commencement of the Ayyash Trial. Being witness to the transition from the pre-trial stage to the trial stage and participating in the first day of the trial was an extraordinary learning experience, offering firsthand exposure to international criminal proceedings. These experiences collectively shaped my legal perspective, reinforcing the importance of meticulous preparation, intellectual curiosity, and a commitment to justice.

    Over the years, you’ve represented clients in landmark cases like the Nithari Killings and the IPL spot-fixing case. What were some of the distinct challenges these cases presented, and how did you approach them from a legal perspective?

    Working on cases like the Nithari Killings case and the IPL spot-fixing case reinforced a fundamental truth for me – that there are no shortcuts to thorough preparation. I first worked on the Nithari Killings case as an intern at the office of Ms. Manisha Bhandari, who was representing Mr. Moninder Singh Pandher, and over the years, I progressed from being an intern on his case to representing Mr. Pandher as an Advocate on Record in the Supreme Court of India. This case has been a continuous source of learning, and I was fortunate to be led and guided by Mr. R.S. Sodhi, Senior Advocate, Ms. Manisha Bhandari, and Mr. Omkar Shrivastava, who not only allowed me to be part of their defense team but also taught me how to navigate a high-intensity, high-stakes matter. One of the greatest challenges in this case was the media and public’s tendency to arrive at unfounded conclusions long before the courts rendered their verdicts. Managing the crumbling spirits of a client who had spent years in jail, awaiting justice, was another formidable challenge. Jail visits during such a prolonged litigation are emotionally taxing, as one cannot help but feel for the client who loses hope with each passing day. The slow churn of justice, especially in death sentence cases, is a heavy burden. Each passing year is not just time lost but a test of endurance, where hope flickers like a candle in the wind, struggling to stay alight.

    You’ve been deeply committed to pro bono work, advocating for marginalized communities. What motivates you to focus on these vulnerable groups, and how do you manage balancing this crucial work with high-profile criminal cases?

    Justice, to me, is not just about legal arguments or courtroom victories. It is about who gets to be heard. Too often, the most vulnerable are the least represented. Their stories are lost in a system that moves too fast for those without power. My pro bono work is driven by a simple belief that access to justice should not depend on privilege. Balancing this with high-profile cases is not a challenge but a responsibility. The law is at its best when it serves everyone, not just those who can afford it. And if I have the skills and opportunity to make that balance possible, then that is exactly what I must do. 

    Criminal law is a constantly shifting field. How do you stay updated on recent developments and emerging trends, particularly in cases related to white-collar crimes or cybercrimes?

    The law is a living, breathing entity, constantly evolving to meet the demands of an ever-changing world, and to stay ahead in the dynamic realm of criminal law, especially in areas like white-collar crimes and cybercrimes, one must embrace learning not just as a practice but as a discipline of vigilance. It is not enough to master how the law may be used. One must also understand how it is misused, manipulated, and twisted to serve those who seek to undermine justice. For instance, in cases involving unscrupulous elements, such as the land mafia, the challenge is not merely legal but systemic, as the police machinery is too often found to be not just complicit but, at times, an extension of the very forces the law is meant to curb. To be effective, one must stay immersed in legislative developments, judicial pronouncements, and global trends, ensuring that the law is wielded as a scalpel against injustice rather than a shield for those who corrupt it.

    Passing the Advocate-on-Record (AOR) exam is no small feat. What aspects of the exam did you find the most challenging, and what strategies or preparations helped you succeed in this prestigious exam?

    The AOR exam is an arduous test, demanding not only a deep reservoir of legal knowledge but also the ability to think critically and apply the law with precision. Its true challenge lies in the depth of one’s understanding of the principles laid down by the Supreme Court. There is no room for superficiality. My approach was rooted in disciplined reading, where I meticulously analyzed leading judgments, unraveling their nuances to grasp the core principles. Drafting, however, is a skill honed over time and refined through constant practice. Some of the most valuable lessons in Supreme Court drafting come not just from the theoretical understanding of the structure of a draft, but from the process of eliminating and curing defects, ensuring that files are cleared for listing by the registry. Ultimately, success in this exam is not just about intellect, but about practice, perseverance, and the invaluable experience gained along the way.

    Outside of law, you’re passionate about poetry, music, and surfing. How do these creative pursuits influence your personal development and help you maintain a balance in managing the demanding nature of your legal profession?

    Poetry, for me, is a way of making sense of the world. It is where I find my voice beyond the courtroom, where I explore life not through statutes but through metaphor and rhythm. Law, much like poetry, allows for interpretation in the face of ambiguity.

    Music is another language by itself. As a DJ, I know that a well-placed beat can shift an entire room’s energy, just as the right argument, delivered at the right moment, can turn the tide of a case. Mixing music is an art of timing, of intuition, of knowing when to hold back and when to let go. It is a lesson that applies just as much to advocacy.

    And then there’s surfing. The ocean is the greatest teacher of all. It humbles you. No matter how skilled you are, the waves have the final say. It teaches patience, resilience, and the art of surrender. You can’t fight the sea. You learn to move with it and to respect its rhythm. In many ways, law is the same. You don’t control justice, but you learn to navigate its currents, to read its shifting tides, to time your movements with precision. Each of these pursuits ground me and add balance to what happens to be a highly stressful profession. 

    What advice would you offer to young law students or aspiring lawyers, particularly those interested in criminal litigation, who are hoping to follow a path similar to yours?

    Be relentless in your pursuit of knowledge, but never lose sight of the people behind the cases. Litigation is not just about statutes and precedents, it is also about understanding human behavior, motivations and social realities. Read voraciously, observe experienced lawyers in court, and take on challenging cases even when they seem daunting. Most importantly, swear by the thumb rule – “when in doubt, ask.” One must not hesitate to seek guidance when in need of it. 

    Get in touch with Dr. Divyadeep Chaturvedi –

  • “My motivation stems from a desire to make a tangible difference through my work. Every case is an opportunity to advocate for justice, contribute to governance, and create a positive impact.” – Amod Kumar Bidhuri, Advocate On Record at Supreme Court Of India.

    “My motivation stems from a desire to make a tangible difference through my work. Every case is an opportunity to advocate for justice, contribute to governance, and create a positive impact.” – Amod Kumar Bidhuri, Advocate On Record at Supreme Court Of India.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    What initially inspired you to pursue a career in law? Were there specific factors that shaped your decision?

    The decision to pursue law was driven by a confluence of personal experiences and values. Coming from a family where integrity and public service were paramount, I grew up watching my father, Chaudhary Veer Singh, uphold honesty and credibility in every aspect of life. His example instilled in me a desire to pursue a career that could make a meaningful impact on society.

    During my tenure as Executive Counsellor in the Delhi University Students’ Union (2003–2004), I encountered the real-world challenges of governance and conflict resolution.I saw firsthand how law plays a pivotal role in addressing grievances and maintaining order. Advocating for students’ rights and negotiating with authorities underscored the importance of the law as a tool for empowerment. These formative experiences, coupled with a desire to address societal inequities, solidified my commitment to the legal profession. I realised that law is not just a profession but a tool for creating meaningful change and that realisation became the foundation of my career.

    What pivotal moments helped develop your legal knowledge and skills early on? Did you face any significant challenges?

    Working with seasoned lawyer Sh Charan Singh Verma in District Court, Saket was what laid the foundation of my career but the most pivotal moment in my career was joining the cChambers of Advocate-on-Record Ankur Prakash in Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. His mentorship was instrumental in shaping my understanding of Supreme Court practice. Under his guidance, I learned the art of drafting pleadings, including special leave petitions, writ petitions, and counter-affidavits. His insistence on precision and thorough research helped me develop a strong foundation in procedural law.

    A particularly defining experience was assisting him in a complex constitutional matter that required interpreting conflicting statutes. Through his mentorship, I gained not only technical skills but also the confidence to handle high-pressure situations. Challenges during this period included managing tight deadlines and navigating the intricacies of Supreme Court practice. However, these experiences laid the groundwork for my future success as an independent practitioner.

    What prompted you to establish your own practice, and what initial challenges did you face?

    After years of learning under my senior/ mentor I felt a strong desire to create my own professional identity. Working with mentors like Ankur Prakash gave me the skills and confidence to start my practice. I wanted to take ownership of my career and build a legacy of trust and excellence in the legal field. Establishing my practice allowed me to work on cases that aligned with my values and aspirations.

    The initial challenges were significant—building a client base, gaining recognition in a competitive environment, and managing operational responsibilities were all daunting. However, the lessons I learned under my mentors proved invaluable. For example, in one of my early independent cases—a property dispute involving multiple parties—I applied the negotiation skills and strategic planning techniques I had observed during my time with  my mentor. Successfully resolving the case helped establish my reputation and brought in more clients.

    Could you share an example of a complex case you handled and how you resolved it successfully?

    A particularly challenging case involved representing a government body in a constitutional matter where the validity of a state policy was questioned. Opposing counsel argued that the policy violated fundamental rights, making the case both high-stakes and politically sensitive.

    Drawing on years of my experience with Ankur Prakash, I approached the case with meticulous preparation. I analysed the legislative history of the policy, collaborated with subject-matter experts, and prepared arguments that balanced individual rights with the policy’s public interest objectives. By presenting clear and well-supported arguments, I was able to secure a favourable judgment for my client. This case demonstrated the importance of combining legal expertise with strategic thinking and reinforced my belief in the power of collaboration.

    What are your responsibilities as a Panel Lawyer for the State of Rajasthan and NBCC? What cases do you typically represent?

    As a Panel Lawyer for the State of Rajasthan, I handle constitutional challenges, criminal  & civil appeals, and administrative disputes. These cases often require balancing the state’s interests with broader public welfare considerations. For NBCC, my responsibilities include managing commercial disputes, advising on contractual obligations, and ensuring compliance with regulatory frameworks.

    My responsibilities include drafting pleadings, representing clients in the Supreme Court and providing legal advice on important issues. These roles require me to balance legal acumen with an understanding of policy implications. Ensuring that my clients interests are effectively represented in critical matters. These roles demand not only legal acumen but also strategic foresight, qualities I developed through years of experience and mentorship.

    What motivates you to stay focused and driven, and how do you maintain a balance between work and personal life?

    My motivation stems from a desire to make a tangible difference through my work. Every case is an opportunity to advocate for justice, contribute to governance, and create a positive impact. My long-term aspirations—to become one of India’s leading lawyers and a respected political figure—keep me focused on continuous improvement.

    Balancing professional and personal life is challenging but essential. I prioritise spending time with my family and engaging in activities that refresh and inspire me. Personal time with family and moments of reflection are essential for maintaining perspective and energy. This balance not only keeps me grounded but also enhances my professional effectiveness.

    How has your role as an Advocate-on-Record shaped your approach to handling complex matters in the Supreme Court?

    Being an Advocate-on-Record has deepened my understanding of the procedural and substantive nuances of Supreme Court practice, it also demands accountability and precision. Handling cases before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India has sharpened my ability to navigate procedural complexities and distill extensive case records into compelling arguments. 

    My time of association with Ankur Prakash prepared me for this responsibility by exposing me to high-profile cases and teaching me the importance of precision and accountability.

    One unique challenge has been dealing with cases involving conflicting judicial precedents. These require innovative legal reasoning and persuasive articulation to guide the court toward a favourable interpretation. My approach involves detailed research, crafting concise submissions and anticipating questions from the bench to ensure comprehensive preparedness.

    What advice would you offer to young lawyers starting out, especially those interested in both criminal and civil law?

    I encourage young lawyers to focus on building a strong foundation in legal principles and honing their research skills. A criminal and civil law require different approaches – criminal law emphasises procedural precision, while civil law demands analytical reasoning and negotiation skills. Networking with peers and senior advocates is essential for gaining insights and opportunities.

    Additionally, I cannot overstate the value of mentorship. My own experience with Ankur Prakash taught me that having a seasoned professional to guide and challenge you can accelerate your growth and open doors to new opportunities. I also advise young lawyers to embrace challenges, maintain ethical integrity and cultivate resilience. Success in the legal profession is a marathon, not a sprint and consistent effort over time is the key to growth which requires perseverance, and early struggles are stepping stones to long-term achievements.

    How do you prepare for high-pressure legal proceedings, and what strategies do you use for effective advocacy?

    Preparation begins with a comprehensive review of the case file and identifying key issues. I invest time in drafting concise submissions, researching precedents and anticipating counter arguments. Revising /rehearsing my submissions ensures clarity and confidence during hearings.

    In high pressure situations, adaptability and presence of mind are critical. I focus on engaging with the court, addressing questions directly and presenting logical well structured arguments and maintaining composure. I view high pressure situations as opportunities to demonstrate my expertise and adaptability. Effective advocacy, in my view, is about crafting arguments that resonate with the court while addressing the clients objectives. 

    Get in touch with Amod Kumar Bidhuri –

  • “I think multi-jurisdictional careers are going to be the norm. It is very doable and in fact, some jurisdictions in the US, such as California, enable foreign trained lawyers to apply to the Bar without further education.” – Chidambara Sastry Sarva, Dual Qualified Lawyer and Advocate at the High Courts of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh. 

    “I think multi-jurisdictional careers are going to be the norm. It is very doable and in fact, some jurisdictions in the US, such as California, enable foreign trained lawyers to apply to the Bar without further education.” – Chidambara Sastry Sarva, Dual Qualified Lawyer and Advocate at the High Courts of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh. 

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Reflecting on your extensive experience of over a decade, what initially inspired you to pursue a career in law, and what was your journey like during law school at NLU Jodhpur?

    I’ve always been fascinated by how the law shapes societies and protects individual rights. Growing up, dinner conversations always revolved around legal and political issues. My father’s stories about his day at Court or a case often left an impression on me. However, it was not until Class 12, that I finally decided to pursue law. Preparing for the Common Entrance Test with Mrs. Sheela Reddy, who trained a handful of students pro bono, cemented my interest in law. She followed a Socratic method of teaching which I came to appreciate even more when I was at UC Berkeley. She would often quip that training with her, we had already covered all the subjects that would be covered till the third year of law school. She was not entirely wrong. 

    Choosing NLU Jodhpur was a turning point—it was challenging, exciting, and rewarding in equal measure. The curriculum was rigorous, and opportunities like mooting and journal editing pushed me to think critically and hone my legal acumen. Brief Writing for Moot Court Competitions gave me an opportunity to really experiment not just with legal writing but also with legal research. Although, when I look at those Briefs now, they seem silly, they have played a huge role in exposing me to various facets of advocacy. I was always clear that I wanted to pursue Litigation, probably because that is all that I had seen growing up. 

    Having completed your LL.M. at UC Berkeley, California, what led you to choose this institution and specialize in areas such as Constitutional Law and International Commercial Arbitration? How did the teaching methodology at Berkeley differ from what you experienced in India?

    Berkeley popularly is known for its IP program. However, I wanted to study with Professors like Erwin Chemrinsky and Neil Popovich who are well known in the fields of Constitutional Law and International Commercial Arbitration respectively. During my time at Berkeley I also opted for some IP course which focused on Federal Litigation which helped me a great deal when I later worked in the US. One Senior Advocate I worked with used to refer to Constitutional Law as the divine law. I agree with him. For me the genesis of any legal system flows from its constitution and constitutional theory. Even during law school, constitutional philosophy appealed to me a lot. The socratic approach of dissecting seminal Constitutional Law cases at Berkeley, gave me new insights into constitutional philosophy and the critical approach to  reading any case law. I also had the opposite to explore the field of Administrative Law, an offshoot of Constitutional law during my time at Berkeley. Comparing the evolution of Administrative Law in India and the US gave me a new perspective about how Indian Courts dealt with this subject. The compare and contrast approach along with the socratic approach, I believe has a lasting impact on anyone who studies as such institutions. The exposure the Institution offered is unparalleled. The multi national perspective you get to experience aids one in thinking from different perspectives as well.

    As a dual-qualified lawyer in both India and California, how has this qualification shaped your practice? How do you handle multi-jurisdictional disputes, particularly those involving private international law?

    Being qualified in both jurisdictions allows me to work seamlessly on matters in both jurisdictions and also cross-border matters, especially in cases involving overlapping jurisdictions. Like Courts in India, most Courts in the US have also gone digital during the COVID-19 pandemic. That change has further helped me appear virtually in matters in the US. Doing cases in both jurisdictions simultaneously offers me a unique way to compare both the systems, the laws, the manner of interpretation, and the approach. This has helped me in doing multi-jurisdictional matters as well. I am able to anticipate how different aspects could play out in the two jurisdictions.

    Managing each multi-jurisdictional dispute is unique. For instance, in a corruption case involving Indian and foreign entities, understanding the nuances of both legal systems was crucial. Managing such disputes often involves coordinating with subject experts, local counsel, and understanding the  differing legal frameworks. One has to anticipate how any stance taken in one jurisdiction may impact the other jurisdictions. 

    In your litigation practice in India, you’ve worked on intricate cases in Administrative Law, Company Law, and Constitutional Law. Could you share an example of a particularly challenging case and how you navigated it?

    I was fortunate to work on a few white collar offences and was successful in defending the independent directors of the Company. However, as an offshoot of the main offence, the SFIO had initiated proceedings before the NCLT against all the directors. Ultimately, it took us close to 14 years to have the matter resolved. All through this period, the case was heard by different benches of NCLT – some time in New Delhi and then in Hyderabad. Navigating the voluminous record running into several thousand pages each time we had to argue the matter and then to have the matter placed before a different bench was initially disheartening. Several other directors, considering the time it was taking, admitted their guilt and agreed for the punishment. However, we advised our client not to take such a plea and to fight it out. Ultimately, our client was the only one who was successful in defending the charges and the case was dismissed against him. The case was a learning experience not just on the skill of advocacy but also on the overlapping legal issues between criminal law and Company law. 

    Transitioning from the Indian legal system to the U.S. must have presented its challenges. What were the key differences in litigation practices between the two systems, and what were the most difficult aspects of passing the California Bar exam?

    While I noticed a lot of similarities between the two systems, the biggest difference I noticed is the approach to Litigation. All the stake holders in a dispute, including the Lawyers and Judges always try to settle the matter either before going to court or before trial begins. The attempt to settle disputes is not limited to civil matters but extends to criminal matters as well in the form of plea bargains. The other aspect that I noticed is the time it takes to get a dispute / case heard. There have been occasions where we would complete a trial in half a day and the judgement is also delivered immediately. 

    The most difficult part about the Bar exam, especially for foreign lawyers, is to be able to study for 14-16 hours a day for at least 50-60 days. That is the amount of time it takes to go over the 14 odd subjects that you get tested on. Most courses for the preparation are designed keeping in view this requirement. If one were to put in the long hours without giving into exhaustion, then clearing the exam is not that difficult. I think lawyers with some amount of practical training fare better in the exam because they are able to compare and contrast the systems to make it easier to remember a large amount of information.

    In both the corruption case and shareholder dispute you handled, you faced complex, multi-jurisdictional issues. How do you manage the intersection of domestic and international law in such cases?

    These cases require a fine balance between understanding the specifics of domestic law and the broader implications of international treaties or foreign regulations. In one of those instances, we had to attend court proceedings in three different jurisdictions carefully monitoring the stand being presented to avoid adverse results in any other jurisdiction. Trying to coordinate with lawyers from two other jurisdictions was very enriching in the sense that it gave us an opportunity to understand how they viewed and dealt with such disputes. Sometimes, the discussions would see no end as we differed on the strategy to be adopted in each jurisdiction. Thankfully those were very few instances.

    Can you elaborate on your role and the specific challenges you face while representing institutions like the Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanam (TTD) before the Andhra Pradesh High Court?

    While representing institutions like TTD a nuanced approach is required that takes into account the complexities of the case and the specific context of religious institutions. One of the primary challenges is balancing the legal aspects of the case with the deep religious sentiments of the millions of devotees associated with TTD. 

    When addressing legal issues, it’s crucial to be sensitive to the cultural and spiritual importance of TTD, as any decisions made can significantly impact the faith and emotions of the community. This requires not only legal expertise but also an understanding of the social and religious dynamics at play.

    Additionally, I focus on looking at the larger picture. This means considering the long-term implications of legal decisions, not just for TTD, but for the broader community and the heritage it represents. It’s important to advocate for solutions that not only resolve immediate legal challenges but also promote the greater good and ensure the continued functioning of the institution in a way that respects and upholds the values of the devotees.

    Overall, navigating these challenges requires a careful balance of legal strategy, cultural sensitivity, and a commitment to the wider implications of our work.

    What advice would you give to law students and professionals who aspire to build a career like yours, with a focus on international practice and successfully clearing the California Bar Exam?

    I believe that going forward there would be a globalisation of the legal industry. Lawyers with training in other jurisdictions are needed in all fields of law. For instance, when we represent Indian origin clients in the US, the client and the lawyers there prefer to have an Indian lawyer on the team. This would ensure a more robust representation for the client. I think multi-jurisdictional careers are going to be the norm. It is very doable and in fact some jurisdictions in the US enable foreign trained lawyers to apply to the Bar without further education. California is one such jurisdiction. 

    For those preparing for the California Bar, practice is key—focus on understanding patterns and writing concise, analytical answers. Legal writing is what most candidates find difficult.

    With your numerous professional commitments, how do you manage to maintain a balance between your personal life and your demanding legal practice?

    Balancing a demanding legal practice with personal life is indeed very difficult. One of the key strategies I employ is setting clear boundaries. This means making a conscious effort to separate work from personal time, ensuring that I dedicate specific hours to my legal practice while also carving out time for my personal life and family.

    Additionally, I maximize my time in court. Court appearances can be time-consuming, but I use that time efficiently. By preparing thoroughly and organizing my schedule around court dates, I can minimize the amount of time spent on related tasks outside of court, which helps free up more time for my personal commitments.

    Overall, while the challenge of maintaining this balance is significant, being disciplined about boundaries and strategic about my court-related time helps me manage both my professional responsibilities and personal life more effectively.

    Get in touch with Chidambara Sastry Sarva –

  • “My takeaway from my journey in the field of law has been to be patient, to keep up the hard-work, and to know that every opportunity and every win or loss is a golden ticket to learn something new.” – Shraddha Deshmukh, Advocate-on-Record at Supreme Court of India.

    “My takeaway from my journey in the field of law has been to be patient, to keep up the hard-work, and to know that every opportunity and every win or loss is a golden ticket to learn something new.” – Shraddha Deshmukh, Advocate-on-Record at Supreme Court of India.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    You completed your Bachelor in Civil Law at Brasenose College, University of Oxford. Was law always the career path you envisioned for yourself and what motivated you to pursue law as a profession?

    My tryst with law was accidental. I had lost my Civics book, a day prior to my final exams in school. My father sat me down with a copy of the Constitution of India and spoke about Keshvananda Bharti. Whilst reading through the charter on Fundamental rights and duties, I came across the wide powers of the courts as enforcers and protectors of rights and therefore, by default, the duty of the lawyers to bring causes to justice. That was it! Dreamy eyed about the change and difference that lawyers can make to society (of course also influenced by Alan Shore from Boston Legal), I decided to pursue Law as my profession.

    Early in your career, you worked at several prestigious law firms before transitioning to work with Senior advocates like Mr. Akhil Sibal and Mr. K.K. Venugopal. How would you describe the cultural differences between these two environments, and how did you adapt to each?

    There are definite distinctions and also certain similarities in the working culture of a Law Firm when compared to a Counsel’s Chamber. 

    Starting with the distinction first, at a law firm, you are exposed to direct client dealings, extensive drafting and working with many counsels and senior counsels. You are involved with filing and getting matters listed, billing and preparing recording letters for the client. 

    On the other hand, working in a Senior Advocate’s chamber gives you a balcony view into the mind of the lawyer- her/his quirks, style of presentation, method of preparation and the ultimate act of reading the law and convincing the bench with arguments. Preparation of briefing notes involved detailed churning of legal research with factual analysis.

    Coming to the similarity– at both places, you are expected to work hard and stay abreast with the law and the legal system. The working hours don’t get better at either, and you learn and gain immensely at both!

    Therefore, whilst the scope of work for the junior may differ in a Law Firm when compared to a Senior’s chamber, the expectations from her/him to give their best- remains the same.

    Having worked closely with prominent Senior Advocates like Mr. K.K. Venugopal, what are some of the most valuable lessons you’ve learned from them, and how have those lessons shaped your approach to legal practice?

    Working with a venerated counsel like Mr. Venugopal- who is an institution in himself, was a guiding factor in me truly coming to love the law and understand the rigours and discipline that are basic tenets for a lawyer. Boss, as we all call him in his chamber, taught us that there are no shortcuts to success. Even today, whilst preparing for a matter, he refers to judgments and makes copious notes, with the same curiosity as he would have if he were reading it for the first time, despite having argued many of them himself and having applied them in several instances. During arguments, Boss could ask any question from the briefing junior, which was born from the facts stated in the file or beyond, which meant that we had to always be on top of things and be prepared for a volley of questions- sometimes tougher than what came from the bench itself. This taught us to be prepared beyond the file, to ask questions and analyse, to fact-check and to never argue on conjectures. Boss would rarely ever raise his voice at us and his disappointment was often remarked with a long sigh reverberating in a whistle, the consequence of which was far stronger than mere words. He taught us the discipline to reach court early irrespective of how late your matter was on board. He taught us to be fair and to act as an ethical officer of the court. He treats every colleague of his as an extension of his family. One instance that I will never forget was, when I was seeking a passover for him in Court as he was stuck before another bench, and the concerned Judge asked me to argue the matter instead. He came in the middle of my arguments, but patted me on my back and asked me to continue arguing and sat right next to me-that kind of encouragement to a young counsel starting out in their career meant a lot! Despite working so hard, boss also taught us to not take ourselves too seriously and to always remain curious. In his own words, he taught us that “to know that you don’t know is the beginning of knowledge.” I am truly blessed to be a part of his chamber- which has had a large part in shaping me as a lawyer. 

    Working with Mr. K.K. Venugopal on landmark cases like the Right to Privacy case must have been an enriching experience. Could you share some insights from your involvement in that case and how it has influenced your career?

    Being a part of the 9 Judge bench’s unanimous declaration of the right to privacy as a fundamental right definitely stands out for me as one of the most exhilarating experiences in my short stint as a lawyer. Days preceding and during the hearing were spent reading countless judgments, articles, international covenants, and expert views on the issue. As a student of law, partaking in thought-provoking arguments from some of the finest minds in the country- at bar and on bench, was outstanding. It exposed me to understand the many different silos that exist in the right to privacy, beyond its manifest existence in body integrity. As a counsel, I have applied the said doctrine in my matters dealing with data privacy and boundaries of authentication and digital records. We are all richer in our rights by the said decision and I couldn’t be more grateful for having been a part of this landmark case. 

    After gaining experience with top law firms and senior advocates, you made the transition to establishing your own practice. What motivated that shift, and what were some of the challenges you faced when starting your independent practice?

    Like any other counsel, I also dreamt of having my own independent practise and to put my training to task. So, after about 8 years of apprenticeship, and with a small handful of clients, I decided to take the plunge and went independent. The initial days were tough especially as the quality and quantity of work that comes to you as a fresh, off the hook, independent counsel is very different from what you may have done in the senior’s chambers or in firms. But the free time gives you an opportunity to read and update your knowledge base. Being on the panel for the Union of India at the time gave me the opportunity to work on diverse areas of law and appear in court regularly. Soon after, I was appointed as the Deputy Advocate General for the State of Chhattisgarh. As special counsel, I successfully represented the Special Task force in Rajasthan in a multi-cooperative society scam involving thousands of crores of Rupees, which added to my experience. When I look back, my takeaway has been to be patient, to keep up the hard-work, and to know that every opportunity and every win or loss is a golden ticket to learn something new. I am extremely grateful for my fears and experiences, which play a part in shaping me as a lawyer today. 

    As an Advocate on Record and now running your own practice in areas like Constitutional and Administrative Law, Arbitration, Data Protection etc. You’re clearly dealing with highly complex issues. Could you share one of the most interesting or challenging cases you’ve worked on, and how did you prepare for that case?

    A very interesting case that I recently argued was the 7 judges constitutional bench reference on the issue of sub-classification of reservation benefits to Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe seeking re-consideration of the decision in E.V. Chinnaiah v. State of Andhra Pradesh and Ors. [(2005) 1 SCC 394]. In order to justify the reversal of the earlier judgment required presenting the Hon’ble court with constituent assembly debates- to show the original intent of the constitutional framers. I argued that Compensatory discrimination, as a subset of Affirmative Action, has the preliminary goal of curbing discrimination and the ultimate goal of its eradication. I presented empirical data to show that Scheduled Caste as a group is heterogeneous in its form and acute disparity exists within the groups and treating them with the same brush of representation is antithetical to the concept of substantive equality. Several scholarly writings on the subject, such as Marc Galanter’s book-Competing Equalities: Law and the Backward Classes in India, J.H. Hutton’s book, Caste in India: Its Nature, Functions and Origins, celebrated Austrian Economist Friedrich A. Hayek’s work on the Constitution of Liberty, to name a few, came to my extensive aid. We are now in receipt of the landmark judgment, where my arguments have found mention, and which lays down the distinguished principle of sub-classification of reservation benefits as a facet of substantive equality. 

    Given the demanding nature of your work, especially your role as Counsel for the Union of India in the Supreme Court, how do you manage to maintain a work-life balance? What strategies do you use to recharge and stay passionate about law?

    I remember reading the quote somewhere that “The law is a jealous mistress and requires long and constant courtship. It is not to be won by trifling favors, but by lavish homage.” I couldn’t agree more- it takes away most of your weekends and expects you to burn the midnight oil. But the profession is also like riding a wave, some days are crazier than others-So in my free time, I love to read, spend time with my family and pursue my hobbies.  Also, the court calendar sets out long vacation periods, allowing us to travel or take time off, which for me, is the best energiser. Staying passionate about law comes from staying in tune with the changing times and also from rigorous reading and discussions. Even if I am not involved in a matter, I love watching cases being argued in court and to witness legal jurisprudence develop. Discussion with my colleagues in the office is an enriching exchange of fresh ideas. Legal conferences can also be a great venue to brainstorm and to learn from other’s experiences and discussions. 

    For young lawyers just starting out, particularly in the fields of litigation and international/domestic arbitration, what advice would you offer to help them navigate these complex areas and build a successful career?

    Young lawyers just starting out today have far more exposure and better understanding of the nuances of law and its practise, than I remember having, when I started out. The only thing that I sometimes find lacking in young lawyers is patience. I see young counsels diving into calling themselves specialists without knowing basic procedural laws. Also, whilst arguing matters in the Apex Court or doing big ticket arbitrations is a thrilling experience, learning from the ground carries you higher. Walking through the registries and learning how to get defects cured and getting matters filed and listed, to me, is as crucial as knowing how to argue a case. These learnings help you especially when you start out on your own and have to run an office and give time commitments to your client. In today’s time, being comfortable with technology is a must- both for litigation and Arbitration. Staying abreast with evolving law helps you stand out. AI based research may have made life easier, but it is crucial that the foundations are laid stronger and provisions in a statute are read before diving into research. In my opinion, perseverance, hard work and integrity are key ingredients to success for any and all. 

    Get in touch with Shraddha Deshmukh –

  • “The road to success in law is rarely quick or easy. It is a journey that is built brick by brick, requiring dedication, resilience, and a constant commitment to justice.” – Avishkar Singhvi, Advocate at Supreme Court of India and Delhi High Court.

    “The road to success in law is rarely quick or easy. It is a journey that is built brick by brick, requiring dedication, resilience, and a constant commitment to justice.” – Avishkar Singhvi, Advocate at Supreme Court of India and Delhi High Court.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Was pursuing law a deliberate choice for you, or did it evolve into your chosen career over time?

    Pursuing law was the result of an evolving journey shaped by both destiny and conscious choice. Coming from a family of legal stalwarts, I grew up immersed in the world of law. Intense debates—ranging from courtroom strategies to ethical dilemmas—were a regular feature of our dinner-table conversations. While these discussions planted a seed of curiosity, I wasn’t immediately certain that law would be my path. My early years were marked by explorations in diverse fields, from economics to business, as I searched for a career that combined intellectual stimulation with a meaningful societal impact. It was during this exploration that I realized the unique power of the law. It offered not just a way to understand the complexities of human behavior and governance but also a means to address injustice and drive positive change. 

    Your career includes training under Mr. Harish Salve in 2012 and working with Sr. Adv. Shyam Divan from 2012-2015. How did these varied experiences shape your approach to legal strategy and advocacy? What key lessons from these roles have influenced your current practice?

    Working with legal stalwarts like Mr. Harish Salve and Mr. Shyam Divan was akin to being immersed in a legal crucible—intense, demanding, and transformative. Under Mr. Salve’s mentorship, I had the privilege of witnessing some of the most intricate legal battles, including the Vodafone tax case. Watching him distill the complexities of international tax law into a compelling narrative taught me a foundational truth: advocacy is as much about storytelling as it is about precision. The ability to craft a persuasive argument lies in presenting the law as a relatable, logical story.

    With Mr. Divan, the experience was equally inspiring but with a different focus. He emphasized the ethical dimensions of advocacy, championing causes like environmental protection and public interest. His approach reinforced the idea that law isn’t just about winning but about serving a larger purpose. These formative years grounded me in the importance of not just skillful argumentation but also principled advocacy.

    In 2015, I joined Agarwal Law Associates and had the privilege of working in the High Court team under Mr. Rishi Aggarwal. This role gave me a hands-on understanding of the complete lifecycle of a case-from meticulous drafting to effective courtroom strategy. It was a masterclass in building cases from the ground up and developing the confidence to tackle complex legal issues.

    My time as Additional Standing Counsel for Government of NCT which began in 2023 has been starkly different yet an equally enriching chapter. It requires navigating the delicate balance between policy-making and legal frameworks. This role has sharpened my sense of diplomacy and pragmatism, as it often involves reconciling competing interests while staying within the boundaries of law. It has also taught me the value of adaptability—essential for a litigator handling varied and dynamic challenges.  

    While litigation demands technical expertise, it also requires understanding the human element—the psychology of clients, the mood of the courtroom, and the pulse of a judge. Recognizing these subtleties has been crucial in my practice. In essence, these varied experiences have not only shaped my approach to legal strategy and advocacy but have also instilled in me the humility to learn, the courage to innovate, and the discipline to strive for excellence every single day.

    Anyone starting off must get all different kinds of flavours before charting out their own journey either as corporate, litigating advocate or an In-house counsel. I guess it’s a matter of identifying your strengths and weaknesses and personality traits and chart upon your own journey – As they say one man’s vulgarity is another man’s lyric!!

    As the Additional Advocate General for Karnataka, you represent the state in significant legal matters before the courts. Can you share some challenges you have faced in this capacity, and what your approach is in complex constitutional or administrative matters?

    Representing a state is an overwhelming responsibility. It transcends the goal of securing legal victories and focuses on safeguarding the public interest while upholding the fundamental principles of the Constitution. Every case carries weight, but some test the limits of your expertise and commitment. Among the most challenging matters I’ve handled was an essential policy dispute that put the delicate balance between federalism and state autonomy to the test. The stakes were monumental, and the case required a comprehensive examination of constitutional provisions, a thorough study of historical jurisprudence, and an acute understanding of the potential societal and economic ripple effects our stance could create.

    In tackling such high-stakes issues, my approach is deeply rooted in preparation and collaboration. It begins with an exhaustive analysis of the legal framework, ensuring that every aspect of the matter is understood in its entirety. I place great emphasis on engaging in intense, constructive discussions with my colleagues, leveraging their perspectives to build a stronger case. Anticipation is key—I work tirelessly to predict and prepare for potential questions or arguments that may arise, whether from opposing counsel or the judiciary. 

    The stakes in such state matters are undeniably high. Yet, the challenges come with an unparalleled sense of fulfillment. Contributing to the larger public good, shaping the course of policy, and upholding the ideals of justice are not just professional achievements—they are deeply personal rewards. This is what fuels my passion and dedication to the role, even in the face of its inherent complexities and pressures.

    After gaining experience with prominent figures in the legal field, what motivated you to establish your own practice? What challenges did you face in the early stages of building your own practice?

    Starting my own practice felt like jumping off a cliff with the hope of building wings on the way down. The motivation? A burning desire to step out of the shadows and craft my own identity in the legal world. I wanted the freedom to choose my battles, shape my approach to justice, and make a meaningful impact on both public and private interests. I’ve always relished diving deep into the complexities of law, even when it meant hitting roadblocks that tested my patience and resolve.

    The early days were a whirlwind of excitement and uncertainty. Earning the trust of clients was daunting—people place their faith in your expertise, and you have to prove your worth every single day. Building a competent team was another challenge; finding individuals who shared my vision and drive took time. Then there was the steep learning curve of managing finances and the logistics of running a practice—it felt like constructing a skyscraper, laying one brick at a time with no blueprint in sight.

    But every challenge taught me something invaluable. I learned resilience, adaptability, and the power of persistence. Those early struggles also revealed the importance of collaboration, mentorship, and an unwavering commitment to excellence. Gradually, what started as a daunting endeavor evolved into a fulfilling journey. My practice became more than just a professional commitment—it became a platform to explore complex legal issues, fight for justice, and pursue both commercial and public interest work.

    In hindsight, those early challenges weren’t just obstacles; they were stepping stones. They shaped me into a more nuanced and versatile practitioner, giving me a deeper appreciation for the law and its potential to transform lives. Starting my own practice wasn’t just a career move—it was a leap of faith that helped me grow in ways I never imagined.

    As an independent private practitioner, you specialize in a range of areas such as commercial disputes, company law, IP, and insolvency matters. How do you prioritize cases across such diverse fields, and how do you manage the intricacies of each area in your practice?

    Managing a practice that spans diverse legal fields is like orchestrating a symphony—each area has its distinct tempo and complexity, but success lies in achieving harmony. Prioritizing cases depends on several factors: urgency, the potential impact on the client, and the complexity of the legal issues involved. For example, commercial disputes often require quick, strategic interventions to minimize business disruptions, whereas insolvency matters demand meticulous analysis of financial details and legal frameworks to ensure equitable outcomes.

    My approach blends specialization with adaptability. Each area brings its own challenges—intellectual property law requires creativity and a nuanced understanding of innovation, while company law involves intricate knowledge of corporate governance and compliance. The key is to immerse myself fully in the specifics of each case, tailoring my strategy to the unique demands of the matter at hand.

    To manage such a dynamic practice, I maintain a disciplined workflow. This includes leveraging the expertise of a talented team, continuously updating my knowledge of legal developments, and maintaining a client-focused approach. Staying informed about the latest rulings, legislative changes, and industry trends is non-negotiable—it allows me to provide solutions that are not just legally sound but also practically effective.

    Ultimately, this multidisciplinary approach ensures that I can navigate the intricacies of each field while delivering cohesive, impactful results for my clients. It’s this balance between specialization and versatility that defines my practice and keeps me motivated to tackle challenges across the legal spectrum.

    Your practice spans both private commercial litigation and government representation. How do you approach preparing and arguing cases for the government, especially in sensitive constitutional matters or PILs? Can you share a particularly challenging case with us?

    Preparing for government cases requires carefully balancing social, legal, and policy considerations. Take, for instance, petitions involving land acquisition and compensation issues. The core challenge lies in reconciling public interest with the protection of individual rights. These cases demand not only a deep understanding of constitutional safeguards but also a keen awareness of the socio-economic implications of governmental policies.

    In such matters, my strategy revolves around crafting nuanced arguments that respect individual rights while emphasizing the broader public good. This involves meticulously analyzing legal precedents, assessing the societal impact of proposed actions, and ensuring that the state’s position aligns with constitutional principles. These cases push you to think beyond the technicalities of law. They require engaging with the larger societal context, understanding the effects of policy decisions, and striving to find solutions that uphold justice for all stakeholders. It’s this interplay between law and societal concerns that makes such cases both challenging and profoundly fulfilling. 

    I have been privileged to contribute to causes that hold immense significance, including public health, environmental protection, and the prevention of animal cruelty. These endeavors have given me a deep sense of pride and fulfillment, allowing me to serve as a responsible and conscientious citizen of India.

    That said, public interest litigation is a powerful tool but one that is often misused. It must be exercised sparingly and only in truly exceptional circumstances where the cause is both genuine and pursued with unwavering sincerity, passion, and integrity. PILs should always prioritize the ultimate beneficiary—public interest—and must never be driven by personal motives or frivolous intentions. When used responsibly, they can be a transformative force for justice and societal progress.

    You’ve been involved in pro bono work, particularly in areas like animal welfare and environmental law. Can you discuss your motivation and how you balance such work with your high-profile commercial litigation practice?

    Pro bono work is not just a professional obligation; it is a personal calling. Causes like animal welfare and environmental conservation resonate with my belief in the law as an instrument of social change. These cases often demand creativity and passion rather than resources, and the satisfaction they bring is unparalleled. Balancing this with commercial litigation is a matter of discipline and prioritization. I view pro bono work as an opportunity to give back to society, and it fuels my sense of purpose even amidst the rigors of high-stakes litigation.

    Having worked on several high-profile cases involving major corporations, how do you approach the strategy for such complex matters, particularly those with significant commercial implications?

    High-profile corporate cases are a testament to the art of legal strategy, demanding both precision and adaptability. Each case begins with a critical step: deconstructing intricate transactions and factual matrices into manageable and comprehensible components. The ability to simplify the seemingly convoluted comes with experience and continuous learning—a process I embrace daily. The sheer exposure these cases offer is a remarkable opportunity to deepen one’s understanding of the law and its real-world applications.

    Once the foundation is clear, the focus shifts to identifying potential legal risks, predicting opposing arguments, and crafting a strategy that not only protects the client’s interests but also aligns seamlessly with their commercial objectives. This requires a deep dive into the nuances of the case, backed by meticulous research and a robust understanding of the relevant legal framework.

    Collaboration is another cornerstone of my approach. High-profile matters often span multiple disciplines—finance, technology, regulatory compliance, and more. Partnering with domain experts ensures that every angle is considered, enabling the development of innovative legal solutions tailored to the client’s needs. For instance, in cases involving regulatory complexities, understanding the finer details of compliance is as crucial as interpreting the law itself. Equally important is clear communication. In high-stakes matters, ensuring that clients, stakeholders, and the legal team are aligned is paramount. Breaking down legal strategies into actionable insights allows clients to make informed decisions, fostering trust and confidence.

    Above all, my approach is guided by an unwavering commitment to ethical standards. Protecting the client’s interests is always the priority, but it must never come at the expense of integrity or the larger principles of justice. The intersection of law and business in such cases is both challenging and rewarding, offering the opportunity to create meaningful and impactful outcomes.

    Given the high demands of your legal career, how do you balance your professional responsibilities with personal obligations? What strategies do you use to recharge and stay motivated in your work?

    The idea of a perfect work-life balance in the legal profession is, in many ways, a myth. As a litigator, the demands are relentless—requiring an unwavering commitment of passion, intellect, and hard work. There are times when family commitments inevitably take a back seat. Let’s be clear: the profession isn’t for the faint-hearted. It calls for sacrifice, and the stakes are high.

    That said, it’s not all about unyielding work. I make a conscious effort to find pockets of time to recharge, especially during court recesses or when the case load allows for a break. These moments, though brief, are invaluable. I use them to reconnect with loved ones, dive into a good book, or engage in enriching conversations that allow me to step away from the legal grind and reset mentally.

    The motivation to keep going despite the pressures lies in the profound impact of the work I do. There is an undeniable sense of fulfillment in knowing that my efforts contribute to justice, the rule of law, and societal progress. This sense of purpose is what fuels my passion and drives me forward, even when the demands are at their peak.

    Ultimately, while work-life balance may be elusive, the positive influence of my work serves as the ultimate form of professional satisfaction, and that is what keeps me motivated and committed to my craft.

    You have been involved in training sessions with Senior Advocates and Judges. How do you approach mentoring young lawyers, and what advice would you offer to aspiring lawyers who hope to achieve success in the legal profession?

    Mentoring young lawyers is one of the most rewarding aspects of my career. I view it as both a responsibility and a privilege. In my mentorship, I encourage young lawyers to embrace the challenges that the profession presents. Every case, every legal question, is an opportunity for growth. I stress the importance of developing strong critical thinking skills and cultivating a deep, insatiable curiosity for the law. It is this curiosity that drives innovation and fuels the passion necessary to succeed in such a demanding field.

    For aspiring lawyers, my advice is straightforward but vital: never stop learning, stay persistent, and, above all, practice with humility and integrity. The road to success in law is rarely quick or easy. It is a journey that is built brick by brick, requiring dedication, resilience, and a constant commitment to justice. The legal profession rewards those who approach it with patience and diligence, knowing that each case and each experience contributes to a greater understanding of the law.

    Looking ahead, I also believe that technology, particularly AI, will play an increasingly significant role in the legal field. Just as technology has already transformed legal research and case management, I’m confident that AI will continue to aid lawyers in refining their practice. Lawyers who embrace these advancements and use them effectively will not only enhance their own productivity but also improve the quality of service they provide to their clients. The key is adapting to these changes and harnessing the power of technology to make the most of your time and expertise.

    Ultimately, mentoring is about instilling young lawyers and colleagues with the belief that success is not just about winning cases but about making a meaningful impact, continuously learning, and striving to elevate the practice of law to its highest ideals. We are constantly learning on a daily basis, knowledge must be imbued and absorbed with great hunger and passion.

    Get in touch with Avishkar Singhvi –

  • “Reflecting on this journey, from a small-town upbringing to standing before the Supreme Court, fills me with both immense satisfaction and a renewed sense of resolve.” – Aakarshan Aditya, Advocate-on-Record, Supreme Court of India.

    “Reflecting on this journey, from a small-town upbringing to standing before the Supreme Court, fills me with both immense satisfaction and a renewed sense of resolve.” – Aakarshan Aditya, Advocate-on-Record, Supreme Court of India.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    With over 13 years of extensive legal experience as an Advocate and over 6 years as an Advocate on Record at the Supreme Court of India, what inspired you to choose law as your career path? 

    The inspiration to pursue law came from multiple sources. My mother is a significant influence— she joined the legal profession at the age of 45, once my elder brother had joined the Army, my elder sister was in college pursuing medicine, and I was transitioning from Class 10 to 11. Her resilience and passion greatly inspired me. Growing up, I was also deeply interested in reading newspapers and absorbing information. This habit nurtured my analytical thinking and my drive to stay informed, traits that have greatly helped me in my legal career; I became fascinated by the stories of lawyers and how their work shaped society. The idea that lawyers could make such a difference, combined with the intellectual challenge and professional independence aligned perfectly with my aspirations and personality, making law the ideal career choice for me.

    What motivated you to start your own practice after completing your law degree, and what were some of the initial challenges you encountered while setting up? 

    Once you choose to become a practicing lawyer, the natural progression is to set up an independent practice. The real challenge, however, is deciding when to take that step. For me, the motivation was always there—it was a matter of timing. I started as a chamber junior, gradually assisting other lawyers on case-to-case basis, and eventually became an Advocate-on-Record in 2018, which marked my readiness to embrace independent practice. Every stage before that was preparation, building the skills and confidence needed to take the plunge. 

    A key factor in making the transition successful is cultivating strong professional relationships. In our profession, seniors often move on to more complex and high-value cases as they gain experience, leaving opportunities for younger lawyers to handle the work they previously did. If you maintain positive relationships and avoid burning bridges, seniors are more likely to trust you with cases or clients they can no longer manage, providing you with both work and credibility. 

    The challenges of independent practice are significant. Financial uncertainty, ensuring timely client payments, and retaining clients require tact and effort. Additionally, during slow periods, staying productive is crucial. These moments should not feel like “off days.” Instead, they are opportunities to improve skills, network, and prepare for future cases. Success in independent practice requires resilience, adaptability, and consistent effort to navigate uncertainties and grow. 

    Given your diverse legal practice, could you share a particularly challenging constitutional law case you have argued before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India? What strategies did you use in preparing for the case? 

    One of the most challenging constitutional law cases I argued before the Hon’ble Supreme Court involved the arbitrary exercise of legislative and executive powers in notifying sporting events as “Events of National Importance” under the Sports Broadcasting Signals (Mandatory Sharing with Prasar Bharti) Act, 2007. The case raised critical questions about the violation of Article 14 of the Constitution, focusing on the lack of objective criteria for determining such events, which led to inconsistencies and arbitrariness in notifications. 

    The case attracted significant attention as it directly impacted the sports broadcasting industry, threatening the revenue models of major broadcasters who relied on exclusive rights. During the admission hearing, the courtroom saw intense arguments from several senior advocates representing the broadcasters, emphasizing how arbitrary classifications undermined their profitability and autonomy. 

    Our challenge focused on the absence of transparent guidelines, arguing that such notifications disregarded constitutional principles of equality and fairness. Drawing comparisons with global best practices, such as the “anti-siphoning lists” in Australia and “listed events” in the UK, we highlighted how these systems balanced public access with commercial interests. 

    Preparation of the case, required multi-faceted approach to address its complexity and ensure a robust argument. This began with in-depth legal research, focusing on judicial precedents related to Article 14, comparative analysis of global practices, including the “anti-siphoning lists” in Australia and “listed events” in the UK, to highlight the lack of transparency and objectivity in the Indian framework. A meticulous review of the notifications issued under the Act revealed inconsistencies, demonstrating how events of significant public interest were excluded while less important ones were arbitrarily included. Collaborative brainstorming with colleagues helped refine arguments and anticipate counterpoints, especially given the presence of senior advocates representing major broadcasters. Mock arguments further ensured clarity and precision in presenting key submissions. The strategy also involved framing the issue as one that extended beyond commercial concerns, emphasizing the public interest in accessing culturally significant events. 

    Can you share some impactful experiences from the “Lawyers on Borders” project that demonstrate the critical role of legal support for soldiers and their families? 

    The “Lawyers on Borders” initiative, launched by the KhushHal Bharat Public Charitable Trust in collaboration with VanGuard Legal, addresses the legal challenges faced by serving and retired Indian Armed Forces personnel and their families. Since November 2023, it has provided free legal consultancy, litigation support, and educational resources to over 50 soldiers and their families, covering civil, criminal, service, and consumer matters. Leveraging its extensive network and technology, VanGuard Legal operates a dedicated helpline, offers pro bono advisory services, and provides litigation support on a needs basis at most reasonable fees. Regular updates are shared via helplines, emails, Google Meet, and WhatsApp, ensuring convenience and accessibility even for soldiers in remote areas. This initiative embodies a commitment to safeguarding the rights and dignity of those who serve the nation, delivering legal solutions with the professionalism of a top-tier law firm. 

    How do you manage the dual responsibilities of being an Advocate on Record at the Supreme Court and leading VanGuard Legal? What challenges do you face in balancing both roles effectively? 

    Managing the dual responsibilities is undoubtedly demanding, but it is also deeply fulfilling. It requires careful planning, thoughtful delegation, and a sharp focus on priorities. I ensure my court work and client commitments are well-structured, allowing me to give focused attention to both roles. At VanGuard Legal, I am fortunate to have a dedicated and capable team that manages day-to-day operations, while I oversee strategic decisions and maintain the quality of our services. To ensure efficiency, my chamber and the firm operate as separate entities from distinct physical spaces. 

    Balancing time and energy can be challenging, particularly during peak litigation periods or when handling complex cases. However, open communication with and within the team and leveraging technology have been crucial in streamlining processes and ensuring that both roles align seamlessly. What inspires me the most is the work we are doing at VanGuard Legal, especially through the Lawyers on Borders project. It is more than just legal work—it feels like a way to repay our debt to the country and give back to those who serve us selflessly. This sense of purpose keeps me motivated and committed to making a meaningful impact. 

    How has your experience as an Advocate on Record at the Supreme Court contributed to the growth of your professional practice, and how do you keep yourself updated on the latest trends in the legal field? 

    It has profoundly enhanced my professional practice, allowing me to deepen my understanding of complex legal issues while honing my skills in drafting, advocacy, and strategy. It has also pushed me to develop my intellectual and cognitive faculties, sharpening my ability to analyze and address intricate cases. Representing a diverse range of clients at the highest judicial forum has strengthened my confidence, broadened my professional network across the country, and exposed me to the multifaceted challenges of the legal profession. 

    Beyond professional growth, this journey has enriched me personally. Becoming an AOR brought with it the honor of representing my peers as an elected member of the Supreme Court Advocates on Record Association—a responsibility I hold close to my heart. Securing the runner-up position in the first Hackathon organized by the Hon’ble Supreme Court was another milestone that reinforced my belief in innovation and teamwork. 

    Reflecting on this journey, from a small-town upbringing to standing before the Supreme Court, fills me with both immense satisfaction and a renewed sense of resolve.  

    To stay updated on the latest trends in the legal field, I make it a point to actively follow landmark judgments, legislative developments, and esteemed legal publications. Engaging in discussions with peers and participating in seminars, lectures and other programmes organised by SCAORA, SCBA and other platforms allows me to exchange ideas and gain fresh perspectives. I also rely on technology to access global legal resources, which keeps me informed and well-prepared for the evolving challenges of the profession. 

    In my free time, I enjoy exploring emerging tools like GPTs and similar platforms, where I engage in debates, discussions, and predictive analyses of legal and broader issues. While no one can predict the future with certainty, these interactions offer fascinating insights into the potential directions the profession might take. It excites me to imagine how legal practice could evolve and to prepare myself for those changes. At the same time, this exploration serves as a refreshing intellectual exercise, keeping me curious and forward-looking. 

    As a mentor to younger lawyers and law students, what advice do you offer to those aiming to build a successful career in litigation and corporate practice? 

    Start by mastering the fundamentals of law, developing strong drafting and research skills, and gaining hands-on experience through internships in diverse areas. Ideally, start from the Trial Courts moving up to Higher Courts. Work under experienced mentors who can guide you and help refine your skills while navigating the challenges of the profession. Communication and interpersonal skills are critical—both for courtroom advocacy and collaborative corporate work. Stay updated on legal developments, leverage technology to enhance your efficiency, and actively network with seniors and peers to create opportunities rather than waiting for them to come to you. Success, especially in our profession takes time, so be patient, persistent, and disciplined. Treat each day as a new opportunity—finish what you start, avoid procrastination, and tackle challenges with calm determination. Take pride in your profession, remain mentally agile under pressure, and continuously train yourself to be a powerhouse of knowledge and eloquence. Always maintain humility in your interactions, even as you take confidence in your growing abilities. This is a lifelong learning process—embrace it with passion, adaptability, and integrity, as your reputation and commitment to excellence will ultimately define your success. 

    How do you manage the demands of being an Advocate on Record and leading your firm, while also maintaining balance with your personal obligations? 

    We all operate within the same 24-hour framework, balancing the demands of personal and professional life. However, how effectively we use these hours determines our success and well-being. These days, many people adopt irregular routines, staying up late and following inconsistent sleep schedules. While a number of conversations these days often emphasize flexibility in choosing one’s schedule, the reality is that our profession demands a disciplined and structured approach to time management. 

    While it is essential to identify your own personal rhythm—understanding when you are most productive and at your best, however, a time-tested approach for our field is adhering to the principle of “early to bed and early to rise.” This routine not only ensures physical health but also sharpens mental clarity and focus, both of which are non-negotiable for success in the legal profession. Good health and wisdom form the bedrock of this career, and financial success inevitably follows when these two are in place. In a demanding profession like ours, maintaining discipline in your daily routine is not just advisable—it is essential for sustaining long-term excellence and balance.  

    One essential quality every lawyer should cultivate is the ability to switch between their professional and personal modes, even more so when family members or close friends are also part of the legal profession, such as in husband-wife, parent-child, or sibling relationships. While it is natural for discussions about law to spill over into personal spaces, it is equally important to consciously step out of your “lawyer mode” when you are with your family and friends. 

    Learning to disconnect from the professional mindset allows you to nurture your personal relationships, which are your greatest sources of strength, comfort, and happiness. Your loved ones offer the emotional balance and support needed to thrive in a demanding profession. By creating boundaries between your professional and personal life, you ensure that your personal relationships remain fulfilling and unaffected by the pressures of work, ultimately contributing to both your mental well-being and professional success.

    Get in touch with Aakarshan Aditya-