Super Lawyer

Tag: Criminal lawyer

  • “Reflecting on this journey, from a small-town upbringing to standing before the Supreme Court, fills me with both immense satisfaction and a renewed sense of resolve.” – Aakarshan Aditya, Advocate-on-Record, Supreme Court of India.

    “Reflecting on this journey, from a small-town upbringing to standing before the Supreme Court, fills me with both immense satisfaction and a renewed sense of resolve.” – Aakarshan Aditya, Advocate-on-Record, Supreme Court of India.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    With over 13 years of extensive legal experience as an Advocate and over 6 years as an Advocate on Record at the Supreme Court of India, what inspired you to choose law as your career path? 

    The inspiration to pursue law came from multiple sources. My mother is a significant influence— she joined the legal profession at the age of 45, once my elder brother had joined the Army, my elder sister was in college pursuing medicine, and I was transitioning from Class 10 to 11. Her resilience and passion greatly inspired me. Growing up, I was also deeply interested in reading newspapers and absorbing information. This habit nurtured my analytical thinking and my drive to stay informed, traits that have greatly helped me in my legal career; I became fascinated by the stories of lawyers and how their work shaped society. The idea that lawyers could make such a difference, combined with the intellectual challenge and professional independence aligned perfectly with my aspirations and personality, making law the ideal career choice for me.

    What motivated you to start your own practice after completing your law degree, and what were some of the initial challenges you encountered while setting up? 

    Once you choose to become a practicing lawyer, the natural progression is to set up an independent practice. The real challenge, however, is deciding when to take that step. For me, the motivation was always there—it was a matter of timing. I started as a chamber junior, gradually assisting other lawyers on case-to-case basis, and eventually became an Advocate-on-Record in 2018, which marked my readiness to embrace independent practice. Every stage before that was preparation, building the skills and confidence needed to take the plunge. 

    A key factor in making the transition successful is cultivating strong professional relationships. In our profession, seniors often move on to more complex and high-value cases as they gain experience, leaving opportunities for younger lawyers to handle the work they previously did. If you maintain positive relationships and avoid burning bridges, seniors are more likely to trust you with cases or clients they can no longer manage, providing you with both work and credibility. 

    The challenges of independent practice are significant. Financial uncertainty, ensuring timely client payments, and retaining clients require tact and effort. Additionally, during slow periods, staying productive is crucial. These moments should not feel like “off days.” Instead, they are opportunities to improve skills, network, and prepare for future cases. Success in independent practice requires resilience, adaptability, and consistent effort to navigate uncertainties and grow. 

    Given your diverse legal practice, could you share a particularly challenging constitutional law case you have argued before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India? What strategies did you use in preparing for the case? 

    One of the most challenging constitutional law cases I argued before the Hon’ble Supreme Court involved the arbitrary exercise of legislative and executive powers in notifying sporting events as “Events of National Importance” under the Sports Broadcasting Signals (Mandatory Sharing with Prasar Bharti) Act, 2007. The case raised critical questions about the violation of Article 14 of the Constitution, focusing on the lack of objective criteria for determining such events, which led to inconsistencies and arbitrariness in notifications. 

    The case attracted significant attention as it directly impacted the sports broadcasting industry, threatening the revenue models of major broadcasters who relied on exclusive rights. During the admission hearing, the courtroom saw intense arguments from several senior advocates representing the broadcasters, emphasizing how arbitrary classifications undermined their profitability and autonomy. 

    Our challenge focused on the absence of transparent guidelines, arguing that such notifications disregarded constitutional principles of equality and fairness. Drawing comparisons with global best practices, such as the “anti-siphoning lists” in Australia and “listed events” in the UK, we highlighted how these systems balanced public access with commercial interests. 

    Preparation of the case, required multi-faceted approach to address its complexity and ensure a robust argument. This began with in-depth legal research, focusing on judicial precedents related to Article 14, comparative analysis of global practices, including the “anti-siphoning lists” in Australia and “listed events” in the UK, to highlight the lack of transparency and objectivity in the Indian framework. A meticulous review of the notifications issued under the Act revealed inconsistencies, demonstrating how events of significant public interest were excluded while less important ones were arbitrarily included. Collaborative brainstorming with colleagues helped refine arguments and anticipate counterpoints, especially given the presence of senior advocates representing major broadcasters. Mock arguments further ensured clarity and precision in presenting key submissions. The strategy also involved framing the issue as one that extended beyond commercial concerns, emphasizing the public interest in accessing culturally significant events. 

    Can you share some impactful experiences from the “Lawyers on Borders” project that demonstrate the critical role of legal support for soldiers and their families? 

    The “Lawyers on Borders” initiative, launched by the KhushHal Bharat Public Charitable Trust in collaboration with VanGuard Legal, addresses the legal challenges faced by serving and retired Indian Armed Forces personnel and their families. Since November 2023, it has provided free legal consultancy, litigation support, and educational resources to over 50 soldiers and their families, covering civil, criminal, service, and consumer matters. Leveraging its extensive network and technology, VanGuard Legal operates a dedicated helpline, offers pro bono advisory services, and provides litigation support on a needs basis at most reasonable fees. Regular updates are shared via helplines, emails, Google Meet, and WhatsApp, ensuring convenience and accessibility even for soldiers in remote areas. This initiative embodies a commitment to safeguarding the rights and dignity of those who serve the nation, delivering legal solutions with the professionalism of a top-tier law firm. 

    How do you manage the dual responsibilities of being an Advocate on Record at the Supreme Court and leading VanGuard Legal? What challenges do you face in balancing both roles effectively? 

    Managing the dual responsibilities is undoubtedly demanding, but it is also deeply fulfilling. It requires careful planning, thoughtful delegation, and a sharp focus on priorities. I ensure my court work and client commitments are well-structured, allowing me to give focused attention to both roles. At VanGuard Legal, I am fortunate to have a dedicated and capable team that manages day-to-day operations, while I oversee strategic decisions and maintain the quality of our services. To ensure efficiency, my chamber and the firm operate as separate entities from distinct physical spaces. 

    Balancing time and energy can be challenging, particularly during peak litigation periods or when handling complex cases. However, open communication with and within the team and leveraging technology have been crucial in streamlining processes and ensuring that both roles align seamlessly. What inspires me the most is the work we are doing at VanGuard Legal, especially through the Lawyers on Borders project. It is more than just legal work—it feels like a way to repay our debt to the country and give back to those who serve us selflessly. This sense of purpose keeps me motivated and committed to making a meaningful impact. 

    How has your experience as an Advocate on Record at the Supreme Court contributed to the growth of your professional practice, and how do you keep yourself updated on the latest trends in the legal field? 

    It has profoundly enhanced my professional practice, allowing me to deepen my understanding of complex legal issues while honing my skills in drafting, advocacy, and strategy. It has also pushed me to develop my intellectual and cognitive faculties, sharpening my ability to analyze and address intricate cases. Representing a diverse range of clients at the highest judicial forum has strengthened my confidence, broadened my professional network across the country, and exposed me to the multifaceted challenges of the legal profession. 

    Beyond professional growth, this journey has enriched me personally. Becoming an AOR brought with it the honor of representing my peers as an elected member of the Supreme Court Advocates on Record Association—a responsibility I hold close to my heart. Securing the runner-up position in the first Hackathon organized by the Hon’ble Supreme Court was another milestone that reinforced my belief in innovation and teamwork. 

    Reflecting on this journey, from a small-town upbringing to standing before the Supreme Court, fills me with both immense satisfaction and a renewed sense of resolve.  

    To stay updated on the latest trends in the legal field, I make it a point to actively follow landmark judgments, legislative developments, and esteemed legal publications. Engaging in discussions with peers and participating in seminars, lectures and other programmes organised by SCAORA, SCBA and other platforms allows me to exchange ideas and gain fresh perspectives. I also rely on technology to access global legal resources, which keeps me informed and well-prepared for the evolving challenges of the profession. 

    In my free time, I enjoy exploring emerging tools like GPTs and similar platforms, where I engage in debates, discussions, and predictive analyses of legal and broader issues. While no one can predict the future with certainty, these interactions offer fascinating insights into the potential directions the profession might take. It excites me to imagine how legal practice could evolve and to prepare myself for those changes. At the same time, this exploration serves as a refreshing intellectual exercise, keeping me curious and forward-looking. 

    As a mentor to younger lawyers and law students, what advice do you offer to those aiming to build a successful career in litigation and corporate practice? 

    Start by mastering the fundamentals of law, developing strong drafting and research skills, and gaining hands-on experience through internships in diverse areas. Ideally, start from the Trial Courts moving up to Higher Courts. Work under experienced mentors who can guide you and help refine your skills while navigating the challenges of the profession. Communication and interpersonal skills are critical—both for courtroom advocacy and collaborative corporate work. Stay updated on legal developments, leverage technology to enhance your efficiency, and actively network with seniors and peers to create opportunities rather than waiting for them to come to you. Success, especially in our profession takes time, so be patient, persistent, and disciplined. Treat each day as a new opportunity—finish what you start, avoid procrastination, and tackle challenges with calm determination. Take pride in your profession, remain mentally agile under pressure, and continuously train yourself to be a powerhouse of knowledge and eloquence. Always maintain humility in your interactions, even as you take confidence in your growing abilities. This is a lifelong learning process—embrace it with passion, adaptability, and integrity, as your reputation and commitment to excellence will ultimately define your success. 

    How do you manage the demands of being an Advocate on Record and leading your firm, while also maintaining balance with your personal obligations? 

    We all operate within the same 24-hour framework, balancing the demands of personal and professional life. However, how effectively we use these hours determines our success and well-being. These days, many people adopt irregular routines, staying up late and following inconsistent sleep schedules. While a number of conversations these days often emphasize flexibility in choosing one’s schedule, the reality is that our profession demands a disciplined and structured approach to time management. 

    While it is essential to identify your own personal rhythm—understanding when you are most productive and at your best, however, a time-tested approach for our field is adhering to the principle of “early to bed and early to rise.” This routine not only ensures physical health but also sharpens mental clarity and focus, both of which are non-negotiable for success in the legal profession. Good health and wisdom form the bedrock of this career, and financial success inevitably follows when these two are in place. In a demanding profession like ours, maintaining discipline in your daily routine is not just advisable—it is essential for sustaining long-term excellence and balance.  

    One essential quality every lawyer should cultivate is the ability to switch between their professional and personal modes, even more so when family members or close friends are also part of the legal profession, such as in husband-wife, parent-child, or sibling relationships. While it is natural for discussions about law to spill over into personal spaces, it is equally important to consciously step out of your “lawyer mode” when you are with your family and friends. 

    Learning to disconnect from the professional mindset allows you to nurture your personal relationships, which are your greatest sources of strength, comfort, and happiness. Your loved ones offer the emotional balance and support needed to thrive in a demanding profession. By creating boundaries between your professional and personal life, you ensure that your personal relationships remain fulfilling and unaffected by the pressures of work, ultimately contributing to both your mental well-being and professional success.

    Get in touch with Aakarshan Aditya-

  • “In essence, success is about creating value, making a positive impact, and finding joy in the journey. It’s an ongoing, evolving goal rather than a single milestone.” – Dr. Abhimanyu Singh, Founder and Managing Partner at Manulegal & Associates.

    “In essence, success is about creating value, making a positive impact, and finding joy in the journey. It’s an ongoing, evolving goal rather than a single milestone.” – Dr. Abhimanyu Singh, Founder and Managing Partner at Manulegal & Associates.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Can you tell us about your academic journey, starting from your undergraduate studies at National Law University, Patiala, to completing your Ph.D. at the University of Rajasthan? What motivated you to specialise in criminal law and criminology?

    Well, I hail from Bharatpur, Rajasthan which is a very small town; got my initial education there till 12th Standard and thereafter my academic journey in Law began with my under graduation at National Law University, Patiala, where I pursued a Bachelor in Law with a specialization in criminal law. My years at NLU Patiala were full of new and inspirational formatives, providing me with a solid foundation in various aspects of law and life including improving and working on my articulation skills. This period marked my initial exposure to the multifaceted nature of how the world is revolving around law  and deepened my interest in understanding the mechanics of the criminal justice system.

    Upon completing my postgraduate studies, I sought further specialization through a Ph.D. program at the University of Rajasthan. The decision to focus on criminal law and criminology stemmed from a combination of personal motivation and academic curiosity. Growing up in an environment where societal issues, particularly crime, were frequently discussed, I developed an early interest in the root causes of criminal behavior and the societal mechanisms to address it. Criminal law and criminology offer insight not only into punitive measures but also into preventive aspects, which I find particularly compelling. My Ph.D. thesis, focusing on “Crimes Against Juveniles in India,” allowed me to delve deeper into specific issues affecting vulnerable populations, contributing to both academic discourse and practical solutions in the field.

    You worked as a Junior Associate with an IP Law Firm before establishing your own practice. What motivated this transition and what were the initial challenges you faced while starting your firm?

    I guess all experiences matter, be it me working as a Junior Associate in an IP law firm or any other, provided me with invaluable experience in routing all my legal impressions towards what laws says and its implementation. Talking specifically about the IP Law Firm I honed my skills in client management, legal drafting, and courtroom proceedings, which prepared me for the multidimensional demands of independent practice. However, I soon felt the urge to branch out on my own, driven by a desire to apply my legal skills across a broader spectrum of law and cater to a more diverse clientele.

    The transition to establishing my own practice was both exciting and challenging. Initially, I faced difficulties in building a client base, as the legal industry is highly competitive, and establishing credibility as a new firm takes time. Managing administrative tasks, securing office space, and setting up operational systems were other hurdles. Yet, these challenges were instrumental in shaping my resilience and business acumen. Overcoming these obstacles strengthened my commitment to my clients and fortified my understanding of what it takes to thrive in independent legal practice.

    As a Managing Partner at ManuLegal & Associates, you deal with complex legal matters in domains like corporate law, taxation, ADR, IPR, and criminal law. Could you share a memorable case or challenge you’ve encountered in your legal practice?

    One of the most memorable cases I encountered at ManuLegal & Associates involved a complex corporate dispute intertwined with criminal allegations. This particular case required a nuanced approach, as it involved corporate stakeholders and accusations of embezzlement. We needed to navigate both corporate law and criminal proceedings simultaneously, balancing civil legal remedies with criminal defenses.

    The case taught me a great deal about the intricacies of handling multi-dimensional legal matters, particularly the importance of collaboration across legal domains. Our team’s efforts ultimately helped secure a favorable outcome for our client, while reinforcing my commitment to a holistic approach in managing cases. This case underscored the value of multidisciplinary legal expertise and reminded me of the profound impact that comprehensive legal strategies can have on a client’s life and livelihood.

    Your career spans across both legal practice and academia. How do you balance the practical demands of running a law firm with your academic pursuits and publications?

    Balancing the responsibilities of running a law firm with academic pursuits is challenging but rewarding. I have always been passionate about contributing to academic literature, as it enables me to share my insights and learnings with future legal practitioners. I believe the more knowledge we share the more knowable we become. My approach to balancing these roles involves structured time management and a commitment to prioritizing both facets of my career.

    I often schedule my academic commitments, such as lectures and research, around my practice’s caseload. Engaging in academia also keeps me updated with evolving legal theories and practices, which, in turn, benefits my clients. This dual commitment has enhanced my professional versatility and enriched my contributions to both the academic and legal communities.

    Your Ph.D. dissertation focused on ‘Crimes Against Juveniles in India’ with a special reference to Rajasthan. Could you elaborate on the key findings of your research and how it contributes to the understanding of juvenile crimes in India?

    My Ph.D. dissertation, “Crimes Against Juveniles in India,” focused on understanding the patterns, causes, and implications of juvenile crimes, with a particular emphasis on Rajasthan. One of the key findings of my research was the alarming prevalence of crimes perpetrated against juveniles, highlighting the need for targeted reforms in juvenile protection laws. I discovered that socio-economic factors, educational disparities, and lack of awareness contribute significantly to the vulnerability of juveniles.

    My research also underscored the need for a stronger legal framework that specifically addresses juvenile protection, beyond the general provisions of the Juvenile Justice Act. The study’s findings advocate for improvements in preventive measures, awareness programs, and the establishment of rehabilitative support systems. By contributing to the understanding of juvenile crimes in India, I hope my research will aid policymakers and legal practitioners in implementing more effective protection mechanisms for vulnerable young individuals.

    As a lawyer specialising in both criminal and corporate law, how do you see the intersection of these fields, particularly in areas like corporate crime, data protection, and intellectual property rights?

    As a lawyer with a specialization in both criminal and corporate law, I often encounter cases where these fields intersect, especially in areas such as corporate crime, data protection, and intellectual property rights. Corporate crime has become a pressing issue, as global businesses face increasing scrutiny over issues such as fraud, insider trading, and data breaches. These cases not only involve criminal liability but also impact corporate reputation and operational integrity.

    Data protection is another area where criminal and corporate law intersect. With the rise of digital platforms, protecting sensitive data has become paramount, and legal frameworks must address both corporate responsibilities and criminal liabilities associated with data breaches. Intellectual property rights also face challenges from digital piracy and infringement, which have criminal implications. My expertise in these fields allows me to offer clients comprehensive guidance that addresses both regulatory compliance and criminal accountability, ensuring they are well-prepared to navigate today’s complex legal landscape.

    You’ve worked with a variety of organisations and governmental bodies. What changes or improvements would you recommend for enhancing the legal and institutional support for child protection laws in India?

    Working with various organizations and governmental bodies has given me insights into the strengths and gaps in India’s child protection laws. To enhance legal and institutional support for child protection, I recommend several key improvements. First, there should be greater emphasis on preventive measures, such as community-based awareness programs, to educate families and children about their rights.

    Second, the judicial process for child protection cases should be expedited to minimize the trauma and uncertainty faced by young victims. Establishing special courts with trained professionals dedicated to child protection cases could ensure faster and more sensitive handling of these matters. Finally, I believe that better coordination among governmental agencies, law enforcement, and non-governmental organizations is crucial for effective child protection. With these improvements, India’s child protection framework can become more resilient and responsive to the needs of vulnerable children.

    As someone who has worked both as an educator and as a practitioner, what is one piece of advice you would give to those entering the legal field in India today?

    For those entering the legal field in India, my advice is to embrace the learning process and maintain resilience. The legal profession is challenging and demands a lifelong commitment to learning, as the law is ever-evolving. New lawyers should focus on developing a strong foundation in legal principles and gaining practical experience through internships or clerkships.

    Additionally, I encourage aspiring lawyers to be adaptable, as the legal field often requires one to navigate diverse areas of law and adjust to changing regulatory environments. It is also important to cultivate professional integrity and uphold ethical standards, as these qualities form the bedrock of a reputable legal career. By embracing these values and committing to continuous growth, new lawyers can make meaningful contributions to the legal field and their communities.

    You have handled intricate legal matters across areas such as corporate law, taxation, ADR, IPR, and criminal law. What does success look like to you now?

    To me, success has evolved far beyond conventional measures like profit or growth. Success now means creating a lasting impact and making a difference in people’s lives and in my industry that continues to resonate, even when I’m not directly involved.

    Today, I define success as building a business that’s sustainable, resilient, and purpose-driven. It’s about more than just reaching short-term goals; it’s about creating a legacy, something meaningful that reflects my values and contributes positively to society. 

    I’ve learned that if my work is not aligned with my personal values or if it detracts from my well-being, it doesn’t feel like real success. I aim to build a business that not only thrives but allows me and my team to thrive alongside it.

    In essence, success is about creating value, making a positive impact, and finding joy in the journey. It’s an ongoing, evolving goal rather than a single milestone, and it motivates me to keep learning, adapting, and growing every day.

    Based on your extensive experience, what advice would you offer to aspiring entrepreneurs?

    Embrace learning and adaptability as your greatest assets. In business, nothing will go exactly as planned. Markets shift, trends evolve, and obstacles arise when you least expect them. So, rather than striving for perfection, focus on building resilience and agility.

    One of the most important lessons I’ve learned is that failure is a stepping stone, not an endpoint. You’ll make mistakes, and you’ll face setbacks—probably more than once. But each mistake brings a new insight, and each setback is a chance to grow stronger and smarter. Don’t let fear of failure hold you back; lean into the challenges, and let them teach you.

    Build a strong support network too. Surround yourself with people who challenge and inspire you—mentors, advisors, or even fellow entrepreneurs who understand the journey. No one builds success alone, and the perspectives of others can help you see things you might miss or encourage you when things feel tough.

    Finally, remember to stay true to your values and your “why.” Having a clear purpose will ground you in moments of uncertainty and remind you why you started in the first place. Passion is a powerful motivator, but a meaningful purpose is what keeps you going over the long haul.

    Get in touch with Dr. Abhimanyu Singh-

  • “Success in law isn’t just about winning cases, it’s about the respect you earn, the difference you make, and the justice you help deliver.” – Juhi Arora, Founder of Juhi Arora and Associates and Counsel at Supreme Court of India.

    “Success in law isn’t just about winning cases, it’s about the respect you earn, the difference you make, and the justice you help deliver.” – Juhi Arora, Founder of Juhi Arora and Associates and Counsel at Supreme Court of India.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    You have an incredibly diverse legal career with expertise in several areas. Could you share with us what initially inspired you to pursue law as a profession?

    Thank you for the kind words! Honestly, my decision to pursue law wasn’t something I planned from the beginning—it grew out of a strong desire to help people navigate a system that often feels overwhelming and inaccessible. Coming from a family with no legal background, I saw how intimidating the legal world could be for those without connections or guidance. That’s what inspired me: the idea that I could bridge that gap for people who felt unheard or unsupported.

    When I started Juhi Arora & Associates, it wasn’t just about building a career—it was about creating a space where clients feel seen and empowered, knowing they have someone who genuinely cares about their rights and their story. Law, for me, has always been about standing up for fairness and justice, and every case reminds me why I took this path.

    It’s been a journey filled with learning, growth, and moments of real impact. I often say that the beauty of law is that it’s not just about solving problems; it’s about giving people the courage to face them. That’s what keeps me going.

    As the Founder of Juhi Arora & Associates, how do you manage the challenges of running a law firm along with your practice in high-profile cases and on several legal panels?

    Honestly, it’s not easy, and there are days when it feels like I’m juggling too many things at once. But I’ve learned that you can’t—and shouldn’t—do it all alone. My team at Juhi Arora & Associates is my biggest strength. I’ve always believed in trusting and empowering the people I work with. They handle so much with confidence and dedication, which lets me focus on the things that really need my attention, whether that’s a high-profile case or contributing to a legal panel.

    I also rely on good planning. It’s about taking things one step at a time and being realistic about what can be done in a day. I try to keep my priorities clear—clients always come first, but so does ensuring my team has what they need to succeed.

    Of course, there are moments when it feels overwhelming, but that’s part of the journey. I remind myself that it’s not about being perfect—it’s about staying committed. What keeps me going is knowing that the work we do matters. Whether it’s helping a client in crisis or shaping a broader discussion on a legal issue, it’s all worth it.

    At the end of the day, I think the key is to stay grounded, take a deep breath when things get hectic, and remind myself why I started this journey in the first place.

    One of your notable cases was challenging a tender issued by NCERT in the matter of Samit Khanna v. UOI & Ors. What was the motivation behind this case and how did you prepare for it?

    This case was particularly close to my heart because it wasn’t just about legalities—it was about fairness and accountability in public processes. The motivation came from the realization that the tender process in question wasn’t transparent. The eligibility criteria were vague, and the evaluation process seemed unfair, raising questions about whether it truly allowed equal opportunity for all participants.

    Preparation for this case was intense and detail-oriented. We started with a thorough review of the tender documents, comparing them against legal standards for public procurement. This involved identifying where the process fell short and how it potentially violated principles of fairness and equality under Article 14 of the Constitution. We also researched past judgments to strengthen our arguments and present a clear picture of why this tender needed scrutiny.

    For me, the case wasn’t just about challenging NCERT’s actions—it was about standing up for the idea that public institutions must be held to the highest standards of integrity. Fairness isn’t optional; it’s foundational. Cases like this remind me why I became a lawyer: to ensure that the principles of justice are upheld, no matter how complex the issue.

    In family law, you have represented clients in cases such as Sandhya v. Manish and Kavita Malik v. State of NCT of Delhi. What are some of the key takeaways for you from these cases, especially regarding the evolving dynamics of marriage and divorce laws in India?

    Family law cases are always deeply personal, and working on cases like Sandhya v. Manish and Kavita Malik v. State of NCT of Delhi has been both challenging and eye-opening. These cases have really shown me how the law is evolving in response to the changing dynamics of marriage and divorce in India.

    In Sandhya v. Manish, we dealt with issues of domestic violence and financial dependency. It made me realize just how hard it can be for women to assert their rights within a marriage, especially when societal pressures or economic factors come into play. This case highlighted the importance of legal safeguards that protect women’s rights—both emotionally and financially—during and after a marriage.

    Then, in Kavita Malik v. State of NCT of Delhi, the focus was on post-divorce maintenance, and it was heartening to see how the courts are increasingly taking a more holistic approach to divorce. It’s no longer just about ending a marriage; it’s about making sure that both parties can move forward with dignity and financial security.

    The key takeaway for me has been how marriage and divorce laws are no longer seen just through the lens of tradition but are also evolving to protect individuals and ensure fairness. Whether it’s about addressing domestic violence or ensuring financial stability after a divorce, the law is moving toward a more inclusive and balanced approach, one that recognizes the complexities of relationships today.

    These cases remind me why I’m passionate about family law—because it’s not just about the law itself, but about making sure people feel supported and heard in some of the most difficult moments of their lives.

    You’ve been a strong advocate for women’s rights, and your efforts have earned you several awards, such as the Nari Shakti Award. In your opinion, how can the legal profession further empower women and ensure gender equality?

    As a woman in law, I believe the legal profession plays a pivotal role in empowering women. One of the first steps is to increase women’s representation in leadership roles—whether in law firms, the judiciary, or academia. Diverse leadership brings new perspectives, and that’s essential for shaping a fairer legal system.

    Mentorship is also crucial. Senior women lawyers need to actively support and guide younger women in navigating career challenges, from overcoming biases to achieving work-life balance. It’s about creating a support system that helps them grow and thrive in the profession.

    We also need stronger policies to tackle discrimination head-on—ensuring equal pay, offering flexible work arrangements, and creating more inclusive environments for women.

    Finally, training lawyers to handle cases involving women’s rights with greater empathy and sensitivity is key. When the legal profession takes these steps, we can set the stage for gender equality, not just within our field, but across society.

    Your expertise as a Certified Mediator by DDRS shows your dedication to Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). How do you think ADR is transforming dispute resolution in India, and how can it be more widely accepted?

    As a Certified Mediator by DDRS, I am deeply committed to Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) because it aligns with my core belief that disputes can be resolved more peacefully, efficiently, and collaboratively. ADR methods such as mediation, arbitration, and conciliation offer not just a cost-effective solution, but also one that prioritizes mutual respect and understanding. Given the growing pressure on our judicial system, ADR is an essential alternative that helps parties resolve their issues quickly, while encouraging a more cooperative approach to conflict.

    In India, we’re starting to see a cultural shift towards ADR, particularly in commercial disputes, family matters, and labor issues. ADR creates a platform where parties can engage in open, productive conversations, leading to mutually beneficial outcomes. However, awareness around ADR is still developing, especially in smaller towns and rural areas, where many are unaware of its advantages or lack access to trained professionals.

    To make ADR more effective, we need to focus on increasing awareness, providing better training for mediators, and ensuring ADR services are accessible and affordable for everyone. Legal reforms that integrate ADR into the mainstream legal framework would further promote its use. With continued support, ADR can not only help ease the burden on our courts but also foster a more peaceful, efficient, and collaborative approach to resolving disputes across the country.

    As a lawyer, how do you maintain a work-life balance, especially when handling complex cases and public appearances? Are there any personal practices that keep you grounded?

    Maintaining a work-life balance as a lawyer, especially when dealing with complex cases and public appearances, is certainly challenging, but it’s essential for both professional success and personal well-being. For me, it’s about prioritizing and setting clear boundaries.

    Firstly, time management is crucial. I make sure to plan my day carefully—balancing court appearances, client meetings, and my family time. Of course, there will be days when work demands more attention, but I ensure that I carve out personal time in my schedule, whether it’s spending time with my children or pursuing my hobbies, like cooking or painting, which help me recharge.

    I also delegate tasks to my trusted associates at the firm. Delegation is not about relinquishing control; it’s about empowering your team to handle matters effectively while you focus on the bigger picture. This helps in reducing the pressure on myself and ensuring that we’re all working together efficiently.

    On a personal level, I’ve always found it important to stay grounded and connected with my roots. I practice gratitude regularly and believe in taking moments to reflect on how far I’ve come and how much I still have to achieve. This perspective helps me stay focused on what truly matters. I also make it a point to exercise—a good workout or a walk always clears my mind and helps me stay energized throughout the day.

    Above all, self-belief is the key. When you’re confident in your abilities, you can handle the pressure without losing sight of your personal life. And yes, having a support system—especially family—plays a big role. My mother, for instance, has been a huge source of inspiration and support for me. Balancing work and personal life aren’t easy, but it’s all about managing your time, staying organized, and remembering that you’re in control of your journey.

    As a woman in a highly competitive profession, what advice would you give to young women who aspire to pursue law, especially those who wish to establish themselves as successful legal practitioners?

    As a woman in this highly competitive profession, my advice to young women aspiring to pursue law would be simple yet powerful: believe in yourself and never underestimate your potential. The legal field is demanding, and yes, it’s tough, but remember, as women, we are naturally resilient, intuitive, and capable of handling challenges that come our way.

    First and foremost, education and continuous learning are key. Law is a dynamic profession that evolves with time, so you need to stay updated with the latest developments, case laws, and legal trends. Secondly, embrace hard work and discipline. There will be times when you’ll feel overwhelmed, but your perseverance will be what sets you apart. Don’t expect shortcuts to success; it’s the long hours and dedication that will ultimately take you far.

    Additionally, don’t be afraid to take up challenges. When opportunities come your way, grab them with both hands, even if they seem daunting. Seek mentorship from senior lawyers and build relationships with your peers. Your network will help you grow both personally and professionally.

    Lastly, I cannot stress enough the importance of integrity and honesty. In our profession, we deal with the truth, and the way you practice will define your reputation. Stand by your values, be ethical, and ensure that justice remains at the heart of everything you do.

    Remember, success in law isn’t just about winning cases—it’s about the respect you earn, the difference you make, and the justice you help deliver. Keep your vision clear, stay grounded, and trust the process. You’ve got this!

    Get in touch with Juhi Arora-

  • “A legal career, just like Rome is never built in one day, it’s like trust and based on it, which is built over a longish period of time and even greater service through GRIT, sincerity and hard work.” – Soumyadeep Biswas, Attorney at Law, at High Court of Calcutta

    “A legal career, just like Rome is never built in one day, it’s like trust and based on it, which is built over a longish period of time and even greater service through GRIT, sincerity and hard work.” – Soumyadeep Biswas, Attorney at Law, at High Court of Calcutta

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Can you take us through your early journey as a lawyer? What inspired you to choose law as a career, and how did you build your path to where you are today?  

    “I am standing in a courtroom before one of the senior most judges of the Hon’ble High Court, and I started, My Lord, the Petitioner wants immediate intervention of My Lord in the nature of a mandamus (I wanted to sound important, I guess and college made me superfluously over-confident); The immediate reply, though a simple one came in a resounding baritone- ‘Yes, Mr. Counsel, Mandamus! Why? Tell me, what do you want! ’, while I took the Hon’ble Court through the merits of the Petitioner’s case, the Hon’ble Judge listened to me intimately with an amusing chuckle on his face to denote that he was already abreast with the relief claimed and the merits of the matter, however he, with immense patience granted a hearing to an absolutely green junior and awarded me with a win”- An overwhelming pleasure as a lawyer but I was rewarded with a fee, so meagre that would not even cover the expenses; it’s quite evidently a mixed feeling. Albeit, one experience should never deter a young practitioner from going on especially since each and every experience is unique and distinct in its flavour and nature, not always salty and more often than not it’s actually rewarding. A legal career, just like Rome is never built in one day, it’s like trust and based on it, which is built over a longish period of time and even greater service through GRIT, sincerity and hard work.

    With a career that bridges multiple aspects of law, how do you see the legal landscape in India evolving, particularly with respect to consumer protection, banking disputes, and taxation?  

    It’s rightly put by you and it really seems to be the future of the legal landscape where monetary disputes would seem to rule the profession in the coming days.

    As someone who upholds the rule of law, how do you balance professionalism with empathy when dealing with cases that involve sensitive or personal matters, such as criminal defense or family disputes?  

    Your question warrants two separate answers, I believe. With regard to empathy, I have my own standards and method of choosing the clients I represent and often I choose to represent client’s pro bono and with regard to criminal defense I believe it ought to be the ethical code which should guide us in efficiently representing the clients. In family matters, well it’s really the worst of it all since it’s where everything including each and every intimate details of a household comes to be strained through the test of evidence and testimony and is often exhausting. Nevertheless, it’s your legal aptitude which saves the day and rescues you from the difficult trenches of matrimonial mudslinging. It’s not easy, but it’s the job and it demands your objectivity and so it lets you go on with the interests of the client at heart.

    With a strong foundation in arbitration and dispute resolution, what are your views on the importance of Alternative dispute resolution methods in the Indian legal system? How can they help reduce the burden on courts and offer quicker justice? 

    Alternative Dispute Resolution is without any ambiguity the future and we must resort to it more often, especially since the need of the hour is avoidance of protracted litigation in any matter.

    What advice would you give to young lawyers who aspire to specialize in diverse areas of law, from arbitration to constitutional law? How should they navigate the complexities of building such a broad skill set?  

    Specialization in terms of academic qualification cannot be equated with professional specialization. A young lawyer must aim to and actually practise each and every aspect of law and if so desired and necessitated navigate towards one or more specializations later on not before.

    With your experience in both litigation and arbitration, which of the two do you find more rewarding and why? Can you share an instance where you felt arbitration was a more effective approach than traditional litigation?

    It would be unfair to compare traditional litigation to arbitration and to be truthful both are equally rewarding. However, since arbitration tends to do away with strict rules of procedure it certainly aims at an expeditious resolution.

    You hold a diploma in Medical Jurisprudence & Forensic Science, which is quite unique for a civil and criminal law practitioner. How has this specialized knowledge influenced the way you approach cases, particularly those involving forensic evidence?  

    I must confess, I am more based in the High Court which more often than not lets me not use my knowledge gained in studying Forensics however at conducting Trial at Trial Courts I am at an immense advantage where I am easily and quite effectively able put such knowledge to use in deciphering the case details put forth by the prosecution and find the obvious and not so obvious loopholes in it favouring in criminal defense to my benefit.

    Could you share some of the key differences you’ve experienced in practicing law across different courts, and what do you see as the major distinctions when representing a government client versus a private client?  

    Yes, Trial Courts are often so accommodating to you to put forth facts, law and so on in a detailed manner however, the Hon’ble High Courts are often so about your capacity to put forth your submissions in a concise manner supported by sound legal principles which are ‘jointly and severally’ so rewarding.

    After handling intense and high-profile cases across various legal domains, what are some of your favourite ways to unwind and recharge outside of work? 

    My unwinding is far away from the legal domain. We’ve heard ‘all work and no play…’ and I believe it verbatim. As a matter of fact, I love trekking, travelling the most besides having a Bengali Adda with friends with a simmering hot tea and incidentals.

    Get in touch with Soumyadeep Biswas-

  • “Success in law requires not just technical expertise, but also an understanding of human dynamics and effective communication.” – 𝐀𝐛𝐡𝐢𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐤 𝐄𝐬𝐪., Attorney at Law, at Delhi High Court

    “Success in law requires not just technical expertise, but also an understanding of human dynamics and effective communication.” – 𝐀𝐛𝐡𝐢𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐤 𝐄𝐬𝐪., Attorney at Law, at Delhi High Court

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    You have a diverse academic background, from hotel management to law. What inspired your transition into the legal profession, and how have your experiences in corporate hospitality and business management shaped your legal career?  

    My transition from hotel management to law was driven by a deep-seated passion for advocacy and a desire to impact the corporate landscape meaningfully. It was a natural progression stemming from a deep-seated fascination with human interaction, problem-solving, and the intricate web of laws that govern our society. While working in corporate hospitality, I gained invaluable insights into business operations, customer relations, and the importance of legal frameworks in guiding ethical practices. This experience fostered my understanding of how law intersects with various industries. The dynamic and often complex nature of the hospitality industry exposed me to a myriad of legal challenges. The hospitality sector sharpened my skills in negotiation and conflict resolution, which are crucial in legal practice. Additionally, managing diverse teams allowed me to appreciate the nuances of communication and the importance of clear, actionable advice—skills that I apply daily in my legal career.

    With over 18 years of experience in industries as varied as hospitality, language industry, and legal services, what have been the key lessons learned from working in such different fields, and how have they contributed to your current practice?  

    My journey across diverse industries has been a rich tapestry of experiences that have shaped my professional perspective and enriched my current practice. Working in hospitality, language industry, and legal services has provided me with unique insights into different business cultures, communication styles, and legal frameworks. One of the most valuable lessons I have learned is the importance of adaptability and cultural sensitivity. In hospitality, I encountered clients from all walks of life, each with their own expectations and preferences. This experience taught me to approach each situation with empathy and understanding, tailoring my approach to meet their specific needs. Similarly, working in localization industry exposed me to the nuances of different languages and cultures, fostering a deep appreciation for linguistic diversity. This adaptability allows me to navigate complex legal issues with a creative mindset, drawing from different perspectives and methodologies. Another key takeaway is the power of effective communication. In all three industries, clear and concise communication is essential for building relationships, resolving disputes, and achieving desired outcomes. My experience in these fields has honed my ability to articulate complex legal concepts in a way that is easily understood by clients and stakeholders, while also fostering open and productive dialogue with opposing counsel. Lastly, my diverse background has reinforced the value of collaboration. Each sector relies on teamwork and leveraging varied skill sets to achieve common goals. This collaborative spirit enhances my ability to work effectively with clients, colleagues, and other professionals, fostering a holistic approach to legal solutions.

    You specialize in both corporate and criminal law. How do you balance the intricacies of corporate governance and criminal defense, and what unique insights have you gained from handling cases across such varied legal disciplines?  

    Balancing the intricacies of corporate and criminal law requires a delicate interplay of analytical skills, strategic thinking, and a deep understanding of the ethical and legal implications of corporate conduct. While these two areas of law may seem disparate, they are interconnected in many ways. Corporate misconduct can often lead to criminal charges, and effective corporate governance can help prevent legal and reputational risks. One of the key insights I have gained from practicing in both corporate and criminal law is the importance of understanding the broader context of a case. By analyzing the corporate culture, business practices, and regulatory environment, I can identify potential vulnerabilities and develop strategies to mitigate risks. Additionally, my experience in criminal defense has taught me the value of aggressive representation and the importance of protecting my clients’ rights. Another valuable insight is the interconnectedness of legal issues. For example, a corporate fraud case may involve complex financial transactions, regulatory violations, and potential criminal liability for individuals. By understanding the interplay of these different legal areas, I can provide comprehensive advice and develop a tailored approach to address the specific needs of my clients.

    In your experience as a corporate governance expert and Independent Director, what ethical challenges do companies commonly face, and how do you guide them through ensuring compliance and ethical business practices?  

    As a corporate governance expert and Independent Director, I have encountered a wide range of ethical challenges faced by companies. Common issues include conflicts of interest, bribery and corruption, environmental sustainability concerns, and data privacy breaches. To address these challenges, I guide companies by promoting transparency, accountability, and ethical decision-making. This involves establishing robust governance frameworks, implementing ethical policies and procedures, conducting regular risk assessments, and fostering a culture of integrity within the organization. By providing independent oversight and guidance, I help companies navigate ethical complexities and maintain a strong reputation in the marketplace. Additionally, I stress the importance of board oversight to ensure accountability and adherence to ethical standards, ultimately guiding companies toward sustainable compliance and ethical business practices.

    As a seasoned legal professional, what advice would you give to young lawyers starting their careers, especially those interested in combining multiple areas of law as you have with corporate, criminal, and commercial law? 

    To young lawyers starting their careers, I would advise them to embrace a broad-based approach to their legal education and practice. While specializing in a particular area of law can be beneficial, a diverse background can offer unique insights and opportunities. By exploring multiple areas of law, you can develop a well-rounded understanding of the legal landscape and better serve your clients’ needs. Additionally, don’t be afraid to step outside of your comfort zone and take on challenging cases. Every experience, whether positive or negative, can contribute to your professional growth and development.

    Having qualifications in both corporate law and mediation, how do you blend these seemingly contrasting roles of litigation and peaceful dispute resolution in your day-to-day practice?

    Blending my qualifications in corporate law and mediation allows me to approach disputes with a unique perspective that balances advocacy and resolution. In my day-to-day practice, I assess each situation to determine the most effective strategy. While these two approaches may seem contrasting, they are actually complementary. In many cases, mediation can be a valuable tool for resolving disputes before they escalate into litigation. By leveraging my mediation skills, I can help parties identify common ground, explore mutually beneficial solutions, and reach agreements that avoid the time, expense, and stress of a courtroom battle.

    However, there are also situations where litigation may be necessary to protect clients’ rights or interests. In such cases, my corporate law expertise enables me to develop a strong legal strategy, advocate effectively in court, and negotiate favourable settlements when appropriate.

    As the founder of “Legal Eloquence” and an advocate for continuous learning, how do you mentor young lawyers and legal professionals in developing both technical legal skills and the softer skills required for success in the industry?  

    In today’s rapidly evolving legal landscape, marked by advancements in artificial intelligence and the increasing complexity of legal issues, success requires a multifaceted approach. At “Legal Eloquence,” we believe that thriving as a legal professional, demands not only a strong foundation of technical legal skills but also a deep understanding of human dynamics and effective communication. To mentor young lawyers and legal professionals, we focus on developing both aspects of their professional development. On the technical side, we provide comprehensive training in legal research, writing, and analysis, equipping them to navigate the complexities of the legal system and understand the ethical implications of their practice. We emphasize the importance of staying up-to-date with legal developments and industry trends, including the integration of AI tools into legal workflows.

    However, we also recognize that the legal profession is increasingly interpersonal. Therefore, we invest in developing the softer skills that are essential for building relationships, communicating effectively, and navigating the challenges of the legal workplace. By fostering a culture of continuous learning and professional development, we aim to inspire the next generation of legal leaders.

    Your background includes working with environmental, social, and governance (ESG) matters. How do you see interdisciplinary collaboration between lawyers and other professionals (like environmental scientists) playing a role in corporate legal strategies in the future?  

    Interdisciplinary collaboration between lawyers and professionals such as environmental scientists will be crucial in shaping corporate legal strategies related to ESG matters, particularly in the context of Business Responsibility and Sustainability Reporting (BRSR). This collaboration enables organizations to align legal compliance with environmental objectives, ensuring that their strategies meet BRSR requirements while addressing sustainability challenges. By integrating legal expertise with scientific insights, companies can develop comprehensive frameworks that not only enhance compliance but also drive innovation and responsible practices, ultimately fostering greater transparency and accountability in their operations.

    With such a demanding and diverse career, how do you find time to unwind and recharge? Are there any specific activities or hobbies that help you maintain a healthy work-life balance?  

    Balancing a demanding and diverse career with personal well-being is essential for long-term success and happiness. I prioritize unwinding through activities that allow me to disconnect and recharge.

    One of my favourite ways to relax is spending time in nature. I enjoy hiking, gardening, and simply being outdoors. Additionally, I find meditation and mindfulness practices to be invaluable tools for managing stress and maintaining focus. Regular exercise, such as jogging and yoga, helps me clear my mind and stay physically fit. Additionally, I enjoy reading, both fiction and non-fiction, as it provides an escape and stimulates my creativity. Spending time with family and friends is also vital; it keeps me grounded and offers a supportive network. Finally, I dedicate time to hobbies like cooking and exploring new cuisines, which not only relaxes me but also adds a personal touch to my life outside of work. These activities collectively help me maintain focus and energy in my professional endeavors.

    Get in touch with Abhishek ESQ-

  • “In the dynamic landscape of legal practice, a client-centric approach  stands as the cornerstone of success for lawyers, striving to excel and that means  developing a process for building and sustaining relationships”- Rakesh Kumar Singh, Advocate-on- Record, Supreme Court of India

    “In the dynamic landscape of legal practice, a client-centric approach  stands as the cornerstone of success for lawyers, striving to excel and that means  developing a process for building and sustaining relationships”- Rakesh Kumar Singh, Advocate-on- Record, Supreme Court of India

    This Interview has been published by Pragya Chandni and The SuperLawyer Team

    Can you tell us about your journey into law? What inspired you to pursue an LL.B and later an LL.M in Corporate/Banking & Insurance law?

    My journey into law is not an easy Journey. It was my Childhood dream to  become a lawyer, but initially destiny had planned something else for me and due  to the compelling economic conditions of my family and my zeal to serve the  country, I had joined the Indian Air Force at the age of 17 Years as an Airman in the  year 1996. 

    While serving the Indian Air Force I have pursued my higher education.  When I was posted at Air Force Station, Nashik, I attended evening law college  after my working hours in the Indian Air Force for a law degree. I did my LLM from  Kurukshetra University. 

    I am a first-generation lawyer with no lawyer in the immediate or distant family.  Being from a humble background, I was always inspired by this profession and  believed that lawyers have the unique opportunity to help others and make a  difference in their lives.  

    You have extensive experience in the Supreme Court of India, High Courts, and Tribunals. What were some of the most challenging cases you handled early in your career?

    Most of the cases I handled initially were challenging. I would like  to talk about two of those cases: – 

    There is a reported case of CBI, wherein, we all have encountered a unique  legal issue, that whether the statement of an accused can be recorded under  Section 313 CrPC, Since the accused is not able to write and speak. The Ld. The Trial  Court Judge has cancelled the bail granted to my client (accused) stating that the  accused is deliberately not answering the question put to him under Section 313  of Cr PC. We had only two days’ time to get relief from the higher court. I had  done all the mentioning and could get the case listed on the same day. The Hon’ble  High Court ruled that “As per the medical report, the accused is unable to write  and speak and therefore the Statement under Section 313 of CrPC cannot be  completed.

    In another case, through SLP (Criminal) I ensured cancellation of bail of a  murder accused from the hon’ble Supreme Court of India, in which indirectly I  received threat from the accused side. 

    Your role as in-charge of the Air Force Legal Cell at the HQ Western Air Command is quite intriguing. Can you share some key experiences and challenges you faced during your tenure there?

    As in-charge of the Indian Air Force Legal Cell, one needs to have a much more holistic understanding of law. Right from the management of  litigation in Courts and Tribunals for Union of India and Indian Air Force to  management and conduct of Court Martial and Court of Inquiry, management of  all the applications and 1st and 2nd Appeals related to Indian Air Force under the  Right to Information Act, 2005. Defended 2nd Appeals on behalf of the Indian Air  Force under the Right to Information Act at Central Information Commission,  Management and conduct of Charge Trials for the minor offence committed by  Indian Air Force personnel, to provide general legal administrative and  Secretarial support to Command Judge Advocate. 

    Further, you are not only in charge of the Legal Cell, but you are a trusted  advisor, making sure that the legal department of Command Headquarter and  Units under its area of operations functions properly and smoothly. 

     Managing litigation on behalf of the Union of India/Indian Air Force must have been a significant responsibility. What strategies did you employ to effectively manage and resolve these legal issues?

    Strategy is one of the most critical aspects in effectively managing  and resolving legal issues of an important organization like the Indian Air Force. A  good strategy acts as the bedrock on which the entire legal department functions  efficiently.  

    I started understanding the work and worked closely with Command Judge  Advocate Generals to set clear legal goals that fit with the Organization’s overall  plans. Good and effective Communication within the team members and with  other departments were the key for everyone to work together smoothly and in  tandem. I used to talk regularly with the Unit Legal Cells of the Command to  understand their Legal needs and extend all the possible help round the clock.

    You have a strong background in drafting various legal documents. What do you think are the most critical aspects of drafting effective legal documents?

    Legal Drafting is the most important instrument of legal  Communication. The Skill to draft well, is the skill to think and Communicate  Well.  

    In my legal draft I judiciously select words, phrases and clauses adhering  to the intricacies of the subject matter. Whether it’s contracts, Agreements, or  Petitions, each document necessitates bespoke attention to details. 

    A proficient drafter must bridge the gap between precision and  comprehensibility leaving no room for ambiguity. Documents must not only be  legally sound but also strategically crafted to achieve the desired outcomes for  the clients. 

    One needs to follow the principles of drafting legal documents i.e., clarity  and precision, simplicity and conciseness, specificity and completeness and  compliance with legal requirements. 

    Maintaining excellent relations with clients and legal counsels is vital in your profession. Can you share your approach to building and sustaining these relationships?

    In the dynamic landscape of legal practice, a client-centric approach  stands as the cornerstone of success for lawyers, striving to excel and that means  developing a process for building and sustaining relationships. 

    I make a compelling argument for why clients should choose us. My approach  is to build lasting relationships with the clients and ensure they don’t feel like  mere rupee signs. It is important to understand the client’s needs, the  communication should be transparent, I should be able to manage the expectation  of my client and I should be ready to walk an extra mile by providing exceptional  services. 

    Building and sustaining strong client relationships is paramount in the legal  profession, where trust serves as the CornerStone for Success. For an Advocate  -on-Record, most of the Clients are legal Counsels of High Courts and trial Courts  through whom briefs come.

    You’ve obtained favorable judgments for clients in several high-profile cases, including the Delhi Metro Rail Corporation project and Armed Forces personnel cases. Could you elaborate on these achievements and their impact?

    The legal field is known for being highly competitive with lawyers,  Paralegals and legal professionals all striving to outperform one another. This  intense environment often resembles a constant legal battle where success is the  ultimate prize. In such a challenging arena these achievements become imperative. 

    This was the long pending issue of Delhi Metro Rail Corporation project  due to which DMRC has suffered revenue loss of Crores of Rupees. I had perused  the legal issues of land acquisition and rehabilitation of people from one place to  another place. The said DMRC project was affecting the residents of Trilokpuri. 

    There were multiple litigations pending in various Courts including the Supreme  Court of India on the issue. The 58.6 Kms long Mukundpur Shiv Vihar Corridor  was to be the longest Corridor on Delhi Metro Network. The Delhi Metro had  missed the deadlines for its Phase III project. A Communal twist has prevented  Delhi Metro from relocating nearly 400 families at Trilokpuri. The DMRC was  struggling to resolve this issue. The Delhi Metro was given an alternative land in  Pocket 16,17, and 18 for rehabilitation of People living in pocket 15 in 2014 itself,  but DMRC was not able to carry out the rehabilitation work even after the  completion of the construction of flats due the non verification of documents and  multiple litigation pending in various Courts. 

    I have successfully undertaken the project of rehabilitation of the affected  person to the alternate location by verifying their documents and clearing the way  for the long pending DMRC project, which further settled all the litigations pending  in various courts. 

    In one of the landmark Case of Armed Force, I successfully argued before  the Principal Bench of the Armed Forces Tribunal, wherein, the Hon’ble Bench  has directed the Ministry of Defence and Indian Air Force to issue a No Objection  Certificate (NOC) to Serving personnel of Indian Air Force, Sgt Samant Singh  Sengar, clearing his way to join as an Assistant Professor of History in Madhya 

    Pradesh Public Service/Commission. In 2017, he applied for the post of Assistant  Professor with the Madhya Pradesh Government and cleared the exams. However,  he could not secure permission from the IAF since his current Skill grade did not  qualify him for the post. In the revised Policy of the Air Force, possession of  professional skill grade ‘A’ was added as a mandatory requirement to apply for  Gp A/B Civil exams. 

    This landmark Judgement has paved the way for many similarly situated aspiring airmen. 

    Finally, what advice would you give to fresh law graduates who are just starting their careers? What key skills and mindset should they develop to succeed in this field?

    My advice to fresh law graduates who are just starting their career  is to focus on basic concepts and constantly stay informed about changes. It’s  important to stay updated on new developments and technologies. 

    They should work on and develop analytical abilities to assess the complex  legal issues, analyze statutes and case laws. Effective written and oral  communication skills are paramount in law. The young lawyers should also  develop proficiency in legal research to gather relevant information, examine  precedents to support their legal arguments. 

    Nevertheless, fresh law graduates should always strive to maintain a high  standard of professionalism, ethics and integrity in all their work. Law is a noble  profession, and it’s important to uphold its values and principles.

    Get in touch with Rakesh Kumar Singh-


  • “Be open to collaborations and aim for higher. Working together with an advocate or a friend on a sharing basis will yield better results.” – Adv Pushkar Patil, Advocate at Adv Pushkar Patil and Associates.

    “Be open to collaborations and aim for higher. Working together with an advocate or a friend on a sharing basis will yield better results.” – Adv Pushkar Patil, Advocate at Adv Pushkar Patil and Associates.

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    Could you share what motivated you to pursue a career in law and how your journey began, especially your initial experiences in the legal field?

    I am a second-generation lawyer, many people think that it is only because my father is an Advocate, that I have come into this field. It is partly true, watching him as a kid has always been the real source of inspiration. But I always wanted to be into Sports, to be honest. I have played at National Level Cricket, but being in the shoes of an Advocate is something I have always been passionate about. And if I rightly remember, I have been visiting the Court since I was 6 years old.

    Reflecting on your early career, what were some of the significant challenges you faced when you first started practicing, and how did you overcome them?

    After completing my LLB degree, I simultaneously pursued my education in Diploma in Corporate Law and a Diploma in Housing Law. I also worked with a Real Estate group that was engaged in buying and selling of properties that initially had my liking. However, I completed my LLM from University of Glasgow, Scotland and I intended to work in the United Kingdom itself. But maybe it wasn’t destined. I came back to India and immediately went to Mumbai and joined Jaykar and Partners. It was a good experience. One fine day, I got a call from my close friend who was facing multiple cases, and since the “fee” part wasn’t the initial criteria for me, I took up his cases and that’s how the real journey began. Contrary to what others think, my father did not entertain me in his firm, which I believe was a good decision. As of the challenges you may ask, yes, it was difficult, I used to take guidance from many friends and seniors who sometimes did guide well. The truth is, you never find perfection in practice, there is nothing called stability, l or fixed income, there are always going to be downfalls, it depends on every individual how sportingly he takes it and faces the situation. For me, I have always taken it positively, as the legend says, every Storm is followed by the calm.

    How did your time at the University of Glasgow, particularly studying LLM in International Commercial Law, influence your approach to legal practice and contribute to your expertise in handling complex cases?  

    There is a vast difference between studying LLB and LLM, on top of it there is a huge difference between the LLM in India as well as the LLM in Scotland. The LLM courses in the United Kingdom also differ from university to university. Just as any other ordinary kid, I was guided by the Consultancy firms to opt for a good university. In 2013, University of Glasgow, School of Law ranked No. 1. It was but natural I opted for taking admission there. The course was indeed difficult, but you learn through the course. Not just in studies, I had the opportunity to meet new people and explore new opinions, new cultures, new traditions, and new concepts and I also found small-time jobs where I made new friends. All this affects our thinking plus the Dissertation studies also helped me a lot to work on research techniques. In real life, these things help a lot. In simple words, you find out that to reach the top of the mountain, there are multiple ways, you just have to find the right ones. In situations of studying and appearing complex and complicated cases, sometimes hiring an expert along with you always gives a new direction and a new perspective with experience of course.

    You were awarded the Cyber – Techno Legal Pioneer award in 2021. Could you elaborate on the contributions that led to this recognition?

    When I begin my practice, initially I only wanted to work in the Corporate field and that was the exact reason I completed my LLM in Commercial Law and I joined a corporate firm. But down the line, handling my friend’s case and the cases referred by friends and relatives, had a variety in them. From Civil disputes, Matrimonial Disputes, criminal cases, etc., to mediation, all of this variety pushed me into the different types of matters which were neither of the same nature nor similar facts. Since I did not completely understand the law regarding electronic evidence or I would say there was not much awareness about the same in the beginning of year 2015, I started researching on the authenticity of electronic evidence. In this phase, cyber frauds had also started to begin, and this was something worth exploring. I started to handle matters that had the part of electronic evidence, electronic records and areas that covered the Information Technology Act. It is here I received appreciation from the legal fraternity, including Police officers who would also call me up and ask for guidance. I have in fact delivered over 75 lectures to various colleges and institutions which covers the topic of Cyber Crimes. The word quickly spread and it’s here. I came into contact with Dr. Rohan Nyayadhish who recommended my name for the Cyber-Techno Legal Pioneer Award in 2021. It felt really good. 

    With over 1000 cases handled, can you discuss a particularly challenging case and what unique legal strategies you employed to achieve a successful outcome?  

    Well amongst thousands of cases that me and my firm have handled, we dealt with a case of rape and bigamy. There has been a long debate as to whether Matrimonial Rape is punishable or not, but this unique case we dealt with was regarding Bigamy and cheating as well. So whether this can amount to Rape (having sexual intercourse with a second wife), was a real question. Although the Indian Penal Code defines Consent, in this case, we had to research the very concept of “Consent” obtained by deceit and fraud. The case was almost 13 years old and because of the strict guidelines of the hon’ble High Court, this case was expedited to be concluded within 3 months. The prosecution testified several witnesses to prove every section in isolation and I had the opportunity to cross-examine them at length. This case also had the angle of Information Technology where we challenged the “65B certificate” as it was not in proper format. We succeeded in getting our client acquitted because of various lacunae of the prosecution and the failure by prosecution to prove the “fraudulent intention” of our client.

    How do you see the role of technology evolving in the practice of law, particularly in the areas of criminal and cyber law, and what steps have you taken to integrate technological advancements into your legal practice?  

    Technology has become a basic need for our human society. Hate it or love it, you cannot ignore it. With the Rapid growth in digitalisation and the courts also moving towards adopting the good uses of Artificial Intelligence, there are going to be several challenges to not just the Courts, but also to the investigation agencies and this also means a good area of practice to all the lawyers to explore. Since the implementation of mandatory e-filing and the requirement to upload every application online first, we have no choice but to work in hybrid mode. So we have to adopt what is existing and although there is no smoothness in the work as yet, it will eventually become normal, we have to go with the flow and adopt the changes. For the basics, getting a good-sized semi Commercial Printer Scanner Xerox machine is what every lawyer needs along with a good speed Internet and a good Mobile Tablet with a good camera. This has been a modern-day basic in practice.

    You’ve been a guest lecturer on various legal issues at numerous prestigious institutions. How has this experience contributed to your professional growth and understanding of the law?  

    I have delivered lectures to various institutions on various topics. Every time I have to deliver a lecture, I make sure to give at least 2 full days for its preparation. I also prepare a PPT which gives the listeners an ease in understanding the concept. Once again, before any lecture, what I do is research. This is something I have learned during my LLM course and this has helped me alot to sharpen my own knowledge. To simplify it, the more and more books you read, the more and more you understand a concept and then you can explain it to the others which again sharpens your knowledge. Delivering lectures is stressful, but the sense of satisfaction that I see on the faces of the listeners at the end of it is everything that matters. In all my lectures, the only thing I try to do is, Keep it simple.

    Working with a team of 17 advocates and 6 interns at Patil and Mantri Associates, how do you ensure effective collaboration and maintain high standards of legal practice?  And  what advice would you give to young lawyers and law students who aspire to specialize in criminal and cyber law?

    To all the students, aspirants and upcoming lawyers and freshers reading this, I would suggest you, welcome and be open to collaboration on a sharing basis. You cannot become a master of all the concepts overnight. Law is vast, but you can always be smart enough to accompany another advocate who has an expertise in that matter and work alongside them for the benefit of your client and a fair amount of professional fee. With the debate going on in various parts of the country over the stipend, I would suggest you to aim for higher. “Stipend” will cut off your wings and settle you down for less, but working together along with an advocate or your friend on a sharing basis will yield better fruits. Once you are into a good experience, take up pro-bono matters, work for legal aid and use your experience, expertise and knowledge to give back to society. To the lawyers, I advise you to read a lot of articles, case laws, judgments etc and observe the cross-examinations in Trial Court, do not jump to higher courts. And to the law students, I would suggest in addition to all of these, participating in the Moot Courts, it helps.

    You’ve mentioned interests in activities like gym and American football. How do you balance these personal hobbies with the demands of your legal career? Please share how important it is to unwind yourself from work?

    Well, I do have a lot of interest in staying fit. I have been into sports since childhood; I have played National Level Cricket and have also for a brief period, been into kickboxing. I have also held the Vice-president post for Wako Kickboxing Trust, Pune and I suggest that every lawyer must give at least an hour of his busy schedule daily to work on his body. A good appearance and a wonderful personality is a positive energy. A positive energy keeps the mind calm and open to learning new things. No man on earth is so busy that he cannot give time to work on his health, so please make sure you stay fit. Be it any sport you love. Do not settle for less.

    Get in touch with Adv. Pushkar Patil-

  • “Life is what happens to you when you are busy making other plans” – From Medicine to Mastery in Law: Rajvendra Sarswat, Independent practitioner & Senior Standing Counsel for Union of India

    “Life is what happens to you when you are busy making other plans” – From Medicine to Mastery in Law: Rajvendra Sarswat, Independent practitioner & Senior Standing Counsel for Union of India

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    Could you please help our readers get to know you better by sharing how you came into the field of law? We’d love to hear about your journey, who inspired you to join the legal profession, and the challenges you faced initially.  

    Many of us will agree that growing up in the nineties, there used to be primarily two career choices every student had to make at a certain stage, either medicals or engineering, and similarly I was also in the same mainstream preparing to be a doctor someday. Law was surprisingly introduced to me by my brother which intrigued me when I explored more about it as a profession. As I always believe in the quote that ‘life is what happens to you when you are busy making other plans’. I joined National Law University, Jodhpur as its first batch student and graduated in the year 2006 with Corporate Law Honors in B.B.A. LL.B. and thereafter joined Kanga & Company, Mumbai and also worked with Majmudar & Partners, Mumbai till close to 2011 end. While working with these firms it was purely general corporate, M&A and PE transactional work with almost negligible work related to litigation and the learning I received from both these places left a significant impression in my approach towards work. My initial years into litigation were very challenging and every new case I got was accepted as a blessing. I was appointed as amicus curiae or Court commissioner in many Public Interest Litigations during my initial years which gave me the opportunity to appear regularly before the court and to make myself relevant. I was always open to any area of law and focused myself to take each case as the most important and crucial for me for building myself as a litigation lawyer.   

    As Senior Standing Counsel for Union of India, GST, Central Excise / Customs, what are the key challenges you face in representing such a broad spectrum of governmental interests?

    The most fascinating part of representing tax department in the High Court is that mostly the controversies involved are interpretational issues where constitutional validity is under question and having serious implications wherein invariably I get the chance to argue against the best and top tax lawyers of the country, which I believe is a valuable learning experience for me. As we know that the Goods and Service Tax law is new and evolving so many issues are nascent and completely innovative in its challenge which is a constant learning experience. One has to keep in mind the complexity of Laws, diverse stakes, managing the litigation coupled with the factor in change in the policy. However, balancing the government’s interests with the broader public interest can be a delicate task. Ensuring that legal actions align with public expectations and serve the overall welfare of the society is important. Navigating these challenges requires a deep understanding of legal intricacies, effective communication skills, strategic thinking, and the ability to adapt to dynamic legal landscapes.

    We want to understand how different the study of law is compared to the practice of law. What was the most challenging aspect of transitioning from academic learning to actual legal practice?  

    What we study in law school is a very fundamental yet primitive part of law. The actual application and understating of the practical aspects of law comes only when we enter in the profession. As a first generation lawyer, the journey is altogether different and difficult because you inherit nothing and have to build everything from scratch but the good part is that you have an empty canvas and you are the artist. A fresh law school graduate who wishes to enter into litigation should always start with fundamental and practical aspects including the process of filing or curing of defects therefore I also advise to start from trial courts for at least two years before practicing in higher forums. Nowadays it’s good to see that law schools are also focusing on practical learning aspects other than just theoretical teaching. Applying legal principles to real cases, clients, and situations requires a different skill set than memorizing legal theories. In academia, the emphasis is often on analysing case law and statutes. However, in practice, building strong client relationships, effective communication, and understanding client needs become crucial. Developing these interpersonal skills can be challenging for some. In a practical legal environment, time management becomes critical. Meeting deadlines, handling multiple cases simultaneously, and managing client expectations require efficient time management skills that may not be as emphasized in academic settings. And, most importantly grappling with ethical dilemmas, maintaining client confidentiality, and upholding professional conduct standards are integral parts of legal practice that go beyond academic discussions of legal ethics. I also happen to be a guest faculty at a few law universities. I also give lectures at many intuitions and this helps me keep my own learning in the game.     

    How do you approach the complexities of constitutional writs compared to other types of legal matters you handle, and what strategies have proven most effective for you?  

    The unique feature of writ jurisdiction is that it’s an extraordinary remedy and how you can convince the court to get a favourable order depends upon how innovative and ingenious you can be. In my experience of being into litigation, I believe there is only one strategy and that is there is no strategy. You have to be quick on your feet, well prepared and thoroughly researched. One of the key focuses should be on the drafting because there may not be occasion for you to change your pleadings in the later stage if you have missed out a crucial fact or legal ground. You must know what to speak and more importantly what not to speak. Court crafting is an art and it takes patience and keen openness for observing to learn on a daily basis which cannot be taught but has to be learnt. By combining thorough legal research, precise drafting, effective oral advocacy, and a deep understanding of constitutional principles, handling constitutional writs can be approached with the rigor and strategic insight they demand. This ensures that the complexities of these cases are navigated effectively, maximizing the chances of a favourable outcome. When I joined litigation, I ensured to be in the court and get the chance to hear senior advocates arguing their matters because one can learn a lot from mere observation as to how a particular case was presented and how the questions of the court were replied back. 

    What innovations or changes would you like to see in the Indian judicial system to improve efficiency and fairness in legal proceedings? Additionally, what steps are you personally taking or planning to take to help achieve these improvements?   

    We are presently in a rapidly growing and evolving legal system. Before the covid pandemic, none ever imagined the idea of having courts running online where lawyers and even litigants were attending courts from home. Now we have a seamless virtual platform where any lawyer can not only do the filing but also attend the court. We just need more adaptability and openness to it. However, that is mostly at the High Court and Supreme Court or other higher forums, which needs to be adopted at all the levels. This requires proper infrastructure and training. Once this is achieved, service of process, examination of witness, inspection etc. many such procedural aspects which delays the justice dispension system can be curtailed. We are currently transitioning our entire office from physical file to digital file and do not carry physical file to the dias. This way we have access to the entire office record, documents and relevant judgments with ease even if we are travelling. 

    You transitioned from being an associate to a legal head and then switched back to a senior associate role. What differences did you observe in both practice areas during these transitions, and what motivated your move back to the litigation?  

    You cannot compare being an associate in a corporate non-litigation firm with being an in-house counsel with any corporate organisation with having your independent practice as they all work within their uniquely peculiar sphere. The kind of work you do, the atmosphere you work in, the people you deal with on a daily basis, the issues you have to handle independently, they all are different and distinct. The initial journey is always difficult, nonetheless, they all have their own challenges and benefits. After graduating from law school; my primary interest was to work with a good corporate law firm, either in Delhi or Mumbai. I got a chance to work with two very reputed firms in Mumbai and a brief period to be legal head of a public limited company. However, after working for a few years I realised the quench of working on my own started bubbling up. I remember I had visited the High Court once for a matter related to one of my relatives and after observing the lawyers and court room, from there the idea of starting my own practice triggered inside. It was a very difficult and risky decision to take after investing years into Mumbai and then coming back to Jodhpur coupled with the fact being a first generation lawyer, but somehow I took the plunge. My initial few years as a litigation lawyer were difficult with self-doubts and fear as to who will give me work and how will I sustain; but I also believe that such fear keeps you motivated too.

    Mr. Sarswat, transitioning from prestigious firms to independent practice is often a significant milestone. Could you share how your independent practice is evolving, and which specific areas of law are you currently focusing on? Additionally, what qualities do you look for in interns who seek to work under your guidance? Any suggestions you would like to give them?

    I practice primarily constitutional writs, civil, arbitration and a few criminal matters too. Public Interest Litigation has inspired me to a significant manner which lead me to file and appear in many such PILs involving public issues around me, where we have been successful to get very favourable orders from Court either as the counsel or as the amicus curiae. We also do a lot of arbitration practice. The qualities which I aspire and look for in anyone who is willing to join litigation is patience, persistence and hard work. There is no shortcut in this profession and if one can maintain that, the sky’s the limit. I firmly believe that every person has a unique journey and the only comparison you should have is with yourself as to what you were one year back in the past. I find young lawyers getting impatient, which is inevitable though, but this is a lifelong building profession and takes time. One has to be well prepared with facts and position of law, latest judgment on the issue involved. If you are sincere and hardworking, you will automatically stand out and become noticeable. If one can manage to do that, one will be picked up at the right time from the right people and the path will appear. Lastly, never be too focused that you miss out little opportunities at the corner of your eyes and if you wish to take litigation as a serious and primary choice of profession, then only join it otherwise don’t start it with as plan B.

    Outside of law, what hobbies or personal interests do you pursue that help you maintain a balanced perspective?  

    I love to read and travel. I believe the more you read and travel, the broader perspective you achieve about various aspects of life. One should have a habit of reading at least 15-20 pages daily, other than office work. I also write and paint at times. Every new place you visit, teaches you a lot about yourself as a person too. I also love running and keeping myself physically fit because a healthy body can only give you a healthy mind. I love to listen to old school music and my favourite bands or artists are U2, Bob Dylan and all time legends Kishore Kumar and Jagjit Singh.  

    Get in touch with Rajvendra Sarswat-

  • “Lawyers are tools of social change in society. Observing my surroundings, where there are prevalent economic and social inequalities, I always wished to be a tool for social change.” – MANOHAR PRATAP, Advocate-on-Record at the Supreme Court of India.

    “Lawyers are tools of social change in society. Observing my surroundings, where there are prevalent economic and social inequalities, I always wished to be a tool for social change.” – MANOHAR PRATAP, Advocate-on-Record at the Supreme Court of India.

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    Can you share what initially inspired you to pursue a career in law, especially coming from a remote rural area in Bihar? Who showed you this career path of Law? Please allow us to walk through your journey.

    Right from the very beginning, i.e. primary school days, I used to read that most of the freedom fighters, politicians and ministers were lawyers. This fact developed thinking inside my mind that lawyers are tools of social change in society. Observing my surroundings, where there are prevalent economic and social inequalities, I always wished to be a tool for social change. Though initially, I tried social upliftment in the village through arranging plays, cleanliness drives and free tuition after passing intermediate examinations, I decided to choose law as a profession so that my passion could also be fulfilled.

    Transitioning from a Hindi medium school to studying law in English must have been challenging. How did you overcome these hurdles, and what advice would you give to students in similar situations?  

    Transitioning from Hindi Medium to English was the biggest challenge. Initially in school, I learnt translations from books, but later I chose more convenient ways to learn English by listening to Hindi and English news broadcasts respectively. Hindi and English broadcasts of BBC, DW (Deutsche Welle) and All India Radio on short waves helped me to a greater extent. Later in college, I used both Hindi and English medium books to study, however I used to write examinations in English. Watching English movies with subtitles also helped me in gaining vocabulary. After joining the courts, reading judgments regularly improved my English.

    Young students who are in similar situations are advised to read lots and lots of bilingual study materials and switch to English gradually. In the current times, knowledge of the English Language is a must for success at least in Supreme Court and High Courts. However, no one should feel shy in trying even if he/she feels that his English is not perfect. Even today, after almost a decade of law practice, sometimes I fail to find or remember exact English words for feelings that I wish to express to Court or somewhere else. So the most important part is to keep trying and to remember that none of the Indians speak English as their mother tongue and they all have learnt English sooner or later as a second language only.

    You have an extensive background working with legal stalwarts like Mr. K. K. Venugopal and Mr. Kapil Sibal. What are some key learnings you gained from these experiences?  

    Briefing legal stalwarts like Mr. K. K. Venugopal and Mr. Kapil Sibal are insightful. I have briefed them on many occasions in my independent matters. The biggest learning from briefing them is, to hear briefs patiently and carefully. Even though they are themselves an authority on some legal subject matters, but then also they take briefings very patiently and accommodate the viewpoints of juniors. In one of the matters wherein interpretation of the MMDR Act was involved, Mr. K. K. Venugopal, who was the Attorney General of India, had many detailed discussions with me as assisting counsel before giving the final Written Opinion to the State of Chhattisgarh.

    Since shifting your focus to the Supreme Court in 2016, how has your approach to handling cases evolved, and what unique challenges have you encountered?  

    After shifting practice in the Supreme Court, my approach has remained simple and steady. I never draft unnecessary bulky briefs and have never tried to mislead the Hon’ble Court or the opposite party. In the beginning years, my focal point of briefs was scattered but with experience, gradually, I have learnt to pinpoint the main legal issues involved in a case, so that the Hon’ble Court may not waste valuable judicial time in finding legal issues in a brief.

    The most unique challenge I have faced in the Supreme Court is the unbalanced approach of Hon’ble Benches in hearing cases that are led by Senior Advocates and Advocates. There is a general tendency among Judges that if a matter is represented by relatively young counsel, it must not be an important matter. Some benches even get angry and try to dissuade them from appearing in the Supreme Court threatening with costs.  

    You have been involved in various public interest litigations aimed at improving the judicial system. Can you discuss a specific PIL you worked on and its impact on society?  

    I remained part of many PILs. However, the most important PIL was ‘Youth Bar Association of India V Union of India’ reported in (2016) 9 SCC 473 wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court was pleased to direct all states and Union Territories to upload a copy of FIR on respective websites within 24 hours of its registration. This judgment had a huge impact on the administration of justice. Earlier, common citizens were not able to get copies of FIR even after many attempts, now it can be obtained through some clicks online. In one of PIL ‘Manohar Pratap V Union of India’ W.P. (C) No. 780 of 2019, I raised issues of the deaths of hundreds of children in Bihar due to Encephalitis. The Hon’ble Supreme Court took a serious view in the matter and in reply filed by the State of Bihar, it was found that there is a complete lack of medical services in Bihar. Later the matter was disposed of with liberty to approach the High Court of Patna.

    During your tenure as Deputy Advocate General for the State of Chhattisgarh, what were some significant cases you handled, and what did this role teach you about state-level legal issues?  

    During my tenure as Deputy Advocate General, most of the matters handled by me were related to the MMDR Act and NGT Act. There are no such remarkable judgments to point out, however representing the state I learned about the stage-wise implementation of policies, and lacunas in State machinery leading to non-implementation of judgments.

    As a staunch supporter of mediation in matrimonial cases, how do you see mediation contributing to a more efficient and humane judicial process?  

    Mediation is an important tool for resolving disputes. From my personal experience, I found that there is a 50% success rate for resolving disputes through mediation, which is much better than dragging cases for years.

    As a staunch supporter of mediation in matrimonial cases, how do you see mediation contributing to a more efficient and humane judicial process? Can you elaborate on its effectiveness in resolving disputes compared to traditional litigation?  

    Most mediations are in matrimonial disputes arising from transfer petitions. I don’t do adversarial litigation in matrimonial disputes and always try to find an amicable solution through the help of mediators from the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee. Meditations in matrimonial disputes are completely averse to traditional litigation. When parties in matrimonial disputes go to Courts in traditional hearings, they develop animosity against each other which further deteriorates their relationship, and litigation keeps going on for years and years. However, in Mediation, when parties sit face to face in the presence of a mediator, with the comfort that their words cannot be used against each other in a Court of law, they open up and issues are generally resolved in 1 to 3 hearings. Which saves a lot of judicial time.

    Outside of your legal practice, what personal hobbies or interests do you pursue, and how do they help you maintain a work-life balance? 

    Outside my legal practice, I am a pet lover and I like to travel to serene places. I am a good swimmer. In my free time, I watch a lot of documentaries based on various social and other issues around the world.

    Looking ahead, what are your goals for your independent practice, and how do you plan to continue contributing to the legal field and society at large?   

    My goal in independent practice is to keep gradually rising and make space among already established names in the Supreme Court. For my contribution to society, I do many pro bono cases, mostly for persons in custody. All the matters that I argue in the Supreme Court are aimed towards strengthening the civil liberties and rights of common citizens. I believe that every advocate owes a duty to challenge arbitrary actions of Govts. which are aimed towards curtailing liberty in any manner. 

    Get in touch with Manohar Pratap-

  • “As a Panel Advocate, I developed ethical practising skills and increased my corporate legal field knowledge.” – From Ayurveda to Advocacy: The Transformative Journey of Deen Dayal Purohit, Advocate at the Jaipur High Court & Purohit & Associates,

    “As a Panel Advocate, I developed ethical practising skills and increased my corporate legal field knowledge.” – From Ayurveda to Advocacy: The Transformative Journey of Deen Dayal Purohit, Advocate at the Jaipur High Court & Purohit & Associates,

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    Could you please introduce yourself to our readers and walk us through your journey? Also before pursuing your LL.B., you completed a diploma in Ayurveda Ratna. What motivated you to switch to law after seven years in Ayurveda? What inspired you to pursue law?

    Yes, I’ll feel grateful to introduce myself and about my journey to you. From 1985 to 2000, I served as a consultant in the renowned Ayurveda Pharmaceutical company, meanwhile, in 1997 my brother B.P. Chhangani was selected for judicial service. He motivated me to do an LLB course, and as you know I cleared LLB in the year 2000 and started practising as an Advocate from 2000 onwards to continue.

    Could you please elaborate on the main practice areas you specialize in and the types of cases you most frequently handle in your legal practice?

    My main practising areas are Criminal, and Writs in the High Court.

    What responsibilities does your position as a Public Notary for the Government of India entail, and how does it integrate with your other legal work?

    In the tribunals and high courts, documents need to be notarized, so, it is a part of day-to-day professional practice.

    You have been a panel advocate for numerous institutions. How does this role differ from private practice, and what skills have you developed from these experiences? Please share some insights from your work as a panel advocate.

    Panel Advocating work is different from private practice. As a Panel Advocate, I’m working in corporate culture. During my work as a Panel Advocate, I developed ethical practising skills and increased my corporate legal field knowledge. 

    Could you please discuss the significance of the reportable judgments you were involved in, such as Priyanka Shrimali Vs. State of Rajasthan and Hindustan Zinc Ltd. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors.? Also you could share some insights from the case.

    In the case of Priyanka Shrimali Vs. State of Rajasthan the significance of this matter was “Married daughter is entitled to the compassionate appointments in the Government service”. Before this judgment, the Married daughter was not entitled to the compassionate appointment. In the case of Hindustan Zinc Ltd. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors., the significance of this matter is “the challenge to the vires of provisions of sec 38(C) & 39 of the Act and Rule 24(1) of the Rules fails. The writ petitions are dismissed. However, the petitioners, if aggrieved by the entry made in the provisional assessment list, shall be at liberty to file the appropriate objections before the Assessing authority and in the matters wherein final assessment orders have already been made. The demands have been created, they shall be at liberty to file an appeal before the Appellate Authority, if not already filed, within thirty days from the date of this order. The amount, if any, deposited by the petitioners against the demand created in terms of interim orders passed by this court or otherwise, shall be adjusted against the amount payable to satisfy the condition of pre-deposit for maintainability of the appeal”.

    Beyond your areas of expertise, which other fields of law do you find particularly fascinating or are passionate about exploring further, and why?  

    In Legal Service Authority Act, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Act and Companies Act, but especially in Article 39 A of the constitution of India enacted Legal Service Authority Act because the Legal Service Authority Act, sec 12 is about free and competent legal services for the needy person and other persons that need the justice.

    As an experienced lawyer, what do you think the current generation can do to prepare themselves for successful careers in law and beyond?  

    The current generation has ample opportunities to prepare and develop for successful careers in legal fields, like International Arbitration, Companies Law, Banking Law, Legal Drafting and several other fields.

    Outside of the legal realm, what are your hobbies or interests that help you unwind from the demands of your profession?  

    Outside the legal realm, I’m working for several legal awareness campaigns at various places like schools, colleges, and public places on subjects like POSH, POCSO, IT, CYBER CRIME, SENIOR CITIZEN’S RIGHTS, LABOUR ACT, PCMA ACT etc.

    Could you tell us more about Purohit and Associates, the types of legal practices they specialize in, and what opportunities they offer for interns looking to gain experience in the legal field?  

    The Purohit & Associate practices in the subordinate court, tribunals, High Court, DRT, State Commission and various other fields, and It develops the skill of Associates in practice as well as in the competition of judicial exams and gives enough opportunities to the Associates working under the Purohit & Associates, and also provide opportunities to intern about “earn while learn”.

    Get in touch with Deen Dayal Purohit-