Super Lawyer

Tag: GNLU

  • Leading with Curiosity: My Journey with Law, Tech, and Mentorship. – Astha Srivastava, Principal Associate at Ikigai Law.

    Leading with Curiosity: My Journey with Law, Tech, and Mentorship. – Astha Srivastava, Principal Associate at Ikigai Law.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    With over nine years of experience, what initially inspired you to pursue a career in law? What drove your decision to choose this profession, and how did your journey shape you into a mentor and a leading voice in technology law?

    It’s always nice to be asked this question. It gives you an opportunity to pause and reflect. And when I do that, I’m taken back to the time I seriously started thinking about law – probably around Class 8 or 9.

    I knew I enjoyed public speaking. I loved talking to people, reading, analysing things, and connecting the dots. Law felt like a natural extension of these abilities.

    That was also around the time when internet use was just picking up in India. I remember, sometime in Class 10 or 11, my father got us a desktop computer. I used it to look up what CLAT was, what law school meant, and what this profession was all about.

    I also had a clear sense of what I wasn’t great at – I was average at maths. And I remember thinking: if I became an engineer, I’d probably be an average one. I didn’t want that. So I chose law. And looking back, I think that was absolutely the right call.

    I didn’t overthink whether I’d succeed or not. At that point, I just knew I’d enjoy it. And that was enough.

    Once college started, I found myself drawn to finance pretty early on. That’s what pulled me toward corporate law firms. I began with transactions—PE/VC, mergers and acquisitions. I spent four years doing that at JSA. But I gradually realised that advisory work really resonated with me.

    As I moved from JSA to IndiGo, I became more and more certain that the intersection of finance and tech was where I wanted to be. And that brought me to Ikigai Law.

    It’s been five years since. And honestly, most days, I’m genuinely excited to go to work. I think that’s rare and I’m grateful for it.

    Basically, if you love what you do, you don’t really work, you just do it.

    Well, you still work. It’s still hard. That said, there are definitely parts you enjoy. There’s intellectual satisfaction, a sense of recognition, and those moments of achievement that keep you going. Over time, you also start to see a bigger purpose. Whether it’s mentoring others, hopefully inspiring them in some small way or doing something else for the society based on what you have built. All of that becomes a motivator. You learn something new every day. And most days, you walk away feeling good.

    We all have our own challenges to navigate, and when it comes to FinTech, especially disruptive tech like blockchain, it becomes even more complex. Since blockchain sits at the intersection of technology, finance, and law, we’d love to hear your views on how companies are planning for this shift and how you tailor your consulting approach. As someone deeply involved on the corporate side, how have you adapted to these evolving technologies? What challenges have you faced, and how are companies responding to them? For instance, how do you navigate legal ambiguities around cryptocurrency, which isn’t legal tender but is still taxable?

    It’s a very interesting question. I do work a lot in the Web 3.0 space, along with traditional domains like lending, payments, and Wealth-Tech. The interesting part about being a blockchain lawyer is that it allows you to do the same thing but in a completely different plane. It’s like being transported to another universe where you’re doing the same things, paying, investing, lending, but in a blockchain-based world.

    Right now, there are very limited laws in select jurisdictions that apply to such technologies. The exciting part of being a lawyer here is that you apply traditional laws, for instance, those regulating cross-border money flow, like RBI’s foreign exchange regulations or the PSS Act, to this entirely new world. The best part is that nobody has done this before. There are hardly any judicial precedents. So your thought process is as original as it gets.

    As lawyers, we rarely get the chance to be that original. And naturally, a corollary to advising clients on emerging tech is that you get pulled into policy-making. So you get to do exciting work that I don’t think the previous generation of lawyers got to do. 

    But the hard part is, you have to really think originally. You have to know how the law applies in the traditional world. You need experience. Take, for instance, something like the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. You can pull out provisions from it and apply them to blockchain. Or the Collective Investment Scheme, something SEBI has been regulating since 1999. You might apply those same rules when advising a blockchain-based product emulating that scheme.

    So yes, it’s exciting, it’s hard, but it’s the right time to be in this space.

    You’re helping shape the future for generations of lawyers, and that’s a powerful responsibility. With your experience in suggestive work and public policy at Ikigai, could you share key learnings from that journey and how they’ve impacted your practice? Having transitioned from finance and law to technology, then an in-house role, and now back to private practice, how do you think these shifts will influence your career? How can young lawyers chart their own unique paths by learning from your journey?

    In medical practice, unless you understand the human body, you can’t be a heart specialist. Similarly, in law, unless you understand the building blocks, you can’t specialize meaningfully.

    So, for early practitioners, I’d say focus on the basics, reading the law, comprehension, analytical ability, and issue spotting. These only come when you’ve been exposed to a wide variety of laws, from IBC to RERA to the Motor Vehicles Act. The downside of specializing too early is that you miss that exposure. 

    The focus should be on building solid foundational skills, communicating well, writing clearly. Once that’s in place, you can specialize. Then you can apply those general skills to any sector, FinTech, SpaceTech, AgriTech. But if the basics aren’t strong, even in your chosen sector, things won’t work out.

    So in sum, get the basics right. Then go with the flow.

    The future in TMT space is definitely promising. I’m especially excited about AI, which is changing everything around us. And as lawyers, we play an important role. Who help sets the rules for this new world? We do.

    We need more talented lawyers. We need thinkers. Not just people who can read the law, but people who can think about it. If you’re in law school or the early stages of your career, focus on that.

    Wow! What a beautiful way of sharing your learning, it’s truly amazing. You’ve worked extensively as a principal associate advising FinTech startups within the Indian legal and regulatory framework. How do you see these startups overcoming jurisdictional obstacles, and what advice do you give them to navigate the Indian system? Do you notice significant differences between national and international regulatory approaches, and how do these impact startup success or failure globally?

    That’s a good question. I think we, as a country, are doing well. Because see, UPI is a great success. The other parts of our digital public infrastructure, like account aggregator frameworks, which are ramping up, are all Government-owned and Government-promoted.

    So the Government is doing its bit. Regulators are also, I think, trying really hard. For example, for the financial sector, RBI as a regulator not only looks after financial regulations but is also the monetary policymaker. So it has too much to do, but I think despite that, it has done a fair job.

    Also, our industry is vocal enough to fight for its cause. We have the right kind of supporters for the industry, the right kind of advisors for the industry, and the regulator is listening. It’s not like the doors are closed. Regulators also understand the importance of having that dialogue with the industry because the time has passed when you can do law-making in silos.

    So I think we are doing okay as a country. I’m not too concerned about the future. Now when I compare it to other jurisdictions, well, I would say that some practices are good in every jurisdiction. Some jurisdictions are more forward-looking in their approach. And India can borrow and learn from them.

    Thank you so much for being absolutely clear about how the government has supported FinTech growth while also acknowledging its fallbacks. You’ve worked extensively in this space, but transitioning from traditional legal work to technology and law isn’t easy. You’ve mentioned COVID played a role, but what effort did that shift actually take? How did you successfully manage this transition and excel in a new domain?

    Switching practice areas can be one of the hardest things to do. So I’ll take a step back and talk about why I made the switch.

    I started my career, as I mentioned earlier, with a general corporate practice. I had the privilege of working with some of the most brilliant lawyers in the country at JSA, which was incredibly motivating.

    While at JSA’s Gurgaon office, I got the opportunity to go on secondment with PepsiCo. At the time, PepsiCo was transferring all its major plants in India to Varun Beverages Limited – a massive business transfer. And being part of that was exhilarating. For the first time, I experienced what it means to run a business and impact of my advice on it. I was interacting with the communications team, the supply chain folks, plant managers – essentially everyone. My job was to orchestrate and help bring this entire transaction to a close. That experience made me seriously consider going in-house – it just seemed exciting and so much more connected to the business. That’s what led me to join IndiGo after four years at JSA.

    IndiGo was just as exciting as I had imagined. I was working on aircraft leases, technology contracts, software that went into aircraft systems. That was my first hands-on experience of how law interacts with technology. And that really piqued my interest in tech. I felt like it was something I could understand and contribute to.

    Then the pandemic hit. Around that time, I was already in touch with Ikigai, and stars just aligned. 

    So, some of the transition happened organically, some of it was by design and I think that’s how most careers unfold.

    If I had to leave you with two takeaways from this journey, they’d be these:

    First, don’t shy away from change and follow your instinct. Second, when an opportunity presents itself, grab it with both hands. Because chances are, it may not come again.

    What a candid way of explaining things, where you had to put in that hard work, and you did. Congratulations to you for making that seemingly impossible transition from one aspect of law to another and making it big. On that particular note, we would request you to share some personal checklists or personal ways of dealing with these kinds of transitions because such broad area transitions are not easy, and many people are unable to do them.

    What kind of suggestions do you have for these young lawyers who may start with one area but eventually want to transition? How do you do it, and how can one do it as smoothly as you have, without experiencing that stress of moving from one area to another while fearing the loss of something? Since you’ve done it, you’ll be the right person to suggest this to students and learners.

    In addition to what I’ve already said, I’ve just one thing to add. In my experience, anyone going through a good law school, who has joined a good law firm or is working with sharp lawyers is smart and intelligent. That’s why they are where they are. So that is table stakes. What really makes a real difference is persistence, patience and resilience.

    So, by the kind of understanding you’ve given us, resilience is absolutely important. Along with that, overcoming challenges is another key aspect. All of this you manage within the same 24 hours we all have. How do you maintain your mental, physical, professional, and personal health while juggling so much? What strategies do you follow, basic or advanced, to keep your sanity intact? As lawyers, we don’t talk enough about the stress we go through, whether in-house, in practice, or elsewhere. So how do you deal with it?

    That’s one question I get asked a lot. And honestly, there’s no simple answer. Like most young professionals, work-life balance wasn’t really a priority for me early in my career. There was no fixed schedule – you worked as per the demands of your clients. And I think that’s okay. You’re younger, your energy levels are different, and if you start chasing balance too early, you may find yourself struggling for relevance later. I read that somewhere, and it really stuck with me.

    Though, as I’ve grown older, I’ve found different ways to balance my life. And let me just say – I completely disagree with the idea that stress is something you should just get used to or live with because ‘it’s inevitable’. It’s not. Stress management, like lawyering or contract drafting, is a skill. And like any other skill, it can be learned.

    You have to self-train. You have to find the right mentors, speak to the right people, and actively work towards it. I’ve done a lot of that over the years.

    You also need a strong support system – people who are emotionally present and available for you. My family has been incredible, and I owe them everything. But friends matter just as much – both within and outside the profession. That’s been a huge source of strength for me. And most importantly, my husband is my biggest cheerleader and support system. Having that makes all the difference. Without it, it’s hard.

    Another big learning has been understanding the link between stress and physical health. Over the last four or five years, I’ve realised it’s not just a mindset issue – your physical health plays a huge role. And I know this might sound like standard social media advice, but it’s true: you need to move your body. You need to eat and sleep well. That’s what made a real difference for me. In fact, staying fit has now become one of my core interests.

    The third piece is having interests outside of work. That’s so important. We actively encourage this at Ikigai. 

    And finally, reading good books has helped. There’s so much you can self-learn today. As a generation, we’re incredibly lucky to have access to so much information. If we’re intentional about how we use it, we can teach ourselves almost anything.

    Thank you so much for your beautiful answers. Just to quickly respond to one of the aspects you mentioned, yes, we are our own leaders, and while we agree we should take command and understand things, it’s not always that easy. Sometimes organizations are supportive, sometimes they’re not. What we take away from this conversation is the importance of understanding what you’re doing, how you’re working, and who you’re working for. If you’re in the right environment, you’ll not only thrive professionally but also personally.

    I just wanted to share a few closing thoughts. I completely agree that the environment you work in, especially early in your career, can make all the difference.

    I also want to take a moment to talk about what we’re building at Ikigai. At the senior and mid-management level, we’re very intentional about creating a space that gives even our younger associates a lot of independence. There’s a strong emphasis on thinking independently, and we’re a flat and non-hierarchical setup. You can speak directly with the equity partners, the founding partner, with me, or with anyone else on the team.

    In many ways, we function like a new-age startup. Just like many of the clients we advise. And that’s something I’m genuinely proud of. 

    One of the most meaningful aspects of our culture, and something I hope more organizations adopt, is our deep focus on training and mentorship. It’s actually what drew me to Ikigai as a new lawyer. And now that I get to mentor others, it’s incredibly fulfilling. Personally, one of the ways I measure my own success is by how well I support and guide the associates and senior associates I work with.

    My hope is that this approach becomes the norm across the industry. I’m excited about what that future could look like.

    Get in touch with Astha Srivastava –

  • “The need of the hour is to ensure good governance of sports governing bodies (“SGBs”) so that the interest of athletes is at the forefront.” – Srinjoy Bhattacharya, Dual Qualified Lawyer and Principal Associate at Khaitan & Co.

    “The need of the hour is to ensure good governance of sports governing bodies (“SGBs”) so that the interest of athletes is at the forefront.” – Srinjoy Bhattacharya, Dual Qualified Lawyer and Principal Associate at Khaitan & Co.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Sir, you have extensive experience advising and representing clients across diverse legal domains. Looking back, what initially inspired you to pursue a career in law? How did your integrated B.S.W., LL.B. degree from Gujarat National Law University shape your early understanding of the legal system and its role in society?

    Firstly, thank you for inviting me to your platform to share my journey. From a young age, I took a keen interest in public affairs. I religiously read the newspapers and followed the news on television. The dynamics of politics, society and international affairs fascinated me. To me, the study of law seemed like the perfect pathway to enter public life. I felt, and was also advised, that the subjects one would study in law school would hold me in good stead in achieving my goals at that point in time. So, that is how I found myself in law school. It is a different matter that at present, I’m doing something slightly removed from public affairs in the way I understood it as a teenager. But then again, litigation also intersects with public affairs, so I am content doing it.

    As far as choosing BSW as my stream in law school goes, it was entirely by happenstance. I was allotted GNLU after the third round of CLAT counselling, by which time seats in my preferred Bachelor of Arts stream were unavailable. Given that BSW also aligned with my career objectives at that point of time, I decided to take the plunge. There was some trepidation, given that we were the first batch that was being offered this course. However, looking back, I have no regrets, given that it exposed me to a range of experiences, especially in the course of field work in rural areas, that I would otherwise not have had.

    In the early stages of your legal career, what were some of the key formative experiences or challenges that deepened your understanding of the law and helped shape the direction of your professional journey?

    Before I joined law school, I had a vague idea that the practice of law is demanding. It was during my internships while in law school that I got my first glimpse of what it actually meant. I had the privilege of doing most of my internships in Delhi at the Supreme Court and Delhi High Court. At first, I was star struck, seeing stalwarts of the legal profession in such close proximity. Over time, I saw them in action and gradually, began to recognise the mastery in their craft. Often, the fees charged by top lawyers get the spotlight, but what people do not see is the years of effort, hard-work, dedication and sacrifice that precedes that. Being exposed to that environment gave me a sense of what it takes to succeed in the profession. I, very reluctantly, came to terms with the fact that the conventional notions of work life balance would have to be foregone. After all, one has to work seven days a week for most of the year. Professional life is often fast paced and dynamic. It is certainly not for every personality type. At the same time, the profession also offers a sense of fulfilment and reward, provided the right effort is put in. Therefore, if one is able to accept the trade-offs, the profession can be deeply rewarding. 

    It was also during my internship phase and subsequent professional life that my understanding of the law truly started taking shape. It’s still an ongoing process. For me, it was essential to move beyond books and see the law in action to truly internalise it.

    What was your motivation behind taking the England & Wales Solicitor Qualification Exam (“SQE”)? How has your dual qualification influenced your approach to your practice area?

    My decision to prepare for the SQE was guided by multiple factors. Primarily, I believed that since the Indian legal system is largely derived from English law and is relevant to some extent in shaping Indian jurisprudence, pursuing it would be a good idea. The area of English law that I was keenest on learning was civil commercial law, which is especially relevant to my practice area. It has a rich jurisprudence dating back almost three centuries and continues to be the preferred legal system to govern a range of commercial contracts. A hallmark of English law is that it has adapted itself over time to facilitate commerce by balancing predictability and flexibility. That is why it continues to be referred to for guidance across the Common Law world. I was eager to learn about its development in greater detail.

    Preparing for the exam was a unique experience, offering its share of excitement and overwhelm. It felt like going through law school again with the advantage of some professional experience, which made grasping concepts easier. The fact that Indian law aligns with English law in many aspects also helped. For me, being exposed to facets of civil commercial law and civil procedure were deeply enriching. It was remarkable to see the level of detail with which the Civil Procedure Rules along with the practice directions dealt with. Another subject which fascinated me was Equity and Trusts. It did not occupy a prominent position in Indian law school syllabi at our time. However, once I entered the profession, I understood the importance of this body of law, especially to my practice area. 

    On the whole, studying for the SQE certainly broadened my perspective on my legal practice, which I try to bring to bear in my work. One example that comes to mind is the guidance on steps to be taken and best practices at different stages of a litigation (from pre-claim to execution) are pieces which I have sought to incorporate into my practice. 

    You’ve represented and advised clients in and relating to both, domestic and international arbitrations. What are your thoughts on the evolution of the arbitration landscape in India and where it stands in the international landscape?

    One of the most important considerations while incorporating arbitration clauses in contracts is the choice of seat, given its ramifications on the conduct of the arbitration and enforceability of the award. While choosing a seat, parties would essentially look at whether the legal framework, predisposition of courts and the general structure of the legal system is favourable to aiding arbitration, from the interim measures stage to enforcement of the award. In the last 15 years, there has been a concerted effort in India to encourage arbitration, be it through judicial decisions or legislative change. Pain points have sought to be resolved. The general trend has been positive. After all, it must be recognised that to attract and encourage trade and commerce, India needs to provide an effective and efficient dispute resolution mechanism to businesses. Arbitration provides a potential answer to this. However, one hurdle that is yet to be overcome entirely are the delays in courts processes, right from appointment of arbitrators to hearing challenges to awards. This is primarily a consequence of the heavy roster of Indian judges. This structural bottleneck would have to be addressed if India is to compete as a hub of international arbitration. Here again, the general trajectory has been in the right direction. We must also recognise that the effect of changes sought to be made will not appear overnight. We can certainly be hopeful that in the coming decade, India will occupy a more prominent role in the international arbitration landscape.

    As a Principal Associate in Khaitan & Co’s dispute resolution practice, you’ve dealt with complex matters across insolvency, arbitration, and constitutional litigation. Can you please talk about some of the key strategic and legal insights from your experience?

    Without going into the specifics of matters, one of the significant learnings from my professional life is that no matter how good or bad a client’s case might appear to be, its ultimate outcome is far from certain. Therefore, while humility is the order of the day in all situations, it assumes even more importance when your client appears to be on a strong footing. One must never let their guards down.

    On the other hand, even when your client does not appear to have the best of cases, earnest effort can get your client a result favourable to it in the circumstances. Essentially, the outcome of a case is not always black and white in terms of winning or losing. There are a range of outcomes in between which can be of tremendous help to clients. It is, therefore, important to understand the Client’s needs and devise strategy accordingly. While the Client should be given an accurate account of the merits of their case, it should not influence how you defend the case. 

    Finally, and perhaps most importantly, lawyers must remember that they are officers of the court and they have a responsibility to assist the court in arriving at the right decision. Therefore, it is important to strike a balance between the responsibilities towards your client and the court. 

    Also, while litigation strategy is essential, it has to be balanced with thinking on the feet. We operate in a dynamic environment, where evolving circumstances might require a complete reorientation of strategy. Therefore, it is important to develop the muscle to deal with such changes.

    With your interest in public policy and sports governance, what institutional or regulatory reforms do you believe are most needed in India’s sports ecosystem? Are there specific areas where legal intervention could drive meaningful change?

    The need of the hour is to ensure good governance of sports governing bodies (“SGBs”) so that the interest of athletes is at the forefront. A report by the Indian Express earlier this year highlighted that 770 sports-related litigations pending in courts across India, out of which more than 200 related to governance of the SGBs. This means that valuable energy and finances that could have been used to support athletes is being diverted towards other causes. Ensuring that SGBs get their houses in order is essential so that athletes can receive the support they need and deserve. There are numerous accounts of athletes having to fight against the system to achieve their goals. If we are to become a sporting nation, reform of SGBs is fundamental.

    The Union Government has taken several steps in the right direction. The Draft National Sports Governance Bill, 2024 which was published for public comments in October 2024, offers some hope. The Minister for Youth and Sports Affairs recently announced measures to foster more accountability from National Sports Federations. However, it must be remembered that sport is a State List subject under the Constitution. Therefore, the onus is on states to ensure good governance of SGBs at the State and District level. Orissa has shown the way in this regard. Moreover, it is critical to understand that to build India’s sporting credentials, we cannot look at the government for all our solutions. Private sector involvement and investment has to be facilitated across sports. For that to happen, a favourable sporting ecosystem conducive to investment has to be created, which takes us back to reform of SGBs. Private players will be wary of supporting sports which are not well administered. On the other hand, if the sport is being administered well, it will naturally attract private sector support. Rugby India is a case in point. Despite not being a major sport in India, it has managed to secure private sector funding because it is well governed and is more likely to achieve its targets, however modest they may be, than a sport which is more prominent but ill-administered.

    What advice would you offer to young lawyers aspiring to work in the dispute resolution practice in a law firm? Were there any particular habits, values, or resources that played a significant role in your own professional development?

    In a law firm, you don two hats- one of a lawyer and the other of a businessman. The latter does not get highlighted enough. As a junior, you are so engrossed in the minutiae of the legal side that the business side gets neglected. Before you know it, you are eligible for partnership and to stake your claim, you must show your business building credentials. It is then that you truly start focusing on it. While it is certainly true that the initial phase of your career should be spent honing your craft, some time should also be devoted to learning the business of law. As you move up the ladder, the amount of time you devote to it would necessarily need to go up. So, my advice to those aspiring to work in law firms would be to start learning the business of law early in your career so that you don’t have to endure baptism by fire.

    As far as values go, the ones that have served me best are responsiveness and reliability, be it with colleagues, clients or even the Bench. These are fundamental to success in a service industry like ours. 

    To develop professionally, I have tried to push myself out of my comfort zone by embarking on educational endeavours frequently. Time is always a constraint but I have never let that be an excuse. 

    Finally, as lawyers, it is important to remain updated about developments in my practice area. It is also essential to anticipate areas where I could bring my professional skills to bear in the future, so that I can position myself accordingly. To this end, I try and read about developments and trends within and outside the law on a daily basis. I immensely enjoy reading and learning new things. I love that I’m able to do that in this profession.

    Given the high-pressure nature of litigation and arbitration, how do you maintain a healthy work-life balance? Are there specific practices, routines, or philosophies that help you stay grounded, focused, and resilient in your career?

    As I said before, to work in the law, you have to forego conventional notions of work-life balance. However, that does not need to come at the cost of spending time with your family and yourself. In fact, both are basic human needs.  Even within this system, one can find a way to give them the time they deserve. All it requires is conscious effort and awareness. Being particular with your schedule helps. It goes without saying that support from family is also necessary in adjusting to this way of life.

    It is important to underline the importance of taking care of one’s physical and mental health so that you are able to be the best version of yourself every day. It is very easy to go off the rails, given the demanding work environment. I try and fit in 3-4 days of physical activity every week. To regulate my emotions and nervous system, I have incorporated breath work into my routine. The third area which I try to focus on is the food I eat. I love eating but to operate optimally, I avoid eating foods that inhibit my mental functioning. I do indulge myself from time to time but not on a regular basis.

    Get in touch with Srinjoy Bhattacharya –

  • “Litigation tests your character before it builds your career.” – Akhil Hasija, Advocate-on-Record at the Supreme Court of India.

    “Litigation tests your character before it builds your career.” – Akhil Hasija, Advocate-on-Record at the Supreme Court of India.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    The field of law is intellectually stimulating but undoubtedly comes with its own set of challenges. What initially inspired you to pursue a career in law, and what continues to drive your passion for this profession?

    During my school days, even though I was a backbencher, I was deeply committed to my studies and consistently ranked among the top five students. In 12th grade, my sole focus was to score well in the board exams. At that stage, I didn’t have the right exposure or mentorship to guide me through structured career entrances like CLAT, so I missed that opportunity. But in hindsight, I believe everything unfolded as it was meant to.

    My journey into law began soon after, and it felt like a natural progression. What initially inspired me was the intellectual challenge the field presents—law requires critical thinking, structured reasoning, and a constant engagement with real-world issues. I was drawn to its power to bring order, resolve disputes, and protect rights.

    What keeps me passionate today is how dynamic and impactful the profession is. No two matters are ever the same. Whether I’m drafting arguments, interpreting statutes, or strategizing for a client, there’s always something new to learn and contribute. The sense of purpose that comes from knowing my work can help individuals, shape policies, or uphold justice is incredibly fulfilling. Law constantly challenges me to grow, not just as a professional but as a person. That’s what keeps me inspired every single day.

    After completing your law degree, what motivated you to pursue a Master’s in Corporate and Business Law from Gujarat National Law University? Why did you choose this particular specialization and institution?

    Before pursuing my Master’s, my journey as a first-generation lawyer was rooted in curiosity and a hunger to learn through experience. With no mentors in the field, I gravitated naturally toward litigation. My first internship was under Hon’ble Mr. Justice Aniruddha P. Mayee, who was then an Advocate-on-Record at the Supreme Court and is now a sitting judge of the Gujarat High Court. Observing his sharp advocacy and structured thinking left a lasting impression on me. It was there I discovered the energy and depth of courtroom practice, and I knew litigation was my path.

    Being a hands-on learner, I expressed a desire to continue training under him. He encouraged me to first build a strong foundation at the trial court level, and referred me to a boutique litigation firm in Jangpura. For nearly three years, I balanced my law school schedule with intensive training at the firm, gaining invaluable exposure to real-world practice.

    Later, I decided to pursue a Master’s in Corporate and Business Law from Gujarat National Law University. Having missed the NLU experience earlier, I was determined to learn in that ecosystem. GNLU’s academic rigor and national stature gave me the perfect platform to complement my practical litigation background with a solid corporate legal framework.

    In the early stages of your legal career, what were some formative experiences that deepened your understanding of the law? How significant do you believe was the role of mentors or seniors during this phase?

    In the early stages of my legal career, what truly deepened my understanding of the law was being exposed to its ground-level application. Working closely at the trial court level, I learned that law is not just about theory or interpretation; it is about people, timing, and precision. I saw firsthand how a strong cross-examination or a well-crafted written submission could influence the outcome of a case. This practical immersion gave me a sense of how justice is pursued step by step.

    One particularly formative experience was learning to draft under tight deadlines in live matters. I understood the value of clarity, accuracy, and urgency. No classroom could have replicated that intensity.

    Mentors played a critical role during this time. Their guidance was not limited to legal advice; they taught me how to carry myself in court, how to listen, when to push, and when to hold back. Their trust in giving me real responsibilities early on helped build my confidence. Being corrected in real time and then being encouraged to do better was more valuable than any textbook. These early lessons laid the foundation not just for my knowledge of law but for how I practice and perceive it to this day.

    You have represented constitutional writ petitions involving sensitive issues, such as the rights of transgender and sexual minority prisoners. What inspired you to take on such complex matters? How do you approach the legal, ethical, and emotional dimensions of cases that receive widespread media attention?

    Yes, I’ve always been deeply driven by causes rooted in social justice and constitutional values. My journey into such complex and sensitive matters began in 2020, when I filed a PIL in my own name before the Delhi High Court, seeking protection of attorney-client privilege in virtual communications during the COVID-19 pandemic. The court issued directions to the Bar Council of India, following which the BCI requested the government to specify secure apps for confidential communications. That experience showed me how a focused legal intervention can protect fundamental rights, even in emerging digital contexts.

    Shortly after, I was approached by a legal correspondent who brought to my attention a disturbing gap, the complete absence of data regarding transgender in the NCRB’s prison statistics. This struck a chord with me. I filed another PIL arguing that in a system where transgender persons are neither acknowledged on paper nor provided with basic facilities in jails, their dignity and identity are systematically denied. I sought urgent judicial intervention to include “third gender” as a separate category in national prison statistics.

    The Hon’ble Court took serious note, and the Union Government committed to including transgender persons in future jail data reporting.

    Cases like these require more than legal knowledge, they demand empathy, courage, and a strong ethical compass. I approach such matters with humility and responsibility, knowing that they affect real lives and attract public scrutiny. My role is not only to argue persuasively but to uphold the dignity of those whose voices often go unheard. Media attention never distracts me, it reminds me of the greater duty I carry as a lawyer committed to constitutional values and human dignity.

    After working with various Advocates-on-Record and Senior Advocates, what led you to establish your own independent practice? What were some of the initial hurdles you encountered, and how did you navigate those challenges?

    I was fortunate to work under some of the finest legal minds in the profession, who not only sharpened my understanding of the law but also instilled in me the discipline, ethics, and confidence essential for courtroom practice. The exposure I received, whether through detailed research, complex drafting, or closely observing strategic litigation, made me realize the kind of advocate I aspired to become.

    Eventually, I felt the urge to take ownership of my own matters and arguments. I believed that building an independent practice would allow me to grow beyond execution and step into strategic thinking, decision-making, and direct client advocacy. It was not an easy transition.

    One of the biggest hurdles was earning the trust of clients without the backing of a senior’s name. I had to prove my capability in every brief and every appearance. There were also financial uncertainties and administrative pressures that come with running your own practice. But I overcame them through consistency, networking, and staying deeply committed to every matter I took up, big or small.

    The challenges were many, but the sense of professional growth and personal fulfillment that comes with independence has made the journey deeply rewarding.

    As an AOR you represent both private and government clients, particularly in matters under the Electricity Act. What are some recurring legal or procedural challenges you face in this domain?

    As destiny would have it, my exposure to electricity and regulatory law began early in my career at one of the offices I worked in, where I had the opportunity to assist on matters for a panel representing electricity distribution companies before the Delhi High Court. That experience sparked a genuine interest in the regulatory framework under the Electricity Act. I gradually took on more responsibilities, working closely on drafting, strategy, and regulatory filings. Recognizing my growing familiarity and aptitude for the subject, the panel encouraged me to formally associate and handle matters independently. That marked the beginning of my journey in this specialized field.

    Electricity law is a unique blend of legal, technical, and regulatory dimensions. One recurring challenge is navigating the procedural overlaps between forums such as the State Commissions, the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission, and Appellate Tribunal. Each has its own timelines, jurisdictional nuances, and compliance obligations. Another frequent hurdle is the technical complexity of issues, including tariff computations, grid code compliance, and power purchase agreements, which often require a detailed understanding of engineering and finance concepts.

    To overcome this, I make it a point to engage regularly with technical experts and stay updated on evolving regulatory guidelines and judicial precedents. Whether I represent government utilities or private players, I approach each matter by balancing legal strategy with technical clarity. This intersectional understanding is what helps deliver real value to clients in this challenging yet intellectually rewarding area of law.

    What has been one of the most challenging cases you’ve handled so far? Could you share insights into how you prepared for it and managed its complexities?

    There have been several challenging cases in my journey, and each one, whether a high-stakes regulatory dispute or a sensitive constitutional matter, has tested my legal acumen in different ways. What I’ve learned is that no case is “simple” once you delve into its details. Every matter demands thorough preparation, a clear strategy, and a deep understanding of both law and facts.

    I approach complex cases by breaking them down systematically, starting with exhaustive legal research, understanding procedural nuances, and aligning the facts with the most persuasive legal framework. Often, the real challenge lies in navigating unpredictability, whether it is evolving judicial trends, stakeholder expectations, or tight timelines.

    Support from peers and mentors, along with constant self-discipline, has been critical. I believe the ability to remain calm under pressure, think logically, and communicate clearly both inside and outside court is what ultimately helps turn legal complexities into opportunities for impactful advocacy.

    What advice would you offer to young lawyers starting their careers? Are there specific habits, mindsets, or resources that played a key role in shaping your professional journey?

    My advice to young lawyers, especially those stepping into litigation, is to embrace patience and perseverance. This profession doesn’t offer immediate rewards but it promises lasting growth for those who are committed. In the early years, it’s easy to feel disheartened when you see peers in other fields earning more or progressing faster. But law, particularly litigation, is a long game. The knowledge, credibility, and client trust you build over time compound into something far more meaningful than just a paycheck.

    One habit that shaped my journey was showing up consistently, even when the work felt repetitive or unrewarded. Staying curious, reading beyond case files, and learning from seniors helped me sharpen both my understanding of the law and the courtroom. I also found it crucial to remain humble. This field rewards those who are open to learning every day.

    Litigation tests your character before it builds your career. But if you remain focused, disciplined, and honest in your work, the profession will eventually give you more than you imagined. There’s no shortcut, only the steady climb. And that’s what makes every milestone worth it.

    Being an AOR and balancing a demanding legal practice with personal life can be challenging. How do you manage your professional responsibilities while also making time for yourself? What do you do to unwind and stay focused?

    Balancing a demanding legal practice as an Advocate-on-Record with personal life certainly has its challenges, but I’ve come to believe that balance isn’t about doing everything; it’s about doing what truly matters with focus and intention. I’ve learned to manage my schedule by prioritizing what needs my attention most and creating small pockets of time for myself, no matter how busy the day is.

    To unwind, I rely on simple but grounding routines: spending time with loved ones, going for long walks, and staying physically active. I also make it a point to disconnect from screens and step away from work conversations when I’m off duty. That break, however brief, allows me to return to work sharper and more focused.

    For me, it’s not about achieving a perfect work-life balance every day, but about being present in whatever I’m doing, whether I’m in court or at the dinner table. That mindset keeps me centered. Over time, I’ve realized that sustaining a successful legal career isn’t just about how hard you work; it’s also about how well you care for your own well-being along the way.

    Get in touch with Akhil Hasija –

  • “Legal tech can eliminate the mundane routine tasks and save the time of the lawyers in focusing on the core legal areas.” – Sridevi Sidharthan, Principal Associate at M&CO Legal, Dubai

    “Legal tech can eliminate the mundane routine tasks and save the time of the lawyers in focusing on the core legal areas.” – Sridevi Sidharthan, Principal Associate at M&CO Legal, Dubai

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    Could you share the pivotal moments and personal motivations that inspired your journey into the field of law, and how did you navigate the initial challenges and struggles as you embarked on your career?  

    My father is an advocate on record practicing in the Supreme court of India. So, most people naturally assume that is the reason why I chose law. While my father is my personal motivation however, there is quite a bit of story behind why I chose law as my career. I was in grade 5 in school when I first visited the Supreme Court with my dad during my winter vacation. The Court was also closed and there were very few visiting lawyers in the court premises. I was in the cafeteria, when a couple of lawyers approached me and my dad, probably they were curious about seeing a 10-year-old kid in the court premises. They started having a conversion and asked the cliché question, what I want to become in the future. I recollect mentioning wanting to become a scientist and they suddenly asked me, “Why don’t you become a judge”. I said okay and they said, “ promise us that one day you will become a judge of the supreme court”. The young me just went with the flow and promised them. But from that day onwards, I was clear that I wanted to pursue my career in the legal field. Even though later, I decided to take a different path and steer towards corporate practice. Nonetheless, I don’t regret the decision till date.

    I guess, the fact that I was determined to be a lawyer and that I wanted to become a corporate lawyer has made it easier for me to focus; the academic faculty at my university, notably Dr. Mamta Biswal, also helped me crystallize my decision to become a corporate lawyer. Our Commerce professor, Mr. Satya Ranjan Mishra encouraged me to pursue the Company Secretary course during my LLB, which helped me in gaining extra learning experience in the subject. While at university, acquiring an internship opportunity was quite stressful and I ended up getting rejected twice by Amarchand for the internship. However, perseverance and proper guidance from my seniors in the University helped me land a job with Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co. (Erstwhile Amarchand Mangaldas Suresh Shroff & Co.)  during the campus placement.

    Given your diverse experience in both India and the UAE, how do you navigate the legal nuances and cultural differences in your practice, and how do you stay updated with the latest legal developments and industry trends to integrate these insights into your work?  

    I am indeed grateful to have worked in such diverse legal landscapes.  In India, working with Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas under the leadership of Mr. Inder Mohan Singh was a great learning experience. I remember when I joined the firm in 2013, the new companies’ law had just been enforced and our team was primarily working on dissecting the law, making submissions on the lacunas and shortfalls to the ministry as well as other organizations like FICCI. I am really thankful to my mentors, Mr. Aayush Kapoor and Mr. Harish Kumar, who moulded me as a lawyer and became a role model for me. In UAE, I work with M&Co Legal, which is a DIFC-registered law firm run by Emirati lawyers. The legal landscape of both India and UAE is completely different, as you may know, UAE is primarily a civil law country and has two common law jurisdictions in free zones (Dubai International Financial Center and Abu Dhabi Global Market). The transition from India to unlearn and learn civil laws in UAE was challenging in the beginning, especially, trying to understand the legal systems in place.  However, the partners and the colleagues at M&Co. Legal were quite helpful during this transition phase, and additionally, the training that I had received at Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas, also helped me to quickly complete the learning phase. Since I am working at a local law firm with a very niche clientele, it naturally assisted me in my understanding of not only the local culture, but also provided exposure in interacting with as well as dealing with clients and peers from different nationalities. The peculiarity of working in UAE (or rather interesting part) is that you get to work under both Civil and Common law jurisdiction, and I have thoroughly enjoyed maneuvering through both these jurisdictions simultaneously.  Both India and UAE have fast-changing economic and legal terrain, and I continue to keep myself abreast with the changing legal dynamics, as this is pertinent to provide plausible legal solutions to the client. I normally do that by following media (through news and professional social media platforms), from newsletters released by legal knowledge platforms, and keep a look-out for any important changes by setting a Google alert on the pertinent topics.

    Your profile mentions your involvement in drafting insider trading codes and handling related investigations. What insights have you gained from such regulatory experiences, and how do they inform your approach to compliance?

    During my tenure in India, drafting insider trading codes and especially handling related-investigations from regulatory authorities in India like SEBI was an interesting opportunity. The experience from dealing with insider trading investigations gave an insight to the regulators point-of-view as well as stance on the points and identify the key areas of focus. This experience in turn guided me while drafting such insider trading codes for the listed entities to ensure the key focus areas, and to effectively deal with the challenges as well as provide proper guidance on these matters to the client. Such matters are extremely delicate and there is a fine-line when it comes to becoming non-compliant, hence, it was important to lay down a proper strategy to ensure effective mechanism to deal with the price-sensitive information with the top management and employees of the organization.

    It is also interesting to mention that in UAE, as well, I have dealt with various investigations issued by the Ministry of Economy related to the breach of DNFBP (Designated Non-Financial Business or Profession) obligations and breach of licensing conditions raised by Abu Dhabi Financial Services Regulatory Authority. All these experiences with the regulators teach you to think from a different angle while approaching a matter, and helps you to visualize everything from a macroscopic level as well as gives you guidance to navigate through the regulatory requirements.

    With your expertise in employment laws, what advice would you offer to companies navigating labor-related challenges, especially in cross-border transactions?  

    During my practice in India, employment used to be one of the crucial areas of concern during the M&A deals, and the matter considering the impact on the livelihood of people had to be dealt with caution and delicately. UAE is a labour friendly country and the employment laws strike a balance between the Employers requirements and Employees rights. I would personally like to advise the companies in UAE to specifically be aware of the local employment laws and to understand that the common law free zones (ADGM & DIFC) have a separate employment law. It is important that the terms of employment are carefully drafted to ensure compliance with the local laws. I would specifically recommend the corporates to have an employee handbook to note down the various employment policies while dealing with matters such as disciplinary actions, internal grievance redressal, employee policies tailor-made to the specific industry and educate the employees about these policies.

    In relation to cross-border transactions, the areas of transfer of employees and secondment needs to be tackled carefully. Employees in international companies with offices in UAE are normally subjected to the group policies wherever applicable, however, it is to be noted that notwithstanding the group policies and benefits available to the employee, such that an employee in UAE will be receiving the necessary benefits and protection mandated by the local laws. Hence, it is important to reconcile these policies to include the local labour laws and the emoluments accordingly.

    In your opinion, how can the legal profession leverage technology and innovation to enhance efficiency and client service while maintaining confidentiality and security?  

    The advent of digital technologies is positively impacting the legal profession as well. At the moment, I don’t believe that AI can take over a lawyer’s job, however, I firmly agree that it can increase the efficiency in doing the job. Legal tech can eliminate the mundane routine tasks and save the time of the lawyers in focusing on the core legal areas. This will in turn ensure faster delivery of tasks and ensure economic efficiency for the clients by reducing the additional billable hours payable by them. Another area where legal tech can help lawyers is in data entry and research. Even though legal tech ensures efficiency, lawyers have to be responsible enough not to use free and public AI platforms to provide inputs on confidential information. It is always key to ensure that only secured legal tech platforms are used to avoid data leakage and breach.

    What motivated you to move your career to Dubai, and how has this transition influenced your professional growth and perspective on corporate law?  

    My career-move to Dubai was purely due to personal reasons and was not a calculated move from my end. However, I am thankful that it happened as UAE was truly resilient to the challenges during the covid times, and post-covid, the country has seen an economic upward trend. UAE is now increasingly becoming the hub not only for all the international businesses but also for the high-net-worth individuals from various parts of the world. Obviously with the increase in business activities in the country, the legal requirements also follow. Being in UAE and working with M&Co Legal has provided a vast exposure to me to develop my personal and professional growth. Being part of a small yet niche corporate team has expanded my horizon in practicing various aspects of the corporate laws and in various industries. This has helped me understand the business and regulatory requirements for various sectors such as F&B Industry, real estate among others.

    As a legal influencer recognized by Lexology, what advice would you offer to aspiring lawyers seeking to establish their presence in the legal community? 

    I would advice aspiring lawyers to carefully understand the law. “ The devil lies in the detail” is especially true in our legal profession. I understand that nowadays everything is available on AI and legal tech platforms, however, it is important not to blindly rely on it for research without reading the underlying law itself. While I am not against using AI, it is important to use these platforms as a reference and not base the entire work on it without using your own analytical skills. You leave a mark in the legal profession and on your client by using your analytical as well as problem-solving skills.

    The acquisition of Al Huraiz Packaging Industry LLC by Hotpack Packaging Industries LLC was a significant deal. What were the most complex aspects of this transaction, and how did you navigate them?  

    We represented the Seller, AL Huraiz Packaging Industry, which is a local Emirati Company involved in manufacturing packaging materials. The deal was a 100% shareholding acquisition by the major packaging company, Hotpack Packaging Industries LLC.  The transaction, considering 100% shareholder takeover included transferring the factory unit and other equipment to the new shareholder. Additionally, there was debt restructuring as part of the transaction; the aspect of regulatory approval and debt restructuring was the challenging part of the deal. However, the negotiations based on good-faith between the parties and legal representatives assisted in finding the appropriate resolution for the concerns.

    When advising on mergers and acquisitions, what key factors do you consider to ensure the transaction is legally sound and beneficial for your clients? 

    Fact-finding by way of due diligence (either legal or financial due diligence) is the most important part of ensuring whether the deal is legally plausible. Additionally,  it is commonly believed that the lawyers should not interfere with the commercial aspect of the transaction. However, I would opine otherwise; since commercial considerations have major legal impact, it is crucial that lawyers carefully review the commercial understanding and advice the client as well as provide any alternative solution for the client.

    Outside of your professional work, what hobbies or personal interests do you pursue, and how do they influence your approach to your legal practice?  

    I love travelling! I know it’s a cliché statement, but I consider myself a “traveller instead of tourist” while exploring a new place. My research skills are utilized prior to and while travelling, especially planning the travel. I plan the itinerary down to every intricate detail. I ensure I understand the local culture, interact with local people, and try out the local cuisine. I use travelling not only to unwind from my daily routine, but also the things I learn my travel helps me understand different people, including my clients and peers. I truly believe that to become a successful corporate lawyer and leader to your team, you not only need technical expertise but also need to have interpersonal as well as people-management skills.

    Get in touch with Sridevi Sidharthan–

  • “While collaborating with legal counsels and law firms, I’ve found that effective communication and alignment of objectives are paramount to successful partnerships and achieving our goals”- Trushil Vora, Head – Legal at Aditya Birla Sun Life Asset Management

    “While collaborating with legal counsels and law firms, I’ve found that effective communication and alignment of objectives are paramount to successful partnerships and achieving our goals”- Trushil Vora, Head – Legal at Aditya Birla Sun Life Asset Management

    This Interview has been published by Pragya Chandni and The SuperLawyer Team

    Could you share a bit about your journey into the field of law, particularly what drew you to specialize in Funds, Banking, Finance, Debt Capital Markets, and Corporate Laws?

    My journey into the field of law has been shaped by a combination of rigorous academic training and hands-on experience across prestigious institutions and diverse sectors. Graduating from Gujarat National Law University (GNLU) and subsequently studying at The London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) broadened my perspective on legal principles and practices.

    At GNLU, I had the privilege of learning from some of the best legal minds in the country. The practical insights gained from internships at firms like Little & Co., Nishith Desai Associates and ALMT Legal complemented my theoretical learning, providing invaluable exposure to real-world legal challenges.

    Continuing my academic journey at LSE, one of the world’s top law schools, deepened my understanding of global legal frameworks and their intersection with business dynamics. Interacting with students from diverse backgrounds enriched my perspective, fostering adaptability and cultural sensitivity, qualities crucial for navigating the complexities of a globalized legal landscape.

    My passion for law stems from a problem-solving mindset, drawn to complex legal issues that demand innovative and business-friendly solutions. Internships provided me with early exposure to complex legal issues within Funds, Banking, Finance, Debt Capital Markets, and Corporate Laws. Specializing in Funds, Banking, Finance, Debt Capital Markets, and Corporate Laws aligns with my inclination towards strategic thinking and continuous learning. These areas offer a diverse range of legal challenges across various business sectors, avoiding monotony and stimulating intellectual curiosity.

    Throughout my 15-year journey as a legal professional, I’ve had the privilege of working directly under lawyers who are stalwarts in their respective areas of practice. Their mentorship provided invaluable guidance, reinforcing the importance of understanding client business and delivering practical, strategic legal counsel.

    My experiences working across prestigious law firms and in an in-house role at Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC Limited, have honed my skills in navigating complex legal landscapes. Today, as the Head of the Legal Team, I draw upon this diverse background to provide innovative solutions that drive business growth and mitigate risks effectively.

    In essence, my journey into law has been guided by a quest for continuous learning, a passion for problem-solving, and a commitment to delivering value-driven legal solutions. Specializing in Funds, Banking, Finance, Debt Capital Markets, and Corporate Laws allows me to leverage these strengths while contributing to the success of my clients (internal stakeholders in my current role) and organizations.

    As the Head of Legal at Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC Limited, you oversee various legal aspects, including contract management and dispute resolution. What challenges do you commonly face in these areas, and how do you navigate them?

    As the Head of Legal at Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC Limited, I oversee various legal aspects, including contract management and dispute resolution, in a dynamic industry fraught with unique challenges. With our diverse lines of business spanning mutual funds, alternate investment funds, and portfolio management services, navigating the rapidly changing regulatory landscape presents intricate and ever-evolving legal hurdles.

    Our team’s strategic approach to managing these challenges is rooted in a clear and systematic process. We begin by meticulously understanding the nuanced business requirements and objectives, engaging closely with stakeholders across different verticals. This ensures that our legal strategies are not only legally sound but also seamlessly aligned with the company’s overarching goals and group’s values.

    Simultaneously, we systematically analyze legal risks associated with each initiative, conducting thorough due diligence and staying attuned to regulatory developments. Continuous learning and regularly tracking regulations are essential aspects of our legal operations. We subscribe to legal resources and newsletters to remain abreast of the latest legal developments, ensuring our business objectives are consistently aligned with regulatory requirements.

    One common challenge we frequently encounter is understanding the mindset of concerned stakeholders and persuading them to accept a path that is not only legally and regulatorily compliant but also aligned with the company’s overarching goals. This often involves engaging with and convincing stakeholders to deviate from their initial approach in favor of a more legally sound solution.

    We have implemented robust legal policies and processes to ensure that documents, matters, and notices do not escape legal scrutiny, thereby protecting the organization from exposure to legal risks. Additionally, we engage in continuously sensitizing employees and conducting training to ensure they understand the legal processes, rules, and regulations applicable to them, further safeguarding the company against legal risks.

    Leveraging legal technology for contract and litigation management enhances operational efficiency and saves time, enabling us to proactively focus on identifying potential pitfalls and implementing preemptive measures. Each team member plays a defined and vital role, fostering collaboration in resolving legal challenges effectively.

    Whether it’s crafting tailored contracts, providing strategic advice to senior management, or implementing proactive risk management strategies, our actions are guided by a deep understanding of both business imperatives and legal intricacies.

    By following this clear and systematic approach, we not only mitigate legal risk but also contribute to the achievement of our broader strategic objectives. Our focus on understanding business requirements, assessing legal risks, leveraging legal expertise, and harnessing technology for enhanced efficiency ensures that we remain agile and responsive in addressing the evolving legal landscape.

    With your extensive experience in collaborating with legal counsels and law firms, what strategies do you employ to ensure effective communication and alignment of objectives between your team and external legal partners?

    While collaborating with legal counsels and law firms, I’ve found that effective communication and alignment of objectives are paramount to successful partnerships and achieving our goals. One strategy I employ is to establish clear lines of communication from the outset, ensuring that expectations, timelines, and deliverables are clearly defined and understood by all parties.

    Regular communication channels, such as scheduled meetings and status updates, help maintain alignment and ensure that any issues or concerns are addressed promptly. Additionally, I believe in fostering an open and collaborative environment where both internal and external teams feel comfortable sharing ideas, feedback, and insights.

    Furthermore, I prioritize building strong relationships with our external legal partners, fostering trust and mutual respect. By understanding each other’s strengths, capabilities, and areas of expertise, we can leverage our collective knowledge and experience to achieve common objectives.

    Lastly, I believe in the importance of ongoing feedback and evaluation to assess the effectiveness of our collaboration efforts. This allows us to identify areas for improvement and make adjustments as needed to ensure continued alignment and success.

    Overall, effective communication, collaboration, and relationship-building are key strategies I employ to ensure alignment of objectives between my team and external legal partners.

    You’ve been instrumental in implementing legal training programs for employees. How do you approach balancing regulatory adherence with fostering a culture of innovation within the legal department?

    As a leader in the legal department, I’ve been implementing legal training programs for employees, and I approach balancing regulatory adherence with fostering a culture of innovation through a multifaceted strategy.

    Firstly, I prioritize creating a culture of trust and autonomy within the team. This involves providing flexibility for innovative thinking while ensuring strict adherence to regulatory requirements. By empowering team members to think creatively within the bounds of law, I encourage innovative solutions while upholding legal standards.

    Secondly, continuous legal development is crucial. Our organization invests in ongoing education initiatives, such as seminars, workshops, and access to online resources, to keep the team updated with the latest legal developments. This ensures that innovation is informed by a comprehensive understanding of regulatory requirements.

    Additionally, practical exposure and direct interaction opportunities with key stakeholders play a significant role. By involving team members in meetings, negotiations, and other crucial aspects of legal practice, I foster a deeper understanding of legal and regulatory challenges and encourage innovative approaches to address them.

    Ultimately, my approach aims to strike a balance between regulatory adherence and fostering innovation. By creating an environment of trust, investing in continuous legal education, and providing practical exposure, we cultivate a culture where innovation thrives within the applicable legal and regulatory framework.

    Happy to address this alternate question instead – “You’ve handled transactions in banking and project finance, leading negotiations and client meetings. Can you share a particularly challenging project you managed and how you successfully navigated it?”

    One particularly challenging project I managed involved transactions in banking and project finance, where I served as the legal counsel for a consortium of about 20 lenders, comprising significantly large banks. The complexity of the project lay not only in the intricacies of the transaction but also in the sheer scale of stakeholders involved, each with their own unique perspectives and priorities.

    As the legal advisor representing the lenders, one of the most daunting challenges was to navigate the decision-making process among the consortium members. With a large number of stakeholders, each with varying degrees of influence and interests, reaching a consensus on critical legal matters posed a considerable challenge.

    To address this challenge and streamline the decision-making process, I proposed a solution that ultimately proved to be highly effective. I suggested forming a steering committee comprising the top five lenders by contribution and size. This committee would be tasked with making decisions on legal challenges and strategic matters, thereby expediting the decision-making process and ensuring that key decisions were made in a timely manner.

    Despite initial skepticism from some stakeholders, I was able to effectively communicate the benefits of this approach and garner support for the formation of the steering committee. By highlighting the advantages of having a smaller, more agile decision-making body, I was able to overcome resistance and gain consensus among the lenders.

    The implementation of the steering committee proved to be a game-changer for the project. With a more streamlined decision-making process and faster resolutions to legal challenges, we were able to expedite the transaction timeline significantly. By empowering the steering committee to take decisive action, we minimized delays, resolved issues proactively, and ultimately closed the transaction in a remarkably short time frame.

    This experience taught me the importance of creative problem-solving and effective stakeholder management in complex transactions. By proposing a solution that addressed the specific challenges of the project and gaining buy-in from key stakeholders, I was able to navigate a challenging situation successfully and achieve a positive outcome for all parties involved.

    Given your expertise in legal risk mitigation and fraud prevention, could you share some key strategies or best practices for identifying and addressing potential legal risks within financial institutions?

    In my experience, effective legal risk mitigation and fraud prevention within financial institutions require a multifaceted approach that combines proactive measures with ongoing vigilance. Some key strategies and best practices include:

    • Conducting thorough risk assessments: Regularly assess the legal and regulatory landscape to identify emerging risks and vulnerabilities. This involves analyzing regulatory changes, market trends, and internal processes to pinpoint areas of potential exposure.
    • Implementing robust compliance programs: Develop comprehensive compliance programs that are tailored to the specific regulatory requirements and business operations of the financial institution. This includes establishing clear policies, procedures, and controls to ensure adherence to legal and regulatory standards.
    • Enhancing due diligence processes: Strengthen due diligence processes for onboarding clients, vendors, and business partners to mitigate the risk of fraud and misconduct. Conduct thorough background checks, verify credentials, and assess potential risks before entering into any business relationships.
    • Promoting a culture of compliance: Foster a culture of compliance throughout the organization by providing regular training, education, and awareness programs to employees. Encourage open communication channels for reporting potential issues and promote ethical behavior at all levels.
    • Implementing robust internal controls: Establish robust internal controls and monitoring mechanisms to detect and prevent fraudulent activities. This includes implementing segregation of duties, regular audits, and reviews of financial transactions to identify anomalies and potential red flags.
    • Leveraging technology and data analytics: Utilize technology-driven solutions and data analytics tools to enhance fraud detection and prevention capabilities. Implement advanced monitoring systems, artificial intelligence, and machine learning algorithms to identify patterns of suspicious behavior and potential fraud risks.
    • Collaborating with regulatory authorities and industry peers: Maintain open communication channels with regulatory authorities and collaborate with industry peers to share best practices, insights, and emerging trends in legal risk mitigation and fraud prevention.

    By adopting these strategies and best practices, financial institutions can proactively identify and address potential legal risks, safeguarding their reputation, financial integrity, and long-term viability.

    Your career trajectory showcases a progression from Associate to Head of Legal. What were some pivotal moments or lessons learned along the way that contributed to your professional growth and leadership development?

    My career journey from Associate to Head of Legal has been shaped by pivotal moments and invaluable lessons that have contributed significantly to my professional growth and leadership development.

    One such pivotal aspect has been the opportunity to work directly under legal stalwarts in their respective fields. Their mentorship and guidance have been instrumental in shaping my approach to legal practice, imparting invaluable insights and best practices that have enriched my skill set and strategic thinking.

    Moreover, collaborating closely with business heads and key stakeholders has provided me with a deep understanding of their perspectives and priorities. This exposure to the business side of operations has been transformative, enabling me to offer innovative, business-friendly solutions to legal challenges. Understanding the business goals, challenges, and industry dynamics has allowed me to deliver tailored solutions that align seamlessly with our business objectives.

    Furthermore, working across diverse sectors has provided me with a unique perspective, allowing me to view legal issues through the lens of a businessman. This holistic understanding of client expectations and business realities has been particularly invaluable in my current role at Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC Limited.

    In essence, the combination of mentorship from legal experts, collaboration with business leaders, and exposure to diverse sectors has been key to my professional growth and leadership development. These experiences have not only enhanced my legal acumen but also honed my ability to provide strategic counsel that drives business success.

    Finally, what advice would you offer to fresh graduates aspiring to pursue a career in law, especially those interested in the areas of Funds, Banking, Finance, and Corporate Laws?

    For fresh graduates aspiring to carve a career path in law, particularly in the domains of Funds, Banking, Finance, and Corporate Laws, my advice revolves around fostering a strong foundation in legal fundamentals and cultivating a solution-oriented mindset.

    Firstly, it’s paramount to build a robust understanding of core legal principles such as the Contract Act, Companies Act, Transfer of Property Act, and principles of interpretation. These foundational laws serve as the cornerstone upon which specialized areas like finance and corporate law are constructed. By mastering these fundamentals, young lawyers can develop a solid framework for analyzing legal issues and offering effective solutions to clients.

    Additionally, I urge aspiring lawyers to adopt a solution-oriented approach to problem-solving. Clients in fields like finance and corporate law often seek pragmatic solutions to intricate legal challenges. Rather than just identifying problems, young lawyers should focus on crafting innovative and practical solutions that address clients’ underlying needs and objectives. This necessitates critical thinking, creativity, and a readiness to explore alternative legal avenues.

    Moreover, maintaining a curious mindset and a commitment to continuous learning is crucial. Given the dynamic nature of finance and corporate law, staying updated with legal developments and industry trends is imperative. Aspiring lawyers should embrace opportunities for learning, ask pertinent questions, and seek growth opportunities to enhance their problem-solving skills and legal acumen.

    Lastly, I encourage young lawyers to seek mentorship and guidance from seasoned professionals in the field. Learning from experienced practitioners can offer invaluable insights, practical wisdom, and networking opportunities that accelerate career growth and development.

    In summary, my advice to fresh graduates aspiring for a rewarding career in finance and corporate law is to prioritize building strong legal fundamentals, adopting a solution-driven mindset, fostering curiosity and continuous learning, and seeking mentorship from experienced professionals. Embracing these principles equips aspiring lawyers to embark on a fulfilling and impactful journey in the legal profession.

    Get in touch with Trushil Vora-

  • “The legal landscape has undergone some of the most significant changes in recent years, due to technological advancements and subject-specific specialization.”- Prashant Kumar, Advocate-on-Record, Supreme Court of India and Principal Associate at Dua Associates

    “The legal landscape has undergone some of the most significant changes in recent years, due to technological advancements and subject-specific specialization.”- Prashant Kumar, Advocate-on-Record, Supreme Court of India and Principal Associate at Dua Associates

    This Interview has been published by Pragya Chandni and The SuperLawyer Team

    Sir, could you please share your journey of how you ended up becoming an Advocate-on-Record at the Supreme Court of India and a Principal Associate at Dua Associates? What motivated you to pursue a career in law?

    The starting point of my journey with law was a matter of chance. During my school days I never imagined myself studying law, however, when I look back today, I think that joining law school was one of the best decisions which I took. I got through Gujarat National Law School, Gandhinagar in the year 2005 and started my journey in the profession in the year 2010 under the able guidance of Ratan Kumar Singh, Senior Advocate. Thereafter, I joined Kapil Sapra & Associates in the year 2012 where I dealt with multifarious works. Being a small set up, work was of different kinds, and the exposure there helped me understand the finer nuances of corporate commercial laws. In the year 2016, I joined Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan, where I dealt with high stake arbitration matters amongst others. Therefore, the exposure at this firm was of a completely different nature. In the year 2020, I joined Dua Associates as a principal associate and continue to work in this firm. I firmly believe that one must keep upgrading his skill sets to be relevant in the legal field. This belief led me to write Advocate-on-Record examinations and I cleared the same in my first attempt. I have enjoyed and learned immensely from different stints in the legal profession.

    With a specialization in commercial/civil litigation, insolvency laws, and alternate dispute resolution, can you discuss a particularly challenging or significant case you’ve worked on? What lessons did you learn from that experience?

    Every case presents a different set of challenges. Therefore, as a lawyer one must understand each case of its merits and treat the same accordingly. I started my practice with a strong foundation of civil, commercial and arbitration laws, which has helped me in dealing with other laws as well. With the advent of insolvency laws, the options available with the parties have increased manifold. Therefore, the first challenge which a lawyer faces today is to decide the right course of action in the given facts and circumstances. Whilst I have worked on various cases which have been challenging or significant, I have been recently involved in a matter before the National Company Law Tribunal, where I represented the financial creditor, in an application filed by the homebuyers, seeking to commence insolvency proceedings against a real estate developer, to which the financial creditor had lent money. Whilst the law is fairly settled, and in case the homebuyers meet the threshold and there is a default, insolvency proceedings should be commenced. However, I argued that the tribunal should not act mechanically and should see the financial health of the company, in addition to the intent behind the filing of the application by the homebuyers which can be fraudulent. I also argued that the interest of homebuyers who are not before the tribunal should also be considered before arriving at a final decision. The tribunal is yet to pass an order, however, this is significant because law is all about being creative within the realm of judicial precedents and legal principles. 

    As someone who appears regularly before various courts and tribunals, can you shed light on the dynamics of practicing law in different forums? How does your approach differ when dealing with cases in the Supreme Court compared to other fora?

    Every forum presents a different set of challenges, and a lawyer should be flexible to deal with such challenges in case one intends to practice before a different forum. By flexibility I mean adapting to the situation at hand. A lawyer who regularly appears before a district court has a particular way of dealing with the cases, however, the same may not be applicable with higher forums. Similarly, a lawyer who practices before the higher forums, will find it difficult to practice before the district courts. That’s why a lot of lawyers choose forums and stick to it. My approach is different because I have been associated mostly with chambers and firms. I started with district courts, tribunals and gradually shifted to high courts and supreme courts, and therefore had the benefit of knowing finer nuances of various courts practice. The best approach according to me is to stick to the basics, i.e., mastery over facts, reliefs sought and an understanding of the forum where the matter is listed. 

    Given your extensive experience in handling commercial disputes and arbitration matters, both domestic and international, could you highlight some key trends or changes you’ve observed in the legal landscape over the years?

    The legal landscape has undergone some of the most significant changes in recent years, due to technological advancements and subject-specific specialization. In addition, the legal profession is also moving towards a multidisciplinary approach, where there is an integration of legal services with other disciplines, such as technology, finance, and business. The areas which have seen significant change include information technology related laws, cyber laws, environmental law, arbitration law etc. In order to cater to the evolving laws and changing trends, a legal professional is required to be updated and focus on specialization. 

    Having dealt with cases across diverse sectors such as Oil & Gas, Infrastructure, Telecom & IT, Banking & Finance, etc., how do you stay updated on the intricacies of different industries? How important is industry-specific knowledge in your field?

    It’s very essential for a lawyer to be updated with latest legal developments and changes, especially in the areas in which he/she works. The way in which I stay up to date is by regularly reading legal updates online and offline. These days there are various newsletters being issued by firms, organisation which contains useful industry specific updates. In addition, I also attend to webinars and conferences, whenever the time permits in order to stay updated. Industry-specific knowledge is very essential in my areas of practice since different industries have different styles of operation. For example, a banking and finance industry has a different style of operation if one compares the same with an oil and gas industry. Therefore, it becomes imperative for a legal professional to deal with every industry after understanding and analysing the basic difference. Once there is a clarity on the basics, one can deal with the issue at hand with ease. 

    What role does advisory work play in your practice? Can you share an instance where your advice made a significant impact on a client’s case or decision-making process?

    Advisory assumes a great importance in my practice areas. Advisory does not only mean a written/oral legal advice, but it includes the day to day dealing with clients, and answering the queries, and extending support to them in the usual course as and when required. One of the opinions which according to me made a significant impact on a client’s case or decision-making process, relates to an analysis of attachment orders issued by district collector, pursuant to the recovery certificates issued by National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, and suggesting the future course of action. Pursuant to our thorough analysis and opinion, the attachment orders were quashed and the same was a big relief for the clients. 

    With over 13 years of experience in the legal field, what advice would you give to fresh graduates aspiring to pursue a career in law, considering the evolving nature of the legal profession? What qualities or skills do you believe are crucial for success in this field?

    My advice to a fresh graduate aspiring to pursue a career in law is to focus on the basics first. One can excel in the field and do specialization only if the base is strong. Secondly one has to be humble and have a humane approach. The legal profession is a noble profession wherein we have to deal with various human beings on a daily basis, therefore being humble is very essential. In addition, being sincere and meticulous also helps a lawyer in the long run. Also, having a commercial bent of mind is also important for a lawyer, especially for lawyers who deal with commercial disputes, arbitration, insolvency, corporate laws, and others. Constant upgradation of skill set is also required for a lawyer who wants to succeed in the legal profession. Lastly, one must be solution oriented and should have clarity of thought. This can only come through continuous learning and adapting to the situation at hand.  

    Get in touch with Prashant Kumar-

  • “Success of a case or project isn’t the result of individual brilliance but rather the outcome of a meticulously orchestrated collaboration”- Mitsu Parikh, Senior Partner at World of Legal Research

    “Success of a case or project isn’t the result of individual brilliance but rather the outcome of a meticulously orchestrated collaboration”- Mitsu Parikh, Senior Partner at World of Legal Research

    This Interview has been published by Pragya Chandni and and The SuperLawyer Team

    Can you share a bit about your educational journey and how you pursue law as a career? 

    I originate from a quaint town in Gujarat where, a decade ago, career choices such as law, journalism, creative writing, and hotel management were not common for females. When I expressed my aspiration to pursue a career in law to my parents, their reaction was beyond surprise. They recommended that I gain firsthand experience by shadowing a seasoned lawyer before making a definitive decision. Consequently, I immersed myself in the legal field, accompanying and observing an accomplished lawyer in various cases spanning banking, constitutional, employment, and family laws. The diverse and intricate nature of the legal profession left a profound impression on me, ultimately solidifying my determination to pursue law as a career. This experience broadened my understanding of the legal landscape and instilled in me a deep appreciation for the multifaceted challenges and responsibilities inherent in the field.

    You’ve pursued advanced degrees in International Law and Legal research. What drew you to specialize in these areas? 

    During my undergraduate studies, I actively participated in moot court competitions, assuming roles as a speaker and researcher. While I thoroughly enjoyed the entire moot court experience, I found a particular passion for research. Delving into legal research became more than necessary; it became a profound interest. This inclination led me to explore opportunities to publish papers and interact with esteemed academicians at conferences and symposiums. Recognizing the significance of contributing substantively to the legal discourse through research and publishing papers, I pursued a master’s degree. Someone once told me that just raising questions doesn’t make you people worthwhile; finding solutions does. 

    You’ve had diverse roles, from Legal Assistant in law firms to your current position as a Senior Researcher and Coordinator. How did these experiences contribute to your growth and specialization in international law? 

    My stint in the corporate sector and various law firms served as a journey of self-discovery, compelling me to confront the realization that these roles may not be my lifelong passion. However, I wholeheartedly acknowledge that each experience played a crucial role in shaping my personal and professional growth. During my internship, a pivotal lesson resonated deeply – the significance of every task, regardless of its scale. It became evident that the success of a case or project isn’t the result of individual brilliance but rather the outcome of a meticulously orchestrated collaboration. Whether assuming the role of a clerk, lawyer, or researcher, every individual in the chain contributes uniquely, and the collective effort propels success. This realization has ingrained in me a commitment to execute my responsibilities to the best of my abilities, regardless of my role in the process. 

    Could you tell us more about your role as a Senior Researcher and Coordinator at the international consultancy World of Legal Research? What kind of research-based consultancy do you provide to the government, law schools, and academicians? 

    We provide a variety of services. Some of the services involve a project where we have to study impact assessment, create analytical research reports, and assist with reviewing the research papers. Additionally, we are more inclined towards assisting our legal fraternity with our efficient legal research team, specializing in diverse fields of law.

    As a Visiting Faculty to many universities in India and abroad, you teach Public International Law and Legal Research Methodology. What inspired you to take up a teaching role alongside your research work? 

    When I was a student, the thought often crossed my mind – what if certain topics were approached differently? Would they become more intriguing? It wasn’t until I visited conferences in the southern part of India that I stumbled upon a fascinating realization. Among the accomplished individuals, be it a thriving businessman, a seasoned lawyer, or a distinguished doctor, there was a common thread – academic involvement. It brought to my mind Chanakya’s words about teachers never being ordinary; they hold the power of construction and destruction. This insight fueled my aspiration to contribute meaningfully to the academic realm. As I transitioned into the role of a researcher, my desire crystallized into a passion for teaching law students the art and science of research. It’s not just about acquiring knowledge but understanding the intricacies and methodologies that make research a captivating and essential facet of the legal profession. 

    Your experience includes working in law firms in Australia and India. How did these experiences shape your understanding of legal practice on an international scale? 

    Lawfirms became my school of perfection, teaching me the invaluable skills of meticulousness and the art of thriving under deadlines. But beyond the technicalities, it was a vibrant classroom where I learned to navigate the intricate tapestry of human diversity. Working with people from different cultures was a daily lesson in understanding, patience, and respect. There were instances where a case forced me to reconcile my personal beliefs with my client’s position. The legal profession throws a unique challenge at you – dealing with ethical dilemmas that demand a delicate balance. The realization that every client, boss, or judge is a distinct chapter in your professional story. Each encounter is an opportunity to embrace diversity, not just in your home country but in foreign lands. It taught me the importance of respecting diverse cultures and opinions, a lesson that goes beyond the legal arena and shapes how I approach life.

    You’ve presented papers on various topics, from health inequalities during COVID-19 to discrimination in legal education. Can you highlight a paper that you found particularly impactful or that received significant attention? 

    In 2023, I had the privilege of presenting a paper at the Center for Criminal Law, University of Oxford (UK), addressing the alarming issue of ancestral rapes in the state of Haryana during the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper garnered recognition and was honored with an award for being the most passionate presentation. Subsequently, I received emails from faculty members and fellow paper presenters at the conference, affirming that this problem extends beyond India to encompass every country and culture. The correspondence highlighted a shared sentiment that societies tend to suppress or disregard such issues, choosing to deny their existence. The suggestions and solutions proposed in my paper resonated with the international audience, earning appreciation from diverse perspectives. It was a powerful acknowledgment of the universality of the problem and the importance of proactive and compassionate approaches to address it on a global scale.

    Your involvement in founding an NGO called ‘Madad’ during the COVID-19 pandemic is commendable. Could you share more about the initiatives and impact of this organization?

    I wouldn’t like to talk much about my NGO as our ancestors say that if you help someone with your right hand, your left hand shouldn’t even know about it. I would just say that at whatever stage you are in life, try to help others, not for the betterment of society, but for yourself, so that you can face yourself in the mirror at the end of the day. 

    You’ve received several awards and honors for your contributions, including the Youngest Leader Award from Rotary International. Which of these achievements holds a special place in your heart, and why? 

    In the third year of my undergrad studies, I received an award for the best position paper at Harvard University. That paper made me realize that regardless of being from a small town or being from the vernacular medium of studies, you can if you really want to achieve something in life.

    You’ve held various editorial roles and served as chairman in some committees while studying at the University of Sydney. How have these positions enriched your professional journey? 

    These positions equipped me with essential skills such as time management and strategic planning. Additionally, they provided valuable lessons on effective teamwork. Each extracurricular engagement in Law School imparts qualities beyond the teachings of books or academic activities.

    Finally, based on your journey so far, what advice would you give law graduates just starting their careers in the legal field? 

    Well, I’m not experienced enough to give any advice. I’d reframe it as learning that I can share from the mistakes I made in my journey. 

    1. Take your internships seriously. You will gain something from every task you do during your internship, even if it is just carrying your senior’s briefcase and/or documents. For example, you’ll be able to be a part of his conversations with clients and people around in court, how one carries his business in the legal field, etc.; this will teach you much more about the practicalities that even a subject in law school wouldn’t. 

    2. Whether you want to join corporate or litigation, publish papers and take part in conferences. Publish or perish is a thumb rule. If someone googles you on the internet, and you have something published, you will get brownie points. 

    3. There is no shortcut to success. It might sound like the cheesiest line. However, life is not 2 minutes noodles. Instant gratification. Instant Fame. All these are not to be focused upon. Do smart work, but don’t get scared away from hard work. Thus, creating a strong base first is very important, because if you sow well, you’ll reap the fruits throughout your life. Choice is always yours.

    Get in touch with Mitsu Parikh-

  • “I have experienced the highest of highs and lowest of lows, but I keep showing up and never despair. I would say litigation is very unpredictable as you never know what will happen in court”- Usha Lakshmipathaiah, Associate Partner at Krishnamurthy & Co. (K Law)

    “I have experienced the highest of highs and lowest of lows, but I keep showing up and never despair. I would say litigation is very unpredictable as you never know what will happen in court”- Usha Lakshmipathaiah, Associate Partner at Krishnamurthy & Co. (K Law)

    This Interview has been published by Pragya Chandni and and The SuperLawyer Team

    Ma’am, could you please share your journey and how you ended up pursuing a career in law? What motivated you to choose this profession?

    From a young age I was very bold and would always speak my mind. I also had a very strong desire to help people. I felt like I gravitated towards Law as my elder brother also chose Law as his career path. At that age you are extremely influenced by your siblings. When I started reading different law subjects, I became more and more curious and continue to be curious about everything law has to offer. 

    I remember feeling so overwhelmed on my first day in court. But I kept accompanying my colleagues / seniors and I slowly became familiar with all the court procedures etc. 

    My journey has been full of surprises. I have experienced the highest of highs and lowest of lows, but I keep showing up and never despair. I would say litigation is very unpredictable as you never know what will happen in court. 

    With your extensive experience in handling commercial and civil disputes, insolvency cases, and matters under the Industrial Disputes Act, can you highlight a particularly challenging case that stands out in your career and how you navigated through it?

    I represented a company in a case wherein there was an injunctive order against termination of an employee. It was challenging as the company was forced to continue his employment. However, we took the aid of section 14 and section 16 of the specific relief act and were able to demonstrate that contracts solely dependent on personal qualifications cannot be enforced. 

    Your work involves representing clients in intellectual property rights cases. Could you discuss a memorable case where your skills in IP law played a crucial role in achieving a favourable outcome?

    In one of the Intellectual property rights cases there was an ex-parte order operating against our client restraining them from infringing the plaintiff’s trademark.  We relied on section 30 of the trademarks act and were able to demonstrate that there was no infringement of trademark as our client was merely showcasing products and was in no way “using the plaintiff’s trademark”. This case was challenging as it is difficult to get an interim order vacated. 

    From your time at Poovayya & Co., you were involved in representing organizations in electronic and print media. Can you share an interesting experience or case related to media law that you found particularly intriguing or challenging?

    An interesting experience was regarding injunctive reliefs against publications (electronic or media) from telecasting defamatory articles / news. In such cases, the plaintiffs tend to include all media channels irrespective of whether they had published defamatory articles. We were representing media houses who were unnecessarily dragged to court who had nothing to do with the alleged defamatory articles. It was an uphill task to demonstrate that the media houses were only reporting facts / actual events that took place. 

    As someone who has also worked with a Judge of the Supreme Court, could you shed light on how that experience influenced your perspective and approach to practicing law?

    This experience was immensely valuable as it gave me first-hand experience as to what the Judge expects from a lawyer irrespective of who he is representing. It made me realise that the arguments must be presented in a manner which can easily be grasped in a short period of time. It also taught me the importance of keeping the pleadings precise and using simple language as opposed to complex sentences. 

    You’ve been involved in consumer matters and divorce cases. Can you discuss a case that had a significant impact on your understanding of these areas of law, and perhaps a lesson you learned from it?

    We had filed a consumer case for an individual wherein the complaint was allowed in part and half of the compensation amount claimed was granted. Although we had good grounds for appeal, it made commercial sense for the client to accept the part compensation considering the costs and time it would take for the Appeal to be decided, finally. 

    This case provided me with a different perspective of the importance of balancing between the desire to win a case and a feasible remedy for the client. 

    Your role as an Associate Partner at Klaw involves providing legal advice to various e-commerce platforms. How do you approach the unique challenges and legal issues that arise in the rapidly evolving landscape of e-commerce?

    The law pertaining to e-commerce is rapidly evolving and new guidelines are released from time to time. I constantly keep myself updated on the law regarding intermediaries and its interpretation by different courts which equips me with providing the best solution to the client.

    Given your diverse experience, what advice would you offer to law graduates who are just starting their careers in the field? What key lessons or insights have you gained that you believe would be valuable for them?

    To anyone who is just starting their career, I would advise that gaining practical experience at an early stage would give them an edge over their peers. Exposure to court procedures, being involved in evidence and cross examinations is what they should be aiming at the early stages of their career. They should eagerly look out for opportunities to present arguments be it at the stage of interim hearings or final arguments. 

    Get in touch with Usha Lakshmipathaiah-

  • “Figure out your “why” of continuing with litigation. The practice of law brings me peace and satisfaction”- Anu Shrivastava, Advocate on Record, Supreme Court of India

    “Figure out your “why” of continuing with litigation. The practice of law brings me peace and satisfaction”- Anu Shrivastava, Advocate on Record, Supreme Court of India

    This interview has been published by Priyanka Karwa and The SuperLawyer Team

    Please tell us a bit about your upbringing and what motivated you to study law?

    I was born to a doctor couple in Ranchi. I have an elder brother who is also a doctor. I finished pre-school from St. Mary’s Nursery School and enrolled at DPS Ranchi where I studied until I finished 12th grade. Ranchi used to be a small quiet town. We didn’t have much exposure and the career options were limited to medical or engineering.

    I had seen my parents at their workplaces but was somehow not attracted to their profession. I wanted to understand how the society and our legal system functions. There was a natural inclination to move from the study of sciences to social sciences (This is not to say that I didn’t enjoy science, I did quite well in my 12th board as a Biology student and I miss organic chemistry a lot!). I remember chancing upon the question paper for the first CLAT and finding the questions very interesting. I thought that this was something that would be fun to study. My parents were not keen with the decision at first. But I owe it to my school teachers who played a very important role in convincing them. They eventually came around. 

    How was your law school journey? We see that you’ve done a fair bit of extra-curricular activities as a member and head of the Music Club at GNLU. You’ve also been part of the organising committee for the GNLU International Moot Court Competition (“GIMC”) and the GNLU Moot on Securities and Investment Law (“GMSIL”). Tell us a bit about these. Are co-curricular and extra-curricular roles important for a law student?

    I think 5 year is a really long time if you have to just study law, so it is very important that you keep your interest going with other things. I have always loved playing music. I have even trained in Hindustani Classical. GNLU had a bunch of extremely talented musicians who formed the music club (a tradition that I’m glad to know has continued). Something very special and beautiful happens when a bunch of strangers with very varied backgrounds and interests in music come together to create music. I forged some excellent friendships through the music club, and I did it mostly for myself. It helped survive the grey walls.

    The Organising Committee roles started because I wanted to be among the “cool kids” on campus during GIMC. But over a period of time, it taught me responsibility and very strong organisational skills. The Organising Committee itself is divided into sub-teams for logistics, sponsorship, PR and hospitality, which have their respective team heads or coordinators. Organising a moot which witnesses such wide participation from teams and judges is a crash course in event management. By our 5th year, some of us who were part of the GIMC-OC founded GMSIL because to bridge the need for a moot exclusively for securities and investment law. Our moot court coordinator, Dr. Girish R. liked the proposal and took the idea forward. The University administration was extremely cooperative and helpful, and we had another moot to organise!

    Co-curriculars are definitely important for an all-round development, and somewhat even necessary given today’s competitive environment. I am not sure if extracurriculars help directly. Being involved with the organising committee of a moot court competition may not help you with job applications. But they do form good conversation starters. As an OC member, whether you like it or not, you will know something or the other about the moot problem, and learn a lot simply by hearing the oral arguments. Some of the younger judges who come might also help in mentoring and guiding.   

    Winning the Best Speaker at the 3rd All India Corporate Law Moot Court Competition and receiving an Honourable Mention at the 23rd Willem C. Vis International Commercial Arbitration Moot in Vienna are impressive achievements. Could you share some insights into these experiences and their impact on your career?

    It is incorrect to equate good speaking skills in a moot with a good career in litigation or even law, generally. Moot problems help you think. They come closest to making a student apply the law, think on your feet, and experiment with legal arguments. I picked up a lot on coherent, crisp, and succinct drafting when I was doing Vis (all credits to my team – Muskan, Shweta and Catherine, and to our team coach – Zehaan). Drafting is a very underrated skill. It is extremely important to be able to convey legal arguments in simple words and in a structured manner to have maximum impact on the reader. 

    As far as oral argumentation goes, the preparation for Vis was very different compared to AICLM. With AICLM our focus was very much on the law and clarity of thought and expression. Since it was a national moot we expected the judges to ask questions and preparation was done accordingly. Vis was trickier. We had prepare for arguments before judges from different jurisdictions who were used to hearing very different accents and dialects. I remember hitting rock bottom at one point in my preparation for the oral rounds, because I felt that I wasn’t getting better. Things got better once I identified that I cannot go by a scripted speech. In that sense, moot court competitions helped me discover an individual style of argumentation. 

    Most moot court competitions are based on a new and upcoming legal issue. They’re a great way to keep on your toes about legal developments and interesting areas of law. My main reason for participating moots was because they were a great learning experience. 

    You secured a pre-placement offer with Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas in your 3rd year at GNLU. What would be your placement advice to students?

    Honestly, I had not given much thought to placements back then. Our University had an excellent placement and internship committee which worked towards ensuring that students had internships and placements. I can’t speak of the standard procedures today but back then, a PPO was the culmination of repeat internships at any office. I had performed fairly well at my internships with the erstwhile AMSS. I was amongst the top rankers in my batch and had a well-rounded CV. Those factors did play a very large role in securing the PPO. 

    A strong resume is imperative for higher chances at a placement with any top-tier firm. But that does not necessarily mean an “academically good” resume. I can’t generalise but I think when firms come for placements, they are looking not just for talent, but also for a candidate that fits well with the larger work culture and ethos of the firm. Not everyone is a good fit for every firm.

    How was your experience of working at CAM, Delhi. Did it seem daunting at first? What tips would you give to fresh joinees at a law firm? 

    It was quite daunting in the beginning. It was the first time that I was living in Delhi by myself. But I shared a home with some of my college seniors who took out the time and energy to guide me. There was a fair bit of inhibition and self-doubt. What helped was to have seniors around who could guide, and I was quite fortunate that way. It is important for everyone to understand that there is a bit of a jump from being an intern to being an Associate at a law firm. Nobody is inherently good at law. Good lawyers are a by-product of good training. 

    I don’t have many tips for fresh joinees. Each team and each firm has a different style of working and requires a different skill set. Diligence, honesty, sincerity, humility, patience and a willingness to learn are just the starting points. It’s essential to look after one’s health – we often ignore that when we’re starting out. 

    What were your reasons for leaving a Tier-1 law firm and joining litigation? What advice would you give to students who want to join litigation?

    I wanted to be in and out of court more regularly and practice a wider range of law. I had great exposure at CAM, but the learning curve had started to plateau. I didn’t want to get too comfortable with the money and decided to move out young after finishing 2 years at CAM. That decision worked out really well for me because I had learnt my basics and was able to get up to speed on matters very easily. 

    The usual advice on patience and perseverance in litigation is quite common so I won’t repeat that. I have two pieces of advice for students. First, the horse is as good as the stable (as said by Fali Nariman in his autobiography). Find an office or a chamber which will really help you blossom into the best version of you.

    Second, figure out your “why” of continuing with litigation. Law in general is a demanding and challenging profession, if you want to go about it the right way. It looks very different from the outside than it is on the inside. So, you really need to have a pretty strong reason to be a litigating lawyer – it can be anything, whatever keeps you going. For me, it was not the money, or the adrenaline rush of being in court, or the glamour of being a senior advocate. At the risk of sounding nerdy and naïve, I have continued with this purely because I like reading briefs, I love reading law, I like applying my mind to the case and to the law, and I like drafting. The practice of law brings me peace and satisfaction. 

    Please tell us more about working at a Chamber in Delhi. How is it different from working in the litigation team at a law firm? 

    I joined the chambers of senior advocates after my stint at CAM. With a senior’s office you don’t draft so much but you are handling a larger number of matters on a given day. The drafting is already done by the firms and advocates who come to brief the senior. The input expected from a junior is to be thorough with the briefs they’re marked on, prepare notes for arguments and be quick on the uptake and legal research. All this happens post 3-4 PM when you are back in office from court. In court, a big part of your job is to keep tabs on what matters are reaching, avoid a clash to the extent possible and ensure that your senior appears in them. This last part is very important because all preparation goes to waste if your senior does not appear and the matter gets adjourned.

    Why did you decide to qualify as an Advocate on Record? Can you share some insights into the process of qualifying as an Advocate on Record and its impact on your career?

    The decision to qualify as an AOR was influenced due to the chambers that I had worked or interned at. I had interned with HMJ (Retd.) Indu Malhotra (before her elevation), who had been an AOR before being designated as a senior advocate, another internship with ADP Chambers where Mr. Debesh Panda is an AOR. I was already enamoured by the prospect of being an AOR because I witnessed first-hand the kind of responsibility it came with and the skills that it required. Post CAM, I joined the chambers of Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Senior Advocate who used to be an AOR too. I then joined Mr. Jayant Mehta who was an AOR when I joined him but got designated as a senior during my tenure at his chamber. Both my seniors are not only great lawyers but have been excellent draftspersons. I wanted to emulate that and hence, taking the AOR exam was another step in that direction. I also enjoy Supreme Court practice a lot and hope to build my practice as an AOR office.

    The impact of becoming an AOR is yet to be seen as I have only recently started my independent office. The process of qualifying is pretty straightforward and the details are available on the Supreme Court website itself. The exam comprises 4 papers – Practice and Procedure, Drafting, Advocacy and Professional Ethics, and Leading Cases.

    Your publication record is quite extensive, covering topics from arbitration to competition law. How has academic research and writing contributed to your growth as a legal professional, and do you see a synergy between your academic pursuits and your practical work? Please tell us a bit about your research papers such as, the one on the overlap of insolvency and arbitration laws in India and its implications? How do you decide to write on a particular topic?

    Despite several earnest attempts, I have not been able to keep up with a regular habit of writing. It is not mandatory to be engaged with academics and scholarly writing once you are a professional. Whatever little that I have published was purely because I have academic leanings and I enjoy writing on legal topics. I want to be a lawyer who is very actively involved in academia, and I have unrealistic ambitions of being able to author a commentary (someday, who knows?). 

    The more you read and keep updated, the easier it is to zero in on a topic. Being legally aware and updated automatically leads to a churning and overflow of ideas which often seek release in the form of an article. I also took my research projects in University seriously and chose topics which either piqued my interest or left room for creative scholarly work.

    Why did you decide to read for a masters at the University of Cambridge after working for a couple of years. Is post-qualification experience important to secure an admission? What advice would you give to students who want to pursue an LL.M. abroad?

    A masters’ degree wasn’t on my agenda when I finished my undergraduate. It was only during practice that I got the opportunity to dabble with very different areas of law. I’m truly grateful to my seniors’ chambers for that opportunity and for planting in me a genuine and deep interest in certain areas of law. I wanted to study these civil and commercial laws in depth and spend time in not just understanding how these laws work, but how they should work, and why.

    The importance of work experience depends on the University and the programme that you choose. There is really no one-size-fits-all approach. As far as Cambridge goes, they have a very inclusive selection process and work experience is not a pre-requisite to secure an admission. 

    Like litigation, figure out your reasons for doing your masters, and tailor your CV accordingly. A masters from a reputed University does increase your chances of getting hired with an international law firm but it is not a ticket to that job. There are people who have moved to international law firms without a masters too! It is best to do a masters right after law school if you know that you want to get into academia. But it is certainly not a necessity if you want to continue practicing law.

    How has the LL.M. helped in your career? How did you decide on your LL.M. subjects (International Commercial Litigation, Intellectual Property, Information Law and Advanced Private Law)? 

    As mentioned earlier, I chose these subjects because I was already familiar and interested in them through my work experience. I didn’t pursue my masters for any immediate or direct advantages to my career as far as employability is concerned. It did tremendously expand my knowledge, understanding and overall ability to think about the legal issues relating to my masters subjects. Since I continue to deal with these practice areas, they do contribute towards my outlook to briefs and my engagement with these laws on a regular basis. 

    Tell us a bit about your time at Cambridge – curricular and extra-curricular activities, both. What would a typical day look like for you? How challenging was it to deal with the reading lists and the academic work?

    Cambridge is a very peaceful and engaging place, almost a respite from the busy hustle bustle of my life in litigation. The whole city is full of students and the culture is such that it fosters academic growth. Every attempt is made by the colleges to help focus by taking care of all other pastoral needs. This is done, perhaps, to ensure that students are able to cope up with the humongous amounts of readings. In the LL.M. course it is not enough to know the law. The professors’ expect that you have thought deeply about your subjects and have reasoned with it well. They are more interested in hearing your original ideas.

    During term time, apart from attending class, I used to spend most of my time at my college library or at the reading room trying to cover up just the basic readings for my classes. It was impossible to finish the reading lists during term, so a majority of the break between terms was also spent in finishing the pending readings. For someone who has a genuine interest in their subjects and wants to be thorough, the entirety of the course duration can get used up in just finishing the readings. But the readings were divided into essential and optional to make things easier for students.

    It wasn’t all work though. I helped organise the Cambridge Arbitration Days – 2022 at the Faculty of Law. This was one of the first arbitration events that was being held in person post COVID. We had some of the best barrister chambers and solicitor firms come down for the sessions. I met some of the best legal minds here.

    I was a member of Darwin College at Cambridge which is right by the Cam River. Matter of fact, the backyard of my house opened into the college gardens which were adjacent to the river. Darwin has a special place in my heart – I made friends from all over the world and across disciplines. You could just be sitting and having a cup of coffee in the café and strike a very thoughtful and enriching conversation with a complete stranger who will most certainly have a thing or two to teach you. 

    I founded the Law Society at Darwin. I was very active with the swimming club. I would almost never miss our Saturday swims followed by brunch at the college. I did a fair bit of punting and kayaking. I signed up to become a punt captain at my college and by the end of my course I had become an expert at giving people punt rides along the river. I even did a night punting trip! Darwin has the best (and the most affordable) bar in Cambridge and is run entirely by students. I used to bartend once a week and earn some side money. I played a lot of cricket and football. I think I made the most of my time there, but that is how the environment is like at Cambridge. It ensures that you maximize your involvement with everything. This can also lead one astray. So it is important to not lose track of your priorities.

    In addition to your litigation work, you have advised on various aspects of data protection laws and have drafted privacy policies. How do you stay updated on evolving legal landscapes, especially in areas like data protection, and what advice would you give to legal professionals on staying current in today’s dynamic legal environment?

    I think it is easier to stay updated in today’s legal environment because important cases and developments get reported immediately. I think LiveLaw and Bar&Bench do a pretty good coverage of domestic legal developments. I have also been in the habit of reading international developments by customising my Feedly since I was in law school. There must be newer ways of staying updated now, would appreciate receiving tips on that myself. 

    A question that is often repeated- How difficult is it to be a first generation lawyer in the litigation circle? 

    It is difficult for sure, especially if you are not from Delhi, like me. But then again, it is not impossible either. The starting point differs if you are from a family of lawyers and you certainly have an edge over others. Even if you discount legacy, lineage makes things easier purely in terms of rent, expenses, office space, library and resources. But, I’m hopeful that in the longer run everyone does end up finding their ground. I can’t say for other cities but the Bar in Delhi is relatively more welcoming to outsiders. One of my law professors used to say in GNLU – Everyone will end up reaching the same place. If someone has an airplane, let them use that. You take the bus if that’s what you can afford.

    I must also count my blessings and check my privilege. I managed to work with some of the best chambers even though I didn’t have any connections to secure an entry for me. Hard work does get recognition across the board. My seniors, and the people I have worked and interned with have always been exceptionally kind to me. I have been able to keep litigation because my parents are not dependent on me and I have no liabilities. I have a spouse and in-laws who have been exceptionally supportive. It wouldn’t have been possible for me to transition to independent practice without their backing. I can imagine the trajectory being far more difficult for someone else.

    It is also important to understand that setting up an independent practice is not the only way that one can be a litigating lawyer. People are doing exceptional work at chambers and in law firms, be it small, mid-tier or big law firms. Being part of a team is less stressful than running your own establishment. It also gives more flexibility, allows room for experimenting with varied work, and ability to handle heavy briefs.

    As a woman at the Bar, do you face any particular challenges and how do you deal with them? What changes would you suggest for a more inclusive and diverse Bar? What future opportunities and challenges do you foresee?

    Women face more challenges in every field (personal or professional) and litigation is no different. A comparison of the number of men and women senior advocates and judges is self-explanatory. But I must point out that a career in litigation has a lot of longevity. There is always scope for coming back after a break, albeit, with initial struggles and difficulties. Since there is no linear career progression, it leaves room to carve a distinct path which may be very different from one’s contemporaries. 

    There are definitely a larger number of women at the bar today. With passage of time, courts have become more inclusive and accommodative spaces. There are also a large number of women who are re-joining the field once their children have grown up and they don’t need to be caregivers. I’m grateful for the Bar here which has an amazing set of women who have always been very encouraging and supportive. We have a long way to go but I’m hopeful about the future. We are the products of the hard work of all women who came before us and made our lives easier, and I hope that we’ll continue making things better for the future.

    Lastly, if you were to provide advice to recent law graduates entering the field today, what key pieces of wisdom or lessons learned would you share with them as they embark on their own legal journeys?

    “Own legal journeys” is the operative part here. The legal profession is very wide, diverse and rich. Each person has their fair share of struggles, blessings and rewards. There really isn’t a template to follow. Feel free to experiment, but do a good job with whatever you choose to experiment with. Another piece of advice is to have hobbies outside of law.  The profession (and life in general) is far too long to live without poetry, music, sports, food, art and culture.

    Get in touch with Anu Shrivastava-

  • After spending reasonable time on all the preparation, it is equally important to sleep peacefully within time and appear with a calm mind without trying to attach any emotions to your client/matter-Divanshu Gupta, Advocate, Rajasthan High Court

    After spending reasonable time on all the preparation, it is equally important to sleep peacefully within time and appear with a calm mind without trying to attach any emotions to your client/matter-Divanshu Gupta, Advocate, Rajasthan High Court

    This interview has been published by  Priyanka Karwa and The SuperLawyer Team

    Can you tell us about your journey into the field of law? What inspired you to pursue a career in this field?

    I am a first generation lawyer with no lawyer in the immediate or distant family. I appeared for my 12th standard examination and parallel competitive entrance exams in 2009. I belong to a generation where the traditional career choices of medicine/engineering had just begun to phase out and emerging career choices like law, arts, actuarial science etc. had begun to phase in. Like many others, I was preparing for engineering entrance exams and used to study law/law entrance during my free time or just as a back up. Incidentally, all the law entrance exams were scheduled after all the engineering entrance exams. I could take out time and focus on the same. The one thing which intrigued me the most about law entrance was – how the overall subject was technical on one hand and yet so narrative like a story book on the other hand. I could relate very well to this unique sort of intersection.  

    You’ve had a diverse career, starting with working for a prominent law firm and now running your own law chambers in Jaipur. How did you decide to transition into independent practice?

    At and around the time I graduated, GNLU was one of the (and continues to be) most sought after institution for recruitment by top tier law firms from India and abroad. I too was one of the many candidates who wanted to be a part of this ‘to be hired bunch’. A position with a top tier transactional law firm brought much required and sought after financial comfort, peace and stability. However, the work was far away from how one traditionally perceives the practice of law, be it a layman or a lawyer. It was away from reading and understanding latest case laws, working on matters before the courts or even going to courts. Everytime I had an opportunity to visit any court or do anything related, it would bring in some natural excitement and eagerness. Untill I transitioned to independent practice, I realized that this was my calling which I had been ignoring forever due to different reasons. I first transitioned by shifting from transactional law practice to litigation practice within the same firm. Since I was already more than 4 years old in Bombay, I then considered where did I want to be in the long run. At the same time, I could see Jaipur (my hometown) continuing to grow as an emerging metro city. Many of my knowns/seniors were satisfied with litigation and overall career opportunities over here in the legal field. I did a detailed survey of lawyers and opportunities in the city and luckily some of them were kind enough to give me a holistic and unbiased picture of what law-life here is going to be like. I found this platform to be more full of opportunities without any compromise in scope of learning and exposure. After quitting my job at CAM in January 2019, I started with my practice in Jaipur in April 2019.      

    During your time with Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, you worked on project finance and later diversified into dispute resolution. How did this experience shape your legal perspective and approach?

    For all transactional law lawyers, they say that one should have working knowledge of litigation. And I feel the same other way round for litigation lawyers as well. Since the time I shifted untill now, my overall understanding of finance/transactional law continues to aid me day in and day out in ways more than one. So many litigation/legal issues these days stem from some or the other kind of emerging and complicated financial structure. In such a situation, one needs to be very adaptive to first understand the complex arrangement himself and then being able to break it down in a manner before the concerned forum that it becomes inclined to grant your client the desired relief within reasonable time.     

    It’s impressive to see the range of entities you currently represent as their empaneled advocate in Rajasthan. Can you share some of the highlights of your work with these organizations?

    A lot of the entitles of which I am a panel lawyer, are government bodies/corporations. In my limited experience and exposure, the case of such entities is often strong on paper but usually not properly represented. Many such cases relate to projects of public importance involving public money. Given the opportunity, I always try my best to deep dive into the entire case bunch/file such that false/frivolous claims, if any, are not allowed and what should remain for adjudication is the actual genuine claim. The work usually involves arbitration matters arising out commercial contracts, writ jurisdiction work arising out of service law issues, matters before the consumer forum etc.

    Dealing with complex legal issues to find simple solutions is an intriguing approach. Could you share an example of a particularly challenging case you worked on and how you managed to simplify the legal complexities for your client?

    As part of project finance practice, one works on lot of financing documents like – loan, guarantee, mortgage, pledge etc. many of which find their roots in the Indian Contract Act, 1872. I had drafted and negotiated these documents extensively for almost 4 years. Cut to 2022, I was dealing with a case of a widow lady ousted from her home by the lender bank on account of being a defaulting guarantor in a loan arrangement. While under general principles of contract law, it possibly appeared to be the right thing to do by the bank, however, her legal arrangement fell within the purview of the Rajasthan Cooperative Societies Act, 2001 which created an exception to the general rule of subrogation/co-extensive liability (Section 128 of the Contract Act) – i.e. recovery from the guarantor could only have been done after exhausting recovery mechanisms against the borrower. This is how my overall experience at a law firm doing financing documents day in and day out came in handy and based on this one point itself, we could secure back the possession of the house of our client.

    Apart from your legal practice, you also provide training for law students in various areas. What motivates you to engage in academic activities, and how do you balance them with your legal practice?

    As a law student and even before that in school, I always faced issues with respect to proper practical guidance – especially on things not available in any books or the internet. What motivates me to engage in academic activities is to eliminate fear and anxiety within then student/graduate community to take up new challenges/roles. Law for everyone including students should be a tool and not a mystery. Whenever I feel saturated or worked up with my regular legal work, it is actually the work of legal training which keeps me motivated and going.

    As a successful advocate, you have valuable experience appearing before different courts and tribunals. What advice would you give to young law graduates who aspire to excel in litigation and advocacy?

    Thoroughness in everything in my view matters a lot in litigation and advocacy. However, you cannot allow the perfect to be the enemy of good (something which I also recently learned from my father). One will never feel prepared enough to appear for any kind of matter. After spending reasonable time on all the preparation, it is equally important to sleep peacefully within time and appear with a calm mind without trying to attach any emotions to your client/matter (easier said than done). The more objective your approach would be, the more you’ll be at peace leading to overall positive legal consequences.

    Your journey seems to have taken you to various cities and law firms through internships. How did these internships contribute to your growth as a lawyer, and what key lessons did you learn from these experiences?

    My internships formed the backbone of what I should be like an actual lawyer – whether it was dressing, appearance, the way I spoke, ate, walked, responded, client dealing, file management, email writing and any and everything. All of these internships were a lot about observing minutely and learning how to keep calm at the time of legal chaos, urgencies and short deadlines. Everything which an intern does or is asked to do, should not be treated as unimportant or miniscule. Every single piece of such delegated work matters to the core and can have positive/negative irreversible consequences on any matter.

    Could you share some insights into the legal landscape in Rajasthan and the unique challenges and opportunities it presents for legal practitioners?

    One unique thing about legal practice in Rajasthan which I personally like dealing with is that the practice is not dominated by one particular kind of matters/lawyers – lets say banking, service law, electricity, start ups etc. and at the same time does not allow you to maintain that kind of approach. There is available work and clientele of diverse fields which one needs to tap, be it out of choice or compulsion. Similarly, there are both young as well as experienced senior lawyers in the market, contributing to the system at large in their own unique manner. Rajasthan, being at the pinnacle of renewable energy in the country continues to offer plenty of opportunities in the area of electricity law. In terms of challenges, there are many fora which continue to work in hindi pleadings, ordersheets and arguments. While it is not a challenge for seasoned lawyers, but could possibly be a challenge for lawyers fresh out of university.

    Running your law chambers must have its own set of challenges and rewards. What are some of the most fulfilling aspects of having your own practice, and how do you navigate the complexities of managing a legal firm?

    Being your own boss is the most fulfilling as well the most challenging aspect at the threshold. There is no office/firm if you are not there in the first place either by being physically present or in form of conducting daily review meetings/discussions. As a chamber practitioner, work flows down the in the hierarchy only from a single point of contact, i.e. myself. In such times, you ought to be constantly available for resolving queries of interns and associates, queries posed by a judge in court and kept for the next day, meeting and closing deals with new clients for upcoming legal work, focusing on your own legal and overall growth, taking out time to finish complicated drafting exercises, ensuring that the same gets filed without exceeding the limitation period and so on. Ultimately, the chain of command flows from you and everything which goes wrong, the buck stops at you. This is both challenging and yet enjoyable at the same time. It keeps you on your toes always, tires you out but doesn’t ever make you feel redundant – and that in my view is the silver lining. You only grow and every bad or unfortunate incident is a learning experience. This becomes most challenging when suddenly you have to deal with a legal issue you have never dealt before. The issue is not that much with legal skill but rather with the short span of time in which you have to resolve it out. In such a scenario, all your previous experiences of being a cucumber in chaos come in handy, you spoil some and you learn from some.  

    In your experience, what are some of the critical skills or qualities that young lawyers should focus on developing to build a successful legal career?

    Patience, is not a new answer to this question. Additionally, irrespective of whether someone is in litigation, transaction or anywhere else, being well read, thorough, being able to listen more and speak less (or only when it is required), not allowing a situation to overpower your senses, demeanor, being able to manage your temper, being slightly overprepared and most importantly – being responsive and not reactive to people as well as situations are the critical skills that young lawyers should focus on developing.

    Finally, considering your journey from a young law graduate to an established advocate and legal consultant, what advice would you like to give to fresh graduates who are about to step into the legal profession?

    I would tell them and rather clarify – I continue to establish myself and we all are sailing in the same boat. It’s just that our journeys began at different points of time. The moment one starts feeling that he/she has established himself at any point of time is the moment that you have slipped into some or the other kind of comfort zone. Don’t let that happen to you. As they say, if you are the smartest in your class, you are in the wrong class. One should try to be in company of people or lawyers where there is always something new to learn. There is no dearth of legal opportunities in the market. There are so many people literally craving for the right legal advice, don’t disappoint or misguide or play around with them. I am not telling you to work for free, after all we all have to first feed ourselves and then only we can feed the law. But, don’t take up a particular legal assignment or case only for the money and at the same time don’t abandon one because of money. There will always be some or the other kind of compromise. So, see accordingly where your sense of judgment takes you as everything you’d do as part of your daily work – drafting, research, arguing, filing, marketing yourself, you’ll always find yourself amidst a set of choices or options. Exercise your choices carefully but don’t be hesitant in doing that. Lastly, if you have 60% positive inclination towards doing a particular thing or making a choice and 40% negative, do go for it as not every time one can have 100% clarity or instinct with respect to everything.   

    Get in touch with Divanshu Gupta-