Super Lawyer

Tag: International Law

  • “Patience, combined with a willingness to embrace new challenges, will set apart those who not only succeed but thrive in this evolving landscape.” – Rishabh Gandhi, Founder of Rishabh Gandhi & Advocates.

    “Patience, combined with a willingness to embrace new challenges, will set apart those who not only succeed but thrive in this evolving landscape.” – Rishabh Gandhi, Founder of Rishabh Gandhi & Advocates.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    Welcome to SuperLawyer, Mr. Rishabh Gandhi! We’re excited to have you here with us today.

    Thank you so much for having me here! It’s truly a pleasure to be speaking with you, and I’m looking forward to our conversation. 

    We’re going to ask you a few questions about your journey as a lawyer, academician, judge, and your general experiences in life and learning. Shall we begin? 

    Certainly! I’m all yours. I’m looking forward to sharing my experiences and thoughts.

    Your academic journey is truly distinguished, including topping the MPSC interview, being a Gold Medalist, achieving top ranks as a university topper, receiving the Chief Minister’s appreciation, winning in national research, debates, and moot court competitions, presenting and publishing internationally, and now as a PhD research scholar of law and religion with a thriving legal practice. How have these accomplishments shaped your legal practice, and how do you integrate these experiences into your daily work as a lawyer?

    (Smiling after hearing the question)  Ah, now I get why your team was so keen on my CV!

    My academic journey has been truly fulfilling. Coming from a Marathi medium background until the 12th standard, English was my 5th language, so the early years were certainly challenging. I had to work harder, learn faster, and adapt quickly. But once I found my rhythm, I was able to keep pace.

    I wouldn’t say I was the most brilliant or intelligent, but I was certainly the most sincere. Looking back now, these accomplishments don’t seem as significant as they once did, but at the time, each one pushed me to work a little harder and aim a little higher.

    What I truly gained from this journey was a deep appreciation for sincerity and hard work. These values have shaped my approach to everything—whether it’s diving deep into legal research or crafting arguments for arbitration and litigation.

    The discipline of thorough preparation, structuring complex arguments logically, and presenting them persuasively—all stem from the principles that guided me throughout my academic years. 

     And perhaps, more than anything, it’s about maintaining that sense of curiosity—always wanting to learn more, to dig deeper, and to apply that knowledge in ways that can truly make a difference, whether in the courtroom or beyond. 

    Clerking with Hon’ble Justice Dr. D. Y. Chandrachud at the Bombay High Court, interning at Fox Mandal and other law firms, and working with firms like J S Wad & Co. and Karnik and Karnik Advocates must have been highly formative experiences. Could you share any particularly interesting or challenging situation from these roles and what you learned from it? 

    I vividly remember my first day clerking with Justice Chandrachud—it was November 11th, his birthday, and in the evening after court hours. I walked into his ante chamber and introduced myself, and he responded by saying, ‘Hello, I am Dhananjay.’ A senior high court judge introducing himself with his first name—it was remarkable. I was nothing compared to his stature, yet his humility and grace left a lasting impression on me.

    I also recall how Justice Chandrachud would take a bag full of files home with him every day, preparing for the next day’s work. His dedication and commitment to preparation were powerful lessons that have stayed with me throughout my career. I still think about the case we discussed involving Section 295A of the IPC and Section 95 of the CrPC before a full bench. His depth of analysis was inspiring and shaped my approach to complex legal issues. 

    (Pauses, reflecting)  At Karnik and Karnik Advocates, I learned the ABCs of civil procedure. It was the first time I appeared in court, even if it was just for an adjournment. But for me, it was a big opportunity to successfully convince the judge. I also gained my first experience drafting plaints, applications, and written statements. I’ll never forget one incident during the Facebook era—I was in the court chambers during lunch, using the office computer to check Facebook, when suddenly my senior walked in! Panicking, instead of closing the page, I shut off the computer—losing hours of unsaved work. It was a naive mistake, but it taught me two valuable lessons: never mix social media with work and always save your files—Ctrl + S became my best friend after that!  (Chuckles)

    (Pauses, then continues)  At J S Wad & Co., I had the opportunity to handle civil and commercial disputes from start to finish. I was heavily involved in drafting, arguing interim and final matters, and conducting witness examinations and cross-examinations. I even got a taste of the corporate working style. 

    Turning down an MNC offer to pursue litigation must have been a significant decision, especially as a first-generation lawyer practicing away from your hometown. What factors influenced that choice, and how did you navigate the obstacles you faced early in your career? Reflecting on your journey, what advice would you give to others in similar positions who may be considering a similar path?

    The offer from Infosys appeared quite lucrative, but I wasn’t drawn to the job profile. I felt that litigation and dispute resolution were where I truly belonged. Litigation is fascinating—each day brings new challenges, different cases, different people.

    In the beginning, there were financial challenges, but over time, you find your rhythm. I’m happy I chose litigation over that offer, and if I had to make the decision today, I’d still do the same.

    For those starting out, don’t focus on money early on. There will be struggles, but with patience and perseverance, the rewards will come. Patience is the key.

    Your time as a Trial Court Judge must have offered unique insights into the legal process. Can you share an experience that challenged your views or required you to rethink your approach to law?

    (Pauses, reflecting)  As a Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, I had the opportunity to handle many complex partition suits relating to agricultural lands, specific performance suits, and injunction cases. These matters required extensive reading and strengthened my understanding of contractual obligations. I particularly recall granting a status quo ante in a case, which required deep thought and careful consideration.

    Apart from that, I also served as a judicial member of the Juvenile Justice Board. Handling juveniles was quite different—it required a more humane and understanding approach. The process and environment were kept less formal to make it less intimidating for the juveniles. It was challenging, but also incredibly rewarding.

    In my time as a Magistrate in criminal cases, I often encountered witnesses turning hostile. Navigating those situations required quick thinking, patience, and adaptability.

    I must also mention the incredible training we received from the Maharashtra Judicial Academy. The training was rigorous and went beyond legal skills—it worked on discipline and integrity as well. The academy instilled a strong ethical foundation in us, which has shaped my approach to every case since. 

    Why did you leave the judiciary? What motivated you to transition from the judiciary back to legal practice, and how has your experience as a judge influenced your work in arbitration and litigation?

    Why did I leave the judiciary? That’s a question I’ve been answering since 2016, and it still follows me! There’s no single reason, but I’ll share some pivotal moments.

    The thought of resigning first crossed my mind just two months into my appointment when my leave application for my pre-planned wedding was rejected by the Principal District Judge.  Fortunately, after escalating the matter to the Bombay High Court, the Principal District Judge was directed to grant me two days of leave.

    However, that wasn’t the reason I ultimately left. After completing my training and taking charge, I enjoyed my work in the judiciary. But over time, there were some health issues and personal reasons. After much reflection, I made the decision to step down. I paid the compensation for the bond to the Government and resigned.

    That said, my experience as a judge continues to shape my work in arbitration and litigation. Sitting on the bench taught me how arguments are perceived, what judges prioritize, and the importance of precision in presenting a case. I apply these lessons in every case I handle, whether it’s arbitration or litigation, giving me a more well-rounded approach to dispute resolution

    You’ve handled high-profile cases, including the defamation case involving Justice P. B. Sawant and the Osho will forgery case. How did you approach these complex cases, and what lessons did they teach you about advocacy?

    The Osho will forgery case was incredibly complex. It involved multiple police statements and a voluminous record, with the media closely watching. The case required detailed preparation, touching on international legal aspects like letters rogatory, multi-country assets, and the accused residing in another country who was never arrested. The police investigation had its flaws, and the case is now sub judice before the appellate court, but it remains one of the most interesting cases I’ve worked on.

    As for Justice P. B. Sawant’s defamation case, I was retained by J. S. Wad & Co. as the advocate on record, alongside Late Adv. Nahar in the trial court. The case involved Times Now mistakenly displaying Justice Sawant’s photo and name in connection with a scam involving another judge, Justice Samanta. The trial was intense, with many witnesses and considerable media attention.

    In the end, the court ruled in our favor, ordering Times Now to pay ₹100 crore in damages, though the case is now under appeal. The judge didn’t just refer to one of my submissions but actually included it in her judgment. I had quoted the Bhagavad Gita, where Lord Krishna tells Arjuna that damage to one’s reputation is worse than death, and she wrote that shloka verbatim in her decision.

    Both of these cases taught me that working on minute details is crucial. As lawyers, we must not only refer to laws and precedents but also draw inspiration from broader sources, like the Gita in this case. It reminded me that advocacy goes beyond legal knowledge; it involves a deeper understanding of context and philosophy as well. 

    With experience in commercial litigation, real estate, and arbitration, how do you manage the demands of these different areas? Are there common challenges across these fields, and how do you address them?

    In commercial litigation, the parties are typically corporate entities, which means communication must be prompt, and clients expect regular updates. Having a strong understanding of contract law and specific reliefs is essential, but it’s also about thinking with a businessperson’s perspective. You need to understand the business context in which the dispute arises to offer strategic legal solutions that align with the client’s goals.

    Real estate, on the other hand, presents its own unique challenges. One of the biggest is untangling complex revenue records and land ownership histories. Real estate disputes often involve intricate, layered documentation, and resolving these disputes requires a meticulous approach to both historical and legal records.

    Arbitration brings a different set of challenges. Domestic arbitration, especially when led by retired judges, has unfortunately become time-consuming, resembling traditional court processes. International arbitration, particularly institutional ones, tends to be more streamlined, although the complexity of cases can be higher due to jurisdictional issues. Arbitration has also become more expensive, and recently, the Government of India has discouraged arbitration for government-related cases below ₹10 crores in value.

    It’s clear that Indian arbitration stakeholders need to reflect on this trend and revisit how the process can be streamlined. Making domestic arbitration more cost-effective and efficient is essential for restoring faith in the system. Across all these fields—whether commercial litigation, real estate, or arbitration—careful preparation, client communication, and strategic thinking are key to managing the demands and challenges effectively. 

    Arbitration is becoming increasingly important in India. What trends do you observe in this area, and how do you see arbitration evolving in the future, particularly in light of recent legal developments?

    The legal profession is undergoing significant transformation due to technological advances, particularly AI. How do you view the role of AI in law, and do you see it as more of an opportunity or a challenge?

    AI is playing an increasingly important role in law, and I see it as more of an opportunity than a challenge. Tools like live streaming, live transcription, and auto-dictation are revolutionizing court proceedings, making them more transparent and efficient. Research has become easier with AI-powered tools that can analyze case law and statutes in seconds. These advancements allow lawyers to focus more on strategy and less on routine tasks. However, it’s vital to remember that while AI can enhance efficiency, it can never replace human judgment, empathy, and ethics in legal practice. So, while AI is a powerful tool, it should complement human expertise rather than replace it. 

    Looking ahead, what do you see as the most significant trends or challenges that will shape the future of the legal profession? What skills and attributes will be most crucial for young lawyers in this evolving landscape?

    (Pauses, reflecting) Looking ahead, the legal profession will be shaped by several transformative trends. Technology, particularly AI, will continue to streamline legal processes, but it will challenge lawyers to balance efficiency with human judgment. Globalization will intensify cross-border disputes, and alternative dispute resolution mechanisms like arbitration will become even more prominent as courts face backlogs.

    For young lawyers, adaptability and technical proficiency will be crucial, but patience will be equally important. This is not a profession that yields instant rewards. You need to give it time—years, even—before it truly bears fruit. It’s essential to build a solid foundation of experience, knowledge, and client trust, which only comes with time. Emotional intelligence, resilience, and a strong ethical foundation will remain indispensable as well.

    Patience, combined with a willingness to embrace new challenges, will set apart those who not only succeed but thrive in this evolving landscape.

    Reflecting on your career, what have been some of the most important lessons you’ve learned? Were there any experiences that particularly shaped your philosophy as a lawyer?

    (Pauses, reflecting) One of the most important lessons I’ve learned throughout my career is that patience and persistence are key. As the Mahabharata says, धैर्यं सर्वत्र साधनम्। ‘Patience is the solution to everything.’ Success in law takes time—years, even—and it’s essential to build a solid foundation before you see the real rewards. Equally important is humility. Be humble; humility helps. As the shloka says: अश्वस्य भूषणं वेगो मत्तस्य भूषणं क्षमा। वश्यस्य भूषणं विद्या विनयः शीलस्य भूषणम्।। ‘The ornament of a horse is its speed, of an elephant, its forgiveness; the ornament of a wise person is knowledge, and of character, humility. You don’t need to exhibit your knowledge or oratory skills to impress the courtroom. Instead, focus on persuading the judge. Argue to convince, not to show off. Don’t play to the gallery—play to the judge. It’s about expressing to persuade, not expressing to impress.”

    This version effectively integrates the shloka with your original thoughts, reinforcing the importance of humility and persuasive advocacy in law.I’ve also learned that every suit has its own fate. You may feel you have a favorable case, or the law is on your side, or you’ve argued brilliantly, but the outcome might still go against you. Likewise, there are times when the facts and law aren’t favorable, and yet you receive a favorable order. Don’t let outcomes—favorable or otherwise—affect your state of mind. Remember, there’s always an appeal in case of an unfavorable judgment.

    Networking is crucial in this profession, as is clear communication with your clients. Always be transparent and never give false hope. Be clear about the realities and complexities of their cases.

    Above all, READ. You must constantly educate yourself. Reading will always be your most powerful tool in law. And finally, respect your peers, whether senior or junior. It’s important to show respect to opposing lawyers, as professional courtesy will always take you further.

    With your extensive experience in trial court practice, what do you believe are the most critical skills or mindsets for young lawyers who want to succeed in litigation?

    (Pauses, reflecting) For young lawyers entering litigation, several critical skills and mindsets are key to success. Preparation is everything—mastering the facts and anticipating courtroom questions is vital. Patience and persistence are equally important, as litigation is a long journey with inevitable setbacks.

    Cross-examination skills are crucial: knowing what to ask, what not to ask, and how to read a witness can make or break a case. Understanding the foundational principles of evidence and a deep knowledge of procedural laws are essential. Minute procedural understanding ensures that you’re not caught off-guard by technicalities.

    Communication is key, both in court and with your client. And finally, humility and respect—towards judges, staff, and opposing counsel—are non-negotiable. Litigation isn’t just about legal knowledge; it’s also about how you conduct yourself professionally. 

    As someone deeply involved in both legal practice and academia, what areas of law do you think need more attention in legal education? How can law schools better prepare students for the practical challenges they will face in the profession?

    There are a few areas in legal education that I believe need more attention. First, there needs to be a greater focus on procedural law and its practical applications. Many young lawyers enter practice without a deep understanding of procedural intricacies, which can be critical in litigation.

    Cross-examination techniques and understanding the nuances of evidence law should also be emphasized more. Law schools should introduce more hands-on training, such as moot courts, mock trials, internships, and regular court visits, to provide practical insights into how the legal system operates and bridge the gap between theory and practice.

    Research skill enhancement is vital, as the ability to conduct thorough legal research underpins strong advocacy. Moot courts and mock trials are invaluable for simulating real-world courtroom experience, while regular court visits provide students with a real-time understanding of courtroom proceedings. Internships allow students to apply what they’ve learned in real-life scenarios, helping them gain practical exposure.

    Moreover, legal education should adopt a multidisciplinary approach, integrating subjects like business, technology, and international law, which are increasingly relevant in today’s legal landscape. Finally, developing skills like client management, ethics, oratory, debating skills, and clear communication—often learned on the job—should be incorporated into curricula to better prepare students for the profession’s demands.

    Your role as an Arbitrator and Mediator offers a unique perspective. What trends do you observe in dispute resolution in India, and how do you see the future of arbitration and mediation evolving?

    In recent years, there’s been a noticeable shift toward arbitration and mediation, with more businesses seeking quicker and less adversarial alternatives to litigation. However, domestic arbitration in India is becoming slower and more expensive as many arbitrators, particularly retired judges, follow procedures resembling court litigation. This is a trend that Indian stakeholders need to revisit to ensure arbitration remains efficient and cost-effective.

    On the other hand, international arbitrations, particularly institutional ones, are more streamlined and efficient, despite the complexity of the cases. The processes are smoother, and parties benefit from a structured framework. One recent development is the government’s decision to discourage arbitration for disputes under ₹10 crores in value for government contracts, which raises questions about the accessibility of arbitration for smaller cases.

    Mediation is also growing in acceptance, particularly in commercial disputes and family matters. Its ability to resolve disputes amicably without prolonged court involvement is being increasingly recognized. I believe mediation will continue to evolve, with a focus on better training for mediators and a more robust framework for implementation.

    A model that I think has great potential in India is Arb-Med-Arb. This hybrid approach allows parties to begin with arbitration, transition to mediation to seek a collaborative solution, and return to arbitration if mediation fails. It combines the best of both processes, reducing the adversarial nature of disputes while ensuring a final, enforceable resolution through arbitration. I see a bright future for Arb-Med-Arb, especially in complex commercial and civil matters.

    You’ve been a visiting professor at many law colleges and frequently give guest lectures. How has your experience been in these academic roles?

    Teaching is, to me, one of the most pious professions. I genuinely enjoy it, and I believe one learns a lot while teaching. The curiosity and enthusiasm of students are always fascinating. I fondly remember giving coffee lectures under the trees at one college—those informal discussions were some of the most memorable. I also cherish moments like when a class at ILS Law College, Pune, choreographed a dance on the last day of my lecture—it was such a sweet gesture, and I’ll treasure it forever.

    One of the most rewarding experiences is seeing my former students standing across from me in court, arguing passionately. It makes me feel incredibly proud to see how far they’ve come and to know that I played a small part in their journey.

    You manage a team of lawyers and paralegals while running a boutique law firm in Pune. What are some of the challenges you face in operating the firm, especially when dealing with high attrition rates? Is it difficult to manage and sustain a law firm in such a competitive environment?

    High attrition rates are a universal challenge for law firms, and the key is to avoid becoming overly reliant on any one individual. You need to operate with the understanding that any employee may submit their notice at any time, which is why strong management and delegation skills are so important.

    Some lawyers struggle with delegation—they prefer to handle everything themselves. However, effective delegation allows you to focus on high-priority work without micromanaging. Trusting your team empowers them and creates an efficient workflow while enabling you to invest time in strategic decisions.

    Balancing client expectations, case management, and team dynamics can be challenging, but with clear leadership, a vision, and consistent professional development, it becomes manageable. Ultimately, running a successful law firm is about nurturing relationships—both with the team and clients—while ensuring everyone is aligned with the firm’s goals.


    With your demanding career, how do you manage to unwind and find balance in your life? Are there any hobbies or activities that help you recharge and stay grounded amidst your busy schedule? 

    Balancing work and life is tricky, but I make it a priority because it’s essential to stay sharp. I wish I could say my hobbies include something fancy like golf or late-night partying! But I’m quite simple—a good book, good food and a solid night’s sleep, and I’m happy. Eating is honestly my hobby! I love trying different vegetarian cuisines, and sleep is my ultimate relaxation.

    I enjoy visiting temples, especially old ones. I find a sense of peace there that helps me reconnect with myself. I also enjoy Family get-togethers, meetings with friends, beach vacations. It’s all about finding balance, and in the end, it’s the little things that keep me grounded and ready for the challenges ahead.

    Reflecting on your diverse career, what advice would you give to aspiring lawyers or young professionals who are just starting their journey in law? What mindset or approach has been most valuable to you, and what would you encourage them to focus on as they build their own path?

    For aspiring lawyers and young professionals, I would say: patience, persistence, and humility are key. The legal profession is a long game—success doesn’t come overnight, and you’ll face your share of challenges and setbacks. Embrace the process, and don’t focus solely on the end result. Learn from every case, whether you win or lose.

    We must always remember the wisdom from Hitopadesha: उद्यमेन हि सिद्ध्यन्ति कार्याणि न मनोरथैः। न हि सुप्तस्य सिंहस्य प्रविशन्ति मुखे मृगाः।। ‘Success is achieved through effort, not by mere dreams. A deer doesn’t enter the mouth of a sleeping lion.’ With this in mind, we must put in all the efforts required.

    Most importantly, maintain integrity. Be ethical in your dealings with clients, colleagues, and the court. Focus on continuous learning—read widely, stay curious, and never stop honing your craft. And remember, law is not just about knowing the law; it’s about understanding people, managing relationships, and balancing the technical with the human side of the profession. If you can do that, you’ll go far.

    Get in touch with Rishabh Gandhi-

  • “Teaching is one of the best ways to learn. It gave me the ability to view complex cases with a broader perspective and has immensely helped in my practice.” – Surya Senthil, Partner at Surana & Surana International Attorneys India

    “Teaching is one of the best ways to learn. It gave me the ability to view complex cases with a broader perspective and has immensely helped in my practice.” – Surya Senthil, Partner at Surana & Surana International Attorneys India

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    You began your legal journey under the mentorship of Advocate Radhakrishnan. How did that experience shape your foundational years, and how have those early lessons influenced your practice today? Could you please walk us through your journey?  

    To say the truth, I am fortunate to have two learned seniors who have mentored me. As soon as I passed out of law school, I was propelled by a passion for justice and was initially attracted towards Criminal law practise. My first Senior Late Advocate R. Radhakrishnan used to say that, though I may not continue my law practise in Cuddalore, a district headquarters in the State of Tamilnadu and will eventually move out to Madras High Court, nevertheless, the short stint of Law practise in District and lower courts where one will learn basic advocacy, nuances of conducting a trial and client handling, will help me in the long run career of an advocate. Today I realise the foresightedness of my Senior, when I practically see that I have an edge over others while conducting the trials.

    My first senior helped me understand the art of choosing the right questions to be asked in cross-examination by identifying the loopholes in the evidence given by a witness and drawing a comparison with the documents and statements made by them. Further, I learnt from him the exercise of mentally charting the course of a cross-examination rather than writing it on a piece of paper in question format, unlike most practitioners.

    I used to keenly observe the trials he conducted in criminal cases, wherein he would walk the witness through simple questions based on accepted facts and slowly make the witness comfortable. At this point, he will lead the witness to walk into the trap of reliability where the witness will become at his ease and real self. Subsequently, he will gradually shift the gear and ask about the pertinent contradictions in his statement to elucidate the truth of the witness. Though in criminal cases it worked well I was very sceptical as to how it would work in civil or commercial cases, but to my astonishment, it has worked very well and notably even in a few of my cases the opposite party whom I have cross-examined, has immediately after the cross-examination has proposed for a settlement and the matters have been settled.

    I started my second innings of advocacy under my Senior PS Surana before the Madras High Court in the year 2004 focussing on Intellectual Property law practice. My second senior not only taught me the nitty-gritty of civil litigation, but also the importance of attention to detail and essential qualities to become a successful lawyer. On the personal front, he is also my spiritual guide who has made a significant awakening in realising my inner potential, by practically living through the values of detachment, fearlessness and minimal materialistic needs. For example, though he could afford a luxurious car, he used to always have value-for-money cars. These observations made me realise that there are bigger and better achievements in one’s life rather than going for materialistic comfort.

    As someone who transitioned between academia and active practice, what unique insights did you gain from teaching law, and how did it enhance your approach to complex cases later in your career?  

    Though I was to resume my Court Practice, after the completion of my Master’s in Law, I was pulled into teaching, by my mentor in the NLSIU, Professor Dr. N L Mitra who was not only an academician of excellence but also a Jurist with profound thinking and deep understanding of commercial laws. Just after completing my master’s from NLS, I was offered a teaching job by Professor Mitra at the newly found National Law University, Jodhpur in the year 2003. This was his dream project where for the first time in India courses including BSc LLB and BCom LLB were offered in addition to the traditional BA LLB. 

    I was offered to teach the law of Torts and Commercial Transactions for undergraduate students and Trademark and Copyright laws for Post Graduate students. Though I have taught only for a short stint of 18 months, it was a great experience for me and those students whom I taught are still fond of me and maintain a good relationship with me even today. In my opinion, the teaching profession has still not received its due recognition with lucrative pay and societal respect, which in turn will attract the best talent. It is noteworthy to mention the commendable move by the Bar Council of India to relax its rules in making leading practitioners’ contributions to academia, by way of recognising ‘Professors of Practice’. This transition is only a beginning, and I strongly believe that we still have a long way to go.

    My first takeaway from my teaching experience comes from my exposure to International Jurisprudence, especially the evolution of law from the American courts and the English courts, which immensely helps me to trace the evolution and march of law in a particular subject. This understanding gives me a better perspective, which when presented before our Courts aids them, in interpreting the law more convincingly.

    My second takeaway from the teaching experience is the learning of effective use of case law research tools and the habit of being updated with current legal events. In the era of the internet and the availability of an enormous amount of knowledge in any given field from online resources to students, modern Teachers of law must use these online tools.

    Further, I always feel that ‘Teaching is one of the best ways to learn’.

    Your pro bono work, such as the case advocating for the retrospective regularization of a Tamil Nadu government driver, is commendable. What lessons did this case teach you about the power of law in changing individual lives?

    There are two driving forces I get as a lawyer, when I do pro bono works. Firstly, I get the satisfaction that by using my legal knowledge and acumen, I can get a relief for a person whose rights have been affected by the system since he is not able to defend himself or get the services of a lawyer due to his economic and/or social background. This also comes from my brought up, where my mother always supports the underdogs in any given situation. The next level of satisfaction arising out of pro bono work is when I attempt to challenge a particular law or proposition of law propounded by a case law which in general perception is not conformity with the equity and good conscience. 

    My first pro bono case was for a driver, who was working in Government of Tamil Nadu and has worked under my father, when he was in service. He came to meet my father knowing that I have become an advocate, and he wanted my help to fight his case, as he is not a financial position to engage a lawyer. I fought that service matter for retrospective regularisation from the date of his joining in the service and got a successful order before the Madras High Court.

    I realised the power of the Court especially the Constitutional Courts, to alter a person’s destiny when I handled a case in 2011. A second-year student from Madras Dental college approached me saying that she has scored 200/200 in physics and chemistry and 196 in Biology but was not able to secure an admission in MBBS and therefore got admitted in BDS in Madras Dental College. Subsequently the TN Govt had brought in a G.O wherein any student studying in a professional course and has Witten an improvement exam conducted by TN Higher Secondary Board gets an improved score , then he/she can secure admission in a better professional course on merits as per his/her choice, without having any impediment of studying in another professional course. In that student’s case, she gave the improvement exam and scored an improved score of 200/200 in Biology also. She then applied for MBBS, and she was called for counselling to get admitted in Madras Medical college for MBBS. In the middle of counselling, her candidature was cancelled, based on an order passed by the First Bench of Madras High Court quashing the said Govt. Order as unconstitutional.  I was able to relate myself personally to this as I myself joined an engineering course but had to forcefully discontinue that when I wanted to pursue medicine, as the law at that point stated that one has to discontinue a professional course before the commencement of the semester exam, if they wish to pursue another professional course or one has to wait for 3years after the completion of the first professional course to pursue the 2nd professional course. 

    The rationale given in support of this rule is that if anyone discontinues a professional course in the middle of the Course then that seat cannot be filled and goes waste. Further, another argument put forth was that Government spends a considerable amount to make any student study a professional course and by quitting in the middle, the student is wasting the money spent on his/her studies by the Government. 

    However, the said GO, Government had relaxed that rule and allowed any students to discontinue in the middle of his/her first professional course to join or pursue another professional course of his/her choice if he/she is otherwise eligible. However, the First Bench of the Madras High Court believed that GO was unconstitutional and struck it as violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. 

    The student was not keen on challenging as she was already into BDS and bet the odds-on uncertainty. Therefore, I took up the matter as pro bono and convinced my friend Mr. Senthil Jagadeesan who was an AOR then, now a designated Senior Counsel in Supreme Court, and engaged Retired Justice Nageshwar Rao, then a designated Senior Counsel to appear in this matter. We were able to convince the then Chief Justice of India Justice K.G. Balakrishnan, on the point that if a person is determined to study a particular professional course, then he/she would anyway do it after the mandatory cooling off period and therefore such restriction does not seem to be rationale and serve any purpose.

    This particular case was an eye opener for me and I realised the enormous power vested by the Constitution on the High Courts and Supreme Court to mould a suitable relief to the deserving, which made me realise the power of the court to alter a person’s destiny and in which along with the judge, a lawyer also gets to plays a small but vital role.

    Serving on the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB), you played a key role in landmark decisions, including setting royalty rates for music composers and lyricists. How did these decisions impact the intellectual property landscape in India, and what challenges did you face during such high-profile cases? 

    Intellectual Property Appellate Board served as a specialized tribunal to adjudicate matters pertaining to intellectual property laws and as an appellate body it provided for appeals against decisions of IP offices. I served under Hon’ble Mr. Justice Manmohan Singh of the Delhi High Court (Retd) and gained a significant experience in contributing the bench towards the effective adjudication of complex intellectual property issues. In my tenure of 8 months, was part of the bench deciding on the rate of royalty and the right of claiming it by the IPRS in respect of the broadcast of lyrics and music underlying sound recordings by FM Radio Stations in India. The hearings took place continuously for 28 days and all leading Senior counsels like Mr. Mukhul Rohtagi, Mr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul among others, appeared for the parties to present their arguments. We have judiciously examined their legal arguments, analysed the case laws stated and interpreted the legal provisions pertaining to copyright licensing in India and delivered an order recognising the rights of lyricists and music composers to claim royalties based on the 2012 amendments to the Copyright Act, 1957.  I am glad that the Chairman of IPAB had allowed me to pronounce the order.    

    As a Copyright member of IPAB, we were mandated to fix the Royalty rates by 31-12-2021, before the expiry of the rates fixed by Copyright Board. During that exercise, under the able guidance of Hon’ble Mr. Justice Manmohan Singh, Chairman of the Board, we have not only fixed the royalty rates but also applied the position of law as it stood by recognising the right of the music composers and lyricists through the Copyright Amendment Act 2012. Notably, this order was subjected to judicial scrutiny by way of writ petitions before the High Courts of Bombay and Delhi and subsequently has received affirmations from these Hon’ble courts attesting to the soundness of the decisions made by the IPAB.  

    While adjudicating as a member of IPAB, though for a shorter period, I felt that I have a strong sense of justice and a desire to play a direct role in upholding justice and ensuring the fair application of the law. Though as a member of the bar, I made my earning for my living and contributed my bit to the society and legal fraternity, I have not got the fullest personal satisfaction of making a positive impact on society when compared to my sitting as a part of the Bench.

    Your work has touched both legal practitioners and the broader community. How do you believe your role as a litigator and advisor contributes to helping businesses and individuals protect their intellectual property while fostering innovation?

    As IP practitioner, my foremost duty is to sensitise my client on the value of creating an IP, the significance of lawfully protecting it and to reap the benefits out of it. As it is a negative right, creating a limited monopoly rights for one’s intellectual efforts, it is also my bounden duty to give a fair warning to my client, not to abuse such power by trying to create an absolute monopoly out of it. This delicate balance must be imbibed in the minds of an IP creator/client to fully utilise the IP laws to its letter and spirit. This is the role of an advisor played by me towards my client for fostering innovation and strategic growth in their business. 

    Once, my client’s IP right has been rightfully oriented under the existing IP regime, thereafter my role as a litigator begins in guarding the IP of my client at all possible ways. In my experience, either at the Cease-and-Desist stage or at the Pre suit mediation stage (as mandated by Section 12 A of the Commercial Courts Act) itself matters have resulted in settlement due to the rightful presentation of facts on how the infringer is infringing my client’s IP.

    With the current generation of legal professionals seeking to specialize in areas like intellectual property, what key skills and knowledge areas do you think are crucial for their success in this domain?  

    According to me, specialising in an area like IP needs a broader perspective and an in-depth understanding of the laws. Further, IP laws constantly evolve due to the ongoing International Trade talks through WTO and subsequent normalisation of IP laws in addition to the emerging jurisprudence of IP due to the interpretation by Courts in accordance with the Countries’ specific needs. 

    As a practitioner, one must subscribe to latest journals or website which keeps updating the latest jurisprudential developments along with commentary or viewpoints of the eminent authors. One should also organise/attend conferences and seminars where peers in the field are given a platform to share and brainstorm ideas that have evolved in IP practise. 

    As a legal expert in intellectual property law, how do you see IPR playing a critical role in today’s business landscape, especially in India’s growing tech and innovation sectors?  

    Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) plays a crucial role in shaping the business landscape, especially in a rapidly growing economy like India. Here are some key points highlighting the importance of IPR in India’s technology and innovation sectors.  IP laws encourage innovations by providing legal protection for inventions and innovations, which incentivizes individuals and companies to invest in research and development. This is particularly significant in sectors like Information Technology, Biotechnology, Health care and Renewable Energy. 

    A robust IPR regime is essential for the growth of startups and small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). SMEs play a vital role in stimulating the economic growth, providing employment opportunities for large number of people and promoting grass root level innovations which normally results in lot of products which will ease our living and improve our comfort. This potential of the SMEs as a trigger for economic boom is realised by the Government and has the Govt taken lot of measures to promote and support MSME’s at the State and the Central level through various policies and implementation of beneficial schemes.

    By harnessing Intellectual Property and protecting it, companies can have a competitive edge over others in the market. A strong IP culture in their organisation is essential for Indian companies that are looking to leave their footprint Globally and to compete with the MNC giants.

    When we talk about IPR regime and IPR enforcement they are two parts of the same structure. While India has made significant strides in strengthening its IPR regime, challenges remain in terms of enforcement and awareness. A sound strategy to address the issue of enforcement can further enhance the effectiveness of the IPR regime in India, which in turn will attract FDI that will result in economic boost leading to creation of high value jobs. 

    Introduction of commercial courts is one such bold step taken by the Government of India to bring in an effective and efficacious dispute resolution mechanism for the business disputes including IPR related disputes. In my opinion, India’s evolving Commercial Court’s litigation and practice is a strategic move that will promote an environment of growth for technology and innovation sectors. As the country continues to grow, a robust IPR system with proper enforcing mechanism, will be pivotal in sustaining this momentum and ensuring long-term economic prosperity.

    With such a dynamic and demanding legal career, how do you unwind in your personal time, and what hobbies or activities do you pursue to maintain balance and recharge?  

    I unwind by watching movies regularly on weekends, mostly humour or action genre. I also have the habit of listening to music on the way to home and office. Once in 3 or 4 months, I venture out for Trekking, Hiking or biking which rejuvenates me. I have completed the Leh to Manali bike expedition with my wife in 2006 and alone in 2023, which I would say one of most enchanting as well as enduring trip. I have also travelled by car from Chennai to Chardhams with my Parents for a 22-day long pilgrimage tour covering many temples on the way including the famous Siddheswara temple, Kashi, etc. I have climbed multiple times Chaturagiri hills, Agasthya hills, Parvatha malai, Velliangiri hills, Tirupathi hills etc. to name a few.

    Trekking allows you to connect with nature, experience diverse flora and fauna, and enjoy breathtaking view and reminds us about the destruction mankind has done to mother nature in the name of unsustainable development and growth. The serene and picturesque environment of hill stations can significantly reduce stress and anxiety. Being in the nature and breathing the fresh air, boosts mental clarity, improve the general mood and brings inner peace. Once you practise this regularly then you will develop a connection with the universe which will provide a deep sense of fulfilment which cannot be expressed by words until one experience it personally. From health perspective, trekking or hiking in hilly uneven terrains is equal to a tough work out and burns more calories and develop endurance the body. Trekking can be a family activity also, I used to go with my friends, niece and nephews. After marriage, my wife who is a pillar of strength and a guiding factor in all my activities either professional or personal, used to accompany me. 

    You’ve had the opportunity to interact with both senior legal luminaries and upcoming law students throughout your career. What common threads do you see between these generations of legal minds, and how do you think legal education should evolve to address future challenges?

    Definitely, more sharper minds are coming into the profession after the emergence of 5 year Integrated professional course and National Law Schools. Common threads between these generations of legal minds are to protect the rights and defend the vulnerable section of the society. Legal Education also tries to modernise its curriculum to be more practical and legal practitioners should be brought in to interact with students to share their practical knowledge.

    Compared to 30 years ago, when I completed law, the internship opportunities offered by universities today are more structured and systematic whereby it gives a plethora of exposure and versatile experiences. For example, nowadays universities provide a structured guidance wherein first year students are expected to do an internship with an NGO, second year students are expected to do an internship with companies and from 3rd year onwards they can intern with a lawyer or law firm, and they can intern twice a year. Universities should play a vital role in continuous legal education in collaboration with Bar Council/ Bar Association for a structured two-week course on specialised areas such as Arbitration Practise, IP Practise etc for the practising advocates to keep them updated in their respective fields. Further, just like how medical colleges have attached hospitals and patients treated by the final year house surgeons, Law Universities should also facilitate legal aid clinics in law colleges, in which under the guidance of professors, students can provide free legal aid. 

    Get in touch with Surya Senthil-

  • “A positive approach is a must while working in a team. ‘You’re almost there’ is always better than ‘you cannot do it.'” – Ritin Vatrana, Legal Counsel -Corporate Litigation, Piramal Capital & Housing Finance Limited

    “A positive approach is a must while working in a team. ‘You’re almost there’ is always better than ‘you cannot do it.’” – Ritin Vatrana, Legal Counsel -Corporate Litigation, Piramal Capital & Housing Finance Limited

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    You started your legal career in 2007 after completing your BALLB (Hons.) from Kurukshetra University. What motivated you to choose law as your career, and could you walk us through your journey from those early days to where you are now?  

    My entry into the Legal field was very much certain since I am a third generation Lawyer. My grandfather practiced in Labour Laws, my father is still practicing in District Courts Patiala and hence my parents had already decided during my childhood about my profession and hence I entered the field. Initially, I started learning the procedures followed in court and the ground realities of the Legal field where I came to know about how to apply what I learnt in my degree. For this, I actually went through the entire degree subjects 4-5 times again doing self-study in order to get a deep knowledge of the subjects so that I can have better understanding of the cases I got to handle. Slowly and gradually, I developed my own understanding in law and by that time I was able to handle the cases independently. Being a trial lawyer, handling the evidence part was most challenging and most interesting as well. I started cross examining the witnesses independently and luckily many cases went my way. However, in Patiala there wasn’t much to learn about since there was hardly any variety in the cases we got; mostly there used to be Cheque bounce matters, matrimonial disputes, NDPS etc. and those cases were very much cyclostyled and my eagerness to learn wanted me go out and do something new in the field. 

    You began your law practice at the Patiala district courts, where your father was a well-established professional. How did working in the district courts shape your approach to law, and what key lessons did you take away from those early formative years?    

    My time in the Courts was extremely important. Being a legal professional, the most important thing is to know how to draft a legal document and an in-house Counsel is always expected to have very crisp drafting skills which would go on to protect the interest of the organization. Further, being meticulous, attention to detail, presence of mind, patience and calculated aggression were the key qualities I learnt during my practice days.

    You mentioned your encounter with the Legal Head of CIPLA, which inspired your transition into corporate law. What about that interaction made you decide to shift from litigation to becoming an in-house counsel?  

    As I had stated, in one of my cases related to CIPLA, I met the in-house counsel of the company and had a great conversation with him about how things go as an in-house counsel and what are the prospects. He told me that as an in-house, he came across several types of different cases and that made his knowledge in the field vast and comprehensive and to add to that the biggest incentive was the opportunity to travel. Afterwards, I discussed it with my elder brother, who was already working in corporate and he also reiterated a similar view. That was perhaps the trigger point of me looking to shift to the Corporate. It took me quite a while to get my first opportunity in a large organization. The first one month was like a roller coaster but gradually I managed to get into the system and started understanding corporate governance and that was perhaps the turning point of my life both professionally and personally as it gave me so much energy to work and live round the clock. Leaving the comfort zone was tough initially but once you are out of it, THERE BEGINS THE LIFE.

    What advice would you give to young legal professionals who aspire to transition from litigation to corporate in-house roles, especially those aiming to work with large multinational corporations?

    Ever since I have started my journey with the corporate, I have met many legal professionals eager to know how things work in the sector. Many are under the myth of “Corporate Slavery”. I shared my experiences with them of how I managed PAN India litigation and contracts of my first Company single handedly. From working for 4-5 hours a day in practice to working 16-18 hours in corporate was an eye opener and a huge confidence booster. I only advise the youngsters to look for excellence and not results early on. Law is a vast field and to move on in this field, not only you need to know the law, but how and where to apply it and this requires both theoretical as well as practical knowledge. In-House Counsels do a whole lot of drafting work including contracts, complaints, notices etc. Litigation lawyers hardly get to know about drafting of contracts and hence i advise them to find some good books pertaining to contract drafting if they have any plans to shift to the sector.  

    You’ve been involved in arbitration cases with values ranging from ₹50 lakh to ₹300 crore. What are some key skills a lawyer needs to successfully handle such high-stakes cases, and how do you manage the pressure?  

    When the stakes are high, the pressure is high as well but as a legal professional, my job is to find the law point and the circumstances favouring my organization so that I can benefit them or at least prevent any loss. The skills I learnt in practice also lets me foresee the tentative result sometimes and that helps us to plan accordingly. The thing with high stake matters is that you need to thing out of the box sometimes to get the desired results and for that you need to have strong legal knowledge but also to know the ground realities. 

    With over 17 years of legal experience and handling high-pressure cases, how do you manage work-life balance, and what advice would you give to legal professionals to avoid burnout?  

    In my previous organization, I did go through that burnout because of the urgencies involved. The stakes were high and time was less and that is when you learn and develop a strong temperament. Sometimes, there were late hour calls and emails but I had set a time for my “homework” so that I can give time to family and household works too and me being a travel bug, occasional holiday was always going to be there. To add to that, I am an early riser and a cyclist so every morning an hour’s ride would freshen me up with all the energy to go hard for the day.

    In your view, how important is interdisciplinary knowledge, such as understanding business or finance, for a successful legal career in the corporate world?

    Corporate is all about business and finances and whosoever is working in corporate needs to know about it. During my stint with Isgec Heavy Engineering, I learnt a lot about International Business processes as to how contracts of supply work and how the conditions are set by the companies and where to negotiate. I was naive back then but going through so many Contracts of Supply, Erection and Commissioning and those tender documents was another experience. Especially when I was told that the documents drafted by me are going to Russia or Dubai; it sometimes gave me goosebumps but it made me work harder and to get a better understanding about the subject. 

    You’ve managed a team of 40 lawyers in your current role. What leadership qualities do you think are essential for managing a successful legal team, and how do you mentor young lawyers under your guidance?  

    My job is to allocate the work to empanelled lawyers. Generally, I have a 5-10 conversation with the lawyer to understand his understanding on the subject and if he is a newcomer or unaware about the topic, I provide him/her with the relevant information along with legal provision and let them prepare the draft and as they say, a lawyer’s calibre can be judged by his drafting skills and so i always advise youngsters to draft the document from scratch and avoid doing copy paste; you’re never going to learn copying and pasting. Drafting skill to a lawyer is like a sword to a warrior.  Further, a positive approach is a must while you work in a team. “you’re almost there” is always better than “you cannot do it”. 

    Looking ahead, what emerging legal trends do you think will significantly impact the corporate legal landscape, and how should aspiring legal professionals prepare for them?  

    The advent of technology has really brought a huge window for legal professionals to enter the corporate world. Earlier, the legal professionals were limited to law practice, judiciary or teaching but now the upcoming generation is proactive and are perhaps 5-7 years quicker than ours. Nowadays, in-house Counsel’s job is not limited to civil, consumer, criminal laws or contract laws; Technology laws, Artificial Intelligence, Intellectual Property Rights, Data Privacy laws have taken over and in the coming times, knowledge about these is going to play a key role. So, I always advise the aspiring professionals to keep getting some knowledge in the fields as they are going to play a pivotal role in carving them a successful in-house Counsel. 

    Get in touch with Ritin Vatrana–

  • “Growing up in a household where legal discussions were a part of everyday life, I developed a natural inclination towards the field,” – Dr. Sachin Sharma, Managing Partner at KSV TAX CONSULTANTS.

    “Growing up in a household where legal discussions were a part of everyday life, I developed a natural inclination towards the field,” – Dr. Sachin Sharma, Managing Partner at KSV TAX CONSULTANTS.

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    Could you please share with us the journey of how you found inspiration to pursue law, followed by your decision to delve into Company Secretaryship, and then continuing your education for Doctor of Laws with a focus on taxation? What motivated these transitions and how do you believe they have contributed to your expertise in the field today?

    My journey into law was inspired by my family’s long-standing legacy in the legal profession. Growing up in a household where legal discussions were a part of everyday life, I developed a natural inclination towards the field. After completing my BA LLB (Hons.) from the University of Rajasthan, I realized the importance of understanding corporate governance, which led me to pursue Company Secretaryship from the Institute of Company Secretaries of India. This qualification provided me with a deep insight into corporate laws and practices, complementing my legal knowledge.

    My interest in taxation, particularly GST, emerged from the evolving economic landscape in India and the significant impact of tax laws on businesses. Pursuing an LL.M in Commercial Law from the University of Bristol and later a Doctor of Laws with a focus on GST from JECRC University, allowed me to specialize in this area. These educational transitions were driven by a desire to build a comprehensive understanding of the legal and corporate world, which I believe has been instrumental in my role as a Managing Partner at KSV TAX CONSULTANTS, enabling me to provide holistic and informed advice to our clients.

    As the Managing Partner at KSV TAX CONSULTANTS, you oversee various aspects of the firm’s operations. Could you share with us some key strategies or initiatives you’ve implemented to foster growth and maintain the firm’s competitive edge in the field of taxation?

    When I took over as Managing Partner, my primary focus was on consolidating and expanding our services. One key strategy was to integrate all our legal services under the KSV banner, which provided a unified identity and streamlined our operations. We also expanded our reach beyond our traditional geographic limits, establishing a presence among international clientele such as Japanese, UK, US, and UAE.

    Collaborating with firms that specialize in areas beyond our core competencies allowed us to offer a comprehensive suite of services to our clients. Additionally, we emphasize continuous learning and pro bono training, especially on GST, to ensure that our team and clients are well-informed and compliant with the latest regulations. Our high success ratio and strong market reputation are testaments to these initiatives.

    As a lead speaker on GST, you’ve had the opportunity to educate and inform many. What do you believe are the most common misconceptions people have about GST, and how do you address them?

    One of the most common misconceptions about GST is that it is overly complex and burdensome for businesses. Many people believe that complying with GST regulations requires excessive paperwork and frequent changes to their accounting systems. To address these concerns, we focus on educating our clients and the public about the long-term benefits of GST, such as one nation one tax, improved tax compliance, elimination of cascading taxes and most importantly eradication of non-compliant players in the market.

    We also conduct training sessions to simplify the GST framework, providing practical examples and hands-on guidance to help businesses transition smoothly. By breaking down the complexities and demonstrating the operational advantages of GST, we aim to dispel myths and build confidence in the system.

    Having appeared multiple times on CNN News 18 for live talks on GST, what do you believe are the most pressing issues or developments in the realm of taxation that the general public should be more aware of?

    One pressing issue in the realm of taxation is the need for greater awareness and understanding of the dynamic nature of tax laws, particularly GST. The general public should be aware of the frequent updates and amendments to tax regulations, which can significantly impact their businesses and personal finances.

    Another critical development is the increasing focus on digital taxation and compliance. As the economy becomes more digitized, understanding the implications of digital transactions and e-commerce on taxation is crucial. I also emphasize the importance of proactive tax planning and compliance to avoid legal complications and penalties. By staying informed and adapting to these changes, individuals and businesses can navigate the tax landscape more effectively.

    Your dissertation on the success of mergers and acquisitions offers a unique perspective. How do you see the legal landscape evolving in facilitating such transactions, particularly in light of global economic shifts?

    The legal landscape for mergers and acquisitions is becoming increasingly complex and dynamic, influenced by global economic shifts and regulatory changes. One significant trend is the emphasis on due diligence and compliance, ensuring that transactions are transparent and meet all legal requirements.

    With globalization, cross-border mergers and acquisitions are becoming more common, necessitating a thorough understanding of international laws and regulations. The rise of technology and digital platforms is also transforming the way these transactions are conducted, making the process more efficient but also more susceptible to cybersecurity risks.

    To facilitate successful mergers and acquisitions, it is crucial for legal professionals to stay updated with global economic trends, regulatory changes, and technological advancements. This proactive approach helps in anticipating challenges and navigating the complexities of such transactions effectively.

    What do you believe are the key factors contributing to the success and recognition of KSV Tax Consultants on a global scale?

    Several key factors have contributed to the success and global recognition of KSV Tax Consultants. Firstly, our long-standing legacy of over seven decades has established a strong foundation of trust and reliability in the market. This legacy has been a cornerstone, providing us with a solid reputation built by my grandfather and father.

    Secondly, my strategic vision in expanding the firm’s services both nationally and internationally has significantly broadened our client base. By extending our reach beyond traditional geographic boundaries and establishing a presence in key international markets, we’ve been able to serve a diverse range of clients. Additionally, our focus on comprehensive service delivery, through strategic partnerships and a 360-degree service model, has set us apart from our competitors. This approach allows us to provide a full spectrum of legal and financial services, tailored to meet the unique needs of each client.

    Furthermore, my emphasis on continuous learning and professional development has ensured that our team stays at the forefront of the latest legal and tax developments. We regularly engage in training sessions and consultancy services, often provided pro bono, to keep ourselves and our clients well-informed. This proactive approach has reinforced our reputation as a knowledgeable and client-centric firm.

    Reflecting on your academic journey, you completed your LL.M at the University of Bristol, known for its excellence in legal education, and subsequently pursued a Doctor of Law at JECRC University. Could you share with us your experiences in both these academic environments, highlighting the insights gained from studying at an international institution like Bristol and how it compared to your experience at an Indian university like JECRC?

    Studying at the University of Bristol was a transformative experience. The international exposure and diverse academic environment broadened my perspective on legal issues, particularly in commercial laws. The emphasis on critical thinking, research, and practical applications of law at Bristol equipped me with advanced skills and knowledge that have been invaluable in my professional career.

    In contrast, my experience at JECRC University provided me with a deep understanding of the Indian legal framework of GST and its comparative study with Canada, Singapore, New Zealand and Malaysia . The focus on taxation law, especially GST, was particularly relevant given the significant tax reforms in India. The combination of these two academic experiences allowed me to integrate global best practices with local insights, enhancing my ability to address complex legal issues in both domestic and international contexts.

    How do you approach mentoring and developing the next generation of tax professionals within your firm?

    Mentoring and developing the next generation of tax professionals is a priority at KSV TAX CONSULTANTS. We adopt a structured approach that includes formal training programs, hands-on experience, and continuous learning opportunities.

    New recruits undergo comprehensive onboarding training to familiarize them with our firm’s practices and the latest developments in taxation laws. We encourage them to participate in ongoing professional development courses and certifications to enhance their expertise.

    Mentorship plays a crucial role in their development. Experienced partners and senior staff provide guidance and support, helping younger professionals navigate complex cases and client interactions. We foster a collaborative environment where knowledge sharing is encouraged, and every team member feels valued and supported.

    Additionally, we also organize conferences, seminars, and workshops. These platforms not only expand our team member’s knowledge but also allow them to network with peers and industry leaders, furthering their professional growth.

    With the demanding nature of your profession, how do you unwind and recharge outside of work? Could you share some of your favorite ways to relax and rejuvenate?

    1. Exploring different Countries and Cultures;
    2. Love to explore upcoming technology and models in automobiles being an automobile freak.
    3. Love to explore luxury hotels for relaxation

    Given your wealth of experience and expertise, what advice or suggestions would you offer to the current generation of aspiring tax professionals and legal scholars navigating the complexities of today’s business and legal landscapes?

    Five mantras, “Dedication, Discipline, Honesty, Hard work and Self-confidence”. If you do your task with full confidence and efforts, you will succeed at first stage or next.

    Get in touch with Dr. Sachin Sharma-

  • “One of the critical existing challenges in the WTO Trade Remedial investigations is the existence of unchecked administrative discretion of investigating authorities due to legislative shortcomings and procedural inconsistencies that impact international trade”- Dr. Amit Randev, International Trade Lawyer and Policy Consultant

    “One of the critical existing challenges in the WTO Trade Remedial investigations is the existence of unchecked administrative discretion of investigating authorities due to legislative shortcomings and procedural inconsistencies that impact international trade”- Dr. Amit Randev, International Trade Lawyer and Policy Consultant

    This Interview has been published by Pragya Chandni and The SuperLawyer Team

    Could you please share with us what initially drew you to pursue a career in law, particularly in the specialized field of international trade law?

    Frankly speaking, I was an above average student during my school days but was really drawn towards sports and extracurricular activities. I was sensitized to social issues through my association with civil and community service organisations like Indian Scout and Guide, I was fortunate to be one of the few candidates from the state of Uttar Pradesh to have received the Governor’s award. 

    Like any other aspiring student hailing from a humble background, I was very motivated and ambitious to do something for my family and the country. After completing my 12th standard from the Commerce stream with decent marks, I was certain that I didn’t want to pursue any conventional graduation course or pursue chartered accountancy. So, law as a career option came through the zeal to do something impactful.

    Being a first generation lawyer, it was quite difficult to chalk out a typical plan in terms of selecting the institution and the subject of specialisation in law. Law College Dehradun, which was then affiliated to a Central University was recommended by one of our family friends based in Dehradun. 

    But initially like any other student belonging to a tier three city in 2011-12, I was a bit nervous about the choice of the institution in India due to limited exposure. However, it was a blessing in disguise as Law College, Dehradun really helped me to inculcate some of the best values of the profession and life. It was an excellent journey with experienced faculty (notably our Principal Prof (Dr.) Rajesh Bahuguna and Prof (Dr.) Poonam Rawat, supportive batch-mates and world class education facilities that laid the foundation for my legal profession.

    I believe it was due to my keenness to learn and ask questions beyond the curriculum that motivated me to pursue my Master’s in Law right after my law graduation. 

    I was fortunate to get a reasonable rank to qualify CLAT PG-2017 to secure admission in one of the most prestigious law schools of India that is “West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences (“NUJS”), Kolkata”. 

    Without reservation and with a humble acknowledgment, I admit that graduating in law from a traditional Central University, I was unaware of concepts like Anti-dumping (“ADD”) or Countervailing Measures (“CVD”) until my initial LL.M. class on International Trade Law at NUJS in 2017, under the guidance of my esteemed mentor, Prof. (Dr.) Sandeepa Bhat.

    However, that 45-minute class sparked my curiosity, driving me to delve deeper into the subject and inspiring nearly 7 years of passionate work in this domain. 

    Your academic journey is quite impressive, from your B.A. LLB at Law College Dehradun to your Ph.D. in International Trade Law. What were some of the key experiences or influences during your education that shaped your career path?

    As I mentioned, I truly cherish every day of my law school that made me learn something or the other each day. During my law graduation days, I was really an active member of various student bodies and had an opportunity to be the President of the Legal Aid Centre of the college. I have participated and organised several national and international cultural and academic events that provided me with the exposure to learn a lot of things subconsciously.

    What I can recall is that my initial internships were a bit unconventional like working for renowned NGOs like Childline India Foundation (Childline-1098) and Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra (RLEK) that provided me an exposure to understand the issues of the weak and marginalised sections of our society. 

    Also, my internships with Uttarakhand State Women Commission and Uttarakhand Human Rights Commission provided me a fair idea as to how good laws and policy, if implemented well, can act as an instrument to bring change and social justice.   

    After completing my Masters, in the initial phase of my career, I worked as a Research Associate with the Directorate General of Trade Remedies (“DGTR”), under the Ministry of Commerce & Industry, Government of India. This is India’s investigating authority to deal with Trade Remedial issues raised by Indian domestic industries against the unfair trade distortive practices. 

     At DGTR, I gained valuable insights on WTO jurisprudence and Indian practices while working with dynamic investigating teams (including officers from different cadres and ranks), handling ADD and CVD cases and actively contributed to providing institutional support to small and medium enterprises through awareness campaigns and technical assistance.

    Your Ph.D. thesis focuses on “WTO Trade Remedial Measures.” Can you tell us about the most significant challenges you uncovered in your research and how they impact international trade, especially concerning India?

    I started my research with a motivation or a quest to find answers to several questions regarding the hyper-technical concepts of International Trade Laws. My initial hypothesis that eventually stands correct in a technical sense was that the existing sensitive and procedural framework governing WTO Trade Remedial measures in India are not efficient and effective enough to address the contemporary issues in global trade.

    One of the critical existing challenges in the WTO Trade Remedial investigations is the existence of unchecked administrative discretion of investigating authorities due to legislative shortcomings and procedural inconsistencies that impact international trade.

    Transitioning from academia to professional practice, you worked as an Associate Director at SBA Group Solicitors and Consultants. How did this role help you apply your academic knowledge to real-world trade law cases?

    Needless to mention, the legal profession is very demanding, such as International Trade Litigation.

    I joined SBA Group Solicitors and Consultants (“SBA”) after working as a Trade Consultant with Government of India and as an in-house legal counsel with Jindal Group. So, by that time I got a reasonable idea of the expectations of the corporates/industry from Trade lawyers/consultants.

    The experience at SBA was very rich and challenging but rewarding at the same time. Being one of the few Indian Trade Law firms in India that represents before the International Investigating Authorities like US Department of Commerce (USDOC) and European Commission, working with the firm was indeed an amazing and overwhelming experience. 

    At SBA, I led a team responsible for representing Indian industries in Trade Remedial Investigations, specifically ADD, CVD, and Safeguard Measures before Trade Investigating Authorities, primarily the United States and the European Union. During my tenure, I also conducted comprehensive legal research and prepared precise technical and legal submissions, contributing to the successful execution of strategic assignments for major Indian corporate entities covering Textile, Steel, Pharmaceutical and Ceramic Industries. 

    You’ve worked on more than 15 antidumping and countervailing duty cases, saving millions for your clients. Could you highlight one or two cases that were particularly challenging or rewarding and explain why?

    I should confess that I was quite lucky to have such a rich experience so early in my career. I am especially grateful to my partners and the management at SBA to show such trust and confidence in me. Mr. Sunil Bhargava, Mr. Arpit Bhargava and Ms. Radhika Sharma deserve a special mention. 

    Though working for each case and assignment was quite exciting, two important cases that provided me exceptional exposure was working with the Senior US Trade Counsel to prepare a legal brief before the US Court of International Trade (USCIT) challenging the finding of USDOC and another was to facilitate the verification of European Commission for one of our client who was the largest exporter of ceramic tiles to EU and work closely with the European Commission officers for each details and arguments, we were able to successfully defend our clients in the case.

    Your experience includes working with international clients and representing cases before the U.S. Department of Commerce. How has this international exposure influenced your perspective on trade law?

    Since both India and the Unites States are common law countries, so principally the legal fundamentals are broadly similar. Having said that, working with international clients from different cultural and educational backgrounds and that too in different time-zones was quite challenging. 

    Further, practising before the USDOC was very fascinating, though it warrants a lot of diligence and accuracy but officials are very accommodating and are rational at the same time. This exposure provided me with a realisation that international trade litigation has a very significant impact on stakeholders globally. 

    In your current role as a Consultant at the Centre for WTO Studies, what are some of the key projects or initiatives you’re involved in, particularly regarding the India-EU FTA negotiations?

    I joined the Centre for WTO Studies in December 2023, following the completion of my doctorate in International Tarde Law. The Centre, established in 1999, serves as a permanent repository for knowledge and documentation related to WTO negotiations.

    My decision to join the Centre was driven by a strong desire to further my learning and research capabilities by working alongside some of the brightest academic minds in the fields of WTO and International Trade Law and policy. The Centre offers a unique environment that combines institutional training with international exposure, which is crucial for enhancing my research skills.

    In my current role, I am working closely with India’s Free Trade Agreement (FTA) negotiating teams. These teams engage with potential strategic trade partners, and my primary responsibility is to provide research and technical insights that inform the negotiation process.

    This experience has been exceptionally rewarding, as it has allowed me to delve into the complexities of trade negotiations. I have gained a deeper understanding of the challenges involved in negotiating with developed nations and reaching mutually beneficial agreements. It has also been an eye-opener, revealing that international trade and negotiations extend far beyond the realms of law, economics, and policy, involving intricate dynamics and strategic considerations. 

    We have noted that recently you have authored a book on WTO Trade Remedial Measures, what inspired you to write this book, what is the audience to seek to cater to?

    My passion for international trade law and my hands-on experience in the domain have greatly motivated me to write a book titled “WTO Trade Remedial Measures: Navigating Legal and Economic Complexities in International Trade”. The book published by one of the renowned publication houses of the country, has received appreciation from academic and legal fraternity.

    The multilateral trading system, epitomized by the World Trade Organization (WTO), is at a critical juncture due to escalating trade tensions and global crises. My book aims to unravel the evolution, challenges, and implications of trade remedy measures within the framework of WTO agreements. It offers a distinct focus on India’s perspective, enriched with a comparative analysis of practices in the United States and the European Union. This comprehensive exploration provides valuable insights into the contemporary trade environment and the specific issues faced by different jurisdictions.

    In this context, the book undertakes a pioneering effort to evaluate existing laws and procedures concerning trade remedy measures in India. It sheds light on legislative shortcomings and procedural inconsistencies, advocating for safeguards against unchecked administrative discretion. By proposing amendments to enhance the efficacy of trade remedies, the book charts a course toward a more equitable and responsive global trading system.

    This book is tailored for a diverse audience, including scholars, practitioners, policymakers, exporters, entrepreneurs, and students interested in international trade law, economics, and policy. It aims to serve as a critical resource for understanding the intricacies of trade remedy measures and their role in the multilateral trading system.

    The motivation behind writing this book stems from my desire to contribute to the field by addressing existing gaps and offering practical solutions. My industrial exposure and passion for the subject drive me to advocate for a fairer and more effective global trade system, which I hope to achieve through this work.

    Finally, based on your extensive academic and professional experience, what advice would you give to fresh graduates who are aspiring to build a career in law, especially in the niche field of international trade law?

    Although I don’t consider myself an expert in career orientation. My mantra in my career is “to go with the flow and keep it simple”. However, here are some key points of advice for fresh graduates aspiring to build a career in law, especially in the niche field of international trade law:

    1. Stay Updated
    • Keep Abreast of Developments: Regularly read journals, articles, and news related to international trade law and WTO updates.
    • Attend Seminars and Webinars: Participate in conferences and webinars to stay informed about the latest trends and issues in the field.
    • Subscribe to Industry Newsletters: Follow relevant organizations, think tanks, and law firms that specialize in international trade law.
    1. Develop Soft Skills
    • Effective Communication: Work on your written and verbal communication skills to articulate complex legal concepts clearly.
    • Networking: Build and maintain professional relationships within the industry through networking events and social media platforms like LinkedIn.
    • Negotiation Skills: Develop strong negotiation skills, as they are crucial in trade law and dispute resolution.
    1. Embrace Technology
    • Familiarize with Legal Tech: Learn about the latest legal technologies and software that can aid in research, document management, and case analysis.
    • Enhance IT Skills: Be proficient in using data analysis tools and legal research databases.
    1. Identify Research Interests
    • Focus on Specific Areas: Identify and specialize in specific areas within international trade law, such as trade remedies, intellectual property rights, or dispute resolution.
    • Engage in Academic Research: Contribute to academic journals, write articles, and participate in research projects to build your expertise and profile.
    1. Gain Practical Experience
    • Internships and Fellowships: Seek internships at law firms, international organizations, or government agencies that deal with trade law.
    • Pro Bono Work: Engage in pro bono work related to trade law to gain hands-on experience and contribute to your community.
    1. Pursue Further Education and Certifications
    • Advanced Degrees: Consider pursuing an LLM or other advanced degrees in international trade law.
    • Certifications: Obtain certifications from recognized institutions to bolster your credentials.
    1. Understand the Global Context
    • Study Comparative Law: Learn about the trade laws and practices of different countries to gain a global perspective.
    • Language Skills: Develop proficiency in foreign languages, as this can be advantageous in international legal practice.
    1. Stay Open to Diverse Roles
    • Explore Various Roles: Be open to roles such as policy advisory, consultancy, or academia, which can provide diverse experiences and insights into international trade law.

    Get in touch with Dr. Amit Randev-

  • “There are no shortcuts to success. Your ability to read and analyze will set you apart from others, Always read the provision or judgment independently before considering others opinion” – Amit Shrivastava, Advocate on Record & Managing Partner at Imperial Law Offices

    “There are no shortcuts to success. Your ability to read and analyze will set you apart from others, Always read the provision or judgment independently before considering others opinion” – Amit Shrivastava, Advocate on Record & Managing Partner at Imperial Law Offices

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    It’s a pleasure to have you with us. Could you share with our readers a bit about your journey, from how you embarked on your career in law to becoming the Managing Partner at Imperial Law Offices? What inspired you to choose law as your career path?

    Thank you Namrata and team Super lawyer for having me here. Well my journey in law started with guidance from my best friend’s father Mr. L.D. Borasi, who was an Additional District Judge then in Madhya Pradesh. He knew me personally and was of the view that I could do really well in law. On his encouragement I did my research on the subject and came to know that the legal profession suits my personality.  Then I took admission in BA LLB (Hons.) course in Devi Ahilya VishwaVidyalaya, Indore (M.P.). I completed my law in 2009 and started my practice in Delhi, things started happening. and here I am 15 years later.

    As a co-founder of Imperial Law Offices, what inspired you to establish your own legal practice, and what unique approach do you bring to the legal profession?

    The idea of embarking upon the entrepreneur journey was always there in the back of mind. However, I was very lucky to have an opportunity to work in the top law firms of the country. It was a very enriching experience working there and was a tough decision to quit the job. The idea of starting Imperial Law Offices germinated after meeting my co-partners who themselves having worked in top law firms of the country were looking to start  a law firm. As a law firm we bring to the table a full service law firm for our clients with partners having more than decade and a half years of experience of representing leading Multinational Companies in the country. The Firm’s global perspective is based on its deep knowledge of the sector/industry and the prevalent practices. The team of professionals understand issues across a broad spectrum of business and legal practices. This fluency allows the Firm to bring the right talent and knowledge to deliver commercially pragmatic advice to our clients. 

    Your extensive experience (as a litigation lawyer) spans across various legal domains, including Insolvency & Bankruptcy, Tax, Real Estate and Arbitration. Among these, do you have a particular area that you find most fulfilling to work in? Could you tell us why?

    These are my core practice areas, it is very difficult to choose between them. However, the best thing I like about being a litigation lawyer is that it always keeps you on the edge and keeps throwing new challenges at you. However long you may have practised there will always be something or the other which you will be dealing with for the first time. As they say, you are always a student of law. Each day you learn new things. So there is never a dull day in litigation. This is what keeps you going. Another thing which is very satisfying is the ability to make an impact on society and help others. 

    Given your extensive experience in taxation and insolvency matters, what advice would you give to young lawyers aspiring to specialize in these areas of law?

    Both these fields, especially taxation, are very dynamic in nature. There are lots of amendments, notifications, circulars and clarifications by the government very frequently on these subjects which govern the interpretation of law. Not to mention the day to day case laws coming in from courts/ tribunals. So one of the key features of practicing in these subjects is to be able to trace out the legal history of the provision you are dealing with to understand the mandate of the legislature. Another very important part of practicing in these areas of law, especially while dealing with international taxation matters is that you will have to deal with various international treaties and international jurisprudence. Apart from the above strong knowledge of constitution law and basic understanding of accounting principles are must. So if you have these basics covered, you can excel in these subjects. 

    For the current generation aspiring to build successful legal careers, what would be your top piece of advice or mantra for achieving professional excellence and fulfilment in the legal field?

    To young lawyers my piece of advice is that one should inculcate the habit of reading. There are no shortcuts to success. Your ability to read and analyse will set you apart from others. Also never make your belief on the basis of the opinion of others without actually reading the provision/ judgement yourself independently. First read the provision/ judgement unbiased by the opinion of the others or common belief, then see what others are saying. This habit will give you a closer understanding of the law and will eventually lead you to success. Also your command over language is a very important factor which will contribute towards success.

    In today’s world where there are lots of branches of law apart from litigation, where you can excel relatively easily. Career in litigation, unlike old times, has become a choice. Clearly life in litigation initially is not very financially gratifying, however if you have the bent for it and are willing to put in the long hours, it can prove to be a very enriching career. 

    You’re an Advocate on Record at the Supreme Court of India. Can you shed some light on the challenges and significance of clearing the Advocate on Record exam, and how it has impacted your legal career?

    The Advocate on Record exam is more of a practical knowledge based exam. If you are regularly practising in the Supreme Court and are well aware of the practices and procedure of the Supreme Court it becomes slightly easier to clear the exam. The next big challenge in this exam is that question papers are very lengthy, so you will have to be very clear and concise in your answers, it is only then you will be able to attempt all the questions. 

    Qualifying the exam really helped me as it gave an added advantage as a litigation lawyer. Clients/ friends from high courts started  approaching me to file matters before the Supreme Court. This increased my client base, which was very important for me professionally as my independent practice is quite new. As a law firm we were able to comfort our clients that we can represent their cases till the Supreme Court. Also one of the good things about practicing as an AOR is that you get to do matters from different fields of law, one day you are arguing a criminal law matter and other day you may be dealing with a tax law matter related to transfer pricing. This type of variety is very rare otherwise. So it has been quite an enriching achievement.

    Your involvement in landmark judgments and complex legal matters is evident from your extensive list of reported judgments. Among these, is there a particular case or judgment that you found particularly challenging or rewarding, and why?

    I will tell you about the most recent ones before the Supreme Court and NCLAT. Last year I was approached to file a very complicated criminal matter wherein parties involved were from two rival political parties. In 2017, during a politically charged environment, there was a skirmish between the two parties during an election campaign involving exchange of gunfire, leading to cross FIRs from both sides. In the FIR against my client, SC/ST Act was falsely invoked, just to jeopardize his contention in elections. We were against dismissal of discharge applications by the courts below, especially qua SC/ST Act. There was a battery of senior advocates from both sides. It was a hard fought case, in which we were able to obtain a positive order from the Supreme Court in December 2023. This resulted in my client successfully contesting election this year. It was a very satisfying win, given the pressure situation and the amount of hard work that was put in by us. 

    The other very satisfying win was before NCLAT wherein we were challenging the NCLT order dismissing our petition seeking CIRP (Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process) against a very influential real estate company, on the ground that our debt is barred by limitation. In holding so NCLT had misinterpreted the definition of acknowledgement of debt and had also missed certain documents on the basis of which we were claiming extension of limitation. I argued the matter myself, the bench was initially not convinced, however, after two days of hearing accepted our arguments. This was a very satisfying win as initially the bench was totally against me and was not holding back in communicating the same to me ☺.

    The most recent one was a anticipatory bail application which I argued before the Hon’ble Supreme Court, though it was a very regular matter, I was pleasantly surprised as Hon’ble Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy appreciated me for arguing the matter well in open court. It was a very special moment and a huge encouragement.

    Starting your career in chamber practice before the Delhi High Court and Supreme Court must have been quite a journey. What valuable lessons did you learn during those formative years that still resonate with you today?

    It was indeed a very enriching experience, because in a chamber practice being the only junior, I was expected to help my senior with literally everything, right from conferences with new client, coordinating with them and obtaining the documents, researching law points, drafting the petition, filing the petition, preparing for arguments, attending hearing (if you are lucky and your senior is busy in some other court, arguing the matter or at least starting the arguments till your senior reaches the courtroom ☺). And last but not the least raising invoices and making follow ups for like ever ☺. I was very lucky in my initial days, I got a chance to work with very good advocates who have now become Senior Advocate, Senior Partners at leading law firms of the country. I am still in touch with them and they keep helping me whenever I need them.  

    Whatever I have learned is virtually because of the time I had spent with my seniors and their constant encouragement. However, the most important thing which I have learned from my formative years is the importance of  hard work and preparation. You will always be recognized for your hard work and preparation. Till date this habit helps me. Clients always have an eye on you as to how you are handling the matter. When they see your hard work and commitment, they remain with you even if the matter does not go according to your liking. 

    Thank You.

  • “I have always wanted to be in a profession that is more society-centric and has good opportunities to meet people from different walks of life.” – Manish Gaurav, Founding Partner at Lexspectrum

    “I have always wanted to be in a profession that is more society-centric and has good opportunities to meet people from different walks of life.” – Manish Gaurav, Founding Partner at Lexspectrum

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    Could you take us back to the beginning of your career journey? What inspired you to pursue law, and can you share any pivotal moments or experiences that shaped your decision to enter this field? Additionally, what were some of the challenges you faced when starting out, and how did you overcome them to establish yourself as a prominent figure in the legal profession?

    I have always believed that God has bestowed grace upon me. Importantly, my parents have always encouraged me to make decisions and have provided enough freedom and information to make an important decision that has a long-term impact on my life.

    I have always wanted to be in a profession that is more society-centric and has good opportunities to meet people from different walks of life. In this context, law as a profession was an obvious option for me. I consulted many of my friends/seniors and some reputed lawyers before taking this decision to pursue law. Their encouraging words (along with challenges in the profession that they mentioned) encouraged me to pursue my career in this field.

    Since I am first generation lawyer, there were plenty of difficulties. I was very clueless in my initial days (after completing my law degree) about my next step and other related aspects. But, there is always someone to help me or guide me in such difficult situations. They were either friends/colleagues or strangers (as well). I am thankful to all of them.  

    Lexspectrum is known for its comprehensive legal services. What inspired you and your partner to establish this firm, and what sets it apart from others in the field?

    I have always believed that there is enough space for new law firms in the sector that can be more focused (handholding approach) towards clients. Additionally, having experience of a certain number of years, acted as an asset for me in this endeavour.

    Importantly, I sought feedback from various clients/friends to provide their suggestions regarding setting up a new law firm. In most the cases, I got very positive and encouraging suggestions/responses that helped me make such a decision.

    Your bio mentions you’re recognized as a recommended lawyer for Corporate and Mergers & Acquisitions. What advice would you give to young lawyers aspiring to achieve similar recognition in their careers?

    Well, such recognitions are always welcome. It gives a sense of satisfaction and improves confidence. In my opinion, consistency with quality work is key to success in the field. It is important for a young lawyer to be very consistent with quality work to achieve their professional goal.  

    In your opinion, what can the current generation do to carve out successful careers in law, especially in a field as dynamic as yours?

    The current generation of lawyers should focus (in addition to basics) on the changes which is taking place in the field of law. For example, legal practice in the field of data/AI/the international context of multi-party disputes/PE/VC transactions was not so common a few years ago but now it is very much mainstream practice. Hence, it is imperative that a lawyer should pay adequate attention to the development/changes in the legal field wherein such lawyer is practising.

    Additionally, quality of work and timely response to clients is imperative. I have noticed that these days clients are well informed about the existing legal provision(which affects them) and their expectation from the lawyer is not only to be better informed about applicable legal provisions but also to have good understanding of the case which such a lawyer is handling. Hence, a lawyer should be much more attentive to the case/assignment that they are being entrusted with. 

    Outside of your professional life, do you have any hobbies or interests that you’re passionate about? How do you balance your personal interests with your demanding career?

    Typically, I do not get much time to pursue my hobbies which has changed with time. I love travelling with my family and friends and I try to do the same whenever it is possible. Being with family and friends is always a wonderful experience. 

    With the constantly evolving legal landscape, how do you stay updated with industry trends and changes, and how do you ensure your team at Lexspectrum remains ahead of the curve?

    We, as a firm, have weekly sessions on the legal updates on the matter concerning the current assignments and generally related to the subject matter of practice area. Additionally, we encourage our team members to write articles/updates regularly to get a better understanding of the subject matter. We also encourage our team to participate in relevant conferences to be fully updated.

    There is always an emphasis that we as Lexspectrum should be well aware of the subject matter which we are dealing with. There is also an emphasis on having a good understanding of the sector in which such client is engaged.

    Being recognized as one of the highly recommended lawyers in Mergers & Acquisitions is a remarkable achievement. For students aspiring to excel in this field, what specific skills or knowledge areas would you recommend they focus on during their education and early career to position themselves for success in M&A transactions?

    Typically, I have noticed that law schools have a higher degree of inclination towards litigation than corporate matters. Likewise, law students have better exposure to litigation matters. Hence, it is imperative that law students must participate in all relevant events /seminars (typically organised by Investment banking firms/law firms/CA firms) to get exposure to the subject matter.

    Additionally, various blogs/research paper are being published by law firms that should be referred regularly. Having internships in law firms with maximum exposure to corporate matters will be very helpful. 

    Could you share with us the experience of the first time you stepped into a courtroom to argue a case? What was going through your mind, and how did it shape your approach to advocacy?

    I consider myself lucky in this respect wherein my senior permitted me to argue a matter when I was just 4-5 months into the profession. My senior mentored/guided me well on the said case. However, it was a bit shaking moment for me till I started making submissions to the Hon’ble Court. Once, I started, it became relatively normal for me.

    Courtrooms often witness intriguing moments and unexpected twists. Can you recall any particularly memorable anecdotes or moments from your time practicing law that stand out to you?

    On several occasions wherein the Hon’ble judge and/or opposite counsel has agreed to deviate from the established norms keeping the larger interest of the litigants in mind and the same has served very well in the interest of justice. On one such occasion, a key witness has arrived here in India for a minimal time period. Such a witness was critical to the matter. On our request, the Hon’ble court and opposite counsel agreed to complete all procedural aspects concerning such witness on the same day which is not so common.

    On several occasions, we are informed about certain documents/events on the day of the hearing which is critically important.  Such events on many occasions require us to immediately make suitable changes in our strategy/submission. Due to confidentiality, I will not be able to delve into this any further.

    Get in touch with Manish Gaurav-

  • “By combining meticulous preparation and a strategic approach to litigation, we can effectively represent our clients’ interests and achieve favorable outcomes in high-value litigation cases.” – Sunav Rastogi, Advocate-on-Record at the Supreme Court of India.

    “By combining meticulous preparation and a strategic approach to litigation, we can effectively represent our clients’ interests and achieve favorable outcomes in high-value litigation cases.” – Sunav Rastogi, Advocate-on-Record at the Supreme Court of India.

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    Could you please introduce yourself to our readers and share your journey from growing up in a family of lawyers to becoming an Advocate-On-Record at the Supreme Court of India? Additionally, given your family background, did you ever contemplate pursuing a career outside the legal profession, or was the path of becoming a lawyer a natural and predetermined choice for you?

    My name is Sunav Rastogi, and I am an Advocate-On-Record at the Supreme Court of India. Presently, I am a practising Advocate based in New Delhi. My journey into the legal profession was deeply influenced by my family background, as I grew up in a family of Advocates. From a young age, I was surrounded by legal discussions and immersed in the world of law.

    As the allure of the law was so strong, I, at an early age, have decided to follow in the footsteps of my family members. My academic pursuits led me to pursue a Master of Laws (LLM) degree from Nottingham University, which further solidified my passion for the legal profession. 

    After completing my education, I embarked on my journey as an Advocate, starting from the District Court and gradually progressing to the High Court and eventually becoming an Advocate-On-Record at the Supreme Court of India. It has been a challenging yet rewarding journey, filled with opportunities to advocate for justice and uphold the rule of law.

    Overall, while the path of becoming an Advocate may have been somewhat predetermined by my family background, it was ultimately my passion for justice and legal advocacy that drove me to pursue this career with dedication and determination.

    You have extensive experience in handling high-value litigation cases. Could you elaborate on a specific strategy or approach you’ve used that yielded particularly favorable outcomes for your clients in litigation? What difference can we see in banking cases compared to other cases?

    In handling high-value litigation cases, a key strategy that has often yielded favorable outcomes for my clients is thorough preparation combined with a deep understanding of laws and regulations.

    This means early case assessment and strategic planning. This involves conducting a comprehensive analysis of the facts, legal issues, and potential risks associated with the case at the outset. By understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the case at an early stage, we can develop a tailored strategy to maximize our chances of success.

    Additionally, in banking litigation, it’s crucial to leverage specialized knowledge of banking laws and regulations. Banks operate within a highly regulated environment and legal disputes involving banks often entail complex financial transactions, regulatory compliance issues, and intricate contractual arrangements. Therefore, having a deep understanding of banking laws and regulations allows one to navigate the complexities effectively and present a compelling case on behalf of the clients.

    Furthermore, in banking cases, the stakes are often higher compared to other types of litigation. Financial institutions deal with substantial assets and liabilities, and the outcome of a legal dispute can have significant implications for their business operations, reputation, and financial standing. As a result, there is often a greater emphasis on resolving disputes efficiently and minimizing potential financial losses.

    To conclude I say by combining meticulous preparation and a strategic approach to litigation, we can effectively represent our clients’ interests and achieve favourable outcomes in high-value litigation cases.

    Your educational journey took you from Bangalore to Nottingham, shaping your understanding of both Indian and international legal systems. How has this dual perspective influenced your approach to legal practice, especially in cases with cross-border implications?

    My educational journey from Bangalore to Nottingham has indeed provided me with a unique perspective on both the Indian and international legal systems. This dual perspective has significantly influenced my approach to legal practice, particularly in cases with cross-border implications.

    Firstly, studying in both India and the UK has equipped me with a comprehensive understanding of different legal frameworks, procedures, and jurisprudence. This broad perspective allows me to draw upon diverse legal principles and methodologies when addressing complex legal issues, including those with cross-border elements. By leveraging insights from both the Indian and International legal systems, I can develop innovative strategies tailored to the specific needs of each case.

    Moreover, my educational background has instilled in me a deep appreciation for the importance of cultural sensitivity and global legal competence. It has also honed my skills in cross cultural communication and collaboration.  In cases with cross-border implications, cultural nuances and differences in legal traditions can play a significant role and my learning thus far has proven invaluable in legal practice, particularly in cases involving multinational clients, cross-border transactions, or disputes spanning multiple jurisdictions. By fostering open communication and understanding between parties from different cultural and legal backgrounds, I can facilitate smoother negotiations and achieve more favorable outcomes for my clients.

    As a seasoned professional, you’ve likely encountered situations where the law may not provide a clear solution. How do you approach such scenarios, and what guiding principles do you rely on to navigate legal gray areas effectively?

    Encountering situations where the law may not offer a clear-cut solution is indeed a common challenge in legal practice. In such scenarios, I rely on several guiding principles to navigate legal gray areas effectively:

    Firstly, thorough research and analysis are paramount. When faced with ambiguity in the law, I invest time and effort into researching relevant statutes, case law, legal commentary, and precedents. By conducting comprehensive research, I strive to identify any applicable legal principles or analogies that may shed light on the issue at hand.

    Secondly, consultation and collaboration with colleagues and legal experts can be invaluable. Consulting with colleagues and experts provides diverse perspectives and alternative strategies.

    Additionally, ethical integrity is paramount. In navigating legal gray areas, I remain committed to acting in the best interests of my clients while also ensuring compliance with ethical standards and legal obligations. Upholding the principles of fairness, justice, and honesty is essential in maintaining the integrity of the legal profession and fostering trust with clients.

    In order to sum up, I approach legal gray areas with diligence, collaboration, ethical integrity, and strategic foresight, upholding the highest standards of legal professionalism and advocacy.

    Your work involves representing clients in diverse legal forums, from District & Sessions Courts to the National Company Law Tribunal. How do you adapt your advocacy style to suit the nuances of each forum while maintaining consistency in legal arguments?

    Adapting advocacy style to suit the nuances of diverse legal forums, from District & Sessions Courts to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), requires a keen understanding of the unique procedural rules, judicial dynamics, and audience expectations in each forum. While maintaining consistency in legal arguments across different forums is essential, it is equally crucial to tailor the delivery and presentation of those arguments to resonate effectively within each specific context.

    To achieve this balance, I employ several strategies such as:

    Comprehensive Understanding: Thorough understanding of the procedural rules, judicial preferences, and prevailing practices of each forum. This enables me to anticipate procedural requirements and adapt my advocacy style accordingly.

    Strategic Emphasis: While maintaining consistency in legal arguments, I strategically emphasize aspects of the case that are particularly relevant or compelling within the specific forum. This involves highlighting jurisdictional issues, procedural matters, or legal precedents that resonate strongly with the Tribunal or Court.

    Flexibility and Agility: Legal advocacy often requires flexibility and adaptability in response to unforeseen developments or judicial inquiries. Being prepared to adjust arguments in real-time while staying true to core legal principles.

    Professionalism and Respect: Regardless of the forum, I uphold professionalism and respect for the judiciary, opposing counsel, and all parties involved. This includes adhering to courtroom decorum, presenting arguments cogently and respectfully, and engaging in constructive dialogue with the court or tribunal.

    By integrating these strategies into my advocacy approach, I can effectively navigate the nuances of diverse legal forums while maintaining consistency in legal arguments. This adaptive approach maximizes the persuasive impact of my advocacy and enhances the likelihood of achieving favorable outcomes for my clients across various legal proceedings.

    As someone deeply entrenched in the legal profession, what advice would you give to aspiring lawyers looking to carve out a successful career in today’s competitive legal landscape?

    Aspiring lawyers face a competitive legal landscape today. Here are key tips for a successful career:

    Invest in Education: Prioritize continuous learning to stay updated on legal developments. 

    Develop Strong Legal Skills: Hone your legal research, writing, analytical, and advocacy skills early on. These are the backbone of legal practice and are crucial for providing effective representation to clients.

    Gain Practical Experience: Join law firms or independent chambers for hands-on learning and insights into legal practice.

    Build Professional Networks: Develop and Maintain relationships with seniors, mentors, and professionals within the legal community. Networking can open doors to opportunities, provide guidance and support, and facilitate professional growth and development.

    Embrace Technology and Innovation: Stay current with tech tools to enhance efficiency and client service.

    Maintain Professionalism and Integrity: Uphold ethics and integrity for long-term success.

    Be Resilient and Persistent: Embrace challenges as opportunities for growth and learning.

    Prioritize Work-Life Balance: Cultivate hobbies, interests and relationships for well-being and sustainability.

    Given your experience in drafting and vetting consortium documents for loan accounts involving substantial sums, what measures do you take to ensure legal compliance and mitigate potential risks for all parties involved?

    Drafting and vetting consortium documents for loan accounts involving substantial sums requires meticulous attention to detail, thorough legal analysis. To ensure legal compliance and mitigate potential risks for all parties involved, I implement the following measures:

    Comprehensive Legal Review: Conduct a thorough legal review of all consortium documents, analyzing terms, rights, obligations, and dispute resolution mechanisms to ensure compliance with laws and standards.

    Risk Assessment and Mitigation: Identify and mitigate potential legal risks such as compliance issues, contractual ambiguities, and credit risks through clear drafting and robust due diligence.

    Customized Legal Solutions: Tailor consortium documents to meet the specific needs and concerns of all parties involved, drafting clear provisions to minimize disputes.

    Clear Terms and Conditions: Ensure clarity in all terms related to loan disbursement, repayment, interest rates, collateral, and default provisions.

    Documentation Accuracy: Ensure accuracy and completeness in drafting all consortium documents. Any ambiguity or inconsistency in the documents could lead to disputes or legal challenges in the future.

    By adopting this proactive and systematic approach, I aim to ensure legal compliance and mitigate risks for all parties involved in consortium arrangements. 

    Away from the courtroom, what hobbies or personal interests do you pursue to maintain a healthy work-life balance, and do you find any parallels between these activities and your legal work in terms of skills or mindset?

    Maintaining a healthy work-life balance is crucial for well-being and productivity. I recharge by pursuing hobbies like traveling, which broadened my horizons and fosters cultural appreciation. Mindfulness and meditation help me cultivate mental clarity and resilience amid the demands of legal work, enhancing focus and decision-making. Engaging in physical activities like playing squash and cycling not only promotes physical health but also reduces stress and boosts energy levels. These hobbies enrich my life, fostering qualities essential for success in both my personal and professional endeavors.

    Your dissertation focused on the analysis of non-conventional trademarks. How do you see the evolving landscape of intellectual property law influencing commercial practices, especially in the digital age?

    The evolving landscape of intellectual property (IP) law, particularly in the realm of non-conventional trademarks, is profoundly shaping commercial practices, especially in the digital age. As technology advances and consumer behavior evolves, businesses are increasingly relying on innovative branding strategies and creative forms of intellectual property protection to differentiate themselves in the marketplace and safeguard their competitive advantage. Several key trends in IP law are influencing commercial practices in the digital age:

    Expansion of Non-Conventional Trademarks: Beyond traditional marks, businesses now use smell, color, sound, motion, and holograms for unique branding experiences.

    Digitalization and Online Branding: E-commerce and social media have transformed how brands engage consumers, with trademarks crucial for product distinction, brand loyalty, and fighting online infringement.

    Globalization and Cross-Border IP Protection: Global trade demands international IP protection, requiring businesses to navigate complex legal frameworks for safeguarding brands and innovations across borders.

    Emergence of New Technologies: AI and VR bring new IP challenges and opportunities, necessitating proactive legal strategies for ownership, licensing, and enforcement.

    Focus on Brand Experience and Consumer Engagement: In an increasingly competitive marketplace, businesses are prioritizing brand experience and consumer engagement to drive customer loyalty and retention. Trademarks are not just symbols of origin but also catalysts for immersive brand experiences that resonate with consumers across digital touchpoints.

    Adaptation to Evolving Legal Frameworks: Regulatory changes and court rulings are continually shaping the landscape of IP law, particularly in areas such as copyright, patent, and trademark law. Businesses must adapt to evolving legal frameworks, stay compliant with regulatory requirements, and anticipate future developments to protect their intellectual property rights effectively.

    Overall, businesses that embrace innovative IP strategies and adapt to evolving legal and technological landscapes will thrive in the dynamic digital marketplace.

    In your opinion, what are some of the key challenges facing the legal profession in India today, and how do you think they can be addressed?

    Certainly, the legal profession in India faces several challenges that require collaborative efforts from legal professionals, policymakers, regulators, and the judiciary. Some of the key challenges include:

    Access to Justice: Marginalized communities need better access to justice. This requires expanded legal aid programs, alternative dispute resolution methods, improved legal literacy, and technological innovations. 

    Quality of Legal Education and Training: Legal education needs improvement, including updated courses, better teaching methods, enhanced practical skills training, and continuous professional development for lawyers.

    Ethical Standards and Professional Conduct: Upholding high ethical standards is crucial. This involves strengthening disciplinary mechanisms, promoting transparency, and increasing awareness of ethical responsibilities among legal professionals.

    Legal Reforms and Policy Advocacy: Policymakers and regulators need to undertake legal reforms to address outdated laws, streamline legal procedures, and enhance access to justice. Legal professionals play a crucial role in advocating for legislative and policy changes that promote the rule of law, protect fundamental rights, and advance social justice

    Technology and Innovation: Embracing technology and innovation can enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of legal services delivery.

    Collaborative efforts from legal professionals, policymakers, regulators, the judiciary, civil society, and the private sector are essential to overcome these challenges and advance the rule of law for all.

    Get in touch with Sunav Rastogi-

  • “Now with last amendments and a proactive approach by the bench over time, we are able to see arbitration proceedings working close to its objectives of being quick and efficient”- Varun Nischal, Partner, Q & A- Advocates

    “Now with last amendments and a proactive approach by the bench over time, we are able to see arbitration proceedings working close to its objectives of being quick and efficient”- Varun Nischal, Partner, Q & A- Advocates

    This Interview has been published by Pragya Chandni and The SuperLawyer Team

    Could you walk us through your journey from completing your LL.B. to specializing in corporate compliance and dispute resolution, particularly in arbitration?

    After completing the 5 yr LL.B. (H) program I joined a law chamber for about a year. The idea was to get an exposure to the trial work and gain an understanding of the ‘real world’ dispute resolution system. I remember on the first day of law school our constitutional teacher told us “you will spend 5 yr in law school to learn certain things that you will spend the next 1 year unlearning when you start practicing”. It was quite true. In fact interacting with a client and analysing facts to understand his underlying desired outcome is something I started learning during that period. I also wanted to add work experience before applying for LL.M. to improve chances of getting admission to a good university. During the LL.M. my focus was on ADR and business transactions. The classes on ADR introduced me to the advanced Mediation process being followed in the US at a time when Mediation was still not considered an effective alternative here. The Arbitration law had undergone a generational shift a few years ago and it was early days. The classes I took in LLM helped me grasp universally applicable principles in Arbitration which helped me when I came back and gradually focussed on ADR practice. Over the years working with several good corporate clients we realised that they were focussed on being legally compliant and always needed legal advice to avoid any pitfalls. I guess I kind of developed the necessary expertise to address the regular compliance issues of clients.

    What motivated you to pursue a Master of Laws (LL.M.) degree with a specialization in ADR and international business transactions law at the University of Southern California (USC)?

    The idea of doing LL.M. from a foreign university is not only to learn but to also develop additional skill sets and make new connections. Most of the faculty are practicing professionals from top tier firms and share the industry specific best practices. At that time there was a lot of focus on Bharat and with a lot of cross border transactions there was a growing market in the US for lawyers with working knowledge of Indian law and understanding of the legal ecosystem here. With the major focus on Arbitration as a dispute resolution option, the International ADR course seemed a logical extension of being prepared for practicing in that area. Unfortunately, the subprime mortgage crisis led to a prolonged economic downturn and cut short the plans to work on transactions but being taught ADR by some of the best faculty motivated me to focus part of my practice area on Arbitrations. It only helps to service clients today with a global presence as I am still connected to my fellow classmates from the LL.M. program who are based in Europe, Middle East and SouthEast Asia.

    Your work involves representing both private and public sector corporations (PSU). How do you navigate the differences in handling legal matters for these different types of clients?

    Whether you represent a government entity or a private party, a counsel’s approach towards finding a solution to those disputes remains largely the same. However, there is a wide difference between the two sides when it comes to the work culture and decision-making process especially when it comes to matters related to litigation or Arbitration. Whether its negotiating contracts or working on case strategy the private client is either more willing to settle with a reasonable outcome or pursue legal options up to the Apex court but there is finality in the decision making, however when it comes to PSU client we have to weigh the slow decision making process and also impact of any policy decisions made by government on the strategy being followed. We also have to understand that decisions for PSU clients are impacted by legal costs involved as it will burden the exchequers ultimately. I must add that though some lawyers may feel less incentivised to pursue government side work however, I feel that working on the government side allows one to get great exposure to a variety of complex legal problems and it is also a matter of great pride as one gets to be of service to the public in a way.

    Could you share a particularly challenging case you’ve worked on and how you approached resolving it?

    Every case comes with its own sets of challenges and in fact sometimes a case involving most basic issues can throw a completely new challenge at you at any stage of the case. Once a client came to us who was a defendant in a claim involving recovery of money which he was unable to pay due to the financial crisis. His right to cross-examine had been closed by the Court due to failure on part of his legal team, therefore he was clearly facing an adverse outcome ultimately. We were able to get the appeal admitted on legal issues and also conveyed our willingness to the court for closing the matter for a reasonable settlement. Since our client had previous long standing business relations with the plaintiff, I advised him to have the settlement discussion with the management of the plaintiff directly and fairly convey his difficulty and work out a structure for making reasonable payments over a period of time which included a large chunk of interest accrued. During the hearing the Judge appreciated the genuine effort being made by us and understood the financial distress caused during Covid period and prevailed upon the plaintiff to accept a reasonable payment structure. It ultimately saved our client from going out of business.

    You’ve been heavily involved in advising on labour and HR compliance, as well as issues related to Sexual Harassment at Workplace (POSH Act). What are some common challenges you encounter in this area, and how do you address them?

    Most common challenge we face when it comes to HR related issues is that there is a lack of awareness about the enforceability of various clauses that are put in contracts or conditions in the HR manual being followed by the entity. Sometimes the policies put in place are outdated and not in sync with the current legal scenario. Another issue we see is non implementation of policies across the offices in different places of the same company. For example, some organisations have policy for Maternity benefits under the Act but their implementation varies depending on the location and economics involved. When it comes to POSH related issues, I feel that implementation of the law in its true spirit is missing. Sometimes even the top management is not sensitized enough to understand that   training sessions are not meant for female coworkers only but requires equal participation from male coworkers as well. I think the law itself requires to be redesigned to address some of the grey areas, the current issues and evolving work culture. But there is a serious need to at least have a system for enforcing the provision, as they exist, so that it is followed uniformly in every organisation / entity covered under it. 

    Your involvement as a certified Mediator and being empaneled with various legal bodies is impressive. How do you balance your role between advocacy and mediation, and what benefits do you see in offering both services to your clients?

    I am a certified mediator empanelled with the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation centre called “Samadhan” as well as the Mediation cell with NCDRC. In my 6-7 years of experience in mediating a range of disputes, I have realised that settling disputes through mediation is much more fulfilling professionally as it helps the litigants with timely relief compared to endlessly litigating with greater costs and worsening relationships. As a mediator, I do not have to think about the interest of only one party as there is no side to choose and the ultimate goal is to help parties in reaching an amicable solution to the entire dispute. While at the same time the process helps me in honing the negotiation skills as well.

    I must confess that many of our colleagues believe that mediation is antithetical to a lawyers’ dispute resolution practice which is incorrect. In fact being a certified Mediator helps me in advising the client holistically. I always initiate a counselling session with the client to understand their underlying expectation of the outcome of either a negotiation or litigation with the opposite party and use mediation skills to help them understand their best-case scenario in case of failure to settle. The process helps the client to have a realistic assessment of his case and the actual time and costs involved. The ever growing importance of mediation was highlighted by the CJI Hon’ble DY Chandrachud at the National Conference on Mediation held last year, who called for a ‘Youth-based mediation’ and even J. Manmohan, the current acting Chief Justice of Delhi High Court remarked that mediation be made a part of curriculum for students as early as possible to ‘catch them young’.

    I find mediation to be very rewarding and I hope more lawyers consider taking up mediation as a prominent part of ADR practice. In fact at a recently concluded Arbitration event, Hon’ble J. Sanjiv Khanna, Judge, Supreme Court of India remarked that some mechanism needs to be evolved to merge mediation process with the Arbitration Act in order to have a quick, party-driven dispute resolution mechanism. 

    With nearly 17 years of practice, what changes have you observed in the legal landscape, especially concerning arbitration and dispute resolution, and how have you adapted to them?

    Arbitration proceedings in India were very different prior to the amendments introduced in 2015. Though the time consuming issues were addressed but still it was fraught with difficulties that made it challenging to obtain the arbitral award and far more challenging to execute it. Now with last amendments and a proactive approach by the bench over time, we are able to see arbitration proceedings working close to its objectives of being quick and efficient. However as recent decisions have shown, that many issues involved are still getting adjudicated and will take some more time to authoritatively address many complexities in interpretation of the clauses and unfettered powers of arbitrator which sometimes lead to situations where outcome in similar situations are not based on legal principle but on the understanding of particular arbitrator. I believe that greater push is rightly being made by the government towards institutional arbitration in the country to bring some sort of uniformity in the whole process. 

    When it comes to the dispute resolution system, I believe the greatest change brought in recent years is through complete digitisation of the court records especially in Delhi High Court and the availability of virtual hearings which has truly taken the justice delivery to every doorstep. As lawyers, efficiency and productivity of our practice has immensely grown due to the above changes and in almost all the Arbitrations I am involved in they are being conducted through virtual platforms. I believe that the continued promotion of digitisation of courts led by the Hon’ble Supreme Court and equally adopted vigorously by the Hon’ble High Court is commendable and deserves appreciation.

    As a member of various legal associations and advisory boards, how important do you think networking and community engagement are for legal professionals, and what advice would you give to those looking to establish similar connections?

    Aristotle is famously quoted for saying “Man is by nature a social animal” I believe he was thinking of lawyers when he said it!  But on a serious note, I think networking for lawyers is as important as any other skill and maybe some have used it exceptionally to be quite successful. Not only does a good network allow one to bounce off different ideas and broaden their own horizons but can also help by opening doors for more opportunities and growing as a professional especially when it comes to young lawyers. I think young lawyers who are not part of lawyer networking events should try to attend conferences and lectures as much as possible which can help them with finding an opportunity or connecting with the right mentor. Also take up the membership of at least a couple of associations even if they are not connected with any particular court.  Being a member of various bar associations especially at Delhi High Court has helped in connecting with colleagues over various sports activity or cultural programs and seminars which are organised regularly and in fact are equally supported by the bench also.

    Get in touch with Varun Nischal-

  • “Never give up! Embrace failures as learning opportunities… Success will follow with hard work and perseverance.” – Adv. Sudhir Reddy, Founder of Reddy & Reddy Law firm

    “Never give up! Embrace failures as learning opportunities… Success will follow with hard work and perseverance.” – Adv. Sudhir Reddy, Founder of Reddy & Reddy Law firm

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    Could you please walk us through your journey as to what inspired you to pursue a career in law?

    Law has always been something which I have seen at close quarters coming from a business family. It has intrigued me and given me an insight into its importance and the eminent role it plays in society.  Law is that facet of the society which keeps the citizens in check and gives society its balance. It also is the  very basis for the society to get justice and have fair practice in everyday life. This set me on a path at an early age to pursue a career in law. 

    What was the idea behind founding Reddy & Reddy Law Firm?

    Pursuing an LL.M. immediately after my LL.B. was a well-planned strategy to equip myself with a comprehensive understanding of the international legal landscape. Also, I have had an entrepreneurial flair from early days, and again business, negotiations, contracts, acquisitions is something that I have been fond of since early days. I hail from Pune, an Industrial city which was just beginning to blossom around early to mid 2000’s, and law firms were absent and individual practice was the order of the day, I saw this as an opportunity and  so founding a Law firm was a natural progression.

    You’ve dedicated a significant part of your career to dispute resolution. What is it about this area of law that captivates you?

    During my law studies, I was introduced to Dispute Resolution practice.To develop expertise in this area, I actively participated in relevant activities and eventually pursued my first specialised course in Civil/Commercial Mediation from UK, becoming an accredited mediator in 2014, which developed a deeper interest in the subject area leading to opportunity in providing set services in this domain, furthermore in the later years I undertook other various International courses and affiliations leading to my latest course in  February 2024 on Program on egotiations from Harvard Law School. The area of dispute resolution  has become the mainstream practice as it has been globally accepted at all levels of business and governments. It has been found to be a much holistic and easier medium for getting resolutions and so is the order of the day today.

     How do you stay motivated in the face of challenging cases?

    I have a natural aptitude for conflict avoidance and dispute resolution. In our profession listening is a key strength which I have and I use it well, so in every case the key motivation is listening to both parties well, which then helps me successfully resolve disputes. 

    The Indian Institute of Alternate Dispute Resolution is a significant achievement. Can you share the story behind its inception and your vision for its impact on the legal profession in India?

    It was at my course at Oxford in the UK where I saw the merits of  Mediation practice. It was also during the same time  some of my clients inquired about commercial mediators, I recognised an opportunity and decided to set up IIADR as a pivotal organisation which would lead in the area of ADR with members, knowledge center, courses and training’s which would equip the new legal advocates to pursue ADR as a career through this platform.

    With your extensive experience in mediation and arbitration, what advice would you give to clients or individuals who are torn between choosing litigation and alternative dispute resolution methods?

    There is never a black and white scenario in the legal space and there are various many factors which decide the course of legality. However, until now the only option has been litigation which at times is long, costly and arduous. Mediation and Arbitration come in as a very strong viable alternative solution to resolve conflicts amicably. It provides the client a chance to get a faster resolution, which can be cost effective too.

    Given your vast experience and success, what advice would you offer to young professionals spiring to make their mark in the legal field ?

    To young professionals aspiring to establish their own law firms, my message would be: Never give up. Embrace failures as learning opportunities, for they are crucial to personal growth and development. In my experience, there are four stages in the journey of starting out on your own in the legal arena / mediation :

    ∙ The first stage involves having no work and no money.

    ∙ The second stage brings work but no money.

    ∙ The third stage sees good work and good money.

    ∙ Finally, the fourth stage is characterised by less work but consistent income.

    While this may not be the exact path for everyone, it represents the holistic picture. The key is to remain confident and patient to take the leap when the opportunity arises. Success will follow with hard work and perseverance.

    Moving away from your professional life, do you have any hobbies or interests that you’re passionate about outside of work?

    Engaging in fitness activities, pursuing hobbies, or participating in sports can provide much-needed mental refreshment and balance amidst the rigours of legal practice. I am an avid fitness freak and train regularly, I am a trekker and do go out on weekends for long treks and do adventurous sports.

    With technological advancements and the increasing acceptance of online dispute resolution (ODR), where do you see the future of dispute resolution and law practice heading in the next decade?

    Technology acceptance in mainstream society is at its peak and technology today has touched every human interaction throughout a day of 24 hours. The Indian government themselves have introduced and have made digital payments a roaring success all throughout the country. Similarly, in the legal arena, government has launched a big initiative in the space of ODR and is taking active initiatives in this space.

    In fact, it can be said that technology is the mediator in our interactions and influence our actions in many ways, such as mediation of experience, influence on behavior and ethical considerations, Virtual Mediation will take central place. AI and Mediation is an emerging trend in technological advancements.

    I see a huge demand in this space of tech application in the legal world and we at Reddy and Reddy Law Firm are at the forefront of this where we are designing our own tech platforms to decimate knowledge, provide platform for interaction and help the society to reach out to us seamlessly.

    More important role of technology will be in the area of education and training skills for the next generation. So yes, I am very vocal and a strong pursuer of technology adaptation in the legal profession.

    Your Master of Laws (LLM) from Cardiff University in the UK provided you with international exposure. How do you think this experience differed from a purely domestic legal education, and what exceptional insights or perspectives do you believe students in India could gain from similar international exposure?

    International learning gives one an exposure to different cultures, mindset’s and systems. LL.M. in International Commercial Law at Cardiff University comprised a diverse range of subjects, including international banking, competition laws, international corporate governance, and the World Trade Organization. These topics were distinctly different from the regular curriculum taught in India, and the flexibility to choose optional modules allowed me to tailor the program to my interests.The education system in the UK is more interactive and knowledge driven, that is one of the primary reasons for total development of a student who is keen to pursue his career. Another important aspect that I learnt in the UK was attending the seminars and conferences that the University hosted which gave me an exposure to meet industry stalwarts and subject matter experts which helped me with holistic knowledge.

    You’ve also been involved in philanthropic efforts, notably with your NGO. Could you share with us the purpose of this organization and the inspiration behind its inception? What societal issues or causes does it seek to address, and how do you envision making a difference through this initiative?

    Raksha Seva Suraksha is the name of my NGO, it was formed in 2010. Right as I was finding my foothold in  my career. My parents come from a very humble background and at home i had always seen my parents make that extra space to help people, this inculcated in me a very strong purpose of societal ownership where  my parents took it upon themselves to ensure that help has to be extended whenever needed to the needy.

    Hence the day I passed out as a law graduate and decided to start my own law firm, the NGO was a natural progression. My NGO, as per its name Raksha Seva Suraksha, needs  Raksha (Protection), Seva (Service), Suraksha ( Complete Protection in all terms). We provide holistic care to the needy not restricted to legal aid, but even in the space of  health, education and family matters.

    This is a very small but very focused entity of our organisation and luckily every member of my organisation feels and participates here Pro Bono, and together we resolve as many conflicts as we can.

    Leading a team of 18 advocates requires effective communication and leadership skills. How do you ensure that everyone is on the same page and working towards common goals? Could you share some guidance on fostering collaboration and cohesion within a legal team, particularly in navigating complex cases or disputes? 

    Regular structured communication and key defined  processes are the cornerstones of having successful team efforts, especially when one is working with large teams on complex matters, as in the corporate world, at RRLF we breakdown the case into its relevant sectors and create team leads, I am personally a big fan of KPI’s and at the very outset we together as a team set our KPI’s(Key Performance Indicators) for each sub team and how we get there. Over the last 13 years of legal practice and leading small and big teams we have honed our processes to capture all the details. This then helps the team in defining and reaching their KPI’s which finally give the complete team its outcome which is the motto of the Law Firm a “HAPPY CLIENT’.

    Get in touch with Adv. Sudhir Reddy–