Super Lawyer

Tag: LLM

  • Ramakrishnan Viraraghavan (RKV). Senior Advocate, Supreme Court and bestselling author on GST Laws shares his learning on legal writing, lecturing at National Judicial Academy and pursuing LLM after three decades of practice

    Ramakrishnan Viraraghavan (RKV). Senior Advocate, Supreme Court and bestselling author on GST Laws shares his learning on legal writing, lecturing at National Judicial Academy and pursuing LLM after three decades of practice

    This Interview has been published by Pragya Chandni and and The SuperLawyer Team

    Congratulations on the success of your book The Law of Goods and Services Tax: A Comprehensive Internet Age Commentary. Tax is primarily an auditor’s topic and a territory of Chartered Accountants. Why did you choose to write a book on GST Laws?


    I started my practice in the 1980’s in an age of information scarcity. I had a degree in commerce and then a law degree. I worked under my maternal uncle who was a tax lawyer. I enjoyed the complexity of tax practice and specialized in tax litigation, appearing before various tribunals. My exposure to accounting and accounting principles in my commerce degree was a huge advantage in commercial and tax litigation. In my experience, judges and lawyers without an accounting background feel challenged by accounts and accounting entries. Understanding these is essential for tax litigation . Much of my advocacy in the High Courts and the Supreme Court is to simplify accounting principles and concepts and explain them in a legal language acceptable to the legal mind.  . 

    After GST laws were enacted in 2017, I saw tax lawyers and practitioners instructing me struggle with the complexities of GST legislation. Unlike the Income Tax Act, GST Laws did not have any standard commentary. I decided to do something about it and began writing. My book is  a focused and penetrative commentary, an original writing on GST laws . It took me four years to complete my book. 

    I wrote a commentary in simple language avoiding legal jargon and overflow of citations. Considering the daily information overload on tax practitioners, I wanted to write a book which tax lawyers and practitioners could read on the way to the court or the tribunal and succeed in their arguments.

    It is an internet age commentary which avoids copious extracts from judgments, circulars, and GST notifications to the greatest extent possible. The book refers to a large number of decisions of the courts and rulings of the advanced ruling authorities. However, these references are given only as footnotes to the commentary. The relevant page and para number is given in the footnote. This will make it easier for the reader to locate the relevant para and cite the decision. The book also points out defects and deficiencies in judgments of the courts and advance rulings. It gives possible answers to legal issues (such as betting, racing and online gaming)  which have not been decided by the courts so far. My book is gender neutral. I avoided using ‘he’ or ‘she’ unless absolutely necessary. 

    Your involvement at the National Judicial Academy, conducting sessions for newly elevated High Court Judges and Judges from other jurisdictions is unique and commendable. How has this experience influenced your own perspective on the legal profession? 

    These experiences have made me deeply sympathetic and understanding of the plight of an average judge. Judges face enormous pressure disposing of matters, sitting in committees and simultaneously handling tons of administrative work. I am no longer irritated when a judge does not read the papers fully or adjourns a matter for want of time. Lawyers must understand that judges are also human beings. Judges also feel hunger, body pain and tiredness. Mental fatigue and irritability set in any judge, any human being after hearing arguments day after day, week after week without time to recover or recoup energy. 

    My advocacy has become judge-centric. I now see myself as a senior advocate assisting the court rather than arguing before the court. The best of arguments should be made in a manner helpful for the judge to write the judgment in the client’s favour. Good advocacy should give the judge a quick and easy solution to the dispute. No judge anywhere is interested in long arguments showcasing the lawyers’ erudition.

     You’ve authored publications, conducted sessions on law for judges, and played a role in drafting rules. Could you share the motivations behind your contributions to legal literature, legal education, and rule-making, and how do you believe these efforts contribute to the legal community?

    I did not have any specific motivation to do all of these. The legal profession rewards good work with more work. My first book was on the Madras High Court Letters Patent, Appellate and Original Side Rules. The book was successful and resulted in the Chief Justice appointing me on the Court Fees Rationalisation Committee. The committee’s well drafted report was accepted by the government and by the High Court without modifications. 

    This led to my appointment on the Madras High Court Arbitration Committee and on the Madras High Court Rule Committee. My contributions here were kindly appreciated and I continue to be on the Rule Committee although I have shifted to the Supreme Court. Similarly, the success of my first book led to publishers inviting me to more books.

     There are two lessons from all of these. Firstly, one must grab every opportunity that presents itself. Secondly, most opportunities lie outside the comfort zone. Therefore, having grabbed the opportunity, one must struggle, overcome discomfort and grow to the level of the opportunity.

    How have you seen yourself evolving as a Senior Advocate from a raw young law graduate? What role do you believe mentorship plays in your development as a legal professional?

    As a young lawyer, I thought precedents were all important and tried to support every argument with some case law. Now, I realise persuasion is all-important. Arguments with too much case law are like over spicy food. They turn away judges. Arguments must be garnished with minimum case law, just enough to make it attractive and presentable but not beyond. As a young lawyer, I thought I could succeed in my arguments without too much hard work once I became a senior. Now, I realise hard work is a part of the process even as a senior advocate. I had appeared in common-law jurisdictions across three continents. I found hard work was an essential requirement for success at the Bar throughout the world.

    Mentorship is essential for improving the quality of the justice delivery system. I have seen retired judges mentoring sitting judges at the National Judicial Academy. Similarly, advocates must mentor junior advocates. Mentoring must be professional and must meet the needs of the mentee. Mentoring does not mean placating the mentor’s ego by listening to the mentor’s war stories. Real-life examples from the mentor’s past offer valuable guidance but must be fine-tuned towards the mentee’s requirements.

    Sir, could you please share a bit about your background and journey that led you to become a Barrister at Law, practicing in both India and London? What inspired you to pursue a career in law?

    I completed my bachelor’s degree in commerce. Then, I had the option of pursuing management, accounting or law. I applied for an MBA and was offered admission by two prestigious colleges in Mumbai. My father felt I was temperamentally suited for a profession rather than a corporate job. He suggested I could become a chartered accountant or a lawyer. My paternal great-grandfather, my maternal and paternal grandfathers and my uncle were lawyers. Law seemed to be a more attractive choice. I felt I would be bored with accounting. I studied law and became a lawyer. 

    I became a barrister at law by accident. An English barrister met me for legal advice on Indian law. She was impressed by my legal skills and suggested I should become an English barrister. By then, I had put in 25 years as a lawyer in India. I felt becoming a barrister did not add any value to my practice in India. 

    A couple of years later, she convinced me to sign the application papers. Amidst hectic professional life, I studied English law like a maniac and passed the difficult test. I was called to the Bar by the Honourable Society of Inner Temple where Mahatma Gandhi was also called to the Bar. I wanted to return to India after becoming a barrister. However, the Sub-Treasurer of Inner Temple insisted that I should complete my pupillage in England and obtain rights of audience before the English courts. I stayed on, pupilled in barristers’ chambers in London and obtained my practising certificate as well.

    Your educational background is quite diverse, including degrees from the University of Edinburgh, NALSAR University, and the University of Bangalore. How did these experiences shape your approach to law, especially in the areas of international arbitration and commercial litigation?

    LLM from the University of Edinburgh was a game changer for three reasons. Firstly, since I joined LLM after 25 years as a lawyer, I could understand and implement in my practice many legal concepts taught in the course. This would not be possible had I joined LLM immediately after my LLB. 

    Secondly, my writing skills improved enormously. I needed to write concisely and with precision. I could not simply fill up the pages and expect to pass. Almost everything I wrote in my dissertation needed to be supported by citations. The high quality of writing I learnt from LLM helped me write three books on law. 

    Thirdly, a degree from one of the top universities in the world gave me entry to many places. 

    One of the courses in LLM was on international commercial arbitration. The course was taught by a reputed international arbitrator. Learning the nuances of international commercial arbitration helped me become a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators, teach arbitration as an accredited tutor, argue international arbitration matters in Indian courts and finally sit as an international commercial arbitrator abroad.

    Exposure to foreign legal systems such as English law, Scottish law and continental jurisprudence in Europe helped me to think out-of-the-box in identifying new lines of arguments in Indian commercial and tax litigation.

    You’ve been involved in significant matters under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and commercial litigation. Could you share some insights into the challenges and complexities you’ve faced in these areas, especially when dealing with issues such as avoidance applications, corporate liquidation, and company petitions for oppression and mismanagement?

    I have only one insight. The task of an advocate in any complex litigation is to break the complexity into simplicity. Judges hate complexity and love simplicity. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes said “For the simplicity on this side of complexity, I wouldn’t give you a fig. But for the simplicity on the other side of complexity, for that I would give you anything I have.” It requires enormous hard-work to reach this simplicity.

    As a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators, you’ve been involved in numerous domestic and international arbitrations. Can you discuss some of the key aspects of your experience in arbitration, including any notable cases or challenges you’ve encountered?

    The glaring contrast between domestic and international arbitration is the professionalism in international arbitration. Timelines for pleadings, witness examination and arguments are scrupulously followed by the lawyers in international arbitration. The arbitral tribunal is also well prepared, having studied the pleadings and the evidence well ahead of the hearing. International arbitrators do not have a sense of loyalty to the party appointing them. Domestic arbitration has to travel a long way to catch up with international arbitration. Sitting as an international arbitrator, I see Indian lawyers and Indian law firms rise up to international standards. However, this is absent in domestic arbitrations.

    Lastly, considering your wealth of experience, what advice would you offer to law graduates who are just entering the profession? Are there any key lessons or principles that you wish someone had shared with you at the beginning of your career?

    First, take care of your health. Eat correctly and exercise regularly. Aim to live active and to ripe old age. 

    Secondly, set one small goal, reach the goal. Then set another small goal and so on. Do this consistently. Small goals always trump large goals. 

    Thirdly, remember the journey never ends. Thirty-eight years at the Bar, I am still learning law and improving my skills, daily.

    Fourthly, be kind to yourself (but not indulgent).

    Get in touch with Ramakrishnan Viraraghavan-

  • “Young lawyers should avoid being a generalist and look for specialization. Law is a profession and should be treated as a career which spans 30-40 years.” – Anil Choudhary, Partner at Finsec Law Advisors.

    “Young lawyers should avoid being a generalist and look for specialization. Law is a profession and should be treated as a career which spans 30-40 years.” – Anil Choudhary, Partner at Finsec Law Advisors.

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    Your journey includes an LL.M. from Harvard Law School and a B.A. LL.B. (Hons.) from NALSAR. How did your time at these prestigious institutions shape your approach to law, and do you have any memorable experiences you’d like to share from your time at Harvard?

    It was a privilege to be part of the two leading law institutions both in India and the world. As a law student, I was exposed to the best professors and brightest of legal minds which helped me develop my curiosity in law. I understood very early that law as a subject is ever evolving and there are no right answers in law. It is all about thinking in pairs where you need to think both sides of an argument and not rush to conclusions. 

    HLS for me was an exposure to the international world as we had students from more than 50 countries in the LLM batch. I made friends from various countries and understood their culture and thought processes. HLS not only made me a better lawyer but more than that it gave me tools to understand the world and its people better. 

    As a member of the New York Bar, you bring an international perspective to your practice. How has being admitted to practice law in New York influenced your career, and what unique insights do you gain from practicing in both India and the U.S.?

    I can confidently say that NY Bar was the toughest examination I gave in my life and for which I worked the hardest. As a lawyer trained in India, it is more difficult to crack the NY Bar since you would need to unlearn Indian laws and focus on both federal and NY state laws which at times would have conflicting positions. 

    Although I don’t actively practice US laws, having been exposed to securities law jurisprudence of the US- it helps tremendously in my practice in India. Most of Indian securities laws have been made on the similar lines as US laws and while Indian laws are still at a developing stage- US laws have an established history and jurisprudence. I often refer to US laws to draw parallels while assisting securities market players in both advisory and disputes practice.

    Congratulations on co-authoring the book ‘Securities Regulation – Primary Market Offerings in India.’ What inspired you to delve into this subject, and how has the book been received in the legal community?

    In my first few years of practice, I was a capital markets lawyer and had worked on several IPOs. I quickly realized that most of the laws surrounding this practice have been influenced by US laws and the knowledge of US securities laws is essential to excel in the field of securities laws. This motivated me to do my LLM at Harvard and once I returned I was itching to put down on paper a comprehensive legal book on doing IPOs in India. There was no existing literature and for me it was an opportunity to understand the Indian laws contextualizing it to the prevailing US laws. The book was more of a learning experience for me to better understand the policy rationales and choices India has made to regulate the Indian securities market as compared to other developed jurisdictions.

    I have heard that few law schools and MBA colleges use the book as part of curriculum and most law firms also have a copy of the book. I believe it was well received but it would now need an update and reprint for which I am trying to motivate myself.

    Finsec Law Advisors has likely seen various achievements during your tenure as a Partner. Can you highlight a moment or accomplishment that you are particularly proud of, either for yourself or for the firm?

    FLA is one of the very few firms in the country that is a specialist firm in the field of securities laws and financial regulatory space. We have been consistently ranked as the Top Tier in all Indian and global rankings of laws firms specializing in Indian securities laws.

    The Firm over a decade has been the forerunner in thought leadership and policy development of securities laws. We are active in advisory, disputes and policy work in the financial sector laws. Over the years, we have not only advised top marquee clients like top blue chip listed companies, largest mutual funds, stock exchanges, FPIs, AIFs etc. but have been actively assisting the growth of the fintech industry with clients like Zerodha, Smallcase, Navi etc. We are proud to develop a niche practice area focussed on expert and quality services to our clients and forerunner in thought leadership and policy development.

    You’ve been actively involved in academia, giving guest lectures and teaching a credit course on Securities Regulation at NALSAR University of Law. How does your involvement in academia complement your legal practice, and what insights do you gain from interacting with students?

    We as a firm work on a very focussed area of practice and therefore for us it is not only important that talents joining the firm not only have proven academic excellence but also have a keen interest in securities laws. For us law school courses and other academic endeavours help us develop students’ curiosity in the subject and also assist us to go back to basics to explain laws in first principles. Our practice requires specialized skill sets and continuous learning, teaching stints and guest lectures also lead you to re-read the laws and overall help me in my professional growth.

    With over 17 years of experience, you’ve seen the legal landscape evolve. What changes in the legal industry do you find most intriguing or challenging today?

    I think there are two major shifts in the legal industry space- one is technology and the other is specialized skill sets. With the development of technology, starting a legal practice is just one degree and a computer away. Technology has ensured the barriers between clients and experts have been diminished and all services can be provided without requiring any physical meeting or sharing of documents. Now, with AI etc the legal industry would evolve further where the first level of research or first draft of an opinion or suit can be drafted by AI. The human skills would be to review and verify the technology output.

    Since technology would replace general research and drafting skills, top money would be paid by clients only for specialist lawyers. This shows the shift in trends in the legal industry wherein specialist law firms having the technical expertise and experience in narrow practice focus would only survive in the next decade or two. 

    Your expertise extends to regulatory proceedings, including cases of insider trading and securities fraud. Can you share an interesting aspect of this work that people might not be aware of?

    As a securities lawyer, we need to not only understand the regulatory framework but also understand workings of the securities market like trading, settlement, F&O and roles of intermediaries involved such as brokers, clearing members, stock exchanges, custodians etc. It is essential that we understand the securities market eco-system as we regularly need to analyse trading patterns, fund flows etc towards advising our clients. For effective advice, both legal and factual matrix need to be analysed carefully towards providing optimum solutions for the client.

    Also, we assist our clients in development of new products especially in fintech space and policy development wherein we assist in creating a regulatory framework for new services, platforms in the financial industry. We often work on complex technical issues in the space of payment systems, exchange control and other SEBI and RBI regulations that require us to be up to speed with the latest developments both in the field of law and technology.

    Another interesting part of my practice is that I not only get to advise clients on various financial regulations but also I regularly appear before SEBI and SAT to argue matters. Working on policy, compliance and regulatory proceedings/dispute at the same time gives us an edge on the regulator’s mind. We understand why the laws are framed, how the laws should be implemented and lastly, how it is enforced which help us to defend/advise our clients better.
    Thinking about the future generation of lawyers, what advice or insight would you offer to those aspiring to follow in your footsteps and make an impact in the legal field?

    I think young lawyers should follow their heart and choose a field that interests them the most. Only if you enjoy your work can you excel. Young lawyers should avoid being a generalist and look for specialization. Being an expert in one field of law would help them be less reliant on jobs in big law firms and help them set up their independent practice or law firm in the future. Law is a profession and should be treated as a career which spans 30-40 years and one should not look out for short term goals and treat it as a job without any long term goals. Lastly, I would advise young lawyers to be more patient and showcase more perseverance in their chosen field- in law nothing is more rewarding than experience and dedication which leads to self confidence of the lawyer which translates confidence of clients to the lawyer.

    Get in touch with Anil Choudhary-

  • “Litigation is 10% intelligence and 90% diligence and Every citizen is capable of understanding the law, provided it is explained in simple language” – Shrutanjaya Bhardwaj, Counsel & Founder, Pravah Law Offices.

    “Litigation is 10% intelligence and 90% diligence and Every citizen is capable of understanding the law, provided it is explained in simple language” – Shrutanjaya Bhardwaj, Counsel & Founder, Pravah Law Offices.

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    We are extremely delighted to have you with us for this interview. To start, could you please introduce yourself and share the inspiration behind establishing Pravah Law Offices?

    Thank you for having me. I have been a Delhi-based practising lawyer since 2017. The bulk of my practise is at the Supreme Court, which is also the forum where I learnt the maximum work as an associate with my mentors, Ms. Haripriya Padmanabhan and Mr. Gopal Sankaranarayanan.

    ‘Pravah Law’ is the official designation of my law chambers. The primary motivation behind establishing it was to foster a distinct professional identity that resonates with my core values and expertise, to enhance the efficiency and organization of my practice.

    Being awarded the Vice-Chancellor’s Gold Medal for ‘Best Male Student’ is a remarkable achievement. How has your academic journey, including your time at National Law University, Delhi, influenced your approach to law and legal practice?

    Getting the Vice-Chancellor’s Gold Medal was a big confidence booster because of what it signifies: it is awarded to two students from each batch, male and female, who graduate with the best all-round performance. Incidentally, even at my school’s farewell function, I was awarded the ‘Best All-Rounder’ trophy—something I cherish more than any other recognition I’ve received. I enjoy being able to handle multiple activities and projects together. In college, I was an avid sportsperson, musician and mooter (in that order) with an interest in many other extra-curricular activities. 

    As regards academics, those five years were formative. My teachers at NLU Delhi were outstanding in terms of how much they pushed us. For instance, we were made to prepare bulky, complex judgments and other texts within tight deadlines—not just read the material, but also form polished opinions about it. This seemed impossible back then. We kept complaining about being forced to meet unrealistic standards! But I realise with every passing day as to how much edge those exercises can give you in a profession where reading is everything and everything is to be read. I owe a lot to NLU Delhi.

    Your LL.M. at the University of Michigan Law School was accompanied by the prestigious Michigan Grotius Fellowship. How did this international exposure shape your perspective on law, and what key lessons did you bring back to your practice in India?

    It was a terrific experience. UMich gives you the freedom to design your course by choosing any combination of subjects. So, besides my law subjects (media law, freedom of speech & religion, equality law etc.), I selected a few subjects situated at the intersection of law and philosophy, which significantly contributed to my intellectual growth. My teachers were excellent and my classmates were intelligent and accomplished, which made classes engaging and challenging. It was exactly the kind of quality I wanted in my higher education.

    Looking back, my most important learning in Ann Arbor was that there’s always another way—to think of a legal problem, articulate an argument, research case law, and even draft a memorandum—if only one is willing. I find that many colleagues here are used to old methods that may no longer work, at least not as effectively as one would like. The mere willingness to try another way can produce great results. And it requires no earth-shattering effort; sometimes, it is as simple as learning a new technological tool, shortening your drafts, using visual representations (graphs instead of paragraphs), making a LinkedIn profile, or even writing an email that you thought would be futile.

    Law Vaarta is a unique blend of Hindi and English, making legal discussions more accessible. What inspired you to start this podcast, and how has the response been from your audience?

    I believe that law is not as elusive as it is made out to be. Every citizen is capable of understanding the law, provided it is explained in simple language. Unfortunately, discussions around the law on TV and other media are either superficial or too technical-sounding. That is why I felt that a platform is required where complex legal issues are explained in straightforward language without losing their complexity.

    I am delighted with the response the podcast has received. People have been kind in their appreciation as well as criticism, both of which are aimed at improving the quality of the content. I’m learning new things about content creation on the go. In 2024, I intend to increase the reach of the podcast through interactive content that will cater specifically to law students and young litigators, in the hope that litigation can become a more accessible profession.

    Your research covers various topics, from constitutional rights to online gaming legislation. What upcoming research projects or areas of interest are you currently exploring?

    Over the past couple of years, I have picked up an interest in empirical research on judicial behaviour. I am currently working on two projects relating to preventive detention and one on India’s abortion law. All three projects are geared towards understanding the behaviour of the Supreme Court and High Courts in cases involving the fundamental rights of citizens. For instance, in the preventive detention research, I am trying to map the speed with which our constitutional courts act in habeas corpus petitions against illegal detentions.

    The Right to Receive Information is an upcoming publication. Can you give our readers a sneak peek into what conceptual problems you explore in this piece?

    In the post-emergency years, the Supreme Court infused many fundamental rights with expansive content. The right to receive information was a product of this exercise. The Supreme Court held that the right to “speak” under Article 19 of the Constitution includes the right to “know”. I find this to be somewhat of a logical jump. There is no doubt that an informed citizen will exercise their right to free speech more meaningfully, but it is hard to agree with the proposition that there is no right to free speech without full or proper information about the subject matter. Anyway, the paper mainly explores the judicial approach to the right to receive information over the years, first, on whether the right is horizontal or vertical, and second, on whether there are any additional grounds on which the right to receive information can be restricted over and above the grounds listed in Article 19(2). The paper finds that the judicial approach on both counts has been thoroughly inconsistent and requires clarity.

    On a personal note, outside the legal realm, what are your hobbies or activities that bring you joy and relaxation?

    I try and do everything that interests me: poetry, sports, music and beyond. Lately, I have been exploring coding to automate some of my daily tasks as a litigator, which would help me save time on clerical work and focus on the more substantive aspects of the law.

    Looking ahead, what are your future goals or aspirations for Pravah Law Offices 

    As the chamber’s work grows, increasing the size of the team has been on my mind. In fact, Pravah Law recently finished one round of hiring. To my good fortune, I have generous mentors and supportive clients, and I am sure the chamber will grow rapidly with their blessings.

    Other than that, I endeavor that Pravah Law remains ahead of the curve in terms of technological infrastructure and awareness. I believe lawyers must upgrade and upskill every year. Artificial intelligence is making path-breaking advances by the minute, and I do not doubt that lawyers will have to catch up to stay relevant. 

    Considering your multifaceted journey, what advice would you offer to aspiring lawyers, especially those who are interested in a diverse legal practice or engaging in legal academia?

    ‘Advice’ is a tricky concept. Everyone comes from a different context and must figure out their own ways. But I would pass on the following helpful pieces of advice that I have followed:

    1. “Litigation is 10% intelligence and 90% diligence.”
    2. “Don’t settle for mediocrity.”
    3. “Writing is thinking.”

    Get in touch with Shrutanjaya Bhardwaj-

  • “Transparency, direct counsel, and a relentless commitment to securing the best results for clients” – Embarking on a three-decade journey from litigation to global business leadership, Priti Suri, the Founder and Managing Partner of PSA, Legal Counsellors.

    “Transparency, direct counsel, and a relentless commitment to securing the best results for clients” – Embarking on a three-decade journey from litigation to global business leadership, Priti Suri, the Founder and Managing Partner of PSA, Legal Counsellors.

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    Could you share a bit about your journey from starting as a litigator to becoming a business lawyer? How has your overseas experience shaped your approach as a business lawyer, and what valuable insights have you gained from working across diverse legal landscapes?

    When I joined the legal profession, it was the norm to work with a senior practitioner in the courts. My first job was with Mr. Pran Nath Talwar, a senior advocate at the Delhi High Court who was the Standing Counsel for DDA. I worked with him for two years, from July 1986 to July 1988. Mr. Talwar was a stellar lawyer with a razor-sharp mind. Every day he regaled me with stories about the law, about life and always insisted we read the jurisprudence deeply and fully and learn how to apply it. He underscored the devil is always in the detail and to ensure we know full facts before starting to think of the merits or demerits of a case. I was fortunate to get solid grounding with him. 

    Subsequently, I left for the US to study further and then had opportunities to work there. My work with the large US law firms exposed me to and gave me insights on the western large firm model functioning – a deeper and different kind of professional ethics, to structured processes and systems, to development of a profound sense of responsibility for the advice we give to clients on the basis of which corporations were going to take decisions, to concepts of negligence if our advice was incomplete or inaccurate. After I moved to Paris, initially for a year, in a pre-Google era, I confronted different challenges including juggling work in a country where the native language was not English and I did not speak a word of French. I had no option but to take up the challenge and do what I had to. I was thrown into the deep end of the pool and simply had to figure out how to swim if I did not want to drown. I did not get anything easy, and, in hindsight, I am glad it was that way. Eventually, my one year in Paris became five! 

    Since my formative professional years were spent overseas, my work experience in both the US and in Europe shaped me enormously and provided insights on how to work which now, over decades, are part of my DNA! My clients reinforced that transparency is key when advising and it is best to be direct, without providing circuitous or ambiguous counsel. Eventually, we must remember they act on our recommendations, relying on our expertise. Plus, there is always a human impact as eventually people implement. So, it is crucial to understand the ramifications of what we say, when we say, and how we say. The work environment coupled with the commitment and diligence towards the tiniest of matters made me realize that regardless of the country, some key fundamentals are global: work hard truly, honestly with the key objective of securing the best result for your client and it will not evade you. All my lessons, professional learnings and value systems garnered from my clients, peers and seniors from around the globe always pointed to one thing only – work hard and the results will come. I suppose it is the age-old wisdom from the Bhagavad Gita. I firmly subscribe to the view that there are no shortcuts to success. Let your work speak for you and do not look for excuses. 

    Congratulations on being named “Woman Lawyer of the Year – India & Middle East” and the recipient of the “Mayre Rasmussen Award” for promoting gender equality. How do these accolades impact your commitment to gender sensitization, women empowerment and equality within the legal profession? 

    Thank you very much. Of course, I am very grateful, but the accolades came much later. Legal awards are a relatively recent development, while I have been personally, deeply committed to the advancement and nurturing of women lawyers in India since I returned to set up the practice. As a first-generation woman lawyer, setting my own firm in the late 90s was a huge challenge in every aspect, be it law firm management, execution of work, finding and training teams. Slowly, but surely, I wanted to try to make a difference and help in gender sensitization, women empowerment and equality. The legal profession is changing so rapidly everywhere, Indian women need to be equipped to handle the change and how the future is likely to impact their practice, be it of solo practitioners in courts or within law firms or in-house positions. While the education system has undergone a change, and the information highway is at everyone’s fingertips, yet most prospective lawyers are unprepared for life with the law. This requires more practical courses and skillful use of interns. All of us who are experienced at the Bar need to contribute to bring about that transformation. There is a dire need to focus on professional development, which must be matched by a desire to grow as well by women protagonists. 

    I think it is essential to focus on the reasons why organizations should create sustainability for women in the legal profession. There should be strategies in place for nurturing our own careers and those of the women following us. I have looked at this issue often, both in India and overseas.  It is essential to address the issues from a positive perspective and focus on what women lawyers can and should do to participate in their own success and the success of those who follow them. Despite a lot of progress in the law firm world, we still have “miles to go.” I could articulate more, but I think these are enough for the moment. After over three and half decades in the law, I feel the legal world needs to be more open to change as we come together to share experiences and aid in finding solutions at a local, national and even transborder level. 

    You’ve authored books and contributed to various publications. How does thought leadership play a role in shaping discussions on legal issues, and what motivated you to share your insights through books?

    So, for me, as a first gen lawyer in an era where technology had not really evolved, I had to devise ways and means to showcase my capabilities while building a practice. Writing came naturally to me. Plus, while navigating through the labyrinth of varied laws, regulations, guidelines, I would often be flummoxed at the lack of clarity, even amongst those who implemented those laws. The challenge was always to find answers in simple words. As a result, I thought writing and publishing would be a tool to demonstrate subject matter knowledge plus say it in a manner which would be easy for the reader to understand.  I still feel the same. 

    As a Board member of the International Technology Law Association, how do you see the intersection of technology and law evolving, and what legal challenges and opportunities do you anticipate in this space?

    I firmly believe whether we like it or not, rapid developments in technology have changed and are continuing to change how people consume, interact, play and work. Like it or not, AI, Big Data, blockchain, cybersecurity, Fintech, IoT, privacy are here to stay and an integral part of daily lives. 

    While government policies will influence the direction of technological developments, laws and regulations will undoubtedly need to match and address the new reality. Some people fear developments in the foregoing areas will somehow replace human interactions and, eventually, make us shed our human persona. Others believe these innovations will benefit humanity and help solve many problems of today and potentially of the future. As companies navigate through these changes and await effective enforcement of new legislation, one key challenge is how to gear up for the future and the need to formulate internal rules that comply with strictest global standards in place in other parts of the world or wait to match with local requirements. Legislating and regulating developing technologies is complex, and it becomes way more complex when crossing borders. A balance between global and local rules with some degree of self-regulation will be the need of the hour. Another problem is legislation can take far too long. Look what happened to the Digital Personal Data Protection Act and the number of years and iterations it has taken to pass this law. More than 4.5 months after the DPDP Act was passed, we still await the rules. In the tech world, this feels like eternity. Finally, I want to touch on cybercrime and data breaches which have grown exponentially even when compared with the start of the pandemic. A systemic threat of cybersecurity risks is the talk of most boardrooms. But while awareness is growing many directors simply are unsure if they have the information and tools to effectively handle today’s dangers. The massive digital transformation requires robust cybersecurity and privacy laws. The Indian government must put in place far more effective mechanisms to regulate cybersecurity and cybercrime effectively. 

    Can you share a particularly challenging or memorable deal you’ve worked on? How did you navigate complexities to ensure a successful outcome? 

    There are many that come to mind, but I will talk about one. I was in Europe for business and had to travel to the US for client meetings. Meanwhile, the Iraq war started which led to companies imposing travel embargoes. I had a tricky transaction that was to close later that week in Delhi. The business and legal team of the client wanted me to travel to India but I had commitments. I managed to convince them to let me stick to my travel schedule, and committed that I would be available to work with my team and the other side according to Indian time that week to ensure closing occurs timely. They agreed. As I was about to board the plane for New York, I got a call from my colleague in Delhi who said there was a problem, which was really an issue of the counterparty. They realized and announced at the last minute, but the effect was the deal could be in jeopardy. We needed to inform the client, and I had to board my transatlantic flight. Oh, and the colleague was to wrap up work on this file and then leave for her wedding, which was 2 weeks later. I felt the flight from London to New York was crawling and just felt helpless due to lack of knowledge. Eventually, I succumbed and asked for a satellite phone, rang my office in Delhi and got all the facts. I knew the client would be unhappy to hear of the developments. Upon landing in NY, I connected with the business and legal people at the client where one was ready to call off the whole thing, while the other wanted to proceed. 

    The problem was that we needed regulatory intervention, and it is always tough to predict the duration a government agency may take. So, there were several moving pieces, and we had no idea how long the closing could take. I told the client if they wanted to proceed, I would find a solution. I canceled my meetings in the US for the next few days, went to a travel agent and bought a ticket to fly to India. I must have been in the US for 5 hours from landing to heading again to the airport. I returned to Delhi as fast as I could, went directly to the office and stayed there for a week. We delayed the closing by a few days, drafted additional contracts to address the new developments which were negotiated each night between 10 PM to 2 AM and, finally, managed to get to the finishing line a week after the original scheduled date. It was tough both physically and mentally as I did not sleep for 3 or 4 days at all but worked non-stop. The satisfaction of a successful outcome with all sides happy was the adrenalin rush that kept us all going!   

    Juggling a dynamic legal career and contributing to various committees and associations can be challenging. How do you maintain balance in your professional and personal life? Any hobbies or activities that you turn to for relaxation?

    Balance does not come easy for anyone, and it needs both method and time and for long-term gains, it is important to cultivate resilience. I meditate regularly, read, take time out for fitness, and find periods of silence, all of which is therapeutic. Then, my closest childhood friends are my rocks and always there for me, when I need to talk. I also think it is essential to create boundaries, personal and professional. I never did that for the longest time when I was building the firm, but I encourage all my colleagues to do so and do so myself as well now. 

    Looking ahead, how do you perceive the future of legal practice, especially considering the evolving dynamics of international business and technological advancements? What advice would you give to the coming generation of lawyers? 

    The legal landscape is at a very interesting phase undergoing rapid and radical change.  Boundaries have blurred with digital and technology transformation. Then, competition has increased exponentially, putting pressure on firms and lawyers to be increasingly open to innovation. While the legal industry is known for sticking to tradition but for practices to thrive, lawyers must be aligned with developments in technology and emerging areas of practice, focus on building skills and learn effective, consistent communication, both internal and external. Never forget clients demand efficiency, transparency, personalized service. I firmly believe lawyers have the potential to seize challenges and convert them to opportunities.

    Get in touch with Priti Suri-

  • “The more diverse your practice areas are the better it is for you and your growth” – A Global Trailblazer in Wealth Management Solutions, Varun Kalsi, Global Head of Legal & Business Solutions, Lighthouse Canton

    “The more diverse your practice areas are the better it is for you and your growth” – A Global Trailblazer in Wealth Management Solutions, Varun Kalsi, Global Head of Legal & Business Solutions, Lighthouse Canton

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    Varun, it’s a pleasure to have you for this interview. Could you please introduce yourself and share a bit about your journey and your current role as the Global Head of Legal and Business Solutions at Lighthouse Canton? 

    Thank you for inviting me for this interview. I began my legal career back in 2007-08. Predominantly, I have always been a law firm lawyer before joining Lighthouse Canton as their Global Head of Legal and Business Solutions. I would bifurcate my career into two parts wherein the first part was spent at Dua Associates where I began as an Associate and continued for almost a decade. Thereafter, I was a Partner at PSA Legal Counsellors, and Desai & Diwanji, respectively. At Lighthouse Canton, I oversee the legal function, which is self-explanatory. The other function that I oversee is business solutions, which is essentially at the heart of the wealth management business of Lighthouse Canton, which has 2 main businesses wealth and asset management. While legal has a broad range and would cover arrangements on asset management, HR and myriad other areas across the organisation, business solutions cater to HNIs and UHNIs who are on the lookout for niche tax/other structuring solutions, setting up an offshore family office, flipping their current structure, succession planning solutions and so on.

    Varun, you pursued your Master of Laws (LLM) at NYU in New York and now hold a prominent position in Singapore. How did your education in the U.S. influence your career path, and what prompted your move to Singapore? 

    Education in the US is an incredibly enlightening experience. Not only is the method of instruction different from that in India or England, but the culture and approach towards education per se are distinct. The focus is on discussion, rationale, understanding and analysis, and your age or current vocation does not matter. There is no limitation to acquiring or enhancing one’s skill set. Ideally, I would have liked to work in the US for some time at least. But as they say, man proposes and God disposes. Shortly after I began my LLM program the world was hit by something called the subprime mortgage crisis, a global recessionary situation wherein the US was the epicentre of this economic earthquake, and I was one of those right in the middle of it. That apart, the US, especially New York, teaches you a lot about life in general. One of those things is self-reliance or sufficiency. If you are open to the idea, you could discover yourself in such a situation. Let’s face it. The LLM program at a premium varsity abroad is expensive for the average person. So, one would like to procure a work opportunity in the US to obtain exposure and recover the hefty tuition unless one manages a scholarship. The latter was on my agenda, but that discussion is for another day, I guess. Law firms in the US are extremely professional. Thus, even rejections to my request for placement were kindly worded and came to me in sealed envelopes. Other than the fact that you are away from home/family, an existing economic crisis only has a compounding effect on one’s self-esteem. However, sometimes, such a situation only makes one stronger, and it’s not in my DNA to give up easily. Thus, I took everything with a pinch of salt and made my way back to India. To clarify, Singapore was not on my agenda then. 

    Can you share insights into adapting to the legal and business environment in Asia after your experiences in the U.S.? 

    Honestly, the first time I thought about Singapore as a place where I could work and live was when I was transiting from Singapore for a holiday in 2015. The layover was longer than usual for some reason, so we opted for the free city tour that Singapore Airlines does from the Changi airport. It is an interesting tour for someone who has never been to Singapore. I had already been here twice and thought that I was aware of the city, but things were to change. The island country had changed a lot from the days when Orchard Road was the city centre and the Merlion stood tall at Sentosa. Now, there was a thriving central business district at Raffles Place/Collyer Quay and the city had transformed itself in more ways than one. So, yes, the thought did cross my mind, but I was too preoccupied with what I was already doing so I did not follow through. It was only in 2021-22, when the opportunity with Lighthouse Canton came along that I put my mind to it and began a detailed investigation into the possibility of moving to Singapore. Singapore and the US are very different from each other. One of the major factors is the sheer size, demographics, and population of the respective countries. There is no second-guessing about Singapore’s position as the financial hub of Southeast Asia. Further, the law and order promulgation, enforcement, political stability, and swift and efficient judiciary make it a force to reckon with not only in Asia but also in the world. As Singapore is a common law country, the basic structure of all laws is like other common law countries with subtle nuances to the same. The banking and finance industry is at the centre stage and almost all global corporations and conglomerates have a significant presence here. Honestly, the pressure to deliver never changes if you take your work seriously and have the desire to grow personally and professionally. So, while there could be a difference in approach, there is no compromise on quality. 

    You’ve had a diverse and extensive career, ranging from private practice at law firms to your current global leadership role. How has your journey, including experiences at Desai & Diwanji, Priti Suri & Associates, and Dua Associates, shaped your approach to legal and business solutions? 

    It has been a rather interesting journey wherein I have worked with two large firms and one boutique law firm. I began my career at Dua Associates, so a large part of my initial learnings came from here. I was fortunate to report to a senior partner with rich experience behind him. While that meant that expectations were always high, I had the opportunity to learn, sometimes by simply observing my senior and some other times by asking the right questions of him. One needs to understand that this process necessarily involves unbiased introspection as otherwise, you will not be able to upskill, improve yourself and identify the chinks in your armour. Further, another important thing is to know what to learn and imbibe and what not to. Of course, that comes with experience, age, and wisdom. By the time I was at PSA, I was relatively senior and joined them as a partner. Also, as it is a boutique law firm, the manner of operations was very different from that at Dua Associates. However, as we were a lean team, everyone put that extra effort to make things happen and sometimes the energy you create in such situations is contagious to others too. It was here that I unlearned some of the things that I had learnt as I identified and learnt some things that were better and contemporary than what I was accustomed to previously. One needs to appreciate that learning is a continuous process and one must continue to upskill themselves and sync with the present. While I had already begun the process of developing my own book, it was at PSA, that I shifted gears and opened my mind to different possibilities at work. Working at both these wonderful organizations gave me an insight into setups that were traditional and a heady mix of modern and traditional. My last law firm stint before Lighthouse Canton was at D&D, wherein I worked closely with the other partners. So, yes, I was back to a large law firm setup but the manner of functioning of the organization was again distinct from what I had seen in my earlier firms. As I said, the learning never stops. One needs to be a good observer and listener to identify what should be done and also what should not be done in a particular situation. Working at these firms was an enriching experience that shaped my career for the better and made me a better lawyer and a person.     

    As the Global Head of Legal & Business Solutions, you provide legal support to wealth and asset management businesses. How do you strike a balance between addressing legal intricacies and facilitating business solutions, especially in the wealth management sector? 

    Interestingly, there is an overlap between the legal and business solutions functions. As mentioned earlier, business solutions involve providing structuring solutions to HNIs/UHNIs, that are tax efficient. Further, a client may have successional planning requirements, which is akin to private client practice at law firms. At Lighthouse Canton, the main difference is that client requirements will typically mostly be at a global level, unlike a law firm wherein you may still engage in domestic mandates and transactions. Also, at law firms, we would typically engage a local counsel when catering to the laws of a foreign jurisdiction. However, with business solutions, there is an expectation to have a preliminary handle on foreign laws too. For instance, one will have to examine legal regimes across jurisdictions to appreciate the tax impact for a particular client. It is pertinent to note that this will change depending on the situation, objectives, and asset locations of a client. Similarly, succession planning solutions will also require us to assess the best option available globally, to address a client’s needs and objectives. Of course, we will engage with local advisers as and when necessary. Thus, it is fair to say that my legal background is critical in enabling me to deliver requisite solutions to our wealth management clientele.

    Your role involves executing wealth management pitches for UHNI prospects, including conglomerates and founders. Can you share an interesting experience or a successful pitch that stands out in your memory? 

    There have been many such experiences that are worth remembering or mentioning. But one needs to understand that a pitch to provide a solution becomes even more interesting where there is interplay between multiple jurisdictions, or where there is some uncertainty in applicable laws. A classical situation that arose some time ago was when we were prospecting a conglomerate for setting up its family office in Singapore. For this purpose, the prospect would make overseas direct investment/ODI from India under the new route for operating companies in India, as introduced by the legislature in August 2022. Interestingly, while on paper, which is also backed by a law firm’s opinion, this route is still available, practically it is not possible due to certain informal communication to authorised dealer banks, who are no longer willing to allow remittance through this new route. Again, this is one amongst several instances that have been extremely intriguing and interesting.

    Among the diverse legal projects, you’ve been involved in, is there one that stands out as your favourite? What made it particularly memorable or rewarding? 

    This is a tough one. I have been party to many and it is hard to place a finger on anyone. However, let me share one of them for our audience. The thing in legal practice is that favourites will change with time. This is so because at a later point in time, hopefully, one will be more experienced/skilled and the same thing that was interesting once may appear mundane now. In a particular instance, I met someone for a business development meeting at their office. We spoke for an hour about various businesses and issues that the group was involved with and areas where I could help the organization. The meeting was with the CEO himself. About a week after our meeting, he sent me a text saying I liked what you told me about securing our group’s IP. Let’s begin with that and see where we go. From there, I ended up assisting the promoter on their private client matters and other issues that the group was facing from time to time. Even today, I am in touch with the gentleman and my highest reward is not the billing that happened but the faith he reposed in me in executing different kinds of tasks for the group. I am ecstatic that I earned a person while earning my livelihood.

    Outside of the legal realm, what are your personal interests or hobbies that bring you joy and relaxation? How do you unwind from the complexities of legal leadership? 

    Now we are talking. I love my music, food, outdoor sports, and spending time with family including my extended family and specifically, my grandparents. I firmly believe that one should not forget that later our grandparents and parents will need us just the way we needed them earlier (and still do). As an aside, I am agnostic to the genre/kind of music or food as the music should sound nice and the food should taste good.

    In your career, you’ve worked across various legal domains, from general corporate to private client and intellectual property laws. How has this diversity contributed to your skills, and what advice do you have for legal professionals looking to diversify their practice? 

    Interestingly, nowadays most law firms have lawyers who operate in silos in terms of practice areas. While that can be a good thing for some practice areas, for some others, it is my view, that it inhibits growth. So, if you have the choice to diversify your practice areas, please do. However, keeping in mind how most law firms will have specific practice area-based departments, it makes sense to bifurcate your skill sets between your core areas and those that move around them. This is crucial from most large law firm’s perspective. Interestingly, in a smaller law firm (and some larger ones too), or in-house role, the more diverse your practice areas are the better it is for you and your growth. While it makes sense to augment your skill set, you must choose your areas wisely both in terms of your core areas and the then prevailing trends and opportunities.

    As we conclude, we’d love to hear your perspective on the importance of continuous learning in the legal profession. How do you stay updated on industry developments, and what role does ongoing education play in your career? 

    As I have already acknowledged, learning is indeed a continuous process. Personally, I keep my eyes and ears open concerning anything that affects my current work profile, or that may otherwise have any relation to the same. As you would appreciate, with the global role, my canvas is quite large. So, I need to keep painting when the opportunity arises while the canvas keeps on expanding itself. We also indulge in external trainings, that can enable us to improve our work and knowledge especially those in relation to Lighthouse Canton’s wealth management business. Thus, ongoing learning and education are critical for my functions.

    Get in touch with Varun Kalsi-

  • “I appeal to the young lawyers to have an empathetic and humane approach with integrity towards the downtrodden and poor litigants for whom lawyer is the only hope to fight for justice for him/her”- Sudeep Vijayan, Independent Legal Practitioner

    “I appeal to the young lawyers to have an empathetic and humane approach with integrity towards the downtrodden and poor litigants for whom lawyer is the only hope to fight for justice for him/her”- Sudeep Vijayan, Independent Legal Practitioner

    This Interview has been published by Pragya Chandni and and The SuperLawyer Team

    Can you share with us your journey into the field of law, from your decision to pursue it as a career to your experience at Hidayatullah National Law University and GGSIPU for your LL.M. and your recent decision to enrol for a Ph. D. program with IIULER?

    First of all, I would take this opportunity to thank Superlawyer for this interview and convey my deep appreciation for this endeavour as it could offer your young readers some valuable insights while planning their life around law as a career. 

    Addressing  the first part of your question on deciding to pursue law as a career; I would like to tell you that  I was a student of Physics, Chemistry and Biology up to 12th standard; and had no family member into active  legal practice, but I think my flair for languages and my father’s inspiration who despite being a serving Army officer ; pursued Law. Since my scoring in languages had remained stable throughout my school career, the orientation classes helped in getting an insight into the field of law. Thereafter, after completion of my 12th Std, I cleared entrance examinations for Hidayatullah National Law University, Raipur (HNLU) and Army Institute of Law, Mohali (AIL) in the year 2003. I decided to continue with HNLU. HNLU was established in the year 2003, and I could become a part of its 1st Batch having passed out in the year 2008. The State of Chhattisgarh was established in the year 2001, so our batch had a unique distinction of being from a new university in a newly established state, which had its own challenges but, it soon turned into opportunities for all my batchmates. 

    Now coming to the second part of the question; I would like to say that the professional work environment of a career in law is quite dynamic which entails frequent changes in laws, new legislations, delegated legislations etc. I have always believed that life in general and Law in particular is an ongoing process of learning; one needs to keep a tab on new developments to keep oneself updated and the grasp the diversity of knowledge. I, thus, completed my LL.M in Corporate Law from USLLS, IP University, Delhi during 2014-16 and currently pursuing a Ph.D. from India International University for Legal Education & Research, Goa (IIULER), on the topic of ‘Food packaging and food Contact materials’ and its Regulatory & Legal Standards in India’. IIULER is designated as the 1st International University for Law in India and is an initiative of Bar Council of India Trust-Pearl First.    

    You have a diverse career path, including working with ZEUS Law Associates, KPMG, and the Ministry of Finance. How did these experiences shape your expertise in tax law and advocacy?

    Law as a profession has always intrigued me with its depth and ambit and I have always wanted to explore the diverse verticals that it encompasses. During the final stages of college education, drawing inspiration from revered names in law practice i.e. Sh. Nani Palkhiwala & Sh. Harish Salve had both started their respective careers in the field of taxation. I was deeply inspired to take-up tax as a career option despite the general trend being to opt for court practice, corporate practice or capital markets. Despite being involved in matters of significant constitutional issues having national and international repercussions, they are still considered doyens of tax practice. My professional journey commenced with the tax team at Zeus Law Associates, New Delhi followed by KPMG. Both these stints gave me incredible insights into tax as an area of practice coupled with much desired cross-country work exposure. I had also learnt the importance of working with professionals from different disciplines, since it involved working with Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, Architects etc. These interactions gave me immense insight into overall working of ‘business transactions’ and added incredible value in my growth as a lawyer. From early part of 2013, I had ventured into independent practice and started to take-up matters in other areas of law in addition to my continued work in tax. Hence, I would encourage young graduates to bear in their mind that life shall always give you avenues to earn and learn. As long as you are able to identify those avenues which can catapult you and enhance your own sense of individuality, you should choose them over anything else no matter what the costs. I don’t intend to sermonise this but, if one were to practically see within the legal profession and perhaps medical profession too, there are no defined career progression or milestones which more or less exists for other professions. It’s all upto an individual about how one intends to lead his life. Hence, as and when one is able to identify an avenue of personal growth, one must prioritise it and seize the opportunity and work towards enhancing one’s skill set. Please understand that, skill set doesn’t really mean ‘legal skills’ alone it also means honing-up ‘life skills’ and can be as simple as one’s ‘ability to listen’, ‘time-management’, ‘language’ etc. It is for a reason that, law as a career lacks any entry age or retirement age as in life there is no specific age or stage for learning.  

    Could you tell us more about your role in formulating key proposals and legislative drafting for the Ministry of Finance? What were some of the most significant challenges you faced in this role?

    I have had the opportunity to work as a Consultant with the Ministry of Finance, Department of Economic Affairs, Govt. of India in 2016-17. This assignment entailed exploring the arena of legislative drafting and policy making for the said Department. This entailed attending stakeholder’s consultation process, undertaking research, preparing notes from legal standpoint, and drafting of statutory legislations, amendments, circulars etc. as desired by the said Department.  I can definitely say that it was quite an enriching experience. It gave me a bird’s eye view regarding the functioning of various securities laws in India and how policy making by the Departments tries to respond to challenges and concerns faced by the stakeholders and the public at large.        

    Co-founding Integricon Consultancy Services (ICS) is a significant milestone in your career. Can you share the motivation behind starting ICS & ILO and how it has evolved to offer comprehensive consultancy solutions?

    The basic idea behind ICS is to bring the concept of seamless cross-practice experience to clients. As a result, myself and two other partners were able to establish ICS in the year 2020 as a one stop consultancy service solution for clients. So as to provide these consultancy services, we have a bouquet of professionals from myriad walks of life viz., bureaucrats, lawyers, chartered accountants, cost accountants, economists, engineers, technocrats and company secretaries. ICS engages with various Companies, PSU’s etc. for meeting their consultancy, research and training needs.  

    In addition to the same, we had established Integricon Law Offices (‘ILO’) as a full-service Law firm for legal services and as a think tank for research and legal services. The think tank works on various vacuum areas of anticipated legislation world over and elucidates various situations from a legal standpoint involved.  On the legal services side, the ILO focuses on litigation practice, corporate practice and tax & regulatory practice. I personally look after the tax and regulatory practice including Food Safety and Standards Act, Legal Metrology Act, NMC Act & related Rules etc.      

    As someone with extensive experience in the legal field, what advice would you offer to fresh graduates who are just starting their careers in law? What skills and strategies do you believe are essential for success in the legal profession?

    All fresh graduates should journal their life and professional experiences. This would not only assist them to traverse through a career in law but also make them mindful of their respective professional/ life environment that they are a part of. This would allow them an opportunity to evaluate their respective strengths and weaknesses. Law offers myriad career choices. Thus, in addition to these career choices, a graduate should also try and develop a sectoral focus by integrating technical knowledge and expertise and not merely restrict to the nature and kind of work coming their way. After all, apart from professional journey it’s a life journey as well hence, both needs separate prioritising. In a lighter vein, I can only say that in this world of T20 cricket, a career in law practice is a like that of a Test Match wherein after surviving a few testing sessions the playing conditions are bound to get better. Hence, it’s all about staying put on the crease while trying to be the best player version of oneself alongside. 

    It is famously said about lawyers that they have this unique capacity to do what common people might find boring. Therefore, so as to answer your question, fresh graduates who are at the stage of commencement of their careers need to really hone up their capacity to pay attention to details. Moreover, no work should yield satisfaction unless there is an internal assessment of whether one has performed to the best of their capacity on a given day. Late Nani Palkhiwala had mentioned that, graduates coming out of law colleges should not be ‘ethical literates’ and they should inculcate a greater sense of understanding about public good hence, it is important for graduates to develop a public character while pursuing a career in law.

    For the lawyers/ young law graduates who aspire to take to court practice, my only advice is to be a keen practitioner who can challenge and alter his/her own thought process every day on settled legal propositions as per human and societal needs because that helps civilisations grow into a certain direction. Also, I appeal to the young lawyers to have an empathetic and humane approach with integrity towards the downtrodden and poor litigants for whom lawyer is the only hope to fight for justice for him/her. 

    In the end, I would like to once again thank Superlawyer for their initiative which has afforded me an opportunity to try to put my perspective on law as a multifaceted profession before the younger lawyers of the country.  

    Get in touch with Sudeep Vijayan-

  • “From Corporate Law in India to Shaping US Policies: A Journey of Resilience and Advocacy”- In an illuminating interview, Samar Jha, Government Affairs Director at AARP shares his remarkable journey.

    “From Corporate Law in India to Shaping US Policies: A Journey of Resilience and Advocacy”- In an illuminating interview, Samar Jha, Government Affairs Director at AARP shares his remarkable journey.

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    To start, could you please introduce yourself to our readers, providing a glimpse into your professional journey and the pivotal moments that shaped your career?

    I am Samar Jha, a government affairs and advocacy professional working for American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) in Washington D.C. and I lead the state and local housing advocacy for our organization. In my previous role, I was a corporate lawyer in India, having worked in a few of the big law firms in New Delhi, India. I think every professional experience I have had has contributed to my development as a professional. My academic experience in NALSAR coupled with my legal training at law firms has contributed immensely to my government affairs work. I also have to say that my time at University of Pennsylvania (Penn) at the law school (Penn Law) and at the Fels Institute of Government (Fels) was pivotal as it provided me with a massive boost to my work in the US. It took me time to finally find my niche, but I think I am now at a position where I can safely say that I love what I am doing.  

    You’ve navigated through various roles, from law firms to the City Council and now AARP. What motivated your transition from legal practice to government affairs, and how have these diverse experiences shaped your approach to advocacy?

    It has been a fascinating journey for me. After working as a corporate lawyer for close to 6 years, I took a break to study at Penn Law. After my LLM, I was looking to do something different other than corporate law, subsequently, in 2015 I applied for a public policy fellowship at the Philadelphia City Council President’s office. I was lucky to be accepted as a fellow. At that time, I was the first foreign trained lawyer to be accepted as a fellow. That was the pivotal moment in my professional career, as I fell in love with public policy work. I got to work on issues ranging from criminal justice reform to housing issues. It was a wide range of public policy issues that I had the privilege of working on. At the end of my fellowship, I was recommended for a position of Director of Government and Public Affairs at the Greater Philadelphia Association of Realtor® (GPAR), which is a trade association in Philadelphia. I was lucky to get that position, which allowed me to do advocacy and government affairs at the city level and sometimes at the state level due to Philadelphia’s importance in the state of Pennsylvania. While I was working at GPAR, I also got my Master of Public Administration (MPA) at Fels. All these experiences provided me a solid grounding on US public policy and advocacy work. And then in November 2020, I joined AARP as their Government Affairs Director, where I oversee the state and local housing advocacy for our 53 state offices. 

    Your work at GPAR included advocacy at the city and state level.  Could you share some insights into your work at GPAR?

    As I had mentioned GPAR is a trade association that advocates for policies in relation to the real estate industry. As the lead advocacy person at GPAR, I was responsible for tracking legislation that pertained to our industry. I was tasked to review or draft legislation, provide adequate amendments, and/or negotiate legislation on behalf of the association. I was in touch with lawmakers and their staff to discuss the proposed bills. Invariably the work involved, making sure the legislation that eventually is signed into law does minimum harm to our members and residents of the City of Philadelphia. At GPAR, I also was tasked to work on political campaigns and work on fundraising for our political action committee (PAC). 

    With degrees from NALSAR, University of Pennsylvania Law School, and the Fels Institute of Government, your education has been diverse and extensive. How have these academic experiences contributed to your professional roles, especially in the areas of government affairs and public policy?

    I always credit NALSAR, Penn Law, and Fels for providing me with a great foundation to my career. My time at NALSAR afforded me an opportunity to work at some great law firms in India, which provided me with the legal application, which I still use. Penn Law was instrumental in providing me the grounding on US Law and how the legal system works. And having passed the NY State Bar exam, I am hoping to be registered as an Attorney in the state of New York by the end of 2024. Lastly, a huge credit goes to Fels Institute of Government for getting me acclimated to the US public policy and advocacy arena. Each of these institutions have been instrumental in my life as a professional, and I will always be very grateful for that. 

    Your role as the Government Affairs Director at AARP is pivotal. Could you share some insights into your responsibilities and the impact you aim to make in this position, particularly in the context of housing advocacy and policies for Americans aged 50 and older?

    While at GPAR, my work was geographically limited to Philadelphia. Whereas my role at AARP dramatically increased. AARP is a member-based organization that advocates for policies that improve quality of life for all ages, especially for older adults (typically 50+). It is the United States largest member organization with nearly 38 million members. AARP has 53 state offices (50 states and offices in Washington D.C., Puerto Rico, and American Virgin Islands). I am tasked to lead AARP’s local and state housing advocacy, which means I work with state offices on their housing advocacy. States offices reach out to me regarding legislation to be reviewed, provide adequate legislative language that protects our interest, or draft complete legislative text that can be shared with their respective lawmakers. It is interesting how your legal training tends to be so useful in government affairs work. I always say advocacy and government affairs is very similar to being a corporate lawyer. As a corporate lawyer, you work on strategy, drafting, and negotiation. That is exactly what you do in advocacy, as you strategize your legislative work, and then assist in drafting legislation, and it ends with negotiating with lawmakers and other stakeholders to pass an optimal legislation. Similar to clients in law firms, I treat my state offices my clients and try to provide the best quality service that I can. 

    Lastly, in addition to helping state offices, I am also invited to speak at various conferences and panel discussions at the local, state, and national level to discuss our housing policy and advocacy work. This is an important aspect of my work, as we try to engage with as many stakeholders as possible, because any legislative work, in the end, cannot be accomplished alone and needs allies and coalition members to cross the finish line. So, in a nutshell, that is what I do for AARP.       

    As the Co-Chair of the Young Professionals Committee for the World Heritage City Celebration in 2022, how did you contribute to the event, and what significance does preserving global heritage hold for you personally?

    This was one of my favorite volunteering experiences. I was invited by the Global Philadelphia Association (GPA) to be the co-chair of the Young Professionals Committee for the World Heritage City Celebration in 2022. In 2015, GPA was successful in getting Philadelphia recognized as the first World Heritage City in the nation by the Organization of World Heritage Cities. GPA organizes this event every year to celebrate Philadelphia’s World Heritage Status and raise Philadelphia’s international profile and inspire a new level of local heritage recognition and activity. Along with my co-chair Toyin Ogunfolaju, we fundraised for the event, as well as being featured on videos to raise the profile of the event. We also welcomed the attendees at the event, and we were lucky to be part of the team that welcomed Ali Velshi, MSNBC anchor and the main draw of the event. Lastly, I love the city of Philadelphia, as I owe a lot to the city, so being part of the celebration was special to me. 

    You’ve received several awards and recognitions, such as the Audrey Miller Poritzky Award for Leadership. How do you balance professional achievement with your commitment to community service and leadership roles?

    It was a pleasant surprise to be awarded the Audrey Miller Portizky Award for Leadership by the Fels Institute of Government. This was during my second year of my MPA program. My wife (Anjali Chainani) and I believe it is important to give back. For example, many people advised and mentored us while we were coming up during our career. Hence, our way of giving back is to mentor young professionals and hoping they will do the same for the next person. So, we do try to volunteer our time to things we believe in. I am part of the Penn Alumni Ambassador program where I get to have conversations with prospective undergraduate student applicants about their experience and my Penn experience. More recently, I was appointed to City of Philadelphia Mayor-Elect Cherelle Parker’s Transition team for Housing, Planning, and Development. The purpose of the transition committee is to come together and recommend plans and policies that the Mayor-Elect Parker can undertake for the city when she takes oath as the 100th and the first female Mayor of Philadelphia in January 2024. Fortunately, Anjali was also asked to serve on another transition committee. Therefore, as I mentioned, we try to give our time to causes that we believe in.   

    Outside of your professional life, what hobbies or personal interests do you engage in to unwind and find inspiration? How do these activities contribute to your overall well-being?

    Anjali and I are avid cyclists. We love doing long distance cycling and try to go on the long cycling trails that Philadelphia and its suburbs have to offer. We also try to plan our vacations that involve cycling. Especially, if we are in a new country, we typically like cycling and going through the country. It is a great way of seeing parts of the country you may not see while driving. More recently, we were cycling through the Bavarian Alps in Germany and Austria.

    Cycling helps us not only stay fit but also Anjali and I can spend time doing something we enjoy a lot. Both of us get busy with work and travel, therefore, it is important to take out time for ourselves and cycling together helps in doing that. 

    Navigating a career as dynamic as yours surely comes with challenges. Can you share some significant obstacles you’ve faced along the way and how you overcame them, offering any lessons for those aspiring to follow a similar path?

    I have had my share of ups and downs in my professional career. Life after NALSAR looked easy, as I was able to earn a spot as an Associate in one of the biggest law firms in India. However, it took a toll on me mentally and physically. Moving to the US, I had to completely change my outlook towards networking. The way networking happens in India, at least when I was in India, is very different from how it is done in the US. I had to learn how to network for myself, which is not something I did in India, and it took some funny and embarrassing moments before I could find myself in the rooms where I belong. So, when I decided to pursue a policy position in the US, I had to start from scratch. Imagine, being an Indian, working as an advocacy and government affairs professional in a country like the US, and in one of the biggest cities in the country. Initially, I was non-existent for people, and no one knew who I was. I had to go through the grind of proving myself firstly, through my work and then through networking. I always tell upcoming professionals that, let your work product speak for you first before you want the person in front of you to engage with you.   

    As we conclude, we would love to hear your thoughts on the current state and future trajectory of government affairs and advocacy. What trends or developments do you foresee shaping these fields, and how can professionals prepare for the evolving landscape?

    Government Affairs and advocacy is an ever-changing field of work. One must be very aware of, among other things, the political climate at the local, state, and federal level, the legal system, and the stakeholders in your issues. Whenever I talk to students, I explain the process of an idea becoming law. It starts with an idea, which people start talking in conferences and forums, and then policy is developed, which is used to draft a legislation, and is negotiated between stakeholders, and is deliberated in legislative chambers, and then it passes, eventually signed by the Executive. The process does not end there, as it needs to be implemented. Having said that, I think I have oversimplified the process a lot and it does not do justice to the field of work. Therefore, advocacy involves various parts, and students interested in entering the field of advocacy must be aware of the ever-changing aspects of the process. 

    In the US, government affairs and advocacy have rules, which are strictly governed by regulations at the local, state, and federal level. In India, government affairs and advocacy work are still evolving and need more codified legal requirements. When I was a law student in India, there weren’t many opportunities to enter policy and advocacy work apart from taking the UPSC exam and joining the Civil Services. However, currently there are some amazing policy think tanks in India and a lot of students are interested in pursuing policy work and it is very heartening to see more Indian law students willing to enter the field of policy and advocacy work. And I sincerely hope I get a chance to talk to policy and advocacy students in India as I would love to share the US advocacy perspective with them.  

    Get in touch with Samar Jha-

  • “Continuous learning, adaptability, seeking mentorship, and maintaining integrity are the keys to building a successful and fulfilling legal career” From In-House Counsel to India’s Top Lawyer – Nitin Jain, Partner at Agama Law Associates

    “Continuous learning, adaptability, seeking mentorship, and maintaining integrity are the keys to building a successful and fulfilling legal career” From In-House Counsel to India’s Top Lawyer – Nitin Jain, Partner at Agama Law Associates

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    Nitin, we are extremely delighted to have you with us for this interview. Could you please introduce yourself and share the key milestones in your professional journey that led you to become a Partner at Agama Law Associates?

    Corporate law firms are a testament to the spirit of finding lateral solutions. Being one of the partners managing an established yet ever-expanding corporate law practice, I embrace business agility and dynamism. And I think, serendipitously, every milestone in my professional journey set me up for it. 

    Even before ALA, I have seen legal problems not just through the lens of arguing notable cases, but also through strategic contributions, ultimately culminating in my current role. I was fortunate to wear both hats. It helps to see legal issues from 360 degrees which my role in the house lent itself to Day-to-day contractual and compliance issues, transactions as well as disputes going hand-in-hand at all times leaves very little to be overwhelmed with. Corporate systems are the added icing on cake, demonstrating how everything can be tackled so long as there are systems. On the other hand, being a practitioner I had a front row view to the action in court, the understanding of procedures, the art of drafting was absorbed from the best – the solicitor chambers. Everything has been imperative to now being capacitated to work out client solutions that are not half-baked or with gaps on the practical perspectives.     

    Your professional journey includes senior management positions in various industries, blending in-house and external legal counsel roles. How has this diverse experience shaped your approach to handling commercial disputes, compliance, and regulatory matters at Agama Law Associates?

    A lot of business has to do with expectation management, and there’s nothing better than watching the interplay of multiple sectors as one from within them, to understand various concerns. My journey as In-house Counsel working with logistics, automobiles, chemicals and nutraceutical industries has provided me with a holistic understanding of varied business dynamics. This, coupled with my legal expertise, enables me to approach commercial disputes, compliance, and regulatory matters at Agama Law Associates with a strategic and business-oriented mindset. I strive to align legal strategies with overarching business goals, fostering effective resolution.

    What can readers learn from your extensive experience navigating the international arbitration domain?

    Certainly, one standout moment was successfully representing a client in a high-stakes international arbitration. Navigating intricate cross-border legal nuances and securing a favorable outcome not only showcased the depth of my expertise but underscored the importance of meticulous preparation and a strategic approach in the realm of international arbitration and specially when we have not only got a favourable result for our clients but made a win -win for both parties, which made a memorable moment.

    Beyond your legal prowess, you’ve been acknowledged as India’s Super 50 Lawyer by Asian Legal Business and listed in the 100 Top Lawyer A-List by India Business Law Journal. How do you stay grounded amidst such accolades, and what role do these recognitions play in your professional journey?

    I remain cognizant of the fact that accolades are a reflection of collective efforts of the entire team and not of an individual. These recognitions also serve as reminders to stay committed to excellence and continuous learning. They reinforce the responsibility to uphold high standards in the legal profession and inspire me to contribute to the legal community at large with fostering a positive impact on clients.

    In your role at Agama Law Associates, you focus on developing legal strategies for corporate clients’ new ventures and acquisitions. How do you strike a balance between legal diligence and fostering business growth, especially in the context of complex corporate disputes?

    With Agama’s varied sector experience and having seen challenges for mid-size legal entities to large corporate’s, have a repository of the issues faced by the clients and providing them timely legal strategy and solutions, by anticipating their challenges I actively collaborate with stakeholders, aligning legal strategies with business objectives. This synergy ensures that corporate disputes are addressed strategically, promoting not only legal resilience but also contributing to the overall success and sustainable growth of our clients’ businesses.

    Your involvement as a speaker and author reflects your commitment to thought leadership. What drives you to share your insights, and how do you think such knowledge-sharing events contribute to the legal community’s growth?

    I’m driven to share insights because knowledge-sharing is integral to professional growth. By participating in speaking engagements and authoring content, I contribute to the collective wisdom of the legal community. These exchanges foster a culture of continuous learning, enabling practitioners to stay abreast of industry trends, best practices, and innovative approaches. Ultimately, such knowledge-sharing events serve as catalysts for the legal community’s growth, nurturing a dynamic and informed professional landscape.

    You’ve successfully handled cross-border disputes, insolvency restructuring, and business regulatory advisory. Can you share a challenging situation you’ve encountered in your career and the key strategies you employed to navigate it successfully?

    Cross-border disputes are challenging because of the web of regulatory intricacies – regulation is a fluid beast to foresee and plan for and when it involves international angles, it also weaves in inconsistencies between the approaches of the regulators of all jurisdictions involved. The only strategy that stands a chance is one which considers as many variables as is possible to imagine.  The starting point is always  a comprehensive risk assessment. And the fulcrum that drives the process forward to fruition is to engage in, and maintain, proactive communication with all stakeholders. Collaborating with international legal experts, we crafted a tailored resolution approach that factored in both legal and business considerations. This integrated strategy proved effective, leading to a successful resolution while minimizing potential regulatory hurdles and preserving the client’s business interests.

    Away from the legal arena, what are some of your personal hobbies or interests that provide a break from the complexities of your professional life? How do you unwind and recharge outside of work?

    Outside of work, I find solace in reading, particularly exploring diverse genres to broaden my perspective. Recently finished reading Atomic Habits by James Clear and How to Win Friends and Influence People by Dale Carnegie. Engaging in outdoor activities, whether it’s hiking or simply spending time in nature, helps me unwind and recharge. 

    Considering your extensive experience, what advice would you give to young legal professionals entering the industry today, especially those aspiring to build expertise in commercial disputes resolution and international arbitration?

    For young legal professionals entering the industry, my advice would be to cultivate a robust foundation in legal fundamentals while actively seeking diverse experiences. Patience and perseverance should be their Mantra, since there is no shortcut to success. Embrace continuous learning, stay abreast of industry and legal developments. Building expertise in commercial disputes resolution and international arbitration requires a combination of legal acumen covering various laws and a deep understanding of business dynamics. Actively seek mentorship and be adaptable to change. Lastly, maintain integrity, as it is the bedrock of a successful and fulfilling legal career.

    Get in touch with Nitin Jain-

  • The maxim “justice delayed is justice denied” encapsulates a critical issue within the Indian legal system that demands meticulous attention and reform – Dr. Anagh Mishra, Advocate-on-Record at the Supreme Court of India, unravels his remarkable journey from law student to a legal luminary

    The maxim “justice delayed is justice denied” encapsulates a critical issue within the Indian legal system that demands meticulous attention and reform – Dr. Anagh Mishra, Advocate-on-Record at the Supreme Court of India, unravels his remarkable journey from law student to a legal luminary

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    Dr. Anagh Mishra, your journey through the legal landscape, from the hallowed halls of ILS Law College to being an Advocate-on-Record at the Supreme Court, is quite intriguing. Can you share a memorable anecdote from your early days as a law student that still brings a smile to your face?

    Reflecting on my law college days, one standout memory that brings a profound sense of accomplishment is when the Placement Cell chose my CV to be the exemplar for the forthcoming batches. The announcement came as both a surprise and an honor, underscoring the meticulous effort I had invested in crafting a CV that not only showcased my achievements but also adhered to the highest professional standards.

    The recognition from the Placement Cell carried significant weight, knowing that my CV would be presented as the ideal template for fellow students navigating their own paths into the professional realm. It wasn’t just a personal triumph; it became an opportunity to contribute to the success of my peers and offer guidance through a tangible example.

    The experience highlighted the importance of attention to detail in the professional realm, emphasizing the impact a well-crafted CV can have on one’s career trajectory. This moment stands out as a testament to the collective growth and support within our academic community, shaping not only my journey but also contributing to the broader success of aspiring legal professionals.

    Your expertise spans areas like environmental activism, corporate laws, and intellectual property. How do you find harmony or balance between such diverse legal realms, and do you have a favorite area of practice among them?

    Navigating diverse legal realms such as environmental activism, corporate laws, and intellectual property requires a thoughtful approach to finding harmony and balance. One of the key strategies is to identify overreaching principles and interdisciplinary connections that exist among these areas.

    Environmental activism often intersects with corporate laws, especially in areas such as sustainability, compliance, and corporate social responsibility. Intellectual property, on the other hand, plays a crucial role in safeguarding innovations related to environmental technologies. Recognizing these interconnected threads allows for a more holistic understanding of the legal landscape. The intersection of IPR and environmental concerns has become increasingly crucial, particularly as technological innovations play a significant role in addressing environmental challenges, and that was primarily the issue addressed in my Ph.D. thesis.

    To maintain balance, I prioritize staying informed about the latest developments in each area through continuous learning and networking. It’s essential to understand the broader context in which legal issues arise and how they may impact multiple sectors simultaneously.

    As for having a favorite area of practice, each realm brings its unique challenges and opportunities. Environmental activism allows me to contribute to a cause I am passionate about, corporate laws provide a strategic and business-oriented perspective, while intellectual property allows for creative problem-solving. The diversity keeps my work dynamic and intellectually stimulating. While I may not have a singular favorite, I appreciate the synergy that arises from integrating insights from these different legal spheres, fostering a well-rounded and comprehensive approach to my practice.

    Apart from your legal practice, you’re actively involved in publications covering topics from biosafety to landlord-tenant disputes. What drives your interest in legal writing, and how do you choose the topics you want to explore and share with the legal community?

    Engaging in legal writing beyond my legal practice is a passion rooted in a desire to contribute to the legal community and share insights on a diverse range of topics. Several factors drive my interest in legal writing.

    Firstly, legal writing provides a platform to contribute to the ongoing discourse within the legal profession. It allows me to share my perspectives, research findings, and practical experiences with a broader audience, fostering a sense of community and knowledge exchange.

    The choice of topics stems from a combination of current legal trends, emerging issues, and areas where I believe I can offer meaningful insights. Whether it’s biosafety, landlord-tenant disputes, or any other legal subject, I aim to select topics that are relevant, timely, and have the potential to impact practitioners, scholars, and the general public.

    Furthermore, my interest in diverse topics reflects a commitment to staying well-rounded and informed across various legal domains. It allows me to continuously expand my knowledge base and adapt to the evolving landscape of the legal profession.

    Ultimately, the driving force behind my legal writing is a genuine passion for the law and a commitment to contributing positively to the legal community.

    You’re known for handling PILs addressing air pollution in Uttar Pradesh and the disposal of used cooking oil. How does it feel to make a legal impact on issues that affect people’s daily lives, and what kind of challenges do you encounter in such cases?

    Handling Public Interest Litigations (PILs) majorly concerning public health has been a deeply fulfilling yet challenging aspect of my legal career. Making a tangible impact on issues that significantly influence people’s daily lives carries a profound sense of responsibility and purpose.

    The satisfaction derived from contributing to environmental and public health improvements is immeasurable. Knowing that legal actions have the potential to enhance air quality in communities or establish proper mechanisms for the disposal of used cooking oil creates a direct link between legal advocacy and the well-being of individuals.

    However, these endeavors are not without their complexities. Environmental litigation often involves navigating intricate regulatory frameworks, scientific intricacies, and sometimes resistance from industries or entities with vested interests. Crafting legal arguments that effectively convey the gravity of environmental issues to judges and stakeholders requires a meticulous understanding of both legal principles and scientific evidence.

    The prolonged nature of legal processes in PILs demands unwavering persistence and dedication. Challenges may arise not only within the courtroom but also in coordinating with diverse stakeholders, including government agencies, environmental experts, and impacted communities. Striking a balance between these various interests and ensuring that legal actions align with the broader public interest adds layers of complexity to the work.

    In conclusion, while PILs addressing environmental concerns pose challenges, the opportunity to contribute meaningfully to societal well-being through legal advocacy is unparalleled. The convergence of legal expertise, scientific knowledge, and a commitment to positive change makes this aspect of legal practice exceptionally rewarding. It underscores the transformative potential of the law in addressing pressing issues that impact the lives of individuals and communities.

    Your educational journey includes a Ph.D. on ‘Intellectual Property Regime and Protection of Biodiversity.’ How has this academic pursuit influenced your approach to legal practice, and have there been instances where your academic insights shaped your strategy in a case?

    Certainly, my Ph.D. journey on ‘Intellectual Property Regime and Protection of Biodiversity’ has significantly influenced my approach to legal practice and has proven instrumental in shaping strategies in various cases.

    Acquiring in-depth knowledge in this specific area has provided me with a nuanced understanding of the intersection between intellectual property laws and biodiversity protection. This academic background has enhanced my ability to identify novel legal arguments, foresee potential challenges, and craft more comprehensive and strategic approaches when dealing with cases that involve issues related to biodiversity and intellectual property.

    In addition to your professional achievements, we’d love to know more about your personal interests. Do you have any hobbies or activities outside of the legal world that you find helps you unwind and recharge?

    Absolutely! Beyond my professional achievements, my life is enriched by three passions that bring me immense joy and fulfillment – cooking, gardening and travelling.

    Cooking is a delightful journey into the world of flavours and culinary traditions. The art of preparing authentic Italian dishes allows me to experiment with fresh ingredients, herbs, and spices, creating dishes that are not just meals but experiences. It’s a culinary adventure and feeding people that I find both therapeutic and rewarding.

    Gardening is another cherished aspect of my life. Tending to plants, cultivating green spaces, and witnessing the growth of a garden provide a serene escape. The hands-on connection with the soil, the vibrant colors of blooming flowers, and the satisfaction of nurturing life contribute to a sense of tranquility and balance in my everyday life.

    Travel is my constant companion in the pursuit of new experiences and perspectives. Whether it’s strolling through historic streets, savouring local delicacies, or taking in breathtaking natural scenery, each journey adds a unique chapter to my life’s story.

    One of your recent achievements is clearing the prestigious Advocate on Record examination in your first attempt. Can you tell us how difficult was it for you to prepare for the exam alongside managing your own practice?

    I appreciate the acknowledgement. Clearing the Advocate on Record examination in my first attempt was indeed a significant achievement and a demanding endeavor. I think it was in the year 2009, when I entered the CJI’s court as an intern and upon witnessing the compelling arguments presented by several senior lawyers at that time, I was profoundly impressed, leading me to make a firm resolution that I would one day be appearing in the Supreme Court.

    No doubt preparing for such a prestigious examination while managing my own legal practice posed its set of challenges. The examination’s rigorous nature not only requires an in-depth understanding of procedural laws but also a mastery of court practices and drafting. Balancing this intensive preparation alongside the responsibilities of managing a legal practice demanded meticulous time management and a disciplined approach.

    Late nights and early mornings were often dedicated to focused study sessions, ensuring that I stayed abreast of the extensive syllabus. Integrating practical insights from my own legal practice into the theoretical framework of the examination added an extra layer of complexity but also enriched my understanding of the subjects.

    While the journey was undoubtedly demanding, the commitment to professional growth and the pursuit of excellence fueled my determination. The experience not only deepened my legal knowledge but also enhanced my organizational and multitasking skills. Overall, the challenges were significant, but the sense of accomplishment upon successfully clearing the examination made the effort worthwhile.

    Looking ahead, what’s one aspect of the legal profession you would like to see change or improve, and what role do you envision yourself playing in that transformation?

    The maxim “justice delayed is justice denied” encapsulates a critical issue within the Indian legal system that demands meticulous attention and reform. A fundamental transformation is required to establish a mechanism ensuring the prompt and efficient disposal of cases.

    One of the pivotal improvements I envision is a comprehensive reform initiative aimed at expediting the legal process. This entails addressing systemic issues contributing to delays, such as case backlog and procedural inefficiencies. Implementing technological solutions for better case management, e-filing, and facilitating virtual hearings can significantly contribute to expediting legal proceedings.

    Furthermore, fostering a culture of judicial accountability and introducing performance metrics could incentivize timely case resolutions. Streamlining procedural complexities and promoting alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, such as mediation and arbitration, can offer efficient alternatives to protracted litigation.

    In this transformation, I see myself playing a role as an advocate for judicial reforms. This involves actively participating in dialogues on legal reform, engaging with relevant stakeholders, and supporting initiatives that prioritize the timely dispensation of justice. Through these efforts, I aim to contribute to a legal system where justice is not just a theoretical concept but a tangible reality, accessible to all in a timely manner.

    Get in touch of Dr. Anagh Mishra-

  • “A good lawyer is not one who knows the law, rather one who knows where the law is”- An In-Depth Conversation with Siddharth Batra, Advocate-on-Record, Supreme court of India

    “A good lawyer is not one who knows the law, rather one who knows where the law is”- An In-Depth Conversation with Siddharth Batra, Advocate-on-Record, Supreme court of India

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    From your diverse experience in the legal arena to your recent recognition with the ‘BW 40 Under 40’ award, can you share a bit about what motivates you in your legal journey?

    My journey in the legal field has been fueled by a combination of factors. At its core is a deep-seated passion for justice and equality, using the legal platform to advocate for these values in individual cases and broader policy realms. The legal profession’s intellectual demands and ever-changing landscape provide ongoing challenges and learning opportunities, which I find stimulating and rewarding.

    The impact of legal work on society is a significant motivator for me, as I aim for excellence and integrity in all my endeavors, understanding the substantial influence my work can have on people’s lives and societal norms. 

    The recognition and achievements, such as the ‘BW 40 Under 40’ award, validates my efforts and propel me to continue contributing meaningfully to the field. 

    Being part of a community of legal professionals and mentoring emerging talents enhances my journey, helping to shape the next generation of lawyers. This amalgamation of personal passion, intellectual curiosity, societal impact, professional recognition, community engagement, personal growth, and advocacy for change continues to drive my legal journey.

    You’ve had an extensive legal career, from district courts to the Supreme Court. How has your approach to cases evolved over the years, and are there any experiences from your early days that significantly shaped your legal philosophy?

    Reflecting on my extensive legal career, which has spanned from district courts to the Supreme Court, I have noticed significant change in my approach to legal cases. I moved to the Supreme Court in 2014 before which, I was at the Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh for 10 years. I essentially started my practice in 2004 at the District Courts Rohtak and later moved to Chandigarh when I got the opportunity to become an Assistant Advocate General in 2005. I left the office of the Advocate General in 2008 to start my own private practise and became retainer to the Haryana Urban Development Authority. In 2011, I became Additional Advocate General, Haryana.

    In my early days, my focus was primarily on learning and applying basic legal principles. However, as I delved deeper into the intricacies of law, my understanding and approach became more nuanced, especially when arguing before the Supreme Court.

    One of the most profound changes has been in my analytical skills. Initially, my approach was straightforward, centering on the direct application of the law. But with time and experience, I’ve shifted towards more complex legal reasoning and constitutional interpretation, considering various legal precedents.

    Moreover, my legal philosophy has evolved considerably. Landmark cases and mentorships in my early career significantly shaped my views. 

    I treat every new case with a new perspective and fresh outlook. My first major trial as a young attorney remains an experience that has definitely shaped my legal philosophy. It taught me the importance of thorough preparation and the profound impact of the legal system on an individual’s life. My father’s advice – “a good lawyer is not one who knows the law, rather one who knows where the law is” captures a profound truth about the practice of law. Over time, I realised that what mattered more was developing the skill to research efficiently, understand the context of the laws, and apply them appropriately to different scenarios. It is not just about what you know, but how you use your knowledge to find solutions. 

    You have worked as an Additional Advocate General for the State of Haryana in the past and presently you have an independent counsel practice at the Supreme Court. What do you think is the difference in both the kinds of practice? Would you go back to being a government counsel?

    Transitioning from being an Additional Advocate General (AAG) to an independent counsel practicing at the Supreme Court in India marks a notable shift in roles and responsibilities within the legal profession.

    As an AAG, my primary focus was on representing the State’s interests in various legal matters. It involved offering legal advice to government departments, handling constitutional issues, and representing the state in litigation proceedings. Working closely with government agencies, providing legal opinions, and defending the government’s stance in court were key aspects of this role.

    In contrast, as an independent counsel at the Supreme Court, I’ve had the opportunity to represent private clients or organizations across a wide spectrum of cases. This entails a broader range of legal issues spanning constitutional law, civil matters, criminal cases, and public interest litigations. The autonomy to select cases and clients and the diversity of legal subjects have been enriching aspects of this practice.

    The transition has brought about a shift in focus and clientele. While government counsel primarily revolves around serving the state’s interests, independent practice offers a more varied landscape, allowing me to choose cases aligned with diverse interests and work across multiple areas of law.

    The decision to return to government counsel or continue as an independent practitioner depends on various factors. While government service offers a sense of duty and the opportunity to serve the public, independent practice provides flexibility, a wider scope of cases, and personal career growth. My decision would be guided by a balance between these factors and my aspirations within the legal profession.

    As a legal professional with a commitment to growth and development, how do you balance your role as an Advocate-on-Record with your position as a Visiting Faculty and your involvement in various professional and academic bodies? How do these diverse roles contribute to your overall professional fulfillment?

    Balancing my roles as an Advocate on Record with my position as a Visiting Faculty  and an active membership of various professional and academic bodies is indeed challenging but immensely fulfilling. Each role complements and enriches the other. As an advocate on record, I deal with complex legal issues firsthand, which I then bring into my role as a Visiting Faculty, making my lectures more relevant and dynamic. On the other hand, interacting with students keeps me abreast of fresh perspectives and emerging legal theories, which informs my practice. My involvement with various professional and academic bodies allows me to keep myself updated with the latest legal development and professional standards. My diverse roles provide me with opportunities for networking with legal professionals, academicians and students. At times, these interactions lead to collaborative projects, thereby enriching my professional experience and contributing to my growth. Juggling these roles is not just about career advancement; it’s deeply fulfilling. Teaching allows me to give back to the legal community, shaping future legal minds. My court practice keeps me grounded in the practical realities of law, and my involvement in professional bodies lets me contribute to the legal profession’s evolution.

    Beyond the courtroom, you’ve been recognized as a BW 40 Under 40 Best Lawyer and Legal Influencer. How did it feel to receive such an award, and what does this recognition mean to you personally and professionally?

    I remember quite vividly that I received the email stating that I had won the BW 40 under 40 at 1:30 am at night and I felt extremely elated and joyous. I remember feeling extremely grateful for people who have supported me throughout my career and have pushed me in the right direction. Receiving an award of high stature indeed brings numerous rewards, including recognition and visibility, both personally and professionally. On a personal level, such an honor serves as a validation of my hard work and dedication. It’s a tangible acknowledgment of the countless hours, effort, and perseverance that I have put into my legal career. This recognition goes beyond mere professional achievement; it resonates with my commitment to excellence and the values I uphold in my practice.

    Professionally, an award of this nature symbolizes the high standard I have set as a lawyer. It enhances my credibility and reputation in the legal community, signaling to peers, clients, and the industry at large that my contributions are significant and impactful. This visibility can open doors to new opportunities, collaborations, and professional growth.

    Moreover, such recognition can serve as an inspiration to others in the legal field, especially emerging lawyers who may see in my journey a path to aspire to. It is a reminder that dedication and quality work are noticed and appreciated.

    In essence, while the award is a personal achievement, its implications extend far beyond, enriching my professional journey and potentially influencing the broader legal community.

    Your involvement in the Indo-French Chamber of Commerce & Industry highlights your connection to international matters. How do you navigate the legal landscape when working with French companies, and what unique challenges or rewards does this bring to your practice?

    My involvement with the Indo-French Chamber of Commerce & Industry indeed adds an international dimension to my legal practice, particularly in navigating the legal landscape when working with French Companies. Working with French companies requires an appreciation of cultural differences in business and legal practices. This includes understanding formalities, negotiation styles, and the general approach to contracts and disputes. Being culturally sensitive and adaptable is key to building strong professional relationships and trust. This provides an opportunity to work on diverse and often complex international legal matters, enhancing my expertise and broadening my professional horizon. It also allows for significant networking opportunities fostering a global perspective. 

    Outside the legal realm, what activities or hobbies do you engage in to unwind and recharge? Is there a particular hobby or interest that you find complements your legal profession in unexpected ways?

    Outside the legal realm, I engage in several activities and hobbies that help me unwind and recharge. 

    I used to be captain of my University Lawn Tennis Team at the time I was pursuing BA LLB. I really enjoy playing sports, whether it is Lawn Tennis or Cricket or Badminton. I regularly take part in SCBA Cricket Tournaments. 

    One of my favorite pastimes is reading. Delving into various books, without any specific genre preference, allows me to explore a wide range of ideas, cultures, and philosophies. “Tuesdays with Morrie” by Mitch Albom is a personal favourite of mine. It’s narrative is centered around Morrie’s reflection on life as he confronts ALS, and it provides invaluable lessons on the essence of human existence and relationships. 

    Apart from this, I greatly enjoy watching movies. They offer a complete escape into different worlds and narratives, providing a mental break from the rigors of law. My favourite movie is The Godfather.

    Each of these hobbies, in their own unique way, complements my legal career. They provide balance, enhance skills relevant to my profession, and keep me grounded and focused.

    With over two decades in law, what advice would you give to young lawyers starting their journey in the legal field, especially those who aspire to make a significant impact?

    The best advice I would give someone who is just starting their legal journey is that there is no substitute for hard work and there is no shortcut to success. A legal professional should always work hard and have faith in what he/she does. 

    Arguing in court is what every law student strives for. However, initially the focus should be entirely on honing your drafting skills and developing the skills of doing extensive and exhaustive research. In law, learning never ends. Even today, after practicing for 20 years, I continue to learn something new every single day. Law is constantly evolving and changing and you should try to keep yourself updated. Whether it is through legal news apps such as SCCOnLine or LiveLaw or following your mentors and senior lawyers on LinkedIn or through conferences and seminars. 

    When it comes to arguing in court, it’s okay to stumble occasionally. Everyone has ups and downs. The goal isn’t always to be the best but to make your point clear. Judges often understand and are patient with newer lawyers. Prepare well and present your case in simple terms. A solid grasp of the relevant law and case facts is essential.

    Get in touch with Siddharth Batra–