Super Lawyer

Tag: Supreme Court

  • “I encourage younger lawyers to develop a deep understanding of the law, cultivate strong communication and advocacy skills, and maintain a high level of professionalism in their practice.” – Ishaan Chhaya, Partner at Revera Legal.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    After over 13 years of experience in representing clients in disputes, through arbitration and court proceedings, can you tell us what initially inspired you to pursue a career in law? What motivated you to establish your professional journey in this field?

    My initial outlook towards law was fraught with ignorance – in school, one never saw it as an option. Law opened up as a career when I fortunately received admission into National Law University, Jodhpur and decided to join on my parents’ insistence. As time passed and as my studies progressed, having already been a voracious reader, I became drawn to the intellectual challenges and problem-solving aspects that the legal profession offers. I realised that law pervades almost every aspect of life and society which leads to learning new and interesting things every day. Once I graduated, the satisfaction of being the means for clients to secure their rights provided (and still provides) the drive for my legal practice..   

    Having gained substantial experience at law firms such as Phoenix Legal, and Tuli & Co., how has your approach to dispute resolution evolved over time? What unique perspectives have you brought to Revera Legal in your current role as Partner?

    Over the years, my approach to dispute resolution has evolved from a purely academic and legalistic approach to a more holistic and practical one. I have come to realize that effective dispute resolution requires not only a deep understanding of the law but also a keen awareness of the commercial and practical realities facing my clients. I believe in taking a proactive and solution-oriented approach, working closely with my clients to develop strategies that not only achieve their legal objectives but also align with their business goals. At Revera Legal, I have brought this perspective, along with my extensive experience in handling complex commercial disputes, to provide our clients with comprehensive and commercially sound legal advice and representation.   

    You’ve handled high-profile arbitration cases, including disputes in an LCIA-administered arbitration. What legal strategies did you employ to address the complexities of fraud and misrepresentation allegations in international arbitration, and how do you navigate challenges arising from differing governing laws and jurisdictions in cross-border disputes?

    Proving fraud requires demonstrating that the person committing fraud acted with intent to deceive, which can be difficult to establish through evidence in a civil trial. Fraud cases often involve intricate fact patterns and transactions, making it challenging to present a clear and concise case to the arbitral tribunal. In arbitrations involving fraud and misrepresentation, I therefore focus on building a strong evidentiary foundation. This includes meticulous document review, financial analysis, and engagement of forensic experts if needed. I also carefully analyse the arbitral tribunal’s procedural rules and the applicable law to tailor my arguments. In cross-border disputes, navigating jurisdictional and governing law issues requires a thorough understanding and crafty application of conflict-of-laws principles. In fact, as I speak, we are currently preparing for a potential dispute which presents an interesting conflict between Indian and US jurisdictions

    In the case of National Insurance’s claim against Chubb European Group under a  reinsurance policy, what challenges did you face when representing the insurer before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission?

    The National Insurance case presented a unique challenge as to whether the scope of consumer disputes includes reinsurance disputes. To address this, our team at the time. I  focused on demonstrating that the reinsurance policy in question was not being used for commercial purpose but rather a means for National Insurance to protect itself from significant losses that may affect its bottomline in the event that it settles a large insurance claim. The challenge was that to an untrained eye it would appear that an insurer, being in the business of providing insurance, was simply leveraging its reinsurance cover for receiving heftier premia in its insurance policies. We drafted submissions based on the specific terms of the policy and reinsurance notes, IRDAI regulations governing reinsurance in India, industry practices, , and relevant case law to show that obtaining a reinsurance policy is not used for generating profit but rather acts as security for unforeseen losses to the insurer. A final decision in the matter is pending I believe and I hope that the foundation that we created in the case years back, leads to the Hon’ble Commission ruling that an insurer is a consumer of reinsurance coverage and therefore can file a consumer complaint against its reinsurer.

    Drawing from your experience in providing pre-arbitration strategic advice for a FIDIC-based contract with the Ministry of Defence, what are the critical considerations when preparing the client for such disputes and future arbitration proceedings?

    A fundamental strength of FIDIC contracts is their emphasis on clearly defining and allocating risks between the employer and the contractor. When advising on FIDIC-based contracts, I first emphasize proactive contract management to mitigate potential disputes. This includes ensuring clear documentation of all project-related communications, adherence to contractual timelines and procedures, and prompt identification and resolution of any ambiguities or disagreements within the framework provided by the contract. However, should the case proceed to arbitration  the focus always remains on building a strong case file,  which needs in depth identification, analysis and organization of evidence much prior to invocation., Successful claims (or counter-claims) in such an arbitration and often depend on lawyers efficiently and accurately synchronizing and linking timelines, technical evidence and contractual provisions before formulating the statement of claims or defence.

    Your commitment to fostering diversity within the legal profession is admirable. How do you ensure that aspiring lawyers receive the mentorship and opportunities needed within your firm? What key qualities do you look for when mentoring young lawyers, and what guidance do you offer them as they navigate their legal careers?

    At Revera Legal, we are committed to fostering a diverse and inclusive work environment. We provide aspiring lawyers with mentorship opportunities, training programs, and challenging assignments to help them develop their skills and advance their careers. When mentoring young lawyers, I look for qualities such as intellectual curiosity, strong work ethic, and empathy with a client’s position. I encourage younger lawyers to develop a deep understanding of the law, cultivate strong communication and advocacy skills, and maintain a high level of professionalism in their practice. Irrespective of personal or professional difficulties throughout their career, lawyers must foremost ensure that their client’s best case is presented.

    Given the demands of your career and leadership position, how do you personally manage to maintain a work-life balance? Additionally, how do you encourage your team to prioritize a healthy work-life balance while excelling in their professional roles?

    Maintaining a work-life balance is crucial for both personal well-being and professional success. Though this appears to be a difficult endeavour in the practice of law, which requires constant attention, reading and mental exertion, do attempt and encourage proper time management,  and distribution of responsibilities amongst the team to the extent possible. Lawyers are always doing a lot of heavy lifting, whether in court practice or transactional negotiations. In such a situation, having a  flexible work environment, rewards and recognition for achievements and drawing boundaries between work and personal life ensures sustainable growth in the profession. 

    In your view, what role will technological innovation play in shaping the future of the legal profession, particularly in the areas of arbitration and dispute resolution?

    Technological innovation is transforming the legal profession as I knew it at the inception of my career, and I believe this trend will continue to accelerate. In arbitration and dispute resolution, we are seeing the rise of online dispute resolution platforms, the use of artificial intelligence for document drafting and review as well as the adoption of virtual hearings by courts throughout the country. I also see that several lawyers and esteemed judges have altogether stopped using paper, instead using tablets and laptops in court, all of which are helpful in organizing, reviewing and carrying voluminous files, and are certainly friendly to the environment. In fact, I believe even notarial services are now being offered online, which are helpful when parties are located in far flung jurisdictions or locations. These innovations have the potential to make the dispute resolution faster, more efficient, cost-effective, and accessible. I am excited to embrace these advancements and leverage them in my firm and practice.

    Get in touch with Ishaan Chhaya –

  • “The ability to work hard, good recollection capacity, vivacity, positive attitude are what I feel some of the most important qualities for a litigation lawyer” – Nishant Kr. Srivastava, Advocate-on-Record at Supreme Court of India and the Founder & Managing Partner at Actus Legal Associates & Advocates.

    “The ability to work hard, good recollection capacity, vivacity, positive attitude are what I feel some of the most important qualities for a litigation lawyer” – Nishant Kr. Srivastava, Advocate-on-Record at Supreme Court of India and the Founder & Managing Partner at Actus Legal Associates & Advocates.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    As an Advocate-On-Record (AOR) and with over a decade of experience in the field of law, what initially inspired you to pursue a career in law, and how did your passion for the legal field evolve over the years?

    Honestly speaking, it was destined for me to become a lawyer! I had been a Civil Services aspirant after my Graduation and had also reached till the Interview stage the Civil Services Exam (CSE) conducted by UPSC. In 2005 I joined Law Centre-II (at that time evening classes at Atma Ram Sanatan Dharma College) of the Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, Delhi during the later period of my CSE preparations. However, in the same year I once again cleared the Prelims and had to write my UPSC Mains and the dates coincided with my First Semester Law exams and I had to make a choice. I chose the UPSC Mains over the law exam and so did not attend the law classes resulting in shortage of attendance and my not being able to fill the form and appearing in the exams. 

    Later on in 2009, I again joined the Faculty of Law, but this time the Campus Law Centre (CLC), Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, Delhi. 

    Coming from a relatively small city i.e., Gorakhpur (UP), I, for the first time, realised during my preparation period in Delhi that law is just not only a respectable career option, but also Delhi is the best place for anyone who has no other support system/ a first generation lawyer, apart from her/his own hard work and competence. 

    Also, from the college days, my friends used to tell me that I was good at communication- both oral as well as written, and once my attempts at CSE were over in 2006, I was faced with a grim situation and I was required to find a career option, where I could utilise my strengths to support my choice of career. And at this time law as a carrier option looked to me as the best career option, looking at my ability to study for long hours (honed during my CSE preparation days) and a good communication skills, especially in English, and having my earlier small brush with the study of law made the decision to pursue law as a career option a forgone conclusion. 

    In the early stages of your career, you worked with trial court seniors and also managed your independent practice, handling cases across all the three tiers of the courts in Delhi-trial, High Court and the Supreme Court of India. What were the most valuable lessons you learned during this phase that helped shape your career path?

    In my 2nd year at the CLC became the Student Convenor of the Seminar & Discussion Society of the CLC, apart from being one of the Student Editors of the Delhi Law Review (DLR), the renowned Journal published by the Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, Delhi, and I was also one of the Student Convenors of the Legal Aid Society of CLC. This gave me enough exposure and opportunity to meet and initiate an informal conversation with some of legal legends and top jurists of the country. It was during those discussions and interactions, I realised that being a first generation lawyer, I must know the basics and go for an organic growth and progression in my career- from trial works to appellate works. When all my Batchmates were planning to join some of the top lawyers and chambers in the Supreme Court and the High Court, I was searching for a good trial court senior, by the time I completed my course.

    Building a career in litigation can be challenging, especially as a defense lawyer dealing with white-collar crimes. What were the initial obstacles you faced, and how did you navigate and overcome them to establish yourself in this competitive field?

    Usually in any case involving allegations of a white collar crime, the accused is a well to do person having all the facilities, including a battery of lawyers. In such a scenario, initially it was difficult to make such risk aversion taking people to convince that I can handle their case well and have the requisite competence and skills, however I think what worked for me was the fact that in the courts whenever I was acting as a defense counsel, even in smaller cases, I used to give my 100% and used to put more hard work than many of the established lawyers would have put. This became noticeable not only to the Presiding Officers, Additional Public Prosecutors, Niab Courts and the police officials, but also to the litigants waiting for their cases to be called. This gave me visibility. Also, I enlisted myself with the South District Legal Aid Society (DLSA-South) in the initial days and rendered my services to the best of my abilities  as a Legal Aid Counsel (LAC) in those matters where the poor accused persons, because of lack of wherewithal, were unable to get good representation in the courts. 

    When handling both ad-hoc and institutional arbitration cases, what core skills and strategies do you rely on? Can you share an example of a particularly difficult arbitration case that you were able to resolve successfully?

    I would honestly say that Arbitration is akin to an exalted Civil Trial. And if one doesn’t have the experience of conducting trials, especially in civil cases starting from drawing up the case from the scratch and skill in cross-examination of witnesses, that is going to be a big handicap for the lawyer intending to succeed in the field of arbitration. Fortunately, I started my career in the beginning years in trial courts, apart from frequent appellate and HC/ SC/ NCDRC works. And this decision to start from the trial courts was only because I was fortunate enough to interact with the stalwarts and who and who of the Indian legal system during my Law Faculty days as the Student Convenor of the Seminar & Discussion Society of the CLC. It was one unanimous piece of advice, as a student of law, I had received from them, i.e., to know the basics and to learn the trial works, especially being a first generation lawyer and an outsider in Delhi. 

    In my first Arbitration case, the seat of which was in Kolkata, West Bengal, before the Ld. Sole Arbitrator Sh. Sushanta Chatterjee (who recently passed away), former Judge Calcutta High Court, where the Respondent had, citing a big theft at their site because of the alleged deficiency of service and dereliction of duty on the part of my client (a Manpower Supplier), had withheld payments of my client. Much depended on the veracity of the story of theft as alleged by the Respondent. At that point of time, my first-hand experience at cross-examination stood in good stead in Kolkata and I was able to show/ expose that the alleged theft never took place and it was a just ploy on the part of the Respondent to not to pay the dues of my client. This clinched the case in my favour and I won the Award for my client.

    In defending clients in cases involving economic offenses, such as those handled by the EOW, CBI, or ED, what do you believe are the key considerations in crafting an effective defense strategy? Could you highlight a case that was particularly interesting to you?

    Usually, and if I may say, invariably, the EOW and CBI has a penchant for filing voluminous chargesheet and enlist 30/50/85 witnesses, if not more. And here there is enough scope of contradictions and loopholes. As a defense lawyer representing an accused, I am not required to prove that my client is innocent beyond reasonable doubt, since the same is the burden of the Prosecution and not the accused. A careful reading of the chargesheet and statements particularly of the key witnesses, gives sufficient points and opportunities to show to the Court that there is difficulty in accepting the case of the prosecution and there are doubts and contradictions and there are two views possible and after that I leave the rest to the Court to decide. In fact in many EOW cases, I have got my clients discharged at the initial stage itself. Obviously, the knowledge about the latest judgment is something, inter alia, which clinches the decision in your favour. In an interesting case being tried u/s 420 IPC, the CBI has summoned on a single day a number of witnesses. The trial had started almost 6/7 years after the case was registered. By that time many witnesses were not traceable and those who had come had shifted to different places outside Delhi and had travelled to Delhi from distant places. That very day, due to the sheer number of witnesses (complainants) and the heavy board of the court concerned, matter was getting adjourned. The witnesses showed reluctance to come again for the examination in chief and cross-examination. At that point of time, I was able to get them to compromise and get their statements recorded. On that single day most of the witnesses compromised with the accused and the case became very weak. Later on, in the cross examination of the few remaining witnesses, I was able to show that the prosecution was not able to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt.

    You are highly regarded for your expertise in matrimonial disputes and family law. How do you view the changing landscape of women’s rights in matrimonial cases, and what are the major challenges you come across while dealing with matrimonial cases?

    Unfortunately, matrimonial disputes are one of the fastest increasing legal disputes in India, at least in Metropolitan cities like Delhi. The ability to adjust and let go of certain things, which at the first place should not have been an issue at all, I am sorry to state, has become more and more scarce these days. Intervention of the family members, especially because of the instant calls and the tendency of the people to “create evidence” has weekend the mutual trust and faith a couple ought to have for any marriage to work. I am happy to see that the Courts in Delhi have become more and more gender neutral, especially in the matters instituted under the various provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The same is the situation in cases instituted under s.144 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) (old s. 125 CrPC). Over implication of the relatives and distant relatives in DV Act matters by the aggrieved are being frowned upon by the Judicial Magistrates. 

    The major challenge, I think, is the lack of cogent and convincing evidence in matrimonial disputes, since most of the allegations pertain to something which had happened within the four walls of the matrimonial home. And this many a time, gives opportunity to a party to level baseless and sometimes ridiculous allegations!  I am also especially sad to see how the children suffer due to the mutual fight between their own parents. I strongly  feel that any lawyer handling such matrimonial cases must be a sensitive person herself/ himself because that is the only thing which might help the litigating couple who are blinded by their mutual distrust and hate towards each other and who would go to any extent to prove that the other person was wrong and he/she has been wronged. 

    As the founder and managing partner of Actus Legal Associates, how do you effectively manage a team of 7-10 lawyers while ensuring consistent performance and a steady flow of work across the firm?

    I believe in self-control and believe that no one can help a person who is not willing to help herself/ himself. So, I always try to make my colleagues and juniors realise that they have to take responsibility and deliver the results. Litigation, among other legal areas of practice and when compared with other areas of practice in law, is very demanding. Only highly motivated people can survive in litigation. 

    I believe in situational leadership and delegation. Once the expectations are clear and one is clear with the facts of the case at hand, I trust my team to deliver the results. Discussions and deliberations and constant evaluation of the progress of the cases we are handling through our own internal mechanism, I think helps us to ensure consistent performance and steady flow of work across the firm.

    For young lawyers aspiring to specialize in litigation, arbitration, or criminal defense in India, what advice would you offer? What key skills and personal qualities do you believe are essential for success in these areas of law?

    Your this question is precisely the same question, which as a law student and the Student Convenor of the Seminar & Discussion Society of the CLC, I used to ask the Legal Luminaries, since I was one coordinating and inviting those Supreme Court and High Court Judges and the doyens of the Bar to the CLC for events, lectures and conferences and many a time, I used to get some free time with these seniors in the profession. Since many of them were alumni of CLC, the chats were pretty friendly. I was told invariably by everyone I had put this question, that I must know the basics and spend some initial years learning trial work, both civil and criminal and this is what I will advise the young lawyers aspiring to specialize in litigation, arbitration or criminal defense in India. 

    Inter alia, the ability to work hard, good recollection capacity, vivacity, positive attitude and what I feel are some of the most important qualities for a litigation lawyer, I also feel that a litigation lawyer must be ready and be there in the court much before the court starts. Being before time, gives sufficient time to once again go through your file, talk to the client and be abreast with facts of the case at hand. Many times, your ability to keep an open mind and not acting only as per your strategy made last evening, just being alive to the requirements and queries of the court, carries the day for you. Ability to network with people outside your profession is also one of the important skills and qualities, I believe are essential for success in these areas of law.

    Looking back at your career, what has been your most fulfilling case, and what were the learning experiences that you’d like to share with us?

    In one of the matrimonial disputes cases, where both the parties had married with each other after their unsuccessful first marriage and had a baby born out of this second marriage, I played a crucial role to ensure that the matter is settled through mediation in which there was no intervention of the families of both the parties. Actually, I sensed during the initial days of my engagement as a counsel for one of the parties that the real culprit for the impasse were the parents of both the parties and the couple were having almost cordial relationship and it was only because of the unintended but damaging interference by the parents from both the sides, the relations had become strained to the extent that one of them had filed a petition for divorce on the ground of cruelty. I impressed upon the Ld. Family Court to send the matter (despite I having been drafted the WS and carrying the same in my hand to the Court) to the Mediation Centre and be taken up under the supervision of the most experienced Mediator and the parents of both the parties be strictly barred from entering the Mediation Room. That worked! The moments the parents were barred from interfering, the couple was able to come to an amicable settlement and resolve their grievances. I am happy to inform you that as on date those warring couples are living happily together with their beautiful child. 

    The experience which I gained here was that a lawyer must also be a good listener, especially in family matters and the best way to resolve a matrimonial dispute is amicable settlement. Dehors the din, usually matrimonial matters are more about small issues generally connected with adjustments and if one is able to point out and target and resolve those small issues, many families may be saved from disintegration and ending up in divorce.

    Get in touch with Nishant Kr. Srivastava –

  • “The legal profession grants creative and financial freedom, but true success comes when one learns to focus on enhancing their lawyering skills without indulging in comparisons.” – Rishi Raj Sharma, Advocate-on-Record at the Supreme court of India and Founder of Law Chambers of Rishi Raj Sharma.

    “The legal profession grants creative and financial freedom, but true success comes when one learns to focus on enhancing their lawyering skills without indulging in comparisons.” – Rishi Raj Sharma, Advocate-on-Record at the Supreme court of India and Founder of Law Chambers of Rishi Raj Sharma.

    This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

    What inspired you to pursue a career in law, and how did you begin your journey in this field? What motivated you to establish your own practice in 2016, and what challenges did you face in the initial stages?

    Belonging to the family of civil servant, I was influenced by prominent members of legal fraternity who were family acquaintances. When I was around 9-10 years old, my father pursued LLB course from Agra University (though he never practised), which gave me access to judicial precedents that I used to read as bed-time stories. Being academically inclined, I was pursuing the IIT-dream, when I came across Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mocking Bird, which fructified my decision to pursue law. 

    My parents readily agreed to allow me to pursue law with the condition that I get admitted to one of the top law schools. I missed NLSUI-Bangalore seat by a whisker. However, I got selected in almost all other top law schools in country, but decided to join ILS Law College-Pune. During my five-years at law school, I worked hard on academics as well as all extra-curricular and sports activities. During college vacations, I did my internships with law firms, senior advocates, and high court judges for my all-round development as a complete lawyer.

    With an initial focus on work-discipline, I joined Remfry & Sagar, where I had an illustrious career for nearly five years. My memorable tenure at Remfry & Sagar taught my punctuality and sharpened my comprehension skills, which I feel are the key essentials for every good lawyer. Thereafter, for short periods, I joined few other legal offices, law firms, senior advocates, etc. to learn court-craft and get an exposure on the variety of work on offer in the market, and then, I set up my own chamber practice in the year 2016. With my experience, I advise that in our country, the legal profession is structured in a manner that one gets complete creative and financial freedom for work and growth only in self-owned law-firm/chamber practice. However, being a first-generational lawyer, the biggest initial challenge that I faced was handling clients and sometimes the lack of them. My advice to every aspiring and young lawyer is to not indulge in comparative analysis, and instead focus on enhancing the lawyering skills, and success will follow.  

    How did your time working with former Solicitor General Mr. Ranjit Kumar and former Additional Solicitor General Mr. Sanjay Jain shape your legal acumen? Can you share some insights from your time working with them?

    Both these two gentlemen are God’s men, and my two gurus, and legal legends in the true spirit. They have completely different lawyering kills and court-craft, but humbleness and kindness are common to them. When you spend long hours with someone together, especially your teacher/guru, a special bond develops with them. My life is deeply indebted to both of them in a lot many ways. Having worked elaborately with both of them, I say that Ranjit Kumar sir has an orthodox teacher-pupil like approach, where for gaining true knowledge, one has to first completely surrender and unlearn everything. Whilst Sanjay sir has a rather modernized approach, to teach and learn at the same time. 

    Can you share some insights and experiences from handling high-profile cases like Lajpat Nagar Bomb Blast case or the 2G scam?

    My third guru, Uttam Datt sir has taught me that all cases are equally important. The nature of court forum and the nature/gravity of the case should neither cause anxiety/over-keenness, nor deserve any special attention/concession. I do my best in every case and opportunity that lands at my door step. It is the small steps we take on daily basis that prepares us for the one large big step. Certainly, Rome was not built in a day. In my short career of fifteen years, God has been kind enough to provide me the opportunity to be associated with several high-profile cases defining legal jurisprudence in the country. I am grateful to Sanjay Jain sir for providing me with the opportunity to be involved in several high-profile cases such Lajpat Nagar Bomb Blast, 2G scam, and Antrix-Devas. All high-profile cases come with the baggage of voluminous court records and long-sitting hours. The happiness and satisfaction achieved by success obtained in these high-profile cases has no bounds and cannot be measured. 

    What are the unique responsibilities and challenges of being an Advocate-on-Record at the Supreme Court of India? Could you describe a typical day in your life as an Advocate-on-Record, and how do you manage the demands of such a prestigious and demanding role?

    Being an Advocate-on-Record at Supreme Court of India is a prestigious designation for any lawyer. We must understand that Supreme Court is the final frontier for all litigation disputes, and therefore, the biggest responsibility and challenge faced is to meet the expectation of clients. With the court hearings being conducted via hybrid mode – physically/virtually, and considerable infrastructure development, appearing before the Court has been made easier for the lawyers as well as the litigants. However, for listing of the case, one has to coordinate with the Registry, which since past few months has not been functioning at optimal level. Though the silver lining in the dark clouds is that some changes are lined-up, and we can expect things to improve in near future. 

    My chamber-practice is very structured and organized. Having an efficient and loyal clerk like Anand-ji helps.  We are planned/prepared in all our cases a week before the court-date, courtesy which I am able to appear before two-three different courts in a day. In my initial days of practice, I would be working 15-16 hours a day. However, things have changed post-COVID. Now, as opposed to the general practice of law chambers starting work post 4:00 pm, I start my work day at 7:30 am, and try to finish the major drafting work by 9:30 am. Courts are attended to from 10am to 4:30pm. The time available between court hearings is spent on reading case files, legal research, client meetings, etc. After court hours, 5:00pm to 6:30pm is spent on preparing for the next day or some client meetings. Unless there are some urgent pressing work commitments, I do not attend to any office work after 7:00pm. On a daily basis, 30 minutes is specially dedicated on reading the latest judicial precedents as bed-time reading.   

    As a legal advisor to media companies and projects like the documentary series “HUNT FOR THE INDIAN MUJAHIDEEN”, how do you balance creative freedom with legal compliance?

    Contrary to popular belief, the only role lawyers play in media and corporate houses is to red flag possible legal hurdles and issues, and suggest ways to avoid any hurdles/issues by making changes in the document, script, characterization, dialogues, nature of depiction / representation, drafting / vetting agreements/ NOCs / disclaimers etc. with the objective of retaining the creative freedom for the artists, who are essentially your clients. The final outlook of the visual content created and the market reception of the same is not in domain of the lawyer, whose job is to be handle and avoid all legal objections / possible legal objections from all sections of the society. This is relatively easier for fictional works, but for documentary works a lot of time is spent verifying the sources, whilst the problematic areas from lawyer perspective are inspirational works and biographical works.   

    Outside of your legal career, what hobbies or interest do you pursue, and how do they help you maintain a work-life balance?

    Litigation practice is a full-time job and serious work. I do not get time for pursuing hobbies and interests. I am immensely fond of reading and playing chess, but it has been a decade since I read a novel or played chess at club-level. All my days are structured and planned about a fortnight in advance. Whatever limited time I get from work, I spend with my family and go out for shopping, movies, social gatherings, temple visits, picnics, long-walks, sports, vacations, etc. During winters, I do play sports like badminton, cricket, and hockey at club-level. As a rule, I keep one day a week exclusively for family. I do cook once a week, which calms my mind.  

    Are there any specific legal reforms or policy changes you are passionate about advocating for, based on your experience in the field?

    My litigation practice is diverse to include civil, corporate and criminal matters, both at original and appellate levels. I strongly believe that the drastic changes need to be made in the judicial system to make it speedier. Justice delayed is Justice denied. We need more competent Judges at District Court level. All civil and criminal trials should be done on day-to-day basis. All cases should be processed chronologically. Hefty costs should be imposed for seeking adjournments. There are numerous judgements by Supreme Court and High Courts on this issue, but in ground reality, things still move at snail pace. 

    What trends do you foresee shaping the future of legal practice in India, and how are you preparing your firm to stay ahead of these trends?

    I feel law firm practice will be way forward. However, independent counsels / people with small chamber-practice will never be out of work. The focus is to keep enhancing the lawyering skills on daily basis. People with top skills are never out of work, be it in any field.  

    As someone with significant experience, how do you approach mentorship and leadership within your firm and broader legal community? What advice would you give to young aspiring lawyers who are just starting their legal careers and looking to make significant impact in the field?

    At this stage, mentorship are big shoes for me to fill. In the past, I have visited quite a few colleges to share my experience with the students. I am accessible to all young lawyers for guidance and advise, and many of them do consult me from time to time. My general advice to everyone aspiring to be a litigation lawyer is to keep head down, learn, work, and be patient for at least 8-10 years. As opposed to other professions, the legal profession requires considerable maturity, compassion, and years of skill and learning. I would suggest them to not compete with anyone or to do comparative analysis or to be influenced by social media influencers, and rather they must try to be a person with substance, and an empty noisy vessel.  

    Get in touch with Rishi Raj Sharma-

  • “Effective communication with clients and a commitment to upholding justice guide my approach to each case, regardless of its profile and complexity”- Amit Kumar, Advocate at the Supreme Court of India

    “Effective communication with clients and a commitment to upholding justice guide my approach to each case, regardless of its profile and complexity”- Amit Kumar, Advocate at the Supreme Court of India

    This Interview has been published by Pragya Chandni and The SuperLawyer Team

    Can you share with us your journey from studying mathematics to pursuing a career in law? What inspired this transition?

    After studying mathematics, I developed a strong analytical mind-set and problem-solving skills.  However, I realized my passion lies in using these skills to advocate for justice and navigate complex legal issues.  Inspired by the intersection of logic and law, I pursued a career in law to apply my mathematical aptitude to legal challenges, ultimately seeking to make a meaningful impact in society through the legal profession.

    As a criminal defense lawyer, you’ve handled a wide array of cases, including high-profile ones. What drew you specifically to criminal law, and how do you navigate the complexities of such cases?

    From an early stage, I was drawn to criminal law due to its dynamic nature and the opportunity it presents to defend individual’s rights and ensure fair treatment within the legal system.  In navigating complex cases, I rely on thorough research, strategic planning and a deep understanding of both the law and facts.  Effective communication with clients and a commitment to upholding justice guide my approach to each case, regardless of its profile and complexity.

    Founding “The Chambers of Amit Kumar” in 2007 marked a significant milestone in your career. What motivated you to establish your own legal practice, and what were some of the challenges you faced in the early stages?

    Founding ‘The Chambers of Amit Kumar’ in the year 2007 was driven by my vision to provide personalized legal services tailored to clients’ needs.  Motivated by a desire for autonomy and innovation, I sought to create a platform where I could pursue my passion for law while fostering a culture of excellence.  In the early stages, challenges such as building a client base, managing finances, and establishing credibility were prevalent.  However, through perseverance, strategic networking, and a commitment to delivering exceptional results, I overcame these obstacles and steadily grew our practice.

    Could you walk us through how you approach each case uniquely, considering the legal complexities and ethical considerations involved?

    I approach each case uniquely, recognizing that every situation has its own complexities and ethical considerations.  Just as jewellery cannot be crafted with pure gold alone, cases often carry inherent impurities.  I meticulously scrutinize these imperfections, strategically leveraging them to build a compelling defence.  By identifying and addressing these nuances, I aim to achieve favourable outcomes for my clients while upholding ethical standards.

    With extensive experience representing clients in various courts, including the Supreme Court and the Delhi High Court, how do you ensure effective representation while upholding the principles of justice and fairness?

    In representing clients across different courts, my focus remains steadfast on effective advocacy while upholding the principles of justice and fairness.  This involves thorough preparation, detailed discussions with clients, and adherence to ethical standards.  I prioritize understanding the nuances of each case and presenting compelling arguments based on law and evidence.  By maintaining integrity, respect for due process, and a commitment to equity, I strive to ensure effective representation that upholds the highest standards of justice.

    Advocating for causes such as the petition relating to marital rape demonstrates your commitment to social justice issues. What role do you believe lawyers play in advocating for societal change, particularly in addressing sensitive issues like gender-based violence?

    Lawyers play a crucial role in advocating for societal change, particularly in addressing sensitive issues like gender-based violence.  Similar to doctors, lawyers are often at the forefront of observing societal trends and have the opportunity to raise awareness about important social issues through their daily practice.  With this responsibility towards society, lawyers can leverage their expertise to challenge unjust systems, advocate for policy reforms, and provide support for victims of gender-based violence, ultimately contributing to a more just and equitable society.

    Handling cases involving fraud and corruption, such as the JBT recruitment scam and housing society scam, requires a deep understanding of legal intricacies. How do you navigate through the legal complexities of such cases while ensuring transparency and accountability?

    In navigating cases involving fraud and corruption, I prioritize a meticulous approach that combines through legal analysis with a commitment to transparency and accountability.  This involves conducting extensive investigations, research work, collaborating with experts, and presenting compelling evidence in court.  By upholding the principles of due process and ensuring transparency in all legal proceedings, I aim to pursue justice for my client.

    As someone with a significant breadth of experience in the legal field, what advice would you offer to aspiring law graduates who are just starting their careers, especially those interested in criminal law and social justice advocacy?

    My advice to aspiring law graduates interested in criminal law and social justice advocacy is to stay committed to continuous learning, develop strong analytical skills, and cultivate empathy for your clients and their communities.  Seek out diverse experiences, such as internships, pro bono work, and mentorship opportunities, to gain practical insights and build a robust professional network.  Never compromise with the ethical standards.

    Get n touch with Amit Kumar-

  • “Legal Profession particularly working as Advocate on Record is full of challenges and Responsibilities and for being successful, one has to required to develop the habit of working 24*7  without any liberty from work”- Purnima Jauhari, Advocate on record at the Supreme Court of India

    “Legal Profession particularly working as Advocate on Record is full of challenges and Responsibilities and for being successful, one has to required to develop the habit of working 24*7  without any liberty from work”- Purnima Jauhari, Advocate on record at the Supreme Court of India

    This Interview has been published by Pragya Chandni and The SuperLawyer Team

    Can you share with us your journey into the legal profession and what inspired you to pursue a career in law?

    First of all, I would like to extend my thanks to team ‘Super Lawyer” for my interview.  Being a second generation lawyer in the family, it was my  passion and privilege both to join the legal profession and to reach the prestigious and challenging milestone of  Advocate On Record.

    As an Advocate-On-record at the Supreme Court of India, you’ve handled a variety of cases ranging from education to environmental issues. Could you tell us about a particularly challenging case you’ve worked on and how you navigated through it?

    As an Advocate on Record I appeared in a number of cases wherein the most challenging to appear in bail matters wherein Hon’ble Supreme Court granted bail to the  accused  charged under Section 302 I.P.C under life imprisonment and Anticipatory bail to the accused charged for Section 376 I.P.C .

    Your reported judgments include significant cases such as Girish Ramchandra Desh Pande Vs. Central Information Commissioner and Indore Development Authority Vs. Manohar Lal Sharma. Could you walk us through the process of handling such high-profile cases and the impact they’ve had on your career?

    Before the apex Court, I also got the  opportunity to assist the reputed Senior Advocates and it was a great experience  for me to appear in high profile cases like the Indore Development Authority Case related to Land Acquisition. NJAC Case and recently   in Article 370  case and an important  point in these  types of cases is research work and finding out the reported judgment in your favor and to search a new point which can change the direction of your case in your favor.

    Being a member of the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA), you’re deeply entrenched in the legal community. How has networking and building connections within the legal fraternity influenced your career trajectory?

    I also get a 4 time  opportunity to serve the  Supreme Court Bar Association as Member Executive. During my tenure as member executive I tried my best to raise my voice against  issues related to day to day  problems faced by members of the bar  like Filing , Health , Chamber Allotment, Lockers Allotment,  Canteen Facility etc.

    Could you shed some light on your experience representing the U.P. Madhyamik Shiksha Sewa Chayan Board? How does representing a government entity differ from other types of cases you handle?

    In relation to professional assignments I always  realized  that clients  appreciate your sincerity towards your work rather than result. In my professional journey I represented the U.P. Madhyamik Shiksha Sewa  Chayan Board handled  cases related to selection and  appointment of candidates . I also get the opportunity to appear on behalf of Prathmik Shiksha  Mitra Association  regarding their appointment and working as Shiksha Mitra. While handling such types of  service matters I realized my responsibility  towards those persons who belong from the rural side and have no proper sources despite that they qualify the competitive exams and not getting  their appointment and sometimes persons less than in merit from them are appointed at their post.

    Your expertise covers a wide range of legal areas, including matrimonial matters, criminal law, and land acquisition cases. How do you manage to stay updated and proficient in such diverse areas of law?

    I usually appear in Matrimonial Transfer Petitions where usually wife filed petition for transfer her matrimonial disputes from one state to another state now a days on being working and equal stake holder it is not easy to get relief of Transfer the cases but on certain guidelines Hon’ble Court always consider the point of Transfer in favour of Petitioner wife . Apart from it I appear in  Mediation thereof wherein I feel the great satisfaction when I get success in settling the dispute of the parties .

    Can you share some strategies or approaches you’ve employed to overcome obstacles and achieve success in your legal practice? What advice would you offer to recent law graduates aspiring to establish themselves in the legal profession, especially those interested in advocacy and litigation?

    In my professional journey  I have realized that  Legal Profession particularly working as Advocate on Record is full of challenges and Responsibilities and for being successful, one has to required to develop the habit of working 24*7  without any liberty from work. Lastly, I would like to advise the law graduates who have recently join or going to  join the profession that – “Successful people are not gifted; they just work hard with dedication and Sincerity.” 

    Get in touch with Purnima Jauhari-

  • “Travelling to various Courts per-se add a great value, however, arguing a matter before another Court apart from your regular Court adds more experience and sharpens the argumentative skills”- Devmani Basal, Associate Partner at SNG Partners

    This Interview has been published by Pragya Chandni and The SuperLawyer Team

    Sir, could you please share the story of how you initially decided to pursue a career in law? Were there specific experiences or influences that led you to choose this path? 

    First of all, I am a second generation lawyer. I was motivated to pursue law from the beginning as Law is a noble profession and contributes a lot to society. Since my childhood, I have seen my Father’s contribution towards society as his core practice area was Criminal Law. However, during my college days, I was much inclined to pursue my career in the stock market being financially connected which goes to my core passion. Simultaneously, I was pursuing Law and finally, I decided to shift myself to Law especially in Commercial matters, which is a mixed bag of finance and commerce. I, then, shifted to Delhi.

    With almost 12 years of experience across litigation, commercial arbitration, and consumer and company litigation, what motivated you to specialize in these specific areas within the legal field? 

    I am passionate to read and learn more and more deep into financial activities related to business and commerce. This interest connects me with the litigation and enlightens me to understand the problem of a businessman in a much better way, which ultimately led to making a business decision. Law can be practiced by anyone but having basic knowledge over the general subject of the case either commercial, arbitration or consumer or company makes things easier to resolve the query in an effective way. Like an Advocate having understanding of stock market would be able to pursue a case related to stock market than a novice. Since I have interest in reading these topics, I was more inclined to specialise in the above specific areas in the legal field, so that I can deliver better than ordinary. 

    Your career includes appearances before various High Courts, the Supreme Court of India, and various tribunals. Can you highlight a particularly challenging case you’ve worked on and discuss the strategies you employed to navigate through it successfully? 

    It was in Sep’ 2014, when I caught up in a matter before Hon’ble Supreme Court. I briefed a Senior Advocate, however, he was stuck in a traffic jam and could not make it on time. I was called upon by the Bench to argue. With hesitation, I began and strenuously argued the matter. When I finished my arguments, my Senior reached the Court. However, by that time, the Hon’ble Court reserved the matter for order. The judgement was delivered in the month of March’ 2015 and finally, we succeeded. This case taught me to always be ready with the brief irrespective of engaging a Senior Advocate. I have fearlessly appeared before almost 11 High Courts of the country and numerous District Courts and Tribunals across the country and independently argue the matters. This rich experience and exposure are completely devoted to my Senior Colleague Mr. Ajay Abhay Monga Advocate, who always reposed faith on my skills and offered opportunity as and when it appeared.  

    Given your expertise in Consumer Laws, Commercial Law, and other areas, how do you stay abreast of the ever-evolving legal landscape, especially with regards to amendments and changes in laws and regulations? 

    In the current scenario, especially the deep presence of online updates and platforms, it becomes easy to keep updated. However, specific laws get evolved as and when I work upon a case file. I must state that sitting in Court, in idle time, is indeed a good way of learning and keeping updated, apart from learning argumentative skills and to have a broad idea about the temperament of a Judge.

    You’ve been associated with significant reported judgments, such as Millennium Wires vs. The State Trading Corporation of India. Can you share the role you played in these cases and the impact they had on your legal career? 

    As explained to you above, the case you highlighted was a game changer for me as it was an opportunity to independently argue a case before the Hon’ble Supreme Court in addition to the fact that many stakes were involved. I was quite nervous in the beginning, however, after the hearing concluded, I felt immensely satisfied with my performance and it boosted my confidence to argue a case before any Court. I was involved in the above case since it was before the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi, therefore, I had good command over the facts and coupled with the fact that I briefed the Senior Advocate for hearing, so I was quite prepared with the case. The preparation, briefing and discussion with Senior and deep involvement in the case since inception, in fact, gave power and confidence to present the case independently.

    Having worked on matters related to FEMA, PMLA, and other financial regulations, how do you approach advising senior management on the legal implications of business decisions, particularly in the context of financial laws? 

    Advising on the legal implications of financial laws certainly depends upon the kind of business my client is involved in coupled with their requirements. Those days are gone by, where businesses can flourish without legal support. Presently, the laws are quite stringent, which require legal advice at every stage of business decisions. Therefore, after understanding the business model and the requirements of a particular trade, I would advise my Client in making its business decisions in line with the financial laws.

    From being an Associate to now being an Associate Partner at SNG & Partners, can you discuss the key milestones and challenges you faced in your career progression? 

    I belong to Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh and shifted myself to Delhi in Sep’ 2011 to pursue my career in law. Since, I was not much active during my college days, therefore, I was completely raw, when in fact, I entered the profession. I initially practiced with some Advocate for a period of 4 months and thereafter, I began my career with SNG & Partners in March’ 2012. Our Managing Partner, Mr. Sanjay Gupta is a kind-hearted and a great mentor, who always encourages the juniors. In the beginning, rushing from one Court to another gave me an exposure to a variety of laws. I was working under Mr. Ajay Abhay Monga, Senior Partner, who gave me ample opportunities to argue the matter independently. Later on, he handed over the outstation cases portfolio to me, which added more exposure in my experience. Travelling to various Courts is per-se add a great value, however, arguing a matter before another Court, apart from your regular Court, adds more experience and sharpens the argumentative skills. Travelling to different Courts gives independence as well as enhances decision making without the support of your colleagues. It also helps you to understand the local practices of various Courts. I must add that there are no free lunches anywhere and the same goes with different Courts in different states. You will face challenges like language barriers as all the Courts in this country are not following English as their base language but these exposures not only add experience but also shape an Advocate to argue a matter in challenging circumstances as well. My journey with SNG is full of challenges in each case, however these challenges make an Advocate. I am always thankful to my Seniors for always appreciating my work and finding me suitable for new challenges. A special regard to Mr. Monga, who has been a great mentor for me and guided me in my hard times and always motivated me.

    As someone with a rich and varied legal career, what advice would you give to fresh law graduates who are just entering the legal profession? What key lessons have you learned along the way that you would like to share with them? 

    A law graduate must understand that law is a learning process, which would never end. Therefore, reading and understanding the law and its implications are essential. Like practice makes a man perfect, similarly, the more you read, the more you gain. Law graduates, during the initial days, must visit Court everyday and observe the Advocates arguing their cases and the kind of questions raised by the Benches. This will make them understand how the case is presented. You can make notes and read the file thoroughly, however, there are certain spontaneous questions, which would arise and those questions can be answered, only with your general acumen. A law graduate must not refrain from reading the topics, which are not necessary for the kind of legal practice he/she is involved in. He/She must understand that presenting a case before the Court is an art crafted by an Advocate. Thus, every advocate has a different way of presenting the case. Thus, the argumentative skills can only be learnt, when you hear and listen in a Courtroom. I wish All the Best to all the Law graduates.  

    Get in touch with Devmani Bansal-

  • Dr.Vidyottma Jha, Advocate at Supreme Court of India, In Conversation With SuperLawyer On Strategies For Successful Outcomes In Legal Profession

    Dr.Vidyottma Jha, Advocate at Supreme Court of India, In Conversation With SuperLawyer On Strategies For Successful Outcomes In Legal Profession

    This interview has been published by Prabhjot Singh, Priyanka Karwa and The SuperLawyer Team

    What inspired you to choose law as a career? How has been the decision so far?

    I’ve wanted to be a lawyer for as long as I can remember, so much so that I don’t really remember ever wanting to be anything else! My earliest memories of wanting to be lawyer date back to when I was in primary school. What triggered the idea of becoming a lawyer in the first place was becoming the voice of people or the voiceless who for some reason are unable to speak for themselves or they are not heard. There are people who fear to approach the court and ask for justice.

    This deeply impacted my thought process and since then, I set a goal for myself and from then on my focus was on one thing – to become a lawyer so that I could serve the people; the needy and the unheard. Many of us have childhood dreams which end up being just that, dreams. Life takes us in different directions and those childhood dreams become distant memories. I was a very determined child. My decision or the journey so far has been of trial triumphs. All I can say is despite the odds the journey has been good and worth it.

    What were the challenges that you faced in the beginning of your career?

    Ans: Despite the Constitutional guarantees and amendments in the laws women are still far away from the desired level of treatment from society. They still face bias. The legal profession is no different. Here also the women have to confront gender bias at several levels. According to senior advocate Pinky Anand, women in litigation have it harder as they have to face clients, lawyers and judges, most of whom are male, on a daily basis. In a way, they have to confront gender bias at several levels. We say we live in a modern society, but gender inequality is still evident in several professions, including law.

    According to data published by the American Bar Association’s Market Research Department in April 2016, women comprised only 36 percent of legal professionals in the country. Though the number of women is growing in private law firms as well as the judiciary, they don’t have equal access to senior positions.

    The working environment and office hours in most law firms are still more suitable to male lawyers compared to their female counterparts. Women entering the legal profession have to face a multitude of obstacles to pursue a successful career. Three issues still continue to be the biggest problems to a woman’s advancement in the legal profession. They include traditional sexual stereotypes, inflexible workplace structures and inadequate access to mentoring.  

    Besides, women also face problems such as inequality in pay and sexual harassment in the workplace. There is a wide gap which still needs to be addressed and women ought to be given better work environment as we know they can give a boost to the economy if they participate actively. It’s high time that they are not repressed, suppressed and oppressed.

    What strategies do you use to ensure successful outcomes for your clients?

    Well…advocates are mere representatives of their clients. It’s all about facts and circumstances when you reach the court room. The advocates certainly have to do a lot of research, studies and observations to ensure a positive outcome for the clients. At the same time even the clients have to be truthful with the facts and documents so that things turn out to be positive. In short, it requires a lot of hard work from the lawyers and cooperation from the clients.

    Vidyottma, how do you keep up with the changing laws and regulations in your field?

    This is an era of globalization. It has impacted almost every sector and legal profession is no exception to it. The impact is both qualitative and quantitative. In fact, the past revolution  has been a sort of mini-revolution in the legal service sector with the greatest impact on corporate legal arena, activities in the field of corporate taxation, corporate governance, environmental protection, competition law, intellectual properties etc. The number of law firms dealing with such work was very few so there has been discerning shift in the disposition of emerging legal sectors towards settling disputes through ADRS rather the adversarial litigation mode of dispute resolution. Globalization has thus expanded the internal and external demand for legal services.

    Among all the cases, i.e, Environmental law, Service matters, Family and matrimonial disputes, Cyber laws and IP, etc, Vidyottma which one do you find the most interesting and challenging? 

    All these areas are different. In fact law itself is vast, diverse like an ocean. It has various facets. Choosing one stream over another won’t be fair as all are very interesting and important. Still if I need to choose I will choose Environmental law and Cyber law as they have grabbed much attention in recent times due to the changing paradigms in the legal sector in the era of globalization.

    How do you handle ethical dilemmas that may arise in your work? Could you highlight some ways to tackle the same?

    The Bar Council has codified the laws that relate to the ethics for the practicing lawyers. According to the Bar Council Rules the advocate has to accept any brief in the Courts or Tribunals at a fe consistent with his standing at the Bar as per the nature of the cases. An advocate can say ‘No’ in certain cases according to the Rule 11 of Bar Council of India. He has to give valid reasons for not accepting the briefs. It could be due to non-availability, not practicing in such area as the case relates to or if an advocate has to go out of station he can decline from accepting the brief. 

    According to you Vidyottma, as you are also involved as a speaker on various issues, like sexual harassment of women, hit and run cases, PoSH, etc, do you think it is implied in local committees where women are neglected in informal sectors?

    Yes, it is implied and women face myriad challenges in no matter which sector they work in be it informal sector or any. Women are not given the requisite treatment. They are denied their rights. Though the Constitution guarantees equal rights to all irrespective of gender. The onus is upon us, the society as a whole; to give them equal footing in every area. It should not be just said that they deserve to be treated equally rather it should be manifested.

    Talking about work-life balance, there has been ample amount of discussion on health issues as a lawyer, what do you believe are the best practices to maintain the equilibrium? 

    The work-life balance  for an Attorney can’t be defined just once.  It is rather a process that evolves and grows with time. One has to discover self in order to chart a course of action which is flexible on the one hand and committed on the other. Besides, it should add to the overall well-being and mental health.

    Also, one’s mindset towards achieving a balance is very important. Mindset would include positive stress and growth which can pay positive dividends in the way you process the work. So, the work-life balance could be achieved by the lawyers only by way of non-negotiable commitment to yourself and developing an understanding of an idea that no two definitions of the term will look alike. An attorney has to delve deep, process and channelize their work in such manner that it does not affect their health especially mental health.

    Few advice for our young law professionals?

    Well… for the new generation lawyers I will suggest to go where the expectations and demand to perform are high. This will give them the opportunity to grow. They should refrain from joining the easy crowd that won’t help in the long run though it may seem easy in the beginning. Then you will always have two ways in front of you; the easy way and the right way.  

    Not only in law school but in life also you will come across these two every now and then; committing to choosing the latter over the former can help you not only grow as a professional but also as a person.

    The shortcuts may seem easier but it may haunt you later. Law graduates have number of opportunities they just have to take their time, delve on every option available and think about it analytically and then decide which career path suits them the most.

    I strongly believe that we know ourselves the best and whatever career option we choose is a reflection of our choices that we make. I suggest to think and decide for that one should talk to the seniors, the teachers and the mentors who can help in clearing the doubts and take the best decisions. 

    Get in touch with Dr.Vidyottma Jha-

  • What does it take to become a partner? Sahil Narang, Partner at Khaitan & Co and AOR, Supreme Court shares his 8-year-long journey at Khaitan: from junior associate to a distinguished Partner.

    This interview has been published by Sonali Parashar and the SuperLawyer Team

    Let us begin with the most important question, did you always dream of becoming a lawyer or, did it happen by chance? Also, tell us about your journey.

    Before coming to what led me to become a lawyer- a little bit about me. I hail from Abohar, a small town, about 30 km from the India-Pakistan border, in the State of Punjab. My grandfather was a local politician and social worker, and my father was a lawyer practising at the city civil courts, Abohar who, quite often, also used to attend and appear before the District Courts at Ferozepur (later at Fazilka, a border town). So, I was exposed to the field of law at a very young age. 

    Since I grew up looking at my father, working diligently as a lawyer and collecting hundreds of books for his library every year, the curiosity towards law was imbibed in me by default. However, I had a huge interest in the field of science during my school days and wanted to become either a doctor or an engineer given the trend prevalent at that time.  I went on to study science in the 11th and 12th standard and gave competitive exams such as the IIT, AIEEE, etc. to get admission into engineering courses back then. I had an option to continue that pursuit and become an engineer, however, the innate affinity towards law imbibed within me from childhood, looking at the meticulous way my father used to practise law, pushed me to pursue the study of law. Therefore, rather than getting admission in some renowned engineering college, I enrolled in the B.A.(Hons.) program at DAV College, Chandigarh affiliated to the Panjab University, Chandigarh. I passed BA with a distinction in Political Science in 2005, post which I got selected in the three-year law course at one of the oldest institutions in the region, the Department of Laws, Chandigarh, my father’s alma mater.

    Since I was inclined to continue the study of law and give competitive examinations including the judicial services exam, I got admitted to the LL.M course at NALSAR University of Law, Hyderabad through CLAT. I was actively involved in research, pro bono work and co-curricular activities at the university during the LL.M course. 

    During my days at NALSAR, I was introduced to various opportunities in the field of law. I also got an opportunity to attend the Private International Law Course at the Hague Academy of International Law at, the Hague, the Netherlands in 2009. Eventually, I joined Khaitan & Co. and a decade later – here we are. 

    The present focus is on advising on regulatory issues, commercial litigation, and the representation of various clients from the entertainment and multiplex industry across India. If we draw a comparison between the global and Indian entertainment and multiplex industries, were you able to predict these advancements in the legal arena?  

    The advancement in the legal arena surrounding a sector depends upon the growth of that sector. I have been blessed to get exposure to and advise and represent clients in various sectors including in the entertainment and multiplex industry during my career. The Indian entertainment and multiplex industry caters to a very different demographic as compared to the western world. Although we receive some guidance from other countries when it comes to legal issues surrounding this sector. While there is a significant amount of autonomy and minimal regulation in western countries in the sphere of entertainment and cinemas, jurisprudence is still evolving in India. We still see heavy regulation by the government in these spheres and archaic laws which are dealing with these fields. The Indian cinema industry is faced with archaic laws which need to be updated given the fast-paced development in this area. The liberalisation of Indian cinemas and the recent shift to OTT has been a game-changer on how people consume entertainment in today’s world. The recent years have witnessed a massive influx of OTT giants such as Netflix and Amazon foraying into the Indian market. This has led to an increased reliance on Indian lawyers to assist them to find their way into the Indian space and steer clear from legal repercussions. The real challenge is for the regulation to catch up with the development of this sector.    

    You were named as one of the lawyers for Legal Era’s 40 under 40 list in the field of law for the year 2020, and you also served as the Co-Chair of Competition Law & Consumer Affairs Committee of PHDCCI for Presidential Year 2021-22. Congratulations on adding another feather to your cap. What is your next goal? Is there anything you’d like to tell us about?

    I had started with Khaitan & Co as an intern in the year 2009, got a PPO and became a Partner with the Dispute Resolution practice group, New Delhi in the year 2018. I have learnt a lot during this time. Currently, I lead a team of lawyers working on the dispute resolution side with a primary focus on commercial litigation and arbitration. The year 2020 was a very challenging year given the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. It brought the best out of many of us. I was very lucky to have worked on a variety of matters despite the disruption in the legal sector because of the pandemic. It was because of the wide variety of work and the client’s recommendations that helped me get recognised in recent years. 

    However, I wish to be mindful that it’s a sea out there and there is still more to be achieved. I would want to expand my commercial litigation and arbitration practice, both domestic and international, and engage more in highly complex and challenging disputes. 

    Besides this, I would also like to contribute to the development of jurisprudence in various nuances of laws including beneficial legislations made for ease of trade and commerce.

    Having received so much from the legal fraternity, I would like to take out time to render legal advice to individuals and organisations that are unable to afford legal advice and/or cannot access legal aid. Various organisations are doing good work in this sphere. However, it is particularly overwhelming to see young law students very effectively running legal aid clinics in their colleges and effectively using social media to educate people and spread legal awareness. It would be a privilege to be associated with such benevolent activities.  

    At this juncture of my career, I would want to engage with law students and young lawyers to share the experiences and learnings, which I have received in my career to date. In fact, in furtherance of this endeavour, I have been actively participating in such webinars and would certainly like to keep that going. 

    I would conclude with a famous quote – ‘Big tasks are still out there and a lot of hard work yet to be done.

    You are involved in research and have authored some extensive research on a variety of topics. How has research work helped you stay updated with the academics as well as policy and legislative changes that we see occur from time to time?

    I think the most important tool in a lawyer’s toolbox is his / her ability to research, read and write. During my time at NALSAR University of Law, while pursuing the masters’ course, I realised that one of the best things one could invest in is books, be it academic or otherwise. This habit of reading will inculcate a life-long habit of curiosity and research.  

    This helped me immensely during my preparation for the coveted Advocate-on-record exam of the Supreme Court of India. Getting admitted is a major achievement as very few lawyers qualify in this annually held examination conducted by the Supreme Court of India.

    In addition, knowing and being abreast of the current position of law gives one confidence in dealing with and correctly advising a client.  

    Further, research methodologies would generally include comparatives analysis of legislation across jurisdictions and critique of legislation and policy prevalent in various jurisdictions. This would in turn give one perspective of laws of developed countries and what legislative changes our country may see. 

    Mr. Sahil Narang, Partner at Khaitan & Co.

    Can you give our readers a brief idea of what they need to prepare for if they want to climb the corporate ladder based on your experience representing international commercial arbitration in a variety of matters?

    There is no shortcut to hard work, perseverance, and commitment. I would add that in the initial years, a young lawyer must remain open to all kinds of work whether he/she chooses to join a law firm, a senior counsel or a chamber practice for his/her training. At a later stage, one may discover their interest in a particular field of law.  

    Further, for one to excel and climb the corporate ladder, it is important to be client-centric, innovative, detail-oriented, and prolific. These virtues will not only make one solution-oriented but also will give them an edge over other contemporaries.

    In the field of arbitration, it is important to refer to commentaries of various celebrated authors on arbitration and keep abreast of recent judgments by the courts.  

    What was the one learning experience throughout your entire career that you’d credit to have shaped your career and brought you to this point?

    My family, I would say has been my greatest motivator, and has shaped my career. Seeing my father practising law at the city civil courts, Abohar, working hard, day in and day out, motivated me at a very young age to work hard and excel in academics. Further, having roots in a very small town has made me grounded but at the same time meaningfully ambitious.

    Can you take us through a typical day in your life? Is it possible to carve out time for your other interests or hobbies given your hectic schedule as a renowned Partner at Khaitan & Co?

    In pre-covid times, most parts of my day were spent either in courts or in office. Substantial time used to be spent commuting from court to office or conferences and venues for arbitration. Travelling used to take a fair share of my time, however, with most courts and tribunals going virtual, I could save a lot of time. Consequently, efficiency increased. During covid times, my day is usually spent on reviewing drafts, attending conference calls with my colleagues in the team, clients, and senior counsel. I also make it a point to read the latest case laws of the Supreme Court and other courts on dispute resolution and arbitration. Even in my hectic schedule, I make it a point to take out time for my family. I love to read books on weekends. My favourite pastime since my college days has been to watch movies in multiplexes and the latest series on OTT platforms. I have recently picked up badminton as a sport and would also like to learn to play the piano soon.  

    What career advice do you have for our readers? In my opinion, to be successful in the field of law one must inculcate a habit of reading at a young age. One thing that has helped me in being thorough in my work is that I read every document in full, irrespective of any preconceived notions. I would advise law students to read, read and read everything you can get your hands on. To put this in perspective, my favourite quote is by Walt Disney- “There is more treasure in books than in all the pirate’s loot on Treasure Island.”

    GET IN TOUCH WITH SAHIL NARANG:

  • Pavan Duggal, Advocate, Supreme Court, shares his views on protecting privacy, cyber security issues and enforcement of cyber laws in India

    Pavan Duggal, Advocate, Supreme Court, shares his views on protecting privacy, cyber security issues and enforcement of cyber laws in India

    Pavan Duggal is an Advocate specialising in the field of cyberlaw and e-commerce. He has been recognised as one of best cyber lawyers around the world. He has made a tremendous impact with an international reputation as an expert and authority on Cyberlaw, Cyber Security Law and e-Commerce law.

    His empanelment as a consultant to UNCTAD and UNESCAP on Cyberlaw and Cyber crime respectively, membership of the AFACT Legal Working Group of the UN / CEFAT, consulting as an expert with the Council of Europe on Cyber crime, inclusion in the Board of Experts of European Commission’s Dr. E-Commerce and his work as an expert authority on a Cyberlaw primer for e-ASEAN Task Force and as a reviewer for Asian Development Bank speaks volumes of his worldwide acceptance as an authority. He is the President of Cyberlaw Asia, Asia’s pioneering organisation committed to the passing of dynamic Cyber laws in the Asian continent. He is also a member of the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center Panel of Neutrals.

    He has been associated with the Ministry of Communication and Information Technology, Government of India on Cyberlaw and Electronic Governance legal issues. He is a member of Advisory Committee on E-Governance in Karnataka constituted by the Government of Karnataka. Pavan is a member of Information Forensic Working Group on e-Information Systems, Security and Audit Association.

    He heads his niche law firm Pavan Duggal Associates, which has practice areas, amongst others, in Cyberlaw, Business Process Outsourcing Law, Intellectual Property Rights and Information Technology Law, Information Security Law, Defence, Biotech and Corporate Law.

     

    HOW WOULD YOU LIKE TO INTRODUCE YOURSELF TO OUR READERS? PLEASE TELL US SOMETHING ABOUT YOUR PRE-COLLEGE LIFE?

    I would like to introduce myself as a student of Cyberlaw.  A person who is constantly trying to discover new nuances pertaining to legal, policy and regulatory aspects pertaining to the Internet, Cyberspace and the newly emerging technologies.  A scholar who has dedicated more than 23 years of his life in this space and who still believes that he is at the outside periphery of knowledge.  A person who believes that the Internet is a game-changing paradigm, which is potentially the most significant, that human civilization has seen after the advent of fire.  I have been working on various issues on the intersection of law and technology.  Hence, my path has not been like traditional lawyers.  I have chosen to create my own path on the road to discovery.  In fact, it is strange that you could never even think while in school what you will ultimately land up doing in life.  I have been the student of Delhi Public School, Mathura Road, New Delhi and did my entire schooling from that school, excelled in academics and topped the school in Humanities and was also in the merit list.  As a student, I was extremely active in extra-curricular activities including debating, music, theatre, dance, essay writing, quizzes and various other kinds of extra-curricular activities.  I won a record number of prizes in school.

     

    YOU ARE FAMOUS AS A CYBER LAW EXPERT. WHAT KIND OF WORK DO YOU CURRENTLY DO?

    It is true that today I am known as a Cyberlaw expert.  This is primarily so because of the kind of super specialization that I have acquired the area of Cyberlaw. I have worked for more than the last 2 decades in this space. I have been extensively working on the intersection of law and technology. Currently, I do various kinds of works. I advise clients on nuances pertaining to cyberspace transactions, compliances under the applicable provisions of the Indian Cyberlaw, advise on cyber/electronic transactions and the legal nuances, help companies to protect and preserve their domain names and their web presence online, do litigation for variety of clients so as to protect their legal interests, whether in the form of plaintiffs or defendants.  I write extensively and have written 102 books on various aspects of Cyberlaw and connected nuances.  I teach extensively in select law colleges and international and national institutions including the National Police Academy, National Judicial Academy, Delhi Judicial Academy and various state judicial academies.  I extensively interact with various international stakeholders on the nuances of cyberspace.

    I had been contributing a column entitled “Brief Facts” for 8 years in the Economic Times. I have extensively featured in various international and national media.  My different columns published in various media, news portals and columns include The Economic Times, The Hindustan Times, The Business Standard, The Pioneer, The Deccan Chronicle, and The Mint etc.  I have launched a Course on Cyber Security Law last year, which today has more than 9750 students from 157 countries.  I speak at various conferences, seminars and workshops.

    I am the Conference Director of the International Conference on Cyberlaw, Cybercrime &Cybersecurity which is the world’s unique Conference looking at the intersection of Cyberlaw, Cybercrime &Cybersecurity.  I am chairing the International Commission on Cyber Security Law which is looking at collating legal principles governing cybersecurity at a global level.  I am also heading the Artificial Intelligence Law Hub which is looking at the examination of cutting-edge nuances concerning Artificial Intelligence.  I am also heading the Blockchain Law Epicentre which is also looking at legalities concerning Blockchain. I am extensively working with international organizations including UNESCO, ITU, ICANN, Council of Europe, INTERPOL and many other organizations so as to contribute to the evolving jurisprudence on Cyberlaw, Cybercrime &Cybersecurity. In my humble manner, I have been trying to contribute my small inputs to pushing the envelope of evolving jurisprudence on Cyberlaw, Cybercrime and Cybersecurity.  In a nut-shell, I try to do the variety of activities all surrounding the Internet, cyberspace and legal, policy and regulatory issues connected therewith.   I advise the Government of India and its various Ministries especially the Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology, Government of India on various issues concerning Cyberlaw and am part of various governmental bodies.  I have also been part of G Gopalakrishna Working Group on Electronic Banking formed by the Reserve Bank of India which determined and set the cybersecurity standards for Banks in India.

     

    WHAT SORT OF CASES DO YOU USUALLY HANDLE?

      I handle a variety of cases on diverse issues. These cases invariably involve data thefts in the corporate sector, unauthorized transmission of data, violation of trade secrets, breach of privacy of individuals, disputes concerning electronic contracts, cybercrime prosecution and defence. I also do cases pertaining to liability arising from contravention under the law.  I advise on domain name disputes and try to get domain names back from the squatters.  I do a lot of cases for protection of reputation.  I do cases concerning cyber defamation, cyber nuisance, cyber harassment, cyberstalking and trolling and help affected persons and provide advisories.  I also do various cases pertaining to breaches of cybersecurity and the potential ramifications emerging therefrom.  I also advice intermediaries, in terms of their respective compliances on how they can limit their liability for third-party data.  I do cases pertaining to abuse of Over The Top Applications and also the social platforms like Facebook, Twitter, Instagram etc.   I also do cases for protecting and preserving digital rights of netizens.  I also file Public Interest Litigations (PIL) on legal aspects concerning cyberspace which impact the public interest at a broader level.

     

    HOW IS CYBER LAW AND ENFORCEMENT SYSTEM IN INDIA? IS IT ADDING TO THE CHALLENGES OF TIME?

    The Cyberlaw system in India has been put in place by virtue of the Information Technology Act, 2000.  India enacted this law, keeping in mind the UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce.  The said legislation is indeed historic as it not only legalized the electronic format but also paved the way for the growth of electronic commerce and electronic governance in the country.  It also sought to cover various cybercrimes.  This law also elaborated the liabilities of intermediaries. However, in the year 2000, this law did not specifically cover the mobiles, despite the fact that mobiles had already emerged as a major factor in mainstream society.  The Information Technology Act, 2000 was amended by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, after 26/11 Mumbai attacks.  The said amendments sought to enhance the scope and applicability of the Indian Cyberlaw to be applicable to all kinds of mobiles and communication devices. Various new cybercrimes were added and also the concept of intermediaries and their liability was more specifically well defined. Cybersecurity as a concept was distinctly added in the said law and various provisions concerning the same were also adequately put in the same.  It has been for the last more than 10 years since the amendments have taken place. However, when one looks at the cyber legal regime in the country, one finds that it has not been effectively implemented.  First and foremost, it needs to be understood that the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 effectively watered down the deterrent effect of the previous law.  This is so because, barring few cybercrimes, almost all cybercrimes were transformed into bailable offences where the accused is entitled to bail.  I was the counsel for the complainant in India’s first cybercrime conviction in the year 2003.  We had hoped that this first conviction could be the precursor of more convictions to follow. However, with the change of law and given the sloppy enforcement of the law, cybercrime convictions have effectively dried up. Today, India is seeing a famine of cybercrime convictions.  This is also primarily so because enforcement of provisions of law has not been very effective.  The way the Police is detecting, investigating and prosecuting cyber crimes, leaves a lot of potential gaps.

    Electronic evidence is not given the right kind of legal treatment, as is mandated by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in its various judgments. Consequently, there is a big gap between the registration of such cybercrimes and final prosecution. Majority of electronic evidence has not been able to be put in the right manner that further complicates the entire scenario.   Further, it needs to be understood that technology is a constantly growing target and technology invariably leaves the law 10 steps behind.  The problem in the Indian Cyberlaw is that despite various shortcomings, it is not effectively amended, given the newly emerging challenges that have already come up, which have not been appropriately addressed under the law.  Social media as a paradigm has not been adequately addressed.  Further, issues like cyber stalking, cyber trolling and cyber harassment are not effectively detailed in the said law.  The advent of Over The Top Applications has brought forward new challenges, which are not adequately covered under the law.  Further, the coming of new technologies like Blockchains, Artificial Intelligence and the Internet of Things have further highlighted the inadequacy of the Indian Cyberlaw. There is a need for appropriate amendments in the same so as to make it topical and relevant to the requirements of today’s times.  While it is indeed laudable that the Indian Cyberlaw has provided the legal framework for the legal validity, sanction and growth of electronic commerce and electronic governance, the fact remains that there is lot more work that is required to be done.  India as a country needs to provide utmost focus and priority to Cyberlaw frameworks since the Indian Information Technology Act, 2000 is special legislation and it supersedes any other law prevailing for the time being in force.  Currently, I do feel that due to the advent of emerging technologies, the inadequacy of the Indian Cyberlaw has not been effectively brought forward. It is high time to make the Indian Cyberlaw more topical and relevant, by updating it and incorporating new offences so as to deal with new technological challenges.

     

    HOW DID YOU BUILD YOUR PRACTICE? THREE STEPS YOU HAVE TAKEN THAT MADE THE DIFFERENCE.

     I began as a civil and corporate lawyer.  I started practice in Tis Hazari Court, Delhi and then moved on to the High Court and Supreme Court.  I was initially interested in technology. In the early 1990s, I got certain software clients and that retriggered my interest in technology.  The advent of the Internet provided a completely new game-changing moment in my life.  After being overwhelmed by the media in the first couple of months, I quickly realised that there are a lot of legal, policy and regulatory issues that need to be appropriately addressed and I started working on the same.  At that time, there was not much work happening in India and I started working with the international players.

    Towards the end of 1990s, the Government of India was preparing the Information Equipment Bill, 1999.  I got active and started working with various stakeholders including the Parliamentarians and the Government of India so as to give inputs on the Bill.  I also started working with the Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology, Government of India on Cyberlaw issues.  All this time, I had started doing work on domain name disputes.  The coming of the Information Technology Act, 2000 provided a new area to focus on, where I focused. As time passed by, clients came back and said that they wanted us to expand the scope of services that we were providing. So, I swam with time and kept on expanding the bouquet of services that were provided to clients and slowly, the practice grew. Today, I am primarily known because of my super-specialization in Cyberlaw, Cybercrime and Cybersecurity.  My law firm PavanDuggal Associates, Advocates also does commercial and civil litigations as well.

    As regards three steps that I have taken that made the difference, I believe that Almighty has got its own ways of getting work done from us. I distinctly believe that we all are puppets on the stage of life, for whom all work has been predetermined.  Looking back, the three steps that made the difference for me would include the following:

    I was driven with my passion for technology and its intersection of law and technology.  I followed my passion and my heart and landed up where I am currently standing.

    My perseverance and hard work.  A lot of people only try to see the glossy side of legal career.  However, it takes a huge volume of untiring effort to make one’s position and contribution.  I have been extensively doing hard work which potentially could also be a contributing factor to my current position.

    Patience is also one factor that has helped me. A lot of people often run out of patience and do not have the patience to pursue their passion for their dreams, if they don’t get early success. There were numerous hiccups and massive earlier failures that I actually experienced but I felt that cyber is the next domain of the future and I need to focus. I patiently waited and kept on working silently in this space.

     

    COULD YOU TELL OUR READERS ABOUT THE FIRST TIME THAT YOU APPEARED IN COURT?

     I remember the first time when I appeared in the Court. That was immediately after passing out from LL.B. My first appearance was in the Tis Hazari Court, Delhi.  I was nervous.  I was appearing before a Trial Judge and while I was reading the case, I was slightly confused as to how to address the Judge, whether the Judge should be addressed as Your Honour or My Lord.  I had done a lot of preparations for the case and ultimately, when the hearing of the case happened, it took a couple of minutes.  I did fail initially because of the slight nervousness but as the case began, I confidently stated what I had to state and the Judge also asked the other side about the proposition and thereafter proceeded to pass an order.  That particular appearance is still vivid in my mind.  It was a completely different experience from the traditionally filmy legal appearances that we are used to seeing in the Bollywood and Hollywood films.  However, I distinctly remember extensively reading the file prior to my first appearance. I also told myself that I need to be most updated with all the aspects of the file, and worked towards that direction. It was my very interesting first appearance.

     

    WHY DID YOU CHOOSE CYBER LAW AS YOUR SPECIALISATION?

     I chose Cyberlaw as my specialisation because I felt that cyberspace is the paradigm of the future.  I was very clear that the world is increasingly going more and more digital and therefore if I have to look in the future, I must be fully prepared for the same. Hence, I chose Cyberlaw as my specialisation since I felt that over a period of time, my specialisation will increasingly have to grow very significantly and will even land up having a large impact, on other specialisation as well.

     

    MANY LAWYERS ARE INTERESTED IN CYBER LAW. WHAT WOULD BE YOUR ADVICE TO THOSE WORKING AS CYBER LAWYERS?

     My advice to lawyers who are interested in working as cyber lawyers is that there is a lot of scope in Cyberlaw in the coming times.  However, everything is not as rosy, as it appears.  There is a lot of hard work, required before one can achieve the desired destination.  There is an increasing need for cyber lawyers as more and more stakeholders are increasingly using the digital format and are using cyberspace as a central theme point for all their operations, activities and initiatives.  As time passes by, the volume of work is constantly going to increase. So if you are interested in Cyberlaw, this is the right time to get started and be involved in this area.

     

    HOW IMPORTANT IS IT TO HAVE MENTORS FOR A YOUNG LAWYER IN STARTING HIS CAREER? WHO WERE YOUR MENTORS AT THE START OF YOUR CAREER?

     It is very important for a young lawyer in starting his career to have mentors.  Mentors are not just pillars of strength but also inspiration, encouragement and source of advice.  One should not believe that one knows everything in the starting of the career. On the contrary, after passing out from the law college, it is very important to unlearn what you have learnt and then relearn aspects in the profession.  Mentors help guide and supervise young lawyers and also put them in the right direction.  The brilliant aspect about mentors is that mentors can use their lifetime experience to guide youngsters to reach their best potential.  My mentor in the starting of my career was my father and he still continues to be my mentor.  My father is a practicing Advocate.  I looked upto him as my hero, as my idol and as my mentor.  Consequently, I started looking up to him for all advice and inputs to get started and what to do in important cases that I am doing. My father still plays a very significant and invaluable role in my evolution as a lawyer. He is the rock-solid pillar to whom I always go back in the event of any challenge.  He appropriately guided me in the right direction and also warned me on how to face various challenges that lie ahead in my legal practice.

     

    PRIVACY HAS BECOME VERY FRAGILE. HOW INDIA SHOULD PROTECT PRIVACY OF CITIZENS?

     Privacy is an integral part of our human existence.  No wonder, when the Hon’ble Supreme Court has declared the right to privacy as an integral part of the fundamental right to life, it is effectively ventilating the hopes and aspirations of millions of Indians.  India needs to do extensive homework to protect and preserve the privacy of its citizens.  Currently, India does not have a dedicated law on privacy.  The Indian Information Technology Act, 2000 is not a law on privacy and only has provided lip service to privacy.  There is a need for a dedicated law on privacy that would help define the roles, duties and responsibilities of various stakeholders. Personal and data privacy needs to be adequately specifically addressed.

    As a nation, we should not confuse privacy with data protection. Data protection is important but privacy is critical to human existence, human dignity and human life.  As a nation goes forward, we need to have specific courts who only look at privacy related violations so that privacy violation matters are handled with utmost care in a very gentle manner and with distinctive victim friendly approach. With now increasingly the Government being straddled with the duty to ensure that the right to privacy is effectively implemented, the Government has also a lot of work to do.   India is currently in the process of coming up with a new Personal Data Protection Bill. While that could address some aspects of privacy, but India needs to do far more. Privacy would require the adoption of distinctive new approaches for the purposes of adequately addressing it.  Also, stringent, effective and efficacious remedies need to be provided to victims whose privacy, both data privacy and personal privacy is infringed or violated.  India needs to provide for a regime of exemplary damages so as to give a right message to all stakeholders, that privacy of citizens cannot be taken for granted and is a value of human dignity that needs to be respected and handled with utmost care, caution and regard.

     

    WHAT IS THE CURRENT STATE OF CYBER SECURITY IN INDIA?

     Today, India as a nation has not been giving its best efforts to the cause of cybersecurity. In fact, India as a nation is giving only lip service to cybersecurity.  India did come across with its National Cyber Security Policy, 2013 which was a remarkable document containing good motherly statements and the Policy of the Indian nation on cybersecurity. However, the last 5 years have shown that the National Cyber Security Policy of 2013 has only remained as a paper-tiger. In addition, we need to appreciate that India does not have dedicated legislation on cybersecurity, in comparison to a large number of other countries.  The Indian Information Technology Act, 2000 is not a cybersecurity legislation.  This is despite the fact that cybersecurity as a concept has been defined and introduced under the Indian Information Technology Act, 2000 by virtue of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.

    At a time when countries like China, Singapore, Vietnam, Egypt etc. are racing miles ahead in terms of coming up with detailed and elaborate cyber security legislation, India as a nation has been left behind.  Further, as a nation, we are also not clear as to whose responsibility is cyber security.  A large number of people in India believe that cyber security is a governmental responsibility, without realising that it is not a correct picture. Cyber security is a collectively shared responsibility for all stakeholders. The Government has to play an important role in cyber security, but other shareholders have to increasingly also play a very significant role in this direction.  India as a nation needs to define the rights, duties and responsibilities of various stakeholders. Indian networks and systems are constantly under attack and as a nation, we have not been very effective in terms of repelling those attacks.  There is a need for a dedicated cyber army in India who can actually protect and preserve cyber security attacks, both in the actual world and also in cyberspace on a 24/7 basis.   We still don’t have a dedicated cyber security authority in the country.  Cyber security is a shared baby and is a subject of turf war amongst various ministries.  India as a nation needs to quickly realise that in case if we are not effectively working on protecting and preserving cyber security, it could potentially start adversely affecting the sovereignty, security and integrity of India in the coming times.

     

    WHAT IS YOUR OPINION IS ON ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION. DO YOU THINK IT WILL BECOME REALITY ANYTIME SOON IN INDIA.

     I feel online dispute resolution is the way going forward.  We have seen the success of online dispute resolution for protection of domain names with the effective implementation of Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN).  We have also started seeing the beta use of online dispute resolution. It will become a reality very soon with the coming of a few years in India.  In fact, cyber arbitration should be an important element in online dispute resolution in the coming times.

     

    WHAT IS THAT ONE CASE THAT HAS LEFT A LASTING IMPACT ON YOU?

     The one case that has left a lasting impact on me is the case that I did for an online card processing company. The company suffered a cybersecurity breach and the said breach was extremely complicated and sophisticated. The breach led to not just theft of data but also subsequent cloning of credit cards of some high net worth individuals. The said cards were subsequently cloned and sent to different countries. In more than 2 dozen countries, the said cards were used in massive global operations all aimed to physically withdraw millions of dollars from ATMs across the world.  Our client lost millions of dollars. The client was however insured. This case demonstrated to me the enormity of cybercrimes through various highly professionally organised and ultra sophisticated cybercrime gangs.  It also showed the inadequacy of organisations and companies to deal with cybersecurity breaches and new challenges of cybercrimes. This case brought to my attention the enormous manipulations of ATMs and planning done by cyber criminal gangs and also showed me the ground reality that in the present and in the coming future, there is nothing known as complete security and that nobody is secure. This case further sensitised that everybody is capable of being hacked and therefore now the new norm has to be to accept the fact that breaches of cybersecurity will be a part of our day-to-day lives. How can we concentrate on cyber resilience and how can we be up and about after being breached by the cyber attack, has to be the new focus area.  This case has been an important case which made me understand the impermanence of today’s present scenario.  Just because everything is going fine, there is no guarantee that these things will keep on going fine tomorrow. On the contrary, change is constant and will be so, in the lives and times of stakeholders in the digital and mobile ecosystem.

     

    HOW CAN A JUNIOR WISHING TO WORK UNDER YOU GET IN TOUCH WITH YOU? WHAT QUALITIES WILL YOU LOOK FOR HIRING A JUNIOR?

     Any junior who wishes to work under me could get in touch with my law firm PavanDuggal Associates, Advocates.   He/she could contact us at email ID info@pavanduggalassociates.com or could also reach out to me personally at my email ID pavan@pavanduggal.com and pduggal@vsnl.com.  I am looking for the hunger and passion to learn as important qualities of any junior that could work for me. A lot of juniors today are not willing to learn.  They come out under the presumption that they know everything and due to overconfidence, often land-up missing important milestones.  Hard work, perseverance, patience, dedication, discipline and good interpersonal relations are important attributes and qualities that I look forward to while hiring a junior.

     

     WHAT INSPIRES YOU TO WRITE? HOW DOES BEING AN AUTHOR OF NUMEROUS BOOKS AND ARTICLES HELP YOU IN YOUR CAREER?

     I believe that life is short.  We will all be dead and gone tomorrow. Hence, it is very important to write your thoughts and express them in print so that they can be your contribution to society.  I get inspired to write because I believe that my thoughts must be well captured and communicated to other stakeholders.  I have had a flair for writing from the very beginning.  I love to write as I feel that writing is the best way of sharing experience, knowledge, perspectives and opinions.  I write rigorously and regularly. Over the last more than 2 decades, I have authored 102 books on different aspects of Cyberlaw, Cybercrime &Cybersecurity and connected legalities.  In addition, I have written a number of articles that have appeared in various newspapers, online media platforms, websites and other publications.

    Being an author of articles and books will help you in your career. People see you with a different perspective and in a different light, once you become an author.  They start giving you more respect and regard and also your books then become ambassadors of your capacities and capabilities. Also, writing books demonstrates your authoritative command on your subject and hence contributes to your career.

     

     YOU ARE A PROLIFIC WRITER. DOES IT HELP A LAWYER TO WRITE ARTICLES AND BOOKS?

    As a prolific writer, I believe that it does help a lawyer to write articles and books.  We have to traditionally change our mindsets about the legal profession. The perception that lawyer must only go and argue matters in courts is an old perception and needs to be slightly changed with the times. Today, lawyers are expected to do multi-dimensional roles. Hence, they must not only have people friendly soft skills but also have appropriate contributions to give back to society. Writing books and articles is one such contribution that one can make in terms of giving back to society.  Your books and articles could get read by members of the public who will then become your potential clients and will start forming an opinion about you.  In the event of any challenge and issue, they would come back and seek your opinion.  So over a period of time, a lawyer which writes books and articles not only tends to enhance his/her capability but also tends to contribute to the growth of evolving jurisprudence.  Having authored 102 books and numerous articles, I believe that it definitely helps lawyers to write articles and books.

    In the end, I would just like to say that the world is a constantly changing paradigm. Everything is in a constant state of flux. Hence, the focus of any lawyer has to be to try to update his/her skill-sets. We must unlearn, relearn, unlearn, relearn all the time.  This is so because the coming times are very challenging times ahead. The advent of new technologies will bring in, not only new challenges but far more opportunities as well. It requires a vision to understand and identify some key opportunities that the coming future will bring across. The legal profession has been one of the best professions in the world. I believe that with the advent of technology and cyberspace, it will continue to grow by leaps and bounds.  Cyberlaw, as a discipline, will increasingly contribute in the evolving digital law jurisprudence at global and national levels.

     

     

     

  • Ashok K. Gupta, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court of India, on the AOR exam, life in litigation and being on panel of union government

    Ashok K. Gupta  graduated in B.A. (Hons. – Political Science) from University of Delhi in the year 1976.  Then he completed LL.B. from Campus Law Centre, University of Delhi in 1979.

    He enrolled as an Advocate with Bar Council of Delhi in January, 1981.  After practicing in District Court, Delhi for two years, shifted to Supreme Court & joined the chamber of Mr. P.H. Parekh, Advocate Supreme Court of India. He passed the Advocate-on-Record Examination conducted by Supreme Court of India in November, 1986.  And started his Independent Practice in 1987.

    He practices primarily before the Supreme Court, various High Courts like Jabalpur and Indore Benches of MP High Court, High Court of Odisha at Cuttack and Punjab & Haryana High Court, and before various statutory fora like National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC), National Green Tribunal (NGT) & Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) .

    He was appointed Counsel by Delhi High Court (to conduct its cases on the administrative side) before the Supreme Court in the year 2000. The he was appointed Senior Panel Counsel for UOI in Delhi High Court, in January 2001. He was designated as a Senior Advocate in April, 2012. He was the appointed by the supreme court as chairman of three-member committee under the Right to Education Act to report on compliance with various stipulations contained in the Right to Education Act in April, 2014. And also, other pro-bono committees.

    He is also the member of Supreme Court Bar Association, Delhi High Court Bar Association, Odisha High Court Bar Association, Madhya Pradesh High Court Bar Association and International Law Association. Life member of All India Women’s Education Fund Association and in that capacity was elected as member of the Governing Body of Lady Irwin College, University of Delhi during the Academic Year 1996-1997 and 1997-1998. Life member and Treasurer of Confederation of Indian Bar.

    In this interview, we talk to him about:

    • Being a first generation lawyer: college life, internships and interest in litigation;
    • Establishing his independent practice;
    • Cracking the Supreme Court Advocate on Record examination;
    • His wide range of practice encompassing various courts, tribunals and;
    • As Panel of Union Of India for Delhi High Court.

     

    HOW WOULD YOU LIKE TO INTRODUCE YOURSELF TO OUR READERS?

    I would like to be known as a quintessential Delhi-06 person, who loves his family, puts in honest, hard work, never ceases to learn and practice, and yet, enjoys all the good things of life: food of Old Delhi, and theatre at Mandi House in the evening, to name a few. This is my typical middle-class perception of myself.

     

    YOU ARE A FIRST GENERATION LAWYER. WHAT LED YOU CHOOSE LAW AFTER GRADUATION IN POLITICAL SCIENCE?

    Right, I am a first-generation lawyer. After my graduation in political science from Delhi University way back in the year 1976, I chose law not because it fascinated me; I chose law because I thought firstly, it would help me in my Civil Services examination, and shall be my second subject apart from political science. The other feeling was that, in case, I fail to make it to the Civil Services (as indeed, I did), I won’t be unemployable and could always do something as a professional lawyer. So, this was with a view to ensure that I don’t remain unemployed and/or unemployable.

     

    YOU STARTED YOUR CAREER WITH PRACTICE IN DISTRICT COURTS. HOW IMPORTANT IS IT FOR YOUNG LAWYERS TO KNOW BASIC DISTRICT COURT PRACTICE BEFORE MOVING TO THE HIGH COURT AND SUPREME COURT.

    It is correct that I started my career in district courts. Knowing that the nitty-gritty of practice in the Districts Courts is an absolute must for a young lawyer, I’m not suggesting that a lawyer should not aspire to become a High Court/ Supreme Court practitioner. All that I’m suggesting is that one should be fully familiar with the procedural parts of the legal practice, both on the criminal as well as the civil side. At the genesis of one’s career, it is your known circle of acquaintances who approach you, say, for a recovery suit, section 138 complaint, some accident or insurance case, matrimonial disputes and such matters which primarily emanate at the district court level. The ideal situation would be, of course, where one joins a chamber, which handles district court work, besides work in the constitutional courts.

     

    YOU JOINED THE CHAMBER OF SENIOR ADVOCATE PH PAREKH. PLEASE SHARE YOUR EXPERIENCE WORKING WITH HIM.

    Way back in the early eighties, the experience of working in my senior’s chamber was very fascinating and exhilarating. We were about a dozen junior colleagues at that time and it was not unusual for one junior to be doing two-three cases each day. The day would normally begin with a conference with a Senior Counsel like Mr. Fali Nariman, Mr. Sorabjee, Mr. Mridul or Mr. Tarkunde at around 8:30 A.M in the morning, court thereafter, after which we would be immediately heading towards office for drafting work and, again, the cause list would come around 6:30 P.M, whereupon our senior would allocate matters; the office of Senior Counsel would be informed and conferences fixed for next day morning. Then you head towards home around 9 PM and read the brief for the next day morning conference. But we had great fun; lot of outings and birthday celebrations, with legal conferences and seminars thrown-in between.

     

    HOW DID YOU DECIDE TO COMMENCE YOUR INDEPENDENT PRACTICE WITHIN A SHORT SPAN OF SIX YEARS AFTER GRADUATION?

    I decided to commence my independent practice once I realised that one cannot be somebody’s junior eternally. By the time I commenced practice, I had already passed my AOR examination and knew that one has to setup his own practice one day.

     

    WHAT WOULD BE YOUR ADVICE TO LAWYERS APPEARING FOR AOR EXAM NOW?

    I can really advise that a lawyer should thoroughly prepare with case law, latest judgements and equip himself with precise and concise drafting skills. One should know that on the account of the very heavy work load, the Supreme Court judges very much like and appreciate if the pleadings are to the point, not verbose and the point arising in the case is neatly stated. I keep emphasising and reinforcing to my juniors and briefing counsels: “don’t miss the forest for the trees”.

     

    WHAT ARE THE CHALLENGES IN STARTING INDEPENDENT PRACTICE?

    Challenges in starting independent practice are no different from starting any new venture in any new sphere of activity. But, then, if you put in sufficient quality work, you are bound to be noticed. You have to build up reputation for being an upright and a committed professional. Of course, all this would take time. Nothing good was ever achieved in a short time.

     

    YOU ALSO TAKE UP AND ARGUE ARBITRATION CASES. HOW IS PRACTICE IN ARBITRATION DIFFERENT FROM LITIGATION PRACTICE IN INDIA?

    I was first introduced to arbitration way back in the mid-eighties when I appeared alongside a noted junior counsel (now, a respectable Judge of the Supreme Court) in an arbitration proceeding pertaining to claims and counter-claims arising out of the 1982 Asian Games held in New Delhi. The Arbitral Tribunal was headed by Justice (Retd.) A.C. Gupta of the Supreme Court. He was a very quiet and taciturn arbitrator, unlike the majority of present-day arbitrators. For a successful arbitration practice, it is indispensable for one to know the basic essentials of handling suits, even though the technicalities of CPC and Evidence Act do not apply to arbitration proceedings. Surely, one must know about admission and denial of documents, framing of issues (not all arbitral tribunals frame issues), and the proof of documents in case of denial by other side, etc. Also, the art of cross-examination assumes a lot of significance and seriousness in an Arbitration proceeding. An arbitration claim is no different from a claim in a suit, except that the procedure is shorn of all the technicalities, and there is much less stress because of less pressure of time.

     

    YOU HAVE ALSO BEEN ON THE PANEL OF UNION OF INDIA FOR DELHI HIGH COURT. WHAT IS THE MODUS OPERANDI WORKING FOR THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT?

    This was the first time ever that I worked for any government (Central/ State). I was, hitherto, primarily appearing for private clients and some PSUs. It was, initially, difficult for me to adjust to the role of a government lawyer, inasmuch you hardly receive timely instructions, proper records are not maintained, and most of the time you cut a sorry figure before the Court, not on the account of any lack of professional skill or competence on your part. That said, it is, indubitably, a matter of pride, prestige and honour for any lawyer to be empaneled as a government lawyer.

     

    WHAT ARE THE SKILLS REQUIRED FOR A LAWYER AIMING TO BE A SENIOR ADVOCATE IN HIS CAREER?

    First, one has to be a competent and honest lawyer and the other, one should totally abjure sharp practices as a lawyer. There have been several instances, where very skilful and competent lawyers were not given the designation of a Senior Advocate by the Court, on account of the perception of lack of ethics on the part of such lawyer. Now, of course, the Supreme Court in the judgement of ‘Ms.Indira Jaising vs. Supreme Court of India’ has laid down the entire procedure for designation of a lawyer as a Senior Advocate.

     

    BEING A LAWYER, IS IT DIFFICULT TO MAINTAIN WORK-LIFE BALANCE?

    Work-life balance is difficult but not impossible to achieve, just like in any other business or employment. Here the complexities are of a different nature, in the sense, that in the early years as a lawyer, money is hard to come by, hours are uncertain and stress is a little too much to handle. The reason being that the client is primarily concerned with the outcome of his case, not really concerned with your legal knowledge and the hard work put in by you. This does take its toll on one’s health and impacts work life balance.

     

    WHAT IS THE REQUIRED SKILL-SET OF BEING A SUCCESSFUL LAWYER?

    Being successful in the profession requires no set of different rules than the ones you require in other spheres of activities of life. It is talent, hard work and luck – an amalgamation of all the three.

     

    PLEASE LET US ABOUT YOUR MOST MEMORABLE CASES.

    I have appeared in hundreds of cases in my career as a lawyer spread over 38 years, as an instructing advocate in the early years of practice, and as a counsel thereafter, and a senior advocate in later part of life. A government-tender matter, wherein I had engaged and instructed Mr. S.S Ray, Sr. Adv. (now deceased) and Dr. Shankar Ghosh, Sr. Adv. to appear before the Jabalpur High Court in 1991-1992 stands out in my mind. The other case that I fondly remember of the nineties was a very complex trademark case before Justice Ajay Noth Roy of the Calcutta High Court against NALCO Chemicals, USA. I found Justice Roy to be an outstanding and brilliant judge, though the Supreme Court collegium, perhaps, thought otherwise. Among the arbitration matters, I have a proclivity towards my case, ‘National Aluminium Company vs. Pressteel & Fabrications Pvt. Ltd.’: (2004) 1 SCC 540, which paved the way for the Supreme Court to rule on the applicability of the 2015 Arbitration Amendment Act in ‘BCCI vs. Kochi Cricket Pvt. Ltd.’. In recent years, in the cases, ‘National Aluminium Company Ltd. vs. Ananta Kishore Rout’: (2014) 6 SCC 756, ‘Chairman-cum-MD vs. Bharat Chandra Behera’: (2013) 16 SCC 622 and ‘Kalinga Mining Corp. vs. UOI’: (2013) 5 SCC 252, I was able to persuade the Supreme Court to sustain my view point.

     

    HOW CAN JUNIOR WISHING TO WORK UNDER YOU GET IN TOUCH WITH YOU? WHAT QUALITIES WILL YOU LOOK FOR HIRING A JUNIOR?

    A junior wishing to work with me can directly approach me, no need for an intermediary. The only quality I look for in a junior is that he should be hardworking. I have always maintained and continue to maintain till this date, that a talented person might fail but a hardworking person never fails.

     

    WHAT WOULD BE YOUR WORD OF ADVICE TO YOUNG LAWYERS AND LAW STUDENTS AIMING TO MAKE CAREER IN LITIGATION?

    My advice to young lawyers would be no different than what I received in the early eighties, and it is: “work like a horse, live like a hermit”. Now, a word of unsolicited advice: I would very much like if young lawyers take to politics as well, even as they continue to practice law. There is such a dearth of good people- professionally employed people in Politics. This way you contribute to the well-being of the society, as also enhance your own prospect in the profession. The success achieved by the likes of P. Chidambaram, Arun Jaitley and Kapil Sibal is attributable, in part, to their being seen in politics.