Super Lawyer

Category: Founder

  • “Two important values that I learned from my mother are the importance of hard work and maintaining one’s integrity. Both are crucial in assessing one’s self-worth.” – Nishant Datta, Founding Partner at D&T Juris

    “Two important values that I learned from my mother are the importance of hard work and maintaining one’s integrity. Both are crucial in assessing one’s self-worth.” – Nishant Datta, Founding Partner at D&T Juris

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    Can you please introduce yourself to our readers? As a third-generation lawyer, how has your family legacy influenced your approach to the legal profession and your career choices? How did those early conversations about legal matters shape your understanding of the profession and its nuances?

    I am a third-generation lawyer, born in 1979 in New Delhi, and I recently completed twenty years of law practice. I completed my schooling at Hansraj Model School, New Delhi, in 1997, and thereafter had the privilege of attending Ramjas College, Delhi University, where I earned my Bachelor’s Degree in Commerce, B.Com (Hons), in 2000.

    While graduating, I considered various career options, including MBA and Chartered Accountancy. During this process, I discovered my acumen and passion for law and decided to pursue my LL. B degree from the Campus Law Centre, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, which I completed in 2003.

    Additionally, I hold a postgraduate diploma in IPR Laws from the Indian Law Institute. I joined the bar in 2003 and began practicing at the High Court of Delhi in New Delhi, joining the family practice, which has now spanned more than 60 years. The practice was started by my grandfather, Mr. O.P. Dutta, and later joined by my father, Mr. Vinod Datta. My late mother, Dr. Savita Datta, was initially a lecturer who taught astrophysics, among other subjects, and went on to become the Principal of two colleges: Deshbandhu College and later Maitreyi College. She was my biggest source of inspiration and was appointed Director of the School of Open Learning, University of Delhi.

    My specialization lies in litigation and arbitration, with a particular focus on cases on the Original Side of the High Court of Delhi as well as in the newly introduced genre of commercial suits.

    I currently run two firms, each focusing on different practice areas within the wide genre of commercial laws, primarily before the Supreme Court of India, the High Court of Delhi, the National Company Law Tribunal, the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, and other tribunals and commissions.

    After completing my law degree, although joining my family’s law practice was a readily available option, I chose to join an outside office to broaden my horizons. During this time, I had the opportunity to intern with a leading law practitioner of the High Court of Delhi. After spending two years in this office and learning the ropes, I joined my family’s law practice, working alongside my father and later my wife, Ruchita. Speaking of the family practice, it began with my grandfather, the late Mr. O.P. Dutta, who moved to India from what is now Pakistan. At the time of Partition, he had a family (wife and children) and was working in a job. While working, he began studying law, completed his degree, and commenced his legal career in the 1960s. My grandfather was primarily a criminal law practitioner, and a successful one at that. My father, the late Mr. Vinod Datta, enjoyed a blend of High Court cases (civil and public law) in addition to trial court-level practice of both civil and criminal cases.

    One of the biggest benefits of growing up in a family of lawyers is that you get to hear your elders talk shop in your younger days. Client handling, in terms of managing expectations and making full disclosures about cases, goes a long way in retaining long-term clients and maintaining fruitful and healthy professional relationships with them. However, the most important aspect of practicing law is to communicate well with clients. Client satisfaction, especially in the legal profession, is directly linked to managing client expectations and maintaining attorney-client communication. Making lofty and unfounded claims that are unlikely to be delivered will lead to a breach in the professional relationship with the client. Thus far, I have been able to fulfill my clients’ expectations and deliver the desired outcomes in almost all of my cases. Therefore, working in accordance with and within these parameters is what makes me stand out from the crowd.

    What inspired you to specialize in litigation and arbitration, particularly focusing on commercial law?

    To understand one’s inclination towards litigation in general, and commercial litigation and arbitration in particular, it is essential to appreciate what lies at its core: strategy. One must grasp the complexity of layers in intricate commercial disputes and formulate appropriate strategies and courses of action aligned with the desired outcomes, which may range from protecting intellectual property rights and preserving properties to handling purely ego-driven battles among rivals. It’s the thrill of the hunt. The early exposure to such discussions at home with my father, and the excitement he experienced in technical and complicated matters (which also came with bragging rights), made the lure of commercial law practice irresistible, and my professional journey has never been monotonous. There is another underlying reason that draws a person towards commercial law practice: with higher stakes and risks come better compensation for the counsel. This specialty, in addition to being the most exciting for me, also pays rather well.

    You’ve emphasized the importance of adopting technology in legal practice. How do you see technology shaping the future of law, and what role does it play in your firm’s operations?

    I believe in constantly innovating and adapting to the changing needs of the legal landscape. One of the key ways I have adopted an innovative approach is by embracing technology in my practice.

    From the early days of my practice, I have digitized my office, making us more efficient and effective in our work by adopting use of applications such as Manupatra, SCC online, Live Law, Bar & Bench and Provakil. I have taken my offices’ legal research capabilities and automation to the next level, we also subscribed to various websites which assist in AI based document drafting. This means we can quickly and easily access documents and information, reducing the time and effort required to complete tasks. I have always been ahead of my peers in adopting the latest technology and software for legal research and dictation in my office. This has helped us stay ahead of the curve and deliver superior service to our clients.

    Another way we have been innovative is by leveraging technology to stay connected with our clients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite the challenges posed by the pandemic, we were able to continue serving our clients without interruption by transitioning to virtual consultations and meetings, executing all our work from home using just our laptops.

    This ensured the safety of our clients and staff alike while providing even greater flexibility and accessibility to our clients.

    Given your commitment to providing pro bono and legal aid services, can you share a rewarding experience where your legal expertise made a significant difference in someone’s life?

    We understand the importance of giving back to the community, and we handle pro bono cases for clients who cannot afford to pay for legal services. We take pride in helping those who need legal assistance the most.

    Our commitment to providing fast, efficient, and effective legal solutions, mentoring young lawyers, and giving back to the community has made a positive impact on the industry. We will continue to strive for excellence and provide the best possible service to our clients.

    For young students aspiring to excel in litigation, what actionable steps or practices would you recommend they adopt to distinguish themselves and thrive in the competitive legal landscape?

    The first and most important aspect that young students must understand is that excelling in litigation takes time and tremendous effort. The usual speech that law students get to hear about the three Ps (Patience, Perseverance and Persistence) is spot on. There has to be constant endeavour not only to outdo yourself more than your peers. One thing I picked up on early in my career was that stagnation is the enemy of growth and this encouraged me to handle and pursue litigation in various industries and sectors instead of limiting myself early on in my career to one forum or speciality. Today’s litigation landscape is constantly evolving at a rapid pace, I cannot emphasize enough the importance of being well-acquainted with technological advancements in the legal sphere and the need to adapt and stay ahead of the curve. Consequently, young lawyers must divert their time and energy to pursuing online and certification courses on diverse topics especially in the first ten years of their career.

    Beyond your legal career, you’ve mentioned your mother’s influence and her achievements in academia. How has her legacy impacted your personal values and approach to life?

    My mother was perhaps the hardest-working person I have ever known. Two important values that I learned from her are the importance of hard work and maintaining one’s integrity. Both are crucial in assessing one’s self-worth. In simple terms, being able to look at yourself in the mirror and feel confident and proud only comes from these virtues.

    Get in touch with Nishant Datta-

  • “I’m a great believer in luck, and I find the harder I work, the more I have of it.” – Shweta Sharma, Advocate-on-Record at the Supreme Court of India.

    “I’m a great believer in luck, and I find the harder I work, the more I have of it.” – Shweta Sharma, Advocate-on-Record at the Supreme Court of India.

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    Could you please introduce yourself to our readers and share your journey from your early days in law to becoming an advocate-on-record at the Supreme Court of India? We’d love to hear about the pivotal moments, challenges, and inspirations that have shaped your remarkable career trajectory.

    After graduating from Symbiosis Law School, Pune in 2009 I joined the Legal (Tax and Regulatory) Department of PriceWaterhouseCoopers (PwC) where I had a short stint of about a year. My work at PwC mainly included doing due-diligences for various organizations and businesses, opening on labour law and employment law queries from pan-india PwC locations. While my time at PwC gave me a lot of exposure to the regulatory side of work, from the point of view of Indian as well as international clients, I felt that I wasn’t being challenged as much – mentally as well as academically. I started speaking to my law school batchmates who were pursuing litigation and that’s when it became clear that I was missing out on the real deal. Even though the economy was in a recession in the year 2009, I did the unthinkable and put in my papers at PwC and joined Parekh & Company, which is a full-service litigation firm. To be honest, it was very difficult to take a 50% pay-cut and say goodbye to the 9 to 5 job where I had the weekends all to myself. Looking back, it was the best decision ever. Upon joining litigation, I realized that there is no concept of weekends and no fixed timings. Juniors were expected to carry work home and make sure the filings were done in time, seniors were briefed well in advance and the clients got the reliefs they wanted. There were moments where I felt I’d bitten off more than I can chew but I just kept at it and before I knew it, I fell in love with the entire process. At Parekh & Co, I was under the guidance of my “first boss” as I call him to this very day – Mr. Sameer Parekh. At Parekh & Co., I had the privilege of working on matters being argued by some of the most distinguished legal luminaries like Mr. Harish Salve, (Late ) Mr. Ashok Desai, (Late) Mr. Ram Jethmalani, Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, (Late) Mr. Goolam Vahanvati, (Late) Mr. T R Andhyarjuna, Mr. Rohinton Nariman, K K Venugopal, Justice P S Narsimha, (Retd.) Justice U. U Lalit to name a few. After working in Parekh & Co. for about three years, I had a short stint at TMT Law Practice which is a technology, media and telecommunications law firm where I had the opportunity to represent clients across the entire spectrum of the media and entertainment industry, including television, films, radio, music, print and publications. Thereafter, I got married to my batchmate from law college – Diggaj Pathak, who was also pursuing litigation full time. Since we had put in about five years into the profession and got a fairly decent amount of work to pull us through, we decided that it was time now to take the plunge and go independent. That was truly the best decision of our lives. Now we were two like-minded individuals ready to take our love affair with litigation to the next level. People say it is difficult to work with one’s spouse and that one mustn’t mix business with pleasure but that has been far from the truth for us and we have had such a successful partnership where both of us have immensely contributed to each other’s growth in this profession. After spending 7 years in litigation, we became eligible to take the Advocate – on – Record examination and cleared it in the first attempt. There was really no looking back after that.  

    You have an impressive portfolio of legal representation spanning various tribunals and courts. Could you share a memorable experience from your early days in the legal profession that shaped your career trajectory?

    Due to the work ethic I was exposed to at Parekh & Co., I learnt that one must never say no to any kind of work and that litigation encompasses more than just the Supreme Court or the High Court. There are so many tribunals and quasi-judicial bodies in Delhi like National Green Tribunal, Ministry of Mines, Central Information Commissions, National Consumer Fourm, Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, Debt Recovery Tribunal, Central Electricity Regulatory Commission, Armed Forces Tribunal, Appellate Authority for Revenue cases etc. So there is really no dearth of work. There were times when I wasn’t sure if I could do justice to a matter but I was fortunate enough to be surrounded by such encouraging seniors and mentors who provided me with the necessary push so that I could give my 100% to the cases in question. I had the opportunity to appear very frequently before the Telecommunications Disputes Settlement Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) when Justice Aftab Alam (Retd.) was the Chairman. Justice Alam was extremely encouraging of women practitioners and would often appoint me as Advocate Commissioner in matters which really helped me build my confidence. Similarly, Justice Shiva Kirti Singh (Retd.) also appointed me as Local Commissioner in several cases for which I had to travel outstation and that again really helped me understand the telecommunications and broadcasting sector from close quarters. Apart from TDSAT, I had the privilege of working with Mr. Krishnendu Datta, Senior Advocate on various company matters before the NCLT. I was greatly inspired by Mr. Datta’s work ethic and the way he completely immerses himself into cases really had an impact on me. I also love to brief Mr. Gopal Sankaranarayanan, Senior Advocate for my Supreme Court matters from whom I get to learn so much. He is truly an exceptional individual. Then I had the good fortune of working with Mr. Meet Malhotra, Senior Advocate on several telecommunications and broadcasting matters. Words cannot describe how much Meet Sir helped me in building my practice in the energy sector. His trust and faith in my work has helped me immensely. I am deeply indebted to these individuals.  

    With your extensive involvement in telecommunications and energy sectors, what sparked your interest in these particular areas of law?

    To be honest I never imagined that I would be practicing so extensively in these sectors but that’s the beauty of being a first-generation litigating lawyer – you never know what you’re going to get and sure enough you never say no to any kind of work! Having said that, I had the opportunity to work in the telecommunications sector early on because my partner was already handling the work in that area for a few clients. So, when we started working together, I had to naturally shoulder the responsibilities with him. Some of the cases before TDSAT were extremely high-stakes and in those matters we would brief Mr. Meet Malhotra, Senior Advocate from whom we got to learn so much. As far as work in the energy sector is concerned, I owe most of what I know in this field to Mr. Buddy Ranganadhan. Buddy Sir is an outstanding lawyer and briefing him is such an enriching experience, every single time. 

    Balancing a career in law with personal interests is crucial for holistic well-being. Could you share some of your hobbies or interests outside of the legal realm that help you maintain a sense of balance?

    To be very frank, it is super hard to maintain a work – life balance being a litigating lawyer and even more so if you’re a female litigating lawyer. And if you are a mother, then you need multi-tasking skills of a different level. Even if you ace this time management, be prepared to pay the ‘motherhood penalty’. Yes, the legal profession is not immune to it. Every day of the week, we are in court and the evenings are spent lamenting on the cases listed for the next day. Sometimes, you’re in multiple courts on a single day and your meal-timings go for a toss. Then Saturdays are for the district court cases and Sundays are for drafting assignments, conferences with senior advocates and client meetings. One has to also take out time for social and professional commitments. In all this chaos, it is very easy to actually lose sight of your own health and the health of your loved ones. So, keeping fit – mentally as well as physically – is of utmost importance. I try to be active and take out time to take my toddler out to the park and ensure that I take at least 4 vacations a year. I carry work with me on those vacations too, much to my partner’s dislike, but that’s another story. I also enjoy judging moots and have had the privilege of judging some moot court competitions like the FDI International Arbitration Moot, the KTS Tulsi Mock Trial Competition etc. I also love to interact with young law students, especially first-generation lawyers who are sometimes overwhelmed by litigation practice and have had the privilege of speaking at the Delhi Faculty of Law on the topic of Career as an Advocate-on-Record. I also try to give my services to those who cannot afford it and have done a few pro-bono matters. The appreciation I receive from my pro-bono clients is really immeasurable. 

    Starting a legal career can be daunting for many young aspirants. What advice would you offer to the current generation of law students and aspiring lawyers looking to make their mark in the legal profession?

    There are a couple of things that one must mentally prepare before joining the legal field. Firstly, always and I mean always remain an “eager beaver”. Everyone will see it – Judges, clients, seniors as well as colleagues – it will help you generate new work. Secondly, never say no to any case even if it is small research – you will learn so much from it and that knowledge is to be treasured. Thirdly, be prepared to sometimes miss out on important personal events like weddings, funerals, birthdays etc. as you may have a deadline or the limitation would be expiring in a particular case. If you have taken up some assignment or matter, you cannot leave it halfway no matter what. Having said that, it is also incumbent upon you to then make it up to that family or friend who’s function you missed. Fourthly, there will be times when you may be reprimanded at – by the Judge or your senior. Do not take it to heart, listen to what they are saying as they have experience which you don’t and experience must be respected at all costs. Fifthly, be kind to your support staff – court clerks, driver, office boy, nanny, cook etc. You will be most effective if you have a strong team backing you up. Sixthly, be grounded and grateful. It is easy to lose sight of where you started from when you’re making a lot of money but one must never take any matter – big or small, for granted. Lastly, be fair to your opposite counsel. There is life outside court also. We are a small fraternity and people talk. Not all cases you get would be very high stakes, but be determined to prove yourself. Slowly but surely, the work will start pouring in from all quarters. 

    Being a female practitioner in a male dominated profession do you have any specific advice for women who are keen to join litigation?

    Let’s face it, the ratio of women-to-men in the legal profession is abysmally low. But the demographics are changing over the past few decades. While it is true that the legal profession demands long hours and constant availability, I want to tell these women who want to join litigation that the fruits of the hard work you will put in will be immense. If you are a working mother, and this holds true for any field, you will be perceived as less committed to your career because it is assumed that you choose to work only because you have financial needs to fulfil. Employers are wary of hiring mothers as it is thought that since they have familial responsibilities, they will be less dedicated to their roles. But this notion is completely wrong, and, if at all, only applies to a very small percentage of working women. We can be as passionate, as driven and as ambitious as our male counterparts. We are currently blessed to have Justice D Y Chandrachud as our CJI who is a staunch supporter of increased participation of women in the legal profession. He values inclusivity of women lawyers and makes a mention of it not just in open court but also at every public platform he speaks at. He was very pleased to see a dramatic increase in the number of women appearing virtually before the courts during and post-covid as it provided them the comfort of appearing from the safety of their homes. In 2024, a committee headed by our CJI designated the highest number of female senior advocates that have ever been designated by the Supreme Court in its entire history since 1966. Just imagine, 12 in 75 years and 11 in just one year! Justice Chandrachud has also encouraged more and more women to come forward, contest elections and hold positions of responsibility in the bar associations and the bar councils. He has further advocated for institutional support (like creches in courts) to ensure more and more female lawyers are inducted and retained in the profession. This augurs really well for us women practitioners. We should take full advantage of this changed scenario. In the coming times, I’m sure there will be more designations and more elevations. Personally speaking, I feel so inspired looking at the women senior advocates practicing today. Few senior advocates whom I have briefed and who had a great impact on me include Mrs. V Mohana, Mrs. Madhavi Divan and Mrs. Haripriya Padmanabhan. I hope to one day have the opportunity of working with (Retd) Justice Indu Malhotra, Mrs. Indira Jaisingh and Mrs. Aishwarya Bhati as well, all of whom are outstanding lawyers. So, my advice to young women aspiring to join litigation would be to perform decently at law school, write legal articles, if possible, take your internships very seriously and once you start a career in litigation, just stick with the grind. The results are inevitable. 

    As an advocate-on-record and panel counsel for esteemed organizations like TRAI, WBSETCL, Eastern Coalfields Limited and Central Coalfields Limited, what strategies do you employ to effectively represent your clients’ interests while upholding your own ethical standards?

    Preparation is key obviously. Secondly, I inform the client of all the eventualities because anything can happen in court so one has to be prepared in advance. If the client has been slightly in the wrong, and is informed in advance of the probable reaction from the court, then it can give suitable instructions to his lawyer about the extent of the concession the lawyer can make on its behalf. Thirdly, if there is a senior counsel being briefed in the matter then he/she has to see how invested you are in the case. It makes it all the more interesting for them. Since some of the matters for these clients are very high stakes, I always get instructions in writing to avoid any miscommunication later on. 

    Your educational journey includes international exposure during your schooling in the United States. How do you think such cross-cultural experiences contribute to a lawyer’s ability to navigate diverse legal scenarios?

    I studied in California for about three years and it was such an enriching experience. Since my father was in a transferable job, I changed almost eleven schools and had the opportunity to stay in many different parts of India too. This gave me so much exposure as I had to get used to adapting to a new place every few years. That helped me tremendously. The legal professional is so multi-faceted. You may be able to impress your client with your legal knowledge but if you’re not able to smooth talk your way in a Bihari or a UP accent with the Court Master or the Alhmad to get a certified copy or a shorter date then what is the point of all the fancy education that you have had?  

    Becoming an Advocate-on-Record involves rigorous training and examination. What motivated you to pursue this prestigious designation, and how has achieving it impacted your legal career and approach to advocacy?

    So, it is very important to understand that one doesn’t magically start getting Supreme Court briefs simply because one has cleared the Advocate-on-Record examination. In order for a steady stream of Supreme Court cases to come your way, you have to have what we refer to as a “parent high court” where the advocates from that particular high court keep sending you matters regularly to be filed in the Supreme Court. But the fact of the matter is that many first-generation advocates like myself do not have any such contacts with any high court so the cases initially will be far and few. One has only to ensure that they give their 100 percent to those cases. Soon enough, your client, your colleagues, your seniors will spread the word which will certainly translate into more matters. Having said that, choosing to practice exclusively in the Supreme Court is a completely personal choice and if that is the path you have chosen as a first-generation lawyer then you must keep reaching out to the lawyers practicing at various High Courts to generate Supreme Court work. But I speak for myself, I consciously did not want to restrict myself to practicing only in one court. I took the exam because I wanted to have this added qualification so that in the event a situation arises where I’m required to approach the highest court of the land, I should be able to do so myself without asking anyone else to be my AoR. I was also able to generate supreme court work by practicing in various forums like the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, TDSAT, National Green Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal for Electricity etc. 

    You’ve been associated with the law office of DPSS, which holds a prominent position in the legal landscape. Could you share some insights into the working of your firm?

    The Law Offices of DPSS was founded by my husband (Diggaj Pathak) and I about ten years ago. Diggaj was my batchmate at law school and we started out with just a handful of matters. We are soon going to complete 1000 files together. Though we have grown since our founding, we are the same agency at heart. We approach each of our clients with fresh eyes to offer them customized and unique strategies. We are result oriented, in as much as we try and get speedy relief for our clients instead of keeping them embroiled in litigation which can sometimes last for several years in our judicial system. If the circumstances permit, then we actively try to mediate and settle the cases for our clients which can sometimes get better and faster results than adversarial litigation. We feel we owe this to our clients and to our judicial system. Ultimately, as lawyers we must not burden our courts unnecessarily and if there is a way to sit across the table and negotiate terms of a settlement then we always explore that option. 

    Get in touch with Shweta Sharma-

  • “You should be passionate about what you do, spend time learning the craft and use your knowledge to solve problems for your client”- Sourav Bhagat, Partner at Fox & Mandal

    “You should be passionate about what you do, spend time learning the craft and use your knowledge to solve problems for your client”- Sourav Bhagat, Partner at Fox & Mandal

    This Interview has been published by Pragya Chandni and The SuperLawyer Team

    This Interview has been published by Pragya Chandni and The SuperLawyer Team

    Can you tell us what initially sparked your interest in pursuing a career in law, and how that interest developed during your time at The West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences?

    I belong to a family of lawyers. I was fascinated by this profession from childhood. I was hugely inspired by watching my father practice as a lawyer. He is still a huge inspiration for me. So, from my very childhood, the legal profession was the only thing in my mind as a profession. When I was in class 12, I saw in the newspaper that Professor Menon would set up WBNUJS at Kolkata. I was fortunate enough to sit for the entrance examination and got through. Five years at WBNUJS were the best five years of my life. These are the formative years for any individual. WBNUJS has given me exposure to diverse fields of law and much beyond. My love for law in general grew further in WBNUJS. I got to interact with professors and other students, who played a huge role in my growth and development as a lawyer. WBNUJS taught us the importance of learning basic skills not only in law but also in life.  

    With 19 years of experience in the legal field, you’ve specialized in areas such as dispute resolution, real estate, and corporate advisory. What aspects of these practice areas do you find most fulfilling, and why?

    Each practice area has its own charm. Since litigation was always my first choice, I am a  little bit biased towards dispute resolution. I have gained experience in diverse areas of law due to my interest in studying different laws and use them to solve problems faced by the client. While in real estate and corporate advisory, you are generally restricted to certain aspects / branches of law, in case of dispute resolution, depending on the nature of disputes, one has to deal with diverse laws. Sometimes, we have to study legal provisions which were unknown to us and do research on such laws to prepare an argument for the client. I think the opportunity to learn laws, interpret them and use them to give relief to the client makes dispute resolution the most fulfilling for me. When our hard work in dispute resolution helps our client get the desired relief from the Court, it gives you a sense of satisfaction.      

    Your practice spans multiple industry sectors, including FMCG, construction, healthcare, and education. How has working across these diverse sectors shaped your approach to legal challenges?

    I love and enjoy learning diverse laws. While dealing with these sectors, I not only learn the laws applicable to these industry sectors but also I have to understand their businesses. Diverse experience in multiple industries and multiple practice areas have helped me acquire diverse skills which, in the era of specialization, give me an advantage in dealing with a client, who may face different legal issues.  Working across these diverse sectors have brought me a wider range of perspectives and approaches to problem-solving, which have enabled me to advise my client on diverse issues in a holistic manner. 

    One of your key strengths is effective knowledge management within your team. Can you elaborate on the strategies you use to keep your team updated with changing legal frameworks and ensure they are well-prepared for complex cases?

    I believe that we lawyers remain students of law throughout our life. We keep on learning. We learn from seniors, colleagues, juniors and clients. Once we stop learning, that will be the end of our profession. Thus, constant learning and sharing of knowledge within the team are very important aspects. We, as a law firm, encourage everyone to be updated with changing legal frameworks and share such updates within the team. In addition to usage of e-mails or WhatsApp, we encourage everyone to discuss with each other new updates – new laws, rules, notifications, judgments, amendments etc. during office hours. Such discussions help everyone gain diverse perspectives of law rather than having his own interpretation only. This helps them to apply the law in diverse cases they handle. 

    You have represented schools in West Bengal in matters related to fees charged during COVID-19 and appeared before both the High Court at Calcutta and the Supreme Court of India. How do you approach such sensitive and high-profile cases to ensure the best outcomes for your clients?

    The education sector is very important in nation building, and was severely impacted by Covid. Physical classes had to be stopped and some of the parents suffered financially. On one hand, the schools have a right to carry out their activities – which are dependent on the fees to be collected from the parents and utilizing the same for educating the students and taking care of its teachers, officers, non-teaching staff and other stakeholders. On the other hand, we have to exercise the rights of the student to get an education. There has to be balance between these two interests, which in fact are not conflicting. The schools we represented adapted very quickly and shifted to online classes for the benefit of the students. Considering the hardships faced by some of the parents, the schools had taken the decision to provide various concessions to the students who needed such concessions. We did not approach the litigation in a generic adversarial mode. We understood that given the situation, the judges would have been sympathetic to the interest of the students, because the future of the students was to be considered. Thus, our approach was to ensure that the Courts also understood the rights of the school authorities – the importance of continuation of fees so that interest of teachers, administrative staff, other staff, contractors and all other stakeholders were also protected and it was important for the students themselves that the schools should survive and be able to continue to provide education to its students. Of course, there was some financial losses to the schools initially, but the schools survived Covid and continue to provide education to its students while protecting the interest of the students, teachers and all other stakeholders.  

    You have also been involved in significant corporate transactions, such as private equity investments and business transfers. What are the most critical factors to consider during such transactions to safeguard your clients’ interests?

    Each private equity investment and business transfer is unique in its character. It is very important to understand the business part of the transaction, you can only use your legal expertise in a particular transaction if you understand the business part of it. Due diligence plays an important role in private equity investment and business transfer. If you are on a buyer side / investor side, then identifying the legal risk in the proposed transaction is very critical to safeguard your clients’ interest. You need to explain the risk to your client and advise your client regarding various ways to mitigate the risk – through changing the structure of the deal, through execution of additional documents or through incorporating appropriate clauses in the documents. It is important for the client to make an informed decision. Our job is to identify the risk and advise the client on mitigating the risk; However, sometimes, the client has to take a business call. Legal expertise should be used as a business enabler and not as a deal breaker.  

    Lastly, what advice would you give to fresh law graduates who are just starting their careers and hoping to make a significant impact in the legal profession?

    Every individual is different and each of them must find their own way to make a significant impact in the legal profession. What may have worked for somebody need not work for all. A fresher must find a right path himself which suits him. Of course he may learn from other professionals / seniors, but such learning has to be suitable for him. However, the basic template to have reasonable success in the legal profession is the same as in any other profession. It is hard work, discipline, dedication and finding the right balance. You should keep on learning and have faith in your ability. You should be passionate about what you do, spend time learning the craft and use your knowledge to solve problems for your client. You will definitely get an opportunity in this profession, you have to be ready for such opportunity and if you are prepared to take advantage of such opportunity with your hard work, you will be able to make an impact in the profession. 

    Get in touch with Sourav Bhagat-

  • “If at all there is something to chase, chase the might of the white-collar bands which signifies being subservient only to God and be fearless and truthful learned counsel. There is much more than money in-store when you are a dignified and respectable officer of the court.” – Shiv Mangal Sharma, Additional Advocate General, Government of Rajasthan

    “If at all there is something to chase, chase the might of the white-collar bands which signifies being subservient only to God and be fearless and truthful learned counsel. There is much more than money in-store when you are a dignified and respectable officer of the court.” – Shiv Mangal Sharma, Additional Advocate General, Government of Rajasthan

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    Your journey in the legal profession has been remarkable, from your early days to founding Aura & Co. Could you please allow us to walk through your journey and share how you came to this profession and what challenges you faced during your initial days?

    Walking into the initial days of my legal career drives me a little nostalgic. However, in response to your question, I initially earned my Bachelor of Science (Honors) degree from B.S.A. Degree College and K R Degree College affiliated with the University of Agra in 1996, followed by a Bachelor of Laws (LL.B.) from the Agra University in 1999. Hence, technically my career as a legal professional commenced/ began in the early 2000s. I was admitted as an Advocate to the Bar Council of Delhi in 2000, and by 2003, I was enrolled as an Advocate with the Supreme Court of India. Since the early days of my practice, I started gaining immense recognition for my expertise in handling complex legal issues. As challenges are concerned, like every practicing advocate, I also faced some minute challenges but my dedication and devotion towards the legal profession, and the immense support of my family members gave me a drive to work hard every day and led me towards the path of becoming a successful advocate.

    As the Managing Partner of Aura & Co., you’ve managed to build a comprehensive legal service covering various aspects of law. What inspired you to establish such a diverse legal platform?  

    From the very inception of my career, I had an aim to provide my expertise in the legal field in various dimensions to society. The only vision that I have been carrying is to provide unprejudiced, unbiased, and unsurpassed legal services to my clients in the relevant legal domain. In response to your question the vision behind establishing the firm is that the firm must be chosen for the clients and take that relationship forward by making ourselves deserving enough to be their business advisers and not just legal service providers. Moreover, it is my ideology that the management of the firm should make sure the echelon and efficient functioning of the firm while providing opportunities and avenues for its members to grow and learn. The main aim to establish the firm was to encourage leadership development and transparency between management and its associates.

    Further, the establishment of the firm aims at the Firm to work with clients engaging with legal teams and the wider business to help them in achieving the right commercial outcome. As a result, the Firm aims to support the client’s technology, outsourcing, corporate and commercial needs. The structuring of the firm is intentionally coupled with effective, timely, and practical solutions the factors that are predominant in choosing the firm by the clients. The vision of the Managing Partner follows the vision the firm that is vision is to provide continued excellent and practical timely solutions to the clients.

    Your tenure as Additional Advocate General for the Government of Rajasthan must have provided unique insights. Could you please share some details of this role and the commitments that come with this? How did this experience influence your approach to legal advocacy?

    It is an opportunity for me to be appointed as Additional Advocate General for the Government of Rajasthan and represent the State of Rajasthan before the Supreme Court of India. It is a matter of immense pride that I have got such an opportunity. Being on this post for the past 3 months, I have experienced a veracity of legal arenas and the enlarged scope of working of the State of Rajasthan.

    Given your extensive background in both civil and criminal law and your involvement in law-making and policy advising at high levels, how do you navigate the complexities of cases that involve overlapping legal areas, and how do you envision the role of legal professionals in shaping public policy? 

    Like every legal practitioner, it is my role to navigate the complexities of the cases. As a matter of fact, there is a plethora of cases where there arises overlapping of legal areas, in such a situation me, and my team are inclined towards the providing best services to our clients in an efficient and ethical manner. We as a team make all possible attempts to get our clients the best legal, practical, and workable solutions for our clients.

    How do you foresee the role of international law evolving in India, and what steps is Aura & Co. taking to prepare for this shift while also promoting legal awareness and education among the general public? 

    In my opinion, India has been a significant and influential player in the global arena. It plays a pivotal role in the intricate relationship between international law and diplomacy. With its vast population, rapidly growing economy, and geopolitical influence, India is uniquely positioned to influence and shape the course of international affairs. India’s approach to international law is characterized by a delicate balance between its commitment to principles of sovereignty and non-interference and its recognition of the importance of international legal frameworks in addressing complex global challenges. India’s multifaceted role in global diplomacy and international law is the complexity of the relationship between these two critical components of international relations. As a rising global power, India’s approach to international law and diplomacy continues to evolve, and its engagements will continue to influence the ever-changing ideology of global governance. In doing so, India reinforces the interdependence of diplomacy and international law, illustrating its vital role in shaping the future of international relations and global governance. As the promotion of legal awareness and education among the general public is concerned, we as a law firm with the help of writing articles, research papers, and attending seminars have attempted to convey our thought process in the society concerning the development in international law. Also, Aura & Company with its associated Lawyers, is a law firm that has a strong international presence. The firm currently has an office in the United Kingdom under the name Aura & Company International Ltd. The firm is also in the process of opening offices in Dubai and Canada. In addition to its services, Aura & Company Lawyers’ sister concern, Auraleagueglobal, provides advice and services to clients involved in international litigation. With its expanding global reach, Aura & Company Lawyers is well-positioned to provide support and guidance to clients operating in various parts of the world.

    As one of the premier law firms in India, what qualities do you look for in potential legal interns, and what advice would you offer to students seeking internship opportunities at Aura & Co.? 

    In my opinion internships play a crucial role in our careers. Working at a competent law firm can give a law student a major competitive edge over others. As the qualities are concerned for the potential legal interns, the firm expects the interns to have a desire to learn, be punctual, be hardworking. Being a premier law firm, we provide opportunities to law students from the different areas of the country.

    Reflecting on your extensive experience, are there any cases or achievements that stand out as particularly rewarding or challenging? What made them memorable?  Also, how do you balance the demands of your various roles, from being a Senior Panel Counsel for multiple state governments to managing a premier eLaw Firm?

    As Professional Achievements are concerned I have over 3000 appearances in the Supreme Court of India.  I have been involved in numerous landmark cases reported in various law reports. I have got an opportunity to Work alongside eminent legal professionals including Harish Salve, Mukul Rohatagi, and K.K. Venugopal. I have actively engaged in seminars and conferences related to legal process outsourcing and innovative legal services. Being a legal counsel, the commitment to the cause of providing clients with professional, responsive, and diligent legal support with the degree of excellence and integrity that one expects from legal advisors. The assistance may be in connection with litigation(s) or advisory work pertaining to disputes before all Courts, Tribunals, Commissions, and other various authorities and boards with our extensive team of lawyers and officers having expertise in respective fields. These are certain reasons that helps me to balance the demands of my various roles, from being a Senior Panel Counsel for multiple state governments to managing a premier eLaw Firm.

    Apart from your professional endeavors, what personal hobbies or interests do you pursue to maintain a work-life balance? 

    I am inclined towards learning new languages.

    What advice would you give to young lawyers who aspire to take on roles as significant and varied as yours in their careers?  If at all, there is something to chase, chase the might of the white-collar bands which signifies being subservient only to God (as the ministers of the church in earlier days felt, from whom the robes and the bands are borrowed for the dress code) and be fearless and truthful learned counsel. There is much more than money in-store when you are a dignified and respectable officer of the court. As an advice to the young lawyer, firstly, a legal professional needs to be proactive. The best juniors take the initiative on seeking out problems, solutions and opportunities. They don’t just wait for these to be handed to them by their supervisor / law firms. Secondly, lawyers should take care of the easy stuff. The real value that juniors provide is all the other stuff within our control and skill level (so that the supervisors don’t have to think about it), such as proofreading and formatting; properly naming and saving documents in the right place; and carefully reading through all email attachments / relevant documents sent to us. Thirdly, communication, a lawyer who is good at communication gives an ad-on advantage to progress in this field.

    Get in touch with Shiv Mangal Sharma-

  • “Change starts with individuals who challenge the status quo and advocate for justice. Building alliances and understanding cultural nuances are key to addressing global human rights issues,” – Dr. Anthony Raju, Advocate at Supreme Court of India & Chairman of Indian National Human Rights Protection Council

    “Change starts with individuals who challenge the status quo and advocate for justice. Building alliances and understanding cultural nuances are key to addressing global human rights issues,” – Dr. Anthony Raju, Advocate at Supreme Court of India & Chairman of Indian National Human Rights Protection Council

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    Dr. Anthony, with such an impressive and diverse list of roles – Advocate, Human Rights Activist, TEDx Speaker, and more – could you share with our readers a bit about the journey that led you to wear so many hats?

    My journey began in a very humble setting in Meerut, Uttar Pradesh. Growing up in a poor family, I had to work from a young age, selling newspapers and working in small shops to support my family while pursuing my education. This early exposure to hardship instilled in me a deep sense of empathy and a desire to fight for justice. My legal education and subsequent practice as an advocate opened up avenues for me to address issues I deeply care about, such as human rights and social justice. Over time, my roles expanded naturally as I found myself addressing these issues in various capacities – be it as a lawyer, activist, or speaker. Each role complements the other, enabling me to make a broader impact.

    Juggling between being a lawyer, human rights activist, and so much more must be quite a feat. How do you maintain a balance between your legal profession and your various social and humanitarian roles?

    It indeed requires a delicate balance, but the key lies in passion and prioritization. My legal profession and humanitarian roles are interconnected, as both strive towards the common goal of justice and human dignity. I allocate specific times for my legal practice, social work, and speaking engagements, ensuring that each receives the attention it deserves. Effective time management and a dedicated team also play crucial roles in helping me manage these diverse responsibilities without compromising on any.

    Your dedication to human rights is evident not only in your professional life but also through your social work in tribal and underprivileged areas. What motivates you to spend a significant amount of your time in these communities, both nationally and internationally?

    The motivation stems from my early life experiences and the realization of the stark inequalities that exist in our society. Spending time in tribal and underprivileged areas allows me to directly engage with and understand the challenges faced by these communities. It’s one thing to advocate for human rights from a distance, but it’s entirely different to be on the ground, witnessing the struggles and triumphs of the people. This direct engagement fuels my passion and commitment to making a tangible difference in their lives.

    As a dynamic criminal advocate and human rights ambassador, you’ve spoken at TEDx. Can you share a moment in your career that you consider a turning point or a particularly proud achievement?

    One significant turning point was when I founded the All India Council of Human Rights, Liberties & Social Justice (AICHLS). This platform has allowed me to channel my efforts more systematically and mobilize support for various human rights causes. Another proud moment was speaking at TEDx, where I could share my journey and inspire others to join the fight for justice and equality. Receiving the “International Human Rights Awards” and honorary doctorates were also affirmations of the impact of my work and further motivated me to continue my advocacy.

    You’ve been recognized with several awards, including honorary doctorates and the “International Human Rights Awards.” How do such accolades fuel your commitment to the causes you champion?

    These accolades serve as important validations of the work being done and the causes being championed. They bring attention to critical human rights issues and inspire others to join the movement. For me, these recognitions are not just honors but also reminders of the responsibilities that come with them. They reinforce my commitment to continue advocating for those who cannot speak for themselves and to push for systemic changes that uphold human dignity and justice.

    In addition to your legal practice, you founded the International Human Rights Advisory Council. Can you tell us more about the council’s mission and some of the key initiatives it has undertaken?

    The International Human Rights Advisory Council aims to promote and protect human rights globally through education, advocacy, and direct intervention. One of our key initiatives is providing free legal aid to marginalized communities, ensuring they have access to justice. We also run awareness campaigns on issues such as child rights, women’s rights, and the right to education. Additionally, we collaborate with other organizations to address human trafficking and violence against women. Our mission is to create a world where every individual can live with dignity and freedom.

    How has your venture, Legal and Legal Associates, made a significant difference in people’s lives by providing free legal aid, intersected with your role as a criminal lawyer, and can you share a challenging or interesting case where your dedication and skills played a crucial role in securing justice?

    Legal and Legal Associates has been instrumental in providing free legal aid to those who cannot afford it, ensuring that justice is accessible to all. One particularly challenging case involved a group of tribal women who were falsely accused of theft. My team and I worked tirelessly to gather evidence, advocate for their rights, and eventually secure their acquittal. This case highlighted the intersection of my roles as a criminal lawyer and human rights activist, demonstrating the impact of dedicated legal advocacy in protecting the vulnerable.

    How does your commitment to fostering understanding through the World Inter-Faith Council for Peace & Human Rights align with your initiatives like “Giving with Compassion,” and how do you envision the intersection of human rights and interfaith dialogue inspiring individuals to contribute to social causes on an individual level for a more peaceful world?

    The World Inter-Faith Council for Peace & Human Rights and “Giving with Compassion” both stem from the belief that understanding and empathy are crucial for social harmony. Interfaith dialogue promotes respect for diverse beliefs and fosters a sense of shared humanity. By encouraging individuals to look beyond their differences and unite for common causes, we can inspire them to contribute to social justice initiatives. The intersection of human rights and interfaith dialogue is powerful because it not only addresses legal and social issues but also nurtures the moral and ethical dimensions of peace and justice.

    How has your journey as a change maker shaped your approach to navigating the complexities of international relations as a diplomat and advocate, all while realizing the profound impact that an individual can have on society?

    My journey has taught me that change starts with individuals who are willing to challenge the status quo and advocate for justice. As a diplomat and advocate, I approach international relations with a focus on collaboration and mutual respect. Understanding cultural nuances and building alliances are key to addressing global human rights issues. Realizing the impact one individual can have inspired me to continue pushing for systemic changes and mobilizing others to join the cause. It’s about creating ripples that lead to broader societal transformations.

    On a more personal note, can you share a hobby or interest that you turn to for relaxation and rejuvenation amidst your busy schedule? How does it complement your work-life balance?

    I find solace in reading and meditation. Reading allows me to explore new perspectives and ideas, which is essential for my work as an advocate and speaker. Meditation helps me maintain mental clarity and emotional balance, enabling me to handle the various demands of my roles effectively. These hobbies provide me with the necessary downtime to recharge and stay focused on my mission.

    Aside from your professional endeavors, we’ve heard that you are involved in teaching and training. What advice do you have for aspiring advocates and human rights activists entering the field today?

    My advice to aspiring advocates and human rights activists is to stay committed to the cause, no matter how challenging it may seem. Dedication, hard work, and perseverance are crucial. Always remain empathetic and understand the struggles of those you are advocating for. Continuous learning and staying informed about legal and social issues will equip you to be effective in your efforts. Lastly, never underestimate the power of collaboration and building networks, as collective action can amplify your impact.

    Ge in touch with Dr. Anthony Raju–

  • “The law is not static; it evolves over time through amendments and the introduction of new legislation to reflect changing moral and societal values”- Ashima Mandla, Partner at Mandla & Singh Law Chambers

    “The law is not static; it evolves over time through amendments and the introduction of new legislation to reflect changing moral and societal values”- Ashima Mandla, Partner at Mandla & Singh Law Chambers

    This Interview has been published by Pragya Chandni and The SuperLawyer Team

    Can you share a bit about your journey into the field of law? What inspired you to pursue this career path?

    When I was in school, I was rather drawn to the criminal justice system, whether it was from what was covered in the news in then ongoing cases, criminal novels and shows which piqued my interest. Thereafter, I did my graduation in Psychology Honors from LSR, where my primary field of study was abnormal psychology, being intertwined with criminal laws. Even though during the first year of LL.B, like most of us, I was also equally attracted to the Corporate side and ended up interning for 6 months at Trilegal, the first day I set foot inside the Apex Court while interning with Mr. K.T.S. Tulsi sir, all my aspirations in this field shifted and I knew I wanted to practice criminal laws. 

    As a Partner at Mandla & Singh Law Chambers, what are some of the most rewarding aspects of your work?

    In litigation, mostly everyone aspires to go independent someday and establish their own practice. For me, that juncture came a little earlier than expected and Mandakini Singh, (my senior associate from the Chambers of Tulsi sir) and I started this litigation chamber in 2018. Undoubtedly, it takes significant time and effort to get your independent practice off the ground, especially being first-generation lawyers, but then there were many seniors who were exceptionally kind to us to offer support and even refer work. The most rewarding aspect in running your own practice is the opportunity to not only build cases by formation of a narrative but also to oversee the outcome. It gives you a platform and opportunity to understand your shortcomings and actively work towards growth. 

    Your involvement in drafting legislation such as the Criminal Law Amendment Bill, 2019, reflects a deep commitment to legal reform. What drives your passion for advocating for change within the legal system?

    The law is not static; it evolves over time through amendments and the introduction of new legislation to reflect changing moral and societal values. As our worldview and perceptions shift, so do the nuances of the legal system. Every judgment that explains or expands the scope of any section or act is an active step toward changing the limits and understanding of the legal system. Law and society are intertwined, each contributing to shifting the perspective of the other.

    Could you tell us about a particularly challenging case you’ve worked on and how you navigated through it?

    The most challenging case has been the Tablighi Jamaat case. There were 955 foreigner nationals from 48 countries which were detained for 2 months and when the Habaes Corpus case was preferred before the High Court of Delhi for their release, overnight chargesheets were filed against the foreigners. Even though there was not a single medical report which was placed on record in the chargesheet showing anyone as Covid-19 positive, yet the narrative in the media was running contrary to the evidence on record, which also colored the public perception. The impact and perception of media trials, particularly in sensitive and high-profile cases was highlighted. Media trials can lead to premature judgments and public opinion that may not align with the legal proceedings and the principle of “innocent until proven guilty.”  Furthermore, 2 months into the litigation, it surfaced that there were second FIRs against the foreign nationals and those who were repatriated on humanitarian grounds of plea bargaining after depositing costs to an extent of Rs. 52L to the Government, they were once again estopped from returning to their homes. It led to an arduous and protracted litigation” of 150 hearings, 955 bail applications, 5 writs, 44 discharge applications, 26 quashing petitions, 80 revision petitions, 15 hearings before the Supreme Court and then a trial in a Delhi court over 9 months. Even though there was not a single conviction in Delhi as even all the foreigners who chose to contest the charges in the trial were acquitted, this case was unprecedented under the unforeseen circumstances across the globe.

    The other case, which was recently viewed as a landmark judgment in Pavana Dibbur v. Directorate of Enforcement.,2023 SCC OnLine SC 1586 wherein the Hon’ble Apex Court was pleased to quash the complaint u/s 44/45 of the PML Act, 2002 (akin to chargesheet) on the ground that s. 120-B IPC can be invoked only in reference to a predicate scheduled offence, was rather challenging as a case, as there were no authorities on this issue and all judgments of the Apex Court as well as various High Courts were ambiguous. The coming of this judgment reinforced the confidence that one can build arguments from bare reading of provisions and interpretation of statutes even if there are no judicial precedents precisely on the issue. Needless to say, it would not have been possible without the fierce and structured arguments led by Senior Advocate Meenakshi Arora ma’am.

    Your achievements in both academia and extracurricular activities are impressive. How do you balance your professional responsibilities with your personal interests and commitments?

    I believe that lawyers led stressful lives as is, which makes it imperative to have interests outside of work, to balance out. More often than not, the demands of every day work and deadlines puts personal lives at the backseat. I personally make it a point to travel, even if it is a short trip, whenever the opportunity presents itself. It gives you something to look forward to as well. Apart from that, there are many tournaments organized by various Bar Associations, which are an amazing way to break the ice, forge better bonds with your peers and seniors. 

    Being an Advocate-on-Record before the Supreme Court is a significant achievement. How did you prepare for and approach the examination, especially achieving such a high rank on your first attempt?

    I had started my career at the Apex Court as a junior, so I was always enchanted and inspired to become an Advocate-on-Record before the Apex Court. Truly, with running my own practice, I was able to only devote 20-25 days of study towards the examination and managed to secure a Rank #4. However, the fact that a lot of the concepts tested in this examination especially in the papers of Practice and Procedure as well as Drafting have nexus with everyday practice before the Apex Court, having practiced for 5 years, in terms of drafting, filing and arguments, before appearing in this examination made those papers fairly easy to prepare for. 

    As for the other two papers namely Leading Case and Advocacy and Professional Ethics, most of those cases were a part of the curriculum in college and hence were formative concepts which are widely referred to and relied upon across a spate of judgments and thus, if the basic concepts in law are clear, the examination is not all that tough. Therefore, the syllabus ought to not be viewed as something one can mug up for the examination, but if you truly read the judgments in its entirety, you will benefit in your practice as it will enhance your concepts and knowledge base, with concepts or sub-concepts which were perhaps not completely understood during college.

    With your experience in criminal defense litigation, what do you find to be the most common misconceptions people have about this area of law?

    It is no surprise that the salary for freshers in litigation is not comparable to the corporate sector, which has been a driving factor for an increased number of graduates preferring the latter. However, criminal defence litigation is far more rewarding in all aspects as compared to the corporate sector. Furthermore, another misconception is that criminal defence litigation is not for women, and for most of us, even our families are not comfortable with the thought of women visiting jails, police stations and lower courts. We have legal stalwarts such as Senior Advocates Ms. Meenakshi Arora ma’am, Ms. Indira Jaisingh ma’am, Ms. Rebecca John ma’am, Ms. Shobha Gupta ma’am, who are not just counted as the best female advocates, but in the list of the best advocates.  Therefore, the field is not an old boys club. 

    As someone who has accomplished a lot in their legal career, what advice would you give to recent law graduates who are just starting out in the field?

    Be patient, zealous and persevere. Law demands layers of intricate knowledge which is gathered across a spectrum of fields over a period of time. There are essentially no shortcuts to success and the only way to conjointly sustain and grow is through day-to-day perseverance. The skill-set which needs to be developed in this profession to stand out, are built over years of backbreaking work. Join offices which teach you work, develop your skills and offer you opportunity to grow. 

    Get in touch with Ashima Mandla-

  • “A good cross-examination has the potential to turn litigation in your favor. Every day in a lawyer’s life is an experience and a learning.” – Rajesh Ramanathan, Partner, Factum Law

    “A good cross-examination has the potential to turn litigation in your favor. Every day in a lawyer’s life is an experience and a learning.” – Rajesh Ramanathan, Partner, Factum Law

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    What motivated you to pursue a career in law, and could you walk us through your journey from your early days in law school to becoming a partner at Factum Law? Additionally, could you share some of the challenges you encountered during the initial stages of your career and how you overcame them?

    The Question should be ‘Who?’ and not ‘What?”. I owe my professional life to my grandfather Mr. V.V. Ramanatha Iyer who was a prominent Lawyer in the Vellore District. As a school going kid, I used to accompany my grandfather to the Munisiff Court at Ranipet where he predominantly practised. It was his wish that I take after him. I joined Law School much against the wishes of my mother who like many others at that time thought that I would end up a Lier to be a successful lawyer. It took a while to convince her and she reluctantly agreed after I promised her that I will not Lie. It was my grandfather who sowed the seed in me to be a Lawyer and it was he who taught me that a Lawyer can be honest, truthful and successful. Legal education in those days were more theoretical unlike today and we hardly ever stepped into a Court during our Law School days. Of course there were quite a few exceptions to this and a few of my friends started interning quite early. 

    But I was a Reluctant Lawyer, when for the first time I set foot in Court almost 29 years ago.  Growing up, I was very quiet, reserved and had all qualities uncharacteristic of a Litigating  Lawyer. When I started my practise as a junior to my grandfather at Ranipet, I was just happily  going around the corridors of the Subordinate Courts as a privileged grandson but without actually knowing the fundamentals of being a Lawyer. I  felt I was in the middle of a jungle with  my eyes tied shut. I did not know what was happening.  I became a lawyer because of my  Grandfather and also because I did not know what else to do with my life.

    What inspired you to specialize in contentious and non-contentious litigation in areas such as IP, corporate, and commercial laws?

    When we started our careers as lawyers, we had only two options. Either to litigate or go inhouse. Since I followed my grandfather’s footsteps, contentious and non-contentious litigation was the obvious choice. But to sustain and keep up with that choice is a completely different challenge. I would say, Intellectual Property Rights and Commercial Laws chose me rather than me choosing them. A year into practice, my illustrious grandfather advised me to relocate and start afresh with a good Senior Practitioner at the Madras High Court. He felt that the Subordinate Courts were being bifurcated and it would be difficult for me to run around from one Court to the other in the Vellore District of Tamil Nadu. I am glad I took his advice and moved to the High Court where I was given the opportunity to join the chambers of Mr. V. Veeraraghavan, one of the most prominent Lawyers in the field of Intellectual Property Law in Chennai then.  It was more like an institution where we got to learn the practice of IPR and commercial Litigation. Mr. Veeraraghavan was instrumental in tutoring many other stalwarts like Mr. Prabhakara Reddy and Mr. Perumbulavil Radhakrishnan who were also my mentors and still continue to guide me in my journey.  All these mentors inspired me and continue to inspire me to do well. And IPR as a subject is so unique and different from all the other areas of laws, it is but natural to be drawn to this area of specialization.  

    We noticed you’re a senior panel lawyer for ‘The Institute of Chartered Accountants in India.’ How did this collaboration come about, and what does your role entail?

    I have been a Senior Panel lawyer for ICAI  the past few years. The collaboration started after a process of application and selection through an in person interaction. As a Senior panellist, I am entrusted with representing ICAI before the Madras High Court in select matters of complex legal issues. It has been both a learning and a rewarding experience representing one of the premier Statutory Bodies of the Country. 

    Given your extensive experience, what advice would you give to aspiring lawyers looking to specialize in intellectual property law?

    The Legal profession generally is a very noble profession which is also very satisfying and rewarding to all the genuine practitioners. I would most certainly tell all the youngsters who are looking at Law as a career, that honest, sincere hard work would make you very efficient and successful. It is imperative to believe that a lawyer is allowed to interpret a law but not facts. 

    Our profession has spread its wings far and wide now in terms of the avenues for a lawyer to get into. Earlier a lawyer had no other alternative but to either choose litigation or become an inhouse Counsel. But the options that are now available are much more. However,  It is my firm view that every lawyer on their enrolment should litigate in any Court of their Choice and convenience for a minimum of three years before choosing any other option. Because Litigation teaches us everything that one needs in life including Man Management. Right from just seeking an adjournment, to substantial arguments it is just an art. I always believe that the lessons a young lawyer learns from litigation in the first three years, would keep him/her in good stead for the rest of his/her life in whatever they choose to do.  So my first advice, if I may call it, is to gain experience as a litigator for a minimum period of three years before they decide to opt for any other avenues of the profession. 

    As for Intellectual Property Rights, this is the only area of law whose value stems from the public perception of such IPR (except Patents of course) and therefore every case would be different from the other. This is also a subject that just keeps evolving with every new invention and/or creative work. This to me is the unique aspect that makes it even more interesting than any other areas of law. The entry of AI now is taking to  different heights and it would be interesting to see where else it goes. 

    Can you share any insights into the legal landscape in India, particularly in terms of intellectual property rights and brand protection strategies?

    The Legal landscape is pretty promising as I believe that India of all the Major economies of the World has the best IPR protection in terms of Statutory Laws. Having said that, I also believe that we have to improve a lot in its implementation. Our Judiciary has been doing a lot to improve/ fasten the time for delivering Justice which by itself is no mean feat considering the population and the number of Judges we have. 

    As for strategies, I keep thinking that the brand owners take a long time to realise the potential value of their IPR’s and more often than not, the time delay in seeking Statutory protection by way of registering one’s brands or Patenting their new invention results in them losing value. Statutory protection of IPR’s should be the first on the agenda for a brand to be valuable. Registering a brand alone is not enough but maintaining it and protecting it from infringement at the right time is also equally important. In my little experience, I have come across quite a few brands losing their brand value just because they did not take action at the right time. It is also imperative for brand owners to understand that the cost and expenses for protecting and maintaining their brand is more of an investment than just an expense. 

    Looking back at your career journey so far, what are some key milestones or turning points that have shaped your professional growth and approach to law?

    Looking back, It just amazes me that I am able to sustain in this competitive field and quite well. I would like to think that the entire Universe comes to your aid if you just keep working without thinking about the result or the consequences. I take this opportunity to thank all my Seniors who nurtured/ mentored me and who still guide me in my journey. There are quite a few turning points since the day I started my career as a lawyer. I very vividly remember my Grandfather’s loving advice to relocate to the High Court and the day I joined the Chambers of my Senior Mr. V. Veeraraghavan who helped me transition into a High Court Practitioner. 

    The year I spent at the Franklin Pierce Law School in the USA would be the turning point or a milestone in my career. It is not only the Legal Skills I acquired there that made it a milestone, but the people I met there and the multi-cultural life that I was introduced to, changed me as a person. I went in as an Indian and returned as a true International. I still am in touch with most of my friends and teachers and I will always cherish my year at my alma mater. This camaraderie with all these people in a foreign Country for one full year taught me to be affable and friendly to all and guides me in my approach to the Legal Profession even today. Starting our own firm ‘Factum Law’ in the year 2017 was another key turning point in my professional life and with the right people to work with, this has been a very interesting and rewarding journey so far. 

    The International Trademark Association of which I have been a member since 2008, has also shaped my knowledge throughout. The Annual Meeting every year and the opportunity to meet thousands of IP practitioners from around the world in one place is always satisfying. This also helps me and my colleagues in keeping ourselves updated with all the developments of Law around the world. 

    None of this would have been possible if we did not have the right team to depend on. I am eternally grateful to all my team members for being with me through thick and thin. Thanks to them I am certain of many more milestones in my Professional life. 

    Reflecting on your time at UNH Franklin Pierce School of Law, could you share your experience and highlight any notable differences you observed between the educational approach there and the legal education system in India? How do you think these differences have influenced your practice of law?

    The life I spent at Pierce Law is the most memorable and life changing. I would be failing in my duty if I don’t credit Pierce Law for all of my achievements so far in my life and whatever I am destined to do more in this professional life. The Education system is more pragmatic whereas we in India still focus on theory. I am however told that it is changing here as well. There are no lectures in the US education system but only discussion. Which means you have to be prepared to be part of the discussion in every class. And you will be tested in the exams only on the discussion you had in the class. So it is imperative that you are well prepared even before attending the class and you get to participate in the discussion. This I believe is the most pragmatic way of teaching subjects and I hope Law Schools in India follow suit on this kind of pragmatic education. This has greatly influenced my thinking and my preparation for a case. 

    As a faculty member at EBC Learning and an alumnus of the Franklin Pierce Law Centre, do you incorporate your international experience and the teaching methodologies you encountered during your LLM into your approach to teaching? If so, how do you adapt these methods to suit the needs of your students and the legal education landscape in India?

    Whenever I get the opportunity to address  the students on some topic of interest, I make sure I follow the lessons learnt at Pierce Law. That of being pragmatic in my approach. So I try to make it an interactive session rather than just a lecture. This certainly aids in the students improving their thought process and their knowledge. This approach is imperative for Lawyers. I am also of the view that no Law school or college in India produces  Lawyers. They can only produce a good Law Student. It is the legal practice that moulds a student into a lawyer and that takes a minimum of three years. So a pragmatic approach would equip the students better in their transition to a professional lawyer. 

    Could you walk us through what a typical workday looks like for you, and how do you ensure you stay updated on the latest developments in the legal field amidst your busy schedule?

    Life of a lawyer is very demanding and unless we are prepared to sacrifice that ‘me time’, it will be very difficult to succeed. There are times when one feels overburdened but that comes with the territory. A typical day for me starts at 9.30 AM if not earlier. That depends on my Court work. Evenings are spent in preparing for the next day’s work and so on and so forth. Law journals and commentaries accompany me many times even in my travels. There can never be a day where a lawyer can say or feel he knows everything and the day one feels as such, would either be his last day of practice or after his retirement. Since Law is something that keeps evolving and changing with times, we as lawyers have to keep updating all the time. So I would only say ‘keep working’ to keep updated. 

    Do you remember the first time when you fought a case? Please tell us some anecdotes that happened in the courtroom.

    Very Vividly. That was my second day at the Madras High Court. I was asked to appear for a contemnor in a Trademark Infringement case against a formidable and successful lawyer who later became a Senior Counsel. I remember struggling to even mouth ‘May I please your Lordship” and the Judge had to lean forward to hear me. I was so nervous that I didn’t even know how I reacted in a room full of stalwarts. Within a few months, I became better at it and started enjoying my appearances in the High Court. Full credit to my senior who constantly encouraged me. It is those opportunities that I got from my seniors that exposed me to successful litigation early in my life. 

    Could you share with us one of the most interesting and challenging cases from your career that still resonates with you, and walk us through the complexities you encountered and how you navigated them? 

    There are quite a few. Particularly at the beginning of my career where I was assisting a Senior Counsel in a Trademark case. It was an appeal and the Senior Counsel appearing for the Appellant swayed the Bench completely in his favour. It looked as though we wouldn’t even have a chance to argue. 

    When it was our chance, all we did was to pick some errors in the Appellants documents and in no time the Division Bench turned in our favour. It showed me what presence of mind and a thorough knowledge of every single piece of paper filed in Court could do. That was a lesson I carried all through my life and I still make it a point to thoroughly study the files. You never know where the spark would come from. 

    I have also enjoyed my experiences in appearing in trial Courts and conducting cross examinations. One can never be fully prepared to cross examine a witness and a presence of mind is most essential to be a successful trial Lawyer. Conducting trials is an art by itself and every Law Student should expose himself/herself to the art of cross examination. A good cross examination has the potential to turn litigation in your favour. I will end by saying that every day in a Lawyers Life is an experience and a learning. I most certainly love the challenges that this profession throws at me every single minute.

    Thank you 

    Get in touch with Rajesh Ramanathan-

  • “Successfully arguing appeals and securing victories for my clients taught me that persistence and a deep understanding of law are key to success.” – Vikas Sharma, Director and Principal Solicitor at Vikas Sharma & Co Ltd., Solicitors & Solicitor at LAWSMITH SOLICITORS’

    “Successfully arguing appeals and securing victories for my clients taught me that persistence and a deep understanding of law are key to success.” – Vikas Sharma, Director and Principal Solicitor at Vikas Sharma & Co Ltd., Solicitors & Solicitor at LAWSMITH SOLICITORS’

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    Reflecting on your journey from studying law to becoming a director at Vikas Sharma & Co Ltd, what specific moments or individuals inspired you to pursue a career in law? What were some of the challenges you faced and how did you overcome them?

    I come from a lineage of lawyers, with my maternal great grandfather practicing in Hissar, Haryana, and both my grandfather and father in Ratangarh, Rajasthan. Growing up in Ratangarh, I was deeply influenced by the respect lawyers commanded in a small town. Visits to court with my father and uncles were frequent, and the court premises felt like a second home. Initially, my interest wasn’t in the law itself but in the sweets and pampering I received from my father’s clients and lawyer friends. However, over time as I grew older, observing my family’s dedication and the impact they had on people’s lives inspired me to pursue law seriously.

    My father, the late Shri Shyam Sunder Sharma, played a crucial role in encouraging me to aim higher and move to the Supreme Court. I learned not only how to prepare a case from him, but also how being a lawyer is more than just a business but a way to help people and enjoy the process. One of the pivotal moments was my working with Group Captain Karan Singh Bhati at the Supreme Court of India, where I gained invaluable experience representing the State of Rajasthan. Group Captain Bhati was then standing counsel for Rajasthan. 

    The passing of my father and two uncles was a significant emotional challenge, prompting me to move to Scotland for a master’s degree in law. This move was both a personal and professional turning point, allowing me to start afresh in a new environment. The journey was filled with obstacles, but the support of mentors like Mr. Vincent Buffoni and Mr Matthew Cohen, and my persistence in adapting to new legal systems, helped me overcome these challenges.

    Can you share the journey of how you transitioned from practicing various areas of law to specializing exclusively in immigration law? What motivated this shift?

    The transition to specializing in immigration law was largely serendipitous. Once I qualified as a solicitor in England and Wales, I joined Vincent Buffoni & Co, a central London law firm. While working with Mr Vincent Buffoni, an Oxford graduate who was very humble and thorough, I gained experience in UK immigration law. Initially, barristers handled appeal hearings, but Mr. Buffoni trusted my abilities enough for me to represent clients. After gaining hands-on experience in immigration cases, I became interested in the field more deeply earlier 

    Having worked in London for a few years, I returned to Scotland where I had earlier completed my LLM degree. Since English and Scottish legal jurisdictions are separate, I had to pass conversion exams to become a Scottish solicitor. My litigation background allowed me to handle all kinds of court matters when I moved to Aberdeen and joined Mathew Cohen and Associates Ltd. There was, however, an increase in demand for immigration law services. Aberdeen, being the oil capital of Europe, had a clientele that required legal assistance for complex immigration issues. A growing number of cases and the complexity involved led me to focus almost exclusively on immigration law, which I found intellectually stimulating and professionally rewarding.

    With over 20 years of experience, what key insights have you gained about the intricacies and challenges within immigration law that may not be apparent to those outside the field?

    One key insight is the profound impact of immigration law on individuals’ lives. It’s not just about legal procedures but about people’s futures, their ability to stay with their families, and their livelihood. The emotional and personal stakes are incredibly high, which adds a layer of complexity and responsibility to each case.

    Another challenge is the ever-evolving nature of immigration law. Policies and regulations change frequently, requiring constant learning and adaptation. Navigating these changes while advocating effectively for clients demands meticulous attention to detail and a comprehensive understanding of both the legal and human aspects of each case.

    Could you please provide examples of some of the most complex immigration cases you’ve handled and how you approached resolving them? What lessons did you learn from these experiences?

    Compared to London and other major cities in the UK, Aberdeen’s clientele is different. As Aberdeen is an oil capital in Europe, most of the clients are well educated professionals working in the oil industry. Therefore, they engage you only when a case is too complex for them to handle. As a result, almost all of my cases are quite complex. It was last week that I argued an appeal in which the UK government refused the appellant’s permanent residence/indefinite leave to remain application because the appellant has served a non-custodial sentence in a criminal case. The Home Office lawyer accepted before the judge that the application should not have been refused given that the appellant’s application to work in the UK had been approved despite a criminal conviction. In my argument, I relied on the principle of legitimate expectation, which was well received by the Home Office lawyer. We had another appeal where the husband of one of our clients was being removed from the UK due to criminal convictions. As a result of hugging his coworkers, he was convicted. It was my contention that the immigration rules that governed his removal contained an element of discretion. In this case, neither the UK government recognized or explained why discretion inherent in the immigration rule was exercised against the appellant. The judge allowed the appeal. Another case involved a Thai lady who was married to a British national and they had two British children. After the marriage ended, the British husband relocated to another part of the UK with the children. Due to the expiration of her visa and lack of funds, our client was able to move to the new city where her ex-husband and children had moved. Since her children lived away from her, the UK government refused her application on the ground that she was not actively involved in the upbringing of the children. Despite living away from her children due to circumstances beyond her control, I argued that she still had a genuine and enduring relationship with them. The appeal was dismissed, as were the applications to the Upper Tribunal. As a result of the Court of Session’s intervention, the matter was referred to the Upper Tribunal, where the appeal was ultimately allowed. 

    The lessons I learned from cases in which I didn’t receive a successful outcome initially are that ultimately success will be attained if the legal point is in our favor regardless of how many judges dislike it. 

    What inspired you to establish your own law firm, Vikas Sharma & Co Ltd, in Aberdeen? How does it differentiate itself in terms of approach and client experience compared to other firms in the area? Also, what challenges did you come across during the initial days of your firm?

    I joined Matthew Cohen Associates as the head of the immigration law department in 2010. It was in 2018 that I joined The Chamber Practice as a partner. Since I was running both firms’ immigration law departments, I was responsible for providing the best service to my clients. As a result, setting up Vikas Sharma and Co Ltd did not make a significant difference in the way the firm assisted clients. Having my name on my firm helped my previous clients find me and gave me more freedom to run my business. Besides the procedural requirements for setting up a law firm in Scotland, which are quite onerous, I had no problems because I have been serving people here for more than 15 years and my previous clients found me through Google reviews.

    Considering your background as an advocate in the Supreme Court of India, how do you perceive the differences in legal systems between India and the UK? Are there any insights from your experience in India that you apply to your practice in the UK?

    The process of preparing a case for court and presenting it to the court does not seem to differ much between India and Scotland. However, there are many other distinct differences, such as the requirement that a law firm be insured before starting to practise, and the Law Society of Scotland is much more strict in its regulation of this profession than Indian bar councils. At the outset, lawyers here are required to provide engagement letters outlining the costs involved and how unhappy clients can make complaints. The Law Society of Scotland regularly inspects law firms to ensure compliance with rules of practice. Keeping the office and clients’ bank accounts up-to-date is a mandatory requirement. Generally, lawyers specialize in one area of law, such as family law, immigration law, or criminal law. Lawyers must advise clients efficiently because the cost of cases can be enormous, otherwise, they will be liable for claims and complaints. Once the pleadings are complete and the case is ready to proceed to the evidence stage, the lawyers of the parties determine if their client’s case deserves to proceed to the next stage since the client could end up paying the other party’s legal costs. As far as I’m concerned, the Scottish legal profession is much more strictly regulated than that in India.

    Transitioning from practicing law in India to establishing yourself in the UK legal system must have been a significant change. Could you share your experiences and insights regarding this transition? What were some of the biggest challenges you faced, and how did you adapt your legal expertise to the new environment?

    Interestingly enough, I struggled little to establish myself as a lawyer here. Vincent Buffoni, the partner of the central law firm and an Oxford graduate, had earlier shown me trust, and later Matthew Cohen, a principal of a Scottish law firm, gave me an opportunity to appear in Scottish courts. In this region, I am the only Indian lawyer and have even appeared in smaller towns such as Peterhead and Stonehaven where English is spoken in a very different accent. In terms of my work, speaking English with an Indian accent or my origin has not had any adverse effects. My experience as a lawyer in India extends even to smaller towns such as Ratangarh and Shri Dungargarh, as well as the High Courts of Rajasthan and Delhi and the Supreme Court of India. Having moved from a small town to a higher court already prepared me to handle the changes and adapt to them. I believe that when it comes to practising as a lawyer, there are certain requirements regardless of the country or court: knowledge of facts, knowledge of applicable law, understanding the stakes for the client, empathy towards the client, and the ability to represent the client before a judge.

    Any new court requires adaptation, whether it is the District Court of India or the Supreme Court of India. In the same way, adapting to the courts of the UK involves a series of steps. As part of my adaptation process, I sought guidance from experienced colleagues and continued learning about the nuances of the UK legal system. A crucial step toward becoming an English and Scottish solicitor was passing the conversion exams. Additionally, I qualified as a solicitor in Ireland and worked with a firm there in 2017. I was able to successfully navigate this transition by embracing the differences and leveraging my foundational legal expertise.

    With your wealth of experience in the legal profession, what advice would you offer to the new generation of aspiring solicitors and advocates who are just beginning their careers, particularly those interested in specializing in immigration law?

    For aspiring solicitors and advocates, my advice is to develop a deep understanding of the law and stay updated with the latest developments. Immigration law is a dynamic field, and continuous learning is essential. Practical experience through internships and mentorship from seasoned professionals is invaluable.

    Specializing in immigration law requires empathy, patience, and a genuine desire to help people. Building strong client relationships and maintaining integrity in your practice are crucial. Always approach each case with meticulous preparation and a commitment to achieving the best outcome for your clients.

    We may enter this noble profession motivated by the motivation to help people, but it is the discipline that earns us credibility and reputation with clients, colleagues, and the judicial system. 

    Due to the ever-changing nature of immigration law in the UK, no one can claim to be an expert. It is therefore important that we stay on top of any amendments to the rules, regulations, policies, and statutes as students of law. 

    With the demands of your legal career, maintaining a healthy work-life balance is crucial. Could you share some of your favorite ways to relax and unwind outside of the office? How do these activities contribute to your overall well-being and productivity in your professional life?

    When I am in control of my work, I feel relaxed. Consequently, I try to answer all my emails and phone calls by the end of the day. If I am unable to complete the work, I email the client when I will complete it. In the end, it comes down to managing the expectations of others.

    After a difficult day at work, watching a good movie or web series helps me unwind. Since I have a sweet tooth, I run approximately 5 kilometers a day and do push-ups and squats on alternate days. Scotland is close to nature and picturesque, so I have chosen to settle there. It is relaxing to take a drive in the Scottish countryside and to have an Indian cup of tea to clear my mind. In spite of living in Scotland for almost 20 years, I remain a teetotaler and a vegetarian, so I still drown my stress in tea rather than Scotch.  

    Get in touch with Vikas Sharma-

  • “Self-trust is the primary requirement. Understanding the fundamentals of law, good communication, time management, teamwork, dedication, critical thinking, and adaptability are equally important” – Savithri Sravanthi, Founder & Managing Partner at IUSTUS LEGAL

    “Self-trust is the primary requirement. Understanding the fundamentals of law, good communication, time management, teamwork, dedication, critical thinking, and adaptability are equally important” – Savithri Sravanthi, Founder & Managing Partner at IUSTUS LEGAL

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    Could you share with us the story behind your decision to pursue a career in law? Does anything change for a women post-marriage? Looking back, would you revisit your career path? 

    Becoming a lawyer was my childhood dream. Unlike an add-on degree, I wanted the legal profession to be my primary career. My father was an accountant while my mom initially was a homemaker and later turned into an entrepreneur. Fortunately, as a child there was no pressure from my parents to choose the career path of their preference or excelling in academics. My choice of electing a legal profession as a career option was welcomed and completely supported by my parents. Relentless support from parents meant a lot to me, which motivated me to achieve a Gold Medal in my bachelor’s degree. 

    Family support for any lady post marriage undoubtedly helps her to retain her identity whereby she can balance her career aspirations with familial responsibilities. I have been fortunate to receive encouragement from my husband and kids, that I was able to achieve a Gold Medal in my Master’s degree 17 years after I completed my bachelors. 

    Time files, it has been more than 2 decades. If I look back, I feel it is deeply fulfilling and gratifying. I wholeheartedly thank my mentors, seniors, peers and family who contributed to my professional growth and being part of my life’s journey. 

    As a legal advisor across various sectors, including IT & ITES, Manufacturing, Real Estate, Pharma and Techlaw, what common challenges do you encounter, and how do you address them while ensuring compliance and legal efficacy?

    Every client reposes trust on their advisors, either legal or financial. As a legal counsel I pre-empt and aid our clients navigate through complex situations and challenges and comply with the laws to avoid potential risks and liabilities and seamlessly concentrate on their business goals. 

    Every organisation requires to comply with a plethora of laws which makes it important for companies to place reliance on subject matter experts. As a legal counsel, we advise on various laws based on the needs of our client, which include data protection, labour & employment laws, consumer protection laws, intellectual property rights, corporate and commercial laws.

    Creating awareness and conducting training sessions to the appropriate functions helps us to interact with the teams to explain to them the need for compliance and adverse effects of non-compliance. These sessions instill a value system and is a collaborative work as we share real time experiences  and challenges. We advise on legal compliance after assessing each client’s pain points and prepare policy or guidelines to suit their requirement within the legal framework. Periodic supervision, audits and team reviews with clients aid to keep a watch on adherence with ever changing laws. Compliance is not a one-time event but an on-going task. By doing so, organizations ensure they meet legal requirements, uphold ethical standards, and manage risks effectively. This proactive approach not only reduces the likelihood of non-compliance but also enhances overall organizational resilience and reputation.

    As a practitioner in Anti-Sexual Harassment Law, how do you approach training and awareness sessions for employees and internal committee members to foster a culture of respect and inclusivity within organizations?

    Sexual harassment is a social issue. It has been nearly a decade, that our Government enacted the Prevention of Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (POSH Act) yet many establishments remain oblivious to its existence or compliance. Like Consumer awareness this also needs to reach the people. Like the impact created by the ‘Jago Grahak Jago’ awareness program run by the Government, we need a similar movement to sensitize and create awareness of this beneficial legislation.

    Regular meetings with IC members is highly recommended, awareness sessions for employees are important likewise orientation to IC members is also equally critical, as they redress the complaints. IC members  have to be trained to ensure judicious redressal, as most of IC members are seniors and experts in their field but may not be from legal background hence may need assistance to understand the nuances of law and manner of conducting redressal process in a time bound manner. 

    Usually, participants /audience are silent for the first 15-20 minutes, some voice their concerns during the session while some wait until we conclude. But there are many queries which can be resolved only by training and interactive sessions. These sessions are to be attended by all, it should not be a women’s day event. Government has enacted the law but its implementation is a collective responsibility. 

    Could you elaborate on your involvement in Estate & Succession Planning and share insights into the importance of such planning for individuals and families, especially in the context of evolving legal frameworks?

    Estate and succession planning are complex processes that require careful consideration of legal, financial, and personal factors. It is a collaborative effort of legal, tax and financial professionals to meet their goals and safeguard their properties. Will is the most sought out option for many as it is easy. Whereas for High Networth Individuals and Ultra High Networth Individuals s structuring, distribution and transfer of assets /wealth to beneficiaries or legal heirs upon death is a complex task. Identifying assets, including real estate, investments, savings, retirals, insurance policies, prized possessions, and personal belongings itself is the first step, which is followed by structuring and so on.  Trusts can be useful for minimizing taxes, legal attachments, and providing for minor children or individuals with special needs. Pre-empting pros and cons and advising clients is challenging yet fulfilling once we reach the desired outcome. We partner with reputed financial advisors and family office experts to give our clients holistic solutions.Although we have laws, healthcare/ advance medical directives, such as living wills, outline an individual’s preferences for medical treatment and appoint someone to make healthcare decisions on their behalf if they are unable to do so. This is a very sensitive topic similar to that of a Will. No child can ask his parent to execute a Will to safeguard our assets or have advance medical directive in place to avoid issues in case of incapacity of parent to make a decision.  

    Justice M S Sonak, who serves on the Goa Bench of the Bombay High Court, became the first person in Goa to register a “living will”, an advance medical directive for his family for when he cannot make his own decisions. Such trailblazers pave the way and pass on a message that nothing is permanent. It is rational to pass on responsibility of taking decisions in case of health in case of an emergency or wealth in case of eventuality. 

    What inspired you to embark on the journey of founding your own firm, IUSTUS LEGAL, and what specific vision or goals did you aim to achieve through this endeavour? Could you share some of the significant challenges you encountered when establishing IUSTUS LEGAL?

    Starting a law firm or independent practice is a logical and common path for any legal professional in practice. I believe a silver lining during pandemic for me was clients both domestic and international realised that corporate legal services can be rendered effectively and efficiently using technology. E-meetings became the go-to venue and virtual data room a repository of documents. Personally, I noticed there were avenues and opportunities which were opened and I wanted to explore the waters as the market dynamics were changing and legal compliance was gaining a foothold due to enormous foreign investments and funding which prompted legal due diligence and paved the way for diversified agreements and mandated compliance under corporate and labour laws.

    I truly believed that it was the right time for me to make my deep rooted vision of providing just and fair legal services to clients into a reality. Initially, I was apprehensive, as it could be risky moving out of my comfort zone and setting up a firm from scratch. It meant less to no work and less to no steady income. I took a leap of faith and established IUSTUS Legal. IUSTUS is a name derived from IUSTITIA, the Lady of Justice (Nyaya Devta) and also means righteousness, ‘dharma’, being just and fair which is based on the vision to create value to every client in every entrusted matter. It is fulfilling when a client entrusts a matter to you and feels content when the desired outcome and refers to new clients or more matters.

    It has been nearly 3 years since I ventured on this journey and we are expanding. I feel elated when I say it was an all women team (and young mothers) who continue to balance both professional and personal responsibilities effectively. We are expanding with young professional minds joining us.  I am grateful to the Almighty for being the guiding light, to our amazing clients, competent team and my wonderful family.  

    Entrepreneurship comes with its risks and challenges, but if you have conviction in yourself and faith in God, the journey is beautiful. 

    What challenges did you encounter as a woman along the way that shaped your journey to becoming a seasoned legal professional and Managing Partner at IUSTUS LEGAL?

    Conventionally, the representation of women in the legal profession is low. Despite significant advancements, women face challenges and many let go of this profession due to gender discrimination, demanding timelines, constant comparisons, unrealistic expectations, work-life balance, motherhood etc. Support from seniors and family is important for any woman to pursue their career aspirations. I was fortunate that there have been only a few such instances more gender based, but have heard so many experiences from my friends and colleagues to quit the profession and change their career paths. 

    In fact many women colleagues leave the profession due to familial responsibilities or unsupportive family, post marriage or childbirth. Out of 30 women students in my class of 2000 batch, hardly a handful women are continuing in this profession, which is disheartening.

    I truly believe and advise young mothers, who have no support but have legal acumen and skill sets, could take up tasks where they could work from home or work as freelancers. 

    Earlier, litigation or corporate law were the only options, now the legal profession has further branched out. One can be a legal correspondent, legal analyst, part time lecturer, corporate lawyer, labour law consultant, POSH advisor. Quitting is easy, navigating through odds is a challenge worth trying.  

    How do you balance your work-life as a legal professional? How do you manage your work day?

    Time is the most precious commodity which is non-renewable, but we need to value both time and money. Legal profession is highly demanding. Striking a balance is not an easy task as profession and personal life are equally important. Based on situations, I have prioritized both professional growth and personal life. 

    In response to your question, I prioritize work every day before I start my work, I read a matter and make hand noting this helps me recollect the matter easily, avoid procrastination, except in case of emergencies and keep a watch on the deadlines, in case work spills beyond expected timeline I ensure apprising clients helps in maintaining a healthy and long standing professional relationship. I believe enriching client relationships and being updated with domain areas is also spending time productively as a lawyer. delegation of work with a team helps in productivity, time management and ability to focus on priority and high risks matters.

    Most of all, I believe in spending time with family and taking short breaks/getaways as it rejuvenates me. This helps growth of professional and personal lives

    What advice or suggestions would you offer to the next generation of aspiring legal professionals who are entering the field, especially in light of the evolving legal landscape and emerging challenges?

    Self-trust is the primary requirement for any aspiring student as comparisons are bound to happen and that should not adversely impact on your growth. Embarking as a lawyer is an exciting yet challenging journey. Understanding the fundamentals of law and research are key skill sets but good communication, time management, team work, dedication, critical thinking and adaptability are also equally important. 

    Formal education gives aspiring lawyers an overview of law but practical learning under a senior /mentor and gaining insights from experienced professionals enhances the knowledge, legal reasoning and application of the education judiciously. Attending workshops, conferences, networking aids in an impactful way to foster continuous learning. A legal professional must be willing to be a lifelong student to sustain and grow. My motto ‘if you are not updated, you are outdated’. Stay updated to continue and shine in this noble profession and collaborate with colleagues. One may not know everything but everyone will know something.

    I am happy to have been part of this pious profession and strongly urge students to consider this as their career option, if it aligns with their skill sets, interests, and career aspirations. Lawyers can positively influence the Country’s law & policy, make key contributions in people’s lives and decisions through their expert legal guidance. 

    Get in touch with Savithri Sravanthi –

  • “Lawyers are tools of social change in society. Observing my surroundings, where there are prevalent economic and social inequalities, I always wished to be a tool for social change.” – MANOHAR PRATAP, Advocate-on-Record at the Supreme Court of India.

    “Lawyers are tools of social change in society. Observing my surroundings, where there are prevalent economic and social inequalities, I always wished to be a tool for social change.” – MANOHAR PRATAP, Advocate-on-Record at the Supreme Court of India.

    This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team

    Can you share what initially inspired you to pursue a career in law, especially coming from a remote rural area in Bihar? Who showed you this career path of Law? Please allow us to walk through your journey.

    Right from the very beginning, i.e. primary school days, I used to read that most of the freedom fighters, politicians and ministers were lawyers. This fact developed thinking inside my mind that lawyers are tools of social change in society. Observing my surroundings, where there are prevalent economic and social inequalities, I always wished to be a tool for social change. Though initially, I tried social upliftment in the village through arranging plays, cleanliness drives and free tuition after passing intermediate examinations, I decided to choose law as a profession so that my passion could also be fulfilled.

    Transitioning from a Hindi medium school to studying law in English must have been challenging. How did you overcome these hurdles, and what advice would you give to students in similar situations?  

    Transitioning from Hindi Medium to English was the biggest challenge. Initially in school, I learnt translations from books, but later I chose more convenient ways to learn English by listening to Hindi and English news broadcasts respectively. Hindi and English broadcasts of BBC, DW (Deutsche Welle) and All India Radio on short waves helped me to a greater extent. Later in college, I used both Hindi and English medium books to study, however I used to write examinations in English. Watching English movies with subtitles also helped me in gaining vocabulary. After joining the courts, reading judgments regularly improved my English.

    Young students who are in similar situations are advised to read lots and lots of bilingual study materials and switch to English gradually. In the current times, knowledge of the English Language is a must for success at least in Supreme Court and High Courts. However, no one should feel shy in trying even if he/she feels that his English is not perfect. Even today, after almost a decade of law practice, sometimes I fail to find or remember exact English words for feelings that I wish to express to Court or somewhere else. So the most important part is to keep trying and to remember that none of the Indians speak English as their mother tongue and they all have learnt English sooner or later as a second language only.

    You have an extensive background working with legal stalwarts like Mr. K. K. Venugopal and Mr. Kapil Sibal. What are some key learnings you gained from these experiences?  

    Briefing legal stalwarts like Mr. K. K. Venugopal and Mr. Kapil Sibal are insightful. I have briefed them on many occasions in my independent matters. The biggest learning from briefing them is, to hear briefs patiently and carefully. Even though they are themselves an authority on some legal subject matters, but then also they take briefings very patiently and accommodate the viewpoints of juniors. In one of the matters wherein interpretation of the MMDR Act was involved, Mr. K. K. Venugopal, who was the Attorney General of India, had many detailed discussions with me as assisting counsel before giving the final Written Opinion to the State of Chhattisgarh.

    Since shifting your focus to the Supreme Court in 2016, how has your approach to handling cases evolved, and what unique challenges have you encountered?  

    After shifting practice in the Supreme Court, my approach has remained simple and steady. I never draft unnecessary bulky briefs and have never tried to mislead the Hon’ble Court or the opposite party. In the beginning years, my focal point of briefs was scattered but with experience, gradually, I have learnt to pinpoint the main legal issues involved in a case, so that the Hon’ble Court may not waste valuable judicial time in finding legal issues in a brief.

    The most unique challenge I have faced in the Supreme Court is the unbalanced approach of Hon’ble Benches in hearing cases that are led by Senior Advocates and Advocates. There is a general tendency among Judges that if a matter is represented by relatively young counsel, it must not be an important matter. Some benches even get angry and try to dissuade them from appearing in the Supreme Court threatening with costs.  

    You have been involved in various public interest litigations aimed at improving the judicial system. Can you discuss a specific PIL you worked on and its impact on society?  

    I remained part of many PILs. However, the most important PIL was ‘Youth Bar Association of India V Union of India’ reported in (2016) 9 SCC 473 wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court was pleased to direct all states and Union Territories to upload a copy of FIR on respective websites within 24 hours of its registration. This judgment had a huge impact on the administration of justice. Earlier, common citizens were not able to get copies of FIR even after many attempts, now it can be obtained through some clicks online. In one of PIL ‘Manohar Pratap V Union of India’ W.P. (C) No. 780 of 2019, I raised issues of the deaths of hundreds of children in Bihar due to Encephalitis. The Hon’ble Supreme Court took a serious view in the matter and in reply filed by the State of Bihar, it was found that there is a complete lack of medical services in Bihar. Later the matter was disposed of with liberty to approach the High Court of Patna.

    During your tenure as Deputy Advocate General for the State of Chhattisgarh, what were some significant cases you handled, and what did this role teach you about state-level legal issues?  

    During my tenure as Deputy Advocate General, most of the matters handled by me were related to the MMDR Act and NGT Act. There are no such remarkable judgments to point out, however representing the state I learned about the stage-wise implementation of policies, and lacunas in State machinery leading to non-implementation of judgments.

    As a staunch supporter of mediation in matrimonial cases, how do you see mediation contributing to a more efficient and humane judicial process?  

    Mediation is an important tool for resolving disputes. From my personal experience, I found that there is a 50% success rate for resolving disputes through mediation, which is much better than dragging cases for years.

    As a staunch supporter of mediation in matrimonial cases, how do you see mediation contributing to a more efficient and humane judicial process? Can you elaborate on its effectiveness in resolving disputes compared to traditional litigation?  

    Most mediations are in matrimonial disputes arising from transfer petitions. I don’t do adversarial litigation in matrimonial disputes and always try to find an amicable solution through the help of mediators from the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee. Meditations in matrimonial disputes are completely averse to traditional litigation. When parties in matrimonial disputes go to Courts in traditional hearings, they develop animosity against each other which further deteriorates their relationship, and litigation keeps going on for years and years. However, in Mediation, when parties sit face to face in the presence of a mediator, with the comfort that their words cannot be used against each other in a Court of law, they open up and issues are generally resolved in 1 to 3 hearings. Which saves a lot of judicial time.

    Outside of your legal practice, what personal hobbies or interests do you pursue, and how do they help you maintain a work-life balance? 

    Outside my legal practice, I am a pet lover and I like to travel to serene places. I am a good swimmer. In my free time, I watch a lot of documentaries based on various social and other issues around the world.

    Looking ahead, what are your goals for your independent practice, and how do you plan to continue contributing to the legal field and society at large?   

    My goal in independent practice is to keep gradually rising and make space among already established names in the Supreme Court. For my contribution to society, I do many pro bono cases, mostly for persons in custody. All the matters that I argue in the Supreme Court are aimed towards strengthening the civil liberties and rights of common citizens. I believe that every advocate owes a duty to challenge arbitrary actions of Govts. which are aimed towards curtailing liberty in any manner. 

    Get in touch with Manohar Pratap-