You have a diverse background, both in Patent law and in Chemical Engineering. Can you share what inspired you to transition from a technical field like chemical engineering to a career in Intellectual Property Law?
I started with Patent Law, and to practise patent law – one needs to have a science/technology background. So, transition from an engineer to patent attorney was rather smooth and felt natural. However, transitioning to intellectual property law – covering trademarks, copyright, design, geographical indications, plant varieties, contracts etc. has been quite a journey. It was mostly inspired by my own hunger to expand my skills and offerings. The learnings in these areas too felt natural as they seemed like a natural extension of patent law – for the bedrock on which IP laws are framed and promulgated share common or similar pith, substance and motivations. If I am reaching out to a client, I have to then go with an entire set of solutions and deep knowledge on all fronts of IPRs.
What are some important lessons from the early stages of your career that have stayed with you, and how have they influenced the trajectory of your professional journey?
First and foremost, lesson that I have taken and retained and continue to expand is about finding my Why. Initially, I wasn’t sure why I am in patent law. Just because it is interesting – I get to work on frontiers of technology and law – wasn’t a good enough answer to Why. It was a self-centered answer. In business and particularly in client facing professions like law – your reasons to pursue those professions cannot be self-centred. You may start with such motivations but you cannot continue and grow with this motivation. Let’s face it – all learning becomes boring after you have spent enough time on it – this is true for me. I learn quickly. I read a lot. I get bored of a subject after having understood its basics/founding principles or first principles and move onto something new. I continued to expand my Why – which in turn helped me expand my skillset, and which in turn allowed me to offer more and more services – high quality services – to my clients, and this skill or this aspect has shaped my professional journey deeply.
Given your extensive experience working with various corporations and legal entities, what inspired you to transition into starting your own practice with Aumirah and what were the initial challenges that you had to overcome?
Frankly, if you are good at what you do – you won’t face any challenges. High quality clients or Impactful clients will find high quality professionals or Impactful professionals. Also, I have always worked like an entrepreneur. So, when I started Aumirah, for me it was being employed by Aumirah. It is not about entrepreneurship – it is about entrepreneurial mindset – that you can carry in any form – as an employee or employer.
Sure, I did face usual problems of cash flow etc. but I didn’t face any problems with respect to the work or getting work itself. For this, I am also obliged to my very dear colleagues who have worked closely with me and understood my “Why”. We have always found friends at the right juncture who took us along on path to growth. I have been blessed with some of the best clients one can get across the domain and they have spread our work far and wide.
In your role as a mentor to startups, you’ve worked with several incubators like Nexus by the US Embassy and IIITD Incubator. What are the most common IP challenges you see startups facing, and how do you help them overcome these?
The most common challenges faced by startups is lack of proper advice on IP rights at an early stage. I have seen many established companies with extremely poor IP frameworks and portfolio. Unfortunately, I do not see that improving anytime soon since IP advice right now is being doled out in the market is for sake of making money and not for sake of making the client and especially startups – sail through the initial phase of their journey. We definitely help startups overcome challenges by coming up with advisory on how to defer and when to prioritise what kind of IP. Not all IP is urgent. Not all IP can be deferred. Between these two paradigms – startups can find their right IP framework.
With your background in chemical engineering, how do you assess the patentability of inventions in the tech or life sciences sectors? What common mistakes do inventors make when filing patents in these industries?
The assessment of patentability – be it chemical engineering, semiconductors, biotechnology, robotics or automation – is highly similar. Sure, there can be differences in assessment of inventive step – for the context of ontology in each of the mentioned domains – but the first principles are similar. The common mistakes inventors do is to confuse their product as their invention.
Having extensive experience in Patent Law, can you share a recent case where you helped a client with patent opposition or litigation, and what was the outcome?
Sure. Recently, we strategized, prepared and litigated in the matter of Falcon Autotech vs Kengic China. We not only got the patent granted but also litigated it against Kengic and got an ex parte injunction in the first hearing itself before Delhi High Court. The matter pertained to sorters used in logistics and warehousing.
As the leader of Aumirah, how do you foster a culture of innovation and excellence among your team, especially when dealing with high-stakes IP and corporate matters?
At Aumirah, from very early on, everyone is exposed to clients or clients are exposed to even the junior most associate. This exposure and discussions with clients expose our team to the high stakes and wide range of work that we do, are capable of and can be capable of. The innovation and excellence cannot happen in silos. It is like you cannot be a good boxer if you training only with boxing bags – you have to do technical sparrings, power sparrings and sometimes even a club-level fight routinely to be able to enter the bigger arena eventually. So far, my team has made me proud of the fact that they have very judiciously handled clients. They are miles deep with our clients and also mile wider in law and its applications in handling their matters because of this exposure.
What advice would you give to aspiring IP professionals who are looking to build a successful career in the field?
If you want to build a successful career in IP or in fact any field of law – there are only two ways to go about it. First is to find your WHY – and continue to enrich the answer as you go along in your journey. Second is to read as much as you can and as wide as you can and if you cannot read – then keep company of people who read and make sure your choice of reading materials be not restricted to just law or science or business – make it wider – fiction, poetry, news, history, religion, vastu, architecture, biographies – become a sponge – absorb knowledge and become a powerhouse.
You completed your Bachelor in Civil Law at Brasenose College, University of Oxford. Was law always the career path you envisioned for yourself and what motivated you to pursue law as a profession?
My tryst with law was accidental. I had lost my Civics book, a day prior to my final exams in school. My father sat me down with a copy of the Constitution of India and spoke about Keshvananda Bharti. Whilst reading through the charter on Fundamental rights and duties, I came across the wide powers of the courts as enforcers and protectors of rights and therefore, by default, the duty of the lawyers to bring causes to justice. That was it! Dreamy eyed about the change and difference that lawyers can make to society (of course also influenced by Alan Shore from Boston Legal), I decided to pursue Law as my profession.
Early in your career, you worked at several prestigious law firms before transitioning to work with Senior advocates like Mr. Akhil Sibal and Mr. K.K. Venugopal. How would you describe the cultural differences between these two environments, and how did you adapt to each?
There are definite distinctions and also certain similarities in the working culture of a Law Firm when compared to a Counsel’s Chamber.
Starting with the distinction first, at a law firm, you are exposed to direct client dealings, extensive drafting and working with many counsels and senior counsels. You are involved with filing and getting matters listed, billing and preparing recording letters for the client.
On the other hand, working in a Senior Advocate’s chamber gives you a balcony view into the mind of the lawyer- her/his quirks, style of presentation, method of preparation and the ultimate act of reading the law and convincing the bench with arguments. Preparation of briefing notes involved detailed churning of legal research with factual analysis.
Coming to the similarity– at both places, you are expected to work hard and stay abreast with the law and the legal system. The working hours don’t get better at either, and you learn and gain immensely at both!
Therefore, whilst the scope of work for the junior may differ in a Law Firm when compared to a Senior’s chamber, the expectations from her/him to give their best- remains the same.
Having worked closely with prominent Senior Advocates like Mr. K.K. Venugopal, what are some of the most valuable lessons you’ve learned from them, and how have those lessons shaped your approach to legal practice?
Working with a venerated counsel like Mr. Venugopal- who is an institution in himself, was a guiding factor in me truly coming to love the law and understand the rigours and discipline that are basic tenets for a lawyer. Boss, as we all call him in his chamber, taught us that there are no shortcuts to success. Even today, whilst preparing for a matter, he refers to judgments and makes copious notes, with the same curiosity as he would have if he were reading it for the first time, despite having argued many of them himself and having applied them in several instances. During arguments, Boss could ask any question from the briefing junior, which was born from the facts stated in the file or beyond, which meant that we had to always be on top of things and be prepared for a volley of questions- sometimes tougher than what came from the bench itself. This taught us to be prepared beyond the file, to ask questions and analyse, to fact-check and to never argue on conjectures. Boss would rarely ever raise his voice at us and his disappointment was often remarked with a long sigh reverberating in a whistle, the consequence of which was far stronger than mere words. He taught us the discipline to reach court early irrespective of how late your matter was on board. He taught us to be fair and to act as an ethical officer of the court. He treats every colleague of his as an extension of his family. One instance that I will never forget was, when I was seeking a passover for him in Court as he was stuck before another bench, and the concerned Judge asked me to argue the matter instead. He came in the middle of my arguments, but patted me on my back and asked me to continue arguing and sat right next to me-that kind of encouragement to a young counsel starting out in their career meant a lot! Despite working so hard, boss also taught us to not take ourselves too seriously and to always remain curious. In his own words, he taught us that “to know that you don’t know is the beginning of knowledge.” I am truly blessed to be a part of his chamber- which has had a large part in shaping me as a lawyer.
Working with Mr. K.K. Venugopal on landmark cases like the Right to Privacy case must have been an enriching experience. Could you share some insights from your involvement in that case and how it has influenced your career?
Being a part of the 9 Judge bench’s unanimous declaration of the right to privacy as a fundamental right definitely stands out for me as one of the most exhilarating experiences in my short stint as a lawyer. Days preceding and during the hearing were spent reading countless judgments, articles, international covenants, and expert views on the issue. As a student of law, partaking in thought-provoking arguments from some of the finest minds in the country- at bar and on bench, was outstanding. It exposed me to understand the many different silos that exist in the right to privacy, beyond its manifest existence in body integrity. As a counsel, I have applied the said doctrine in my matters dealing with data privacy and boundaries of authentication and digital records. We are all richer in our rights by the said decision and I couldn’t be more grateful for having been a part of this landmark case.
After gaining experience with top law firms and senior advocates, you made the transition to establishing your own practice. What motivated that shift, and what were some of the challenges you faced when starting your independent practice?
Like any other counsel, I also dreamt of having my own independent practise and to put my training to task. So, after about 8 years of apprenticeship, and with a small handful of clients, I decided to take the plunge and went independent. The initial days were tough especially as the quality and quantity of work that comes to you as a fresh, off the hook, independent counsel is very different from what you may have done in the senior’s chambers or in firms. But the free time gives you an opportunity to read and update your knowledge base. Being on the panel for the Union of India at the time gave me the opportunity to work on diverse areas of law and appear in court regularly. Soon after, I was appointed as the Deputy Advocate General for the State of Chhattisgarh. As special counsel, I successfully represented the Special Task force in Rajasthan in a multi-cooperative society scam involving thousands of crores of Rupees, which added to my experience. When I look back, my takeaway has been to be patient, to keep up the hard-work, and to know that every opportunity and every win or loss is a golden ticket to learn something new. I am extremely grateful for my fears and experiences, which play a part in shaping me as a lawyer today.
As an Advocate on Record and now running your own practice in areas like Constitutional and Administrative Law, Arbitration, Data Protection etc. You’re clearly dealing with highly complex issues. Could you share one of the most interesting or challenging cases you’ve worked on, and how did you prepare for that case?
A very interesting case that I recently argued was the 7 judges constitutional bench reference on the issue of sub-classification of reservation benefits to Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe seeking re-consideration of the decision in E.V. Chinnaiah v. State of Andhra Pradesh and Ors. [(2005) 1 SCC 394]. In order to justify the reversal of the earlier judgment required presenting the Hon’ble court with constituent assembly debates- to show the original intent of the constitutional framers. I argued that Compensatory discrimination, as a subset of Affirmative Action, has the preliminary goal of curbing discrimination and the ultimate goal of its eradication. I presented empirical data to show that Scheduled Caste as a group is heterogeneous in its form and acute disparity exists within the groups and treating them with the same brush of representation is antithetical to the concept of substantive equality. Several scholarly writings on the subject, such as Marc Galanter’s book-Competing Equalities: Law and the Backward Classes in India, J.H. Hutton’s book, Caste in India: Its Nature, Functions and Origins, celebrated Austrian Economist Friedrich A. Hayek’s work on the Constitution of Liberty, to name a few, came to my extensive aid. We are now in receipt of the landmark judgment, where my arguments have found mention, and which lays down the distinguished principle of sub-classification of reservation benefits as a facet of substantive equality.
Given the demanding nature of your work, especially your role as Counsel for the Union of India in the Supreme Court, how do you manage to maintain a work-life balance? What strategies do you use to recharge and stay passionate about law?
I remember reading the quote somewhere that “The law is a jealous mistress and requires long and constant courtship. It is not to be won by trifling favors, but by lavish homage.” I couldn’t agree more- it takes away most of your weekends and expects you to burn the midnight oil. But the profession is also like riding a wave, some days are crazier than others-So in my free time, I love to read, spend time with my family and pursue my hobbies. Also, the court calendar sets out long vacation periods, allowing us to travel or take time off, which for me, is the best energiser. Staying passionate about law comes from staying in tune with the changing times and also from rigorous reading and discussions. Even if I am not involved in a matter, I love watching cases being argued in court and to witness legal jurisprudence develop. Discussion with my colleagues in the office is an enriching exchange of fresh ideas. Legal conferences can also be a great venue to brainstorm and to learn from other’s experiences and discussions.
For young lawyers just starting out, particularly in the fields of litigation and international/domestic arbitration, what advice would you offer to help them navigate these complex areas and build a successful career?
Young lawyers just starting out today have far more exposure and better understanding of the nuances of law and its practise, than I remember having, when I started out. The only thing that I sometimes find lacking in young lawyers is patience. I see young counsels diving into calling themselves specialists without knowing basic procedural laws. Also, whilst arguing matters in the Apex Court or doing big ticket arbitrations is a thrilling experience, learning from the ground carries you higher. Walking through the registries and learning how to get defects cured and getting matters filed and listed, to me, is as crucial as knowing how to argue a case. These learnings help you especially when you start out on your own and have to run an office and give time commitments to your client. In today’s time, being comfortable with technology is a must- both for litigation and Arbitration. Staying abreast with evolving law helps you stand out. AI based research may have made life easier, but it is crucial that the foundations are laid stronger and provisions in a statute are read before diving into research. In my opinion, perseverance, hard work and integrity are key ingredients to success for any and all.
After completing your law degree in 2012, you decided to pursue a CS qualification. What motivated you to choose law as a career, and how has your CS degree contributed to your professional journey?
I pursued my law and CS degree simultaneously. My father suggested enrolling in CS course alongside law as he had this preconceived notion that students who are academically disinclined, choose law. But as fate would have it, the combination of law and CS turned out to be a powerful skill set for me. During my academic years I began to realise the profound impact of law and how a well-established legal system can be used as a means for promoting social progress and addressing business challenges. After interacting with Company Secretaries, I began to see the role of CS as KMP which puts you in a position to drive and manage the board members/ stakeholders- decision makers and driving force of any corporation. The combination has played an imperative role in my professional journey as it bridges Law and Business. In my shoes of an Inhouse counsel, I can have a broader perspective of business challenges, industry development and how to navigate the business through legal landscape by formulating a strong legal structure for catering to increasing business demands, stakeholders’ investment which comes with potential liability exposure, and compliance requirements.
In the beginning of your career where you assisted clients with secretarial services, corporate structuring, and compliance, what were the key learning experiences that shaped your approach in the early years of your career?
After completing my law and CS degree, I accepted an offer from a corporate consultancy firm Bansal & Co. My initial years in the industry were full of sprits, as I worked with renowned clients with various industries including insurance, pharmaceuticals, food, technology, manufacturing, and education. After a few years I moved to a Fashion TV, Paris (India office) as an assistant legal manager where I spent generous amount of time to learn and understand the complexity and challenges of a foreign entity to establish business in India. In Fashion TV, I was responsible for legal and regulatory compliances associated with business and to safeguard the interests of businesses by being compliant with India’s legal framework.
Early in my career, many of my batchmates joined as fresh graduates in different set ups. But over time, I noticed that only a few of them could survive the harsh reality in the legal profession. The legal field is undeniably demanding and exposes you to its share of challenges. And soon I realized that the only way to address these challenges is by ensuring we stay committed to our respective legal journeys.
My sole motive has been how to align the spirit of law with the business strategic approach to make legal compliance a tool which enables a business to expand and not to be considered as an obstacle. But to implement that It’s also important not to give up, but to keep trying and influencing the business and the leaders and the senior management to bring about the positive and constructive changes which are very good for your organization. Basically, these are some of the learnings and the insights and the trends that I think are extremely important
Having worked at Fashion TV and Bansal & Co. in a Legal Manager & CS role, you transitioned to a law firm later. How did the culture differ between these organisations, and could you share a particularly challenging case you encountered in your time at Gravitas Legal?
Shifting to a Law firm was a life changing decision and was quite a challenging environment to work into. This shift was starkly different from my earlier roles. I have had the privilege of working with exceptional lawyers/ mentors who have been or continue to be part of my journey.
My role at Gravitas Legal proved to be the perfect foundation for the lawyer in me today. They taught me how crucial it is to pay attention to detail in drafting any kind of legal document and application of the law therein. Though it was difficult to manage the demanding nature and expectations of clients, I learned to have a broader and proactive approach to address the complexities of the business propositions which refined my skills. While handling the project finance transactions, I also got an exposure to hard core litigations in insolvency laws and got the opportunity to work on diverse cases which helped me build a strong foundation in corporate laws.
My time in Gravitas was a humbling and eye-opening experience and after spending a few years, began my journey as an in-house counsel, armed with a balanced perspective from both worlds.
In the context of contract management at Meiden T&D, a power transformer manufacturing company, how do you manage dispute resolution and mitigate the risk of litigation through the use of airlock supply contracts, and what strategies are employed to ensure seamless execution while avoiding disputes?
In Meidensha, I am responsible for contract management which includes setting up legal processes and internal policies for all stages of contract including standardisation of all contracts. Being a manufacturing industry, most of our contracts are driven through subcontracting, it leads to many legal complexities and multiple litigations on back-to-back contracts. Such disputes are common in industries like construction, infrastructure, manufacturing, and service contracts where multiple parties are involved in the execution of one project. Hence recognition of legal rights makes it very challenging to litigate and mitigate risk.
I strive to keep a proactive approach while executing the contracts considering the interest of both the parties and allocating the risk equally and fairly between the parties. Our contracts clearly set out terms such as KPI- (Key performance Indicators), clear scope of service, incorporating informal discussions, ADR clauses wherein pre litigation mediation between the parties are encouraged to avoid issues escalating to litigations.
Over the years of my experience in dispute resolution leading to corporate litigation, I have developed an understanding that the fate of any litigation significantly depends on the jurisdiction of the courts that have authority. In India, the judicial process is a long road which is lengthy, costly due to ceiling of counsel’s and court fees. Hence a thorough cost-analysis and financial implications also become part of strategic considerations. Wherever possible, I aim to explore alternative mechanisms for dispute resolution to achieve faster and mutually agreeable outcomes.
However, I strongly pursue litigation cases where the dispute raises an important question of law that requires intervention and adjudication, or where ADR’s method might set an unfavourable precedent, thereby impacting the interests of the company. On the other hand, if the dispute involves a relatively minor contractual issue and resolution is in the best interest of the company, we recommend a settlement route which allows us to mitigate risks, preserve business relationships with our vendors and consumers.
In your current role, how do you maintain operational efficiency and ensure a smooth workflow while preventing burnout within your team?
I believe that an efficient team is an asset and that without collaboration nothing can be achieved at the Lead position where I am today. For optimal efficiency, you have to be able to trust yourself and be extremely energetic while you upskill. I strongly believe It is very important to know your team, their goals, ambitions, strengths and weaknesses and one must really show your team that you love them, and you care for their growth as well. To prevent burn out, I make efforts for effective communication in understanding the personal and professional difficulties my teammates are going through via meetings and get-togethers to build trust and improve relationships.
As the Legal Head and Company Secretary of MEIDEN T&D (INDIA) LIMITED can you elaborate on how you manage your role? How do you stay updated with evolving regulatory requirements?
As a Company Secretary and Legal Head, I am responsible for the overall legal affairs of the company which includes minimising legal risks and to ensure compliances are in order so as for Meidensha to tread along their inspiring journey.
Currently, I am leading a legal and secretarial team of Meidensha Corporation, India, where I oversee both the legal and secretarial functions. I’m responsible for developing the company’s legal strategy, managing risk, and ensuring that our business growth is aligned with legal and regulatory frameworks.
My legal responsibilities are quite broad and include overseeing the legal structure of the Company, mitigating legal risks, managing contracts, and providing guidance on employment law and corporate governance. I also handle regulatory compliance, disputes, and work on arbitrations and litigations. Additionally, I support law enforcement agencies when needed and ensure that compliance management becomes more robust. My role ensures that legal considerations are integrated into decision-making processes, helping drive sustainable growth while managing risks. On the policy front, I’m responsible for drafting, implementing the policies by engaging with regulators and responding to government regulators that affect our business.
For a manufacturing industry, the constant flux of statutory and regulatory regulations makes compliance management quite challenging hence it makes it imperative to be updated and on your toes. I actively pursue to set up a stable legal regulatory framework by being in touch with the industry experts, while preparing the opinion on day-to-day strategic management, by upskilling, by conducting regular audits, by using the compliance management tools etc.
Given the demanding nature of your work environment, how do you manage to balance your professional and personal life? What activities or practices help you unwind and recharge?
It is necessary to complete the work assigned and live up to your professional commitments, but on the other hand you must prioritize your personal life as well. I strongly encourage and maintain a healthy work life balance by setting boundaries at my workplace. I keep an approach to maintain a professional and personal balance by structuring the office work within 9 hours of schedule and not to stress of my work and my professional life in my personal time. When I am not working, I ensure that I spend quality time with my parents, friends, and with my loved ones, when you don’t stress of your work and your professional life.
There are multiple ways to unwind. For me, Unwinding is taking regular mental health breaks by practicing meditation, by indulging in building new skill sets, by regular exercising, by travelling, going on treks, travelling etc.
What advice would you offer to young professionals aspiring to pursue careers in both Company Secretarial and Law, and who are interested in following a path similar to yours?
To all the young minds, please note, pursuing a career in Company Secretarial and Law is a lifelong learning. Law and CS complement each other very well; however, my advice would be to first develop skills and a strong knowledge base, work on your communication/analytical skills and most importantly build a network of mentors for yourself.
Further, I would like to add- Don’t worry about the “How” yet. Don’t get frustrated if you don’t know how, It is not important to know everything at the start. Just take the first step if you have a clear goal in your mind, your path will be shown to you by your perseverance.
What inspired you to pursue a career in law, and what led you to specialize in intellectual property (IP), particularly in trademarks and copyright and designs?
Getting into law school was a decision guided by my mother, who is an English teacher, and who made sure I had an excellent grounding and appreciation of the language, which has helped me in the field to a great extent. In my fourth year in college, I was lucky enough to work at an internship at a leading New Delhi law firm – Lall & Sethi. My internship at Lall & Sethi was an eye-opening experience, and seeing the practical aspects of advising brands on their trademarks, copyright and designs was a career shaping occurrence. Since then, intellectual property law has been a passion which I have pursued.
Even today, after years of practice, the study of this field of law still excites me, since there is so much happening in terms of developments. Almost everyday there is something new in the field, which challenges practicing professionals to re-think how laws are shaped and interpreted. For example, the rising challenge of artificial intelligence is the most immediate and daunting challenge for IP lawyers, since it is a complete game changer in terms of how the law is practiced and implemented.
The boundaries of intellectual property law touch almost each and every aspect of our lives today, from brands making sure we have safe food and medicines, to e-commerce providing us with almost everything delivered to our doorsteps, to characters and streaming platforms shaping how we entertain ourselves, to our how we earn our livelihoods and more.
You began your career working with law firms in Delhi, handling intellectual property management for both multinational and Indian clients with global business interests. How did this early experience shape your understanding of IP, and in what ways did it influence the development of your practice?
I have been fortunate enough to receive the opportunities to work in firms with global clients which has immensely added value to my career growth. I have also had the chance to gain invaluable experience through cross-border collaboration with multiple legal teams. Every company has its tailored methods of working, and as external counsel, learning and adapting to their style is important to be able to provide clear and actionable guidance.
While the basics of IP remain the same, each and every client has its own distinct way of functioning, meaning that even a straightforward scenario can have unexpected outcomes. In one instance, we were advising the client to take enforcement action against a particularly slippery third party. However, despite our repeated advice, the client did not seem willing to go forward, leading to damages to their local business. It took a call with their senior leadership to understand and overcome their reluctance, which was stemming from a particularly bad case they had handled earlier in another country.
Working with multinational companies teaches the importance of legal advice that extends beyond an India-centric perspective, to calculate the implications in the other countries that the company operates / functions. For Indian clients expanding abroad, practical advise which works well here in India does not always work well in other countries. In India, there are some deadlines which we know are extendable, in practice, but when we were advising on a deadline in Australia, it turned out to be a couple of weeks shorter than our estimation, due to an early holiday season, leading to a panicked last-minute filing for the Indian client.
Can you share your experience working on the Trade Marks Manual project with the Controller General of Patents, Designs, and TradeMarks (CGPDTM) and International Trademark Association (INTA), and how did it contribute to deepening your expertise in IP? What were some of the key challenges you faced, and how did you approach resolving them?
The Trade Marks Manual project, although it still remains incomplete, is a mammoth project on its own. This required distilling decades of office practices, condensing legal procedures, and mapping future changes to the practice, which is likely the reason why a final version has not yet been published by the Indian Trade Marks Registry. Even today, a draft version is available on the IPIndia website, to serve as a guide or a starting point, but it is not binding on its officers.
My involvement with the project in its early stages meant working with teams of lawyers having experience in similar projects in various countries, and there was much to learn from their guidance. The INTA organisation has a very effective set of professional committees which are meant to share knowledge and advance the study of trademark law worldwide. I highly recommend young lawyers to try and join such committees, and making the most of such collaborations, since the committees are invaluable in terms of practical knowledge and mentorship opportunities. I am glad to say that my participation in the entire process gave me a lot to learn in terms of collaborating on a massive project.
I do hope that the project is finalised in the near future, since it will serve as a guiding light for trademark practice for future lawyers, who can refer to the manual as a guide for common queries, and perhaps advance the study of this niche field of law.
Having advised clients on trademark filing strategies in over 25 countries, what are the most important factors you consider when crafting a global filing strategy for international trademark protection?
An effective filing strategy envisages multiple aspects which are important to a brand and a company, including cost, identifying risks, forecasting solutions, and practical, on-ground advice, and these aspects can generally require years of experience to get them right.
Even so, it is quite impossible to predict any and all legal challenges which may arise, and quick and effective solutions, require close monitoring and actions. Assignments across multiple jurisdictions are generally very tricky to get it right, particularly when time is of the essence.
Prior to 2013, filing trademarks outside India meant engaging local counsel. Since India acceded to the Madrid Protocol in 2013, this opened an entirely new avenue of trademark filings in other countries. Initial usage of the Madrid Protocol was low, and this in my opinion, still remains an area of growth in future. Even today, Indian companies can effectively utilise this system for quick and effective registrations abroad. This does not mean that this system is devoid of any risks, and proper legal advise should be sought before considering expanding a trademark portfolio abroad.
Your success in trademark opposition cases across countries like the USA, Brazil, the EU, and the UK is impressive. How do you approach the preparation and defense of trademark opposition cases in such diverse legal landscapes?
The creation of a worldwide legal strategy for Indian brands is a tough challenge, but must be done to ensure success in new markets. Each country has its own set of legislations, market forces, and pitfalls, which must be navigated for any brand. In my opinion, the most important step in ensuring success for a brand in a new country would be choosing a trusted local expert. I am glad to say that I have worked with brilliant lawyers in such countries which ensured that I was able to handle legal risks and challenges with positive outcomes for clients.
I assisted a large Indian IT services company for their worldwide filings which led to a lot of challenges, particularly in navigating legal procedures of countries with advanced legal systems like the US, UK, EU, Brazil, Japan, Australia. The set of deadlines meant keeping constantly in touch with local counsels across multiple time zones and tracking deadlines across countries. This also meant anticipating needs in advance, and keeping multiple solutions forecasted, in case the local business decided that they needed to change their strategy.
Working with multinational companies means that their brand identities and market strategies are already well-defined, however, working with Indian companies expanding internationally requires extensive groundwork to ensure success in foreign markets. An effective brand strategy which identifies, and balances risk means that solutions to looming problems can be thought of well beforehand. Trademark law stems from international treaties, which means that preparing defense of opposition cases can be done quite consistently. However, practical guidance from local counsel is absolutely indispensable. Brazil, for example, has a completely different procedure for trademarks, as compared to India, and opposition proceedings required extensive research and in-depth studying of local laws. The European Union, requires that adverse parties conduct settlement talks before starting opposition procedures, which is designed to reduce the backlogs on the EUIPO.
You helped create a Geographical Indications (GI) training module for FICCI. What do you believe are the most critical elements of GI protection, and why is it especially important for India to focus on this area?
Back when I was assisting in creating a knowledge module for Geographical Indications with FICCI, the act was fairly under utilized, and there was much work to be done in this field. I am glad to see that there are currently about 600+ registrations for various products since the inception of the act, for protecting GIs. India has an immense wealth of knowledge when it comes to products originating from various regions within the country. From Darjeeling Tea, which was the first registered GI, to Basmati rice, Lucknow Chikan Craft, Kullu Shawls, and more, each product is steeped in history and represents unique opportunities for communities to commercially exploit such products for the benefit of the entire region as a whole. Protecting the product ensures that the community reaps the benefits, consumers can identify the GI, leading to increased knowledge and development of the GI itself.
There are still additional challenges to be overcome, in this field, as shown by the European Union, and China, which currently lead in the number of GIs registered worldwide. The European Union has shown the way in protecting and commercially exploiting their food & beverage products, which are protected under local laws, leading to immense commercial benefits to the producers of such products, particularly in export markets worldwide. I believe that there is an immense scope of expansion of Indian origin products, particularly to international markets, and this can start with the first step of seeking registration under the GI Act.
The Indian Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT) is currently in the process of amending the GI Act, which will be a welcome improvement for the legislation.
With such a demanding professional schedule, how do you unwind and maintain a work-life balance amidst your high-level commitments?
Work life balance is very difficult to achieve, especially in the early years. This does not mean that one should not strive for it, but it may not always work out in the way that you expect. I think that this depends on a lot of circumstances, but most important is the kind of team that you work with. The times when I have been able to rely on my teammates have been good periods of time in terms of work life balance, and similarly, when their schedules demand it, I have stepped in to take over and manage work for them. Your team is quite important in terms of what it takes to have a good work life balance, since you cannot do everything on your own.
Even then, working in law firms, there are certain days in which much more is expected, since work flow can be quite unexpected. There have been more than a few instances of all nighters, since deadlines need to be met, as well as calls in the wee hours, to accommodate schedules of people from around the world. Slowly you get to learn and understand what to expect, and you can predict busy or lean weeks / months to plan and manage your schedule well.
My wife has been a blessing in managing my schedule and making sure everything gets done, no matter how busy it gets. She also has a job which is sometimes unpredictable, so we try and split responsibilities between us.
What advice would you give to young professionals aspiring to follow your path and build a successful career in intellectual property law?
During the beginning of my career, I had to devote long hours to research and learning. Whenever I came across something new, which was almost everyday, I made it a point to learn about it from whichever sources I could find information, such as bare acts, commentaries, caselaw, blogs, etc. My advice would be to learn about anything new by reading as much as possible. It may not make sense at first, but gradually the pieces start to fit together a few years later. IP law is about intuition and instinct, and not so much about memorisation or rote learning.
IP laws may differ from country to country, but overall the concepts and fundamentals remain the same. Reading on blogs about practice in the US like TTABlog or EU such as IPKat or other countries also helps build your perspective on how the law should be practiced. Indian court decisions are becoming increasingly sophisticated, but reading foreign decisions is quite interesting, to see how each country’s jurisprudence is evolving.
Another piece of advice is that every client offers a unique learning experience, and there is no piece of work which is too small at the beginning. Some of the most interesting cases I have worked on have been from start-ups. Advising a small client who relies on you completely requires a certain amount of teaching, and to teach anything is the best way to learn, since you are yourself applying the concepts into practice.
In about 2015, I had the chance to study a foundational course in copyright law – covering not just the way it is implemented, but also why it was created. I would recommend that anyone who is interested to check out the course called CopyrightX, which is designed by the Harvard professor William Fisher, and is offered online, once a year to anyone. The course, although offered with a US based perspective, offers fascinating explanations on why the field of IP law was created, and what benefit does IP offer our society as a whole.
After completing your law degree, you pursued an LLM in Intellectual Property & Technology Law from the National University of Singapore. What motivated you to specialize in this field, and what aspects of IP law drew you to it specifically?
During my undergraduate studies, I had the opportunity to intern in various areas of law. It was in my fourth year that I opted for Intellectual Property (IP) law as a specialization and completed my first IP internship at Remfry & Sagar. I thoroughly enjoyed the experience and realized that IP law was where my passion lay, leading me to specialize in it for my career.
What particularly appeals to me about IP law is that it is a field where creativity and innovation are protected. I find it rewarding to be part of the process that helps individuals and businesses build and safeguard their brands. It’s fulfilling to contribute to the growth of creative endeavors and ensure that these efforts are legally protected, allowing them to thrive in a competitive market.
Could you share your experience pursuing your specialization in Intellectual Property & Technology Law at the National University of Singapore? What advice would you give to students wishing to pursue a master’s degree? Additionally, what was the process like for you in applying and gaining admission to the university?
I had a highly rewarding experience specializing in Intellectual Property & Technology Law at the National University of Singapore (NUS). The program provided me with invaluable opportunities to develop key skills, particularly in research paper writing, where I saw significant improvement.
NUS also offered intensive courses taught by visiting faculty from prestigious institutions. I was fortunate to learn not only from the esteemed NUS professors but also from one professor from Harvard Law School and another from an esteemed Italian university, which was a truly enriching experience. One module that particularly stood out to me was The Fulfilled Life and the Life of the Law, which offered profound insights.
The coursework was rigorous, with a significant amount of reading material, which required great discipline to stay focused. My advice to students considering a master’s degree at a foreign university is to form study groups early. Dividing assignments and teaching each other different sections is an effective way to manage the workload and stay on track.
For the application process, I submitted a resume, personal statement, degree transcripts, official TOEFL score report (you can also take IELTS and a waiver can also be requested), and two letters of recommendation. I am deeply grateful to my professors for providing me with glowing recommendation letters.
With the unwavering support of my parents and family, I was able to turn my dream of pursuing a career abroad into a reality. I was also fortunate to have a dear friend, who was pursuing her PhD at NUS, guide me through the entire application process and my journey at the university.
You started your career at a leading firm like Remfry & Sagar. What were some of the most important lessons you learned in the early stages of your practice, and what inspired you to develop an international career?
One of the most important lessons I learned in my early career days was the critical nature of managing deadlines, as IP law is particularly deadline-driven. I had to adapt to prioritizing tasks and staying organized under pressure. This process involved considering various factors, such as critical deadlines, client-set timelines, time zones, and the estimated time required for each task. Ultimately, there is no one-size-fits-all approach; it requires navigating different permutations and combinations to ensure that everything is completed efficiently and on time.
I also realized that working smart is just as important as working hard. It’s essential to optimize your approach, streamline processes, and focus on efficiency without compromising quality.
Additionally, I learned the importance of maintaining a mindset of continuous learning. The legal landscape, especially in IP, is constantly evolving, and being open to new ideas and approaches has been crucial to staying relevant and delivering the best outcomes for clients.
Another key lesson was the importance of delegating effectively. As a professional, it’s essential to recognize when tasks can be shared with others to maximize efficiency. Delegating responsibilities not only helps manage workload but also fosters teamwork and collaboration, which are crucial for success in any profession.
My decision to work in an international setup was driven by my interest in how global legal frameworks intersect with diverse industries and cultures. From the outset of my legal career, I realized that the challenges and opportunities in today’s interconnected world often span multiple jurisdictions. This realization sparked my desire to expand my expertise beyond national boundaries.
Additionally, working with international clients and understanding the complexities of cross-border legal issues was something I found both intellectually stimulating and professionally rewarding.
As the head of a department at Mirandah Asia (Singapore) Pte. Ltd., managing trademark portfolios across six continents, how did you navigate the complexities of different legal systems?
Navigating the complexities of different legal systems requires a solid understanding of each country’s IP laws, procedures, and practices. For example, while Letters of Consent are not accepted in Thailand, they are typically acceptable in Singapore. Therefore, it is essential to be aware of these regional differences before developing a strategy to overcome potential objections and ensure compliance with local requirements. Over time, I became familiar with the IP laws of different jurisdictions, but it helped to consult local experts from time to time to clarify any nuances.
With experience in both the Indian and Singapore IP Regulations, what do you see as the key differences between the two? How do these differences impact your practice when managing international trademark portfolios?
The Singapore IP regime is relatively faster compared to the India one. With respect to trademarks, in Singapore, a trademark application with no objections can proceed to registration in 6-9 months while in India it can take about 18-24 months.
When it comes to the inherent registrability of marks, the approach in Singapore and India differs regarding the stylization of marks. In Singapore, stylizing a mark can often help avoid absolute objections, even when the mark includes descriptive terms. In contrast, India tends to be more rigid in its approach. Even if a mark is stylized, it might still face objections if it contains descriptive terms.
Another important difference is the approach to citing earlier marks. In Singapore, it is rare for earlier marks to be cited as obstacles unless they are highly similar or identical. However, in India, the Registry has been known to cite even far-removed marks as potential conflicts, making the process more complex.
These differences impact the management of international trademark portfolios, as brands operating in both regions must prepare for longer timelines and more complex objection handling in India, whereas Singapore offers a relatively smoother and faster registration process.
Vis-à-vis copyright, while for both countries copyright is automatic upon creation, there is no formal system of registration of copyright in Singapore while there is one in India.
As an Intellectual Property Manager, what challenges do clients face in global markets when it comes to trademark registration, and brand protection? Could you share a specific example of a case you’ve handled in this regard?
One of the main challenges clients face in global markets when it comes to trademark registration and brand protection is that many countries have different trademark registration practices.
Southeast Asian countries, in particular, can present significant hurdles.
For example, Indonesia operates under a first-to-file system, meaning the first person to file a trademark application gains exclusive rights to it over the person who uses it first. As a result, trademark squatters often register well-known brands’ trademarks before the rightful owners do. Since trademark rights are territorial, these squatters demand compensation to withdraw or transfer the trademark to the legitimate brand owner.
I have dealt with numerous such cases, often filing oppositions on behalf of clients. Fortunately, Indonesia accepts bad faith as a ground for opposition, which is helpful in cases involving well-known brands. However, for lesser-known brands, proving bad faith can be more challenging.
Given your international practice across various global markets, how do you stay up to date with the latest trends in IP law and how do you incorporate these trends into your own practice?
I keep myself informed by staying in touch with industry experts through conferences, networking on platforms like LinkedIn, and being an active member of IP organizations such as the International Trademark Association and the Institute of Singapore Trademark Agents.
These resources provide valuable insights into the latest trends and developments, which I then incorporate into my work to ensure that clients receive the most current and effective advice. This is achieved by reviewing and adjusting my strategies to align with emerging developments.
For example, if new regulations or rulings affect trademark protection, I make sure that clients are aware of these changes and adjust the strategies accordingly.
As a mentor in the Law Alumni Mentor Program, what advice would you offer to younger legal professionals who aspire to build a successful career in Intellectual Property law?
My advice to younger legal professionals aspiring to build a successful career in IP law is to first and foremost enjoy the subject, which will keep one motivated in the long run.
Additionally, I recommend pursuing additional certifications or graduate programs to deepen one’s expertise, which can help specialize and stand out in the IP landscape.
Finally, it’s important to balance work with enjoyment. IP law can be demanding, so finding time for hobbies or social activities is essential for maintaining a healthy work-life balance, which will ultimately support long-term success and satisfaction in career.
Given the high demands of your legal career, how do you balance your professional responsibilities with personal obligations? What strategies do you use to recharge and stay motivated in your work?
Balancing professional responsibilities in a high demand legal career with personal obligations requires effective time management. I make sure to prioritize my tasks and set realistic goals for both work and personal life.
One of the key factors that helps me is having a strong support system, including family, friends, and colleagues—and I consider myself fortunate to have all of these. Having people to rely on for emotional support and a sense of community is crucial.
Additionally, engaging in some physical activity helps to stay recharged. My personal favorite is playing badminton or cycling which help clear my mind, helping me during demanding times.
Lastly, sometimes, a little getaway is all you need to recharge.
You have over 21 years of experience in dealing with complex legal issues across various industries. How did your career journey begin, and what motivated you to specialize in Corporate Law, Mergers, Acquisitions, and regulatory matters?
I grew up in Delhi and my school & college times were during the 90’s. Those were the times when the most sought-after career paths were law, engineering, medicine or chartered accountancy. Though I am a Science graduate, I somehow could not create the interest within me to pursue Science or its related fields as a career option.
I lived near the North Campus of Delhi University. So, quite often after college would get over, me and my friends would stroll within the North Campus area. There, outside the Faculty of Law, I used to see students carrying and studying voluminous books. The sight of such books created a spark of interest in Law within me. I really got fascinated by these voluminous books. Many times, it happened that I would visit any random book stall and pick any random law book to see what is written inside. As I explored this further, this spark became stronger and stronger. Those were the moments when I decided that yes, Law would be a career field for me and the topic that enticed me the most was – corporate law.
With this passion, I enrolled myself for Company Secretary and after qualifying as a Company Secretary, my first step of becoming a corporate lawyer was taken. I joined a corporate group and was assigned to handle the matters relating to corporate law. This was my first exposure to the theoretical and practical aspects of corporate laws and my journey began.
After a few years, I prepared myself for the Faculty of Law, University of Delhi (D.U.) entrance exams. I cleared it out and got admission into the LL.B. degree course offered by the University of Delhi. With my hard work and dedication, I became a Law Graduate as well. With the passage of time and getting more and more exposure to the various fields of corporate laws, I developed an inclination towards mergers, acquisition and related regulatory matters. Today, with an experience of two decades, I am cherishing my journey as a corporate lawyer.
As a law graduate from Delhi University and a qualified Company Secretary, how has your dual qualification helped shape your approach to addressing legal and business challenges?
The dual qualifications of being a law graduate from Delhi University and a qualified Company Secretary has helped me immensely in navigating an approach towards solving a corporate challenge. I have been able to view the risks involved in a task both from the business as well as from the legal angle and thereby able to provide a pragmatic solution.
The dual qualifications have helped me to navigate the complexities of corporate law with tact, ensuring compliance and simultaneously providing legal advice, and thereby contributing to the smooth functioning of the business. With ever growing complexities in the business, it has become very indispensable that a balanced approach is maintained between the requirement of the business and the requirement of laws. For any business to thrive, the requirement of maintaining a balanced approach is a must and the dual qualifications have helped me to find a win-win situation for both the verticals.
Having dual qualifications have also helped the corporate whom I worked with in terms of single window resolution [for (i) non-litigation matters; (ii) litigation matters; and (iii) corporate matters] besides controlling the cost aspects.
In your current role as Global General Counsel at Whitespan Business Solutions, what are your primary responsibilities and obligations, and how do you effectively manage them?
As a Global General Counsel at Whitespan Business Solutions, my primary responsibilities are that of a (i) business enabler; (ii) legal advising through evaluation and mitigation of risks involved in the business; and (iii) managing compliance. As a Global General Counsel, I have to see that unnecessary hindrances are identified and avoided.
The challenges in managing these responsibilities are not easy. While the crossing of paths of business strategy and legal requirements can never be avoided, the biggest challenge for me is to ensure, not only in Whitespan but every other corporate I have worked with, that this cross does not become a dead end. To keep both the internal as well as the external stakeholders satisfied calls for an ardent approach toward the work, ability to convince the parties involved and thereby providing a win-win solution for all.
You have handled several mergers, acquisitions, and joint ventures. Can you share an example of a particularly complex transaction and the key legal strategies you employed to ensure its successful completion?
As I mentioned earlier that with the passage of time and getting more and more exposure to the various fields of corporate laws, I developed an inclination towards mergers, acquisition and joint ventures (I would give here a common term to these – corporate restructuring – for the ease of understanding). Today, having undertaken a decent number of corporate restructurings, I would mince no word in mentioning that this line of business is not easy. Each and every case of corporate restructuring is unique and different from the other one and challenging. For e.g.: if one is working in a corporate group say ‘X’ and the ‘X’ takes, within its group, corporate restructuring twice, each of these two cases will be different from the other. There will be few common sections obviously, processes may be similar, but the schemes for undertaking these corporate restructuring will vary vastly on the grounds of: (i) due diligence; (ii) pricing; (ii) communication process; (iii) cultural diversity; (iii) employee engagement; (iv) financial integration; (v) system and data integration; (vi) management integration to name a few. And to make a point, each of these exercises in itself is a huge task.
I will quote one case for an acquisition which I handled. However, since I am bound by the confidentiality clause, I will not name the parties. So, this was a case where an international company wanted to purchase a major stake in an Indian company. Thus, when a cross-border transaction is involved, in addition to the applicable Indian laws, I also had to keep in mind the provisions of RBI / FEMA. I was the counsel for the Indian group in which the international company intended to acquire a stake. My first test began with due diligence. While we provided all the relevant records to the counsel for the international company, their list of seeking clarifications would not end. Realising this, I decided that I would employ tact, legal strategy and sympathy to cross this bridge. With these action steps in mind, I discussed the open points with the opposite counsel. And as it turned out, after a few rounds of discussion, the due diligence was complete.
The next and the biggest challenge came in the form of transaction documents i.e. Share Purchase Agreement, Shareholders Agreement etc. While drafting international agreements, it is essential to approach the process with a strategist mindset which involves a good number of key considerations like conditions precedent, conditions subsequent, selection of jurisdiction which would come into every aspect of dispute in a transaction. Coming back to the transaction, I had really hard negotiations on almost all the major clauses like tag along rights, drag along rights, pre-emptive rights, right of first refusal, reserved matter and indemnity clause. This exercise was a great experience for me and provided me with good learning as well as sharpened my professional and personal skills since the negotiations on the clauses were very hard, fierce sometimes, reached deadlock stages a few times and the entire process of negotiations consumed almost 3 months. But in the end, I could get the documents to a stage which was a win-win situation for all the stakeholders involved in the capital raise process which documents were at the beginning more of a one-sided affair. And thus, the transaction went through successfully.
You have extensive experience advising on corporate governance and regulatory issues under the Companies Act, FEMA, and SEBI. How have these frameworks evolved over the years, and what changes do you foresee in the near future?
The corporate actions in any corporate in India are majorly regulated by three laws namely, (i) Companies Act, (ii) RBI / FEMA; and (iii) SEBI. While Companies Act and RBI / FEMA applies to all companies whether listed or unlisted, SEBI is for listed companies.
My experience of dealing with these regulatory bodies has always been good. Right from the starting days of my professional journey till date, I have always found the regulatory bodies supportive. My take on these regulatory bodies is that the first duty the corporate must do is to comply in letter and spirit. Even if some compliance is missed out, don’t panic and take any otherwise decision. Approach the regulator and speak with them, they are always ready to help.
Having the understanding of business requirements, the authorities of these regulatory bodies are always working hard to make the respective framework business friendly keeping in mind the ask of the time.
How do you ensure that businesses remain compliant with the evolving regulatory landscape, especially in high-stakes transactions such as mergers, acquisitions, or foreign investments?
Working in the corporate, my understanding of business and law is that both complement each other. A business cannot be successful without compliance with law and there will be no requirement of law if there is no business. This equilibrium is also necessary for the economy of the country. Businesses have also realised that to attract capital for business requirements, staying compliant is of utmost importance. Obviously, no one would like to join hands with a business which is non-compliant or less-compliant with the applicable laws. No one would like to pump their money into a business which has regulators running after it on account of non-compliance. Who would want to risk their money? Not even a single person. So, if any person thinks that compliance is costly, please ask him / her to try non-compliance. The person will get the answer.
To ensure the business remains compliant, I would suggest the following:
Keep a track of regulatory updates.
Create an effective compliance program within the organisation and educate the employees about the same.
Develop policies and procedures for compliance.
Implement internal teams to monitor compliance.
Create a business continuity plan in case of any unforeseen happening.
Regular status update to the management on compliance.
With such a demanding professional schedule, how do you unwind and maintain a work-life balance amidst your high-level commitments?
Well, well, well, this is a tricky question and the most discussed topic nowadays. (Smile). Professional life is always demanding but as a human, one has to take out time for his / her personal well-being as well. Where work is important, life is equally important. For me, it’s like two pans of a weighing scale. Sometimes one goes up and the other comes down. But it should not happen that one is always up and the other is always down. To unwind myself, I listen to songs and read books. Besides, I also like watching suspense movies. It is very important for anyone to take care of oneself, in whatever way he / she likes. And so do I. Enjoy your life (both professionally and personally).
What advice would you give to young professionals aspiring to follow your path and build a successful career in corporate practice?
My advice to the young professionals is simple, both for professional and personal growth – work hard and do not procrastinate. Avoid taking short-cuts. Learn new things and wherever required, de-learn and re-learn. Explore territories which scare you. Continuous learning is essential since our profession is ever evolving. Stay updated to the best possible way you can. This will give you a lot of confidence to face others whether it is your company management or your client. Networking is vital for success nowadays. Try making a decent circle of professionals where one can share, discuss and learn.
Remember, each day teaches you something. Every person around you teaches you something, bad people give you lessons and good people give you memories. Learn the lessons and enjoy the memories.
With over a decade of experience in various areas of the law, was law a planned career path for you, and what inspired you to specialize in corporate law, particularly in the maritime and international trade sectors?
Law was always a calling for me; the discipline, the analytical rigor, and the opportunity to impact society resonated with my drive for meaningful work. My journey to specialize in corporate and maritime law, however, was shaped by my academic background and early exposure to international trade’s vast complexity. Earning my LL.M. in Maritime Law from the Indian Maritime University, where I graduated with a Silver Medal, gave me a solid foundation in both theoretical and practical aspects of maritime law. Corporate and international trade law present a unique set of challenges and rewards that only a global, multidisciplinary approach can address. This field offers a constant intellectual challenge and an opportunity to work at the intersection of law and global business, which I find immensely fulfilling.
What do you consider the most pressing legal challenges that companies in the shipping and maritime industries face today, especially in the context of cross-border trade?
Today, maritime companies are navigating a minefield of legal challenges, with compliance and risk management at the forefront. Companies face increasingly stringent environmental regulations—compliance with IMO standards on emissions, for instance, is now critical. Global trade tensions have also intensified the need for adaptable legal strategies, as tariffs, sanctions, and embargoes add layers of complexity to cross-border trade. Additionally, cybersecurity risks are an urgent concern as shipping operations become more digitized, making robust data protection policies and crisis management strategies essential. Having represented clients in international arbitration and cross-border disputes, I’ve seen firsthand how preparation and adaptability are key to meeting these multifaceted challenges.
Given the evolving nature of corporate governance in India, how do you advise shipping and maritime companies to navigate compliance with both Indian and international regulatory frameworks?
In today’s regulatory environment, I advise maritime companies to adopt a comprehensive compliance strategy that harmonizes Indian laws with international requirements. With my background in both Indian corporate law and international maritime regulations, I focus on creating frameworks that meet the stringent standards of bodies like the IMO while aligning with Indian regulatory mandates. Regular training and internal audits are invaluable for keeping teams aware of emerging compliance needs. It’s also critical for companies to build relationships with regulators and industry experts, as this fosters an environment of mutual understanding that aids in anticipating and preparing for regulatory changes.
You have extensive experience in international arbitration. Can you discuss a particularly complex international trade dispute that you’ve been involved in, and the strategies you used to achieve a favourable outcome for your client?
Well, there are many, but I’d like to share a notable case involving bunker fraud. This was issue with regards to the time charter party, where charterer hired a vessel on a six-month time charter, incurring losses exceeding million dollars due to severe underperformance (over consumption of fuel). Complicated by a penalty clause for early termination, the charterer sought expert guidance to mitigate potential legal risks.
Our investigation uncovered a Cappuccino bunker fraud conspiracy (cappuccino effect is a type of fuel fraud that occurs when compressed air is introduced into fuel delivery hose during bunkering) involving the ship management company, bunker supplier, and crew. We responded with strategic, multi-jurisdictional legal action:
– Initiated criminal proceedings against the supplier in its concerned jurisdiction.
– Filed parallel arbitration for damages against the owner and ship management company according to Charterparty Arbitration Clause.
– Secured the arrest of a sister vessel in admiralty to ensure payment.
These coordinated efforts across three jurisdictions prompted the respondent to settle, securing justice and recovering our client’s losses.
How do you balance your dual roles as a practicing lawyer and a faculty member teaching maritime law? What are the most common gaps in legal knowledge relating to maritime law that you encounter among students and professionals, and how do you address these in your teaching?
Balancing a legal practice with teaching at institutions like the Indian Maritime University and Narottam Morarjee Institute of Shipping requires a structured approach. Both roles feed into each other: my practice enriches my teaching, allowing me to bring real-world cases to the classroom, while teaching helps me stay sharp and analytical. One common gap I observe is a limited understanding of the global regulatory landscape—students often lack context on how international treaties like UNCLOS and IMO conventions interact with national laws. I address this by emphasizing a global perspective in my lectures, encouraging students to think beyond national boundaries, as maritime law is inherently international. This perspective prepares them to handle the legal and regulatory complexities they will encounter in practice.
Given your extensive experience in Corporate, Shipping/Maritime & International Trade Law, what motivated you to become a Partner at International Maritime Law Chambers, and what were the initial challenges you faced?
Joining International Maritime Law Chambers as a Partner was motivated by my commitment to advancing the field of maritime law in India and beyond. As a Partner, I wanted to not only lead complex cases but also mentor young lawyers interested in this specialized area. Initially, building a team that could meet the high standards we set for international arbitration and complex cross-border cases was challenging. Developing a reputation for excellence required establishing trust with clients, consistently delivering favorable outcomes, and positioning our firm as a trusted advisor in high-stakes matters. These early challenges have since translated into rewarding partnerships with clients and an exceptional team dedicated to the firm’s mission.
How do you balance your corporate law practice and your role as an educator and trainer with your personal life?
Balancing these responsibilities requires setting clear priorities and respecting my personal time. I believe in structured time management—segmenting the day for client work, research, teaching, and personal commitments. I am fortunate to have a supportive family and a team that enables me to manage my workload effectively. Maintaining a balanced life isn’t just about work—it includes time for self-reflection and rejuvenation, which are vital for sustaining the energy needed in a demanding profession. Ultimately, my roles as a partner, educator, and advocate are deeply fulfilling, as they allow me to make meaningful contributions while honoring my personal values and commitments.
What advice would you offer to young aspiring lawyers who aim to excel in the field of maritime law?
For aspiring maritime lawyers, a solid grounding in both Indian and international law is essential. I encourage young lawyers to invest time in understanding treaties, conventions, and the workings of regulatory bodies like the IMO, as maritime law is global by nature. Building expertise in arbitration and cross-border dispute resolution is equally critical, as maritime disputes often require these specialized skills. Finally, cultivate a mindset of continuous learning; maritime law evolves in response to global trade trends, and staying informed will differentiate you in this highly specialized field. As a faculty member, I always remind students that success in this field comes from both expertise and a commitment to lifelong learning.
Having a background in commerce, looking back, what inspired you to transition into law as a profession?
Reflecting on my transition from commerce to law, it was driven by a deep-seated interest in understanding the systems that govern society and the desire to make a meaningful impact. My commerce background provided me with a strong foundation in analytical thinking, understanding corporate finance, problem-solving and understanding economic frameworks, which seamlessly complemented the logical and structured nature of law.
My passion for detailed research evolved into a strong interest in the field of law, where I found a perfect outlet for my drive to explore and solve complex issues. The turning point in my academic career was realizing that law not only offered a dynamic and intellectually challenging career but also a platform to advocate for justice, resolve conflicts and contribute to societal progress. The ability to bridge commerce with law, especially in areas like corporate frauds and insurance law, further motivated me to take this path, blending my prior knowledge with the intricacies of legal practice.
How did your role evolve over time at each of the organizations you worked with, particularly from Legalogic Consulting LLP to Nikhil Kulkarni and Associates? What were some of the key challenges you faced when setting up your own practice?
Being a first-generation lawyer, my ultimate goal was always to start my own practice. The journey from being a fresh law graduate to establishing my own law firm has been one of growth, learning and resilience. At each stage, my role evolved as I gained more responsibility, honed my skills and expanded my understanding of the legal field. All my previous experiences have helped me develop important skills such as client communication, legal strategy formation, preparing arguments for a case, problem solving skills, to name a few. Establishing my own practice marked a significant shift. I transitioned from focusing solely on legal work to also managing the operational, administrative, and business aspects of a law firm.
Establishing one’s own legal practice requires a lot of patience, perseverance and hard work. Building a client base initially was challenging in the initial years, however maintaining a strong work ethic and providing consistent results to earn referrals helped us build a good client base. Building a competent team is also crucial so that all the diverse areas of practice are effectively managed. Juggling the responsibilities of a lawyer, leader and entrepreneur was also a challenge. But prioritizing tasks and delegating effectively helps in overall management of the firm. Each step of this journey has been a learning experience, and the challenges faced have shaped my practice into what it is today. Fortunately, all my clients have had faith in my legal acumen and my team at Nikhil Kulkarni & Associates have given favourable results to most of my clients.
How have you navigated the cases in the insurance sector particularly in your role as an empanelled advocate for United India Insurance Company? What was the most interesting case you had to deal with and what were your preparation strategies?
To deal with cases in insurance sector requires a lot of preparation, particularly the motor accident cases since in most of these cases, the insurance companies are ordered by courts to pay compensation to the victims. Hence, preparing a good defence to mitigate the liability of insurance company is paramount. I will share one of the interesting cases relating to motor accident, which acquired a lot of media attention also. In that case, the relatives of the motor accident victim submitted a fake insurance policy belonging to our client United India insurance to claim compensation from the said insurance company. We had to convince the hon’ble court that in such a case, it is the victim who has not approached the court with clean hands by submitting a fake insurance policy before the court. Our team thoroughly prepared the questions for cross examination and extensively researched on various judicial precedents to support our case. After a series of arguments, counter-arguments and recording of evidence, the court came to a conclusion that our client insurance company is not liable to pay compensation. This verdict is significant since in most of the MACT cases, the courts order insurance companies to pay compensation whereas in this case, we zeroed down the liability of insurance company.
You’ve handled a wide range of criminal proceedings, including FIR quashing, bail, and anticipatory bail in both Sessions Court and the High Court. Can you share the most difficult case you’ve worked on and how you approached it?
One of the most challenging cases I handled involved securing anticipatory bail for a client accused in a highly publicized fraud case. The stakes were high, as the accusations not only threatened my client’s liberty but also had severe professional and personal repercussions. The case involved allegations under the MPID Act, where obtaining anticipatory bail is difficult due to the nature of the offences, which are considered crimes against society at large. Courts typically adopt a stringent stance in cases under special statutes like the MPID Act and MCOCA, given their gravity and impact. Despite these challenges, through a strategic and persistent legal battle, we successfully secured anticipatory bail for our clients, safeguarding their rights and ensuring they could cooperate with the legal process without fear of immediate custody.
We have encountered cases involving cross FIRs, where both parties file complaints against each other, often presenting contradictory versions of the same incident. One particularly challenging case involved a client accused in a molestation case. Securing the quashing of the FIR and related proceedings was especially difficult, given the stringent restrictions imposed by the Hon’ble High Courts and the Hon’ble Supreme Court on the accused’s right to seek such relief. Despite these challenges, through meticulous preparation and strategic advocacy, we succeeded in having the FIR and proceedings against our client quashed. This outcome not only reinforced our confidence in handling complex cross-FIR scenarios but also deepened our understanding of the nuanced approach required in such cases.
Corporate fraud cases often involve intricate details. Can you share an example where your legal expertise helped uncover or resolve a complex corporate fraud case?
One of the most challenging corporate fraud cases I handled involved a Private Limited company accused of financial irregularities and siphoning funds through shell entities. The allegations not only threatened investor confidence but also had serious implications for regulatory compliance and the company’s reputation. The case required navigating a complex web of legal frameworks, including the Companies Act, SEBI regulations, the Partnership Act, and provisions under the Indian Penal Code. The involvement of substantial public funds attracted intense scrutiny from regulatory authorities and the media, adding to the pressure.
Handling such a case demanded a deep understanding of both civil and criminal laws, as the issues often overlapped in unexpected ways. I worked closely with auditors to meticulously analyse financial records, identify discrepancies, and trace the diversion of funds to various entities. My background in Commerce proved invaluable in understanding the transactions and their accounting implications, enabling me to navigate the complexities of the case with greater precision. Defending a company in such circumstances required strategic legal manoeuvring, proactive compliance measures and consistent engagement with stakeholders. We had to clearly defined our client’s scope of work and their specific roles in the alleged offence, which is a crucial aspect when dealing with frauds committed through companies or other entities.
Your experience spans across multiple domains—civil, criminal, insurance, and corporate law. How do you manage and prioritize cases across these diverse legal areas?
I believe in the philosophy “Jack of all trades, master of none, but oftentimes better than a master of one.”
In litigation, we often handle cases where multiple legal domains intersect. Clients may have access to various legal remedies including both of civil and criminal nature. Additionally, corporate law often involves litigation where companies must file or defend both civil and/or criminal cases. Therefore, to provide comprehensive legal solutions, it is essential to be well-versed in multiple areas of law. Corporate clients increasingly demand such all-encompassing legal services. Our firm has carved out a niche in this sector by combining a core corporate law practice with expertise in the litigation aspects of corporate law. We have a dedicated team of lawyers who specialize in diverse domains. My wife, a highly skilled lawyer, leads a team that handles much of our corporate work, including contract negotiation, drafting, contract management, general corporate advisory and handling employer-employee disputes.
With such a diverse and demanding portfolio, how do you maintain a balance between your professional and personal life, especially considering your interests in football, music, and stock market analysis?
I have always drawn inspiration from the famous lines of poet William Henry Davies: “What is this life if, full of care, we have no time to stand and stare.” A healthy work-life balance helps in personal well-being as well as professional performance. Everyone gets the same number of hours in a day; it’s how you manage and utilize your time effectively that determines your success. Hobbies are incredibly useful when we need a rejuvenation from our daily routine. Football serves not just as a passion but also a way to stay physically and mentally fit. Football helps me lead a disciplined routine and enhance team work skills beneficial to legal practice. I have a keen interest in music and stock market analysis. Listening to music is an excellent stress buster. I also follow the stock market regularly.
I started with stock market analysis and gradually shifted my focus towards investments, realizing that analysis alone—without practical application—won’t lead to desired results. Similarly, law is about translating theoretical knowledge into real-world solutions.
How do you think the advancement of technology, particularly through AI and other innovations, is transforming the way lawyers and the judiciary operate, improving efficiency, accessibility, and decision-making processes?
Technology has been significantly transforming the legal landscape in India, offering numerous benefits for both lawyers and the judiciary. The introduction of e-filing systems allows lawyers to submit petitions, affidavits and other documents online, reducing delays and the burden of physical paperwork. It makes accessing court services more convenient, especially for clients in remote areas. With the rise of video conferencing tools, courts have increasingly held virtual hearings, making justice more accessible and reducing the need for physical presence. This is especially beneficial in a country as vast as India where transportation and geographical barriers can delay proceedings. However, the District Courts face certain infrastructure issues which makes it difficult to adopt technology as Hon’ble High Courts and the Hon’ble Supreme Court. Technology is playing a pivotal role in transforming the legal field in India by enhancing efficiency, accessibility and transparency. It helps lawyers manage their workload, conduct thorough research and serve clients more effectively. For the judiciary, technology accelerates case management, improves accessibility and helps in reducing delays, ultimately contributing to a more efficient justice delivery system. The adoption of these tools continues to improve legal processes, making them faster, more accurate and widely accessible to all. Technology in law has also opened various avenues and accelerated the growth of Apps and websites like LawSikho and Superlawyers which give advocates a platform to showcase their skills and experiences.
What advice would you offer to young individuals aspiring to follow a similar career path as yours?
Always consider yourself of the student of the law. The attitude of knowing everything, will only make you complacent. To grow your practise, you need to constantly evolve with changing times. As a first-generation lawyer aspiring to build a career in litigation and having your own law firm, you may face unique challenges but you also have the potential to shape your path with determination and strategy. Building a strong foundation in terms of understanding the basic procedural laws such as Civil Procedure Code and Criminal Procedure Code (BNSS) is crucial for advocates. You must stay up to date with recent judgments and understand the changes in the laws. Plan your internships in advance and spend time in understanding the court procedures, drafting skills and client interactions. Networking is equally important in our field. Stay connected with your faculties, colleagues, batchmates and seniors. Technology in law is constantly growing, and this will create more opportunities for young lawyers, who are tech-savvy and adaptable to the changing times. It can open doors to opportunities and mentorship. Success in litigation is a marathon, not a sprint. Stay dedicated, seek knowledge at every opportunity, and be patient. The respect and recognition you earn will make the effort worthwhile.
What was your initial motivation to pursue law, and what motivated you to pursue a Master’s Degree in International Business Law (LL.M.) from the City University of London as a specialization?
My initial motivation to pursue law stemmed from my passion for problem-solving and advocacy. I’ve always been fascinated by the role of law in shaping societies and resolving disputes, which led me to pursue a legal career. As I progressed in the field, I realized the increasing significance of international business and cross-border transactions in today’s globalized world. Pursuing an LL.M. in International Business Law from the City University of London allowed me to gain specialized expertise in navigating complex international legal frameworks, particularly in areas such as corporate compliance, arbitration, and contract law. The program provided me with a global perspective and practical skills that are invaluable in my current role in Dubai’s dynamic legal landscape.
You started your career as a Junior Associate working with various legal firms across Dubai and Abu Dhabi. What are the key learning experiences from that phase which have helped your career?
Starting as a Junior Associate was a foundational phase of my career. Working with diverse legal firms in Dubai and Abu Dhabi exposed me to various aspects of UAE law, including commercial litigation, corporate structuring, and arbitration. One of the most important lessons I learned was the importance of precision and thoroughness in drafting legal documents and presenting arguments. I also developed the ability to manage time-sensitive cases while dealing with the expectations of both local and international clients. Additionally, observing senior lawyers taught me the value of negotiation and strategic thinking, skills that I rely on daily as the Head of Legal at Bartawi Contracting.
Having drafted and negotiated various legal documents for both UAE and international clients, what are the key challenges you face when dealing with international clients, especially considering the regulatory framework in the UAE?
The primary challenge is bridging the gap between international clients’ expectations and the local regulatory framework. Many international clients are unfamiliar with the nuances of UAE law, such as the Civil Law system, restrictions on foreign ownership, and Sharia-based principles in certain commercial transactions. Another challenge is ensuring that legal documents comply with UAE laws while maintaining language that is clear and understandable to clients from diverse jurisdictions. Communication is also crucial—educating clients on the importance of adhering to local regulations while addressing their business needs requires a balance of technical expertise and cultural sensitivity.
You have done filing in DIAC & DIFC along with advising clients on commercial contracts, company law, and corporate compliance. What has been one of the most interesting cases you’ve come across that you would like to share with us?
One of the most interesting cases I handled involved a commercial arbitration at DIAC. The case revolved around a dispute over a multi-million-dirham construction project, with claims of breach of contract and delays. It was particularly challenging because it involved multiple jurisdictions, technical construction-related arguments, and high stakes for both parties. Successfully navigating this case required collaboration with technical experts, thorough analysis of construction timelines, and presenting arguments that aligned with UAE laws and international arbitration principles. The successful resolution not only protected my client’s interests but also highlighted the importance of strategic planning and preparation in arbitration.
In your current role, can you walk us through your responsibilities of how you identify and evaluate potential legal and regulatory risks that could affect the holding company and its subsidiaries? Can you share an example of a time when you successfully mitigated a significant legal or regulatory risk for the company?
In my current role, I am responsible for ensuring the company and its subsidiaries operate within the bounds of UAE laws and regulations. This involves regularly reviewing contracts, monitoring compliance policies, and staying updated on regulatory changes. A notable example of risk mitigation was identifying and addressing potential issues in a subsidiary’s lease agreements that could have led to litigation. By renegotiating lease terms and adding clauses for greater flexibility, I ensured both parties’ interests were protected while avoiding potential legal disputes. This proactive approach not only safeguarded the company’s interests but also strengthened relationships with external stakeholders.
Since you develop and monitor compliance programs and policies for the holding company and subsidiaries and ensure all business activities comply with applicable legal and regulatory requirements, what are the major challenges you face while working on such policies given the UAE setup?
One of the biggest challenges is the frequent updates to regulations in the UAE, which requires constant vigilance and adaptability. Additionally, balancing compliance requirements with the operational flexibility needed by the business can be complex, particularly when dealing with subsidiaries that have distinct operational models. Another challenge is ensuring that employees at all levels understand and adhere to compliance policies, which often requires tailored training programs and effective communication. Lastly, navigating the interplay between federal, emirate-specific, and free-zone regulations demands a deep understanding of the legal framework and careful coordination.
What strategies do you employ to provide legal support for the incorporation, restructuring, and management of subsidiaries?
My approach includes conducting thorough due diligence to understand the specific needs of the business and the regulatory requirements for incorporation or restructuring. I work closely with financial and operational teams to ensure that the legal framework aligns with the company’s objectives. For restructuring, I focus on minimizing risks by reviewing contracts, liabilities, and compliance obligations. Clear communication with stakeholders is essential to manage expectations and timelines. Additionally, I rely on strong relationships with regulatory bodies and legal consultants to facilitate smooth processes, especially when dealing with cross-border entities.
What advice would you give to young aspirants who wish to have a career in the UAE and have an international practice?
To succeed in the UAE’s legal field, young aspirants should focus on gaining a solid understanding of UAE laws and regulations while also developing expertise in international legal frameworks. Fluency in Arabic and English is invaluable, as is cultural awareness and adaptability. Networking is crucial—building connections within the legal community can open doors to opportunities and mentorship. I also recommend pursuing advanced degrees or certifications in specialized fields like arbitration or corporate law to enhance their credentials. Lastly, being proactive and maintaining a strong work ethic will set them apart in this competitive market.
Given your extensive legal experience and practice, how do you maintain motivation and drive in your career? Additionally, looking ahead, what are your professional goals or next steps, and how do you envision your career evolving in the future?
My motivation comes from the dynamic nature of the legal field and the satisfaction of resolving complex challenges. Every case presents an opportunity to learn and grow, which keeps me engaged. Looking ahead, my professional goals include further expanding my expertise in corporate governance and compliance, particularly as businesses in the UAE become more regulated. I also aim to mentor young legal professionals and contribute to shaping the next generation of lawyers. In the long term, I see myself taking on broader leadership roles, potentially within an international legal framework, while continuing to make meaningful contributions to the legal profession.
THANKS: I would like to extend my sincere gratitude to Mr. Hamed, the CEO of Bartawi General Contracting, and all employees and C-level executives at Bartawi Group for their unwavering support and collaboration.
Was pursuing law a deliberate choice for you, or did it evolve into your chosen career over time?
Pursuing law was the result of an evolving journey shaped by both destiny and conscious choice. Coming from a family of legal stalwarts, I grew up immersed in the world of law. Intense debates—ranging from courtroom strategies to ethical dilemmas—were a regular feature of our dinner-table conversations. While these discussions planted a seed of curiosity, I wasn’t immediately certain that law would be my path. My early years were marked by explorations in diverse fields, from economics to business, as I searched for a career that combined intellectual stimulation with a meaningful societal impact. It was during this exploration that I realized the unique power of the law. It offered not just a way to understand the complexities of human behavior and governance but also a means to address injustice and drive positive change.
Your career includes training under Mr. Harish Salve in 2012 and working with Sr. Adv. Shyam Divan from 2012-2015. How did these varied experiences shape your approach to legal strategy and advocacy? What key lessons from these roles have influenced your current practice?
Working with legal stalwarts like Mr. Harish Salve and Mr. Shyam Divan was akin to being immersed in a legal crucible—intense, demanding, and transformative. Under Mr. Salve’s mentorship, I had the privilege of witnessing some of the most intricate legal battles, including the Vodafone tax case. Watching him distill the complexities of international tax law into a compelling narrative taught me a foundational truth: advocacy is as much about storytelling as it is about precision. The ability to craft a persuasive argument lies in presenting the law as a relatable, logical story.
With Mr. Divan, the experience was equally inspiring but with a different focus. He emphasized the ethical dimensions of advocacy, championing causes like environmental protection and public interest. His approach reinforced the idea that law isn’t just about winning but about serving a larger purpose. These formative years grounded me in the importance of not just skillful argumentation but also principled advocacy.
In 2015, I joined Agarwal Law Associates and had the privilege of working in the High Court team under Mr. Rishi Aggarwal. This role gave me a hands-on understanding of the complete lifecycle of a case-from meticulous drafting to effective courtroom strategy. It was a masterclass in building cases from the ground up and developing the confidence to tackle complex legal issues.
My time as Additional Standing Counsel for Government of NCT which began in 2023 has been starkly different yet an equally enriching chapter. It requires navigating the delicate balance between policy-making and legal frameworks. This role has sharpened my sense of diplomacy and pragmatism, as it often involves reconciling competing interests while staying within the boundaries of law. It has also taught me the value of adaptability—essential for a litigator handling varied and dynamic challenges.
While litigation demands technical expertise, it also requires understanding the human element—the psychology of clients, the mood of the courtroom, and the pulse of a judge. Recognizing these subtleties has been crucial in my practice. In essence, these varied experiences have not only shaped my approach to legal strategy and advocacy but have also instilled in me the humility to learn, the courage to innovate, and the discipline to strive for excellence every single day.
Anyone starting off must get all different kinds of flavours before charting out their own journey either as corporate, litigating advocate or an In-house counsel. I guess it’s a matter of identifying your strengths and weaknesses and personality traits and chart upon your own journey – As they say one man’s vulgarity is another man’s lyric!!
As the Additional Advocate General for Karnataka, you represent the state in significant legal matters before the courts. Can you share some challenges you have faced in this capacity, and what your approach is in complex constitutional or administrative matters?
Representing a state is an overwhelming responsibility. It transcends the goal of securing legal victories and focuses on safeguarding the public interest while upholding the fundamental principles of the Constitution. Every case carries weight, but some test the limits of your expertise and commitment. Among the most challenging matters I’ve handled was an essential policy dispute that put the delicate balance between federalism and state autonomy to the test. The stakes were monumental, and the case required a comprehensive examination of constitutional provisions, a thorough study of historical jurisprudence, and an acute understanding of the potential societal and economic ripple effects our stance could create.
In tackling such high-stakes issues, my approach is deeply rooted in preparation and collaboration. It begins with an exhaustive analysis of the legal framework, ensuring that every aspect of the matter is understood in its entirety. I place great emphasis on engaging in intense, constructive discussions with my colleagues, leveraging their perspectives to build a stronger case. Anticipation is key—I work tirelessly to predict and prepare for potential questions or arguments that may arise, whether from opposing counsel or the judiciary.
The stakes in such state matters are undeniably high. Yet, the challenges come with an unparalleled sense of fulfillment. Contributing to the larger public good, shaping the course of policy, and upholding the ideals of justice are not just professional achievements—they are deeply personal rewards. This is what fuels my passion and dedication to the role, even in the face of its inherent complexities and pressures.
After gaining experience with prominent figures in the legal field, what motivated you to establish your own practice? What challenges did you face in the early stages of building your own practice?
Starting my own practice felt like jumping off a cliff with the hope of building wings on the way down. The motivation? A burning desire to step out of the shadows and craft my own identity in the legal world. I wanted the freedom to choose my battles, shape my approach to justice, and make a meaningful impact on both public and private interests. I’ve always relished diving deep into the complexities of law, even when it meant hitting roadblocks that tested my patience and resolve.
The early days were a whirlwind of excitement and uncertainty. Earning the trust of clients was daunting—people place their faith in your expertise, and you have to prove your worth every single day. Building a competent team was another challenge; finding individuals who shared my vision and drive took time. Then there was the steep learning curve of managing finances and the logistics of running a practice—it felt like constructing a skyscraper, laying one brick at a time with no blueprint in sight.
But every challenge taught me something invaluable. I learned resilience, adaptability, and the power of persistence. Those early struggles also revealed the importance of collaboration, mentorship, and an unwavering commitment to excellence. Gradually, what started as a daunting endeavor evolved into a fulfilling journey. My practice became more than just a professional commitment—it became a platform to explore complex legal issues, fight for justice, and pursue both commercial and public interest work.
In hindsight, those early challenges weren’t just obstacles; they were stepping stones. They shaped me into a more nuanced and versatile practitioner, giving me a deeper appreciation for the law and its potential to transform lives. Starting my own practice wasn’t just a career move—it was a leap of faith that helped me grow in ways I never imagined.
As an independent private practitioner, you specialize in a range of areas such as commercial disputes, company law, IP, and insolvency matters. How do you prioritize cases across such diverse fields, and how do you manage the intricacies of each area in your practice?
Managing a practice that spans diverse legal fields is like orchestrating a symphony—each area has its distinct tempo and complexity, but success lies in achieving harmony. Prioritizing cases depends on several factors: urgency, the potential impact on the client, and the complexity of the legal issues involved. For example, commercial disputes often require quick, strategic interventions to minimize business disruptions, whereas insolvency matters demand meticulous analysis of financial details and legal frameworks to ensure equitable outcomes.
My approach blends specialization with adaptability. Each area brings its own challenges—intellectual property law requires creativity and a nuanced understanding of innovation, while company law involves intricate knowledge of corporate governance and compliance. The key is to immerse myself fully in the specifics of each case, tailoring my strategy to the unique demands of the matter at hand.
To manage such a dynamic practice, I maintain a disciplined workflow. This includes leveraging the expertise of a talented team, continuously updating my knowledge of legal developments, and maintaining a client-focused approach. Staying informed about the latest rulings, legislative changes, and industry trends is non-negotiable—it allows me to provide solutions that are not just legally sound but also practically effective.
Ultimately, this multidisciplinary approach ensures that I can navigate the intricacies of each field while delivering cohesive, impactful results for my clients. It’s this balance between specialization and versatility that defines my practice and keeps me motivated to tackle challenges across the legal spectrum.
Your practice spans both private commercial litigation and government representation. How do you approach preparing and arguing cases for the government, especially in sensitive constitutional matters or PILs? Can you share a particularly challenging case with us?
Preparing for government cases requires carefully balancing social, legal, and policy considerations. Take, for instance, petitions involving land acquisition and compensation issues. The core challenge lies in reconciling public interest with the protection of individual rights. These cases demand not only a deep understanding of constitutional safeguards but also a keen awareness of the socio-economic implications of governmental policies.
In such matters, my strategy revolves around crafting nuanced arguments that respect individual rights while emphasizing the broader public good. This involves meticulously analyzing legal precedents, assessing the societal impact of proposed actions, and ensuring that the state’s position aligns with constitutional principles. These cases push you to think beyond the technicalities of law. They require engaging with the larger societal context, understanding the effects of policy decisions, and striving to find solutions that uphold justice for all stakeholders. It’s this interplay between law and societal concerns that makes such cases both challenging and profoundly fulfilling.
I have been privileged to contribute to causes that hold immense significance, including public health, environmental protection, and the prevention of animal cruelty. These endeavors have given me a deep sense of pride and fulfillment, allowing me to serve as a responsible and conscientious citizen of India.
That said, public interest litigation is a powerful tool but one that is often misused. It must be exercised sparingly and only in truly exceptional circumstances where the cause is both genuine and pursued with unwavering sincerity, passion, and integrity. PILs should always prioritize the ultimate beneficiary—public interest—and must never be driven by personal motives or frivolous intentions. When used responsibly, they can be a transformative force for justice and societal progress.
You’ve been involved in pro bono work, particularly in areas like animal welfare and environmental law. Can you discuss your motivation and how you balance such work with your high-profile commercial litigation practice?
Pro bono work is not just a professional obligation; it is a personal calling. Causes like animal welfare and environmental conservation resonate with my belief in the law as an instrument of social change. These cases often demand creativity and passion rather than resources, and the satisfaction they bring is unparalleled. Balancing this with commercial litigation is a matter of discipline and prioritization. I view pro bono work as an opportunity to give back to society, and it fuels my sense of purpose even amidst the rigors of high-stakes litigation.
Having worked on several high-profile cases involving major corporations, how do you approach the strategy for such complex matters, particularly those with significant commercial implications?
High-profile corporate cases are a testament to the art of legal strategy, demanding both precision and adaptability. Each case begins with a critical step: deconstructing intricate transactions and factual matrices into manageable and comprehensible components. The ability to simplify the seemingly convoluted comes with experience and continuous learning—a process I embrace daily. The sheer exposure these cases offer is a remarkable opportunity to deepen one’s understanding of the law and its real-world applications.
Once the foundation is clear, the focus shifts to identifying potential legal risks, predicting opposing arguments, and crafting a strategy that not only protects the client’s interests but also aligns seamlessly with their commercial objectives. This requires a deep dive into the nuances of the case, backed by meticulous research and a robust understanding of the relevant legal framework.
Collaboration is another cornerstone of my approach. High-profile matters often span multiple disciplines—finance, technology, regulatory compliance, and more. Partnering with domain experts ensures that every angle is considered, enabling the development of innovative legal solutions tailored to the client’s needs. For instance, in cases involving regulatory complexities, understanding the finer details of compliance is as crucial as interpreting the law itself. Equally important is clear communication. In high-stakes matters, ensuring that clients, stakeholders, and the legal team are aligned is paramount. Breaking down legal strategies into actionable insights allows clients to make informed decisions, fostering trust and confidence.
Above all, my approach is guided by an unwavering commitment to ethical standards. Protecting the client’s interests is always the priority, but it must never come at the expense of integrity or the larger principles of justice. The intersection of law and business in such cases is both challenging and rewarding, offering the opportunity to create meaningful and impactful outcomes.
Given the high demands of your legal career, how do you balance your professional responsibilities with personal obligations? What strategies do you use to recharge and stay motivated in your work?
The idea of a perfect work-life balance in the legal profession is, in many ways, a myth. As a litigator, the demands are relentless—requiring an unwavering commitment of passion, intellect, and hard work. There are times when family commitments inevitably take a back seat. Let’s be clear: the profession isn’t for the faint-hearted. It calls for sacrifice, and the stakes are high.
That said, it’s not all about unyielding work. I make a conscious effort to find pockets of time to recharge, especially during court recesses or when the case load allows for a break. These moments, though brief, are invaluable. I use them to reconnect with loved ones, dive into a good book, or engage in enriching conversations that allow me to step away from the legal grind and reset mentally.
The motivation to keep going despite the pressures lies in the profound impact of the work I do. There is an undeniable sense of fulfillment in knowing that my efforts contribute to justice, the rule of law, and societal progress. This sense of purpose is what fuels my passion and drives me forward, even when the demands are at their peak.
Ultimately, while work-life balance may be elusive, the positive influence of my work serves as the ultimate form of professional satisfaction, and that is what keeps me motivated and committed to my craft.
You have been involved in training sessions with Senior Advocates and Judges. How do you approach mentoring young lawyers, and what advice would you offer to aspiring lawyers who hope to achieve success in the legal profession?
Mentoring young lawyers is one of the most rewarding aspects of my career. I view it as both a responsibility and a privilege. In my mentorship, I encourage young lawyers to embrace the challenges that the profession presents. Every case, every legal question, is an opportunity for growth. I stress the importance of developing strong critical thinking skills and cultivating a deep, insatiable curiosity for the law. It is this curiosity that drives innovation and fuels the passion necessary to succeed in such a demanding field.
For aspiring lawyers, my advice is straightforward but vital: never stop learning, stay persistent, and, above all, practice with humility and integrity. The road to success in law is rarely quick or easy. It is a journey that is built brick by brick, requiring dedication, resilience, and a constant commitment to justice. The legal profession rewards those who approach it with patience and diligence, knowing that each case and each experience contributes to a greater understanding of the law.
Looking ahead, I also believe that technology, particularly AI, will play an increasingly significant role in the legal field. Just as technology has already transformed legal research and case management, I’m confident that AI will continue to aid lawyers in refining their practice. Lawyers who embrace these advancements and use them effectively will not only enhance their own productivity but also improve the quality of service they provide to their clients. The key is adapting to these changes and harnessing the power of technology to make the most of your time and expertise.
Ultimately, mentoring is about instilling young lawyers and colleagues with the belief that success is not just about winning cases but about making a meaningful impact, continuously learning, and striving to elevate the practice of law to its highest ideals. We are constantly learning on a daily basis, knowledge must be imbued and absorbed with great hunger and passion.
