Sir, could you please share with us what inspired you to pursue a career in law, and how did your journey into legal practice unfold, especially in economic offenses and commercial dispute litigation?
I hail from a small village in Bihar and hence my dreams were also moderate. Engineering and UPSC are the most popular options in Bihar as many of the locals perform well in these exams. I was too striving to become an Engineer, however the turning point for me was when I visited my uncle in Delhi who practices as a lawyer in the Supreme Court of India as an AOR. I was enchanted by his work on complex legal issues which created lasting imprints on my pristine mind. My Uncle also advised me to opt for a career in the field of law and with his guidance I took my leap into this exciting world of legalese.
Being garrulous by nature it seemed like a fish finding its natural waters and felt comforted by the mentor from my family who could always guide me past all obstacles that I may encounter charting this unfamiliar terrain. I was charmed by the interaction with a few senior advocates and their view on contemporary issues from the legal point of view which was on a much higher pedestal than many other professions and also afforded me the visibility which was missing in other professions.
The rest of the things then fell into place with single-minded dedication and persistence in clearing the CLAT examination and opted for the curriculum at NIRMA University, Ahmedabad, where the set-up was quite rewarding in terms of the constant encouragement by the Professors and a competitive batch of students who would challenge me to excel and hone my skills.
Economic offences and commercial litigation seem to be the growing albeit nascent field of litigation and have become a natural choice for any newcomer who seeks to grow at an accelerated pace.
Your focus area involves economic offenses, including matters related to the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, and more. What drew you to specialize in this particular field, and what challenges do you find most intriguing in handling such cases?
With the opening of the Indian Economy and integration with the world economic systems, the intricacy of financial matters has acquired greater complexities, and it is important to delve into the nuances of trade and ensure compliance with the rules and regulations of the countries where they impact. Digitisation and internet connectivity have eased vigilance and tracking and often people get trapped into the web of deceit/conundrum of litigation which vexes the common man and in order to aid and assist them a legal professional is well suited to advice and counsel business professionals to safeguard their interest.
Increasingly the burden in litigation is being shifted onto the defendants and well-trained legal minds come to their rescue. Economic offences are the sunrise sector of litigation and hence attract young minds like a bee to the flower for its nectar.
You’ve transitioned from being associated with law firms to establish your independent practice. Could you tell us about the pivotal moments that led to this decision, and how has the experience been as an independent legal practitioner?
One of the special privileges of our profession is that it allows you to sail in two boats and so a person can be associated with a reputed firm and side by side nurture an independent practice of his own to find his ground in due course. I have always chosen to associate with firms that have no restrictive working conditions to hamper my independent practice. In this process, I have lost vital aspects of stability and study earnings with a top-tier law firm, but the confidence gained while straddling two boats has been a fair bargain in my assessment. It is akin to being a co-pilot who after filing in the requisite hours of flying is qualified to occupy the chair of the commander of his own craft.
Nothing is gained without experiencing its share of struggle and the initial formative years shape our destinies. Every young professional is like a diamond which must undergo its share of being cut and shaped by circumstances and chiselled by the artisans who mould them, and I count myself lucky that I got picked by the sharp intellects who are luminaries in their own right and illumine the path for me. I also feel redeemed and gratified when I do pro-bono matters which satisfy not only the mind but also the heart which makes this profession endearing and noble.
Your professional journey includes representing clients before various courts and tribunals on diverse matters. Can you share an experience of handling a particularly challenging or high-profile case and the lessons you learned from it?
With God’s grace and the blessings of my mentors, I have had multiple opportunities to assist in several high-profile matters. It is my belief that every matter imparts a new learning and everything that augments my knowledge is to be counted as high profile as it has uplifted me from the lower echelons to the next level.
I take pride in all the matters that are assigned to me and am committed to giving it my best regardless of the outcome. The end result may not always be to our expectation, since the judges have a mind of their own, but our conscience should not bite us for having left any stone unturned. One hallmark of professional integrity which I strive for is to put the best foot forward with persistence and care. The sporting spirit is my guiding principle that even the best of players/champions encounter defeat in some games, but it never weakens their spirit or resolve.
Having excelled academically during your time at Nirma University, how do you balance the theoretical knowledge gained in law school with the practical challenges faced in the legal profession?
Once you get on the field there is no substitute for experience. Once again, the sports analogy will help understand this – no amount of theoretical knowledge about the intricacies of the sport, the past statistics, the precedents etc can anticipate the uncertainties of playing conditions. The theory brings about awareness and is like a rough diamond, but it is only experience and constant practice that shapes our minds, characters and destinies. Needless to emphasise excelling in academics opens several vistas and avenues for anyone to choose the path for individual glory.
And in this profession, constant updation is the sine qua non for any practicing advocate just like you have new software versions which regularly and periodically update and upgrade your knowledge and provide you with the edge which is the single differentiator of any successful professional. The need to burn the midnight oil is greater in practice than ever in academia. This is also what Steven Covey enlisted as the Seventh Habit in ‘Sharpening the Saw’.
You’ve had the opportunity to learn from some of the best advocates, including senior advocates and government counsels. How has mentorship played a role in shaping your career, and what advice would you give to aspiring lawyers on finding the right mentors?
That the greatest learning in the profession has been that no work is small or unimportant and what is done by one’s own hand shall stay with one for life. It is similar to swimming which once learnt is never unlearnt. Mentors and guides are the lighthouses that safely guide the ships in the vast ocean of life. The role of mentors can never be undermined, and I always look up to them when faced with a quandary. Senior advocates help us understand as to how arguments have to be framed and articulated in any hearing and to steer the course in the direction which shall eventually help the judge decide in our favour. We can learn to craft strategies from the seniors who bring their wealth of experience and maturity and fuse with our exuberance to present our side with vigour and vitality. In all of this it is essential that the facts are garnered from the files and discussions that are compiled and then neatly sifted into a summary which can be helpful in framing the briefs for senior counsels who need to be provided the critical points for their arguments.
Given your extensive experience, could you share your perspective on the current legal landscape in India, especially in areas such as economic offenses, commercial dispute litigation, and the impact of recent legal developments?
The legal domain is fraught with extensive work opportunities and provides an excellent launching pad for assuming leadership roles in society. Technology is quickly upgrading the systems and making it easy to adjudicate matters without logistical constraints. It is therefore necessary to be tech-savvy so that one can stay ahead in matters which are bearing global footprints and have far-reaching ramifications.
What prompted you to write the AOR examination and what do you suggest to any candidate who will appear for these examinations.
For every advocate, it is a dream to work at the pinnacle which is the august body of the Supreme Court, and it was not possible to stay away from this venerable temple of justice. I would appear immodest if I were to claim that this was my goal, but the fact is that one needs to take this exam with great dedication and commitment and at a young age one is required to be enthralled with energy to conquer this peak amongst the many that we set our minds to scale.
Lastly, considering your achievements and the knowledge you’ve gained along the way, what advice would you like to offer to fresh law graduates who are embarking on their legal careers today?
I always draw inspiration from the Mahabharata which asserts and exhorts us to – Stay focused on the eye of the fish only and nature shall conspire to let your wishes come true.
Can you share the pivotal moments that led you to pursue a career in law, from your LL.B. at Maharaja Ganga Singh University to becoming an Advocate on Record at the Supreme Court of India?
Honestly, I admit that I am an accidental Advocate. I had never thought to pursue LL.B. and practice Law. Rather, I first visited Courts, on the day of joining in the profession as an intern at District Courts, Ludhiana in February, 2012. I am basically a physiotherapist and even worked as respiratory physiotherapist at Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana before starting my independent practice as physiotherapist. My father was a bank officer and I also wanted to join Government Service, so I tried my luck in UPSC and developed interest in the Constitution of India. During my job as physiotherapist, I developed a habit of using the library in 2008. That was the turning point of my life.
But destiny wanted me to join the legal profession, as one of my friends during my UPSC preparation advised me to pursue LL.B. It was November, 2009 and admissions were closed as the examination was scheduled for March, 2010. My friend who was already pursuing LL.B. from that University advised me to visit college. I got admission on payment of late fees and penalty. My friend left LL.B. after second year but I continued and completed my degree. I started my career in the Chamber of Sh. Amandeep Singh Grewal at District Courts, Ludhiana in 2012. Being from a medical background, I have keen interest in reading, subscribed to quarterly law journals to keep myself updated since the beginning of my career and even opened a small office at Ludhiana. Sh. Davinder Pal Singh, my dear friend and senior, gave me the opportunity to address the judicial magistrate on preliminary summoning in 138 N.I. Complaint. He had also trusted my abilities and referred to a proclaimed quashing to me during earlier days at High Court. In 2013, a retired bank officer visited my office to claim benefits as he was dismissed by disciplinary authority in 2001 and reinstated by appellate authority in 2003 with punishment for stoppage of increments for 5 years. The bank counted 5 years from 2003 instead of 2001. Being fresher, I was reluctant to take his case whereas the client not only trusted my ability but motivated me to proceed with his Civil Writ Petition. I learnt High court etiquettes on observing advocates while waiting for my turn at Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh. The notice was issued and thus started my journey at Punjab and Haryana High Court. Similarly, I was successful in getting the Proclaimed Order quashed without even issuance of notice to the respondent by Punjab and Haryana High Court. So, people started referring to my work.
I was appearing before DRT, Chandigarh and other forums as well because I never wanted to specialize but to expand my wings. It was tough during initial years but I never stopped and kept moving with the flow. Thereafter, in 2017, an advocate referred me two Special Leave Petitions pertaining to bail in 420 IPC. I contacted Ms. Manju Jately, AOR for filing and started appearing as arguing counsel before Supreme Court. During lockdown, I planned for AOR examination as Court work was limited, so joined Ms. Manju Jately as a trainee. I appeared in AOR examination in December, 2021
but could not make it in the first two papers because simultaneously I was pursuing LL.M. As such, I was determined to become AOR and succeeded in April, 2023.
You’re currently pursuing a Ph.D. at Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law, Punjab. How do you balance your academic commitments with your active legal practice, and what motivates you to continue your scholarly pursuits?
It is really difficult to pursue both things together but my friends and associates helped me during mandatory Ph.D. coursework. The Ph.D. research has helped me to refine my legal skills and knowledge. The research work does have an impact on my professional career. As my supervisor has shared a time Schedule to complete various stages of the research, therefore, I have become selective in accepting matters since 2022. I have a library in my office and I even use the Court Library during free time at courts to continue my research. I have also got a new teaching assignment and was invited by Punjab Police Academy for training of Punjab Police Officers. I was felicitated by the Director, Punjab Police Academy and this motivated me to pursue my research further. To curb the pressure, I have already closed Facebook and other social media applications. I am going to shift to keypad mobile to save myself from distraction and limit internet usage.
You’ve qualified in the Canadian Law examination. Could you elaborate on your interest in international law and how it has influenced your practice in India?
I had planned to migrate and therefore, wanted to pursue a career in law after migration. I applied for assessment before migration to Canada in 2015. But I did not find Canada as a place to live for the rest of my life and returned back. To enhance my skills and legal acumen, I appeared in examinations conducted by the National Committee on Accreditation for law society of Canada. I have been influenced by many legal issues and have even included in my professional and academic life to name a few:-
The Canadian Supreme Court decision on disclosure influenced me to a great extent. The Court in William W. Stinchcomb v. Her Majesty The Queen held that “The Crown has a legal duty to disclose all relevant information to the defence. The fruits of the investigation which are in its possession are not the property of the Crown for use in securing a conviction but the property of the public to be used to ensure that justice is done. The absolute withholding of information can only be justified on the basis of the existence of a legal privilege and privilege is reviewable”.
As I wanted to do something on disclosure by prosecution in India, so this is my research topic in Ph.D. During interview for Ph.D., Prof. (Dr.) G.S. Bajpai, Vice Chancellor, RGNUL (Punjab) appreciated my research interest in disclosure and advised me to conduct pilot study. I have also got an article published on “Inconspicuous Duty of the Prosecution to Disclosure” in Criminal Law Journal, March, 2022. My Supervisor, Dr. Shiva Satish Sharda at RGNUL, Punjab has also motivated me to pursue comprehensive research so as to work in directions for necessary amendments in legal regime looking
problems of overcrowding of prisons, increasing under-trials population and low conviction rate in India.
I am also advising during training to the Police Officers at Punjab Police Academy to respect the fundamental rights of accused and disclose the fruits of investigation to avoid false prosecution. I have even impressed the trial court for disclosure of withheld exculpatory evidence collected by the investigating agency in one or two criminal trials.
The Model Code of Professional Conduct is another area which helped me to learn lawyer’s ethics and was useful in AOR examination. The Model code forbids the lawyers to advise clients to initiate criminal and quasi criminal proceedings to secure satisfaction of private grievances. But it is common in India to initiate criminal proceedings to threaten or intimidate the opponents for personal matters like financial disputes, property matters, family disputes including marriage and custody of children
and sometime even the consensual sexual relations are given the color of rape as recently noticed by Madhya Pradesh High Court. The tactics to use criminal law for monetary gains need to be checked for a healthy Indian Society. I feel it is a misuse of the judicial process and sensitization of different stakeholders is necessary to avoid misuse of criminal law for personal satisfaction.
Your practice spans across various courts and tribunals, dealing with a wide range of cases. How do you manage such a diverse portfolio of legal matters, from civil writs to criminal appeals and everything in between?
My mentor has been dealing with both civil and criminal matters but he has not been dealing in service matters. I got an understanding of service law as my father retired as a bank officer and my first matter at High Court pertains to service matters of a retired bank employee only. I am always keen to learn and spread my wings, therefore, I shifted to Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh. Being the capital of two states, there are various forums. As such, I never denied matters for forums like DRT, State Consumer Commission, Human Rights Commission and NCLT. The initial foundation days gave me exposure to both civil and criminal branches of law before various forums.
I have been associated with the Department of Defence welfare (Punjab) since 2019 and this has helped me to refine skills in civil writs and service matters including departmental disciplinary proceedings. Even today, I take original civil and criminal matters before all courts because I believe one should not stop learning and limit oneself to any stream of law. One needs to accept change and challenges of life with open arms and mind. Litigation is a team work, I have always been assisted by friends, colleagues and even my senior appears for me at District Courts whenever required because I could not spare except Saturday for District Courts. Lastly, I am indebted to my associates and clerks at Supreme Court, New Delhi, Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh and District Court, Ludhiana for timely filing, without whom, it is not possible to appear at different courts.
Your civil writ petition in 2019 regarding CCTV installations in polling booths received media coverage. How do such cases with public interest components shape your approach as a lawyer, and what impact do you aim to achieve beyond legal resolutions?
There is a difference between Public and Publicity Interest Litigation as recently highlighted by the Former Chief Justice of India. I never used PIL jurisdiction for publicity and have not received any case even if any matter is reported in the media. I am very particular about professional ethics. The civil writ petition pertaining to CCTV installations in polling booths was pro bono and I mentioned the same in morning to get it listed in afternoon. The Court found legal points in the matter and issued directions to install CCTV cameras at Polling Booths with the objective of fair election looking at apprehensions of the petitioner. An advocate being aware of the constitutional and statutory rights of the people and citizens of India, must use its expertise for the welfare of the society. I am impressed by Sh. Mahatma Gandhi, father of nation, the way he used his legal expertise against oppressive law in South Africa and he is being recognized globally for his welfare activities and Indian struggle for independence. Similarly, one should not limit his legal expertise for dispute resolution but work for social welfare and learn from seniors in the profession.
You’ve provided legal opinions for Indian Express Pvt. Ltd. Can you share an instance where your legal advice played a crucial role in the resolution of a complex legal matter?
I have been associated with Indian Express since 2017 and contested their civil matters at District Courts, Ludhiana and Chandigarh and NCLT, Chandigarh. But, I have been specifically engaged by Indian express in 2019, to carry out the thorough legal search and submit a report on the status of the complainant partnership firm as directed by the Supreme Court in a defamation complaint against Chairman, Indian Express pending before Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ambala. On the basis of the report, the Supreme Court quashed the criminal complaint and summoning order issued in 2000 against the Chairman, Managing Director and Editorial Director of the Indian Express Group.
You’re actively involved in legal awareness programs and social welfare activities. How do you believe legal professionals can contribute to the betterment of society beyond their regular legal practice?
I feel it is the duty of every person to contribute to society. So, to repay the debt of what has been gained by me during the course of professional and personal experience, I try to volunteer within my limits and even try to settle the family and personal matters at the pre-litigation stage with honest advice. One can contribute by organizing camps at villages and also by starting lecture series for different stakeholders. Our government needs good legal instructors with bare minimum expenses, therefore, one can apply as instructors/trainers at different training governmental and non governmental institutes or organizations. In the world of the internet, social media is a good platform for necessary legal education. The legal awareness and education should not focus on work procurement but with welfare objectives. Presently, the crime against children is rising and therefore, I feel it is important to sensitize the people with sex education, penalties in sexual crimes. People need to be aware of fundamental duties as well rights because duties are equally important as rights. The most important duty of every advocate is to educate the youth of the nation as most of them, due to physical interaction indulge in activities forbidden by law and destroy their career and life.
Considering your extensive experience, what advice would you give to law graduates who are just starting their careers in the legal field?
The first lesson, my senior taught me that never run for money but work hard, the money will follow you. India is a developing nation, where people need affordable and quality legal assistance. There is no dearth of work and the only precondition is hard mental labor to update oneself with all facts and relevant legal issues. There is neither any shortcut nor scope of smart work in the legal field. Last but not least, honest efforts by lawyers, honest thorough presentation to court and honest updated advice to clients. Honesty, dedication and hard work automatically pay back. Failure does not determine success but the response to it. Therefore, always be ready to learn, unlearn and relearn.
In the end, I am grateful to the SuperLawyer Team for this interview.
Sir, could you share with our listeners how you embarked on your journey in law? What motivated you to pursue a career in the legal field?
Infact, my current profession of being a litigation lawyer is my second avatar as a professional as I started my career as a Scientist/Assistant Professor of Physics at Delhi University and I still consider myself to be a scientist by training and education but a Lawyer by profession. I am a first generation lawyer with no direct or indirect background in Law till I completed my LL.B. My real-life experiences rather confrontation with Law and Law enforcement agencies and my quest for the justice to the common masses motivated me to make my career in Law. During my stint as Professor of Physics, I was quite captivated by the working of certain law enforcement agencies and other government Institutions under the aegis of Constitution of India and the interplay of the Legislature, the Executive and the Judiciary. Post my LL.B. from University of Delhi, I got shortly associated with the office of ASG, Government of India and AAG for the state of Rajasthan at Hon’ble Supreme Court, and thereafter, I started my own independent practice in the year 2012.
My cordial associations and relationships with my seniors at Supreme Court and other Courts helped me a lot in learning and developing the idea of litigation in a short span of time.
From your early career as a Jr. Associate at the office of the Additional Solicitor to become an Advocate-on-Record of the Supreme Court and to your current role as Senior Central Govt. Counsel, Counsel for DDA, Counsel For state of U.P. and several other PSUs including PNB & RFC and being lead and arguing Counsel for few big Corporate Houses like HAL Offshore, McDonald’s, Ultratech Cement, Binani Cement etc, you’ve navigated through different roles. How did these transitions shape your legal perspective, and what key responsibilities have defined your journey?
Though, I had very short stint as Junior Associate in the office of ASG, Union of India and AAG, State of Rajasthan but I had a lot of learning in those offices and that helped me develop basic idea of litigation in a short span of time and with almighty’s grace, I was also able to strike very cordial associations and relationships with my seniors colleagues as also officers of registry at Supreme Court and other Courts. After only 15-18 months of my Jr. Associateship, I got onto my own independent practice because I started getting a few independent assignments based on my basic understanding of Court Ecosystem. However, my relations with my seniors at Supreme Court, High Courts and District Courts/Tribunals helped me in perfect execution of those assignments, thereby getting the intended reliefs. This is how the journey began and since then I have never looked back.
I am practicing as an independent Litigation and Arbitration Lawyer since Aug’2012 at Supreme Court of India, Delhi High Court, Mumbai High Court & Other High Courts across India, DRTs, DRAT, NCLT, NCLAT CCI, CAT ( erstwhile BIFR & COMPAT) at New Delhi.
The key responsibilities include:
Drafting & Vetting of Pleading of SLPs, Writs, PILs, Suits, Original Applications, Securitization Application, Misc. Applications, Service Matter Petitions, Claim Petition, Counter Claims, Evidence Affidavits, Legal Notice, Reply/rejoinders and conducting Civil Trials and Appeals as also Arbitration matters.
Appearing in all Court proceedings before the Hon’ble Justices & Registrars of Supreme Court of India, Delhi High Court, Bombay High Court, CAT, DRT, DRAT, NCLT, CCI, COMPAT & SAT at New Delhi, Kolkata and Mumbai.
Well versed with SARFAESI Act’ 2002, Recovery of Debts due to Banks & Financial Institutions Act’1993, DRT Rules, DRAT Rules, Banking Regulation Act’1949, Banking Companies Act’1970, Companies Act’2013, Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code’2016, SEBI Act’1992, PMLA Act’2002, Information & Technology Act’2000, Arbitration & Concilliation Act’1996, Specific Relief Act, Registration Act, Contract Act, Specific relief Act, Civil Procedure Code.
Vetting of Contracts, Agreements, Licenses, Hypothecation, Mortgage & Conveyance Deeds.
I am regularly appearing and conducting Litigations before Supreme Court of India, High Court of Delhi & Mumbai, DRT- Mumbai, DRT Kochi, NCLT & NCLAT Delhi, NCLT Mumbai, High Court of Calcutta, High Court of Kerala at Ernakulum, High Court of Orissa at Cuttak for my clients. Apart from my appearances before the Courts, I am also representing many of clients in their Arbitration cases at Mumbai and Delhi. I am also a qualified Mediator and am empanelled as Mediator- at Supreme Court of India.
Your profile showcases extensive experience in Civil-Corporate Litigation, Arbitration, and White-Collar Crimes. How did you develop an interest in these specialized areas, and what challenges and rewards have you encountered along the way?
To be honest with you, as a first generation lawyer, you cannot be choosy as you have to run your show and household also. Therefore, during my initial years, I took variety of cases, which ranged from appearing before a Revenue Officer to going to Police Station or Human Right Commission. From drafting of criminal Complaint to drafting of Consumer Complaint. From drafting a Claim Petition for MACT to drafting a Claim Petition for Arbitral Tribunal. Doing almost all the work at Supreme Court/High Court registry myself. Took every assignment irrespective of its pecuniary rewards or forum or rigours with only one thing in mind that each case was learning experience and success at these cases boosted confidence and fostered new relations at different levels of hierarchy. Success in these small assignment perhaps got me noticed by my senior colleagues and few Corporate Heads and the insight, which I gained during these exposures lead me to convince my initial Clients with confidence. I started getting cases related to Banking and Recovery before DRT Delhi & DRT Mumbai and also erstwhile BIFR. After implementation of IBC regime, these cases took me to NCLT & NCLAT. These financial/ banking cases with big exposure values invariably involve criminal aspects of wilful default, siphoning off and diversion the funds, fraud or money laundering. Similarly Property disputes these days have intrinsically some criminal colour in form of forgery, cheating and Service matters may also have flavour of corruption involving PC Act. Thus, despite not exactly planning for venturing into a specific area of expertise, I gradually got specialised into these areas. The best reward and motivation to keep on moving in these areas of expertise was the pecuniary benefits and broad and global exposure to working of various Industries such as Cement Industry, Shipping Industry, Oil & Gas Industry, Minning Industry, FMCG Companies, Banking and Non-Banking Institutions, Event Management Companies, Hospitality Companies etc. However, the challenge is obvious, one needs to extensively study and understand working of each Industry so that one have an insight of practical execution of business in such Industry or Sector, secondly since stakes are high in these commercial matters, therefore there is constant pressure to outperform the routine practitioners and one has to keep toiling, traversing and translating the strategies into court room success.
You’ve represented significant industrial houses and corporations in high-stake litigation and arbitration cases. Could you share a specific case or accomplishment that you consider particularly impactful or challenging in your career?
There is not one or two but rather 4-5 cases, each in different domain of law, wherein my legal mettle along with personal traits of being lawyer was put to test. Out of 5, I succeed in three but lost in two but all 5 cases, I consider as most challenging and which left long lasting affect in my career journey. These cases gave me learning for lifetime and helped me to meta morph into a seasoned lawyer. It is difficult to describe the entire experience in this short interview but in hint, I can say that one matter was an arbitration matter against a big Corporate giant of this Country being represented through battery of senior designated lawyers. But as luck could have it, my grit and determination finally prevailed and the Tribunal went by merit and not by the stature of either the Corporate House or the Sr. Counsel. Another matter was a matter against a Head of top Government Institution, who had entangled a female employee in her service matters ostensibly, whereas in reality it was a criminal matter having contour of POSH and other criminal element. This Officer was being defended by a Sr. Counsel, who was from a family of Judiciary and exuded aura and confidence. Though, we had initial success, however his aura prevailed in later part. Finally our persistence paid and fortunately after 4.5 years this person was booked by CBI and taken into custody but not before we had filed several cases before several forums in 3-4 years unshakingly, unperturbed and undeterred by initial setbacks. The third one relates to a case before CCI & COMPAT, which gave me my entry into corporate litigation and again this was example of purely Out of Box thinking, wherein, we took advantage of legal technical loopholes to save 18.5 crores of rupees and to buy time to properly strategise our bankruptcy filling before NCLT, Kolkata. These instances lead me to believe in the famous saying- ‘ A lawyer never looses- either He Wins or He Learns ! ‘
How do you approach the unique challenges presented by different clients and Industries?
The first and foremost thing, which I do, is to understand and identify the core issue/dispute involved in the given case and the mindset of client and his desired goal. Thereafter, I make a fresh & unorthodox approach towards finding all the possible legal remedies available for the client and devise strategies with precision taking holistic view of the matter to suit specific requirement of the client but at the same time ensuring that each step involving the dispute resolution is in sync with the legal requirements. Most of the time it requires – ‘Out of Box thinking’ and Risk taking. At times, it involves working beyond clock hours and travelling to different cities and interacting with people from different walk of life. To have a clear and succinct understanding of an event or case, I meticulously study each transactions or step involved till arising of the dispute and thereafter take a practical overview of working of that Industry or Office to get nuances and peep into intention of the person or parties behind such transaction or dispute. Once I am clear on this, I devise a multi- pronged strategy to tackle the issue effectively and efficiently. In accordance to the strategy, the steps are legally executed to get the intended result. So far it has given me success@85-90%. I do not believe in misleading a client or over stating before a client and therefore adopt a pragmatic approach towards the dispute resolution. I am a firm believer of settling dispute through ADR mechanism especially in commercial disputes and that also makes a client to trust my bonafide. In order to understand financial jargons, nuances and technicalities with more clarity and in order to empower myself with a knowledge, wherein I could not only answer to the Court Room queries but also to Board Room queries, I did Executive Program in Business Finance ( (EPBF)from Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad.
Given your rich experience, what advice would you offer to fresh law graduates who are about to embark on their legal careers? Are there specific skills or mindsets you believe are crucial for success in the legal profession?
Rather than advising, I shall prefer to share my experience which itself comprises of experiences of several associates of mine. Here, I would like to mention three things that I have learnt in the process. Firstly, during the initial phase of your career, give most of your time in learning the methodology of doing things, like how are the things being done. Understand the ecosystem in which we work. Learn and understand what is the ecosystem of the District Courts, the High Court, the Tribunal and the Supreme Court. Nobody can learn that ecosystem in such a short span of time therefore you need to have patience and perseverance and an undying attitude for exploring and learning. You need to understand what is registry, what is court master, what is cause list, what is the interplay of various officers in the court, what is the roster, how is filing done in registry, what is the defect curing technique, what is criteria for listing and how are matters listed and more. People think that every day when a case is listed, it is listed for the argument. No, it is not true. On a given day, a matter may be listed only for limited purpose of notice or for limited purpose of arguments or for a limited purpose of compliance. Therefore, we need to understand as to what is required for us to learn during formative years and than learn them effectively.
Secondly, as a law student or young lawyer, you should try to learn things other than the law itself. You need to read and understand polity, history, sociology, economics and finance but not in theoretical sense but the news part or the part of it actively influencing day to day life. You need to read news, you need to read technology. You need to read several other things more than the core law during these formative years.
Thirdly, as a law professional, your connections and relations with people from several walks of life help you in securing cases and to effectively tackle it. Thus you need to forge and curate your relationships and connections with outmost sincerity and caution during these formative years. Even today, I seek guidance and help from my seniors and my cordial relations with them have helped me a lot in advancement of my career.
In crux, I intend to say that litigation is not just about researching or presenting arguments before the Courts. There is some basic homework which as lawyer you do before arguing your case or presenting your case in the Court on a given date. Now those requisite skills cannot be learnt in the law school but only during your exposure with the Court Eco-system. Moot courts can definitely hone your researching and arguing skills but devoted internships and association as Junior Advocate with right mentor/ senior associate and your personal capacity to grasp things by observing and studying can help you take large strides. Mastering your drafting skills, client handling skills, communication skills and system management, makes you a wholesome lawyer. We, as established advocates always look up for competent juniors with good skills and traits. Learning law in the law school and its application in the real life court scenario with efficiency and effectiveness can help you become excellent litigation advocates of tomorrow. Learning the process and procedure is the key.
Devotion, perseverance and consistency along with right approach will make one sail through it. Ultimately, it is one’s own hard work and patience that pays. Keep on learning each day. Even as an established advocate, I still thrive to learn each day.
Sir, can you share with our listeners how your journey into the field of law began? What inspired you to pursue a career in law, and how did your early experiences shape your decision to become an Advocate on Record?
When I completed my law in the year 2023 I had decided to pursue my career as a lawyer so initially I started my practice from the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad high court in 2003 till 2006. After that in July 2005 I joined the chambers of senior Advocate late Shri R K Jain. To start your career in the field of law one has to have a good senior who acts as a mentor. Learning law is also similar to learning about life. If one has to practice in the Supreme Court, a lot of dedication is required.
Having completed your B.A LL.B (Hons.) from Aligarh Muslim University, could you highlight any specific aspects of your education that you believe significantly contributed to your success as an advocate? What motivated you to enroll in the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh?
In order to practice law a student has to work on certain subjects such as IPC CPC CrPC, Evidence Act etc but most importantly one has to thoroughly read a newspaper. The law page is the most important. The availability of a large number of cases and overload on judiciary motivated me to enroll in the Bar Council.
You started your practice as an advocate in the High Court of Delhi and the Supreme Court of India. Can you share some memorable experiences from your early years, including the types of cases you handled and any significant challenges you faced?
To practice in Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court one has to be punctual and secondly good command over English language. As per my experience, judges in the Delhi High Court are very cooperative, and empathetic towards young lawyers who are at the learning stage. I have a lot of experience in civil cases because of the interest. The challenges include adapting with the new age technology and striving for perfection with each amendment.
Your profile mentions handling matters in various domains, such as criminal, service, civil, and constitutional law. How did you navigate the diverse legal landscape, and were there specific cases or areas that you found particularly intriguing or challenging?
It is never easy to choose a particular field. In my case, I was fortunate enough to gain experience in diverse types of laws and ultimately, I understood that all of them are equally important. As far as the challenges are concerned, civil law as well as criminal law pose a lot of challenges in college years.
You’ve worked with notable legal figures such as Late Mr. R.K. Jain and Mr. P.C. Hota, as well as with organizations like the Yash Birla Group and Karims Mughlai Foods. How did these collaborations influence your professional growth, and what lessons did you learn from working with such experienced individuals and entities?
All of them have had a great impact on my overall development. Professional growth is a slow and steady process, and it would be wrong to give all the credit to just one organisation. We keep learning through the way. The only lesson that keeps me going is that nothing in life comes easy, irrespective of the field of law chosen.
Your work experience includes associations with companies like Lemon Entertainment Ltd. and Shambhu Technology Services P. Ltd. Could you share insights into how your legal expertise was applied in the corporate context, and what unique challenges did you encounter in these roles?
Corporate law offers a plethora of opportunities. When I started practicing, it was never a goal to become a corporate lawyer. Based on the opportunity, I learned a lot about Contracts and other aspects of corporate law. As such, there have been no unique challenges but deep learning all the while. I then apply the learning in upcoming cases to solve them in a more comprehensive manner.
You’ve appeared in various tribunals, including the Central Administrative Tribunal and National Green Tribunal. How does advocacy in these forums differ from traditional court settings, and what skills do you consider crucial for success in specialized tribunals?
Contrary to popular opinion, the nature of work remains the same. It is just that the tribunals have a more streamlined process and the cases are disposed of quite expeditiously. Critical thinking skills will help in the long run, for people who wish to pursue a career on this path.
Drawing from your experiences and achievements, what advice would you give to law graduates who are just starting their careers? Are there particular principles or strategies that you believe are essential for success in the legal profession?
Everyone has their own fields of interest. My only advice would be to give your 200% in everything, even in petty cases. It will shape you as a lawyer and definitely make you a better thinker. There are no particular principles, since law is not just a subject but a way of life. All law graduates should try to imbibe everything they hear about the latest laws, for a successful career in any aspect.
Can you share the story of how you chose to pursue a career in law and specifically how you ended up becoming an Advocate on Record at the Supreme Court of India?
I was always fascinated with law and the working of courts. My father being a member of Rajasthan Higher Judicial Services also naturally fuelled my inclination towards law. However, as it is with most people, it was not my first choice. I was preparing for engineering entrances and even scored well in some of them. But when I got through in CLAT, I wholeheartedly chose to join National Law University, Patiala, Punjab where I spent the most important five years of my life.
During my third year, I was fortunate to intern with Ms. Shobha, a distinguished Advocate on Record at the Supreme Court. This particular internship completely changed my perspective and helped me develop a keen interest in the practice of law, especially, at the Supreme Court. By the time I finished college I couldn’t wait to get my bar license and come to Delhi.
I immediately joined the offices of Ms. Aishwarya Bhati in 2014. I was fortunate enough to get invaluable opportunities to work on important legal matters, appear with and assist Seniors in the Supreme Court. Subsequently, I transitioned to the Delhi High Court where I learnt the ropes of original side work under the mentorship of Ms. Mrinalini Sen. The comprehensive exposure to various judicial fora, including district courts and tribunals, during my juniorship, significantly enriched my professional acumen.
With the blessings of my mentors and a couple of briefs in my repertoire, I went into independent practice in 2017 and set up my own office. As soon I became eligible to write the AOR examination, I diligently started preparing for it. However, on account of Covid-19 pandemic, AOR exams were rescheduled twice and came to be scheduled in December. It was extremely challenging to prepare and sit for the exams while also maintaining a running practice. However, all the hard work paid off and I was able to fulfil the dream I had since my third year of college.
With over nine years of experience in handling multifarious litigation, could you highlight a pivotal moment or case that significantly shaped your career as an advocate?
I was fortunate to receive a number of opportunities wherein my seniors and mentors gave me a lot of freedom to independently draft, file and argue matters. The trust reposed by my mentors helped me develop the confidence to venture out on my own. I started taking on independent briefs from the beginning of my practice and achieved several wins, but one matter which will be close to my heart was a pro bono matrimonial matter for maintenance under Section 125CrPC. My client had been suffering from cancer but was extremely diligent in providing inputs and following up with her case. It was one of the first matters I did as an independent counsel where I conducted the entire trial by myself and eventually was able to get maintenance not only for her but even her major but dependent son.
Recently I was able to secure notice in a pension matter of a retired government officer from the Supreme Court. Another pivotal moment has been very recent wherein I was able to secure quashing of criminal proceedings as well as divorce under Article 142 from the Supreme Court for my client.
Your practice spans across various forums, including the High Court of Delhi and the Supreme Court of India. How do you navigate the unique challenges posed by different legal environments and what strategies do you employ to ensure success across these diverse platforms?
Throughout my extensive legal practice across various courts in Delhi, I’ve come to realize that while the fundamental values of the judicial system and an Advocate’s preparation remain constant, the strategies employed must adapt to the distinct practices and procedures of each court. For instance, when dealing with the Supreme Court in a Special Leave Petition under Article 136, the focus lies in crafting a precise synopsis that highlights relevant legal points due to the limited scope. Miscellaneous days demand a quick-witted approach, as benches pose pointed questions, necessitating a thorough understanding of the case. Conversely, in Writ Petitions, where more time is allotted for arguments, a different presentation strategy is required. In trial courts, adherence to statutory timelines, rules of evidence, cross-examination, and knowing the procedural law thoroughly is imperative. My diverse experience has enabled me to tailor strategies on a case-by-case basis, involving clients in the decision-making process. Recognizing the importance of client inputs, particularly in matters of equity, underscores the necessity for effective communication. Staying updated with relevant cases, understanding the court dynamics, and maintaining a positive mindset are integral to my approach.
Given your specialization in Commercial Litigation, Debt Recovery, and Litigation Management, can you elaborate on your approach to handling complex cases involving corporates and companies, especially with a focus on debt recovery?
In handling complex cases involving corporates and companies, particularly with a focus on debt recovery, my approach centres on meticulous case analysis, client consultations to align legal strategies with business objectives and strategic planning tailored to each case’s unique aspects. I prioritize alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms to expedite resolutions and maintain effective client communication. Staying abreast of industry regulations and providing timely and relevant inputs to devise precise legal strategy is also key. Ultimately, my goal is to secure favourable outcomes for clients while upholding the highest standards of professionalism.
You mentioned taking up pro-bono cases and providing legal consultation to those in need. How do you balance your commercial practice with pro-bono work, and what drives your commitment to providing legal assistance to those who may not afford it?
Managing the balance involves meticulous time management and a strategic approach to workload allocation. I prioritize pro-bono cases that align with my expertise and can make a significant difference in someone’s life. While commercial cases may demand substantial attention, I allocate dedicated time and resources to pro-bono work, treating it with the same level of professionalism and commitment.
As an aspiring speaker and mentor, you’ve presented at webinars attended by law students and legal professionals. What topics do you find most important to discuss with aspiring lawyers, and what advice do you typically offer to those entering the legal profession?
I implore young professionals who are keen to learn the ropes to first conquer good drafting skills, which is the most important aspect of litigation which sets you apart from the competition. Sadly, university education hardly focuses on practical aspects of drafting. Second most important would be to maintain strong work and legal ethics without which it is difficult to build credibility with clients as well as mentors. Third would be to remain reasonably updated about the working of practice and procedure of different courts which builds confidence and independent thinking; and lastly to make lots of friends, develop strong relationships and have fun while you are at it.
Expanding your practice to the Rajasthan High Court at Jaipur indicates a dynamic multi-state approach. Could you share the challenges and opportunities you anticipate in creating and sustaining a multi-state practice?
I have had the opportunity to appear before the courts at Rajasthan and collaborate with like-minded advocates which inspired me to expand my practice across jurisdictions. While there are inherent challenges, including adapting to divergent legal procedures, different client needs and logistical challenges, however, this expansion also brings forth significant opportunities for growth and networking. During the past years I have developed strong professional relationships which will help me overcome these challenges significantly. Additionally, key to growing any practice is meticulous planning and organizational efficiency. I am sure it would be an amazing opportunity for personal and professional advancement.
Lastly, drawing on your extensive experience, what advice would you give to fresh law graduates aspiring to build successful careers in law, especially considering the evolving landscape of legal practice in India?
Every person who enters practice understands litigation differently based on their personal experiences, ambitions and capabilities. Strong work ethic and continuous learning are the basics, while, the more you work on upgrading your knowledge and skill, the more it will help you flourish.
However, it is indeed a very tough profession, a very long and arduous journey. I learnt really late that one should prioritize their mental and physical health to be able to survive and thrive in this profession. Fresh law graduates should learn to manage stress in positive ways and must aim for personal growth besides just professional growth.
As far as the ever evolving legal landscape is concerned, young professionals have wonderful knowledge management resources in the form of legal news portals and online workshops. Moreover, virtual courts, live streaming of constitution bench matters and open access to supreme court judgments are some of the recent welcome steps which can ensure easy access to learning. Fresh law graduates should not feel overwhelmed by the constant information overload by making reading and writing on legal issues a part of their daily or weekly schedule.
Please tell us a bit about your upbringing and what motivated you to study law?
I was born to a doctor couple in Ranchi. I have an elder brother who is also a doctor. I finished pre-school from St. Mary’s Nursery School and enrolled at DPS Ranchi where I studied until I finished 12th grade. Ranchi used to be a small quiet town. We didn’t have much exposure and the career options were limited to medical or engineering.
I had seen my parents at their workplaces but was somehow not attracted to their profession. I wanted to understand how the society and our legal system functions. There was a natural inclination to move from the study of sciences to social sciences (This is not to say that I didn’t enjoy science, I did quite well in my 12th board as a Biology student and I miss organic chemistry a lot!). I remember chancing upon the question paper for the first CLAT and finding the questions very interesting. I thought that this was something that would be fun to study. My parents were not keen with the decision at first. But I owe it to my school teachers who played a very important role in convincing them. They eventually came around.
How was your law school journey? We see that you’ve done a fair bit of extra-curricular activities as a member and head of the Music Club at GNLU. You’ve also been part of the organising committee for the GNLU International Moot Court Competition (“GIMC”) and the GNLU Moot on Securities and Investment Law (“GMSIL”). Tell us a bit about these. Are co-curricular and extra-curricular roles important for a law student?
I think 5 year is a really long time if you have to just study law, so it is very important that you keep your interest going with other things. I have always loved playing music. I have even trained in Hindustani Classical. GNLU had a bunch of extremely talented musicians who formed the music club (a tradition that I’m glad to know has continued). Something very special and beautiful happens when a bunch of strangers with very varied backgrounds and interests in music come together to create music. I forged some excellent friendships through the music club, and I did it mostly for myself. It helped survive the grey walls.
The Organising Committee roles started because I wanted to be among the “cool kids” on campus during GIMC. But over a period of time, it taught me responsibility and very strong organisational skills. The Organising Committee itself is divided into sub-teams for logistics, sponsorship, PR and hospitality, which have their respective team heads or coordinators. Organising a moot which witnesses such wide participation from teams and judges is a crash course in event management. By our 5th year, some of us who were part of the GIMC-OC founded GMSIL because to bridge the need for a moot exclusively for securities and investment law. Our moot court coordinator, Dr. Girish R. liked the proposal and took the idea forward. The University administration was extremely cooperative and helpful, and we had another moot to organise!
Co-curriculars are definitely important for an all-round development, and somewhat even necessary given today’s competitive environment. I am not sure if extracurriculars help directly. Being involved with the organising committee of a moot court competition may not help you with job applications. But they do form good conversation starters. As an OC member, whether you like it or not, you will know something or the other about the moot problem, and learn a lot simply by hearing the oral arguments. Some of the younger judges who come might also help in mentoring and guiding.
Winning the Best Speaker at the 3rd All India Corporate Law Moot Court Competition and receiving an Honourable Mention at the 23rd Willem C. Vis International Commercial Arbitration Moot in Vienna are impressive achievements. Could you share some insights into these experiences and their impact on your career?
It is incorrect to equate good speaking skills in a moot with a good career in litigation or even law, generally. Moot problems help you think. They come closest to making a student apply the law, think on your feet, and experiment with legal arguments. I picked up a lot on coherent, crisp, and succinct drafting when I was doing Vis (all credits to my team – Muskan, Shweta and Catherine, and to our team coach – Zehaan). Drafting is a very underrated skill. It is extremely important to be able to convey legal arguments in simple words and in a structured manner to have maximum impact on the reader.
As far as oral argumentation goes, the preparation for Vis was very different compared to AICLM. With AICLM our focus was very much on the law and clarity of thought and expression. Since it was a national moot we expected the judges to ask questions and preparation was done accordingly. Vis was trickier. We had prepare for arguments before judges from different jurisdictions who were used to hearing very different accents and dialects. I remember hitting rock bottom at one point in my preparation for the oral rounds, because I felt that I wasn’t getting better. Things got better once I identified that I cannot go by a scripted speech. In that sense, moot court competitions helped me discover an individual style of argumentation.
Most moot court competitions are based on a new and upcoming legal issue. They’re a great way to keep on your toes about legal developments and interesting areas of law. My main reason for participating moots was because they were a great learning experience.
You secured a pre-placement offer with Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas in your 3rd year at GNLU. What would be your placement advice to students?
Honestly, I had not given much thought to placements back then. Our University had an excellent placement and internship committee which worked towards ensuring that students had internships and placements. I can’t speak of the standard procedures today but back then, a PPO was the culmination of repeat internships at any office. I had performed fairly well at my internships with the erstwhile AMSS. I was amongst the top rankers in my batch and had a well-rounded CV. Those factors did play a very large role in securing the PPO.
A strong resume is imperative for higher chances at a placement with any top-tier firm. But that does not necessarily mean an “academically good” resume. I can’t generalise but I think when firms come for placements, they are looking not just for talent, but also for a candidate that fits well with the larger work culture and ethos of the firm. Not everyone is a good fit for every firm.
How was your experience of working at CAM, Delhi. Did it seem daunting at first? What tips would you give to fresh joinees at a law firm?
It was quite daunting in the beginning. It was the first time that I was living in Delhi by myself. But I shared a home with some of my college seniors who took out the time and energy to guide me. There was a fair bit of inhibition and self-doubt. What helped was to have seniors around who could guide, and I was quite fortunate that way. It is important for everyone to understand that there is a bit of a jump from being an intern to being an Associate at a law firm. Nobody is inherently good at law. Good lawyers are a by-product of good training.
I don’t have many tips for fresh joinees. Each team and each firm has a different style of working and requires a different skill set. Diligence, honesty, sincerity, humility, patience and a willingness to learn are just the starting points. It’s essential to look after one’s health – we often ignore that when we’re starting out.
What were your reasons for leaving a Tier-1 law firm and joining litigation? What advice would you give to students who want to join litigation?
I wanted to be in and out of court more regularly and practice a wider range of law. I had great exposure at CAM, but the learning curve had started to plateau. I didn’t want to get too comfortable with the money and decided to move out young after finishing 2 years at CAM. That decision worked out really well for me because I had learnt my basics and was able to get up to speed on matters very easily.
The usual advice on patience and perseverance in litigation is quite common so I won’t repeat that. I have two pieces of advice for students. First, the horse is as good as the stable (as said by Fali Nariman in his autobiography). Find an office or a chamber which will really help you blossom into the best version of you.
Second, figure out your “why” of continuing with litigation. Law in general is a demanding and challenging profession, if you want to go about it the right way. It looks very different from the outside than it is on the inside. So, you really need to have a pretty strong reason to be a litigating lawyer – it can be anything, whatever keeps you going. For me, it was not the money, or the adrenaline rush of being in court, or the glamour of being a senior advocate. At the risk of sounding nerdy and naïve, I have continued with this purely because I like reading briefs, I love reading law, I like applying my mind to the case and to the law, and I like drafting. The practice of law brings me peace and satisfaction.
Please tell us more about working at a Chamber in Delhi. How is it different from working in the litigation team at a law firm?
I joined the chambers of senior advocates after my stint at CAM. With a senior’s office you don’t draft so much but you are handling a larger number of matters on a given day. The drafting is already done by the firms and advocates who come to brief the senior. The input expected from a junior is to be thorough with the briefs they’re marked on, prepare notes for arguments and be quick on the uptake and legal research. All this happens post 3-4 PM when you are back in office from court. In court, a big part of your job is to keep tabs on what matters are reaching, avoid a clash to the extent possible and ensure that your senior appears in them. This last part is very important because all preparation goes to waste if your senior does not appear and the matter gets adjourned.
Why did you decide to qualify as an Advocate on Record? Can you share some insights into the process of qualifying as an Advocate on Record and its impact on your career?
The decision to qualify as an AOR was influenced due to the chambers that I had worked or interned at. I had interned with HMJ (Retd.) Indu Malhotra (before her elevation), who had been an AOR before being designated as a senior advocate, another internship with ADP Chambers where Mr. Debesh Panda is an AOR. I was already enamoured by the prospect of being an AOR because I witnessed first-hand the kind of responsibility it came with and the skills that it required. Post CAM, I joined the chambers of Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Senior Advocate who used to be an AOR too. I then joined Mr. Jayant Mehta who was an AOR when I joined him but got designated as a senior during my tenure at his chamber. Both my seniors are not only great lawyers but have been excellent draftspersons. I wanted to emulate that and hence, taking the AOR exam was another step in that direction. I also enjoy Supreme Court practice a lot and hope to build my practice as an AOR office.
The impact of becoming an AOR is yet to be seen as I have only recently started my independent office. The process of qualifying is pretty straightforward and the details are available on the Supreme Court website itself. The exam comprises 4 papers – Practice and Procedure, Drafting, Advocacy and Professional Ethics, and Leading Cases.
Your publication record is quite extensive, covering topics from arbitration to competition law. How has academic research and writing contributed to your growth as a legal professional, and do you see a synergy between your academic pursuits and your practical work? Please tell us a bit about your research papers such as, the one on the overlap of insolvency and arbitration laws in India and its implications? How do you decide to write on a particular topic?
Despite several earnest attempts, I have not been able to keep up with a regular habit of writing. It is not mandatory to be engaged with academics and scholarly writing once you are a professional. Whatever little that I have published was purely because I have academic leanings and I enjoy writing on legal topics. I want to be a lawyer who is very actively involved in academia, and I have unrealistic ambitions of being able to author a commentary (someday, who knows?).
The more you read and keep updated, the easier it is to zero in on a topic. Being legally aware and updated automatically leads to a churning and overflow of ideas which often seek release in the form of an article. I also took my research projects in University seriously and chose topics which either piqued my interest or left room for creative scholarly work.
Why did you decide to read for a masters at the University of Cambridge after working for a couple of years. Is post-qualification experience important to secure an admission? What advice would you give to students who want to pursue an LL.M. abroad?
A masters’ degree wasn’t on my agenda when I finished my undergraduate. It was only during practice that I got the opportunity to dabble with very different areas of law. I’m truly grateful to my seniors’ chambers for that opportunity and for planting in me a genuine and deep interest in certain areas of law. I wanted to study these civil and commercial laws in depth and spend time in not just understanding how these laws work, but how they should work, and why.
The importance of work experience depends on the University and the programme that you choose. There is really no one-size-fits-all approach. As far as Cambridge goes, they have a very inclusive selection process and work experience is not a pre-requisite to secure an admission.
Like litigation, figure out your reasons for doing your masters, and tailor your CV accordingly. A masters from a reputed University does increase your chances of getting hired with an international law firm but it is not a ticket to that job. There are people who have moved to international law firms without a masters too! It is best to do a masters right after law school if you know that you want to get into academia. But it is certainly not a necessity if you want to continue practicing law.
How has the LL.M. helped in your career? How did you decide on your LL.M. subjects (International Commercial Litigation, Intellectual Property, Information Law and Advanced Private Law)?
As mentioned earlier, I chose these subjects because I was already familiar and interested in them through my work experience. I didn’t pursue my masters for any immediate or direct advantages to my career as far as employability is concerned. It did tremendously expand my knowledge, understanding and overall ability to think about the legal issues relating to my masters subjects. Since I continue to deal with these practice areas, they do contribute towards my outlook to briefs and my engagement with these laws on a regular basis.
Tell us a bit about your time at Cambridge – curricular and extra-curricular activities, both. What would a typical day look like for you? How challenging was it to deal with the reading lists and the academic work?
Cambridge is a very peaceful and engaging place, almost a respite from the busy hustle bustle of my life in litigation. The whole city is full of students and the culture is such that it fosters academic growth. Every attempt is made by the colleges to help focus by taking care of all other pastoral needs. This is done, perhaps, to ensure that students are able to cope up with the humongous amounts of readings. In the LL.M. course it is not enough to know the law. The professors’ expect that you have thought deeply about your subjects and have reasoned with it well. They are more interested in hearing your original ideas.
During term time, apart from attending class, I used to spend most of my time at my college library or at the reading room trying to cover up just the basic readings for my classes. It was impossible to finish the reading lists during term, so a majority of the break between terms was also spent in finishing the pending readings. For someone who has a genuine interest in their subjects and wants to be thorough, the entirety of the course duration can get used up in just finishing the readings. But the readings were divided into essential and optional to make things easier for students.
It wasn’t all work though. I helped organise the Cambridge Arbitration Days – 2022 at the Faculty of Law. This was one of the first arbitration events that was being held in person post COVID. We had some of the best barrister chambers and solicitor firms come down for the sessions. I met some of the best legal minds here.
I was a member of Darwin College at Cambridge which is right by the Cam River. Matter of fact, the backyard of my house opened into the college gardens which were adjacent to the river. Darwin has a special place in my heart – I made friends from all over the world and across disciplines. You could just be sitting and having a cup of coffee in the café and strike a very thoughtful and enriching conversation with a complete stranger who will most certainly have a thing or two to teach you.
I founded the Law Society at Darwin. I was very active with the swimming club. I would almost never miss our Saturday swims followed by brunch at the college. I did a fair bit of punting and kayaking. I signed up to become a punt captain at my college and by the end of my course I had become an expert at giving people punt rides along the river. I even did a night punting trip! Darwin has the best (and the most affordable) bar in Cambridge and is run entirely by students. I used to bartend once a week and earn some side money. I played a lot of cricket and football. I think I made the most of my time there, but that is how the environment is like at Cambridge. It ensures that you maximize your involvement with everything. This can also lead one astray. So it is important to not lose track of your priorities.
In addition to your litigation work, you have advised on various aspects of data protection laws and have drafted privacy policies. How do you stay updated on evolving legal landscapes, especially in areas like data protection, and what advice would you give to legal professionals on staying current in today’s dynamic legal environment?
I think it is easier to stay updated in today’s legal environment because important cases and developments get reported immediately. I think LiveLaw and Bar&Bench do a pretty good coverage of domestic legal developments. I have also been in the habit of reading international developments by customising my Feedly since I was in law school. There must be newer ways of staying updated now, would appreciate receiving tips on that myself.
A question that is often repeated- How difficult is it to be a first generation lawyer in the litigation circle?
It is difficult for sure, especially if you are not from Delhi, like me. But then again, it is not impossible either. The starting point differs if you are from a family of lawyers and you certainly have an edge over others. Even if you discount legacy, lineage makes things easier purely in terms of rent, expenses, office space, library and resources. But, I’m hopeful that in the longer run everyone does end up finding their ground. I can’t say for other cities but the Bar in Delhi is relatively more welcoming to outsiders. One of my law professors used to say in GNLU – Everyone will end up reaching the same place. If someone has an airplane, let them use that. You take the bus if that’s what you can afford.
I must also count my blessings and check my privilege. I managed to work with some of the best chambers even though I didn’t have any connections to secure an entry for me. Hard work does get recognition across the board. My seniors, and the people I have worked and interned with have always been exceptionally kind to me. I have been able to keep litigation because my parents are not dependent on me and I have no liabilities. I have a spouse and in-laws who have been exceptionally supportive. It wouldn’t have been possible for me to transition to independent practice without their backing. I can imagine the trajectory being far more difficult for someone else.
It is also important to understand that setting up an independent practice is not the only way that one can be a litigating lawyer. People are doing exceptional work at chambers and in law firms, be it small, mid-tier or big law firms. Being part of a team is less stressful than running your own establishment. It also gives more flexibility, allows room for experimenting with varied work, and ability to handle heavy briefs.
As a woman at the Bar, do you face any particular challenges and how do you deal with them? What changes would you suggest for a more inclusive and diverse Bar? What future opportunities and challenges do you foresee?
Women face more challenges in every field (personal or professional) and litigation is no different. A comparison of the number of men and women senior advocates and judges is self-explanatory. But I must point out that a career in litigation has a lot of longevity. There is always scope for coming back after a break, albeit, with initial struggles and difficulties. Since there is no linear career progression, it leaves room to carve a distinct path which may be very different from one’s contemporaries.
There are definitely a larger number of women at the bar today. With passage of time, courts have become more inclusive and accommodative spaces. There are also a large number of women who are re-joining the field once their children have grown up and they don’t need to be caregivers. I’m grateful for the Bar here which has an amazing set of women who have always been very encouraging and supportive. We have a long way to go but I’m hopeful about the future. We are the products of the hard work of all women who came before us and made our lives easier, and I hope that we’ll continue making things better for the future.
Lastly, if you were to provide advice to recent law graduates entering the field today, what key pieces of wisdom or lessons learned would you share with them as they embark on their own legal journeys?
“Own legal journeys” is the operative part here. The legal profession is very wide, diverse and rich. Each person has their fair share of struggles, blessings and rewards. There really isn’t a template to follow. Feel free to experiment, but do a good job with whatever you choose to experiment with. Another piece of advice is to have hobbies outside of law. The profession (and life in general) is far too long to live without poetry, music, sports, food, art and culture.
Can you please share your journey from obtaining a B.A., LL.B (Hons.) degree at National Law University, Delhi, to becoming an Advocate-on-record at the Supreme Court of India? What motivated you to pursue a career in law?
There were no lawyers in my immediate family, in fact I grew up in the beautiful city of Bhopal which despite being the capital doesn’t even have a High Court. I took mathematics and science and it was only in my senior secondary year that law as a profession attracted me. It was my English teacher who saw my potential in law and suggested that I take it up as a profession. At that time little did I know that it would change my perspective towards society completely and give my life a deeper meaning and purpose.
I loved every bit of my time at National Law University, Delhi, it ignited a sincere passion towards law and people here were smart in so many different ways and fields. At NLU, Delhi, I was busy doing assignments, research work, internships, Moot Courts, Mediation & publishing articles. I had no clue that 5 years went by so quickly. I enjoyed mooting, I guess it came naturally to me, it gave my exposure at international level at Jakarta (Indonesia), Malaysia and Cape Town (South Africa). I was part of the Moot Court Organizing Committee and also Convener of the Student Welfare Committee at NLU, Delhi. When I graduated with a degree in law I was selected in western universities with partial scholarship & fee waiver and also at Indian Law Institute, Delhi for LLM (1 year program) but I chose to start practicing law and learn in the chamber and before the Courts.
Becoming an Advocate-on-Record was a necessity for me being a first generation advocate practicing at the Supreme Court. It was with God’s grace and years of chamber practice that I was able to attain this milestone in my very first attempt despite the challenges that came along with the way. When I cleared the AOR exam, Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic was already here and that gave me an opportunity to pursue a master’s degree in law. I did my LLM in constitutional law and administrative law during that period. It motivates me that as advocates not only we contribute in the justice delivery system but also keep the faith of the masses in our wonderful system & constitution, despite the challenges, flaws and adversities.
You’ve had a diverse range of experiences in different legal chambers and roles. How didthese experiences shape your understanding of the legal profession, and what valuablelessons did you learn during this time?
In my final year of law school while interning at the office of Sr. Adv. Sidharth Luthra I realized that litigation at the Supreme Court of India is my calling. After enrolling as an advocate I joined the chamber of Sr. Adv. Rebecca M. John where I got an opportunity to work on leading criminal cases including cases involving heinous crimes, CBI trials, trap & disproportionate asset cases and many more. This gave me hands-on experience of addressing the court & arguing, drafting and filing, observing examination in chief & conducting cross-examinations and also further enhanced my court craft. After a year, I joined the Chambers of Sr. Adv. Gopal Subramanium, where I assisted him in variety of matters before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India & other High Courts. Sir, dealt with various issues such as constitutional matters, writs, challenging varies of Acts, election petitions, criminal appeals, opinion on Delhi as State or Union territory, tender and mining cases, intellectual property matters & so on.
During this time as a chamber junior I learnt a lot about the legal profession, most importantly how to approach any case, how to extract facts and not only to simplify the most difficult situations/ facts/ documents but also to present it in a manner which is easy and effective to understand. Understanding of law is only one part of practice of law, its application on given facts as they come from the lower court, after various testimonies of witnesses and their cross examinations is not the same thing. It is only when you apply yourself to the given factual matrix and understanding of law, that you can unravel the truth and get justice for your client(s). Above all, never compromise with your professional ethics and morals. Give yourself a little grace, don’t have unrealistic expectations or look for magic to happen overnight, give it time. It takes years and its own time so just be honest, humble and diligent with your work and don’t lose patience or hope.
Could you tell us more about your interest in these specialized areas of criminal law,original suits before the Supreme Court of India (Suits between states) & river waterdisputes and how they have influenced your legal practice?
Criminal jurisprudence and penal law always fascinated me, perhaps it was the small town factor along with the media reporting where news reports covered major financial & heinous crimes regularly. They also covered interesting arguments of the lawyers appearing in those cases and opinions on its impact in general. Every student of law knows that bail is the rule and jail is an exception. There are so many cases where courts have emphasized bail should be granted, even recently by order dated 30.07.2023 in MD. Asfak Alam v. the state of Jharkhand & Anr. The Hon’ble Supreme Court reiterated the directions issued earlier and as well as other directions to emphasize unnecessary arrest should not be made & bail should be granted especially in cases where punishment is less than seven years. Thus given the grim situation we have there is so much one can contribute in the field of criminal law & more importantly I feel fortunate that I can actually help people get justice and live a life outside prison.
It is very important to resolve disputes that arise between states/ union & states for the integrity of our country. It is not only the government which is at stake here but also lives, peace and prosperity. When the suit is between two states which are equally independent and part of the same constitutional framework, the suit is instituted at the Supreme Court of India which has to find a solution and pass a decree. Similarly a life & prosperity depends on the river water availability and this gives rise to disputes where the upper riparian doesn’t provide the water to the lower riparian state. Such disputes are heard before the River Water Disputes Tribunal and where the claims of the states are heard and their shares are determined. They also lead to Original Suits for enforcement of agreements, power distribution, for seeking mandatory injunctions and for control & administration between the States &/ or Union. Both these areas have significantly influenced my practice as on one hand there are criminal cases and suffering of the individuals waiting for justice and to come out of prison and on the other hand issues that will affect millions of people in different states.
As a practicing lawyer, you’ve represented clients in various matters before the SupremeCourt of India and other high courts. Could you share a memorable or challengingexperience that had a significant impact on you and your career?
Early in profession I was approached to file a bail application, where client was arrested for the offence of rape. This one stands out in particular because I was able to get the client out on bail in one day from the lower court itself. We were able to establish that this woman was not only married to someone else and seeking settlement from her present husband but in the last 2 years she had filed over 5 complaints in different police station against different individuals alleging rape on the ground of false promise of marriage. Eventually case was quashed by the Hon’ble High Court. While I was legal advisor at National Commission for Scheduled Tribes, I came across this case where a tribal women was raped and police was not even ready to take her complaint, much less the registration of an FIR. This case touched me because it made me realize that despite 75 years of independence our forces are still in colonial hangover, where the station head officer feels he is the king & his word in the law. There is no audience for the downtrodden in his police station. With commission intervention police became active, FIR was registered and investigation was done, commission also recommended stern action against the erring police officials. In another case, I have a decree in my clients favor passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court almost two decades ago but looking into the sensitivity of the matter and the geo-political implications, the Hon’ble Court was pleased to direct the central Government to play an active role to mediate the matter. This matter highlights the importance of mediation as all levels and parties should consider it not to complete the formality but put in real effort to resolve the dispute.
In your experience, what are the key skills and qualities that a successful lawyer shouldpossess, especially for those who aspire to practice at the highest levels, like the SupremeCourt?
Lawyer should be hard working and honest to begin with, he should be ready to put in the analytical abilities and also the hours required to complete the draft or prepare the arguments. He must be consistent and diligent, each and every case must be prepared very carefully, and detailed legal research should be carried out on the subject, not only he should go through the latest judgments but also how law has developed over the years on the concerned issue. Lawyer must have good analytical ability, he should be able to extract facts, information from the factual details & complex documents provided by the client, testimonies of the witnesses. Attention to detail is very important for any lawyer for instance any inconsistencies during the cross examination must be caught on the spot. Whether it’s the witness testimony or the inconsistency in the documents, attention to detail can save your day and present surprises in the middle of a hearing. Other important skills include, time management, keeping your documents organized (even on the electronic devices as a lawyer one must keep documents and files up to date & organized), legal writing skills as not only oral arguments but also petitions/ applications/ written submissions have to be simple to understand and yet very persuasive and lastly interpersonal skills as lawyers have to interact with clients and other professionals on regular basis.
You mentioned providing free legal advice to the underprivileged through a Legal Helpline.Can you share the importance of pro bono work in the legal profession, and how can younglawyers get involved in such initiatives?
It is very important that we give back to the society we live in. It is even more important for a lawyer to do so because we form part of this privileged and noble profession, where we understand not only the rights and duties but also the general state of affairs in the country. We can see when the law is wrong, when it will not stand in court of law and when it is being misused thus it is our responsibility to take action and help those who cannot afford to fight their own legal battles. Many times people are not even aware that legal aid is available in the courts and if someone tells them able the procedure of getting legal aid or where the office for legal services are situated, that in itself a huge help for them. A young lawyer may have difficulty taking up the case pro bono due to the financial incapacity and lack of experience but he can provide his opinion and also guide the person / fill the application for getting legal aid, which will enable the needy to get assistance and representation from the concerned legal services authority.
Finally, what advice would you give to recent law graduates who are just starting theirlegal careers? What lessons have you learned along the way that you believe would bevaluable for them as they embark on their own journeys in law?
Be patient and take your time to decide how you want to serve, look for your calling. Whether you want to litigate or be a judge, teach law and become a professor, join the civil services or a law firm or a corporate house. In litigation, first look for a mentor, a chamber where you will unlearn the bookish knowledge and learn the practice of law. It is under the able guidance of your senior that one honed their skills, collects the tools necessary for future cases. Be prepared to be a student of law for all your life, develop a habit of reading daily, not just law but also other subjects. Be through with the research and apply your mind, be analytical and work on your legal writing skills. In any chamber first way to prove your ability and to bind trust and credibility with your senior is through in depth research (not just reading of headnotes, but developing habit of reading the cases & commentaries cover to cover) and by legal writing skills reflected through the drafts. Don’t be scared of working long hours and working hard but at the same time manage your time wisely to ensure no clients suffer because of you. Lastly, enjoy the journey in law, you have a long way to go.
Please tell us about your family background, pre-law school life and your experience at Symbiosis Law School, Pune.
I was completely raised by my mother Smt. S. Mohanaranai, who is a Central Government employee and completed my secondary and senior schooling from Delhi Tamil Education Association (DTEA) School. Academically, I was an above-average student and took a keen interest in extra-curricular and co-curricular activities.
Symbiosis Law School, Pune is a confluence of culture, ideas and bright minds. It was then located in the heart of Pune surrounded by plenty of colleges, universities, religious institutions and other centres of excellence and this was surely a boon for any young student far away from home.
Thanks to God almighty, I made great friends and a really supportive peer group, due to which I was able to overcome my initial fears and excel in prestigious Moot Courts and other co-curricular activities including representing my law school at the Williem C. Vis International Commercial Arbitration Moot, Hong Kong.
I am also very blessed that my wife Ms. Harimohana N. too is an Advocate and we support each other in our law practice.
You were one of the initial Law Clerks of Justice Najmi Waziri, popularly known as the Green Judge of the Delhi High Court. Please tell us about your experience with him and your other seniors at Bar.
I was Justice Waziri’s third law clerk. Joining his prestigious chambers, right after law school, was purely a matter of chance and I am very fortunate to have been a part of it. Justice Waziri made a deep impact in my life with his thought process such as respect for law, women, nature and religious beliefs. He was very polite and courteous to everyone. To us Law Clerks, he gave us several opportunities to prepare draft judgments and research on complex legal problems, which laid a strong foundation for me as a lawyer. I was mentored further in the profession by Mr. TK Bhaskar, Mr. Sanjay Kapur and Mr. Shri Venkatesh, who gave me several opportunities to conduct and argue cases.
Please tell us about your law practice, practice areas and the clients whom you represent before Courts.
I founded my law firm VMK Law Offices in the year 2018 and we are located in South Delhi, in close proximity to the Supreme Court of India, High Court of Delhi and other major Tribunals. We have a fairly vast and diverse practice area such as commercial disputes, Energy Regulatory, Insolvency & Bankruptcy, Company, Arbitration, Property, White Collar Crimes, Telecom and Competition. We regularly appear before the Supreme Court, High Courts (Delhi, Madras, Calcutta, Gujarat, Chhattisgarh), APTEL, NCLAT, NCLT, Central / State Electricity Regulatory Commissions, TDSAT, Competition Commission, PMLA / FEMA Appellate Tribunal, District Courts and Arbitral Tribunals. I have represented Public Sector Banks and Undertakings, Statutory Authorities, Multinational Companies, Power Generators (Private and State Owned), Transmission Licensees and Utilities, Distribution Companies, EPC Contractors and Sports Federations.
Please tell us about a few important and challenging cases that you have handled as a lawyer.
To me, no case is less important or less challenging. All the cases that we do, be it before the highest Court or otherwise, are equally prioritised. However, a few of the reported judgments to my credit are below:
SBI Vs. Vibha Agro – (2023) 1 SCC 286
Lalit Kumar Jain Vs. UoI – (2021) 9 SCC 321
SBI Vs. Radhey Shyam Pandey (2020) 6 SCC 438
ARCIL Vs. Bishal Jaiswal – (2021) 6 SCC 366
SSIM Association Vs. UoI – (2021) 8 SCC 511
A. Nabibasha Vs. Small Farmers Agri Business Consortium – 2020 SCC OnLine Del 1250 : 2020 ACD 877 : (2020) 3 MWN (Cri) DCC 51 : (2020) 4 RCR (Cri) 575
SBI Vs. Athena Energy Ventures – 2020 SCC Online NCLAT 774
2021 SCC Online NCLAT 4
2021 SCC Online NCLAT 1621
2022 SCC OnLine NCLAT 27
2020 SCC OnLine NCLAT 717
You are an Advocate-on-Record (AoR) of the Supreme Court of India. How is an AoR different from a non-AoR before the Supreme Court?
As per the Supreme Court Rules, no Advocate other than an AoR can appear, plead and address the Supreme Court unless he is instructed by the AoR. Therefore, an AoR has been statutorily conferred a privilege with respect to cases before the highest Court of the land. However, this privilege comes with enormous responsibility at various stages right from drafting of a petition/appeal, which have to be done with utmost honesty and precision. It is common knowledge that the Supreme Court is a very busy place, therefore, brevity and speed are vital. A crisp Synopsis can win or lose a case before Judges who have 80-100 cases listed before them. Next, strategizing, preparation and thinking out of the box are essential for a Supreme Court practice. It must always be borne in mind that the Supreme Court is the last Court and the result can be a make or break situation for the clients. The AoR system at the Supreme Court equips us to handle these challenges.
What advice would you like to give to young lawyers who are starting their careers?
Young lawyers, who want to be litigation practitioners should carefully choose their seniors and mentors. It is equally important to enjoy the process and seize any and all the opportunities that come your way. Since a litigation practitioner is required to do multiple tasks such as drafting, filing, arguing, briefing, clerical work, client and financial management etc., one must constantly learn and implement new and effective ways to manage the workload. Litigation practice is one of the most thrilling professions and I urge all young lawyers to take a shot at it.
Can you share your journey of how you ended up pursuing a career in law, and what led you to specialize in commercial litigation and white-collar crime?
Being a third generation lawyer, choosing a career in the field of law became a natural progression at the crossroads of life. While I was pursuing a science based professional during my high school, I always remained fascinated with my parents talking about cases at home, how things unfolded in court etc. and as it would turn out, my passion and aptitude for law took over.
While working at Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas since 2012, my Partner Anuj Berry and I were representing certain clients in large scale litigation and anti-corruption compliances in India for foreign companies. Under his able guidance and together with him, we started working to build the white-collar crime practice as a niche area at SAM. As luck would have it, our in-depth work on the advisory side soon translated into many courts facing white-collar crime matters around 2017-18 when there was a surge of criminal investigations by specialized agencies like CBI, ED and SFIO. Once I branched out to pursue my independent practice, I developed this expertise further and continue to ride the learning curve in this field. What is the most interesting part of white collar crime practice is the inter-sectional dynamics it holds between criminal law on one hand and commercial laws, taxation laws on the other.
You completed your B.A., LLB (Hons.) from NALSAR University of Law and later pursued a Bachelor of Civil Laws from the University of Oxford. How did these academic experiences shape your perspective and approach to practicing law?
I believe the holistic course structure at NALSAR and the increasing importance given to procedural laws really helped in shaping my understanding of the court processes. One always found these subjects boring in class – however, once I got into active practice, the realization dawned soon that the foundational stone for easing out court related process and practices was set through these subjects taught phenomenally well at NALSAR. As a word of advice, I always harp on the fact that one must always pay utmost attention to the finer details of our procedural laws – the CPC, CrPC, Evidence Act etc., which are the heart and mind for a career in litigation.
Coupled with this, the Socratic method of teaching at Oxford really instilled the practice of self-reading, analysis of finer details and most importantly, joining the dots across subjects – a key aspect which one should practice when it comes to a court case.
You’ve been recognized as a “Rising Star” by Legal 500 in the Asia Pacific Region for White Collar Crime Practice. Could you tell us about one of your most challenging or high-profile white-collar crime cases, and how you navigated the complexities of such cases?
Undoubtedly, the most challenging case was the investigations being conducted by multiple agencies into the affairs of Frost International Limited and its group companies. What later turned out to be one of the biggest cases – started with 3 different agencies probing the companies on the same set of facts. We were faced with several complex legal issues – such as whether different agencies could look into the same transactions for alleging different offences under special statutes, what would be the evidentiary value of a one sided forensic audit, whether a counter audit would be a plausible defence at the investigation stage itself. Faced with these complex questions, our team was able to ably navigate through these issues with a 3 step simple approach – (i) break down the issue and assess the answer from a first principles perspective (ii) a textbook approach may not always work in niche situations which the law would otherwise not have contemplated – think out of the box when the situation requires (iii) always keep the fundamental rights of the persons facing investigation at the forefront. Since liberty remains at stake in such cases – prompt action and immediate responses are key.
Your career includes a role as a Panel Counsel for the High Court of Gujarat to represent at the Supreme Court. How has this experience informed your understanding of the judicial process, and what unique challenges does representing a high court at the apex court pose?
Representing a High Court is the most valuable and honourable experience one can get. Time and again the Supreme Court has reiterated that the High Courts are no subordinate courts – they are equal constitutional courts as the Supreme Court. To appear on behalf of the High Court requires a lot of preparation and is a position of very high responsibility. At times, the High Court is required to take an adversarial stand, in some cases it may not. It is my role and responsibility to assess the High Court’s position for an effective representation before the Supreme Court.
You’ve advised and represented multinational companies in litigation proceedings before the Supreme Court and High Courts. Could you share a memorable case where your legal expertise made a significant impact on the final outcome?
One of the most significant and interesting cases I worked on was the case of Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Limited v. State of Maharashtra, which is now a landmark reported judgment. The Supreme Court was faced with a very interesting, yet peculiar question of law – can the High Court give protection to accused while hearing petitions under S. 482 CrPC and in what cases can the trials/investigations be stayed. Knowing that Mr. K.V. Vishwanathan (as he then was before Lordship’s elevation as a Judge of Supreme Court) will be arguing for the Petitioner, I knew my preparation had to be top notch and very detailed. Appearing for the private Respondent in the case, I presented a detailed comparative approach on how this issue had been addressed not only by High Courts, but also by other foreign jurisdictions having similar provisions. The bench was very accommodative and patient during arguments – which really helped me in arguing full length before the Supreme Court. Albeit having lost the matter, it was a great experience which really helped me at the preparation stage of the matter, a practice which I now adopt in all matters.
Your involvement with organizations like the ICC Young Arbitrators’ Group and the Oxford Cambridge Society of India showcases your commitment to professional growth. How have these affiliations enriched your legal career and influenced your approach to the law?
Man is a social animal. A lawyer is “social-er”. Our interactions with other members of the society, our intersections with people across other forums, professional and walks of life shapes our outlook and understanding of law. Being a member of these bodies and actively participating in the events has really developed my understanding of one very basic fact – there may be different approaches to the same set of facts and a lawyer’s appreciation of this helps immensely in setting out preparing for a court case.
As someone who has successfully represented both companies and individuals, what advice do you have for aspiring lawyers seeking a balance between providing effective representation and upholding ethical standards?
A career in litigation is a steep slope. Gestation periods are high, rewards are initially low and recognition is seldom easy at an early stage. However, my only advice to young lawyers on this difficult path would be not to lose hope or your passion for law. Easy money is easy for a reason – but reputation and recognition is for those who persevere. Never let down your guard when it comes to maintaining the ethics of this noble profession. I echo the words of the one I look upto, Mr. Mukul Rohatgi– don’t count the hours you put in as a young lawyer.
Lastly, what advice would you give to fresh law graduates who are about to embark on their legal careers, especially considering the evolving landscape of the legal industry?
The field of law is ever expansive , inclusive and experimental. At the crossroads of choosing what to do, you will always get the conventional options and yet some new avenues which may not only interest you, but may be the path of your passion. Do not ever hesitate to try something new in the field of law. The multi-dimensional folds of this profession have a lot in store for everyone and if you have conviction in your actions then pursue it without any fear or doubt.
Can you share with us your journey from your undergraduate studies in law at Christ University to pursuing an LL.M. at Tilburg University in the Netherlands and O.P. Jindal University, Sonepat? What inspired you to take this path?
Growing up in a household where both my parents are Ph.D. holders, my fondness for academics was always subconsciously ingrained. Having chosen law professionally, I was exposed to various philosophies and jurisprudences, which shaped my interest towards academia. Having said that, it was also important for me to not jump into LL.M. right after my undergrad and approach it like just another degree or as an exercise of CV building. It was really important for me to enjoy this process. So I decided to work for a minimum of three years and see for myself where my interest organically built. Even in my undergrad, I had the opportunity of being the Convener of Model United Nations Society and had consciously chosen to only do international moots like Oxford Price Moot- South Asia rounds and Jessup India Qualifiers, upon realising that I might not be able to learn much international law once I graduate and start litigating. Once I started practising, just like any other fresher, I had engrossed myself in learning law and court craft. With the unfortunate onset of COVID-19 pandemic in India, where courts and offices were operating in virtual mode, I was able to give space to my academic interests. It was then that I enrolled and completed various certificate courses on contract law, anti-discrimination and citizenship laws from Harvard Law School, Stanford Law School and the University of London respectively. In the meantime, I had also applied to O.P. Jindal University to pursue an LL.M. and was fortunate enough to get ERASMUS+ Scholarship and was sent as an exchange student for a semester to Tilburg University, Netherlands. The semester exchange at Tilburg University is certainly one of my fondest experiences, both personally and academically.
Your academic achievements, including the Gold Medals and Rank 1 recognition, are impressive. Could you tell us about some of the key experiences or strategies that contributed to your success during your LL.M. studies?
Personally, I think that one cannot and should not plan to top the course or win Gold Medals, at least while doing LL.M. At the cost of sounding preachy, it should be a natural outcome of one’s inclination, understanding and efforts put into that course. Having said that, what I personally think helped me to achieve Nani Palkhivala Memorial Trust Gold Medal, Savitri Jindal Merit Scholarship, Gold Medal for Academic Excellence and Rank 1 in Outstanding All-Round Performance in LL.M. was certainly the maturity that I garnered with my 4 years of practice, as against jumping into LL.M. right after undergrad. I was able to see the visible difference in my approach to law subjects in my undergrad and those in my Masters. Since I had chosen my area of interest to be human security and dispute resolution, it fell right in the midst of my prior work experience and academic interests. I was able to connect the dots much better than I could in my undergrad, which gave me an edge over the majority of the students who enrolled in Masters right after their UG.
You’ve worked on a wide range of cases in the Supreme Court of India, including some landmark ones. Can you share a memorable case or experience that had a significant impact on your legal career?
For this, I certainly have to thank Hon’ble Justice Ms. Neela Gokhale, with whom I was working, prior to her elevation as a Justice of the Hon’ble High Court of Bombay. Justice Gokhale had a wide range of matters from the lowest court to the highest court with an experience of over 30 years. Under her guidance, I worked on a variety of matters ranging from civil, criminal, and arbitration to matters of constitutional importance. One such case was Sakshi Bhattacharya v. Union of India where we had challenged various provisions of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 since the Act did not deem the mother as a ‘natural guardian’ as against the father, amongst various anomalies. The research for this matter was astounding since a huge amount of literature had to be read and understood to get a perspective of the legislative intent, though archaic and colonial. This matter did have a significant impact on my understanding and approach to law as a young litigating lawyer. This did teach me that I did not have to be bound by the constraints of law if it is principally in breach of one’s fundamental rights. This also taught my younger self that I could and should question everything, including the laws in force to secure ends of justice. This certainly enhanced and nuanced my approach to every dispute, more so the ones before the Hon’ble Supreme Court since the aspect of substantial questions of law was involved in every appellate filing.
Your experience also includes internships and chamber experience with notable legal figures. How did these experiences shape your perspective on the legal profession, and what valuable lessons did you learn from them?
As a first-generation aspiring lawyer, I did intern in different offices with a variety of work. I interned with Mr. Amit Anand Tiwari, Advocate-on-Record, followed by World Wildlife Fund and Nishith Desai and Associates, Delhi to get a first-hand idea of how chamber practice differs from a corporate practice. It was only thereafter did I started interning with Justice Gokhale in my third year and continued to work with her until I started my own Firm and independent practice. Working with Justice Gokhale has been the biggest influence on my perspective on litigation and the justice delivery system. As an intern, I used to take dictation and would often be given a blank document to draft an affidavit/petition, without the benefit of a format to merely fill in. The biggest takeaway from the said exercise was that the template formats should be used for convenience and not in substitution for actual learning. It should not be the case that if a template format is not available, one is not able to draft. This is a practice I till date put my junior colleagues through. Despite having done a certain type of matter a few times, we were still made to re-read the same provision every time I did a new matter. As redundant as it might sound, but it always does wonders as one would interpret a certain word/ingredient of a section differently in light of the peculiar facts of the case. It was the aforementioned that made it easier for me to crack the Advocate-on-Record examinations on my first attempt.
As a founder partner of Vox Populi Legal, what motivated you to start your own law firm? Could you tell us about the focus areas and goals of your firm?
The idea of starting Vox Populi Legal [meaning Voice of the People] was long pending. It really grew in shape while I was doing my Masters in the Netherlands. As a first-generation young litigator, it is always hard to have a clientele flowing in clinically and to be substantial enough to learn and grow. To overcome this, I along with my friends from my UG started Vox Populi Legal, so that we could pool our resources to run our office and at the same time work together on a variety of matters to grow. Once we started working with each other, the influx of matters automatically increased and we were able to manage offices in three different cities- now grown to five. Vox Populi Legal is primarily a litigation firm which specialises in civil and criminal dispute resolution, arbitration, insolvency proceedings, intellectual property rights etc. from the lowest to the highest courts. Apart from the objective of rendering services to people throughout the country, we are also attempting to change how a law firm ought to work. We attempt to prioritise better work-life balance and mental health, while not compromising with the quality of service. We also strive to fairly compensate our junior associates and also our interns so that they remain motivated to perform optimally.
In addition to your litigation work, you have experience in arbitration. Can you explain the differences and challenges between litigating in court and handling arbitration cases?
Personally, I see arbitration and litigation in courts as two strong pillars of dispute resolution in India, though with its own limitations. While arbitration is predominantly founded on the principle of consent, litigation in courts may not necessarily revolve around consent- arbitration clause, appointment of arbitrator, seat of arbitration etc. That being said, arbitration is more flexible in terms of schedule and also spends more time on each claim made by the Claimants than what courts generally do. So essentially, arbitration demands a lot more attention from determining the timeline of proceedings, and schedule of fees to the smallest of the arithmetic detail to justify one’s claim. Though the general principle is to ensure least interference by courts in arbitration, one would often find themselves being in court against every order passed by the Arbitrator. The said ping-pong between the arbitrator and the courts would often lead to delay, which is antithetical to the idea of arbitration as an alternate dispute resolution itself. Thus as a practitioner, it is of utmost importance to constantly evaluate the needs of one’s client and choose forums and strategies accordingly.
You’ve published several research papers on various legal topics. Could you highlight one of your research findings or publications that you’re particularly proud of and explain its significance in the legal field?
Though I have had the privilege of having my work considered worthy of publication in esteemed journals, but the one I thoroughly enjoyed working on was ‘Report on Legal Assistance at the stage of Pre-Arrest’ for National Legal Services Authority [NALSA]. Having worked in cases involving criminal law from the stage of pre-arrest, the need for effective legal assistance became more glaring and obvious. For effective functioning of a vibrant democracy, equal access to justice is a sine qua non, not just after proceedings have been initiated, but also at the stage of pre-arrest. So essentially, legal aid serves as the contact point between law and people who are living in poverty and is a catalyst for social change. By way of the said report, various structural, qualitative, policy-based reforms were suggested to ensure prompt access to legal advice and assistance to guarantee a fair trial and the rule of law, keeping up with the latest technological advancements.
Finally, what advice would you give to fresh law graduates who are just starting their legal careers? What key principles or strategies should they keep in mind as they embark on their professional journey?
As a fresh law graduate in litigation, it is reasonable for one to feel ‘not sure’ about the field of law or type of practice one intends to partake in. But what is important is that one should not close themselves to learning new things constantly. In my opinion, a common mistake fresh law graduates often make is that they pre-define their area of specialisation, even before they try new fields. Though people might differ on this, I strongly feel that one’s specialisation should be determined organically wherein one ends up doing/enjoying a certain kind of matter a lot more than other. As a fresh law graduate, the best thing that one can do for themselves is that one has to be the ‘Master of their Brief’, without any exception. It is a non-negotiable that one ought to know every fact, every page, every document, and every law involved in the said matter, better than anyone else on the given day in the said courtroom. This will not only help a fresh graduate to be more confident but will also help one grow consistently. There is no shortcut to hard work in litigation. When the same is coupled with consistency and integrity, one would find results visibly quicker than the rest of the legal professionals. Having said that, one also needs to strive to maintain a healthy work-life balance and mental health to enjoy the journey of life-long learning.
