Super Lawyer

Tag: Founder

  • As a first-generation young litigator, it is always hard to have a clientele flowing in clinically and to be substantial enough to learn and grow-Ilam Paridi, Advocate-on-Record, Supreme Court of India, and Founding Partner, Vox Populi Legal

    As a first-generation young litigator, it is always hard to have a clientele flowing in clinically and to be substantial enough to learn and grow-Ilam Paridi, Advocate-on-Record, Supreme Court of India, and Founding Partner, Vox Populi Legal

    This interview has been published by  Priyanka Karwa and The SuperLawyer Team

    Can you share with us your journey from your undergraduate studies in law at Christ University to pursuing an LL.M. at Tilburg University in the Netherlands and O.P. Jindal University, Sonepat? What inspired you to take this path?

    Growing up in a household where both my parents are Ph.D. holders, my fondness for academics was always subconsciously ingrained. Having chosen law professionally, I was exposed to various philosophies and jurisprudences, which shaped my interest towards academia. Having said that, it was also important for me to not jump into LL.M. right after my undergrad and approach it like just another degree or as an exercise of CV building. It was really important for me to enjoy this process. So I decided to work for a minimum of three years and see for myself where my interest organically built. Even in my undergrad, I had the opportunity of being the Convener of Model United Nations Society and had consciously chosen to only do international moots like Oxford Price Moot- South Asia rounds and Jessup India Qualifiers, upon realising that I might not be able to learn much international law once I graduate and start litigating. Once I started practising, just like any other fresher, I had engrossed myself in learning law and court craft. With the unfortunate onset of COVID-19 pandemic in India, where courts and offices were operating in virtual mode, I was able to give space to my academic interests. It was then that I enrolled and completed various certificate courses on contract law, anti-discrimination and citizenship laws from Harvard Law School, Stanford Law School and the University of London respectively. In the meantime, I had also applied to O.P. Jindal University to pursue an LL.M. and was fortunate enough to get ERASMUS+ Scholarship and was sent as an exchange student for a semester to Tilburg University, Netherlands. The semester exchange at Tilburg University is certainly one of my fondest experiences, both personally and academically.

    Your academic achievements, including the Gold Medals and Rank 1 recognition, are impressive. Could you tell us about some of the key experiences or strategies that contributed to your success during your LL.M. studies?

    Personally, I think that one cannot and should not plan to top the course or win Gold Medals, at least while doing LL.M. At the cost of sounding preachy, it should be a natural outcome of one’s inclination, understanding and efforts put into that course. Having said that, what I personally think helped me to achieve Nani Palkhivala Memorial Trust Gold Medal, Savitri Jindal Merit Scholarship, Gold Medal for Academic Excellence and Rank 1 in Outstanding All-Round Performance in LL.M. was certainly the maturity that I garnered with my 4 years of practice, as against jumping into LL.M. right after undergrad. I was able to see the visible difference in my approach to law subjects in my undergrad and those in my Masters. Since I had chosen my area of interest to be human security and dispute resolution, it fell right in the midst of my prior work experience and academic interests. I was able to connect the dots much better than I could in my undergrad, which gave me an edge over the majority of the students who enrolled in Masters right after their UG.

    You’ve worked on a wide range of cases in the Supreme Court of India, including some landmark ones. Can you share a memorable case or experience that had a significant impact on your legal career?

    For this, I certainly have to thank Hon’ble Justice Ms. Neela Gokhale, with whom I was working, prior to her elevation as a Justice of the Hon’ble High Court of Bombay. Justice Gokhale had a wide range of matters from the lowest court to the highest court with an experience of over 30 years. Under her guidance, I worked on a variety of matters ranging from civil, criminal, and arbitration to matters of constitutional importance. One such case was Sakshi Bhattacharya v. Union of India where we had challenged various provisions of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 since the Act did not deem the mother as a ‘natural guardian’ as against the father, amongst various anomalies. The research for this matter was astounding since a huge amount of literature had to be read and understood to get a perspective of the legislative intent, though archaic and colonial. This matter did have a significant impact on my understanding and approach to law as a young litigating lawyer. This did teach me that I did not have to be bound by the constraints of law if it is principally in breach of one’s fundamental rights. This also taught my younger self that I could and should question everything, including the laws in force to secure ends of justice. This certainly enhanced and nuanced my approach to every dispute, more so the ones before the Hon’ble Supreme Court since the aspect of substantial questions of law was involved in every appellate filing.  

    Your experience also includes internships and chamber experience with notable legal figures. How did these experiences shape your perspective on the legal profession, and what valuable lessons did you learn from them?

    As a first-generation aspiring lawyer, I did intern in different offices with a variety of work. I interned with Mr. Amit Anand Tiwari, Advocate-on-Record, followed by World Wildlife Fund and Nishith Desai and Associates, Delhi to get a first-hand idea of how chamber practice differs from a corporate practice. It was only thereafter did I started interning with Justice Gokhale in my third year and continued to work with her until I started my own Firm and independent practice. Working with Justice Gokhale has been the biggest influence on my perspective on litigation and the justice delivery system. As an intern, I used to take dictation and would often be given a blank document to draft an affidavit/petition, without the benefit of a format to merely fill in. The biggest takeaway from the said exercise was that the template formats should be used for convenience and not in substitution for actual learning. It should not be the case that if a template format is not available, one is not able to draft. This is a practice I till date put my junior colleagues through. Despite having done a certain type of matter a few times, we were still made to re-read the same provision every time I did a new matter. As redundant as it might sound, but it always does wonders as one would interpret a certain word/ingredient of a section differently in light of the peculiar facts of the case. It was the aforementioned that made it easier for me to crack the Advocate-on-Record examinations on my first attempt.

    As a founder partner of Vox Populi Legal, what motivated you to start your own law firm? Could you tell us about the focus areas and goals of your firm?

    The idea of starting Vox Populi Legal [meaning Voice of the People] was long pending. It really grew in shape while I was doing my Masters in the Netherlands. As a first-generation young litigator, it is always hard to have a clientele flowing in clinically and to be substantial enough to learn and grow. To overcome this, I along with my friends from my UG started Vox Populi Legal, so that we could pool our resources to run our office and at the same time work together on a variety of matters to grow. Once we started working with each other, the influx of matters automatically increased and we were able to manage offices in three different cities- now grown to five. Vox Populi Legal is primarily a litigation firm which specialises in civil and criminal dispute resolution, arbitration, insolvency proceedings, intellectual property rights etc. from the lowest to the highest courts. Apart from the objective of rendering services to people throughout the country, we are also attempting to change how a law firm ought to work. We attempt to prioritise better work-life balance and mental health, while not compromising with the quality of service. We also strive to fairly compensate our junior associates and also our interns so that they remain motivated to perform optimally.

    In addition to your litigation work, you have experience in arbitration. Can you explain the differences and challenges between litigating in court and handling arbitration cases?

    Personally, I see arbitration and litigation in courts as two strong pillars of dispute resolution in India, though with its own limitations. While arbitration is predominantly founded on the principle of consent, litigation in courts may not necessarily revolve around consent- arbitration clause, appointment of arbitrator, seat of arbitration etc. That being said, arbitration is more flexible in terms of schedule and also spends more time on each claim made by the Claimants than what courts generally do. So essentially, arbitration demands a lot more attention from determining the timeline of proceedings, and schedule of fees to the smallest of the arithmetic detail to justify one’s claim. Though the general principle is to ensure least interference by courts in arbitration, one would often find themselves being in court against every order passed by the Arbitrator. The said ping-pong between the arbitrator and the courts would often lead to delay, which is antithetical to the idea of arbitration as an alternate dispute resolution itself. Thus as a practitioner, it is of utmost importance to constantly evaluate the needs of one’s client and choose forums and strategies accordingly.

    You’ve published several research papers on various legal topics. Could you highlight one of your research findings or publications that you’re particularly proud of and explain its significance in the legal field?

    Though I have had the privilege of having my work considered worthy of publication in esteemed journals, but the one I thoroughly enjoyed working on was ‘Report on Legal Assistance at the stage of Pre-Arrest’ for National Legal Services Authority [NALSA]. Having worked in cases involving criminal law from the stage of pre-arrest, the need for effective legal assistance became more glaring and obvious. For effective functioning of a vibrant democracy, equal access to justice is a sine qua non, not just after proceedings have been initiated, but also at the stage of pre-arrest. So essentially, legal aid serves as the contact point between law and people who are living in poverty and is a catalyst for social change. By way of the said report, various structural, qualitative, policy-based reforms were suggested to ensure prompt access to legal advice and assistance to guarantee a fair trial and the rule of law, keeping up with the latest technological advancements.

    Finally, what advice would you give to fresh law graduates who are just starting their legal careers? What key principles or strategies should they keep in mind as they embark on their professional journey?

    As a fresh law graduate in litigation, it is reasonable for one to feel ‘not sure’ about the field of law or type of practice one intends to partake in. But what is important is that one should not close themselves to learning new things constantly. In my opinion, a common mistake fresh law graduates often make is that they pre-define their area of specialisation, even before they try new fields. Though people might differ on this, I strongly feel that one’s specialisation should be determined organically wherein one ends up doing/enjoying a certain kind of matter a lot more than other. As a fresh law graduate, the best thing that one can do for themselves is that one has to be the ‘Master of their Brief’, without any exception. It is a non-negotiable that one ought to know every fact, every page, every document, and every law involved in the said matter, better than anyone else on the given day in the said courtroom. This will not only help a fresh graduate to be more confident but will also help one grow consistently. There is no shortcut to hard work in litigation. When the same is coupled with consistency and integrity, one would find results visibly quicker than the rest of the legal professionals. Having said that, one also needs to strive to maintain a healthy work-life balance and mental health to enjoy the journey of life-long learning.

    Get in touch with Ilam Paridi-

  • The intersection of technology and law has been a recurring theme in my career, and it’s a space that continues to excite and challenge me- G.V. Anand Bhushan, Founder, Bhushan Rajaram, Advocates & Consultants

    The intersection of technology and law has been a recurring theme in my career, and it’s a space that continues to excite and challenge me- G.V. Anand Bhushan, Founder, Bhushan Rajaram, Advocates & Consultants

    This interview has been published by  Priyanka Karwa and The SuperLawyer Team

    Sir, could you please share with our listeners what initially inspired you to pursue a career in law and how you navigated your way to specializing in Corporate, Intellectual Property, Technology, Litigation, and Real Estate laws?

    Certainly, the journey to a legal career is often as varied as the individuals who undertake it. In my case, I stumbled upon the field of law somewhat serendipitously. Like many young lawyers of my generation, I wasn’t particularly inclined towards math or science. However, I had a deep-rooted fascination with technology—I even built my own computers and was an avid proponent of open-source platforms, particularly Linux.

    As fate would have it, my graduation coincided with two significant developments in the Indian tech landscape: the enactment of the Information Technology Act and the onset of a multi-decade growth spurt in the Indian technology industry. These events were not just pivotal for the sector but also set the stage for my own career trajectory.

    The legal challenges posed by the burgeoning tech industry were both complex and novel, offering a fertile ground for specialization. My affinity for technology naturally led me to focus on Corporate, Intellectual Property, and Technology laws. Over time, as I gained more experience and exposure, I expanded my practice areas to include Litigation and Real Estate laws as well.

    While my entry into the legal profession may have been somewhat accidental, the path I’ve carved within it has been intentional and guided by a combination of personal interests and market opportunities. The intersection of technology and law has been a recurring theme in my career, and it’s a space that continues to excite and challenge me.

    Over your impressive 20-year career, you’ve gained extensive experience in General Corporate, Projects, Technology, and Dispute Resolution. Could you highlight some of the key milestones or projects that have played a pivotal role in shaping your expertise and career trajectory?

    One must always remember that competition is fierce. There is terrific talent in the market in the next generation of lawyers. There’s a saying in private practise “You are only as good as your last deal”. Lol, I remember being quite taken aback as a young lawyer when I first heard that! But if you understand that in this economy you always need to upskill to stay relevant and competent, you will be able to thrive. For me, that meant things like pursuing my master’s as a Fulbright scholar and exploring both opportunities in-house and as a Partner in Shardul Amarchand. For example, in Cognizant I was the lawyer hired to set up both the India and the wider Asia Pacific teams as General Counsel. At Shardul Amarchand, I was given the opportunity to start our Chennai office. That kind of entrepreneurial journey is something that I will always cherish. 

    You’ve held significant roles such as General Counsel and Board Member of Cognizant Technology Solutions Asia Pacific. Could you tell us about the challenges and rewards of managing diverse practice areas, resolving complex disputes, and advising on multi-million dollar technology deals?

    The scale of operations at Cognizant, one of the fastest-growing Fortune 500 companies, meant that even seemingly routine matters like EULAs, Labour issues or client Master Service Agreements (MSAs) involved high-stakes financial implications, often running into tens of millions of dollars. The urgency was palpable, and the need for effective prioritization and execution across diverse geographies in the Asia-Pacific region was paramount.

    My experience in private practice at Shardul Amarchand was marked by an intense performance culture. Clients often presented us with complex, unprecedented challenges. It’s worth noting that most large clients have highly sophisticated in-house teams, so when they seek external counsel, it’s typically for issues that are both novel and intricate. This necessitates original research and innovative problem-solving, skills that are indispensable in the legal landscape. Our office of 4 partners advised on Tech, Corporate, M&A, Real Estate and litigation matters. 

    The common thread between these diverse roles has been the critical importance of a strong, well-trained team. Whether it was navigating the complexities of multi-million dollar technology deals, resolving intricate disputes, or advising on regulatory compliance, the strength of the team was often the determining factor in the successful outcome of these endeavors. I’ve been fortunate to work with exceptional teams both at Cognizant and in private practice, and their contributions cannot be overstated.

    Throughout your journey, you’ve been hailed as a trusted legal advisor. What do you believe sets you apart in terms of building strong client relationships and delivering effective legal counsel?

    What distinguishes my approach in building robust client relationships and offering effective legal counsel boils down to two key elements: trust and capability.

    In today’s fast-paced business environment, clients are inundated with challenges and operate under immense pressure. They aren’t seeking a legal lecture; they’re in search of actionable solutions, a quantifiable assessment of risks, and a straightforward strategy for compliance. To earn their trust, it’s imperative to communicate in a clear and direct manner that aligns with their commercial objectives.

    The legal industry often falls into the trap of obscuring advice with layers of disclaimers and complex jargon. This not only dilutes the impact of our counsel but also hampers the decision-making process for the client. My focus is on cutting through the noise to deliver advice that is both clear and actionable.

    Consistency is the final, yet crucial, ingredient in this equation. Trust isn’t built overnight or through a single transaction; it’s cultivated over years of reliable and consistent service. The ability to consistently identify and mitigate client risks transforms a transactional relationship into a long-term partnership.

    You’ve received recognition from esteemed publications like Legal 500, Chambers, and Asian Legal Business. How has this recognition influenced your approach to your work, and what does it mean to you to be acknowledged by your peers in the legal industry?

    Recognition from esteemed platforms is an honor. I’m deeply grateful for it. In a competitive market where credibility is often scrutinized, these accolades serve as a valuable endorsement. Operating under my own name, Bhushan Rajaram, these recognitions act as a seal of approval, opening doors that might otherwise remain closed.

    However, it’s crucial to understand that these accolades are essentially a foot in the door, not a guarantee of sustained success. Clients today are incredibly savvy. They have a keen eye for expertise and can quickly discern whether an advisor possesses the depth of knowledge required to address their unique challenges. So, while the recognition is validating, it’s merely the starting line, not the finish.

    Lastly, could you leave our listeners with a piece of wisdom or a mantra that has guided you through your remarkable legal journey, and which you believe can resonate with those embarking on their own paths in the legal profession?

    Before we conclude, I’d like to share a guiding principle that has been invaluable to me on my legal journey—a piece of wisdom from my father that I believe will resonate with many of you.

    We live in a time where ambition and intelligence are in abundance, especially among young professionals. The drive to reach significant milestones—like making partner, buying a home, or achieving financial independence—often takes center stage. My father, however, offered a different perspective: “Life is not a checklist but a journey.”

    The relationships you cultivate, particularly with your life partner during these formative years, are incredibly enriching. These bonds are built on shared struggles and triumphs, and they often become your most reliable support system.

    So, as you ascend the ranks in the legal field, by all means, be ambitious and aim high. But also remember to live your life fully. The journey itself is just as important as the destination, and the relationships you form along the way make the journey all the more rewarding.

    Get in touch with G.V Anand Bhushan-

  • With technological advancement, the access to justice and quality education is more probable now then ever- Dr. Charu Mathur, Independent Counsel, Supreme Court of India

    With technological advancement, the access to justice and quality education is more probable now then ever- Dr. Charu Mathur, Independent Counsel, Supreme Court of India

    This interview has been published by  Priyanka Karwa and The SuperLawyer Team

    Ma’am,  please introduce yourself to our listeners and provide an overview of your current role as an Advocate-on-Record at the Supreme Court of India?

    Hi! I’m a mom, wife, daughter, sister and also a lawyer and a lifelong learner. I’m deeply privileged to practice as an Advocate-on-Record before the Supreme Court. AORs as original envisioned have a deep role in efficient functioning of the apex court. An AOR is personally responsible to the court; there’s reason why close proximity to Supreme Court complex is provided in SC Rules. The idea is an AOR must be available to assist the court. Since the inception we have around 3000 lawyers who became AOR. The year I cleared my AOR Exams, some 20-25 people made the cut. Earlier only 3 or 4 people could clear AOR Examination. I’m particularly not happy that since past few years over 250 people are made AORs. It is good that so many people are able to clear the examinations but then it also speaks volume about the quality of assessment and nature of question paper set. It is actually disheartening to see that some of the speakers who conduct the lecture series on behalf of SCBA/SCAORA actually give out complete paper. This to me lowers the sanctity of examinations.

    Coming back to my own journey, I come from a family of lawyers and some of them were elevated as judges as well. I did my LLB from LA Shah Law College, Ahmedabad. Right from my student days I worked under my senior Sh SN Shelat, Sr Adv and former AG of Gujarat. In my entire professional life, I have just one enduring motive that whatever I do or not do should bring glory to my senior- Sh SN Shelat and my father Justice NN Mathur; I pray that even accidently I should not do something that blemishes their fair name.

    Post marriage I moved to Delhi. My husband is a fellow AOR and represent few States before the Hon’ble High Court. He has also penned a book on GST, one of the earliest. I’m particularly proud of that. His book explains conceptual GST soundly. He is a man of few words but probably the sharpest person I have come across.

    You have an impressive academic journey with degrees in law, business laws, and even a Ph.D. in Legal Aspects of Pharmaceutical Patents. How did you find your way into the field of law and what motivated you to pursue such a diverse range of qualifications?

    I think the answer to this lies in my gender and role attributed by the society. As long as I can remember, I always wanted to be a lawyer. Constitution of India is my only sacred book. My mother retired as a Professor from Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur. So, I believe I have received some academically genes from her. As for my PhD and even AOR examinations I cleared while being a young mother. I absolutely believe in spending quality as well as quantity time with family. For me spending time with my son, reading to him was very important. I have read him many books multiple times. So, yes, at one point of time in my life reading to him and searching for books for him was my number one priority. I’m glad that our initial efforts turned him into a lifelong reader. He was judging MUNs at St Stephen’s and Hindu while he himself was a school kid. He did us proud by securing place to read Undergraduate law at Trinity College, University of Cambridge and topping the University in the 1st year. As for my own academic journey, I could devote time because I was master of my own time. I was privileged that as I was working with my husband I could decide on my own working hours and even choosing what I will work on what I will not. Saying all that, I do miss the fact that I could have advanced my litigation professional profile at better speed but it was the choice I made, so that it is.

    With over 20 years of experience as a practicing lawyer before the Hon’ble Supreme Court, you’ve handled a wide range of legal matters. Could you share some highlights or cases that have been particularly memorable or impactful in your career?

    Some of the memorable cases I can rattle is- my 1st appearance before the Supreme Court. It was a bail matter. My SLP was dismissed but not before the judge (Justice Rajender Babu) narrated the story of Bruce, the spider- try try again until you succeed.

    I remember arguing murder reference of Purshottam Dashrath Borate before the three judges bench headed by the Chief Justice. One case which I particularly remember was fighting for an old father against her daughter. I could secure win for the father. It was emotionally charged matter. We have been doing medical entrance examination matters fairly regularly. We have seen pre and post NEET era. We have got relief in many of these matters. However, seeing these matters closely, I really question our medical education. Just like AOR exams the bar is getting lower and lower. I do educational matters also. I’m counsel for some of universities as well. I’m happy that relying upon an earlier judgement (where I was part) in a subsequent Writ under Article 32 could change the way seats are allocated in PG AIIMS.

    You’ve also been involved in advisory work for various corporates and organizations. Could you elaborate on your role in providing legal counsel to corporate clients and startups?

    I’m fortunate to get the diverse work. I believe, startups need hand holding. Legal issues are complex and to navigate this maze they need some guidance. Sometimes only discussing the point help them see the point with greater clarity. I do help them on transaction side as well as in drafting and vetting agreements, and even in arraying partners for them.

    Your list of appearances before different high courts and your engagements as a speaker on various legal topics are extensive. Could you tell us about your motivations behind sharing your expertise through speaking engagements and publications?

    I have started taking out station matters. I derive great satisfaction by arguing before various High Court. Recently, we could persuade a High Court to quash demand notice worth Rs 12 Crores, in another High Court could persuade the court that the fault was not of the tax official but the assessee and could get notice issued against his discharged. Likewise in Delhi High Court could persuade the court for relief in arbitration matter.

    As for speaking engagement, I enjoy interacting with young law students and absorb their worldview.

    You’ve also been involved in e-learning content development and have written books on legal topics. Could you elaborate on your experience in creating educational content and how it helps in disseminating legal knowledge?

    Legal education is something close to my heart. With technological advancement, the access to justice and quality education is more probable now then ever. As a continuous lifelong learner, this is my way of giving back to society. 

    Lastly, what advice would you give to fresh law graduates who are just entering the legal profession? Are there any key lessons you’ve learned that you believe would be beneficial for them to know?

    Like each successive generation, this generation is far smarter than the previous one. It has more resources at its disposal. However, there is no substitute for in-depth understanding, reading and introspection. You must have sometime to reflect, assimilate knowledge. We are not machines who keep on downloading information, idea is to read and reflect. In my opinion, running around for internships is meaningless. First, have conceptual clarity, read case laws, read provisions. Now, with live streaming you can witness finest oral advocacy. 

    Get in touch with Dr. Charu Mathur-

  • When one puts their thoughts into words, it unlocks additional dimensions of knowledge-Dr. Sudhir Raja Ravindran, Founder, Altacit Global

    When one puts their thoughts into words, it unlocks additional dimensions of knowledge-Dr. Sudhir Raja Ravindran, Founder, Altacit Global

    This interview has been published by  Priyanka Karwa and The SuperLawyer Team

    Could you please share your journey and how you ended up pursuing a career in law after obtaining degrees in both engineering and law?

    I developed an interest in law while pursuing a Master’s Degree in Engineering from the Warwick Manufacturing Group at the University of Warwick. I was studying regulations relating to automobiles and how they affect innovation, which instilled in me an interest in further exploring and understanding the functioning of legal systems through academic pursuits.

    How do you believe your background in engineering complements your expertise in law, particularly in the realm of intellectual property?

    The diverse educational backgrounds in the fields of Engineering and Law contributed to bring about a range of perspectives in the practice and application of law. This amalgamation of knowledge facilitated the development of a systematic problem-solving approach, nurtured critical thinking skills, and enhanced the ability to provide adept counsel to clients across various industries. It does also help in understanding technology and innovations and their protection under the Intellectual Property regime. 

    As the founder of Altacit Global, a leading Indian law firm, could you tell us about the key factors that led you to establish your own firm and what unique challenges you faced as an entrepreneur in the legal industry?

    The founding impetus behind the establishment of Altacit Global was to create a firm capable of delivering international-caliber services to Indian clients, while fostering a culture of ethical practices. The foremost challenge at hand was to ensure the provision of consistent services on a considerable scale and across diverse geographic locations. This challenge extended to attracting and retaining premier talent, as well as establishing a platform that could foster and acknowledge excellence within a professional work environment. By embracing technology early on and maintaining a commitment to best practices, we have successfully positioned ourselves at the forefront of the spectrum, enabling us to serve esteemed clients.

    You are a regular speaker at universities and national and international conferences. How do you balance your professional commitments with your passion for sharing knowledge and insights with others?

    Professionals in all fields amass a wealth of experience and exposure to diverse facets and issues. This knowledge typically remains within an individual and is seldom shared unless direct interaction occurs through internships, apprenticeships or employment, reminiscent of the ancient gurukul systems. The act of imparting knowledge and contributing to the society from which we have gained is the principal impetus behind authoring articles, publishing books, and speaking. Furthermore, when one puts their thoughts into words, it unlocks additional dimensions of knowledge.

    Your achievements are truly commendable, and you have been recognized as one of the 100 legal luminaries of India and top 100 IP leaders of India. 

    When someone is passionate about their pursuits and excels in them, recognition will inevitably follow. Such recognition serves as a motivating force, propelling individuals to push their boundaries and embark on unprecedented journeys, ultimately leading to a profound sense of satisfaction.

    Your book “Intellectual Property Risk Management” delves into the process of identifying, assessing, and evaluating risks associated with intellectual property. What are some common misconceptions about IP risk management, and how can organizations better understand and address these risks?

    Law is an evolving domain that continuously adapts to the prevailing social, economic, political, and technological developments. The publications “Intellectual Property and Taxation” and “IP Acquisition in India – Tax & Legal Aspects” include chapters authored by various subject matter experts, serving as quick-reference guides and starting points for navigating the intricate landscape of law and its implications on the commercial aspects of intellectual property. The intangible nature of intellectual property poses challenges for all stakeholders within the intellectual property regime. Ensuring appropriate value derivation from intellectual property requires careful attention, distinct from other forms of property.

    The publication “Intellectual Property Risk Management” aimed to elucidate the inherent risks associated with intellectual property and strategies for their mitigation. However, the time has come to release updated versions of these publications to bridge recent developments.

    Lastly, with your extensive experience in the legal and intellectual property domain, what advice would you give to fresh graduates who aspire to make a mark in the legal field and potentially pursue a career in intellectual property law?

    It is of utmost importance for lawyers to remain abreast of developments, encompassing not only the legal field but also various aspects of life, such as technology, social dynamics, economic trends, and more. Grasping the implications of the law and effectively harmonizing economic interests with those of humanity holds immense significance.

    When the process of learning comes to a halt, the growth of the lawyer also stagnates. For law students aspiring to build a career in the realm of intellectual property, which resides at the intersection of technology, law, and economics, a preparedness for perpetual and lifelong learning is imperative.

    Get in touch with Dr. Sudhir Raja Ravindran-

  • Knowing your brief, correct facts, being bold and aware about what you present, are key points which come what may, would not shake the confidence no matter what- Anushkaa Arora,Principal & Founder at ABA Law Office

    Knowing your brief, correct facts, being bold and aware about what you present, are key points which come what may, would not shake the confidence no matter what- Anushkaa Arora,Principal & Founder at ABA Law Office

    This interview has been published by  Priyanka Karwa and The SuperLawyer Team

    Ma’am, please tell us about your educational background and how you ended up pursuing a Master of Laws (LL.M) in Intellectual Property Laws from the National University of Singapore?

    I was born and brought up in Delhi however, I pursued 8 years of school from Dehradun, namely Ann Mary School.  I am a Science with Maths student from an ICSE + ISC school named previously. Thereafter, from a PCM background I took the plunge into BA LLB, and with god’s blessings topped semesters and attained top position during my final semester. I further pursued my masters in IPR from NUS Law. Meanwhile during school, I have also had the innate interest towards yoga and attained Pramana Patra by clearing all 5 levels with highest grades. 

    I took the plunge into IPR for the reason that apart from criminal laws, IP Laws interested me a lot during university days. I found that the curriculum taught in law schools was not enough to overall understand this subject, which is when I decided that I would definitely want to study IP  in depth. I was fortunate to get into Amarchand Mangaldas on merit, as an intern, where I was put into the IP team, which further caught my attention towards IP, which is when I was sure that I would like to explore this subject more, before I hit the professional world. I thereafter to satisfy my curiosity over this subject got into Luthra & Luthra internship and experienced various more aspects in the same. Further, I was called back at Amarchand Mangaldas over an assessment internship, with which I was sure that I would really love to further pursue this subject and dwell into advanced core. This is when, it struck me, to pursue IP from NUS, being top 10 in the world for IP Laws, as a recommendation from every well-known practitioner of IP India has seen. After further training with some of the most refined law firms as named above including RK Dewan, I took the plunge for Singapore to pursue masters in IP. 

    During your LL.M program, you specialized in subjects such as Celebrity and Entertainment laws, fair use in the UK and USA, copyright, trade marks, cyber law, and more. What sparked your interest in these areas of law, and how do you think they contribute to the field of intellectual property?

    My main motive to pursue masters from Singapore in IP field was to be trained by the best and pursue subjects which form part of real core of IP. These subjects form part of the real core of IP if we talk about trademarks and copyrights. Being trained by the best, witnessing luxury brands In Front of your eyes by professors who teach such subjects, not only amazed me, but reinstated the dedication for which I had subscribed to masters from Singapore. 

    These subjects have not only contributed towards my professional commitments but have given me the maturity, edge over competitors and confidence to deal with some of the very high stake and high profile IP litigations/advisory I have handled so far.

    You completed Directed Research under Prof David Tan on Luxury Brand Counterfeiting. Could you share some insights from your research and its significance in addressing the issue of counterfeiting?

    My directed research under the topic as mentioned has been pursued under the guidance of a person who is not only well known for the said subject but is a live example of walking luxury brands. My research involved understanding luxury brands, the efforts and time spent on making the same, counterfeits of such brands, empirical research of the same. To undertake the research,  I even travelled to south Vietnam, which houses counterfeits of the world, understanding the market there, issues with use of counterfeits etc were some aspects which were witnessed in person and thereafter jotted down. 

    Counterfeiting is escalating especially with advent in technology and know-how. The directed research addresses very specific points over the same, creating significant impacts over society to understand the issue to its root cause and the pitfalls associated.

    Your Bachelor of Arts and Law Honours degree from Guru Gobind Singh IP University in Delhi showcased exceptional academic performance. What motivated you to excel in your studies, and how did this experience shape your understanding of the law?

    Honestly, I was always passion driven. Nothing seems rather a task when it comes to law. I just loved what I am doing, hence it all happened as it should happen. I always had the innate quality to understand arts subjects right from school where I used to obtain highest grades in history, English etc. continuing the same interest in BA LLB. I am glad I did exceptionally well. 

    Being honest, law school studies did shape a personality, however with respect to understanding of law, I will say I give the credit to my training as an intern since 2012 in any or all holidays. I think practical knowledge in law is most important which one does not get by studying law. Same story follows, at least for me. 

    As a member of the Singapore International Arbitration Center (SIAC), could you share some of your experiences in handling arbitration cases and the significance of alternative dispute resolution in the legal profession?

    I have represented Indian clients before SIAC and have also advised on such international arbitrations. Apart from the same, I have dealt/been a part of some of the high stake arbitrations in India for which the journey compared with litigation has been a much smoother ride.

    Getting instructions from clients, presenting the same before the arbitrator working your way out in a much organised and sophisticated manner, have been some of the most loved experiences.

    I believe we should work towards advising parties in choosing ADR rather than complex, long and haphazard litigation, which not only saves time and money of the Client but it does give a comprehensive organised flavour to the case. Speedy angle being added, makes it even more suited for clients. 

    You have been actively involved in conducting webinars on various legal topics and moderating sessions with renowned individuals in the legal field. What motivated you to engage in knowledge-sharing activities, and how do you think they benefit both legal professionals and the wider community?

    I have always been involved in such knowledge-sharing activities, since school days. Having an innate quality to help the society, I have even kept myself occupied with pro bono activities and extending pro bono legal aid to the downtrodden. 

    Be that as it may, I do not think anything motivated me, I think this is always something I liked, because I wanted to help a major section of society either by imparting education or by getting dignitaries who could do the same. 

    Such knowledge-sharing activities have far reaching effects. These days, the internet is accessible to masses. For those students or professionals who cannot afford expensive commentaries, web access, mentoring under dignitaries, can gain insights by witnessing such knowledge-sharing activities, which has been my main motive all the while. People who are preparing for exams, involved in litigation over subject matter relating to such knowledge-sharing activities etc are tremendously befitted, as they can join and during interactive sessions, pen down their queries and thereby avail answers. 

    In your role as the Founder of ABA Law Office, you have worked on notable matters such as handling complex criminal law cases, intellectual property rights etc. matters for clients. Could you share some key challenges you faced in these cases and how you effectively addressed them?

    Key challenge faced is I believe with respect to me being a female. Gender discrimination though subtle but is prevalent. Tackling the same especially in lower courts outside Delhi is yet again a major task, which I successfully seem to have handed over the years of my practice. 

    Knowing your brief, correct facts, being bold and aware about what you present, are key points which come what may, would not shake the confidence no matter what. Being any sort of subjugation from the opposite sex, having the above mentioned points, would not let you digress from your end goal.

    As a litigator, you have represented clients in various forums and courts, including notable companies like M & R Furnishing (Apartment 9), Asian Paints, Mr. Shiv Khera Central, Government of India, Indian Railways etc. Could you share some experiences from your litigation practice and how you have successfully advocated for your clients’ interests?

    Running from one court to another, 1 DAY- different forums, different state courts, international matters, briefings, advisories, client calls, drafting’s, arguing, sleep and repeat is a summary of my experience of litigation.  

    I am very confident to say that I believe in obtaining a speedy redressal for my Clients which my track record till date (by god’s grace) has been at par with my thought process. Having an unblemished record of win and speedy redressal is something for which I am truly humbled and bow down to the almighty to bestow upon his kindness. 

    Throughout your career, you have received several professional qualifications and honors, such as winning the Best Research Paper Award and being a recipient of the Ram Jethmalani Academic Excellence Award. How have these accolades contributed to your growth as a legal professional?

    They have given me the boost to consider that I am on the right track and also the reinstatement of the thought that with hard work comes success.

    Based on your experiences and expertise, what advice would you give to fresh law graduates who are about to embark on their legal careers?

    Train/intern as much as you can. Do not waste law school years by sitting ideal and wasting vacations. Any vacations, joining an internship, online internship, virtual internships can be done even if we have difficulty in pursuing physical internships. 

    Only once you have experienced different types of law offices, you would have clarity as to what is the right profession for you when you leave law school. 

    Many a times, students do not train/intern much during law schools, and end up figuring for the first 1-3 years as to which place suits them best, is it a law office, law firm, chamber, judges chamber etc. so to avoid wasting 3 -5 crucial years of career post law school, my only advice would be this. 

    Could you provide us with an overview of the collaboration between ABA Law Office and R S Solomon LLC? What drove the two firms to sign a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and join forces?

    The collaboration is an understanding between group international law firms, to work together on matters which may come across each other’s way including advisory, drafting or vetting etc.

    I always had a vision for a global practice of my Law Firm. I have always since my law school ventured to international domains to present papers, understand cultures, built international contacts, and then pursued my masters from Singapore, which further gave me an excellent domain to further strengthen my international contact database. 

    With the said edge of having an international masters from Singapore my south east Asia connect with my colleagues became very strong and soon ABA Law Office started to become a one stop shop for client who wanted to set up companies in southeast Asia by having an Indian law office who could coordinate with various other law offices abroad and get the work done.

    India clients reposed trust in ABA Law Office and soon ABA Law Office developed a strong international practice of advisory, registering trade marks, opinions on IP, contract vetting etc. 

    In the same manner, R S Solomon LLC carrying the same vision was already in a group law firm collaboration with various other law firms across the globe. With the recent BCI notification of allowing foreign lawyers and law firms in India, I saw the same as a good opportunity to further strengthen my Firm’s international practice and with the same in mind, both law firms found synergies to further dwell and commit to. 

    Get in touch with Anushkaa Arora-

  • With the right team, right resources and right networking we make sure that we are able to provide our expertise and handle different cases- Kanika Bhardwaj, Founder of Kanika Bhardwaj Law firm

    With the right team, right resources and right networking we make sure that we are able to provide our expertise and handle different cases- Kanika Bhardwaj, Founder of Kanika Bhardwaj Law firm

    This interview has been published by  Priyanka Karwa and The SuperLawyer Team

    Can you tell us about your journey and how you ended up becoming a lawyer? What drew you to the field of law and motivated you to establish Kanika Bhardwaj Law Firm?

    My journey till date has been full of ups and downs. There were several issues from time to time. Being a first generation lawyer, I have started from scratch. There was a lack of resources, there was no office ( I used to keep my files in my car and used to meet clients at canteen or CCD.) But I must say consistency is the key and then obviously one must be passionate and love what they do. If you are not passionate about this profession, I can bet you will eventually quit. So step in this profession only if you are passionate about it. 

    I always wanted to be a lawyer. So this was fixed.  It is not the case of mine where I landed up in court with the flow. I knew this place was for me and I must get in. 

    Moreover the idea of establishing a Law Firm was there in my mind since 5th year of mine because to be honest, I did almost 12-15 internships during my college days. I knew everything in and out about the courts and I understood that litigation can only be successful if you have clients on table. If there are no clients, no cases, no matter how good you are, your practice will be considered as “FAIL”. So I started moving towards my goal of establishing a law firm and bringing clients to the table since the day one I got my Certificate of practice. 

    Kanika Bhardwaj Law Firm has been providing legal services in both litigation and the corporate sector. Could you elaborate on the types of cases, matters, disputes, and legal compliance that your firm handles on behalf of clients?

    We are dealing in hard core litigation in criminal, civil, family (matrimonial) cases. 

    We also handle matters in the High court & Supreme court of India which includes appeals, writs, SLP’s, Statutory appeals, Transfer petitions etc.

    Plus we are on panel of companies and start-ups (national & international) and handling their legal department which includes contract/ agreement drafting, legal support in meetings, all sort of legal documentation, handling employer-employee issues, arbitration support, Data protection support and alongwith this we also as “Out-House Counsel” for  these companies who choose us to be on their panel or get associated with us.

    How do you develop innovative legal strategies for your clients to ensure they are always a step ahead in each case, matter, or dispute? Can you provide an example of a successful strategy you implemented?

    Every case is different just like every body and mind is different. So legal strategy always depends upon the facts of a case and also depends upon what relief does a client want. When you are in defense, you have to find loopholes in law and process, when you are for complainant or petitioner you have to make sure that a single loophole is not left. So the strategy keeps changing depending upon case to case. 

    Moreover I make sure that my clients update me with each and every information and detail of the case so that I can make a winning strategy. At times the clients also give incomplete facts or they hide some crucial part of the facts. So the first thing I do is to make the client comfortable and take out every detail of the story that I need to know for the trial.

    Second thing I usually do is to know about the opponents. It’s a saying that you win half of the battle if you know your opponent. 

    Then I come on the laws and procedures and then finally I support my case with judgements/ precedents. 

    I also make sure to go through the facts of the case again and again for the pleadings and trial. Also I focus very much on the drafting part. Drafting is very important. I have seen some lawyers randomly draft a case through a stereotyped draft. This is wrong practice. 

    Drafting should be done carefully as the draft of the case is the foundation of the entire case. Whatever you have drafted, you cannot contradict or change the same till the Supreme Court of India. So draft carefully and take proper time in the drafting part. 

    So this is how I go but again there are several stages in between which again depends upon the facts of a case and relief that client wants. 

    To make sure that my client is one step ahead, I always keep advising my client from time to time what steps he has to take, what all evidence he has to arrange, what things he should do and shouldn’t do during the trial. At cross-examination, I make sure my client reads every detail of the file and I tell him how to answer while he is being examined. I stay connected with the client and keep him one step ahead.

    Your firm strives for legal excellence while appreciating the commercial environment in which your clients operate. How do you strike a balance between personal approach and high professional standards in delivering comprehensive legal services to your clients?

    I believe that a lawyer should not develop any personal sort of relationship with the clients. It should always be professional which makes it easier for a lawyer to work and clients also respect the same. If one develops a personal bond with the clients, the client will not take the lawyer and his instructions seriously after one point of time. A client should always have a professional picture of a lawyer in his mind. Personal approach should only be limited to an extent if a client wishes to express his emotional side in regard to his case or general/ basic information about any relevant issue.

    Could you share some insights into the team at Kanika Bhardwaj Law Firm? How does the management and operations function within the firm, and what role do you as a founder of the firm play in the decision-making?

    So we have 3 juniors as of now, one office boy, one clerk and 5-6 interns which keeps changing. Whenever we get a fresh case, the juniors do the drafting, share it with me, I finalize the draft. Meanwhile the juniors do the research work, find relevant judgments on the same. Clerk is responsible for all the fillings in the court, getting the orders, keeping a record of cases and maintaining the files and other clerical work.

    We do have a team for legal drafting too. But the final draft of the case or any legal document is always finalized by me personally. 

    Kanika Bhardwaj Law Firm handles a wide range of practice areas, including civil litigation, labor law, arbitration, corporate law, intellectual property rights, and more. How does your firm ensure expertise in such diverse areas, and what is your approach to handling different types of cases?

    With the right team, right resources and right networking we make sure that we are able to provide our expertise and handle different cases. 

    The stages in all these cases are almost the same. Every Act follows the process of CPC or CrPC. And one should also thoroughly know the Evidence Act.  The exception if any and the way of challenge, appeal of an order, the jurisdiction etc. is given in the Act itself. So if you read, everything is there in the Act itself. One just has to follow it. It is not rocket science. 

    According to me a lawyer should know everything, learn everything and do everything until he comes to a level where he can earn in Lacs for 1 hearing.

    I always aimed to provide services in diverse areas, I never wanted to restrict myself in a particular field. A lawyer should have knowledge of everything. 

    Also the expertise comes from experience. The more and different cases you will do, the more experience and expertise you will have. It is a simple funda. 

    Plus, it is very important to have the right kind of networking with seniors and other important people. At times there can be a situation where you are stuck, so one must have the right connections who can help you out in such situations. We make sure that we have the resources, networking, knowledge, expertise and skills to manage different cases. But all this is not built in a day. It cannot happen in a few days or months. It took 10 years to come this far and maybe it will take a few more years to reach a certain level where I have always dreamt of.

    In addition to handling cases in various courts and tribunals, your firm also offers retainership and contract-based legal services. Could you explain how these arrangements work and how your firm maintains effective communication and updates with clients?

    The empanelment of law firms or lawyers in government and private companies is common. We act as an “out house counsel” for several companies (both nationally and internationally) and handle their internal and external legal matters and drafting of their documents e.g. contracts, agreements, NDA’s, Legal notices, arbitration support plus we handle their litigation in court. We also provide the companies and start-ups legal advice they need from time to time. 

    For all internal issues, drafting of legal documents, legal consultation, IPR and data protection related issues we charge a monthly retainership amount depending upon the work burden of a company or start-up. And in case there is any litigation, we charge extra for court cases and the fees are pre-decided. So this is how it goes. 

    Initially the issue or drafting comes to juniors, they give me a basic draft, and then I finalize it.  The court hearings are attended by me personally. 

    All the communication is via mail and virtually via zoom or google meet. If required our office is always open on working days and working hours for in-person meetings. 

    The legal landscape is constantly evolving. How do you stay updated with local and international legal developments that may affect the interests of your clients? How does your firm adapt its strategies to incorporate these changes?

    We all stay updated with the latest judgements and rules.  Nowadays several websites online keep us updated on latest judgements, rules and amendments. Several webinars are being arranged. In fact, lawsikho is one such website that helps us stay updated. 

    For judgments we have SCC and Manupatra access plus we have access to several other newsletters.

    The scenario has now changed a lot. With the digitalization in the legal profession, it is very easy now to stay updated with national and international laws. 

    Also we keep ourselves updated from international bar associations and their pages plus we are also connected to lawyers and researchers who are working in relevant fields internationally if we want to know any specific law/ rules or guidelines. 

    As a successful lawyer and founder of Kanika Bhardwaj Law Firm, what advice would you give to fresh law graduates who are starting their careers in the legal field?

    Today I have seen the law students and fresh law graduates directly in order to maybe show- off or for whatever reason directly start their internship or practice from supreme court or high profile law firms which is a major mistake. I can bet you will not understand a word there and you will end up wasting your time. 

    The right way is to start from ground level. Start from district court. Learn Trial; learn basic things e.g. filling of a case, filing of summons, learn the art of cross- examination, the stages in civil or criminal case. Once you have mastered this, and then go to the High court/ Supreme Court. Then you will be able to understand the process and arguments in upper courts. 

    If you start from High court or Supreme Court directly, you will not know how to conduct a proper trial or you won’t be able to handle a case individually. 

    So start from the scratch, there is no short-cut. 

    Get in touch with Kanika Bhardwaj-

  • Arguing a matter in court may sound and seem quite glamorous. But behind these glamor filled moments are hours and hours of hard work which of course, is behind the scene and goes unnoticed. It’s with every lawyer- Rajeshwari Hariharan, Arguing counsel, Founder of Rajeshwari & Associates

    Arguing a matter in court may sound and seem quite glamorous. But behind these glamor filled moments are hours and hours of hard work which of course, is behind the scene and goes unnoticed. It’s with every lawyer- Rajeshwari Hariharan, Arguing counsel, Founder of Rajeshwari & Associates

    This interview has been published by  Priyanka Karwa and The SuperLawyer Team

    Please  tell us about your journey and how you ended up pursuing a career in law, particularly in the field of Intellectual Property Rights?

    After college, I wanted to do medicine. But, due to some circumstances, I couldn’t do that and turned to law.  I had seen some of my father’s friends as lawyers and was curious. So I took to law and joined practice at the District court. I had exposure to many common areas of law like conveyancing, land laws, contracts, arbitration, and even medical negligence. The medical negligence case really got me hooked on law. Then I got work on some trademark cases at my senior’s chamber  (Mr Khaladkar) which lured me into the area of intellectual property law. Because IP was not so well known in District Courts, we came to Delhi to explore and understand this area bit better.  

    I realised that there are lawyers who specialise just in intellectual property law. As a green horn I wanted to absorb every bit of work that came my way – be it a trademark matter or any other. Eventually, I joined K&S Partners where I had the good fortune to work on very interesting matters including the Basmati patent revocation, turmeric patent revocation, neem patent revocation, etc. My knowledge in sciences came in handy in patent matters, be it drafting or developing arguments in court. So it was reinforced that IPR was the way to do it. 

    Soon in 2008-09 I set up my own practice. I then had the occasion to work on various important matters including the first ever compulsory licence that was granted in India by the Patent office. I continue to work on patent and other intellectual property matters and with new technologies, I think there will be many more opportunities for us to assist the court and  development of law. It has been a very interesting journey and I really cherish every moment. 

    With a background in biotechnology, what led you to specialize in Intellectual Property Rights? Was there a specific experience or event that sparked your interest in this field?

    As I mentioned, my initial  years of practice were focussed on general law. It was deliberate, as I felt that one should first build a sound fundamental platform and from thereon, one can expand and deep dive into any specific area of your liking. That’s how I did a myriad of matters including cases relating to Urban Land Ceiling Act, banking, arbitration, conveyancing, medical negligence etc. All this made me look at different areas and open up new vistas. But I always wanted to use my science background and was looking for an appropriate area where I could put this to use. My senior’s chamber had some cases on medical negligence which were very interesting. In fact, there was a suit for damages against a doctor which was filed and it was my science background that helped us make comprehensive and incisive arguments that impressed the court and finally led to dismissal of the suit. Then we got a couple of patent matters – where again I had the occasion to assist the court with my technical knowledge. We won that matter also.  All this fortified my belief that IPR is an area where my science background would inevitably be my Ace card and this area is what I should specialise in. Back then in 1995-96, generalisation was the trend and specialisation rarity. But the more I read about Intellectual property, the more I fell in love with the subject. And the love affair continues till date. Even today, I think, all that I know is just a tip of the iceberg. There is an undiscovered ocean and even a lifetime is not enough to master this infinite ocean of knowledge. You may say I was lured into IPR practice. 

    You founded Rajeshwari & Associates, a full-service IPR law firm specializing in various areas. What motivated you to start your own firm, and what were some of the challenges you faced during the initial years?

    I was always taught that law is a service, a profession where one has ample occasions to serve the public at large. And I have experienced it first-hand. We had a case relating to a land dispute (partition dispute) and our client was a farmer from Aurangabad. He would dutifully come on each day of argument, sit at the chamber with folded hands and hope that we would be able to argue and win his case. He knew he has contributing nothing in terms of law- but that was his way of expressing his moral support to us. 

    Eventually, we won the case for him at the District Court. He was so elated, so happy  that tears welled up in his eyes and he fell at the feet of my senior. We were literally “gods” for him!!!

    Our whole chamber of 15 lawyers had worked day and night to research and develop arguments for his case. When we won the case and saw the expression on this man’s face, we as young lawyers felt a deep sense of satisfaction, a sense that we did something that impacted someone’s life positively. I cannot tell you the joy that we felt or express in words the feeling that we had. All our gruelling days of hard labour, the slavery, the torture by my senior just vanished with this one expression. 

    A week later he returned with two sacks full of potatoes and rice. That was the client’s way of paying the fee for the case. My senior also accepted it with grace and did not ask anything at all. Nothing was spoken but both knew what was going on. 

    This again reinforced that we actually did something good and our work was not academic. There were many such instances that had left an indelible mark and resulted in a firm resolve, that one day, I will have my own chamber where I will serve such clients and witness the happiness on their face.  That is why, after serving in a law firm for many years, I started my own practice where I have complete freedom to decide which matters I should take up, when and how. I only wish I had done this much earlier. 

    Over the course of your career, you have achieved significant milestones in the field of IPR, including winning the first ever compulsory license for Natco and litigating the Glivec battle up to the Supreme Court. Can you share some insights into these landmark cases and the impact they had on the Indian patent landscape?

    Both these cases that you mention have had a socio-economic impact. First – the compulsory licence case. That case was one where I and every one in my team had worked for days on end researching, strategizing, going back to the drawing board again and again. And of course, with the firm backing from our client Natco, we could make it. Our client’s mission was to make a life saving drug (sorafenib) available to the common man- to save a liver cancer patient from immediate death and extend his life by several months. It was about a big pharma abrogating to itself the right to choose who would live and who would die. The mission was so huge that we couldn’t help identifying ourselves with it and acting as catalysts. The case had its own share of challenges- like how to prove that the drug sorafenib sold at Rs. 2,80,000 by Bayer is not affordable ? There was no published article that profiles and analyses the income of liver cancer patients. So, we did a survey of such patients. 

    Then, came the simultaneous suit for infringement, and our counter-claim. The court in the infringement suit asked how we could argue that the patent is invalid and at the same time, ask for compulsory licence. The answer lay in the Patents Act itself – which carves out no exception as to who can challenge the validity of a patent and provides that non-challenge clauses in agreements are bad. Case law such as Lear vs Adkins (US) came to our assistance. 

    Then came the arguments before the Controller General – I was opposite a Senior Advocate Sudhir Chandra and he was at his shrillest best. Though I may not have matched the pitch in terms of decibels or stature, me and my team had worked equally hard  to present a compelling case for grant of Compulsory licence which was ultimately upheld by the IPAB, the Bombay High Court and Supreme Court. 

    The Glivec case was also a device of strategy, strong technical arguments and arguments of public interest. Here, Novartis had been granted the first ever Exclusive Marketing Rights (EMR) under the Patents (amendment) Act 2002. Basis this, they were rightly granted injunction by the Madras High Court against certain parties. We challenged the EMR at the Delhi High Court on the ground that it was granted without hearing the affected parties, and without due notice. Novartis immediately filed a suit at the High Court of Bombay, being armed with the Madras High Court order. Our client was naturally jolted. I was told by my colleagues that its no use fighting the suit at the Bombay High court who is bound to grant injunction in view of the Madras High Court order. However, I was hopeful. We argued many issues including public interest. In fact public interest was a very strong argument in the facts of that case – the drug imatinib mesylate was to be given to CML (blood cancer) patients who were in their final stage. The cost of the drug as sold by Novartis was Rs. 1,10,00/- per month as compared to Rs. 6000-8000 of our client. We cited case law from the UK and other countries and argued various aspects of public interest. The court ultimately refused the injunction, and the primary basis is public interest. The judgement is reported as ‘Novartis Vs Meher Pharma’. 

    There was also the opposition to the patent application for polymorphic form of imatinib mesylate which opposition was allowed by the Patent office on the ground that the invention lacked novelty, inventive step and failed on the ground of section 3(d). This was one of the first ever cases where the Patent office had the occasion to explore section 3(d) and due to lack of therapeutic efficacy rejected the application. This was upheld by the High Court and Supreme Court. 

    Both are cases etched in my memory. Both are cases that have actually helped cancer patients. Something I have always wanted to do.    The Glivec case is also important for the reason that it interpreted the scope of section 3(d) and it is that interpretation that we follow till date. The CL case had interpreted the CL related provisions of compulsory licence that were hitherto considered ‘academic’ and near impossible to achieve.

    As an arguing counsel at the High Court of Delhi and the Supreme Court of India, you have represented clients in patent and other litigations. What are some of the unique challenges and opportunities you encounter when arguing before these higher courts?

    It is a very interesting and challenging life as an arguing counsel. Firstly, we argue matters on the basis of instructions from the instructing lawyers and basis their briefs. Sometimes their pleading lacks some of the most basic or crucial points that one may need for arguments. But still, we have to make do, plaster the pleading and make out a good case. Second, many times, the briefing counsel is not up to-date with the latest developments in law – resulting therefore in bad planning or taking incorrect steps or filing unwanted applications which may get rejected by the court. Obviously, the instructing counsel and more so -the client are puzzled as to what happened with the outcome. Third, I find that people just show clients a rosy garden which is bit different from real life. So again when I tell them that their case has certain flaws, they are not very happy. Fourth,  some people feel that once a brief is handed over to a senior, their job is over- it is actually the start of the process. As a result, our team has run the extra mile to make sure we have all the tools and ammunition to do well in the court. 

    Arguing a matter in court may sound and seem quite glamorous. But behind these glamor filled moments are hours and hours of hard work which of course, is behind the scene and goes unnoticed. It’s with every lawyer. 

    But at the end of the day, if we achieve a good outcome, every midnight oil burnt is worth it and we will do it a hundred times over. 

    You have been recognized as a visionary in the domain of Intellectual Property Rights. How do you stay updated with the latest trends and dynamics shaping the intellectual property landscape, especially in developing nations?

    It is very important to stay updated not only with cases of Indian courts but also of courts in other countries as it gives an idea of the trend. It also gives an insight into what was argued and how the argument was received by the court. So I try and keep case-law reading for weekends or anytime that I find free. I don’t like to waste time and I try to utilise in catching up with case law or technology. The only way to stay updated is to allocate time and in disciplined manner keep reading. I also get invited to do podcasts or talks at various places on various subjects – that also keeps me on my feet. Sometimes we have discussions with groups. All this helps. But self-reading and staying updated is indispensable.

    As a TEDx speaker, what was the topic of your talk, and why is it important for you to share your insights and knowledge through platforms like TEDx?

    I am a follower of TED talks and have been greatly inspired by these talks. I was very excited to be invited to give a TEDx talk. 

    So I thought, I should speak on a topic that would be helpful to one and all- courage and conviction, Its about having the courage to pursue your path despite the negative talk around, despite the discouragement. I think in life as well in any profession, there is a need to pursue your objective or goal with all your might, complete perseverance and passion. There will be obstacles but if you are determined, nothing can stop you. But the determination must be strong and unshakable.  

    We have been taught these principles and most of us do apply them in our daily lives and surely do practice them. But it is important to keep reminding ourselves of these principles from time to time so that we stick to the chosen path and don’t deviate. And what better example than our own experiences. 

    With burgeoning information on the internet, today’s youth wants to do something, but is often confused or even discouraged if they do not instant success like instant Maggi. 

    Hence I talked about my experience, about how I had debilitating injuries and despite that, I managed to survive and move on, rather than mourn over what was lost. I felt that if I could inspire at least one person, I can say, it’s a good beginning. 

    You have authored several articles and are a regular speaker at conferences and seminars. Can you share some of the key messages you aim to convey through your writings and speaking engagements?

    I have been writing since a very young age. Most of my speaking assignments at conferences and seminars are IPR or other legal topic oriented. Hence through these sessions, I try to spread knowledge – the knowledge that I have gained so far. I think that people attending any session on any topic should find it a good investment of time and effort- and as trainers or speakers it is our responsibility to ensure that their time is well spent. So I usually prepare and try to ensure that whatever topic I speak on throws some new perspectives and the audience is able to gain knowledge. Knowledge is gained by spreading not by keeping it locked. 

    Recently, I have authored a chapter on Trade Secrets and it is published by Chambers in 2023. You will find the link at https://practiceguides.chambers.com/practice-guides/trade-secrets-2023/india/trends-and-developments. The chapter summarises the position in India regarding trade secrets. It gives an insight into the existing law and the remedies available within the current framework. 

    Surely, with technical progress, everyone would be impacted especially companies and institutions. Its high time we enact a comprehensive law on trade secrets and law should protect confidential information in whatever shape and form. Right now, we have several judicial precedents to protect confidential information. While we are quite successful in protecting breaches of confidentiality by employees, it is always helpful to have a legislation as it imposes confidence in business owners and enables framing of appropriate policies to protect such information. 

    With your vast experience in the field of IPR, what advice would you give to fresh graduates who are aspiring to pursue a career in law, particularly in the domain of Intellectual Property Rights?

    For fresh law graduates, I would advise that they should initially try all kinds of practice areas. Gain knowledge and not look for instant money. This is a profession not a money spinning business where one expects ROI from day one or year one. It’s a profession, a service to the public. Money will come, slowly but surely. Knowledge is king. 

    So one should practice in lower courts, gain experience in courts, tribunals, working or training with solicitors as well as in-house counsels and having gained a general perspective, then, make up your mind whether you want to do litigation or something else. Its each for himself. In this profession, hard work is the only currency that may get you somewhere. There no short-cuts; so one has to have patience and keep working at it. You would attain your gaol sooner or later. If you choose litigation, it is surely a hard life. Even a solicitor’s life is not as simple as you think – every field will have its own twisted path. But one has to enjoy the process, enjoy the profession, satisfy yourself with the happiness and smile that you may bring on someone’s face. That’s the glory and gold coins this profession offers.

    Get in touch with Rajeshwari Hariharan-

  • In colleges your professors will teach you different laws but to know the procedure of court of law and to be master in it, you must know the court procedure very well- Priyanka Matlane, Founder of Matlane & Grewal Legal Associates LLP

    In colleges your professors will teach you different laws but to know the procedure of court of law and to be master in it, you must know the court procedure very well- Priyanka Matlane, Founder of Matlane & Grewal Legal Associates LLP

    This interview has been published by  Priyanka Karwa and The SuperLawyer Team

    What inspired you to establish your own law firm? What challenges  did you face in the initial stages? 

    After completing my LL.B. I joined the chamber of Sr. Advocate C.A.  Ferreira was the then Assistant Solicitor General of India practicing before the High court of Bombay at GOA. Working with him in actuality, triggered a  thought to have a settled practice like him and to establish a law firm.  Before starting my law firm ‘Matlane & Grewal Legal Associates LLP’,  the journey of 10 years as an individual advocate was not so easy. There  were many difficulties as theoretical knowledge is completely different  from the practical procedure. In colleges your professors will teach you different laws but to know the procedure of court of law and to be master  in it, you must know the court procedure very well. As an advocate you  will learn new things on a daily basis. When you start your practice as an  individual advocate at a very young age is not such an easy task. Profession of  advocates used to be considered as the profession of old ones and not of  youngsters. I do remember on completion of my 6 months internship with  Ferreira sir, I shared my views to start independent practice with my family  members, frankly, telling no one was so convinced with my thought to start an independent practice as everyone thought I don’t even know the  ABCD… of the complete court procedure. Many said ‘do you know how  to draft a case? How would you give consultation to your client? What if  you lose the case? You should spend at least 5/7 years with a senior advocate  then only you can practice independently, Bla bla ssss…..  

    But it was my Guru/Mentor Mr. Vikas Lathar (Professor of Govt. College  of Safidon) and my mother who always trusted and had faith in my  abilities. They both supported me to start my journey and see I am here  today before you. 

    To have a reputed own law firm was always a biggest dream of mine. Many times I spoke to my husband about my dream to form a law firm. My  husband Navdeep Singh Grewal, who is also a part of our law firm, encouraged me to establish “Matlane & Grewal’s”. Working as an  independent advocate and running a law firm is completely different from  each other. As I am a fast learner and love to explore, I feel that working as  an independent practitioner is restricting the growth, learnings and  controlling the case types. But a firm can become one roof to offer all legal  services. Hence, ‘Matlane & Grewal Legal Associates LLP’ came into  existence.  

    Team of our law firm works passionately as a single soul without  compromising on professional ethics. Our Law firm is growing by giving  growth to our junior advocates as well as to our interns.  ‘Different brains and different abilities will work together and will grow  together’, with this mind set up I have started my own law firm.  

    With almost 10 years of experience in the field of law, what have been  some of the most memorable cases or achievements in your career? Could  you share a particularly challenging case that you successfully handled? 

    If I tell you the truth , my every case is unique and  definitely, I have achieved and learnt something or the other from my every  single case during this decade. There are many and all the cases on which I can share working experience but as you know time is limited and I can’t go on…. But I can Yes still, share my such a memorable and wonderful  experience in my 2 cases which are very much close to my heart. The first  case is of property case i.e., the Second Appeal filed before the High Court  of Bombay bench at Aurangabad and another was a criminal case filed by  the parents against their son. I personally feel both the cases were difficult  for me to handle. As in both the disputes the emotions of parties were  ultimately affected. I won a second appeal and it was a reportable judgment.  My client got his disputed land back after spending his 30 years of life in  court. The matter earlier was handled by many lawyers but when it came to me and after filing my VP on record, I ended the matter in just 1 year.  And winning a second appeal is itself an achievement and a milestone in  one’s legal career. Talking about my second case, this was a criminal  application for maintenance filed by the 80yrs old age parents against their  55yrs old son. The parents just filed the application to see their son due to  courts dates as he was separated from his parents due to past fights and  all… when on the first date of the court hearing I tried to reconcile and I succeeded , you know what the 80yrs old parents said me, ‘ beta, tum  humare ghar me humari devi maa ban ke ayi ho, tumhari wajah se humara  bichda hua beta hume wapis mil gaya.’ The matter ended happily and the parties are still living a happy family life.  

    You mentioned being highly effective at developing creative case  strategies and writing persuasive briefs. Could you share some insights into  your approach and how it has contributed to your success in the legal field? 

    Yes, we have effective strategies and we do adopt the same  strictly while dealing with the cases.  

    Firstly, we are good listeners. We listen peacefully to our clients and we  believe in transparency and keeping client’s secrecy. Secondly, we guide and consult them according to their legal requirements  and as per available legal provisions.  Thirdly, we draft our case patiently and appropriately as per court  guidelines.  Fourthly, we prepare our strategy to have effective cross, chiefs,  arguments, etc. we prepare our whole case before filing it in actual before  the court. Fifthly, we keep on doing research on landmark cases. Simply, we keep  updated our knowledge on a day-to-day basis.  

    The legal field is known for its dynamic nature and ever-changing  demands. How do you stay updated with the latest developments and  ensure that you can adapt to the evolving legal landscape? 

    As we are the generation of the 21st Century and as the technology is  developing and upgrading rapidly. Being a law practitioner, we too adapt  and adopt the use of technology and for the same my husband cum my firm  partner always supports us to maintain the balance between the old practice era and use of new technology.  

    To stay updated with the latest developments I do read newspaper on daily basis and also, we have opted for several paid subscriptions and  applications for the same. We follow SCC, MANUPATRA,  INDIANKANOON, DIGILEGAL, ETC., We are also very much active on  social media.  

    Could you share any valuable lessons or insights you have gained  throughout your career that have contributed to your professional growth  and success? 

    For me my success mantras are: keeping legal knowledge updated,  being truthful to your profession, ethical to your clients and consistency in your  working and learnings, time management, team management, leadership  and last but not least knowing the basic laws deeply.  

    How have public speaking skills helped you in your legal practice?  What tips would you give to aspiring lawyers who want to improve their  communication abilities? 

    I’m a very talkative person. and this has always helped me to make a bridge between me and my client. With ability to have proper  communication, my client never hesitates to share his/her problems with me, no matter how the situation is worsened or the facts are sensitive. To improve the communication skill, one should have good vocabulary,  one must know our basic laws and principles, keeping updated knowledge  and lastly read, read and read. Reading always helps to grow vocabulary and knowledge.  

    Lastly, what message or advice would you like to give to fresh  graduates who are considering a career in law? What qualities or skills do  you believe are essential for success in the legal profession? 

    It is the only law which ensures and gives the balance to live a happy  life. Every single individual should know their basic and fundamental  rights. Our Constitution has always safeguarded us in every manner. At least  one member of every family should have a person from the legal profession. To pursue a career in law, according to me skills such as being a hard  worker is not the only key. But you should be smart enough. You must  have the ability to take the risk factors. Your confidence should be greater.  You should keep your legal knowledge updated always, you should be a public speaker, multitasker and presentable and definitely you should be tech savvy. 

    Get in touch with Priyanka Matlane-

  • From the clothes we wear to the recipes of food we eat, IP forms a part of anything and everything that revolves around us on a daily basis- Arpit Jain, Founder at Lawdroit

    From the clothes we wear to the recipes of food we eat, IP forms a part of anything and everything that revolves around us on a daily basis- Arpit Jain, Founder at Lawdroit

    This interview has been published by  Priyanka Karwa and The SuperLawyer Team

    Sir, can you tell us a little bit about yourself and how you became interested in law?

    I describe myself as a person on the prowl for learning new things. Even when I was pursuing Engineering, I always had an eye out for the latest developments in the law. Subsequently, I completed a course to feed my curiosity in Cyber Law then got my law degree followed by a Master’s degree and, ever since, have not looked back.

    What inspired you to focus on trademark, copyright, design and patent law, and what do you find most rewarding about it?

    My inspiration is derived from the omnipresent nature of Intellectual Property. From the clothes we wear to the recipes of food we eat, IP forms a part of anything and everything that revolves around us on a daily basis. If that is not inspiration, then what is? The most rewarding factor of IP is the never-ending brain-racking challenges the clients present in continual. To fit their ideas into the right mould in IP and the same reaching to fruition is what being rewarded truly means to me.

    Could you describe your experience as a founder of Lawdroit and the types of cases you handle there?

    LawDroit is a dynamic law firm. I established it with the motive of “IP under one roof,” and that is what I have aimed for. I started off with India-based clients, the work involves IP prosecution to litigation, and now with the help of my team have slowly expanded into International arenas as well. The experience has been nothing short of a roller-coaster ride, but when you love what you do, the low lows are a teaching point rather than a despondent experience.

    How do you advise clients on the registrability of trademarks, and what factors do you consider when conducting trademark clearance searches?

    All my work experience has taught me is that the trademark clearance search forms the ground norm of any brand. I usually assess a trademark based on how unique it is for the perceiving public. The questions I ask myself while conducting a search involve the risk of confusion, availability in the Trade Mark Office register, and whether a prior party exists, which can later turn into a red flag.

    How do you approach opposition proceedings, and what strategies have you found to be most effective?

    The most effective strategy is gauging the interest and capabilities of the other party. Before commencing an opposition proceeding, I make sure to assess how my client’s rights in the conflicting trademark are getting affected and what is the severity of such an infringement. The strategies revolve around honest concurrent use or acquired statutory or common-law rights.

    What do you think are the biggest challenges facing intellectual property law in today’s global economy?

    The first and foremost challenge I can put my finger on is the lack of knowledge. The unawareness of the aspects or the prospects that surround IP. I have come across various instances where a client wishes to safeguard a particular design but has already released it in the public domain, which makes it outrightly impossible to protect such nuances that can easily be avoided with proper awareness.

    You mentioned that you will be appearing for the Barrister and Solicitor exam in Canada later this year. What motivated you to pursue this additional qualification?

    I embarked on this journey a while ago, and additional qualifications never hurt. My only motivation, as also stated above that we are now expanding our clientele internationally, and this step was taken to embark on more projects with primary knowledge of the Canadian law of the land.

    Finally, what advice would you give to fresh graduates who are interested in pursuing a career in law, particularly in the area of intellectual property?

    My advice is two-fold. First, do not be dependent on someone to come and spoon-feed you the procedures and the law. In today’s internet era, when there is a never-ending cluster of knowledge, embrace that and read. Secondly, do not shy away from asking questions during internships and do not decide on a particular field too early. Explore a little and circle back to what floats your boat and will continue to float your boat 30 years down the line as well.

    Get in touch with Arpit Jain-

  • A lawyer must always remain humble and a student for life- Shivangi Prasad, Author & Co-Founder, Equilibrio Advisory LLP

    A lawyer must always remain humble and a student for life- Shivangi Prasad, Author & Co-Founder, Equilibrio Advisory LLP

    This interview has been published by  Priyanka Karwa and The SuperLawyer Team

    Did you always choose to be an advocate or there were other plans as well?

    I actually wanted to convert my love for painting and creativity into a career and I wanted to be a fashion designer. However, law also always seemed very exciting and I ultimately decided to choose this path. Today I can safely say that I made a good decision. There is immense pleasure in serving the society in a way I am able to do now. Everyday there is a sense of calm and peace and that belief that I made a difference.

    How challenging has it been maintaining a work-life balance and how young legal professionals can learn to strike that balance in their professional lives?

    Today’s working environment has a lot of pressures attached to it with several deadlines and deliverables and deliverables are required as of ‘yesterday’. Running a firm has required me to be on my toes for different reasons everyday. It has been overwhelming on many days too! One thing that really works for me is to try and visualise my week as much as possible and plan it in advance. When I started I felt like planning itself takes 2-3 hours of my time and I couldn’t plan days to the T as there would always be surprises but taking some time to plan my days has really helped me in the long run. It just provides a method to the madness. Further, I have a team of 20 currently. Planning helps me plan their work as well which in turn means they are prepared. In fact, I have often recommended planning in advance to my associates as well and I can see that when they do that too, there is less anxiety, quick delivery and better work life balance. Some days, as I mentioned, can be exceptional depending on sudden work demands. In such situations, its important to prioritise the most important deliverables and be aware that certain other deliverables may suffer and be prepared to let somethings go.

    With having such a great experience on POSH and training in the same, according to you what creates an obstacle for a great work environment in any organisation?

    After having conducted 250+ trainings and 200+ inquiries on this subject, I can safely say that it’s a culmination of a lot of things. There can be several factors that create obstacles for a great work environment in any organization and it can also include aspects such as micromanagement, unhealthy competition, lack of recognition and appreciation etc. However, in the context of the work I do, I think some of the below play a key role:

    1. Lack of respect: Sometimes, based on the complaints I get, it appears as though there is complete disregard for respect for the other person. There is nothing wrong in asking a person out. However, in spite of repetitively and clearly stating that one may not be interested, there still appears to be lack of respect for that decision and constant follow ups. This leads to mental breakdowns sometimes and complaints.
    2. Miscommunications – intent vs. impact: Sometimes, what a person says is very different from what a person understands. While one may say something to help the other, the other feels as though their private space is being invaded in, for example. This also acts as an obstacle for a great workplace. Further, when there is a lack of open and honest communication between management and employees or among team members, it can create confusion, misunderstandings, and a lack of trust.
    3. Inadequate leadership and vision: if leaders do not walk the talk and themselves engage in inappropriate behaviour, there is very little for others to learn. Abusive language is often considered as cool in modern workplaces and the impact is that right from leaders to new joinee – everyone ends up speaking the same language. New joinees often feel ‘that’s the way it is’ and they must become a part of the culture to really be a part of the culture. Often leaders also misuse their position and engage in harassing behaviour knowing that very few people to no one may have the courage to report – thereby percolating the behaviour throughout the fabric of the organization.
    4. Unfair or unequal treatment: Discrimination, bias, or favoritism also ads to toxic work environment that erodes trust and morale. While there are more and more regulations coming in, it is important to inculcate the practice of equal treatment to all.

    You can read more in my book – Handbook on the Law of Sexual Harassment

    What was that one case in your life wrt POSH and Child Safety at work that completely shocked you? If you could share some brief facts about it?

    Given that instances such as these have to be dealt with confidentially, I am not at liberty to discuss facts of any of the complaints I have handled. However, I can certainly say that most of the complaints feel shocking still even after having handled hundreds of them. This is not an area of work where you ever receive a pleasant concern. Anyone looking to work in this space, must consider the fact that such complaints may (most of the times) feel deeply inappropriate, triggering and may even lead to emotional or mental breakdown in extreme cases. Most of the times complaints that involve sexual assault or rape are the most disturbing. One example that I can think of right now is a case in which a child was raped by the father and the mother was aware of it. She did not say anything as she did not want the name of the family to get ruined.

    Congratulations Shivangi on your publications on several topics! But as digital media creates mis-information as well sometimes, how beneficial are the newly built websites and journals for updating yourself wrt regulatory changes?

    I think this is a very important and a relevant question today. I think we have a mix of ways in which information is being put out– some are very professional and sensitive (and that may give you the right information). Some on the other hand may use CHAT GPT for example to create content which you absolutely cannot depend on! also, this culture has someone got stuck to students in a way that often interns quote website links (which could be news paper articles) as legal reference to a legal opinion. They also write down opinions on laws based on quotes mentioned in articles without reading the actual clauses. That gets me worried sometimes as most of the information is misinterpreted. Its important for law professors as well as professionals to guide students and teach legal research. My website www.poshatwork.com also provides regular updates on the law, however, we always always always analyse the original copy of the judgment or the law to put out any summary as well. Anyone who decides to publish must take responsibility because the moment you put out an information, there are people who may depend on it.

    What are the problems according to you that are still encountered by the LGBTQ youth in India?

    Its almost impossible to list down the challenges here given there are so many. The few top ones based on my research, observation and discussions with those impacted appear to be:

    1. Lack of awareness (while a lot has changed, people still tend to use insulting language, they grapple with stereotypical understanding of the community, people misgender, deadname others due to lack of understanding around gender affirmation, people also assume a lot about bisexuality for example which may be completely incorrect)
    2. Discrimination (with lack of awareness comes discrimination. As a result most people from the community are still closeted)
    3. Lack of inclusion (with being closeted comes an apparent lack of inclusion. Even if one is getting an opportunity or doing well for themselves, the society will never know, they will never learn. As a result while things are changing slowly however most people from the community don’t get equal opportunity– be it in education or employment or any other aspect of life. Its like a vicious circle).
    4. Absence of equitable measures (there have been generations of wrong committed. Our society needs equitable measures to correct those wrongs. While some states have launched some measures which have been effective, a lot more needs to be done)
    5. Lack of facilities (infrastructure and facility needs to develop for inclusion. We do not have unisex public bathroom. Public buses are a challenge for trans folx. These need to go through a change and everyone needs to play their part).

    The law does mandate duties for all of us. You can read more about them in my book – Handbook on the Law for Protection of Rights of Transgender Persons’.

    As a legal professional with such great achievements, what motivates you to push harder than yesterday? And what is the role of mentoring specifically in the legal industry?

    As mentioned earlier, making a change everyday pushes me harder. It’s a fantastic feeling to have helped resolved a concern. As a firm, we have conducted 1500+ inquiries, 2500+ trainings and created awareness amongst 3L+ individuals directly excluding all our social media efforts. I believe that’s a good step towards building respectful workplaces but a lot more needs to be done.

    Also as mentioned earlier, today its extremely important for law professors and professionals to nudge students in the right research direction. I may sound outdated, but based on my experience with most students so far, in the world of AI and everything else, somewhere the quality of legal opinions is losing the battle!

    Finally, a word of advice for the upcoming legal professionals?

    Society and law are intertwined. If you have chosen this field, don’t shy away from reading about new developments. A lawyer must always remain humble and a student for life.

    Get in touch with Shivangi Prasad-