Can you share with us how your journey in law began, and what inspired you to pursue a career in litigation and dispute resolution?
Specialization and Expertise: Commercial Litigation, Insolvency and Arbitration.
To be honest, I belong to a family of lawyers, my father and my elder brother are both lawyers, although both have worked/work in starkly different fields. One (my elder brother), being a hardcore IPR expert and the other (my father) who has seen the growth of litigation in the once colonial town of Allahabad and been actively involved in service matters before various High Courts.
As they say, you sooner or later become a victim of your surroundings. However, in my case, it worked for the best and I can turn the statement around and say, “I am a true by-product of my enriching and encouraging surroundings”!
I would often as a child accompany my father to the court or interact with his colleagues and associates at home as well as in social spheres. In my opinion (of course as lawyers we are bred in a manner to specify our opinions !) my liking and fondness towards the profession began then itself, in my formative years. Thereafter I saw my brother go to law school as well, which is when my intentions to pursue a career in law solidified and I was sure that I wanted to become a lawyer.
My decision to pursue litigation is however a result of my internships and work experiences at various law offices. The irony is that my first job offer and might I add, with a hefty pay in a big firm, was NOT in litigation but the General Corporate team. However, even then, I refused to take up that opportunity and decided to start all over with the process so long as I was given Litigation. Thus, inherently, my brain and heart were always drawn towards litigation.
With expertise in civil and commercial disputes, arbitration, intellectual property, and more, what specific aspects of law drew you in, and how did you develop such a diverse skill set over the years?
My personal favourite has always been the constitution, which is why I was driven to even appear for the Advocates-on Record examination, which I successfully cleared in the year 2022!
However, over the last couple of years, I have come to the conclusion that in the intensely dynamic environment that we live in where the laws are revolving on a constant basis, it is imperative to have at least the bare minimum knowledge of all fields of law, so as to best advise your client. Let’s say you have a client who approaches you for a simple case of corporate fraud, your advice however will start on the basic provisions of companies act in the north pole and span to filing a criminal complaint in the south pole. For the naked eye, one is a civil remedy and one is criminal, but for me, both are equally important. Thus, I feel, skill sets also develop over the years based on the kind of matters and briefs you receive or work on as well as the happenings and trivia in the legal fora, which in my view, every budding lawyer should keep pace with.
Establishing your own law firm is a significant accomplishment. What motivated you to form Aeddhaas Legal, LLP, and how has the experience of working with accomplished legal professionals influenced your approach to legal practice?
From the time I decided I wanted to pursue a career in litigation, I had my eyes on like a hawk!! on opening my own law firm and setting up my practice.
I was fortunate to have met people who I connected and bonded well with, who echoed the same feeling as mine, and thus, we all got together and created Aeddhaas.
One thing I learnt the most from all the stalwarts at the bar as well as all the accomplished legal professionals I have worked with is the golden rule of always being prepared. One thing I preach to every lawyer is that you must always read your brief to the fullest (of course over time you learn the art of swiftly navigating ) as well as prepare your draft after a detailed research to seal any/all loopholes. A good draft in my opinion is not one which runs into 100 pages but one which briefly summarizes the issue in question. At the same time, a good argument is not the one which involved showing to the court every document (in most cases pleadings exceed 10000 pages!!), but one where the advocate runs through the essentials, to touch the heart of the case.
I also learnt the benefits of team work and how to be calm and patient even in the time of an urgency to take the right decisions.
Thus, Aeddhaas for me is the final dish, of all such ingredients, hard work, team building, patience (most important virtue of a lawyer) and attentiveness!
Your experience in handling matters under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is extensive. Can you share insights into the complexities involved in such cases and the strategic considerations one needs to keep in mind?
Insolvency and Bankruptcy code is now one of the most commonly invoked statutes in our country. I have always had an affinity towards commercial laws and hence, once the code was published, I was naturally drawn towards the same.
To be frank, as it is still fairly new as a law in our country, it still keeps evolving. It’s an extensive statute with various regulations and rules made thereunder.
I would recommend that to be abreast, the best way is to read the recent judgments and monthly updates released by various legal media. Nowadays live law and bar and bench upload updates even before the judgments are released online! Life has become easy because of them. So, we must use these mediums to our benefit.
For handling matters under the IBC, strategy planning with regard to the end goal at the very initial stage, whether you are for the corporate debtor or the creditors, goes a long way.
With a focus on arbitration matters, including those related to construction contracts and commercial agreements, what role do you see arbitration playing in resolving disputes, and how has the landscape evolved during your career?
Arbitration is the need of the hour. In my opinion an arbitration clause has become as important as a confidentiality clause in any agreement/contract and there has been a paradigm shift worldwide towards arbitrating disputes viz entering into long drawn litigation battles, which in case of international commercial contracts is a nightmare, be it in the initial stages of overcoming the hurdle of jurisdiction or seeking the enforcement of a decree.
Having said this, even though the Indian Arbitration Act was enacted to be time bound, today, realistically speaking the Appellate courts are burdened with appeals and challenges to the awards passed by arbitrators, leading to a delay in execution. All in all however, the interim reliefs and ease of dispute management are unparalleled with arbitration.
Unlike courts that are often overwhelmed with a high volume of cases each day, comparatively, arbitration provides parties with more time and opportunities to present their arguments. In arbitration proceedings, parties have more flexibility in scheduling hearings and presenting evidence, which can result in a more efficient and streamlined resolution of disputes. This is because arbitration is a private and confidential process, and the parties have more control over the proceedings, including the selection of the arbitrator (who can be a specialist in case of subject matter being technical in nature). As such, arbitration can be a more attractive option for parties seeking a faster and more cost-effective resolution of their disputes.
Reflecting on your career, what would you consider as the key milestones or turning points, and how have any challenges or setbacks contributed to your growth as a legal professional?
Well I am fortunate to not come across any setbacks as yet and I hope it continues to be the same. My journey so far has been exactly the way I thought it would be. Turning point is of course setting my own practice and qualifying the Advocates-on Record examination.
The transition from working for someone else or a law firm to establishing one’s own practice presents numerous challenges beyond just completing tasks. In addition to securing new clients and meeting their expectations, there are other obstacles to overcome such as financial management, marketing, and building a reputation in the legal community. These challenges can be overwhelming, but successfully navigating them is a significant milestone for any lawyer.
As a legal professional, it is my duty to provide my clients with the most effective solution within a specific timeframe. So far, I have been doing justice to my work and that I think the actual growth one should be aiming for.
As someone with a wealth of experience, what advice would you offer to law graduates entering the field today, especially those aspiring to build a successful career in litigation and dispute resolution?
Law is a dynamic field. You could be making policies sitting in the parliament or challenging their implementation. You could be the mastermind behind a watertight contract or the person whose job is to find ways to read into the clauses. You could be the one because of whom we resonate a tick to Nike and an apple to Apple) or the one because of whom an acquisition or merger failed.
My advice is simple, whatever it is that you intend to do, be it corporate, litigation (civil or criminal), be it IPR or policy, one should begin planning their way forward the day you step foot in law school. I am sure there are days when confusion is bound to occur, however, the sooner you surpass that, you will be way ahead of many others by the time you graduate. You would get the advantage of taking up internships in the specific field and building your CV, additional courses, writing papers and attending conferences in the field of your preference. This way, by the time you graduate out of law school, you are not a ripe student looking for direction, but someone who would add value to the place which hires you.
Can you share your journey and how you ended up becoming a litigation attorney, especially specializing in intellectual property disputes, arbitration, and corporate laws?
It all began from a small town called Chittorgarh (Rajasthan), where I was born and did my schooling. There people were aware of only very limited career options such as engineering, BBA, MBA or BCA, MCA. Most people opted for one of these.
I was not inclined towards any of these and was honestly quite confused at that point. It was then through a relative that I got to know about the integrated course of BBA, LLB. I researched on the subject and that’s where I was hooked. That was my first exposure to legal life.
During college, I participated in a few moot court competitions (most of the time as speaker), as well as took on internships every semester. So while my initial mindset was towards joining a company as in-house counsel, from these experiences, I learned about my acumen as a litigator and speaker. Most importantly, I enjoyed it tremendously. I understood that a legal career is like a tree with several branches, but the trunk remains litigation i.e. the Court practice. Because no matter which branch you choose as your career, you will always find your way back to the trunk i.e. the court cases and litigation.
By the time I reached my final year of law school, I was sure that I would start my career most definitely with litigation to learn drafting, filing, arguing, preparing for Court hearings, etc. Basically all the aspects of litigation. After graduation, I joined a law office in Jaipur, Rajasthan.
In Jaipur – at my first job, I was handling Intellectual property infringement cases. I also helped some of my seniors in court while appearing and arguing bail applications and other cases, with no charge. My focus was to learn as much as possible in my first year. This is how I got several opportunities to argue IP infringement cases, bails, criminal first appeal, Arbitration petitions, MACT cases.
While the experience in Jaipur was a very rich learning experience for me, I was still worried about my financial stability. At the same time, I also started enjoying the process of preparing cases, finding case laws, preparing arguments, occasional long nights and then arguing in Court. All it took to make up for any tough nights, bad days, etc., was a single compliment or favourable order from the bench.
Another subject that has piqued my interest since my college days is the law of crimes. Naturally, I dabbled in this field as well. That said, soon I realised that Intellectual Property laws and Arbitration are comparatively newer statutes with a lot more coming especially in terms of interpretation and evolving jurisprudence. Being a first generation lawyer, I was especially keen on taking on a new challenge and mastering it- drawing me into these new subjects.
Even when I was practicing in Jaipur, I frequently travelled to the Delhi High Court for various IP and arbitration matters. Slowly I realised that the scope of learning is far wider in Delhi for these subjects motivating my move to Delhi.
In 2017, I got an opportunity to join a law firm in Delhi where I learned a lot about Intellectual Property Laws- such as civil and criminal cases, enforcement and raid actions, communicating with clients and general advisory. This was great exposure and after a few years I took the risk and finally decided to go independent. I wanted to explore and learn matters arising out of various other laws such as Criminal cases, Arbitration matters, other Commercial disputes, etc.
During my independent practice, I came in contact with the Senior Partners at Ediplis Counsels. The very first conversation was fruitful as they not only understood my passion for litigation but in fact appreciated it. So much so that I was offered a partner position to develop and manage a team for litigation.
With almost a decade of experience practicing law, can you highlight some of the most memorable cases you’ve worked on, particularly those involving the interface between criminal and corporate laws?
Ahh! I always find these questions very tough to answer. I treat all my cases like my baby and it’s always difficult to choose your favourite child. However I still remember one fine day when my senior in Jaipur called me for a meeting immediately. I was informed that an FIR was lodged in Kota against one of our clients for alleged copyright infringement. This client was in fact a senior citizen. He was being taken from Alwar to Kota (Rajasthan) under custody and I was asked to leave immediately to figure out his release. This was particularly important as Diwali was approaching. I reached the police station at Kota and tried to convince police personnel that the allegation in the FIR does not constitute any offence under the Copyright law, however all efforts went in vain.
The next day, my senior was supposed to join me but due to some unavoidable reasons he couldn’t make it. This was when I got the opportunity to argue my first bail and my client was released. When I returned to my office in Jaipur, my senior gave me my first salary. For obvious reasons, this case is still very close to my heart.
Another very interesting and relevant scenario is when we recently filed an action against a social media influencer who had uploaded multiple defamatory/disparaging videos on YouTube. In this day and age of the internet, it was of utmost importance to take swift action to prevent dissemination of defamatory/disparaging content. After consulting with our client and relaying our strategies, we were able to file a suit for injunction and damages wherein on the first date of hearing, we secured an ex-parte, ad-interim temporary injunction against the social media influencer. Google was also directed to take down the disparaging videos from their platform Youtube.com
At the moment, we are also handling a very unique case of identity theft where an unknown person has obtained illegal digital signatures in the name of our clients, created fake LLPs, and filed trademark withdrawals impersonating our clients. We filed a writ petition seeking appropriate directions from the Delhi High Court and the Hon’ble Court was pleased to direct the government departments to reply to the representations submitted and resolve the issue within two weeks. Since these discussions and a final resolution is impending, I cannot disclose any further details for now. We curated an out of box strategy for our clients here and I’m happy to report that it has provided good results.
Having worked with different law firms and currently heading litigation at Ediplis Counsels, what factors influenced your career decisions and transitions between firms?
Litigation is generally also called “practice” i.e. the more you work, the more you learn. When I use the word learning, it is not limited to various laws and Court cases but also extends to communications and handling different clients. Each client is unique and accordingly needs different kinds of solutions, patience levels, strategies, etc. My transitions between firms was motivated by the various learning opportunities that each place provided. At every firm I have learnt a lot – not only have I learnt how to handle different kinds of cases but also to handle different kinds of clients ranging from a poor needy person, to a new and promising start-up, or even an established conglomerate or governmental body.
Finally, joining Ediplis as Partner was a conscious decision as now I can not only independently use my experience to serve the clients, but at the same time can always strategize with other senior partners who are experts in their respective domains.
Your profile mentions expertise in conducting civil and criminal raids for trademark protection. Could you share an experience or case that stands out in this aspect and the challenges you faced?
So in Trademark Law- there are two kinds of remedies against infringement, one a civil lawsuit filed before the Court seeking injunction and second filing a criminal FIR. In both the scenarios, it is imperative to conduct search and seizure at the premises of the infringer (also known as raid).
I have been lucky enough to be a part of both civil and criminal raids in my journey. It involves lots of research, right from the starting till the infringing products are seized. Each experience brings something new to the table – sometimes one may have to convince police personnel or even explain the basics of IP law, other times you may have it easy with personnel who already know the procedure. The risks can also vary as it is possible that the target entity is very influential in a local area. This could create problems right in maintaining secrecy which is a crucial component before any raid- the complete procedure is not only very filmy but very exciting also.
I still remember one raid which I conducted for a famous electronics manufacturer. The targets were spread out at 16 different shops in 6 markets located across 6 different cities of India. All the raids were conducted simultaneously. I was in a famous electronics market in Chennai. I had an intuition that this is not going to be easy and I will have to be really quick in my process. However, by the time my team and I were concluding the seizure, the whole electronic market surrounded us. There were approximately 70-80 people who threatened us and tried to detain us in the market. I decided to approach the president of the market immediately and convince him politely to let us complete the procedure. I explained to him that we were not taking any products and that we would only click photos, make an inventory and then they can defend their case in Court. After much persuasion and cajoling, we safely came out from that market. It was a bone-chilling experience. But we were happy when the task was completed.
Being recognized as an IP Specialist by Asia Law Profiles and a Recommended Lawyer by Legal 500 Asia Pacific, how have these accolades impacted your career and approach to legal practice?
The first feeling is always feeling happy and excited, when your hard work is recognized. I also treat them as milestones and it motivates me to put in more effort, with more sincerity.
Can you shed light on your role in advising and handling Custom Recordal portfolios for various corporate and Fortune 500 companies? What challenges do you often encounter in this domain?
The owner of an intellectual property can register its brand(s) with the Customs Authorities. This is highly recommended for brand owners. Once the brand is registered with the Customs Authority, the same is uploaded to a central database which can be accessed from all ports. Now, whenever a consignment is imported into India and customs officers suspect that it may be containing counterfeit goods, they seize it and call the representatives of brand owners (us in most cases). After a detailed inspection of the seized consignment, we file our reply stating whether the consignment has original or counterfeit goods. If the goods are original then they are released however, in case they are counterfeit, such goods are seized and destroyed thereafter.
There are many challenges which we face in this process- in order to get the brand registered we need to continuously follow up with the authorities, we also keep conducting trainings for the Customs officials to apprise them about the developments in the IP laws, about the new products of our clients and the new kinds of infringement which are being imported etc.
Given your background in both criminal and corporate laws, how do you navigate the complexities of white-collar crimes, bail applications, and other related areas?
We have been assisting our clients in conducting internal audits and to create appropriate risk mitigation strategies. Since the stakes involved in white-collar crimes are very high, we have to be very cautious, and thus as a general policy we have several meetings with our clients to understand their actual needs. Thereafter we curate an exclusive strategy for each client to move further. I always feel if due diligence and research is accurate, it becomes really easy to get a favourable order, be it bail applications or any other discretionary relief.
With your extensive experience, what advice would you give to law graduates entering the field today, particularly those interested in pursuing a career in litigation, IP disputes, and corporate laws?
Be patient and avoid peer pressure. Every person has their own journey. In the initial days of your career, focus on learning a variety of cases/laws. I particularly always recommend my colleagues to start from scratch and have strong basics. It is important to know the legal profession right from arranging files to arguing cases. Research and knowledge is key and something one must continue at all ages and experience level in this profession. Transparency and providing a very clear picture of the case and potential results to your client is imperative.
Reflecting on your journey, could you share some insights into your college days at ILS Law College, Pune, and the initial struggles you faced in the early days of your career after graduating? How did those experiences shape your resilience and approach to the legal profession?
Law School is where you formed your foundations, be it education or friends. ILS Law College was, and remains, one of the most prestigious institutions in Law. It was an incredible learning experience as you came together with aspiring lawyers from all over the country. It was evident from the beginning that the legal profession professed immense competition and that one needed to do more than what was ‘required’ in order to stay ahead of the curve. Whilst at Law School, our version of finding a job was finding an ‘internship’! There was immense competition, if for nothing else, then for bragging rights – which was an undeniable reality. These early experiences were a lesson for later years – that life wouldn’t be easy, or fair.
Your legal career spans over 17 years, with a wealth of experience in civil/criminal litigation and commercial arbitration. Can you share a memorable moment or case that significantly shaped your approach to legal practice?
It was in my second year in the profession where I was faced with the occasion of having to argue a high stakes matter before the Delhi High Court in an arbitration case. As my senior was on his legs at that moment (as is very common), I sought the customary Passover. However, the Hon’ble Judge insisted (read: encouraged) that I present the arguments. Reluctantly, I proceeded with the arguments. My senior arrived mid-way but the Hon’ble Judge insisted I continue. After the hearing, my senior encouraged me to lead the matter, of course, with his support in whatever way needed. We went on to win the matter.
The takeaway: Judges will always be there to inspire and encourage you, but the hard work will have to be yours alone. You must be able to cash in on opportunities through thorough preparation, of law as well as facts. Your Seniors will also be there to mentor and guide you, but you must win their trust – again, through your work. These are privileges, which must never be misused.
I was extremely fortunate to have found the support from my senior during my early years who was pivotal in my learnings, especially that there is nothing like a big or small matter. Every matter is equally important for a lawyer because it carries the trust of a client, which must be reciprocated with competence and responsibility. Also, you either know an answer or you don’t – never faff! Your duty to your client is always first and sacrosanct.
As a Partner at Kochhar & Co., you handle disputes related to arbitration, insolvency, and commercial litigation. What aspect of your current role do you find most fulfilling and challenging?
Keeping abreast with the ever evolving concepts of law is one of the most crucial aspects for any practice, be it Arbitration, Insolvency, or any other field. Clients look for solutions from both legal as well as commercial perspectives. Striking a balance between the two remains the most challenging and satisfying aspect. Your skillset must include the ability to provide out of the box solutions.
Beyond your legal expertise, you’ve been associated with various publications. What inspired you to write articles?
As a lawyer, you are constantly exploring ways to hone your skills, especially reasoning and conveyancing. When you write an article, you are free to express your own views on a subject after understanding the jurisprudence and evolution of said subject. But it is not just about sharing your views, rather how to grasp the attention of the reader. This requires a fair amount of research and formulation of opinions based thereon. To articulate and convey your views independent of others is the biggest privilege a lawyer has.
Your bio mentions a deep passion for the legal profession, passed down through a family of lawyers. How has this familial connection influenced your journey, and what does the legal profession mean to you on a personal level?
Growing up, we were privy to numerous stories and anecdotes emanating from the legal profession. This definitely had an impact on the decision to pursue law, but said decision was never owing to expectation or pressure. We were always free to choose our career path and were always supported in that. From the beginning, we were motivated to make it on our own and not through whom you knew. Case in point: my father refused to consider my candidature for his organization unless I had garnered at least 3-4 years of experience!
I have always considered the legal profession as a noble profession. I learned very early that representing a client was an enormous responsibility which could only be shouldered through your understanding of the law and a thorough appreciation of the issues involved. On the other hand, you are also an officer of the Court, which comes with its own set of responsibilities. There must be a sense of pride when you don the gown, but never arrogance.
Having been associated with both DSK Legal and Luthra & Luthra Law Offices, what unique aspects of each firm have contributed to your professional growth, and how do these experiences influence your approach as a Partner at Kochhar & Co.?
Both organizations had very distinct and unique characteristics.
While at Luthra, I was fortunate to have been a part of a wonderful set of lawyers, and human beings alike in a very close knit environment. Our senior colleagues were always ready to help and mentor, which every newcomer looked to. A lot was learnt in the ways of mentorship and on how to hone your skills as a lawyer. In many ways, I learnt my core professional values whilst at Luthra. It taught me the importance of not only learning to deliver quality, but also of the need to guide and assist youngsters.
DSK Legal further encouraged you to go beyond the role of a Partner and to grow as an individual. It is with the combined experience garnered from both organizations that I look to assisting my present organization in its visions ahead.
From your time at The Doon School to being a School Athletics Captain, how do you think your early experiences and leadership roles in school have shaped your professional journey?
Doon has played a pivotal role in my journey. I was primarily a long distance runner which entailed two main requirements: keep breathing, and keep going – a trait most often needed in today’s profession in many ways! Doon inculcated a strict sense of discipline and leadership from a very early age. These characteristics have been essential to me through the years in the profession.
In addition to your legal expertise, you’ve authored articles and judged Moot Courts. How do you balance the roles of an author, mentor, and litigator, and how do these activities contribute to your overall professional satisfaction?
All these roles are interlinked. It is crucial to invest in mentoring and undertaking extracurriculars beyond work. Time has always been a constraint but one needs to find the time as these are investments you make in yourself as an individual. Moot Courts are an excellent way to interact with budding lawyers and to get a feeling on how they perceive the law and present themselves. The coming generation is extremely sharp and intelligent, and they certainly offer a fresh perspective, which is often much needed.
Apart from your professional commitments, how do you unwind and relax? Are there any hobbies or activities that you particularly enjoy in your free time?
Travelling has been the best way for unwinding and finding a break from the regular vigour of life. I found my ultimate Xen in Scuba Diving many years back, which I pursue religiously.
AI is fast taking charge in developing times. How do you see AI impacting the legal industry?
Technology has always been a powerful tool in a lawyers arsenal. Online research, though not a substitute for conventional modes, has certainly been a boon over the past many years with access to legal databases merely a click away. Now with the advent of AI, the landscape of the profession is fast changing. Numerous Corporates have already started using this for their professional needs. There is thus a dire need for lawyers to adopt and adapt, lest you miss the bus.
AI is well poised to reduce (and in cases, even remove) the reliance on different sources, be it drafting or research. Although human logic and ingenuity is difficult to be substituted, Generative AI is certainly a stiff competition in the field. What will be the endgame in the vista, time will tell. For now, AI is certainly the most powerful tool available to us and its potential must be capitalized.
Would you like to share any suggestions or advice for the upcoming generation of lawyers?
Read, read, and read! There is no shortcut to hardwork. Every lawyer is unique.
Cherish your relationship with your Mentor, but maintain respect and independence. Read “Letters to a Young lawyer” by Alan M.Dershowitz for more insights.
Invest time in networking early – this will be your biggest asset in the later years.
Always look out for yourself – you alone will be responsible on setting the trajectory of your career. Don’t let anyone dictate your choices. Have confidence in yourself.
Eat well and stay fit – don’t be 50 at 35.
Lastly: no matter how successful you become in life – always respect the Bench.
Mr. Naveen, your journey from the University of Delhi to becoming an Advocate-On-Record with over two decades of experience is impressive. Can you take us through the pivotal moments or decisions that shaped your path and brought you to where you are today?
While the journey from Delhi University onwards may be as good as it could be, the expedition from a village school to CLC (Campus Law Centre of Delhi University) is nothing short of a miracle. As it is said, if you believe in miracles they do happen. Today while I can boast myself as a modern english educated person having scientific temperament, I owe a lot to the scriptures, especially “The Ram Charitramanas” (by Goswami Tulsidas) without which I could not have grown even as an educated person.
As in the first page of the epic Tusidas ji has worshiped goddess of faith and belief by saying “भवानीशङ्करौ वन्दे श्रद्धाविश्वासरूपिणौ” (alute lord Shiva and mother goddess Parvati who are personification of faith and belief). In hindsight, I can trace my existence to the very faith and belief (in God and oneself) which shaped my early life. Thus, I have no hesitation in confessing that I could not have received even an elementary education but for my interest in spiritualism and mythological stories such as Ramayana, Mahabharata, Puranas etc which used to be daily ritual in my family, while growing up in a village of district Siwan (Bihar).
Of course, the spiritual light was sparked by the parents, especially my father, a deeply religious person, who used to narrate bed time stories of Ramayana, Mahabharata and Puranas etc.
In this backdrop even before starting formal schooling, I was able to recite Chaupai and Dohas. My father had a fixed routine throughout his life, he used to do puja (worship) every morning which included Path (recital) Ram Charitmans. The child’s natural curiosity led them to look through the pages of the epic, perhaps starting with the photos, and thereafter reading the stories. Soon I grew up as a favorite child to be called for reciting Dohas and chaupais in front of guests and visitors by my father.
I don’t remember anything more about my studies or schooling up to class 8th. A significant milestone (again in hindsight) was surpassed when I was shifted from the village primary school to high school in class 9th in the year 1984-85. Because of my interest in Hindi poetries etc., and the ability to orate them loudly in front of anyone, a few of my teachers somehow started admiring and encouraging me.
In the year 1985, during the 9th class, I won the first prize in antakshari on Tulsi Jayanti. Though it may not have seemed much worth at the time, today, it appears to be one of the significant events of my life. This achievement drew the attention of more and more teachers in school towards me, leading to special attention in my studies.
Due to the encouragement of the teachers, I began to take my studies more seriously, ultimately becoming the highest scorer in the 10th board exams in the whole village. Even today, I can vividly recollect my first day as I started learning my alphabets in the sunshine on the auspicious day of Basant Panchami in 1985 when one my teachers, Shri Hiral Lal Singh, started teaching me ‘angrezi’ (English).
Because of the encouragement (rather blessings) of my teachers I grew up to become the first person in the joint family (of about 30 people), consisting of all of my cousins, to study beyond Class 12th.
The first seed of big dreams were planted again by sheer coincidence (almost like a miracle). In 1987, my identity as a sincere student received a boost due to my good result in 10th Board. Simultaneously, an unrelated event occurred where a native of Siwan district topped the UPSC Civil Services Exam in the same year. Instantly, it became a matter of huge celebration and talk of every nook and corner of the district including my village. A number of inspiring tales of hard work and success left a lasting charm of civil services which stuck with me and played a role in drawing me to Delhi.
As I landed up in Delhi with big dreams and empty pockets the hard realities in the form of huge financial constraints and cultural shock put insurmountable challenges; in that backdrop few well-wishers suggested getting admission in a Law course in DU which would give access to library and other facilities. Accordingly, preparation for DU entrance started, and luckily, I secured a few tuition assignments to sustain survival in the life of the metro. After having secured good rank in the entrance test, doors of CLC opened and so the new horizon of hope, aspiration and struggle.
During CLC days I was again dear to my teacher who inspired me to engage in the extracurricular activities as visits to Tihar Jail, Criminal Courts, Slums-areas, I used to perform in Nukkad-Natak etc,. as a part of our Legal awareness activities which opened the doors of real-life learnings and helped me to develop a keen interest in interplay of law justice (or injustice) at the crude level.
Thus, my journey is an intricate interconnection of how spirituality, education, and the quest for knowledge all played a role. Starting from the small village temple to studying law, each part of my journey has added to my life story, making me who I am today.
Your career spans over 24 years in litigation, with a focus on diverse areas like Energy/Natural/Mining Laws, Intellectual Property, and more. Can you share a case that significantly shaped your approach to law and advocacy?
After having completed my LL.B. degree in 1998, I got my bar registration and plunged into practice; the obvious choice for me was to start from Tis Hazari court as some of my friends as well as seniors were practicing there. I drifted for about 2 years in various chambers of Tis Hazari court. In 3rd year through a senior’s reference, I joined the chambers of Mr. Gopal Jain, (now a senior advocate). This opportunity proved to be a very huge milestone as I got access up to the highest echelons of litigation practice. Because of my initial training in district courts and hardworking nature my senior started giving independent briefs for subordinate courts and showed full faith in me. I got various chances to handle the cases independently which ultimately turned out to be a good grooming process. While working with Mr. Jain, I had numerous opportunities to brief various senior advocates, including the most renowned ones and these opportunities enhanced confidence and enriched my understanding of diverse legal areas.
Like any other young aspirant, I too was fascinated by the grandeur of the Apex Court. I was a regular visitor to the premises of the highest court of the land. However, I didn’t get any case in the Supreme Court despite my sincere wish for that. As it is said, that every thought is a prayer, my purposeless visits manifested into a reality when I got my first Supreme Court case in the year 2005 with reference to one of my distant relatives. Later on, another milestone in my career as an advocate of the Supreme Court was achieved when I got one case involving eleven policemen accused of murder in an encounter in Jharkhand, which later on became a landmark judgment on Section 482 of the Cr.P.C.
During the grooming days striving to become a practitioner in the Hon’ble Supreme Court and High Court(s) of India, my mentors/seniors instilled the ethos of “working like a horse and living like a hermit”. A junior is expected to be very thorough with the list of dates, comparative analysis of rival pleadings, argument points, compilation of case laws and also possible arguments of the other side (devil’s advocate) etc. As I always aspired to be a litigation lawyer in higher forums, I was constantly asking my seniors to provide me more and more work or opportunity to read files, also, I used to ask for those matters, which were not assigned to me. In that process and during my association with Mr. Jain I gained invaluable experience and professional maturity.
A significant turn happened in 2011 when I handled a case related to illegal mining before the Supreme Court of India, arguing against a renowned Senior Advocate and securing a favorable outcome for the mining lease holder. The controversial and politically sensitive nature of the case gained widespread attention in the State of Odisha consequently I started getting a lot of mining cases which eventually created my reputation as a mining lawyer and till date I have handled almost 500 mining cases before Mines Tribunal, NGT, different High Courts and Supreme Court. In fact, in 2018, in one of the most controversial mining cases, a bench of the Apex court asked a super senior to give way to me to address the court, and after five days of full day arguments a reported judgment was delivered. This provided firmness in Supreme Court litigation practice, marked by strong desire, hard-work, consistency and consequent abilities to overcome the hindrances/ barriers created by language, lack of family background, or financial or other support from parents.
Your extensive list of publications showcases a keen interest in legal commentary. How do you decide which topics to delve into, and what impact do you hope your writings have on the legal community or society at large?
In determining the topics for my legal commentaries, I am guided by a dual purpose – a passion for the subject matter and a commitment to addressing issues that hold relevance for the legal community and society at large. Each publication represents a careful selection based on contemporary legal challenges and emerging issues.
For instance, my book titled “Sand Mining Laws in India” delves into a crucial yet often overlooked aspect of environmental law. Through this work, I aim to shed light on the intricacies of sand mining regulations, contributing to a better understanding of the legal framework surrounding this environmental concern.
The article “Judicial Restraint in Tender matters – A perspective,”published in SCC Online, reflects my interest in exploring the nuanced application of judicial restraint in the context of tender matters. By sharing this perspective, I hope to initiate thoughtful discussions within the legal community and contribute to the development of jurisprudence in this area.
Similarly, my writings on topics like“Principles of Bail in Financial Crimes,” “Goal of Net Zero,” “Ban on Single-use-Plastic,”“Gender Pay Gap,”and“Compensatory Afforestation”aim to bridge the gap between legal theory and practical implications. These pieces in Bar and Bench and Live Law are designed to prompt reflection, foster informed dialogue, and potentially influence legal discourse and policy-making.
Ultimately, my goal is not only to contribute to the legal scholarship but also to bring about positive changes and make contribution in the legal discourse. I aspire for my writings to serve as catalysts for discussions, policy reforms, and a deeper understanding of the legal complexities surrounding these critical topics.
You’ve authored “Sand Mining Laws in India.” What inspired you to write on this specific subject, and what challenges did you face in distilling such complex legal issues for a broader audience?
So far as the sand mining is concerned, from my experience in appearing before NGT and Supreme court, I realized that there is a serious discord between the authorities who are granting quarry leases for sand and those who are regulating and implementing the environmental regulations concerning the sand mining. Through interactions with numerous lease holders, it became evident that they were uninformed about the intricate statutory rules, regulations, circulars and office memorandums etc., governing their business of sand mining. Due to the lack of awareness, many miners incur the ire of NGT, resulting in the imposition of significant penalties. Many times, penalties are computed by the committees constituted by the NGT, which are based on an eye estimation, surmises, conjectures and which is far beyond the paying capacity of the respective quarry holders. This mainly inspired me to write a book on this specific topic with a purpose to spread awareness amongst the stakeholders about the required compliance as sand the most extracted materials from the earth’s crust and a lot of environmental, social, sustainability concerns do arise from it. Thus, it underlined the necessity of basic awareness within the mining community and other stakeholders. Another aim is to provide a view point to the policy makers, researchers and to facilitate informed decision-making in this crucial sector.
Your practice extends to various tribunals like NGT, NCDRC, NCLT, NCLAT, and more. How do these forums differ from appearing in courts like the Supreme Court or High Courts, and how do you adapt your advocacy style accordingly?
Practicing in different forums like NGT, NCDRC, NCLT and NCLAT is little different from that in higher courts like the Supreme Court or High Courts. These tribunals specialize in handling specific cases, such as those related to environment, corporate and financial matters. The rules and procedures in these tribunals are designed specifically for the types of cases they adjudicate, showcasing a nuanced and specialized approach in contrast to the broader scope of the Supreme Court or High Courts.
On the other hand, the Supreme Court and High Courts have a broader jurisdiction, dealing with a wide range of legal issues beyond specific specialties. Appearing in these courts involves navigating more general legal procedures and practices.
The main difference is that tribunals are specialized, allowing for a more focused and streamlined approach to cases within their specific areas. This sets them apart from the broader and more diverse settings of the higher courts, with their own dynamics and nuances.
Usually when we prepare for cases, we do extensive research of all the relevant case laws and topics which are germane to that particular matter. To adapt my advocacy style accordingly, I focus on the specific rules and procedures of each forum. The key is to be flexible and adjust my approach based on the unique requirements of each forum.
You’ve presided over workshops on legal awareness. Why is legal education and awareness crucial in today’s society, and what challenges do you see in bridging the gap between legal intricacies and public understanding?
Legal awareness programs hold immense significance for several reasons, and if we impart basic legal awareness to the masses, it will be the most effective tool for empowering them. Equipping people with fundamental information about their legal rights and responsibilities is a necessity, as it enables them to deal with injustice which they face on a daily basis by the police and other administrative machinery. In fact, when we used to do street plays, we ensured that through that play we educate the public about their rights and duties and create legal awareness. These events provided a unique opportunity to establish direct connections with the masses, offering valuable insights into the practical application of laws.
The challenge in bridging the gap between legal intricacies and public understanding lies in making the law simple and accessible to everyone. Legal terms and processes can be complex, and people might find them difficult to grasp. As an advocate, my role is to break down these complexities, use simple language, and provide real-life examples that the public can relate to. Therefore, conducting legal awareness programs, using plain language in legal communications, and engaging with communities directly are some ways to overcome this challenge. Making the law less intimidating and more understandable for everyone is crucial for ensuring justice reaches every corner of society.
As someone with experience in arbitration, what advice would you give to businesses entering into arbitration agreements to safeguard their interests?
Having observed the evolution of Arbitration as the most effective mechanism for alternative dispute resolution in India, I have gathered insights into the crucial aspects that need consideration by all stakeholders. The challenges which arise from court interference, delays in arbitral award execution, and concerns about the quality of arbitrator asks for careful attention. To my clients, I have always been advising that they should be objective and fair while negotiating and drafting clauses in arbitration agreements. Where the arbitration clause and the terms of the arbitration agreement are one-sided, then the scope of interference from the courts would be much wider at different stages. I have always advised my clients that the arbitration clauses should provide for selection of an impartial and experienced person as an arbitrator and both the parties must have fair chances and stake in the appointment of the arbitral tribunal and conduct of the arbitration proceedings and the clauses of the agreement should be drafted accordingly.
Away from the legal arena, what are your hobbies or interests that provide a respite from the complexities of your profession? Any particular activity that helps you recharge?
I engage in hobbies that offer an escape from the intricacies of my profession. Reading historical and spiritual books, immersing myself in the calming melodies of classical music, and enjoying moments of solitude are my chosen activities. Additionally, I find fulfillment in social initiatives, interacting with people on my own accord. These pursuits not only provide a break but also contribute to my overall well-being. They bring to life the childhood dictum, “विद्यां ददाति विनयं, विनयाद् याति पात्रताम्,” reinforcing the importance of both knowledge and humbleness. Engaging in these diverse activities provides me with energizing distractions from my high demanding profession and allows me to return to my legal responsibilities with a refreshed perspective and renewed energy.
Simultaneously, participating in social initiatives deepens my connection with the community, instilling a sense of responsibility and empathy. This active engagement not only broadens my understanding of societal issues but also provides an avenue to contribute positively. The synergy between these diverse activities creates a harmonious rhythm in my life, enabling me to navigate the complexities of my demanding profession with resilience, a balanced perspective and a genuine appreciation for the multifaceted tapestry of my life.
With your extensive experience, what advice would you give to young lawyers aspiring to build a successful career in litigation and advocacy?
My rocky journey in this profession may have some advice for younger stars such as-
Ø Consistent Hard Work- While I was traveling in the DTC bus a co- passenger while interacting made a statement that “it is very easy to get a law degree but it is extremely difficult to become a good lawyer”. This statement of a stranger echoed in my mind throughout my struggle period and it holds good even today which is evident from the fact that we have a huge pool of young law graduates but there is a dearth of good lawyers in each court of India. What shaped my life in initial days is that I had inculcated a few small but good habits such as I used to read bare acts, legal magazines and cases even though I do not have any brief relating to the respective subject. These seemingly small habits paid off, as clients recognized me as a well-read individual, enhancing my “likeability factor”. My advice to budding lawyers is to keep learning, even in the absence of immediate briefs, as continuous learning prepares one for future opportunities.
Ø Work is worship- One small event which I could recollect is that one of my clients advised me saying that “one’s commitment to work should supersede all other priorities”. The advice came roughly because I had got delayed in reaching the court and because of my being late the matter was passed over. Being late for a court appearance taught me a direct lesson. The client’s advice was straightforward – giving preference to any family event or anything else instead of work would not bring either the success or happiness or even the admiration of family members. This lesson stuck with me every for the whole of my formative age in the professions. I can say with conviction that a legal profession is a very high demanding profession which requires the highest degree of focus and dedication and that too without much reward in initial days of practice.
Ø Patience and Big Goals- Overcoming initial challenges requires patience and a larger vision. Although the situation has improved significantly due to the emergence of numerous law firms, opportunities in the corporate sector, and academia, young law graduates now have a variety of choices. Despite these growing opportunities, struggles persist. In the early days, I had few techniques to keep myself inspired. While practicing in district courts, I regularly visited the Supreme Court and High Court to observe the legends of the legal profession and used to idolize them. Seeking inspiration from legendary lawyers in the Supreme Court and Delhi High Court kept my ambitions high.
Ø Learn broadly and with focus- Another ritual of observing the court proceedings of all the courts helped me in staying motivated. Thoroughly reading legal documents, bare acts, law magazines etc. proved very beneficial. Later on, one of my seniors advised that you must flip through (using tai-lopez method of speed reading) the bare acts and rules whenever you get a case relating to that subject.
I would like to quote an excerpt from David J. Schwartz- “The Magic of Thinking Big” which is a must for this profession “likeability factor”-
Mark this point well. A person is not pulled up to a higher-level job. Rather, he is lifted up. In this day and age nobody has time or patience to pull another up the job ladder, degree by painful degree. The individual is chosen whose record makes him stand higher than the rest. We are lifted to higher levels by those who know us as likable, personable individuals. Every friend you make lifts you just one notch higher. And being likable makes you lighter to lift.
To sum up, my advice to the young lawyers is simple – Dear young lawyers, here’s a piece of advice: alongside your legal studies, make sure to gain practical experience. Real-world situations teach you valuable lessons that books alone can’t provide. So, dive into the practical side of law to become a more skilled and effective legal professional. embrace hard work, treat work as worship, practice patience, think big, and focus on continuous learning as well as ensure to have a likable personality. These principles, from personal experiences, pave the way for a successful legal career.
We’d love to know more about your journey in the legal field. Can you share what inspired you to specialize in technology law and pursue a career in arbitration and corporate litigation?
My journey as a lawyer technically started in the year 2010, however, I have regularly interned at different offices since 2006-07 (even during law school). I started my career as a chamber junior to Ms. Manmeet Arora (who is now a Judge at the Hon’ble Delhi High). I can proudly say that I was trained by the best and the initial chamber training prepared me for what I was bound to do in my career. Later I moved to Luthra & Luthra Law offices (which it then was), progressing further to being a Partner at SAM and presently, I am a Partner at CAM. My journey from college days till date has been a roller coaster ride, with different experiences, ranging from doing the Aircel Maxis Spectrum Trial, to representing Tech Giants in almost all spheres, to recently being part of the much celebrated NN Global matter. My interest in Tech law grew with my inquisition towards small issues that we face on a daily basis. If you see, Tech and Arbitration are the two fields that are ever-evolving and I think that’s my inspiration.
As a “Future Star” in arbitration, could you tell us about a particularly challenging or interesting case you’ve worked on recently and what made it stand out for you?
In the order of ranking, the most challenging matters that I have been part of as a briefing Counsel would be HCC Ltd. Vs. UOI & Ors. 2019 SCC Onlibe SC 1520, where the 3-Judge Bench of the Supreme Court struck down Section 87 of the A&C Act, second would be Kal Airways vs. SpiceJet Ltd. & Anr. which is still a landmark on Section 9 A&C Act. Recently, I have argued a few important arbitration matters before the Delhi High Court, including HCC vs. NHPC, 2023 SCC Online Del 819, which decided an important question on bank guarantees and till what point the same have to be maintained in case the arbitral award is under challenge. This was special to me as recently I got a call from a Senior Counsel who told me that they relied on this judgment and got an order before the Rajasthan High Court. The next and very important issue on Section 28(2) of the A&C act which I argued before the Delhi High Court is NHPC vs JP Associates Ltd., 2023 SCC Online Del 3294, i argued on Section 31 and 28 (2) and got the award partially set-aside. As mentioned earlier, recently I have made submissions before the Supreme Court in the case of NN Global which put to rest the issue of stamping. Each case was challenging in its own way. The intricacies you learn from Senior Counsels and how you evolve and transform into arguing the same issues yourself is what stands out for me.
Being a member of the Steering Committee at IAMC, how do you see the landscape of international arbitration evolving, especially in the context of technology-related disputes?
I believe arbitration is one field that runs totally on stakeholder involvement. We as practitioners and arbitrators are constantly evolving the field and ourselves. Being part of an institution gives us the platform to get more ideas. The evolution of arbitration in the international context and specifically technology-related disputes has been increasing recently. I Have recently finished arguments in an arbitration where the underlying issue was the performance of an App designed in a particular way. While we still have time to see big tech-related disputes being referred to arbitration, we are taking baby steps towards it and the future is bright for the generation that is following us.
You’ve represented tech companies on issues related to intellectual property and regulatory frameworks. What, in your opinion, is the most exciting or challenging aspect of navigating the legal landscape in the technology sector today?
As I said earlier, the ever-changing nature of Tech is what is the most challenging part of it. While you learn to deal with one particular issue, you won’t even know that the same is obsolete and you have to move to learn the new version. The IP and regulatory framework issues that I have dealt with personally have also changes their nature and shape. Litigants are becoming smarter by the day and know how to navigate the entire ecosystem.
In your career, you’ve dealt with a wide range of disputes in infrastructure, real estate, and corporate matters. Is there a piece of advice you often find yourself giving to clients facing such diverse challenges?
My first advice to every client, whether it’s an infrastructure, real estate, tech or any other issue is to find out a way to settle the matter, so it is a win-win situation for all. Prolonged litigation is what each corporate now wants to avoid and that makes complete sense when it comes to business efficiency and cost benefit analysis.
Having worked on a variety of international commercial arbitrations, can you share some insights into the differences or nuances you’ve encountered in dealing with disputes on a global scale?
I have never found anything very different even while dealing with an international dispute. The ways and methods may be different, but the approach is the same. Yes, if I have to point out a few distinguishing factors, I would say the sophistication and systematic approach that is adopted internationally, is something we must even adopt in our domestic arbitrations.
Representing major tech giants in various matters is certainly impressive. Can you share a bit about the unique challenges or dynamics involved in handling cases for major social media platforms?
The most unique challenge that a lawyer faces in such cases is that any of your actions/reaction in Court will have a far-reaching impact on the entire industry. So whatever way you are presenting your case- pleadings, submissions or oral arguments, have to be well thought out and based on parameters that do not only do good for your client, but for the industry at large.
Given your extensive experience, what skills or qualities do you believe set apart successful lawyers in today’s competitive environment, and how can law students cultivate these attributes during their academic years?
The ability to keep yourself abreast with the latest changes to law, with knowledge of the first principles is what will set you apart. The learning will never stop but one tips I can give to youngsters is that they should be observant. The Red-car theory is something I always believe in. Never say no to any work that comes your way and dedicate yourself to the profession. During academic years, focus on bare acts and law journals. Once you start practising you will constrain yourself to the books that you will be using in your case, so today is the best time to read]
Many students contemplate between pursuing a career in litigation or opting for judiciary preparation. What factors should they consider when making this decision, and are there benefits to gaining experience in both areas early in one’s career?
I think if someone wishes to pursue judiciary, they should start visiting District Court in as many districts as they can. See what is happening in Courts and are you up for it. For litigation, similarly start early. Observe how trials are done, how lawyers argue, how they act in Court and how the judges react. By following this, one can totally connect with what they would want to do and develop the Rio interest accordingly.
Switching gears a bit, outside of the legal realm, what are your personal hobbies or interests that you enjoy in your free time?
I am a biker and a super bike lover. I love to ride early morning during weekends (if work permits). I also like listening to old songs and ghazals and to justify my surname, I have slight inclination towards poetry 🙂
Lastly, we’d like to know your perspective on mentorship. Have there been mentors or individuals in your career who significantly influenced your professional growth, and what lessons have you carried forward from them?
Mentors play a very important role in this profession. Whether some is teaching you with interest or you learn by just following them, the idea is to learn. The most important part of this mentorship is that no one will come and tell you that they are your mentor. You have to choose yourself and follow them. I am lucky to have many mentors in the profession, starting from Ms. Manmeet Arora (“it’s a people’s profession”), Mr. Gaurav Duggal (“anything is possible if you want”), Mr. RS Suri, Sr. Adv (“money isn’t everything”), Mr. Anirban Bhattacharya (“eat, sleep litigate”) and Mr. Tejas Karia (“build your team”). Each one of them I chose as my mentor and all of them at one point or another have taught me things that have helped me grow as an individual and a lawyer and they all continue to inspire me every day.
Your family has a rich legal legacy, with your grandfather being the first Advocate General of Uttarakhand. How has this legacy influenced your journey as a third-generation lawyer, and what values or lessons have you carried forward from your family’s legal background?
I have always been around lawyers at my house and have had the opportunity to be inspired by my grandfather and my father. My grandfather always used to tell me that all I can give you is the family name and the rest is upon you what you make out of it, so till date, I’m trying to live up to his legacy and be a better lawyer every day. The lesson I have learnt is that hard work is the key to success no matter what generation you are if you don’t work hard you will not get work one needs to constantly keep working on his advocacy skills and perform better every day.
Transitioning from a small law firm to establishing your own practice is undoubtedly a significant step. Can you share a memorable experience or a turning point in your early career that shaped your approach to building your practice from the ground up?
I learnt the basics of drafting and working with a small team at the law firm. I still remember my senior used to always ask us where do you see yourself in 5 years and I told him that I see myself as an Advocate on Record at the Supreme Court of India, so that was my manifestation and somehow with the grace of god I could achieve it in my first attempt. Thereafter I started hustling and doing small matters at the trial court and kept working constantly at honing my drafting and argument skills. I would like to especially thank Adv Dattatrey Vyas who was my immediate senior in the law firm for constantly helping me by vetting my drafts and guiding me through the drafting process while I was at the firm and later when I was away. I think I was lucky to have good mentors like Adv. Anurag Tomar who gave me constant opportunities to argue and appear before various forums right from the beginning of my career which paved the way for me to argue matters before the Supreme Court of India. One of the few instances I remember is while arguing an admission matter before a division bench presided by Justice Gyan Sudha Mishra at the Supreme Court, it was a MACT matter and I argued all the aspects and informed the court about the injuries on the lower part of the left leg of the petitioner, the court after hearing me asked about the exact part of the leg and the nature of the injury which at that point of time was not very clear in the documents as there was some medical term used which was not known to me or the court. The court then passed over the matter to enable me to take instructions about the same and eventually when the matter was heard I was able to answer the query of the court and notice was issued in the matter. The lesson I learnt is that one has to be well prepared from all aspects of the file no doubt you may have read the file, but one has to be careful about every minute detail depending upon the nature of the case being argued.
You’ve been practicing law across various courts, including the Supreme Court of India and the National Green Tribunal. How do you manage the dynamics of different legal forums, and do you have a preference for any particular type of cases?
Practicing across various forums can be tiresome at times as we have a lot of running around to be done apart from the preparation for the matters to be argued at various stages. But having a good team of associates around who help ease the burden by holding the fort while I can travel from one court to the other at times. But yes we have over time developed an effective way of taking separate dates for various courts so there is no clash between cases. But I constantly motivate my juniors to start arguing applications before the trial courts or tribunals so that they build up the confidence and eventually pave way for them to start their own practise later in life. Though I am most comfortable at the Supreme Court of India, but yes I love appearing before trial court and have had the opportunity of appearing before Trial courts and High courts across states like U.P, Uttarakhand, Punjab etc. There is a whole lot of thrill in the process of cross-examination which I truly love about trial court advocacy which requires a different skill set especially compared to appellate court advocacy and appearing before trial court is always enriching.
As Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand at the National Green Tribunal, you’ve been involved in cases related to environmental issues. How does your role contribute to your personal commitment to environmental sustainability, and do you have any personal initiatives in this regard?
I have been on the panel of State of Uttarakhand at the National Green Tribunal, Principal Bench Delhi right from 2017 and have been appearing regularly. After the retirement of Retd Justice Swatatantra Kumar from the post of Chairperson the approach of NGT of dealing with matters had changed drastically as they started the process of letter petitions the filing of Original Applications came down drastically and reduced the role of counsels to a large extent which in one way made the court more accessible to the common man, but yes the role of state counsels and other counsels was reduced to very minimal until and unless a specific response was called from a particular authority on an issue. Rest we keep assisting courts as and when we are called upon to file Joint inspection reports or filing responses and explaining the stand of the authorities. Further with regard to my personal view on sustainability I as an individual try to save water and electricity and follow basic civic rules of not littering around on highways or public roads etc. I think if all the citizens of the country follow these rules strictly then our country will be a much cleaner place. I think awareness amongst people about waste management can take our country a long way towards environmental sustainability.
Balancing criminal trials along with civil trials is not common among lawyers. What motivated you to diversify into criminal trials, and how do you approach the unique challenges they present?
As I have already mentioned my love for trial court advocacy, especially the part of cross-examination of a witness, so I have done my fair share of civil trials and Criminal Trials under section138 Negotiable Instrument Act cases and had never thought of delving into criminal trials but, recently in 2021 one client approached me for conducting a criminal trial under POCSO Act at Ghaziabad Sessions court, after going through the file and as the matter was at evidence stage in the peculiar facts and circumstances I took up the matter and eventually the Prosecutrix a 11-year-old girl went hostile which led to the conviction of my client after the incarceration of 3 years. My experience in this trial was worth sharing first and foremost is the non-adhering to the basic principles of an In-camera trial as envisaged under the Section 37 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act 2012, though the same is followed to the teeth in the trial courts in Delhi, but I was shocked to see that the evidence of the prosecutrix including the examination in chief and the cross-examination was all done in open court.
After this trial, I have taken up a few more matters including a trial under SC/ST act before the Rohini Court and another matter under section 376/354 of the IPC on behalf of the accused before the Dwaraka Sessions Court. But, yes for the readers I have to clarify that while I have taken up these matters I did thorough research on the subject matters of these cases and did a lot of consultation with senior colleagues who have had long experiences in handling these matters before the trial court, it is very crucial that we know the finer nuances of such trials before we start conducting one as life and liberty of person depends on us.
Apart from this some basic things that I felt were a problem in other states was the lack of judicial infrastructure like stenographers for judges and in some courts, the courts even didn’t have a computer system. I think little changes in the whole justice administration system would affect the quality of the justice being delivered across all courts, especially trial courts.
Your 45-day judicial internship with Justice Dalveer Bhandari seems to have been a turning point. How did this experience influence your perspective on legal practice, especially in the Supreme Court, and set the course for your career?
The internship with Retd Justice Dalveer Bhandari is where it all started and it was my first experience at observing the practice and procedure at the Supreme Court of India. I along with my friend had the special privilege back then to join this internship as then the clerkship and the internship program was only for the students of the National Law Institutes and we would have had no chance at getting the internship if our Professor Ms Deesha Meshram had not provided us this opportunity. We were in our 8th Semester of 5-year Integrated law Course and had the basic knowledge of the subjects such as CPC, CRPC, Evidence etc, but this internship changed our perspective. During the internship our tasks included reading briefs of admission hearing matters and preparing a brief note and then finally presenting the matter before Justice Bhandari just like we do now in the Supreme court before the Hon’ble Judges, he would then ask us basic questions about the case about findings in the trial court judgement and things like issue involved etc. This exercise majorly helped me to see up close how the mind of a Supreme judge works and a brief idea of the kind of queries that can entail in a fresh matter. Our tasks also included providing the law clerk with research materials in the after-notice matters apart from observing the matters that we had briefed sir on being argued in court. It was truly an enriching experience and it was only after this internship that I made up my mind about settling down in Delhi and practising before the Supreme Court of India. Some of my positive takeaways from this internship were learning the basic skill of reading an SLP and the relevant papers, preparing a note and relevant case research on the subject matter and knowing how the synopsis and list of dates play a very crucial role in the fate of the matter before the Supreme Court.
You’ve represented organizations like the National Institute of Technology, Srinagar (Garhwal), and provided litigation support to companies on a retainer basis. How do you navigate the dual role of legal advisor and litigator, and what challenges and rewards come with this multifaceted approach to legal practice?
Over the span of 12 years of being a litigator i have had the opportunity to represent many corporations and companies before various courts some of them would be Uttarakhand University, NIT Uttarakhand,Transunion CIBIL, Carnival Cinemas etc. the key to working with big organisations and corporations is timely delivery of work and adhering to high professional standards. I completed my 1-year Post Graduate Diploma in Entrepreneurship Administration and Business Laws from NUJS, Kolkatta in 2016 which helped me equip myself with practical skills related to business laws. Later in time, I ventured into providing my services on the advisory side related to Contract Drafting and allied services related to day to day functioning of the companies so that the companies could avoid or at least try to keep their disputes and litigation to the minimum. Time management and organising the work schedule between courts and the advisory work is the key to balancing the work between both the fields and rest having a good team to assist me helps me a lot. The benefit of playing the dual role of litigator and legal advisor helps one to broaden one’s horizon and then you are never short of work.
In addition to your legal responsibilities, you’ve represented the Cricket Association of Uttarakhand. Are you an avid cricket fan yourself, and if so, do you have a favourite cricket memory or player that you hold dear?
I like the game of Cricket and follow all the major tournaments, IPL etc., but no I have not played cricket at any level as such. I have been appearing for the CAU before Uttarakhand HC, District Courts and before the Hon’ble Ombudsman which is an internal dispute mechanism at the Association. Associating with the CAU has also been a great learning experience in getting to know the nuances involved in the cricketing field and kind of dispute and the resolution process before the Ombudsman which all is done in terms of the Constitution of the Association which is framed under the aegis of BCCI.
Clearing the AOR exams is a significant accomplishment. How has being an Advocate on Record at the Supreme Court impacted your career, and what advice would you give to aspiring lawyers aiming for a similar milestone?
As I mentioned earlier, clearing the AOR Exam was my dream from the day I started practising because I had fair knowledge about the role that is played by an AOR in the Supreme Court of India through my previous internship experience with Retd Justice Dalveer Bhandari. Nowadays we see a lot of people who have not practised at the Supreme Court or intend to practice at Supreme Court think that it’s crucial for one to be an AOR to appear before the Supreme Court which is not the case. The fact of the matter is merely clearing AOR exam doesn’t help one start practise at Supreme Court, but yes my advice would be that one should join some chamber and get to know the basic procedures of the court and functioning of the court and then try to clear the exam it would really help to make the mark may be in your first attempt. Further with regards to the exam I would advise all those who are preparing to start with the Supreme Court Rules and practising drafting petitions on paper as with the advent of computers we are more used to typing on our laptops you may be thorough with drafting but it’s really a difficult task when comes to doing the same manually, so the key is to try and time yourself in solving the previous year’s drafting problems that will give you an edge while you write your paper. My last word of advice is that try and keep the presentation of your answer neat considering the time you have to write the paper and answer all the questions.
Could you please share with us how your journey into law began? What inspired you to pursue a career in the legal field?
In my hometown, lawyers were not looked at with respect due to the low fees they used to command in the twentieth century. It was believed that those who could do nothing else, do LL.B. Hence, it was not a childhood dream fascinated by observing a successful lawyer in my neighbourhood or from some scenes in Bollywood movies.
I was living in a hostel while pursuing B.Com. Simultaneously, I was doing an articleship with a CA firm namely AAG & Associates as I wanted to become a Chartered Accountant as we knew only about being doctors, engineers, and CAs at that time. In December 2000, I unearthed a financial scam in the hostel management. However, the administrators of the hostel connived with the grifter and asked me to prove the charge after forging his confession letter. That day, I argued before the influential people to prove the clerk’s wrongdoing but they let him off scot-free. That was one of the worst days of my life when I got harassed despite being a whistle-blower. The proverb “Every cloud has a silver lining” became true to me. That night while introspecting the entire incident with my younger brother Naveen, I realised I had argued very confidently and logically before so many persons in authority. I also underwent the pain of false accusations and injustice done to me. They say “जाके पांव न फटी बिवाई, वो क्या जाने पीर पराई”. I realised getting justice was one of the most basic human rights. That was the night when I decided to stand for others in their pursuit of justice.
I sought time to meet Shri Ravi Sharma, Advocate, before leaving the hostel who portrayed a very good picture of lawyers in society and advised me to do LL.B. from the University of Delhi. As luck had it, the next day one of the articles of that CA firm called me to come to Delhi as he needed someone to share room rent. I immediately came to Delhi with a small briefcase in hand and cleared the entrance test of the Faculty of Law, DU and that’s how my journey commenced in law. This has turned out to be the best decision of my life to choose law as my profession and I heartily thank God for that incident.
How did you end up specialising in arbitration and litigation?
As far as my entry into the arbitration field is concerned, it was in 2005 when I was working in Amitabha Sen & Co., we filed an application u/s 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 before the “Chief Justice of India” for appointment of the Arbitrator in an international commercial arbitration titled: Secit S.P.A. vs. NTPC. I signed that application myself without engaging an AOR and approached the Registrar (Judicial) to take it on record who asked me to file it at the filing counters. But I tried to convince him that it was to be filed before the Registrar (Judicial) only as I was not approaching the “Supreme Court of India” but the “Chief Justice of India” in his administrative capacity as per the judgement in the case of Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd. and Anr. v. Rani Construction Pvt. Ltd. (2000)2 SCC 388.
After several rounds of persuasion, the Registrar (Judicial) called me to his office and informed me that Hon’ble Mr. Justice RC Lahoti, the then Chief Justice of India, had allowed the filing of our application without engaging an AOR that too through the Registrar (Judicial) for the first time and the last time as his Lordship had directed him to amend the paragraph 10 of “The Appointment of Arbitrators by the Chief Justice of India Scheme, 1996” whereby all applications thenceforth would be filed at the filing counter of the Supreme Court only. A few months after his retirement, I joined the late Justice Lahoti’s office as his Legal Assistant. I used to assist his Lordship during arbitral hearings and in writing legal opinions by doing research and preparing drafts. Just after I commenced my independent practice in April 2008, I was engaged in an international commercial arbitration. Advocates from other states and Clients started approaching me thereafter for their arbitration cases. Several cases related to arbitration law were marked to me by the Litigation Incharge, Ministry of Law & Justice when I became Senior Panel Counsel of the Union of India in December 2014 for cases before the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi. To date, I have already argued in approx 100 cases related to arbitration law before the High Court of Delhi and approx 50 arbitration cases before the Arbitral Tribunals consisting of former Chief Justices of India, former Judges of Supreme Court & High Courts, and former officers of CPWD/ MES, etc. Today, I am handling a number of high-stakes international commercial arbitrations and construction arbitrations for several ministries of the Central Government, PSUs, autonomous bodies, and private companies. That’s how my practice heavily tilted towards arbitration law.
You had the privilege of gaining first hand training from the Late Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.C. Lahoti, Former Chief Justice of India. How did this experience shape your professional life?
I was his Lordship’s first junior post-retirement who got the privilege of getting first hand training under his tutelage. His Lordship was very humble and soft-spoken and would never admonish or scold his staff for any mistake whatsoever. His Lordship was very meticulous in doing his day-to-day personal and professional work which deeply influenced me. He was fond of exclusive stationery and the latest gadgets. He guided me to read the autobiographies of legal stalwarts, classic literature, and even stories of Singhasan Battisi, Baital Pachchisi and Panchatantra as they develop decision-making abilities and have hidden messages of imparting justice. I imbibed the habit of gifting books from his Lordship only. So far, I have gifted hundreds of books to my interns, associates, friends, and libraries. The lesson I learned from his way of working was “जिन खोजा तिन पाइया, गहरे पानी पैठ” meaning thereby the one who keeps trying deeply gets the desired results. He would always ask me to examine even the repealed Acts and overruled judgments before drafting any opinion or award to find out the reasons for the development of present-day laws. He used to discuss with an open mind and would allow me to change his drafts if gets convinced by my viewpoints. Likewise, I encourage all my associates and interns to come up with ideas that may seem even absurd to make them learn the art of thinking out of the box.
Could you share insights into the international commercial arbitration case you handled before the ICC International Court of Arbitration, France in 2008-09? What challenges did you face, and how did it contribute to your professional growth?
I started my independent practice in April 2008 and obviously did not have that much work to do. After the elevation of its counsel as a judge of the High Court of Delhi, an Indian company having business in 70 countries approached me in July 2008 for its international commercial arbitration in which the tribunal consisted of three arbitrators from different countries, the seat of arbitration was in Geneva and laws of UK/ India were applicable as per the arbitration clause. Despite my lack of experience in doing international arbitrations under the aegis of the ICC International Court of Arbitration, one of the Directors of the company who used to take a deep interest in that arbitration, entrusted the case to me. So I had to study many laws at that time including the arbitration rules of the ICC, and the laws of the UK and India. I invested in buying many latest commentaries including Chitty’s Contract, Benjamin’s Sale of Goods, Kluwer’s Yearbook Commercial Arbitration, Buhler Webster’s Handbook of ICC Arbitration, Black’s Law Dictionary, etc which were very expensive for a lawyer who had just come into independent practice. I had written an email to a legal giant of that time to give me a written opinion on a particular issue which he declined by citing the reason that giving an opinion would disable him from appearing in the matter at a later stage. I briefed 3-4 other senior advocates but somehow my client did not get enough satisfaction; hence, asked me to handle the case myself. For final arguments, my client engaged Shearman & Sterling LLP, one of the largest law firms in the USA and asked me to hand him my passport so that he could get a Visa issued to participate in the arbitral hearings in Geneva. Today I regret and laugh at the same time that I had not even heard of passports by that time. Though I immediately applied for a passport but due to no change in the schedule, my client had to leave without me. Though we lost the case, the client again approached me to draft the application u/s 34 of the A&C Act, 1996 to challenge the arbitral award. This case considerably enhanced my interest, experience and confidence in international commercial arbitrations and gave me the opportunities to read laws of different jurisdictions and to brief several senior advocates which helped me in my ensuing practice. No doubt I earned handsome fees which enabled me to get established during those initial times. Of the above incident, I wish to convey to the fresh graduates that you should always be positive and hopeful as God has its mechanism to help you through unexpected ways.
Your profile mentions the publication of several critical articles and the delivery of speeches/ lectures to law students and professionals. How do you balance your practical legal work with academic pursuits, and how has this dual engagement enriched your legal practice?
Mr. Vinay Vaish, Managing Partner of Vaish Associates, encouraged me to write my first article titled: Should Capital Punishment Be Given Capital Punishment – A Capital Question” while I was interning in his law firm in June 2004. That article was published in Delhi Law Review – the annual journal of the Faculty of Law, University of Delhi. Thereafter, I wrote many articles that were published in the journals of NLU Jodhpur, Indian Law Institute, the Institute of Company Secretaries of India, Indian Social Institute, CNN magazine, etc. By writing articles, you not only learn to identify the legal issues but also how to do multidimensional research and develop your arguments; particularly when you seek to differ with a judgement of the Supreme Court/ High Court. Further, I have never declined invitations to deliver speeches and lectures to law students and professionals. The latest one was in December 2023 to the serving officers of Military Engineer Services, Ministry of Defence. I have also delivered lectures to 4th year students at a law school in Delhi as a guest faculty during my early days of practice.
There is no dual engagement and nothing to be balanced to write legal articles. I identify the conflicting issues while researching to argue in my forthcoming cases and shape them into articles/ case comments. I feel grateful to the late Hon’ble Mr. Justice RC Lahoti, Mr. Jagdish Sagar, Advocate, and Professor Alka Chawla, PIC of Campus Law Centre, for vetting my all articles with keen interest by taking time out of their busy schedules.
Due to publications, I have got many new clients who read my articles and approached me for their cases. One army man from Kolkata came to my chambers to engage me for his brother-in-law’s case as he believed that an advocate who dares to author and publish articles critical of the Supreme Court’s judgement would be dead honest. Senior Vice President of a pharmaceutical company came down from Bangalore to engage me in his several cases after reading one of my articles. During those days, law students from NLUs approached me to intern in my office after reading my articles as there were no online platforms at that time. I also got appreciation from my peers, seniors, and judges.
You’ve been representing various government departments, PSUs, and autonomous bodies since 2014. Could you share some highlights or challenges faced while representing them before the Delhi High Court and Arbitral Tribunals?
Representing the Central Government for me is a matter of gratification and a sense of fulfilment as well. Being the government’s counsel, you are expected to be thoroughly prepared and more responsible than the opposite party in your conduct before the court. You are appointed in cases of a wide range and having issues of national importance which is an exceptional opportunity to learn and get noticed by the judges and others present in the courtroom. Further, you get a close opportunity to learn how the government functions. I might have never appreciated how much effort the government officers make with utmost honesty and sincerity to safeguard the public money had I not been engaged by different government organisations in the last 9-10 years. However, there are certain practical and common challenges that I encounter while representing the government:
There is no monetary reward for winning the cases for the government. You need to have a strong purpose and abundant willpower that will propel you to keep burning your midnight oil.
Sometimes, you don’t get proper and timely instructions due to frequent transfers of the concerned officers or their heavy workload.
Difficult to find the concerned officers of different ministries as sometimes the cases get marked in late evening and you have to appear before the High Court the next morning when the opposite party might be seeking some urgent relief.
Very low fee irrespective of your standing at the Bar and the nature of cases which makes it difficult to run the office. No clerkage is paid even though you have to file ten thousand pages of documents with applications u/s 34 of the A&C Act, 1996. Payment of bills gets delayed routinely.
Had a good private practice; particularly, before the Supreme Court, prior to getting panels, which suffered due to heavy workload before the High Court of Delhi and arbitral tribunals. I couldn’t appear before other High Courts also which I used to do earlier.
Your focus has been on defending various ministries of the Government of India in construction and engineering arbitration cases. What complexities do these cases typically involve, and how do you navigate them successfully?
Construction law is a specialised field that has its highs and hindrances. Site managers who get the work executed are not available for briefing due to transfers or retirements, and documents related to the site like works diary, site order book, cement register, steel register, test register, drawings, etc are not made available due to non-maintainability of the record properly or lack of coordination between the headquarter and the site offices. Officers briefing me and sending comments to draft pleadings have generally not visited the site. Lack of trained and separate staff leads to delayed drafting and filing which sometimes results in imposition of costs or closure of the right to place on record the pleadings. A few arbitrators held hearings at venues out of Delhi where we could not go due to the lack of provision to reimburse the actual expenses. Some of the officers are unwilling to appear as a witness as they apprehend that in case their answers turn out to be favourable to the claimant, that may land them in the soup or they may be exposed to their inadequate knowledge. There is an acute deficiency of supporting staff and logistics required for efficient conduct of arbitral hearings. Officers as well as I are overburdened which makes us have late-night conferences in the office almost every day to prepare for the arguments the next day. The claimants engage a team of lawyers led by seniors, whereas the government does not have provision for paying a minimal fee to even a single associate of its counsel.
Further, a few of the sole arbitrators consisting of former judges may not have that much sound technical knowledge while the sole arbitrator being an engineer may not be able to appreciate the basic concept of ‘burden of proof’ and generally get completely baffled by the judicial precedents as to which one to be followed. Having a tribunal consisting of three arbitrators makes it unaffordable and the proceedings get delayed due to the non-availability of matching dates.
To encounter some of the above difficulties, I deploy my additional staff and I have also visited a few project sites to learn the quality and status of the executed works. I insist on the presence of project managers and site staff who have contemporaneous personal knowledge. Despite so many challenges, we have finished final arguments in more than 12 big construction arbitrations in 2023 out of which 8 awards have been published. All the cases filed by the contractors have either been dismissed, including two wherein our statement of defence not taken on record, or a small percentage of the claimed amount has been allowed. In one case, we have just been awarded 35 crores for counterclaims by a former judge of the Supreme Court. Such successes and genuine appreciation from the court/ tribunal alleviate all hurdles and make you stride with added vigour.
You’ve consistently pursued professional development, including obtaining a PG Diploma in ADR and currently pursuing an LL.M. in ADR. How do you believe these additional qualifications enhance your capabilities as a legal professional?
I firmly believe in continuous education in the form of participating in conferences, writing articles, and enrolling in specialised professional courses in which you are practising or intend to practise. I was greatly influenced by the fact that my mentor Justice Lahoti was looking for a tutor to learn Sanskrit language to read the untranslated literature in its original form just after his retirement, showing that age is just a number. Undoubtedly, doing an LLM/ PhD is not the recipe for becoming a good advocate but may help you learn the art of doing in-depth legal research, develop the habit of reading law books for long hours, explore the law library, learn the art of legal writing in the form of research articles and projects, if you have not done all the above in your law school due to the factors of you being in part employment or for lack of guidance, etc at that time. However, you would get to learn theoretical aspects of law and may make new lifelong friends and professional connections in the classroom. Further, additional diplomas and degrees in the same field you are practising in give a little extra credibility to your profile. Moreover, I have seen some government organisations and arbitration centres give added weightage at the time of empanelment if you have done LL.M.
Further, my father, who has earned three master degrees, always encourages us to go for higher studies by saying that no degree remains irrelevant and it may come to your aid in future. One of the reasons for attending the classes is that Generation Z keeps me updated with the technology and young at heart.
Lastly, considering your extensive experience and varied roles, what advice would you like to give to law students or fresh graduates who are just starting their legal careers, especially those interested in arbitration and litigation?
Ours is such a wonderful profession where all lawyers help each other without having any kind of competition or jealousy. You ask a query in any lawyers’ WhatsApp group and solutions will start pouring in. I would advise fresh graduates to not gripe about being first-generation lawyers or from small towns or being Hindi medium/ non-NLU students – “Count your blessings, name them one by one; Count your blessings, see what God hath done”. After coming into independent practice, I surprisingly realised that grey hair or lineage no longer convinces a client of you being a competent lawyer.
Never believe in the cries of nepotism and favouritism. Had it been so, I would not have won so many cases against eminent senior advocates and big law firms. The first case I won before the Supreme Court was where Ld. ASG was appearing for UOI and the recent one is against a senior known for his international arbitration practice. No judge has snubbed me for coming from a humble background. Please understand that every profession has its incomparable gestation period. For establishing in litigation you may have to ‘live like a hermit, work like a horse’ during the initial years.
Always be grateful to society for giving us affordable education – Most of us have got education in government schools and colleges at a negligible fee.
“Stay hungry, stay foolish” is perhaps the most apt quote for Advocates. Keep reading the A&C Act, Contract Act, Specific Relief Act, Partnership Act, Sale of Goods Act, Limitation Act, CPC, Suit Valuation Act, Stamp Duty Act, Registration Act, Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam and General Clauses Act while waiting for your turn in the courts as many cases get dismissed for the technicalities prescribed in the above Acts.
Pay special attention to the art of cross-examination, which is done by your seniors and even by other advocates – with this skill alone you can batten down the hatches.
Finally, love your profession, it loves you back. Be proud of being an advocate – you are on an eternal quest of securing justice for the helpless and hapless people – sometimes the animals and nature even. God is always with you!
The following aspects greatly contributed to the growth of my practice:
One should undergo training for at least 5-6 years before establishing own chamber.
Invest in buying good commentaries and study the relevant provisions before doing any drafting or making arguments in the court.
As a matter of lifestyle make life-long relationships with your clients, classmates, and opposite counsel who often refer clients to you.
Write articles; particularly, for legal news & views websites and professional bodies like Chartered Accountants and Company Secretaries.
Read autobiographies of legal stalwarts and interviews on websites like www.superlawyer.in
Don’t waste your time in cafeteria gossip, at least during the initial years.
Try to grab the opportunities to argue the cases of your seniors. Most of the judges do not pass adverse orders if you fumble but they expect and appreciate good preparation at your end.
Do the same level of work for a fee of rupees one thousand as you would do for a fee of rupees one lakh – this will raise your default standards of working.
It is such a fast-paced profession that if you don’t realise you knew nothing 6 months back then you have wasted your last 6 months. Keep upgrading your skills by adopting technology, attending conferences, and doing specialised courses.
Honesty and Integrity will grow your practice like bamboo after 8-10 years.
It is not your last day in the court, it is not your last case – do your best and leave it to the fate of the client. Don’t get tempted to take a shorter route – it leads nowhere.
Have good terms with your seniors who may refer some cases to you when you leave their chambers. Mr. Vaish and the late Justice Lahoti have referred a few good cases to me.
Develop the habit of reading literature. Late Justice Lahoti used to emphasise upon reading books every day. Many times, I have referred to incidents from Ramayana, Mahabharata, Bhagawad Gita and stories of Munshi Premchand/ Ravindra Nath Tagore and recited Dohe & Sher to cut across my viewpoints which significantly impacted the judges/ arbitrators. I listen to classics on Audible these days.
Last but not the least, पहला सुख निरोगी काया. Please take care of your health to be in this unending marathon.
Sir, could you share with our listeners how you embarked on your journey in law? What motivated you to pursue a career in the legal field?
Infact, my current profession of being a litigation lawyer is my second avatar as a professional as I started my career as a Scientist/Assistant Professor of Physics at Delhi University and I still consider myself to be a scientist by training and education but a Lawyer by profession. I am a first generation lawyer with no direct or indirect background in Law till I completed my LL.B. My real-life experiences rather confrontation with Law and Law enforcement agencies and my quest for the justice to the common masses motivated me to make my career in Law. During my stint as Professor of Physics, I was quite captivated by the working of certain law enforcement agencies and other government Institutions under the aegis of Constitution of India and the interplay of the Legislature, the Executive and the Judiciary. Post my LL.B. from University of Delhi, I got shortly associated with the office of ASG, Government of India and AAG for the state of Rajasthan at Hon’ble Supreme Court, and thereafter, I started my own independent practice in the year 2012.
My cordial associations and relationships with my seniors at Supreme Court and other Courts helped me a lot in learning and developing the idea of litigation in a short span of time.
From your early career as a Jr. Associate at the office of the Additional Solicitor to become an Advocate-on-Record of the Supreme Court and to your current role as Senior Central Govt. Counsel, Counsel for DDA, Counsel For state of U.P. and several other PSUs including PNB & RFC and being lead and arguing Counsel for few big Corporate Houses like HAL Offshore, McDonald’s, Ultratech Cement, Binani Cement etc, you’ve navigated through different roles. How did these transitions shape your legal perspective, and what key responsibilities have defined your journey?
Though, I had very short stint as Junior Associate in the office of ASG, Union of India and AAG, State of Rajasthan but I had a lot of learning in those offices and that helped me develop basic idea of litigation in a short span of time and with almighty’s grace, I was also able to strike very cordial associations and relationships with my seniors colleagues as also officers of registry at Supreme Court and other Courts. After only 15-18 months of my Jr. Associateship, I got onto my own independent practice because I started getting a few independent assignments based on my basic understanding of Court Ecosystem. However, my relations with my seniors at Supreme Court, High Courts and District Courts/Tribunals helped me in perfect execution of those assignments, thereby getting the intended reliefs. This is how the journey began and since then I have never looked back.
I am practicing as an independent Litigation and Arbitration Lawyer since Aug’2012 at Supreme Court of India, Delhi High Court, Mumbai High Court & Other High Courts across India, DRTs, DRAT, NCLT, NCLAT CCI, CAT ( erstwhile BIFR & COMPAT) at New Delhi.
The key responsibilities include:
Drafting & Vetting of Pleading of SLPs, Writs, PILs, Suits, Original Applications, Securitization Application, Misc. Applications, Service Matter Petitions, Claim Petition, Counter Claims, Evidence Affidavits, Legal Notice, Reply/rejoinders and conducting Civil Trials and Appeals as also Arbitration matters.
Appearing in all Court proceedings before the Hon’ble Justices & Registrars of Supreme Court of India, Delhi High Court, Bombay High Court, CAT, DRT, DRAT, NCLT, CCI, COMPAT & SAT at New Delhi, Kolkata and Mumbai.
Well versed with SARFAESI Act’ 2002, Recovery of Debts due to Banks & Financial Institutions Act’1993, DRT Rules, DRAT Rules, Banking Regulation Act’1949, Banking Companies Act’1970, Companies Act’2013, Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code’2016, SEBI Act’1992, PMLA Act’2002, Information & Technology Act’2000, Arbitration & Concilliation Act’1996, Specific Relief Act, Registration Act, Contract Act, Specific relief Act, Civil Procedure Code.
Vetting of Contracts, Agreements, Licenses, Hypothecation, Mortgage & Conveyance Deeds.
I am regularly appearing and conducting Litigations before Supreme Court of India, High Court of Delhi & Mumbai, DRT- Mumbai, DRT Kochi, NCLT & NCLAT Delhi, NCLT Mumbai, High Court of Calcutta, High Court of Kerala at Ernakulum, High Court of Orissa at Cuttak for my clients. Apart from my appearances before the Courts, I am also representing many of clients in their Arbitration cases at Mumbai and Delhi. I am also a qualified Mediator and am empanelled as Mediator- at Supreme Court of India.
Your profile showcases extensive experience in Civil-Corporate Litigation, Arbitration, and White-Collar Crimes. How did you develop an interest in these specialized areas, and what challenges and rewards have you encountered along the way?
To be honest with you, as a first generation lawyer, you cannot be choosy as you have to run your show and household also. Therefore, during my initial years, I took variety of cases, which ranged from appearing before a Revenue Officer to going to Police Station or Human Right Commission. From drafting of criminal Complaint to drafting of Consumer Complaint. From drafting a Claim Petition for MACT to drafting a Claim Petition for Arbitral Tribunal. Doing almost all the work at Supreme Court/High Court registry myself. Took every assignment irrespective of its pecuniary rewards or forum or rigours with only one thing in mind that each case was learning experience and success at these cases boosted confidence and fostered new relations at different levels of hierarchy. Success in these small assignment perhaps got me noticed by my senior colleagues and few Corporate Heads and the insight, which I gained during these exposures lead me to convince my initial Clients with confidence. I started getting cases related to Banking and Recovery before DRT Delhi & DRT Mumbai and also erstwhile BIFR. After implementation of IBC regime, these cases took me to NCLT & NCLAT. These financial/ banking cases with big exposure values invariably involve criminal aspects of wilful default, siphoning off and diversion the funds, fraud or money laundering. Similarly Property disputes these days have intrinsically some criminal colour in form of forgery, cheating and Service matters may also have flavour of corruption involving PC Act. Thus, despite not exactly planning for venturing into a specific area of expertise, I gradually got specialised into these areas. The best reward and motivation to keep on moving in these areas of expertise was the pecuniary benefits and broad and global exposure to working of various Industries such as Cement Industry, Shipping Industry, Oil & Gas Industry, Minning Industry, FMCG Companies, Banking and Non-Banking Institutions, Event Management Companies, Hospitality Companies etc. However, the challenge is obvious, one needs to extensively study and understand working of each Industry so that one have an insight of practical execution of business in such Industry or Sector, secondly since stakes are high in these commercial matters, therefore there is constant pressure to outperform the routine practitioners and one has to keep toiling, traversing and translating the strategies into court room success.
You’ve represented significant industrial houses and corporations in high-stake litigation and arbitration cases. Could you share a specific case or accomplishment that you consider particularly impactful or challenging in your career?
There is not one or two but rather 4-5 cases, each in different domain of law, wherein my legal mettle along with personal traits of being lawyer was put to test. Out of 5, I succeed in three but lost in two but all 5 cases, I consider as most challenging and which left long lasting affect in my career journey. These cases gave me learning for lifetime and helped me to meta morph into a seasoned lawyer. It is difficult to describe the entire experience in this short interview but in hint, I can say that one matter was an arbitration matter against a big Corporate giant of this Country being represented through battery of senior designated lawyers. But as luck could have it, my grit and determination finally prevailed and the Tribunal went by merit and not by the stature of either the Corporate House or the Sr. Counsel. Another matter was a matter against a Head of top Government Institution, who had entangled a female employee in her service matters ostensibly, whereas in reality it was a criminal matter having contour of POSH and other criminal element. This Officer was being defended by a Sr. Counsel, who was from a family of Judiciary and exuded aura and confidence. Though, we had initial success, however his aura prevailed in later part. Finally our persistence paid and fortunately after 4.5 years this person was booked by CBI and taken into custody but not before we had filed several cases before several forums in 3-4 years unshakingly, unperturbed and undeterred by initial setbacks. The third one relates to a case before CCI & COMPAT, which gave me my entry into corporate litigation and again this was example of purely Out of Box thinking, wherein, we took advantage of legal technical loopholes to save 18.5 crores of rupees and to buy time to properly strategise our bankruptcy filling before NCLT, Kolkata. These instances lead me to believe in the famous saying- ‘ A lawyer never looses- either He Wins or He Learns ! ‘
How do you approach the unique challenges presented by different clients and Industries?
The first and foremost thing, which I do, is to understand and identify the core issue/dispute involved in the given case and the mindset of client and his desired goal. Thereafter, I make a fresh & unorthodox approach towards finding all the possible legal remedies available for the client and devise strategies with precision taking holistic view of the matter to suit specific requirement of the client but at the same time ensuring that each step involving the dispute resolution is in sync with the legal requirements. Most of the time it requires – ‘Out of Box thinking’ and Risk taking. At times, it involves working beyond clock hours and travelling to different cities and interacting with people from different walk of life. To have a clear and succinct understanding of an event or case, I meticulously study each transactions or step involved till arising of the dispute and thereafter take a practical overview of working of that Industry or Office to get nuances and peep into intention of the person or parties behind such transaction or dispute. Once I am clear on this, I devise a multi- pronged strategy to tackle the issue effectively and efficiently. In accordance to the strategy, the steps are legally executed to get the intended result. So far it has given me success@85-90%. I do not believe in misleading a client or over stating before a client and therefore adopt a pragmatic approach towards the dispute resolution. I am a firm believer of settling dispute through ADR mechanism especially in commercial disputes and that also makes a client to trust my bonafide. In order to understand financial jargons, nuances and technicalities with more clarity and in order to empower myself with a knowledge, wherein I could not only answer to the Court Room queries but also to Board Room queries, I did Executive Program in Business Finance ( (EPBF)from Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad.
Given your rich experience, what advice would you offer to fresh law graduates who are about to embark on their legal careers? Are there specific skills or mindsets you believe are crucial for success in the legal profession?
Rather than advising, I shall prefer to share my experience which itself comprises of experiences of several associates of mine. Here, I would like to mention three things that I have learnt in the process. Firstly, during the initial phase of your career, give most of your time in learning the methodology of doing things, like how are the things being done. Understand the ecosystem in which we work. Learn and understand what is the ecosystem of the District Courts, the High Court, the Tribunal and the Supreme Court. Nobody can learn that ecosystem in such a short span of time therefore you need to have patience and perseverance and an undying attitude for exploring and learning. You need to understand what is registry, what is court master, what is cause list, what is the interplay of various officers in the court, what is the roster, how is filing done in registry, what is the defect curing technique, what is criteria for listing and how are matters listed and more. People think that every day when a case is listed, it is listed for the argument. No, it is not true. On a given day, a matter may be listed only for limited purpose of notice or for limited purpose of arguments or for a limited purpose of compliance. Therefore, we need to understand as to what is required for us to learn during formative years and than learn them effectively.
Secondly, as a law student or young lawyer, you should try to learn things other than the law itself. You need to read and understand polity, history, sociology, economics and finance but not in theoretical sense but the news part or the part of it actively influencing day to day life. You need to read news, you need to read technology. You need to read several other things more than the core law during these formative years.
Thirdly, as a law professional, your connections and relations with people from several walks of life help you in securing cases and to effectively tackle it. Thus you need to forge and curate your relationships and connections with outmost sincerity and caution during these formative years. Even today, I seek guidance and help from my seniors and my cordial relations with them have helped me a lot in advancement of my career.
In crux, I intend to say that litigation is not just about researching or presenting arguments before the Courts. There is some basic homework which as lawyer you do before arguing your case or presenting your case in the Court on a given date. Now those requisite skills cannot be learnt in the law school but only during your exposure with the Court Eco-system. Moot courts can definitely hone your researching and arguing skills but devoted internships and association as Junior Advocate with right mentor/ senior associate and your personal capacity to grasp things by observing and studying can help you take large strides. Mastering your drafting skills, client handling skills, communication skills and system management, makes you a wholesome lawyer. We, as established advocates always look up for competent juniors with good skills and traits. Learning law in the law school and its application in the real life court scenario with efficiency and effectiveness can help you become excellent litigation advocates of tomorrow. Learning the process and procedure is the key.
Devotion, perseverance and consistency along with right approach will make one sail through it. Ultimately, it is one’s own hard work and patience that pays. Keep on learning each day. Even as an established advocate, I still thrive to learn each day.
Can you tell us about your journey and how you ended up pursuing a career in law? What motivated you to choose this profession, and did you always envision yourself working in diverse areas of law?
The first time I studied the Constitution in school, I was amazed that a single ‘document’ defined our nation, government, laws, freedoms, rights, duties, everything. This got me very interested in the law. As I grew up, becoming a litigator became my default option. Although I was open to exploring other options, nothing else has ever appealed to me.
After graduating from law school, I was keen on exploring diverse areas of law. In the first few years of my profession, I decided to join law firms that would give me opportunities in as many areas of law as possible. Litigators are always advised to start out at the trial court. So, I joined a firm where I was part of a team handling civil and criminal matters at the trail court.
In the first five odd years of my career, I was able to gain experience in civil litigation, criminal litigation, arbitrations, regulatory litigation, company litigation, intellectual property matters, consumer matters, tax matters etc. Working in diverse fields in the initial years kept me motivated and gave me the confidence to take on any kind of matter. Even now, having a diverse portfolio of work not only keeps me motivated and excited but also enables me to provide clients with comprehensive and practical advice.
With over 15 years of experience in civil and commercial litigation, arbitrations, regulatory litigation, and criminal litigation, you’ve had a rich and varied career. What would you say has had the most impact on your professional growth?
The most memorable and impactful experience for me has been working with excellent seniors, colleagues, and clients over the years. Any complex litigation is always a team effort. Litigation teams mostly work long hours in close quarters. They see each other’s good sides and bad. They challenge and push each other every day. This team dynamic is crucial for every litigator and perhaps plays the most important part in forging your skills.
Your work seems to span across numerous sectors, from Infrastructure & Real Estate to Banking & Finance to Information Technology. How do you manage to stay well-versed in such diverse areas of law and provide effective representation to clients in each domain?
It is not only important to identify the areas of law that interest you, but also the areas of law that you have an aptitude for. Once you identify these areas, you need to dedicate some study time every day. I feel that the best way to understand an unfamiliar area of law is to read judgments. I try and read every judgment passed by the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court in the areas of law that I practice in. It takes a lot of time and discipline, but the insights that you gain are invaluable. Other than that, there are so many good resources to keep yourself updated these days. It is also crucial to meet your clients and other experts in the field and understand the latest developments and issues being faced by them.
Arbitrations seem to be a prominent part of your practice. Could you walk us through some of the challenges in handling arbitrations and how you successfully navigate them?
One of the major reasons that parties choose arbitration is to free themselves from the procedural rigors of civil procedure. The irony is that arbitration procedures have become more and more complex and unpredictable with time while civil procedure is becoming more and more streamlined. The law of arbitration is ever evolving, and legal positions flip every now and then. The recent judgments on Stamp Duty and Arbitration Agreements are a case in point. Therefore, it is very important for an arbitration lawyer to be updated on the present legal position and to anticipate future issues. Failure to do so can land your client in endless procedural hurdles which can take years to resolve.
Apart from procedural issues, arbitrations are very fact intensive. For instance, high-stake infrastructure arbitrations normally relate to projects that have taken three to five years to execute. These arbitrations usually involve some technical and scientific issues. There is usually an immense amount of correspondence, records may be scattered, or unavailable, key personnel may have left and so on. Therefore, it is very important for an arbitration lawyer to master the facts to a greater degree than may be required in other proceedings. You need to put yourself in your client’s position and understand the situation that prevailed on the ground. Unless you do this, you cannot present the facts in perspective and ultimately, you will find it difficult to build upon your legal submissions.
You’ve also represented clients in proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. How do you approach these cases?
The IBC is certainly a work in progress and there are several challenges for every stakeholder. Promotors and Corporate Debtors would say that the law is draconian; Financial Creditors would say that they are frustrated with significant costs, delays, and haircuts; Operational Creditors would say that their interests are not adequately protected; Resolution Applicants would say that they do not get the clean slate that they paid for; the Government and Regulators would say that their claims are being undermined; the Tribunals would say that they are flooded with thousands of petitions and do not have the infrastructure they need.
While representing clients in IBC matters, your approach depends on the needs of your client. When representing Creditors, your goal is to get the petition admitted expeditiously. On the other hand, when representing Debtors, your goal is to oppose the admission of the petition or at least provide your client some time or leverage to be able to negotiate a favorable settlement. Representing Creditors and Debtors has its own challenges, but like any litigation, implementing a winning strategy requires preparation and experience.
Representing clients in commercial disputes is undoubtedly demanding. What does it take to be a good commercial disputes lawyer?
Commercial disputes are very aggressively litigated because of the financial stake involved. When the stakes are high, there is absolutely no scope for any weakness or mistakes. Your pleadings and arguments need to be perfect and precise. Achieving this level of perfection is not easy unless you are willing to work towards it. To handle commercial disputes effectively, you need to have a certain degree of business acumen and a good understanding of the industry. Apart from this, you need to have a strong grasp of contract law and procedural law. Your is not only to resolve the dispute, but to do so as effectively and efficiently as possible.
Besides litigation, you have extensive experience in advisory work, providing opinions on commercial contracts, regulatory matters, environmental protection, and more. How do you balance the responsibilities of advisory work with the demands of litigation?
Balancing litigation and advisory can be challenging at times, but both complement each other. I believe that you can give your clients better advice if you have experience of litigating similar issues in court. Similarly, you can represent your clients better in court if you have been part of the transaction at the implementation stage. For instance, while reviewing a contract, a litigator can provide a new perspective on liquidated damages clauses, limitation of liability clauses, non-compete clauses, dispute resolution clauses and so on. Similarly, if you have advised your client when the contract was being negotiated, you have a better understanding of the transaction and the intent of the parties and can provide better representation should the matter go into litigation.
In your secondments with GE India and Wrigley India, you took on in-house roles. How did those experiences differ from working in a law firm, and what insights did you gain from those roles?
There is a world of a difference between working in a law firm and working in-house. The expectations and requirements are very different. Both have their own advantages and disadvantages. To succeed in either role, you require the same basic legal skills, but you apply these skills very differently. The common thread is that, in both cases, your job is to protect the interests of your client. When you are in-house, you have only one client and when you are working in a law firm you have multiple clients. If you understand this, you can easily transition from one role to the other.
Working in-house for some time in the early parts of my career gave me great insights into what in-house legal teams expect from their external counsels. I also understood the day-to-day challenges that in-house legal teams face. This is something that many external counsels do not even consider. At the end of the day, we are providing a service to our clients and understanding their challenges and expectations is crucial.
As an accomplished professional with years of experience, what advice would you give to fresh law graduates who are just starting their careers in the legal field?
The cliché advice about hard work and constant learning holds true without exception. Apart from this, fresh graduates should seek out good mentors and actively build a strong professional network.
Palash, your journey from assisting your father at the District Court to becoming an Advocate on Record at the Supreme Court is remarkable. What sparked your interest in law despite not initially considering it as a career option?
I think people can be either destined for something or they can find the determination to get it. The advantages and pitfalls are many and, and yet it can work either way as long as we understand what we must do. I chose to study law and become a lawyer and I had some idea about what to expect. My father is a lawyer too, and he was my first mentor. After I finished high school, I started assisting my father in matters before District Courts. But when it came to choosing a career, neither of my parents persuaded me to study law. In fact, once I got enrolled into the law school, my father told me that he will not have me as a junior and that I had to find my own way. I know his intention was to ensure that I don’t get comfortable with the thought that I can just go back and join him. Sometimes you do better when things are not already decided for you. So, despite law being in my destiny, I chose it and I enjoy it everyday.
As one explores further and learns more aspects of law practice, the excitement and zeal to learn only grows. But with this excitement, it is also important to remember that our work affects other people. So I try to be punctual at work and make sure to be present in courts whenever a matter is listed. I try to be diligent in preparing my case briefs and be ready to make submissions. For me there was no plan B and so I make sure that I am prepared for the challenges that litigation brings and I stay determined.
You’ve had the opportunity to work on diverse cases, from representing a leading Infrastructure Company in arbitral proceedings to handling matters related to oppression and mismanagement. Is there a specific type of case or legal challenge that you find particularly stimulating or rewarding?
As a lawyer you have to be always ready for a variety of briefs. A new challenge comes with every new case. According to me, the best way to start preparing for a matter is to first read and understand all the relevant provisions of law, the statutory mechanisms, the procedures and the legislative intent of that law. From this, it becomes easier to proceed in the matter. The next step would be to marshal the facts. This enables us to be the master of the brief. If there is a chink in the armor, then we must know it. Unless we have complete control over the facts, there will always be some room for doubt. The best part about law is that it keeps evolving, so we can always read more and improve the arguments. However, the facts remain constant. Knowing all the relevant facts beforehand is not only crucial for the initial stages of a legal dispute, but also for appeals and petitions against a bad order.
It goes without saying that every new case is rewarding as it brings new challenges and the opportunity to overcome them. It also brings the opportunity to learn and to be more informed, articulate, and proficient. If you deal in diverse matters, you can draw a corollary from other laws and apply them to the case in hand to compare where the relevant law does not cover a certain aspect. If you know more, you can create a more convincing argument.
You’ve been involved in a diverse range of legal matters, from commercial litigation to arbitration. When you’re not deep in legal intricacies, what’s something about Palash that people might be surprised to learn?
As lawyers, we are required to constantly juggle between courts, conferences, office, and whatnot. Since the time is always limited, we must utilize it properly and wisely. I have been fortunate to work in the organizations where I was given the liberty to set my own deadlines and prioritize my tasks accordingly. This also gives me a chance to keep up with my interests and hobbies. On most weekends, I play cricket or badminton with friends or we just end up spending some quality time with great conversations and movies etc. Being away from the family, this is a great way to feel comfortable in midst of all the stress. During the court vacations, I plan my travels and to try to get away from all this hustle bustle and to just explore places and food! I also never miss the annual “Jashn-e-Rekhta” in Delhi. Something which is surprising about me needs to be asked from my friends and colleagues because I spent most of my time around them so I think they are in a better position to point out something which is not very common about me.
Being deeply committed to your work, you mentioned missing the football world cup final for your exams. How do you balance your passion for sports, particularly football, with the demands of a legal career?
As I said, lawyers need to juggle between things and it is not as easy for everyone to find a good work life balance. I have seen my friends working till midnight or after that as well, working on weekends, holidays, festivals and on many other occasions. But I think we can all learn how to manage our time and work. Our profession demands utmost dedication, however, post Covid-19 era, I have realized that deadlines can be pushed when it comes to the health and well-being of a person. I never compromise on my health, but I also never make it a reason for deliberately delaying any important work. There is a difference between needing some personal time and merely making excuses, and I learnt that as soon as I stepped into this profession.
Staying involved in sports activities also helps. For me, sports, even if you just watch it, is the best way to release all the work pressure and helps in rejuvenating. I am a football geek. I had planned to watch the UEFA Champions League Final in Istanbul in May 2020 but then Covid-19 happened and it ruined all my plans. Then again, I had planned to attend the Football World Cup Final in Qatar, 2022. This time again my AoR exam was on the horizon and that was of course the priority. The exam was scheduled on the very next day of the Finals between Argentina and France. It was a legendary match and since I had decided not to watch it at all, my phone was flooded with calls and texts from all my friends and colleagues who begged me to just watch the game for some time. I didn’t and I don’t regret that decision as I cleared the exam and became an AoR which is a bigger achievement for me.
Despite all these, I keep a slot blocked either on Saturday or Sunday first half for the sports be it football, badminton or cricket. I think this much I deserve after working sincerely for the entire week.
It’s admirable that you take on pro bono matters for those who face financial constraints in seeking justice. Can you share a rewarding experience from one of these cases that left a lasting impact on you?
One of my seniors during my initial days in the profession told me very frankly that I should start my career by focusing on briefs rather than money. That the money will chase you if you justify the work. I kept his words in mind as I started taking up my own briefs and made sure to never focus on fees or ask for it before understanding the matter as well as the client. Someone once referred my name to a daily wage earner from a small village in Uttar Pradesh and told him that I won’t charge too much for his case. When I met that person, he told me how he had lost his child due to electrocution and the police had filed a closure report in the matter. He was desperate to be heard and so he offered some money in advance hoping to persuade me to take up the matter. I told him that I will take it once the matter progresses. In the end, we succeeded before the court and the person came back for my fees. I politely declined and told him to use it for his betterment. To this day, that person has referred numerous other briefs from his locality, and I think in a way, the advice from my Senior has really paid off. Also taking up a pro bono matter makes us understand the ground reality of the justice system in our Country. Not everyone can afford to engage big law firms and big counsels for their matters and the cases, despite being genuine, suffer due to the complex legal system and lack of resources. Every once in a while, if we can give them some representation and put our equal efforts for their best interest, we will understand why this is a noble profession. At the end of the day, everyone is entitled for just and fair legal assistance and as a lawyer I feel it is my duty to perform my part by doing whatever it takes and to the best of my abilities.
In addition to your legal pursuits, you’ve been associated with different law firms and chambers. How do you define the role played by the chamber/firm/offices in shaping your career?
I have worked with different organizations wherein I have worked for various clients. In this profession, working in a law chamber is very different from the firms. All these organizations have their own practice, procedure, work culture etc. which helps us to realize what is a best suited environment for us. This has played a very crucial role in my career as it helped me to decide how I want to proceed in the profession. Unfortunately, I have not worked with a Tier 1 firm but the boutique firms and law chambers have given me my career objective. My inclination was always towards the law chambers as they never had any specific or dedicated team for a practice area which helped me to have diverse cases and to be very frank and independent to appear, argue and appeal (in case anything goes wrong). I am grateful to the chambers where I have worked because there only, I realized my potential, my zeal and enthusiasm towards this profession. By no means I am trying to dishonor the working environment of the firms but I am just explaining how I have realized what is going to be the best recourse for my future.
As someone who has cleared the Advocate on Record examination on the first attempt, what advice would you give to law students or aspiring lawyers who are navigating their early years in the legal profession?
I always feel that I have always benefited from the advice and guidance of my Seniors in this profession. One has to grasp the good qualities from their Seniors which had benefited them in the profession. I still remember that during the initial days in the profession my Senior told me that I have to be thorough with the brief even if I have to take an adjournment in the matter. This helped me a lot as whenever I entered any court, I used to have my brief and a brief note on the matter so as and when if the judge is asking about the matter or even a date of event, I am in a position to answer the same without any hesitation and it will give an impression that the adjournment has not been sought just to delay the matter. Another piece of advice I received from my Senior was not to waste time while waiting for your matter in court. I was told to observe and hear the arguments in the court and see how different lawyers come up with their own strategy for making submissions and bringing fresh judgments which I might find useful in near future. This was immensely helpful during the preparations for the AoR exam as well. While I was preparing, I was hard pressed for time due to the ongoing matters, drafting etc. so I decided while waiting for my matter in court I will start making notes of the submissions of the lawyers to speed up my writing skills. In the end I feel that it worked to my advantage.
